 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18030023
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18030023 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
19:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
19:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-08 19:48:58 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. UNITY OF TITLE AND RIGHT OR WAY ABANDONMENT. | | | ABANDONMENT OF PART OF BISCAYNE DR WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | THIS PROJECT TO PROCEED. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A | | | PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR | | | SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED | | | WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE | | | A FIRE WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION | | | DISTANCE. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 5. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF | | | PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
19:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-08 17:37:29 | - PROVIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY | | | CODE SECTION 94-311 OR DOCUMENTATION DEMONSTRATING THAT | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311(C) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY | | | REQUIRED IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | - TURNAROUND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | ABANDONMENT. IT APPEARS THAT A T TURNAROUND IS BEING | | | PROVIDED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE TURNAROUND MUST BE | | | PROVIDED ON THE APPLICANT PROPERTY. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING AN ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE | | | PARKING AISLE BETWEEN BISCAYNE AND FLAMINGO. THIS WOULD | | | RESOLVE THE TURNAROUND ISSUE ON BISCAYNE IS ALSO | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION | | | ELEMENT. | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-09-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-09-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-09-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-09 11:42:38 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW | | | PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, | | | STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING | | | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY | | | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND | | | OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH | | | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES | | | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, | | | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND | | | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL | | | AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW. | | | DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD FIRE FLOWS TO | | | WATER DEMANDS CHART. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, CUT AND CAP UTILITIES | | | NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES | | | LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED | | | UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. COORDINATE WITH MARK | | | HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF | | | WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW | | | DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT 561-494-2262 | | | OR [email protected] | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT | | | DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL | | | BACKFLOWS. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF | | | WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY | | | ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES ARE | | | PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY LATERAL | | | LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT PARCELS. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE | | | BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN IN | | | CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 | | | FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-07 13:10:01 | PLEASE ADDRESS PREVIOUS ENGINEERING COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-17-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-17-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-17-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-17 10:53:41 | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO MR. GONZALEZ?S | | | COMMENTS OF 5/9/19. | | | | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) | | | AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC | | | 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG | | | ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT | | | OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR | | | PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: HTTP://WPB.O | | | RG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLICATIONS/BACK | | | FLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF | | | ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER | | | OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY | | | CROSSINGS. | | | | | | SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | | | | CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH): | | | 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
05-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
05-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-09 11:52:11 | PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING: | | | | | | 1. ALTHOUGH THE CITY HAS ENOUGH WATER AND SEWER | | | CAPACITY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT THE PROPOSAL OF | | | RELOCATION AND ADDITION OF WATER SEWER FACILITIES SHALL | | | BE DISCUSSED WITH AND REQUESTED DIRECTLY TO THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILTIES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: | | | CONTACT OUR OFFICE TO SCHEDULE A MEETING AT YOUR | | | EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. | | | | | | MRS. POONAM KHAIRA KALKAT | | | DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMIN | | | (4TH FLOOR-CITY HALL) | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | PHONE: 822-2200 EXT: 2284 | | | FAX: 822-2278 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE ESTIMATED DAILY AVERAGE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER OF THE PROJECT. NOTE ON PLANS. | | | | | | 3. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT WILL REQUIRE RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS OVER | | | EXISTING UTILITIES. EASEMENTS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT | | | LIMITED TO THE WIDTH OF THE UNDERLYING CITY | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY PORTION ACQUIRED. | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-08 16:13:52 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT PLANNED | | | FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE. IF REQUIRED THE FDC | | | FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. WHERE REQUIRED, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR | | | FIRE ALARM PER THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY | | | LIFE SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | FIRE ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | FS 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-04-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-04-2020 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-04-2020 |
Time |
16:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-04 16:39:32 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB Z18030023 | | | FEBRUARY 4, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES | | | AND PALMS, INCLUDING ONES LOCATED IN THE EXISTING | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED | | | AND INCLUDED WITH THIS PLAN. | | | THE TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE | | | IDENTIFIED FOR ACCURATE LOCATION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | TREES WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN | | | WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | ADJACENT TO THE OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED | | | TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 94-305 (B)(11) IS RELATED TO | | | BUILDING SETBACKS OF ZERO FEET. IF BUILDING IS AT ZERO, | | | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT IF | | | THERE IS NOT A BUILDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | THE TENNIS COURTS ARE NOT BUILDINGS. | | | | | | ACTUAL CODE SAYS ?BUILDING? SO IF THERE IS NO BUILDING, | | | THERE IS NO EXEMPTION FROM THE BUFFER. THIS COMMENT HAS | | | BEEN ADJUSTED TO SHOW ACTUAL CODE LANGUAGE AND VERIFIED | | | WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | EAST BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. | | | SEE #3, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS AND REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED TREES FOR SOUTH SECTION OF EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | ? THE CHART DOES NOT REFLECT CODE CHANGES FROM 2018 | | | ? SHRUB POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED 51% IN 2 CATEGORIES. | | | TOTAL MUST BE 100% OR LESS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | LIGHTING IS SHOWN BUT IS LOCATED IN THE PARKING | | | OVERHANG IN 2 LOCATIONS AND MUST BE OUTSIDE THE PARKING | | | OVERHANG. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | LOCATIONS OF SOME UTILITIES ARE SHOWN, BUT WATER AND | | | SEWER LINES ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THEIR FINAL LOCATIONS | | | ON THE CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT | | | TREE SIZES PER CURRENT CODE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR | | | NATIVE (Y OR N) AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE (HIGH, MEDIUM OR | | | LOW), INSTEAD OF NOTES. | | | ADD COLUMN FOR NATIVE FOR CLARITY AND EASE OF REVIEW. | | | CHANGE LABEL OF COLUMN FROM STATUS TO NATIVE | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING UTILITIES PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER/LIFT STATION AREA. PLEASE REVISE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/24/19: | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE 12 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW AT | | | THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE. CODE LIMITS THE | | | NUMBER TO MAXIMUM 10 IN A ROW. | | | 14. SATISFIED. THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER MUST BE ADDED. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/16/19: | | | 15. SATISFIED. CHANGE REQUIRED SHADE TREES- OPEN SPACE | | | TO 19. | | | 16. SATISFIED. CONDITION NEEDS TO BE LISTED ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE TWO LIVE OAK TREES #9 AND #10. | | | SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. LIST EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO REMAIN OR | | | BE RELOCATED ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-13 13:30:15 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB Z18040023 | | | JANUARY 13, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES | | | AND PALMS, INCLUDING ONES LOCATED IN THE EXISTING | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED | | | AND INCLUDED WITH THIS PLAN. | | | THE TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE | | | IDENTIFIED FOR ACCURATE LOCATION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | TREES WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN | | | WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | ADJACENT TO THE OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED | | | TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 94-305 (B)(11) IS RELATED TO | | | BUILDING SETBACKS OF ZERO FEET. IF BUILDING IS AT ZERO, | | | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT IF | | | THERE IS NOT A BUILDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | THE TENNIS COURTS ARE NOT BUILDINGS. | | | | | | ACTUAL CODE SAYS ?BUILDING? SO IF THERE IS NO BUILDING, | | | THERE IS NO EXEMPTION FROM THE BUFFER. THIS COMMENT HAS | | | BEEN ADJUSTED TO SHOW ACTUAL CODE LANGUAGE AND VERIFIED | | | WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | EAST BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. | | | SEE #3, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS AND REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED TREES FOR SOUTH SECTION OF EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | ? THE CHART DOES NOT REFLECT CODE CHANGES FROM 2018 | | | ? SHRUB POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED 51% IN 2 CATEGORIES. | | | TOTAL MUST BE 100% OR LESS. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF | | | LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | LIGHTING IS SHOWN BUT IS LOCATED IN THE PARKING | | | OVERHANG IN 2 LOCATIONS AND MUST BE OUTSIDE THE PARKING | | | OVERHANG. | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER | | | AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | LOCATIONS OF SOME UTILITIES ARE SHOWN, BUT WATER AND | | | SEWER LINES ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THEIR FINAL LOCATIONS | | | ON THE CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT | | | TREE SIZES PER CURRENT CODE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR | | | NATIVE (Y OR N) AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE (HIGH, MEDIUM OR | | | LOW), INSTEAD OF NOTES. | | | ADD COLUMN FOR NATIVE FOR CLARITY AND EASE OF REVIEW. | | | CHANGE LABEL OF COLUMN FROM STATUS TO NATIVE | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING UTILITIES PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER/LIFT STATION AREA. PLEASE REVISE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/24/19: | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE 12 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW AT | | | THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE. CODE LIMITS THE | | | NUMBER TO MAXIMUM 10 IN A ROW. | | | 14. SATISFIED. THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER MUST BE ADDED. | | | | | | THESE COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE 10/16/19 REVIEW, | | | BUT WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER | | | OR ON THE PLANS: | | | | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/16/19: | | | 15. NOT SATISFIED. CHANGE REQUIRED SHADE TREES- OPEN | | | SPACE TO 19. | | | 16. NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION NEEDS TO BE LISTED ON THE | | | TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE TWO LIVE OAK TREES #9 AND | | | #10. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN | | | GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. | | | 17. NOT SATISFIED. LIST EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO | | | REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-16 16:20:01 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB Z18040023 | | | OCTOBER 16, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF | | | EXISTING TREES AND PALMS, INCLUDING ONES LOCATED IN THE | | | EXISTING BISCAYNE DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TO BE | | | ABANDONED AND INCLUDED WITH THIS PLAN. | | | THE TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE | | | IDENTIFIED FOR ACCURATE LOCATION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | TREES WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN | | | WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | ADJACENT TO THE OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED | | | TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 94-305 (B)(11) IS RELATED TO | | | BUILDING SETBACKS OF ZERO FEET. IF BUILDING IS AT ZERO, | | | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT IF | | | THERE IS NOT A BUILDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | THE TENNIS COURTS ARE NOT BUILDINGS. | | | | | | ACTUAL CODE SAYS ?BUILDING? SO IF THERE IS NO BUILDING, | | | THERE IS NO EXEMPTION FROM THE BUFFER. THIS COMMENT HAS | | | BEEN ADJUSTED TO SHOW ACTUAL CODE LANGUAGE AND VERIFIED | | | WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. | | | | | | | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THE EAST BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT | | | CHART. | | | SEE #3, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS AND REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED TREES FOR SOUTH SECTION OF EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | ? THE CHART DOES NOT REFLECT CODE CHANGES FROM 2018 | | | ? SHRUB POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED 51% IN 2 CATEGORIES. | | | TOTAL MUST BE 100% OR LESS. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND | | | SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS | | | WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT | | | TREE SIZES PER CURRENT CODE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD COLUMNS TO THE | | | PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE (Y OR N) AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE | | | (HIGH, MEDIUM OR LOW), INSTEAD OF NOTES. | | | ADD COLUMN FOR NATIVE FOR CLARITY AND EASE OF REVIEW. | | | CHANGE LABEL OF COLUMN FROM STATUS TO NATIVE | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING UTILITIES PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER/LIFT STATION AREA. PLEASE REVISE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/24/19: | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE 12 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW AT | | | THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE. CODE LIMITS THE | | | NUMBER TO MAXIMUM 10 IN A ROW. | | | 14. SATISFIED. THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER MUST BE ADDED. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/16/19: | | | 15. CHANGE REQUIRED SHADE TREES- OPEN SPACE TO 19. | | | 16. CONDITION NEEDS TO BE LISTED ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE TWO LIVE OAK TREES #9 AND #10. | | | SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. | | | 17. LIST EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO REMAIN OR BE | | | RELOCATED ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-28-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-28-2019 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-28-2019 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-28 11:32:34 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB Z18040023 | | | MAY 24, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING | | | TREES AND PALMS, INCLUDING ONES LOCATED IN THE EXISTING | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED | | | AND INCLUDED WITH THIS PLAN. | | | THE TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE | | | IDENTIFIED FOR ACCURATE LOCATION. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | TREES WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN | | | WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | ADJACENT TO THE OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED | | | TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D). | | | THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 94-305 (B)(11) IS RELATED TO | | | STRUCTURE SETBACKS OF ZERO FEET. IF BUILDING IS AT | | | ZERO, THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT POSSIBLE, | | | BUT IF THERE IS NOT A BUILDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | THE TENNIS COURTS ARE NOT STRUCTURES AND DO NOT HAVE | | | SETBACKS. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THE EAST BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT | | | CHART. | | | SEE #3 | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | ? THE CHART DOES NOT REFLECT CODE CHANGES FROM 2018 | | | ? SHRUB POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED 51% IN 2 CATEGORIES. | | | TOTAL MUST BE 100% OR LESS. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND | | | SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS | | | WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT | | | TREE SIZES PER CURRENT CODE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD COLUMNS TO THE | | | PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE (Y OR N) AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE | | | (HIGH, MEDIUM OR LOW), INSTEAD OF NOTES. | | | ADD COLUMN FOR NATIVE FOR CLARITY AND EASE OF REVIEW. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING UTILITIES PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER/LIFT STATION AREA. PLEASE REVISE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/24/19: | | | | | | 13. THERE ARE 12 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW AT THE | | | NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE. CODE LIMITS THE NUMBER | | | TO MAXIMUM 10 IN A ROW. | | | 14. THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND | | | AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER MUST BE ADDED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-04-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-04-2018 |
Time |
15:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-04-2018 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-04 15:10:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB Z18040023 | | | MAY 4, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES AND PALMS, | | | INCLUDING ONES LOCATED IN THE EXISTING BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED AND INCLUDED WITH | | | THIS PLAN. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | PLANTINGS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE | | | OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF | | | SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE EAST BUFFER | | | PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART | | | TO CURRENT CODE, AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 8. CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT TREE SIZES | | | PER CURRENT CODE. | | | | | | 9. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES MEET THE | | | 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | 10. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | 11. PLEASE ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE (Y | | | OR N) AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE (HIGH, MEDIUM OR LOW), | | | INSTEAD OF NOTES. | | | | | | 12. LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN AND ENGINEERING UTILITIES | | | PLAN ARE NOT CONSISTENT FOR THE DUMPSTER/LIFT STATION | | | AREA. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-13 15:08:17 | PASSED WITH PROVISO: | | | | | | 1- AS PER LOS SUMMARY PROVIDED ON 12/6/19, SINCE THERE | | | IS NO CHANGE ANTICIPATED IN THE RATE OF SOLID WASTE, 2X | | | 96-GAL. WHEELED CANS SHOULD SUFFICE. THE CAN SHALL BE | | | STRORED INDOOR AT ALL THE TIME, AND ROLLED OUT ON THE | | | SERVICE DAYS ONLY. | | | 2- SHOULD THERE BE ANY NEED FOR A DUMPSTER IN FUTURE | | | FOR THE FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB, A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND | | | APPROVAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-08 19:27:15 | ENCLOSURE MUST HAVE ADDITIONAL PIN HOLES PLACED TO THE | | | OUTSIDE WHERE THE GATE ENCLOSURE FOR THE DUMPSTER IS | | | LOCATED. THESE PIN HOLES MUST ALLOW THE GATES TO STAY | | | OPEN WHILE THE DUMPSTER IS SERVICE WITH NO CHANCE TO | | | OPEN. | | | | | | WE NEED TO SEE AN AUTO TURN INTO THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | FOR A 35' MACK FRONT LOADER WITH DUAL AXLES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-05-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-05-2020 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-06-2020 |
Time |
08:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-05 16:07:02 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | JANUARY 29, 2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE AND INCLUDE THE | | | STATUS FROM THE STORMWATER 4 REVIEW. | | | | | | 1. CCTV REPORT OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEMS RECEIVED LAST | | | WEEK. MAP SHOWING STRUCTURE NUMBERS RECEIVED ON | | | 1/13/2020. THE CCTV VIDEOS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THE VIIDEOS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | REVIEWED TO SEE THE CONDITION OF THE STORM PIPES. THE | | | SITE PLAN CAN BE APPROVED WITH THE PROVISION THAT ANY | | | PIPE REHABILITATION MAY NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED ON THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. LOCATE STRUCTURE S-202 TO AVOID MODIFYING ADJACENT | | | DRIVEWAY. STRUCTURE WILL NEED TO BE LOCATED AT EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT INSTEAD OF AT SIDEWALK, PERHAPS FURTHER WEST. | | | [SATISFIED} THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WAS MOVED TO THE | | | WEST OF THE EXISTING BANYAN TREE AND AT THE EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT. | | | | | | 3. PIPE BETWEEN S-202 AND S-203 IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY AND ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. | | | [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE FOR BISCAYNE DRIVE IS NOW ROUTED | | | THROUGH THE APPICANT'S SITE. A DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL | | | BE NEEDED FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE CITY PRIOR TO | | | FIRST BUILDING C.O. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE INLET ON | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE THAT WILL BE MODIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] THIS CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE INLET ON FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE THAT WILL BE MODIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY ENGINEERING PERMIT | | | FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 5. MOVE THE WEIR FROM CS-1 TO S-103. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 6. CONSIDER SLOPING THE PIPE BETWEEN S-101 AND S-102. | | | [NO LONGER APPLICABLE] DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS CHANGED AND | | | STRUCTURES WERE RE-NUMBERED. | | | | | | 7. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE HAVE ON THE EXISTING FICUS/BANYAN TREES? | | | MEASURES WILL NEED TO BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THE TREES | | | DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 8. THE STREET LIGHT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE IS LOCATED IN THE | | | PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ABANDONED. | | | [NOT ADDRESSED] THE STREET LIGHT RELOCATION WILL NEED | | | TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 9. SHOW EASEMENT FOR NEW STORM PIPE CROSSING PROPERTY | | | SOUTH OF BISCAYNE DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | [NO LONGER APPLICABLE] DRAINAGE SYSTEM LAYOUT MODIFIED | | | TO DRAIN THROUGH SITE. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE INFORMATION BETWEEN THE | | | PIPE BETWEEN S-201 AND S-202 AND THE EXISTING SEWER AND | | | WATER MAINS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] THIS INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED FOR | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ABOUT 100 FEET WEST OF THE PROPOSED | | | ABANDONMENT LINE. LOCATE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS AND | | | SPOT GRADES AT LOW/HIGHT POINTS AND GRADE BREAKS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] TO BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 12. PROVIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CONCRETE APRON AND DROP | | | CURB FOR THE DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO DRIVE. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] TO BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NEW AND CAN BE INCLUDED AS | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROVISOS. | | | | | | 13. PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE FOR THE PIPE BETWEEN CS-1 | | | AND S-103, PREFEREABLY WITH INVERTS HIGHER THAN THE | | | PIPE BETWEEN S-103 AND THE INLET ON FLAMINGO DRIVE. | | | | | | 14. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE INFORMATION FOR THE | | | STORM PIPE BETWEEN CS-1 AND S-103 AND THE PROPOSED FIRE | | | LINE. | | | | | | 15. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE INFORMATION FOR THE | | | STORM PIPE BETWEEN S-201 AND S-101 AND THE PROPOSED | | | SANITARY LATERAL. | | | | | | 16. REMOVE THE TWO EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS ON FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE AND INSTALL TYPE 'D' CURB ALONG THE EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT. REPLACE THE SIDEWALK IF IT EXCEEDS MAX. ADA | | | 2.0% SLOPE. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
10:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-13 10:04:31 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | JANUARY 2, 2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. CCTV REPORT OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEMS RECEIVED LAST | | | WEEK. MAP SHOWING STRUCTURE NUMBERS RECEIVED ON | | | 1/13/2020. THE CCTV VIDEOS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. LOCATE STRUCTURE S-202 TO AVOID MODIFYING ADJACENT | | | DRIVEWAY. STRUCTURE WILL NEED TO BE LOCATED AT EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT INSTEAD OF AT SIDEWALK, PERHAPS FURTHER WEST. | | | | | | 3. PIPE BETWEEN S-202 AND S-203 IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY AND ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE INLET ON | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE THAT WILL BE MODIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | 5. MOVE THE WEIR FROM CS-1 TO S-103. | | | | | | 6. CONSIDER SLOPING THE PIPE BETWEEN S-101 AND S-102. | | | | | | 7. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE HAVE ON THE EXISTING FICUS/BANYAN TREES? | | | | | | 8. THE STREET LIGHT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE IS LOCATED IN THE | | | PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ABANDONED. | | | | | | 9. SHOW EASEMENT FOR NEW STORM PIPE CROSSING PROPERTY | | | SOUTH OF BISCAYNE DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE INFORMATION BETWEEN THE | | | PIPE BETWEEN S-201 AND S-202 AND THE EXISTING SEWER AND | | | WATER MAINS. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ABOUT 100 FEET WEST OF THE PROPOSED | | | ABANDONMENT LINE. LOCATE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS AND | | | SPOT GRADES AT LOW/HIGHT POINTS AND GRADE BREAKS. | | | | | | 12. PROVIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CONCRETE APRON AND DROP | | | CURB FOR THE DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO DRIVE. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-09-2019 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-09-2019 |
Time |
11:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-09 11:05:26 | OCTOBER 7, 2019 PACKAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE ENGINEERING | | | PLANS. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-21-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-21-2019 |
Time |
13:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-21-2019 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-21 13:23:20 | APRIL 26, 2019 PACKAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE ENGINEERING | | | PLANS. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-09-2018 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-09-2018 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-09 14:49:30 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE FROM THE INLET ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF BISCAYNE ROAD APPEARS TO CROSS THE ADJOINING | | | PROPERTY. THE PIPE SHOULD BE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | AND/OR APPLICANT?S PROPERTY WITHOUT THE NEED FOR A | | | CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPOSED MANHOLE AND STORM PIPE ON FLAMINGO DR. | | | NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED TO OUTSIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. IT | | | ONLY CONVEYS STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE APPLICANT?S | | | PROPERTY. | | | | | | 3. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 4. ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE FOR WATER QUALITY | | | TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW LIMITATION PER SFWMD CRITERIA | | | FOR RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. | | | | | | 5. PERMIT WILL BE NEEDED TO WORK WITHIN THE F.E.C. | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 6. 2017 FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREA ARE NOW IN EFFECT. THE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE | | | AT HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX? | | | UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE BOUNDARY | | | SURVEY. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-28-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-28-2020 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-28 13:06:35 | CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. BISCAYNE WILL NEED FINAL APPROVAL FOR ABANDONMENT. | | | 2. AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING OVER THE | | | WATER AND SEWER PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. | | | 3. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-06-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-06-2020 |
Time |
13:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-06 13:18:19 | 1. BISCAYNE WILL NEED FINAL APPROVAL FOR ABANDONMENT. | | | 2. AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING OVER THE | | | WATER AND SEWER PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 3. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 4. NOTE: THE GREENE SCHOOL PLAT AND REMOVAL OF UTILITY | | | SERVICES HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED. THERE ARE ALSO | | | EXPIRED TCO'S ON BOTH BUILDINGS. COMPLETION OF THE PLAT | | | AND THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING SERVICES WILL BE | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEERING OF THE HEALTH | | | CLUB. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-09-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-09-2020 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-09 10:26:12 | 1. WILL NEED TO SEE HOW THE BRIDGE OVER THE UTILITIES | | | IS DESIGNED. | | | 2. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 3. AS OF 1/9/2020, CCTV HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED. | | | 4. PERMIT FROM FEC WILL BE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTION TO | | | EXISTING DRAINAGE IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. APPROVAL WILL BE | | | NEEDED FROM TRACY WARD, STORMWATER ENGINEER. POST CCTV | | | WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED. CONSIDER CONNECTING BISCAYNE | | | DRAINAGE THRU SITE TO FLAMINGO INSTEAD OF FEC. | | | 5. ABANDONMENT OF BISCAYNE WILL NEED TO BE FINALIZED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-18-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
10-18-2019 |
Time |
09:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-18 09:14:28 | 1. WILL REVIEW UPON RECEIPT OF SURVEY AND ENGINEERING | | | PLANS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-21-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-21-2019 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-21 09:13:30 | 1. NO PRELIMINARY ENG. PLANS. WE NEED TO SEE HOW THE | | | "VAULT"SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED AND APPROVED BY THE FEC. | | | BOTH WATER AND SEWER AND POSSIBLY DRAINAGE WILL NEED TO | | | BE REPLACED. PLEASE NOTE THERE MAY BE A LONG LEAD TIME | | | FOR FEC APPROVAL. | | | 2. NEED TO SEE AUTO-TURN OFF OF BISCAYNE FOR EMERGENCY | | | VEHICLES. | | | 3. AN ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FROM BISCAYNE TO | | | FLAMINGO. SIGNAGE SHOULD BE ADDED FOR EXIT TO FLAMINGO | | | FROM BISCAYNE. | | | 4. ADD ANOTHER ROLL-UP DOOR ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING IN LINE WITH THE UTILITIES. | | | 5. NEED CCTV FOR SANITARY IN BISCAYNE AND DRAINAGE IN | | | FEC BETWEEN BISCAYNE AND FLAMINGO. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-07-2018 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-07 09:25:43 | 1. PROPOSED RE-ROUTING OF FORCE MAIN AND WATER MAIN IS | | | NOT ACCEPTABLE. APPLICANT SHOULD HAVE MET WITH | | | UTILITIES TO DISCUSS. | | | 2. PROVIDE FULL SIZE COPY OF SURVEY. | | | 3. LIFT STATION AND DUMPSTER OCCUPY SAME LOCATION. | | | 4. T- TURNAROUND NOT AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. SITE PLAN | | | SHOWS IT ENCROACHING ONTO ADJOINING PROPERTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-09-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-09 15:15:54 | PASSED, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. THE DESIGN PLAN SHALL INCORPORATE MODIFICATIONS OF | | | PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON FLAMINGO DRIVE ALONG THE SITE | | | FRONTAGE TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH THE MARKED ON-STREET | | | PARKING SPACES DURING PERMITTING. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-15-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-15 10:38:22 | 1. PER FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 316.1945, NO PARKING | | | SHOULD BE ALLOWED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE NEAREST RAIL OF | | | A RAILROAD CROSSING. ALSO, SHOW PAVEMENT MARKING AND | | | OTHER TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY ELEMENTS ON FLAMINGO DRIVE | | | EAST TO THE RAILROAD. | | | 2. CONSIDER PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE TO THE HEALTH CLUB. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-30-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-30 17:21:44 | 1. PROVIDE TURNAROUND FOR BISCAYNE DRIVE ABANDONMENT, | | | OR PROVIDE AN ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE PARKING AISLE | | | BETWEEN BISCAYNE AND FLAMINGO. THIS WOULD RESOLVE THE | | | TURNAROUND ISSUE ON BISCAYNE IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH | | | THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. | | | 2. PROVIDE DESIGNATED TURNAROUND SPACES ON-SITE. PER | | | CITY CODE, 94-485(M), ALL VEHICULAR MOVEMENT AND | | | MANEUVERING MUST BE ON-SITE. | | | 3. CONSIDER PROVIDING RAISED CURB ON BOTH ENDS OF THE | | | ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. MODIFY THE DESIGN ON THE EAST | | | END OF THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES TO MATCH THAT OF | | | THE WEST END. ALSO, SHOW PAVEMENT MARKING AND OTHER | | | TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY ELEMENTS ON FLAMINGO DRIVE EAST TO | | | THE RAILROAD. | | | 4. STRAIGHTEN THE NORTHBOUND DRIVEWAY EXIT AT FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE. | | | 5. CONSIDER PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE TO THE HEALTH CLUB. | | | 6. AN INTERIOR ISLAND SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 10 | | | PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-08 17:42:45 | - PROVIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY | | | CODE SECTION 94-311 OR DOCUMENTATION DEMONSTRATING THAT | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311(C) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY | | | REQUIRED IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | - TURNAROUND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | ABANDONMENT. IT APPEARS THAT A T TURNAROUND IS BEING | | | PROVIDED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE TURNAROUND MUST BE | | | PROVIDED ON THE APPLICANT PROPERTY. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING AN ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE | | | PARKING AISLE BETWEEN BISCAYNE AND FLAMINGO. THIS WOULD | | | RESOLVE THE TURNAROUND ISSUE ON BISCAYNE IS ALSO | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION | | | ELEMENT. | | | - SITE PLAN MUST SHOW DRIVEWAYS ON OTHER SIDE OF EACH | | | STREET, E.G. FLAMINGO DRIVE. | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-06-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-06 13:32:10 | ** ZONING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ** | | | | | | 1.) A RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT FOR THE PORTION OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT ABUTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE | | | NORTH AND SOUTH, AND THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD | | | (FEC) RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EAST SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE | | | CITY COMMISSION AND RECORDED BY THE CLERK OF PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS. | | | | | | 2.) SERVICE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPL AND COMCAST | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO | | | THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE | | | SUBMISSION OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS. | | | | | | 3.) PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FROM HISTORIC | | | PRESERVATION BOARD (HPB) CASE NO. 18-27: A.) ALL | | | ENGINEERING CONCERNS REGARDING UTILITY WORK SHALL BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO PERMIT APPLICATION. IF THIS CREATES | | | A SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO THE DESIGN, THE PLANS | | | WILL RETURN TO THE HPB FOR REVIEW; B.) THE TREE ALONG | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE SHALL BE RETAINED TO PROVIDE A SHIELD | | | AND FRAME THE VIEW OF THE BUILDING DOWN THE STREET. IF | | | THE TREE CANNOT BE SAVED A NEW ONE OF SIMILAR SIZE AND | | | CANOPY SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF | | | OCCUPANCY (C.O.); C.) NO EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED FOR THE OUTDOOR COURTS. | | | | | | 4.) ANY WALL MOUNTED SIGN(S) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | SIGNAGE REGULATIONS OF SECTION 94-149(13) OF THE ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-13 14:46:13 | COMMENTS FROM THE 12/20/2019 RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS: | | | | | | 1.) THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH THE PLACEMENT OF TWO (2) | | | LIGHT POLES WITHIN THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG FOR | | | VEHICLES. PLEASE SHIFT THE LIGHT POLES SO THAT THERE IS | | | NO CONFLICT. ALSO, ONCE THE POLES HAVE BEEN RELOCATED, | | | PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AS THE | | | LIGHT POLES ARE REFLECTED IN ALL PLANS (I.E. LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL PLANS). | | | | | | 2.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE STILL INCORRECT. | | | SINCE THERE WILL BE TWO (2) RACKS, THE PROVIDED NUMBER | | | OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IS 4 (NOT 2). | | | | | | 3.) HEIGHT INFORMATION MISSING FOR THE PROPOSED FENCE | | | AROUND THE OUTDOOR COURTS. HEIGHT MUST COMPLY WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-302(C). | | | | | | 4.) LENGTH OF THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY IS 425.02 | | | FT. (NOT 250.02 FT.), AS EXTRACTED FROM THE SURVEY. | | | PLEASE CORRECT FOR ACCURACY. | | | | | | 5.) LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED | | | BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10 | | | PAPER COPIES, 1 REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X 11 INCHES | | | AND 1 SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC | | | COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-16 16:58:38 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION IS A COPY | | | AND IS OUTDATED (DATED 12/14/16). PLEASE PROVIDE AN | | | UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THE SURVEY MUST BE | | | ABSTRACTED, SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY MUST ALSO | | | ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY AND | | | IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREAS (I.E. THERE SEEMS TO BE AN | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT IS NOT | | | REFLECTED IN THE SURVEY OR THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | HOWEVER, IT IS REFLECTED IN THE CIVIL PLANS). [5/4/2018 | | | AND 5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) THE PROJECT REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF PB CASE NO. | | | 1751 (ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, JUST | | | WEST OF THE FEC RAILROAD). PB 1751 IS CURRENTLY PENDING | | | WITH THE PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, STATING | | | THAT THE PROPOSE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS OF THE OF THE | | | COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 4.) THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL NEED TO DETERMINE | | | IF THE ON-STREET PARKING ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IS | | | PERMITTED. DOCUMENTATION MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM SANITATION THAT | | | THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS ADEQUATE. | | | [5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) A NEW LIFT STATION WAS DESIGNED AT THE SAME | | | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, PER THE | | | ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL (RECEIVED 3/13/2018). WHAT HAPPENED | | | TO THE LIFT STATION? IT SEEMED TO HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM | | | THE PLANS (I.E. HAS IT BEEN RELOCATED AND IF SO, | | | WHERE?). [5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 3.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. PLEASE | | | REVISE. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] [5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT ? | | | THE MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT | | | IS 2 AND NOT 1.] | | | | | | 4.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT | | | PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE AND DIMENSION ALL PROJECTIONS FROM THE | | | BUILDING (I.E. CANOPIES, ETC.). [5/4/2018 REPEAT | | | COMMENT ? NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.] | | | | | | 5.) REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION FOR THE 0 FT. INTERIOR | | | SIDE SETBACK ALLIANCE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | | | ABUTTING THE RAILROAD TRACK. REFERENCE: ZLDR | | | S.94-305(B)(11)] [5/4/2018 AND 5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT | | | ? NOTE IN SITE PLAN IS INCOMPLETE AND ALSO DUPLICATED. | | | PLEASE CLEAN-UP!] | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE VERIFY THE WEST BUILDING SETBACK. IT SEEMS | | | TO BE INCORRECT IN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE. | | | ALSO, WHY IS THERE A NOTATION (*) FOR THE WEST SIDE | | | SETBACK? | | | | | | 7.) NOTE REFERENCING THE SURVEY INDICATES THE SURVEY | | | WAS UPDATED ON 8/1/19; HOWEVER, STAFF HAD NOT RECEIVED | | | THIS UPDATED SURVEY. PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | | | 8.) CALCULATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABULAR DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 9.) THE CITY'S DIMENSIONAL STANDARD FOR DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURES HAVE CHANGED. PLEASE CONTACT MATT HERJAZI IN | | | THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (561-822-2045) FOR DETAILS. | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE PLAN AND IN | | | THE DETAIL WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED. | | | | | | 10.) STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE BICYCLE RACK CAN BE PLACED | | | CLOSER TO THE FRONT ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING AND | | | UNDERNEATH A CANOPY FOR PROTECTION FROM THE ELEMENTS. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 11.) PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THE 6 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL | | | WILL RUN ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE WEST PROPERTY | | | LINE, PER HPB CASE NO. 18-27 CONDITION. IT IS UNCLEAR | | | IN THE SITE PLAN. ALSO, THE WALL MUST BE REFLECTED IN | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE | | | OF IDENTIFYING THE FIRST 25 FT. FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY | | | LINE? | | | | | | 12.) THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE IS 20 FT. (NOT 25 | | | FT.). | | | | | | 13.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE FIRST FLOOR IS | | | INCORRECT IN THE SITE PLAN (I.E. SHOWS 2,450 SQ. FT. | | | NOT 31,307 SQ. FT.) | | | | | | 14.) THE "S" IS MISSING IN THE ?HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING AND ABUTS THE RAILROAD ROW. | | | [ZLDR S.94-443(B)] [5/4/2018 AND 5/29/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABULAR. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS) | | | | | | 1.) DIMENSIONS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS ARE | | | STILL MISSING FROM THE PLANS. | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY/ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE | | | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO | | | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT | | | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES OR PUBLIC | | | THOROUGHFARES. A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE | | | PLAN PLAN TO ADDRESS COMPLIANCE. [5/4/2018 AND | | | 5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PER ZLDR SEC.94-149(13)A., ONLY ONE (1) | | | SINGLE-FACED SIGN IS PERMITTED. THE PROPOSED | | | FREESTANDING SIGN IS DOUBLE-SIDED, WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | 2.) REVISE SIGNAGE NOTE ON SHEET SP-1, TO STATE "ALL | | | SIGNAGE DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT AND | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH ZLDR S.94-149(13)." ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS WITH | | | ANY PROPOSED SIGNAGE ON THE ELEVATIONS. | | | | | | 3.) IT?S NOT CLEAR WHY THE ONLY MONUMENT SIGN WITHIN | | | THE PROJECT (AS SPECIFIED IN THE RESPONSE TO STAFF?S | | | COMMENTS, DATED 9/27), IS NOTED AS ?DETAIL A? IN THE | | | PLANS. THIS IMPLIES THAT THERE ARE MULTIPLE | | | DETAILS/SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY. THE ?A? SHOULD BE | | | ELIMINATED IF IT REFERENCES THE ONLY FREESTANDING SIGN | | | ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE ADDRESS. [5/29/19 MODIFIED | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NOT ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE | | | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-29-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
05-29-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
05-29-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-29 16:12:14 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION IS A COPY | | | AND IS OUTDATED (DATED 12/14/16). PLEASE PROVIDE AN | | | UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THE SURVEY MUST BE | | | ABSTRACTED, SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY MUST ALSO | | | ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY AND | | | IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREAS (I.E. THERE SEEMS TO BE AN | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT IS NOT | | | REFLECTED IN THE SURVEY OR THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | HOWEVER, IT IS REFLECTED IN THE CIVIL PLANS). [5/4/2018 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF PB CASE NO. | | | 1751 (ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, JUST | | | WEST OF THE FEC RAILROAD). PB 1751 IS CURRENTLY PENDING | | | WITH THE PLANNING DIVISION, AS THE TURNAROUND ON | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE MUST BE RESOLVED TO STAFF?S SATISFACTION | | | PRIOR TO THE ABANDONMENT APPLICATION MOVING FORWARD. | | | [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT - STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THIS | | | ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED. DOCUMENTATION FROM THE | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS ALSO REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT | | | THE ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED.] | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) IT IS UNCERTAIN IF THE DRIVE/TURNAROUND ON THE | | | SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, LOCATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT IS EXISTING/HAS BEEN | | | MODIFIED. THIS MUST BE CLARIFIED IN THE PLANS. ANY USE | | | OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR ANY VEHICULAR | | | TURN-AROUND IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. [5/4/2018 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM SANITATION THAT | | | THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS ADEQUATE. | | | | | | 3.) A NEW LIFT STATION WAS DESIGNED AT THE SAME | | | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, PER THE | | | ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL (RECEIVED 3/13/2018). WHAT HAPPENED | | | TO THE LIFT STATION? IT SEEMED TO HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM | | | THE PLANS (I.E. HAS IT BEEN RELOCATED AND IF SO, | | | WHERE?). | | | | | | 4.) THE BICYCLE RACK IN THE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE | | | DETAILED PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF SHEET SP-1. THE | | | DETAIL MUST MATCH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 5.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. PLEASE | | | REVISE. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE 8 FT. X 15 FT. CANOPY | | | STRUCTURE LOCATED BETWEEN OUTDOOR COURTS 1 AND 2. THE | | | DETAIL IS STILL MISSING FROM THE PLAN. [5/4/2018 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 7.) SHOW THE LOCATION OF ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT | | | PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT (I.E. ROOFTOP OR GROUND | | | LEVEL). ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM | | | PUBLIC VIEW. [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 8.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT | | | PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE AND DIMENSION ALL PROJECTIONS FROM THE | | | BUILDING (I.E. CANOPIES, ETC.). [5/4/2018 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 9.) REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION FOR THE 0 FT. INTERIOR | | | SIDE SETBACK ALLIANCE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | | | ABUTTING THE RAILROAD TRACK. REFERENCE: ZLDR | | | S.94-305(B)(11)] [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 10.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR: INCLUDE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE INFORMATION | | | FOR THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS (I.E. IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS | | | SURFACE AREA, LANDSCAPE AREA, OPEN SPACE AREA, ETC.); | | | BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION SHOULD INCLUDED THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED HEIGHT | | | OF THE BUILDING; PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT - | | | PLEASE REVISE. [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 11.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS TABULAR: THE MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE SETBACK | | | TO THE WEST SEEMS TO BE 10 FT. (NOT 57.1 FT. AS NOTED | | | IN THE PLANS). SETBACK MUST BE MEASURED FROM THE | | | CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | [ZLDR S.94-149(2)] [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 12.) ONE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR EVERY TEN (10) PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. THE PARKING | | | AREA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS STANDARD. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(3)] | | | | | | 13.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED 6 FT. HIGH WALL | | | ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 14.) THE NOTE REFERENCING THE SURVEY AT THE BOTTOM OF | | | SHEET SP-1 IS INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS WITH A NEW | | | SURVEY. | | | | | | 15.) REFERENCE TO HPB CASE NO. 18-27 SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | IN THE PLANS AS"A NOTE. | | | | | | 16.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE NUMBERS (1ST AND 2ND | | | FLOOR) IN THE SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS | | | PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING AND ABUTS THE RAILROAD ROW. | | | [ZLDR S.94-443(B)] [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND | | | SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS) | | | | | | 1.) ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLAN SHALL BE CONSISTENT | | | (INCLUDING ALL ACCESS POINTS AND OPENINGS, STRUCTURAL | | | OVERHANGS, ETC.). ELEVATIONS SHOW SOME PROJECTIONS THAT | | | ARE NOT REFLECTED OR DIMENSIONED IN THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) DETAILS IN THE CONCEPT FLOOR PLANS (SHEET A-1.01) | | | DO NOT MATCH THE DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE REVISED SITE | | | PLAN (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE | | | ILLUSTRATED IN THE CONCEPT FLOOR PLANS (SHEET A-1.01). | | | THIS IS TO ENSURE THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACK | | | MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR PLACEMENT NEAR THE PRINCIPAL | | | ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 4.) THE SQUARE FOOTAGE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) STAFF HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE CONDITION FROM HISTORIC | | | PRESERVATION THAT NO EXTERIOR LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED | | | FOR THE OUTDOOR COURTS; HOWEVER, WILL THERE BE ANY | | | LIGHTING PROVIDED ON THE BUILDING AND/OR ELSEWHERE ON | | | THE PROPERTY? IF SO, WHERE WILL THE FIXTURES BE PLACED? | | | A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWING THE ILLUMINATION OF ANY | | | LIGHTING ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY/ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE | | | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO | | | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT | | | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES OR PUBLIC | | | THOROUGHFARES. A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO ADDRESS COMPLIANCE. [5/4/2018 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) AT MINIMUM, THERE SHOULD BE A NOTE PROVIDED IN THE | | | PLANS STATING THAT "WALL SIGNAGE WILL BE ADDRESSED AT | | | TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGN | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE RTD DISTRICT PER ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SECTION 94-149(13)." PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT PER ZLDR S.94-149(13)(B.), ONLY ONE WALL | | | SIGN, NOT TO EXCEED THE LESSER OF ONE PERCENT OF GROSS | | | WALL AREA OR 16 SQ. FT. SHALL BE PERMITTED. ACCORDING | | | TO THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS, A TOTAL OF TWO (2) SIGNS, | | | WHICH LOOKS TO EXCEED THE SIGN AREA REQUIREMENTS, HAVE | | | BEEN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2.) DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN WILL | | | NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW BY ILLUSTRATING THE 20 FT. BY 20 FT. | | | VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-305(E). | | | | | | 3.) ARE THERE SUPPOSED TO BE MULTIPLE MONUMENT SIGNS ON | | | THE PROPERTY? SIGN DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 SHOWS THAT THE | | | SIGN DETAIL IS DETAIL "A". PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NOT ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE | | | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-04-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
05-04-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
05-04-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-04 10:43:35 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-10, NO APPLICATION WILL BE | | | PROCESSED AND NO REVIEWS WILL BE FURTHER CONDUCTED BY | | | THE CITY UNTIL THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS CLEARED ALL DEBTS | | | TO THE CITY. THERE SEEMS TO BE OUTSTANDING LIENS ON A | | | PROPERTY OWNED BY THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | 2.) THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION IS A COPY | | | AND IS OUTDATED (DATED 12/14/16). PLEASE PROVIDE AN | | | UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THE SURVEY MUST BE | | | ABSTRACTED, AND SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY MUST ALSO | | | ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY AND | | | IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREAS (I.E. THERE SEEMS TO BE AN | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT IS NOT | | | REFLECTED IN THE SURVEY OR THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS; HOWEVER, IT IS REFLECTED IN THE CIVIL PLANS). | | | | | | 3.) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS TO BE REVIEWED BY HISTORIC | | | FOR COMPATIBILITY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ELEVATIONS | | | SUBMITTED FOR HISTORIC REVIEW DOES NOT MATCH THE | | | ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION. | | | | | | 4.) THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF PB 1751 | | | (ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, JUST WEST | | | OF THE FEC RAILROAD). PB 1751 IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH | | | THE PLANNING DIVISION, AS THE TURNAROUND ON BISCAYNE | | | DRIVE MUST BE RESOLVED TO STAFFS' SATISFACTION PRIOR TO | | | THE ABANDONMENT APPLICATION MOVING FORWARD. | | | | | | 5.) ALL PLANS MUST BE CONSISTENT. THERE SEEMS TO BE | | | CONFLICTING INFORMATION IN THE PLANS SUBMITTED (I.E. | | | SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS VS. CIVIL PLAN). | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE TURNAROUND ON THE | | | PROPERTY WHERE THE SITE DEAD ENDS ON BISCAYNE DRIVE. | | | THE CURRENT DESIGN WILL HAVE VEHICLES BACKING ONTO A | | | PRIVATE RESIDENCE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE TURNAROUND MUST BE | | | PROVIDED ON SITE. | | | | | | 2.) SANITATION COLLECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE. | | | PLEASE RELOCATE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 3.) THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (SHEET SP-1) | | | AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NEW LIFT STATION | | | (SHEET C1.0) ARE LOCATED IN THE SAME SPOT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS THIS DISCREPANCY. | | | | | | 4.) BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE PRINCIPAL | | | ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE | | | RACK IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND | | | AWAY FROM THE MAIN ENTRANCE. PLEASE RELOCATE THE | | | BICYCLE RACK CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. | | | [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | 5.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN | | | THE SITE DATA TABULAR. | | | | | | 6.) THE BICYCLE RACK IN THE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE | | | DETAIL PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF SHEET SP-1. PLEASE | | | REVISE FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 7.) THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH | | | THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S BICYCLE | | | PARKING GUIDELINES. | | | | | | 8.) BASED ON THE BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED IN THE | | | PLAN, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CANNOT EXCEED 40 FT. | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOW THE BUILDING HEIGHT | | | EXCEEDING 40 FT. [ZLDR S.94-149(6)] | | | | | | 9.) THERE IS A VEHICULAR TURNAROUND THAT RESEMBLES A | | | PARKING SPACE WITHIN THE PARKING AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 10.) THERE SEEMS TO BE AN 8 FT. X 15 FT. STRUCTURE | | | LOCATED BETWEEN OUTDOOR COURTS 1 AND 2. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A DETAIL OF THIS STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 11.) SHOW THE LOCATION OF ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT | | | PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW (HEDGE, PARAPET, ETC.). | | | | | | 12.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT | | | PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(20] | | | | | | 13.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A WIDER LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS | | | PROVIDED BETWEEN THE OUTDOOR COURTS AND THE ABUTTING | | | RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 14.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR: THE CONTROL NUMBER FOR THE PROJECT IS: ISPR | | | 18-07/Z18030023; INCLUDE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | INFORMATION FOR THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS (I.E. TOTAL | | | BUILDING COVERAGE, IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS AREA, LANDSCAPE | | | AREA, OPEN SPACE AREA, ETC.); BUILDING HEIGHT | | | INFORMATION SHOULD INCLUDE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED | | | IN THE DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE | | | BUILDING; THE NUMBER OF STORIES IS 2 (NOT 1); PARKING | | | CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS TABULAR: THE MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE SETBACK | | | TO THE WEST SEEMS TO BE 10 FT. (NOT 57.1 FT. AS NOTED | | | IN THE PLANS). SETBACK MUST BE MEASURED FROM THE | | | CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | ALSO, PLEASE ADD THE SETBACK DIMENSION IN THE PLAN. | | | [ZLDR S.94-149(2)] | | | | | | 16.) REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION FOR THE 0 FT. INTERIOR | | | SIDE SETBACK ALLOWANCE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES | | | ABUTTING THE RAILROAD TRACK. | | | | | | | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING AND ABUTS THE RAILROAD ROW. | | | [ZLDR S.94-443(B)] | | | | | | 2.) NO TREES/PALMS SHALL BE REMOVED ON THE PROPERTY | | | WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. | | | | | | 3.) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S | | | LANDSCAPE PLANNER. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL (ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLAN): | | | | | | 1.) THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS INDICATE THAT THE OVERALL | | | HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS 48.5 FT.; HOWEVER, | | | THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING CANNOT EXCEED 40 FT., SINCE | | | THE MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE SETBACK PROVIDED IS 10 FT. | | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-149(6)] | | | | | | 2.) ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLAN SHALL BE CONSISTENT | | | (INCLUDING ALL ACCESS POINTS INTO THE BUILDING, ETC.). | | | | | | 3.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT | | | PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR | | | S.94-305(A)(20] | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) A LIGHTING PLAN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION | | | PACKET. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIGHTING PLAN WITH THE | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE | | | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO | | | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT | | | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC | | | THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE: | | | | | | 1.) WALL SIGN DETAIL REQUIRED. WALL SIGNAGE SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE RTD DISTRICT. | | | [ZLDR S.94-149(13)] | | | | | | 2.) ONLY ONE (1) WALL SIGN IS PERMITTED, NOT TO EXCEED | | | THE LESSER OF 1% OF GROSS WALL AREA OR 16 SQ. FT. [ZLDR | | | S.94-149(13) B.] | | | | | | 3.) THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE | | | RTD DISTRICT. PLEASE ADDRESS THE INCONSISTENCIES WITH | | | THE NUMBER OF SIGN FACES, SIGN HEIGHT AND SIGN WIDTH. | | | ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR A MONUMENT SIGN IN THE RTD | | | DISTRICT ARE PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-149(13) A. | | | | | | 4.) THE MONUMENT SIGN SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 10 | | | FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-149(13) A.] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT | | | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |