Plan Review Details - Project Z18100016
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18100016
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-13-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-13-2018 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-13-2018 Time 18:56 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-13 19:18:31DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 02-20-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 02-20-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 02-20-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By RRossano Date 01-08-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-08-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-08 08:54:09PASSED WITH PROVISO: FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL REVIEW,
 PLEASE CONNECT SEWER LATERALS TO GRAVITY, NOT FORCE
 MAIN.
  
 COMMENT PER MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-09-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 11-09-2018 Time   Sent To I
Notes
2018-11-09 12:31:37COMMENTS PER MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR PROJECT
 COORDINATOR, CITY OF WPB ENGINEERING
 METERED SERVICES TO BE MOVED RIGHT OF 12 FT. EASEMENT
 PROVIDE LEGAL & SKETCH, IF EXISTING EASEMENT IS
 ELIGIBLE
 PROVIDE FLOWS ? LS 80 ? ASSESS CONDITION. CALL OUT LS
 NUMBERS.
 PROVIDE OVER-ALL UTILITY PLAN ? 4? & 8?
 WATER/SEWER/DRAINAGE.
 SHOW EXISTING & PROPOSED WATER LINES.
 PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR PROPOSED 208 BEDS ? 20,800
 GPD (35 GPM X 140 GPM)
 PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER FLOWS FROM DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION (COMING FROM DEALER/SHOPPING CENTER TO THE
 SOUTH)
  
 COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY OF
 WPB ENGINEERING
 ADD SHEET 5 EASEMENTS.
 AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 SUPPLY POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN SHOWING:
 A) WHERE SILT SCREENS WILL BE INSTALLED,
 B) SHOW THE PROTECTION OF ALL ON-SITE CATCH BASINS
 C) SHOW PROTECTION OF ALL OFF-SITE CATCH BASINS
 D) INCLUDE DETAILS AS TO THE TYPE OF PROTECTION USED ON
 THE CATCH BASINS
 E) SHOW HOW SITE DIRT WILL NOT BE TRACKED INTO THE
 ROADS
 HTTP://WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/DOCS/
 CONST_ACTIVITY.PDF
 HTTP://WWW.PBCO-NPDES.ORG/CONSTRUN.HTML
 HTTP://WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/FAQS.
 HTM
  
 GENERAL DRIVEWAY COMMENTS
 1) DIMENSION DRIVEWAYS, LOCATED HORIZONTALLY AND
 VERTICALLY. CALL OUT SETBACK.
 2) SHOW PROPOSED CONCRETE APRON(S), CITY STANDARD
 DETAIL IS REQUIRED, SEE LINK BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPA
 RTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICA
 TIONS
 3) IF USING PAVERS IN THE APRON AREA OF THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY, YOU MUST EXECUTE A PAVER DRIVEWAY AGREEMENT,
 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/
 ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 GENERAL -
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED FOR YOUR GENERAL
 INFORMATION AND USE. THEY MAY NOT BE SITE-SPECIFIC, BUT
 WILL SOON BE ADDED TO CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS.
  
 OBTAIN AVAILABLE UTILITIES OWNED BY THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE
 ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY
 TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE.
 SUBMIT A FORMAL RECORDS REQUEST (WITH SUNSHINE DESIGN
 TICKET NUMBER) TO JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT [email protected]. SUBMIT PROOF
 OF THE FORMAL RECORD REQUEST TO THE CITY. NOTE: RECORD
 INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
 PERFORM FIELD VERIFICATION OF EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH
 BY SOFT-DIGS, POT-HOLING, ETC.
  
 PROVIDE SCHEMATIC UTILITY ENGINEERING DRAWINGS (24IN X
 36IN FORMAT) AT A LEGIBLE ENGINEERING SCALE AND
 PREPARED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
  
 PROVIDE STATEMENT, CONFIRMED BY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS,
 THAT THE EXISTING UTILITY MAINS SERVING THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT ARE ADEQUATE. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED WATER & SEWER DEMANDS (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM,
 PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMAND. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER
 FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
 LOCATIONS, SIZES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE DESCRIPTIONS OF
 THE FOLLOWING EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY FACILITIES:
 ? WATER MAINS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS, VALVES, METERS AND
 ANY SPECIAL STRUCTURES SUCH AS PUMP STATIONS;
 ? SANITARY SEWER MAINS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ANY
 SPECIAL STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES SUCH AS LIFT STATIONS,
 SEPTIC SYSTEMS; AND
 ? PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS
 ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  STORMWATER DRAINAGE MAINS, CHANNELS, RETENTION OR
 DETENTION PONDS, AND OTHER MAJOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES;
 FLOW DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF.
  SHOW LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING DRY/FRANCHISE UTILITIES,
 AND ALL RELATED EASEMENTS ON THE SITE OR ON IMMEDIATELY
 ADJACENT PROPERTY.
 PROVIDE PROFILE VIEW OF ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES WITHIN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE
 CITY. CALL OUT VERTICAL CLEARANCES OF UTILITY CROSSINGS
 WITH CITY AND DRY/FRANCHISE UTILITIES. IDENTIFY TYPE OF
 UTILITY/OWNERSHIP, LOCATION/DEPTH, PIPE MATERIAL, SIZE.
 SHOW CONDITIONS ON IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT
 HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-01-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 11-01-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 11-01-2018 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-01 15:42:15THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, SPECICALLY BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 CHAPTER 28 NEW HOTELS AND DORMITORIES, AND ALL
 ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. ENSURE THAT A
 FIRE PUMP WILL NOT BE NEEDED TO DELIVER THE APPLICABLE
 WATER SUPPLY TO THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT MOST
 REMOTE AND/OR HIGHEST DEMAND AREA.
  
 THE ENTIRE ACCESS ROAD WILL CONSIDERED A FIRE LANE AND
 SHALL REQUIRE ADAQUATE FIRE LANE MARKINGS AND/OR
 SIGNAGE.
  
 THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A COVERED CANOPY OVER THE
 FIRE LANE. THE MINIMUM HEIGHT CLEARANCE SHALL BE 13'6".
  
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION. THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION IS
 ACCEPTABLE; HOWEVER, NO FDC WAS SHOWN.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. FOR ANY LIFE
 SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE
 ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FAC
 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS WILL THEN BE REQUIRED THAT WILL BE BASED ON
 THESE FAC 61G DOCUMENTS.
  
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT
 ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON
 PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS,
 EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 ON REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN, SEVERAL DOORS
 OPEN INTO THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. PLEASE REVIEW NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS,
  
 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT
 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS
 OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE
 REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY,
 OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT
 MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A
 CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN,
 UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN
 EXISTING BUILDING.
 (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS
 PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED
 WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR
 LEAF IS FULLY OPEN.
  
  
 11. IT IS REQUIRED WITH FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM THAT A
 KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR
 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-18-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-18-2019 Time 11:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-18-2019 Time 11:52 Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-18 11:53:19FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS Z18100016
 MARCH 18, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR
 EACH TREE
 ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER
 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE.
 CORRECT FOR MAHOGANY, LIVE OAKS, SLASH PINES CATEGORY 1
 AT 300 SQ FT, PIGEON PLUM CATEGORY 2 AT 150 SQ FT,
 BISCHOFIA NO REQUIRED MITIGATION.
 ? SATISFIED. CALCULATE ALL TREE CANOPY REMOVED, AND
 PROVIDE TOTAL MITIGATION REQUIRED.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL CANOPY CREDIT FOR ALL
 TREES ADDED AS PROPOSED.
 REVISE TOTAL USING SPECIES ON PLANT LIST.
 STAFF CONTACTED SCOTT BARBER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND
 REVIEWED THE CORRECTIONS ON 3/5/19.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448(D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE RELOCATED.
 PROVIDE THE CONDITION FOR EACH TREE IN A COLUMN ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION LIST, AND DESCRIBE IF SPECIES CAN BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR SELECTION OF
 HIGHRISE LIVE OAKS, AS SPECIES LIVE OAKS PROVIDE MORE
 GENETIC DIVERSITY AND RESISTANCE TO INSECTS AND
 DISEASE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) SHOWING ONLY THE AREAS WITHIN THE
 PARKING FIELD, AND THE TOTAL SHOWN TO MEET THE TOTALS
 OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE IN THE NONCONFORMING
 TERMINAL ISLAND TO THE EAST OF THE RECONFIGURED ROW OF
 PARKING ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART AND SHOW 50 REQUIRED POINTS PER SECTION
 94-442(G).
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER
 LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CORRECT CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR
 EXPAND LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING.
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/5/19:
  
 11. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TO THE EAST AND SOUTH OF
 PROPOSED BUILDING IS TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING DRAINAGE
 LINE. MOVE AT LEAST 15 FEET FROM LINE.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AND TREE
 MITIGATION PLAN TOGETHER, SIGNED AND SEALED BY LA.
 13. SATISFIED. GUMBO LIMBO SHOULD BE ON RELOCATE LIST
 IF IN GOOD CONDITION.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-05-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-05-2019 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-05-2019 Time 12:45 Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-05 12:45:55FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS Z18100016
 MARCH 5, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR
 EACH TREE
 ? NOT SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER
 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE.
 CORRECT FOR MAHOGANY, LIVE OAKS, SLASH PINES CATEGORY 1
 AT 300 SQ FT, PIGEON PLUM CATEGORY 2 AT 150 SQ FT,
 BISCHOFIA NO REQUIRED MITIGATION.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CALCULATE ALL TREE CANOPY
 REMOVED, AND PROVIDE TOTAL MITIGATION REQUIRED.
 REVISE TOTAL. SHOULD BE 9,441.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL CANOPY CREDIT FOR ALL TREES ADDED AS
 PROPOSED.
 REVISE TOTAL USING SPECIES ON PLANT LIST.
 STAFF CONTACTED SCOTT BARBER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND
 REVIEWED THE CORRECTIONS ON 3/5/19.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448(D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE RELOCATED.
 PROVIDE THE CONDITION FOR EACH TREE IN A COLUMN ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION LIST, AND DESCRIBE IF SPECIES CAN BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR SELECTION OF
 HIGHRISE LIVE OAKS, AS SPECIES LIVE OAKS PROVIDE MORE
 GENETIC DIVERSITY AND RESISTANCE TO INSECTS AND
 DISEASE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) SHOWING ONLY THE AREAS WITHIN THE
 PARKING FIELD, AND THE TOTAL SHOWN TO MEET THE TOTALS
 OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE IN THE NONCONFORMING
 TERMINAL ISLAND TO THE EAST OF THE RECONFIGURED ROW OF
 PARKING ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART AND SHOW 50 REQUIRED POINTS PER SECTION
 94-442(G).
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER
 LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CORRECT CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR
 EXPAND LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING.
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/5/19:
  
 11. LIVE OAK TO THE EAST AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED BUILDING
 IS TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING DRAINAGE LINE. MOVE AT LEAST
 15 FEET FROM LINE.
  
 12. PLEASE SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AND TREE MITIGATION
 PLAN TOGETHER, SIGNED AND SEALED BY LA.
 13. GUMBO LIMBO SHOULD BE ON RELOCATE LIST IF IN GOOD
 CONDITION.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-22-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-22-2019 Time 17:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-22-2019 Time 17:00 Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-22 17:02:18FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS Z18100016
 JANUARY 15, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR
 EACH TREE
 ? NOT SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER
 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE.
 CORRECT FOR MAHOGANY, LIVE OAKS, SLASH PINES CATEGORY 1
 AT 300 SQ FT, PIGEON PLUM CATEGORY 2 AT 150 SQ FT,
 BISCHOFIA NO REQUIRED MITIGATION.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CALCULATE ALL TREE CANOPY
 REMOVED, AND PROVIDE TOTAL MITIGATION REQUIRED.
 REVISE TOTAL. SHOULD BE 9,441.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL CANOPY CREDIT FOR ALL TREES ADDED AS
 PROPOSED.
 REVISE TOTAL USING SPECIES ON PLANT LIST.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448(D)(3) REQUIRES ALL
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE
 RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE CONDITION FOR EACH TREE IN A
 COLUMN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST, AND DESCRIBE IF
 SPECIES CAN BE RELOCATED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR SELECTION OF
 HIGHRISE LIVE OAKS, AS SPECIES LIVE OAKS PROVIDE MORE
 GENETIC DIVERSITY AND RESISTANCE TO INSECTS AND
 DISEASE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) SHOWING ONLY THE AREAS WITHIN THE
 PARKING FIELD, AND THE TOTAL SHOWN TO MEET THE TOTALS
 OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE IN THE NONCONFORMING
 TERMINAL ISLAND TO THE EAST OF THE RECONFIGURED ROW OF
 PARKING ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART AND SHOW 50 REQUIRED POINTS PER SECTION
 94-442(G).
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER
 LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CORRECT CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR
 EXPAND LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING.
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-13-2018 Time 15:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-13-2018 Time 15:09 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-13 15:10:45FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS Z18100016
 NOVEMBER 13, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN:
 ? PROVIDE THE CURRENT CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE
 ? SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON
 DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL
 AREA 20 FEET OR MORE.
 ? CALCULATE ALL TREE CANOPY REMOVED, AND PROVIDE TOTAL
 MITIGATION REQUIRED.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL CANOPY CREDIT FOR ALL TREES ADDED AS
 PROPOSED.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448(D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE
 CONDITION FOR EACH TREE IN A COLUMN ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST, AND DESCRIBE IF SPECIES CAN BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 3. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR SELECTION OF HIGHRISE LIVE
 OAKS, AS SPECIES LIVE OAKS PROVIDE MORE GENETIC
 DIVERSITY AND RESISTANCE TO INSECTS AND DISEASE.
  
 4. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS
 COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND
 (4) SHOWING ONLY THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD,
 AND THE TOTAL SHOWN TO MEET THE TOTALS OF BOTH SECTIONS
 ADDED TOGETHER.
  
 5. PROVIDE A TREE IN THE NONCONFORMING TERMINAL ISLAND
 TO THE EAST OF THE RECONFIGURED ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT
 TO THE EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 6. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 7. PROVIDE A FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART AND SHOW
 50 REQUIRED POINTS PER SECTION 94-442(G).
  
 8. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CORRECT CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
  
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND
 UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status N Date 11-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-14-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-14-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-14 12:01:04NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL NOW BUT WHEN PLANS TO BUILD
 COME IN PLEASE ENSURE YOU HAVE LOOKED AT YOUR
 SANITATION PLAN AND HAVE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT HOW AND HOW
 MUCH CAPACITY YOU WILL NEED.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-05-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-05-2019 Time 17:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-05-2019 Time 17:36 Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-05 17:36:18THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 FEBRUARY 19, 2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. REVISE THE NGVD 1929 FFE FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 (ON SEVERAL CIVIL SHEETS). VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION
 BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929 IS SHOWN AS 1.54 FEET.
 1.53 FEET WAS USED FOR THE FFE CONVERSION.
  
 2. STAFF CANNOT FIND THE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 ON SHEET C-6 (REPEAT
 COMMENT).
  
 3. VERIFY THE STORM PIPE SIZE (15" HDPE) LISTED FOR
 UTILITY CROSSINGS 1 AND 2 ON SHEET C-6. SHEET C-5 SHOWS
 AN 18" HDPE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE TYPE 'V' GUTTER
 INTLET.
  
 4. SHEET C-5 SHOWS A SPOT GRADE OF 18.25 FEET NAVD 1988
 IN THE PERVIOUS AREA IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PAVED DRIVE
 AND ALSO BETWEEN CONTOURS 17 AND 18. AN ADDITIONAL 18
 CONTOUR LINE IS NEEDED SOUTH OF THE SPOT GRADE.
  
 5. BUILDING APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED WITHIN A SPECIAL
 FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA). THE FEMA FLOOD ELEVATION
 SHOULD BE LISTED ON THE SURVEY. MINIMUM 2 FEET OF
 FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
 A SFHA.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-22-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-22-2019 Time 08:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-22-2019 Time 09:14 Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-22 09:14:49THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 JANUARY 7, 2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. VERIFY THE VERTICAL DATUM USED ON THE ENGINEERING
 PLANS. DATUM NOTES ON SHEETS C-1, C-3, C-5, AND C-7
 INDICATE VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NGVD 1929 BUT THE GRADE
 ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C-5 APPEAR TO BE REFERENCED
 TO NAVD 1988.
  
 2. THERE ARE TWO CONVERSION EQUATIONS PROVIDED FOR THE
 NGVD1929 AND NAVD1988 RELATIONSHIP (1.504 FEET AND 1.53
 FEET).
  
 3. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON SHEET C-6 AND PROVIDE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD 1929.
  
 4. ON SHEET C-6, LABEL THE LOCATION OF THE UTILITY
 CROSSINGS CORRESPONDING TO THE UTILITY CROSSING
 SCHEDULE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SHEET.
  
 5. SITE NOTE 3 ON SHET C-4 - PBC MAY HAVE UPDATED THEIR
 TP-13 TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-09-2018 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-09-2018 Time 14:04 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-09 14:04:02THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION IS NEEDED ON THE SURVEY.
  
 2. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS
 AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929.
  
 3. CERTAIN LAYERS APPEAR TO BE MISSING ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET C4 (PAVING,
 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN) DOES NOT SHOW THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS OR EXISTING WATER AND SEWER MAINS. SHEET
 C-5 (UTILITY PLAN) DOES NOT SHOW EXISTING WATER AND
 SEWER MAINS.
  
 4. CHECK THE HGL FOR THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO
 DETERMINE THE ADDITIONAL FLOW WILL NOT CAUSE FLOODING.
  
 5. PROVIDE A PROJECT BOUNDARY ON SHEET C-2 (SITE PLAN)
 THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE LAND USE AREAS LISTED ON THE
 SAME SHEET.
  
 6. PROVIDE AN STORMWATER MASTER PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE
 CAMPUS THAT TAKES INTO ACCOUNT FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED SFWMD ERP APPROVAL
 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED NPBCID APPROVAL PRIOR
 TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-06-2019 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-06 07:39:44PASSED WITH CONDITION OF MASTER WATER AND SEWER PLAN IS
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND ANY REQUIRED EASEMENTS GRANTED
 TO CITY PRIOR TO C.O.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-24-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-24-2019 Time 07:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-24 07:54:171. THE EXISTING LIFT STATION NO. 80 LOCATED ALONG
 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DRIVE LIES PARTIALLY OUTSIDE OF
 ITS EASEMENT. ADDITIONAL EASEMENT AREA IS NEEDED.
 2. THE EXISTING LIFT STATION NO. 98 ALONG THE E-W CANAL
 WAS PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED TO BE PRIVATE. IN ORDER FOR THE
 CITY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN, AN EASEMENT IS REQUIRED.
 WE WILL ALSO NEED ANY MISSING EASEMENTS OVER THE
 EXISTING FORCE MAINS. THIS IS WHY THE OVERALL MASTER
 WATER AND SEWER PLAN IS REQUIRED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-09-2018 Time 08:18 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-09 08:21:111. NEW EASEMENT FOR LIFT STATION IS REQUIRED.
 2. METER NEEDS TO BE AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.
 3. OVERALL MASTER WATER AND SEWER PLANS NEEDS TO BE
 DEVELOPED SHOWING EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND
 EASEMENTS.
 4. NEED LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR WATER AND SEWER.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-22-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-22 09:28:31PASSED
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-20-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-20 09:54:311. REDUCE THE CORNER RADIUS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
 MILL'S KEISER WAY/KEISER UNIVERSITY DRIVE AND TIE
 MILL'S KEISER WAY TO KEISER UNIVERSITY DRIVE
 PERPENDICULARLY. THIS WILL REDUCE THE SPEED OF TURNING
 VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE ACROSS MILL'S
 KEISER WAY. THE AUTOTURN PATH ON SHEET C-8 SHOWS THAT
 THE LARGE RADIUS IS NOT NEEDED. CONSIDER ADDING A
 SIDEWALK AT THE MODIFIED CORNER TO CONNECT THE EXISTING
 SIDEWALK ON MILL'S KEISER WAY AND KEISER UNIVERSITY
 DRIVE.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-15-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-15 15:52:34PASSED.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-08-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-08 14:39:02Z18100016 KEISER UNIVERSITY RESIDENCE HALL (OCTOBER 9,
 2018 SUBMITTAL)
 1. PROVIDE TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 2. THE JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE INDICATES THAT THE
 MASTER PLAN HAS SEVERAL OTHER CHANGES IN ADDITION TO
 THE RESIDENCE HALL, BUT IT WASN?T CLEAR WHERE THESE
 CHANGES ARE. PLEASE INDICATE THE CHANGES ON THE MASTER
 PLAN.
 3. SINCE THE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS WILL BE SHARED BETWEEN
 PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS
 WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET, 12 FEET PREFERRED,
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE HALL, INCLUDING THE
 EXISTING PATHWAY AT THE BACK OF THE RESIDENCE HALL.
 4. PROVIDE A ?KEEP RIGHT? SIGN (R4-7 OR R4-7B) AT THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CENTER ISLAND FACING WESTBOUND
 VEHICLES.
 5. USE RAISED ISLAND INSTEAD OF STRIPING AT THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CENTER ISLAND, AND USE
 MOUNTABLE CURB AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE TRUCK MOVEMENTS
 AT THAT CORNER.
 6. THE DIAGONAL MARKINGS FOR THE FIRE LANE SHOULD BE
 SLANTED AWAY FROM THE CURB.
 7. CONSIDER PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
 CONNECTIONS TO VILLAGE BOULEVARD AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH
 END OF THE CAMPUS. AT THE NORTH END, CONSIDER PROVIDING
 A PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE BRIDGE ACROSS THE CANAL, AND
 SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON VILLAGE
 BOULEVARD. AT THE SOUTH END, IN ADDITION TO THE
 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINT, CONSIDER PROVIDING A
 SEPARATE BICYCLE PATH THROUGH THE FPL EASEMENT AND
 PROPERTY TO CONNECT TO THE EXISTING PATHWAY AROUND THE
 LAKE TO THE EAST. THESE CONNECTIONS COULD POTENTIALLY
 REDUCE THE CYCLING DISTANCE BETWEEN VILLAGE BOULEVARD
 AND THE CAMPUS FROM OVER 8,800 FEET AND WALKING
 DISTANCE FROM OVER 2,500 FEET TO LESS THAN 750 FEET, AS
 WELL AS ELIMINATING THE EXPOSURE OF HIGH SPEED VEHICLES
 TO STUDENTS ON BICYCLES.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-18-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-18-2019 Time 12:49 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 03-18-2019 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-05-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-05-2019 Time 14:48 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-05-2019 Time 10:54 Sent To  
Notes
2019-03-05 14:48:53CASE NO. PB 1069Z - 2ND RESUBMITTAL
 KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS
 2600 NORTH MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY,
 MARCH 11, 2019, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 APRIL 16, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 5, 2019), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) ONE
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLEASE VERIFY THE ORIENTATION OF THE PRESS BOX
 STAIRS. THE PERMIT DRAWINGS HAD THE STAIRS LOCATED ON
 THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PRESS BOX.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE CHECK THE MATH ON THE
 PARKING TABLE:
  
 A. STAFF HAS ADDED THE LISTED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
 IN EACH PARKING FIELD AND IT TOTALS 1,087, NOT THE
 1,089 LISTED ON THE "PROVIDED" LINE OF THE PARKING
 TABLE ON SHEET MP.1.
 B. STAFF ADDED ALL THE AREAS LISTED AS "EXISTING
 PARKING" AND IT TOTALS 585, NOT 589.
 C. THE RESIDENCE HALL LINE ONLY LISTS 23, NOT THE 25
 PROVIDED PARKING SPACES.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-23-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-23-2019 Time 11:45 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-23-2019 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-23 11:45:47CASE NO. PB 1069Z - 1ST RESUBMITTAL
 KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS
 2600 NORTH MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 FEBRUARY 8, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE MARCH 19, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MARCH 23, 2019), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) ONE
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 GENERAL
  
 1) SHEET A10.1 LISTS THE CHILLER AS BEING 8 FEET IN
 HEIGHT. THE SCREEN WALL SHOWN ON SHEET A1.2 IS ONLY 7
 FEET 4 INCHES IN HEIGHT AND THE GATE SHOWN ON SHEET
 A10.1 IS ONLY 7 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NEEDS TO BE SCREENED.
  
 2) THE SCALE SHOWN ON SHEETS C-5 AND C-7 ARE INCORRECT.
 THESE PLANS ARE DRAWN AT 1:30.
  
 PARKING
  
 3) THE TWO PARKING SPACES THAT WERE REMOVED SOUTH OF
 BUILDING #3 WERE NOT REMOVED FROM THE ?PROVIDED? LINE
 OF THE PARKING TABLE ON SHEET MP.1.
  
 4) THE TAG SHOWING THE NUMBER OF SPACES IN THE PARKING
 ROW IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF BUILDING #3 INCORRECTLY SHOWS
 A "7" ON SHEET MP.5 INSTEAD OF THE PROVIDED SIX PARKING
 SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE OTHER PARKING BAYS IN THIS
 AREA NEED TO INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACE TAGS.
  
 5) STAFF COMMENTED THAT HAVING WHEEL STOPS AND D CURBS
 IS REDUNDANT FOR PARKING SPACES AND RECOMMENDED USING
 JUST THE D CURB, WITH A TWO FOOT OVERHANG. THIS
 REQUIRES THAT THE D CURB BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE PARKING SPACE TO THE FACE OF THE D CURB
 IS 16 FEET AND THEN THE TWO FOOT OVERHANG GIVES THE
 MINIMUM 18 FOOT DEPTH PARKING SPACE. IF YOU PUT 18 OR
 19 FEET OF PAVED PARKING STALL DEPTH, YOU MUST USE A
 WHEEL STOP, REGARDLESS OF THE CURB AS THE REQUIRED TWO
 FOOT OVERHANG IS NOT PROVIDED - THERE IS LANDSCAPE AND
 SIDEWALK AT THE END OF YOUR SPACES THAT MAY NOT BE
 OVERHUNG.
  
 6) A FEW OF THE DIMENSION TAGS ON SHEET MP.5 DO NOT
 ALIGN WITH WHAT THEY ARE DIMENSIONING.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-13-2018 Time 17:28 Rev Time 2.50
Received By eschneid Date 11-13-2018 Time 17:28 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-13 17:32:49CASE NO. PB 1069Z
 KEISER UNIVERSITY DORMS
 2600 NORTH MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 NOVEMBER 30, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE JANUARY 15, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JANUARY 14,
 2019), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 GENERAL
  
 1) THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT/TRAFFIC STATEMENT AND THE PLANS. IS IT 200 OR
 208 BEDS?
  
 2) PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING SOLAR OR GREEN ROOF
 INSTALLATION ON THE ROOF OF THE PROPOSED DORMS.
  
 3) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN
 WALL.
  
 PARKING
  
 4) THE PLANS INCLUDE A TAG FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF A
 PARKING STRUCTURE (#22). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PARKING
 STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE BUILT ON THE 100 FOOT FPL
 EASEMENT, WHICH HAS MAJOR OVERHEAD POWER LINES. WAS THE
 #22 TAG SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FPL
 EASEMENT WHERE THERE IS ROOM TO CONSTRUCT A PARKING
 STRUCTURE?
  
 5) THE PARKING SPACE TAGS SOUTH OF BUILDING #3 AND EAST
 OF THE DORMS ARE CONFUSING AS THEY OVERLAP THE TWO
 AREAS. AS THIS WILL BE THE PLAN OF RECORD, JUST INCLUDE
 THE FINAL NUMBER OF SPACES IN THIS AREA - 26 (18
 SPACES/8 HC).
  
 6) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE FLUSH HEADER CURBS AND THE
 DROP CURB (VALLEY GUTTER).
  
 7) THE PLANS SHOW A D CURB AT THE HEAD OF ALL THE
 PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS THE USE OF
 WHEEL STOPS. IT IS REDUNDANT TO USE BOTH. PLEASE
 CONSIDER PROVIDING A TWO FOOT OVERHANG OF THE D CURB TO
 PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS AREA.
  
 BICYCLE PARKING
  
 8) PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING ADDITIONAL BICYCLE AT THE
 LOCATION OF THE DORMS. EIGHT BICYCLE RACKS FOR 208
 STUDENTS IS A VERY LOW NUMBER. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE
 CONSIDER HAVING SOME OF THE BICYCLE RACKS UNDER COVER.
  
 9) UPDATE SHEET C-2 TO STATE THAT EIGHT BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED (4 RACKS X 2 SPACES) AND THE
 PARKING TABLE ON SHEET MP.1 (64 PROVIDED). IF
 ADDITIONAL SPACE ARE PROVIDED BASED ON COMMENT #8
 ABOVE, PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 10) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON
 THE SITE PLAN (SHEET C-2).
  
 SIDEWALKS
  
 11) WIDEN THE SIDEWALKS AROUND THE DORMS TO A UNIFORM
 EIGHT FEET IN WIDTH AS THIS WILL BE A HEAVY PEDESTRIAN
 USE AREA.
  
 12) PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
 THE ENTRY DRIVE FROM THE DORMS TO THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT
 TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE (NORTH SIDE OF THE CANAL). THIS
 SIDEWALK CONNECTION WOULD BE AN ALMOST DIRECT ROUTE TO
 THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS WAY TO THE VILLAGE COMMONS
 SHOPPING CENTER.
  
 DUMPSTER
  
 13) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE GARBAGE ENCLOSURE ON
 THE PLANS. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM
 CITY STANDARDS.
  
 14) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE ENCLOSURE WALLS.
  
 15) PLEASE CONSIDER RECYCLING FACILITIES FOR THE DORMS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved