Plan Review Details - Project Z18080018
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18080018
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-11-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 09-11-2018 Time 13:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-11-2018 Time 13:11 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-11 13:43:21DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 3. OIL/GAS INTERCEPTOR. AN INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M
 SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS
 AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-03-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By RRossano Date 12-03-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-03-2018 Time   Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-17-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By RRossano Date 09-18-2018 Time   Rev Time 2.00
Received By rrossano Date 09-18-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-18 15:55:44GENERAL DRIVEWAY COMMENTS
 1) DIMENSION DRIVEWAYS, LOCATED HORIZONTALLY AND
 VERTICALLY. CALL OUT SETBACK.
 2) SHOW PROPOSED CONCRETE APRON(S), CITY STANDARD
 DETAIL IS REQUIRED, SEE LINK BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPA
 RTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICA
 TIONS
 3) IF USING PAVERS IN THE APRON AREA OF THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY, YOU MUST EXECUTE A PAVER DRIVEWAY AGREEMENT,
 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/
 ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 GENERAL NOTES:
  
 DELETE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH FROM WATER NOTE (PBC
 WATER)
  
 PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM PBC WATER & SEWER FOR PROPOSED
 POINTS OF CONNECTION FOR WATER AND SEWER.
  
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
  
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION FACILITIES LOCATED ON
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO
 PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
  
Review Stop ENG-A ENGINEERING FORMAL REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-03-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By RRossano Date 12-03-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mgonzale Date 12-03-2018 Time 09:46 Sent To I
Notes
2018-12-03 09:53:16NOTE: THIS "ENG-A ENGINEERING FORMAL REVIEW" STOP WAS
 ENTERED IN ERROR ON 12/3/2018.
  
 RICK ROSSANO
 PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-06-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-06-2018 Time 12:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-06-2018 Time 12:01 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-06 12:55:23THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE
 PREVENTION CODE, AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED
 OCCUPANCY. PLEASE REVIEW NFPA 101, CHAPTER 6, OCCUPANCY
 CLASSIFICATION FOR GUIDANCE ON HOW TO PROVIDE FOR THE
 LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.
  
 CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 OCCUPIABLE AREAS ADJACENT TO, OR STROAGE OF, MOTOR
 VEHICLE OPERATION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 01-30-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-30-2019 Time 12:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-30-2019 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-30 12:15:11FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PALMS GATEWAY PCD MITSUBISHI Z18080018
 JANUARY 30, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 WEST AND SOUTH BUFFER PORTIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT CHART TO REFLECT WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED
 OR SHOW EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTION. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES DO NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED AND A TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING
 SPACES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). PROVIDE INTERIOR
 ISLANDS WITH SPACING NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.
 PROVIDE DIVIDER ISLANDS AS REQUIRED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT DO NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4).
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES
 MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT.
 REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS
 ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. WHEEL STOPS ARE SHOWN IN SOME AREAS.
 REDUCING THE PAVED AREA AND PLACING THE CURB WITH
 OVERHANG IS PREFERRED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED AS 30% FOR
 COMMERCIAL USE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT
 COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW MANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
 THE LIFT STATION IS NOT SHOWN WHERE APPROVED.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS, FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART,
 CALCULATIONS, AND PLANT LIST ON ONLY ONE PAGE OF THE
 PLANS.
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/2/18:
  
 13. SATISFIED. THE LIGHT POLE AND FLAGPOLE CONFLICT
 WITH THE GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREE CANOPY IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND IN THE WESTERN ROW OF PARKING. STAFF WOULD
 PREFER RELOCATION OF THE LIGHT POLE TO A LOCATION THAT
 DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE TREES, AND AN EXPLANATION
 AS TO THE
  
 14. SATISFIED. SITE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 AND SITE PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 15. SATISFIED. SEE RECOMMENDATION. STAFF IS CONCERNED
 THAT THE LACK OF A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, ESPECIALLY TREE
 CANOPY, ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE COMBINED WITH THE
 OPEN ASPHALT DISPLAY AREA CREATE A LARGE HEAT ISLAND.
 THE DESIGN FOR DISPLAY AREA RATHER THAN A PARKING AREA
 WAS NOT ANTICIPATED WHEN THE WAIVER FOR REMOVING THE
 REQUIREMENT FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG INTERNAL
 PROPERTY LINES WAS APPROVED.
  
 16. SATISFIED. CROSS SECTIONS ARE NEEDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS THAT TRANSITION FROM RETAINING
 WALL TO SLOPE ON THE SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES.
 ALSO, INDICATE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OF THE
 RETAINING WALL, AS THE CROSS SECTIONS SUBMITTED
 INDICATE A POURED SOLID WALL VERSUS THE STACKED BLOCK
 WALL THAT WAS INSTALLED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG THE SELF STORAGE AND DEL TACO PARCELS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/18/18:
 17. SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT OF RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PARKING
 SPACE. IF A PARKING SPACE CAN BE ELIMINATED, THE
 ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK COULD BE MOVED TO THE EAST, CLOSER
 TO THE BUILDING AND ALLOWING THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND TO
 EXPAND TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
 18. SATISFIED. A TREE SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE
 BUFFER AREA EAST OF THE WEST ENTRANCE INTO THE SITE
 FROM THE ACCESS ROAD. THERE IS A LABEL -SOD A- WHERE A
 TREE CAN BE PLACED.
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-18-2018 Time 16:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-18-2018 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-18 16:42:45FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PALMS GATEWAY PCD MITSUBISHI Z18080018
 DECEMBER 12, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 WEST AND SOUTH BUFFER PORTIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT CHART TO REFLECT WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED
 OR SHOW EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTION. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES DO NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED AND A TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING
 SPACES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). PROVIDE INTERIOR
 ISLANDS WITH SPACING NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.
 PROVIDE DIVIDER ISLANDS AS REQUIRED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT DO NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4).
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES
 MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT.
 REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS
 ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. WHEEL STOPS ARE SHOWN IN SOME AREAS.
 REDUCING THE PAVED AREA AND PLACING THE CURB WITH
 OVERHANG IS PREFERRED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED AS 30% FOR
 COMMERCIAL USE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT
 COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW MANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
 THE LIFT STATION IS NOT SHOWN WHERE APPROVED.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS, FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART,
 CALCULATIONS, AND PLANT LIST ON ONLY ONE PAGE OF THE
 PLANS.
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/2/18:
  
 13. SATISFIED. THE LIGHT POLE AND FLAGPOLE CONFLICT
 WITH THE GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREE CANOPY IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND IN THE WESTERN ROW OF PARKING. STAFF WOULD
 PREFER RELOCATION OF THE LIGHT POLE TO A LOCATION THAT
 DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE TREES, AND AN EXPLANATION
 AS TO THE
  
 14. SATISFIED. SITE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 AND SITE PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 15. SATISFIED. SEE RECOMMENDATION. STAFF IS CONCERNED
 THAT THE LACK OF A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, ESPECIALLY TREE
 CANOPY, ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE COMBINED WITH THE
 OPEN ASPHALT DISPLAY AREA CREATE A LARGE HEAT ISLAND.
 THE DESIGN FOR DISPLAY AREA RATHER THAN A PARKING AREA
 WAS NOT ANTICIPATED WHEN THE WAIVER FOR REMOVING THE
 REQUIREMENT FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG INTERNAL
 PROPERTY LINES WAS APPROVED.
  
 16. SATISFIED. CROSS SECTIONS ARE NEEDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS THAT TRANSITION FROM RETAINING
 WALL TO SLOPE ON THE SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES.
 ALSO, INDICATE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OF THE
 RETAINING WALL, AS THE CROSS SECTIONS SUBMITTED
 INDICATE A POURED SOLID WALL VERSUS THE STACKED BLOCK
 WALL THAT WAS INSTALLED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG THE SELF STORAGE AND DEL TACO PARCELS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/18/18:
 17. THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST
 CORNER OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF
 RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE. IF A
 PARKING SPACE CAN BE ELIMINATED, THE ACCESSIBLE
 SIDEWALK COULD BE MOVED TO THE EAST, CLOSER TO THE
 BUILDING AND ALLOWING THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND TO EXPAND TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
 18. A TREE SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE BUFFER AREA
 EAST OF THE WEST ENTRANCE INTO THE SITE FROM THE ACCESS
 ROAD. THERE IS A LABEL -SOD A- WHERE A TREE CAN BE
 PLACED.
  
 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE LACK
 OF TREE CANOPY IN THE OPEN ASPHALT DISPLAY AREA AT THE
 EAST SIDE OF THE SITE CREATES A LARGE HEAT ISLAND. THE
 USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR DISPLAY AREA RATHER THAN A
 PARKING AREA WAS NOT ANTICIPATED WHEN THE WAIVER FOR
 REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG
 INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES WAS APPROVED FOR THE PD.
 PLACEMENT OF SOME TREES IN THIS AREA, ALTHOUGH NOT
 REQUIRED, WOULD IMPROVE THE PROJECT.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-05-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-02-2018 Time 13:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-02-2018 Time 13:48 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-05 13:49:43FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PALMS GATEWAY PCD MITSUBISHI Z18080018
 NOVEMBER 2, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 WEST AND SOUTH BUFFER PORTIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT CHART TO REFLECT WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED
 OR SHOW EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTION. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES DO NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED AND A TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING
 SPACES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). PROVIDE INTERIOR
 ISLANDS WITH SPACING NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.
 PROVIDE DIVIDER ISLANDS AS REQUIRED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT DO NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4).
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES
 MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT.
 REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS
 ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. WHEEL STOPS ARE SHOWN IN SOME AREAS.
 REDUCING THE PAVED AREA AND PLACING THE CURB WITH
 OVERHANG IS PREFERRED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED AS 30% FOR
 COMMERCIAL USE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT
 COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW MANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
 THE LIFT STATION IS NOT SHOWN WHERE APPROVED.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS, FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART,
 CALCULATIONS, AND PLANT LIST ON ONLY ONE PAGE OF THE
 PLANS.
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/2/18:
  
 13. THE LIGHT POLE AND FLAGPOLE CONFLICT WITH THE GREEN
 BUTTONWOOD TREE CANOPY IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE
 WESTERN ROW OF PARKING. STAFF WOULD PREFER RELOCATION
 OF THE LIGHT POLE TO A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE
 WITH THE TREES, AND AN EXPLANATION AS TO THE
  
 14. SITE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE
 PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 15. STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE LACK OF A LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER, ESPECIALLY TREE CANOPY, ON THE EAST PROPERTY
 LINE COMBINED WITH THE OPEN ASPHALT DISPLAY AREA CREATE
 A LARGE HEAT ISLAND. THE DESIGN FOR DISPLAY AREA RATHER
 THAN A PARKING AREA WAS NOT ANTICIPATED WHEN THE WAIVER
 FOR REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
 ALONG INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES WAS APPROVED.
  
 16. CROSS SECTIONS ARE NEEDED FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 AREAS THAT TRANSITION FROM RETAINING WALL TO SLOPE ON
 THE SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES. ALSO, INDICATE THE
 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OF THE RETAINING WALL, AS THE
 CROSS SECTIONS SUBMITTED INDICATE A POURED SOLID WALL
 VERSUS THE STACKED BLOCK WALL THAT WAS INSTALLED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE SELF STORAGE AND DEL
 TACO PARCELS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-17-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-17-2018 Time 16:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-17-2018 Time 16:58 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-17 16:59:35FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PALMS GATEWAY PCD MITSUBISHI Z18080018
 SEPTEMBER 17, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE WEST AND
 SOUTH BUFFER PORTIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT
 CHART TO REFLECT WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED OR SHOW
 EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTION. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND SMALL
 TREES DO NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED AND A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING SPACES PER
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3). PROVIDE INTERIOR ISLANDS WITH
 SPACING NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. PROVIDE
 DIVIDER ISLANDS AS REQUIRED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE AREAS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT DO NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS
 COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND
 (4).
  
 4. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES MEET THE
 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT.
 REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND ISLANDS
 ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES.
  
 5. SHOW ALL PARKING SPACE ROW COUNTS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 6. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 WHEEL STOPS ARE SHOWN IN SOME AREAS. REDUCING THE PAVED
 AREA AND PLACING THE CURB WITH OVERHANG IS PREFERRED.
  
 7. CORRECT THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT
 TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED AS 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
  
 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART
 SO THAT TREES AND SHRUBS ARE NOT COUNTED TWICE FOR EACH
 CATEGORY OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT.
  
  
 9. THE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW MANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
 THE LIFT STATION IS NOT SHOWN WHERE APPROVED.
  
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART, CALCULATIONS, AND PLANT LIST
 ON ONLY ONE PAGE OF THE PLANS.
 11. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND
 UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS.
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 02-15-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-15-2019 Time 11:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-15-2019 Time 11:26 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-15 11:25:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE JANUARY 23, 2019
 PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE:
  
 CONDITION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO
 POND 1 ON TRACTS 3 AND 4 HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE
 REQUIRED PARTIES PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF
 CONVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL
 EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED BEGINNING ON PAGE 1743 OF
 PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 29483.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-10-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-10-2018 Time 06:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-10-2018 Time 06:33 Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-10 06:32:07THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE NOVEMBER
 30, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENT #1 CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO
 POND 1 ON TRACTS 3 AND 4 HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE
 REQUIRED PARTIES PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF
 CONVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL
 EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED BEGINNING ON PAGE 1743 OF
 PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 29483.
  
 2. SUGGEST PUTTING ROOT BARRIERS BETWEEN TREES AND
 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
 SITE.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-05-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-05-2018 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-05-2018 Time 17:27 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-05 17:27:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 OCTOBER 26, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. VERIFY THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO POND 1 ON TRACTS 3
 AND 4 WILL BE APPROVED PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF
 CONVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL
 EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED BEGINNING ON PAGE 1743 OF
 PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 29483.
 SPECIFICALLY SECTION 2.1 (B) OF THE DOCUMENT STATES:
 "... THE STORM WATER DETENTION AREAS INDICATED ON THE
 SITE PLAN, AND ALL LINES, CONDUITS, PIPES AND OTHER
 APPARATUS FOR WATER DRAINAGE, AND ALL STORAGE SYSTEMS
 NECESSARY IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, SHALL BE HEREINAFTER
 CALLED THE 'WATER DETENTION AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES'."
 ... "THE WATER DETENTION AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES
 REQUIRED FOR EACH TRACT SHALL INITIALLY BE CONSTRUCTED
 BY TRACT 1 OWNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLAN AND
 PURSUANT TO PLANS APPROVED BY WAWA UNDER THE WAWA
 LEASE, AS A PART OF THE INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE WAWA
 IMPROVEMENTS ON TRACT 1 UNDER THE WAWA LEASE. ONCE
 CONSTRUCTED, THE WATER DETENTION AND DRAINAGE
 FACILITITES SHALL NOT BE MODIFIED, ALTERED, RELOCATED
 OR OTHERWISE CHANGED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
 OF ALL OWNERS AND WAWA (DURING THE CONTINUANCE OF THE
 WAWA LEASE)."
  
 2. VERIFY THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM (AND CALCULATIONS) FOR
 TRACT 3 INCLUDES THE RUNOFF FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
 SPECIFIED IN SECTION 2.1 (B) OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED
 CONVERANTS AGREEMENT.
  
 3. IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANING THE POND 1 LOCATED ON
 TRACTS 3 AND 4 IS TO BE USED FOR THE RUNOFF FROM TRACT
 3 AND TRACT 4. THE EXISTING CONTROL STRUCTURE IN POND 1
 WILL RELEASE WATER OFFSITE VIA THE BLEEDER ORIFICE AS
 WELL WHEN THE STAGES IN THE POND EXCEED THE GRATE
 ELEVATION OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE, SAID GRATE BEING
 OVER 4 FEET ABOVE THE POND BOTTOM. PLEASE ADVISE HOW
 THE PROPOSED STORMWATER EQUALIZEER PIPE SYSTEM ON TRACT
 3 BETWEEN POND 1 AND THE SWALE ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. ON
 THE WEST SIDE OF TRACT 3 WILL MAINTAIN WATER LEVELS IN
 POND 1 FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW
 ATTENUATION. IT APPEARS ALL OF THE WATER ENTERING THE
 POND WILL FLOW TO THE SWALE SINCE THE SWALE IS ABOUT 3
 FEET BELOW THE BOTTOM OF POND 1.
  
 4. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE TRACT 4
 DEVELOPMENT'S LAND USE AREAS.
  
 5. THE RESPONSES TO THE FIRST SET OF COMMENTS INDICATED
 THE SFWMD OR FDEP ERP MODIFICATION IS INCLUDED WITH
 THIS SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. THIS DOCUMENT WAS NOT FOUND.
  
 6. VERIFY THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG THE ENTRANCE ROAD
 ON AUSTRALIAN AVE. WILL MEET ADA CRITERIA. THE SURVEY
 SHOWS SPOT GRADES OF 13.50 AND 11.39 APPROXIMATELY 40
 FEET APART ALONG THE CURB RETURN EDGE OF PAVEMENT,
 WHICH IS STEEPER THAN 5% SLOPE.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERRING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-12-2018 Time 08:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-12-2018 Time 08:01 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-12 08:01:42THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION IS NEEDED ON THE CONCEPTUAL PAVING, DRAINAGE,
 WATER AND WASTEWATER PLAN AND ON THE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
  
 2. SHOW ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN THE AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE FOR THE EXISTING
 DETENTION AREA LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE.
  
 3. IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL CONNECT
 THE EXISTING DETENTION AREA WITH THE PROPOSED SWALE ON
 THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE. EXPLAIN IF THIS CONNECTION
 WILL REDUCE THE STAGING OF WATER IN THE DETENTION AREA
 AND IF THIS ?LOST STORAGE? WILL BE MADE UP IN THE
 SWALE. INDICATE IF OTHER PARCELS ARE USING THE
 DETENTION AREA FOR DRAINAGE STORAGE.
  
 4. AUSTRALIAN AVE AND BELVEDERE ROAD ARE MAINTAINED BY
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-12-2018 Time 10:34 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-12 10:36:24PROVIDE CONVERSION FROM NAVD 88 TO NGVD-29 ON SURVEY
 AND ENG. PLANS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-14-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 07-17-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-29 12:27:45TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
  
 NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-01-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-01 15:03:19PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-06-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-06 15:53:48Z18080018 WEST PALM MITSUBISHI (AUGUST 14, 2018
 SUBMITTAL)
 1. PROVIDE TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY.
 2. SUBJECT TO COUNTY APPROVAL, PROVIDE PROVIDE RAISED
 CHANNELIZED MEDIAN AT THE DRIVEWAY ON AUSTRALIAN
 AVENUE.
 3. SUBJECT TO COUNTY APPROVAL PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN
 REFUGE ISLAND AT AUSTRALIAN AVENUE DRIVEWAY.
 4. EXTEND THE SIDEWALK TO THE EAST FOR FUTURE
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO OTHER TRACTS IN THE CPD.
 5. DESCRIBE PROPOSED ROUTE FOR DELIVERY OF CARS.
 CLARIFY IF A LOADING ZONE IS REQUIRED.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 05-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-06-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-06-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-02 16:48:19APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
  
 1.) NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
 APPROVED USES SPECIFIED IN THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER (#180513), DATED FEBRUARY
 13, 2019, BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION,
 SHALL BE ISSUED AFTER AUGUST 5, 2022. ALL OTHER
 EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE PREVIOUS TPS APPROVAL LETTER
 (#160704) ISSUED BY THE COUNTY, DATED DECEMBER 14, 2016
 SHALL REMAIN VALID.
  
 2.) PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE FOR THE
 MITSUBISHI DEVELOPMENT ON TRACT #3, DOCUMENTATION THAT
 THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO POND 1 ON TRACTS 3 AND 4 HAS
 BEEN APPROVED BY THE REQUIRED PARTIES PURSUANT TO THE
 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
 AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED BEGINNINH ON
 PAGE 1743 OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS
 BOOK 29483 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 3.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW
 CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF ANY
 EXISTING BUIDLING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
 ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $750,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO
 THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78,
 ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 01-31-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 01-31-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 01-31-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-31 11:27:39GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
 LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A
 PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING.
 [12/18/19 REPEAT COMMENT - STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON
 THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE COUNTY.]
 ANY CHANGES TO A PLAN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN ALL PLANS
 IN THE APPLICATION PACKET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE INFORMATION FOR TRACT #3 IN THE MASTER
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NOT TABLE) HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED.
 STAFF HAD REQUESTED THE INFORMATION BE CHANGED FROM
 "USES PERMITTED IN THIS CPD SHALL INCLUDE ALL USES
 PERMITTED BY-RIGHT WITHIN THE GC ZONING DISTRICT AND
 ADDITIONAL USES AS APPROVED PER ORDINANCE NO. 4572-15"
 TO "UP TO 14,683 SF - GFA AND ASSOCIATED PARKING."
 [12/18/2018 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 2.) THE LEGEND NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED BASED ON REMOVED
 INFORMATION. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 3.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES
 FOR TRACT #3: A) THERE ARE STILL DISCREPANCIES IN THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS AREA; B)
 FIGURES FOR: IMPERVIOUS AREA, BUILDING FOOTPRINT,
 PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK, OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS SURFACE DOES
 NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN
 (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS; C) CHECK MINIMUM OPEN
 SPACE PERCENTAGE. IT DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1).
  
 SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1):
  
 1.) PLEASE EXPLAIN/CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS:
 A) IMPERVIOUS BUILDING; B) OPEN SPACE; C) PARKING FOR
 MOTOR VEHICLES AT 9,369 SQ. FT.
  
 2.) IN THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET SP-2), SECTION C
 DETAIL (WEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEEMS TO HAVE THE
 INCORRECT MEASUREMENTS (I.E. 16 FT. DEEP PARKING STALL
 NOT 18 FT. DEEP). PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 MASTER SIGN PLAN:
  
 1.) PLEASE ADD THE REVISION DATE TO THE MASTER SIGN
 PLAN SHEETS. THE REVISION DATE IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP
 TRACK OF ALL CHANGES TO THE MASTER SIGN PLAN.
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
 1.) THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE NORTH ELEVATION IS NOT
 CLEAR. PLEASE ADDRESS ON SHEET A-201.
  
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN:
  
 1.) PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
 PLEASE MAKE SURE THE LATEST LAYERS FOR THE SITE PLAN
 ARE BEING USED FOR THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. [12/18/19
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY
 RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 12-18-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 12-18-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-18 16:13:54GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
 LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A
 PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING.
 [9/18/18 REPEAT COMMENT - STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON THE
 TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE COUNTY.]
  
 2.) ANY CHANGES TO A PLAN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN ALL
 PLANS IN THE APPLICATION PACKET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ONLY THE INTERNAL CROSS ACCESS WITHIN THE CPD
 SHOULD BE DEPICTED IN THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
 PLEASE REMOVE THE ACCESS POINT (NEW ARROW) INTO TRACT
 #3, AS IT IS REDUNDANT INFORMATION TO THE MASTER
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
  
 2.) THE INFORMATION FOR TRACT #3 IN THE MASTER
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NOT TABLE) HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED.
 STAFF HAD REQUESTED THE INFORMATION BE CHANGED FROM
 "USES PERMITTED IN THIS CPD SHALL INCLUDE ALL USES
 PERMITTED BY-RIGHT WITHIN THE GC ZONING DISTRICT AND
 ADDITIONAL USES AS APPROVED PER ORDINANCE NO. 4572-15"
 TO "UP TO 14,683 SF - GFA AND ASSOCIATED PARKING."
  
 3.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE
 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT SITE DATA: THE FAR FOR MOTOR
 VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE HAS YET TO BE CHANGED TO
 0.04.
  
 4.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES
 FOR TRACT #3: A.) THE USE FOR MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND
 SERVICE IS ?PROPOSED? (NOT APPROVED). B.) THE BUILDING
 SETBACKS ARE LABELED INCORRECTLY: NORTH IS THE CORNER
 SIDE (NOT FRONT), SOUTH IS THE SIDE (NOT REAR), EAST IS
 THE REAR (NOT SIDE), AND WEST IS THE FRONT (NOT SIDE).
 C.) THERE ARE STILL DISCREPANCIES IN THE CALCULATIONS
 FOR OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS AREA. D.) FIGURES FOR:
 IMPERVIOUS AREA, BUILDING FOOTPRINT, PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK,
 OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS SURFACE DOES NOT MATCH THE
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1).
 PLEASE ADDRESS. E.) CHECK MINIMUM OPEN SPACE
 PERCENTAGE. IT DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED
 IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1).
  
 SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1):
  
 1.) FOR THE USE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY NORTH: ZONING = COMMERCIAL PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT (CPD) (NOT GC), AND THE USE = C-STORE W/GAS
 SALES (NOT FAST FOOD W/DRIVE-THRU/OFFICE) AS THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF PARCEL #3 IS WITHIN THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD (NOT OUTSIDE).
  
 2.) FOR THE USE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY EAST: ZONING = COMMERCIAL PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT (CPD) (NOT GC), AND THE USE = SELF-STORAGE
 FACILITY (NOT MOTOR VEHICLE SALES) AS THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY EAST OF PARCEL #3 IS WITHIN THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD (NOT OUTSIDE).
  
 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: A.) ACCORDING TO THE TABLE, 1,442 SQ. FT. OF
 CANOPY AREA WILL BE PROVIDED; HOWEVER, THIS FIGURE DOES
 NOT ADD UP IN SHEET A-102. B.) PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION
 TO HOW THE 10% BUILDING COVERAGE WAS CALCULATED. C.)
  PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION TO HOW THE 80% (13,285 SQ. FT.)
 IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR BUILDINGS WAS CALCULATED. D.) CHECK
 PARKING CALCULATIONS. OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA TOTAL DOES
 NOT ADD UP TO 30,590 SQ. FT. PARKING CALCULATIONS MAY
 NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABLE: A.) THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRED IS
 5,000 SQ. FT. (NOT 5 ACRES). B.) DIMENSIONS PROVIDED
 FOR THE WIDTH AND FRONTAGE ARE INCORRECT. C.)
 INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR: MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS, MINIMUM OPEN SPACE, MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPING SHALL MATCH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) FOR CONSISTENCY.
 D.) SETBACK DIMENSIONS ARE INCORRECT, DUE TO THE
 LABELING OF THE SETBACKS IN THE PLANS.
  
 5.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS TWO (2) ELECTRIC CAR CHARGE
 STATIONS COUNTED TOWARDS THE REQUIRED PARKING. SINCE
 THESE CHARGING STATIONS ARE MEANT FOR THE APPLICANT?S
 CUSTOMERS ONLY AND ARE NOT OPEN TO OTHER TENANTS WITHIN
 THE CPD (DEALERSHIP IS GATED FOR SECURITY), THESE
 CHARGING STALLS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS REQUIRED PARKING.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN AND PARKING CALCULATIONS
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 6.) IN THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET SP-2), PLEASE ADDRESS
 THE FOLLOWING: A.) IDENTIFY WHERE IN THE SITE PLAN IS
 THE DETAIL FOR PARKING AND STRIPING W/OVERHANG. B.)
 BIKE RACK DETAIL MUST SHOW A 24-INCH CLEARANCE FROM THE
 EDGE OF THE PAD TO THE RACK ON ALL SIDES. PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. C.) SECTION B
 SHOWS A 30-INCH RAILING LOCATED WITHIN THE 2 FT. CURB
 OVERHANG FOR VEHICLES. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. D.) ENTRY
 GATE DETAIL SHALL READ SECURITY GATE DETAIL TO MATCH
 LANGUAGE ON SHEET SP-1.
  
 7.) PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN SHALL BE SETBACK AT
 LEAST 24 FT. FROM THE LOT LINE OF ANOTHER LOT. SITE
 PLAN SHOWS A SETBACK DISTANCE OF 22 FT. FROM THE
 ADJACENT LOT TO THE SOUTH. [ZLDR S.94-408(D)((2)(E.)]
  
 MASTER SIGN PLAN:
  
 1.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS AN
 APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD. ANY PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (INCLUDE DETAILS AND
 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN, ETC.)
 AND IN THE APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM.
 STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON THE CHANGES TO THE
 FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM.
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) SHEET A-101 SHOULD SHOW THE AMOUNT OF SERVICE AREA
 IN SQUARE FEET.
  
 2.) WHY IS THERE ARE CAR PARKED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE
 DRIVE AISLE IN THE SERVICE AREA?
  
 3.) CANOPY AREA CALCULATION ON SHEET A-102 DOES NOT
 SEEM TO ADD UP TO THE FIGURE PROVIDE IN SHEET A-101 AND
 IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) TYPO FOR "SECOND FLOOR" ON SHEET A-101.
  
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN:
  
 * PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE
 MAKE SURE THE LATEST LAYERS FOR THE SITE PLAN ARE BEING
 USED FOR THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 ?
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY
 RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 11-07-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 11-07-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-07 09:39:35GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
 LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A
 PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING.
 [9/18/18 REPEAT COMMENT ? STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON THE
 TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE COUNTY.]
  
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) COMMENTS:
  
 1.) CORRECT THE FOLLOWING LAND USE AND ZONING: A)
 PARCEL IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE PALMS GATEWAY CPD HAS A
 LAND USE: C AND ZONING: CPD (NOT LAND USE: CS AND
 ZONING: CS), B.) THE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
 CORNER OF BELVEDERE ROAD AND AUSTRALIAN AVENUE HAS A
 LAND USE: C AND ZONING: CPD (NOT LAND USE: CS AND
 ZONING: CPD).
  
 2.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES
 TABLES FOR TRACTS #2 AND #4, PLEASE CORRECT "PROPOSED
 USE" TO "APPROVED USE" AS THE SITE PLANS FOR THESE
 TRACTS HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED.
  
 3.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES
 FOR TRACT #3: A) THE CORRECT FAR FOR THE OVERALL CPD IS
 0.04 (NOT 0.03), B) PLEASE INCLUDE "TOTAL BUILDING
 SIZE" INFORMATION, C) CHECK AREA CALCULATIONS. THE OPEN
 SPACE, PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS DO
 NOT ADD UP (DIFFERENCE OF 2,280 SQ. FT.). ALSO CHECK
 THE PERCENTAGES. [NOTE: INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE
 CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE CITY'S
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER], D) ACCORDING TO THE ELEVATION
 DRAWINGS, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 IS 30 FT. (NOT 29 FT. AS NOTED). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY, E) BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATION DOES NOT
 MATCH THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATION PROVIDED IN
 THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) THE FAR FOR TRACT #3 FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS
 0.04 (NOT 0.03). PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 5.) THE OVERALL FAR FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS 0.37
 (NOT 0.36). PLEASE CORRECT.
  
  
 SITE PLAN:
  
 1.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE LIGHT FIXTURE TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE. SETBACK DIMENSIONS SEEM TO BE MISSING
 FOR THE FIXTURES PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FIXTURES SHALL BE PLACED AT LEAST
 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)]
  
 2.) CORRECT THE FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING FOR THE
 PARCEL ON THE WEST SIDE OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE. THE
 CORRECT FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMERCIAL (C) AND THE
 CORRECT ZONING IS COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD).
  
 3.) PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. CALCULATION FOR
 OUTDOOR STORAGE SHOULD INCLUDE ALL DISPLAY AREAS WITHIN
 THE PROJECT. PLEASE REVISE CALCULATIONS.
  
 4.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE REVISED TO
 REFLECT CORRECT CALCULATIONS.
  
 5.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE
 ILLUSTRATION IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 6.) ALL SECURITY GATES SHALL BE LABELED IN THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 7.) WHERE IS THE ACCESS INTO THE LIFT STATION? PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE. IS THERE A PROPOSED FENCE AROUND THE LIFT
 STATION? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION (I.E.
 HEIGHT, MATERIAL, ETC.)
  
 8.) WHY IS THERE ONLY A PARTIAL RETAINING WALL ALONG
 THE SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES? PLEASE PROVIDE AN
 EXPLANATION.
  
 9.) THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FLAGPOLE MAY BE IN
 CONFLICT WITH THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE
 VERIFY WITH THE CITY?S LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI @
 561-822-1462.
  
 10.) INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED IN THE LOT MEASUREMENTS
 PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE WHEN
 COMPARED TO THE SURVEY/SITE PLAN OF THE SUBJECT
 PROPERTY AND IN THE SETBACKS (I.E. LOT FRONTAGE IS
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE, ETC.). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 11.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE SITE
 DATA TABULAR (SHEET SP-1): A) THE NAME OF THE CPD IS
 "PALMS GATEWAY" (NOT "BW AUSTRALIAN AND BELVEDERE"), B)
 "PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT" SHOULD BE ELIMINATED, SINCE
 THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT CHANGING, C) CHECK
 THE CALCULATION FOR OPEN SPACE. THERE SEEMS TO BE A
 DISCREPANCY WITH STAFF?S CALCULATION FOR OPEN SPACE, D)
 ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION, THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS 30 FT. (NOT 29 FT. AS NOTED).
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY, E) CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 TOTAL PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHALL ALSO BE
 PROVIDED IN THE DATA TABULAR, F) PER ZLDRS, ONE (1) 10
 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.
 PLEASE CORRECT IN THE TABLE.
  
 12.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE REGULATING
 PLAN (SHEET SP-2): A) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS (I.E. HEIGHT)
 FOR THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, B) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS
 (I.E. HEIGHT) FOR THE PROPOSED RAILING.
  
  
 MASTER SIGN PLAN:
  
 1.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS AN
 APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD. ANY PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (INCLUDE DETAILS AND
 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN, ETC.)
 AND IN THE APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM.
  
 2.) WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN.
  
 3.) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA
 (BOTH SIDES OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE) IS 222.46 SQ. FT.
 THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA (194 SQ. FT. PER SIGN FACE)
 SEEMS TO EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS IN THE FLOOR PLANS DO NOT
 MATCH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE MASTER/SITE
 PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 2.) LABEL GENERATOR ON THE NORTH ELEVATION.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 .5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY
 RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 09-18-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 09-18-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-18 10:13:34GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
 LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A
 PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING.
  
 2.) TWO (2) SETS OF ADDRESSED LABELS AFFIXED TO SIZE
 #10 STAMPED ENVELOPES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH
 PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 SHALL HAVE THE CITY'S ADDRESS AS THE RETURN LABEL. THE
 SETS OF ENVELOPES WERE NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE
 APPLICATION PACKET.
  
 3.) THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS MISSING FROM THE
 APPLICATION PACKET. THE MASTER PLAN REQUIRES AN UPDATE
 AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT.
  
 4.) CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH
 THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE
 ENSURE THE CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 5.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A.) REVISE THE LANGUAGE TO STATE
 THAT "MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE USE" IS A
 PERMITTED USE BY RIGHT IN THE PALMS GATEWAY CPD.
 CURRENT LANGUAGE SUGGESTS THAT THE REQUEST ALSO INCLUDE
 AN AMENDMENT TO ADD THE USE TO THE LIST OF PERMITTED
 USES. B.) PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION TO WHY THE MASTER SIGN
 PROGRAM REQUIRES AN AMENDMENT. DOES THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGN MEET CURRENT SIGN CODE STANDARDS? DOES
 THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE REQUIRE A WAIVER?
  
 6.) PER ZLDR S.94-207(A)(1), THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 MUST DEMONSTRATE INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND
 DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE EXPLAIN IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO HOW THIS STANDARD HAS BEEN
 ADDRESSED IN THE PROPOSED PROJECT. STAFF BELIEVES THAT
 THE PROJECT CAN BE IMPROVED THROUGH THE INCORPORATION
 OF ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN FEATURES
 TO INTERCONNECT THE PROJECT TO THE ADJACENT PARCELS.
  
 7.) THE "NOTE" IN THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT THE BASE
 INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY DATED 3/19/2018;
 HOWEVER, THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION HAS
 A REVISION DATED 4/4/18. PLEASE ENSURE ALL INFORMATION
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH
 THE REVISED SURVEY. AN UPDATED SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY
 MAY BE NECESSARY WITH THE RESUBMITTAL.
  
 8.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT (I.E.
 REVISIONS TO THE DIGITAL LAYERS, ETC.)
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.)PER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (NOT DEPICTED IN THE SITE
 PLAN), THE (RELOCATED) LIFT STATION IS LOCATED OUTSIDE
 OF THE PBC UTILITY EASEMENT AND DOES NOT CONNECT TO
 TRACT #1 (DEL TACO RESTAURANT) AND TRACT #2
 (SELF-STORAGE FACILITY), AS SHOWN IN PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED PLANS. THE LOCATION OF THE LIFT STATION/SEWER
 LINE CONNECTION IS ALSO INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEPICTION
 OF THE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR THE OVERALL PD
 SPECIFIED IN THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS
 AND RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB
 29483, PG 1743). PLEASE ADDRESS AND SHOW LOCATION OF
 THE LIFT STATION IN THE SITE PLAN.
  
 2.) PER THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
 RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB BK
 29483, PG 1743), THE DRAINAGE SWALE AREA FOR PARCEL #3
 IS 5,374 SQ. FT. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE
 DRAINAGE AREA IS 4,534 SQ. FT. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS
 DISCREPANCY.
  
 3.) THE PROPOSED SITE CIRCULATION PATTERN IS
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CIRCULATION PATTERN ADOPTED BY
 THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHOWS ONCE ACCESS POINT
 INTO THE PARCEL, NOT TWO). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) WORK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO ADDRESS A.D.A.
 COMPLIANCE AND ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SITE FROM
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE.
  
 5.) THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH END OF THE PARCEL
 SHALL BE EXTENDED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE SITE
 TO PROVIDE INTERCONNECTIVITY WITH THE OTHER PARCELS IN
 THE CPD.
  
 6.) THE PLAN MUST SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES
 ON-SITE WILL BE ALLOCATED (I.E. CUSTOMER/EMPLOYEE
 PARKING, INVENTORY, ETC.)
  
 7.) THE PROPOSED SECURITY GATES AT THE ACCESS POINTS
 INTO TRACT #3 IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES. PLEASE RELOCATE THE GATES OUTSIDE OF THE
 SIGHT TRIANGLES. [ZLDR S.94-305(E)]
  
 8.) A DETAIL OF THE SECURITY GATE (I.E. HEIGHT AND
 DESIGN) SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SECURITY GATE CANNOT EXCEED 8
 FT. IN HEIGHT. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)]
  
 9.) THERE ARE SEVERAL STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN THE
 PALM BEACH COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT (I.E. SECURITY
 GATES, LIGHT FIXTURES, PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK). AN
 EASEMENT CONSENT/RELEASE FROM THE COUNTY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR THESE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS.
  
 10.) LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT.
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR
 S.94-145(2)]
  
 11.) ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) ON
 THE PROPERTY SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.
 94-408(D). PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
 DISTANCE SEPARATION AND SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 12.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGN FROM AUSTRALIAN AVENUE (SHOW SETBACK
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN)?
  
 13.) ALL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SIGN DETAIL HAVE
 NOT BEEN PROVIDED ON SHEET SP-2 (I.E. WIDTH OF THE
 PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN). PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 14.) PLEASE DIMENSION OUT ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS IN THE
 PARKING AREA. ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS SHALL BE A MINIMUM
 OF 8 FT. (MEASURED FROM THE INSIDE CURB) AND NOT LESS
 THAN THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(C)(3)]
  
 15.) ONE (1) INTERIOR ISLAND SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR
 EVERY TEN (10) PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. THERE ARE
 SEVERAL ROWS OF PARKING THAT EXCEED THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES WITHOUT AN INTERIOR ISLAND. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(C)(3)]
  
 16.) SHOW DIMENSION FOR ALL WALKWAYS. A MINIMUM 7 FT.
 WIDE SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS VEHICULAR
 OVERHANG. [ZLDR S.94-443, FIGURE XIV-2]
  
 17.) A MINIMUM OF ONE 10 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF
 THE LOADING ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE LOADING ZONE SHALL
 BE LOCATED ON THE SAME PROPERTY WHICH THE USE/STRUCTURE
 EXISTS. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 18.) INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON WHERE THE VEHICULAR
 INVENTORY WILL BE UNLOADED/LOADED ON-SITE.
  
 19.) BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE
 PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)]
  
 20.) THE NOTATED RETAINING WALLS TO THE EAST AND WEST
 SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT CLEARLY SHOWN IN THE PLAN.
 PLEASE SHOW.
  
 21.) HOW TALL ARE THE RETAINING WALLS? INCLUDE
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN/DETAIL. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)]
  
 22.) WHAT IS THE HATCHING ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING? THERE IS NO LEGEND THAT IDENTIFIES
 THE HATCHING, NOR IS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE DETAILS IN
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 23.) DIMENSIONS/SHAPE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IN
 SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT MATCH THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL
 PROVIDED IN SHEET SP-2. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 24.) WHAT IS THE AREA OF THE "LOOSE STONES" AT THE
 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY?
  
 25.) THE "ACCESS EASEMENT" SEEMS TO BE EXCLUDED IN MOST
 CALCULATIONS IN THE SITE DATA AND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABLES. THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS WITHIN THE
 PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT AND THEREFORE, MUST BE
 INCLUDED IN ALL CALCULATIONS. PLEASE CORRECT THE
 CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE THE ACCESS EASEMENT.
  
 26.) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: A.)
 FLAG POLE STRUCTURE, B.) SECURITY GATES, C.) VEHICULAR
 DISPLAY AREA (I.E. IS IT ELEVATED?), D.) PARKING STALL
 DETAIL FOR SMALLER PARKING STALLS AND FOR STALLS WITH A
 CURB OVERHANG.
  
 27.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: A.) PROJECT NUMBER IS PB 1670J/Z18080018, B.)
 INCLUDE BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION, C.) PARKING
 CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; ALSO INCLUDE THE
 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE
 PROJECT/PARKING ALLOCATION FOR SPECIFIC USES (I.E.
 INVENTORY, CUSTOMER, ETC.), D.) BICYCLE PARKING
 CALCULATION MISSING, E.) LOADING ZONING CALCULATION
 MISSING
  
 28.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE: A.) ZONING DISTRICT IS
 CPD (NOT PCD), B.) CHECK PERCENT CALCULATION FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE PROVIDED.
  
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 COULD BE WIDENED BY ELIMINATING THE WHEEL STOPS AND
 SHORTENING THE PARKING STALLS TO A DEPTH OF 16 FT.
 (CURRENTLY DIMENSIONED AT 18 FT.).
  
 2.) LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR
 USE AREAS BY NON-MOUNTABLE, CONCRETE CURBING OF THE
 TYPE CHARACTERIZED AS "TYPE D". THERE SEEMS TO BE
 SEVERAL AREAS IN THE SITE PLAN MISSING THE
 NON-MOUNTABLE CURB, ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPED AREAS.
 PLEASE MODIFY PLAN TO SHOW CURBING. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(C)(3)]
  
 3.) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI (561) 822-1462.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3
 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE BY
 PROVIDING DIMENSIONS IN THE ELEVATION PLANS. [ZLDR
 S.94-305(B)(2)]
  
 2.) THERE SEEMS TO BE A STRUCTURAL ELEMENT THAT
 PROJECTS BEYOND THE PARAPET AT THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
 PLEASE IDENTIFY THIS ELEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE
 PARAPET.
  
 3.) WHAT IS THE SECOND STORY BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE?
  
 4.) PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS.
  
  
 LIGHTING (PHOTOMETRIC) PLAN:
  
 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE SITE
 AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE ENSURE USE OF THE SAME CAD
 FILE/LAYERS FOR ALL PLANS.
  
 2.) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT.
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE ADDRESS IN BOTH THE
 SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)]
  
 3.) LIGHT FIXTURES ARE WITHIN THE PBC UTILITY EASEMENT
 LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROPERTY. RELOCATE THE
 LIGHT FIXTURES OUT OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT OR PROVIDE A
 UTILITY EASEMENT CONSENT/RELEASE FROM THE COUNTY FOR
 ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
  
 4.) ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE
 GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE
 AWAY FROM PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(A)]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($600.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved