Plan Review Details - Project Z18030036
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18030036
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-25-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-25-2018 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-25-2018 Time 15:02 Sent To  
Notes
2018-05-25 15:02:49THIS APPROVAL IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
  
 1. THE PROPOSED CHILLER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE SET BACK AT
 LEAST TWO (2) FEET (TO THE SOUTH) FROM THE FRONT FA?ADE
 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION.
  
 2. CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 OWNER (TO THE EAST), THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION BETWEEN
 THE TWO PROPERTIES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CURBING
 SHALL BE EXTENDED, AS IDENTIFIED IN THE ?ALTERNATE
 DRIVEWAY EXHIBIT? PROVIDED ON SHEET C1.00 (SITE PLAN)
 OF THE BELOW REFERENCED APPROVED PLANS.
  
 3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY/COMPLETION OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION, BIKE
 RACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE (IF NONE CURRENTLY
 EXIST). THE LOCATION AND STYLE OF THE BIKE RACKS SHALL
 BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY?S PLANNING
 DIVISION AND INCORPORATED INTO ANY APPLICABLE BUILDING
 PERMITS.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING TREES, A TREE
 ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO,
 AND APPROVED BY, THE CITY?S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-17-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-17-2018 Time 14:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 04-17-2018 Time 14:38 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-17 14:39:03PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.17.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18030036
 CASE NO.: PB 1171LL
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. WHAT IS THE JUSTIFICATION (BY CODE) FOR REMOVAL OF
 THE LARGE LAUREL OAK ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD?
 IN DISCUSSIONS WITH RAY CARANCI, THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE
 PLANNER, IT IS HIS PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THIS TREE
 COULD BE PRESERVED IN-PLACE AND THAT IT IS NOT IMPEDING
 WITH THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
  
 2. I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE ENCLOSURE FOR THE CHILLER
 BE SHIFTED SOUTH A FEW FEET TO PROVIDE FOR A RECESS
 ALONG THE PALM BEACH LAKES FACADE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 3. IS THERE ANY WAY TO WORK WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 OWNER (GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE) TO FIX THE CURB
 LINE ON THEIR PROPERTY FOR WHEN THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION
 IS REMOVED?
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved