City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z18050030

Plan Review Stops For Project Z18050030

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-12-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	06-12-2018	Time	19:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mgonzale			Date	06-12-2018	Time	19:17	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-12 19:20:31	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	3. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
	CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
	HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
	ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
	AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
	PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
	FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.

	4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
	REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M
	SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS
	AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
	FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
	GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
	SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	6. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG			ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	02-13-2019		Cont ID
Sent By	Mgonzale			Date	02-13-2019	Time	Rev Time	1.00
Received By				Date	02-13-2019	Time	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-10-2019		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	04-10-2019	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	04-10-2019	Time	Sent To

Notes

2019-04-10 06:44:04	PASSED WITH PROVISO: DECORATIVE PATTERN PAVER DESIGN
	EXTENDING INTO 8TH STREET SHALL BE EVALUATED AT TIME OF
	FORMAL SUBMITTAL BY CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING
	SERVICES TRAFFIC SECTION. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT
	TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ADA AND MANUAL OF UNIFORM
	TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) STANDARDS.

	FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
	CONCERNS, THANKS.

	RICK ROSSANO
	PROJECT COORDINATOR
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
	(MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
	MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
	DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
	FAX: (561) 494-1116
	MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
	EMAIL: [email protected]
	WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING

	MANNY GONZALEZ
	SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
	(MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
	MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
	DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
	FAX: (561) 494-1116
	MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
	EMAIL: [email protected]
	WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING

	CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH):
	24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC
	UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-13-2018		Cont ID
Sent By	Mgonzale			Date	06-13-2018	Time	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	mgonzale			Date	06-13-2018	Time	Sent To	I

Notes

2018-06-13 13:14:40	#1 DISCUSS CONNECTIONS FOR WATER AND SEWER WITH CITY OF
	WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER.

	#2 PROVIDE GPD CALCULATIONS FOR WATER AND SEWER
	DEMANDS.

	#3 NEW TREE CONFLICTS WITH THE 8" SANITARY SEWER IN THE
	ALLEY/EASEMENT. AND ROSEMARY.

	#4 DISCUSS REPLACEMENT OF MAIN IN LUE OF CUTTING THE
	WATER SERVICES AT MAIN ON 8TH ST. - CITY OF WPB PUBLIC
	UTILITIES ENGINEER.

	MANNY GONZALEZ
	SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
	(MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
	MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
	DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
	FAX: (561) 494-1116
	EMAIL: [email protected]
	HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS
	/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS

	IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF
	WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
	FREE."
	FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
	CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	02-08-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	02-08-2019	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	02-07-2019	Time	10:32	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-08 08:59:07	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM LIZ
	LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER, THE LETTER ATTACHMENT
	DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2019, FROM REG ARCHITECTS, INC., AND
	DRAWING DOCUMENTS, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN
	ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
	561-804-4709

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-08-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	06-08-2018	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	06-08-2018	Time	16:57	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-08 17:11:44	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
	OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY.

	7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
	LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
	SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.

	8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

	9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
	THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
	ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
	ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
	SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT PLAN.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS OCCUPANCY SHALL BE
	PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	PLEASE REVIEW THE REAR EXTERIOR STAIR AS IT APPEARS TO
	HAVE UNPROTECTED WINDOW OPENINGS DURING THE EGRESS PATH
	THAT DO NOT MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.

	PLEASE REVIEW THE EGRESS PATHS FROM THE 3RD FLOOR TO
	THE 2ND AND EXIT PATHS ON THE 2ND FLOOR. IT APPEAR THAT
	THERE ARE DOORS THAT OPEN AGAINST THE PATH OF TRAVEL
	AND A DOOR IN AREA 203 THAT OPENS INTO A STAIR TRAVEL
	PATH. ADDITIONALLY, IT APPEARS THAT SETS OF DOUBLE DOOR
	ALLOW FOR EGRESS FROM THE MEZZANINE BUT THEN SINGLE
	DOORS MAY PROVIDE FOR A PINCH POINT THAT REDUCES FLOW
	ADN RESTRICT EGRESS.

	11. A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS IS REQUIRED FOR ENTRY DOOR
	LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.



	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	06-04-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-04-2019	Time	16:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-04-2019	Time	16:06	Sent To

Notes

2019-06-04 16:06:57	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: SUNSET LOUNGE Z18050030
	JUNE 4, 2019
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. COMMENTS 1-13 PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED
	2. SATISFIED.
	3. SATISFIED.
	4. SATISFIED.
	5. SATISFIED.
	6. SATISFIED.
	7. SATISFIED.
	8. SATISFIED.
	9. SATISFIED.
	10. SATISFIED.
	11. SATISFIED.
	12. SATISFIED.
	13. SATISFIED.

	14. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
	THE INFORMATION PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE CODE
	REQUIREMENT. ALL ADDED PLANT MATERIAL FROM THE PLANT
	LIST NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED, AND PERCENTAGE OF PLANTS
	THAT ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT OR NATIVE MUST MEET OR EXCEED
	60% OF THE TOTAL PLANTS.

	15. SATISFIED.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/20/19:
	16. SATISFIED. THE OPEN SPACE ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING
	BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS BEING
	CLASSIFIED AS SEMI-PUBLIC COURTYARD. PROVIDE THE
	CALCULATIONS FOR 25% MIN. VEGETATED AREA AND 30% MIN.
	TREE CANOPY.

	17. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES
	ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
	REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE
	PLAN. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS ALREADY SHOW CONFLICTS.
	SHOW ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS.
	18. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW SHELL
	GINGER AS NON-NATIVE.

	19. SATISFIED. ADD WHEEL STOPS PARKING SPACES IN THE
	CENTER WITH OVERHANGS ADJACENT TO THE CENTER SIDEWALK.
	THE OVERHANG CANNOT BE OVER THE SIDEWALK.

	20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ABOVE
	GROUND UTILITY VALVES AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
	21. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN HAVE
	DIFFERENCES THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO BE CONSISTENT.
	22. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE ISLAND MID ROW WHERE THE SEA
	GRAPE WAS LOCATED SHOULD BE MOVED TO PROVIDE THE AREA
	ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER NOW THAT THE SEAGRAPE IS NOT
	BEING PRESERVED.
	23. SATISFIED. THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE ISLAND ALONG THE
	NORTH ROW OF PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE SHIFTED TO THE
	TERMINAL ISLAND.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	05-01-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-01-2019	Time	12:59	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-01-2019	Time	12:59	Sent To

Notes

2019-05-01 13:02:10	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: SUNSET LOUNGE Z18050030
	MAY 1, 2019
	RESUBMITTAL OF 4/5/19 REVISION
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. COMMENTS 1-13 PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED
	2. SATISFIED.
	3. SATISFIED.
	4. SATISFIED.
	5. SATISFIED.
	6. SATISFIED.
	7. SATISFIED.
	8. SATISFIED.
	9. SATISFIED.
	10. SATISFIED.
	11. SATISFIED.
	12. SATISFIED.
	13. SATISFIED.

	14. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445
	L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
	THE INFORMATION PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE CODE
	REQUIREMENT. ALL ADDED PLANT MATERIAL FROM THE PLANT
	LIST NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED, AND PERCENTAGE OF PLANTS
	THAT ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT OR NATIVE MUST MEET OR EXCEED
	60% OF THE TOTAL PLANTS.

	15. SATISFIED.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/20/19:
	16. NOT SATISFIED. THE OPEN SPACE ADJACENT TO THE
	BUILDING BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS
	BEING CLASSIFIED AS SEMI-PUBLIC COURTYARD. PROVIDE THE
	CALCULATIONS FOR 25% MIN. VEGETATED AREA AND 30% MIN.
	TREE CANOPY.

	17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND
	SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS
	WITH LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
	REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE
	PLAN. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS ALREADY SHOW CONFLICTS.
	SHOW ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS.
	18. NOT SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW SHELL
	GINGER AS NON-NATIVE.

	19. SATISFIED. ADD WHEEL STOPS PARKING SPACES IN THE
	CENTER WITH OVERHANGS ADJACENT TO THE CENTER SIDEWALK.
	THE OVERHANG CANNOT BE OVER THE SIDEWALK.

	20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ABOVE
	GROUND UTILITY VALVES AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
	21. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN HAVE
	DIFFERENCES THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO BE CONSISTENT.
	22. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE ISLAND MID ROW WHERE THE SEA
	GRAPE WAS LOCATED SHOULD BE MOVED TO PROVIDE THE AREA
	ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER NOW THAT THE SEAGRAPE IS NOT
	BEING PRESERVED.
	23. SATISFIED. THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE ISLAND ALONG THE
	NORTH ROW OF PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE SHIFTED TO THE
	TERMINAL ISLAND.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	02-21-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	02-21-2019	Time	14:02	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	02-21-2019	Time	14:02	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-21 14:03:56	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: SUNSET LOUNGE Z18050030
	FEBRUARY 21, 2019
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. STAFF WILL MEET WITH THE APPLICANT TO
	DISCUSS CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	A SITE VISIT IS NECESSARY TO POSITIVELY IDENTIFY THE
	TREE SPECIES. ALL INVASIVE EXOTIC PLANTS SUCH AS JAVA
	PLUM MUST BE IDENTIFIED TO BE REMOVED. THE SEAGRAPE
	TREE #13 IS IN AN AWKWARD LOCATION FOR THE PROPOSED
	SITE PLAN AND SHOULD BE RELOCATED. SABAL PALMS THAT ARE
	IN A POOR LOCATION THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 FOOT CLEAR
	TRUNK SHOULD BE REMOVED AND MITIGATED.

	2. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	LANDSCAPE SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS FROM
	THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COLUMN FOR NATIVE PLANT SPECIES
	IDENTIFICATION IN THE PLANT LIST.

	4. SATISFIED. MONTGOMERY PALM IS LISTED AS MEDIUM WATER
	USAGE, PLEASE CORRECT.

	5. SATISFIED. THE ROSEMARY STREETSCAPE DESIGN NEEDS TO
	BE LOOKED AT MORE CLOSELY TO ASSURE THE TREES HAVE
	ADEQUATE ROOT SPACE WITH STRUCTURAL SOIL OR LARGER
	PLANTING AREAS.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED TREES THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
	ADJACENT TO PARKING AREAS, AND THE STREET TREES ALONG
	AREAS NOT ADJACENT TO PARKING.

	7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR PROVIDED TOTAL
	OPEN SPACE AND REQUIRED TREE COUNTS.

	8. SATISFIED. THE OAK TREES PROPOSED FOR THE ROSEMARY
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER ARE NOT POSSIBLE WITH THE OVERHEAD
	POWER LINES. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE POWER LINES WILL BE
	MOVED OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.

	9. SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALK AREAS
	ADJACENT TO TREE PLANTING AREAS, PROVIDING A MINIMUM14
	BY 9 FOOT ROOT ZONE FOR ALL STREET TREES AND PROVIDE A
	TYPICAL DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	10. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	PROVIDED, AND SUPPLY CALCULATIONS FOR ANY REQUIRED
	VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY.

	11. SATISFIED. ALL TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ROWS
	OF PARKING MUST BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT
	PARKING SPACE.

	12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE SUBSTANTIAL PLANTINGS
	INCLUDING HEDGES AND MID-RANGE TREES FOR THE REAR OF
	THE BUILDING.

	13. SATISFIED. THE GREEN ISLAND FICUS PLANTING ALONG
	THE CURB ON 9TH ST. MUST CONTAIN BREAKS ADJACENT TO THE
	PARKING SPACES TO ALLOW ACCESS.

	14. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445
	L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
	THE INFORMATION PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET THE CODE
	REQUIREMENT. ALL ADDED PLANT MATERIAL FROM THE PLANT
	LIST NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED, AND PERCENTAGE OF PLANTS
	THAT ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT OR NATIVE MUST MEET OR EXCEED
	60% OF THE TOTAL PLANTS.

	15. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CAD OVERLAY EXTENDING INTO
	THE TOP OF THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET LP-1.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/20/19:
	16. THE OPEN SPACE ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING BEING
	COUNTED TOWARD THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS BEING
	CLASSIFIED AS SEMI-PUBLIC COURTYARD. PROVIDE THE
	CALCULATIONS FOR 25% MIN. VEGETATED AREA AND 30% MIN.
	TREE CANOPY.

	17. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
	SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO PROTECT
	UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE PLAN. CIVIL
	ENGINEERING PLANS ALREADY SHOW CONFLICTS.

	18. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW SHELL GINGER AS
	NON-NATIVE.

	19. ADD WHEEL STOPS PARKING SPACES IN THE CENTER WITH
	OVERHANGS ADJACENT TO THE CENTER SIDEWALK. THE OVERHANG
	CANNOT BE OVER THE SIDEWALK.

	20. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ABOVE GROUND UTILITY
	VALVES AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
	21. LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN HAVE DIFFERENCES THAT
	NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO BE CONSISTENT.
	22. LANDSCAPE ISLAND MID ROW WHERE THE SEA GRAPE WAS
	LOCATED SHOULD BE MOVED TO PROVIDE THE AREA ADJACENT TO
	THE DUMPSTER NOW THAT THE SEAGRAPE IS NOT BEING
	PRESERVED.
	23. THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE ISLAND ALONG THE NORTH ROW OF
	PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE SHIFTED TO THE TERMINAL ISLAND.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-11-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-11-2018	Time	14:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-11-2018	Time	14:39	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-11 14:39:54	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: SUNSET LOUNGE Z18050030
	JUNE11, 2018
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. STAFF WILL MEET WITH THE APPLICANT TO DISCUSS
	CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	A SITE VISIT IS NECESSARY TO POSITIVELY IDENTIFY THE
	TREE SPECIES. ALL INVASIVE EXOTIC PLANTS SUCH AS JAVA
	PLUM MUST BE IDENTIFIED TO BE REMOVED. THE SEAGRAPE
	TREE #13 IS IN AN AWKWARD LOCATION FOR THE PROPOSED
	SITE PLAN AND SHOULD BE RELOCATED. SABAL PALMS THAT ARE
	IN A POOR LOCATION THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 FOOT CLEAR
	TRUNK SHOULD BE REMOVED AND MITIGATED.

	2. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
	SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE 50 POINTS FROM THE
	DESIGN OPTIONS CHART.

	3. PROVIDE A COLUMN FOR NATIVE PLANT SPECIES
	IDENTIFICATION IN THE PLANT LIST.

	4. MONTGOMERY PALM IS LISTED AS MEDIUM WATER USAGE,
	PLEASE CORRECT.

	5. THE ROSEMARY STREETSCAPE DESIGN NEEDS TO BE LOOKED
	AT MORE CLOSELY TO ASSURE THE TREES HAVE ADEQUATE ROOT
	SPACE WITH STRUCTURAL SOIL OR LARGER PLANTING AREAS.

	6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED TREES THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ADJACENT TO
	PARKING AREAS, AND THE STREET TREES ALONG AREAS NOT
	ADJACENT TO PARKING.

	7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR PROVIDED TOTAL OPEN SPACE
	AND REQUIRED TREE COUNTS.

	8. THE OAK TREES PROPOSED FOR THE ROSEMARY LANDSCAPE
	BUFFER ARE NOT POSSIBLE WITH THE OVERHEAD POWER LINES.
	PLEASE INDICATE IF THE POWER LINES WILL BE MOVED OR
	RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.

	9. ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHOW LOCATIONS
	OF STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALK AREAS ADJACENT TO
	TREE PLANTING AREAS, PROVIDING A MINIMUM14 BY 9 FOOT
	ROOT ZONE FOR ALL STREET TREES AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL
	DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	10. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED,
	AND SUPPLY CALCULATIONS FOR ANY REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA
	AND TREE CANOPY.

	11. ALL TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ROWS OF PARKING
	MUST BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE.

	12. PROVIDE MORE SUBSTANTIAL PLANTINGS INCLUDING HEDGES
	AND MID-RANGE TREES FOR THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

	13. THE GREEN ISLAND FICUS PLANTING ALONG THE CURB ON
	9TH ST. MUST CONTAIN BREAKS ADJACENT TO THE PARKING
	SPACES TO ALLOW ACCESS.

	14. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
	SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
	ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
	SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
	SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
	WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
	LANDSCAPES.

	15. CORRECT THE CAD OVERLAY EXTENDING INTO THE TOP OF
	THE PLANT LIST ON SHEET LP-1.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS MAY BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	02-09-2019		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	02-09-2019	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	02-09-2019	Time	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-09 19:19:27	BASED ON RESUBMITTAL THE PLANS PASS. PLEASE NOTE IT
	LOOKS AS THOUGH YOU ARE PLANNING TO HAVE TWO DUMPSTERS
	IN THIS LOCATION. THEY WOULD NEED TO BE ON WHEELS TO
	WORK AS PROPOSED.
2018-07-23 14:16:00	BASED ON A REVIEW OF THE PROJECT THE ENCLOSURE WILL
	NEED TO MEET ALL CITY GUIDELINES. THE PAD CAN BE BUILT
	TO HOLD A DUMPSTER THAT IS WHEELED OUT BY SANITATION
	STAFF. THE ENCLOSURE SHOULD BE SET FURTHER FORWARD FROM
	ITS LOCATION TOWARDS THE ENTRANCE. THIS WILL ALLOW THE
	DRIVERS TO PICK UP THE DUMPSTER ON THE STREET. PLEASE
	BE AWARE THAT THE CITY WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE UP
	TO A 6 CUBIC YARD DUMPSTER ON WHEELS. THE AMOUNT OF USE
	WILL BE BASED ON THE PRODUCTION BY THE OCCUPANTS WHICH
	WILL DICTATE THE SIZE OF THE DUMPSTER SERVICE NEEDED.
2018-06-11 14:35:25	NEED TO PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS FOR COMMERCIAL TRUCK TO
	SERVICE CONTAINERS. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN ANALYSIS
	AND DESIGN PROPER APPROACH ACCORDINGLY.

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	5	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	07-31-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	07-31-2019	Time	15:29	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	07-31-2019	Time	15:41	Sent To

Notes

2019-07-31 15:41:26	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE JULY
	17, 2019 REVIEW PACKAGE. THEY CAN BE PROVISO FOR SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL.

	1.. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING
	DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON N. ROSEMARY AVE. [REPEAT COMMENT]

	2.. THERE SHOULD NOT BE DIRECT SHEETFLOW RUNOFF ACROSS
	THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET.GRADE
	THE PARCEL NORTH OF 8TH STREET TO FLOW INTO THE
	PERVIOUS BANDS TO OBTAIN SOME STORMWATER TREATMENT.YARD
	DRAIN(S) CAN BE CONSTRUCTED TO COLLECT EXCESS
	STORMWATER AND PIPE IT TO THE EXISTING DRAIANGE
	STRUCTURE AT THE NW CORNER OF 8TH ST AND N. ROSEMARY
	AVE.

	3. PRIOR TO C.O., THE PROPOSED EASEMENTS SHALL BE
	RECORDED IN THE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.

	4. LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE/HARDSCAPE
	PLAN. THE ONSITE CIRCULAR BANDS NORTH OF 8TH STREET
	MEASURE 5 FEET WIDE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE BANDS
	ARE DIMENSIONED AS 4 FEET WIDE ON THE HARDSCAPE PLAN.

	5. 8TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH
	THE HEART AND SOUL PROJECT.

	TRACY WARD, P.E.
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	[email protected]
	561-494-1120

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-06-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	06-06-2019	Time	09:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	06-06-2019	Time	09:26	Sent To

Notes

2019-06-06 09:26:28	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MAY
	22, 2019 REVIEW PACKAGE:
	1. V. NOEL WAS PROVIDED WITH A SIGNED AND SEALED
	BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THE RELATIONSHIP
	BETWEEN THE NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929 VERTICAL DATUMS AT
	THIS LOCATION NEEDS TO BE LISTED ON THE SURVEY. [REPEAT
	COMMENT]

	2. SHOW FLOW AREAS FOR THE CROSS SECTION D AS SHOWN FOR
	THE OTHER SECTIONS ON SHEET C3.2.

	3. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C3.2
	DO NOT MATCH THE GRADING SHOWN ON SHEET C2.1. SUGGEST
	SHOWING THE CROSS SECTIONS WITHOUT THE ELEVATION GRID.

	4. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING
	DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON N. ROSEMARY AVE. [REPEAT COMMENT]

	5. STORMWATER SYSTEM FOR THE PARCEL NORTH OF 8TH STREET
	TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW
	ATTENUATION PER SFWMD CRITERIA.

	6. DRAINAGE EASEMENT (MINIMUM 5 FEET FROM CENTERLINE OF
	PIPE) WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE PIPE BETWEEN S-303 AND THE
	EXISTING CATCH BASIN.

	7. SHEET C6.1 IS MISLABELED. SHEET INDEX SHOWS IT
	SHOULD BE LABELED SITE DEMOLITION AND EROSON CONTROL
	PLAN.

	8. ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN SHOW THE DEMOLITION OF 8TH
	STREET FOR THE HARDSCAPE ITEMS.

	9. WHO IS DESIGNING THE RAISED INTERSECTIONS ON 8TH
	STREET? HOW WILL IT AFFECT THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
	PATTERNS AT THESE INTERSECTIONS?

	10. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE OAK TREE NEXT
	TO EXISTING INLET AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET
	AND N. ROSEMARY AVE.

	11. SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED STORM PIPE ON
	HENRIETTA AVE AND EXISTING/PROPOSED TREES.

	12. SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED STORM PIPE ON N.
	ROSEMARY AVE AND PROPOSED TREES.

	13. HOW IS THIS PROJECT BEING COORDINATED WITH THE
	PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET?

	14. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED ALLEY R/W
	ABANDONMENT SHOULD FLOW TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.

	15. SHOW AND LABEL THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES AT EACH
	END OF THE ALLEY TO BE ABANDONED AND SHOW PROPOSED
	EASEMENTS ON THE CIVIL PLANS.

	16. THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANES CANNOT INCLUDE THE
	GUTTER. (P&Z SITE PLAN SHEET A0.04)

	17. CORRECT THE LABELING AND DIMENSIONING OF THE
	HENRIETTA AVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON SHEET A0.04. THE 50.0
	DIMENSION AT THE SOUTH END OF THE STREET IS SHOWN FROM
	BACK OF SIDEWALK TO BACK OF SIDEWALK. THE DIMENSION AT
	THE NORTH END OF THE STREET READS ?40.0 R.O.W. (WAS
	30.0 R.O.W.)? AND IS SHOWN FROM FRONT OF SIDEWALK TO
	FRONT OF SIDEWALK. RIGHT OF WAY LINES SHOULD MATCH THE
	BOUNDARY SURVEY.

	TRACY WARD, P.E.
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	[email protected]
	561-494-1120

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	02-20-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	02-20-2019	Time	08:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	02-20-2019	Time	09:01	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-20 09:01:15	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	FEBRUARY 5, 2019 REVIEW PACKAGE:

	1. SHOW THE VERTICAL DATUM RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NAVD
	1988 AND NGVD 1929 ON THE SURVEY (SHEET A.SI) [REPEAT
	COMMENT].

	2. ADD THE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION EQUATION TO NOTE 7
	ON SHEET C1.0.

	3. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND SHOW THE VERTICAL DATUM
	CONVERSION EQUATION ON EACH SHEET WITH ELEVATION DATA
	(SHEETS C2.1, C2.2, C3.1, C3.2, C4.1, C6.1).

	4. SURVEY (SHEET A.SI) IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.

	5. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR 8TH STREET SHOWING HOW
	THE VALET DROP OFF AREA WILL BE GRADED.

	6. SURVEY NOTE ON SHEET A.SI STATES THERE IS A LATER
	CERTIFIED SURVEY. PROVIDE A COPY OF THIS SURVEY.
	[REPEAT COMMENT]

	7. PROVIDE A CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING
	DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON N. ROSEMARY AVE. [REPEAT COMMENT]

	8. NEED WHEEL STOP OR CURB FOR THE FOUR FULL DEPTH
	PARKING SPACES.

	9. HARDSCAPE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WILL
	REQUIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-13-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	06-13-2018	Time	07:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	06-13-2018	Time	07:22	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-13 07:22:04	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
	WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
	MITS-APPLICATIONS

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:

	1. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
	ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
	EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. LABEL THE VERTICAL
	DATUM ON THE CONCEPTUAL PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
	AND THE WATER & WASTEWATER PLAN. SHOW THE DATUM
	CONVERSION IF NAVD 1988 IS USED. SHOW THE DATUM
	CONVERSION ON THE SURVEY.

	2. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON SHEET A.SI.
	FEMA ISSUED NEW FIRMS IN OCTOBER 2017.

	3. ONSITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE
	WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION PER
	SFWMD CRITERIA.

	4. EXPLAIN HOW STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS BEING PROVIDED
	IN THE PARCEL NORTH OF 8TH STREET.

	5. IT APPEARS THE CURB IS BEING RELOCATED AT THE NE
	CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND N. ROSEMARY AVE. HOW WILL THIS
	AFFECT THE EXISTING ROADWAY DRAINAGE SYSTEM.

	6. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXISTING GRADES ALONG N. ROSEMARY
	AVE AND HENRIETTA AVE.

	7. SURVEY NOTE ON SHEET A.SI STATES THERE IS A LATER
	CERTIFIED SURVEY. PROVIDE A COPY OF THIS SURVEY.

	8. PROVIDE A CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING
	DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON N. ROSEMARY AVE.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
	BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
	THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
	CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
	ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS

	2. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.

	3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
	WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-28-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	05-28-2019	Time	11:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-11-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	06-11-2018	Time	09:38	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2018-06-11 09:43:41	1. NO SURVEY PROVIDED.
	2. ALLEY WILL REQUIRE ABANDONMENT THRU PLANNING.
	EASEMENT FOR SANITARY WILL BE RESERVED.
	3. ALL EXISTING SERVICES TO BE ABANDONED WILL BE
	REQUIRED TO CUT BACK TO MAIN.
	4. ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WILL BE
	REQUIRED.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	06-04-2019		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	06-12-2019	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2019-06-04 13:55:35	REVISED JUNE 12, 2019

	PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.

	1. THE APPLICANT SHOULD REVISE THE SITE PLAN DURING
	PERMITTING TO SHOW NORTH CURB LINE AND ANY CURB CUTS ON
	NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET.
	2. THE APPLICANT SHOULD REVISE THE SITE PLAN DURING
	PERMITTING TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE ON THE
	SOUTHBOUND APPROACH FROM THE PARKING LOT ADJACENT TO
	THE DUMPSTER, PER FDOT GREENBOOK/AASHTO REQUIREMENTS.
	3. THE APPLICANT SHOULD COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ON THE
	ROSEMARY CROSS-SECTION ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE DURING
	PERMITTING, AND THE APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO
	ELIMINATE PARALLEL PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE IF
	NECESSARY.
	4. THE APPLICANT SHOULD COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ON THE
	STREET LIGHTING REQUIREMENT DURING PERMITTING.


	SHING TSOI
	CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
	561-494-1141
	[email protected]
	(IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date			Cont ID
Sent By				Date	04-23-2019	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2019-04-23 10:27:20	***PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED AND ARE
	REPEATED HERE. PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS.***

	1. A TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS NEVER PROVIDED WITH THE
	SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE EVENT DATA ON THE EXISTING
	DEVELOPMENT, AND DISCUSS THE ACTIVITIES WHICH WILL BE
	HELD ON SITE, INCLUDING INFORMATION ON THE HOURS OF
	OPERATIONS, DURATION, PROJECTED NUMBER OF ATTENDEES,
	ETC. PLEASE VERIFY WHETHER THE PROVIDED PARKING SPACES
	WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES.
	2. LABEL RADIUSES OF CURB RETURNS.
	3. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR PUBLIC STREETS
	INCLUDING 8TH STREET AND THE ALLEY WITH DIMENSIONS
	4. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY AS REQUIRED IN THE
	CITY?S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM.
	5. REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW NORTH CURB LINE AND ANY
	CURB CUTS ON NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET
	6. LIVE OAKS ARE PROPOSED UNDER POWER LINE ON NORTH
	ROSEMARY AVE. CHECK FPL REQUIREMENTS.
	7. EIGHT-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED FOR
	NON-RESIDENTIAL IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN.
	8. ON-SITE, PROVIDE SIGHT TRIANGLE EXHIBIT FOR SIGHT
	LINE WITH DUMPSTER.
	9. THE 20-FOOT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHOULD BE DRAWN
	ALONG THE CORNER OF PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE REVISE.
	10. SHEET A0.04 EIGHT ST. IS NOTED AS 60? ROW, BUT 50?
	PLOTTED. CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO RIGHT OF WAY WIDTHS.
	11. WE DON?T SUPPORT SHIFTING OF ROSEMARY TO PROVIDE
	PARALLEL PARKING ON ONE SIDE AS THIS WILL MAKE IT
	DIFFICULT FOR THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET TO PROVIDE
	PARALLEL PARKING IN THE FUTURE. THIS WILL ALSO CAUSE
	ROSEMARY AVENUE TO SHIFT THROUGH INTERSECTIONS AT NINTH
	STREET AND EIGHT STREET. PLEASE HOLD ROADWAY CENTERLINE
	AND WIDEN ONSITE FOR PARALLEL PARKING.
	12. THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AT MIDBLOCK ON 8TH STREET
	GOES THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE VALET/DROPOFF LANE.
	PROVIDE A BULB OUT AT THIS LOCATION FOR THE MIDBLOCK
	CONNECTION. ALSO, THE CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS
	MIDBLOCK CONNECTION. PLEASE REVISE.
	13. ARE STREET LIGHTS BEING PROPOSED? WHO WILL MAINTAIN
	THE STREET LIGHTS?

	SHING TSOI
	CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
	561-494-1141
	[email protected]
	(IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date			Cont ID
Sent By				Date	02-13-2019	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-13 15:20:54	NOTE: QUITE A NUMBER OF PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE NOT
	ADDRESSED AND ARE REPEATED HERE.
	1. A TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS NEVER PROVIDED WITH THE
	SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE EVENT DATA ON THE EXISTING
	DEVELOPMENT, AND DISCUSS THE ACTIVITIES WHICH WILL BE
	HELD ON SITE, INCLUDING INFORMATION ON THE HOURS OF
	OPERATIONS, DURATION, PROJECTED NUMBER OF ATTENDEES,
	ETC. PLEASE VERIFY WHETHER THE PROVIDED PARKING SPACES
	WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES.
	2. LABEL RADIUSES OF CURB RETURNS.
	3. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR PUBLIC STREETS
	INCLUDING 8TH STREET AND THE ALLEY WITH DIMENSIONS
	4. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY AS REQUIRED IN THE
	CITY'S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM.
	5. REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW NORTH CURB LINE AND ANY
	CURB CUTS ON NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET
	6. LIVE OAKS ARE PROPOSED UNDER POWER LINE ON NORTH
	ROSEMARY AVE. CHECK FPL REQUIREMENTS.
	7. EIGHT-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED FOR
	NON-RESIDENTIAL IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN.
	8. ON-SITE, PROVIDE SIGHT TRIANGLE EXHIBIT FOR SIGHT
	LINE WITH DUMPSTER.
	9. THE 20-FOOT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHOULD BE DRAWN
	ALONG THE CORNER OF PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE REVISE.
	10. SHEET A0.04 EIGHT ST. IS NOTED AS 60' ROW, BUT 50'
	PLOTTED. CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO RIGHT OF WAY WIDTHS.
	11. WE DON'T SUPPORT SHIFTING OF ROSEMARY TO PROVIDE
	PARALLEL PARKING ON ONE SIDE AS THIS WILL MAKE IT
	DIFFICULT FOR THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET TO PROVIDE
	PARALLEL PARKING IN THE FUTURE. THIS WILL ALSO CAUSE
	ROSEMARY AVENUE TO SHIFT THROUGH INTERSECTIONS AT NINTH
	STREET AND EIGHT STREET. PLEASE HOLD ROADWAY CENTERLINE
	AND WIDEN ONSITE FOR PARALLEL PARKING.
	12. THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AT MIDBLOCK ON 8TH STREET
	GOES THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE VALET/DROPOFF LANE.
	PROVIDE A BULB OUT AT THIS LOCATION FOR THE MIDBLOCK
	CONNECTION. ALSO, THE CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS
	MIDBLOCK CONNECTION. PLEASE REVISE.
	13. ARE STREET LIGHTS BEING PROPOSED? WHO WILL MAINTAIN
	THE STREET LIGHTS?

	SHING TSOI
	CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
	561-494-1141
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date			Cont ID
Sent By				Date	06-12-2018	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-12 11:01:51	SUNSET LOUNGE SITE PLAN (DATED 5-30-18)
	- THE COMMENTS ARE PRELIMINARY AS THE PLANS ARE MISSING
	KEY DIMENSIONS SUCH AS RADIUSES OF CURB RETURNS AND
	WIDTHS OF LANES ON STREETS.
	- LABEL RADIUSES OF CURB RETURNS.
	- PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR PUBLIC STREETS WITH
	DIMENSIONS
	- PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY
	- REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW NORTH CURB LINE AND ANY CURB
	CUTS ON NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET
	- ON SITE ANGLE PARKING APPEARS TO BE 60 DEGREES. AISLE
	WIDTH IS TOO NARROW FOR 60 DEGREES.
	- LABEL ANGLE OF ANGLE PARKING WITH RESUBMITTAL
	- LIVE OAKS ARE PROPOSED UNDER POWER LINE ON NORTH
	ROSEMARY AVE. CHECK FPL REQUIREMENTS.
	- INTERNAL PARKING LOT. AISLE WIDTH DOESN?T MEET CITY
	STANDARD 24 FOOT.
	- INTERNAL PARKING LOT, SPACES ARE 9? WIDE. CITY CODE
	IS 8.5 FOOT WIDE.
	- EIGHT FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED FOR
	NON-RESIDENTIAL IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN.
	- SHEET A0.04 COUNT OF ON-STREET PARALLEL PARKING
	SPACES IN PLAN VIEW IS INCORRECT.
	- ON-SITE, PROVIDE SIGHT TRIANGLE EXHIBIT FOR SIGHT
	LINE WITH DUMPSTER.
	- NINTH STREET. ON STREET PARKING SPACE IS TOO CLOSE TO
	FIRE HYDRANT. FLORIDA STATUTES 15? NO PARKING FROM
	HYDRANT.
	- SHEET A0.04 EIGHT ST. IS NOTED AS 60? ROW, BUT 50?
	PLOTTED. CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO RIGHT OF WAY WIDTHS.
	- WHY ARE BIKE LANES PROPOSED ON 8TH STREET?
	- APPEARS ROSEMARY AVENUE IS SHIFTING THROUGH
	INTERSECTION OF EIGHT STREET TO ALLOW FOR PARALLEL
	PARKING ON WEST SIDE OF ROSEMARY AVE. PROVIDE DETAILS
	FOR ROADWAY TRANSITION.
	- ROSEMARY AVE. ON STREET PARKING SPACE IS 8? 8 INCHES
	WIDE. IT CAN BE REDUCED TO 8?.
	- ROSEMARY IS SHOWN WITH NINE FOOT LANES. PROVIDE 10
	FOOT WIDE LANES.
	- WE DON'T SUPPORT SHIFTING OF ROSEMARY TO PROVIDE
	PARALLEL PARKING ON ONE SIDE AS THIS WILL MAKE IT
	DIFFICULT FOR THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET TO PROVIDE
	PARALLEL PARKING IN THE FUTURE. SUGGEST HOLDING ROADWAY
	CENTERLINE AND WIDEN ONSITE FOR PARALLEL PARKING.
	- WHO IS THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE ROADWAY
	IMPROVEMENTS?
	- CONSIDER ON-STREET ANGLED PARKING AROUND BUILDING AND
	PARK TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PARKING
	- SUGGEST ELIMINATING SOME ON-STREET PARKING ON 8TH
	STREET TO PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AT MIDBLOCK
	FROM THE SUNSET TO THE PARK
	- ARE STREET LIGHTS BEING PROPOSED? WHO WILL MAINTAIN
	THE STREET LIGHTS?
	- CODE OF ORDINANCES 94-305, TABLE X-1 ROSEMARY IS A
	THOROUGHFARE WITH A 30 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY SETBACK AND IS
	REQUIRED TO HAVE FOUR LANES.

	ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	05-28-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	05-28-2019	Time	10:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	elevesqu			Date	05-28-2019	Time	10:18	Sent To

Notes

2019-05-28 10:22:41	PROVISOS:
	APPLICATION FOR ALLEY ABANDONMENT ONGOING.
	APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT FOR REPLAT AND UNIFY PROPERTIES.
	PHOTOMETRICS AND STREET LIGHT DETAIL FOR STREET
	LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PERMIT.
	APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT.
	A SEPARATE FENCE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
	PROPOSED METAL FENCE.
	ANY SIGNAGE SHALL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMIT.
	ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES, INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW
	PREVENTER SHALL BE LANDSCAPED.
	EXACT LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER, TRANSFORMER, AND
	FDC SHALL BE REVIEWED IN THE FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION
	WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND
	ZONING DEPARTMENT.
	THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE CROSS INTO THE
	PROPERTY LINE. AN EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
	APPLICANT SHALL MOVE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE OUT OF SIGHT
	TRIANGLE LINE. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY REMOVING
	TRAFFIC ISLAND AND SHIFTING PARKING SPACES AND
	ENCLOSURE TO THE NORTH.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	05-03-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	05-03-2019	Time	16:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	elevesqu			Date	05-03-2019	Time	16:03	Sent To

Notes

2019-05-03 16:03:05
	PER SECTION 94-54, THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT IS REQUIRED TO
	HAVE DAC REVIEW AS PART OF THE FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
	PROCESS. DAC REVIEW FOR ALLEY ABANDONMENT REQUIRED
	PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. DAC REVIEW OF ALLEY
	ABANDONMENT SCHEDULED FOR 5/8/2019.

	1. SATISFIED.
	2. SATISFIED.
	3. SATISFIED.
	4. SATISFIED.
	5. SATISFIED.
	6. SATISFIED.
	7. SATISFIED.
	8. SATISFIED.
	9. SATISFIED.
	10. SATISFIED.
	11. SATISFIED.
	12. SATISFIED.
	13. SATISFIED.
	14. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, THE PROPERTIES WILL NEED TO
	BE UNIFIED.
	15. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, THIS SITE WILL BE REQUIRED TO
	BE REPLATTED.
	16. SATISFIED.
	17. SATISFIED.
	18. SATISFIED.
	19. SATISFIED.
	20. SATISFIED.
	21. SATISFIED.
	22. SATISFIED.
	23. SATISFIED.
	24. SATISFIED.
	25. SATISFIED.
	26. SATISFIED.
	27. SATISFIED.
	28. SATISFIED.
	29. SATISFIED.
	30. SATISFIED.
	31. SATISFIED.
	32. SATISFIED.
	33. SATISFIED.
	34. SATISFIED.
	35. SATISFIED.
	36. SATISFIED.
	37. ONGOING. PROVISO: PHOTOMETRICS AND STREET LIGHT
	DETAIL FOR STREET LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF
	PERMIT.
	38. SATISFIED.
	39. SATISFIED.
	40. ONGOING. PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
	94-113(F) FOR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS.
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED THROUGH
	SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. SEE COMMENT #45.
	41. SATISFIED.
	42. SATISFIED.
	43. SATISFIED.
	44. SATISFIED.
	NEW COMMENTS FEBRUARY 22, 2019
	45. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT
	WILL BE REQUIRED.
	46. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, A SEPARATE FENCE PERMIT WILL
	BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED METAL FENCE.
	47. SATISFIED.
	48. SATISFIED.
	49. SATISFIED.
	50. ONGOING. PROVISO: ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES,
	INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE LANDSCAPED.
	PLEASE ADDRESS AT TIME OF LANDSCAPE PERMIT. EXACT
	LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER, TRANSFORMER, AND FDC
	SHALL BE REVIEWED IN THE FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH
	ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND ZONING
	DEPARTMENT.
	51. SATISFIED.
	52. SATISFIED.
	53. SATISFIED.
	54. SATISFIED.
	55. SATISFIED.
	56. SATISFIED.
	57. SATISFIED.
	58. ONGOING. PLEASE UPDATE ALL CIVIL PLANS TO MATCH THE
	SITE PLAN. COORDINATE WITH TRAFFIC REVIEW COMMENTS.
	59. SATISFIED.
	60. SATISFIED.
	61. SATISFIED.
	62. ONGOING.
	63. SATISFIED.

	PROVISOS:
	THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE CROSS INTO THE
	PROPERTY LINE. AN EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	02-22-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	02-22-2019	Time	14:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	elevesqu			Date	02-22-2019	Time	14:50	Sent To

Notes

2019-02-22 14:51:13	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER OPEN AIR STRUCTURES UNDER
	THE HALLWAY AND AREAS CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING
	STRUCTURE ON THE ROOFTOP TERRACE LEVEL TO MEET THE
	DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL AND HEIGHT OF
	THE STRUCTURES ON THE ROOFTOP TERRACE.
	3. SATISFIED. CONSIDER THE USE OF PERMEABLE SURFACE,
	ESPECIALLY IN THE PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING LOT.
	4. SATISFIED. THE COLORED RENDERING AND THE PROPOSED
	ELEVATIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH. PLEASE REVISE
	ACCORDINGLY.
	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, PER TABLE IV-38, THE CORRECT
	STREET DESIGNATIONS AND SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
	A. FRONT (8TH STREET): RESIDENTIAL- 17'
	B. SIDE (9TH STREET): RESIDENTIAL - 17'
	C. SIDE (HENRIETTA AVE): RESIDENTIAL- 17'
	D. SIDE (ROSEMARY AVE): SECONDARY - 12'
	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE SITE DATA TABLE, AND
	INCLUDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION
	AND PARKING LOTS ON THE SITE PLAN (SHEET A0.04, SHEET
	A1.00).
	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING CURBS AND
	CENTERLINES OF ALL ROADWAYS AND INDICATE WHERE THE
	CURBS WILL BE MODIFIED.
	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
	AREA, SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB, AS
	DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109. WHERE THE CURB LOCATION
	VARIES ALONG A PROPERTY, THE BACK OF CURB SHALL BE
	DEFINED AS THE PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE FURTHEST
	FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD (CURB LOCATION ALONG
	50% OF STREET FRONTAGE). PLEASE AMEND THE SETBACK
	MEASUREMENTS AS NECESSARY.
	9. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR PARKING CANNOT BE INCLUDED AS PART
	OF THE REQUIRED SETBACK. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	10. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
	FOOTPRINT FOR GROUND LEVEL IS 87% AND FOR THE PODIUM IS
	90%. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL IN THE TABLE ON THE PERCENT
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR EACH PROPOSED NEW LEVEL. PLEASE
	AMEND THE LABEL FROM "LOT COVERAGE" TO "BUILDING
	FOOTPRINT."
	11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PARKING CALCULATIONS IS BASED
	ON NET INTERIOR AREA, NOT GROSS AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE
	THE NET INTERIOR AREA AND CALCULATE ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE
	BREAK DOWN THE TABLE INTO REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
	PARKING.
	THE MINIMUM PARKING FOR THIS SITE IS 1/1000 AND THE
	MAXIMUM IS 2/1000. PLEASE ADJUST TABLE ACCORDINGLY.
	12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT AN ILLUSTRATION
	AND TABLE OF THE F.A.R. BREAKDOWN BY EACH SEPARATE
	FLOOR, INCLUDING THE ADDITIONAL PARKING. PLEASE
	SEPARATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE BY ALLEY, NORTH PROPERTY
	AND SOUTH PROPERTY. PER SECTION 94-79 (HISTORIC
	RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS), FAR INCLUDES INTERIOR
	AND ROOFED EXTERIOR STAIRWAYS, ELEVATORS, ESCALATORS
	AND SIMILAR FEATURES. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	THE PROVIDED PLAN IS DIFFICULT TO INTERPRET. PLEASE
	PROVIDE A FAR BREAKDOWN BY EACH FLOOR USING THE FLOOR
	PLAN. AN EXAMPLE CAN BE SENT IF REQUESTED.
	13. NOT SATISFIED. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A
	SEPARATE ALLEY ABANDONMENT APPLICATION.
	14. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, THE PROPERTIES WILL NEED TO
	BE UNIFIED.
	15. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, THIS SITE WILL BE REQUIRED TO
	BE REPLATTED.
	16. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ILLUSTRATIONS AND A DATA
	TABLE DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVE USE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR NWD-2, AS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-38.
	PLEASE NOTE, THE STREET DESIGNATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
	A. 8TH AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	B. HENRIETTA AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	C. ROSEMARY AVENUE: SECONDARY
	D. 9TH STREET: RESIDENTIAL
	17. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ILLUSTRATIONS AND A DATA
	TABLE DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRANSPARENCY
	REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GROUND FLOOR IN NWD-2, AS REQUIRED
	BY TABLE IV-38. PLEASE NOTE, THE STREET DESIGNATIONS
	ARE AS FOLLOWS:
	A. 8TH AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	B. HENRIETTA AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	C. ROSEMARY AVENUE: SECONDARY
	D. 9TH STREET: RESIDENTIAL
	18. NOT SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED AISLE WIDTHS IN SOME
	SECTIONS OF THE PROPOSED PARKING AREAS APPEAR TO BE TOO
	SMALL. PLEASE LOOK AT SECTION 94-485, FIGURE XV-2 AND
	REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	ALTHOUGH THE TERMINAL ISLAND WAS REDUCED BUT THE 24?
	DIMENSION INCLUDES 2 FEET OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND.
	PLEASE REVISE. THE TERMINAL ISLAND CAN BE REDUCED TO 5
	FEET WITH A MINIMUM RADIUS OF TWO AND ONE-HALF FEET AT
	ITS END TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
	19. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF ADA PARKING
	SPACES DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT AS ESTABLISHED BY
	SECTION 94-485, TABLE XV-3. PLEASE REVISE.
	20. SATISFIED. IF PROPOSED ADA PARKING SPACES ARE
	DIAGONAL, THE REQUIRED LENGTH IS 18' AND WIDTH IS 12',
	PER SECTION 94-485 (O)(2). THE PROPOSED DIAGONAL
	PARKING SPACE AREA TO THE EAST OF THE BUILDING ADDITION
	DOES NOT WORK WITH REQUIRED PARKING DEPTHS AND DRIVE
	AISLE WIDTHS. PLEASE CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES.
	21. SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF ON STREET PARKING ALONG
	HENRIETTA AVENUE IS LABELED AS 5 SPACES BUT THERE
	APPEAR TO ONLY BE 4 SPACES. PLEASE CONFIRM LABELS AND
	TOTAL NUMBERS IN THE SITE DATA TABLE.
	22. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING ON SITE POWER POLES APPEAR
	TO CREATE PROBLEMS WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, ON STREET
	PARKING AND PROPOSED STREET TREES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
	LOCATION OF EXISTING POLES, AND PROVIDE DETAIL OF POLES
	BEING REMOVED OR NEWLY PROPOSED POLES. PLEASE CONTACT
	STAFF TO HOLD A SEPARATE MEETING TO DISCUSS THE
	MULTIPLE ISSUES.
	23. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED BUS PARKING DOES NOT WORK
	WITH TURNING RADIUS REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CONSIDER A BUS
	PULL-OFF OR OTHER ALTERNATIVE.
	24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING
	FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IS 1 PER 15 REQUIRED
	PARKING SPACES WITHIN A SECURED STORAGE AREA. THE
	REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC USE IS ONE SPACE PER EVERY 100
	FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE STREET FRONTAGES AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE OF
	THE SEPARATE BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE SITE
	DATA TABLE. THE BICYCLE PARKING NUMBER IN THE SITE DATA
	TABLE DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS ON THE SITE
	PLAN. PLEASE UPDATE WITH RESUBMITTAL MEETING THE CITY
	REQUIREMENTS.
	PLEASE PROVIDE SOME PUBLIC BICYCLE RACKS IN THE
	PROPOSED PLAZA, CLOSER TO THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE BREAK
	DOWN BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT INTO PUBLIC
	REQUIREMENT AND PRIVATE REQUIREMENT.
	25. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE FROM WALL-MOUNTED BIKE
	RACKS TO GROUND MOUNTED BIKE RACKS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE
	OF THE BUILDING.
	26. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL,
	MEETING CITY STANDARDS. STAFF WILL PROVIDE DETAIL.
	PLEASE SHOW EXACT LOCATION OF PROPOSED BICYCLE RACKS
	AND DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN.
	PLEASE PROVIDE BICYBLE RACK DETAIL. THE BICYCLE RACK IN
	THE FRONT ALONG 8TH STREET DOES NOT APPEAR TO FIT WITH
	THE REQUIRED DIMENSIONS, PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	27. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
	FENESTRATION ALONG THE NORTH FACADE OF THE PROPOSED NEW
	ADDITION, AS IT IS FACING THE PRIMARY PARKING LOT FOR
	THE BUILDING USE. BLANK WALLS CANNOT BE VISIBLE BY THE
	GENERAL PUBLIC. BLANK WALL MEANS ANY PORTION OF A
	FA?ADE THAT HAS AN AREA GREATER THAN 20 PERCENT OF THE
	ENTIRE FA?ADE ELEVATION THAT IS ABSENT OF FENESTRATION
	AND IS ABSENT OF A PLANAR BREAK OF AT LEAST TWO FEET IN
	DEPTH. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK WALL
	REGULATIONS.
	28. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-109, TABLE IV-4, ON
	FACADES ENCLOSING ACTIVE USES (E.G., THE KITCHEN,
	BATHROOMS), FENESTRATION MUST COVER A MINIMUM OF 15% OF
	THE FACADE AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FENESTRATION
	ALONG THE EAST FACADE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING
	ADDITION.
	29. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-109, TABLE IV-4, ON
	FACADES ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE USES, ARCHITECTURAL
	TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED. SEE SECTION 94-109,
	DEFINITIONS AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL
	TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS, SPECIFICALLY FOR THE EAST
	FACADE OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. PLEASE ADD MORE
	ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
	30. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-109, TABLE IV-4, AT
	THE GROUND FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS WITH A MINIMUM
	CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF THE BUILDING
	FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT THE
	FRONTAGES, ESPECIALLY THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION MAY
	NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. PLEASE REVISE AND PROVIDE
	ILLUSTRATIONS SHOWING THE LENGTH OF HORIZONTAL
	PROJECTIONS ALONG THE GROUND FLOOR FRONTAGES TO SATISFY
	THIS REQUIREMENT.
	31. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL OF
	PROPOSED AWNINGS AND CANOPIES. SEE TABLE IV-5:
	PROJECTION STANDARDS FOR REGULATIONS.
	32. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94-110(D) FOR
	SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USES
	WITHIN RESIDENTIAL ENCLAVE PLANNING AREAS. PLEASE
	PROVIDE DETAIL OF ANY NEWLY PROPOSED SIGNS, AND ADD A
	NOTE SAYING "SIGNAGE WILL BE REVIEWED SEPARATELY AT
	TIME OF SIGN PERMITTING" TO THE PLANS.
	33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A SEPARATE OPEN
	SPACE PLAN AND TABLE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF
	SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7. PLEASE NOTE,
	REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN OPEN
	SPACE CALCULATIONS.
	THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SHALL INCLUDE THE GATHERING
	PLAZA AND THE ROOFTOP GARDEN. THE GATHERING PLAZA SHALL
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEMI-PUBLIC COURTYARD, AS
	OUTLINED IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
	34. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER AN OPEN SPACE
	AMENITY/SEATING AREA IN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING FOR
	KITCHEN STAFF/EMPLOYEES, WHICH COULD THEN BE CONSIDERED
	IN THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS.
	35. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE PLANTING ON THE ROOFTOP
	TERRACE TO PROVIDE A ROOFTOP GARDEN AREA. PLEASE
	INCLUDE DETAIL OF PROPOSAL AND AMENITIES.
	36. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113(E), CURBS AND
	WHEEL STOPS, ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANT MATERIALS
	WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE
	PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY WHEEL STOPS,
	CURBS, OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE.
	PLEASE ADD WHEEL STOPS TO FOUR MIDDLE PARKING SPACES ON
	BOTH SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
	37. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113(D), STREET
	LIGHTS, STREET LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ATTAIN THE
	APPROPRIATE FOOTCANDLE MEASUREMENT NECESSARY FOR SAFE
	PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR MOVEMENT. LIGHT FIXTURE AND
	POLES SHALL MEET THE CITY APPROVED STANDARD. PLEASE
	PROVIDE LOCATION AND DETAIL OF LIGHT FIXTURES.
	PLEASE SUBMIT PHOTOMETRIC PLANS AND LIGHT FIXTURE
	DETAILS.
	38. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113(D), SIDEWALKS, A
	SIDEWALK WITH A MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET CLEAR WIDTH SHALL
	BE PROVIDED ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PLEASE REVISE
	ACCORDINGLY.
	39. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113(F), SURFACE PARKING
	LOTS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM GROUND FLOOR SETBACK
	REQUIREMENTS AS PROVIDED IN THE SUBDISTRICT BUILDING
	REQUIREMENTS TABLE. A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SURFACE
	LOT IN ADDITION TO THE GROUND FLOOR SETBACK TO VISUALLY
	SCREEN PARKING AREAS.
	40. ONGOING. PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
	94-113(F) FOR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS.
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED THROUGH
	SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. SEE COMMENT #45.
	41. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL AND
	DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AREA,
	MEETING THE REGULATIONS OF SECTION 94-315.
	PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL OF TRASH RECEPTACLE ENCLOSURE,
	INCLUDING MATERIAL AND HEIGHT, MEETING THE
	SPECIFICATIONS OF SECTION 94-315(A).
	42. SATISFIED. CAN VISITORS ENTER THROUGH THE BACK OF
	THE BUILDING? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL INTO BUILDING
	ENTRANCES FROM EIGHTH STREET AND FROM THE PARKING LOT.
	PLEASE CONSIDER PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY INCLUDING
	CROSSWALKS, AND DISTINGUISHED PRIMARY ENTRANCES.
	43. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLEAN UP LABELS ON THE PLAN THAT
	ARE REMAINING FROM THE FIRST SUBMITTAL OR OTHERWISE
	MISPLACED.
	44. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE LABEL READING
	"PROPOSED 3RD FLOOR-PLAN" FROM SHEET A1.03 AND RELABEL
	AS "PROPOSED ROOFTOP TERRACE" OR SOMETHING SIMILAR.
	NEW COMMENTS FEBRUARY 22, 2019
	45. PLEASE NOTE, A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE
	REQUIRED.
	46. PLEASE NOTE, A SEPARATE FENCE PERMIT WILL BE
	REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED METAL FENCE. IN THIS
	DISTRICT, FENCES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FOUR
	FEET. PLEASE REVISE HEIGHT ON PLANS.
	47. THE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE
	NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND ON STREET PARKING SPACE
	LAYOUT AND HAVE DISCREPANCIES IN PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
	PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
	48. PLEASE INCLUDE A TREE REMOVAL/RELOCATION PLAN WITH
	RESUBMITTAL.
	49. ARE GATES PROPOSED TO ACCESS THE PARKING LOT?
	PLEASE NOTE, A QUEUING DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 20 FEET IS
	REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-111(P).
	50. PLEASE SHOW ANY ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES,
	TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, ETC. ON THE SITE
	PLAN. THESE SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE MINIMUM
	SETBACK. PLEASE CONSIDER A DIFFERENT LOCATION FOR THE
	BACKFLOW PREVENT AND WATER METER, FURTHER FROM THE
	SIDEWALK.
	51. PLEASE ENLARGE THE INTERNAL SIDEWALK WITHIN THE
	PLAZA THAT LEADS FROM THE ADA PARKING TO THE 8TH STREET
	ENTRANCE TO ALLOW FOR BETTER PEDESTRIAN ACCESS.
	52. PLEASE ADD SIDEWALK AND SETBACK DIMENSIONS ON THE
	HARDSCAPE PLAN SHEET HP-1.
	53. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE WALL/FENCE ON THE
	HARDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE PROPOSED LOCATION ON
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE CLARIFY AND REVISE
	ACCORDINGLY.
	54. PLEASE SUBMIT A GROUND FLOOR PLAN WITH RESUBMITTAL.
	55. PLEASE UPDATE THE INDICATED PARKING NEAR THE HEART
	AND SOUL PARK ALONG 8TH STREET, AS THE CURRENT PARK
	PLAN DOES NOT HAVE PARKING ON 8TH STREET.
	56. PLEASE UPDATE THE BICYLE RACKS ON THE HARDSCAPE
	PLAN TO MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
	57. PLEASE UPDATE THE CIVIL PLANS TO SHOW THE PROPOSED
	PEDESTAL AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING ON 8TH STREET.
	PLEASE ENSURE THAT THERE IS AT LEAST 8 FEET MINIMUM
	SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND THE PEDESTAL.
	58. PLEASE UPDATE ALL CIVIL PLANS TO MATCH THE SITE
	PLAN.
	59. PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED GENERATOR ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN WITH SUFFICIENT PROPOSED SCREENING.
	60. PLEASE ADD BOLLARDS OR PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION ALONG
	8TH STREET WITH THE CURBLESS DESIGN.
	61. PLEASE ADD A DETECTABLE WARNING RAMP AT THE
	MID-BLOCK CROSSING FROM SUNSET LOUNGE TO THE HEART AND
	SOUL PARK.
	62. PLEASE CHECK WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
	REGARDING THE SHIFTING OF THE CENTERLINE.
	63. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS CONFIRMING THERE WILL BE
	SCREENING AS HIGH AS ANY PROPOSED ROOFTOP MECHANICAL
	EQUIPMENT.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-12-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	06-12-2018	Time	15:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	elevesqu			Date	06-12-2018	Time	15:14	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-12 15:15:12	1. PLEASE CONSIDER OPEN AIR STRUCTURES UNDER THE
	HALLWAY AND AREAS CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE
	ON THE ROOFTOP TERRACE LEVEL TO MEET THE DISTRICT
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
	2. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL AND HEIGHT OF THE
	STRUCTURES ON THE ROOFTOP TERRACE.
	3. CONSIDER THE USE OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACE, ESPECIALLY
	IN THE PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING LOT.
	4. THE COLORED RENDERING AND THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS DO
	NOT APPEAR TO MATCH. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	5. PLEASE NOTE, PER TABLE IV-38, THE CORRECT STREET
	DESIGNATIONS AND SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
	A. FRONT (8TH STREET): RESIDENTIAL- 17'
	B. SIDE (9TH STREET): RESIDENTIAL - 17'
	C. SIDE (HENRIETTA AVE): RESIDENTIAL- 17'
	D. SIDE (ROSEMARY AVE): SECONDARY - 12'
	PLEASE CORRECT THE SITE DATA TABLE, AND INCLUDE THE
	SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION AND PARKING
	LOTS ON THE SITE PLAN (SHEET A0.04, SHEET A1.00).
	6. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING CURBS AND CENTERLINES OF ALL
	ROADWAYS AND INDICATE WHERE THE CURBS WILL BE MODIFIED.
	7. PLEASE NOTE, IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AREA,
	SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB, AS DEFINED IN
	SECTION 94-109. WHERE THE CURB LOCATION VARIES ALONG A
	PROPERTY, THE BACK OF CURB SHALL BE DEFINED AS THE
	PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE FURTHEST FROM THE CENTER
	LINE OF THE ROAD (CURB LOCATION ALONG 50% OF STREET
	FRONTAGE). PLEASE AMEND THE SETBACK MEASUREMENTS AS
	NECESSARY.
	8. PLEASE NOTE, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	FOR PARKING CANNOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED
	SETBACK. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	9. PLEASE NOTE, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR
	GROUND LEVEL IS 87% AND FOR THE PODIUM IS 90%. PLEASE
	PROVIDE DETAIL IN THE TABLE ON THE PERCENT BUILDING
	FOOTPRINT FOR EACH PROPOSED NEW LEVEL. PLEASE AMEND THE
	LABEL FROM "LOT COVERAGE" TO "BUILDING FOOTPRINT."
	10. PARKING CALCULATIONS IS BASED ON NET INTERIOR AREA,
	NOT GROSS AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE THE NET INTERIOR AREA
	AND CALCULATE ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE NOTE, ANY PARKING
	ABOVE THE MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT IS COUNTED AS FAR. PLEASE
	BREAKDOWN THE TABLE INTO REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING.
	11. PLEASE SUBMIT AN ILLUSTRATION AND TABLE OF THE
	F.A.R. BREAKDOWN BY EACH SEPARATE FLOOR, INCLUDING THE
	ADDITIONAL PARKING. PLEASE SEPARATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	BY ALLEY, NORTH PROPERTY AND SOUTH PROPERTY.
	12. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A SEPARATE ALLEY
	ABANDONMENT APPLICATION.
	13. PLEASE NOTE, THE PROPERTIES WILL NEED TO BE
	UNIFIED.
	14. PLEASE NOTE, THIS SITE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
	REPLATTED.
	15. PLEASE INCLUDE ILLUSTRATIONS AND A DATA TABLE
	DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVE USE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR NWD-2, AS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-38.
	PLEASE NOTE, THE STREET DESIGNATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
	A. 8TH AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	B. HENRIETTA AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	C. ROSEMARY AVENUE: SECONDARY
	D. 9TH STREET: RESIDENTIAL
	16. PLEASE INCLUDE ILLUSTRATIONS AND A DATA TABLE
	DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRANSPARENCY
	REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GROUND FLOOR IN NWD-2, AS REQUIRED
	BY TABLE IV-38. PLEASE NOTE, THE STREET DESIGNATIONS
	ARE AS FOLLOWS:
	A. 8TH AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	B. HENRIETTA AVENUE: RESIDENTIAL
	C. ROSEMARY AVENUE: SECONDARY
	D. 9TH STREET: RESIDENTIAL
	17. THE PROPOSED AISLE WIDTHS IN SOME SECTIONS OF THE
	PROPOSED PARKING AREAS APPEAR TO BE TOO SMALL. PLEASE
	LOOK AT SECTION 94-485, FIGURE XV-2 AND REVISE
	ACCORDINGLY.
	18. THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF ADA PARKING SPACES DOES NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENT AS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 94-485,
	TABLE XV-3. PLEASE REVISE.
	19. IF PROPOSED ADA PARKING SPACES ARE DIAGONAL, THE
	REQUIRED LENGTH IS 18' AND WIDTH IS 12', PER SECTION
	94-485 (O)(2). THE PROPOSED DIAGONAL PARKING SPACE AREA
	TO THE EAST OF THE BUILDING ADDITION DOES NOT WORK WITH
	REQUIRED PARKING DEPTHS AND DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS. PLEASE
	CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES.
	20. THE NUMBER OF ON STREET PARKING ALONG HENRIETTA
	AVENUE IS LABELED AS 5 SPACES BUT THERE APPEAR TO ONLY
	BE 4 SPACES. PLEASE CONFIRM LABELS AND TOTAL NUMBERS IN
	THE SITE DATA TABLE.
	21. THE EXISTING ON SITE POWER POLES APPEAR TO CREATE
	PROBLEMS WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, ON STREET PARKING AND
	PROPOSED STREET TREES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF
	EXISTING POLES, AND PROVIDE DETAIL OF POLES BEING
	REMOVED OR NEWLY PROPOSED POLES. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF
	TO HOLD A SEPARATE MEETING TO DISCUSS THE MULTIPLE
	ISSUES.
	22. THE PROPOSED BUS PARKING DOES NOT WORK WITH TURNING
	RADIUS REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CONSIDER A BUS PULL-OFF OR
	OTHER ALTERNATIVE.
	23. THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING FOR COMMERCIAL
	DEVELOPMENTS IS 1 PER 15 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES WITHIN
	A SECURED STORAGE AREA. THE REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC USE
	IS ONE SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE.
	PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE STREET FRONTAGES
	AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE OF THE SEPARATE BICYCLE
	PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE SITE DATA TABLE. THE
	BICYCLE PARKING NUMBER IN THE SITE DATA TABLE DOES NOT
	APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE UPDATE
	WITH RESUBMITTAL MEETING THE CITY REQUIREMENTS.
	24. PLEASE REVISE FROM WALL-MOUNTED BIKE RACKS TO
	GROUND MOUNTED BIKE RACKS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
	BUILDING.
	25. PLEASE INCLUDE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL, MEETING CITY
	STANDARDS. STAFF WILL PROVIDE DETAIL. PLEASE SHOW EXACT
	LOCATION OF PROPOSED BICYCLE RACKS AND DIMENSIONS ON
	THE SITE PLAN.
	26. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FENESTRATION ALONG THE
	NORTH FA?ADE OF THE PROPOSED NEW ADDITION, AS IT IS
	FACING THE PRIMARY PARKING LOT FOR THE BUILDING USE.
	27. PER SECTION 94-109, TABLE IV-4, ON FACADES
	ENCLOSING ACTIVE USES (E.G., THE KITCHEN, BATHROOMS),
	FENESTRATION MUST COVER A MINIMUM OF 15% OF THE FA?ADE
	AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FENESTRATION ALONG THE
	EAST FA?ADE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION.
	28. PER SECTION 94-109, TABLE IV-4, ON FACADES
	ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE USES, ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
	SHALL BE PROVIDED. SEE SECTION 94-109, DEFINITIONS AND
	MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
	REQUIREMENTS, SPECIFICALLY FOR THE EAST FA?ADE OF THE
	PROPOSED ADDITION. PLEASE ADD MORE ARCHITECTURAL
	TREATMENT TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
	29. PER SECTION 94-109, TABLE IV-4, AT THE GROUND
	FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS WITH A MINIMUM CUMULATIVE
	HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE SHALL
	BE PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT THE FRONTAGES, ESPECIALLY
	THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION MAY NOT MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT. PLEASE REVISE AND PROVIDE ILLUSTRATIONS
	SHOWING THE LENGTH OF HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS ALONG THE
	GROUND FLOOR FRONTAGES TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT.
	30. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL OF PROPOSED
	AWNINGS AND CANOPIES. SEE TABLE IV-5: PROJECTION
	STANDARDS FOR REGULATIONS.
	31. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94-110(D) FOR SIGNAGE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USES WITHIN
	RESIDENTIAL ENCLAVE PLANNING AREAS. THE PROPOSAL SEEMS
	TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS PERMITTED. PLEASE
	PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE SIGNS, AND ADD A NOTE SAYING
	"SIGNAGE WILL BE REVIEWED SEPARATELY AT TIME OF SIGN
	PERMITTING" TO THE PLANS.
	32. PLEASE INCLUDE A SEPARATE OPEN SPACE PLAN AND TABLE
	MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-6
	AND TABLE IV-7. PLEASE NOTE, REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
	CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS.
	33. PLEASE CONSIDER AN OPEN SPACE AMENITY/SEATING AREA
	IN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING FOR KITCHEN
	STAFF/EMPLOYEES, WHICH COULD THEN BE CONSIDERED IN THE
	OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS.
	34. PLEASE INCLUDE PLANTING ON THE ROOFTOP TERRACE TO
	PROVIDE A ROOFTOP GARDEN AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL OF
	PROPOSAL AND AMENITIES.
	35. PER SECTION 94-113(E), CURBS AND WHEEL STOPS, ALL
	LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN OR ADJACENT
	TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM
	VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY WHEEL STOPS, CURBS, OR OTHER
	SIMILAR DEVICES. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
	36. PER SECTION 94-113(D), STREET LIGHTS, STREET
	LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ATTAIN THE APPROPRIATE
	FOOTCANDLE MEASUREMENT NECESSARY FOR SAFE PEDESTRIAN
	AND VEHICULAR MOVEMENT. LIGHT FIXTURE AND POLES SHALL
	MEET THE CITY APPROVED STANDARD. PLEASE PROVIDE
	LOCATION AND DETAIL OF LIGHT FIXTURES.
	37. PER SECTION 94-113(D), SIDEWALKS, A SIDEWALK WITH A
	MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET CLEAR WIDTH SHALL BE PROVIDED
	ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	38. PER SECTION 94-113(F), SURFACE PARKING LOTS SHALL
	MEET THE MINIMUM GROUND FLOOR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS
	PROVIDED IN THE SUBDISTRICT BUILDING REQUIREMENTS
	TABLE. A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED
	AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SURFACE LOT IN
	ADDITION TO THE GROUND FLOOR SETBACK TO VISUALLY SCREEN
	PARKING AREAS.
	39. PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-113(F) FOR
	LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS.
	40. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL AND DIMENSIONS OF THE
	PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AREA, MEETING THE
	REGULATIONS OF SECTION 94-315.
	41. CAN VISITORS ENTER THROUGH THE BACK OF THE
	BUILDING? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL INTO BUILDING ENTRANCES
	FROM EIGHTH STREET AND FROM THE PARKING LOT. PLEASE
	CONSIDER PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY INCLUDING CROSSWALKS,
	AND DISTINGUISHED PRIMARY ENTRANCES.
	42. PLEASE CLEAN UP LABELS ON THE PLAN THAT ARE
	REMAINING FROM THE FIRST SUBMITTAL OR OTHERWISE
	MISPLACED.
	43. PLEASE REMOVE THE LABEL READING "PROPOSED 3RD
	FLOOR-PLAN" FROM SHEET A1.03 AND RELABEL AS "PROPOSED
	ROOFTOP TERRACE" OR SOMETHING SIMILAR.