 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18100039
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18100039 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
12:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
19:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-13 19:48:20 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14 FT NAVD. THE | | | FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING IS | | | COVERED BY CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING | | | CODE. THE HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE | | | PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE | | | APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-31-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
01-31-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-31-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-06-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
12-06-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-06-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 12:36:43 | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY OF | | | WPB ENGINEERING | | | AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | SUPPLY POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN SHOWING: | | | A) WHERE SILT SCREENS WILL BE INSTALLED, | | | B) SHOW THE PROTECTION OF ALL ON-SITE CATCH BASINS | | | C) SHOW PROTECTION OF ALL OFF-SITE CATCH BASINS | | | D) INCLUDE DETAILS AS TO THE TYPE OF PROTECTION USED ON | | | THE CATCH BASINS | | | E) SHOW HOW SITE DIRT WILL NOT BE TRACKED INTO THE | | | ROADS | | | HTTP://WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/DOCS/ | | | CONST_ACTIVITY.PDF | | | HTTP://WWW.PBCO-NPDES.ORG/CONSTRUN.HTML | | | HTTP://WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/FAQS. | | | HTM | | | | | | GENERAL DRIVEWAY COMMENTS | | | 1) DIMENSION DRIVEWAYS, LOCATED HORIZONTALLY AND | | | VERTICALLY. CALL OUT SETBACK. | | | 2) SHOW PROPOSED CONCRETE APRON(S), CITY STANDARD | | | DETAIL IS REQUIRED, SEE LINK BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPA | | | RTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICA | | | TIONS | | | 3) IF USING PAVERS IN THE APRON AREA OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRIVEWAY, YOU MUST EXECUTE A PAVER DRIVEWAY AGREEMENT, | | | WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ | | | ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | GENERAL - | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED FOR YOUR GENERAL | | | INFORMATION AND USE. THEY MAY NOT BE SITE-SPECIFIC, BUT | | | WILL SOON BE ADDED TO CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | OBTAIN AVAILABLE UTILITIES OWNED BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE | | | ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY | | | TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. | | | SUBMIT A FORMAL RECORDS REQUEST (WITH SUNSHINE DESIGN | | | TICKET NUMBER) TO JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT [email protected]. SUBMIT PROOF | | | OF THE FORMAL RECORD REQUEST TO THE CITY. NOTE: RECORD | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. | | | PERFORM FIELD VERIFICATION OF EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH | | | BY SOFT-DIGS, POT-HOLING, ETC. | | | | | | PROVIDE SCHEMATIC UTILITY ENGINEERING DRAWINGS (24IN X | | | 36IN FORMAT) AT A LEGIBLE ENGINEERING SCALE AND | | | PREPARED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. | | | | | | PROVIDE STATEMENT, CONFIRMED BY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS, | | | THAT THE EXISTING UTILITY MAINS SERVING THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT ARE ADEQUATE. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED WATER & SEWER DEMANDS (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM, | | | PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMAND. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER | | | FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | LOCATIONS, SIZES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE DESCRIPTIONS OF | | | THE FOLLOWING EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY FACILITIES: | | | ? WATER MAINS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS, VALVES, METERS AND | | | ANY SPECIAL STRUCTURES SUCH AS PUMP STATIONS; | | | ? SANITARY SEWER MAINS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ANY | | | SPECIAL STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES SUCH AS LIFT STATIONS, | | | SEPTIC SYSTEMS; AND | | | ? PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS | | | ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | STORMWATER DRAINAGE MAINS, CHANNELS, RETENTION OR | | | DETENTION PONDS, AND OTHER MAJOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES; | | | FLOW DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF. | | | SHOW LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING DRY/FRANCHISE UTILITIES, | | | AND ALL RELATED EASEMENTS ON THE SITE OR ON IMMEDIATELY | | | ADJACENT PROPERTY. | | | PROVIDE PROFILE VIEW OF ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES WITHIN | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE | | | CITY. CALL OUT VERTICAL CLEARANCES OF UTILITY CROSSINGS | | | WITH CITY AND DRY/FRANCHISE UTILITIES. IDENTIFY TYPE OF | | | UTILITY/OWNERSHIP, LOCATION/DEPTH, PIPE MATERIAL, SIZE. | | | SHOW CONDITIONS ON IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT | | | HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
13:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-20 13:12:31 | 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE AND STORAGE HAZARD CLASSIFICATION, PER | | | THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | A FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE WITHIN 150' OF A FDC. | | | | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWING | | | CAN THEN BE DEVELOPED AND SUBMITTED SEPRATETLY. | | | | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 11. IT IS REQUIRED WITH FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THAT A | | | KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR | | | 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-01-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-01-2018 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-01 16:00:49 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE AND STORAGE HAZARD CLASSIFICATION, PER | | | THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | A FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE WITHIN 150' OF A FDC. | | | | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWING | | | CAN THEN BE DEVELOPED AND SUBMITTED SEPRATETLY. | | | | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 11. IT IS REQUIRED WITH FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THAT A | | | KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR | | | 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-12-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-12-2019 |
Time |
09:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-12-2019 |
Time |
09:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-12 09:04:16 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: METROCENTRE LOT 10 Z18100039 | | | FEBRUARY 12, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-20 14:54:48 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: METROCENTRE LOT 10 Z18100039 | | | DECEMBER 20, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NEW BUILDING | | | AND REMOVAL OF THE 10 MATURE LIVE OAK TREES IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE REPLACED WITH SMALL TREES DOES | | | NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR THE CITY, | | | AND MAY NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES WITHIN THE COVENANTS FOR | | | THE METROCENTRE CPD. THE MATURE TREES PROVIDE BUFFERING | | | FROM I-95, AND THE COVENANTS REQUIRE LANDSCAPE AND | | | TREES TO BREAKUP LARGE EXPANSES OF BUILDING WALLS BEING | | | VIEWED FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE CPD. THE PROPOSED | | | CHANGES WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY THE POA. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY CREDITS | | | PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN, AS THE QUANTITY SHOWN IS BELOW THE | | | MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATION FOR THE | | | REQUIRED TREES AND FLOWERING TREES IS 40% PER THE CODE, | | | 69,643 SQ FT. CORRECT ON PLANS AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED | | | TREES. | | | ADJUST THE OPEN SPACE FOR REQUIRED 40% ON CHART, AND | | | RECALCULATE TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. THE PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO SHOW ONLY | | | THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND THE TOTAL SHOWN | | | TO MEET THE TOTALS OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | 3240 + 2310. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE | | | CALCULATIONS TO 22 FOR THE EAST, AND 3 FOR THE WEST. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. APPROVED PLAN SHOWS BUFFER TREE LOCATIONS | | | AND QUANTITIES. PROVIDE A COMPARISON TO SHOW THE | | | QUANTITY OF TREES FOR THE PROPOSED PLAN AND THE | | | APPROVED PLAN. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE FOR BOTH BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT | | | COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED TREE CALCULATIONS | | | TO CURRENT CODE OF 1500 SQ FT FOR SHADE TREES, AND 6000 | | | SQ FT FOR FLOWERING TREE. | | | | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CORRECT CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR | | | EXPAND LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE | | | GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
12:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
12:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-13 12:27:42 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: METROCENTRE LOT 10 Z18100039 | | | NOVEMBER 9, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NEW BUILDING AND | | | REMOVAL OF THE 10 MATURE LIVE OAK TREES IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE REPLACED WITH SMALL TREES DOES | | | NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR THE CITY, | | | AND MAY NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES WITHIN THE COVENANTS FOR | | | THE METROCENTRE CPD. THE MATURE TREES PROVIDE BUFFERING | | | FROM I-95, AND THE COVENANTS REQUIRE LANDSCAPE AND | | | TREES TO BREAKUP LARGE EXPANSES OF BUILDING WALLS BEING | | | VIEWED FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE CPD. THE PROPOSED | | | CHANGES WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY THE POA. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY CREDITS PROVIDED WITH | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN, AS THE QUANTITY SHOWN IS BELOW THE MITIGATION | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATION FOR THE REQUIRED TREES | | | AND FLOWERING TREES IS 40% PER THE CODE, 69,643 SQ FT. | | | CORRECT ON PLANS AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 4. THE PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) | | | NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO SHOW ONLY THE AREAS WITHIN THE | | | PARKING FIELD, AND THE TOTAL SHOWN TO MEET THE TOTALS | | | OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. 3240 + 2310. | | | | | | 5. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES MEET THE | | | 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. REQUIRED TREES | | | INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS ADJACENT TO | | | PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 6. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE CALCULATIONS TO 22 | | | FOR THE EAST, AND 3 FOR THE WEST. | | | | | | 7. APPROVED PLAN SHOWS BUFFER TREE LOCATIONS AND | | | QUANTITIES. PROVIDE A COMPARISON TO SHOW THE QUANTITY | | | OF TREES FOR THE PROPOSED PLAN AND THE APPROVED PLAN. | | | | | | 8. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 9. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE FOR | | | BOTH BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART | | | SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH | | | CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | | | | 11. CORRECT THE REQUIRED TREE CALCULATIONS TO CURRENT | | | CODE OF 1500 SQ FT FOR SHADE TREES, AND 6000 SQ FT FOR | | | FLOWERING TREE. | | | | | | | | | 12. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CORRECT CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND | | | LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. | | | 13. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND | | | UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
11-14-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-14 12:03:05 | APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED - PLEASE TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION | | | ANY ADDITIONAL SANITATION REQUIREMENT AND ADDED | | | CAPACITY AS NECESSSARY WITH ADDITIONAL BUILDING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
10:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-15 10:58:58 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 1/30/2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION BETWEEN THE ADJACENT PARALLEL | | | PARKING STRIPES ON THE STANDARD (PARKING) SPACE WITH | | | WHEEL STOP DETAIL. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2. THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE SURVEY IS NGVD1929. THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS IS LISTED AS | | | NAVD1988. ALL PLANS SHOULD REFERENCE THE SAME VERTICAL | | | DATUM AND PROVIDE A CONVERSION TO THE CITY'S VEERTICAL | | | DATUM, NGVD1929. | | | | | | 3. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM AND RELATIONSHIP TO NGVD | | | 1929 ON EVERY ENGINEERING SHEET THAT SHOWS AN | | | ELEVATION. THIS APPLIES TO SHEETS C-101, C-400, C-600. | | | [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 4. ON SHEET C-500, PG&D NOTE #1 STATES ALL ELEVATIONS | | | ARE REFERNCED TO NGVD 1929. THE NOTE AT THE BOOTOM LEFT | | | OF THE SHEET STATES PLANS ARE IN NAVD1988. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 5. CONSIDER ADDING ROOT BARRIERS BETWEEN THE TREES AND | | | THE DRAINAGE PIPE(S). STAFF COULD NOT FIND WHERE THESE | | | ROOT BARRIERS ARE CALLED OUT ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 6. VERFY THE TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION LISTED FOR THE STORM | | | PIPE IN CROSSING #1 ON SHEET C-600.. | | | | | | 7. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE ALTA LAND | | | TITLE SURVEY. | | | | | | 8. PROPOSED 3-STORY OFFICE ADDITION MAY BE WITHIN A | | | SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA). THE PROPOSED FFE IS | | | LISTED AS 15.00, WHICH IS LESS THAN TWO FEET ABOVE THE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.0 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-10 16:40:43 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REIVIEW OF THE | | | 12/4/2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION BETWEEN THE ADJACENT PARALLEL | | | PARKING STRIPES ON THE STANDARD (PARKING) SPACE WITH | | | WHEEL STOP DETAIL . | | | | | | 2. THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE SURVEY IS NAVD1988. | | | PROVIDE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEENNAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 | | | ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 3. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY ENGINEERING SHEET | | | THAT SHOWS AN ELEVATION. THE VERTICAL DATUM SHOULD | | | MATCH THE DATUM USED ON THE SURVEY AND PROVIDE THE | | | CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929. | | | | | | 4. SHEET C-500 (PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN) | | | INDICATES THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE SHEET IS NGVD1929. | | | | | | 5. CONSIDER ADDING ROOT BARRIERS BETWEEN THE TREES AND | | | THE DRAINAGE PIPE(S). | | | | | | 6. SHEET C-600: THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PIPE CONFLICT | | | NOTES DID NOT PRINT. | | | | | | 7. VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES | | | ST-01 AND ST-02. | | | | | | 8. PROPOSED 3-STORY OFFICE ADDITION MAY BE WITHIN A | | | SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA). STRUCTURES WITHIN | | | SFHA ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD | | | ABOVE THE SFHA FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
14:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 14:08:29 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. NEW FIRMS WERE ISSUED IN 2017. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE | | | INFORMATION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 4. NOTIFY FPL OF THE OVERLAP OF THE PROPOSED 12 FOOT | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND THE EXISTING FPL U.E. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED SFWMD ERP APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. SPECIAL CONDITION #7 | | | FOR THE PERMIT ISSUED IN RESPONSE TO APPLICATION NO. | | | 911106-12 TO BE MODIFIED TO READ IN PART: | | | ?OPERATION OF THE PRIMARY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT | | | SYSTEM SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH. THE SECONDARY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT | | | SYSTEM SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE.? | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED NPBCID APPROVAL PRIOR | | | TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
08:53 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 08:55:12 | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. WILL | | | NEED RELEASE AND GRANT OF NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM | | | THE POA. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-06 14:32:22 | 1. PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STILL | | | INDICATES THE ADDITIONAL SELF-STORAGE FACILITY. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | 2. PROVIDE TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | 3. WHY IS INFORMATION ON REMODEL INCLUDED IN TRAFFIC | | | STATEMENT (APPENDIX C) IF THE REMODEL DID NOT VEST | | | TRIPS? CONSIDER REMOVING INFORMATION ON REMODEL. | | | 4. PROVIDE A MORE DIRECT ROUTE FOR PEDESTRIAN TO ACCESS | | | THE PROPOSED 20,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-18-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-18 13:29:12 | Z18100039 METROCENTRE LOT 10 (DECEMBER 4, 2018 | | | RESUBMITTAL) | | | NOTE ? THE RESUBMITTAL HAS CHANGED THE PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED STORAGE BUILDING TO AN OFFICE BUILDING. A | | | REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WAS NOT INCLUDED WITH | | | THE CURRENT PROPOSED USES. THE REVIEW IS PARTIAL AS A | | | COMPLETE PACKAGE WAS NOT PROVIDED AND WE RESERVE THE | | | RIGHT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | TRAFFIC STUDY: | | | 1. PROVIDE TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | 2. PROVIDE MINOR AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 3. WHY IS INFORMATION ON REMODEL INCLUDED IN TRAFFIC | | | STATEMENT IF THE REMODEL DID NOT VEST TRIPS? CONSIDER | | | REMOVING INFORMATION ON REMODEL. | | | | | | SITE PLAN: | | | 1. THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FROM METRO | | | CENTRE BLVD. TO THE PROPOSED 20,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE | | | BUILDING IS VERY POOR. PEDESTRIANS HAVE TO TAKE AN | | | INDIRECT ROUTE AROUND THE OTHER BUILDING TO ACCESS | | | METRO CENTRE BLVD. PROVIDE A MORE DIRECT ROUTE. ONE | | | OPTION IS TO CONVERT THE SEVEN AND FOUR 90 DEGREE | | | PARKING SPACES ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING INTO PARALLEL PARKING. THIS CHANGE WOULD ALLOW | | | SPACE FOR A SIDEWALK ALONG THE FRONT OF THE EXISTING | | | NORTH BUILDING THAT WOULD CONNECT TO THE FRONT OF THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING. THE SITE IS OVERPARKED. | | | 2. CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO | | | THE CRACKER BARREL AND TO 2410 METROCENTRE. PEDESTRIANS | | | SHOULD HAVE A DIRECT ROUTE AND NOT HAVE TO WALK TO | | | METRO CENTRE TO ACCESS THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. DIRECT | | | PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS WILL ENCOURAGE A PEDESTRIAN MODE | | | SHIFT. | | | 3. EXISTING CURB CUT ON METROCENTRE BLVD. DOES NOT | | | APPEAR TO MEET ADA STANDARDS. REVIEW CURB CUT AND IF | | | NECESSARY UPGRADE TO MEET ADA STANDARDS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-08 14:42:29 | Z18100039 METROCENTRE LOT 10 (OCTOBER 9, 2018 | | | SUBMITTAL) | | | TRAFFIC STUDY: | | | 1. PROVIDE TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | 2. IN FIGURE 1, THE SHADED PARCEL IS NOT THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL OF THIS AMENDMENT. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. | | | 3. PROVIDE A SUMMARY TABLE SHOWING THE VESTED LAND USES | | | AND INTENSITY OF THE CPD, AND PROPOSED LAND USES AND | | | INTENSITIES WITH THIS AMENDMENT. | | | 4. CLARIFY IF THE CONVERSION AT THE LINCOLN COLLEGE OF | | | TECHNOLOGY BUILDING FROM A VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OF 658 | | | STUDENTS TO 65,770 SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE | | | USE WAS A PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED CPD AMENDMENT. IF SO, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION. WE ARE NOT AWARE | | | OF THIS CONVERSION. | | | 5. IN TABLE 1, THE INTENSITY OF GENERAL OFFICE UNDER | | | THE PROPOSED SCENARIO IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH | | | DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES ON PAGE | | | 3, WHICH INDICATES THE CONVERSION TO 65,770 SF OF | | | PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND ADDITION OF 23,390 SF OF OFFICE | | | WITH THIS AMENDMENT. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 6. DECREASE THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION TO THE WEST. 20% OF | | | TRIPS ARE ASSIGNED TO 45TH STREET WEST OF MILITARY | | | TRAIL, BUT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ARE LIMITED IN THE | | | WEST. | | | 7. FDOT WORK PROGRAM INDICATES PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING | | | IS SCHEDULED FOR THE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT AT | | | I-95/45TH STREET IN FISCAL YEAR 2021. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | DISCUSSION ON THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SECTION | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 8. THE DRIVEWAY VOLUMES SHOWN IN FIGURE 4 DO NOT APPEAR | | | TO BE CONSISTENT WITH TRIP GENERATION AND TRIP | | | ASSIGNMENT. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. | | | SITE PLAN: | | | 9. LOCATE MOST OF THE BIKE RACKS NEAR THE OFFICE | | | BUILDING SINCE THE OFFICE USES GENERATE MAJORITY OF THE | | | TRIPS. | | | 10. DIMENSION THE PARKING AISLE WIDTH. | | | 11. PROVIDE EXTERNAL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS TO CONNECT THE | | | OFFICE BUILDING TO THE SIDEWALK ON METROCENTRE | | | BOULEVARD, AND INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS TO CONNECT | | | BETWEEN THE OFFICE BUILDING AND THE SELF-STORAGE | | | BUILDING. | | | 12. 3 LOADING SPACES ARE REQUIRED BUT ONLY 2 ARE | | | PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION IF A WAIVER IS | | | REQUESTED. | | | 13. PROVIDE AUTOTURN TRUCK PATHS SHOWING TRUCK ACCESS | | | TO THE LOADING SPACES AND GARBAGE TRUCK ACCESS TO THE | | | DUMPSTER FROM THE ACCESS POINT. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
15:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-20 15:34:05 | 2400 METROCENTRE BOULEVARD LOT 10 | | | PB 878M | | | Z18100039 | | | | | | --PROVIDE A DIRECT ROUTE (SIDEWALK) FROM THE PROPOSED | | | 20,000 SF OFFICE BUILDING TO METROCENTRE BOULEVARD | | | | | | --REDUCE THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES BY INCLUDING A | | | 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD FUNCTION AS WHEEL | | | STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF SMALL CAR SPACES | | | TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. UP TO 30% OF | | | SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR SMALL CAR USE | | | | | | --A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING | | | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY | | | WILL BE REQUIRED | | | | | | --ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT | | | *PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS | | | MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | *RESUBMITTAL FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE | | | *CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ 561-822-1443 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
15:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 15:08:50 | 2400 METROCENTRE BLVD | | | PB 878M / Z18100039 | | | | | | 1) THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS THE APPROVED SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR | | | METROCENTRE AS OUTLINED IN THE DECLARATION OF | | | PROTECTIVE COVENANTS OF METROCENTRE CORPORATE PARK | | | (570,000 SQUARE FEET). FOR REFERENCE, A TOTAL OF | | | 540,126 SQUARE FEET HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO DATE IN | | | METROCENTRE. ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDING 29,874 | | | SQUARE FEET NECESSITATES A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT | | | 2) PROPOSAL REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECTURAL | | | REVIEW COMMITTEE OF METROCENTRE CORPORATE PARK PROPERTY | | | OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. CONTACT MIKE COULING, BOARD OF | | | DIRECTORS PRESIDENT | | | 3) STAFF SUPPORTS A RELOCATION AND REDESIGN OF THE | | | PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING TO INCREASE THE CIRCULATION | | | AND FUNCTIONALITY OF THE OVERALL SITE | | | 4) PROVIDE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | PROPOSED STRUCTURES. PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE | | | GIVEN TO THE ELEVATION(S) VISIBLE FROM INTERSTATE 95. | | | MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO BETTER BLEND THE | | | ARCHITECTURE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING WITH THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING ON SITE AND PROVIDE FOR ABUNDANT ARCHITECTURAL | | | FENESTRATION, PARTICULARLY ON PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING | | | VISIBLE FROM INTERSTATE 95. | | | 5) STAFF SUPPORTS AN ELIMINATION OF A PORTION OF 60 | | | EXTRA PROPOSED PARKING SPACES IN FAVOR OF GREEN SPACE, | | | LANDSCAPING, AMENITIES, SIDEWALKS, ETC. | | | 6) PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR SITE | | | 7) PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM | | | METROCENTRE BOULEVARD TO PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING | | | 8) RELOCATE BIKE RACKS TO OFFICE BUILDING | | | 9) SITE SHOULD FUNCTION AS ONE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT - | | | PROVIDE CROSSWALKS/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FROM ALL | | | PARKING BAYS, EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND | | | PERIMETER SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS | | | 10) REDUCE THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES BY INCLUDING A | | | 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD FUNCTION AS WHEEL | | | STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF SMALL CAR SPACES | | | TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. UP TO 30% OF | | | SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR SMALL CAR USE | | | 11) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING | | | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY | | | WILL BE REQUIRED | | | 12) PROVIDE CITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR PARKING STALLS, | | | BIKE RACKS, DUMPSTER | | | 13) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT | | | | | | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 8.5X11, ONE SET IN | | | 11X17 AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | *PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | *CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ 561-822-1443 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |