 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18060022
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18060022 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-09-2018 |
Time |
18:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-09-2018 |
Time |
18:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-09 18:32:07 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY | | | LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER | | | APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE | | | WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION | | | DISTANCE. | | | | | | 4. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. PODIUM LEVEL 2 PLAN, SHEET | | | A1.02, SHOWS A CHEF'S KITCHEN. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY | | | BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES | | | O&M SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS | | | OILS AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
20:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
20:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-10 21:03:08 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE | | | FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 4. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY | | | LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER | | | APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE | | | WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION | | | DISTANCE. | | | | | | 5 ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 6. PASSENGER LOADING/VALET DROP-OFF. GROUND FLOOR PLAN | | | A1.01 SHOWS THREE PARKING SPACES THAT APEAR TO BE VALET | | | CAR DROP=OFF. NONE OF THESE SPACES ARE ACCESSIBLE, SO | | | THE BUILDING ENTRANCE MUST HAVE A PASSENGER LOADING | | | ZONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 209.4 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR VALET | | | DROP-OFF. | | | | | | 7 . VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX | | | REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 8. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 9. EXIT DISCHARGE. SITE PLAN SHEET A0.01 SOWS AN | | | INSWING GATE FROM THE REAR (WEST) STAIR TO THE CURRIE | | | CRESCENT SIDE WALK. THE GATE MSUT BE AN OUTSWING GATE, | | | | | | 10. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE | | | DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL | | | OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING | | | GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING | | | GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS | | | USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 11. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. PODIUM LEVEL 2 PLAN, SHEET | | | A1.02, SHOWS A CHEF'S KITCHEN. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY | | | BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES | | | O&M SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS | | | OILS AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 12. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 13 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 09:06:37 | PASSED WITH CONDITION OF SUBMITTAL AND FINAL APPROVAL | | | OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-11 12:31:13 | RESPOND IN WRITING: | | | | | | #1 SHOW MORE DETAIL AS TO CONNECTIONS ON OLIVE AVE FOR | | | WATER. SEWER LINE ON CURRIE SHALL BE LINED OR REPLACED, | | | SUBMIT VIDEO OF CONDITION. | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE | | | LEAD-FREE." | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-18-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-18-2018 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-18-2018 |
Time |
11:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-09-18 11:08:35 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPLE PLANNER, AND THE ATTACHMENTS WITH | | | PLAN SHEETS, DATED AUGUST 31, 2018, FROM CARLTON FILEDS | | | JORDON BURT, P.A., THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
Time |
12:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-03-2018 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-03 12:21:03 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 5 A. THE TWO EXITS STAIRS LOCATED WITHIN THE CORE OF | | | THE STRUCTURE APPEAR TO BE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER TO MEET | | | THE MINIMUM EXIT SEPARATION OF NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, | | | MEANS OF EGRESS, DISTANCE FOR THE AREA SERVED. PLEASE | | | REVIEW AN ENSURE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED NOT MORE | | | THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT | | | CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY. | | | | | | HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER | | | SUPPLY. | | | | | | AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING THE | | | REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES, | | | BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER | | | CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE | | | APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA | | | 1 SECTION 18.4. | | | | | | PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL | | | HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE. | | | | | | THERE APPEARS TO BE ONLY ONE FDC INDICATED. TWO FDC'S | | | ARE NEEDED. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF THE | | | FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE BEST FIRE OPERATIONAL POSITIONS IS | | | STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 7 A. A FIRE TRUCK STAGING AREA IS INDICATED. THE AREA | | | WIDTH IS INDICATED AS 15' AND APPEARS TO BE UNDER THE | | | OVERHANG FOR THE BUILDING. IS THIS AREA ON A A GRADE? | | | ANY FIRE TRUCK STAGING AREA IS REQUIRED TO 20' AND | | | 13'6" HIGH AND BE FLAT, BUT SHOULD ALSO BE CLEAR OF ANY | | | OVERHEAD OBSTRUCTION. A LADDER TRUCK COULD NOT BE | | | OPERATED FROM THIS LOCATION. | | | | | | 7 B. THERE IS A FDC AND FIRE HYDRANT INDICATED OFF OF | | | CURRIE CRESENT; HOWEVER, THERE IS NO FIRE LANE | | | INDICATED OR HOW THE FD WILL ACCESS THE BUILDING FROM | | | THIS LOCATION. THERE ARE TWO DOORS INDICATED FOR THE | | | FIRE COMMAND ROOM BUT THE LOCATION OF THESE DOORS MAY | | | BE BETTER LOCATED FOR FD ACCESS. CLOSE COORDINATION | | | WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE BEST FIRE | | | OPERATIONAL POSITIONS IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A FIRE HYDRANT INDICATED ON | | | FLAGLER DR. IT WOULD BE OPTIMAL TO HAVE A FIRE HYDRANT | | | AND FDC LOCATED OFF OF FLAGLER DR FOR FIREGROUND | | | OPERATIONAL PURPOSES. | | | | | | 12. COMMAND ROOM | | | THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, | | | CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN | | | THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: | | | A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM | | | DIMENSION OF 10 FT. | | | B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. | | | C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL | | | FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION | | | OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE | | | BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS | | | E. A WORK TABLE. | | | F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF | | | THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL | | | I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS. | | | J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY | | | K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY | | | PANELS | | | L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS | | | M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND | | | TRANSFER FEATURES. | | | O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED | | | BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE | | | P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL | | | Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1. | | | R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR | | | SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS | | | PROVIDED | | | | | | 13. RADIO | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS | | | ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS. | | | 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF | | | FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH | | | 24.5.2.2.3. | | | 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE | | | EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S), | | | EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES, | | | STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE | | | LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING | | | AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA | | | RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH. | | | 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | | | | THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL | | | STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN | | | ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES | | | NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE | | | PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION | | | EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-18-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-18-2018 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-18-2018 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-18 13:48:38 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD Z18060022 | | | OCTOBER 16, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L4.21: | | | ? SATISFIED TREES AND PALMS IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ARE | | | MISSING FROM THE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | ? SATISFIED THE COLUMN FOR STATUS ON THE CHART IS NOT | | | ALIGNED WITH THE OTHER COLUMNS OR IS MISSING THE STATUS | | | OF THE FIRST THREE TREES. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CHART TO CALCULATE THE | | | MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS REMOVED. | | | THIS NEEDS SOME CORRECTION. | | | ? SATISFIED. SABAL PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED | | | IF IN GOOD CONDITION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.01 FOR | | | THESE ITEMS: | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING PLANT SIZES, AND CHOOSE | | | ONE MINIMUM SIZE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM SPECIES THAT | | | MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CODE REQUIREMENT. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING INFORMATION IN THE | | | IRRIGATION NEEDS COLUMN. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDICATE LIGNUM VITAE AS NATIVE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART ON SHEET L4.01 TO CURRENT CODE | | | SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | CURRENT VERSION IS IN MUNICODE. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, SHOW PERVIOUS PAVERS AS A SEPARATE CATEGORY WITH | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE, AS THEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW | | | THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD | | | THE ONE TREE PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443 | | | (D)(2)A. TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED | | | FOR REQUIRED TREE NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION | | | 94-442(D). | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL REQUIRED TREES | | | AND SHRUBS FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH, AND PROVIDED NUMBER | | | PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)C. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THERE ARE | | | CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF BUFFER STRIP INTERRUPTION | | | FOR ACCESS FOR THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER TO COMPLY WITH | | | MAXIMUM OF 20 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 40 | | | PERCENT REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE | | | BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. TREES ADDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OUTSIDE | | | OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES FOR THE SITE. THEY CAN BE COUNTED AS | | | MITIGATION FOR TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. ACACIA ROAD PARCEL WILL HAVE TO BE | | | EVALUATED FOR APPLICATION OF THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS | | | DEPENDING ON WHETHER THE ROAD WILL BE CITY OWNED OR | | | NOT. THE CHART PROVIDED MAY NOT HAVE THE CORRECT | | | CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES. IF CITY OWNED, SECTION | | | 94-442(E) WILL APPLY. | | | | | | THERE ARE ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED WITH UTILITIES PRIOR TO | | | FINAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER, | | | FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | THERE ARE UNRESOLVED ISSUES WITH LOCATIONS OF WATER AND | | | SEWER LINES, THIS WILL BE ONGOING. | | | | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL SIDES OF THE VALVE AREAS NEED HEDGING. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-26-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-26-2018 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-26-2018 |
Time |
13:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-09-26 13:59:21 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD Z18060022 | | | SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L4.21: | | | ? SATISFIED TREES AND PALMS IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ARE | | | MISSING FROM THE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | ? SATISFIED THE COLUMN FOR STATUS ON THE CHART IS NOT | | | ALIGNED WITH THE OTHER COLUMNS OR IS MISSING THE STATUS | | | OF THE FIRST THREE TREES. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CHART TO CALCULATE THE | | | MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS REMOVED. | | | ? THIS NEEDS SOME CORRECTION. | | | ? SATISFIED. SABAL PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED | | | IF IN GOOD CONDITION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.01 FOR | | | THESE ITEMS: | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING PLANT SIZES, AND CHOOSE | | | ONE MINIMUM SIZE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM SPECIES THAT | | | MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CODE REQUIREMENT. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING INFORMATION IN THE | | | IRRIGATION NEEDS COLUMN. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDICATE LIGNUM VITAE AS NATIVE. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART ON SHEET L4.01 TO CURRENT CODE | | | SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | CURRENT VERSION IS IN MUNICODE. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, SHOW PERVIOUS PAVERS AS A SEPARATE CATEGORY WITH | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE, AS THEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW | | | THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD | | | THE ONE TREE PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443 | | | (D)(2)A. TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED | | | FOR REQUIRED TREE NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION | | | 94-442(D). | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART | | | SHEET L1.04, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL REQUIRED | | | TREES AND SHRUBS FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH, AND PROVIDED | | | NUMBER PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)C. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THERE ARE | | | CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET | | | L1.04, SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF BUFFER STRIP INTERRUPTION | | | FOR ACCESS FOR THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER TO COMPLY WITH | | | MAXIMUM OF 20 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 40 | | | PERCENT REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE | | | BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. TREES ADDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OUTSIDE | | | OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES FOR THE SITE. THEY CAN BE COUNTED AS | | | MITIGATION FOR TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ACACIA ROAD PARCEL WILL HAVE | | | TO BE EVALUATED FOR APPLICATION OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS DEPENDING ON WHETHER THE ROAD WILL BE CITY | | | OWNED OR NOT. THE CHART PROVIDED MAY NOT HAVE THE | | | CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES. IF CITY OWNED, | | | SECTION 94-442(E) WILL APPLY. | | | | | | THERE ARE ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED WITH UTILITIES PRIOR TO | | | FINAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN APPROVAL. | | | 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | SHOW THE PERCENTAGE FOR ALL ADDED PLANTS. | | | | | | 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF | | | WATER, SEWER, FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | THERE ARE UNRESOLVED ISSUES WITH LOCATIONS OF WATER AND | | | SEWER LINES, THIS WILL BE ONGOING. | | | | | | | | | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL | | | GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL SIDES OF THE VALVE AREAS NEED HEDGING. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-10 15:15:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD Z18060022 | | | JULY 9, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L4.21: | | | ? TREES AND PALMS IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ARE MISSING FROM | | | THE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | ? THE COLUMN FOR STATUS ON THE CHART IS NOT ALIGNED | | | WITH THE OTHER COLUMNS OR IS MISSING THE STATUS OF THE | | | FIRST THREE TREES. | | | ? PROVIDE A CHART TO CALCULATE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED | | | FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS REMOVED. | | | ? SABAL PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED IF IN GOOD | | | CONDITION. | | | | | | 2. UPDATE THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.01 FOR THESE | | | ITEMS: | | | ? ADD ALL MISSING PLANT SIZES, AND CHOOSE ONE MINIMUM | | | SIZE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM SPECIES THAT MEETS OR | | | EXCEEDS THE CODE REQUIREMENT. | | | ? ADD ALL MISSING INFORMATION IN THE IRRIGATION NEEDS | | | COLUMN. | | | ? INDICATE LIGNUM VITAE AS NATIVE. | | | | | | 3. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS | | | CHART ON SHEET L4.01 TO CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-446 (G) | | | AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, SHOW | | | PERVIOUS PAVERS AS A SEPARATE CATEGORY WITH SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE, AS THEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PERVIOUS | | | LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 5. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, CORRECT | | | THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SHADE TREE | | | AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD THE ONE TREE | | | PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A. TO | | | ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT. | | | | | | 6. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR | | | REQUIRED TREE NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION | | | 94-442(D). | | | | | | 7. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, PROVIDE | | | THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS FOR | | | EACH BUFFER LENGTH, AND PROVIDED NUMBER PER SECTION | | | 94-443(D)(1)C. | | | 8. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH | | | UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 9. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF BUFFER STRIP INTERRUPTION FOR ACCESS FOR | | | THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER TO COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM OF 20 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 40 PERCENT | | | REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING | | | PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B. | | | | | | 11. TREES ADDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OUTSIDE OF THE WEST | | | PROPERTY LINE CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE REQUIRED | | | TREES FOR THE SITE. THEY CAN BE COUNTED AS MITIGATION | | | FOR TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 12. ACACIA ROAD PARCEL WILL HAVE TO BE EVALUATED FOR | | | APPLICATION OF THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS DEPENDING ON | | | WHETHER THE ROAD WILL BE CITY OWNED OR NOT. THE CHART | | | PROVIDED MAY NOT HAVE THE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR | | | REQUIRED TREES. IF CITY OWNED, SECTION 94-442(E) WILL | | | APPLY. | | | | | | 13. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER, FIRE LINES, | | | DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 15. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 16. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
10-09-2018 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
10-09-2018 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-09 13:21:30 | PER PETER B. | | | | | | CONDITION: THE GARBAGE RECEPTICLES ARE TO BE READY | | | BEHIND THE GATE A HALF HOUR PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED | | | PICK-UP TIME AND THEN ROLLED OUT WHEN THE TRUCK | | | ARRIVES. THE GARBAGE RECEPTICLES ARE TO BE RETURNED | | | BEHIND THE GATE WITHIN ONE HALF HOUR OF THE PICK-UP. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-10 12:23:01 | THERE IS NO PLANS FOR SANITATION SERVICE IDENTIFIED ON | | | THE SITE LAYOUT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-08-2018 |
Time |
08:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-08-2018 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-08 09:31:01 | PER TRACY WARD: | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. SHEETS SURVEY 1 AND SURVEY 2 CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | PLOTTED AT THE INDICATED SCALE. THIS NEEDS TO BE | | | CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF ANY ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT PLANS. | | | | | | 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED GUMBO LIMBO TREES | | | THIN FOUR FEET OF THE EDGE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. | | | INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON HOW THE TREE | | | ROOTS WILL BE PREVENTED FROM DAMAGING THE EXFILTRATION | | | SYSTEM AND INTERFERE WITH THE CAPACITY AS STATED IN THE | | | DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. DETAIL ST-8 NEEDS TO BE UPDATED | | | TO SHOW THE ROOT BARRIERS AND THE TREES, WITH ACCURATE | | | DIMENSIONS (INSTALLATION DEPTH AND DISTANCES FROM ROOT | | | BARRIER TO EXFILTRATION TRENCH AND TO TREE TRUNK). | | | PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES ARE NOT ONLY | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, BUT ALSO ARE BEING USED TO SHADE | | | ACACIA ROAD. THIS COMMENT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR | | | TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING/PREVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS (SHEET L1.04) NEED TO BE CORRECTED. | | | THIS COMMENT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING | | | FOR CITY COMMISSION. | | | | | | A. OVERALL SITE AREA DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL | | | PLAN TABLE. | | | B. THE AREA EAST OF FLAGLER DRIVE SHOULD BE CLEARLY | | | SHOWN AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM. | | | C. THE LEGEND FOR THE SITE PLAN OVERLAY NEEDS TO MATCH | | | THE DESCRIPTION FOR THE SITE CALCULATIONS. | | | D. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NEED TO MATCH ABOVE ITEMS. | | | | | | 4. GRADES SHOWN FOR THE DRIVEWAY PROFILE ON SHEET C5.00 | | | DO NOT MATCH THE GRADES IN PLAN VIEW. | | | | | | 5. REMOVE THE PROPERTY LINE CUTTING ACROSS THE PROPERTY | | | TO THE SOUTH SHOWN ON SHEETS C5.00 AND C6.00 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-30-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-30-2018 |
Time |
09:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-30-2018 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-30 16:10:24 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. SHEETS SURVEY 1 AND SURVEY 2 ARE NOT PLOTTED AT THE | | | INDICATED SCALE. | | | | | | 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED GUMBO LIMBO TREES | | | WTHIN FOUR FEET OF THE EDGE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. | | | HOW WILL THE TREE ROOTS BE PREVENTED FROM DAMAGING THE | | | EXFILTRATION SYSTEM. CAN THE EXFILTRATION SYSTEM BE | | | MOVED UNDER THE LONG ENTRANCE ROADWAY AND/OR A | | | SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM BE USED INSTEAD UNDER THE | | | ENTRANCE ROADWAY? | | | | | | 3. WHERE DO TRENCH DRAIN TD-1 AND YARD DRAIN YD-1 DRAIN | | | TO? | | | | | | 4. COORDINATE THE BUILDING/PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLANSE (SHEET L1.04) AND THE DRAINAGE | | | CALCULATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE SHEET SHOWS A BUILDING AREA | | | OF 19,381 S.F. (0.44 ACRES). THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS | | | SHOW THE BUILDING AREA AS 0.30 ACRES. | | | | | | 5. REPLACE DETAIL ST-8 WITH A PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAIL | | | OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS OF | | | THE TRENCH, THE PIPE INVERT ELEVATION AND THE PIPE | | | SIZE. | | | | | | 6. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A WEIR WILL NOT | | | BE NEEDED. EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE | | | SURCHARGED TO THE ELEVATIONS ASSUMED IN THE | | | EXFILTRATION TRECH CALCULATIONS WHEN THE WEST PIPE | | | CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE ST-3 IS CONNECTED TO AN OFFSITE | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-25-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-25-2018 |
Time |
17:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-25-2018 |
Time |
18:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-09-25 17:54:05 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. NO DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED FOR THE | | | DESIGN OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH AND DRAINAGE VAULT. | | | | | | 2. SEVERAL TREES ARE PROPOSED NEAR OR OVER THE STORM | | | PIPE. FOR EXAMPLE A GUMBO LIMBO IS PROPOSED OVER THE | | | DRAINAGE VAULT AND NEAR STRUCTURE ST-3. | | | | | | 3. THE WALKWAYS FROM THE STREET TO THE BUILDING SLOPE | | | TOWARD THE STREET. HOW IS THE RUNOFF FROM THE WALKWAYS | | | DIRECTED TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | 4. THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE | | | AFFECTED BY THE BASEMENT WALLS. | | | | | | 5. CONFIRM THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE FIRE MAIN LINE | | | AND STORM PIPE ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE FRONT | | | ENTRANCE MEETS HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 6. TYPICAL SECTION D-D SHOULD INCLUDE A SWALE SIMILAR | | | TO THE OTHER SECTIONS TO PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO | | | OFFSITE PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE A SECTION THROUGH THE ACACIA ROAD | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE THE WALKWAY IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 8. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT IS DEVELOPING TREE | | | PLANTING GUIDELINES NEAR ITS UTILITIES. COORDINATE WITH | | | EITHER THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OR THE CITY?S | | | LANDSCAPE PLANNER. | | | | | | 9. SURVEY IS USING NAVD 1988 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM. THE | | | CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. PROVIDE A COVERSION | | | EQUATION BETWEEN THE TWO VERTICAL DATUMS ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 10. EXPLAIN HOW THE BASEMENTS WILL BE PROTECTED FROM | | | FLOODING BY THE GROUNDWATER TABLE. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
18:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
18:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-10 18:50:56 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | 1. LEFT OF THE SURVEY WAS CUTOFF ON SHEET G0.02. | | | | | | 2. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3. STORM PIPES IN FLAGLER R/W AND IN CURRIE CRESCENT | | | R/W TO BE RELOCATED ONSITE. | | | | | | 4. REMOVE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH FROM PUBLIC R/W. | | | | | | 5. USE ONLY RCP STORM PIPE IN THE PUBLIC R/W. | | | | | | 6. VERIFY THE HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NOT BACKFLOW TO | | | THE TRENCH DRAINS TD-2 AND TD-3. | | | | | | 7. DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF SEA LEVEL RISE ON THE | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | 8. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFWMD CRITERIA. | | | | | | 9. OFFSITE DISCHARGE TO THE CITY?S INDIVIDUAL DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEMS SHALL NOT EXCEED EXISTING PEAK DISCHARGE RATES. | | | | | | 10. VERIFY THE PROPOSED SWALE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY | | | LINE WILL FUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED SFWMD ERP APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 09:04:07 | PASSED WITH CONDITION OF PLATTING PRIOR TO C.O. AND | | | APPROVAL OF FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS WITH SUBMITTAL OF | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-17-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
10-17-2018 |
Time |
07:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-17 08:46:04 | 1. EXISTING SANITARY IN NASSER PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE | | | RELOCATED WITHIN ACACIA. | | | 2. FPL TRANSFORMER PADS WILL CONFLICT WITH | | | EXISTING/PROPOSED UTILITIES. HAVE FPL RELOCATE TO | | | WITHIN APPLICANTS PROPERTY. | | | 3. ENGINEERING AND SURVEY COMMENTS ARE NOT SHOWN OR | | | ADDRESSED IN RESPONSE LETTER. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 10:49:37 | 1. PROVIDE FULL SIZE ORIGINAL OF SURVEY. | | | 2. ADJOINING SANITARY AND STORM NEEDS TO BE TELEVISED | | | BY APPLICANT. NEED PROPOSED AVERAGE AND PEAK WATER AND | | | SEWER FLOWS. | | | 3. NO EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WILL BE ALLOWED IN CURRIE | | | CRESCENT. | | | 4. NEED COPIES OF U.E.'S AND AGREEMENTS SHOWN ON | | | SURVEY. | | | 5. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED. | | | 6. PROPOSED STORM LINE IN FLAGLER NEEDS TO BE MOVED | | | ON-SITE. | | | 7. PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN MAY NEED TO BE LOOPED BACK TO | | | OLIVE AVE. | | | 8. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL TO ENGINEERING FOR DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | 9. WILL NEED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ACACIA ROAD AND | | | CURRIE CRESCENT. | | | 10. SURVEY INCLUDES PROPERTY TO NORTH OF ACACIA WHICH | | | IS NOT INCLUDED IN SITE PLAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-24 11:45:10 | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. A WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE CURRIE CRESCENT | | | LOADING ENTRANCE. | | | 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, A MANAGEMENT | | | PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE CURRIE CRESCENT | | | ENTRANCE. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN MUST ADDRESS THE | | | FOLLOWING ITEMS: | | | - ONLY PRESCHEDULED DELIVERIES WILL BE ALLOWED. | | | - PROVIDE A MEANS OF PRESCHEDULING DELIVERIES WITH | | | PROPERTY STAFF. | | | - PROVIDE STAFFING PLAN FOR DELIVERIES. | | | - PROVIDE SPOTTERS FOR BACKING IN OF VEHICLES. | | | - ENSURE THAT VEHICLES WILL NOT STOP OR STAND ON CURRIE | | | CRESCENT SIDEWALK WHILE WAITING FOR GATE TO OPEN. | | | 3. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEER?S COST ESTIMATE | | | FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR | | | FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S. | | | FLAGLER DR.. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED. JUST NORTH OF | | | ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL LOCATION AS A MID-BLOCK REFUGE | | | COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING GORED OUT MEDIAN | | | AREA. | | | 4. PROVIDE CONTRIBUTION FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION | | | OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND | | | DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S. FLAGLER DR.. LOCATION TO BE | | | DETERMINED. JUST NORTH OF ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL | | | LOCATION AS A MID-BLOCK REFUGE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | EXISTING GORED OUT MEDIAN AREA. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-17-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-17 15:09:09 | 1. FLAGLER DR. DRIVEWAY GRADE IS EXTREMELY STEEP. | | | DRIVEWAY PROFILE WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO HAVE A | | | GRADE BREAK OR VERTICAL CURVE INSERTED TO REDUCE | | | BOTTOMING OUT IN SIDEWALK. PROVIDE DRIVEWAY PROFILE | | | WITH RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2. CURRIE CRESCENT ENTRANCE. A GATE IS SHOWN ON SHEET | | | A0.01 FOR THE LOADING ENTRY. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL | | | ON THE LOCATION OF THE GATE. THE GATE SHOULD BE PLACED | | | 20' BACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE. NOTE IT IS ILLEGAL | | | UNDER FLORIDA STATUTE AND CITY CODE FOR A VEHICLE TO | | | STOP OR STAND ON THE SIDEWALK. | | | 3. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATIONS TO THE OPERATION | | | AND PROCEDURE PLAN FOR VEHICLE MANEUVERING FOR LOADING: | | | O CLARIFY HOW THE DRIVERS OF DELIVERY AND SERVICE | | | VEHICLES WOULD COMMUNICATE WITH THE PROPERTY STAFF UPON | | | ARRIVAL. | | | O CLARIFY WHERE THE WAITING AREA IS FOR THE DELIVERY | | | AND SERVICE VEHICLES. | | | O CLARIFY HOW LONG IT WOULD TAKE FOR THE PROPERTY STAFF | | | TO ARRIVE AT THE GATE AND TO OPEN THE GATE. | | | O CLARIFY WHETHER THE CITY GARBAGE TRUCK OR PRIVATE | | | HAULER WOULD BE USED TO PICK UP THE TRASH AND | | | RECYCLING. | | | O CLARIFY WHERE THE HOLDING AREA IS FOR THE TRASH AND | | | RECYCLING. | | | O CLARIFY IF THE PROPERTY STAFF WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | WHEELING OUT THE TRASH AND RECYCLING TO THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEN THE GARBAGE TRUCK ARRIVES, AND HOW | | | LONG IT WOULD TAKE FOR THE PROPERTY STAFF TO OPEN THE | | | GATE AND TO WHEEL OUT THE TRASH AND RECYCLING OVER A | | | GRADE OF 8% TO 10%. | | | O IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR CITY GARBAGE TRUCK TO WAIT | | | FOR THE PROPERTY STAFF TO WHEEL OUT THE TRASH AND | | | RECYCLING TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY UPON ARRIVAL. | | | 4. CONTRIBUTION OR CONSTRUCTION OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR | | | FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S. | | | FLAGLER DR. IS REQUESTED. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED. | | | JUST NORTH OF ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL LOCATION AS A | | | MID-BLOCK REFUGE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING | | | GORED OUT MEDIAN AREA. | | | 5. THE FIRE TRUCK STAGING AREA SHOWN ON SHEET A0.01 IS | | | AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION THAN THE STAGING AREA SHOWN ON | | | SHEET C9.00. PLEASE CLARIFY OR REVISE. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-26-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-09-26 16:43:05 | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBMITTAL | | | | | | - FLAGLER DR. DRIVEWAY GRADE IS EXTREMELY STEEP. | | | DRIVEWAY PROFILE WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO HAVE A | | | GRADE BREAK OR VERTICAL CURVE INSERTED TO REDUCE | | | BOTTOMING OUT IN SIDEWALK. | | | - SHEET A1.01, EAST-WEST SECTION REFERENCES WRONG | | | SHEET. CORRECT SECTION VIEW APPEARS TO BE ON SHEET | | | A3-02 NOT A3-01. | | | - A3-02 AND SHEET G0.04 HAVE DIFFERENT DRIVEWAY SLOPES. | | | 12% AND 11.3% RESPECTIVELY. | | | - ADDITIONAL TRENCH DRAIN SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT FLAGLER | | | DRIVEWAY AT RIGHT OF WAY LINE. STORMWATER SYSTEM NEEDS | | | TO BE REVIEWED TO ENSURE WATER DOESN?T STAGE OUT OF | | | THIS DRAIN. | | | - FLAGLER DRIVE DRIVEWAY ? THE DRIVEWAY HORIZONTAL | | | ALIGNMENT COULD USE SWITCHBACKS TO LESSEN THE GRADE OF | | | THE DRIVEWAY. POTENTIALLY THE SWITCHBACK COULD BE USED | | | TO DIRECT STORM WATER TO INLETS AND / OR ALLOW A | | | GREATER FLAT AREA ON S. FLAGLER DR. LOMBARD STREET IN | | | SAN FRANSISCO IS A GOOD PRECEDENT, ALTHOUGH CURVES ARE | | | PROBABLY TOO SHARP FOR THE DESIGN VEHICLES. | | | - SURVEY IS MISSING A UTILITY EASEMENT. ORB 25330, | | | 1318. | | | - SURVEY IS NOT TO SCALE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE | | | PROVIDED UPON RECEIPT OF A SCALED SURVEY DRAWING. | | | - SHEET A3-01 SHOWS SLOPE DRAINING DIRECTLY ON ACACIA. | | | CIVIL PLANS SHOW DIFFERENT GRADING IN THIS AREA. RUNOFF | | | DIRECTLY ONTO ACACIA ISN?T ALLOWED. REVISE PLAN SET TO | | | BE CONSISTENT. | | | - ACACIA - PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE | | | FEASIBLE DUE TO THE NUMBER OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. | | | - CURRIE CRESCENT ENTRANCE. A GATE IS SHOWN SHEET A0.01 | | | FOR THE LOADING ENTRY. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL ON THE | | | LOCATION OF THE GATE. THE GATE SHOULD BE PLACED 20? | | | BACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE. NOTE IT IS ILLEGAL | | | UNDER FLORIDA STATUTE AND CITY CODE FOR A VEHICLE TO | | | STOP OR STAND ON THE SIDEWALK. | | | - TRANSPORTATION STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED | | | BACKUP MANEUVER FROM THE CURRIE CRESCENT ENTRANCE. A | | | WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | - TRANSPORTATION DIVISION REQUESTS A WIDER SIDEWALK ON | | | FLAGLER DRIVE OR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK SIMILAR TO WHAT | | | HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT AT | | | 1101 S. FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | - ACACIA DRIVE - THE PROPOSED ART WALK DESIGN WILL | | | HINDER EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND POTENTIALLY ACCESS | | | TO THE EXISTING PARKING SPACES AND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING | | | AT THE REAR OF 1301 S. FLAGLER DRIVE. THE DESIGN SHOULD | | | BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE TURNING MOVEMENTS FROM 1301 | | | S. FLAGLER DRIVE?S DRIVE TO THE REAR OF 1301 S. | | | FLAGLER'S PROPERTY. | | | - CONTRIBUTION OR CONSTRUCTION OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR | | | FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S. | | | FLAGLER DR. IS REQUESTED. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED. | | | JUST NORTH OF ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL LOCATION AS A | | | MID-BLOCK REFUGE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING | | | GORED OUT MEDIAN AREA. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 18:03:54 | Z18060022 ? 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE RESIDENTIAL (JUNE | | | 12, 2018 SUBMITTAL) | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH CITY | | | ENGINEER ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREMENTS. | | | SITE PLAN AND OTHER COMMENTS: | | | - CLARIFY IF THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY ON CURRIE CRESCENT | | | ONE-WAY OUT. IF SO, CONSIDER MAKING IT A TWO-WAY | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | - CLARIFY IF THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE ENOUGH PARKING AFTER | | | THE PARKING SPACES IN PARCEL 3 ARE REMOVED. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING WIDER PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS OF AT | | | LEAST 8 FEET ON SITE. | | | - ALSO SHOW RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE OF | | | ROADWAY. | | | - THE PARKING AISLE FOR THE 3 PARKING SPACES ON THE | | | GROUND FLOOR (A1.01) IS LESS THE REQUIRED 24 FEET PER | | | CITY CODE 94-485. PLEASE PROVIDE WIDER PARKING AISLE OR | | | CONSIDER CONVERTING THESE 3 PARKING SPACES TO ANGLED | | | PARKING. ALSO, THESE 3 PARKING SPACES ARE LABELED AS | | | VALET PARKING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (L1.01), BUT NO | | | VALET DROP-OFF AREAS ARE PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | - IN BASEMENT 2 (A0.B2), THE COLUMN AT THE END OF THE | | | PARKING RAMP CREATES A TIGHT TURNING RADIUS FOR | | | RIGHT-TURNING VEHICLES. CONSIDER PROVIDING A BUFFER OR | | | ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THIS COLUMN. | | | - IN BASEMENT 1 (A0.B1), PROVIDE A TURNAROUND SPACE IN | | | THE DEAD-END PARKING AISLE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF | | | THE GARAGE. | | | - COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEERING TO REVIEW POTENTIAL | | | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OPTIONS ACROSS FLAGLER. | | | - LANDSCAPE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING 10? WIDE SIDEWALKS ON FLAGLER DR. | | | - PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CURRIE CRES. | | | - IDENTIFY SIDEWALK ON CURRIE CRES. AND LABEL WIDTH. | | | - PROVIDE DETAILS ON VALET CIRCULATION AND LOADING IN | | | THE TRAFFIC STUDY. | | | - THE LOADING ON CURRIE CRES. APPEARS TO REQUIRE | | | VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY. BACKING OUT | | | INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY IS NOT ALLOWED. | | | - REDUCE CURB CUT WIDTH ON FLAGLER. | | | - BIKE SHARE STATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE RIGHT | | | OF WAY. | | | - HOW MUCH EMPLOYEE PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED? WHERE IS | | | IT LOCATED? | | | - ACACIA. SHOW TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF ADJACENT | | | PROPERTIES ON PLAN VIEW. WILL CHANGES TO ACACIA | | | CONFLICT WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES? | | | - WHY ARE TWO ACCESS POINTS REQUIRED ON CURRIE CRES? | | | CONSOLIDATE ACCESS POINTS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-09-2018 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-08-2018 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-09 13:27:05 | SUFFICIENT FOR PLANNING BOARD. | | | | | | 1. SECTIONS A-A AND B-B ON SHEET C8.00 DO NOT MATCH THE | | | WALL ELEVATION SHOWN ON SHEET L9.02. THIS NEEDS TO BE | | | CORRECTLY SHOWN PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A HEARING BEFORE | | | THE CITY COMMISSION. THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON SHEET | | | C8.00 REQUIRES A FENCE HEIGHT WAIVER. PLEASE REMEMBER | | | THAT ANY FENCES AND WALL (TO INCLUDE RETAINING WALLS) | | | WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACKS MAY ONLY BE A MAXIMUM OF | | | SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT FROM EXTERIOR GRADE. THIS HEIGHT | | | REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL FENCES AND WALLS WITHIN THE | | | FIRST 21 FEET 10 INCHES FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE | | | (REQUESTED SETBACK). | | | | | | 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED GUMBO LIMBO TREES | | | WITHIN FOUR FEET OF THE EDGE OF THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH. INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON HOW | | | THE TREE ROOTS WILL BE PREVENTED FROM DAMAGING THE | | | EXFILTRATION SYSTEM AND INTERFERE WITH THE CAPACITY AS | | | STATED IN THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. DETAIL ST-8 NEEDS | | | TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE ROOT BARRIERS AND THE TREES, | | | WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE | | | GUMBO LIMBO TREES ARE NOT ONLY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, | | | BUT ALSO ARE BEING USED TO SHADE ACACIA ROAD. THIS | | | COMMENT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR | | | CITY COMMISSION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-07-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
10-30-2018 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
10-26-2018 |
Time |
11:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-07 09:54:39 | CASE NOS. PB 1799 & 1799A | | | PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER ? 2ND RESUBMITTAL | | | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY, | | | NOVEMBER 5, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR | | | THE NOVEMBER 28, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | PRIOR TO PB: | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA | | | ROAD NEED TO MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION | | | REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE | | | PLANNING BOARD. | | | | | | A. THE CITY SURVEYOR HAS PROVIDED COMMENTS THAT THE FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS MAY NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN ACACIA ROAD | | | SINCE THEY WILL INTERFERE WITH THE UTILITIES LOCATED | | | WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE APPLICANT RESPONSE WAS | | | THAT THIS IS ?ACKNOWLEDGED?. THE FPL TRANSFORMERS NEED | | | TO BE SHOWN OUT OF ACACIA COURT AND AT THEIR FINAL | | | LOCATION. ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND | | | CIVIL PLANS BASED ON THE NEW FPL TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS | | | NEED TO BE COMPLETED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT ALL | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE STILL MET. | | | B. PROVIDE THE SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH TRANSFORMER | | | PAD AS WELL AS THE DIMENSIONS, INCLUDING HEIGHT OF THE | | | TRANSFORMERS. THE E-MAIL THAT WAS PROVIDED FROM BRENNA | | | HOLLAWAY AT FPL INDICATES THAT A 7 FOOT BY 7 FOOT AREA | | | REQUIRED FOR THE PAD, WITH ADDITIONAL CLEARANCE ON EACH | | | SIDE. THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCURATELY REFLECTED | | | ON THE SITE PLAN AS THE TRANSFORMERS LOOK TOO SMALL. | | | THE APPLICATION IS USING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ACACIA | | | COURT AS A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AS PART OF THE INNOVATIVE | | | PLANNING TO JUSTIFY THE WAIVER REQUESTS. THE | | | INSTALLATION OF LARGE, UNSCREENED TRANSFORMER BOXES | | | BLOCKING A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS | | | NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT A REVIEW OF THE FPL | | | TRANSFORMER PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS LIST SETBACKS FROM | | | LANDSCAPE AND SETBACKS FROM RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS. THE | | | PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMERS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO | | | THE PROPERTY LINE OF 1301 SOUTH FLAGLER WOULD PROHIBIT | | | THAT PROPERTY FROM REDEVELOPING IN CODE COMPLIANCE | | | SINCE THE TRANSFORMER SETBACK PROHIBITS THE | | | INSTALLATION OF THE CODE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THE | | | FPL REQUIREMENTS ALSO LIST A 15 FOOT SETBACK TO | | | WINDOWS, WHICH THE PLACEMENT OF THESE TRANSFORMERS DO | | | NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH. | | | C. PROVIDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SWITCH BOXES | | | SHOWN ON THE PLANS, TO INCLUDE HEIGHT. | | | | | | 2) THE PLANTER BOXES ON ACACIA AVENUE NEED TO HAVE | | | MULTIPLE TRUNK PALMS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED EFFECT OF | | | CREATING AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN AREA THAT CAN BE USED | | | INNOVATIVE DESIGN FOR THE RPD REQUEST. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PLANTER BOXES PROPOSED FOR | | | ACACIA ROAD. | | | | | | A. HOW ARE THEY AFFIXED TO THE GROUND? IF NOT AFFIXED, | | | HOW ARE THEY MOVED IN THE EVENT THAT CITY MAINTENANCE | | | IS REQUIRED? NOTE: THIS WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF | | | THE HOA. | | | B. HOW ARE THEY IRRIGATED? WHERE WILL THE IRRIGATION | | | LINES BE INSTALLED? NOTE: THIS WOULD BE THE | | | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOA. | | | C. HOW ARE THE PLANTERS DRAINED? | | | | | | 4) RENDERINGS OF THE PATH ARE NOT ACCURATE. | | | | | | A. THE CONTAINER MATERIAL AND SIZE. | | | B. THE PLANTS SHOWN BOTH TREES AND PALMS. | | | C. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO BE MARKED TO SHOW TAGS | | | WHERE THE RENDERINGS ARE TAKEN FROM. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE DETAILS ON WHAT THE GARAGE SUPPLY AND | | | RETURNS LOOK LIKE ABOVE GRADE, TO INCLUDE THE HEIGHT. | | | | | | 6) WHAT DOES THE PRIVACY FENCE ON SOUTH PROPERTY LINE | | | LOOK LIKE? | | | | | | PRIOR TO CC CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 7) CONTINUE THE WIDENED SIDEWALK THE FULL LENGTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY FRONTAGE AND ALONG THE ARCACIA ROAD AND | | | FLAGLER DRIVE INTERSECTION FRONTAGE. | | | | | | 8) THE WALL AND FENCE AROUND THE GENERATOR SERVICE YARD | | | ARE SHOWN AT A HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET (SHEET L9.01). | | | THE PERMITTED HEIGHT WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK ALONG | | | CURRIE CRESCENT IS FOUR (4) FEET. STAFF IS WILLING TO | | | SUPPORT A FENCE HEIGHT WAIVER, FROM GRADE, OF SIX (6) | | | FEET SURROUNDING THE GENERATOR AREA AND THE MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT AREA. BY CODE, THE HEDGE MAY GROW TO 10 FEET | | | IN HEIGHT, SO NO WAIVER IS REQUIRED FOR IT. | | | | | | 9) BICYCLE FACILITIES. | | | | | | A. STAFF ACCEPTS THE SPECIFIED BICYCLE RACK AS MEETING | | | CITY BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE A BLOW UP OF | | | THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE PROPOSED RACK AND | | | DIMENSIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS | | | SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE SEVEN BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. | | | WHEN COMPARING THE VARIOUS PAGES AND DETAILS, IT | | | APPEARS THERE IS ADEQUATE ROOM, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE | | | CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | B. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE PROVIDED | | | EMPLOYEE BICYCLE PARKING COMPLIES WITH CITY CODE. | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL THAT SPECIFICALLY SHOWS HOW THE | | | BICYCLE RACK WITH THE TWO BICYCLES WILL FUNCTION WHERE | | | IT IS SHOWN AGAINST THE WALL. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO | | | SHOW THAT THE EGRESS PATH IS NOT BLOCKED. WHEN | | | COMPARING THE VARIOUS PAGES AND DETAILS, IT APPEARS | | | THERE IS ADEQUATE ROOM, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY | | | SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-26-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-26-2018 |
Time |
16:24 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-26-2018 |
Time |
08:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-09-26 16:14:08 | CASE NO. PB 1799 & 1799A | | | PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER -1ST RESUBMITTAL | | | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | OCTOBER 5, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | NOVEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM | | | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 26, 2018), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS | | | WERE NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT IS | | | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS BE 20% OF THE | | | ORIGINAL RPD APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REVISED COMMENT: THE BASE MEASURE POINT REQUIRES | | | FURTHER DISCUSSION BASED ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA | | | ROAD NEED TO MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION | | | REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE | | | PLANNING BOARD. ** THE RESPONSE THAT THIS IS TO BE | | | SHOWN ON A SEPARATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS NOT | | | ACCEPTABLE. THE ACACIA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING USED | | | AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | | | TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE | | | DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENTS; THEREFORE, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE A DESIGN | | | THAT MEETS ALL THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION | | | CRITERIA PRIOR TO STAFF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON IF | | | IT IS APPROPRIATE AS A MITIGATION MEASURE. FOR EXAMPLE, | | | IF THE EXISTING UTILITIES, BELOW AND ABOVE GROUND, DO | | | NOT PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF TREES, THEN THE ACACIA | | | ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROVIDE A MINIMAL AMOUNT TO THE | | | ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | A. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AND MORE DETAILS OF THE | | | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CURRENT ELEVATION OF ACACIA | | | ROAD IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SLOPING FROM APPROXIMATELY | | | SIX (6) FEET TO 10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY | | | BOUNDARY OF THE 1309 S. FLAGLER DEVELOPMENT SITE. THE | | | SAME LOCATION IS SHOWN HAVING AN ALMOST CONSISTENT 10 | | | FOOT ELEVATION. HOW IS THIS FOUR (4) FOOT GRADE CHANGE | | | BEING INTEGRATED WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND | | | SOUTH OF THE SITE AS WELL AS TOWARD FLAGLER DRIVE. ** | | | NOT PROVIDED. | | | B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PEDESTRIAN PERMEABLE PAVING | | | AND THE BENCHES THAT ARE PROPOSED. ** NOT PROVIDED -THE | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION MUST AGREE WITH THE | | | PROPOSED PAVERS. | | | C. PROVIDE DETAILS ON ADA ACCESSIBILITY. ** THIS NEEDS | | | TO BE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS. NOT ONLY SLOPE, BUT ADA | | | COMPLIANT MATERIALS. | | | D. THE SKY BIKE CONTRACT IS WITH THE DDA AND DOES NOT | | | EXTEND OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN. ALL OF THE BICYCLE SHARE | | | FACILITIES NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE 1309 S. FLAGLER | | | PROPERTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO ADVERTISING FACILITIES | | | WILL BE PERMITTED. SINCE THE BICYCLE SHARE IS BEING | | | USED AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | | | TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE | | | DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENTS, THEN YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION FROM SKY BIKE THAT THIS LOCATION IS | | | ACCEPTABLE TO THEM (WITHOUT ADVERTISING), TO INCLUDE A | | | PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES OFF | | | CURRIE CRESCENT PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE | | | PLANNING BOARD. ** NO WRITTEN RESPONSE PROVIDED. | | | E. THE 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER HOMEOWNER' ASSOCIATION WILL | | | NEED TO MAINTAIN ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE ACACIA | | | ROAD ROW AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE ELECTRICITY FOR THE | | | LIGHTING. ** CONDITION | | | | | | 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS A SIX (6) FOOT | | | WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN THIS EASEMENT. ** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES | | | THAT THE EASEMENT WILL BE VACATED AND THE UTILITIES | | | RELOCATED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM | | | FPL, THE EASEMENT HOLDER, THAT THEY DO NOT OBJECT TO | | | THE PROPOSED VACATION AND RELOCATION. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE OPEN | | | CHARACTER OF SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, THE RECENT | | | REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (LA CLARE AND BRISTOL) HAVE BEEN | | | REQUIRED TO PROVIDE OPEN SPACE THAT IS PUBLICLY | | | ACCESSIBLE AND THAT DOES NOT HAVE BARRIERS SUCH AS | | | WALLS OR FENCES ALONG THEIR FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGES. ** | | | STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REVISED PLAN AS IT DOES NOT | | | PROVIDE FOR THE EXPECTATION OF OPEN SPACE ALONG FLAGLER | | | DRIVE. | | | | | | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 40 FOOT | | | DRIVEWAY OPENING ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS CREATES AN | | | UNNECESSARILY WIDE CROSSING POINT FOR PEDESTRIANS, | | | WHICH DOES NOT PROMOTE SAFETY. ADDITIONALLY, USING MORE | | | THAN A THIRD OF THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE FOR VEHICULAR | | | ACCESS DOES NOT PROMOTE THE CITY'S AESTHETIC VISION FOR | | | FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | | | | 6) PARKING | | | | | | A. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT VERIFICATION THAT | | | THE PROVISION OF PARKING SPACES AT THIS LOCATION DOES | | | NOT REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF ADA SPACES AS WELL. ** | | | CONDITION - SIGNED "VALET ONLY" SO NO ADA REQUIRED. | | | B. REPEAT COMMENT: INCLUDE PARKING SPACE WIDTH | | | DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN FOR GARAGE PARKING. ** NOT | | | PROVIDED. | | | C. REVISED COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO BE | | | UPDATED TO REMOVE THE TWO TOWN CAR SPACES FROM THE | | | "REQUIRED" COLUMN. | | | D. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO HAVE LINE | | | ITEMS FOR THE NUMBER OF ADA SPACES REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED. | | | E. NEW COMMENT: WHAT ARE THE "3 CAR GARAGE SPACES"? | | | F. NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF COMPACT SPACE NO. | | | 9 ON BASEMENT 2. IT APPEARS SHORT. | | | G. NEW COMMENT: HOW WILL THE RESIDENT PARKING SPACES BE | | | ASSIGNED? STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE VEHICLE CHARGING | | | STATION ASSIGNMENT. IF RESIDENTS ARE BUYING SPECIFIC | | | INDIVIDUAL SPACES, IT MAY BE BETTER TO PRE-WIRE THE | | | ENTIRE GARAGE AND THEN THE RESIDENTS CAN PAY FOR A | | | CHARGING INSTALL IF THEY HAVE AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE. | | | | | | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE B1 VENTILATION MAY NOT BE IN | | | THE REQUIRED TURN AROUND SPACE AS THIS WILL MAKE THE | | | SPACE NONE FUNCTIONING TO USE FOR TURN AROUND. | | | | | | 8) BICYCLE FACILITIES. | | | | | | A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE | | | STORAGE ROOM SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE IF THE TYPE OF | | | RACKS THAT ARE PROVIDED ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE NUMBER | | | OF SPACES. ** INADEQUATE DETAIL PROVIDED. | | | B. REVISED COMMENT - PROVIDE A CITY COMPLIANT BICYCLE | | | RACK DETAIL. ** THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE | | | PROVIDED EMPLOYEE BICYCLE PARKING COMPLIES WITH CITY | | | CODE. PROVIDE A DETAIL THAT SPECIFICALLY SHOWS HOW THE | | | BICYCLE RACK WITH THE TWO BICYCLES WILL FUNCTION WHERE | | | IT IS SHOWN AGAINST THE WALL. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO | | | SHOW THAT THE EGRESS PATH IS NOT BLOCKED. | | | | | | 9) WHAT ARE THE AREAS LABELED SUITE 1 AND 2? CONDITION | | | - NO KITCHEN FACILITIES. | | | | | | 10) SHEET A3-02 SHOWS THE GENERATOR BELOW THE HEIGHT OF | | | THE SCREENING. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE GENERATOR NEEDS | | | TO BE SCREENED FOR ITS FULL HEIGHT, SO ENSURE THAT THE | | | GENERATOR THAT IS USED IS NOT TOO LARGE TO AVOID ISSUES | | | AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. CONDITION - GENERATOR | | | COMPLETE HEIGHT SCREENED. | | | | | | 11) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE ANY OUTSTANDING UTILITY | | | LETTERS. | | | | | | 12) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE GARBAGE/RECYCLING | | | PICK-UP WILL WORK. CONDITION - GARBAGE RECEPTACLES MUST | | | BE READY BEHIND THE GATE A HALF HOUR PRIOR TO THE | | | SCHEDULED PICK-UP TIME. GARBAGE RECEPTACLES ARE THEN | | | ROLLED OUT BY BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ONCE THE | | | TRUCK ARRIVES. THE GARBAGE RECEPTACLES NEED TO BE MOVED | | | BACK BEHIND THE GATE WITHIN A HALF HOUR OF PICK-UP BY | | | BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL. | | | | | | 13) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF THE | | | PROPOSED FENCES/WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. | | | | | | 14) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS OCCURRING ON | | | THE PENTHOUSE ROOF DECK. THERE SEEMS TO BE A | | | DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND THE | | | "OPEN TO THE SKY" MECHANICAL AREAS. | | | | | | REQUIRED WAIVERS | | | | | | 1) CURRIE CRESCENT SB | | | | | | 2) WALL HEIGHTS: | | | | | | RETAINING WALL WEST OF NASSER IS 15 FOOT ABOVE HIS | | | GRADE AT HIGHEST POINT | | | ACACIA COURT RETAINING WALL + SAFETY RAIL IS 10+ FEET | | | TALL IN SETBACK | | | COLUMNS FOR FLAGLER DRIVE - 8 FEET --- STAFF DOES NOT | | | SUPPORT | | | WALLS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT | | | | | | 3) CURRIE CRESCENT ACCESS | | | A. NUMBER | | | B. SEPARATION | | | C. ON-SITE MANEUVERING | | | | | | 4) LANDSCAPE | | | A. REQUIRED TREES | | | B. BUFFER INTERRUPTION ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-05-2018 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
5.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-05-2018 |
Time |
10:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-05 10:31:57 | CASE NO. PB 1799 & 1799A | | | PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER | | | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | JULY 27, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 11, | | | 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL RPD APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) PLANNING STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTING BUILDINGS IN EXCESS | | | OF 300 FEET IN TOTAL HEIGHT, INCLUDING MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT, ALONG SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, SOUTH OF | | | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS THIS IS NOT THE CHARACTER OF | | | DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. THIS IS EVEN MAGNIFIED WHEN | | | THE BUILDING REQUIRES WAIVERS TO THE SETBACKS BASED ON | | | THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 2) THE FLOOR THAT IS LABELED AS BASEMENT LEVEL 1 IS | | | ACTUALLY THE GROUND FLOOR; THEREFORE, THE BUILDING | | | HEIGHT NEEDS TO BEGIN ITS MEASUREMENT FROM THE 3'8" | | | NAVD SHOWN ON SECTION SHEET A3-02, NOT FROM CURRIE | | | CRESCENT. | | | | | | 3) THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA ROAD NEED TO | | | MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION REQUIREMENTS | | | PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD. | | | | | | A. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AND MORE DETAILS OF THE | | | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CURRENT ELEVATION OF ACACIA | | | ROAD IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SLOPING FROM APPROXIMATELY | | | SIX (6) FEET TO 10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY | | | BOUNDARY OF THE 1309 S. FLAGLER DEVELOPMENT SITE. THE | | | SAME LOCATION IS SHOWN HAVING AN ALMOST CONSISTENT 10 | | | FOOT ELEVATION. HOW IS THIS FOUR (4) FOOT GRADE CHANGE | | | BEING INTEGRATED WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND | | | SOUTH OF THE SITE AS WELL AS TOWARD FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PEDESTRIAN PERMEABLE PAVING | | | AND THE BENCHES THAT ARE PROPOSED. | | | C. PROVIDE DETAILS ON ADA ACCESSIBILITY. | | | D. THE SKY BIKE CONTRACT IS WITH THE DDA AND DOES NOT | | | EXTEND OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN. ALL OF THE BICYCLE SHARE | | | FACILITIES NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE 1309 S. FLAGLER | | | PROPERTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO ADVERTISING FACILITIES | | | WILL BE PERMITTED. SINCE THE BICYCLE SHARE IS BEING | | | USED AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | | | TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE | | | DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENTS, THEN YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION FROM SKY BIKE THAT THIS LOCATION IS | | | ACCEPTABLE TO THEM (WITHOUT ADVERTISING), TO INCLUDE A | | | PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES OFF | | | CURRIE CRESCENT PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE | | | PLANNING BOARD. | | | E. THE 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER HOMEOWNER?S ASSOCIATION WILL | | | NEED TO MAINTAIN ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE ACACIA | | | ROAD ROW AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE ELECTRICITY FOR THE | | | LIGHTING. | | | F. BOLLARD LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE USED ALONG THE PATH, | | | NOT POLE MOUNTED LIGHTS. | | | | | | 4) THIS PROPERTY HAS DOUBLE FRONTAGE SO THE FRONT | | | SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM BOTH FLAGLER DRIVE AND CURRIE | | | CRESCENT. | | | | | | A. CURRIE CRESCENT IS A FRONT PROPERTY LINE AND THUS | | | REQUIRES A 25 FOOT SETBACK. THE PLANS SHOW A 15 FOOT 4 | | | INCH SETBACK FROM CURRIE CRESCENT. | | | B. THE MAXIMUM WALL/FENCE HEIGHT WITHIN THE 25 FOOT | | | FRONT SETBACK FROM CURRIE CRESCENT IS FOUR (4) FEET. | | | | | | 5) SHOW THE SETBACKS FROM THE PROPERTY LINES ON THE | | | ELEVATION AND SECTION DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 6) THE SETBACK WAIVER TABLE PROVIDED IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION LETTER HAS ERRORS AND IS CONFUSING. EX. | | | THE FRONT SETBACK IS 25 FEET BASED ON THE MF32 ZONING | | | DESIGNATION; THEREFORE, NO FRONT SETBACK WAIVER IS | | | NEEDED FROM FLAGLER DRIVE TO THE FRONT OF THE GROUND | | | FLOOR (BASEMENT LEVEL 1 AND ITS OVERLOOK). | | | | | | 7) THE SURVEY SHOWS A SIX (6) FOOT WIDE UTILITY | | | EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THIS | | | EASEMENT. THE REQUIRED BUFFER NEEDS TO BE LOCATED TO | | | THE NORTH OF THE EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A | | | STROMWATER LINE IN THIS AREA THAT THERE APPEAR TO BE | | | TREES PLANTED ON TOP OF. | | | | | | 8) THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BUFFER TREES WITHIN THE | | | CURRIE CRESCENT BUFFER ARE NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | 9) IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE OPEN CHARACTER OF SOUTH | | | FLAGLER DRIVE, THE RECENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (LA | | | CLARE AND BRISTOL) HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO PROVIDE OPEN | | | SPACE THAT IS PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE AND THAT DOES NOT | | | HAVE BARRIERS SUCH AS WALLS OR FENCES ALONG THEIR | | | FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGES. THE PROPOSAL FAILS TO PROVIDE | | | THIS OPEN SPACE, WHICH STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT. | | | | | | 10) PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH DESCRIBES THE MATERIALS WHICH | | | WILL BE USED ON THE BUILDING FACADES. | | | | | | 11) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED PROVISION OF | | | INACTIVE/SERVICE USES THAT WILL BE AT THE ENTIRE | | | PEDESTRIAN LEVELS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT AND ACACIA | | | ROAD. | | | | | | 12) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 40 FOOT DRIVEWAY OPENING | | | ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS CREATES AN UNNECESSARILY WIDE | | | CROSSING POINT FOR PEDESTRIANS, WHICH DOES NOT PROMOTE | | | SAFETY. ADDITIONALLY, USING MORE THAN A THIRD OF THE | | | PROPERTY FRONTAGE FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS DOES NOT PROMOTE | | | THE CITY'S AESTHETIC VISION FOR FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | | | | 13) THE REQUEST IS TO PERMIT TWO VEHICULAR ACCESS | | | POINTS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT. | | | | | | A. THE TWO ACCESS POINTS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 125 | | | FOOT SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS. | | | B. WHY DO THERE NEED TO BE TWO CURB ACCESS POINTS? THE | | | TWO ACCESS POINTS SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED. | | | C. WHY IS A VEHICULAR EXIT PROPOSED FROM THE LOBBY | | | ENTRY TO CURRIE CRESCENT? PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR TURNING | | | RADIUS DRAWING SHOWS VEHICLES DRIVING IN FROM CURRIE | | | CRESCENT. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED ON A ONE-WAY EXIT | | | DRIVE. | | | D. THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE | | | THAT ALL VEHICULAR MOVEMENT AND MANEUVERING THAT MAY BE | | | REQUIRED TO UTILIZE OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES SHALL | | | BE RETAINED ON-SITE. PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL NOT BE | | | UTILIZED TO ALLOW OR ENHANCE MOVEMENT OR MANEUVERING, | | | WHICH IS THE REQUIRED BY THE WAY YOU ARE SHOWING YOUR | | | LOADING AREA. | | | | | | 14) THE PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS ARE BEING PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT | | | BY A TYPE D CURB. | | | | | | 15) PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC VALUES AT THE CURRIE | | | CRESCENT PROPERTY LINE AND ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE | | | ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR PALM BEACH | | | ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY AND 1301 SOUTH FLAGLER. THE | | | LIGHTING LEVEL SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 FOOT CANDLE. | | | | | | 16) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS AN EXCESS OF 1 FOOT | | | CANDLE AT THE FLAGLER DRIVE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 17) THE LIGHT POLES (TYPE V) NEED TO MEET THE 25 FOOT | | | FRONT AND 15 FOOT SIDE SETBACKS. | | | | | | 18) PARKING | | | | | | A. THE VALET PARKING SPACE DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO | | | CITY STRIPING STANDARDS. ADDITIONALLY, YOU WILL NEED TO | | | PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT THAT THE PROVISION OF PARKING SPACES AT THIS | | | LOCATION DO NOT REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF ADA SPACES AS | | | WELL. | | | B. INCLUDE PARKING SPACE WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE | | | PLAN FOR GARAGE PARKING. | | | C. SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE | | | SUPPORT COLUMNS. IN A FEW INSTANCES THERE IS ROOM TO | | | SHIFT THE PARKING SPACE AWAY FROM THE COLUMN TO GIVE | | | MORE ROOM, WHICH YOU SHOULD DO. THE SPACES BY THE RAMP | | | IN BASEMENT 1 AND 2 AND ON BASEMENT 1 ACROSS FROM THE | | | ADA SPACE (ADJACENT TO STORAGE) DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE | | | THE REQUIRED 8.5 FEET IN WIDTH (PLEASE DIMENSION) AND | | | TWO SPACES HAVE THE COLUMN AT THE LOCATION WHERE A CAR | | | DOOR WOULD OPEN, AND THUS REQUIRE EXTRA WIDTH. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT IF THESE COLUMNS HAVE NOT BEEN PROPERLY SIZED | | | AS PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL AND GET LARGER AT THE TIME OF | | | BUILDING PERMIT, IT MAY CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF | | | PARKING SPACES TO BE IMPACTED, WHICH COULD LEAD TO | | | PARKING DEFICIENCIES. | | | D. PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DIVISION THAT THE LOCATION OF THE ADA SPACES IN THE | | | GARAGE LEVELS CONFORM TO THE STANDARD THAT THEY ARE ON | | | THE CLOSEST ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. | | | E. THERE IS A DEAD END AISLE ON BASEMENT 1 THAT DOES | | | NOT HAVE A FUNCTIONAL TURN AROUND SPACE - IT HAS A | | | COLUMN IN IT. | | | F. YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ON-SIGHT EMPLOYEE PARKING | | | FOR THE CONCIERGE, VALET, PERSONAL TRAINER, SPA | | | ATTENDANT, ETC. | | | G. PLEASE LABEL ON THE PLAN HOW THE PARKING WILL BE | | | ASSIGNED ? EX. UNIT OWNER, GUEST, VALET, AND EMPLOYEE. | | | H. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO SEPARATE | | | THE PARKING PROVIDED LINE INTO THE VARIOUS CATEGORIES | | | AND THEN PROVIDE A TOTAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT TANDEM | | | PARKING SPACES ONLY COUNT AS ONE SPACE TOWARD MEETING | | | CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | I. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO HAVE LINE ITEMS FOR THE | | | NUMBER OF ADA SPACES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | | | | 19) WHERE IS THE GARAGE VENTING? | | | | | | 20) BICYCLE FACILITIES. | | | | | | A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT IS | | | 1 SPACE PER 20 OF REQUIRED PARKING. WHILE STAFF | | | ENCOURAGES THE PROVISION OF EXTRA BICYCLE PARKING, YOU | | | ARE ONLY REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED AND THE PROVIDE NUMBERS AS | | | SEPARATE LINE ITEMS ON THE PARKING TABLE. | | | B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM SO THAT | | | STAFF CAN EVALUATE IF THE TYPE OF RACKS THAT ARE | | | PROVIDED ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE NUMBER OF SPACES | | | C. AT LEAST ONE BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO BE PROVIDE AT A | | | GUEST OR EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING FOR | | | NON-RESIDENT USERS. PROVIDE A CITY COMPLIANT BICYCLE | | | RACK DETAIL. | | | | | | 21) WHAT ARE THE AREAS LABELED SUITE 1 AND 2? | | | | | | 22) SHEET A3-02 SHOWS THE GENERATOR BELOW THE HEIGHT OF | | | THE SCREENING. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE GENERATOR NEEDS | | | TO BE SCREENED FOR ITS FULL HEIGHT, SO ENSURE THAT THE | | | GENERATOR THAT IS USED IS NOT TOO LARGE TO AVOID ISSUES | | | AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. | | | | | | 23) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS A TRAFFIC | | | IMPACT STUDY, BUT STAFF DID NOT SEE ONE IN THE | | | SUBMITTED MATERIAL. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS DOCUMENT. | | | | | | 24) PROVIDE ANY OUTSTANDING UTILITY LETTERS. | | | | | | 25) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE AREAS SHOWN AS STORAGE IN THE | | | BASEMENT LEVELS. SOME APPEAR TO HAVE WALLS AND DOORS | | | WHILE OTHERS JUST A DASHED LINE. | | | | | | 26) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE GARBAGE/RECYCLING | | | PICK-UP WILL WORK. HOW HIGH IS THE CEILING IN THIS | | | LOCATION? HOW WILL BULK ITEMS BE HANDLED? | | | | | | 27) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR BUILDING PERMIT PLANS, YOU | | | WILL NEED TO CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT | | | SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494-1080, TO VERIFY THE SITE AND | | | UNIT NUMBER ADDRESSING. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |