City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z18030013

Plan Review Stops For Project Z18030013

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-10-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	04-10-2018	Time	19:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	04-10-2018	Time	19:36	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-10 20:44:56	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A
	RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL
	INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
	APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
	ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE.

	3. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SERVING THE
	OFFICE SPACE. THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES DIRECTLY SERVING THE OFFICE SPACE. THE
	PARKING TABLE ON SITE AND PROJECT DATA SHEET A0.01
	STATES THAT 562 PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE
	OFFICE USE. THEREFORE 13 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE
	REQUIRED FOR OFFICE USE PER SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE. OFFICE LEVEL PLAN SHEETS A1.09,
	A1.10, AND A1.11 FOR LEVELS 9 THROUGH 18 ALL SHOW THAT
	ONLY ELEVATORS 1 THROUGH 5 SERVE THE OFFICE LEVELS.
	ONLY 4 OF THE PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE
	LOCATED AS THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THOSE
	ELEVATORS. OF THOSE 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, 2 ARE
	ON LEVEL 7 PLAN SHEET A1.07 AND 2 ARE ON LEVEL 8 PLAN
	SHEET A1.08. THE REMAINDER OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS A1.02 THOUGH A1.06, FOR
	LEVELS 2 THROUGH 6, AND NONE OF THOSE ARE THE CLOSEST
	PARKING SPACES TO ELEVATORS 1 THROUGH 5. SO, THERE ARE
	NOT ENOUGH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SERVING THE OFFICE
	SPACE. IT IS NOTED THAT ELEVATORS 1 THROUGH DO NOT STOP
	AT LEVELS 2 THROUGH 6 BUT THAT DOES NOT AFFECT THIS
	ISSUE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
	SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
	TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. A TOTAL OF 3 VAN
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED BUT ONLY 2 ARE
	SHOWN. LEVEL 2 PLAN SHEET A1.02 SHOWS 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES AND THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY
	OTHERS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, SO AN ADDITIONAL VAN
	ACCESSIBLE PARKIG SPACE IS REQUIREDPER SECTION 208.2.4
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE).

	5. EGRESS FROM THE SOUTH OFFICE SPACE ON LEVEL 2 AND
	LEVEL 4. EGRESS FROM THE OFFICE SPACE SHALL NOT PASS
	THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE. LEVEL 2 PLAN SHEET A1.02
	AND LEVEL 4 PLAN SHEET A1.04 SHOW ONE OF THE EGRESS
	PATHS FROM THE SOUTH (FERN ST) OFICE SPACE GOING
	THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE. SECTION 1016.2(2) OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE STATES THAT EGRESS FROM A SPACE
	SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH AN ADJOINING AREA UNLESS SUCH
	ADJOINING AREA AND THE SPACE SERVED ARE ACCESSORY TO
	ONE OR THE OTHER.

	6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	7. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. THE PARKING GARAGE APPEARS
	TO BE ENCLOSED AND MECHANICALLY VENTILATED. IF THE
	PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR
	SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN
	OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED
	PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE
	LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED
	METHODS.

	9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
	FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
	GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
	SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	10. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT WITH AN
	INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A
	SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
	MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
	1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	11. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION
	OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT,
	CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
	COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-11-2018		Cont ID
Sent By	Mgonzale			Date	04-11-2018	Time	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	mgonzale			Date	04-11-2018	Time	Sent To	I

Notes

2018-04-11 10:56:10	PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING:

	#1 UTILITY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN IN THE ROW
	APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT. PLEASE REQUEST LATEST
	AS-BUILTS FROM OUR CAD GROUP TO UPDATE PLAN.
	NEW SEWER MAIN WAS REPLACED IN EVERNIA.

	#2 LARGE DOMESTIC METER AND VAULT SHOWN IN THE ROW
	NEEDS TO MOVE ON-SITE IN AN EASEMENT JUST INSIDE THE
	PROPERTY, AS FUTURE ROAD ROW WILL NOT ALLOW SPACE FOR
	THIS METER.
	THIS METER MAY BE INSTALLED IN A FIRE RATED ROOM,
	INSTALLED ABOVE GROUND FOR CONVENIENCE.

	#3 WATER DEMANDS AS SHOWN ON SHEET C-6 WILL BE PROVIDED
	FOR EACH METER SERVING THE PROPERTY. INCLUDING ANY
	IRRIGATION AND/OR SMALLER WATER SERVICES SERVING THE
	BUILDING FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.

	#4 ALL EXISTING SERVICES SHALL BE SHOWN AND BE CUT BACK
	TO MAIN.

	#5 IF YOU DECIDE SERVICE OFF AN OLDER SANITARY SEWER
	MAIN, THEN A VIDEO ASSESMENT OF THE SEWER WILL BE
	REQUIRED TO SATISFY THIS SUBMITTAL.

	MANNY GONZALEZ
	SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
	(MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
	MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
	DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
	FAX: (561) 494-1116
	EMAIL: [email protected]
	HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS
	/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS

	IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF
	WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
	FREE."
	FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
	CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-08-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	05-08-2018	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	05-08-2018	Time	16:56	Sent To

Notes

2018-05-08 16:58:24	2ND REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM ANA MARIA
	APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, THE ATTACHED LETTER DATED
	APRIL 27, 2018, FROM LEO A DALY, AND INFORMATIONAL
	DOCUMENTS, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	04-05-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	04-05-2018	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	04-05-2018	Time	13:38	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-05 14:11:56	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
	TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
	NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
	HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY. PLEASE
	PROVIDE THE DIMENSION TO THE FIRE HYDRANT CLOSEST TO
	THE SOUTHERN LOCATED FDC AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE.

	18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
	18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
	THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
	BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
	APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	SECTION 18.4.

	PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
	FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
	POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
	APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
	CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
	AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
	SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
	AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
	PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.

	FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
	PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?

	8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
	SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
	DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM.
	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS
	OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN AMBULANCE STRETCHER
	76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE IN THE HORIZONTAL
	POSITION.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.
	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

	12. COMMAND ROOM
	THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
	CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
	THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
	A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
	DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
	B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
	C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
	FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
	EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
	OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
	BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
	E. A WORK TABLE.
	F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
	FOR THE BUILDING.
	G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
	CONTROL UNIT.
	H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
	THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
	I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
	SYSTEMS.
	J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
	K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
	PANELS
	L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
	M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
	TRANSFER FEATURES.
	O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
	BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
	P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
	Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1.
	R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
	SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
	PROVIDED

	13. RADIO
	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
	NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
	ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
	24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
	PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
	FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
	24.5.2.2.3.
	24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
	EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
	EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
	STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
	LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
	AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
	99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
	24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
	AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
	RADIO COVERAGE.
	24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
	24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
	OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
	AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
	THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
	24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
	OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
	AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
	BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.

	THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
	STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
	PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
	ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
	NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
	PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
	BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
	A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.

	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.

	ONE KNOX BOX WITH KEYS SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT EACH FDC
	LOCATION.

	ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
	PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
	101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
	EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
	THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
	INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
	STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
	RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
	RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION.
	THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
	INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
	APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
	MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
	SYSTEM.
	ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
	INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.

	16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	05-18-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-18-2018	Time	14:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-18-2018	Time	14:45	Sent To

Notes

2018-05-18 14:45:37	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: CITY PLACE OFFICE Z18030013
	MAY 18, 2018
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL STREET TREES AFFECTED
	BY CONSTRUCTION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
	MITIGATION FOR ANY CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSOLIDATE PLANT LISTS
	AND PROVIDE ONLY ONE LIST THAT INCLUDES THE TERRACE
	PLANTINGS. PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH
	SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
	GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G). LOW, MEDIUM OR HIGH
	DROUGHT TOLERANCE IS REQUIRED FOR EACH LISTING.
	LABEL EACH SPECIES AS LOW MEDIUM OR HIGH DROUGHT
	TOLERANCE IN PLANT LIST COLUMN.

	4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE FLORIDA
	FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) TO CURRENT
	CODE REQUIREMENTS OF 50 POINTS AND UPDATE POINT VALUES.

	THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART LIST HAS CHANGED WORDING AND
	POINT VALUES, UPDATE TO CURRENT VERSION IN MUNICODE.

	5. SATISFIED. THE ROSEMARY STREETSCAPE SHALL MATCH THE
	DESIGN CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS.
	(MINIMUM STREET TREE HEIGHT IS 20 FEET, THE
	LAGERSTROEMIA DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.)

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD AN OAK STREET TREE AT THE
	MIDPOINT OF THE DROP OFF AREA ALONG EVERNIA ST. THE
	UTILITY LOCATIONS MAY HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID
	CONFLICT.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL
	ON SHEET L2.00 UNDER SIDEWALK AREAS ADJACENT TO TREE
	PLANTING AREAS, PROVIDING A MINIMUM14 BY 9 FOOT ROOT
	ZONE FOR ALL STREET TREES AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL DETAIL
	FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	8. SATISFIED. FERN ST. STREET TREES SHALL BE ADJUSTED
	TO PROVIDE AN OAK IN THE PLANTING BULB OUT ON THE WEST
	SIDE OF THE ENTRANCE DRIVE INSTEAD OF THE PIGEON PLUM,
	AND THE REMAINING THREE STREET TREES SHOWN AS PIGEON
	PLUMS SHALL BE 4 BY 8 FT. BIOSWALES WITH LIVE OAK TREES
	TO MATCH THE STREET TREE INSTALLATIONS TO THE EAST OF
	THE PROPERTY.

	9. SATISFIED. THE PLANT SYMBOL TA/374 IS NOT INCLUDED
	OR IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANT LIST, PLEASE REVISE.

	10. SATISFIED. REMOVE PLAZA TREE REQUIREMENT REFERENCES
	FROM THE CODE COMPLIANCE TABLE, AS THESE DO NOT APPLY.
	TREE REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED IN THE PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/18/18:
	11. SECTION 94-448(D)(3) REQUIRES ALL NATIVE TREES AND
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN
	DESTROYED. EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY NOT BE USED DIRECTLY ON
	THIS PROJECT, THERE ARE OTHER AREAS WITHIN CITY PLACE
	THAT MAY BE POSSIBLE, AND THE CITY HAS PUBLIC SITES
	THAT ARE IN NEED OF TREES AND PALMS.

	12. THERE ARE MISIDENTIFIED SPECIES ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST. PALMS 68 AND 69 ARE COCONUT PALMS,
	PLEASE CORRECT.

	13. PLEASE CORRECT ALL CANOPY CALCULATIONS FOR TREES
	LESS THAN 20 FEET DIAMETER (1:1 REPLACEMENT MITIGATION)
	TO SHOW THEIR CANOPY CATEGORY BY SPECIES. CATEGORY 1 IS
	300 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT CANOPY
	CREDIT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, AND
	CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT.

	14. FOR THE FINAL PLANT LIST, PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE
	WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60
	PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE
	OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST
	OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF
	SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.




	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-10-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-10-2018	Time	17:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-10-2018	Time	17:22	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-10 17:23:05	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: CITY PLACE OFFICE Z18030013
	APRIL 10, 2018
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL STREET TREES AFFECTED BY
	CONSTRUCTION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.

	2. PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE MITIGATION
	FOR ANY CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	3. PLEASE CONSOLIDATE PLANT LISTS AND PROVIDE ONLY ONE
	LIST THAT INCLUDES THE TERRACE PLANTINGS. PROVIDE WATER
	NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM
	THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
	LOW, MEDIUM OR HIGH DROUGHT TOLERANCE IS REQUIRED FOR
	EACH LISTING.

	4. PLEASE UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART
	SECTION 94-446 (G) TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF 50
	POINTS AND UPDATE POINT VALUES.

	5. THE ROSEMARY STREETSCAPE SHALL MATCH THE DESIGN
	CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS.
	(MINIMUM STREET TREE HEIGHT IS 20 FEET, THE
	LAGERSTROEMIA DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.)

	6. PLEASE ADD AN OAK STREET TREE AT THE MIDPOINT OF THE
	DROP OFF AREA ALONG EVERNIA ST. THE UTILITY LOCATIONS
	MAY HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT.

	7. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON SHEET
	L2.00 UNDER SIDEWALK AREAS ADJACENT TO TREE PLANTING
	AREAS, PROVIDING A MINIMUM14 BY 9 FOOT ROOT ZONE FOR
	ALL STREET TREES AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL DETAIL FOR
	STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	8. FERN ST. STREET TREES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROVIDE
	AN OAK IN THE PLANTING BULB OUT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
	ENTRANCE DRIVE INSTEAD OF THE PIGEON PLUM, AND THE
	REMAINING THREE STREET TREES SHOWN AS PIGEON PLUMS
	SHALL BE 4 BY 8 FT. BIOSWALES WITH LIVE OAK TREES TO
	MATCH THE STREET TREE INSTALLATIONS TO THE EAST OF THE
	PROPERTY.

	9. THE PLANT SYMBOL TA/374 IS NOT INCLUDED OR
	IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANT LIST, PLEASE REVISE.

	10. REMOVE PLAZA TREE REQUIREMENT REFERENCES FROM THE
	CODE COMPLIANCE TABLE, AS THESE DO NOT APPLY. TREE
	REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS.



	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	04-12-2018		Cont ID
Sent By				Date		Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-12 13:45:35	PLEASE ENSURE THAT WHEN YOU CONTRACT FOR ROLL OFF
	SERVICE YOU ARE USING ONE OF THE FRACHISE AUTHORIZED
	COMPANIES.
2018-04-10 15:03:38	BASED ON THE PRINTS PROVIDED I WAS NOT ABLE TO SEE WHAT
	THE SANITATION PLAN IS. HOW DO YOU PLAN ON HANDLING THE
	TRASH FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THIS BUILDING? PLEASE
	PROVIDE THOSE SPECIFICATIONS FOR REVIEW.

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-10-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	04-10-2018	Time	14:28	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	04-10-2018	Time	14:45	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-10 14:44:57	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
	WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
	MITS-APPLICATIONS
	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:
	1. THIS REVIEW DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ADJACENT
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY DESIGN FEATURES.

	2. NEW FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE
	BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD
	HAZARD AREA ARE NOW IN EFFECT. THE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE
	AT HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?
	UPDATE THE FEMA FLOOD MAP INFORMATION ON THE SURVEY.

	3. ONSITE STORMATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO
	PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW
	ATTENUATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFWMD AND CWPB CRITERIA.

	4. COMBINE ROOF LEADERS TO MINIMIMZE THE NUMBER OF
	DRAINAGE CONNECTIONS TO THE OFSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.

	5. MAINTAIN HISTORIC RUNOFF (DRAINAGE BASIN) PATTERNS.

	6. DRANAGE PIPES WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE
	MINIMUM 15" RCP.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
	BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
	THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
	CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
	ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS

	2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
	WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION PERMIT
	FOR THE PROJECT.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-09-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	04-09-2018	Time	09:14	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2018-04-09 09:44:13	1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
	2. AERIAL ENCROACHMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
	AWNINGS/BALCONY'S INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	3. ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED OVER
	DRIVEWAY TO ALLEY.
	4. PLEASE NOTE ROSEMARY AVE. MAINTENANCE MAP IN RPB 8,
	P 82.
	5. ADDITIONAL ACCESS EASEMENT FROM ADJACENT OWNER WILL
	BE REQUIRED FOR ALLEY ACCESS.
	6. CITY WILL OBTAIN QUOTE FOR APPRAISAL TO BE PAID FOR
	BY DEVELOPER.
	7. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
	PLANTERS/LANDSCAPING, ETC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date			Cont ID
Sent By				Date	04-10-2018	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-10 17:57:59
	ROSEMARY TOWER (370 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE) TRAFFIC
	ANALYSIS (DATED MARCH 8, 2018) COMMENTS:
	- CLARIFY THE PROPOSED OFFICE AND RETAIL SQUARE
	FOOTAGE. VARIOUS SQUARE-FOOTAGES FOR THE OFFICE ARE
	INDICATED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY INCLUDING 227,321 SQ.
	FT., 249,902 SQ. FT., AND 205,118 SQ. FT. THE RETAIL
	SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 22,581 SQ. FT. IS ASSUMED IN THE
	TRAFFIC STUDY. THESE ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE SQUARE
	FOOTAGES SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN.
	- CONSIDER REMOVING THE EXCESS PARKING SPACES. THE
	EXCESS PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE CONTRADICTORY OF THE
	ASSUMPTION FOR MULTI-MODAL TRIPS. THE TRIP GENERATION
	ASSUMES 20% REDUCTION IN VEHICULAR TRIPS TO ACCOUNT FOR
	MULTIMODAL TRIPS AND INTERNALIZATION WITH ADJACENT
	DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENTS. HOWEVER, THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT PROVIDES 562 OFFICE ORIENTED PARKING
	SPACES, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 10% MORE THAN THE CODE
	REQUIREMENT OF 513 SPACES.
	- IF VEHICULAR TRIP REDUCTION IS ASSUMED AND EXCESS
	PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A PARKING
	STUDY TO SHOW THAT THE EXCESS PARKING SPACES ARE NEEDED
	EVEN WITH THE VEHICULAR TRIP REDUCTION.
	- PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE 20%
	REDUCTION FOR MULTI-MODAL TRIPS. 20% REDUCTION FOR
	MULTI-MODAL TRIPS IS VERY HIGH.
	- INTERNALIZATION OF TRIPS WITH ADJACENT DOWNTOWN
	DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE TRIP
	DISTRIBUTION, BUT NOT AS A REDUCTION IN TRIP
	GENERATION.
	- CLARIFY IF THE ITE RATES WITH ?GENERAL URBAN/SUBURBAN
	CHARACTERISTICS? FROM THE 10TH EDITION OF ITE TRIP
	GENERATION MANUAL ALREADY ACCOUNT FOR PERSON-BASED
	TRIPS. THE TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN TABLES 6 AND 7 ARE
	35% LOWER THAN THE TRIPS ESTIMATED BASED ON THE TRIP
	GENERATION RATES FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY OR ITE TRIP
	GENERATION 9TH EDITION (398 AM TRIPS AND 372 PM TRIPS).
	THE 10TH EDITION OF ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL HAS
	ADDED DATA FOR URBAN LAND USES, AND THE PUBLISHED RATES
	MAY HAVE ACCOUNTED FOR MULTI-MODAL TRIPS. THEREFORE,
	INCLUDING AN ADDITIONAL 20% REDUCTION IN TRIPS MAY HAVE
	DOUBLE-DISCOUNTED FOR THE MULTI-MODAL TRIPS.
	- INCLUDE THE RETAIL LAND USES IN THE TRIP GENERATION
	ESTIMATES.
	- PROVIDE TRIP INFORMATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENT FOR
	EACH COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT ASSUMED IN THE REPORT.
	- COLLECT UPDATED COUNTS. TRAFFIC COUNTS WERE COLLECTED
	IN 2016. TRAFFIC PATTERN AND VOLUMES IN DOWNTOWN MIGHT
	HAVE CHANGED SIGNIFICANTLY SINCE THEN.
	- INCLUDE THE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS AT AUSTRALIAN
	AVENUE/CLEARWATER PLACE FOR THE FERN STREET EXTENSION
	SCENARIO.
	- PROVIDE WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED 4-WAY STOP
	AT ROSEMARY AVENUE/EVERNIA STREET PER GUIDANCE IN MUTCD
	- THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT RELIES HEAVILY ON FERN
	STREET, TAMARIND AVENUE, AND OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD FOR
	VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE. 70% OF THE TRAFFIC IS
	ASSIGNED TO THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/TAMARIND AVENUE
	INTERSECTION, WHICH CURRENTLY OPERATES AT LOS E AND IS
	PROJECTED TO OPERATE AT LOS F WHEN BUILT-OUT. OVERALL
	INTERSECTION DELAY IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE BY 16% OVER
	THE BACKGROUND CONDITION DURING PM PEAK HOUR, BUT NO
	MITIGATION MEASURES ARE PROPOSED TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC
	ISSUES AT THIS INTERSECTION. PER CITY?S COMP PLAN,
	PLEASE IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
	MANAGEMENT (TSM) AND TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
	(TDM) MEASURES AS MITIGATION, OR PROVIDE PROPORTIONATE
	SHARE CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS CITY?S TSM, TDM OR
	MULTI-MODEL IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING:
	O CONTRIBUTE FUNDING TOWARDS FERN STREET EXTENSION
	O CONTRIBUTE FUNDING TOWARDS DOWNTOWN TROLLEY
	OPERATIONS
	O CONTRIBUTE FUNDING TOWARDS THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
	AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/TAMARIND AVENUE IN THE CITY?S
	DRAFT DOWNTOWN MOBILITY PLAN
	O RECONSTRUCT BOTH SIDES OF ROSEMARY STREET TO SHARED
	STREET ALONG THE SOUTHERN HALF OF THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE
	TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S DRAFT DOWNTOWN
	MOBILITY PLAN
	O PROVIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT AND PRICING STRATEGIES TO
	DISCOURAGE VEHICULAR TRIPS
	O REQUIRE TENANTS TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIES TO TRANSIT
	PASSES FOR EMPLOYEES CONTINUOUSLY
	O PROVIDE CAR SHARING AND BIKE SHARING SERVICES
	O DEDICATE PARKING SPACES FOR CARPOOLS
	O OTHER TDM MEASURES AS APPROPRIATE
	THE EXACT AMOUNT OF CONTRIBUTION WILL BE DETERMINED
	WHEN THE TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSES ARE
	FINALIZED
	- SOME OF THE LOS AND DELAY RESULTS REPORTED IN TABLES
	3 AND 4 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SYNCHRO RESULTS IN
	THE APPENDICES. REPORT HCM 2010 RESULTS INSTEAD OF
	SYNCHRO RESULTS, AND INCLUDE THE APPROPRIATE OUTPUTS IN
	THE APPENDICES. IN ADDITION, SOME OF THE INFORMATION
	REPRESENTED IN TABLES 3 AND 4 ARE MISLEADING, AND
	DETAILED REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL THE TABLES
	ARE CORRECTED. FOR EXAMPLE:
	O SIGNAL TIMING ASSUMED FOR THE AM PEAK HOUR BACKGROUND
	CONDITION AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/TAMARIND AVENUE IS
	UNREASONABLE. WB LEFT-TURN IS ASSIGNED 67 SECONDS OF
	SPLIT TIME FOR 78 VEHICLES PER HOUR. THIS HAS RESULTED
	IN VERY HIGH DELAY FOR OTHER MOVEMENTS, RESULTING IN
	THE BACKGROUND CONDITION BEING A LOT WORSE THAN THE
	TOTAL CONDITION.
	O THE REPORTED LOS AND DELAY FOR THE PM PEAK HOUR AT
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/TAMARIND AVENUE ARE NOT CONSISTENT
	WITH THE SYNCHRO OUTPUTS. TABLE 4 SHOWS THAT TOTAL
	CONDITION OPERATES BETTER THAN BACKGROUND CONDITION,
	BUT THE SYNCHRO OUTPUTS SHOW A 16% INCREASE IN DELAY IN
	THE TOTAL CONDITION OVER BACKGROUND CONDITION. ALSO,
	DELAY OF 92.6 SECONDS PER VEHICLE IS LOS F BUT NOT LOS
	E AS REPORTED IN TABLE 4.
	O THE LANE CONFIGURATIONS USED FOR THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
	AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/TAMARIND AVENUE ARE NOT
	CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS.
	O 10-MINUTE DELAY AND 40-MINUTE DELAY ARE REPORTED FOR
	THE SB LEFT-TURN MOVEMENT AT OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD/QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DURING AM AND PM PEAK
	HOUR EVEN UNDER EXISTING CONDITIONS. CLARIFY IF THIS IS
	REASONABLE.
	SITE PLAN COMMENTS (RECEIVED ON MARCH 13, 2018):
	- DIMENSION ALL DRIVEWAY WIDTHS
	- DIMENSION THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS ON ALL FRONTAGE
	ROADWAYS
	- IN ADDITION TO SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE, DIMENSION
	SETBACKS FROM CENTERLINE OF THE ROADWAY PER CITY CODE
	94-305(D) AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
	APPENDIX A
	- CLARIFY WHERE THE EXISTING SKYBIKE STATION ON
	ROSEMARY AVENUE WOULD BE RELOCATED
	- PROVIDE SECURE BIKE RACKS AND/OR BIKE STORAGE PER
	CITY CODE 94-111(I)(1). THE PROPOSED BIKE RACKS ARE
	LOCATED ON THE SERVICE VEHICLE ALLEY WHICH IS GATED.
	PLEASE CLARIFY IF TENANTS ARE ABLE TO ACCESS THE BIKE
	RACKS.
	- PROVIDE SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITIES AVAILABLE FOR
	ALL TENANTS PER CITY CODE 94-111(I)(1)
	- THE EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES ON ROSEMARY AVENUE DEFINE
	EACH PARKING SPACE WHICH HAS DIFFERENT PAVER PATTERN
	THAN THE SIDEWALK. REVISE THE HARDSCAPE FOR PARKING
	SPACES TO MATCH ROSEMARY AVENUE STREETSCAPE
	- PROVIDE TYPE III PAVER DETAILS WHICH IS MISSING FROM
	THE HARDSCAPE PLAN
	- SOME PLAN SHEETS SHOW THE EXISTING PARKING SPACES
	OUTSIDE THE PUBLIX BUILDING, WHILE SOME DO NOT. CLARIFY
	IF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL RECONSTRUCT THE WEST
	SIDE OF ROSEMARY AVENUE TO SHARED STREET MATCHING THE
	REST OF ROSEMARY AVENUE. IF NOT, PLEASE INCLUDE THIS IN
	THE RECONSTRUCTION.
	- IF THE 4-WAY STOP CONTROL IS PROPOSED AND WARRANTED
	AT ROSEMARY AVENUE/EVERNIA STREET, PLEASE PROVIDE
	PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE AT THIS INTERSECTION.
	- THE AUTOTURN TRUCK PATHS ARE SHOWN TO TRACK OVER THE
	CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG THE ALLEY. PLEASE REVISE.
	- NARROW THE SERVICE VEHICLE EXIT. THE SERVICE VEHICLE
	EXIT IS WIDER THAN REQUIRED PER THE AUTOTURN TRUCK
	PATHS.
	- CLARIFY IF THE SERVICE VEHICLE ENTRANCE IS GATED MOST
	OF THE TIME, AND IF SO, CLARIFY HOW THE UTILITY SERVICE
	VEHICLES ARE ABLE TO ACCESS THE ALLEY WAY.
	- PROVIDE AUTOTURN TEMPLATE FOR UTILITY SERVICE
	VEHICLES ALONG THE ALLEY WAY INCLUDING THE 90-DEGREE
	TURN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

	ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-11-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	04-11-2018	Time	12:29	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	03-13-2018	Time	12:29	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-11 12:32:57	GENERAL COMMENTS
	1.PLEASE INSERT PROPOSED BUILDING IN THE CONTEXT
	(SURVEY WITH EXISTING AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION
	SURROUNDINGS) INCLUDE ALL THE ADJACENT STREETS AND
	BUILDINGS AND INCLUDE PROPOSED CHANGES ON CURB LINES.
	2. PLEASE PREPARE CONTEXT ELEVATIONS, IN COLOR.
	3. PLEASE CHECK THE DIMENSIONS OF ROSEMARY AVENUE
	INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN. TROLLEY DROP-OFF AREA SEEMS
	WIDER THAN TRAVEL LANES.
	4. INCLUDE THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING CURB LINE IN
	SITE PLAN DRAWINGS TO INDICATE THE PROPOSED CHANGES
	FROM CURRENT SECTION.
	5. ROSEMARY STREET STREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL MATCH THE
	STREETSCAPE DESIGN CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS, DETAILS STILL
	TO BE DETERMINED.
	6. FERN STREET STREETSCAPE SHALL MATCH THE DESIGN
	RECENTLY INSTALLED (BIO-SWALES WITH OAK TREES). THE
	PLANTING AREA WEST OF DRIVEWAY CAN BE EXPANDED TO MATCH
	THE BIO-SWALE ALIGNMENT.
	7. ANY EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL
	WILL REQUIRE A PAYMENT OF REMOVAL FEE.
	8. EAST ELEVATION (GARAGE FACING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE)
	SHALL BE ENHANCED TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF THE BLANK
	WALL (POSSIBLE ARCHITECTURAL SCREEN AS PROPOSED ON
	OTHER NON-ACTIVE USE FACADES). THE EASTERN MOST WALL IS
	ALSO 21% EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED FOR A BLANK
	WALL.
	9. EVERNIA STREET FA?ADE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT. BREAK SHALL OCCUR FOR THE
	FULL HEIGHT OF THE PODIUM (PLANAR BREAK DEFINITION).
	10. SOUTH ELEVATION (SHEET A0.01.2) INDICATES SPANDREL
	GLASS ON GARAGE AREAS, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE ARCHITECTURAL
	SCREEN, PLEASE CLARIFY.
	11. SKYBIKE FACILITY REMOVED FROM ROW. PROJECT SHALL
	RELOCATE FACILITY ON-SITE.
	12. PLEASE INCLUDE EXACT AMOUNT OF TDRS NEEDED IN
	PROJECT DATE (SHEET A0.01).
	13. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE SHOWERS AND
	CHANGING FACILITIES REQUIRED FOR THE TENANTS.
	14. WHAT IS THE TREATMENT PROPOSED AT THE GROUND FLOOR
	NON-ACTIVE FA?ADE ON EVERNIA STREET? ?PAINTED ALUMINUM
	PANEL?? WHY NOT SPANDREL GLASS?
	15. PLEASE CONFIRM THE NET INTERIOR AREA CALCULATION
	USED FOR PARKING UTILIZES THE DEFINITION OF NET
	INTERIOR AREA FROM THE DMP.
	16. ONLY 2 10 X 50 LOADING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THIS
	PROJECT.
	17. BIKE PARKING FOR TENANTS SHALL BE IN AN ENCLOSED
	SECURED AREA (38 SPACES).
	18. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED PUBLIC
	BIKE PARKING 1/100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE (8 SPACES
	REQUIRED).
	19. PROJECT IS PROPOSING 606 PARKING SPACES, MORE THAN
	THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE PROJECT. STAFF IS
	SUGGESTING THE PARKING PROVIDED ON SITE BE REDUCED TO
	NO MORE THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.
	20. BULB OUT ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROSEMARY AVENUE AND
	FERN STREET SHALL BE MODIFIED TO FULLY ACCOMMODATE THE
	BIKE LANE UP TO THE INTERSECTION.
	21. PLEASE ENSURE THE RENDERINGS PRESENTED ARE FULLY
	ACCURATE WITH THE CONTEXT AND PROPOSED MATERIALS AND
	LANDSCAPE.
	22. STREET LIGHT FIXTURE SPECIFIED IS NOT CONSISTENT
	WITH DOWNTOWN LIGHT FIXTURE STANDARD. LIGHT FIXTURES
	ALONG FERN STREET AND EVERNIA STREET SHALL FOLLOW DMP
	STANDARD. ROSEMARY FIXTURE WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE
	CURRENT STREETSCAPE REDESIGN PROJECT.
	23. PROPOSED PAVERS ON SIDEWALK SHALL MATCH ROSEMARY
	AVENUE.
	24. PLEASE INDICATE ANY SEATING ON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS.
	25. SEATING AREAS ON PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE OF
	HIGHER FINISH AND INCLUDE ELEMENTS TO DETER
	SKATEBOARDERS.
	26. ADDITIONAL BASE PLANTING IS SUGGESTED ALONG
	BUILDING FA?ADE FOR AT LEAST SOME PORTIONS OF THE
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EDGE.
	27. PLEASE INDICATE THAT THE EXPOSED PARKING DECK WILL
	INCLUDE A FULL PAINTED APPLICATION BY AN ARTIST.
	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
	- THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE
	DAC FOR SPECIAL REVIEW AND TDR TRANSFER. PLEASE FOLLOW
	DAC SUBMITTAL DEADLINES.