 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18070021
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18070021 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
19:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
19:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-25 15:06:19 | TRAFFIC LETTER CREATED BY ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561.494.1092 | | 2018-08-07 19:30:26 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. ACCESSIBLE RAMPS. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE | | | WITH A SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A | | | RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-21-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-21-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-21-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-21 11:45:07 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | 1) PLEASE CLEARLY SPECIFY ON PLANS WHICH EXISTING | | | ADDRESSES WILL BE SERVICED BY THE PROPOSED DOMESTIC | | | WATER LINES. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW ALL DRY UTILITIES - CABLE, FPL, | | | FIBEROPTIC, AT&T, ETC. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 FAX: | | | (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
08-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-08 07:47:53 | PROVIDE VIDEO OF SANITARY SEWER MAIN IN THE REAR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-02-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scaldero |
Date |
08-02-2018 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scaldero |
Date |
08-02-2018 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-02 10:53:30 | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 5. STAIR DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING MINIMUM | | | RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DEPTH. PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS FOR THE | | | BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED AND CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 6. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 7. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 8. IF APPLICABLE, ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S | | | PLANNED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON | | | THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW | | | FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 9. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED | | | FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE | | | CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY | | | MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE | | | WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES | | | HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED | | | REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED | | | WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR. | | | A. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE | | | MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R". | | | B. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS | | | SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F". | | | C. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F". | | | | | | 10. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | SUE ELLEN CALDERON | | | ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-13-2020 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-13-2020 |
Time |
16:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-13 16:41:07 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: HERITAGE ALLEY STRUCTURES Z18070021 STYX ALLEY | | | PROPERTIES | | | FEBRUARY 13, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND A TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART OF TREES ON EACH PROPERTY AND | | | INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED | | | OR REMOVED. INCLUDE CANOPY DIAMETER MEASUREMENT. | | | PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF ANY | | | TREE CANOPY PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | TREE DISPOSITION WAS NOT FOUND, AND NOT LISTED IN THE | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. THE STYX ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING | | | DESIGNED AND REVIEWED CONCURRENTLY. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | THE PROPERTIES BE REPLATTED TO SEPARATE THE PUBLIC | | | IMPROVEMENTS FROM EACH LOT. THIS WOULD GREATLY SIMPLIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH | | | LOT. REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE ALLEY DESIGN ARE BEING | | | TRANSMITTED SEPARATELY BUT WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN | | | ACCURATELY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE FOR | | | EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT AS GROSS LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE LESS | | | BUILDING FOOTPRINT EQUALS OPEN SPACE. FOR EACH LOT, | | | PROVIDE ONE TREE FOR EACH 1,000 SQ FT OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF, AND ONE SHRUB FOR EACH 500 SQ FT OF | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. LOTS 5-8 (3511 SQ FT | | | OPEN SPACE) WILL REQUIRE 4 TREES AND 8 SHRUBS, LOT 9 | | | (4208 SQ FT OPEN SPACE) WILL REQUIRE 5 TREES AND 9 | | | SHRUBS. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINE. EXISTING TREES PRESERVED ON SITE CAN BE COUNTED | | | EXCEPT ANY PROHIBITED TREES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE FOR EACH | | | LOT ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442 (G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY | | | A MINIMUM TOTAL OF 25 POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS | | | CHART FOR EACH LOT. | | | UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO THE | | | CURRENT CODE, VALUES CHANGED EFFECTIVE 4/22/18, CHECK | | | MUNICODE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 FEET | | | IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH LOT. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-482, PARKING REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR LESS THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. (A). | | | REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD; | | | HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 PERCENT | | | OF THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING | | | PLANT MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, | | | HEDGES, VINES OR TREES). SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH LOT | | | FOR FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | LOCATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | ASSURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS. THE CIVIL PLANS ARE NOT | | | COORDINATED WITH THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL | | | ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AS | | | THE UTILITIES ARE NOT SHOWN. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. FOR EACH LOT, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 | | | PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE | | | OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST | | | OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF | | | SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | ANY LOT, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-31-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-31-2019 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-31-2019 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-31 15:05:39 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: HERITAGE ALLEY STRUCTURES Z18070021 STYX ALLEY | | | PROPERTIES | | | OCTOBER 31, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND A TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART OF TREES ON EACH PROPERTY AND | | | INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED | | | OR REMOVED. INCLUDE CANOPY DIAMETER MEASUREMENT. | | | PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF ANY | | | TREE CANOPY PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | TREE DISPOSITION WAS NOT FOUND, AND NOT LISTED IN THE | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. THE STYX ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING | | | DESIGNED AND REVIEWED CONCURRENTLY. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | THE PROPERTIES BE REPLATTED TO SEPARATE THE PUBLIC | | | IMPROVEMENTS FROM EACH LOT. THIS WOULD GREATLY SIMPLIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH | | | LOT. REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE ALLEY DESIGN ARE BEING | | | TRANSMITTED SEPARATELY BUT WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN | | | ACCURATELY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE FOR | | | EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT AS GROSS LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE LESS | | | BUILDING FOOTPRINT EQUALS OPEN SPACE. FOR EACH LOT, | | | PROVIDE ONE TREE FOR EACH 1,000 SQ FT OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF, AND ONE SHRUB FOR EACH 500 SQ FT OF | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. LOTS 5-8 (3511 SQ FT | | | OPEN SPACE) WILL REQUIRE 4 TREES AND 8 SHRUBS, LOT 9 | | | (4208 SQ FT OPEN SPACE) WILL REQUIRE 5 TREES AND 9 | | | SHRUBS. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINE. EXISTING TREES PRESERVED ON SITE CAN BE COUNTED | | | EXCEPT ANY PROHIBITED TREES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE FOR EACH | | | LOT ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442 (G) FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | MUST SATISFY A MINIMUM TOTAL OF 25 POINTS FROM THE | | | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART FOR EACH LOT. | | | UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO THE | | | CURRENT CODE, VALUES CHANGED EFFECTIVE 4/22/18, CHECK | | | MUNICODE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 FEET | | | IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH LOT. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-482, PARKING REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR LESS THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. (A). | | | REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD; | | | HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 PERCENT | | | OF THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING | | | PLANT MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, | | | HEDGES, VINES OR TREES). SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH LOT | | | FOR FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | LOCATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | ASSURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS. THE CIVIL PLANS ARE NOT | | | COORDINATED WITH THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL | | | ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC. | | | | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AS | | | THE UTILITIES ARE NOT SHOWN. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. FOR EACH LOT, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 | | | PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE | | | OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST | | | OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF | | | SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | ANY LOT, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-06-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-06-2018 |
Time |
14:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-06-2018 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-06 14:33:36 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: STYX ALLEY PROPERTIES Z18070021 | | | AUGUST 6, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND A TREE DISPOSITION CHART | | | OF TREES ON EACH PROPERTY AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE | | | PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. INCLUDE | | | CANOPY DIAMETER MEASUREMENT. PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART | | | SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF ANY TREE CANOPY PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | 2. THE STYX ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING DESIGNED AND | | | REVIEWED CONCURRENTLY. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PROPERTIES | | | BE REPLATTED TO SEPARATE THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FROM | | | EACH LOT. THIS WOULD GREATLY SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH LOT. REVIEW | | | COMMENTS FOR THE ALLEY DESIGN ARE BEING TRANSMITTED | | | SEPARATELY, BUT WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN ACCURATELY ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE FOR EACH | | | RESIDENTIAL LOT AS GROSS LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE LESS | | | BUILDING FOOTPRINT EQUALS OPEN SPACE. FOR EACH LOT, | | | PROVIDE ONE TREE FOR EACH 1,000 SQ FT OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF, AND ONE SHRUB FOR EACH 500 SQ FT OF | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. LOTS 5-8 (3511 SQ FT | | | OPEN SPACE) WILL REQUIRE 4 TREES AND 8 SHRUBS, LOT 9 | | | (4208 SQ FT OPEN SPACE) WILL REQUIRE 5 TREES AND 9 | | | SHRUBS. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINE. EXISTING TREES PRESERVED ON SITE CAN BE COUNTED | | | EXCEPT ANY PROHIBITED TREES. | | | | | | 4. SHOW THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE FOR EACH LOT ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 5. PER SECTION 94-442 (G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY A MINIMUM | | | TOTAL OF 25 POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART FOR | | | EACH LOT. | | | | | | 6. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 FEET IN HEIGHT | | | AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. PROVIDE A | | | SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH LOT. | | | | | | | | | 7. PER SECTION 94-482, PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS | | | THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. (A). REQUIRED | | | PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD; HOWEVER, THE | | | LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 PERCENT OF THE FRONT | | | YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING PLANT | | | MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, HEDGES, | | | VINES OR TREES).SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH LOT FOR | | | FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE | | | GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, | | | ETC. | | | | | | 11. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO | | | PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 12. FOR EACH LOT, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 | | | L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | ANY LOT, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-20-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-27-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
01-27-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-29 14:57:28 | 1- A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR A | | | FUTURE ENCLOSURE IF DESIRED. | | | 2- NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-28-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-28-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
10-28-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-28 15:33:16 | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE | | | - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RECYCLING CONTAINERS | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-07 16:01:57 | WHERE THE SANITATION TRASH CANS GOING TO BE STORED AND | | | WHAT TYPE OF SERVICE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-10-2020 |
Time |
12:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-10-2020 |
Time |
12:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-10 12:29:50 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | JANUARY 21, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. THEY SHOULD | | | NOT AFFECT THE SITE PLAN AND CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH | | | WRITTEN RESPONSE. NOTE CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE | | | ALLEY DRAINAGE SYSTEM (LONGER EXFILTRATION TRENCH, | | | DIFFERENT SIZE STRUCTURES, REVISED INVERTS, ETC.) SINCE | | | THE JANUARY 21, 2020 PLAN SET. | | | | | | 1. CHECK SLOPES OF THE PROPOSED COURTYARD AREAS. FOR | | | EXAMPLE, SOUTHEAST OF 638 7TH ST, THE CONTOURS APPEAR | | | TO SHOW 8* SLOPE; SOUTHEAST OF 620 7TH ST, GREATER THAN | | | 5% SLOPE. IS THIS THE INTENT? | | | | | | 2. IT APPEARS THE LOTS WILL MOSTLY DRAIN FROM SOUTH TO | | | NORTH BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS. EXPLAIN HOW PEAK FLOW | | | ATTENUATION FROM THE INCREASED IMPERVOUS AREA AND WATER | | | QUALITY TREATMENT ARE BEING PROVIDED FOR THE STORMWATER | | | RUNOFF FOR THESE LOTS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-29-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-29-2019 |
Time |
16:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-29-2019 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-29 16:26:33 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | OCTOBER 18, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS ARE BEING MADE ON THE 90% DESIGN SUBMITTAL | | | CURRENTLY CITY PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | THE ENGINEERING PLANS HAVE AN ISSUE DATE OF 10/11/2019 | | | AND INCLUDE: | | | - DRAINAGE PLANS FOR 7TH STREET AND THE PROPOSED ALLEY | | | (ROADNAME TO BE DETERMINED LATER), | | | - GRADING PLAN FOR 7TH STREET, THE PROPOSED ALLEY AND | | | THE INDIVISUAL LOTS BETWEEN 7TH STREET AND THE PROPOSED | | | ALLEY | | | - UTILITY PLANS (WATER MAIN ON 7TH STREET; GRAVITY | | | SEWER IN THE PROPOSED ALLEY; AND UTILITY PLAN BLOW UP | | | VIEWS). | | | | | | 1. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EACH SHEET WITH | | | ELEVATION DATUM. THE CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. | | | THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE | | | CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NGVD1929 AND NAVD1988 IS | | | PROVIDED ON THE SHEET. | | | | | | SHEET C403 | | | 2. LABEL THE NORTH-SOUTH STREETS. | | | | | | 3. PIPE SOUTH OF STRUCTURE SD-11 IS CALLED OUT AS 15" | | | RCP. PIPE UPSTREAM OF THIS PIPE (SOUTH OF SD-20 ON | | | SHEET C404) IS CALL OUT AS 18" RCP. | | | | | | 4. STRUCTURE EX SD-8 IS SHOWN WITH EXISTING PIPES TO | | | THE NE AND SW. THE SURVEY SHOWS THESE PIPES EXTENDING | | | OUTSIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONFIRM THE REMOVAL OF THESE | | | PIPES WILL NOT AFFECT OFFSITE (I.E. OUTSIDE THE R/W) | | | DRAINAGE. THIS COMMENT WILL APPLY TO ANY EXISTING PIPE | | | THAT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED.. | | | | | | 5. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE R/W SHOULD USE GRATES | | | AND FRAMES/COVERS PER THE CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS. | | | | | | 6. STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE - STRUCTURE SD-3 HAS | | | AN INVERT ELEVATION OF 18.60 AND CONNECTED PIPE | | | ELEVATION OF 20.60 S. WHICH IS CORRECT? | | | | | | 7. LABEL THE PIPES IN THE PROFILE VIEW. | | | | | | 8. IN THE PROFILE VIEW, WATER PIPES LARGER THAN 2" ARE | | | LIKELY WATER MAINS AND NOT WATER SERVICES. | | | | | | 9. IN PROFILE VIEW SHOW THE PIPE TO THE EAST OF EX | | | SD-13 IN THE CORRECT ORIENTATION. | | | | | | 10. SHOW THE EXISTING 4" GAS MAIN (KEYNOTE 11) IN THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. | | | | | | 11. ALL PROPOSED STORM PIPES WITHIN THE R/W SHOULD BE | | | RCP (KEYNOTE #4). | | | | | | 12. PROFILE PLAN AND PROFILE INFORMATION BETWEEN | | | SAPODILLA AVE AND SD-4. | | | | | | 13. PROVIDE PGL SLOPES. | | | | | | SHEET C404 | | | 14. SHOW EXFILTRATION TRENCH IN PROFILE VIEW. | | | | | | 15. PROVIDE PGL SLOPES. | | | | | | SHEET C503 | | | 16. LINES TYPES IN THE LEGEND DO NOT MATCH PLAN. | | | | | | 17. LABEL THE DASH-DOT LINES. | | | | | | 18. CHECK SLOPES OF THE PROPOSED COURTYARD AREAS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
11:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
11:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-07 11:34:42 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. NO ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT SHALL BE GRADED SO AS TO NOT | | | DRAIN ONTO ADJACENT LOTS. | | | | | | 3. EACH LOT IS TO PROVIDE STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT | | | FOR RUNOFF PER SFWMD CRITERIA. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
08:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 08:32:05 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 2. UTILITY EASEMENT NEEDS RETAINED OVER ABANDONED | | | ALLEY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-06 07:29:50 | 1. REPLAT IS UNDER REVIEW. | | | 2. NEED SUBMITTAL OF ENGINEERING PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-06-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-06-2018 |
Time |
09:26 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-06 09:33:23 | 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. EASEMENT FOR NEW ROADWAY | | | CAN BE CREATED BY PLAT. | | | 2. NO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED. | | | 3. BOUNDARY SURVEY WILL BE REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-25-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-25-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-25 15:08:08 | TRAFFIC ENGINEERING LETTER PROVIDED BY ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561.494.1092 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-27-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-27 13:35:28 | 1. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, AND DOCUMENT THE TRIP | | | GENERATION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-23-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-23 10:54:39 | 1. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, AND DOCUMENT THE TRIP | | | GENERATION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-07 11:29:12 | Z18070021 STYX ALLEY (JULY 10, 2018 SUBMITTAL) | | | - CLARIFY THE PROPOSED USES IN THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES. | | | - PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, AND DOCUMENT THE TRIP | | | GENERATION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | - INCLUDE A SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, AND | | | ILLUSTRATE THE CODE REQUIREMENTS AND PROPOSED SITE | | | PARAMETERS INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PARKING | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | - THE SECTION LABELED HENRIETTA AVENUE EXTENSION IS | | | PART OF THE STYX ALLEY AND SHOULD BE RENAMED. | | | - OVERLAY THE CITY?S DESIGNS ON 7TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS | | | AND STYX ALLEY ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | - SHOW CURB AND CURB CUT ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE | | | STREETS. | | | - SHOW RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE AND FULL | | | CENTERLINE, AND DIMENSION THE ROADWAY WIDTH ON 7TH | | | STREET, HENRIETTA AVENUE EXTENSION, AND STYX ALLEY. | | | - PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PER CITY CODE | | | SECTION 94-111. | | | - SHOW THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE PER CITY CODE SECTION | | | 94-305 WITH THE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY. VERIFY THE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THIS SECTION ARE MET. | | | - PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | - LABEL DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | ERIK FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-20-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
11-20-2019 |
Time |
14:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
11-20-2019 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-20 14:30:46 | 1. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, CALCULATIONS OF LOT AND | | | BUILDING REQUIREMENTS MAY BE ALTERED WITH CITY | | | DETERMINATION IF ALLEYWAY WILL REQUIRE REPLATTING OF | | | SUBJECT AREA OR MAINTENANCE EASEMENT. | | | THE REPLATTING IS ONGOING WITH THE CITY. PLEASE | | | COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO GET | | | A COPY OF THE REPLAT DRAFT, AS THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINES ON THE SITE PLANS TO NOT EXACTLY MATCH UP WITH | | | THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED REPLAT (PARTICULARLY NOT | | | LOT 5 SOUTHEAST CORNER) | | | 2. ONGOING. PLEASE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CONSULTANTS | | | FOR STYX ALLEY, 7TH STREET, AND THE HEART AND SOUL PARK | | | TO INCLUDE UPDATED CAD DRAWINGS OF THE ADJACENT | | | PROJECTS ON THE PLANS AND FOR DISCUSSIONS REGARDING THE | | | TRANSITION OF MATERIALS TO BE USED TO CONNECT THE | | | PROJECTS. | | | 3. SATISFIED. | | | SIDEWALK WIDTH PART OF 7TH STREET AND ALLEYWAY | | | STREETSCAPE PROJECT. OUTSIDE OF THIS PROJECT SCOPE. | | | 4. SATISFIED. | | | 5. SATISFIED. | | | 6. SATISFIED. | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-111, THE REQUIRED | | | PARKING FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR COMMERCIAL IS A | | | MINIMUM OF 2/1000 SF AND MAXIMUM 4/1000 SF. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIREMENT PER LOT IN SITE DATA TABLE. THE | | | REQUIRED NUMBER IS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER. | | | CORRECTION ? MINIMUM PARKING IS 1/1000 SF IN | | | RESIDENTIAL ENCLAVE AREAS. THE REQUIRED PARKING IS A | | | MINIMUM OF 7 PARKING SPACES. ON STREET PARKING CAN | | | COUNT TOWARD REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED THE SPACES ARE | | | DIRECTLY AND WHOLLY ABUTTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES, | | | AND ARE CLEARLY MARKED ON THE SITE PLAN AND SUCH SPACES | | | ARE PUBLIC ACCESSIBLE AND CANNOT BE RESERVED OR | | | RESTRICTED BY THE OWNER OR TENANTS OF THE PROPERTY. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE A PARKING DATA TABLE. | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-111, PARKING AND | | | LOADING REQUIREMENTS, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, | | | EXCLUDING HOTEL USES, SHALL PROVIDE SECURE BIKE RACKS | | | AND/OR STORAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE | | | PER EVERY 15 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, PER | | | SECTION 94-113, BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A | | | MINIMUM OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET | | | FRONTAGE. PLEASE INCLUDE BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE | | | DATA, SHOW THE LOCATION ON PLANS AND PROVIDE BIKE RACK | | | DETAIL. | | | THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED ONE PRIVATE BICYCLE PARKING USE | | | THAT SHALL BE COVERED AND SECURED. THE PROJECT ALSO | | | REQUIRES TWO PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE BICYCLE PARKING | | | SPACES. STAFF RECOMMENDS THESE SPACES BY INCLUDED | | | WITHIN THE ROW OF 7TH STREET OF THE ALLEYWAY. THE | | | PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS ON 7TH STREET | | | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE 7TH STREET DAC APPROVED PLANS. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CRA AND HDR TO MAKE SURE THE | | | LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS WORKS WITH THE OTHER | | | PROJECTS. BICYCLE RACKS CANNOT BLOCK SIDEWALK | | | PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS. PLEASE INCLUDE BICYCLE PARKING | | | DATA IN THE PARKING DATA TABLE. | | | 9. SATISFIED. | | | 10. SATISFIED. | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-86 | | | FOR CALCULATING FAR FOR HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL | | | NEIGHBORHOODS. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE AND PLAN SHOWING | | | AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED FORWARDS FAR. PER SECTION 94-84, | | | THE MAXIMUM FAR ALLOWED IS 0.50 | | | CORRECTION- THE MAXIMUM FAR ALLOWED IS 0.59 PER | | | HISTORIC STANDARDS. PLEASE INCLUDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT | | | INDICATING (HIGHLIGHTING OR SHADING) THE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARDS FAR AND INCLUDE A TABLE WITH CALCULATIONS PER | | | INDIVIDUAL LOT, WITH THE COMBINED TOTAL FOR THE ENTIRE | | | PROJECT. | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-86 | | | FOR CALCULATING LOT COVERAGE FOR HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL | | | NEIGHBORHOODS. PLEASE PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN TABLE | | | CALCULATING THE LOT COVERAGE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT ILLUSTRATING (SHADING | | | OR HIGHLIGHTING) THE SPECIFIC AREAS COUNTED TOWARDS LOT | | | COVERAGE. INCLUDE A TABLE FOR CALCULATIONS PER LOT AND | | | A TOTAL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. | | | 13. SATISFIED. SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE. | | | 14. SATISFIED. | | | 15. SATISFIED. | | | 16. SATISFIED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. NOT SATISFIED.P LEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | PROPOSED WALL COLORS FOR LOTS 5-8. | | | OUTDOOR SEATING TABLES AND CHAIR | | | PAVERS IN COURTYARD AREA | | | PLEASE INCLUDE A PROPOSED HARDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 19. PARTIALLLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94-451 FOR | | | ARTIFICIAL TURF REGULATIONS. | | | ARTIFICIAL TURF IS COUNTED TOWARDS THE IMPERVIOUS AREAS | | | ON THE LOT. IF USING ARTIFICIAL TURF, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EXHIBIT ILLUSTRATING AREAS COUNTED TOWARDS IMPERVIOUS | | | AREA AND INCLUDE AS IMPERVIOUS IN DRAINAGE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | 20. SATISFIED. | | | 21. SATISFIED. | | | 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED.PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC | | | PLANS WITH RESUBMITTAL. PER SECTION 94-113, ALL | | | BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY NIGHT | | | FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING ENTRANCES, | | | ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS, AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6 | | | FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB | | | AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL | | | INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC AND PRIVATE | | | SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED. | | | THE MAXIMUM MEASURE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1.0 | | | FOOTCANDLE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR ALL BUILDING | | | ENTRANCES AND FOR THE PATHWAY FOR LOT 9 LEADING FROM | | | THE ALLEYWAY. | | | 23. SATISFIED. | | | 24. NOT SATISFIED.HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENT: | | | PROPOSE VINYL LATTICE DOES NOT MEET HISTORIC DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | SEE HISTORIC COMMENT NUMBER 43 | | | 25. NOT SATISFIED.HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENT: PLEASE | | | DEFINE FENESTRATION SCHEDULE (PLACEMENT OF SINGLE HUNG | | | VS. CASEMENT WINDOWS) | | | SEE HISTORIC COMMENT NO. 44 | | | 26. SATISFIED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS 11/19/2019: | | | 27. PLEASE UPDATE THE LOT DATA WITH THE CORRECT | | | PROPOSED NEW LOT AREAS 4,750 SF. | | | 28. PLEASE CORRECT SPELLING ERRORS INCLUDING THE MAYORS | | | NAME. | | | 29. PLEASE RENAME THE PROJECT AS THE COMMUNITY HAS | | | EXPRESSED THAT THEY DO NOT WANT THE NAME ?STYX? OR | | | ?ALLEY? ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT ? COORDINATE WITH | | | CRA. | | | 30. PLEASE INCLUDE ONLY THE EXISTING LOT LINES IN THE | | | DEMO PLAN, NOT THE NEW PROPOSED LOT LINES. | | | 31. MECHANICALLY EQUIPMENT CANNOT PROJECT MORE THAN | | | FOUR FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. THE PROPOSED AC | | | PADS PROJECT MORE THAN FOUR FEET INTO THE SETBACKS FOR | | | LOTS 5-8. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. | | | 32. THE PROPOSED WIDTH OF 7TH STREET DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | MATCH THE DAC APPROVED 7TH STREET PLANS. PLEASE | | | COORDINATE WITH HDR. | | | 33. PLEASE RELOCATE THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS TO AN | | | AREA NOT DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. | | | WHEREVER LOCATED, THEY WILL NEED TO BE SCREENED WITH | | | LANDSCAPE AND SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | 34. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROPOSED BACKFLOW PREVENTER ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LANDSCAPE | | | SCREENING SURROUNDING THE UTILITY. | | | 35. THERE IS A LARGE STRETCH ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | NORTH/SOUTH PORTION OF THE ALLEY WITH NO SHADE TREE | | | COVERAGE DUE TO THE SMALL SIDEWALK ALONG THE ALLEYWAY. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE SHADE TREES ON LOT 5 TO PROVIDE SHADE | | | ALONG THIS PORTION OF THE ALLEYWAY. | | | 36. PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED WATER METERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | 37. NO INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR POWER SOURCE LOCATION | | | FOR STRING LIGHTING ? PLEASE NOTE THIS WILL REQUIRE A | | | SEPARATE ELECTRIC PERMIT AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW | | | BUILDING/ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE | | | COORDINATE POWER SOURCE WITH LOCATION WITH BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO PERMITTING. | | | 38. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROLLING GATE OR A GATE THAT SWINGS | | | INWARD INTO THE PROPERTY FOR THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN | | | PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 9. THE GATE CANNOT OPEN INTO THE | | | SIDEWALK PATH ON THE ALLEYWAY. | | | 39. THE ENTRANCE/EXIT DOOR ON THE SOUTH ENTRANCE OF LOT | | | 9 DOES NOT WORK WITH THE WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING. | | | PLEASE ADJUST TO INWARD SWINGING DOOR OR ADJUST THE | | | LANDING. | | | 40. PLEASE PAINT THE ELECTRICAL METERS TO MATCH THE | | | COLOR OF THE BUILDING FA?ADE. | | | HISTORIC COMMENTS: | | | 41. GENERAL COMMENT: DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS, | | | PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR WOOD SIDING DETAIL, INDICATING | | | PROFILE, MATERIAL, AND SIZE. | | | 42. VINYL IS NOT A PERMITTED MATERIAL. PLEASE REMOVE | | | FROM ANYWHERE ON THE EXTERIOR OF STRUCTURES (SHEET A2.2 | | | ? R19/R20 ? NO VINYL) | | | 43. SHEET A3.1: | | | A. EAST ELEVATION NEAR H8 IS PROPOSED TO BE A | | | SINGLE-HUNG WINDOW WITH NO LITES. THE PROPOSED WINDOW | | | SHOULD BE A CASEMENT WITH A 3 LITE PATTERN WITH TWO | | | VERTICAL OGEE MUNTINS OR A FIXED WINDOW WITH A 3 LITE | | | PATTERN WITH TWO VERTICAL OGEE MUNTINS. ALTERNATIVELY, | | | NARROWING THE WINDOW AND INCREASING THE VERTICAL | | | ORIENTATION OF IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE WITH A 1/1 LITE | | | PATTERN SINGLE-HUNG. | | | B. SOUTH ELEVATION NEAR HD IS PROPOSED TO BE A | | | SINGLE-HUNG WINDOW WITH NO LITES, PROPOSED WINDOW | | | SHOULD BE A CASEMENT WITH A 3 LITE PATTERN WITH TWO | | | VERTICAL OGEE MUNTINS OR A FIXED WINDOW WITH A 3 LITE | | | PATTERN WITH TWO VERTICAL OGEE MUNTINS. ALTERNATIVELY, | | | NARROWING THE WINDOW AND INCREASING THE VERTICAL | | | ORIENTATION OF IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE WITH A 1/1 LITE | | | PATTERN SINGLE-HUNG. | | | 44. SHEET A3.2 | | | A. ENSURE NOTES REDIRECT TO PAGES THAT EXIST AND HAVE | | | THE NOTES. | | | I. (I.E. - SEE 2.0 FOR RENOVATION NOTES). NO RENOVATION | | | NOTES LISTED ON SHEET 2.0 | | | II. (I.E. ? ?SEE 6.0? ? SHEET 6.0 IS MISSING, NO WINDOW | | | DETAILS AND SCHEDULE | | | 45. SHEET A3.3 ? ENSURE NOTES REDIRECT TO PAGES THAT | | | EXIST AND HAVE THE NOTES. | | | A. ?SEE 6.1? ? SHEET 6.1 IS MISSING, NO DOOR DETAILS | | | AND SCHEDULE | | | 46. SHEET A4.0 : | | | A. ?ALUMINUM RAILING? SEEMS TO POINT TO THE WOOD | | | RAILING. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | B. LATTICE WORK SHOULD BE MADE OUT OF WOOD, NOT VINYL. | | | LATTICE PATTERN SHOULD BE OF VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL | | | ORIENTED MATERIAL SIMILAR TO A PLUS SIGN (I.E.: | | | +++++++++) | | | C. CHECK SPELLING | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER, WITH | | | ANY QUESTIONS AT 561 822 1426 OR [email protected] | | | PLEASE CONTACT AARON BORNGRABER, HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | PLANNER, AT 561 822 1428 OR [email protected] FOR | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
08-07-2018 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-07 14:54:43 | 1. PLEASE NOTE, CALCULATIONS OF LOT AND BUILDING | | | REQUIREMENTS MAY BE ALTERED WITH CITY DETERMINATION IF | | | ALLEYWAY WILL REQUIRE REPLATTING OF SUBJECT AREA OR | | | MAINTENANCE EASEMENT. | | | 2. PLEASE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CONSULTANTS FOR STYX | | | ALLEY, 7TH STREET, AND THE HEART AND SOUL PARK TO | | | INCLUDE UPDATED CAD DRAWINGS OF THE ADJACENT PROJECTS | | | ON THE PLANS AND FOR DISCUSSIONS REGARDING THE | | | TRANSITION OF MATERIALS TO BE USED TO CONNECT THE | | | PROJECTS. | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE SIDEWALK WIDTH DETAIL. THE REQUIRED | | | SIDEWALK WIDTH FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS IS 5 FEET. | | | PLEASE ALIGN WITH PROPOSALS FOR STYX ALLEY AND 7TH | | | STREET, | | | 4. PER SECTION 94-84, THE REQUIREMENT FOR A CORNER | | | SETBACK FOR LOT 5 IS 12.5 FEET. PLEASE REVISE | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 5. PER SECTION 94-84, THE REQUIRED MINIMUM CUMULATIVE | | | SIDE SETBACK IS 15 FEET. THE SITE PLAN PROPOSES 14 | | | FEET. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 6. PLEASE INDICATE THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURES TO THE HIGHEST POINT. PLEASE NOTE, PER | | | SECTION 94-84 THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED IS 27 FEET. | | | 7. PER SECTION 94-111, THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR RETAIL, | | | RESTAURANT OR COMMERCIAL IS A MINIMUM OF 2/1000 SF AND | | | MAXIMUM 4/1000 SF. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIREMENT PER | | | LOT IN SITE DATA TABLE. THE REQUIRED NUMBER IS ROUNDED | | | TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER. | | | 8. PER SECTION 94-111, PARKING AND LOADING | | | REQUIREMENTS, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, EXCLUDING HOTEL | | | USES, SHALL PROVIDE SECURE BIKE RACKS AND/OR STORAGE AT | | | A RATIO OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PER EVERY 15 | | | REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, PER SECTION | | | 94-113, BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM | | | OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE DATA, SHOW | | | THE LOCATION ON PLANS AND PROVIDE BIKE RACK DETAIL. | | | 9. PLEASE INDICATE THE CONTEXTUAL SETBACK AS REQUIRED | | | BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABLE AND DRAWINGS. | | | 10. IT APPEARS THAT THE FRONT SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM | | | BACK OF CURB, WHILE THE SIDE AND REAR SETBACK IS | | | MEASURED FROM PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE MEASURE FROM | | | PROPERTY LINE, FOLLOWING THE SETBACK REGULATIONS FROM | | | SECTION 94-109, DEFINITIONS AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE DMP. | | | 11. PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-86 FOR CALCULATING FAR | | | FOR HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A TABLE AND PLAN SHOWING AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED | | | FORWARDS FAR. PER SECTION 94-84, THE MAXIMUM FAR | | | ALLOWED IS 0.50. | | | 12. PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-86 FOR CALCULATING LOT | | | COVERAGE FOR HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN TABLE CALCULATING THE LOT COVERAGE. | | | 13. PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-110(D) FOR SIGNAGE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL USES WITHIN RESIDENTIAL | | | ENCLAVE AREAS. SIGNAGE WILL BE REVIEWED AT TIME OF | | | PERMIT. | | | 14. THE OVERALL ELEVATIONS, SHEET A3.0, SHOW A TALL | | | FENCE STRUCTURE ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOT 9. THE LOT 9 | | | ELEVATIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO SHOW THIS. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DETAIL. | | | 15. THE PROPOSED FENCE FOR LOT 9 SHALL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-49(B)(2) OF THE HISTORIC | | | DISTRICT GUIDELINES. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF FENCE | | | MATERIAL AND PROPOSED HEIGHT. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF | | | FENCES IN THIS DISTRICT IS 4 FEET IN THE FIRST 25 FEET | | | OF FRONT SETBACK AND UP TO 6 FEET BEYOND. | | | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE COLOR ELEVATIONS OF LOT 9. | | | 17. PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATION NOTES ON BOTH SHEET | | | A3.2 AND A3.3 FOR CLARIFICATION. | | | 18. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? PROPOSED WALL COLORS FOR LOTS 5-8. | | | ? OUTDOOR SEATING TABLES AND CHAIR | | | ? PAVERS IN COURTYARD AREA | | | 19. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94-451 FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF | | | REGULATIONS. | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF PROPOSED AREA ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF RAMP ON LOT 9. WHAT LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ARE | | | BEING PROPOSED IN THIS AREA? | | | 21. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. IN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTS WITHIN THE | | | DMP, THE SETBACK MEASUREMENT SHALL BE FROM THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. | | | 22. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS WITH RESUBMITTAL. | | | PER SECTION 94-113, ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE | | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO | | | ILLUMINATE BUILDING ENTRANCES, ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, AND | | | PATHS, AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT | | | THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL INCLUDE LIGHT | | | EMANATING FROM PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SOURCES. UNSHIELDED | | | LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED. THE MAXIMUM MEASURE | | | SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. | | | 23. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENT: PROPOSED WIRE | | | RAILING ON PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTED COTTAGE DOES NOT MEET | | | HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 24. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENT: PROPOSE VINYL | | | LATTICE DOES NOT MEET HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 25. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENT: PLEASE DEFINE | | | FENESTRATION SCHEDULE (PLACEMENT OF SINGLE HUNG VS. | | | CASEMENT WINDOWS) | | | 26. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENT: STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | METAL ROOF FOR THE CONTEMPORARY STYLE COTTAGES. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER, WITH | | | ANY QUESTIONS AT 561 822 1426 OR [email protected] | | | PLEASE CONTACT DESIREE ESTABROOK, HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | PLANNER, AT 561 822 1428 OR [email protected] FOR | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | GUIDELINES/ARCHITECTURE | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |