Plan Review Details - Project Z18060022
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18060022
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-09-2018 Time 18:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-09-2018 Time 18:28 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-09 18:32:07DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 4. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. PODIUM LEVEL 2 PLAN, SHEET
 A1.02, SHOWS A CHEF'S KITCHEN. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY
 BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES
 O&M SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS
 OILS AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-10-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-10-2018 Time 20:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 07-10-2018 Time 20:09 Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-10 21:03:08DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 4. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 5 ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. PASSENGER LOADING/VALET DROP-OFF. GROUND FLOOR PLAN
 A1.01 SHOWS THREE PARKING SPACES THAT APEAR TO BE VALET
 CAR DROP=OFF. NONE OF THESE SPACES ARE ACCESSIBLE, SO
 THE BUILDING ENTRANCE MUST HAVE A PASSENGER LOADING
 ZONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 209.4 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR VALET
 DROP-OFF.
  
 7 . VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 8. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 9. EXIT DISCHARGE. SITE PLAN SHEET A0.01 SOWS AN
 INSWING GATE FROM THE REAR (WEST) STAIR TO THE CURRIE
 CRESCENT SIDE WALK. THE GATE MSUT BE AN OUTSWING GATE,
  
 10. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
 DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
 OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
 GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
 GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
 USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 11. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. PODIUM LEVEL 2 PLAN, SHEET
 A1.02, SHOWS A CHEF'S KITCHEN. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY
 BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES
 O&M SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS
 OILS AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 12. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 13 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-09-2018 Time 09:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-09 09:06:37PASSED WITH CONDITION OF SUBMITTAL AND FINAL APPROVAL
 OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-11-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By Mgonzale Date 07-11-2018 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date 07-11-2018 Time   Sent To Z
Notes
2018-07-11 12:31:13RESPOND IN WRITING:
  
 #1 SHOW MORE DETAIL AS TO CONNECTIONS ON OLIVE AVE FOR
 WATER. SEWER LINE ON CURRIE SHALL BE LINED OR REPLACED,
 SUBMIT VIDEO OF CONDITION.
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS
 /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE
 LEAD-FREE."
 FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
  
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-18-2018 Time 11:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-18-2018 Time 11:05 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-18 11:08:352ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM ERIC
 SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPLE PLANNER, AND THE ATTACHMENTS WITH
 PLAN SHEETS, DATED AUGUST 31, 2018, FROM CARLTON FILEDS
 JORDON BURT, P.A., THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-03-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-03-2018 Time 12:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-03-2018 Time 11:50 Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-03 12:21:03THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 5 A. THE TWO EXITS STAIRS LOCATED WITHIN THE CORE OF
 THE STRUCTURE APPEAR TO BE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER TO MEET
 THE MINIMUM EXIT SEPARATION OF NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7,
 MEANS OF EGRESS, DISTANCE FOR THE AREA SERVED. PLEASE
 REVIEW AN ENSURE COMPLIANCE.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED NOT MORE
 THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT
 CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER
 SUPPLY.
  
 AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING THE
 REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA
 1 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT
 CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE.
  
 THERE APPEARS TO BE ONLY ONE FDC INDICATED. TWO FDC'S
 ARE NEEDED. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF THE
 FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE BEST FIRE OPERATIONAL POSITIONS IS
 STRONGLY ENCOURAGED.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7 A. A FIRE TRUCK STAGING AREA IS INDICATED. THE AREA
 WIDTH IS INDICATED AS 15' AND APPEARS TO BE UNDER THE
 OVERHANG FOR THE BUILDING. IS THIS AREA ON A A GRADE?
 ANY FIRE TRUCK STAGING AREA IS REQUIRED TO 20' AND
 13'6" HIGH AND BE FLAT, BUT SHOULD ALSO BE CLEAR OF ANY
 OVERHEAD OBSTRUCTION. A LADDER TRUCK COULD NOT BE
 OPERATED FROM THIS LOCATION.
  
 7 B. THERE IS A FDC AND FIRE HYDRANT INDICATED OFF OF
 CURRIE CRESENT; HOWEVER, THERE IS NO FIRE LANE
 INDICATED OR HOW THE FD WILL ACCESS THE BUILDING FROM
 THIS LOCATION. THERE ARE TWO DOORS INDICATED FOR THE
 FIRE COMMAND ROOM BUT THE LOCATION OF THESE DOORS MAY
 BE BETTER LOCATED FOR FD ACCESS. CLOSE COORDINATION
 WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE BEST FIRE
 OPERATIONAL POSITIONS IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED.
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A FIRE HYDRANT INDICATED ON
 FLAGLER DR. IT WOULD BE OPTIMAL TO HAVE A FIRE HYDRANT
 AND FDC LOCATED OFF OF FLAGLER DR FOR FIREGROUND
 OPERATIONAL PURPOSES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 E. A WORK TABLE.
 F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
 K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
 13. RADIO
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
 ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
 FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
 24.5.2.2.3.
 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
 EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
 EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
 STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
 LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
 AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
 RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
 THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
 AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
 PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
 ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
 NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
 PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-18-2018 Time 13:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-18-2018 Time 13:48 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-18 13:48:38FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD Z18060022
 OCTOBER 16, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L4.21:
 ? SATISFIED TREES AND PALMS IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ARE
 MISSING FROM THE DISPOSITION PLAN.
 ? SATISFIED THE COLUMN FOR STATUS ON THE CHART IS NOT
 ALIGNED WITH THE OTHER COLUMNS OR IS MISSING THE STATUS
 OF THE FIRST THREE TREES.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CHART TO CALCULATE THE
 MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS REMOVED.
 THIS NEEDS SOME CORRECTION.
 ? SATISFIED. SABAL PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED
 IF IN GOOD CONDITION.
  
 2. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.01 FOR
 THESE ITEMS:
 ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING PLANT SIZES, AND CHOOSE
 ONE MINIMUM SIZE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM SPECIES THAT
 MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CODE REQUIREMENT.
 ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING INFORMATION IN THE
 IRRIGATION NEEDS COLUMN.
 ? SATISFIED. INDICATE LIGNUM VITAE AS NATIVE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART ON SHEET L4.01 TO CURRENT CODE
 SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED.
 CURRENT VERSION IS IN MUNICODE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, SHOW PERVIOUS PAVERS AS A SEPARATE CATEGORY WITH
 SQUARE FOOTAGE, AS THEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 5. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD
 THE ONE TREE PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443
 (D)(2)A. TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED
 FOR REQUIRED TREE NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-442(D).
  
 7. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL REQUIRED TREES
 AND SHRUBS FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH, AND PROVIDED NUMBER
 PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)C.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THERE ARE
 CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINE.
  
 9. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF BUFFER STRIP INTERRUPTION
 FOR ACCESS FOR THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER TO COMPLY WITH
 MAXIMUM OF 20 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 40
 PERCENT REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE
 BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B.
  
 11. SATISFIED. TREES ADDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OUTSIDE
 OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE
 REQUIRED TREES FOR THE SITE. THEY CAN BE COUNTED AS
 MITIGATION FOR TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 12. SATISFIED. ACACIA ROAD PARCEL WILL HAVE TO BE
 EVALUATED FOR APPLICATION OF THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 DEPENDING ON WHETHER THE ROAD WILL BE CITY OWNED OR
 NOT. THE CHART PROVIDED MAY NOT HAVE THE CORRECT
 CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES. IF CITY OWNED, SECTION
 94-442(E) WILL APPLY.
  
 THERE ARE ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED WITH UTILITIES PRIOR TO
 FINAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN APPROVAL.
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER,
 FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE UNRESOLVED ISSUES WITH LOCATIONS OF WATER AND
 SEWER LINES, THIS WILL BE ONGOING.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
 ALL SIDES OF THE VALVE AREAS NEED HEDGING.
  
 16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-26-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-26-2018 Time 13:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-26-2018 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-26 13:59:21FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD Z18060022
 SEPTEMBER 26, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L4.21:
 ? SATISFIED TREES AND PALMS IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ARE
 MISSING FROM THE DISPOSITION PLAN.
 ? SATISFIED THE COLUMN FOR STATUS ON THE CHART IS NOT
 ALIGNED WITH THE OTHER COLUMNS OR IS MISSING THE STATUS
 OF THE FIRST THREE TREES.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CHART TO CALCULATE THE
 MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS REMOVED.
 ? THIS NEEDS SOME CORRECTION.
 ? SATISFIED. SABAL PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED
 IF IN GOOD CONDITION.
  
 2. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.01 FOR
 THESE ITEMS:
 ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING PLANT SIZES, AND CHOOSE
 ONE MINIMUM SIZE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM SPECIES THAT
 MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CODE REQUIREMENT.
 ? SATISFIED. ADD ALL MISSING INFORMATION IN THE
 IRRIGATION NEEDS COLUMN.
 ? SATISFIED. INDICATE LIGNUM VITAE AS NATIVE.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART ON SHEET L4.01 TO CURRENT CODE
 SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED.
 CURRENT VERSION IS IN MUNICODE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, SHOW PERVIOUS PAVERS AS A SEPARATE CATEGORY WITH
 SQUARE FOOTAGE, AS THEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 5. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD
 THE ONE TREE PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443
 (D)(2)A. TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED
 FOR REQUIRED TREE NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-442(D).
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART
 SHEET L1.04, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL REQUIRED
 TREES AND SHRUBS FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH, AND PROVIDED
 NUMBER PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)C.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THERE ARE
 CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINE.
  
 9. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET
 L1.04, SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF BUFFER STRIP INTERRUPTION
 FOR ACCESS FOR THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER TO COMPLY WITH
 MAXIMUM OF 20 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 40
 PERCENT REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE
 BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B.
  
 11. SATISFIED. TREES ADDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OUTSIDE
 OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE
 REQUIRED TREES FOR THE SITE. THEY CAN BE COUNTED AS
 MITIGATION FOR TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ACACIA ROAD PARCEL WILL HAVE
 TO BE EVALUATED FOR APPLICATION OF THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS DEPENDING ON WHETHER THE ROAD WILL BE CITY
 OWNED OR NOT. THE CHART PROVIDED MAY NOT HAVE THE
 CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES. IF CITY OWNED,
 SECTION 94-442(E) WILL APPLY.
  
 THERE ARE ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED WITH UTILITIES PRIOR TO
 FINAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN APPROVAL.
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE FOR ALL ADDED PLANTS.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF
 WATER, SEWER, FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL
 TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE UNRESOLVED ISSUES WITH LOCATIONS OF WATER AND
 SEWER LINES, THIS WILL BE ONGOING.
  
  
 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
 GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
 ALL SIDES OF THE VALVE AREAS NEED HEDGING.
  
 16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-10-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-10-2018 Time 15:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-10-2018 Time 15:14 Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-10 15:15:18FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD Z18060022
 JULY 9, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THERE ARE CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L4.21:
 ? TREES AND PALMS IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ARE MISSING FROM
 THE DISPOSITION PLAN.
 ? THE COLUMN FOR STATUS ON THE CHART IS NOT ALIGNED
 WITH THE OTHER COLUMNS OR IS MISSING THE STATUS OF THE
 FIRST THREE TREES.
 ? PROVIDE A CHART TO CALCULATE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED
 FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS REMOVED.
 ? SABAL PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED IF IN GOOD
 CONDITION.
  
 2. UPDATE THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.01 FOR THESE
 ITEMS:
 ? ADD ALL MISSING PLANT SIZES, AND CHOOSE ONE MINIMUM
 SIZE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM SPECIES THAT MEETS OR
 EXCEEDS THE CODE REQUIREMENT.
 ? ADD ALL MISSING INFORMATION IN THE IRRIGATION NEEDS
 COLUMN.
 ? INDICATE LIGNUM VITAE AS NATIVE.
  
 3. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS
 CHART ON SHEET L4.01 TO CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-446 (G)
 AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS AS REQUIRED.
  
 4. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, SHOW
 PERVIOUS PAVERS AS A SEPARATE CATEGORY WITH SQUARE
 FOOTAGE, AS THEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PERVIOUS
 LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 5. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, CORRECT
 THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SHADE TREE
 AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS AND ADD THE ONE TREE
 PER UNIT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A. TO
 ACHIEVE THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREE COUNT.
  
 6. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR
 REQUIRED TREE NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-442(D).
  
 7. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, PROVIDE
 THE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 EACH BUFFER LENGTH, AND PROVIDED NUMBER PER SECTION
 94-443(D)(1)C.
 8. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN. THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH
 UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
  
 9. ON THE SITE CALCULATIONS CHART SHEET L1.04, SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF BUFFER STRIP INTERRUPTION FOR ACCESS FOR
 THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER TO COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM OF 20
 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A.
  
 10. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 40 PERCENT
 REQUIREMENT FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING
 PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B.
  
 11. TREES ADDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OUTSIDE OF THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE REQUIRED
 TREES FOR THE SITE. THEY CAN BE COUNTED AS MITIGATION
 FOR TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 12. ACACIA ROAD PARCEL WILL HAVE TO BE EVALUATED FOR
 APPLICATION OF THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS DEPENDING ON
 WHETHER THE ROAD WILL BE CITY OWNED OR NOT. THE CHART
 PROVIDED MAY NOT HAVE THE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR
 REQUIRED TREES. IF CITY OWNED, SECTION 94-442(E) WILL
 APPLY.
  
 13. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
  
 14. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER, FIRE LINES,
 DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 16. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-09-2018 Time 13:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-09-2018 Time 13:19 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-09 13:21:30PER PETER B.
  
 CONDITION: THE GARBAGE RECEPTICLES ARE TO BE READY
 BEHIND THE GATE A HALF HOUR PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED
 PICK-UP TIME AND THEN ROLLED OUT WHEN THE TRUCK
 ARRIVES. THE GARBAGE RECEPTICLES ARE TO BE RETURNED
 BEHIND THE GATE WITHIN ONE HALF HOUR OF THE PICK-UP.

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-10 12:23:01THERE IS NO PLANS FOR SANITATION SERVICE IDENTIFIED ON
 THE SITE LAYOUT.

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-08-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-08-2018 Time 08:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-08-2018 Time 08:58 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-08 09:31:01PER TRACY WARD:
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. SHEETS SURVEY 1 AND SURVEY 2 CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 PLOTTED AT THE INDICATED SCALE. THIS NEEDS TO BE
 CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF ANY ENGINEERING
 PERMIT PLANS.
  
 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED GUMBO LIMBO TREES
 THIN FOUR FEET OF THE EDGE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
 INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON HOW THE TREE
 ROOTS WILL BE PREVENTED FROM DAMAGING THE EXFILTRATION
 SYSTEM AND INTERFERE WITH THE CAPACITY AS STATED IN THE
 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. DETAIL ST-8 NEEDS TO BE UPDATED
 TO SHOW THE ROOT BARRIERS AND THE TREES, WITH ACCURATE
 DIMENSIONS (INSTALLATION DEPTH AND DISTANCES FROM ROOT
 BARRIER TO EXFILTRATION TRENCH AND TO TREE TRUNK).
 PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES ARE NOT ONLY
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, BUT ALSO ARE BEING USED TO SHADE
 ACACIA ROAD. THIS COMMENT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR
 TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION.
  
 3. THE BUILDING/PREVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS (SHEET L1.04) NEED TO BE CORRECTED.
 THIS COMMENT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING
 FOR CITY COMMISSION.
  
 A. OVERALL SITE AREA DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLAN TABLE.
 B. THE AREA EAST OF FLAGLER DRIVE SHOULD BE CLEARLY
 SHOWN AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM.
 C. THE LEGEND FOR THE SITE PLAN OVERLAY NEEDS TO MATCH
 THE DESCRIPTION FOR THE SITE CALCULATIONS.
 D. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NEED TO MATCH ABOVE ITEMS.
  
 4. GRADES SHOWN FOR THE DRIVEWAY PROFILE ON SHEET C5.00
 DO NOT MATCH THE GRADES IN PLAN VIEW.
  
 5. REMOVE THE PROPERTY LINE CUTTING ACROSS THE PROPERTY
 TO THE SOUTH SHOWN ON SHEETS C5.00 AND C6.00
  
  
  
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-30-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-30-2018 Time 09:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-30-2018 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-30 16:10:24THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. SHEETS SURVEY 1 AND SURVEY 2 ARE NOT PLOTTED AT THE
 INDICATED SCALE.
  
 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED GUMBO LIMBO TREES
 WTHIN FOUR FEET OF THE EDGE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
 HOW WILL THE TREE ROOTS BE PREVENTED FROM DAMAGING THE
 EXFILTRATION SYSTEM. CAN THE EXFILTRATION SYSTEM BE
 MOVED UNDER THE LONG ENTRANCE ROADWAY AND/OR A
 SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM BE USED INSTEAD UNDER THE
 ENTRANCE ROADWAY?
  
 3. WHERE DO TRENCH DRAIN TD-1 AND YARD DRAIN YD-1 DRAIN
 TO?
  
 4. COORDINATE THE BUILDING/PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANSE (SHEET L1.04) AND THE DRAINAGE
 CALCULATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE SHEET SHOWS A BUILDING AREA
 OF 19,381 S.F. (0.44 ACRES). THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
 SHOW THE BUILDING AREA AS 0.30 ACRES.
  
 5. REPLACE DETAIL ST-8 WITH A PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAIL
 OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS OF
 THE TRENCH, THE PIPE INVERT ELEVATION AND THE PIPE
 SIZE.
  
 6. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A WEIR WILL NOT
 BE NEEDED. EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE
 SURCHARGED TO THE ELEVATIONS ASSUMED IN THE
 EXFILTRATION TRECH CALCULATIONS WHEN THE WEST PIPE
 CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE ST-3 IS CONNECTED TO AN OFFSITE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-25-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-25-2018 Time 17:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-25-2018 Time 18:10 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-25 17:54:05THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. NO DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED FOR THE
 DESIGN OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH AND DRAINAGE VAULT.
  
 2. SEVERAL TREES ARE PROPOSED NEAR OR OVER THE STORM
 PIPE. FOR EXAMPLE A GUMBO LIMBO IS PROPOSED OVER THE
 DRAINAGE VAULT AND NEAR STRUCTURE ST-3.
  
 3. THE WALKWAYS FROM THE STREET TO THE BUILDING SLOPE
 TOWARD THE STREET. HOW IS THE RUNOFF FROM THE WALKWAYS
 DIRECTED TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 4. THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE
 AFFECTED BY THE BASEMENT WALLS.
  
 5. CONFIRM THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE FIRE MAIN LINE
 AND STORM PIPE ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE FRONT
 ENTRANCE MEETS HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. TYPICAL SECTION D-D SHOULD INCLUDE A SWALE SIMILAR
 TO THE OTHER SECTIONS TO PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO
 OFFSITE PROPERTIES.
  
 7. PROVIDE A SECTION THROUGH THE ACACIA ROAD
 RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE THE WALKWAY IS PROPOSED.
  
 8. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT IS DEVELOPING TREE
 PLANTING GUIDELINES NEAR ITS UTILITIES. COORDINATE WITH
 EITHER THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OR THE CITY?S
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER.
  
 9. SURVEY IS USING NAVD 1988 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM. THE
 CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. PROVIDE A COVERSION
 EQUATION BETWEEN THE TWO VERTICAL DATUMS ON THE SURVEY.
  
 10. EXPLAIN HOW THE BASEMENTS WILL BE PROTECTED FROM
 FLOODING BY THE GROUNDWATER TABLE.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-10-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-10-2018 Time 18:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-10-2018 Time 18:51 Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-10 18:50:56THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. LEFT OF THE SURVEY WAS CUTOFF ON SHEET G0.02.
  
 2. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED.
  
 3. STORM PIPES IN FLAGLER R/W AND IN CURRIE CRESCENT
 R/W TO BE RELOCATED ONSITE.
  
 4. REMOVE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH FROM PUBLIC R/W.
  
 5. USE ONLY RCP STORM PIPE IN THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 6. VERIFY THE HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF THE EXISTING
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NOT BACKFLOW TO
 THE TRENCH DRAINS TD-2 AND TD-3.
  
 7. DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF SEA LEVEL RISE ON THE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 8. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFWMD CRITERIA.
  
 9. OFFSITE DISCHARGE TO THE CITY?S INDIVIDUAL DRAINAGE
 SYSTEMS SHALL NOT EXCEED EXISTING PEAK DISCHARGE RATES.
  
 10. VERIFY THE PROPOSED SWALE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY
 LINE WILL FUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MODIFIED SFWMD ERP APPROVAL
 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-09-2018 Time 08:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-09 09:04:07PASSED WITH CONDITION OF PLATTING PRIOR TO C.O. AND
 APPROVAL OF FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS WITH SUBMITTAL OF
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-17-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-17-2018 Time 07:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-17 08:46:041. EXISTING SANITARY IN NASSER PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE
 RELOCATED WITHIN ACACIA.
 2. FPL TRANSFORMER PADS WILL CONFLICT WITH
 EXISTING/PROPOSED UTILITIES. HAVE FPL RELOCATE TO
 WITHIN APPLICANTS PROPERTY.
 3. ENGINEERING AND SURVEY COMMENTS ARE NOT SHOWN OR
 ADDRESSED IN RESPONSE LETTER.
  

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-09-2018 Time 10:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-09 10:49:371. PROVIDE FULL SIZE ORIGINAL OF SURVEY.
 2. ADJOINING SANITARY AND STORM NEEDS TO BE TELEVISED
 BY APPLICANT. NEED PROPOSED AVERAGE AND PEAK WATER AND
 SEWER FLOWS.
 3. NO EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WILL BE ALLOWED IN CURRIE
 CRESCENT.
 4. NEED COPIES OF U.E.'S AND AGREEMENTS SHOWN ON
 SURVEY.
 5. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED.
 6. PROPOSED STORM LINE IN FLAGLER NEEDS TO BE MOVED
 ON-SITE.
 7. PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN MAY NEED TO BE LOOPED BACK TO
 OLIVE AVE.
 8. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL TO ENGINEERING FOR DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
 9. WILL NEED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ACACIA ROAD AND
 CURRIE CRESCENT.
 10. SURVEY INCLUDES PROPERTY TO NORTH OF ACACIA WHICH
 IS NOT INCLUDED IN SITE PLAN.

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-24 11:45:10PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1. A WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE CURRIE CRESCENT
 LOADING ENTRANCE.
 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, A MANAGEMENT
 PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE CURRIE CRESCENT
 ENTRANCE. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN MUST ADDRESS THE
 FOLLOWING ITEMS:
 - ONLY PRESCHEDULED DELIVERIES WILL BE ALLOWED.
 - PROVIDE A MEANS OF PRESCHEDULING DELIVERIES WITH
 PROPERTY STAFF.
 - PROVIDE STAFFING PLAN FOR DELIVERIES.
 - PROVIDE SPOTTERS FOR BACKING IN OF VEHICLES.
 - ENSURE THAT VEHICLES WILL NOT STOP OR STAND ON CURRIE
 CRESCENT SIDEWALK WHILE WAITING FOR GATE TO OPEN.
 3. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEER?S COST ESTIMATE
 FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR
 FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S.
 FLAGLER DR.. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED. JUST NORTH OF
 ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL LOCATION AS A MID-BLOCK REFUGE
 COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING GORED OUT MEDIAN
 AREA.
 4. PROVIDE CONTRIBUTION FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
 OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND
 DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S. FLAGLER DR.. LOCATION TO BE
 DETERMINED. JUST NORTH OF ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL
 LOCATION AS A MID-BLOCK REFUGE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE
 EXISTING GORED OUT MEDIAN AREA.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-17-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-10-17 15:09:091. FLAGLER DR. DRIVEWAY GRADE IS EXTREMELY STEEP.
 DRIVEWAY PROFILE WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO HAVE A
 GRADE BREAK OR VERTICAL CURVE INSERTED TO REDUCE
 BOTTOMING OUT IN SIDEWALK. PROVIDE DRIVEWAY PROFILE
 WITH RESUBMITTAL.
 2. CURRIE CRESCENT ENTRANCE. A GATE IS SHOWN ON SHEET
 A0.01 FOR THE LOADING ENTRY. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL
 ON THE LOCATION OF THE GATE. THE GATE SHOULD BE PLACED
 20' BACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE. NOTE IT IS ILLEGAL
 UNDER FLORIDA STATUTE AND CITY CODE FOR A VEHICLE TO
 STOP OR STAND ON THE SIDEWALK.
 3. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATIONS TO THE OPERATION
 AND PROCEDURE PLAN FOR VEHICLE MANEUVERING FOR LOADING:
 O CLARIFY HOW THE DRIVERS OF DELIVERY AND SERVICE
 VEHICLES WOULD COMMUNICATE WITH THE PROPERTY STAFF UPON
 ARRIVAL.
 O CLARIFY WHERE THE WAITING AREA IS FOR THE DELIVERY
 AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
 O CLARIFY HOW LONG IT WOULD TAKE FOR THE PROPERTY STAFF
 TO ARRIVE AT THE GATE AND TO OPEN THE GATE.
 O CLARIFY WHETHER THE CITY GARBAGE TRUCK OR PRIVATE
 HAULER WOULD BE USED TO PICK UP THE TRASH AND
 RECYCLING.
 O CLARIFY WHERE THE HOLDING AREA IS FOR THE TRASH AND
 RECYCLING.
 O CLARIFY IF THE PROPERTY STAFF WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
 WHEELING OUT THE TRASH AND RECYCLING TO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEN THE GARBAGE TRUCK ARRIVES, AND HOW
 LONG IT WOULD TAKE FOR THE PROPERTY STAFF TO OPEN THE
 GATE AND TO WHEEL OUT THE TRASH AND RECYCLING OVER A
 GRADE OF 8% TO 10%.
 O IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR CITY GARBAGE TRUCK TO WAIT
 FOR THE PROPERTY STAFF TO WHEEL OUT THE TRASH AND
 RECYCLING TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY UPON ARRIVAL.
 4. CONTRIBUTION OR CONSTRUCTION OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR
 FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S.
 FLAGLER DR. IS REQUESTED. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED.
 JUST NORTH OF ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL LOCATION AS A
 MID-BLOCK REFUGE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING
 GORED OUT MEDIAN AREA.
 5. THE FIRE TRUCK STAGING AREA SHOWN ON SHEET A0.01 IS
 AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION THAN THE STAGING AREA SHOWN ON
 SHEET C9.00. PLEASE CLARIFY OR REVISE.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-26-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-26 16:43:051309 SOUTH FLAGLER SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBMITTAL
  
 - FLAGLER DR. DRIVEWAY GRADE IS EXTREMELY STEEP.
 DRIVEWAY PROFILE WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO HAVE A
 GRADE BREAK OR VERTICAL CURVE INSERTED TO REDUCE
 BOTTOMING OUT IN SIDEWALK.
 - SHEET A1.01, EAST-WEST SECTION REFERENCES WRONG
 SHEET. CORRECT SECTION VIEW APPEARS TO BE ON SHEET
 A3-02 NOT A3-01.
 - A3-02 AND SHEET G0.04 HAVE DIFFERENT DRIVEWAY SLOPES.
 12% AND 11.3% RESPECTIVELY.
 - ADDITIONAL TRENCH DRAIN SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT FLAGLER
 DRIVEWAY AT RIGHT OF WAY LINE. STORMWATER SYSTEM NEEDS
 TO BE REVIEWED TO ENSURE WATER DOESN?T STAGE OUT OF
 THIS DRAIN.
 - FLAGLER DRIVE DRIVEWAY ? THE DRIVEWAY HORIZONTAL
 ALIGNMENT COULD USE SWITCHBACKS TO LESSEN THE GRADE OF
 THE DRIVEWAY. POTENTIALLY THE SWITCHBACK COULD BE USED
 TO DIRECT STORM WATER TO INLETS AND / OR ALLOW A
 GREATER FLAT AREA ON S. FLAGLER DR. LOMBARD STREET IN
 SAN FRANSISCO IS A GOOD PRECEDENT, ALTHOUGH CURVES ARE
 PROBABLY TOO SHARP FOR THE DESIGN VEHICLES.
 - SURVEY IS MISSING A UTILITY EASEMENT. ORB 25330,
 1318.
 - SURVEY IS NOT TO SCALE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE
 PROVIDED UPON RECEIPT OF A SCALED SURVEY DRAWING.
 - SHEET A3-01 SHOWS SLOPE DRAINING DIRECTLY ON ACACIA.
 CIVIL PLANS SHOW DIFFERENT GRADING IN THIS AREA. RUNOFF
 DIRECTLY ONTO ACACIA ISN?T ALLOWED. REVISE PLAN SET TO
 BE CONSISTENT.
 - ACACIA - PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE
 FEASIBLE DUE TO THE NUMBER OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
 - CURRIE CRESCENT ENTRANCE. A GATE IS SHOWN SHEET A0.01
 FOR THE LOADING ENTRY. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL ON THE
 LOCATION OF THE GATE. THE GATE SHOULD BE PLACED 20?
 BACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE. NOTE IT IS ILLEGAL
 UNDER FLORIDA STATUTE AND CITY CODE FOR A VEHICLE TO
 STOP OR STAND ON THE SIDEWALK.
 - TRANSPORTATION STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED
 BACKUP MANEUVER FROM THE CURRIE CRESCENT ENTRANCE. A
 WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED.
 - TRANSPORTATION DIVISION REQUESTS A WIDER SIDEWALK ON
 FLAGLER DRIVE OR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK SIMILAR TO WHAT
 HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT AT
 1101 S. FLAGLER DRIVE.
 - ACACIA DRIVE - THE PROPOSED ART WALK DESIGN WILL
 HINDER EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND POTENTIALLY ACCESS
 TO THE EXISTING PARKING SPACES AND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
 AT THE REAR OF 1301 S. FLAGLER DRIVE. THE DESIGN SHOULD
 BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE TURNING MOVEMENTS FROM 1301
 S. FLAGLER DRIVE?S DRIVE TO THE REAR OF 1301 S.
 FLAGLER'S PROPERTY.
 - CONTRIBUTION OR CONSTRUCTION OF A RAPID RECTANGULAR
 FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) AND DECORATIVE CROSSWALK ON S.
 FLAGLER DR. IS REQUESTED. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED.
 JUST NORTH OF ACACIA IS A POTENTIAL LOCATION AS A
 MID-BLOCK REFUGE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING
 GORED OUT MEDIAN AREA.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-09 18:03:54Z18060022 ? 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE RESIDENTIAL (JUNE
 12, 2018 SUBMITTAL)
 TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS:
 - PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH CITY
 ENGINEER ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREMENTS.
 SITE PLAN AND OTHER COMMENTS:
 - CLARIFY IF THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY ON CURRIE CRESCENT
 ONE-WAY OUT. IF SO, CONSIDER MAKING IT A TWO-WAY
 DRIVEWAY.
 - CLARIFY IF THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE ENOUGH PARKING AFTER
 THE PARKING SPACES IN PARCEL 3 ARE REMOVED.
 - CONSIDER PROVIDING WIDER PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS OF AT
 LEAST 8 FEET ON SITE.
 - ALSO SHOW RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE OF
 ROADWAY.
 - THE PARKING AISLE FOR THE 3 PARKING SPACES ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR (A1.01) IS LESS THE REQUIRED 24 FEET PER
 CITY CODE 94-485. PLEASE PROVIDE WIDER PARKING AISLE OR
 CONSIDER CONVERTING THESE 3 PARKING SPACES TO ANGLED
 PARKING. ALSO, THESE 3 PARKING SPACES ARE LABELED AS
 VALET PARKING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (L1.01), BUT NO
 VALET DROP-OFF AREAS ARE PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY.
 - IN BASEMENT 2 (A0.B2), THE COLUMN AT THE END OF THE
 PARKING RAMP CREATES A TIGHT TURNING RADIUS FOR
 RIGHT-TURNING VEHICLES. CONSIDER PROVIDING A BUFFER OR
 ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THIS COLUMN.
 - IN BASEMENT 1 (A0.B1), PROVIDE A TURNAROUND SPACE IN
 THE DEAD-END PARKING AISLE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
 THE GARAGE.
 - COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEERING TO REVIEW POTENTIAL
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OPTIONS ACROSS FLAGLER.
 - LANDSCAPE RIGHT OF WAY.
 - CONSIDER PROVIDING 10? WIDE SIDEWALKS ON FLAGLER DR.
 - PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CURRIE CRES.
 - IDENTIFY SIDEWALK ON CURRIE CRES. AND LABEL WIDTH.
 - PROVIDE DETAILS ON VALET CIRCULATION AND LOADING IN
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY.
 - THE LOADING ON CURRIE CRES. APPEARS TO REQUIRE
 VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY. BACKING OUT
 INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY IS NOT ALLOWED.
 - REDUCE CURB CUT WIDTH ON FLAGLER.
 - BIKE SHARE STATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE RIGHT
 OF WAY.
 - HOW MUCH EMPLOYEE PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED? WHERE IS
 IT LOCATED?
 - ACACIA. SHOW TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES ON PLAN VIEW. WILL CHANGES TO ACACIA
 CONFLICT WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES?
 - WHY ARE TWO ACCESS POINTS REQUIRED ON CURRIE CRES?
 CONSOLIDATE ACCESS POINTS.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-09-2018 Time 13:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-08-2018 Time 14:23 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-09 13:27:05SUFFICIENT FOR PLANNING BOARD.
  
