 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18020025
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18020025 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-31-2018 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-31-2018 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-31 10:21:51 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM | | | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SHEET SP-1, SITE PLAN, HAS BEEN | | | REVISED TO SHOW A WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE | | | RESTAURANT FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
21:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
21:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 21:16:24 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SHEET | | | SP-1, SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW HOW A WHEELCHAIR USER CAN | | | GET TO THE RESTAURANT FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. WHEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND | | | 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY | | | ENTRANCES. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
06-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
06-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-14-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
03-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
03-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-14 13:15:04 | #1 DEMONSTRATE HOW PARCEL(S) WILL BE SERVED WITH WATER | | | AND SEWER. | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-18-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-18-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-18-2018 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-18 13:16:55 | 3RD REVIEW | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM PAUL | | | GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER, THE ATTACHMENT DATED JUNE 14, | | | 2018, FROM JOHNSTON GROUP, AND THE DRAWING DOCUMENTS, | | | THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-21-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-21-2018 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-21-2018 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-21 11:19:27 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM PAUL | | | GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER, THE ATTACHMENT DATED MAY 15, | | | 2018, FROM JOHNSTON GROUP, AND THE DRAWING DOCUMENTS, | | | THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
10:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-09 10:53:28 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | NFPA 101. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND, IF REQUIRED, TO BE CLOSELY COORDINATED | | | WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE ACCESS | | | ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER ARRIVING | | | EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 9. IF REQUIRED BY THE OCCUPANCY TYPE AND OCCUPANCY LOAD | | | CLACULATIONS, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE | | | ALARM PER THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE | | | SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE | | | ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS | | | 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-26-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-26-2018 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-26-2018 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-26 16:07:33 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHWIND PLAZA CPD Z18020025 | | | JUNE 26, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE MAINTENANCE | | | OF THE EXISTING TO BE PRESERVED PARKING LOT LIVE OAK | | | TREES AND NEW PROPOSED LIVE OAK TREES. THERE ARE STILL | | | MAJOR LIGHTING CONFLICTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDS LOOKING | | | AT OPTIONS TO UPDATE AND ADJUST THE LOCATIONS OF | | | LIGHTING IN CONCERT WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT | | | CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES, AND ASSURE THE ABILITY | | | TO MAINTAIN THE TREES WITH PROPER PRUNING PER SECTION | | | 94-446(2). | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATES REPLACING LARGE | | | CANOPY TREES WITH PALMS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE SHADE FOR | | | THE PARKING SPACES. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF | | | THE CODE OR THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND THE | | | APPLICANT NEEDS TO EXAMINE SOLUTIONS TO ADJUST THE | | | LIGHTING PLACEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE APPROVED SPECIES | | | OR EQUIVALENT. | | | | | | THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS MUCH IMPROVED AND PROVIDES NEW | | | SUSTAINABLE POTENTIAL TREE CANOPY FOR THE PARKING | | | AREAS, HOWEVER THERE ARE THREE AREAS THAT NEED FURTHER | | | IMPROVEMENT: | | | | | | ? A REQUIRED TREE MUST BE PLACED IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE SOUTH END OF THE THIRD ROW OF | | | PARKING WEST OF THE BANK BUILDING. | | | | | | ? THE SECOND ROW OF PARKING EAST OF THE PROPOSED ONE | | | STORY BUILDING CANNOT EXCEED 10 SPACES IN A ROW WITHOUT | | | A LANDSCAPE ISLAND OF AT LEAST 10 FEET INSIDE CURB, OR | | | 12 SPACES IN A ROW IF THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ARE 10 OR | | | MORE FEET WIDE INSIDE CURB. THE NO PARKING AREA DOES | | | NOT QUALIFY. THE ISLAND SHOULD BE PLACED SO THAT ROWS | | | ONE AND TWO ARE SIMILAR TO ROWS THREE AND FOUR. | | | | | | ? ROWS FIVE AND SIX EAST OF PROPOSED ONE STORY | | | BUILDING MEET THE PARKING SPACE SPACING REQUIREMENTS, | | | BUT LEAVE A LARGE GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY. STAFF | | | REQUESTS A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE POTENTIAL TREE | | | CANOPY AT MATURITY FOR EACH TREE INDICATED WITH A RED | | | CIRCLE TO SHOW THE EVENTUAL CANOPY COVERAGE. THIS WILL | | | BE USED TO SHOW THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION | | | HOW WELL THE FUTURE TREE CANOPY WILL MINIMIZE THE HEAT | | | ISLAND EFFECTS FROM THE PAVED AREAS. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ADDED EAST OF | | | TRACT C MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR A HEDGE ON 3 NON | | | ACCESS SIDES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-31-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-31-2018 |
Time |
15:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-31-2018 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-31 15:39:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHWIND PLAZA CPD Z18020025 | | | MAY 31, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE | | | MAINTENANCE OF THE EXISTING TO BE PRESERVED PARKING LOT | | | LIVE OAK TREES AND NEW PROPOSED LIVE OAK TREES. THERE | | | ARE STILL MAJOR LIGHTING CONFLICTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | LOOKING AT OPTIONS TO UPDATE AND ADJUST THE LOCATIONS | | | OF LIGHTING IN CONCERT WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES, AND ASSURE THE | | | ABILITY TO MAINTAIN THE TREES WITH PROPER PRUNING PER | | | SECTION 94-446(2). | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATES REPLACING LARGE | | | CANOPY TREES WITH PALMS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE SHADE FOR | | | THE PARKING SPACES. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF | | | THE CODE OR THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND THE | | | APPLICANT NEEDS TO EXAMINE SOLUTIONS TO ADJUST THE | | | LIGHTING PLACEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE APPROVED SPECIES | | | OR EQUIVALENT. | | | | | | THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS MUCH IMPROVED AND PROVIDES NEW | | | SUSTAINABLE POTENTIAL TREE CANOPY FOR THE PARKING | | | AREAS, HOWEVER THERE ARE THREE AREAS THAT NEED FURTHER | | | IMPROVEMENT: | | | | | | ? A REQUIRED TREE MUST BE PLACED IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE SOUTH END OF THE THIRD ROW OF | | | PARKING WEST OF THE BANK BUILDING. | | | | | | ? THE SECOND ROW OF PARKING EAST OF THE PROPOSED ONE | | | STORY BUILDING CANNOT EXCEED 10 SPACES IN A ROW WITHOUT | | | A LANDSCAPE ISLAND OF AT LEAST 10 FEET INSIDE CURB, OR | | | 12 SPACES IN A ROW IF THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ARE 10 OR | | | MORE FEET WIDE INSIDE CURB. THE NO PARKING AREA DOES | | | NOT QUALIFY. THE ISLAND SHOULD BE PLACED SO THAT ROWS | | | ONE AND TWO ARE SIMILAR TO ROWS THREE AND FOUR. | | | | | | ? ROWS FIVE AND SIX EAST OF PROPOSED ONE STORY | | | BUILDING MEET THE PARKING SPACE SPACING REQUIREMENTS, | | | BUT LEAVE A LARGE GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY. STAFF | | | REQUESTS A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE POTENTIAL TREE | | | CANOPY AT MATURITY FOR EACH TREE INDICATED WITH A RED | | | CIRCLE TO SHOW THE EVENTUAL CANOPY COVERAGE. THIS WILL | | | BE USED TO SHOW THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION | | | HOW WELL THE FUTURE TREE CANOPY WILL MINIMIZE THE HEAT | | | ISLAND EFFECTS FROM THE PAVED AREAS. | | | | | | 2. THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ADDED EAST OF TRACT C | | | MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR A HEDGE ON 3 NON ACCESS | | | SIDES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-12 13:05:24 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | MEMO TO FILE | | | PROJECT: SOUTHWIND PLAZA CPD Z18020025 | | | MARCH 12, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE MAINTENANCE OF THE | | | EXISTING TO BE PRESERVED PARKING LOT LIVE OAK TREES AND | | | NEW PROPOSED LIVE OAK TREES. THERE ARE STILL MAJOR | | | LIGHTING CONFLICTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDS LOOKING AT | | | OPTIONS TO UPDATE AND ADJUST THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | IN CONCERT WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS | | | WITH REQUIRED TREES, AND ASSURE THE ABILITY TO MAINTAIN | | | THE TREES WITH PROPER PRUNING PER SECTION 94-446(2). | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATES REPLACING LARGE | | | CANOPY TREES WITH PALMS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE SHADE FOR | | | THE PARKING SPACES. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF | | | THE CODE OR THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND THE | | | APPLICANT NEEDS TO EXAMINE SOLUTIONS TO ADJUST THE | | | LIGHTING PLACEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE APPROVED SPECIES | | | OR EQUIVALENT. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
13:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
13:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-17-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-17-2018 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-17-2018 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-17 13:09:39 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 5/16/2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. DRAINAGE EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE NEW RESTAURANT | | | SITE NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-09 13:55:48 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE REVISED SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-02-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-02-2018 |
Time |
11:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-02 11:24:39 | MODIFIED THE CONDITION OF UNITY OF TITLE BEING RECORDED | | | OVER ONLY THE MAIN PARCEL, PCN # 74424301150000010 | | | PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-30-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-30-2018 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-30 10:12:52 | PASSED WITH CONDITION OF UNITY OF TITLE BEING RECORDED | | | PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
07:12 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 07:14:24 | 1. NO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS RECEIVED. | | | 2. UNITY OF TITLE SHOULD BE RECORDED FOR THE ENTIRE | | | SITE. APPLICATION IS MADE THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-20-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-20 17:31:15 | Z18020025_SOUTHWIND_CPD (JUNE 14, 2018) | | | | | | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | - IN TABLE 5, PLEASE ALSO SUMMARIZE THE EB THROUGH AND | | | RIGHT-TURN VEHICLE QUEUE LENGTHS. THE 95TH-PERCENTILE | | | EB RIGHT-TURN QUEUE IS EXPECTED TO BE LONGER THAN THE | | | EXISTING STORAGE LENGTH. THE QUEUE SPILLBACK WILL ADD | | | TO THE EB THROUGH VEHICLE QUEUE WHICH WILL FURTHER | | | AFFECT VEHICLES EXITING THE DRIVEWAYS. ALSO, THE WB | | | LEFT-TURN QUEUE IS SHOWN AS GREATER THAN 2,000 FEET | | | DURING PM PEAK HOUR. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. | | | - INDICATE THE SOURCE OF THE CRASH DATA. | | | - ON PAGE 12 UNDER CRASH DATA REVIEW, SOME OF THE | | | CRASHES ON THE WEST LEG OF 45TH STREET APPROACHING THE | | | INTERSECTION ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUMMARY. FOR | | | EXAMPLE, THE "NORTH LEFT REAR" AND "NORTH-EAST RIGHT | | | ANGLE" CRASHES APPEARED TO INVOLVE VEHICLES EXITING THE | | | EXISTING SITE DRIVEWAY, BUT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE | | | SUMMARY. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. | | | - IN THE VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET FOR 45TH | | | STREET/MEDIAN OPENING DRIVEWAY AND 45TH STREET/MILITARY | | | TRAIL, THE BACKGROUND GROWTH FOR AM PEAK HOUR IS NOT | | | THE MAXIMUM OF "COMMITTED + 1% GROWTH" OR "HISTORIC | | | GROWTH". PLEASE REVISE. | | | - IN THE VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET FOR 45TH | | | STREET/MEDIAN OPENING DRIVEWAY, INCLUDE VEHICULAR | | | PASS-BY TRIP REDUCTION FOR THROUGH VOLUMES ALONG 45TH | | | STREET. | | | - IN THE ATTACHMENTS, THE HCM ANALYSES WITH PROPOSED | | | SECOND NB RIGHT-TURN LANE AT 45TH STREET/MILITARY TRAIL | | | ARE INCLUDED. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE DEVELOPER PROPOSES | | | TO MAKE THIS IMPROVEMENT. IF SO, PLEASE DISCUSS IN THE | | | REPORT. | | | - THE GREEN TIMES USED IN THE HCM ANALYSIS AT 45TH | | | STREET/MILITARY TRAIL DURING PM PEAK HOUR ARE NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE TIMING SHEET. FOR EXAMPLE, A GREEN | | | TIME OF 40 SECONDS WAS USED FOR THE EB LEFT-TURN | | | MOVEMENT WHILE THE TIMING SHEET SHOWS 17 SECONDS; A | | | GREEN TIME OF 17 SECONDS WAS USED FOR THE WB LEFT-TURN | | | MOVEMENT WHILE THE TIMING SHEET SHOWS 40 SECONDS. | | | PLEASE REVISE. PLEASE ALSO REVISE THE QUEUING ANALYSIS | | | WITH THE REVISED GREEN TIMES. | | | - ALTHOUGH THE CRASH FREQUENCY AT THE EXISTING | | | DRIVEWAYS IS NOT HIGHER THAN OTHER FACILITIES OF | | | SIMILAR TYPE BASED ON HISTORICAL CRASH DATA, THE | | | VEHICULAR VOLUMES AT THE DRIVEWAYS ARE EXPECTED TO | | | INCREASE OVER 31% WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE | | | CRASH FREQUENCY MAY CHANGE WITH THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | - COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CONSTRUCT A DIRECTIONAL | | | MEDIAN OPENING AT THE SOUTHERNMOST DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY | | | TRAIL. THIS WILL ELIMINATE APPROXIMATELY 70 NB U-TURN | | | VEHICLES PER HOUR AT 45TH STREET/MILITARY TRAIL AND | | | IMPROVE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS. PROVIDE FDOT DRIVEWAY | | | PERMIT/PRE-APPLICATION APPROVAL ASSOCIATED WITH THIS | | | IMPROVEMENT. | | | - THE NB LEFT-TURN MOVEMENT AT 45TH STREET/MEDIAN | | | OPENING DRIVEWAY IS EXPECTED TO HAVE A DELAY OF OVER | | | 3.5 MINUTES PER THE ANALYSES. DRIVERS MAY BECOME | | | IMPATIENT AND TAKE SMALLER GAPS TO MAKE THAT MANEUVER, | | | CAUSING SAFETY CONCERN. PLEASE CONDUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL | | | WARRANT ANALYSIS AT 45TH STREET/MEDIAN OPENING DRIVEWAY | | | FOR BOTH SCENARIOS WITH AND WITHOUT THE EASTERNMOST | | | DRIVEWAY. FOR THE SCENARIO WITHOUT THE EASTERNMOST | | | DRIVEWAY, THE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC VOLUMES USING THE | | | EASTERNMOST DRIVEWAY WOULD BE REDIRECTED TO THE MAIN | | | DRIVEWAY. THIS SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN THE SIGNAL | | | WARRANT ANALYSIS. SHOULD PALM BEACH COUNTY DETERMINE | | | THAT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL IS WARRANTED, THE DEVELOPER MAY | | | BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE EASTERNMOST DRIVEWAY. | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION | | | BETWEEN THE FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AND THE EXISTING | | | RETAIL BUILDING, BETWEEN THE EXISTING BANK AND EXISTING | | | RETAIL BUILDING, AND BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUS STOP AND | | | THE EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING. NARROW THE INTERNAL | | | ROADWAY CONNECTING TO THE EASTERNMOST DRIVEWAY AND | | | PROVIDE WIDER SIDEWALK FOR THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION | | | FROM/TO THE PROPOSED BUS STOP. | | | - PROVIDE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR FUTURE VEHICLE | | | CONNECTION POINT TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST PER CODE | | | SECTION 94-312(2)C, AND INDICATE ON THE SITE PLAN THE | | | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-25 14:22:14 | THE RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE APPLICANT DATED MAY 15, | | | 2018 DID NOT INCLUDE ANY RESPONSES TO TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEERING'S COMMENTS. OUR COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST | | | REVIEW ARE COPIED BELOW: | | | | | | SOUTH WIND PLAZA TRAFFIC STUDY (DATED JANUARY 26, 2018) | | | COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ON | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | - PROVIDE BUILD-OUT YEAR OF THE DEVELOPMENT | | | - REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY?S | | | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, WHICH ARE DOCUMENTED IN | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311 | | | - INCLUDE AN EVALUATION OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR A | | | TRAFFIC STUDY PER SECTION 94-311(C), AND DETERMINE THE | | | RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE PER SECTION | | | 94-311(D)(4)F | | | - INCLUDE ACCIDENT DATA PER SECTION 94-311(D)(3)I TO | | | DETERMINE HAZARDOUS INTERSECTIONS AT 45TH | | | STREET/MILITARY TRAIL AND 45TH STREET/FULL ACCESS | | | - INCLUDE HCM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AT 45TH | | | STREET/MILITARY TRAIL AND 45TH STREET/FULL ACCESS | | | DRIVEWAY. ALSO, DETERMINE IF THE WB LEFT-TURN LANE | | | STORAGE AT 45TH STREET/FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS | | | SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC | | | - THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THE TOTAL APPROVED | | | INTENSITY OF 146,261 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, BUT THE | | | PROJECT NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES | | | 130,436 SQUARE FEET. PLEASE CLARIFY AND REVISE. | | | - IN TABLE 4, THE PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES SHOULD BE | | | BASED ON ?PROPOSED MINUS EXISTING? TRIPS INSTEAD OF | | | ?PROPOSED MINUS VESTED? TRIPS. PLEASE REVISE | | | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON FEB 14, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - EXISTING CURB RAMPS AT 45TH STREET DRIVEWAYS AREN?T | | | ADA COMPLIANT. UPGRADE CURB RAMPS. | | | - INCLUDE SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN FOR THE | | | SITE SO THAT WE CAN REVIEW THE SITE CIRCULATION | | | - THE PROPOSED SITE HAS 3 DRIVEWAYS ON 45TH STREET. | | | HOWEVER, ONLY 2 ACCESS POINTS ARE ALLOWED ONTO EACH | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-312(1)A | | | - DO NOT REMOVE THE MEDIAN NOSE AT THE FULL ACCESS | | | DRIVEWAY ON 45TH STREET AS THIS WILL INCREASE VEHICLE | | | CONFLICT | | | - REVISE THE EXISTING EAST-WEST CIRCULATION ROADWAY TO | | | FURTHER SOUTH AND AWAY FROM 45TH STREET IN ORDER TO | | | PROVIDE LONGER DRIVEWAY LENGTH AT ALL DRIVEWAYS | | | - PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM 45TH | | | STREET AND MILITARY TRAIL TO THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | LAND USES | | | - SHOW PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FROM THE 36 NEW PARKING | | | SPACES, WHICH ARE LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING, TO THE STORE ENTRANCES | | | - PROVIDE AUTOTURN EXHIBIT FOR THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANE | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT | | | - DIMENSION THE PARKING ANGLE FOR THE ANGLE PARKING | | | SPACES BY THE PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS, AND MAKE | | | SURE THE AISLE WIDTH AND OTHER DIMENSIONS MEET THE CITY | | | CODE SECTION 94-485(J)(2) | | | - COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN TO PROVIDE BUS SHELTER FOR | | | THE EXISTING BUS STOP ON 45TH STREET | | | - CONSIDER ROTATING THE PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING SO | | | THAT ITS LONGER LENGTH IS PARALLEL TO 45TH STREET AND | | | PROVIDING AN EAST-WEST CIRCULATION ROADWAY LOCATED | | | SOUTH BEHIND THE BUILDINGS. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING A WIDE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG 45TH | | | STREET FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE EXISTING NARROW | | | SIDEWALK. | | | - EAST ? WEST CIRCULATION ROAD, CONSIDER PROVIDING A | | | FUTURE CONNECTION POINT TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST. | | | - CHANGES TO THE EAST-WEST CIRCULATION ROAD ARE | | | SUPPORTED BY THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS IN THE CITY?S | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: | | | O POLICY 2.3.2(A): THE CITY SHALL REDUCE THE NEED FOR | | | WIDENING MAJOR AND MINOR THOROUGHFARES BY ENCOURAGING | | | THE PLACEMENT OF A WELL INTER-CONNECTED SYSTEM OF | | | STREETS. WHERE AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM BECOMES | | | POSSIBLE, CARE SHOULD BE GIVEN TO A COMMUNITY'S QUALITY | | | OF LIFE, THE AMOUNT OF THROUGH-TRAFFIC, THE IMPACTS ON | | | SAFETY, AND OVERALL SECURITY. | | | O POLICY 2.3.2(B): THE CITY SHALL DISCOURAGE THE USE OF | | | DEAD-END STREETS, LOOP STREETS, AND OVERSIZED BLOCKS IN | | | FAVOR OF THROUGH-STREETS AND SHORTER BLOCKS; PROVIDE | | | CUT-THROUGHS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT; AND | | | PROMOTE LANDSCAPING OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY. | | | O POLICY 2.3.2(C): THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE NEW | | | DEVELOPMENTS TO INCLUDE: 1) AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM OF | | | STREETS IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLANS WHICH CONSIDER | | | APPROPRIATE ADJACENT PARCELS WITH POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE | | | COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENTS; 2) STUB STREETS THAT CONNECT | | | TO ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED PARCELS WITH A POTENTIAL FOR | | | FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS; AND 3) STUB STREETS THAT TIE INTO | | | EXISTING ADJACENT STUB STREETS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-102 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 17:52:14 | SOUTH WIND PLAZA TRAFFIC STUDY (DATED JANUARY 26, 2018) | | | COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ON | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | - PROVIDE BUILD-OUT YEAR OF THE DEVELOPMENT | | | - REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY?S | | | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, WHICH ARE DOCUMENTED IN | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311 | | | - INCLUDE AN EVALUATION OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR A | | | TRAFFIC STUDY PER SECTION 94-311(C), AND DETERMINE THE | | | RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE PER SECTION | | | 94-311(D)(4)F | | | - INCLUDE ACCIDENT DATA PER SECTION 94-311(D)(3)I TO | | | DETERMINE HAZARDOUS INTERSECTIONS AT 45TH | | | STREET/MILITARY TRAIL AND 45TH STREET/FULL ACCESS | | | - INCLUDE HCM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AT 45TH | | | STREET/MILITARY TRAIL AND 45TH STREET/FULL ACCESS | | | DRIVEWAY. ALSO, DETERMINE IF THE WB LEFT-TURN LANE | | | STORAGE AT 45TH STREET/FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS | | | SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC | | | - THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THE TOTAL APPROVED | | | INTENSITY OF 146,261 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, BUT THE | | | PROJECT NARRATIVE/JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES | | | 130,436 SQUARE FEET. PLEASE CLARIFY AND REVISE. | | | - IN TABLE 4, THE PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES SHOULD BE | | | BASED ON ?PROPOSED MINUS EXISTING? TRIPS INSTEAD OF | | | ?PROPOSED MINUS VESTED? TRIPS. PLEASE REVISE | | | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON FEB 14, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - EXISTING CURB RAMPS AT 45TH STREET DRIVEWAYS AREN?T | | | ADA COMPLIANT. UPGRADE CURB RAMPS. | | | - INCLUDE SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN FOR THE | | | SITE SO THAT WE CAN REVIEW THE SITE CIRCULATION | | | - THE PROPOSED SITE HAS 3 DRIVEWAYS ON 45TH STREET. | | | HOWEVER, ONLY 2 ACCESS POINTS ARE ALLOWED ONTO EACH | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-312(1)A | | | - DO NOT REMOVE THE MEDIAN NOSE AT THE FULL ACCESS | | | DRIVEWAY ON 45TH STREET AS THIS WILL INCREASE VEHICLE | | | CONFLICT | | | - REVISE THE EXISTING EAST-WEST CIRCULATION ROADWAY TO | | | FURTHER SOUTH AND AWAY FROM 45TH STREET IN ORDER TO | | | PROVIDE LONGER DRIVEWAY LENGTH AT ALL DRIVEWAYS | | | - PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM 45TH | | | STREET AND MILITARY TRAIL TO THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | LAND USES | | | - SHOW PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FROM THE 36 NEW PARKING | | | SPACES, WHICH ARE LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING, TO THE STORE ENTRANCES | | | - PROVIDE AUTOTURN EXHIBIT FOR THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANE | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT | | | - DIMENSION THE PARKING ANGLE FOR THE ANGLE PARKING | | | SPACES BY THE PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS, AND MAKE | | | SURE THE AISLE WIDTH AND OTHER DIMENSIONS MEET THE CITY | | | CODE SECTION 94-485(J)(2) | | | - COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN TO PROVIDE BUS SHELTER FOR | | | THE EXISTING BUS STOP ON 45TH STREET | | | - CONSIDER ROTATING THE PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING SO | | | THAT ITS LONGER LENGTH IS PARALLEL TO 45TH STREET AND | | | PROVIDING AN EAST-WEST CIRCULATION ROADWAY LOCATED | | | SOUTH BEHIND THE BUILDINGS. | | | - CONSIDER PROVIDING A WIDE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG 45TH | | | STREET FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE EXISTING NARROW | | | SIDEWALK. | | | - EAST ? WEST CIRCULATION ROAD, CONSIDER PROVIDING A | | | FUTURE CONNECTION POINT TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST. | | | - CHANGES TO THE EAST-WEST CIRCULATION ROAD ARE | | | SUPPORTED BY THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS IN THE CITY?S | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: | | | O POLICY 2.3.2(A): THE CITY SHALL REDUCE THE NEED FOR | | | WIDENING MAJOR AND MINOR THOROUGHFARES BY ENCOURAGING | | | THE PLACEMENT OF A WELL INTER-CONNECTED SYSTEM OF | | | STREETS. WHERE AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM BECOMES | | | POSSIBLE, CARE SHOULD BE GIVEN TO A COMMUNITY'S QUALITY | | | OF LIFE, THE AMOUNT OF THROUGH-TRAFFIC, THE IMPACTS ON | | | SAFETY, AND OVERALL SECURITY. | | | O POLICY 2.3.2(B): THE CITY SHALL DISCOURAGE THE USE OF | | | DEAD-END STREETS, LOOP STREETS, AND OVERSIZED BLOCKS IN | | | FAVOR OF THROUGH-STREETS AND SHORTER BLOCKS; PROVIDE | | | CUT-THROUGHS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT; AND | | | PROMOTE LANDSCAPING OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY. | | | O POLICY 2.3.2(C): THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE NEW | | | DEVELOPMENTS TO INCLUDE: 1) AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM OF | | | STREETS IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLANS WHICH CONSIDER | | | APPROPRIATE ADJACENT PARCELS WITH POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE | | | COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENTS; 2) STUB STREETS THAT CONNECT | | | TO ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED PARCELS WITH A POTENTIAL FOR | | | FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS; AND 3) STUB STREETS THAT TIE INTO | | | EXISTING ADJACENT STUB STREETS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-102 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-30-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
05-30-2018 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-30 16:32:41 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL | | | HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE OF | | | ROADWAYS WITHIN THE COUNTY. | | | | | | 2.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT | | | PROCESS HAS BEEN INITIATED. | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT | | | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 8.5X11, ONE SET IN | | | 11X17 AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.*PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL | | | PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE | | | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | *CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ 561-822-1443 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 16:12:39 | SOUTHWIND MAJOR PD AMENDMENT | | | PB794D | | | Z18020024 | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL, | | | AND COMCAST. | | | 2.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL | | | HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE OF | | | ROADWAYS WITHIN THE COUNTY. THEORETICALLY, TRIPS SHOULD | | | BE VESTED; HOWEVER, STAFF WOULD LIKE A CONFIRMATION | | | LETTER FROM THE COUNTY. | | | 3.) THERE IS A PALM TRAN BUS STOP WITH PEDESTRIAN BENCH | | | LOCATED ALONG 45TH STREET. THE APPLICANT SHALL | | | COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL | | | IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED (I.E. EASEMENT TO PROVIDE BUS | | | SHELTER). WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION OF THE COORDINATION | | | FROM PALM TRAN AND WHETHER OR NOT IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED TO STAFF. | | | 4.) HAS APPLICANT EXPLORED THE INCLUSION OF THE VACANT | | | PARCEL TO THE SOUTH OR PROVIDING AN EASEMENT TO | | | ESTABLISH A PEDESTRIAN LINK FROM THE BALLPARK OF THE | | | PALM BEACHES TO THE PLAZA? | | | 5.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | 6.) PROJECT NARRATIVE STATES THAT THE SITE SHOULD | | | FUNCTION AS ONE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT WITH CROSS ACCESS | | | AND SHARED PARKING. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | CROSSWALKS/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FROM ALL PARKING | | | BAYS, EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND PERIMETER | | | SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS. CONSIDER A PEDESTRIAN ROUTE THAT | | | DIRECTLY CONNECTS THE EXISTING BANK WITH PARKING BAYS | | | AND PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AND PROPOSED RETAIL | | | BUILDING. THIS COULD BE DONE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE | | | PROPOSED REDESIGN/WIDENING OF SEVERAL OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | 7.) ANY PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS SHOULD MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH | | | EXISTING/PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. FUTURE | | | REVISIONS SHOULD RECONCILE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING | | | LOCATIONS. | | | 8.) CONSIDER REDUCING THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES BY | | | INCLUDING A 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD | | | FUNCTION AS WHEEL STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF | | | SMALL CAR SPACES TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE | | | AREA. UP TO 30% OF SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR SMALL | | | CAR USE | | | 9.) STAFF HAS CONCERNS REGARDING POTENTIAL VEHICLE | | | CONFLICTS AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED MEDIAN NOSE | | | REMOVAL EAST OF THE PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT | | | 10.) CONSIDER LOCATING PROPOSED BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO | | | THE 45TH STREET FRONTAGE | | | 11.) PROVIDE CURRENT CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BIKE RACK | | | AND PARKING DETAILS | | | 12.) INCLUDE A SAFE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE | | | PROPOSED EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA TO RETAIL BUILDING | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT | | | | | | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 8.5X11, ONE SET IN | | | 11X17 AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | *PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | *CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ 561-822-1443 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |