City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z18020023

Plan Review Stops For Project Z18020023

Review Stop	B		BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-13-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	03-13-2018	Time	20:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	03-13-2018	Time	20:01	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-13 20:09:08	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS
	(FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD ZONE. THE
	FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
	MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
	BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
	ELEVATION.

	3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THREE VAN ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED BUT THE PLANS DO NOT
	CURRENTLY SHOW VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. IF THE
	THREE FIRST FLOOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE
	VAN ACCESSIBLE THE PLANS SHOULD BE ANNOTATED TO SHOW
	THAT. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE)
	IN A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND
	DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
	INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE
	DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE
	CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	8. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
	ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
	GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	9. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
	(AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
	PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
	SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG		ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-14-2018		Cont ID
Sent By	mgonzale			Date	03-14-2018	Time	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	mgonzale			Date	03-14-2018	Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-14 12:47:06	#1 PROVIDE ESTIMATED FLOWS GPD FOR EACH BUILDING.

	#2 BACKFLOW (RPPA AND DCDA) LOCATIONS MUST BE PRE
	APPROVED BY FIRE AND UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE FOR EACH
	BUILDING.

	#3 PROVIDE TIMELINE AS TO WATERMAIN UPGRADE TO 12" WM.

	#4 PROVIDE PRELIMINARY SUMMARY AS TO THE EXISTING SEWER
	CAPACITY WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILTIES.

	MANNY GONZALEZ
	SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
	(MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
	MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
	DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
	FAX: (561) 494-1116
	EMAIL: [email protected]
	HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS
	/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS

	IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF
	WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
	FREE."
	FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
	CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-25-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	04-25-2018	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	04-25-2018	Time	10:11	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-25 10:14:05	2ND REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC INFORMATION PACKET AND
	RESPONSE LETTER DATED MARCH30, 2018, FROM JOSHUA I.
	LONG, AICP, GUNSTER, YOAKLEY & STEWART, TO JOHN P.
	ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPLE PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY
	SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
	ADDRESSED.

	THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
	NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.


	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]
	2ND REVIEW RESPONSE

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-09-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	03-09-2018	Time	09:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	03-09-2018	Time	09:05	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-09 09:24:16	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED.

	SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
	REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
	PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER
	SUPPLY FEEDING THE FIRE PUMP.

	6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
	NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
	HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.

	18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
	18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
	THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
	BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
	APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	SECTION 18.4.

	PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL
	HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT
	CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE.

	PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
	FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
	POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
	APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
	CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
	AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
	SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
	AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
	PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.

	FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
	PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?

	TWO FIRE PUMP ROOMS ARE INDICATED, WITH EACH HAVING
	THEIR OWN DOOR ACCESS. HOWEVER, ONE DOOR IS FACING THE
	ROADWAY AND THE OTHER FACING THE INSIDE OF THE PARKING
	GARAGE. CAN WE HAVE THEM FACE THE SAME DIRECTION, THE
	OUTSIDE?

	8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
	SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
	DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	PLEASE REVIEW THE EXITING OFF OF THE ROOF DECK POOL
	AREA TO ENSURE IT COMPLIES WITH THE ONE EXIT
	REQUIRMENTS.

	11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

	12. COMMAND ROOM

	THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
	CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
	THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
	A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
	DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
	B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
	C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
	FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
	EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
	OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
	BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
	E. A WORK TABLE.
	F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
	FOR THE BUILDING.
	G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
	CONTROL UNIT.
	H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
	THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
	I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
	SYSTEMS.
	J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
	K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
	PANELS
	L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
	M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
	TRANSFER FEATURES.
	O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
	BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
	P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
	Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1.
	R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
	SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
	PROVIDED

	13. RADIO

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.

	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.

	NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
	ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.

	24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
	PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
	FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
	24.5.2.2.3.
	24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
	EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
	EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
	STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
	LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
	AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
	99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
	24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
	AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
	RADIO COVERAGE.
	24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
	24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
	OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
	AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
	THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
	24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
	OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
	AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
	BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.

	THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
	STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
	PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
	ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
	NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
	PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
	BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
	A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.

	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.
	ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
	PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
	101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
	EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:

	THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
	INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
	STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
	RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
	RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
	INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
	APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
	MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
	SYSTEM.

	ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
	INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.

	16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	08-10-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	08-10-2020	Time	14:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	08-10-2020	Time	14:33	Sent To

Notes

2020-08-10 14:34:06	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: THE MARINA CMPD Z18020023
	AUGUST 7, 2020

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	LANDSCAPE PERMIT 18110731:


	1. SATISFIED. SUBMIT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND
	CHART AND THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR REVIEW WITH THE MINOR
	AMENDMENT.

	2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE ARBORIST REPORT ON THE
	CHANGES FROM RELOCATE TO REMOVAL AS DISCUSSED.


	3. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHOWING
	THE CHANGES PROPOSED CLOUDED, AND FILL ALL TO MEET
	CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR MITIGATION OF 1:1
	REPLACEMENT FOR TREE CANOPY BELOW 20 FEET DIAMETER, AND
	SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER.

	4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART SHOWING THE
	APPROVED MITIGATION QUANTITY AND THE TREE MITIGATION
	PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN.


	5. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE NARRATIVE TO REFLECT THAT
	THERE ARE MORE CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
	PLAN THAN JUST THE SABAL PALMS.

	6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LIST OF ANY CHANGES TO THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN AND CLOUD THEM.


	7. SATISFIED. SEAGRAPE 76301 AND 76351 ARE PROPOSED TO
	BE REMOVED AND MUST BE INCLUDED IN MITIGATION DUE, ALL
	TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED MUST BE MITIGATED. 76270
	NEEDS CANOPY DIAMETER.

	MINOR AMENDMENT:

	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	SHOWING THE CHANGES PROPOSED WITH THIS PETITION
	BUBBLED, AND AMEND TO MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS
	FOR MITIGATION OF 1:1 REPLACEMENT FOR TREE CANOPY BELOW
	20 FEET DIAMETER, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES 20 FEET
	OR MORE IN DIAMETER.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART
	SHOWING THE APPROVED MITIGATION QUANTITY AND THE TREE
	MITIGATION PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
	WITH THIS PETITION.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE AND
	LANDSCAPE AREA PERCENTAGE FOR PBA#1, #2 AND #3, AND
	SHOW COMPARISON TO WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED.

	4. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE FRONTAGE ROAD
	DOES NOT MEET THE DESIGN GUIDELINES CROSS SECTION 6
	UNDER VII C. FRONTAGE ROAD. PLEASE REVISE.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUIRED SHADE TREE,
	FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB QUANTITIES FOR THE SITE PER
	CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-442 (B)(2). ADJUST SUBSTITUTION
	OF PALMS TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF 3:1 FOR COCONUT
	PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION PER THE
	DESIGN GUIDELINES.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	REQUIREMENTS CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE 40
	POINTS AS REQUIRED.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL
	INDIVIDUAL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND
	SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION XI-
	D. OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
	BUFFER AND INCLUDE ANY APPLICATION OF PALM SUBSTITUTION
	PER XII G.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIST OF SHRUBS BY
	SPECIES, QUANTITY AND SIZE. INCLUDE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
	LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST AND IF
	NATIVE.

	9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR PBA #2
	AND PBA #3 SEPARATELY FOR XII E. FOUNDATION PLANTING.

	10. SATISFIED. THE PROMENADE IS VERY PLAIN. PLEASE
	REVISE THE PLAN TO INCORPORATE MORE INTEREST PER THE
	DESIGN GUIDELINES SUCH AS A MEANDERING WALKWAY WITH
	LANDSCAPING AND RESTING SPACES INTERACTING WITH THE
	WALKWAY.

	11. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
	UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW
	PREVENTERS ARE NOT CLEARLY SHOWN IN FINAL LOCATIONS.

	12. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER,
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND
	RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.

	13. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
	TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
	THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
	CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
	BY TREE ROOTS.
	COMMENTS 11, 12, AND 13. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS
	WITH TREES AND NEW UTILITIES, AND MANY TREES HAVE BEEN
	REMOVED FROM THE PLAN ALONG THE CENTER BUFFER OF THE
	FRONTAGE ROAD TO ACCOMMODATE UTILITY VALVES REDUCING
	THE BUFFERING INTENDED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. THERE
	ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE SPACING OR
	ROOT BARRIER TO PROTECT UTILITIES. THE ROOT BARRIER
	PLAN L1-120 AND DETAILS L5-110 ARE FOR SIDEWALKS ONLY,
	NOT UTILITIES.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/26/18:
	14. SATISFIED. THE ADJUSTMENT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
	REDUCING THE REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT FROM
	THE CODE REQUIREMENT MAY NOT BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF.
	SUPPLEMENT 33 TO THE ZLDR?S SECTION 94-443(D) APPROVED
	THROUGH ORDINANCE 4493-13 REQUIRES ONE ADDITIONAL TREE
	PER DWELLING UNIT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE
	ADDITIONAL TREE PER 4 UNITS RESULTING IN 300 LESS TREES
	THAN REQUIRED BY CODE, SO REQUIRES A WAIVER REQUEST.
	THIS WOULD AFFECT ALL FUTURE PBA?S WITH MULTIPLE
	RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/10/20:
	15. SUBMIT THE ARBORIST REPORT ON THE CHANGES FROM
	RELOCATE TO REMOVAL AS DISCUSSED.

	16. SUBMIT CLOUDED COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
	MATCHING THE PERMIT SUBMITTALS.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.

	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE
	PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE
	AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-26-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-26-2018	Time	15:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-26-2018	Time	15:43	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-26 15:44:55	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: THE MARINA CMPD Z18020023
	APRIL 26, 2018

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	SHOWING THE CHANGES PROPOSED WITH THIS PETITION
	BUBBLED, AND AMEND TO MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS
	FOR MITIGATION OF 1:1 REPLACEMENT FOR TREE CANOPY BELOW
	20 FEET DIAMETER, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES 20 FEET
	OR MORE IN DIAMETER.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART
	SHOWING THE APPROVED MITIGATION QUANTITY AND THE TREE
	MITIGATION PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
	WITH THIS PETITION.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE AND
	LANDSCAPE AREA PERCENTAGE FOR PBA#1, #2 AND #3, AND
	SHOW COMPARISON TO WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED.

	4. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE FRONTAGE ROAD
	DOES NOT MEET THE DESIGN GUIDELINES CROSS SECTION 6
	UNDER VII C. FRONTAGE ROAD. PLEASE REVISE.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUIRED SHADE TREE,
	FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB QUANTITIES FOR THE SITE PER
	CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-442 (B)(2). ADJUST SUBSTITUTION
	OF PALMS TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF 3:1 FOR COCONUT
	PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION PER THE
	DESIGN GUIDELINES.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	REQUIREMENTS CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE 40
	POINTS AS REQUIRED.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL
	INDIVIDUAL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND
	SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION XI-
	D. OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
	BUFFER AND INCLUDE ANY APPLICATION OF PALM SUBSTITUTION
	PER XII G.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIST OF SHRUBS BY
	SPECIES, QUANTITY AND SIZE. INCLUDE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
	LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST AND IF
	NATIVE.

	9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR PBA #2
	AND PBA #3 SEPARATELY FOR XII E. FOUNDATION PLANTING.

	10. SATISFIED. THE PROMENADE IS VERY PLAIN. PLEASE
	REVISE THE PLAN TO INCORPORATE MORE INTEREST PER THE
	DESIGN GUIDELINES SUCH AS A MEANDERING WALKWAY WITH
	LANDSCAPING AND RESTING SPACES INTERACTING WITH THE
	WALKWAY.

	11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
	UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW
	PREVENTERS ARE NOT CLEARLY SHOWN IN FINAL LOCATIONS.

	12. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER,
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND
	RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.

	13. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT
	BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM
	CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE,
	SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT
	COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.

	COMMENTS 11, 12, AND 13. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS
	WITH TREES AND NEW UTILITIES, AND MANY TREES HAVE BEEN
	REMOVED FROM THE PLAN ALONG THE CENTER BUFFER OF THE
	FRONTAGE ROAD TO ACCOMMODATE UTILITY VALVES REDUCING
	THE BUFFERING INTENDED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. THERE
	ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE SPACING OR
	ROOT BARRIER TO PROTECT UTILITIES. THE ROOT BARRIER
	PLAN L1-120 AND DETAILS L5-110 ARE FOR SIDEWALKS ONLY,
	NOT UTILITIES.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/26/18:
	14. THE ADJUSTMENT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES REDUCING
	THE REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT FROM THE CODE
	REQUIREMENT MAY NOT BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF. SUPPLEMENT
	33 TO THE ZLDR?S SECTION 94-443(D) APPROVED THROUGH
	ORDINANCE 4493-13 REQUIRES ONE ADDITIONAL TREE PER
	DWELLING UNIT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE
	ADDITIONAL TREE PER 4 UNITS RESULTING IN 300 LESS TREES
	THAN REQUIRED BY CODE, SO REQUIRES A WAIVER REQUEST.
	THIS WOULD AFFECT ALL FUTURE PBA?S WITH MULTIPLE
	RESIDENTIAL UNITS.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.

	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE
	PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE
	AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-13-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	03-13-2018	Time	16:34	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	03-13-2018	Time	16:34	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-13 16:34:57	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: THE MARINA CMPD Z18020023
	MARCH 13, 2018

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. PLEASE UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHOWING THE
	CHANGES PROPOSED WITH THIS PETITION BUBBLED, AND AMEND
	TO MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR MITIGATION OF 1:1
	REPLACEMENT FOR TREE CANOPY BELOW 20 FEET DIAMETER, AND
	SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER.

	2. PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART SHOWING THE
	APPROVED MITIGATION QUANTITY AND THE TREE MITIGATION
	PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THIS
	PETITION.

	3. PLEASE SHOW THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE AND LANDSCAPE
	AREA PERCENTAGE FOR PBA#1, #2 AND #3, AND SHOW
	COMPARISON TO WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED.

	4. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE FRONTAGE ROAD DOES NOT
	MEET THE DESIGN GUIDELINES CROSS SECTION 6 UNDER VII C.
	FRONTAGE ROAD. PLEASE REVISE.

	5. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUIRED SHADE TREE, FLOWERING TREE
	AND SHRUB QUANTITIES FOR THE SITE PER CURRENT CODE
	SECTION 94-442 (B)(2). ADJUST SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS TO
	CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF 3:1 FOR COCONUT PALMS FOR
	REQUIRED TREES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION PER THE DESIGN
	GUIDELINES.

	6. PLEASE UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS
	CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE 40 POINTS AS
	REQUIRED.

	7. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL INDIVIDUAL
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND SHOW
	COMPLIANCE WITH BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION XI- D.
	OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
	BUFFER AND INCLUDE ANY APPLICATION OF PALM SUBSTITUTION
	PER XII G.

	8. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIST OF SHRUBS BY SPECIES,
	QUANTITY AND SIZE. INCLUDE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR
	EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST AND IF NATIVE.

	9. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR PBA #2 AND PBA #3
	SEPARATELY FOR XII E. FOUNDATION PLANTING.

	10. THE PROMENADE IS VERY PLAIN. PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN
	TO INCORPORATE MORE INTEREST PER THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
	SUCH AS A MEANDERING WALKWAY WITH LANDSCAPING AND
	RESTING SPACES INTERACTING WITH THE WALKWAY.

	11. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
	EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
	AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
	AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW PREVENTERS ARE NOT
	CLEARLY SHOWN IN FINAL LOCATIONS.

	12. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, SEWER AND
	DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND RESOLVE ANY
	CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.

	13. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
	INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
	WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
	FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.

	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE
	PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE
	AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW		PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-14 07:11:28	BASED ON THE PRINTS IT SHOWS THAT A ROLL OFF COMPACTOR
	SERVICE IS BEING PROPOSED. THE ONLY STIPULATION IS THAT
	THE SERVICE MUST BE FROM ONE OF THE APPROVED FRANCHISE
	ROLL OFF HAULERS.

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-09 13:41:45	SEE COMMENTS PROVIDED ON PROJECT Z18020021.

Review Stop	SURVEY		SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date			Cont ID
Sent By				Date	04-25-2018	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-25 10:31:05	Z18020021 & Z18020023 THE MARINA CMPD
	1ST RESUBMITTAL

	TRAFFIC STATEMENT (DATED MARCH 29, 2018) COMMENTS:

	- THE TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION APPEARS TO BE CORRECT
	BUT THE RATES INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT ARE
	NOT. PER PALM BEACH COUNTY?S TRIP GENERATION RATE
	INFORMATION, DAILY RATE SHOULD BE 152.03 TRIPS PER
	1,000 S.F., AND PM RATE SHOULD BE 12.81 TRIPS PER 1,000
	S.F. FOR 10,000 S.F. OR LESS. RETAIL PASS-BY % SHOULD
	BE 62% FOR 10,000 S.F. OR LESS.
	- INCLUDE DAILY PASS-BY TRIPS AS DAILY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
	SHOWN IN FIGURE 1. THE DAILY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES SUM UP TO
	THE NET PROPOSED TRIPS ONLY BUT NOT THE TOTAL DRIVEWAY
	VOLUMES SHOWN IN TABLE 2.
	- PROVIDE FINAL SIGNED AND SEALED TRAFFIC STATEMENT.

	SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON APRIL 18, 2018) COMMENTS:

	- PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, INCLUDE IN THE
	APPLICATION THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN, INCLUDING BUT NOT
	LIMITED TO LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALKS/BIKE PATHS, ON THE
	EAST AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE. PLEASE
	COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN.
	THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR
	TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
	FOR THE PROPOSED PBA DEVELOPMENT. THIS COMMENT WAS
	ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE RESPONSE BUT NO STREETSCAPE DESIGN
	IS PROVIDED FOR THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF NORTH
	FLAGLER DRIVE.
	- SWAP THE LOCATIONS OF THE TURNAROUND AREA AND THE
	LAST PARKING SPACE PRIOR TO THE RESIDENTIAL ACCESS
	GATE.
	- SOME OF THE DIMENSIONS IN THE CIVIL PLAN ARE
	DIFFERENT THAN THE SITE PLAN, AND THE SIDEWALK DESIGN
	IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE TWO SETS OF PLANS.
	FOR EXAMPLE, IN SHEETS A1.01 AND C4.00, THE DROP OFF
	AREAS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BUILDING ARE
	INDICATED WITH WIDTHS OF 19?-9? AND 18? RESPECTIVELY IN
	THE SITE PLAN, BUT IS SHOWN AS 18? AND 20? RESPECTIVELY
	IN THE CIVIL PLAN; AND THE INTERNAL ROADWAY WIDTH TO
	THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN AS 25?-2? IN THE
	SITE PLAN BUT IS SHOWN AS 24? IN THE CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE
	REVISE.
	- THE INTERNAL ROADWAY COULD BE REDUCED TO 24? WIDE AND
	THE DROP OFF AREA COULD BE REDUCED TO 18? WIDE TO
	MAXIMIZE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH, WHICH COULD ALLOW A
	MINIMUM OF 6? SIDEWALKS AND PREFERABLY 8? TO 10?
	SIDEWALKS BE PROVIDED. ALSO, INCREASE THE WIDTH OF THE
	SIDEWALKS/PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS WHICH RUN DIAGONALLY
	ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
	- PROVIDE FINAL SIGNED AND SEALED CIVIL PLAN.

	ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-13 17:30:42	Z18020021 & Z18020023
	PPRC MEETING 2018-03-14

	THE MARINA TRAFFIC REVIEW GENERAL COMMENTS:

	- PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 4506-14, PROVIDE A TRAFFIC
	STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER, TO DOCUMENT
	THE TRIP GENERATION AND VERIFY THAT THE MAXIMUM
	ALLOWABLE TRIP COUNT OF 14,640 AVERAGE DAILY VEHICULAR
	TRIPS IS NOT EXCEEDED. THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHALL
	OUTLINE THE NUMBER OF AVERAGE DAILY VEHICULAR TRIPS
	ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR RENOVATION
	ALONG WITH ALL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED TO REMAIN
	ON THE PROPERTY.
	- PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, THE DEVELOPER IS
	RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS, AND MAKE
	ALL NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS TO CONVERT 40TH STREET INTO
	A TWO-WAY ROAD BETWEEN NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE AND BROADWAY
	AVENUE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING
	PERMIT.
	- PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, PROVIDE PROOF OF
	BOND PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF 110% OF THE COST OF
	INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT NORTH FLAGLER
	DRIVE/45TH STREET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST
	BUILDING PERMIT.
	- PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, A NORTHBOUND LEFT
	TURN LANE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE
	ONTO 45TH STREET, AT THE DEVELOPER?S EXPENSE, PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
	- PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
	OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SIGNAL TIMING
	PATTERNS SHALL BE OPTIMIZED AT 45TH STREET/BROADWAY
	AVENUE BY THE DEVELOPER TO ENSURE THE MOST EFFICIENT
	TRAFFIC FLOW. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
	OPTIMIZATION SHALL BE COVERED BY THE DEVELOPER, AND ALL
	WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY AND
	COUNTY?S STANDARDS AND PROCESSES.
	- THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT MODIFIES PBA 2 TO A MAXIMUM OF
	200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND PBA 3 TO A MAXIMUM OF 199
	RESIDENTIAL UNITS, BUT THE SITE PLAN, SHEET A0.02
	PROPOSES 199 UNITS IN PBA 2 AND 200 UNITS IN PBA 3.
	PLEASE REVISE.
	- THE REVISED FIGURES ARE MISSING FROM THE REVISED
	DESIGN GUIDELINES, PAGE 21,22,24, AND 26. PLEASE
	REVISE.

	SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018) COMMENTS:

	- PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, INCLUDE IN THE
	APPLICATION THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN, INCLUDING BUT NOT
	LIMITED TO LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALKS/BIKE PATHS, ON THE
	EAST AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE. PLEASE
	COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN.
	THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR
	TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
	FOR THE PROPOSED PBA DEVELOPMENT.
	- DIMENSION THE FULL WIDTH OF RIGHT OF WAY AND THE
	WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE.
	- THE GARAGE APPEARS TO BE UNGATED AND UNRESTRICTED.
	PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE SURE THE PARKING NEEDS
	OF THE VISITORS, RESIDENTS AND THEIR GUESTS ARE
	ACCOMMODATED.
	- PROVIDE A TURNAROUND AREA FOR THE LAST PARKING SPACE
	UNDER RAMP.
	- FOR SOME OF THE ACTIVE USE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES
	ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE, THE BACKDOORS OPEN INTO
	THE PARKING AISLES UNDER THE RAMP. THIS MAY CREATE
	POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH VEHICLES. PLEASE PROVIDE A
	BUFFER SPACE BETWEEN THE DOORS AND THE PARKING AISLES,
	REMOVE THE BACKDOORS IF ALTERNATIVE ACCESS EXISTS, AND
	HAVE THE DOORS OPEN TO INSIDE.
	- PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS BETWEEN FLAGLER DRIVE
	AND THE PROPERTY NEAR 43RD STREET.
	- CONSIDER PROVIDING WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH AND
	SOUTH BUILDING FRONTAGE BETWEEN FLAGLER DRIVE AND THE
	PROMENADE.
	- THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY IS OFFSET TO 42ND STREET. WHEN
	THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH REDEVELOPS, THIS DRIVEWAY
	WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO ALIGN WITH 42ND STREET TO
	MINIMIZE POTENTIAL VEHICLE CONFLICTS.
	- PROVIDE AT LEAST 25 FEET OF STORAGE SPACE IN ADVANCE
	OF THE STOP BARS AT THE 2 FLAGLER DRIVE DRIVEWAYS.
	- ALL STOP BARS SHOULD BE PLACED IN ADVANCE OF THE
	CROSSWALKS.
	- ON SHEET C4.11, ALL GARBAGE TRUCK PATHS ARE SHOWN TO
	RUN OVER CURBS. REVISE THE CURB TO ACCOMMODATE GARBAGE
	TRUCKS.
	- CLARIFY IF THE GARBAGE TRUCK NEEDS TO ACCESS THE
	PROMENADE. IF SO, PLEASE MODIFY THE CURBS TO
	ACCOMMODATE.
	- INCLUDE THE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE TRUCKS
	ACCESSING ALL 3 TRASH AREAS.

	ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z		ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-14-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	jroach			Date	03-14-2018	Time	08:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jroach			Date	03-14-2018	Time	08:48	Sent To

Notes

2018-03-15 08:48:53	PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
	___________________________________________

	DATE OF REVIEW: 03.14.2018
	PROJECT NO.: Z18020021 & Z18020023
	CASE NO.: PB 1445FF & 1445GG
	___________________________________________

	PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
	REVIEW COMMENTS:

	1. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
	SHALL BE PROVIDED.

	2. SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A NORTH ARROW AND GRAPHIC
	SCALE.

	3. THE PROPERTY LINE SHOULD BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED WITH
	A DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/COLOR/WEIGHT. A PORTION OF THE
	PROPERTY LINE IS SHOWN AS A RED DASHED LINE, WHILE
	OTHER PORTIONS ARE THE SAME LINE WEIGHT/COLOR AS EVERY
	OTHER LINE.

	4. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DRIVEWAY AT THE
	SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT, BETWEEN RYBOVICH AND THE TRG
	PROJECT.

	5. THERE SHOULD BE A DOOR FROM THE BIKE PARKING SPACE
	TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, WITHOUT HAVING TO GO
	THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE.

	6. THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR TO
	ACCOUNT FOR THE ACTIVE USE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS
	PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD.

	7. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE LABELS AND DETAILS OF
	ALL FENCING, WALL, ETC.; HEIGHTS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED.

	8. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE
	SOUTH OF THE OFFICE/OUTDOOR DINING AREA.

	9. THE PARKING STALL DETAIL SHOULD MATCH THE CITY?S
	STANDARD DETAIL; PLEASE EMAIL ME FOR A COPY. AN
	ADDITIONAL DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING HOW THE
	STRIPING WILL BE ACCOMMODATED AROUND OR NEAR THE
	STRUCTURAL COLUMNS IN THE GARAGE.

	10. IS THERE A REASON WHY THE GARAGE IS SHOWN AS
	ONE-WAY? THE ARROWS INDICATE ONE-WAY, BUT STOP BARS ARE
	SHOWN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE GARAGE, ETC.

	11. PLEASE VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE STOP BARS,
	PARTICULARLY AT THE EXITS OF THE PARKING GARAGE. I
	BELIEVE THE BAR SHOULD BE RELOCATED, OR A SECOND BAR
	ADDED, BEFORE THE CROSSWALK.

	12. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE PAVEMENT
	MARKINGS THAT ARE SHOWN ON SHEET C4.00.

	13. PLEASE PROVIDE TURNING ANALYSIS FOR THE
	LOADING/UNLOADING AND TRASH PICK-UP INSIDE THE GARAGE.

	14. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EXTERIOR
	OF THE BUILDING NEAR EACH OF THE ELEMENTS THAT IS OPEN
	TO THE PUBLIC OR WOULD OTHERWISE BE ACCESSED BY SOMEONE
	WHO DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNAL BIKE STORAGE
	AREA.

	15. A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE
	RACK, INCLUDING SIZE, STYLE, DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA
	SURROUNDING, ETC.

	16. TURN AROUND SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT PARKING
	ROWS THAT HAVE A DEAD END, SUCH AS UNDER THE RAMP ON
	THE GROUND FLOOR AND ON THE TOP LEVEL OF THE GARAGE.

	17. DIMENSION ALL PARKING ROWS AND DRIVE AISLES.

	18. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHOULD BE MADE FROM THE SOUTH
	LOBBY ENTRANCE TO THE PUBLIC PROMENADE TO THE EAST,
	WITHOUT HAVING TO CROSS LANDSCAPING.

	19. POOLS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR
	STRUCTURE THAT IS AT LEAST FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
	ACCESS TO THE POOL SHOULD BE THROUGH A BUILDING OR
	THROUGH A SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING GATE WITH
	LATCHES AT LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE
	GATE.

	20. THE DATA ON SHEET A0.02 INDICATE THAT THERE ARE 199
	DWELLING UNITS IN PBA 2 AND 200 DWELLING UNITS IN PBA
	3; THE DESIGN GUIDELINES HAVE THIS INFORMATION
	REVERSED.

	21. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY
	LINE TO THE NORTHERN ROADWAY; THE MINIMUM BUFFER SHALL
	BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH.

	22. THE MASSING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 18 OF THE DESIGN
	GUIDELINES NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT
	THE NEW MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREAS.

	23. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, SHOWER/CHANGING
	FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDE FOR EMPLOYEES OF ALL
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE CMPD. PLEASE INDICATE
	HOW THIS IS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE ACTIVE USES
	PROPOSED ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD.

	24. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, A SITE PLAN
	APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
	THAT DEMONSTRATES THE PROVISION OF SUFFICIENT PARKING
	AND SUFFICIENT VEHICULAR, PEDESTRIAN AND EMERGENCY
	VEHICLE ACCESS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC AS WELL AS
	ALL BUILDINGS REMAINING IN OPERATION DURING THE
	DEMOLITION/CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING.

	25. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THERE IS TO BE A
	MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET OF FOUNDATION PLANTING ALONG
	THE WEST FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING.

	26. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES THE DESIGN OF THE
	FRONTAGE ROAD IS TO INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS SUCH AS
	BENCHES, TRASH CAN, FOUNTAINS, PUBLIC ART, ETC.

	27. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING OT THE
	PROPOSED GREEN WALLS ON THE GROUND FLOOR, ON THE WEST
	FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING.

	28. VERIFICATION FROM THE PROJECT ARCHITECT SHALL BE
	PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE BUILDING WILL BE AT LEAST
	BRONZE LEVEL ON THE ICC 700 2012 NATIONAL GREEN
	BUILDING STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 AND
	INCORPORATE ALL OF THE GREEN INITIATIVES OUTLINED IN
	THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.

	29. PARKING FOR THE ACTIVE USES ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD
	TO NOT APPEAR TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS,
	PLEASE CLARIFY. PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE OUTLINED IN THE DESIGN
	GUIDELINES.

	30. STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED
	NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND THE CONFIGURATION OF THE
	GARAGE, ETC. PLEASE CONTACT FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION.

	31. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED WALKWAY
	EXTENDING INTO THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. IS THE
	DOCKING OF BOATS GOING TO BE PERMITTED? IF SO, ARE THE
	SLIPS FOR RESIDENTS ONLY? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
	REGARDING THIS ELEMENT MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
	DEPENDING UPON THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY?S
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

	32. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE METAL PANELS
	(BEHIND THE CABLE RAILS) INSIDE OF THE PARKING GARAGE.
	PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THESE PANELS SHALL
	BE AT LEAST 3 FEET 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT.

	33. THERE WAS SOME COMMENTS BY STAFF THAT THE PROPOSED
	DESIGN ELEMENTS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE SEEMED A LITTLE
	OUT OF CONTEXT WITH THE REST OF THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER
	AND THOUGHT THAT THEY COULD BE BETTER INTEGRATED.

	34. IS THE GARAGE PROPOSED TO BE GATED? THERE NEEDS TO
	BE DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF REGARDING OPERATION OF THE
	GARAGE, STACKING, GUEST ACCESS, ACCESS TO PARKING BY
	PATRONS OF THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES, ETC.

	35. IS LIGHTING PROPOSED? A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE
	PROVIDED.

	36. IS SIGNAGE PROPOSED AS PART OF THE ACTIVE USES
	ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD?
	___________________________________________

	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:

	A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.

	B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
	17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.

	C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.

	F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE MAY 15, 2018,
	PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
	SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
	DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MARCH 30, 2018.

	G) TO BE PLACED ON THE MAY 15, 2018, PLANNING BOARD
	AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
	THAN APRIL 30, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
	INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
	AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
	THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
	AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
	ABOVE.
	___________________________________________

	QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:

	JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
	401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
	WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402

	P: 561.822.1448
	F: 561.822.1460

	E: [email protected]

	W: WPB.ORG