 1. SECTIONS A-A AND B-B ON SHEET C8.00 DO NOT MATCH THE
 WALL ELEVATION SHOWN ON SHEET L9.02. THIS NEEDS TO BE
 CORRECTLY SHOWN PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A HEARING BEFORE
 THE CITY COMMISSION. THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON SHEET
 C8.00 REQUIRES A FENCE HEIGHT WAIVER. PLEASE REMEMBER
 THAT ANY FENCES AND WALL (TO INCLUDE RETAINING WALLS)
 WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACKS MAY ONLY BE A MAXIMUM OF
 SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT FROM EXTERIOR GRADE. THIS HEIGHT
 REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL FENCES AND WALLS WITHIN THE
 FIRST 21 FEET 10 INCHES FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 (REQUESTED SETBACK).
  
 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED GUMBO LIMBO TREES
 WITHIN FOUR FEET OF THE EDGE OF THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH. INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON HOW
 THE TREE ROOTS WILL BE PREVENTED FROM DAMAGING THE
 EXFILTRATION SYSTEM AND INTERFERE WITH THE CAPACITY AS
 STATED IN THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. DETAIL ST-8 NEEDS
 TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE ROOT BARRIERS AND THE TREES,
 WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE
 GUMBO LIMBO TREES ARE NOT ONLY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER,
 BUT ALSO ARE BEING USED TO SHADE ACACIA ROAD. THIS
 COMMENT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR
 CITY COMMISSION.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-07-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-30-2018 Time 09:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-26-2018 Time 11:42 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-07 09:54:39CASE NOS. PB 1799 & 1799A
 PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER ? 2ND RESUBMITTAL
 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY,
 NOVEMBER 5, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE NOVEMBER 28, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 PRIOR TO PB:
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA
 ROAD NEED TO MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
 REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE
 PLANNING BOARD.
  
 A. THE CITY SURVEYOR HAS PROVIDED COMMENTS THAT THE FPL
 TRANSFORMERS MAY NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN ACACIA ROAD
 SINCE THEY WILL INTERFERE WITH THE UTILITIES LOCATED
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE APPLICANT RESPONSE WAS
 THAT THIS IS ?ACKNOWLEDGED?. THE FPL TRANSFORMERS NEED
 TO BE SHOWN OUT OF ACACIA COURT AND AT THEIR FINAL
 LOCATION. ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND
 CIVIL PLANS BASED ON THE NEW FPL TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS
 NEED TO BE COMPLETED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT ALL
 CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE STILL MET.
 B. PROVIDE THE SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH TRANSFORMER
 PAD AS WELL AS THE DIMENSIONS, INCLUDING HEIGHT OF THE
 TRANSFORMERS. THE E-MAIL THAT WAS PROVIDED FROM BRENNA
 HOLLAWAY AT FPL INDICATES THAT A 7 FOOT BY 7 FOOT AREA
 REQUIRED FOR THE PAD, WITH ADDITIONAL CLEARANCE ON EACH
 SIDE. THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCURATELY REFLECTED
 ON THE SITE PLAN AS THE TRANSFORMERS LOOK TOO SMALL.
 THE APPLICATION IS USING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ACACIA
 COURT AS A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AS PART OF THE INNOVATIVE
 PLANNING TO JUSTIFY THE WAIVER REQUESTS. THE
 INSTALLATION OF LARGE, UNSCREENED TRANSFORMER BOXES
 BLOCKING A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS
 NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT A REVIEW OF THE FPL
 TRANSFORMER PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS LIST SETBACKS FROM
 LANDSCAPE AND SETBACKS FROM RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS. THE
 PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMERS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY LINE OF 1301 SOUTH FLAGLER WOULD PROHIBIT
 THAT PROPERTY FROM REDEVELOPING IN CODE COMPLIANCE
 SINCE THE TRANSFORMER SETBACK PROHIBITS THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE CODE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THE
 FPL REQUIREMENTS ALSO LIST A 15 FOOT SETBACK TO
 WINDOWS, WHICH THE PLACEMENT OF THESE TRANSFORMERS DO
 NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH.
 C. PROVIDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SWITCH BOXES
 SHOWN ON THE PLANS, TO INCLUDE HEIGHT.
  
 2) THE PLANTER BOXES ON ACACIA AVENUE NEED TO HAVE
 MULTIPLE TRUNK PALMS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED EFFECT OF
 CREATING AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN AREA THAT CAN BE USED
 INNOVATIVE DESIGN FOR THE RPD REQUEST.
  
 3) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PLANTER BOXES PROPOSED FOR
 ACACIA ROAD.
  
 A. HOW ARE THEY AFFIXED TO THE GROUND? IF NOT AFFIXED,
 HOW ARE THEY MOVED IN THE EVENT THAT CITY MAINTENANCE
 IS REQUIRED? NOTE: THIS WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
 THE HOA.
 B. HOW ARE THEY IRRIGATED? WHERE WILL THE IRRIGATION
 LINES BE INSTALLED? NOTE: THIS WOULD BE THE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOA.
 C. HOW ARE THE PLANTERS DRAINED?
  
 4) RENDERINGS OF THE PATH ARE NOT ACCURATE.
  
 A. THE CONTAINER MATERIAL AND SIZE.
 B. THE PLANTS SHOWN BOTH TREES AND PALMS.
 C. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO BE MARKED TO SHOW TAGS
 WHERE THE RENDERINGS ARE TAKEN FROM.
  
 5) PROVIDE DETAILS ON WHAT THE GARAGE SUPPLY AND
 RETURNS LOOK LIKE ABOVE GRADE, TO INCLUDE THE HEIGHT.
  
 6) WHAT DOES THE PRIVACY FENCE ON SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 LOOK LIKE?
  
 PRIOR TO CC CONDITIONS:
  
 7) CONTINUE THE WIDENED SIDEWALK THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
 PROPERTY FRONTAGE AND ALONG THE ARCACIA ROAD AND
 FLAGLER DRIVE INTERSECTION FRONTAGE.
  
 8) THE WALL AND FENCE AROUND THE GENERATOR SERVICE YARD
 ARE SHOWN AT A HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET (SHEET L9.01).
 THE PERMITTED HEIGHT WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK ALONG
 CURRIE CRESCENT IS FOUR (4) FEET. STAFF IS WILLING TO
 SUPPORT A FENCE HEIGHT WAIVER, FROM GRADE, OF SIX (6)
 FEET SURROUNDING THE GENERATOR AREA AND THE MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT AREA. BY CODE, THE HEDGE MAY GROW TO 10 FEET
 IN HEIGHT, SO NO WAIVER IS REQUIRED FOR IT.
  
 9) BICYCLE FACILITIES.
  
 A. STAFF ACCEPTS THE SPECIFIED BICYCLE RACK AS MEETING
 CITY BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE A BLOW UP OF
 THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE PROPOSED RACK AND
 DIMENSIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS
 SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE SEVEN BICYCLE PARKING SPACES.
 WHEN COMPARING THE VARIOUS PAGES AND DETAILS, IT
 APPEARS THERE IS ADEQUATE ROOM, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE
 CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
 B. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE PROVIDED
 EMPLOYEE BICYCLE PARKING COMPLIES WITH CITY CODE.
 PROVIDE A DETAIL THAT SPECIFICALLY SHOWS HOW THE
 BICYCLE RACK WITH THE TWO BICYCLES WILL FUNCTION WHERE
 IT IS SHOWN AGAINST THE WALL. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO
 SHOW THAT THE EGRESS PATH IS NOT BLOCKED. WHEN
 COMPARING THE VARIOUS PAGES AND DETAILS, IT APPEARS
 THERE IS ADEQUATE ROOM, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY
 SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-26-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-26-2018 Time 16:24 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 09-26-2018 Time 08:57 Sent To  
Notes
2018-09-26 16:14:08CASE NO. PB 1799 & 1799A
 PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER -1ST RESUBMITTAL
 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 OCTOBER 5, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 NOVEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 26, 2018), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS
 WERE NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT IS
 ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS BE 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL RPD APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) REVISED COMMENT: THE BASE MEASURE POINT REQUIRES
 FURTHER DISCUSSION BASED ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA
 ROAD NEED TO MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
 REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE
 PLANNING BOARD. ** THE RESPONSE THAT THIS IS TO BE
 SHOWN ON A SEPARATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS NOT
 ACCEPTABLE. THE ACACIA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING USED
 AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS; THEREFORE, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE A DESIGN
 THAT MEETS ALL THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
 CRITERIA PRIOR TO STAFF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON IF
 IT IS APPROPRIATE AS A MITIGATION MEASURE. FOR EXAMPLE,
 IF THE EXISTING UTILITIES, BELOW AND ABOVE GROUND, DO
 NOT PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF TREES, THEN THE ACACIA
 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROVIDE A MINIMAL AMOUNT TO THE
 ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 A. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AND MORE DETAILS OF THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CURRENT ELEVATION OF ACACIA
 ROAD IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SLOPING FROM APPROXIMATELY
 SIX (6) FEET TO 10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY
 BOUNDARY OF THE 1309 S. FLAGLER DEVELOPMENT SITE. THE
 SAME LOCATION IS SHOWN HAVING AN ALMOST CONSISTENT 10
 FOOT ELEVATION. HOW IS THIS FOUR (4) FOOT GRADE CHANGE
 BEING INTEGRATED WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND
 SOUTH OF THE SITE AS WELL AS TOWARD FLAGLER DRIVE. **
 NOT PROVIDED.
 B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PEDESTRIAN PERMEABLE PAVING
 AND THE BENCHES THAT ARE PROPOSED. ** NOT PROVIDED -THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION MUST AGREE WITH THE
 PROPOSED PAVERS.
 C. PROVIDE DETAILS ON ADA ACCESSIBILITY. ** THIS NEEDS
 TO BE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS. NOT ONLY SLOPE, BUT ADA
 COMPLIANT MATERIALS.
 D. THE SKY BIKE CONTRACT IS WITH THE DDA AND DOES NOT
 EXTEND OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN. ALL OF THE BICYCLE SHARE
 FACILITIES NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE 1309 S. FLAGLER
 PROPERTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO ADVERTISING FACILITIES
 WILL BE PERMITTED. SINCE THE BICYCLE SHARE IS BEING
 USED AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS, THEN YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION FROM SKY BIKE THAT THIS LOCATION IS
 ACCEPTABLE TO THEM (WITHOUT ADVERTISING), TO INCLUDE A
 PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES OFF
 CURRIE CRESCENT PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE
 PLANNING BOARD. ** NO WRITTEN RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 E. THE 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER HOMEOWNER' ASSOCIATION WILL
 NEED TO MAINTAIN ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE ACACIA
 ROAD ROW AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE ELECTRICITY FOR THE
 LIGHTING. ** CONDITION
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS A SIX (6) FOOT
 WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THIS EASEMENT. ** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES
 THAT THE EASEMENT WILL BE VACATED AND THE UTILITIES
 RELOCATED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM
 FPL, THE EASEMENT HOLDER, THAT THEY DO NOT OBJECT TO
 THE PROPOSED VACATION AND RELOCATION.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE OPEN
 CHARACTER OF SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, THE RECENT
 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (LA CLARE AND BRISTOL) HAVE BEEN
 REQUIRED TO PROVIDE OPEN SPACE THAT IS PUBLICLY
 ACCESSIBLE AND THAT DOES NOT HAVE BARRIERS SUCH AS
 WALLS OR FENCES ALONG THEIR FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGES. **
 STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REVISED PLAN AS IT DOES NOT
 PROVIDE FOR THE EXPECTATION OF OPEN SPACE ALONG FLAGLER
 DRIVE.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 40 FOOT
 DRIVEWAY OPENING ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS CREATES AN
 UNNECESSARILY WIDE CROSSING POINT FOR PEDESTRIANS,
 WHICH DOES NOT PROMOTE SAFETY. ADDITIONALLY, USING MORE
 THAN A THIRD OF THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE FOR VEHICULAR
 ACCESS DOES NOT PROMOTE THE CITY'S AESTHETIC VISION FOR
 FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 6) PARKING
  
 A. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT VERIFICATION THAT
 THE PROVISION OF PARKING SPACES AT THIS LOCATION DOES
 NOT REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF ADA SPACES AS WELL. **
 CONDITION - SIGNED "VALET ONLY" SO NO ADA REQUIRED.
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: INCLUDE PARKING SPACE WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN FOR GARAGE PARKING. ** NOT
 PROVIDED.
 C. REVISED COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO BE
 UPDATED TO REMOVE THE TWO TOWN CAR SPACES FROM THE
 "REQUIRED" COLUMN.
 D. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO HAVE LINE
 ITEMS FOR THE NUMBER OF ADA SPACES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED.
 E. NEW COMMENT: WHAT ARE THE "3 CAR GARAGE SPACES"?
 F. NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF COMPACT SPACE NO.
 9 ON BASEMENT 2. IT APPEARS SHORT.
 G. NEW COMMENT: HOW WILL THE RESIDENT PARKING SPACES BE
 ASSIGNED? STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE VEHICLE CHARGING
 STATION ASSIGNMENT. IF RESIDENTS ARE BUYING SPECIFIC
 INDIVIDUAL SPACES, IT MAY BE BETTER TO PRE-WIRE THE
 ENTIRE GARAGE AND THEN THE RESIDENTS CAN PAY FOR A
 CHARGING INSTALL IF THEY HAVE AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE.
  
 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE B1 VENTILATION MAY NOT BE IN
 THE REQUIRED TURN AROUND SPACE AS THIS WILL MAKE THE
 SPACE NONE FUNCTIONING TO USE FOR TURN AROUND.
  
 8) BICYCLE FACILITIES.
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE
 STORAGE ROOM SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE IF THE TYPE OF
 RACKS THAT ARE PROVIDED ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE NUMBER
 OF SPACES. ** INADEQUATE DETAIL PROVIDED.
 B. REVISED COMMENT - PROVIDE A CITY COMPLIANT BICYCLE
 RACK DETAIL. ** THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE
 PROVIDED EMPLOYEE BICYCLE PARKING COMPLIES WITH CITY
 CODE. PROVIDE A DETAIL THAT SPECIFICALLY SHOWS HOW THE
 BICYCLE RACK WITH THE TWO BICYCLES WILL FUNCTION WHERE
 IT IS SHOWN AGAINST THE WALL. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO
 SHOW THAT THE EGRESS PATH IS NOT BLOCKED.
  
 9) WHAT ARE THE AREAS LABELED SUITE 1 AND 2? CONDITION
 - NO KITCHEN FACILITIES.
  
 10) SHEET A3-02 SHOWS THE GENERATOR BELOW THE HEIGHT OF
 THE SCREENING. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE GENERATOR NEEDS
 TO BE SCREENED FOR ITS FULL HEIGHT, SO ENSURE THAT THE
 GENERATOR THAT IS USED IS NOT TOO LARGE TO AVOID ISSUES
 AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. CONDITION - GENERATOR
 COMPLETE HEIGHT SCREENED.
  
 11) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE ANY OUTSTANDING UTILITY
 LETTERS.
  
 12) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE GARBAGE/RECYCLING
 PICK-UP WILL WORK. CONDITION - GARBAGE RECEPTACLES MUST
 BE READY BEHIND THE GATE A HALF HOUR PRIOR TO THE
 SCHEDULED PICK-UP TIME. GARBAGE RECEPTACLES ARE THEN
 ROLLED OUT BY BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ONCE THE
 TRUCK ARRIVES. THE GARBAGE RECEPTACLES NEED TO BE MOVED
 BACK BEHIND THE GATE WITHIN A HALF HOUR OF PICK-UP BY
 BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL.
  
 13) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF THE
 PROPOSED FENCES/WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK.
  
 14) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS OCCURRING ON
 THE PENTHOUSE ROOF DECK. THERE SEEMS TO BE A
 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND THE
 "OPEN TO THE SKY" MECHANICAL AREAS.
  
 REQUIRED WAIVERS
  
 1) CURRIE CRESCENT SB
  
 2) WALL HEIGHTS:
  
 RETAINING WALL WEST OF NASSER IS 15 FOOT ABOVE HIS
 GRADE AT HIGHEST POINT
 ACACIA COURT RETAINING WALL + SAFETY RAIL IS 10+ FEET
 TALL IN SETBACK
 COLUMNS FOR FLAGLER DRIVE - 8 FEET --- STAFF DOES NOT
 SUPPORT
 WALLS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT
  
 3) CURRIE CRESCENT ACCESS
 A. NUMBER
 B. SEPARATION
 C. ON-SITE MANEUVERING
  
 4) LANDSCAPE
 A. REQUIRED TREES
 B. BUFFER INTERRUPTION ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-05-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-05-2018 Time 10:31 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-05-2018 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
2018-07-05 10:31:57CASE NO. PB 1799 & 1799A
 PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER
 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 JULY 27, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 11,
 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL RPD APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTING BUILDINGS IN EXCESS
 OF 300 FEET IN TOTAL HEIGHT, INCLUDING MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT, ALONG SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, SOUTH OF
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS THIS IS NOT THE CHARACTER OF
 DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. THIS IS EVEN MAGNIFIED WHEN
 THE BUILDING REQUIRES WAIVERS TO THE SETBACKS BASED ON
 THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING.
  
 2) THE FLOOR THAT IS LABELED AS BASEMENT LEVEL 1 IS
 ACTUALLY THE GROUND FLOOR; THEREFORE, THE BUILDING
 HEIGHT NEEDS TO BEGIN ITS MEASUREMENT FROM THE 3'8"
 NAVD SHOWN ON SECTION SHEET A3-02, NOT FROM CURRIE
 CRESCENT.
  
 3) THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA ROAD NEED TO
 MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION REQUIREMENTS
 PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD.
  
 A. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AND MORE DETAILS OF THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CURRENT ELEVATION OF ACACIA
 ROAD IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SLOPING FROM APPROXIMATELY
 SIX (6) FEET TO 10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY
 BOUNDARY OF THE 1309 S. FLAGLER DEVELOPMENT SITE. THE
 SAME LOCATION IS SHOWN HAVING AN ALMOST CONSISTENT 10
 FOOT ELEVATION. HOW IS THIS FOUR (4) FOOT GRADE CHANGE
 BEING INTEGRATED WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND
 SOUTH OF THE SITE AS WELL AS TOWARD FLAGLER DRIVE.
 B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PEDESTRIAN PERMEABLE PAVING
 AND THE BENCHES THAT ARE PROPOSED.
 C. PROVIDE DETAILS ON ADA ACCESSIBILITY.
 D. THE SKY BIKE CONTRACT IS WITH THE DDA AND DOES NOT
 EXTEND OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN. ALL OF THE BICYCLE SHARE
 FACILITIES NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE 1309 S. FLAGLER
 PROPERTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO ADVERTISING FACILITIES
 WILL BE PERMITTED. SINCE THE BICYCLE SHARE IS BEING
 USED AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS, THEN YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION FROM SKY BIKE THAT THIS LOCATION IS
 ACCEPTABLE TO THEM (WITHOUT ADVERTISING), TO INCLUDE A
 PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES OFF
 CURRIE CRESCENT PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE
 PLANNING BOARD.
 E. THE 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER HOMEOWNER?S ASSOCIATION WILL
 NEED TO MAINTAIN ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE ACACIA
 ROAD ROW AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE ELECTRICITY FOR THE
 LIGHTING.
 F. BOLLARD LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE USED ALONG THE PATH,
 NOT POLE MOUNTED LIGHTS.
  
 4) THIS PROPERTY HAS DOUBLE FRONTAGE SO THE FRONT
 SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM BOTH FLAGLER DRIVE AND CURRIE
 CRESCENT.
  
 A. CURRIE CRESCENT IS A FRONT PROPERTY LINE AND THUS
 REQUIRES A 25 FOOT SETBACK. THE PLANS SHOW A 15 FOOT 4
 INCH SETBACK FROM CURRIE CRESCENT.
 B. THE MAXIMUM WALL/FENCE HEIGHT WITHIN THE 25 FOOT
 FRONT SETBACK FROM CURRIE CRESCENT IS FOUR (4) FEET.
  
 5) SHOW THE SETBACKS FROM THE PROPERTY LINES ON THE
 ELEVATION AND SECTION DRAWINGS.
  
 6) THE SETBACK WAIVER TABLE PROVIDED IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER HAS ERRORS AND IS CONFUSING. EX.
 THE FRONT SETBACK IS 25 FEET BASED ON THE MF32 ZONING
 DESIGNATION; THEREFORE, NO FRONT SETBACK WAIVER IS
 NEEDED FROM FLAGLER DRIVE TO THE FRONT OF THE GROUND
 FLOOR (BASEMENT LEVEL 1 AND ITS OVERLOOK).
  
 7) THE SURVEY SHOWS A SIX (6) FOOT WIDE UTILITY
 EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THIS
 EASEMENT. THE REQUIRED BUFFER NEEDS TO BE LOCATED TO
 THE NORTH OF THE EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A
 STROMWATER LINE IN THIS AREA THAT THERE APPEAR TO BE
 TREES PLANTED ON TOP OF.
  
 8) THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BUFFER TREES WITHIN THE
 CURRIE CRESCENT BUFFER ARE NOT PROVIDED.
  
 9) IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE OPEN CHARACTER OF SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE, THE RECENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (LA
 CLARE AND BRISTOL) HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO PROVIDE OPEN
 SPACE THAT IS PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE AND THAT DOES NOT
 HAVE BARRIERS SUCH AS WALLS OR FENCES ALONG THEIR
 FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGES. THE PROPOSAL FAILS TO PROVIDE
 THIS OPEN SPACE, WHICH STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT.
  
 10) PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH DESCRIBES THE MATERIALS WHICH
 WILL BE USED ON THE BUILDING FACADES.
  
 11) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED PROVISION OF
 INACTIVE/SERVICE USES THAT WILL BE AT THE ENTIRE
 PEDESTRIAN LEVELS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT AND ACACIA
 ROAD.
  
 12) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 40 FOOT DRIVEWAY OPENING
 ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS CREATES AN UNNECESSARILY WIDE
 CROSSING POINT FOR PEDESTRIANS, WHICH DOES NOT PROMOTE
 SAFETY. ADDITIONALLY, USING MORE THAN A THIRD OF THE
 PROPERTY FRONTAGE FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS DOES NOT PROMOTE
 THE CITY'S AESTHETIC VISION FOR FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 13) THE REQUEST IS TO PERMIT TWO VEHICULAR ACCESS
 POINTS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT.
  
 A. THE TWO ACCESS POINTS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 125
 FOOT SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS.
 B. WHY DO THERE NEED TO BE TWO CURB ACCESS POINTS? THE
 TWO ACCESS POINTS SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED.
 C. WHY IS A VEHICULAR EXIT PROPOSED FROM THE LOBBY
 ENTRY TO CURRIE CRESCENT? PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR TURNING
 RADIUS DRAWING SHOWS VEHICLES DRIVING IN FROM CURRIE
 CRESCENT. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED ON A ONE-WAY EXIT
 DRIVE.
 D. THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE
 THAT ALL VEHICULAR MOVEMENT AND MANEUVERING THAT MAY BE
 REQUIRED TO UTILIZE OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES SHALL
 BE RETAINED ON-SITE. PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL NOT BE
 UTILIZED TO ALLOW OR ENHANCE MOVEMENT OR MANEUVERING,
 WHICH IS THE REQUIRED BY THE WAY YOU ARE SHOWING YOUR
 LOADING AREA.
  
 14) THE PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS ARE BEING PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT
 BY A TYPE D CURB.
  
 15) PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC VALUES AT THE CURRIE
 CRESCENT PROPERTY LINE AND ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE
 ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR PALM BEACH
 ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY AND 1301 SOUTH FLAGLER. THE
 LIGHTING LEVEL SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 FOOT CANDLE.
  
 16) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS AN EXCESS OF 1 FOOT
 CANDLE AT THE FLAGLER DRIVE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 17) THE LIGHT POLES (TYPE V) NEED TO MEET THE 25 FOOT
 FRONT AND 15 FOOT SIDE SETBACKS.
  
 18) PARKING
  
 A. THE VALET PARKING SPACE DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO
 CITY STRIPING STANDARDS. ADDITIONALLY, YOU WILL NEED TO
 PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT THAT THE PROVISION OF PARKING SPACES AT THIS
 LOCATION DO NOT REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF ADA SPACES AS
 WELL.
 B. INCLUDE PARKING SPACE WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE
 PLAN FOR GARAGE PARKING.
 C. SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE
 SUPPORT COLUMNS. IN A FEW INSTANCES THERE IS ROOM TO
 SHIFT THE PARKING SPACE AWAY FROM THE COLUMN TO GIVE
 MORE ROOM, WHICH YOU SHOULD DO. THE SPACES BY THE RAMP
 IN BASEMENT 1 AND 2 AND ON BASEMENT 1 ACROSS FROM THE
 ADA SPACE (ADJACENT TO STORAGE) DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE
 THE REQUIRED 8.5 FEET IN WIDTH (PLEASE DIMENSION) AND
 TWO SPACES HAVE THE COLUMN AT THE LOCATION WHERE A CAR
 DOOR WOULD OPEN, AND THUS REQUIRE EXTRA WIDTH. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT IF THESE COLUMNS HAVE NOT BEEN PROPERLY SIZED
 AS PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL AND GET LARGER AT THE TIME OF
 BUILDING PERMIT, IT MAY CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES TO BE IMPACTED, WHICH COULD LEAD TO
 PARKING DEFICIENCIES.
 D. PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DIVISION THAT THE LOCATION OF THE ADA SPACES IN THE
 GARAGE LEVELS CONFORM TO THE STANDARD THAT THEY ARE ON
 THE CLOSEST ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.
 E. THERE IS A DEAD END AISLE ON BASEMENT 1 THAT DOES
 NOT HAVE A FUNCTIONAL TURN AROUND SPACE - IT HAS A
 COLUMN IN IT.
 F. YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ON-SIGHT EMPLOYEE PARKING
 FOR THE CONCIERGE, VALET, PERSONAL TRAINER, SPA
 ATTENDANT, ETC.
 G. PLEASE LABEL ON THE PLAN HOW THE PARKING WILL BE
 ASSIGNED ? EX. UNIT OWNER, GUEST, VALET, AND EMPLOYEE.
 H. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO SEPARATE
 THE PARKING PROVIDED LINE INTO THE VARIOUS CATEGORIES
 AND THEN PROVIDE A TOTAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT TANDEM
 PARKING SPACES ONLY COUNT AS ONE SPACE TOWARD MEETING
 CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 I. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO HAVE LINE ITEMS FOR THE
 NUMBER OF ADA SPACES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED.
  
 19) WHERE IS THE GARAGE VENTING?
  
 20) BICYCLE FACILITIES.
  
 A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT IS
 1 SPACE PER 20 OF REQUIRED PARKING. WHILE STAFF
 ENCOURAGES THE PROVISION OF EXTRA BICYCLE PARKING, YOU
 ARE ONLY REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES.
 PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED AND THE PROVIDE NUMBERS AS
 SEPARATE LINE ITEMS ON THE PARKING TABLE.
 B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM SO THAT
 STAFF CAN EVALUATE IF THE TYPE OF RACKS THAT ARE
 PROVIDED ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE NUMBER OF SPACES
 C. AT LEAST ONE BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO BE PROVIDE AT A
 GUEST OR EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING FOR
 NON-RESIDENT USERS. PROVIDE A CITY COMPLIANT BICYCLE
 RACK DETAIL.
  
 21) WHAT ARE THE AREAS LABELED SUITE 1 AND 2?
  
 22) SHEET A3-02 SHOWS THE GENERATOR BELOW THE HEIGHT OF
 THE SCREENING. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE GENERATOR NEEDS
 TO BE SCREENED FOR ITS FULL HEIGHT, SO ENSURE THAT THE
 GENERATOR THAT IS USED IS NOT TOO LARGE TO AVOID ISSUES
 AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
  
 23) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS A TRAFFIC
 IMPACT STUDY, BUT STAFF DID NOT SEE ONE IN THE
 SUBMITTED MATERIAL. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS DOCUMENT.
  
 24) PROVIDE ANY OUTSTANDING UTILITY LETTERS.
  
 25) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE AREAS SHOWN AS STORAGE IN THE
 BASEMENT LEVELS. SOME APPEAR TO HAVE WALLS AND DOORS
 WHILE OTHERS JUST A DASHED LINE.
  
 26) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE GARBAGE/RECYCLING
 PICK-UP WILL WORK. HOW HIGH IS THE CEILING IN THIS
 LOCATION? HOW WILL BULK ITEMS BE HANDLED?
  
 27) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR BUILDING PERMIT PLANS, YOU
 WILL NEED TO CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT
 SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494-1080, TO VERIFY THE SITE AND
 UNIT NUMBER ADDRESSING.
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved