| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18030009 |
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
04-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
04-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-11 12:34:24 | PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING: | | | | | | #1 IDENTIFY FDC AND FIRELINE ON PLANS (CONTACT CAD | | | GROUP FOR ASBUILTS) | | | #2 TOPOGRPHIC INFORMATION TO SUBSTANTIATE ADA | | | ACCESSABILITY ENTRY AND EXIT PATH TO | | | #3 ANCHORING DETAILS TO CURB / SIDEWALK (CURRENT | | | CONDITION OF SIDEWALK CRACKING) | | | #4 WHAT PROVISIONS FOR PARKING ACCESS TO PARKING | | | LOT/BLOCKING/ ROW STRIPING. | | | #5 CONFLICT WITH 10" W.M. UNDER PLATFORM | | | #6 SHOW YOUR PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO | | | PLATFORM. | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
04-05-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
04-05-2018 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-05 15:31:08 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | 1) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | | | | 2) THE PROPOSED PROJECT ENCROACHES INTO THE EXISTING | | | ROADWAY WITH A DIMENSION OF 12'10" TO THE CENTERLINE OF | | | THE ROADWAY. | | | | | | ENSURE THE CENTERLINE AND ROADWAY STRIPING PROVIDES A | | | MINIMUM OF 12' TRAVEL PATH FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | | | | 3) THE PROPOSED PROJECT ENCROACHES INTO THE EXISTING | | | ROADWAY. THOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE FIRE | | | CODE, TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES, SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION | | | ELEMENTS AND/OR REFLECTIVE OE ELECTRIC WARNING | | | SIGNS/LIGHTS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-09-2018 |
Time |
15:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-09-2018 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-09 15:13:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 322 EVERNIA STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Z18030009 | | | APRIL 9, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. IF ANY PLANT MATERIAL IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THE | | | IMPROVEMENTS, IT MUST BE MAINTAINED PER CITY CODE | | | SECTION 94-446 AND BE IRRIGATED AS NECESSARY. PLEASE | | | SUPPLY LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
04-10-2018 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
04-10-2018 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-10 11:19:06 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEE | | | RING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 1. WHY IS PARKLET NOT PARALLEL TO CENTERLINE OF ROAD? | | | | | | 2. SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. SHOW THE DATUM | | | CONVERSION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 4. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
04-09-2018 |
Time |
09:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-09 09:49:46 | 1. HOW IS ACCESS TO EXISTING | | | METERS/UTILITIES/IRRIGATION TO BE MAINTAINED? | | | 2. IS THERE AN AGREEMENT WITH ADJACENT OWNER? | | | 3. HAS PARKING BEEN NOTIFIED AS TO LOSS OF PARKING | | | SPACES? |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-11 12:53:00 | PAGE S2 | | | 1. SHOW HOW ACCESS WILL BE MAINTAIN TO THE EXISTING | | | WATER METERS | | | PAGE S3 | | | 2. SIGNS NEED TO BE ADD AT BOTH ENDS OF THE GARDEN TO | | | SHOW IT IS A PUBLIC AREA. | | | 3. ADD DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TO BOTH ENDS OF THE | | | ADA RAMPS. | | | 4. DRAINAGE NEEDS TO BE EVALUATED TO MAKE SURE A FLOW | | | LINE WILL BE MAINTAIN. | | | 5. HOW AND WHO IS GOING TO BE PERFORMANCE MAINTENANCE | | | UNDER THE DECK TO KEEP THE FLOW LINE CLEAN FROM TRASH | | | AND DEBRIS. | | | 6. SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW BOTH SIDE OF EVERNIA ST FROM | | | DIXIE HWY TO EAST OF THE DRIVEWAY. | | | 7. THE CURB ON THE ADJACENT SIDE OF EVERNIA NEEDS TO BE | | | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | 8. SHOW ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES | | | PAGE S5 | | | 9. THERE IS NO S7 SECTION FOR THE TYPICAL PLATFORM | | | SLEEVE ANCHOR DETAIL. ALSO THE SAME DETAIL CALLS FOR | | | PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK BUT THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW ANY | | | ANCHOR INTO THE PAVEMENT JUST THE SIDEWALK OR CURB. | | | 10. EVERNAI MAY POTENTIALLY BE A STREETSCAPE PROJECT | | | WITH THE UPCOMING CRA BOND. DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO | | | CONSTRUCT THIS PROJECT IF IT WOULD BE REMOVED FOR A | | | STREETSCAPE PROJECT? | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
04-11-2018 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-11 12:46:11 | 1. STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE PERCEPTION OF THE DECK | | | AS A PRIVATE SPACE. | | | 2. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH ABT THE DETAISL ABOUT THE | | | ALCOHOL EXTENSION INTO THE SIDEWALK . IS IS ALLOWED | | | BEYOND THE INMEDIATE FRONTAGE OF THE BUSINESS? | | | 3. NOTE THAT CURRENT BUILDING ENTRANCE DOOR IS FLUSH | | | WITH SIDEWALK. DECK WILL RAISE THE SIDEWALK LEVEL AND | | | CREATE A CONFLICT WITH ENTRANCE DOOR AND ADA ACCESS TO | | | COMMERCIAL SPACE. | | | 4. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE | | | PROJECT? DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS OF PRIVATE PARKLET. | | | IT IS A CITY PROJECT? | | | 5. HOW CLOSE IS THE PROPOSED DECK TO THE TRAVEL LANE? | | | 6. PROPOSED DECK IS COVERING UTILITIES |
|
|
| |
Print |