Plan Review Details - Project Z18020021
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18020021
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status   Date 03-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 03-14-2018 Time 12:48 Rev Time  
Received By mgonzale Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 03-14-2018 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date 03-14-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-14 12:49:30#1 PROVIDE ESTIMATED FLOWS GPD FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 #2 BACKFLOW (RPPA AND DCDA) LOCATIONS MUST BE PRE
 APPROVED BY FIRE AND UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE FOR EACH
 BUILDING.
  
 #3 PROVIDE TIMELINE AS TO WATERMAIN UPGRADE TO 12" WM.
  
 #4 PROVIDE PRELIMINARY SUMMARY AS TO THE EXISTING SEWER
 CAPACITY WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILTIES.
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS
 /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
 FREE."
 FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 03-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-09-2018 Time 09:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-09-2018 Time 09:05 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-09 09:15:37FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED MAJOR AMENDMENT.

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-14 07:10:08BASED ON THE PRINTS IT SHOWS THAT A ROLL OFF COMPACTOR
 SERVICE IS BEING PROPOSED. THE ONLY STIPULATION IS THAT
 THE SERVICE MUST BE FROM ONE OF THE APPROVED FRANCHISE
 ROLL OFF HAULERS.

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-09-2018 Time 13:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-09-2018 Time 13:39 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-09 13:39:14THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 2. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. SHOW THE DATUM
 CONVERSION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE REVISED SFWMD ERP PERMIT FOR
 THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-12-2018 Time 10:00 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-12 10:02:101. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED.
 3. ADD DATUM CONVERSION FROM NGVD 29 TO NAVD 88 ON
 SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS.

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-13-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-13 17:29:10Z18020021 & Z18020023
 PPRC MEETING 2018-03-14
  
 THE MARINA TRAFFIC REVIEW GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 - PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 4506-14, PROVIDE A TRAFFIC
 STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER, TO DOCUMENT
 THE TRIP GENERATION AND VERIFY THAT THE MAXIMUM
 ALLOWABLE TRIP COUNT OF 14,640 AVERAGE DAILY VEHICULAR
 TRIPS IS NOT EXCEEDED. THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHALL
 OUTLINE THE NUMBER OF AVERAGE DAILY VEHICULAR TRIPS
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR RENOVATION
 ALONG WITH ALL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED TO REMAIN
 ON THE PROPERTY.
 - PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, THE DEVELOPER IS
 RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS, AND MAKE
 ALL NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS TO CONVERT 40TH STREET INTO
 A TWO-WAY ROAD BETWEEN NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE AND BROADWAY
 AVENUE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING
 PERMIT.
 - PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, PROVIDE PROOF OF
 BOND PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF 110% OF THE COST OF
 INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT NORTH FLAGLER
 DRIVE/45TH STREET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST
 BUILDING PERMIT.
 - PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, A NORTHBOUND LEFT
 TURN LANE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE
 ONTO 45TH STREET, AT THE DEVELOPER?S EXPENSE, PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
 - PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
 OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SIGNAL TIMING
 PATTERNS SHALL BE OPTIMIZED AT 45TH STREET/BROADWAY
 AVENUE BY THE DEVELOPER TO ENSURE THE MOST EFFICIENT
 TRAFFIC FLOW. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
 OPTIMIZATION SHALL BE COVERED BY THE DEVELOPER, AND ALL
 WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY AND
 COUNTY?S STANDARDS AND PROCESSES.
 - THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT MODIFIES PBA 2 TO A MAXIMUM OF
 200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND PBA 3 TO A MAXIMUM OF 199
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, BUT THE SITE PLAN, SHEET A0.02
 PROPOSES 199 UNITS IN PBA 2 AND 200 UNITS IN PBA 3.
 PLEASE REVISE.
 - THE REVISED FIGURES ARE MISSING FROM THE REVISED
 DESIGN GUIDELINES, PAGE 21,22,24, AND 26. PLEASE
 REVISE.
  
 SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018) COMMENTS:
  
 - PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, INCLUDE IN THE
 APPLICATION THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN, INCLUDING BUT NOT
 LIMITED TO LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALKS/BIKE PATHS, ON THE
 EAST AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE. PLEASE
 COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN.
 THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR
 TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 FOR THE PROPOSED PBA DEVELOPMENT.
 - DIMENSION THE FULL WIDTH OF RIGHT OF WAY AND THE
 WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE.
 - THE GARAGE APPEARS TO BE UNGATED AND UNRESTRICTED.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE SURE THE PARKING NEEDS
 OF THE VISITORS, RESIDENTS AND THEIR GUESTS ARE
 ACCOMMODATED.
 - PROVIDE A TURNAROUND AREA FOR THE LAST PARKING SPACE
 UNDER RAMP.
 - FOR SOME OF THE ACTIVE USE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES
 ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE, THE BACKDOORS OPEN INTO
 THE PARKING AISLES UNDER THE RAMP. THIS MAY CREATE
 POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH VEHICLES. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 BUFFER SPACE BETWEEN THE DOORS AND THE PARKING AISLES,
 REMOVE THE BACKDOORS IF ALTERNATIVE ACCESS EXISTS, AND
 HAVE THE DOORS OPEN TO INSIDE.
 - PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS BETWEEN FLAGLER DRIVE
 AND THE PROPERTY NEAR 43RD STREET.
 - CONSIDER PROVIDING WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH AND
 SOUTH BUILDING FRONTAGE BETWEEN FLAGLER DRIVE AND THE
 PROMENADE.
 - THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY IS OFFSET TO 42ND STREET. WHEN
 THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH REDEVELOPS, THIS DRIVEWAY
 WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO ALIGN WITH 42ND STREET TO
 MINIMIZE POTENTIAL VEHICLE CONFLICTS.
 - PROVIDE AT LEAST 25 FEET OF STORAGE SPACE IN ADVANCE
 OF THE STOP BARS AT THE 2 FLAGLER DRIVE DRIVEWAYS.
 - ALL STOP BARS SHOULD BE PLACED IN ADVANCE OF THE
 CROSSWALKS.
 - ON SHEET C4.11, ALL GARBAGE TRUCK PATHS ARE SHOWN TO
 RUN OVER CURBS. REVISE THE CURB TO ACCOMMODATE GARBAGE
 TRUCKS.
 - CLARIFY IF THE GARBAGE TRUCK NEEDS TO ACCESS THE
 PROMENADE. IF SO, PLEASE MODIFY THE CURBS TO
 ACCOMMODATE.
 - INCLUDE THE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE TRUCKS
 ACCESSING ALL 3 TRASH AREAS.
  
  
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENIGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 03-14-2018 Time 08:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 03-14-2018 Time 08:47 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-15 08:48:02PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 03.14.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18020021 & Z18020023
 CASE NO.: PB 1445FF & 1445GG
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A NORTH ARROW AND GRAPHIC
 SCALE.
  
 3. THE PROPERTY LINE SHOULD BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED WITH
 A DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/COLOR/WEIGHT. A PORTION OF THE
 PROPERTY LINE IS SHOWN AS A RED DASHED LINE, WHILE
 OTHER PORTIONS ARE THE SAME LINE WEIGHT/COLOR AS EVERY
 OTHER LINE.
  
 4. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DRIVEWAY AT THE
 SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT, BETWEEN RYBOVICH AND THE TRG
 PROJECT.
  
 5. THERE SHOULD BE A DOOR FROM THE BIKE PARKING SPACE
 TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, WITHOUT HAVING TO GO
 THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
 6. THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 ACCOUNT FOR THE ACTIVE USE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS
 PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD.
  
 7. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE LABELS AND DETAILS OF
 ALL FENCING, WALL, ETC.; HEIGHTS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED.
  
 8. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE
 SOUTH OF THE OFFICE/OUTDOOR DINING AREA.
  
 9. THE PARKING STALL DETAIL SHOULD MATCH THE CITY?S
 STANDARD DETAIL; PLEASE EMAIL ME FOR A COPY. AN
 ADDITIONAL DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING HOW THE
 STRIPING WILL BE ACCOMMODATED AROUND OR NEAR THE
 STRUCTURAL COLUMNS IN THE GARAGE.
  
 10. IS THERE A REASON WHY THE GARAGE IS SHOWN AS
 ONE-WAY? THE ARROWS INDICATE ONE-WAY, BUT STOP BARS ARE
 SHOWN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE GARAGE, ETC.
  
 11. PLEASE VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE STOP BARS,
 PARTICULARLY AT THE EXITS OF THE PARKING GARAGE. I
 BELIEVE THE BAR SHOULD BE RELOCATED, OR A SECOND BAR
 ADDED, BEFORE THE CROSSWALK.
  
 12. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS THAT ARE SHOWN ON SHEET C4.00.
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE TURNING ANALYSIS FOR THE
 LOADING/UNLOADING AND TRASH PICK-UP INSIDE THE GARAGE.
  
 14. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EXTERIOR
 OF THE BUILDING NEAR EACH OF THE ELEMENTS THAT IS OPEN
 TO THE PUBLIC OR WOULD OTHERWISE BE ACCESSED BY SOMEONE
 WHO DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNAL BIKE STORAGE
 AREA.
  
 15. A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE
 RACK, INCLUDING SIZE, STYLE, DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA
 SURROUNDING, ETC.
  
 16. TURN AROUND SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT PARKING
 ROWS THAT HAVE A DEAD END, SUCH AS UNDER THE RAMP ON
 THE GROUND FLOOR AND ON THE TOP LEVEL OF THE GARAGE.
  
 17. DIMENSION ALL PARKING ROWS AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 18. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHOULD BE MADE FROM THE SOUTH
 LOBBY ENTRANCE TO THE PUBLIC PROMENADE TO THE EAST,
 WITHOUT HAVING TO CROSS LANDSCAPING.
  
 19. POOLS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR
 STRUCTURE THAT IS AT LEAST FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
 ACCESS TO THE POOL SHOULD BE THROUGH A BUILDING OR
 THROUGH A SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING GATE WITH
 LATCHES AT LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE
 GATE.
  
 20. THE DATA ON SHEET A0.02 INDICATE THAT THERE ARE 199
 DWELLING UNITS IN PBA 2 AND 200 DWELLING UNITS IN PBA
 3; THE DESIGN GUIDELINES HAVE THIS INFORMATION
 REVERSED.
  
 21. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY
 LINE TO THE NORTHERN ROADWAY; THE MINIMUM BUFFER SHALL
 BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 22. THE MASSING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 18 OF THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT
 THE NEW MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREAS.
  
 23. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, SHOWER/CHANGING
 FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDE FOR EMPLOYEES OF ALL
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE CMPD. PLEASE INDICATE
 HOW THIS IS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE ACTIVE USES
 PROPOSED ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD.
  
 24. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, A SITE PLAN
 APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
 THAT DEMONSTRATES THE PROVISION OF SUFFICIENT PARKING
 AND SUFFICIENT VEHICULAR, PEDESTRIAN AND EMERGENCY
 VEHICLE ACCESS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC AS WELL AS
 ALL BUILDINGS REMAINING IN OPERATION DURING THE
 DEMOLITION/CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING.
  
 25. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THERE IS TO BE A
 MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET OF FOUNDATION PLANTING ALONG
 THE WEST FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 26. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES THE DESIGN OF THE
 FRONTAGE ROAD IS TO INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS SUCH AS
 BENCHES, TRASH CAN, FOUNTAINS, PUBLIC ART, ETC.
  
 27. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING OT THE
 PROPOSED GREEN WALLS ON THE GROUND FLOOR, ON THE WEST
 FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 28. VERIFICATION FROM THE PROJECT ARCHITECT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE BUILDING WILL BE AT LEAST
 BRONZE LEVEL ON THE ICC 700 2012 NATIONAL GREEN
 BUILDING STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 AND
 INCORPORATE ALL OF THE GREEN INITIATIVES OUTLINED IN
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 29. PARKING FOR THE ACTIVE USES ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD
 TO NOT APPEAR TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS,
 PLEASE CLARIFY. PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE OUTLINED IN THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES.
  
 30. STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED
 NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND THE CONFIGURATION OF THE
 GARAGE, ETC. PLEASE CONTACT FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION.
  
 31. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED WALKWAY
 EXTENDING INTO THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. IS THE
 DOCKING OF BOATS GOING TO BE PERMITTED? IF SO, ARE THE
 SLIPS FOR RESIDENTS ONLY? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 REGARDING THIS ELEMENT MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
 DEPENDING UPON THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY?S
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 32. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE METAL PANELS
 (BEHIND THE CABLE RAILS) INSIDE OF THE PARKING GARAGE.
 PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THESE PANELS SHALL
 BE AT LEAST 3 FEET 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT.
  
 33. THERE WAS SOME COMMENTS BY STAFF THAT THE PROPOSED
 DESIGN ELEMENTS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE SEEMED A LITTLE
 OUT OF CONTEXT WITH THE REST OF THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER
 AND THOUGHT THAT THEY COULD BE BETTER INTEGRATED.
  
 34. IS THE GARAGE PROPOSED TO BE GATED? THERE NEEDS TO
 BE DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF REGARDING OPERATION OF THE
 GARAGE, STACKING, GUEST ACCESS, ACCESS TO PARKING BY
 PATRONS OF THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES, ETC.
  
 35. IS LIGHTING PROPOSED? A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 36. IS SIGNAGE PROPOSED AS PART OF THE ACTIVE USES
 ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD?
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE MAY 15, 2018,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MARCH 30, 2018.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE MAY 15, 2018, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN APRIL 30, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved