 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18020024
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18020024 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
17:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-10-2018 |
Time |
17:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-10 17:48:42 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN | | | SHEET C7 SHOWS REGULAR PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO | | | THE BUILDING ENTRANCE THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES. THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | RELOCATED SO THAT THEY ARE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES | | | TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. THE RESPONSE LETTER DATED 7/2/18 FROM ZACH | | | THORNTON, P.E., IS NOTED. THANK YOU. THE FAILED STATUS | | | OF THIS REVIEW WILL BE CHANGED TO "PASS" UPON RECEIPT | | | AND REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING LETTER. PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | SEPARATE LETTER, EXPLAINING CONSIDERATION OF THE RAISED | | | ACCESS AISLE OPTION AND THE CONCERNS ABOUT WHEEL STOPS | | | AT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES BEING A TRIP HAZARD, | | | SO THAT THE LETTER CAN BE REVIEWED NOW FOR INCLUSION IN | | | THE RECORD WHEN THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. THE | | | LETTER WILL BE KEPT IN THE PERMIT RECORDS IN CASE ANY | | | ADA COMPLAINTS ARE FILED AND PERMIT RECORDS REQUESTED. | | | THERE IS NO NEED TO INCLUDE THE OTHER POINTS IN THE | | | SUBMITTED COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER BECAUSE ADA SIGNAGE | | | COULD HAVE BEEN MOUNTED ON THE BUILDING AT THE REQUIRED | | | HEIGHT INSTEAD OF USING POLES, LOSS OF A PARKING SPACE | | | IS NOT JUSTIFICATION FOR NOR MEETING ACCESSIBILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS, AND COMPARISON OF THIS PARKING LOT TO "A | | | LARGE SHOPPING CENTER", ESPECIALLY WITHOUT CITING A | | | SPECIFIC LOCATION RECENTLY INSTALLED WEST PALM BEACH, | | | IS NOT RELEVANT. "A LARGE SHOPPING CENTER" HAS MULTIPLE | | | BUILDING ENTRANCES WITH MULTIPLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, SO | | | THERE IS MORE FLEXIBILITY AND ROOM FOR INTERPRETATION | | | IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING. THE CHASE | | | BANK PROJECT HAS ONLY ONE ENTRANCE FACING THE PARKING | | | LOT. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-08-2018 |
Time |
10:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-08-2018 |
Time |
10:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-08 11:09:03 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE RESPONSE | | | LETTER DATED 5/8/18 FROM ZACH THORNTON, P.E., IS NOTED | | | BUT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE COMMENT. SITE PLAN SHEET C7 | | | SHOWS REGULAR PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO THE | | | BUILDING ENTRANCE THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. | | | THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE RELOCATED SO | | | THAT THEY ARE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE | | | BUILDING ENTRANCE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. THIS IS A FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | REQUIREMENT BASED ON FEDERAL ADA, SO WE DO NOT HAVE | | | DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY. THE SUBMITTED COMMENT RESPONSE | | | EXPLAINS WHY THIS REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MEET RATHER | | | THAN OFFERING A SOLUTION THAT WILL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENT. THE FOLLOWING OPTION IS JUST A SUGGESTION | | | SINCE YOU HAVE IMPLIED THAT THERE IS NO SOLUTION THAT | | | COMPLIES WITH THE CODE REQUIREMENT. ONE OPTION WOULD BE | | | TO RAISE THE ELEVATION OF THE ACCESS AISLE BETWEEN THE | | | TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SO THAT THE SLOPE FROM | | | THAT ACCESS AISLE, ACROSS THE WALKWAY LEADING TO THE | | | BUILDING ENTRANCE IS NOT STEEPER THAN 1 IN 50 BUT | | | SUFFICIENT TO DRAIN WATER AWAY FROM THE BUILDING | | | ENTRANCE. THE SLOPES ACROSS THE PARKING SPACES AND | | | DRIVE AISLE CAN THEN BE REWORKED TO ACCOMMODATE THIS | | | ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENT. THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN RAISED | | | NOW BECAUSE, IF NOT RESOLVED BEFORE PERMIT APPLICATION, | | | IT WILL BECOME A PLAN REVIEW COMMENT THAT COULD | | | POTENTIALLY AFFECT AN APPROVED SITE PLAN LAYOUT. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
20:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
20:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 21:04:13 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. LOCATION OF ACESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN | | | SHEET C7 SHOWS REGULAR PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO | | | THE BUILDING ENTRANCE THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES. THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | RELOCATED SO THAT THEY ARE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES | | | TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
06-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
06-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-14-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
03-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
03-14-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-14 12:59:10 | REVIEW DUMPSTER LOCATION. | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-12-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-12-2018 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-12 09:00:22 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM PAUL | | | GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER, AND THE ATTACHMENTS DATED | | | JULY 3, 2018, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-21-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-21-2018 |
Time |
11:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-21-2018 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-21 11:15:05 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM PAUL | | | GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER, THE ATTACHMENT DATED MAY 8, | | | 2018, FROM CORE STATES, AND DRAWING DOCUMENT, THE | | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS | | | APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
10:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-09 10:39:38 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | NFPA 101. | | | | | | ANY CONTROLLED ACCESS OR EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT | | | SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN | | | AND REMAIN ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES. | | | | | | 9. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 10. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS | | | FOR DOOR BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 11. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-16-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-16-2018 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-16-2018 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-16 10:59:52 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CHASE BANK 343 SOUTHERN BLVD Z18020024 | | | JULY 16, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND A TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST IDENTIFYING SPECIES AND TREE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER OF TREES AND PALMS, AND INDICATE WHETHER THEY | | | WILL REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. ALL CALCULATIONS | | | AND DATA NEEDS TO BE UPDATED WHEN THE LOCATIONS AND | | | SPECIES OF ANY TREES TO REMAIN ARE DETERMINED. | | | THE 2 TREES ARE LIVE OAKS, AND CANOPY DIAMETER IS LESS | | | THAN 20 FEET. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO | | | 40 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SITE, AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED | | | TREES AND FLOWERING TREES TO CURRENT CODE OF 1 TREE PER | | | 1500 SQ FT OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF, | | | AND FLOWERING TREES TO ONE PER 6000 SQ FT OR PORTION | | | THEREOF. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE | | | AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS | | | AND CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE | | | SURVEY, THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER LENGTHS ARE 105 FT, | | | AND NORTH AND SOUTH ARE 225 FT. RECALCULATE TREE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW HOW PROVIDED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | POINTS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: | | | -CURRENT APPLICABLE CODE REQUIRES 40 POINTS. | | | -PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING HIGH, MEDIUM AND LOW | | | WATER USE ZONES IF POINTS ARE CLAIMED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES MUST BE AT A 3:1 RATIO FOR EACH TREE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED IN THE | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE LONGER | | | THAN 30 FOOT SPACING FOR THE BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO | | | THE ATM. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS | | | TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. | | | THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND | | | CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED | | | BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE LANDSCAPE HEDGE ON THREE SIDES OF DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-25-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-25-2018 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-25-2018 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-25 15:34:45 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CHASE BANK 343 SOUTHERN BLVD Z18020024 | | | MAY 25, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND A TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST IDENTIFYING SPECIES AND TREE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER OF TREES AND PALMS, AND INDICATE WHETHER THEY | | | WILL REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. ALL CALCULATIONS | | | AND DATA NEEDS TO BE UPDATED WHEN THE LOCATIONS AND | | | SPECIES OF ANY TREES TO REMAIN ARE DETERMINED. | | | THE 2 TREES ARE LIVE OAKS, AND CANOPY DIAMETER IS LESS | | | THAN 20 FEET. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO | | | 40 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SITE, AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED | | | TREES AND FLOWERING TREES TO CURRENT CODE OF 1 TREE PER | | | 1500 SQ FT OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF, | | | AND FLOWERING TREES TO ONE PER 6000 SQ FT OR PORTION | | | THEREOF. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS | | | AND CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE | | | SURVEY, THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER LENGTHS ARE 105 FT, | | | AND NORTH AND SOUTH ARE 225 FT. RECALCULATE TREE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW HOW PROVIDED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | POINTS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: | | | -CURRENT APPLICABLE CODE REQUIRES 40 POINTS. | | | -PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING HIGH, MEDIUM AND LOW | | | WATER USE ZONES IF POINTS ARE CLAIMED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES MUST BE AT A 3:1 RATIO FOR EACH TREE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED IN THE | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING | | | ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE LONGER | | | THAN 30 FOOT SPACING FOR THE BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO | | | THE ATM. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS | | | TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. | | | THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND | | | CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED | | | BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE LANDSCAPE HEDGE ON THREE SIDES OF DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-12 16:15:27 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CHASE BANK 343 SOUTHERN BLVD Z18020024 | | | MARCH 12, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND A TREE DISPOSITION | | | LIST IDENTIFYING SPECIES AND TREE CANOPY DIAMETER OF | | | TREES AND PALMS, AND INDICATE WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, | | | BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. ALL CALCULATIONS AND DATA | | | NEEDS TO BE UPDATED WHEN THE LOCATIONS AND SPECIES OF | | | ANY TREES TO REMAIN ARE DETERMINED. | | | 2. PLEASE CORRECT THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO 40 PERCENT | | | OF THE TOTAL SITE, AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED TREES AND | | | FLOWERING TREES TO CURRENT CODE OF 1 TREE PER 1500 SQ | | | FT OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OR PRTION THEREOF, AND | | | FLOWERING TREES TO ONE PER 6000 SQ FT OR PORTION | | | THEREOF. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE CORRECT THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND | | | CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE | | | SURVEY, THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER LENGTHS ARE 105 FT, | | | AND NORTH AND SOUTH ARE 225 FT. RECALCULATE TREE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW HOW PROVIDED. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE UPDATE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE POINTS FOR | | | THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: | | | -CURRENT APPLICABLE CODE REQUIRES 40 POINTS. | | | -PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING HIGH, MEDIUM AND LOW | | | WATER USE ZONES IF POINTS ARE CLAIMED. | | | | | | 6. PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED BUFFER TREES MUST BE | | | AT A 3:1 RATIO FOR EACH TREE. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE AS REQUIRED IN THE TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE LONGER THAN 30 | | | FOOT SPACING FOR THE BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO THE ATM. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES AND FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | LANDSCAPE HEDGE ON THREE SIDES OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 16:29:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 7/3/18 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. THE INTENT OF MOVING THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAYS | | | TOWARD THE PROPERTY LINE IS TO MAXIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF | | | RUNOFF DRAINING TO THE ONSITE STORMWATER TREATMENT | | | SYSTEM (EXFILTRATION TRENCHES) AS WELL AS LIMIT THE | | | VOLUME OF UNCONTROLLED RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. [REFER TO | | | PREVIOUS COMMENT NO. 5] | | | | | | 2. THE STORM PIPES ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 3. THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN PIPE STORM2 | | | (18? HDPE WITH INVERT ELEVATION 7.00 FT NAVD) AND PIPE | | | SAN 5 (6? PVC WITH INVERT ELEVATION BETWEEN 8.02 FEET | | | AND 7.61 FEET NAVD). | | | | | | 4. GENERAL NOTE #8 ON SHEET C8 IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE | | | DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS AND CALLOUT NOTES IN PLAN VIEW ON | | | THE SHEET. REVISE THE GENERAL NOTE TO READ ?? PROVIDE | | | 78 LF OF 6 FEET WIDE ?? INSTEAD OF ?? PROVIDE 78 LF OF | | | 4 FEET WIDE ?? | | | | | | 5. INDICATE WHERE THE STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURE IS | | | LOCATED TO CREATE A HYDRAULIC HEAD OF 4.5 FEET (H2) | | | (HGL ELEVATION 10.92 FEET NAVD 1988) ASSUMED IN THE | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. DETAIL ST-8 ON SHEET C13 WAS MODIFIED TO SHOW THE | | | PIPE SIZE TO BE 12? HDPE. THE STORM STRUCTURE TABLE ON | | | SHEET C8 SHOWS THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH PIPE DIAMETER TO | | | BE 18? HDPE. | | | | | | 7. SHEET C1 AND THE DRAINAGE SUMMARY REFERS TO AN OLD | | | FEMA FIRM AND FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION. FEMA ISSUED NEW | | | FIRMS IN OCTOBER 2017. REFER TO THE SURVEY FOR THE NEW | | | PANEL NUMBER. | | | | | | 8. REVISE THE SR# LISTED WITH THE SPEED LIMIT ON SHEET | | | C1. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE DATE THE DRAINAGE SUMMARY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
Time |
15:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-01 15:51:43 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MAY | | | 14, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. THE DATUM CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 | | | SHOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: | | | NAVD + X.XX = NGVD WHERE X.XXX IS A POSITIVE NUMBER. | | | THE CONVERSION ON SHEETS C8 AND C9 SHOWS X.XXX AS A | | | NEGATIVE NUMBER. | | | | | | 2. THE NAVD NGVD CONVERSION EQUATION NEEDS TO BE SHOWN | | | ON THE SURVEY. THE APPLICANT INDICATED IN THE RESPONSE | | | TO THE INITIAL COMMENTS THAT THIS WOULD BE SHOWN AT | | | TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION. THIS IS | | | OK. THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY AND ON THE | | | ENGINEER PLANS NEEDS TO MATCH. | | | | | | 3. THE RESPONSE TO THE INITIAL REVIEW COMMENTS | | | INDICATED THE SFWMD SELF-CERTIFICATION WAS ATTACHED TO | | | THE RESPONSES. THIS INFORMATION WAS NOT FOUND IN THE | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 4. SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH | | | THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION DEMONSTRATING WATER | | | QUALITY TREATMENT FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF IS BEING | | | PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFWMD CRITERIA (I.E. THE | | | LARGER OF 1 INCH OF RUNOFF OR 2.5 INCHES TIMES PERCENT | | | OF IMPERVIOUSNESS). | | | | | | 5. REVISE THE GRADING OF THE TWO DRIVEWAYS TO REDUCE | | | THE AMOUNT OF DRIVEWAY AREA DRAINING TOWARD THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. FOR DRIVEWAY SECTION A-A (SOUTHERN BLVD), | | | THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY CAN BE MOVED 6 FEET | | | CLOSER TO THE BACK OF WALK BY STEEPENING BEHIND THE | | | SIDEWALK TO 9.9%. FOR DRIVEWAY SEGMENT B-B (DIXIE HWY), | | | ALL BUT 3 FEET OF THE DRIVEWAY APRON BEHIND THE DROP | | | CURB CAN BE STEEPENED FROM 1.72% AND ALSO THE DRIVEWAY | | | SEGMENT EAST OF THE PROPERTY LINE CAN BE STEEPENED FROM | | | 0.42%. | | | | | | 6. SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE ON DRIVEWAY SECTION B-B. | | | | | | 7. THE FLOOD NOTE ON THE COVER SHEET REFERENCES THE | | | 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. THIS CORRESPONDS TO THE | | | 500-YEAR AND NOT THE 100-YEAR STORM. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-09 14:06:55 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. SHOW THE DATUM | | | CONVERSION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. THE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION ON SHEET C8 APPEARS TO | | | BE INCORRECT. | | | | | | 3. SOUTHERN BLVD. AND DIXIE HIGHWAY ARE MAINTAINED BY | | | THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. CONTACT FDOT | | | TO SEE WHAT FDOT PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER ENLARGING THE SITE BASE MAP AND LABELING | | | THE ENTITIES INSTEAD OF USING A KEY MAP. | | | | | | 5. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING SPACE DEPTH BY | | | INCLUDING A 2? GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD FUNCTION | | | AS WHEEL STOPS. COORDINATE WITH THE PLANNING DEPT. | | | | | | 6. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LINES ON THE EROSION CONTROL | | | PLAN DO NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 7. WHY IS SOME OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTHERN BLVD. AND | | | ALONG DIXIE HWY NOT GETTING REPLACED? | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE A CLEANOUT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE | | | SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FDOT PERMITS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-31-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-31-2018 |
Time |
07:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-31 07:33:31 | PASSED WITH CONDITION THAT OTHER UTILITIES CONSENT TO | | | THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE 5' EASEMENTS ALONG THE NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-30 09:53:03 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION NOT RECEIVED. | | | 2. NEED COPIES OF DEED BOOKS. LANDSCAPING MAY NOT BE | | | ALLOWED IN THESE AREAS. | | | 3. PROVIDE COPY OF PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY. | | | 4. NEED BENCHMARK AND CONVERSION FACTOR ON SURVEY PRIOR | | | TO BUILDING PERMIT SUBMISSION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-12-2018 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-12 14:16:10 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE | | | THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 2. HAS A PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY BEEN PERFORMED? | | | 3. SHOW CONVERSION FACTOR TO NGVD-29. AND PARENT | | | BENCHMARK ON SURVEY. | | | 4. PROVIDE COPIES OF DEED BOOKS FOR UTILITY EASEMENTS. | | | LANDSCAPING WITHIN MAY NOT BE ALLOWED. | | | 5. SITE/ENGINEERING PLAN HARD TO READ WITH SO MANY | | | KEYED NOTES. | | | 6. DRIVEWAYS WILL REQUIRE FDOT APPROVE PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-11 17:41:56 | - PROVIDE RAISED ISLAND INSTEAD OF PAVEMENT MARKING | | | EAST OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH EXIT. A PORTION OF THE RAISED | | | ISLAND COULD BE MOUNTABLE, SIMILAR TO A ROUNDABOUT | | | TRUCK APRON, TO ACCOMMODATE OCCASIONAL FIRE AND GARBAGE | | | TRUCKS. | | | -- THE PROPOSED DESIGN PROVIDES A SIDEWALK WITH ONLY A | | | 4-FOOT CLEARANCE AT THE CORNER OF THE CURB RAMP. | | | HOWEVER, CITY CODE SECTION 78-8 REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF | | | FIVE FEET BE PROVIDED. PLEASE CONSTRUCT A SIDEWALK | | | ALONG THE CHAMFERED CORNER OF THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE | | | BEHIND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SO PEDESTRIANS HAVE A | | | 5-FOOT UNOBSTRUCTED PATH BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC | | | SIGNAL PEDESTAL. ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE A SIDEWALK AND | | | TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT EASEMENT ALONG THE CHAMFERED | | | CORNER OF THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AS THE EXISTING | | | PEDESTRIAN PEDESTAL ON THE CURB RAMP DOES NOT MEET | | | CURRENT MUTCD AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. FUTURE RELOCATION | | | OF SIGNAL POLES INTO THE ROW MAY BE NEEDED SHOULD THE | | | SIGNAL GET REBUILT. | | | - CONDITION OF APPROVAL ? A FDOT PERMIT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE DRIVEWAY. | | | - THE FDOT PRE-APPLICATION LETTER DOES NOT SPECIFY THE | | | WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON SOUTHERN BOULEVARD. PER FDOT | | | STANDARD INDEX 000-515, THE MINIMUM DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS | | | 24 FEET BASED ON THE VEHICULAR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES. PLEASE | | | REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO THE MINIMUM TO ACCOMMODATE | | | DESIGN VEHICLES WHILE MEETING FDOT STANDARDS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-15-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-14 08:09:15 | REVISED 6/15/18 BASED ON RECEIPT OF APPLICANT?S COMMENT | | | ? RESPONSE LETTER. | | | 343 SOUTHERN CHASE TRAFFIC LETTER (DATED FEBRUARY 9, | | | 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - USE ITE LUC 946 "GASOLINE/SERVICE STATION WITH | | | CONVENIENCE MARKET AND CAR WASH" AND ITE LUC 942 | | | AUTOMOBILE CARE CENTER FOR THE TRIP GENERATION OF THE | | | EXISTING LAND USES. USE PROCEDURES IN THE ITE TRIP | | | GENERATION HANDBOOK FOR TRIP INTERNALIZATION, IF | | | APPLICABLE, OR PROVIDE SUPPORTING TRIP INTERNALIZATION | | | DATA | | | - NOTE THAT RECEIPT OF A PALM BEACH CONCURRENCY | | | APPROVAL LETTER DOES NOT ALLEVIATE THE NEED TO MEET | | | TRAFFIC STUDY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS CONTAINED | | | IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES. PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY CONCURRENCY APPROVAL IS ONLY ROADS | | | IDENTIFIED ON THE COUNTY THOROUGHFARE MAP. | | | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON MAY 9, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - CITY ORDINANCE 94-312 "THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO | | | SERVE A SITE SHALL BE KEPT AT A MINIMUM". THE CURRENT | | | SITE PLAN WILL FUNCTION WITH A SINGLE ACCESS POINT ON | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD. THE SECOND ACCESS POINT ON S. DIXIE | | | IS NOT NECESSARY AND THE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION WILL | | | NOT APPROVE A SITE PLAN WITH A SECOND ACCESS POINT ON | | | S. DIXIE. | | | - CURRENT DESIGN HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR VEHICLE CONFLICT | | | AND VEHICLE BLOCKAGE AT THE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY | | | AND ALSO REQUIRES DRIVERS IN A SHORT TIME PERIOD TO | | | PROCESS THAT THEY MUST TURN LEFT. WE REQUEST EITHER: | | | O REVERSING THE DIRECTION OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANES. | | | O AN OPERATIONAL AND QUEUING ANALYSIS AT THE SOUTHERN | | | BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SHORT | | | DRIVEWAY LENGTH WOULD CREATE INGRESS AND EGRESS VEHICLE | | | BLOCKAGE | | | - THE EXIT OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY IS WIDE ENOUGH | | | TO ACCOMMODATE 2 CARS, WHICH COULD POTENTIALLY INCREASE | | | VEHICULAR CONFLICT AT THE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY. | | | CONSIDER STRIPING OUT THE EXTRA SPACE TO NARROW THE | | | EXIT. | | | - THE SITE IS PROVIDING MORE PARKING THAN WHAT IS | | | REQUIRED IN THE CODE, REFERENCE SHEET C7,15 SPACES | | | REQUIRED AND 19 PROVIDED. THERE ARE PARKING SPACES NEAR | | | THE STOP BAR AT THE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD ENTRANCE WHICH | | | WOULD REQUIRE PARKING MANEUVERING WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY | | | QUEUEING AREA. ELIMINATE EXCESS PARKING SPACES NEAR THE | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY. | | | - THE TRASH RECEPTACLE MAY LIMIT SIGHT DISTANCE FOR | | | VEHICLES EXITING THE DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY. REVERSING | | | DIRECTION OF DRIVE THRU WOULD ELIMINATE THE POTENTIAL | | | SIGHT LINE ISSUE. | | | - WE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED 2 SEPARATE CURB RAMPS BE | | | PROVIDED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHERN | | | BOULEVARD/DIXIE HIGHWAY. IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO | | | CONSTRUCT A SIDEWALK ALONG THE CHAMFERED CORNER OF THE | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE BEHIND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK. THIS | | | WOULD ALLOW FOR TWO SEPARATE CURB RAMPS AND PERHAPS A | | | LANDSCAPE PLANTER SEPARATING THE TWO CURB RAMPS. A | | | SIDEWALK COULD BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A SIDEWALK EASEMENT | | | IN THE SAFE SITE TRIANGLE. A WIDER SIDEWALK AT THE | | | CORNER WOULD IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS OF THE SITE AND | | | IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN COMFORT AT THE INTERSECTION. | | | - CONDITION OF APPROVAL - A FDOT PERMIT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE DRIVEWAY. | | | - CONSIDER REDUCING THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD. IT APPEARS THAT THE PASSENGER CAR | | | SCENARIO IS THE CONTROLLING SCENARIO. HOWEVER, THERE | | | APPEARS THAT SOME REDUCTION IN WIDTH IS POSSIBLE. NOTE, | | | THAT THE AASHTO PASSENGER CAR IS VERY CONSERVATIVE | | | DESIGN VEHICLE AS IT THE SIZE OF A CHEVROLET SUBURBAN. | | | (ADDED IN AFTERNOON 6/15/18) | | | | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 17:44:21 | 343 SOUTHERN CHASE TRAFFIC LETTER (DATED FEBRUARY 9, | | | 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE THE APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ON | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | - USE ITE LUC 946 ?GASOLINE/SERVICE STATION WITH | | | CONVENIENCE MARKET AND CAR WASH? AND ITE LUC 942 | | | AUTOMOBILE CARE CENTER FOR THE TRIP GENERATION OF THE | | | EXISTING LAND USES. USE PROCEDURES IN THE ITE TRIP | | | GENERATION HANDBOOK FOR TRIP INTERNALIZATION, IF | | | APPLICABLE, OR PROVIDE SUPPORTING TRIP INTERNALIZATION | | | DATA | | | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON FEB 12, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - PROVIDE FDOT DRIVEWAY LETTER AND PERMIT FOR ACCESSING | | | FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | - CONSIDER REDESIGNING THE SITE PLAN TO ELIMINATE | | | POTENTIAL VEHICLE CONFLICT AND VEHICLE BLOCKAGE AT THE | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY, SUCH AS ORIENTING THE | | | BUILDING LENGTHWISE ALONG SOUTHERN BOULEVARD, REMOVING | | | EXCESS PARKING SPACES, REDESIGNING THE DRIVE-THROUGH | | | FACILITY, CONVERTING THE DRIVEWAYS INTO ONE-WAY | | | DRIVEWAYS, ETC. | | | - CONDUCT OPERATIONAL AND QUEUING ANALYSIS AT THE | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE | | | SHORT DRIVEWAY LENGTH WOULD CREATE INGRESS AND EGRESS | | | VEHICLE BLOCKAGE | | | - SHOW THE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR THE GARBAGE TRUCK | | | ACCESSING THE TRASH RECEPTACLES, AND VEHICLES INGRESS | | | AND EGRESS AT THE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY AND ALONG | | | THE PARKING AISLE | | | - THE TRASH RECEPTACLE MAY LIMIT SIGHT DISTANCE FOR | | | VEHICLES EXITING THE DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY | | | - THE THROUGH ARROW AT THE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY | | | IS CONFUSING BECAUSE VEHICLES CANNOT GO STRAIGHT INTO | | | THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANE | | | - PROVIDE STOP SIGNS AT THE STOP BAR LOCATIONS AT THE | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY DRIVEWAY AND THE DRIVE-THROUGH ATM EXIT, | | | AND PROVIDE A STOP BAR, STOP SIGN AND RIGHT-TURN ONLY | | | SIGN FOR THE EASTBOUND APPROACH TOWARDS THE SOUTHERN | | | BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY | | | - 2 SEPARATE CURB RAMPS SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE | | | NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHERN BOULEVARD/DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | PER FDOT STANDARD PLAN 522-008 ?SHEET 8 PLACEMENT OF | | | CURB RAMPS AT CURBED RETURN.? MAKE SURE THE SIDEWALK | | | MEETS ADA REQUIREMENTS | | | - IS IT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD? | | | - SHOW THE STREETS, DRIVEWAYS, INTERSECTIONS, CURB CUTS | | | AND TURNING LANES ADJACENT TO AND ACROSS FROM THE | | | SUBJECT PROPERTY | | | - WE DON?T SUPPORT OVER PARKING OF SITE. | | | - SHOW 20? CLEAR SITE TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTION OF | | | SOUTHERN AND DIXIE. REFERENCE CODE 94-305 FIGURE X-1. | | | - CONSIDER WIDER SIDEWALK IN PARKING LOT TO ELIMINATE | | | THE USE OF CURB STOPS. | | | - COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN AND CITY TO PROVIDE A | | | LOCATION FOR A BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING BUS STOP ON | | | S. DIXIE. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
07-09-2018 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-07-09 10:28:52 | 1.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT OF CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE | | | V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. APPLICANT HAS | | | INDICATED THEY WILL OPT TO PAY INTO CITY?S ART FUND. | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION THAT PROCESS IS BEING INITIATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-30-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-30-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
05-30-2018 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-30 09:56:18 | 1.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT OF CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE | | | V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. APPLICANT HAS | | | INDICATED THEY WILL OPT TO PAY INTO CITY?S ART FUND. | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION THAT PROCESS IS BEING INITIATED. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE INCLUDE STANDARD CITY APPROVED DETAILS FOR | | | PARKING SPACES, BIKE RACKS, AND DUMPSTER | | | | | | | | | | | | PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER | | | 561-822-1443 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
03-13-2018 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-13 16:27:43 | CHASE BANK INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | ISPR 18-05 | | | Z18020024 | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL, | | | AND COMCAST. | | | 2) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE | | | NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE OF | | | ROADWAYS WITHIN THE COUNTY. | | | 3) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | 4) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 4 PARKING SPACES IN EXCESS OF | | | WHAT IS REQUIRED BY CODE. REMOVE EXCESS PARKING SPACES | | | ALONG SOUTHERN BOULEVARD AND CONSIDER REPURPOSING AS | | | LANDSCAPED AREA WITH SITTING AREA, TRELLIS, LOCATION OF | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT, OR COMBINATION OF THE | | | ABOVE | | | 5) CONSIDER REDUCING THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES BY | | | INCLUDING A 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD | | | FUNCTION AS WHEEL STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF | | | SMALL CAR SPACES TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE | | | AREA | | | 6) THERE IS A PALM TRAN BUS STOP WITH PEDESTRIAN BENCH | | | LOCATED ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE APPLICANT SHALL | | | COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL | | | IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED (I.E. EASEMENT TO PROVIDE BUS | | | SHELTER). WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION OF THE COORDINATION | | | FROM PALM TRAN AND WHETHER OR NOT IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED TO STAFF. | | | 7) REVISE PLAN TO SHOW A CROSSWALK FROM PROPOSED | | | HANDICAP SPACE TO CENTRAL PARKING AREA | | | 8) PROVIDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN IN ADDITION TO | | | LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS, SEE DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION AND SITE PLAN CHECKLIST FOR DETAILS. SHOW | | | CALCULATIONS INCLUDING PARKING, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, | | | PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE ETC. | | | 9) DIMENSION ALL PROPOSED PARKING SPACES, DRIVE AISLES, | | | SETBACKS ETC. | | | 10) UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED, PLEASE CONTACT | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES TO INITIATE | | | 11) CONSIDER REDESIGNING THE BUILDING TO HAVE FRONTAGE | | | ALONG BOTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND SOUTHERN BOULEVARD | | | | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT | | | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 8.5X11, ONE SET IN | | | 11X17 AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | *PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($60). | | | *CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ 561-822-1443 OR | | | [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |