Plan Review Details - Project Z18070013
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18070013
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-07-2018 Time 18:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-07-2018 Time 18:38 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 18:42:27DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.7 FT NAVD.
 THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE). THE PLANS SHALL SHOW
 AT LEAST TWO VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WHEN
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-08-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By RRossano Date 08-08-2018 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-08 07:16:411500 CENTREPARK
 PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL SERVICE TAPS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND
 FIRE WATER SERVICE.
 PROVIDE GPD DEMANDS FOR WATER AND SEWER.
 PROVIDE VIDEO OF SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
 PROVIDE HYDRANT FLOW TEST.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-01-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 10-01-2018 Time 12:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 10-01-2018 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-03-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 08-03-2018 Time 13:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 08-03-2018 Time 13:22 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-03 13:53:31THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED.
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO
 SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY.
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
 PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT
 CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE.
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 E. A WORK TABLE.
 F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
 K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
 13. RADIO
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
 ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
 FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
 24.5.2.2.3.
 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
 EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
 EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
 STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
 LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
 AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
 RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
 THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
 AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
 PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
 ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
 NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
 PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-06-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-06-2018 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-06-2018 Time 10:25 Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-06 10:26:15FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z18070013
 DECEMBER 6, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TD-1:
 ? SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED OR
 RELOCATED. THE 19 ROYAL PALMS CAN BE RELOCATED ON SITE,
 WITHIN THE CENTREPARK CPD, OR THE CITY HAS MANY
 LOCATIONS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS FOR RELOCATION.
 ? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PROVIDED MITIGATION CHART FOR
 REPLACEMENT <20?SPREAD TOTAL TO 3,800
 ? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED MITIGATION TO 200
 TOTAL FOR LIGUSTRUMS
  
 2. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION
 94-446 (G) FOR ALL OPTIONS UNDER (3) GROUNDCOVER OR
 GRASS.
 THERE ARE CORRECTIONS NEEDED TO THE WORDING IN (3)(A)
 AND (3)(B), (4)(A) AND (4)(B), (5)(A) AND (5)(B).
 PLEASE REVISE. OPTIONS TAKEN NEED TO BE REVISED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PLANT LIST, LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS, OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
 LANDSCAPE NOTES ON ONE SHEET ONLY. LANDSCAPE PLAN CAN
 THEN BE CONSOLIDATED ONTO TWO SHEETS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ADD A COLUMN FOR
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL
 FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 5. SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART,
 CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD THE
 ONE TREE PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A.
 TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT OF 285.
 CORRECT THE PROVIDED TOTAL TREES TO 68, AS ANY PALMS
 EXCEPT THE ROYALS COUNT AS 3 TO 1 FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 REQUIRED TREES. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT ONCE CORRECTIONS
 AND CALCULATIONS ARE FINALIZED, THE DEFICIENCY OF TREES
 REQUESTED THROUGH THE WAIVER PROCESS MAY BE ADDRESSED
 THROUGH IN LIEU MITIGATION AS PROVIDED IN SECTION
 94-448 (E)(2), OR POSSIBLE PLANTING OF TREES WITHIN THE
 CENTREPARK CPD.
  
 REQUIRED ON SITE TREES ARE 39, MULTIFAMILY 242 EQUALS
 285.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED
 FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-442(D) FOR THE TREES PROPOSED WITH THIS PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NORTH
 BUFFER TO 7. INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SOUTH
 REQUIRED BUFFER.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THE SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINE REQUIRES A 5 FOOT BUFFER.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER,
 FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
 THIS MAY BE PROPOSED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/5/18:
  
 13. SATISFIED. TREE #45 MUST BE INCLUDED IN MITIGATION
 DUE IF IT IS TO BE REMOVED. REVISE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO SHOW 300 MITIGATION REQUIRED AND REMOVE AS
 DISPOSITION.
  
 14. SATISFIED. JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVER OF 143 TREES
 NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED TO PROVIDE THE COMPARATIVE VALUE
 FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED AND PROPOSE A
 COMPARATIVE VALUE FOR THE INCREASED TREE SIZES.
  
 15. SATISFIED. THE PLAZA AREA PLANTING PROPOSED DOES
 NOT PROVIDE ANY TREE CANOPY OR SHADE IN THE PEDESTRIAN
 AREAS AND DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY REASON FOR PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. TREE CANOPY AND SHADE
 IS NOT PROVIDED FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG AUSTRALIAN
 AVENUE. THIS DOES NOT ACCOMPLISH THE PEDESTRIAN
 FRIENDLY EXPERIENCE THE CITY IS TRYING TO CREATE.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 16. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
  
 17. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM
 OF 33 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 18. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #7 AND #10 ARE
 SATISFIED WITH THIS PLAN, AS IT APPEARS THE LAKE BANK
 IS PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED, REMOVING SOME BUFFER ZONE
 AND REQUIRED LITTORAL PLANTINGS.
  
 19. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
  
 20. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST
 50 PERCENT OF THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO
 SOIL CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION, THE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY POINTS SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN THE DESIGN OPTIONS
 CHART TO SHOW CREDIT FOR 25% DROUGHT TOLERANT TREES AND
 SHRUBS BEYOND THE 51% NATIVE PLANT CREDIT, AND THE
 GRASS OR GROUNDCOVER CREDIT REMOVED.
  
 2. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-09-2018 Time 10:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-09-2018 Time 10:01 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-09 10:03:13FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z18070013
 OCTOBER 5, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TD-1:
 ? SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED OR
 RELOCATED. THE 19 ROYAL PALMS CAN BE RELOCATED ON SITE,
 WITHIN THE CENTREPARK CPD, OR THE CITY HAS MANY
 LOCATIONS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS FOR RELOCATION.
 ? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PROVIDED MITIGATION CHART FOR
 REPLACEMENT <20?SPREAD TOTAL TO 3,800
 ? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED MITIGATION TO 200
 TOTAL FOR LIGUSTRUMS
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION
 94-446 (G) FOR ALL OPTIONS UNDER (3) GROUNDCOVER OR
 GRASS.
 THERE ARE CORRECTIONS NEEDED TO THE WORDING IN (3)(A)
 AND (3)(B), (4)(A) AND (4)(B), (5)(A) AND (5)(B).
 PLEASE REVISE. OPTIONS TAKEN NEED TO BE REVISED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PLANT LIST, LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS, OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
 LANDSCAPE NOTES ON ONE SHEET ONLY. LANDSCAPE PLAN CAN
 THEN BE CONSOLIDATED ONTO TWO SHEETS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ADD A COLUMN FOR
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL
 FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD
 THE ONE TREE PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443
 (D)(2)A. TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT OF
 285. CORRECT THE PROVIDED TOTAL TREES TO 68, AS ANY
 PALMS EXCEPT THE ROYALS COUNT AS 3 TO 1 FOR
 SUBSTITUTION FOR REQUIRED TREES. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT
 ONCE CORRECTIONS AND CALCULATIONS ARE FINALIZED, THE
 DEFICIENCY OF TREES REQUESTED THROUGH THE WAIVER
 PROCESS MAY BE ADDRESSED THROUGH IN LIEU MITIGATION AS
 PROVIDED IN SECTION 94-448 (E)(2), OR POSSIBLE PLANTING
 OF TREES WITHIN THE CENTREPARK CPD.
  
 REQUIRED ON SITE TREES ARE 39, MULTIFAMILY 242 EQUALS
 285.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED
 FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-442(D) FOR THE TREES PROPOSED WITH THIS PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NORTH
 BUFFER TO 7. INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SOUTH
 REQUIRED BUFFER.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THE SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINE REQUIRES A 5 FOOT BUFFER.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER,
 FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE
 LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY
 CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 THIS MAY BE PROPOSED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/5/18:
  
 13. TREE #45 MUST BE INCLUDED IN MITIGATION DUE IF IT
 IS TO BE REMOVED. REVISE TREE DISPOSITION LIST TO SHOW
 300 MITIGATION REQUIRED AND REMOVE AS DISPOSITION.
  
 14. JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVER OF 143 TREES NEEDS TO BE
 CLARIFIED TO PROVIDE THE COMPARATIVE VALUE FOR THE
 NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED AND PROPOSE A COMPARATIVE
 VALUE FOR THE INCREASED TREE SIZES.
  
 15. THE PLAZA AREA PLANTING PROPOSED DOES NOT PROVIDE
 ANY TREE CANOPY OR SHADE IN THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS AND
 DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY REASON FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM
 THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. TREE CANOPY AND SHADE IS NOT
 PROVIDED FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVENUE. THIS
 DOES NOT ACCOMPLISH THE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY EXPERIENCE
 THE CITY IS TRYING TO CREATE.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 16. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
  
 17. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM
 OF 33 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 18. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #7 AND #10 ARE
 SATISFIED WITH THIS PLAN, AS IT APPEARS THE LAKE BANK
 IS PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED, REMOVING SOME BUFFER ZONE
 AND REQUIRED LITTORAL PLANTINGS.
  
 19. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
  
 20. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST
 50 PERCENT OF THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO
 SOIL CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-07-2018 Time 17:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-07-2018 Time 17:26 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 17:27:36FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z18070013
 AUGUST 7, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TD-1:
 ? SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED.
 THE 19 ROYAL PALMS CAN BE RELOCATED ON SITE, WITHIN THE
 CENTREPARK CPD, OR THE CITY HAS MANY LOCATIONS WITHIN
 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS FOR RELOCATION.
 ? CORRECT THE PROVIDED MITIGATION CHART FOR REPLACEMENT
 <20?SPREAD TOTAL TO 3,800
 ? CORRECT THE REQUIRED MITIGATION TO 200 TOTAL FOR
 LIGUSTRUMS
  
 2. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS
 CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-446 (G) FOR ALL
 OPTIONS UNDER (3) GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE PLANT LIST, LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
 OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND LANDSCAPE NOTES ON
 ONE SHEET ONLY. LANDSCAPE PLAN CAN THEN BE CONSOLIDATED
 ONTO TWO SHEETS.
  
 4. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ADD A COLUMN FOR FLORIDA
 NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH
 SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 5. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART, CORRECT THE
 SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SHADE TREE AND
 FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD THE ONE TREE PER
 UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A. TO ACHIEVE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT OF 285. CORRECT THE
 PROVIDED TOTAL TREES TO 68, AS ANY PALMS EXCEPT THE
 ROYALS COUNT AS 3 TO 1 FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR REQUIRED
 TREES. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT ONCE CORRECTIONS AND
 CALCULATIONS ARE FINALIZED, THE DEFICIENCY OF TREES
 REQUESTED THROUGH THE WAIVER PROCESS MAY BE ADDRESSED
 THROUGH IN LIEU MITIGATION AS PROVIDED IN SECTION
 94-448 (E)(2), OR POSSIBLE PLANTING OF TREES WITHIN THE
 CENTREPARK CPD.
  
 6. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR
 REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-442(D) FOR THE TREES PROPOSED WITH THIS PLAN.
  
 7. CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NORTH BUFFER TO 7.
 INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SOUTH REQUIRED BUFFER.
  
  
 8. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 REQUIRES A 5 FOOT BUFFER.
  
  
 9. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER, FIRE LINES,
 DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 11. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 12. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 13.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 14. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND
 IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
  
 15. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM OF 33
 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 16. VERIFY CONDITION #7 AND #10 ARE SATISFIED WITH THIS
 PLAN, AS IT APPEARS THE LAKE BANK IS PROPOSED TO BE
 CHANGED, REMOVING SOME BUFFER ZONE AND REQUIRED
 LITTORAL PLANTINGS.
  
 17. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND SOURCE FOR THE
 IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11 REQUIRING USE
 OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
  
 18. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
 FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF
 THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO SOIL
 CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-26-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-26-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-26-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-28-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-28-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-28-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-28 08:35:27BASED ON A REREVIEW OF THE PLAN THERE ARE DUMPSTERS IN
 THE INTERIOR. IF THEY ARE NOT USING A ROLL OFF
 COMPACTOR AND PLAN ON ROLLING THE DUMPSTERS OUT FOR
 PICKUP THEY WILL NEED TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE TO ARRANGE
 THE SERVICE. BASED ON THE AUTO TURN WE CAN MANAGE THE
 SERVICE BUT I NEED TO KNOW DEFINITIVELY IF THEY ARE
 USING A ROLL OFF COMPACTOR OR WILL THEY BE USING OUR
 FRONT LOAD SERVICE.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 15:55:02BASED ON THE PRINT THE SERVICES TO BE A ROLLOFF
 COMPACTOR. THE UNIT MUST BE SERVICED BY ONE OF THE
 CITY'S FRANCHISE HOLDERS.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-07-2018 Time 11:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-07-2018 Time 11:40 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 11:40:01THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION IS
 REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS.
 THE SURVEY INDICATES THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION IS 12.7
 FEET NAVD 1988 (= 14.22 FEET NGVD 1929). MINIMUM
 FINISHED FLOOR WILL BE 16.22 FEET NGVD 1929.
  
 2. LABEL EASEMENTS ON ALL THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 3. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 4. APPROVAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE TREES PROPOSED WITHIN THE UTILITY
 EASEMENTS.
  
 5. SHOW THE LAKE MAINTENANCE AREA FOR THE EXPANDED LAKE
 AREA.
  
 6. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE PROPOSED LAKE SECTION
 SHOWING SLOPES AND MAXIMUM DEPTH.
  
 7. INDICATE MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS FOR TRENCH CUTS
 WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 8. THE PAVILION APPEARS TO BE WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT. CAN THE EXISTING OUTFALL PIPE BE
 MOVED TO THE CENTER OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT?
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED SFWMD ERP APPROVAL
 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
 - IT APPEARS THIS PROPERTY IS IN BASIN 2 OF THE MASTER
 SYSTEM AND THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS PART
 OF THE SITE WILL DISCHARGE TO THE LAKE IN BASIN 1.
 - EXHIBIT 6 OF THE STAFF REPORT FOR ERP PERMIT
 MODIFICATION FOR APPLICATION NO. 000323-13 INDICATES
 356 LINEAR FEET OF 4. X 8 EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS NEEDED
 IN BASIN 2 TO MEET THE C-51 BASIN RULE. IS THIS TRENCH
 STILL NECESSARY AND WILL THE LENGTH NEED TO BE ADJUSTED
 BASED ON THE CURRENT DESIGN CONFIGURATION ON THIS
 PARCEL.
  
 3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-18-2018 Time 11:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date 10-18-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-18 11:31:28PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. RELOCATION OF DRAINAGE WILL NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED
 PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ALONG WITH EASEMENT
 ABANDONMENT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-06-2018 Time 08:55 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date 08-06-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-06 09:16:001. EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED
 AND NEW EASEMENT GRANTED.
 2. POOL DECK/PAVILION CANNOT ENCROACH INTO PROPOSED DE.
 3. IF PARALLEL PARKING APPROVED, A SIDEWALK EASEMENT
 WILL BE REQUIRED.
 4. PARCEL WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED AND INCLUDE
 DEDICATION OF EXPANDED LAKE. UNITY OF TITLE WILL NEED
 TO BE RELEASED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-10-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-10 11:50:25Z18070013 CENTERPARK R3
 PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1. APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY BICYCLE
 FACILITIES FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF CENTRE PARK ON BOTH
 SIDES OF CENTRE PARK.
 2. PARKING WILL BE UNBUNDLED FROM RESIDENTS' LEASES.
 3. APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR A
 SUBSIDIZED TRI-RAIL PASS WHICH REDUCES THE FARES BY 50%
 FOR NEW RESIDENTS.
 4. APPLICANT WILL CONTINUE TO COORDINATE WITH TRI-RAIL
 TO INVESTIGATE HAVING THE TRI-RAIL AIRPORT SHUTTLE ADD
 A STOP AT THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PALM TRAN STOPS
 NEAR THE SITE.
 5. APPLICANT WILL CONTINUE TO COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN
 TO UPGRADE THE NEARBY PALM TRAN BUS SHELTERS ON
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE NEAR CENTRE PARK BOULEVARD.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-04-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-04-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-04-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-04 16:43:41Z18070013 1500 CENTREPARK (SEPTEMBER 20, 2018
 SUBMITTAL)
 1. PROVIDE VEHICULAR LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR
 CENTREPARK DRIVEWAY. DETERMINE IF A LEFT AND RIGHT EXIT
 LANE ARE REQUIRED INSTEAD OF THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED
 SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT EXIT LANE.
 2. THE SIGHT TRIANGLES FOR CENTERPARK DRIVE NORTH
 DRIVEWAY WERE NOT PREPARED ACCORDING TO FDOT DESIGN
 STANDARDS OR FLORIDA GREENBOOK. PLEASE REVISE.
 3. THE PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLANDS ON THE UNMARKED
 CROSSWALKS ACROSS CENTREPARK BOULEVARD AT CENTREPARK
 DRIVE NORTH NEEDS TO BE ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE REVISE.
 ALSO, PROVIDE RAISED CURB IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE
 REFUGE ISLAND TO PROTECT PEDESTRIANS FROM LEFT-TURNING
 VEHICLES.
 4. AS A PARTIAL MITIGATION TO THE REQUESTED WAIVER OF
 144 SHADE TREES (59% BELOW CODE REQUIREMENTS) AND TO
 ALSO IMPROVE WALKABILITY, MODIFY THE DESIGN TO PROVIDE
 SHADE TREES ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVENUE. ALONG THE
 APPLICANT?S AUSTRALIAN FRONTAGE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 COULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE TRAVEL LANE AND THE
 SIDEWALK. THE SIDEWALK COULD BE RELOCATED INTO THE
 UTILITY EASEMENT. PROVIDE A SIDEWALK EASEMENT IF THE
 SIDEWALK ENCROACHES THE PROPERTY LINE. TO THE NORTH OF
 THE APPLICANT?S AUSTRALIAN FRONTAGE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 AND SHADE TREES COULD ALSO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE
 TRAVEL LANE AND SIDEWALK WITH APPROVAL OF THE
 CENTREPARK POA. TO THE SOUTH OF THE APPLICANT?S
 PROPERTY THERE MAY BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO PLANT SHADE
 TREES BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE LAKE. COORDINATE
 WITH THE COUNTY FOR IMPROVEMENTS ALONG AUSTRALIAN
 AVENUE.
 5. REVIEW GRADE PROPOSED GRADE CHANGE AT BACK ALONG
 CENTREPARK TO ENSURE THAT SLOPES AREN'T TOO STEEP FOR
 LANDSCAPING.
 6. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS REQUESTED A PARKING
 REDUCTION OF 64 SPACES (13% BELOW CODE REQUIREMENTS),
 HOWEVER, NO MITIGATION MEASURES ARE PROPOSED BY THE
 APPLICANT TO REDUCE PARKING DEMAND. PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 FOLLOWING AS MITIGATION STRATEGIES:
 A. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT A PORTION
 OF THE BICYCLE RACKS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, BUT
 THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO BICYCLE FACILITIES CONNECTING TO
 THE SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE STRIPED BUFFERED BICYCLE LANES
 ON BOTH SIDES OF CENTREPARK BOULEVARD BETWEEN
 AUSTRALIAN BOULEVARD AND MERCER AVENUE, WHICH IS A KEY
 BICYCLE ROUTE LEADING TO DOWNTOWN WEST PALM BEACH. THE
 BICYCLE LANES SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY ELIMINATING ONE
 TRAVEL LANE IN EACH DIRECTION ON CENTREPARK BOULEVARD.
 GREEN COLORED PAVEMENT SHOULD BE PROVIDED ACROSS
 CONFLICT AREAS PER GUIDANCE IN FDOT DESIGN MANUAL. THE
 BIKE LANES SHOULD BE STRIPED WITH THERMOPLASTIC
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS. A K-71 FLEXIBLE BOLLARD SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED PERIODICALLY IN THE BUFFER.
 B. AS PARTIAL TREE MITIGATION AND TO PROVIDE A MODE
 SHIFT TO CYCLING, INSTEAD OF A PAINTED BIKE BUFFER, THE
 BIKE BUFFER COULD CONSIST OF A RAISED MEDIAN WITH TREES
 AND GROUND COVER.
 C. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT WILL IMPROVE THE WALKABILITY AND
 LIVABILITY IN THIS AREA OF THE CITY, AND THAT THE SITE
 WILL PROVIDE EASY ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND
 OTHER NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES. HOWEVER,
 NO IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED ON THE SIDEWALKS ON
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD AND AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SURROUNDING
 THE SITE, AND THE SIDEWALKS REMAIN AT A MINIMUM OF 5 TO
 6-FOOT WIDE WITH NO SHADE TREE COVERAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 WIDER SIDEWALKS AND SHADE TREES ALONG THESE TWO
 ROADWAYS PER COMMENT #3 WHICH WILL PROVIDE A MUCH MORE
 ATTRACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR PEDESTRIANS AND THEREFORE
 IMPROVING WALKABILITY. PLEASE ALSO INDICATE WHAT ?OTHER
 NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES? INCLUDES.
 D. PLEASE IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
 STRATEGIES INCLUDING UNBUNDLING PARKING SPACES FROM THE
 LEASE, PROVIDING BIKE SHARE STATIONS ON SITE, AND
 PROVIDING SUBSIDIZED PALM TRAN OR TRI RAIL PASSES WITH
 AT LEAST 50% DISCOUNT FOR NEW RESIDENTS FOR THE FIRST
 YEAR.
 7. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE RELATED TO THE REDUCED
 PARKING STATEMENT:
 A. PROVIDE SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR THE ANTICIPATION
 THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENTS WILL HAVE ONLY ONE
 VEHICLE.
 B. SUMMARIZE THE BUS ROUTE INFORMATION INCLUDING
 DESTINATIONS AND FREQUENCIES FOR THE BUS ROUTES NEAR
 THE SITE, UNDER PALM TRAN?S LATEST ROUTE PERFORMANCE
 MAXIMIZATION PROGRAM. THE FREQUENCY OF BUSES NEAR THE
 SITE APPEARS TO RANGE FROM 30 MINUTES TO 60 MINUTES
 HEADWAY, WHICH DO NOT APPEAR TO PROVIDE VERY ATTRACTIVE
 TRANSIT QUALITY OF SERVICE.
 C. THE CLOSEST TRI-RAIL STATION IS APPROXIMATELY 2
 MILES AWAY, WHICH IS NOT CLOSE BY FROM A PEDESTRIAN
 PERSPECTIVE.
 D. PROVIDE SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR THE ANTICIPATION
 THAT A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF RESIDENTS WILL UTILIZE THE
 MASS TRANSIT SYSTEM.
 E. PROVIDE SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR THE ANTICIPATION
 THAT THERE WILL BE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF PEDESTRIAN
 ACTIVITY IN LIEU OF VEHICULAR USE.
 F. PROVIDE SUPPORTING INFORMATION ON SIMILAR SUCCESSFUL
 DEVELOPMENTS WITH PROVIDED PARKING OF 1 SPACE PER
 1-BEDROOM UNIT AND 1.5 SPACES PER 2-BEDROOM UNIT.
 DETAILS SUCH AS THE PROXIMITY TO QUALITY TRANSIT,
 ADJACENT LAND USES, BICYCLE FACILITIES, PEDESTRIAN
 FACILITIES, SOCIO ECONOMIC DATA, STREET INTERSECTION
 DENSITY, AND ACTUAL PARKING UTILIZATION ARE KEY
 INFORMATION TO IDENTIFY COMPARABLE DEVELOPMENTS WITH
 ADEQUATE PARKING LOCATED IN SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTS.
 G. CLARIFY IF THE SITES USED IN THE ITE PARKING
 GENERATION MANUAL ARE LOCATED IN SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTS.
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS WHICH ARE YET TO BE ADDRESSED ARE
 INCLUDED BELOW:
 8. CLARIFY IF THE INTERNALIZATION ASSUMPTION FOR THE
 VESTED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TRIP
 GENERATION FROM THE DRI.
 9. COORDINATE WITH PALMTRAN TO PROVIDE A NEW NORTHBOUND
 BUS STOP WITH BUS SHELTER ON AUSTRALIAN AVENUE NEAR
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH PALMTRAN TO
 PROVIDE BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND BUS
 STOP NEAR CENTREPARK BOULEVARD IF SUFFICIENT
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT IS AVAILABLE.
 10. COORDINATE WITH TRI-RAIL TO HAVE A TRI-RAIL SHUTTLE
 STOP AT THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PALMTRAN STOPS NEAR
 THE SITE.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-06-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-06-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-06 17:35:38Z18070013 1500 CENTREPARK (JULY 10, 2018 SUBMITTAL)
 - CLARIFY IF THE INTERNALIZATION ASSUMPTION FOR THE
 VESTED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TRIP
 GENERATION FROM THE DRI.
 - THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY APPEARS TO BE FOR GARBAGE
 PICK-UP ONLY, AND THE ASSUMPTION OF 10% OF TRIPS USING
 THIS DRIVEWAY MIGHT BE TOO HIGH. PLEASE CLARIFY OR
 REVISE.
 - INCLUDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FROM SITE
 ACCESS TO AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND MERCER AVENUE.
 - PROVIDE WEEKDAY DAILY VOLUMES ALONG CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD.
 - PROVIDE HCM 2010 OR 6TH EDITION INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
 AT AUSTRALIAN AVENUE/CENTREPARK BOULEVARD WITH SITE
 TRAFFIC.
 - INCLUDE EVALUATION OF THE DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER
 CONDITIONS IN THE SUBMITTAL.
 - ALIGN THE GARAGE DRIVEWAY WITH CENTREPARK DRIVE
 NORTH.
 - PROVIDE SIGHT TRIANGLE EXHIBIT FOR CENTERPARK DRIVE
 NORTH DRIVEWAY. VERIFY THE DRIVEWAY MEETS SIGHT
 DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS AS SHOWN IN FDOT DESIGN STANDARDS
 OR FLORIDA GREENBOOK.
 - CLARIFY IF THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE IS GATED. THE
 RENDERING SHOWS THAT THE ENTRANCE IS GATED. IF SO,
 PROVIDE A QUEUING ANALYSIS AT THE ENTRANCE GATE.
 - SHOW INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND
 ACCESS.
 - PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY TO CONNECT TO THE ADJACENT
 PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THROUGH THE
 CROSS-ACCESS AGREEMENT.
 - PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLANDS ON THE UNMARKED
 CROSSWALKS ACROSS CENTREPARK BOULEVARD AT CENTREPARK
 DRIVE NORTH.
 - AS A PARTIAL MITIGATION TO THE REQUESTED WAIVER OF
 221 SHADE TREES (90% BELOW CODE REQUIREMENTS), CONSIDER
 PROVIDING 6-FOOT MINIMUM SIDEWALK (8-FOOT PREFERRED)
 WITH AT LEAST 4-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD AND AUSTRALIAN AVENUE, AND PLANT SHADE TREES
 ON THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PROVIDE SIDEWALK AGREEMENT IF
 THE SIDEWALK ENCROACHES THE PROPERTY LINE.
 - SHOW RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE AND FULL
 CENTERLINE.
 - COORDINATE WITH PALMTRAN TO PROVIDE A NEW NORTHBOUND
 BUS STOP WITH BUS SHELTER ON AUSTRALIAN AVENUE NEAR
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH PALMTRAN TO
 PROVIDE BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND BUS
 STOP NEAR CENTREPARK BOULEVARD IF SUFFICIENT
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT IS AVAILABLE.
 - COORDINATE WITH TRI-RAIL TO HAVE A TRI-RAIL SHUTTLE
 STOP AT THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PALMTRAN STOPS NEAR
 THE SITE.
 - THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT
 INCLUDES A NUMBER OF STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE THE PARKING
 DEMAND. CLARIFY WHAT MITIGATION MEASURES ARE PROPOSED
 BY THE APPLICANT TO MITIGATE THE PARKING NEEDS.
 - CENTREPARK BOULEVARD IS PLANNED FOR SEPARATED BIKE
 LANES, AND IS A KEY BICYCLE ROUTE TO GET TO DOWNTOWN
 PER THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN. CONTRIBUTE FUNDING TOWARDS
 THE SEPARATED BIKE LANES.
 - CHECK ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCE WITH PROPOSED ON-STREET
 PARKING. THERE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH SIGHT DISTANCE TO
 ALLOW FOR PARALLEL PARKING MANEUVERS TO OCCUR SAFELY.
 - WE WILL PROVIDE A DECISION ON IF PARALLEL PARKING
 WILL BE ALLOWED ON CENTREPARK.
 - PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES IN FRONT OF THE
 PROPERTY ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PLANNED PROTECTED
 BIKE LANES.
 - PROVIDE AVAILABILITY LETTER FOR WATER, SEWER,
 GARBAGE, SANITATION AND STORM.
 - PROVIDE AUTOTURN TEMPLATE FOR GARBAGE PICKUPS.
 - THE PROPOSED CODE LANGUAGE SHOULD BE REVISED TO AVOID
 MISINTERPRETATION THAT THE LIMIT ?BETWEEN OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD AND BELVEDERE ROAD? ALSO APPLIES TO I-95,
 E.G. REVISE TO ?EAST OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE BETWEEN
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND BELVEDERE ROAD OR EAST OF
 I-95?.
 - MODIFY THE PROPOSED CODE LANGUAGE ITEM ?J? TO SAY THE
 FOLLOWING OR EQUIVALENT: ?THE APPLICANT SHALL
 DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPERTY HAS AN ACCESSIBLE
 PEDESTRIAN ROUTE OF AT MOST ? MILE FROM THE SITE ACCESS
 POINT TO A TRANSIT STOP FOR ANY HIGH FREQUENCY (HEADWAY
 OF 15 MINUTES OR LESS) OR PREMIUM TRANSIT SERVICE.?
 - THE PROPOSED ITEMS ?F TO J? SHOULD BE IN ADDITIONAL
 TO WHAT ARE CURRENTLY REQUIRED UNDER SECTION
 94-207(B)(13), I.E. THE APPLICANT SHALL MEET A MINIMUM
 OF THREE OR MORE OF ITEMS (13) ?A TO E?, AND IMPLEMENT
 SEVERAL MITIGATION MEASURES AMONG ITEMS ?F TO J? OR AS
 REQUIRED BY THE CITY.
 - ADD ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES TO THE PROPOSED TEXT
 AMENDMENT INCLUDING UNBUNDLED PARKING, PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM, REMOTE PARKING/SHUTTLE SERVICE. REFER TO THE
 CITY?S PARKING AND TDM STUDY FOR DETAILS ON THESE
 MEASURES.
 - A POTENTIAL SOLUTION TO PROVIDE BIKE LANES AND
 PARALLEL PARKING ON CENTREPARK BOULEVARD IS TO CONVERT
 ONE OF THE LANES TO A SERVICE ROAD THAT BICYCLES AND
 PARKING MANEUVERS SHARE. PHOTOS OF THE SERVICE ROAD
 CONCEPT WILL BE PROVIDED AT PPRC MEETING.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1092
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-31-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 10-31-2018 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 10-31-2018 Time 09:46 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-31 10:09:40PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.31.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18070013
 CASE NO.: PB 791GG
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ALL OUTSTANDING UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED. -
 STILL AWAITING FPL LETTER.
  
 2. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY. - THE ONLY LETTER THAT HAS BEEN
 RECEIVED IS DATED 09/10/2018, WHICH INDICATES THAT THE
 PROJECT DOES NOT MEET THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
 OF PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 4. APPROVAL FROM THE CENTREPARK ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
 COMMITTEE SHALL BE PROVIDED. - LETTER OF CONSENT WAS
 RECEIVED, BUT WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT THE COMMENTS OR
 AREAS OF CONCERN THAT WERE NEEDING FURTHER
 DISCUSSION/REVIEW?
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE
 UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION. - RESPONSE
 INDICATES THAT THIS NOTE WAS ADDED ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS...PLEASE PROVIDE A SHEET # AS I WAS UNABLE TO
 FIND IT.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE
 UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR.
 - THE TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT THE
 MANEUVERING OF THE VEHICLES REQUIRES ENCROACHMENT ONTO
 THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING ACCESS
 EASEMENT. AN ADDITIONAL EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED, OR
 THE CIRCULATION MODIFIED SO AS NOT TO EXTEND OUTSIDE OF
 THE EXISTING EASEMENT. IF AN ADDITIONAL EASEMENT IS
 PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN AGREEMENT FROM THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.
  
 15. THE DESIGN OF THE GROUNDFLOOR UNITS SHOULD BE
 MODIFIED SUCH THAT THEY HAVE A WALK-UP ENTRANCE WITH
 FRONT DOOR FACING THE STREET, ETC. THE CURRENT DESIGN
 IS SUCH THAT IT APPEARS TO BE ONLY A SIDEWALK LEADING
 TO A BACK PATIO/SLIDING DOOR. - IS THERE ANY WAY TO
 HAVE THE DOORS FACING THE STREET?
  
 17. AS THE BUILDING IS LOCATED AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 THERE APPEAR TO BE BALCONIES AND ROOF OVERHANGS
 ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK, PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE ENCROACHMENTS AND
 ARE DIMENSIONED ACCORDINGLY. THE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO
 SHOW OVERHANGS ON THE UPPER FLOOR THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ROOF PLAN AND/OR FLOOR PLANS. ENSURE THAT OVERHANGS
 DO NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED
 SETBACK. - - SOME OF THE FRONT STOOPS ARE ENCROACHING
 INTO THE SETBACK, WHICH IS PERMITTED SO LONG AS THEY DO
 NOT EXCEED THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT; PLEASE PROVIDE
 DETAILS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH.
  
 24. (NEW COMMENT) - THE SITE DESIGN SHOWN ON SHEET A2.1
 DIFFERS FROM THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED SITE
 PLAN. SHEET A2.1 STILL INDICATES THE ON-STREET PARKING,
 ETC. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
 ___________________________________________
  
 NOTE, STAFF IS CONTINUING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED TEXT
 AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND
 WILL FOLLOW UP SOON IN THAT REGARD TO DISCUSS THE
 SPECIFIC LANGUAGE, AS WELL AS ANY POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO
 THE PROJECT (IF ANY).
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-08-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 08-08-2018 Time 11:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 08-08-2018 Time 11:08 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-08 11:09:05PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 08.08.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18070013
 CASE NO.: PB 791GG
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ALL OUTSTANDING UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH
 COUNTY.
  
 4. APPROVAL FROM THE CENTREPARK ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
 COMMITTEE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 5. UPDATED WARRANTY DEED SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 6. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE
 CENTREPARK AFFORDABLE AND WORKFORCE HOUSING POLICY THAT
 WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-17.
 AS REQUIRED BY THE POLICY, THE APPLICATION SHALL
 PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS PART OF THE SITE
 PLAN APPLICATION IDENTIFYING WHICH UNITS WILL BE
 OFFERED AS WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS. PLEASE REFER TO THE
 POLICY FOR ALL UNIT RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED.
  
 7. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 98-17,
 UPON OBTAINING SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE $150/UNIT TO THE WORKFORCE HOUSING TRUST
 FUND, UNLESS THE CITY CHOOSES TO USE IT TOWARD THE
 DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT PLAN TO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY
 BETWEEN DOWNTOWN AND CENTREPARK. IF THIS OPTION IS
 CHOSEN, THEN THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PLAN.
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE
 UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 9. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, WATER-SAVING PLUMBING
 FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS INDICATING
 COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 10. ACCORDING TO THE CIVIL PLANS, THE PROPOSED PAVILION
 BY THE POOL WILL BE LOCATED IN THE RELOCATED DRAINAGE
 EASEMENT. PLEASE CLARIFY AND ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE
 UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS/INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT
 APPEARS TO BE GATES/FENCES IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS ALONG CENTREPARK BOULEVARD. ALL FENCING SHALL BE
 CLEARLY DETAILED AND/OR LABELED WITH APPLICABLE
 HEIGHTS, ETC.
  
 13. PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, THE SETBACK ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET; THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN INDICATES ON 19 FEET BEING PROVIDED.
  
 14. CONSIDER REDUCING THE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE/EXIT
 DRIVE FROM THE GARAGE TO 20 FEET. AS SUCH, THE OPENING
 IN THE BUILDING CAN BE REDUCED AS WELL.
  
 15. THE DESIGN OF THE GROUNDFLOOR UNITS SHOULD BE
 MODIFIED SUCH THAT THEY HAVE A WALK-UP ENTRANCE WITH
 FRONT DOOR FACING THE STREET, ETC. THE CURRENT DESIGN
 IS SUCH THAT IT APPEARS TO BE ONLY A SIDEWALK LEADING
 TO A BACK PATIO/SLIDING DOOR.
  
 16. THERE ARE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE
 REQUIRED SETBACK, SPECIFICALLY AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 BUILDING. ONLY ROOF OVERHANGS, BALCONIES, ETC. MAY
 ENCROACH INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 17. AS THE BUILDING IS LOCATED AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 THERE APPEAR TO BE BALCONIES AND ROOF OVERHANGS
 ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK, PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE ENCROACHMENTS AND
 ARE DIMENSIONED ACCORDINGLY. THE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO
 SHOW OVERHANGS ON THE UPPER FLOOR THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ROOF PLAN AND/OR FLOOR PLANS. ENSURE THAT OVERHANGS
 DO NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED
 SETBACK.
  
 18. THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE ON THE ELEVATIONS DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE
 SITE/FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT.
  
 19. A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE
 RACKS.
  
 20. FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG CENTREPARK BOULEVARD,
 CONSIDER HAVING IT AS A STRAIGHT WALK, AS OPPOSED TO
 CONTOURING IT WITH THE CURB LINE. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE
 THERE IS NO ON-STREET PARKING, THIS WOULD ALLOW
 LANDSCAPING/TREES TO BE PLACE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALK
 AND ALONG THE STREET. THIS SHOULD PROBABLY BE DISCUSSED
 IN A BIGGER CONTEXT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER?S
 ASSOCIATION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AS THE
 EXISTING PALMS ARE PART OF AN OVERALL EXISTING THEME
 ALONG THE ROADWAY.
  
 21. THE APPLICANT SHOULD WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER?S
 ASSOCIATION REGARDING ENHANCEMENT OF THE CENTREPARK
 ENTRANCE (AT THE CORNER OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD) AS THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE
 REMOVING THE EXISTING ENTRANCE WALL, ROYAL PALMS, ETC.
  
 22. ALL POOLS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR
 STRUCTURE THAT IS AT LEAST 4 FEET IN HEIGHT. ACCESS TO
 THE POOL MUST BE THROUGH A BUILDING OR THROUGH A
 SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING GATE WITH LATCHES AT
 LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE GATE.
  
 23. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE ARCHIECTURAL DESIGN
 OF THE BUILDING, SPECIFICALLY THE TREATMENT OF THE
 PROMINENT CORNER OF THE BUILDING NEAR THE INTERSECTION
 OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND CENTREPARK BOULEVARD. PLEASE
 NOTE, COLOR RENDERINGS WOULD PROVIDE USEFUL IN THE
 EVALUATION OF THESE ASPECTS OF THE BUILDING.
 ___________________________________________
  
 NOTE, STAFF IS CONTINUING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED TEXT
 AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND
 WILL FOLLOW UP SOON IN THAT REGARD TO DISCUSS THE
 SPECIFIC LANGUAGE, AS WELL AS ANY POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO
 THE PROJECT (IF ANY).
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OCTOBER 16, 2018,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN AUGUST 24, 2018. NOTE
 THAT THE DATE OF THE OCTOBER PLANNING BOARD MEETING MAY
 CHANGE AS A RESULT OF WORK OCCURRING IN THE CITY
 COMMISSION CHAMBERS.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE OCTOBER 16, 2018, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN OCTOBER 1, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved