 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18010013
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18010013 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
17:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
17:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-13 18:08:34 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING. SHEET A1.0, SITE PLAN, SHOWS | | | THAT 142 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED SO 5 | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE SUBMITTED | | | PLANS DO NOT SHOW 5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND ONLY | | | SHOW 1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ON THE MAIN ENTRY | | | LEVEL. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF | | | FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING. THE PLANS DO NOT CALL OUT | | | THE LOCATION OF A VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. PER | | | SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN | | | EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 4. LOCATION OF ACEESIBLE PARKING. CANNOT DETERMINE | | | WHETHER THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE CORRECTLY | | | LOCATED BECAUSE SHEETS A2.1 AND A2.2, LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL | | | 3 - OVERALL PLAN, DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW THE ENTRANCE TO | | | THE BUILDING FROM THE PARKING GARAGE OR THE ROUTE TO | | | THE ELEVATOR. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. IS THIS AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE OR AN OPEN | | | PARKING GARAGE? IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE | | | WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE | | | DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 8. LEVEL 2 EGRESS FROM PARKING GARAGE. SHEET A2.1, | | | LEVEL 2 - OVERALL PLAN, DOES NOT SHOW A ROUTE FOR | | | OCCUPANTS ON LEVEL 2 OF THE PARKING GARAGE TO GET TO | | | THE EAST STAIR. | | | | | | 9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 10. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION | | | OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
02-12-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
02-05-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-12 12:07:25 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 02/12/2018 | | | PROJECT: GOOD SAMARITAN MOB | | | ADDRESS: 300 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. ADVISORY: BURGER KING IS CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH THE | | | BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND ARE PROPOSING TO | | | REMOVE THE 12-INCH RCP; | | | | | | 2. SIDEWALK SHOULD CONTINUE ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE | | | OF PALM BEACH LAKES AND SHALL NOT BE DEFLECTED ONSITE. | | | DEVIATED SIDEWALK IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS PRIVATE; | | | | | | 3. DRIVEWAY APRONS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARD | | | DETAIL GC-6: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUB | | | LIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 4. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES MARK BOUNDARIES BETWEEN | | | PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR WAYS WHERE THERE IS NO RAISED | | | CURB SUCH AS RAMPS WILL BE REQUIRED. DETECTABLE WARNING | | | SURFACES ARE REQUIRED BY 49 CFR, PART 37 AND BY THE | | | AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) WHERE CURB RAMPS | | | ARE CONSTRUCTED AT THE JUNCTION OF SIDEWALKS AND THE | | | ROADWAY, FOR MARKED AND UNMARKED CROSSWALKS. DETECTABLE | | | WARNING SURFACES CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJACENT | | | WALKING SURFACES, EITHER LIGHT-ON-DARK, OR | | | DARK-ON-LIGHT. THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT | | | ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES | | | (ADAAG). | | | | | | 5. INCLUDE CROSSWALK MARKINGS WHICH PROVIDE GUIDANCE | | | FOR PEDESTRIANS WHO ARE CROSSING DRIVEWAYS BY DEFINING | | | AND DELINEATING PATHS ON APPROACHES. | | | | | | 6. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO ASSESS EXISTING | | | LIFT STATION CONDITIONS; | | | | | | 7. SANITARY SEWER SHOULD CONNECT FROM N. OLIVE AVENUE | | | AND NOT FROM THE ALLEYWAY; | | | | | | 8. PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR DRIVEWAY | | | CONNECTING TO ALLEYWAY; | | | | | | 9. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH | | | AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT | | | ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN | | | SHEET; | | | | | | 10. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE | | | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN | | | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY | | | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY | | | DESIGN; | | | | | | 11. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAYS; | | | | | | AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE | | | FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: HTTP | | | ://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,- | | | PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND | | | PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO | | | VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS | | | ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL; | | | | | | 4. CCTV MUST BE PROVIDED FROM MANHOLE TO MANHOLE WHERE | | | THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER WILL BE LOCATED. CONTACT ME | | | FOR THE MANHOLE NUMBER AND SUBMIT CD WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION. | | | COORDINATE WITH UTILITIES O&M SANITARY SEWER | | | SUPERINTENDENT CHARLES PHOENIX PROVIDE 48-HOUR NOTICE | | | AND MUST OBTAIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT; | | | | | | 5. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE | | | FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN | | | SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE | | | PLANS; | | | | | | 6. FIRE HYDRANT TEST CAN BE REQUESTED AT (561)804-4700; | | | | | | 7. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY; | | | | | | 8. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE | | | DETAIL SHEET/S DURING SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD | | | FORMAT. CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT) | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE: HTTP://WPB.O | | | RG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS- | | | APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 9. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY?S | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST | | | INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | ACCESSIBLE; | | | | | | 10. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT | | | TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE | | | CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER | | | PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL | | | ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY | | | CROSSING INFORMATION; | | | | | | 11. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 12. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OPEN CUT/TRENCH FOR | | | UTILITY CONNECTION WORKS WILL NEED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH 2016 CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. THE ROAD SHALL BE | | | MILLED/RESURFACED FOR FULL LANE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL | | | LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH AREA, INCLUDING A | | | TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH. | | | PLEASE SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS THE EXTENT OF THE | | | MILLING AND RESURFACING; | | | | | | 13. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES ON PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, N. OLIVE | | | AVE AND ALLEYWAY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, | | | SEWER, GAS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS ETC. PLEASE | | | IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION | | | UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND | | | STORM SEWER DESIGN; | | | | | | 14. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE | | | THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: HT | | | TP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLICA | | | TIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-31-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-31-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-31-2018 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-31 16:23:11 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, CHAPTER 38, NEW BUSINESS | | | OCCUPANCIES AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | THE GARAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A AND ASSOCIATED | | | CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE OR EACH AREA, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE, AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED | | | OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THERE APPEARS TO BE A FIRE LINE DDCV INDICATED ON THE | | | CIVIL PLAN, THAT MAY NOT COMPLY WITH NFPA 24, | | | PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE REVIEW CHAPTER 6.2 OF | | | NFPA 24 FOR REQUIRMENTS. | | | | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ANY ACCESS GATES THAT | | | THEY BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS | | | AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-21-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-21-2018 |
Time |
16:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-14-2018 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-21 16:54:48 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 300 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. Z18010013 | | | JUNE 14, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR BRELSFORD PARK | | | DISTRICT 5 FOR 18% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY THE | | | TYPE OF OPEN SPACE FROM TABLE IV-6 AND MEETING THE | | | DEFINITION OF THAT TYPE OF OPEN SPACE IN SECTION | | | 94-109. | | | THE AREA SHOWN FOR THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CANNOT | | | INCLUDE THE DROP OFF AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. ADDITIONAL AREA IN A PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | CATEGORY WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED, SUCH AS A TERRACE. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO | | | SHOW THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND | | | PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | PLEASE RECALCULATE THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE USING | | | SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. | | | EXISTING SEAGRAPES-LARGE TREE =500 SQ FT EACH, MEDIUM | | | TREE 2100 SQ FT OK, LARGE PALM 3 RR =150 SQ FT, TOTAL | | | IS 3250. | | | | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLANNING STAFF IS RECOMMENDING A | | | DIFFERENT DESIGN ADJACENT TO THE STREET. PLEASE REVISE | | | THE STREETSCAPE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-113 WITH SPACING OF TREES EVERY 30 FEET AND ADJUST | | | THE LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING TO WORK IN | | | HARMONY WITH THE STREETSCAPE. | | | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT, AND A NEW DESIGN WILL | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. STREET TREES PLANTED IN SIDEWALKS WITH | | | TREE GRATES SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL INSTALLED 5 FEET | | | ON THE SIDES AND REAR OF THE TREE GRATE. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A DETAIL. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT, AND A NEW DESIGN WILL | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT | | | IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS | | | THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT, AND A NEW DESIGN WILL | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | | | | 8. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/14/18: | | | | | | 9. PLEASE CHANGE THE ADONIDIA PALMS AT THE FRONT OF THE | | | BUILDING AND IN THE STREET BULBOUTS TO TREES. CRAPE | | | MYRTLE, SILVER BUTTONWOOD OR ANY QUALIFYING SPECIES FOR | | | UNDER THE FPL LINES THAT WILL PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE | | | SIDEWALK AND PARKING SPACES WILL MEET THE INTENT OF THE | | | STREETSCAPE CODE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, | | | SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT. | | | ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO | | | INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED | | | IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES | | | SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS | | | SERVED BY THE LINES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-27-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-27-2018 |
Time |
13:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-27-2018 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-27 13:17:54 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 300 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. Z18010013 | | | APRIL 26, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. EXISTING TREES ON SITE ARE SHOWN ON THE | | | SURVEY PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SHOWING THE CORRECT SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND | | | IDENTIFYING IF TREES WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, | | | RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION CHART TO | | | SHOW ANY REMOVED TREES ARE MITIGATED PER CODE. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE | | | DIAGRAM TO SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR | | | BRELSFORD PARK DISTRICT 5 FOR 18% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | AND IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE FROM TABLE IV-6 AND | | | MEETING THE DEFINITION OF THAT TYPE OF OPEN SPACE IN | | | SECTION 94-109. | | | THE AREA SHOWN FOR THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CANNOT | | | INCLUDE THE DROP OFF AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. ADDITIONAL AREA IN A PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | CATEGORY WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED, SUCH AS A TERRACE. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO | | | SHOW THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND | | | PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | SEE COMMENT #3, SUBMIT NEW DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLANNING STAFF IS RECOMMENDING | | | A DIFFERENT DESIGN ADJACENT TO THE STREET. PLEASE | | | REVISE THE STREETSCAPE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-113 WITH SPACING OF TREES EVERY 30 FEET AND | | | ADJUST THE LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING TO WORK | | | IN HARMONY WITH THE STREETSCAPE. | | | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT, AND A NEW DESIGN WILL | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES PLANTED IN | | | SIDEWALKS WITH TREE GRATES SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | INSTALLED 5 FEET ON THE SIDES AND REAR OF THE TREE | | | GRATE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT, AND A NEW DESIGN WILL | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A | | | SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA | | | SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE | | | SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE | | | BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE | | | AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT, AND A NEW DESIGN WILL | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING OAK | | | TREES TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY TO COORDINATE WITH | | | PLACEMENT OF BUFFER PALMS AND TREES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, | | | SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT. | | | ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO | | | INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED | | | IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES | | | SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS | | | SERVED BY THE LINES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
12:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-13 12:19:27 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 300 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. Z18010013 | | | FEBRUARY 12, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. EXISTING TREES ON SITE ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY | | | PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SHOWING THE CORRECT SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND | | | IDENTIFYING IF TREES WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, | | | RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION CHART TO SHOW ANY | | | REMOVED TREES ARE MITIGATED PER CODE. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO SHOW | | | QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR BRELSFORD PARK DISTRICT | | | 5 FOR 18% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF | | | OPEN SPACE FROM TABLE IV-6 AND MEETING THE DEFINITION | | | OF THAT TYPE OF OPEN SPACE IN SECTION 94-109 . | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED | | | AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | | | | 5. PLANNING STAFF IS RECOMMENDING A DIFFERENT DESIGN | | | ADJACENT TO THE STREET. PLEASE REVISE THE STREETSCAPE | | | TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-113 WITH SPACING | | | OF TREES EVERY 30 FEET AND ADJUST THE LANDSCAPING | | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING TO WORK IN HARMONY WITH THE | | | STREETSCAPE. | | | | | | 6. STREET TREES PLANTED IN SIDEWALKS WITH TREE GRATES | | | SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL INSTALLED 5 FEET ON THE | | | SIDES AND REAR OF THE TREE GRATE. PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT | | | TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 | | | FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 8. PLEAS SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING OAK TREES TO | | | THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY TO COORDINATE WITH PLACEMENT | | | OF BUFFER PALMS AND TREES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, | | | SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT. | | | ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO | | | INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED | | | IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES | | | SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS | | | SERVED BY THE LINES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-12-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-11 14:28:09 | BASED ON PREVIOUS COMMENT, ENCLOSURE ROOM/ENCLOSURE HAS | | | BEEN MOVED BACK. CUSTOMER WILL BE REQUIRED TO USE A | | | ROLL OUT DUMPSTER IN ORDER TO SERVICE THIS LOCATION. | | 2018-02-12 14:34:59 | THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LOOKS APPROPRIATE BUT BASED ON | | | TRUCK ACCESS I NEED TO SEE A TURN RADIUS TO ENSURE THE | | | TRUCK DOES NOT COME INTO CONTACT WITH THE CORNER ON THE | | | GENERATOR ROOM. WHEN THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK APPROACHES | | | THE DUMPSTER IS THERE AND OVERHEAD ROOF, IF SO WILL | | | THERE BE ENOUGH ROOM TO REMOVE THE DUMPSTER OR WILL A | | | ROLL OUT DUMPSTER BE REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-01 16:51:26 | A REVIEW WAS MADE OF THE MAY 29, 2018 SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. THE STATUS OF THE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW | | | OF THE APRIL 12, 2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 1. VERTICAL DATUM ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS | | | NEEDS TO BE CONSISTANT. ELEVATIONS ON THE SURVEY ARE | | | INDICATED TO BE IN REFERENCE TO NAVD 1988. ELEVATIONS | | | ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS ARE INDICATED TO BE IN | | | REFERENCE TO NGVD 1929. EXISTING SPOT GRADE VALUES ARE | | | THE SAME ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS. COMMENT | | | SATISFIED. BOTH PLANS ARE USING NAVD1988 AS THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM. | | | | | | 2. THE CONVERSION (DIFFERENCE) BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND | | | NGVD 1929 VERTICAL DATUMS LISTED ON THE SURVEY AND ON | | | THE ENGINEERING PLANS NEEDS TO BE CONSISTANT. ONE USES | | | 1.52 FEET AND THE OTHER USES 1.53 FEET. COMMENT | | | SATISFIED. BOTH PLANS ARE USING THE 1.53 FEET | | | CONVERSION FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD AND NGVD. | | | | | | 3. SHEET C4.00 LISTS THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AS | | | 12.00 FEET NGVD. SHEET A1.0 LISTS THE FINISHED FLOOR | | | ELEVATION AS 12 FT 6 INCHES.NGVD. COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED | | | OTHER THAN CHANGING THE VERTICAL DATUM ON SHEET C4.00. | | | THE FINISHED FLOOR IS LISTED AS 12.00 FEET NAVD. SHEET | | | A1.0 STILL LISTS THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AS 12 FT | | | 6 INCHES NGVD. | | | | | | 4. SHEET C4.00 SHOWS ONSITE CONCRETE STEPS ALONG THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY TO THE | | | TRASH / GAS '/ GENERATOR ROOM AND OUTSIDE THE DOOR TO | | | THE STAIRWELL AT THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY. NEITHER | | | SETS OF STEPS ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN (SHEET A1.0). | | | INDICATE HOW THE TRASH BE HANDLED IF THERE ARE STEPS IN | | | THIS LOCATION. CAN THE BOTTOM FLOOR OF THE STAIRWELL BE | | | TAKEN DOWN TO THE ELEVATION OF THE ALLEY SO STEPS WILL | | | NOT BE NEEDED OUTSIDE THE DOOR? COMMENT SATISFIED. THE | | | STEPS IN FRONT OF THE TRASH ROOM HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED. | | | THE STEPS AT THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY HAVE BEEN TURNED | | | 90 DEGREES. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH INCLUDING | | | WIDTH AND TOP ELEVATION OF THE TRENCH. COMMENT | | | SATISFIED. SHEET C4.00 LABELS THE TRENCH AS 4 FEET WIDE | | | BY 4 FEET HIGH. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE THE WEIR ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURE ST-01. | | | | | | 7. MINIMUM 15" RCP STORM PIPE WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE MAY 29, 2018 SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE: | | | 8. LABEL THE DRAINAGE FIXTURES ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS AS | | | "TRENCH" DRAINS AND NOT "FRENCH" DRAINS. | | | | | | 9. ADD'L COMMENTS TO BE ADDED. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-18-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
04-18-2018 |
Time |
17:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
04-18-2018 |
Time |
18:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-18 18:01:11 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE APRIL | | | 12, 2018 REVIEW PACKAGE FROM THE PLANNER: | | | | | | 1. VERTICAL DATUM ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS | | | NEEDS TO BE CONSISTANT. ELEVATIONS ON THE SURVEY ARE | | | INDICATED TO BE IN REFERENCE TO NAVD 1988. ELEVATIONS | | | ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS ARE INDICATED TO BE IN | | | REFERENCE TO NGVD 1929. EXISTING SPOT GRADE VALUES ARE | | | THE SAME ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 2. THE CONVERSION (DIFFERENCE) BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND | | | NGVD 1929 VERTICAL DATUMS LISTED ON THE SURVEY AND ON | | | THE ENGINEERING PLANS NEEDS TO BE CONSISTANT. ONE USES | | | 1.52 FEET AND THE OTHER USES 1.53 FEET. | | | | | | 3. SHEET C4.00 LISTS THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AS | | | 12.00 FEET NGVD. SHEET A1.0 LISTS THE FINISHED FLOOR | | | ELEVATION AS 12 FT 6 INCHES.NGVD. | | | | | | 4. SHEET C4.00 SHOWS ONSITE CONCRETE STEPS ALONG THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY TO THE | | | TRASH / GAS '/ GENERATOR ROOM AND OUTSIDE THE DOOR TO | | | THE STAIRWELL AT THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY. NEITHER | | | SETS OF STEPS ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN (SHEET A1.0). | | | INDICATE HOW THE TRASH BE HANDLED IF THERE ARE STEPS IN | | | THIS LOCATION. CAN THE BOTTOM FLOOR OF THE STAIRWELL BE | | | TAKEN DOWN TO THE ELEVATION OF THE ALLEY SO STEPS WILL | | | NOT BE NEEDED OUTSIDE THE DOOR? | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH INCLUDING | | | WIDTH AND TOP ELEVATION OF THE TRENCH. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE THE WEIR ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURE ST-01. | | | | | | 7. MINIMUM 15" RCP STORM PIPE WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-14-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-14-2018 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-14-2018 |
Time |
13:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-14 13:02:14 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. NEW FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREA ARE NOW IN EFFECT. THE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE | | | AT HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX? | | | | | | 2. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 3. INDICATE WHETHER A DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTS FOR | | | STORMWATER RUNOFF TO FLOW THROUGH THE BURGER KING SITE. | | | A SEPARATE OUTFALL TO PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM OR TOTAL ONSITE RETENTION MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-02-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-02-2018 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-02 13:19:34 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | 1. REPLAT WILL NEED TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 2. SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF SURVEY REQUIRED FOR NEXT | | | SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-14-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-14-2018 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-14 08:21:18 | 1. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED. | | | 2. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | 3. ALLEY WILL NEED TO BE REPAVED. | | | 4. WHAT IS THE ITEM SHOWN BETWEEN THE RAMP AND THE | | | ALLEY? | | | 5. STEPS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IN ALLEY. | | | 6. DRAINAGE WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO NOT FLOW THROUGH | | | THE BURGER KING PARCEL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-11 14:15:43 | 300 PALM BEACH LAKES MEDICAL OFFICE (RECEIVED ON MAY | | | 29, 2018) SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | - IN THE PARKING GARAGE, THERE IS ZERO CORNER RADIUS AT | | | EVERY RAMP DUE TO COLUMNS AND WALLS, AND PASSENGER CARS | | | ARE NOT ABLE TO TURN RIGHT INTO OR OUT OF THE RAMPS | | | WHILE STAYING ON THEIR OWN LANE. CONSIDER PROVIDING | | | BUFFER SPACE AROUND THE COLUMNS AND WALLS OR RELOCATE | | | OR REDESIGN THEM. | | | - THE COLUMNS IN PARKING SPACES WILL MAKE IT VERY | | | DIFFICULT FOR CARS TO TURN INTO THE PARKING SPACES AND | | | FOR OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLES TO ENTER AND EXIT THE | | | VEHICLE. CONSIDER A DESIGN WITHOUT COLUMNS. PROVIDE | | | TURNING PATH EXHIBIT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT CARS CAN | | | MANEUVER INTO THE SPACES WITH THE COLUMNS PRESENT. | | | - IN THE DOWN RAMP TO THE LOWER LEVEL PARKING, IT IS | | | UNCLEAR IF THE GARAGE WALL ON THE NORTH SIDE IS A SOLID | | | WALL. IF SO, THERE WOULD BE INSUFFICIENT SIGHT DISTANCE | | | FOR VEHICLES EXITING ONTO THE GROUND FLOOR LOOKING | | | NORTH. CONSIDER REDESIGNING THE GARAGE WALL OR | | | PROVIDING WINDOWS ON THE WALL. | | | - PROVIDE BACK UP AND DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA AT THE | | | TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END AISLE PER CITY CODE | | | 94-111(C)(2): ?A MINIMUM THREE-FOOT BACK UP AREA SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE | | | TO ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END | | | PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE | | | PARKING SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END AISLE SHALL | | | BE STRIPED AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR TURNING | | | AROUND.? | | | - CLARIFY IF BIKE RACKS ARE PROVIDED ON THE GROUND | | | LEVEL NEAR THE DRIVEWAY ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD. | | | THOSE BIKE RACKS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET A1.0 BUT NOT ON | | | SHEET A2.1. PLEASE PROVIDE BIKE RACKS AS SHOWN ON SHEET | | | A1.0 IF NOT. | | | - CLARIFY HOW CYCLISTS WOULD ACCESS THE BIKE RACKS ON | | | LEVEL 2 PARKING WITH THEIR BICYCLES. WOULD THEY BE | | | ALLOWED TO CARRY THEIR BICYCLES INTO THE MEDICAL OFFICE | | | LOBBY AND TAKE THE ELEVATOR TO LEVEL 2? | | | - REMOVE THE FIRST ON-STREET PARKING SPACE TO THE WEST | | | AT THE PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD TO IMPROVE SIGHT | | | DISTANCE LOOKING WEST. | | | - PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE | | | OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD IMMEDIATELY WEST OF OLIVE | | | AVENUE. | | | - PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN INCLUDING THE PROPOSED | | | LANE ELIMINATION ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD TO BE | | | IMPLEMENTED BY THE APPLICANT, AND ILLUSTRATE HOW IT | | | TIES INTO ADJACENT STREET SECTIONS AND INTERSECTIONS. | | | NOTE THAT THE YELLOW CENTERLINE CLOSEST TO THE SITE | | | WILL HAVE TO BE SHIFTED TO THE NORTH. | | | - SHOW TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD | | | AND ALSO CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY. | | | - THE GORE STRIPING ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD IS | | | ANGLED IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. IT SHOULD ANGLED AGAINST | | | THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC. | | | - ADA TACTILE SURFACES TYPICALLY AREN?T INSTALLED FOR | | | DRIVEWAYS. VERIFY IF THESE ARE REQUIRED. | | | - EXIT OUT ONTO PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD IS SHOWN AS | | | RIGHT OUT ONLY. CONFIRM IF THIS IS THE INTENT OR A | | | DRAFTING ERROR. IF IT IS INTENT THEN PROVIDE RATIONAL | | | FOR THE RIGHT OUT ONLY RESTRICTION. | | | - THE SIDEWALK ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD | | | FRONTAGE IS 5.5' WIDE ON THE PAVING, GRADING, AND | | | DRAINAGE PLANS. THIS IS VERY NARROW AND DOESN'T APPEAR | | | TO MEET DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTHS. PROVIDE | | | CODE REFERENCE FOR SIDEWALK WIDTH WITH RESUBMITTAL. | | | - THE ALLEY IS SHOWN AS ONE WAY. NOTE THE ALLEY IS | | | DESIGNATED BY CITY CODE AS BI-DIRECTIONAL. REMOVE ONE | | | WAY ARROWS FROM PLANS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-25-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-25 17:08:14 | 300 PALM BEACH LAKES MEDICAL OFFICE (RECEIVED ON APRIL | | | 2, 2018) SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | - DIMENSION THE SLOPE FOR ALL PARKING AND NON-PARKING | | | RAMPS. | | | - MINIMIZE THE USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR TRAFFIC | | | CIRCULATION WHICH WOULD CREATE ADDITIONAL TRIPS ON | | | ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAYS. | | | - VEHICLES STACKING ON THE EXIT OF THE TWO-WAY DRIVEWAY | | | ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD WOULD IMPACT INBOUND | | | VEHICLES FROM ACCESSING THE DROP-OFF LANE. | | | - VEHICLES MAY ATTEMPT TO TURN LEFT AT THE ONE-WAY | | | DRIVEWAY ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD AFTER THE | | | DROP-OFF. THIS MAY CREATE SAFETY CONCERN DUE TO THE | | | CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SIGNAL AT OLIVE AVENUE. | | | - THE ALLEY IS ENCOURAGED FOR SERVICE RELATED USES ONLY | | | AND SHOULD REMAIN TWO-WAY OPERATIONS. CHANGING THE | | | ALLEY TO A ONE-WAY OPERATION WOULD REQUIRE CODE | | | AMENDMENT TO SECTION 86-166 WHICH DEFINES THE DIRECTION | | | OF MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC FOR ONE-WAY STREETS AND ALLEYS | | | WITHIN THE CITY. | | | - USING THE ALLEY FOR TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IS | | | DISCOURAGED. HOWEVER, IF THE ALLEY IS USED FOR TRAFFIC | | | CIRCULATION, IT WOULD NEED TO BE WIDENED TO ACCOMMODATE | | | TWO-WAY OPERATIONS. | | | - CONSIDER RELOCATING THE BUILDING TO FRONT PALM BEACH | | | LAKES BOULEVARD WITH MINIMUM SETBACK. THIS CHANGE WOULD | | | ALLOW ADDITIONAL ROOM ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING | | | FOR INTERNAL FOR DROP-OFF AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION | | | COMPLETELY ON-SITE. | | | | | | ERIK FERGUSON, PE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-13 15:57:38 | 1 - SHOW TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY OF PALM BEACH LAKES | | | BOULEVARD AND ALSO CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 2 - PROVIDE PLAN VIEW WHICH SHOWS BOTH SIDES OF THE | | | STREET INCLUDING DRIVEWAYS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE | | | STREET. WE ARE UNABLE TO REVIEW THE DRIVEWAY | | | INFORMATION WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION. | | | 3 - THE PROPOSED TWO ENTRANCES ON PALM BEACH LAKES | | | BOULEVARD ARE NOT ALLOWED. | | | 4 - STAIRS FOR THE BUILDING ARE NOT ALLOWED IN ALLEY | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 5 - DEMONSTRATE THAT ADEQUATE SIGHT LINES WILL BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | 6 - THE EXISTING ALLEY APPEARS TOO NARROW FOR TWO WAY | | | TRAFFIC. WHAT PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS WILL UTILIZE THE | | | ALLEY? CAN PORTION OF ALLEY FRONTING THE PROJECT BE | | | WIDENED FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC? | | | 7 - THIS PORTION OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD HAS BEEN | | | IDENTIFIED IN THE MOBILITY PLAN AS A LANE REPURPOSING | | | CANDIDATE. THE LANE REPURPOSING WOULD ALLOW FOR THE | | | ADDITION OF BIKE LANES AND ON STREET PARKING. THE | | | TRANSPORTATION DIVISION WILL PROVIDE TWO OPTIONS FOR | | | LANE REPURPOSING AT PPRC. | | | 8 - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SITE CIRCULATION AND TURN | | | LANE REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED ON A PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY ROAD. REMOVE REFERENCES TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS AS A REQUIREMENT. | | | 9 - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (T.I.A.) SITE CIRCULATION | | | AND TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS. IN ADDITION TO PALM BEACH | | | LAKES BOULEVARD, ACCESS TO THE SITE IS ALSO PROPOSED | | | FROM THE ALLEY. T.I.A. NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO DISCUSS | | | VOLUMES ON THE ALLEY. | | | | | | UPDATE 2/15/2018 - T.I.A. NEEDS TO DISCUSS HOW VEHICLES | | | LEAVING THE DROP OFF AREA ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD | | | WILL TRAVEL TO THE PARKING GARAGE. THE USE OF LOCAL | | | STREETS FOR INTERNAL SITE CIRCULATION IS DISCOURAGED. | | | IN ADDITION, THERE MAY BE OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS WITH THE | | | EXISTING ALLEY IF VEHICLES LEAVING THE DROP OFF AREA GO | | | TO THE GRAGE VIA OLIVE AND THE ALLEY. | | | | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-28-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
06-28-2018 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
06-28-2018 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-28 16:41:15 | 1. SATISFIED | | | 2. ONGOING. | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT A CLEAR COPY OF | | | THE SURVEY PRIOR TO PERMIT PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | 4. SATISFIED. | | | 5. SATISFIED. | | | 6. SATISFIED. | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER THE USE OF ADDITIONAL | | | WINDOWS ON THE ACTIVE USE (STAIRWELL) AREA FACING SOUTH | | | TO COMPLY WITH THE 15% FENESTRATION REQUIREMENT. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR THE | | | GARAGE INCLUDING THE TRANSPARENCY SEPARATION BETWEEN | | | THE HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT SCREENING | | | ON THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | THE PROVIDED SEPARATION BETWEEN THE HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS | | | WILL NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SCREENING OF THE PARKING | | | GARAGE. THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENHANCED SCREENING WILL | | | BE EVALUATED AT TIME OF PERMIT. | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BIKE PARKING IN | | | THE PARKING DATA. | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED. | | | THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE RACK | | | TYPE IN THE CITY. STAFF WILL PROVIDE DETAIL OF ACCEPTED | | | BICYCLE RACK TYPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE BIKE | | | RACK, INCLUDING SPECIFICATIONS OF THE RACK AND SPACING. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BIKE PARKING IN | | | PARKING DATA. | | | 10. SATISFIED. | | | 11. SATISFIED. | | | 12. SATISFIED. | | | 13. SATISFIED. | | | 14. ACKNOWLEDGED. | | | 15. NOT SATISFIED. | | | PHOTOMETRICS WILL BE EVALUATED AT TIME OF BUILDING | | | PERMIT. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUIRED PHOTOMETRICS ALONG ALL | | | STREET FRONTAGES. | | | 16. SATISFIED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | 1. PER SECTION 94-113(D), SIDEWALKS, A SIDEWALK WITH A | | | MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET CLEAR WIDTH SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 2. THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE/EXIT IS WIDER THAN THE | | | RECOMMENDED 20?. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FROM THE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD ACROSS THE | | | PORTE COCHERE AREA TO THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THE | | | PROJECTS MAIN ENTRANCE. | | | 4. PLEASE REVISE FROM PALMS ALONG THE BUILDING?S ENTRY | | | DRIVEWAY TO A DIFFERENT TREE SPECIES. | | | 5. A BACK-UP SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR DEAD-END AISLES | | | WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-19-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
04-19-2018 |
Time |
10:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
04-19-2018 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-19 10:31:41 | 1. SATISFIED | | | 2. CODE AMENDMENT IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW. FINAL | | | APPROVAL IS CONDITIONAL TO FINAL CODE REVISION | | | APPROVAL. CODE REVISION APPROVAL DOES NOT GUARANTEE | | | APPROVAL OF PORTE-COCHERE FOR SPECIFIC PROJECTS. | | | PROPOSED PORTE-COCHERE NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND WORK FOR SPECIFIC LOCATION. | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE SETBACK | | | DIMENSION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ON THE SURVEY. | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE OF EACH FLOOR | | | GROSS AREA FOR THE TOTAL BUILDING GROSS AREA. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE GRAPHICS SPECIFICALLY ILLUSTRATING THE AREA | | | COUNTED AS FAR ON EACH INDIVIDUAL FLOOR. | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC WITH | | | ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE ACTUAL AREA OF COMPLIANCE FOR | | | ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER THE USE OF | | | ADDITIONAL WINDOWS ON THE ACTIVE USE (STAIRWELL) AREA | | | FACING SOUTH TO COMPLY WITH THE 15% FENESTRATION | | | REQUIREMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR THE GARAGE INCLUDING THE | | | TRANSPARENCY SEPARATION BETWEEN THE HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS | | | TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT SCREENING ON THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE LABEL THE SHOWER FACILITY AND | | | CHANGING ROOM. PLEASE CONSIDER AN ALTERNATE LOCATION | | | FOR THE INTERIOR BIKE RACKS FOR EASE OF ACCESS FOR | | | BUILDING OCCUPANTS. PLEASE LABEL, SHOW THE BIKE RACKS | | | AND INCLUDE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BIKE PARKING IN THE | | | PARKING DATA. | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE BIKE | | | RACK, INCLUDING SPECIFICATIONS OF THE RACK AND SPACING. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BIKE PARKING IN | | | PARKING DATA. | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. THE DIMENSIONS OF PARKING SPACES | | | NEED TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1 FOOT OF WIDTH FOR | | | PARKING ADJACENT TO ONE COLUMN OR WALL, AND PARKING | | | SPACES ADJACENT TO TWO COLUMNS/WALLS NEED TO PROVIDE AN | | | ADDITIONAL TWO FEET OF SPACE. | | | 11. SATISFIED. THERE IS NO EXPOSED PARKING OR PARKING | | | ON ROOF. | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT NUMBER 7. | | | 13. SATISFIED. | | | 14. THE CURB OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD WILL NOT BE | | | MODIFIED WITH ANY CHANGES TO THE ROADWAY. STAFF CAN | | | PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION IN FUTURE DISCUSSIONS. | | | 15. THE CURB OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD WILL NOT BE | | | MODIFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY POLE LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE | | | PHOTOMETRICS FOR ALL STREET FRONTAGES, INCLUDING THE | | | ALLEYWAY. | | | 16. SATISFIED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. NEW COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE, ALL PARKING STRUCTURES | | | ARE REQUIRED TO TREAT THE INTERIOR PORTION OF THE | | | GARAGE ENTRY TO A DEPTH OF 20 FEET. PLEASE ADDRESS ON | | | THE PLANS TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
09:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
09:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-13 12:12:56 | 1 - SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE TOTAL SITE'S SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE THE OTHER SIDE OF PALM BEACH LAKES | | | BOULEVARD AND OLIVE AVENUE ON SURVEY. | | | 2 - PROPOSED PORTE COCHERE IS NOT PERMITTED ALONG AN | | | AVENUE. | | | 3 - PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING | | | INMEDIATELY SOUTH OF PROPOSED PROJECT TO CONFIRM | | | COMPLIANCE WITH CONTEXTUAL SETBACK. | | | 4 - PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE WITH THE DETAIL CALCULATION | | | FOR THE BUILDING GROSS AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE GRAPHICS | | | INDICATING THE AREA COUNTED AS FAR IN EACH FLOOR, AND | | | INDICATE THE AREA NOT COUNTED (MECHANICAL, PARKING, | | | ETC). | | | 5 - LANDSCAPE PROPOSED ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE SHALL | | | CONSIDER EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. | | | 6 - PLEASE PROVIDE SKEMATICS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7 - PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL INFORMATION FOR | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF NON-ACTIVE USES. | | | 8 - BIKE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED. 1 SPACE/15 REQUIRED | | | PARKING SPACES. ONE SHOWER FACILITY AND CHANGING ROOM | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED INSIDE THE BUILDING. | | | 9 - PUBLIC BIKE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG | | | THE STREET. 1/100 LINER FEET OF FRONTAGE. | | | 10 - PARKING SPACE WIDTH SHALL BE ADJUSTED WHEN COLUMNS | | | OR OBSTRUCTIONS PRESENT.SEC 94-111(C) | | | 11 - PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH EXPOSED PARKING | | | DECK REGULATIONS. | | | 12 - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE CALL OUT MATERIALS ON THE | | | FACADE. | | | 13- PLEASE SPECIFY THE GRADE ELEVATION OF THE OLIVE AVE | | | OPEN SPACE, IT IS ABOVE SIDEWALK LEVEL? | | | STREETSCAPE COMMENTS | | | 14 -DUE TO EXCESS PAVEMENT ON PALM BEACH LAKES | | | BOULEVARD CITY IS LOOKING AT A LANE ELIMINATION. THE | | | LANE ELIMINATION WOULD ALLOW ADDITIONAL ON-STREET | | | PARKING AND ENOUGH SPACE FOR A BIKE LANE. ADDITIONAL | | | BULB OUTS FOR TREE ARE ALSO AN OPTION. FURTHER | | | DISUCSSION NECESSARY FOR DETAILED LAYOUT. | | | 15 - PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DECORATIVE LIGHT | | | POLES AND FIXTURES ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. SPEC | | | SHALL MATCH CITY STANDARD. PHOTOMETHICS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA. | | | NOTES: | | | 16 - PLEASE REMOVE SHADOWS FROM DRAWINGS, IT IS | | | DIFFICULT TO READ THE LINES. | | | 17 - PLEASE RESUBMIT DRAWINGS ADDRESSING COMMENTS, AND | | | INCLUDE A LETTER RESPONDING TO EACH COMMENT. | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |