 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18100028
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18100028 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
19:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
19:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-13 19:59:01 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-27-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
11-27-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
11-27-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-27 09:53:11 | PROVISOS: | | | | | | ALL PERTINENT CITY AND PROVATE UILITIES WILL BE | | | ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF DEISGN. | | | | | | MGPNZALEZ | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-25-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
01-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
01-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-11 14:17:01 | PASSED WITH PROVISO: COORDINATE WATER SERVICE WITH PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 14:46:01 | COMMENTS PER MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR PROJECT | | | COORDINATOR, CITY OF WPB ENGINEERING | | | PROVIDE CONCURRENCY FROM PBC FOR WATER & SEWER | | | UTILITIES | | | SHOW 3 IN. FM ALONG COMMUNITY DR. | | | | | | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY OF | | | WPB ENGINEERING | | | PROVIDE PROFILES OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITIES | | | IN CITY OF WPB RIGHT OF WAY | | | PROVIDE COPIES OF PBC & FDOT PERMITS | | | | | | AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | SUPPLY POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN SHOWING: | | | A) WHERE SILT SCREENS WILL BE INSTALLED, | | | B) SHOW THE PROTECTION OF ALL ON-SITE CATCH BASINS | | | C) SHOW PROTECTION OF ALL OFF-SITE CATCH BASINS | | | D) INCLUDE DETAILS AS TO THE TYPE OF PROTECTION USED ON | | | THE CATCH BASINS | | | E) SHOW HOW SITE DIRT WILL NOT BE TRACKED INTO THE | | | ROADS | | | HTTP://WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/DOCS/ | | | CONST_ACTIVITY.PDF | | | HTTP://WWW.PBCO-NPDES.ORG/CONSTRUN.HTML | | | HTTP://WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/FAQS. | | | HTM | | | | | | GENERAL DRIVEWAY COMMENTS | | | 1) DIMENSION DRIVEWAYS, LOCATED HORIZONTALLY AND | | | VERTICALLY. CALL OUT SETBACK. | | | 2) SHOW PROPOSED CONCRETE APRON(S), CITY STANDARD | | | DETAIL IS REQUIRED, SEE LINK BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPA | | | RTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICA | | | TIONS | | | 3) IF USING PAVERS IN THE APRON AREA OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRIVEWAY, YOU MUST EXECUTE A PAVER DRIVEWAY AGREEMENT, | | | WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ | | | ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | GENERAL - | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED FOR YOUR GENERAL | | | INFORMATION AND USE. THEY MAY NOT BE SITE-SPECIFIC, BUT | | | WILL SOON BE ADDED TO CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | OBTAIN AVAILABLE UTILITIES OWNED BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE | | | ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY | | | TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. | | | SUBMIT A FORMAL RECORDS REQUEST (WITH SUNSHINE DESIGN | | | TICKET NUMBER) TO JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT [email protected]. SUBMIT PROOF | | | OF THE FORMAL RECORD REQUEST TO THE CITY. NOTE: RECORD | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. | | | PERFORM FIELD VERIFICATION OF EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH | | | BY SOFT-DIGS, POT-HOLING, ETC. | | | | | | PROVIDE SCHEMATIC UTILITY ENGINEERING DRAWINGS (24IN X | | | 36IN FORMAT) AT A LEGIBLE ENGINEERING SCALE AND | | | PREPARED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. | | | | | | PROVIDE STATEMENT, CONFIRMED BY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS, | | | THAT THE EXISTING UTILITY MAINS SERVING THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT ARE ADEQUATE. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED WATER & SEWER DEMANDS (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM, | | | PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMAND. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER | | | FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | LOCATIONS, SIZES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE DESCRIPTIONS OF | | | THE FOLLOWING EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY FACILITIES: | | | ? WATER MAINS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS, VALVES, METERS AND | | | ANY SPECIAL STRUCTURES SUCH AS PUMP STATIONS; | | | ? SANITARY SEWER MAINS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ANY | | | SPECIAL STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES SUCH AS LIFT STATIONS, | | | SEPTIC SYSTEMS; AND | | | ? PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS | | | ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | STORMWATER DRAINAGE MAINS, CHANNELS, RETENTION OR | | | DETENTION PONDS, AND OTHER MAJOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES; | | | FLOW DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF. | | | SHOW LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING DRY/FRANCHISE UTILITIES, | | | AND ALL RELATED EASEMENTS ON THE SITE OR ON IMMEDIATELY | | | ADJACENT PROPERTY. | | | PROVIDE PROFILE VIEW OF ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES WITHIN | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE | | | CITY. CALL OUT VERTICAL CLEARANCES OF UTILITY CROSSINGS | | | WITH CITY AND DRY/FRANCHISE UTILITIES. IDENTIFY TYPE OF | | | UTILITY/OWNERSHIP, LOCATION/DEPTH, PIPE MATERIAL, SIZE. | | | SHOW CONDITIONS ON IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT | | | HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-01-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-01-2018 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-01 16:33:36 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, INCLDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | NFPA? 30, FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS CODE, 2015 | | | EDITION, NFPA? 30A | | | CODE FOR MOTOR FUEL DISPENSING FACILITIES AND REPAIR | | | GARAGES 2015 EDITION, NFPA 101 CHAPTER 36 NEW | | | MERCANTILE OCCUPANCIES, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION PER THE FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE. IDENTIFY ALL COOKING EQUIPMENT AND/OR | | | APPLIANCES. | | | | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | A FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION COULD NOT CLEARLY BE IDENTIFIED | | | ON OR AROUND THIS PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | A 4" FIRE LINE WAS INDICATING GOIN INTO THE PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURE, WILL THE STRUCTURE BE PROTECTED WITH A FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM? | | | | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-16 15:43:38 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RACETRAC Z18100028 | | | OCTOBER 16, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR | | | EACH TREE | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE. | | | IF UNDER 20 FEET DIAMETER THE MITIGATION DUE IS EQUAL | | | TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. OAK UNDER 20 FEET IS CATEGORY 1, | | | MITIGATION IS 300 SQ FT. TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | SUBMITTED LIST IS 11,479 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDICATE WHY TREES #19 AND #22 WILL BE | | | PRESERVED, AS THEY ARE HATRACKED. | | | ? SATISFIED. CORRECT ALL SPECIES, AS SOME ARE | | | MISIDENTIFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY CREDITS | | | PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | 3. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ON | | | THE PLANT LIST, AS THEY ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE SETBACK | | | AND THE USE OF THE SMALL TREE SPECIES FOR THE WESTERN | | | BUFFER, AND SMALL SPECIES ON THE SOUTHERN BUFFER. | | | 5. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR | | | THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED AREAS ARE CORRECT, BUT AREA | | | TO BE PROVIDED IS THE TOTAL OF THE TWO- 1466 SQ FT., SO | | | 1262 SQ FT PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT. ADD | | | LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD AND ADJUST THE | | | CHARTS ON LP.1 AND LP.2 TO MATCH. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE | | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW WHOLE NUMBERS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE EAST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT | | | COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT. PROVIDE GRAPHIC FOR WATER USE ZONES AND ADD A | | | COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE SPECIES. | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS. | | | 12. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY IF UTILITIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED | | | BY WPB OR PBC. | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS AND | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 12/20/18: | | | 14. SATISFIED. ALL TREES IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE | | | PRESERVED OR RELOCATED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3). THIS | | | APPLIES TO THE TWO LARGE LIVE OAKS #23 AND #24. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 1/30/19: | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN IT WAS ASSUMED THAT THE CURBS WERE THE STANDARD AS | | | REQUIRED BY CITY CODE, AS THEY WERE NOT LABELED TO | | | IDENTIFY THEM AS SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN CODE | | | REQUIREMENT OF A TYPE D CURB PER SECTION 94-443(C)(5). | | | SINCE THIS IS NOT A PD, A WAIVER IS NOT POSSIBLE, AND | | | THE CURBS MUST MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE EXTENDED | | | CONCRETE BACKERS ENCROACHING INTO THE LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | ARE NOT NEEDED WITH A NON-MOUNTABLE CURB. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-10-2019 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-10-2019 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-10 12:15:43 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RACETRAC Z18100028 | | | OCTOBER 10, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR | | | EACH TREE | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE. | | | IF UNDER 20 FEET DIAMETER THE MITIGATION DUE IS EQUAL | | | TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. OAK UNDER 20 FEET IS CATEGORY 1, | | | MITIGATION IS 300 SQ FT. TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | SUBMITTED LIST IS 11,479 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDICATE WHY TREES #19 AND #22 WILL BE | | | PRESERVED, AS THEY ARE HATRACKED. | | | ? SATISFIED. CORRECT ALL SPECIES, AS SOME ARE | | | MISIDENTIFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY CREDITS | | | PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | 3. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ON | | | THE PLANT LIST, AS THEY ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE SETBACK | | | AND THE USE OF THE SMALL TREE SPECIES FOR THE WESTERN | | | BUFFER, AND SMALL SPECIES ON THE SOUTHERN BUFFER. | | | 5. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR | | | THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED AREAS ARE CORRECT, BUT AREA | | | TO BE PROVIDED IS THE TOTAL OF THE TWO- 1466 SQ FT., SO | | | 1262 SQ FT PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT. ADD | | | LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD AND ADJUST THE | | | CHARTS ON LP.1 AND LP.2 TO MATCH. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE | | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW WHOLE NUMBERS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE EAST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT | | | COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT. PROVIDE GRAPHIC FOR WATER USE ZONES AND ADD A | | | COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE SPECIES. | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS. | | | 12. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY IF UTILITIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED | | | BY WPB OR PBC. | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS AND | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 12/20/18: | | | 14. SATISFIED. ALL TREES IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE | | | PRESERVED OR RELOCATED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3). THIS | | | APPLIES TO THE TWO LARGE LIVE OAKS #23 AND #24. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 1/30/19: | | | | | | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN IT WAS ASSUMED THAT THE CURBS WERE THE | | | STANDARD AS REQUIRED BY CITY CODE, AS THEY WERE NOT | | | LABELED TO IDENTIFY THEM AS SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN | | | CODE REQUIREMENT OF A TYPE D CURB PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(5). SINCE THIS IS NOT A PD, A WAIVER IS NOT | | | POSSIBLE, AND THE CURBS MUST MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. | | | THE EXTENDED CONCRETE BACKERS ENCROACHING INTO THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE NOT NEEDED WITH A NON-MOUNTABLE | | | CURB. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2019 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2019 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-08 15:47:21 | MEMO TO FILE | | | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RACETRAC Z18100028 | | | JANUARY 30, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR | | | EACH TREE | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE. | | | IF UNDER 20 FEET DIAMETER THE MITIGATION DUE IS EQUAL | | | TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. OAK UNDER 20 FEET IS CATEGORY 1, | | | MITIGATION IS 300 SQ FT. TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | SUBMITTED LIST IS 11,479 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDICATE WHY TREES #19 AND #22 WILL BE | | | PRESERVED, AS THEY ARE HATRACKED. | | | ? SATISFIED. CORRECT ALL SPECIES, AS SOME ARE | | | MISIDENTIFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY CREDITS | | | PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | 3. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ON | | | THE PLANT LIST, AS THEY ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE SETBACK | | | AND THE USE OF THE SMALL TREE SPECIES FOR THE WESTERN | | | BUFFER, AND SMALL SPECIES ON THE SOUTHERN BUFFER. | | | 5. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR | | | THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED AREAS ARE CORRECT, BUT AREA | | | TO BE PROVIDED IS THE TOTAL OF THE TWO- 1466 SQ FT., SO | | | 1262 SQ FT PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT. ADD | | | LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD AND ADJUST THE | | | CHARTS ON LP.1 AND LP.2 TO MATCH. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE | | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW WHOLE NUMBERS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE EAST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT | | | COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT. PROVIDE GRAPHIC FOR WATER USE ZONES AND ADD A | | | COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE SPECIES. | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS. | | | 12. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY IF UTILITIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED | | | BY WPB OR PBC. | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS AND | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 12/20/18: | | | 14. SATISFIED. ALL TREES IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE | | | PRESERVED OR RELOCATED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3). THIS | | | APPLIES TO THE TWO LARGE LIVE OAKS #23 AND #24. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 1/30/19: | | | | | | 15. REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN IT WAS | | | ASSUMED THAT THE CURBS WERE THE STANDARD AS REQUIRED BY | | | CITY CODE, AS THEY WERE NOT LABELED TO IDENTIFY THEM AS | | | SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN CODE REQUIREMENT OF A TYPE D | | | CURB PER SECTION 94-443(C)(5). SINCE THIS IS NOT A PD, | | | A WAIVER IS NOT POSSIBLE, AND THE CURBS MUST MEET CITY | | | REQUIREMENTS. THE EXTENDED CONCRETE BACKERS ENCROACHING | | | INTO THE LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE NOT NEEDED WITH A | | | NON-MOUNTABLE CURB. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-20 14:38:24 | MEMO TO FILE | | | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RACETRAC Z18100028 | | | DECEMBER 20, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR | | | EACH TREE | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF | | | UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE. | | | IF UNDER 20 FEET DIAMETER THE MITIGATION DUE IS EQUAL | | | TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. OAK UNDER 20 FEET IS CATEGORY 1, | | | MITIGATION IS 300 SQ FT. TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | SUBMITTED LIST IS 11,479 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDICATE WHY TREES #19 AND #22 WILL BE | | | PRESERVED, AS THEY ARE HATRACKED. | | | ? SATISFIED. CORRECT ALL SPECIES, AS SOME ARE | | | MISIDENTIFIED. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY | | | CREDITS PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON | | | THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ON | | | THE PLANT LIST, AS THEY ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE SETBACK | | | AND THE USE OF THE SMALL TREE SPECIES FOR THE WESTERN | | | BUFFER, AND SMALL SPECIES ON THE SOUTHERN BUFFER. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING | | | FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT | | | CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED | | | TOGETHER. | | | CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED AREAS ARE CORRECT, BUT AREA | | | TO BE PROVIDED IS THE TOTAL OF THE TWO- 1466 SQ FT., SO | | | 1262 SQ FT PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT. ADD | | | LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD AND ADJUST THE | | | CHARTS ON LP.1 AND LP.2 TO MATCH. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE | | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW WHOLE NUMBERS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE EAST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT | | | COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT. PROVIDE GRAPHIC FOR WATER USE ZONES AND ADD A | | | COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE SPECIES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY IF UTILITIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED | | | BY WPB OR PBC. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS AND | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 12/20/18: | | | | | | 14. ALL TREES IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED OR | | | RELOCATED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3).THIS APPLIES TO THE | | | TWO LARGE LIVE OAKS #23 AND #24. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-13-2018 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-13 14:32:56 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RACETRAC Z18100028 | | | NOVEMBER 13, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN: | | | ? PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE | | | ? SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON | | | DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL | | | AREA 20 FEET OR MORE. | | | ? INDICATE WHY TREES #19 AND #22 WILL BE PRESERVED, AS | | | THEY ARE HATRACKED. | | | ? CORRECT ALL SPECIES, AS SOME ARE MISIDENTIFIED. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY CREDITS PROVIDED WITH | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. INCLUDE THE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ON THE PLANT | | | LIST, AS THEY ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE SETBACK AND THE USE | | | OF THE SMALL TREE SPECIES FOR THE WESTERN BUFFER, AND | | | SMALL SPECIES ON THE SOUTHERN BUFFER. | | | | | | 5. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR THE | | | AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | | | | 6. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES MEET THE | | | 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. REQUIRED TREES | | | INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS ADJACENT TO | | | PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 7. CORRECT THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE CALCULATIONS TO | | | SHOW WHOLE NUMBERS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | | | | 8. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | ISLAND AT THE EAST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | 9. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE AND | | | INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART | | | SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH | | | CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT. PROVIDE | | | GRAPHIC FOR WATER USE ZONES AND ADD A COLUMN TO THE | | | PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE SPECIES. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL TRANSFORMERS | | | AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS | | | PREVENTERS. | | | | | | 12. IDENTIFY IF UTILITIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY WPB OR | | | PBC. | | | | | | 13. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS AND PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-10 12:17:12 | PASSED WITH PROVISO: | | | DRAINAGE CALCS SHOW THAT STRUCTURE D-8 (FORMERLY D-7) | | | WILL FLOOD DURING A 3 YEAR 1-DAY STORM EVENT. P- | | | COMMENT FROM TRACY WARD, PE, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, | | | ENG. SERVICES. PLEASE UPDATE PLANS AND SUBMIT UNDER | | | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL E19010018. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH): | | | 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
11:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-15 11:20:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 1/23/19 SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1. THE DRAINAGE MODELING RESULTS SHOW THE ROUTED PEAK | | | 25-YEAR 3-DAY STAGE IS 16.78. THE SPOT GRADES AT THE | | | DRIVEWAYS SHOULD BE AT THIS ELEVATION OR HIGHER. | | | | | | 2. NOTE THE EAST SIDEWALK CURB RAMP APPEARS TO SLOPE | | | DOWNWARD AND THE CROWN OF THE DRIVEWAY IS SOUTH OF THE | | | SIDEWALK. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE SIDEWALK TO | | | CONTAIN THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY STORM OR MOVE THE DRIVEWAY | | | HIGH POINT BEFORE THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 3. SHOW AND LABLE A BERM ALONG THE EAST AND SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 4. CHECK THE ORIENTATION OF THE ARROW ON THE LEFT SIDE | | | OF THE DRIVEWAY TO COMMUNITY DRIVE AND THE PLACMENT OF | | | THE LETTERING. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-10 16:18:18 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 12/4/2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. SHOULD SECTION D-D INCLUDE VALLEY GUTTER OR DROP | | | CURB ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY? | | | | | | 2. CHECK THE SPOT GRADES ALONG THE DRIVEWAY TO | | | COMMUNITY DRIVE. THERE IS A PROPOSED GRADE OF 15.10 | | | BETWEEN 15.06 AND THE CATCH BASIN. | | | | | | 3. NO DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED SO STAFF | | | DOES NOT KNOW HOW THE WEIR ELEVATION OF 16.36 FEET WAS | | | DETERMINED. NOTE THIS WEIR ELEVATION IS HIGHER THAN: | | | (A) THE TRENCH GRATE ELEVATION ON THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO | | | COMMUNIITY DRIVE; | | | (B) THE HIGHEST SPOT GRADE FOR THE DRIVEWAY TO MILITARY | | | TRAIL; AND | | | (C) THE TOP OF BANK OF THE DETENTION AREA IN THE | | | SOUTHEAST AREA OF THE SITE. | | | | | | STORMWATER RUNOFF IN EXCESS OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH | | | DESIGN WILL DISCHARGE OFFSITE VIA (A) AND (B) BEFORE | | | FLOWING OVER THE WEIR. | | | | | | 4. ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW THE EXISTING STORM PIPE | | | FROM THE CONTROL STRUCTURE TO THE INLET ON COMMUNITY | | | DRIVE (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 14:32:24 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION IS NEEDED ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION FOR THE VERTICAL | | | DATUM TO NGVD1929 ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 3. NORTH MILITARY TRAIL IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. | | | COMMUNITY DRIVE IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. PERMITS | | | WILL BE NEEDED FROM EACH AGENCY FOR THE DRIVEWAY | | | CONNECTIONS AND ANY OTHER WORK IN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 4. CHESTER LAKE DRIVE IS SHOWN AS A PRIVATE ROAD ON THE | | | SURVEY. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS SHOWN AS DEDICATED TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY ON PAGE 187 OF PLAT BOOK 42. PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION OF ANY ABANDONMENT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | AND LIST IT ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 5. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS NOT SHOWING THE EXISTING | | | OUTFALL DRAINAGE PIPE ON COMMUNITY DRIVE. | | | | | | 6. ROOT BARRIER WILL BE NEEDED TO PROTECT THE | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT | | | PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE NPBCID PERMIT, IF APPLICABLE, FOR THE | | | DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 5. WITH THE ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, MEET WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES ABOUT ESTABLISHING A | | | STORMWATER UTILITY ACCOUNT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-28-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-28-2019 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-28 08:33:34 | PASSED BUT ALSO NEED PUBLIC UTILITY LETTER FROM PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY CONCERNING ENCROACHMENT INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-20-2018 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-20 07:57:40 | SITE PLAN SHOWS CHESTER LAKE DRIVE AS BEING PRIVATE, | | | BUT PB 42, PAGE 187 HAS IT DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY. | | | PROVIDE INFO. IF TURNED OVER TO THE HOA. EITHER WAY | | | APPROVAL OF OWNER IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-25 14:47:44 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. THE TPS APPROVAL SHOWN IN THE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2019 IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTION | | | OF THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY DRIVE DRIVEWAY TO | | | RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ONLY. HOWEVER, THE SUBMITTED | | | DRIVEWAY VOLUME EXHIBIT INDICATES LEFT-IN MOVEMENT. IF | | | A LEFT-IN MOVEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED, PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | REVISED COUNTY TPS LETTER WITHOUT SUCH A RESTRICTION. | | | 2. IN EXHIBITS 2, 3 AND 4, THE SEGMENT ON COMMUNITY | | | DRIVE BETWEEN MILITARY TRAIL AND VILLAGE PARKWAY SHOULD | | | BE BROKEN DOWN INTO TWO AT THE SITE DRIVEWAY. THERE ARE | | | ALSO A FEW TYPOS IN THESE EXHIBITS, SUCH AS THE TITLE | | | "RACETRAC - LANTANA ROAD", AND THE SEGMENT DESCRIPTION | | | ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 3. PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY ON | | | COMMUNITY DRIVE. | | | 4. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR FUEL DELIVERY TRUCKS, | | | COMMERCIAL TRUCKS AND GARBAGE TRUCKS WITH THE DRIVEWAY | | | RESTRICTIONS. ALSO, PLEASE SHOW THAT THE PORKCHOP | | | ISLAND ON COMMUNITY DRIVE DRIVEWAY DOES NOT OBSTRUCT | | | LEFT-IN MOVEMENT OF PASSENGER CARS AND TRUCKS IF THIS | | | LEFT-IN MOVEMENT IS ALLOWED. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-29-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-29 10:39:45 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. IN EXHIBITS 2, 3 AND 4, THE SEGMENT ON COMMUNITY | | | DRIVE BETWEEN MILITARY TRAIL AND VILLAGE PARKWAY SHOULD | | | BE BROKEN DOWN INTO TWO AT THE SITE DRIVEWAY. THERE ARE | | | ALSO A FEW TYPOS IN THESE EXHIBITS, SUCH AS THE TITLE | | | "RACETRAC - LANTANA ROAD", AND THE SEGMENT DESCRIPTION | | | ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 2. PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMENTS ON THE SITE DRIVEWAYS ON | | | MILITARY TRAIL AND COMMUNITY DRIVE MAY IMPACT THE TRIP | | | ASSIGNMENT. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 3. PROVIDE DRIVEWAY APPROVAL LETTER AND TPS LETTER FROM | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | 4. THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE IS NEEDED FOR | | | SAFETY REASONS. EGRESS VEHICLES AT THE MILITARY TRAIL | | | DRIVEWAY MAY NOT EXPECT VEHICLES TURNING RIGHT FROM | | | CHESTERLAKE DRIVE AND VICE VERSA IF THE TWO CONNECTIONS | | | ARE TOO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER. CONSIDER SHIFTING THE | | | MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY TO THE NORTH (WITH FDOT | | | APPROVAL), ELIMINATING THE MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY, OR | | | RESTRICTING IT TO A RIGHT-IN ONLY DRIVEWAY. | | | 5. COUNTY REQUESTED THE COMMUNITY DRIVE DRIVEWAY BE | | | RESTRICTED TO RIGHT-IN RIGHT-OUT ONLY. CLARIFY IF THIS | | | DRIVEWAY WILL STILL BE USED FOR FUEL DELIVERY AS THE | | | AUTOTURN PATHS SHOWN FOR FUEL DELIVERY IS NOW | | | RESTRICTED. IF NOT, REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY TO | | | 24 FEET. | | | 6. REMOVE THE RIGHT-TURN ONLY PAVEMENT MARKING IN THE | | | INBOUND LANE AT THE COMMUNITY DRIVE DRIVEWAY. | | | 7. PROVIDED REVISED AUTOTURN PATHS FOR FUEL DELIVERY | | | TRUCKS, COMMERCIAL TRUCKS AND GARBAGE TRUCKS WITH THE | | | DRIVEWAY RESTRICTIONS. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-18-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-18 14:53:47 | Z18100025, FILED UNDER Z18100028 RACETRAC - 2970 NORTH | | | MILITARY TRAIL (OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUBMITTAL) | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. PREVIOUS COMMENT. APPLICANT | | | RESPONSE TO PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT STATED "SURVEY". | | | 2. PROVIDE DRIVEWAY APPROVAL LETTER AND TPS LETTER FROM | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. PREVIOUS COMMENT. | | | 3. THE CITY PREFERS NO DRIVEWAYS ON MILITARY TRAIL DUE | | | TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE DRIVEWAY TO CHESTER LAKE DRIVE | | | AND COMMUNITY DRIVE. CONSIDER REMOVING THE DRIVEWAY ON | | | MILITARY TRAIL OR CHANGE IT TO A RIGHT-IN ONLY | | | DRIVEWAY. PREVIOUS COMMENT. | | | 4. THE CORNER CLEARANCE FOR THE MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY | | | DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE OF | | | 75 FEET PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-312. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 5. FUEL DELIVERY TRUCK PATH ANALYSIS PROVIDED SHOWS | | | MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY IS NOT REQUIRED FOR FUEL | | | DELIVERY. THIS FURTHER SUPPORTS OUR REQUEST TO | | | ELIMINATE THE MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY. | | | 6. REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE TWO-WAY DRIVEWAYS TO 24 | | | FEET. CITY WILL ONLY ACCEPT A WIDER DRIVEWAY IF | | | DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED FROM THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY | | | THAT THEY WILL NOT PERMIT A 24? WIDE DRIVEWAY. | | | 7. MOVE THE STOP BAR AT THE MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY TO | | | BE IN FRONT OF THE CROSSWALK, IF THE EGRESS IS | | | MAINTAINED. PREVIOUS COMMENT. SHEET C9 - SIGNING AND | | | PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN OUR PLAN SET | | | FROM WGI FOR OUR REVIEW. REVIEW SITE PLAN FOR | | | CONSISTENCY WITH SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN. | | | 8. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF | | | SIDEWALK OR CROSSWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | EASEMENT DOES NOT NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | 9. SHEET C-4 - ADD PLAN SHEET CROSS REFERENCE FOR | | | SECTIONS. WE ASSUMED SHEET C3.1 IS CROSS REFERENCE FOR | | | OUR REVIEW. | | | 10. SITE PLAN SHOWS CHESTERLAKE DRIVE AS PRIVATE WITH | | | 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT. CONFIRM. PLAT BOOK SHOWS ROAD AS | | | PUBLIC. | | | 11. A PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE CHESTERLAKE DRIVE | | | DRIVEWAY. CONFIRM WHO IS THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND | | | PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE DRIVEWAY WILL BE | | | ALLOWED. THE TRAFFIC DIVISION SUPPORTS A DRIVEWAY ON | | | CHESTERLAKE DR. AS IT WOULD ALLOW LOCAL TRIPS TO ACCESS | | | THE SITE WITHOUT ENTERING MILITARY TRAIL, A HIGH SPEED | | | ARTERIAL. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 14:59:30 | Z18100025, 026, 027, 028, 029 RACETRAC - 2970 NORTH | | | MILITARY TRAIL (OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUBMITTAL) | | | 1. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. | | | 2. PROVIDE DRIVEWAY APPROVAL LETTER AND TPS LETTER FROM | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | 3. THE CITY PREFERS NO DRIVEWAYS ON MILITARY TRAIL DUE | | | TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE DRIVEWAY TO CHESTER LAKE DRIVE | | | AND COMMUNITY DRIVE. CONSIDER REMOVING THE DRIVEWAY ON | | | MILITARY TRAIL OR CHANGE IT TO A RIGHT-IN ONLY | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | 4. THE CORNER CLEARANCE FOR THE MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY | | | DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE OF | | | 75 FEET PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-312. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 5. REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE TWO-WAY DRIVEWAYS TO 24 | | | FEET. | | | 6. MOVE THE STOP BAR AT THE MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY TO | | | BE IN FRONT OF THE CROSSWALK, IF THE EGRESS IS | | | MAINTAINED. THE STOP SIGN SHOULD ALIGN WITH THE STOP | | | BAR. ALSO, CONSIDER SHIFTING THE CROSSWALK CLOSER TO | | | MILITARY TRAIL. | | | 7. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF | | | SIDEWALK OR CROSSWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | 8. PROVIDE ADA CURB RAMPS FOR CROSSWALKS ACROSS ALL | | | DRIVEWAYS | | | 9. CONSIDER PROVIDING 8-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG SITE | | | FRONTAGE. | | | 10. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FROM CHESTER LAKE | | | DRIVE AND MILITARY TRAIL TO THE RACETRAC MARKET. | | | 11. PROVIDE AUTOTURN TRUCK PATHS FOR GARBAGE, DELIVERY | | | AND FUEL TRUCKS. | | | 12. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE AND FULL | | | RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH. | | | 13. CONSIDER REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. | | | 14. THE LINEWORK FOR EXISTING FEATURES ARE TOO LIGHT ON | | | THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-16 15:37:22 | 1.) AIPP CONTRIBUTION REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF | | | FINAL C.O. | | | | | | PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | 561-822-1443 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-03-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pgreilic |
Date |
07-03-2019 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
07-03-2019 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-07-03 14:54:53 | RACETRAC ? MILITARY & COMMUNITY | | | PROJECT NO: Z18100028 | | | | | | | | | 1.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING | | | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY | | | WILL BE REQUIRED | | | | | | 2.) SHOW CITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR PARKING STALLS, BIKE | | | RACKS, DUMPSTER ON SITE PLAN SHEETS | | | | | | 3.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | ***WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 15 | | | (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 X 17 INCHES, AND AN | | | ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE CHANGES ON | | | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | ***RESUBMITAL FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | ***CONTACT PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER @ 561-822-1443 | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-18-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-18-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
12-18-2018 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-18 09:07:48 | RACETRAC ? MILITARY & COMMUNITY | | | PROJECT NO: Z18100028 | | | RESUMITTAL 11-29-18 | | | | | | | | | 1.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING | | | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY | | | WILL BE REQUIRED | | | | | | 2.) PROVIDE UPDATED AND ACCURATE LEVEL OF SERVICE | | | ANALYSIS | | | | | | 3.) SHOW CITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR PARKING STALLS, BIKE | | | RACKS, DUMPSTER ON SITE PLAN SHEETS | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES | | | | | | 5.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | ***WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 15 | | | (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 X 17 INCHES, AND AN | | | ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE CHANGES ON | | | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | ***RESUBMITAL FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | ***CONTACT PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER @ 561-822-1443 | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 15:12:11 | 2970 N MILITARY TRAIL ANNEXATION | | | | | | | | | 1) IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE WIDTH OF ALL | | | PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESSES AND PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES BE | | | REDUCED TO 24 FEET. DOING SO WOULD SATISFY CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND ALLOW FOR WIDER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS | | | PARTICULARLY ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE AND CHESTER LAKE | | | DRIVE | | | 2) STAFF SUPPORTS ELIMINATING THE PROPOSED | | | INGRESS/EGRESS ON CHESTER LAKE DRIVE AS THE STREET | | | EXCLUSIVELY SERVES RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC | | | 3) THE PLAN IS PROPOSING 15 PARKING SPACES ABOVE WHAT | | | IS REQUIRED. STAFF SUPPORTS ELIMINATING EXCESS PARKING | | | SPACES TO PROVIDE FOR MORE GREEN SPACE. ADDITIONALLY, | | | REDUCE THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES BY INCLUDING A | | | 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD FUNCTION AS WHEEL | | | STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF SMALL CAR SPACES | | | TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. UP TO 30% OF | | | SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR SMALL CAR USE. REDUCE | | | WIDTH OF SPACES TO 8.5 FEET | | | 4) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK FROM THE SIDEWALK ALONG CHESTER | | | LAKE DRIVE TO PROPOSED RACETRAC MARKET | | | 5) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING | | | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY | | | WILL BE REQUIRED | | | 6) PROVIDE CITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR PARKING STALLS, | | | BIKE RACKS, DUMPSTER | | | 7) PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES | | | 8) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT | | | | | | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 8.5X11, ONE SET IN | | | 11X17 AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | *PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | *CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ 561-822-1443 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |