Plan Review Details - Project Z18070011
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18070011
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-07-2018 Time 20:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-07-2018 Time 20:08 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 20:25:46DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN SHEET C300
 STATES THAT THERE WILL BE 628 TOTAL PARKING SPACES AND
 ONLY 6 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THERE ARE MORE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLANS BUT THE
 COUNT IN THE SITE DAT TABLE IS NOT CORRECT. 13
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE MINIMUM
 NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-02-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 08-02-2018 Time 08:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 08-02-2018 Time 08:48 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-02 08:55:58THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1.SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-15-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-15-2018 Time 16:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-15-2018 Time 16:35 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-15 16:36:37FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18070011
 NOVEMBER 15, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF TREES
 WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE
 PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED
 AREA IN A MINIMUM SCALE OF 1:20, MEETING CURRENT CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 OTHER REVIEW COMMENTS STILL APPLY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED
 AREA AND SHOW THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED
 COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
 PROVIDE THE QUANTITIES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 LIGHTING LOCATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN OR INDICATE IF NO
 LIGHTS ARE BEING ADDED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER
 LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED TREES AND
 UTILITY LINES.
 NEW STORM DRAIN LINE SHOWN ON SHEET C200 CONFLICTS WITH
 CRAPE MYRTLE IN TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C
 UNITS, ETC.
 VALVES ARE NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGE FOR BACKFLOWS SOUTH SIDE OF
 AFFECTED AREA, DIANELLS
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 SHOW PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THERE ARE TREES MISSING ON THE SITE THAT
 ARE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE
 ADDRESS HOW THIS WILL BE CORRECTED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/25/18:
 11. REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L010 TO
 CORRECT THE FOLLOWING (A SITE VISIT WAS CONDUCTED):
 ? SATISFIED. CODE REQUIRES ALL NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN DESTROYED. LIVE
 OAKS #19, 20, 21, 34, 35 AND 36; SABAL PALMS #74, 75,
 76, 77 AND 78 ARE TO BE RELOCATED.
 ? SATISFIED. LIVE OAK #37 DOES NOT APPEAR TO EXIST.
 ? SATISFIED. TREE #47 IS A BLACK OLIVE TREE, AND THE
 CANOPY SIZE IS 40 FEET.
 ? SATISFIED. BOTTLEBRUSH #80 IS 25 FOOT CANOPY
 ? SATISFIED. #0100 THROUGH #0104 ARE BLACK OLIVES, NOT
 OAKS.
 ? SATISFIED. UPDATE THE MITIGATION CHART FOR THE
 CHANGES. TOTALS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE NEED TO BE UPDATED
 FOR #47 TO 1256, AND #80 TO 491, AND TOTAL UPDATED TO
 3952.
  
 12. SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE
 PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE.
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE FOR FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS PER
 SECTION 94-442 (G) AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
  
 UPDATE CHART TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR AFFECTED
 AREA. THE CHART PROVIDED IS NOT THE CURRENT LIST AND
 TOTAL DOES NOT MEET THE 50 POINT REQUIREMENT.
 CURRENT CODE VERSION CAN BE FOUND IN MUNICODE.
  
 14. SATISFIED. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE AND
 DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. ADONIDIA AND ROEBELLINI PALMS IN THE
 CENTER PARKING ISLAND ON SHEET L100 DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE PARKING AND PAVEMENT
 AREAS. PROVIDE SHADE TREES.
  
  
 16. REPLACEMENT TREES SHOWN ON SHEET L015:
 ? SATISFIED. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE AND
 DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT.
 ? SATISFIED. WAX MYRTLE IS A SWAMP SPECIES, AND HAS
 HIGH WATER REQUIREMENTS, IS NOT THE BEST SPECIES CHOICE
 FOR THIS DESIGN.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-17-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-17-2018 Time 16:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-17-2018 Time 16:38 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-17 16:39:19FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18070011
 OCTOBER 17, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF TREES
 WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE
 PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED
 AREA IN A MINIMUM SCALE OF 1:20, MEETING CURRENT CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 OTHER REVIEW COMMENTS STILL APPLY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED
 AREA AND SHOW THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED
 COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
 PROVIDE THE QUANTITIES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 LIGHTING LOCATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN OR INDICATE IF NO
 LIGHTS ARE BEING ADDED.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER
 AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED TREES AND
 UTILITY LINES.
 NEW STORM DRAIN LINE SHOWN ON SHEET C200 CONFLICTS WITH
 CRAPE MYRTLE IN TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING
 FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW
 PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.
 VALVES ARE NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGE FOR BACKFLOWS SOUTH SIDE OF
 AFFECTED AREA, DIANELLS
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 SHOW PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THERE ARE TREES MISSING ON THE SITE THAT
 ARE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE
 ADDRESS HOW THIS WILL BE CORRECTED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/25/18:
 11. REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L010 TO
 CORRECT THE FOLLOWING (A SITE VISIT WAS CONDUCTED):
 ? SATISFIED. CODE REQUIRES ALL NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN DESTROYED. LIVE
 OAKS #19, 20, 21, 34, 35 AND 36; SABAL PALMS #74, 75,
 76, 77 AND 78 ARE TO BE RELOCATED.
 ? SATISFIED. LIVE OAK #37 DOES NOT APPEAR TO EXIST.
 ? SATISFIED. TREE #47 IS A BLACK OLIVE TREE, AND THE
 CANOPY SIZE IS 40 FEET.
 ? SATISFIED. BOTTLEBRUSH #80 IS 25 FOOT CANOPY
 ? SATISFIED. #0100 THROUGH #0104 ARE BLACK OLIVES, NOT
 OAKS.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. UPDATE THE MITIGATION CHART FOR
 THE CHANGES. TOTALS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE NEED TO BE
 UPDATED FOR #47 TO 1256, AND #80 TO 491, AND TOTAL
 UPDATED TO 3952.
  
 12. SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE
 PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE.
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE FOR FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS PER
 SECTION 94-442 (G) AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
  
 UPDATE CHART TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR AFFECTED
 AREA. THE CHART PROVIDED IS NOT THE CURRENT LIST AND
 TOTAL DOES NOT MEET THE 50 POINT REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 14. SATISFIED. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE AND
 DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. ADONIDIA AND ROEBELLINI PALMS IN THE
 CENTER PARKING ISLAND ON SHEET L100 DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE PARKING AND PAVEMENT
 AREAS. PROVIDE SHADE TREES.
  
  
 16. REPLACEMENT TREES SHOWN ON SHEET L015:
 ? SATISFIED. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE AND
 DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT.
 ? SATISFIED. WAX MYRTLE IS A SWAMP SPECIES, AND HAS
 HIGH WATER REQUIREMENTS, IS NOT THE BEST SPECIES CHOICE
 FOR THIS DESIGN.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-25-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-25-2018 Time 16:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-25-2018 Time 16:42 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-25 16:42:52FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18070011
 SEPTEMBER 25, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF TREES
 WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE
 PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED
 AREA IN A MINIMUM SCALE OF 1:20, MEETING CURRENT CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 OTHER REVIEW COMMENTS STILL APPLY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED
 AREA AND SHOW THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED
 COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
 PROVIDE THE QUANTITIES.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 LIGHTING LOCATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN OR INDICATE IF NO
 LIGHTS ARE BEING ADDED.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND
 SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED TREES AND
 UTILITY LINES.
 7. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR
 ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS,
 A/C UNITS, ETC.
 VALVES ARE NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 SHOW PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THERE ARE TREES MISSING ON THE SITE THAT
 ARE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE
 ADDRESS HOW THIS WILL BE CORRECTED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/25/18:
 11. REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L010 TO
 CORRECT THE FOLLOWING (A SITE VISIT WAS CONDUCTED):
 ? CODE REQUIRES ALL NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO
 BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN DESTROYED. LIVE OAKS #19, 20,
 21, 34, 35 AND 36; SABAL PALMS #74, 75, 76, 77 AND 78
 ARE TO BE RELOCATED.
 ? LIVE OAK #37 DOES NOT APPEAR TO EXIST.
 ? TREE #47 IS A BLACK OLIVE TREE, AND THE CANOPY SIZE
 IS 40 FEET.
 ? BOTTLEBRUSH #80 IS 25 FOOT CANOPY
 ? #0100 THROUGH #0104 ARE BLACK OLIVES, NOT OAKS.
 ? UPDATE THE MITIGATION CHART FOR THE CHANGES.
  
 12. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE PLANT AND
 DROUGHT TOLERANCE.
  
 13. PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE FOR FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 94-442 (G) AND
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
  
 14. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE AND DOES NOT
 MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT.
  
  
 15. ADONIDIA AND ROEBELLINI PALMS IN THE CENTER PARKING
 ISLAND ON SHEET L100 DO NOT MEET THE INTENT OF
 PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE PARKING AND PAVEMENT AREAS.
 PROVIDE SHADE TREES.
  
  
 16. REPLACEMENT TREES SHOWN ON SHEET L015:
 ? JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE AND DOES NOT MEET
 CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT.
 ? WAX MYRTLE IS A SWAMP SPECIES, AND HAS HIGH WATER
 REQUIREMENTS, IS NOT THE BEST SPECIES CHOICE FOR THIS
 DESIGN.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-02-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-02-2018 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-02-2018 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-02 16:34:54FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18070011
 AUGUST 2, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF TREES WITHIN THE
 AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE PRESERVED IN
 PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 2. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA IN A
 MINIMUM SCALE OF 1:20, MEETING CURRENT CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA AND SHOW
 THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN.
  
 4. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED COMPARED TO THE
 NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
 THE AFFECTED AREA.
  
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 7. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND
 UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.
  
 8. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 9. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
  
 10. THERE ARE TREES MISSING ON THE SITE THAT ARE SHOWN
 ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THIS
 WILL BE CORRECTED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 15:59:31BASED ON THE DESCRIPTION THE PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD
 ASSESS AND DETERMINE IF A HIGHER LEVEL OF SANITATION
 SERVICE MAY BE NECESSARY.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-31-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-31-2018 Time 12:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-31-2018 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-31 12:02:37THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 AUGUST 29, 2018 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE AND CAN BE
 CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. THIS CONVERSION
 EQUATION IS NEEDED ON THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY.
 (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 2. ADD THE NAVD 1988 / NGVD 1929 CONVERSION EQUATION TO
 THE SURVEY DATA ON SHEET C001.
  
 3. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 SHEETS (C400 AND C401) AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929.
  
 4.STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 NEW IMPERVIOUS AREAS IF THERE IS NOT EXISTING WATER
 QUALITY TREATEMENT ALREADY PROVIDED IN A MASTER SYSTEM.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-07-2018 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-07-2018 Time 11:31 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-07 11:31:23THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. THIS CONVERSION
 EQUATION IS NEEDED ON THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-20-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-20-2018 Time 08:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-20 08:12:56ADD CONVERSION FACTOR FROM NAVD 88 TO NGVD-29 TO SURVEY
 AND ENG. PLANS
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-06-2018 Time 09:35 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-06 09:37:511. NEED SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF SURVEY.
 2. NO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS INCLUDED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-14-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-14 11:13:091. PLEASE PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. PROVIDE WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIRECT VEHICLES TO GET
 FROM THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CAMPUS TO THE NORTH SIDE VIA
 THE RING ROAD.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-16-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-16 12:23:161. PLEASE PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. WE DO NOT RECOMMEND CONVERTING THE NORTH-SOUTH ROAD
 TO ONE-WAY SOUTHBOUND AS INTERNAL CIRCULATION WOULD
 HAVE TO BE ACCOMMODATED THROUGH THE PARKING LOT TO THE
 EAST. THERE WILL BE INCREASED CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 CIRCULATORY VEHICLES AND VEHICLES BACKING UP AND
 SLOWING DOWN FROM AND TO THE PARKING SPACES, WHICH MAY
 BE A SAFETY CONCERN.
  
 SHING TSOI
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-25 17:09:03Z18070011 JFK NORTH CAMPUS (AUGUST 24, 2018 SUBMITTAL)
 - ON THE EASTBOUND APPROACH OF THE PARKING AISLE AT THE
 NORTH ENTRANCE, PROVIDE A STOP SIGN IN ADDITION TO THE
 STOP BAR.
 - PLEASE DIMENSION THE PARKING ANGLE OF THE 4 ANGLED
 PARKING SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING. THESE 4 SPACES DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE
 STALL DEPTH REQUIREMENT OF STANDARD PARKING SPACES IN
 THE CITY CODE. PLEASE REVISE OR SIGN THESE 4 SPACES
 STATING ?SMALL CARS ONLY?. ALSO, THE STOP CURB SHOULD
 BE ORIENTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE PARKING ANGLE. IN
 ADDITION, PLEASE CLARIFY THE 4 SIGNS PROPOSED IN FRONT
 OF THESE 4 PARKING SPACES.
 - SHEET C300 ? THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH ROAD
 IS SHOWN AS 4.6? WIDE. MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH IS 5?.
 - SHEET C300 ? THE NORTH ? SOUTH ROAD IS PROPOSED AS
 ONE-WAY SOUTHBOUND. THE EXISTING ROAD IS TWO WAY.
 CHANGES TO INTERNAL CIRCULATION WILL REQUIRE THAT THE
 ACCESS POINTS ARE ANALYZED. CONSIDER RETAINING THE
 EXISTING TWO WAY CIRCULATION.
 - SHEET C300 ? IF NORTH ? SOUTH ROAD IS ONE WAY THEN
 CONSIDERING REDUCING THE WIDTH OR ADDING BULB OUTS TO
 DISCOURAGE TWO WAY OPERATIONS. THE ROAD IS PROPOSED AS
 18? WHICH WILL BE WIDE ENOUGH FOR PASSENGER CARS TO USE
 FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-07-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-08 12:12:26Z18070011 JFK NORTH CAMPUS (JULY 10, 2018 SUBMITTAL)
 - PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS AND TRAFFIC LETTER.
 - AT THE NORTH ENTRANCE, MODIFY THE LANE ARROW AND
 CHANNELIZATION MARKING IN THE INBOUND LANE, AND INSTALL
 THE TWO-DIRECTION LARGE ARROW SIGN (W1-7). ALSO, THE
 EASTBOUND APPROACH IN THE PARKING AISLE AND THE
 NORTHBOUND APPROACH AT THE INTERNAL ROADWAY AT THIS
 LOCATION SHOULD HAVE A STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN. PROVIDE
 EAST-WEST CROSSWALK AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP ON THE SOUTH
 SIDE OF THIS ENTRANCE.
 - PROVIDE CROSSWALK AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP ACROSS THE
 ENTRANCE OF THE PORTE-COCHERE SOUTH OF THE EXISTING
 HOSPITAL BUILDING.
 - CONSIDER PROVIDING BUS SHELTER FOR THE BUS STOP OR
 EASEMENT ON CONGRESS AVENUE.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 01-31-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-31-2019 Time 09:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-31-2019 Time 09:58 Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-31 09:58:48THE RESUBMITTAL DID NOT INCLUDE THE OVERALL SITE PLAN
 FOR THE EXISTING CSPD BOUNDARY WITH THE ER EXPANSION
 INCLUDED. THIS PLAN WOULD ALSO SHOW THE ACREAGE,
 BUILDING SQUARE FEET AND PARKING COUNT WITHIN THE CSPD
 BOUNDARY. THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN CONTINUES TO ONLY BE
 FOR THE LIMITS OF WORK, WHICH IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE
 MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT LEGISLATION THAT I
 NEED TO PREPARE FOR THE CITY COMMISSION. THE MAILERS TO
 BE ON THE MARCH 11 CITY COMMISSION DATE NEED TO BE SENT
 OUT BY YOUR TEAM WITH A POSTMARK DATE OF FEBRUARY 6,
 2019. IN ORDER FOR ME TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN TO SEE
 THAT IT CONTAINS ACCURATE INFORMATION, I NEED IT
 SUBMITTED TO ME BY 5 PM, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2019. THIS
 WILL ALLOW ME TO REVIEW THE PLANS ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY
 4, 2019, AND SEND YOU A MAILER IF EVERYTHING IS
 ACCEPTABLE BY FEBRUARY 5, 2019. THE PLANS AND RESPONSES
 DID NOT ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING CONDITION FROM THE PB
 REPORT:
  
 B. PROVIDE DIRECTIONAL (WAYFINDING) SIGN LOCATIONS TO
 DIRECT VEHICLES TO GET FROM THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 CAMPUS TO THE NORTH SIDE VIA THE INTERNAL RING ROAD.
  
 THIS WOULD EITHER BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, OR YOU
 WOULD ACKNOWLEDGE IN WRITING THAT PRIOR TO THE FINAL
 INSPECTION TO ALLOW OCCUPANCY OF THE EXPANDED ED, THE
 WAYFINDING SIGNS WILL BE INSTALLED SUBJECT TO THE PLANS
 APPROVED AS PART OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-21-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-21-2018 Time 11:40 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 11-21-2018 Time 11:40 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-21 12:12:20CASE NO. PB1223H
 JFK NORTH HOSPITAL ER EXPANSION - 3RD RESUBMITTAL
 2201 45TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS AND INFORMATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES
 ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF
 INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 DECEMBER 7, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE JANUARY 15, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 21, 2018), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE
 ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
 APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. IF ANY
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ENTRY DRIVES ARE REQUIRED BY THE
 LETTER, THESE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 2) YOU HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THERE IS ADDITIONAL
 TRAFFIC IMPACT (BASED ON THE FORTHCOMING PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TPS LETTER), SO YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND
 ADDITIONAL $2,916 IN FEES ($2,700 REMAINDER OF
 APPLICATION FEE + $216 ADVERTISING FEE).
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INCLUDE
 A LINE ITEM THAT STATES HOW MANY ADA PARKING SPACES ARE
 ARE PROVIDED ON THE ENTIRE CAMPUS.
  
 4) THE PLANS NEED TO INCLUDE THE CITY PARKING DETAIL.
  
 5) PROVIDE THE 500 FOOT MAILER INFORMATION - MAPS,
 ADDRESS LIST AND STAMPED, ADDRESSED ENVELOPES IF LESS
 THAN 50 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 6) SINCE THIS IS NOW GOING TO CITY COMMISSION, THE
 PROPOSED ER CHANGES NEED TO BE MERGED INTO THE PLANS
 FOR THE ENTIRE CAMPUS THAT WERE APPROVED AS PART OF
 RESOLUTION NO. 5-14 (SITE AND LANDSCAPE). NOTE: SINCE
 THIS IS A BIG UNDERTAKING, I WILL NOT NEED THE FULL
 UPDATED PLANS BY PLANNING BOARD, BUT YOU WILL NOT BE
 SCHEDULED FOR CITY COMMISSION UNTIL THEY HAVE BEEN
 SUBMITTED.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-26-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-26-2018 Time 10:03 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-26-2018 Time 09:05 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-26 10:03:33CASE NO. PB1223H
 JFK NORTH HOSPITAL ER EXPANSION ? 2ND RESUBMITTAL
 2201 45TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 26, 2018), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING A TRAFFIC
 IMPACT STATEMENT WHICH SHOWS THAT THERE WILL BE NO
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FROM BASED ON THE EXPANSION.
 THE STATEMENT PERMITTED THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED TO
 THE PPRC FOR REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED EXPANSION. HOWEVER,
 YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE TRAFFIC
 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 VERIFYING THE CONCLUSIONS FROM THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: IF THE COUNTY TPS LETTER VERIFIES
 THAT THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT, THEN THE
 CASE WILL NOT TRIGGER A CITY COMMISSION REVIEW AS A
 MAJOR PD AMENDMENT. HOWEVER, SINCE THE EXPANSION
 EXCEEDS 1,000 SQUARE FEET, IT REQUIRES A FORMAL SITE
 PLAN REVIEW AS WELL AS THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. BOTH
 APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE SAME APPLICATION MATERIAL;
 HOWEVER, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE $1,500 REVIEW
 FEE. NO ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING FEES ARE REQUIRED.
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO
 INCLUDE A LINE ITEM THAT STATES HOW MANY ADA PARKING
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND A LINE ITEM STATING HOW MANY
 ADA PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED. YOU ARE PROVIDING 626
 PARKING SPACES, SO A MINIMUM OF 13 ADA PARKING SPACES
 ARE REQUIRED.
  
 4) REVISED COMMENT: REPLACE THE INCORRECT PARKING
 DETAIL ON SHEET C500 WITH THE DETAIL THAT CONFORMS TO
 CITY STANDARDS. THE PLANNING DIVISION CAN PROVIDE THE
 CITY DETAIL IF YOU DO NOT HAVE IT IN YOUR FILES.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-25-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-25-2018 Time 13:32 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 09-25-2018 Time 09:08 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-25 13:33:03CASE NO. PB1223H
 JFK NORTH HOSPITAL ER EXPANSION ? 1ST RESUBMITTAL
 2201 45TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 8, 2018),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING A TRAFFIC
 IMPACT STATEMENT WHICH SHOWS THAT THERE WILL BE NO
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FROM BASED ON THE EXPANSION.
 THE STATEMENT PERMITTED THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED TO
 THE PPRC FOR REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED EXPANSION. HOWEVER,
 YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE TRAFFIC
 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 VERIFYING THE CONCLUSIONS FROM THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: IF THE COUNTY TPS LETTER VERIFIES
 THAT THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT, THEN THE
 CASE WILL NOT TRIGGER A CITY COMMISSION REVIEW AS A
 MAJOR PD AMENDMENT. HOWEVER, SINCE THE EXPANSION
 EXCEEDS 1,000 SQUARE FEET, IT REQUIRES A FORMAL SITE
 PLAN REVIEW AS WELL AS THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. BOTH
 APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE SAME APPLICATION MATERIAL;
 HOWEVER, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE $1,500 REVIEW
 FEE. NO ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING FEES ARE REQUIRED. ----
 THE RESPONSE STATED THAT THE FEE WILL BE SUPPLIED UNDER
 A SEPARATE COVER. STAFF HAS NO RECORD OF THE FEE BEING
 SUBMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE RECEIPT IF THE
 FEE WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE REMOVED THE
 INFORMATION THAT SHOWED THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 PARKING SPACES FOR THE CAMPUS, TO INCLUDE THE ADA
 REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SHOWS A REMOVAL OF
 BOTH REGULAR AND ADA PARKING, IT MUST VERIFY THAT THE
 MINIMUM OF REGULAR AND ADA SPACES FOR THE CAMPUS ARE
 STILL PROVIDED.
  
 4) NEW COMMENT: THE ORIGINAL PLAN CALLED FOR THE
 PARKING SPACES IN THE AMBULANCE LOOP TO BE FOR
 AMBULANCES ONLY. THE COMMENT RESPONSE IS THAT THIS IS
 FOR AMV PARKING. STAFF IS UNFAMILIAR WITH THIS ACRONYM,
 SO PLEASE CLARIFY. IF THIS IS PUBLIC PARKING IN ANY
 WAY, THEN THESE SPACES ARE CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE THAN
 THE PROVIDED ADA SPACES, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED PER THE
 CITY?S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION.
  
 5) REVISED COMMENT: NO PARKING DETAIL WAS SUBMITTED FOR
 THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES. REMOVE THE INCORRECT PARKING
 DETAIL FROM SHEET C500 AS IT DOES NOT CONFORM TO CITY
 STANDARDS.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE ROADWAY
 ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING IS 18 FEET WIDE, YET IT
 EXPANDS TO 19 (NOW 24) FEET WIDE SOUTH OF THE DROP OFF
 AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. ----- THE
 RESPONSE STATES THAT THIS IS A TWO-WAY DRIVE UP TO THE
 DROP OFF ENTRANCE AND THE 18 FOOT WIDE ROADWAY IS
 ONE-WAY SOUTHBOUND PAST THE DROP OFF. THE SITE PLAN
 SHOWS TWO LANES IN TO THE SOUTHERN ENTRANCE DROP OFF
 WITH A STOP/DO NOT ENTER BAR AT THE 18 FOOT WIDE
 ROADWAY, IN ADDITION TO THE DO NOT ENTER SIGN SHOWN ON
 SHEET C301. THE CURB IS BEING REBUILT HERE AND THE LANE
 SHOULD BE NARROWED TO THE 18 FOOT WIDTH. NO YELLOW
 STRIPING SHOULD BE USED.
  
 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE PLANS SHOW NO NEW FREE STANDING
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT. PLEASE
 VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CASE.
  
 8) NEW COMMENT: THE WALL AROUND THE OXYGEN TANKS IS
 REQUIRED TO HAVE A HEDGE ALONG ITS BASE ON THE NORTH
 SIDE. ADDITIONALLY, THE GREEN SPACE TO THE NORTH OF THE
 TANKS IS THE TERMINAL ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING AND
 MUST HAVE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL TREE OR PALM EQUIVALENT
 INSTALLED. THIS LANDSCAPE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 9) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
 REPLACEMENT BICYCLE RACK AND PAD THAT MEET THE PHYSICAL
 CITY STANDARDS; HOWEVER, THEY NEED TO BE MOVED CLOSER
 TO THE MAIN HOSPITAL ENTRANCE TO MEET THE CITY
 LOCATIONAL STANDARDS. PLEASE SHIFT THE BICYCLE PARKING
 TO THE WEST APPROXIMATELY 40 FEET AND ADJUST THE
 LANDSCAPE ACCORDINGLY.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-06-2018 Time 15:16 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-06-2018 Time 15:16 Sent To  
Notes
2018-08-06 15:16:52CASE NO. PB1223H
 JFK NORTH HOSPITAL ER EXPANSION
 2201 45TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 8, 2018),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING A TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
 WHICH SHOWS THAT THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC
 IMPACT FROM BASED ON THE EXPANSION. THE STATEMENT
 PERMITTED THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED TO THE PPRC FOR
 REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED EXPANSION. HOWEVER, YOU ARE
 STILL REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY VERIFYING THE
 CONCLUSIONS FROM THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT.
  
 2) IF THE COUNTY TPS LETTER VERIFIES THAT THERE IS NO
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT, THEN THE CASE WILL NOT
 TRIGGER A CITY COMMISSION REVIEW AS A MAJOR PD
 AMENDMENT. HOWEVER, SINCE THE EXPANSION EXCEEDS 1,000
 SQUARE FEET, IT REQUIRES A FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW AS
 WELL AS THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. BOTH APPLICATIONS
 REQUIRE THE SAME APPLICATION MATERIAL; HOWEVER, YOU ARE
 REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE $1,500 REVIEW FEE. NO ADDITIONAL
 ENGINEERING FEES ARE REQUIRED.
  
 3) NO LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE
 APPLICATION. STAFF WAS UNABLE TO PERFORM A COMPLETE
 REVIEW WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED PLANS.
  
 4) NO ELEVATIONS WERE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION.
 STAFF WAS UNABLE TO PERFORM A COMPLETE REVIEW WITHOUT
 ALL OF THE REQUIRED PLANS.
  
 5) THE SITE DATA TABLE STATES THAT THERE ARE 628
 PARKING SPACES BEING PROVIDED AFTER THE PARKING AREA IS
 RECONFIGURED BASED ON THE ER EXPANSION. FOR 628 PARKING
 SPACES, 13 ARE REQUIRED TO BE ADA PARKING SPACES. THE
 PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO STATE THAT 13 ADA PARKING SPACES
 ARE REQUIRED AND LIST THE NUMBER OF ADA PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED ON THE SITE.
  
 6) NO PARKING DETAIL WAS SUBMITTED. THE PLANS
 INCORRECTLY CALL OUT SINGLE STRIPING FOR THE NEW
 PARKING SPACES, INCLUDING THE REGULAR, ADA AND
 AMBULANCE SPACES.
  
 7) THE MODIFIED PARKING ROW WHICH IS PROPOSED TO HAVE
 FIVE REGULAR AND THREE ADA PARKING SPACES HAS BEEN
 RESTRIPED FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. PROVIDE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF THIS PARKING SPACES AND THE PLAN SO THAT
 STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE NEW SPACES CONFORM TO MINIMUM
 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT APPEARS THAT
 THE DRIVE AISLE AT THIS LOCATION IS LESS THAN 24 FEET
 IN WIDTH. THE CHANGES TO THIS AREA REQUIRE BRINGING THE
 DRIVE AISLE INTO CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIRED MINIMUM
 DIMENSIONAL STANDARD OF 24 FEET.
  
 8) THE SIDEWALK THAT CONNECTED TO THE FRONT OF THE ADA
 SPACES REFERENCED IN COMMENT NO. 7 HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT WALKING BEHIND CARS AS PART OF
 THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.
  
 9) THERE IS PAVED "LEFT OVER" AREA ADJACENT TO THE
 ACCESS AISLE ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PARKING ROW
 CITED IN COMMENT NO. 7 THAT MAY NOT REMAIN. PLEASE
 WIDEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THIS LOCATION.
  
 10) THE SURVEY SHOWS A CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK WITH STRIPED
 CROSSWALKS FROM CONGRESS AVENUE TO THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE ER BUILDING AND THE NORTHERN PART OF THE CAMPUS.
 THE PROPOSED PLAN FAILS TO SHOW THIS CONTINUOUS ROUTE.
  
 11) THE NEW PARKING ROW CONTAINING 12 PARKING SPACES
 (TWO SIX SPACE BAYS) SHOWS AN 18 FOOT PARKING STALL
 WITH A D CURB AT ITS BASE. THIS DOES NOT MEET CITY
 STANDARDS. EITHER HAVE A 16 FOOT LONG STALL WITH A TWO
 FOOT OVERHANG OF A D CURB, OR USE WHEEL STOPS AT THE 16
 FOOT POINT.
  
 12) THE SIX NEW ADA PARKING SPACES NEED TO HAVE WHEEL
 STOPS OR CURBING TO PREVENT THEM FROM HITTING THE ADA
 SIGNS.
  
 13) WHY DOES THE AMBULANCE PARKING AND DROP-OFF AREA
 DRIVE AISLE NEED TO BE 30 FEET WIDE FOR TWO TRAVEL
 LANES?
  
 14) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE ROADWAY ADJACENT TO THE
 BUILDING IS 18 FEET WIDE, YET IT EXPANDS TO 19 FEET
 WIDE SOUTH OF THE DROP OFF AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
 THE BUILDING.
  
 15) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR THE RAISED SIDEWALK
 ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE ER DRIVEWAY.
  
 16) THE NEW SIDEWALK ALONG THE EXISTING PARKING BAYS
 SOUTH OF THE BUILDING IS BEING SHOWN THROUGH THE
 REQUIRED TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REMOVING
 REQUIRED TREES.
  
 17) THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF
 THE BUILDING PORTE COCHERE IS BEING RELOCATED FURTHER
 WEST. THE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW HOW THE RELOCATED SIDEWALK
 NETWORK, TO INCLUDE THE HATCHED CROSSWALKS, PROVIDES A
 CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK NETWORK.
  
 18) THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW ANY NEW LOCATIONS FOR
 THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA. THE
 SIGNS WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE MASTER SIGN PLAN.
  
 19) WHERE IS THE FIRE HYDRANT THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED
 SOUTH OF THE ER BEING RELOCATED TO? THE CURRENT
 LOCATION IS IN A PROPOSED DRIVE AISLE.
  
 20) THERE IS CURB RELOCATION WORK SHOWN ON THE
 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. YOU WILL
 NEED TO SUPPLY OWNER'S CONSENT FROM THE NEIGHBORING
 PROPERTY TO SHOW THIS ON THE JFK HOSPITAL PLANS.
  
 21) THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE PAVING THAN PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED. PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWING THAT THE SITE STILL
 MEETS THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AND PERVIOUS SURFACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 22) THE SURVEY SHOWS AN EXISTING RACK FOR EIGHT BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE ER. THE PROPOSED SITE
 PLAN FAILS TO SHOW THE REPLACEMENT BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES MEETING CITY LOCATIONAL STANDARDS. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE CURRENT RACK DOES NOT CONFORM TO CITY
 STANDARDS, SO IT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED WITH A CITY
 APPROVED RACK MODEL. THE DIMENSIONED PAD AND RACKS NEED
 TO BOTH BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND IN A BICYCLE RACK
 DETAIL.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved