Plan Review Details - Project Z18070012
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18070012
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 12-12-2018 Time 10:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 12-12-2018 Time 10:42 Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-12 10:43:33PER SAMANTHA HILL, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES:
  
 CONDITION ? PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE A LOMR FROM FEMA.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-07-2018 Time 13:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-07-2018 Time 13:04 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-07 13:07:52COMMENTS ISSUED BY SAMANTHA HILL BASED ON ROBERT
 BROWN'S PREVIOUS COMMENTS.
  
 #2 ? APPLICANT THOUGHT THEY WOULD HAVE THE LOMR LETTER
 BY OCTOBER 8. AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE NOT ADVISED THAT
 IT WAS ISSUED (AND IT IS NOT ON THE FEMA WEBSITE). I?VE
 ASKED FOR AN UPDATE TWICE SO I DO NOT THINK THEY HAVE
 AN ANSWER FROM FEMA YET.
 #4 ? FIRST FLOOR PARKING SHOWS A VAN ACCESSIBLE RAMP. I
 WAS UNABLE TO VERIFY CLEARANCE.
  
  
  
2018-10-23 10:15:21ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-07-2018 Time 19:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-07-2018 Time 19:53 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 20:02:21DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 6 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. ACCESSIBLE RAMPS. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
 WITH A SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
 RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. ALTHOUGH THIS IS A
 CONDO BUILDING, IT IS ALSO A PLACE OF WORK FOR THE
 BUILDING MANAGEMENT STAFF. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE). WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
 PERMIT THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. THE BUILDING ENTRANCE FACES ARKONA
 COURT. UNLESS THERE IS A BUILDING ENTRANCE ON FLAGLER
 DRIVE FOR USE BY RESPONDING EMERGENCY SERVICES
 PERSONNEL, THE BUILDING CANNOT HAVE THE PROPOSED
 FLAGLER DRIVE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-02-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 08-02-2018 Time 08:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 08-02-2018 Time 08:28 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-02 08:43:56THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 4. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS
 AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASST. FIRE MARSHAL
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-02-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-02-2018 Time 16:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-02-2018 Time 16:49 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 15:58:00PLEASE IDENTIFY HOW AND WHERE SANITATION SERVICE IS TO
 BE PROVIDED.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-07-2018 Time 11:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-07-2018 Time 11:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-23-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 09:48:30Z18070012 LA CLARA RESIDENTIAL PD (JULY 10, 2018
 SUBMITTAL)
 - VERIFY THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHOWN IN SHEET
 A114. THE TABLE INDICATES THAT "PARALLEL ON-STREET
 PARKING" SPACE IS 1 BUT 13 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE
 PROVIDED.
 - VERIFY THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE IN THE ARRIVAL COURT IS
 ONE-WAY AND MAKE SURE PROPER SIGNAGE ARE PROVIDED.
 - THE AUTOTURN PATHS SHOW THAT SOME VEHICLES ARE ABLE
 TO TURN AT AN ABRUPT ANGLE, WHICH IS NOT REALISTIC.
 PLEASE REVISE.
  
 ERIK FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 12-12-2018 Time 10:43 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 12-12-2018 Time 10:43 Sent To  
Notes
2018-12-12 11:47:40CONDITION: DETAIL B-B ON SHEET C5.10 NEEDS TO SHOW
 ACCURATE CONDITIONS AT TIME OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-23-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-23-2018 Time 09:55 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-22-2018 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-22 16:59:10PB 1559L ? 1ST RESUBMITTAL
 LA CLARA MINOR AMENDMENT (THE MODERN RPD)
 1515 S. FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 22, 2018),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) UPON REVIEW OF THE REVISED PLANS WHICH INCLUDE THE
 EGRESS PATHWAY, STAFF NOTED THAT THE RETAINING WALL
 LOCATION IS SHOWN FURTHER FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
 ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 THAN IT IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS. WHICH RETAINING
 WALL LOCATION IS CORRECT? IF THE RETAINING WALL IS AS
 SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS, PLEASE REVIEW THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS TO SEE IF MORE OF THE DAHOON HOLLYS CAN REMAIN.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDES ALL OF
 THE ARKONA COURT PARKING SPACES IN MEETING THE 183
 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY TWO OF
 THE 13 ARKONA COURT PARKING SPACES MAY BE COUNTED AS
 REQUIRED PARKING. THE REMAINING 11 ON-STREET PARKING
 SPACES WERE PROVIDED AS PUBLIC PARKING AS PART OF THE
 ORIGINAL MODERN APPROVAL AS A WAIVER MITIGATION MEASURE
 AND MAY NOT BE USED TO MEET THE PARKING COUNT. PLEASE
 UPDATE THE PARKING NUMBERS ON SHEET A114 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: FIVE BICYCLE RACKS REQUIRE 14 FEET
 IN WIDTH. THE STORAGE ROOM IS ONLY 13 FEET 9 INCHES
 WIDE, SO UNFORTUNATELY YOU WILL NEED TO REMOVE A RACK.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-07-2018 Time 16:49 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-07-2018 Time 16:49 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 16:52:08PB 1559L
 LA CLARA MINOR AMENDMENT (THE MODERN RPD)
 1515 S. FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 8, 2018),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) PLEASE VERIFY THE DIMENSIONS ON SECTION C-C ON SHEET
 C5.10. THE DIMENSIONS DO NOT SEEM TO ADD UP TO THE 34
 FOOT 10 INCH SETBACK SHOWN ON THE OTHER PLANS.
  
 2) SHOW THE WEST SIDE SETBACKS TO THE MECHANICAL ROOMS
 AND RAMP TO THE LOWER PARKING ON THE PLANS (SHEET C6.00
 DOES SHOW ONE OF THESE DIMENSIONS).
  
 3) SHEET A111 HAS A MISLABELED DIMENSION ON THE SOUTH
 SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THE 48 FOOT 9 INCH DIMENSION IS
 NOT THE PEDESTAL SETBACK. THE PEDESTAL IS THE BUILDING
 WALL AT GRADE, SHOWN ELSEWHERE MEETING THE 24 FOOT
 REQUIRED SETBACK. IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE THE TOWER
 SETBACK?
  
 4) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY SECTION B-B ON SHEET C5.10 SHOWS
 A 26 FOOT SETBACK AND THE SETBACK SHOWN ON SHEET C6.00
 IS 25.2 FEET. IT LOOKS LIKE THE BUILDING WALL AND THE
 PROPERTY LINES ARE PARALLEL.
  
 5) SHEET C6.00 AND SHEET A111 SHOW DIFFERENT FRONT
 SETBACK DIMENSIONS.
  
 BASEMENT LEVEL:
  
 6) LABEL SPACES 22, 49, 50 AND 51 AS COMPACT SPACES.
  
 7) WHERE POSSIBLE, YOU SHOULD MAKE THE COMPACT SPACES
 LONGER WHERE POSSIBLE (EX. SPACE # 22). THE 16 FOOT
 DEPTH IS A MINIMUM.
  
 8) MOVE SPACES 27 AND 28 FURTHER SOUTH TO GIVE SPACE 28
 MORE SPACE TO OPEN THE DOOR AGAINST THE WALL.
  
 9) MOVE SPACES 58, 59 AND 60 FURTHER WEST TO GIVE SPACE
 60 MORE SPACE TO OPEN THE DOOR AGAINST THE WALL.
  
 10) MOVE SPACES 61, 62 AND 63 FURTHER NORTH TO GIVE
 SPACE 61 MORE SPACE TO OPEN THE DOOR AGAINST THE WALL.
  
 11) MOVE SPACES 55, 56 AND 57 FURTHER NORTH TO GET THE
 FULL CODE REQUIRED 24 FOOT BACK UP.
  
 12) PROVIDE A BLOW UP, TO SCALE, OF SPACES 49, 50 AND
 51. SPACE 49 LOOKS AND TO ACCESS BASED ON THE COLUMN
 PLACEMENT AND SPACE 51 MAY IMPEDE ACCESS TO THE STORAGE
 AREA.
  
 13) ENSURE THAT THE COLUMN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVE
 AISLE IS WELL MARKED TO PREVENT COLLISIONS.
  
 GROUND FLOOR LEVEL:
  
 14) THE TOTAL PARKING COUNT TABLE IS INCORRECT.
  
 A. STAFF ONLY COUNTS 195 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. (182
 IN GARAGE PLUS 13 ON STREET)
 B. THERE ARE 30, NOT NINE (9), COMPACT PARKING SPACES -
 21 ON THE BASEMENT LEVEL PLUS NINE (9) ON THE GROUND
 FLOOR LEVEL.
 C. THERE ARE 13 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES PROVIDED.
  
 15) STAFF ONLY COUNTS 182 PARKING SPACES ON SITE - 80
 IN THE BASEMENT PLUS 97 ON THE GROUND FLOOR LEVEL PLUS
 FIVE (5) ON THE ENTRY COURT. ONE ADDITIONAL PARKING
 SPACE IS REQUIRED.
  
 16) SPACE 2 IS ONLY SHOWN AT 8 FOOT 4 INCHES WIDE. THE
 ADJACENT NOTE STATES THAT IT IS 8 FEET 6 INCHES WIDE.
 WHICH IS CORRECT?
  
 17) SPACES 4 AND 8 ARE NOT LABELED AS COMPACT ON THE
 PLAN.
  
 18) SPACES 8, 9 AND 10 DO NOT MEASURE TO BE THE MINIMUM
 COMPACT REQUIREMENT OF 8 FEET.
  
 19) THE POOL EQUIPMENT DOOR SWING INTO SPACE 57 WHICH
 IS NOT PERMITTED.
  
 20) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR SPACE 96.
  
 21) MOVE SPACES 48, 49 AND 50 FURTHER EAST TO GIVE
 SPACE 50 NOT ONLY ITS FULL REQUIRED WIDTH, BUT ALSO
 MORE SPACE TO OPEN THE DOOR AGAINST THE WALL.
  
 22) SHOW THE FULL DEPTH OF THE ADA SPACES AND THE WIDTH
 OF THE WALKWAY IN FRONT OF THEM. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS
 NOT SUFFICIENT WIDTH OF THE WALKWAY BETWEEN THE COLUMN
 AND THE PARKING SPACES.
  
 23) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE RACK PAD DIMENSIONS ON BOTH THE
 SITE PLAN AND THE DETAIL.
  
 24) PROVIDE A CUT SHEET SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS IN THE
 BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM, TO INCLUDE THE BICYCLE RACKS.
 NOTE: THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS
 DOES NOT LOOK LIKE A MODEL THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY HOLD A
 BICYCLE.
  
 25) SHEET A114 SHOWS THE NORTH SIDE SETBACK AT 34 FEET
 9.5 INCHES. THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED A NORTHERN
 SETBACK MINIMUM OF 34 FEET 10 INCHES. THIS NEEDS TO BE
 CORRECTED. PLEASE NOTE THAT SHEET A115 INCLUDES A NOTE
 THAT THIS IS THE SETBACK FROM THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
 MINOR AMENDMENT, WHICH IS AN INCORRECT STATEMENT. THE
 NORTH SIDE SETBACK IS SHOWN ON MULTIPLE PLANS AND
 ELEVATIONS AS 34 FEET 10 INCHES. THE LESSER SETBACK IS
 SHOWN TO A BALCONY. BALCONIES ARE PERMITTED TO ENCROACH
 INTO THE NORTHERN SETBACK.
  
 LEVEL 2:
  
 26) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING SPACES.
  
 27) PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DIVISION THAT THE ARRIVAL COURT PARKING DOES NOT
 REQUIRE AN ADA PARKING SPACE.
  
 28) WHY DO SHEETS A114 AND A115 HAVE DIFFERENT SOUTH
 SETBACK DIMENSIONS? NOTE THE EXTRA 2.5 INCHES SHOWN ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF SHEET A115 CAN BE REDUCED AND THE
 NORTH SETBACK WILL MET THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED
 DIMENSION.
  
 29) SHEET A123 SHOWS ONLY A 34 FOOT 0.5 INCH NORTHERN
 SETBACK.
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved