 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18060025
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18060025 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
18:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-20-2018 |
Time |
16:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-10 19:00:08 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14 FT NAVD. THE | | | FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 4. PROPOSED TEMPORARY TRAILERS. SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 | | | SHOWS TWO "TEMPORARY OFFICE TRAILERS". IT IS NOT CLEAR | | | WHETHER THEY WILL BE FOR USED BY CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL | | | ONLY, OR USED TO ACCOMODATE FACILITY STAFF DURING THE | | | PERIOD FOLLOWING THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING UNTIL THE NEW BUILDING IS READY FOR OCCUPANCY. | | | IF THE TRAILERS ARE FOR CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL ONLY, NO | | | WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE RAMP IS REQUIRED. IF THE TRAILERS | | | ARE FOR FACILITY STAFF, OR FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT | | | MEETINGS INVOLVING VENDORS, DESIGNERS, CLIENT | | | PERSONNEL, OR ANY OTHER PERSONNEL WHO ARE NOT | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BASED, A WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE RAMP | | | AND ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
08-22-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-21-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-11 12:13:59 | PROVIDE: | | | | | | #1 WATER AND SEWER ESTIMATED FLOWS IN GALLONS PER DAY. | | | #2 VERIFY WATER LINE ALONG NORTH SIDE OF PROPERTY IS OF | | | 8" DIAMETER OUR INFORMATION SHOWS A 4" DIAMETER WM | | | #3 VERIFY WATER LINES FROM PRIVATE TO CITY OWNED. | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE | | | LEAD-FREE." | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-10-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-10-2018 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-10 15:47:04 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPLE PLANNER, AND THE ATTACHMENT DATED | | | JULY 27, 2018, FROMURBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS, THE | | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS | | | APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
Time |
11:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-03 11:27:42 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED TEMPORARY TRAILERS APPEAR TO BE TOO CLOSE | | | TOGETHER. A 25' SEPARATION WOULD BE REQUIRED OR STAGGER | | | THE TRAILER WITH NO DIRECT EXPOSURE. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES, | | | INCLUDING NFPA? 150 STANDARD ON FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY IN | | | ANIMAL HOUSING FACILITIES 2013 EDITION. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. THE NORTHERN ACCESS ROAD HAS A FDC AND FIRE HYDRANT | | | INDICATED ON IT; HOWEVER, THE ROAD WIDTH IS LESS THAN | | | THE REQUIRED FIRE LANE OF 20'. AT ONE POINT 13' IS | | | INDICATED. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE GIVEN TO | | | EITHER INCREASE THE WIDTH OF THE FIRE DEPATMENT ACCESS | | | ROAD OR CHANGE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED FDC AND | | | HYDRANT TO ANOTHER LOCATION. | | | | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | BASED ON # 7 ABOVE SOME CHANGES MAY BE NEEDED. PLEASE | | | CLOSELY COORDINATE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL | | | FOR ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-15-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-15-2018 |
Time |
16:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-15-2018 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-15 16:17:15 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PEGGY ADAMS Z18060025 | | | NOVEMBER 15, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-446 (G) | | | AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | CORRECT THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? #8 MULCH IS ONLY 5 POTENTIAL POINTS. | | | ? #3 CANNOT COUNT 51% NATIVE AND 51% DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | ? NOTE SHOULD READ: PLANTS MAY ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE FOR | | | CREDIT TOWARD DROUGHT TOLERANT OR FLORIDA NATIVE | | | PLANTS. | | | | | | 3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES IN THE | | | TWO TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ADJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEW BUILDING, AND THE | | | TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS AT THE NORTH END OF THE PARKING | | | ROWS WEST OF THE DOME BUILDING. NON-CONFORMING PARKING | | | ROW ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW BUILDING MAY ALSO HAVE | | | TREES ADDED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO | | | ANY PARKING AREAS REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT | | | CODE. | | | | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE NEW BUILDING AND AT | | | THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE DOME BUILDING ARE SHOWN | | | WITH SINGLE ALEXANDER PALMS THAT DO NOT MEET THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENT. THERE IS SUFFICIENT PLANTING AREA TO | | | INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT THE LINES AND ADD THE | | | REQUIRED TREE. | | | | | | 5. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE REMOVAL AND MITIGATION OF TREES FOR | | | THE DRAINAGE AREA RELOCATION WAS APPROVED WITH A TREE | | | ALTERATION PERMIT. A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS NOT APPLIED | | | FOR OR ISSUED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW TREES. A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT WITH AN AS BUILT PLAN MUST BE | | | SUBMITTED FOR THE NEW DRAINAGE AREA TO CONFIRM THAT ALL | | | REQUIRED MITIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. | | | | | | A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED | | | AS THE AS BUILT, BUT I WAS INFORMED IS NOT ACCURATE TO | | | THE AS BUILT PRIOR TO IT BEING ISSUED. THE CORRECTED | | | PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, APPROVED AND | | | INSPECTED TO VERIFY IT IS ACCURATE. AT THAT TIME THE | | | PLAN CAN BE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL PLAN SET WITH | | | ANY CORRECTIONS MADE TO THE OVERALL SITE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 7. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 8. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | 9. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SUPPLY A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN FOR THE SITE, WITH AN ACCOUNTING OF THE TREES ON | | | SITE AND INCLUDE ALL CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SO THAT | | | STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OVERALL | | | REQUIRED TREES AS APPROVED WITH THE CSPD AND WHAT IS | | | PROPOSED FOR THE FINAL DESIGN. | | | | | | SEE COMMENT #6. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/20/18: | | | 11. SATISFIED. TEMPORARY TRAILERS DETAIL INCLUDES TREES | | | AND HEDGE. IF TREES AND HEDGE ARE TO STAY AFTER TRAILER | | | REMOVAL, SHOW IT ON SHEET LP-2 AS PERMANENT. THE 4 CE2 | | | ARE CURRENTLY COUNTED TOWARD SITE TREE CREDITS ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE BUFFER | | | ALONG MILITARY TRAIL ON SHEET LP-2 THAT ARE WITHIN THE | | | LIMITS OF AFFECTED AREA. THEY CAN BE NOTED AS APPROVED | | | AS SHOWN ON OTHER SHEETS, BUT THE BUFFER MUST BE SHOWN | | | ACCURATELY FOR THE NEW BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE BUFFER HEDGE ALONG THE NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR ALL AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO THE WAIVER | | | REQUEST, AS THERE ARE PORTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | | SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | 14. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR PLANNING BOARD, | | | THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW | | | THE ROOT BARRIERS SPACED CLOSER TO THE DRAINAGE LINES | | | TO PROTECT THE PRIVATE LINES YET ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE | | | ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF THE TREES. | | | 15. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR PLANNING BOARD, | | | THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW | | | THE REQUIRED HEDGE IN THE WEST BUFFER FOR ALL AREAS | | | NORTH OF THE EXISTING HEDGE. | | | 16. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR PLANNING BOARD, | | | THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE | | | POND AREA TO REFLECT ANY CHANGES DISCOVERED DURING THE | | | LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-01-2018 |
Time |
16:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-01-2018 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-01 16:53:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PEGGY ADAMS Z18060025 | | | OCTOBER 1, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-446 (G) | | | AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | CORRECT THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? #8 MULCH IS ONLY 5 POTENTIAL POINTS. | | | ? #3 CANNOT COUNT 51% NATIVE AND 51% DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | ? NOTE SHOULD READ: PLANTS MAY ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE FOR | | | CREDIT TOWARD DROUGHT TOLERANT OR FLORIDA NATIVE | | | PLANTS. | | | | | | 3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES IN THE | | | TWO TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ADJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEW BUILDING, AND THE | | | TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS AT THE NORTH END OF THE PARKING | | | ROWS WEST OF THE DOME BUILDING. NON-CONFORMING PARKING | | | ROW ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW BUILDING MAY ALSO HAVE | | | TREES ADDED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO | | | ANY PARKING AREAS REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT | | | CODE. | | | | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE NEW BUILDING AND AT | | | THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE DOME BUILDING ARE SHOWN | | | WITH SINGLE ALEXANDER PALMS THAT DO NOT MEET THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENT. THERE IS SUFFICIENT PLANTING AREA TO | | | INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT THE LINES AND ADD THE | | | REQUIRED TREE. | | | | | | 5. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE REMOVAL AND MITIGATION OF TREES FOR | | | THE DRAINAGE AREA RELOCATION WAS APPROVED WITH A TREE | | | ALTERATION PERMIT. A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS NOT APPLIED | | | FOR OR ISSUED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW TREES. A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT WITH AN AS BUILT PLAN MUST BE | | | SUBMITTED FOR THE NEW DRAINAGE AREA TO CONFIRM THAT ALL | | | REQUIRED MITIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. | | | | | | A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED | | | AS THE AS BUILT, BUT I WAS INFORMED IS NOT ACCURATE TO | | | THE AS BUILT PRIOR TO IT BEING ISSUED. THE CORRECTED | | | PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, APPROVED AND | | | INSPECTED TO VERIFY IT IS ACCURATE. AT THAT TIME THE | | | PLAN CAN BE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL PLAN SET WITH | | | ANY CORRECTIONS MADE TO THE OVERALL SITE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 7. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 8. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | 9. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SUPPLY A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN FOR THE SITE, WITH AN ACCOUNTING OF THE TREES ON | | | SITE AND INCLUDE ALL CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SO THAT | | | STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OVERALL | | | REQUIRED TREES AS APPROVED WITH THE CSPD AND WHAT IS | | | PROPOSED FOR THE FINAL DESIGN. | | | | | | SEE COMMENT #6. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/20/18: | | | 11. SATISFIED. TEMPORARY TRAILERS DETAIL INCLUDES TREES | | | AND HEDGE. IF TREES AND HEDGE ARE TO STAY AFTER TRAILER | | | REMOVAL, SHOW IT ON SHEET LP-2 AS PERMANENT. THE 4 CE2 | | | ARE CURRENTLY COUNTED TOWARD SITE TREE CREDITS ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE BUFFER | | | ALONG MILITARY TRAIL ON SHEET LP-2 THAT ARE WITHIN THE | | | LIMITS OF AFFECTED AREA. THEY CAN BE NOTED AS APPROVED | | | AS SHOWN ON OTHER SHEETS, BUT THE BUFFER MUST BE SHOWN | | | ACCURATELY FOR THE NEW BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE BUFFER HEDGE ALONG THE NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR ALL AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO THE WAIVER | | | REQUEST, AS THERE ARE PORTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | | SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR PLANNING BOARD, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW THE | | | ROOT BARRIERS SPACED CLOSER TO THE DRAINAGE LINES TO | | | PROTECT THE PRIVATE LINES YET ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE ROOT | | | DEVELOPMENT OF THE TREES. | | | | | | 2. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR PLANNING BOARD, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW THE | | | REQUIRED HEDGE IN THE WEST BUFFER FOR ALL AREAS NORTH | | | OF THE EXISTING HEDGE. | | | | | | 3. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR PLANNING BOARD, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE POND | | | AREA TO REFLECT ANY CHANGES DISCOVERED DURING THE | | | LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. | | | | | | 4. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-22-2018 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-20-2018 |
Time |
16:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-22 17:00:44 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PEGGY ADAMS Z18060025 | | | AUGUST 21, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS BELOW 103111 ARE MISSING | | | FROM THE DISPOSITION CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. 103304 AND 103308 ARE LISTED AS PRESERVE, | | | BUT MARKED ON PLAN AS REMOVED. | | | ? SATISFIED. ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED MUST LIST THE | | | CANOPY DIAMETER TO CALCULATE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION | | | 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | CORRECT THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? #8 MULCH IS ONLY 5 POTENTIAL POINTS. | | | ? #3 CANNOT COUNT 51% NATIVE AND 51% DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | ? NOTE SHOULD READ: PLANTS MAY ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE FOR | | | CREDIT TOWARD DROUGHT TOLERANT OR FLORIDA NATIVE | | | PLANTS. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF FIRE LINES AND | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. THERE ARE SEVERAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS THAT | | | HAVE LINES CONFLICTING WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED | | | TREES IN THE TWO TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE ROW | | | OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEW | | | BUILDING, AND THE TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS AT THE NORTH END | | | OF THE PARKING ROWS WEST OF THE DOME BUILDING. | | | NON-CONFORMING PARKING ROW ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW | | | BUILDING MAY ALSO HAVE TREES ADDED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS. | | | ANY MODIFICATIONS TO ANY PARKING AREAS REQUIRES | | | COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CODE. | | | | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE NEW BUILDING AND AT | | | THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE DOME BUILDING ARE SHOWN | | | WITH SINGLE ALEXANDER PALMS THAT DO NOT MEET THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENT. THERE IS SUFFICIENT PLANTING AREA TO | | | INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT THE LINES AND ADD THE | | | REQUIRED TREE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE REMOVAL AND MITIGATION OF | | | TREES FOR THE DRAINAGE AREA RELOCATION WAS APPROVED | | | WITH A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS | | | NOT APPLIED FOR OR ISSUED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | NEW TREES. A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WITH AN AS BUILT PLAN | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE NEW DRAINAGE AREA TO CONFIRM | | | THAT ALL REQUIRED MITIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. | | | | | | A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED | | | AS THE AS BUILT, BUT I WAS INFORMED IS NOT ACCURATE TO | | | THE AS BUILT PRIOR TO IT BEING ISSUED. THE CORRECTED | | | PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, APPROVED AND | | | INSPECTED TO VERIFY IT IS ACCURATE. AT THAT TIME THE | | | PLAN CAN BE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL PLAN SET WITH | | | ANY CORRECTIONS MADE TO THE OVERALL SITE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF NEW PARKING | | | CONFIGURATION NORTH OF THE DOME BUILDING ELIMINATES AN | | | EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA WITH PALMS THAT IS FUNCTIONING | | | AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE ADJACENT | | | PROPERTY. MOVING THE DRIVE AISLE CLOSER TO THE BUILDING | | | WOULD ALLOW THE REQUIRED BUFFER TO BE CREATED ALONG THE | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS PROPOSED FOR THE TEMPORARY | | | TRAILERS WOULD REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF TWO BLACK OLIVE | | | SHADE TREES. THE TREES PROPOSED TO BE ADDED NEAR THE | | | TRAILERS ARE SMALL SCALE TREES. | | | STAFF RECOMMENDS LOOKING AT TRAILER PLACEMENT OPTIONS | | | THAT WOULD AVOID REMOVING THE TREES, AND PROPOSED TREES | | | TO BE LARGE SPECIES. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 30 | | | PERCENT REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE | | | TRAILERS. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUPPLY A COMPREHENSIVE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE SITE, WITH AN ACCOUNTING OF THE | | | TREES ON SITE AND INCLUDE ALL CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS | | | SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE | | | OVERALL REQUIRED TREES AS APPROVED WITH THE CSPD AND | | | WHAT IS PROPOSED FOR THE FINAL DESIGN. | | | | | | SEE COMMENT #6. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/20/18: | | | 11. TEMPORARY TRAILERS DETAIL INCLUDES TREES AND HEDGE. | | | IF TREES AND HEDGE ARE TO STAY AFTER TRAILER REMOVAL, | | | SHOW IT ON SHEET LP-2 AS PERMANENT. THE 4 CE2 ARE | | | CURRENTLY COUNTED TOWARD SITE TREE CREDITS ON THE PLANT | | | LIST. | | | | | | 12. SHOW THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE BUFFER ALONG | | | MILITARY TRAIL ON SHEET LP-2 THAT ARE WITHIN THE LIMITS | | | OF AFFECTED AREA. THEY CAN BE NOTED AS APPROVED AS | | | SHOWN ON OTHER SHEETS, BUT THE BUFFER MUST BE SHOWN | | | ACCURATELY FOR THE NEW BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SHOW THE BUFFER HEDGE ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE | | | FOR ALL AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO THE WAIVER REQUEST, AS | | | THERE ARE PORTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 11:10:38 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PEGGY ADAMS Z18060025 | | | JULY 6, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? TREES AND PALMS BELOW 103111 ARE MISSING FROM THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | ? 103304 AND 103308 ARE LISTED AS PRESERVE, BUT MARKED | | | ON PLAN AS REMOVED. | | | ? ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED MUST LIST THE CANOPY DIAMETER | | | TO CALCULATE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS | | | CHART TO CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 | | | POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF FIRE LINES AND ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS THAT HAVE LINES | | | CONFLICTING WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES IN THE TWO | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ADJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEW BUILDING, AND THE | | | TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS AT THE NORTH END OF THE PARKING | | | ROWS WEST OF THE DOME BUILDING. NON-CONFORMING PARKING | | | ROW ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW BUILDING MAY ALSO HAVE | | | TREES ADDED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO | | | ANY PARKING AREAS REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT | | | CODE. | | | | | | 5. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | 6. THE REMOVAL AND MITIGATION OF TREES FOR THE DRAINAGE | | | AREA RELOCATION WAS APPROVED WITH A TREE ALTERATION | | | PERMIT. A LANDSCAPE PERMIT WAS NOT APPLIED FOR OR | | | ISSUED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW TREES. A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT WITH AN AS BUILT PLAN MUST BE | | | SUBMITTED FOR THE NEW DRAINAGE AREA TO CONFIRM THAT ALL | | | REQUIRED MITIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. | | | | | | 7. THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF NEW PARKING | | | CONFIGURATION NORTH OF THE DOME BUILDING ELIMINATES AN | | | EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA WITH PALMS THAT IS FUNCTIONING | | | AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE ADJACENT | | | PROPERTY. MOVING THE DRIVE AISLE CLOSER TO THE BUILDING | | | WOULD ALLOW THE REQUIRED BUFFER TO BE CREATED ALONG THE | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 8. THE LOCATIONS PROPOSED FOR THE TEMPORARY TRAILERS | | | WOULD REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF TWO BLACK OLIVE SHADE | | | TREES. THE TREES PROPOSED TO BE ADDED NEAR THE TRAILERS | | | ARE SMALL SCALE TREES. | | | STAFF RECOMMENDS LOOKING AT TRAILER PLACEMENT OPTIONS | | | THAT WOULD AVOID REMOVING THE TREES, AND PROPOSED TREES | | | TO BE LARGE SPECIES. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 30 PERCENT | | | REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE TRAILERS. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE SUPPLY A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR | | | THE SITE, WITH AN ACCOUNTING OF THE TREES ON SITE AND | | | INCLUDE ALL CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN | | | EVALUATE THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OVERALL REQUIRED | | | TREES AS APPROVED WITH THE CSPD AND WHAT IS PROPOSED | | | FOR THE FINAL DESIGN. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
10-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-01-2018 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-01-2018 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-01 15:54:54 | THE COMMENT BELOW IS BASED ON THE REVIEW OT THE | | | SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM AROUND THE | | | PROPOSED ADOPTION CENTER IS A LOOPED SYSTEM. IS IT | | | POSSIBLE TO REMOVE ONE OF THE PIPES CONNECTED TO | | | DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ST-9 (OR ANOTHER STRUCTURE) WITHOUT | | | AFFECTING THE HYDRAULICS OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGIENERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-08-2018 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-08-2018 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-08 15:56:09 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | AUGUST 3, 2018 REVIEW PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FROM THE SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE THROUGH THE NEW PARKING LOTS SOUTH OF THE | | | TWO-STORY DOME BUILDING. IT DOESN'T APPEAR A SWALE WITH | | | 3:1 SLOPES CAN BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY | | | LINE UNLESS THERE IS A RETAINING WALL ALONG THE SOUTH | | | EDGE OF THE PARKING. | | | | | | 2. REVIEW THE GRADING OF THE EAST END OF THE PARKING | | | LOT SOUTH OF THE TWO-STORY DOME BUILDING. THERE IS A | | | PAVEMENT GRADE OF 18.53 FT NGVD IN THE CORNER OF THE | | | PARKING LOT. THE NEAREST CATCH BASIN TO THE NORTH WILL | | | HAVE A GRATE ELEVATION OF 18.70 FT NGVD. | | | | | | 3. REVIEW THE UTILITY CONFLICT SEPARATION NOTES ON THE | | | UTILITY PLAN. THE NOTES ARE WRITTEN TO MAKE IT APPEAR | | | THE FIRE LINES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE STORM | | | PIPES FOR EXAMPLE, THE WATER LINE TO THE FIRE HYDRANT | | | AND TO THE FDC, THE CONFLICT IS WRITTEN AS STORM BOP | | | AND FIRE TOP. IF THE WATER LINES ARE PASSING UNDER THE | | | STORM THEN 12" OF CLEARANCE WILL BE REQUIRED INSTEAD OF | | | 6". | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ST-1 IS REPLACING AN EXISTING | | | STRUCTURE. IS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE A CONTROL | | | STRUCTURE FOR THE LAKE TO THE SOUTH OF THE ENTRANCE | | | ROAD? | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-11 08:07:52 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. CONSIDER FLATTENING THE PAVEMENT SLOPE OF THE | | | PARKING LOT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE SOUTH OF THE | | | TWO-STORY DOME BUILDING. THE BACKSLOPE TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINE APPEARS TO BE 4:1 OR STEEPER. CONFIRM THE PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPING CAN BE PLANTED ON THIS SLOPE. | | | | | | 2. AVOID DIRECT RUNOFF TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BY | | | CREATING A SHALLOW SWALE AT THE BASE OF ANY FILL | | | SLOPES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED SFWMD ERP APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. N. MILITARY TRAIL IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. PERMITS WILL BE NEEDED FROM THE COUNTY FOR THE | | | DRIVEWAY CONNECTION AND OTHER WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 10:06:07 | 1. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL FOR ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. ALL ON-SITE UTILITIES TO BE PRIVATE. | | | 3. NO COMMENTS ON SURVEY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-02-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-02 17:20:35 | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | - THE AUTOTURN TRUCK PATH AT THE RIGHT-IN ONLY DRIVEWAY | | | ON MILITARY TRAIL APPEARS TO ENCROACH INTO THE CURB | | | SLIGHTLY. PLEASE ADJUST THE DRIVEWAY TO ACCOMMODATE THE | | | DESIGN VEHICLE. | | | - AT THE RIGHT-IN ONLY DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY TRAIL, | | | STRIPING ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY SHOULD | | | BE WHITE IN COLOR PER MUTCD, AND THE DIAGONAL MARKING | | | SHOULD BE SLANTED AWAY FROM THE CURB ON THE RIGHT-HAND | | | SIDE. | | | - THE SIDEWALK WIDTH ON THE SITE PLAN (SP-1) IS SHOWN | | | AS 4 FEET, WHICH IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SIDEWALK | | | WIDTH OF 5 FEET ON THE CIVIL PLAN (C7.00) AT THIS | | | LOCATION. MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH IS 5 FEET. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-14 12:07:58 | Z18060025 - PEGGY ADAM ANIMAL RESCUE (JULY 27, 2018 | | | RE-SUBMITTAL) | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. | | | - PROVIDE FDOT DRIVEWAY APPROVAL LETTER. | | | - PROVIDE REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY. BELOW ARE THE PREVIOUS | | | COMMENTS: | | | O VERIFY THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDING | | | SQUARE-FOOTAGES. | | | O ATTACH THE 2007 STUDY FOR THE TRIP GENERATION RATES | | | CONDUCTED BY KIMLEY-HORN. | | | O IN FIGURE 2, VERIFY THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT PERCENTAGES. | | | THE FIGURE SHOWS A TOTAL OF 90% OF TRIPS GOING IN/OUT | | | OF THE SITE. ALSO, WESTBOUND AT 12TH STREET/MILITARY | | | TRAIL IS RIGHT-TURN ONLY AND SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO | | | ACCOUNT IN THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | O IN FIGURE 3, THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY TRAIL | | | SHOULD BE RIGHT-IN ONLY. PLEASE REVISE. | | | SITE PLAN AND OTHER COMMENTS: | | | - IN THE PARKING CALCULATION SECTION IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, ONLY 28,295 SF IS PROPOSED TO | | | BE OCCUPIED IN DOMES A AND B OUT OF THE TOTAL OF 47,996 | | | SF. CLARIFY HOW THE REMAINING BUILDING SQUARE-FOOTAGES | | | ARE USED, AND PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR | | | THE REMAINING SQUARE-FOOTAGES. ALSO, THE PROPOSED | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE OF ?VET? FOR GRACE PAVILION HAS A | | | SQUARE-FOOTAGE OF 3,742 SF ACCORDING TO SHEET A0.1. | | | - INSTALL BUS SHELTER AT THE RELOCATED BUS STOP ON | | | MILITARY TRAIL. | | | - MODIFY THE RIGHT-IN ONLY DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY TRAIL | | | TO REDUCE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE. PROVIDE | | | AUTOTURN TRUCK PATHS AT THIS ENTRANCE TO VERIFY THE | | | REQUIRED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS OF AT | | | LEAST 8 FEET WIDE IN THE AFFECTED AREA. SOME PATHWAYS | | | ON-SITE ARE AS NARROW AS 4 FEET FOR PEDESTRIANS AND | | | PETS. | | | - FOR THE INTERSECTION AT THE CENTER OF THE SITE, | | | PROVIDE CURB INSTEAD OF PAVEMENT MARKING FOR THE | | | DELINEATION IN THE EASTBOUND APPROACH TO REDUCE THE | | | CROSSING DISTANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND PETS. INCREASE | | | THE WIDTH OF THE CROSSWALK TO AT LEAST 6 FEET. PROVIDE | | | ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | CROSSWALK. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS TO VERIFY TWO | | | PASSENGER CARS CAN MAKE EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND | | | LEFT-TURN CONCURRENTLY WITHOUT CONFLICT. | | | - PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF | | | CROSSWALK BETWEEN THE PROPOSED ADOPTION CENTER AND THE | | | PORTE-COCHERE. | | | - PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR DELIVERY, GARBAGE AND FIRE | | | TRUCKS. | | | - PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG 12TH STREET FRONTAGE. | | | - A SIDEWALK SHOULD BE PROVIDED FROM 12TH STREET TO THE | | | FIRST BUILDING. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 15:27:09 | Z18060025 - PEGGY ADAM ANIMAL RESCUE (JUNE 12, 2018 | | | SUBMITTAL) | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. | | | - PROVIDE FDOT DRIVEWAY APPROVAL LETTER. | | | - VERIFY THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDING | | | SQUARE-FOOTAGES. | | | - ATTACH THE 2007 STUDY FOR THE TRIP GENERATION RATES | | | CONDUCTED BY KIMLEY-HORN. | | | - IN FIGURE 2, VERIFY THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT PERCENTAGES. | | | THE FIGURE SHOWS A TOTAL OF 90% OF TRIPS GOING IN/OUT | | | OF THE SITE. ALSO, WESTBOUND AT 12TH STREET/MILITARY | | | TRAIL IS RIGHT-TURN ONLY AND SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO | | | ACCOUNT IN THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | - IN FIGURE 3, THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY TRAIL | | | SHOULD BE RIGHT-IN ONLY. PLEASE REVISE. | | | SITE PLAN AND OTHER COMMENTS: | | | - IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, INCLUDE IN THE WAIVER | | | REQUEST TO PROVIDE TWO ACCESS POINTS ON MILITARY TRAIL. | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-312 ALLOWS ONLY ONE ACCESS POINT | | | PER RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH | | | LESS THAN 300 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. | | | - COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN TO PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER AT | | | THE BUS STOP ON MILITARY TRAIL. | | | - 12 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AT A RATE OF | | | 1/20 SPACES, BUT ONLY 8 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE | | | PROVIDED. PLEASE REVISE. | | | - MODIFY THE RIGHT-IN ONLY DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY TRAIL | | | TO REDUCE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE. | | | - PROVIDE FUTURE EASEMENT TO THE GAS STATION PROPERTY | | | WHEN THE PROPERTY RE-DEVELOPS. | | | - DIMENSION THE PARKING ANGLE OF THE ANGLE PARKING | | | SPACES, INCLUDING THE TWO SPACES IN FRONT OF THE DOME | | | BUILDING. THE PARKING AISLE WIDTH FOR THE ANGLE PARKING | | | SPACES BEHIND THE DOME BUILDING IS DIFFERENT BETWEEN | | | THE SITE PLAN (SP-1) AND CIVIL PLAN (C4.01). VERIFY THE | | | PARKING AISLE WIDTH MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY CODE | | | SECTION 94-485. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS OF AT | | | LEAST 8 FEET WIDE IN THE AFFECTED AREA AND ALONG THE | | | NEW RIGHT-TURN LANE ON MILITARY TRAIL. | | | - AT THE JUNCTION OF THE TWO PARKING AISLES ON THE EAST | | | SIDE NEAR THE EXISTING MEMORIAL PAVILION, PROVIDE STOP | | | SIGN FOR ALL APPROACHES INSTEAD OF STOPPING ONLY TWO OF | | | THE THREE APPROACHES. | | | - REVISE THE INTERSECTION AT THE CENTER OF THE SITE TO | | | REMOVE SLIGHT MISALIGNMENT OF THE EAST-WEST INTERNAL | | | ROADWAY. ALSO, PROVIDE NORTH-SOUTH CROSSWALK ACROSS THE | | | INTERNAL ROADWAY AT THIS LOCATION. A SKETCH WILL BE | | | PROVIDED AT THE PPRC MEETING | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-20-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
|
Time |
11:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-19-2018 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
10-23-2018 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
10-23-2018 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-23 16:38:54 | CASE NO. PB 983H - 2ND RESUBMITTAL | | | PEGGY ADAMS ADOPTION CENTER | | | 3200 N. MILITARY TRAIL | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | NOVEMBER 2, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR | | | THE DECEMBER 18, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM | | | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 23, 2018), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE PAVING, | | | GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING THE FINAL CONDITIONS | | | WHEN THE TRAILERS ARE REMOVED. THIS PLAN DOES NOT SHOW | | | THE FINAL CONDITIONS THE SAME AS ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. MORE PAVEMENT REMAINS ON THE CIVIL | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 2) NEW COMMENT: STAFF REQUIRES CLARIFICATION OF THE | | | 12TH STREET MONUMENT SIGN. IT IS SHOWN PARALLEL TO 12TH | | | STREET ON THE SITE PLAN. IS THIS THE ACTUAL WAY IT WILL | | | BE INSTALLED? IF SO, THEN HAVING THE ONE 55 SQUARE FOOT | | | FACE IS LESS THAN THE 103.5 SQUARE FEET PERMITTED ALONG | | | 12TH STREET. HOWEVER, IF THIS SIGN IS INSTALLED | | | PERPENDICULAR TO 12TH STREET, EACH FACE IS ONLY TO BE A | | | MAXIMUM OF 51.75 SQUARE FEET AND THE SIGN PROGRAM | | | DETAIL WOULD NEED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THIS. | | | | | | 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE PROGRAM IS | | | INCORRECTLY CITED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FALL UNDER SECTION 94-40(7)(6) | | | "PARKING AREA INSTRUCTIONAL AND RELATED SIGNS". THESE | | | SIGNS ARE PERMITTED TO BE A MAXIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET IN | | | HEIGHT. IN ORDER TO EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT, A | | | WAIVER MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. THE | | | PREVIOUS COMMENT REQUIRED THAT THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF | | | THE EXISTING DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. THE COMMENT RESPONSE | | | STATES EXISTING SIGNS WILL REMAIN AND THE NEW SIGNS | | | WILL BE NO GREATER THAN THE SIZE SHOWN ON THE SIGN | | | PROGRAM. STAFF NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT THE EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS ARE TO MAKE AN INFORMED RECOMMENDATION ON | | | THE PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SIGN PROGRAM. NINE (9) FEET IS | | | AN EXTREMELY TALL DIRECTIONAL SIGN. | | | | | | 4) NEW COMMENT: THE PARKING SPACE CLOSEST TO THE MAIN | | | MILITARY TRAIL ENTRANCE IS SHOWN AS A COMPACT PARKING | | | SPACE. THIS NEEDS TO BE REFLECTED ON THE PARKING TABLE. | | | | | | 5) NEW COMMENT: THE PERMIT FOR THE NEW GATE AT THE MAIN | | | MILITARY TRAIL ENTRANCE IS FOR A SLICING GATE INSTEAD | | | OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SWING GATE. | | | | | | 6) CONDITION: AS EACH PHASE OF THE CONSTRUCTION | | | COMMENCES AND PRIOR TO CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR | | | THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS BEING ISSUED, A PARKING | | | MANAGEMENT PLAN NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED WITH THE PERMITS | | | THAT VERIFIES THERE IS CODE COMPLIANT PARKING AVAILABLE | | | TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE OCCUPIED. | | | | | | 7) CONDITION: RECORD THE BUS SHELTER EASEMENT IN THE | | | PUBLIC RECORDS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-27-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-27-2018 |
Time |
12:24 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-27-2018 |
Time |
12:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-27 13:53:02 | CASE NO. PB 983H | | | PEGGY ADAMS ADOPTION CENTER | | | 3200 N. MILITARY TRAIL | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | SEPTEMBER 28, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR | | | THE NOVEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 27, | | | 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROVIDED TRAFFIC IMPACT | | | EVALUATION CONCLUDES THAT THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT | | | IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS HAS PERMITTED | | | THE PLANS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PPRC; HOWEVER, THE CASE | | | WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED FOR THE PLANNING BOARD UNTIL THE | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER | | | APPROVING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SUBMITTED TO THE | | | PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER | | | REQUIRES THAT THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY BE A MAXIMUM OF 16 | | | FEET WIDE AND A FOUR FOOT YELLOW STRIPPING SHOULDER. | | | PLEASE SHOW THESE DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS. PLEASE | | | EXPLAIN WHY THE DRIVEWAY AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH | | | MILITARY TRAIL IS 40 FEET WIDE (INCLUDING THE | | | STRIPPING). | | | | | | 3) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE A DIMENSION LINE TO VERIFY THAT | | | THE GATE FOR THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY MEETS THE MINIMUM 80 | | | FOOT SETBACK STATED IN THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION | | | LETTER. NOTE: THIS GATE SHOULD SWING IN TO THE | | | PROPERTY, NOT OUT TOWARD THE INCOMING VEHICLES. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PAVING, GRADING AND | | | DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING THE FINAL CONDITIONS WHEN THE | | | TRAILERS ARE REMOVED. | | | | | | 5) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE CONTACT THE NEIGHBORING | | | CONDO TO THE NORTH REGARDING THE WAIVER TO THE REQUIRED | | | SCREEN WALL. A LETTER SUPPORTING THIS WOULD BE | | | BENEFICIAL. | | | | | | 6) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE ?BALL STYLE | | | POST TOP? FOR THE FENCE. THIS DECORATIVE ELEMENT MAY BE | | | A MAXIMUM OF 10 PERCENT ABOVE THE SIX FOOT FENCE | | | HEIGHT. | | | | | | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE RESPONSE NOTES THAT THERE IS A | | | SIGN PROGRAM BEING REQUESTED FOR THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ON | | | THE SITE PLAN AND PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE | | | SIGNS AS WELL AS THE HEIGHT AND WIDTH OF THE TEXT AREA. | | | STAFF IS UNABLE TO TELL IF ALL OF THE SIGNS ARE THE | | | SAME SIZE (W3 APPEARS TO HAVE AN ADDED PANEL AFTER THE | | | SIGN WAS ORIGINALLY INSTALLED). FOR FUTURE PERMITTING, | | | THERE SHOULD BE A CONSISTENT SIGN SIZE AND POSSIBLY | | | FUTURE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. ALTERNATIVELY, | | | FUTURE SIGN LOCATIONS COULD BE APPROVED AS MINOR PD | | | AMENDMENT. | | | | | | 8) REVISED COMMENT: STAFF CANNOT MAKE AN ACCURATE | | | DETERMINATION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | A. REVISED COMMENT: THE DOMES ARE A TWO STORY BUILDING, | | | YET ONLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE FIRST FLOOR IS | | | SHOWN. | | | | | | B. REVISED COMMENT: STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION FOR 1750 | | | CATS & WORK AREA. ADDITIONALLY THERE ARE AREAS IN THE | | | NEW ADOPTION CENTER SHOWN IN WHITE. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | IN THESE AREAS NEEDS TO BE FULLY COUNTED AS TO THE USE | | | TYPE. | | | | | | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE NEEDS TO BE A CONSTRUCTION | | | PARKING PLAN TO SHOW THAT SUFFICIENT PARKING WILL BE | | | AVAILABLE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND | | | RENOVATION. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS REQUIRES A | | | FOLLOW-UP MEETING. | | | | | | 10) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BUS | | | SHELTER EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT PALMTRAN DOES | | | INSTALL BUS SHELTERS WITHIN MUNICIPAL LIMITS. | | | | | | 11) STAFF REALIZES THAT THERE WILL BE CHANGES TO THE | | | SITE PLAN BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES THAT | | | MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE 2ND FLOOR OF THE DOME SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE, SO ADDITIONAL COMMENT MAY BE FORTHCOMING WHEN | | | REVISED PLANS ARE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
Time |
17:10 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
Time |
17:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-03 17:32:08 | CASE NO. PB 983H | | | PEGGY ADAMS ADOPTION CENTER | | | 3200 N. MILITARY TRAIL | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | JULY 27, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 11, | | | 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) MILITARY TRAIL WILL BE FORMALLY DESIGNATED AS THE | | | FRONT PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2) THE PROVIDED TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION CONCLUDES | | | THAT THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS HAS PERMITTED THE PLANS TO BE | | | REVIEWED BY THE PPRC; HOWEVER, THE CASE WILL NOT BE | | | SCHEDULED FOR THE PLANNING BOARD UNTIL THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER APPROVING | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING | | | DIVISION. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE THE COMCAST APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER REQUIRED | | | FOR THE REVISED NORTHERN DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED TRAILERS AND HOW | | | THEY WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE, TO INCLUDE | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING, ADA ACCESS, EXT. | | | | | | A. PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE WIND LOAD AND FIRE PREVENTION | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRAILERS. THE SPECIFIC TRAILERS | | | NEED TO BE CLEARED WITH THE BUILDING AND FIRE | | | DEPARTMENTS. | | | | | | B. PROVIDE FINAL PLANS AS WELL AS THE TRAILER VERSION | | | OF THE PLANS. | | | | | | 6) HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE NEIGHBORING CONDO TO THE | | | NORTH REGARDING THE WAIVER TO THE REQUIRED SCREEN WALL? | | | A LETTER SUPPORTING THIS WOULD BE BENEFICIAL. | | | | | | 7) THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE FOR PHASE I. | | | PROVIDE THE PHASE II ELEVATIONS SO THAT THE ULTIMATE | | | BUILDOUT CAN BE REVIEWED. STAFF IS CONCERNED WITH THE | | | LACK OF FENESTRATION ALONG THE MILITARY TRAIL FACADE | | | AND THE NORTH FACADE FACING THE RESIDENTIAL | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 8) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE FENCING INSIDE THE BUILDING | | | FOOTPRINT AS IT IS VERY PROMINENT ON THE MILITARY TRAIL | | | FRONTAGE. | | | | | | 9) WHAT IS THE INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | | | TECHNIQUES TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE | | | DEVELOPMENT THAT IS PROPOSED TO WAIVE THE SIGN CODE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR THE NUMBER OF SIGNS AND TO USE THREE | | | DIMENSIONAL SIGNAGE? IS PEGGY ADAMS PROPOSING TO LIMIT | | | THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE SIGNAGE | | | PLAN? | | | | | | 10) STAFF CANNOT MAKE AN ACCURATE DETERMINATION OF | | | PARKING REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | A. PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN OF THE FUTURE GRACE PAVILION | | | AND DOMES LAYOUTS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PARKING | | | BREAKDOWN AND THAT THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT PARKING | | | THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. THE RE-COLORED PLAN ON SHEET | | | A0.1 DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY DETAILS AS TO WHY THE AREAS | | | ARE ASSIGNED HOW THEY ARE. NOTE: THE TABLES AND THE | | | SITE PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE SAME COLORS. | | | | | | B. THE NEW ADOPTION CENTER PARKING USE BREAKDOWN DOES | | | NOT FOLLOW THE PATTERN ESTABLISHED FOR THE GRACE | | | PAVILION. FOR EXAMPLE, IT COUNTS TOO MUCH AREA AS | | | OFFICE INSTEAD OF STORAGE. | | | | | | 11) THERE NEEDS TO BE A CONSTRUCTION PARKING PLAN TO | | | SHOW THAT SUFFICIENT PARKING WILL BE AVAILABLE DURING | | | ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION. | | | | | | 12) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE NEW ANGLE PARKING. | | | | | | A. NORTH OF NEW ADOPTION CENTER - IT APPEARS THAT THESE | | | ARE 60 DEGREE ANGLED SPACES. STANDARD SPACES WITH A 60 | | | DEGREE ANGLE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A STALL DEPTH OF 19 | | | FEET 10 INCHES. THE DIMENSION SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS | | | LISTED AT 19 FEET 9.6 INCHES. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | VERIFICATION ON THE PARKING SPACE DETAIL THAT THE ADA | | | SPACE WILL BE A PARKED LENGTH AT 18 FEET WITHOUT | | | ENCROACHING INTO THE DRIVE AISLE. NOTE: ADA SPACES ARE | | | WIDER THAN NORMAL SPACES SO WHEN ANGLED THEY REQUIRE | | | MORE DEPTH. | | | | | | B. NORTH OF EASTERN DOME - THE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN LIST | | | DIFFERING AISLE WIDTHS (13 FEET VS 15 FEET). WHICH IS | | | CORRECT? IT APPEARS THAT THESE ARE 60 DEGREE ANGLED | | | SPACES WHICH REQUIRE AN 18 FOOT AISLE WIDTH. THESE | | | SPACES DO NOT MEET CODE. | | | | | | 13) TURN ANGLE SPACES SOUTH OF DOME INTO 90 DEGREE AS | | | IT IS SHOWN ON THE AERIAL. THE SURVEY SHOWS IT ANGLED, | | | BUT THERE IS NO RECORD OF PERMIT APPROVAL TO RE-STRIPE | | | THIS PARKING. THE ANGLED PARKING REMOVES TWO PARKING | | | SPACES ON A SITE THAT IS TIGHT ON PARKING. | | | | | | 14) ADD ADA ACCESS AISLE TO THE 2 ADA SPACES SOUTH OF | | | DOME. | | | | | | 15) THE BICYCLE RACK LABEL FOR THE RACK BY THE MAIN | | | ENTRANCE LISTS FIVE RACKS YET EIGHT ARE SHOWN. PLEASE | | | CORRECT. NOTE: THERE IS ONE RACK FOR FOUR BICYCLE | | | SPACES AT THE GRACE PAVILION. SOME BICYCLE PARKING | | | NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE DOMES. | | | | | | 16) THE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO LIST THE BICYCLE PARKING AS | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NOT NUMBER OF RACKS. | | | | | | 17) PROVIDE A BICYCLE RACK AND PAD DETAIL FOR THE | | | SPECIFIC NUMBER BEING USED AT EACH LOCATION. | | | | | | 18) THE BICYCLE RACK SHOWN BY MILITARY TRAIL NEEDS TO | | | BE MOVED CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE NEW ADOPTION | | | CENTER TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S LOCATIONAL STANDARDS. | | | | | | 19) ADD TREES TO INTERIOR ISLANDS SOUTH OF DOME AND | | | TERMINAL ISLANDS WEST AND NORTH OF DOME AND NORTH OF | | | ADOPTION CENTER. | | | | | | 20) LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS WHEEL STOP IN WESTERN TERMINAL | | | ISLAND SOUTH OF DOMES. | | | | | | 21) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING | | | TREES NORTH OF THE EASTERN DOME TO REPLACE THEM WITH | | | PARKING AND THEN THE WAIVER TO NOT PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER IN THIS AREA. THE EXISTING TREES PROVIDE A | | | LANDSCAPED BUFFER BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. | | | | | | 22) PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | | | | 23) THERE IS A BUS STOP ON MILITARY TRAIL IN FRONT OF | | | THE SITE. PROVIDE AN EASEMENT SO THAT A SHELTER CAN BE | | | INSTALLED AND WORK WITH PALMTRAN ON THE INSTALLATION OF | | | A SHELTER. | | | | | | 24) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE NORTHERN WALL. NOTE: ONE SET | | | OF PLANS CALLS OUR 6-8 FOOT TALL AND OTHERS CALL OUR 8 | | | FOOT TALL. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |