Plan Review Details - Project Z18010012
Plan Review Stops For Project Z18010012
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-13-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 02-13-2018 Time 18:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 02-13-2018 Time 18:51 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-13 18:54:38DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 3. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 6. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By squinone Date 02-12-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By squinone Date 02-05-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-12 11:17:31CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 DATE: 02/14/2018
 PROJECT: PROSPECT PLACE
 ADDRESS: 3111 S DIXIE HWY
 STATUS: FAILED
  
 THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE
 ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH
 AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT
 ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN
 SHEET;
  
 2. CITY USES NGVD 1929. PLEASE PROVIDE CONVERSION FROM
 NAVD 1988 TO NGVD 1929 IN PLAN SHEETS;
  
 3. THERE IS NO AS-BUILT INFORMATION OF A 6-INCH DIP
 WATERMAIN ON HAMPTON ROAD, EXCEPT ON WPB GIS MAPS WHICH
 MIGHT BE INACCURATE. ALL EXISTING AS-BUILTS ILLUSTRATES
 A 3-INCH ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE. WATERMAIN WILL NEED TO
 BE REPLACED FROM A 3-INCH AC TO A 8-INCH DIP FROM EAST
 OF FLORIDA EAST COAST TRAIN TRACKS TO S DIXIE HWY;
  
 4. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER WILL NEED A MANHOLE AT
 RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CITY'S POINT OF SERVICE;
  
 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO ASSESS EXISTING
 LIFT STATION CONDITIONS;
  
 6. SEVERAL OF THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS ARE
 BEING OBSTRUCTED BY PARKED VEHICLES. PLEASE REFER TO
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL P-8 FOR MINIMUM
 CLEARANCE ON SHEET C4.02;
  
 7. EXISTING OVERHEARD ELECTRIC CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED
 ON-STREET PARKING AT HAMPTON ROAD. ARE THE UTILITIES
 GOING UNDERGROUND OR RELOCATED?
  
 8. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN;
  
  
 9. PLEASE ALSO SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHEN
 SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT REVIEW PHASE, SHOW THE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES ON HAMPTON ROAD FOR VEHICULAR EXITS FROM THE
 SITE. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES);
  
 10. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAYS;
  
  
 AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE
 FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: HTTP
 ://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-
 PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC
 CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL
 WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE
 FOLLOWING LINK: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-
 PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND
 PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO
 VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS
 ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL;
  
 4. CCTV MUST BE PROVIDED FROM MANHOLE TO MANHOLE WHERE
 THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER WILL BE LOCATED. CONTACT ME
 FOR THE MANHOLE NUMBER AND SUBMIT CD WITH THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION.
 COORDINATE WITH UTILITIES O&M SANITARY SEWER
 SUPERINTENDENT CHARLES PHOENIX PROVIDE 48-HOUR NOTICE
 AND MUST OBTAIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT;
  
 5. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE
 FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN
 SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE
 PLANS;
  
 6. FIRE HYDRANT TEST CAN BE REQUESTED AT (561)804-4700;
  
 7. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
 WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN
 AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY;
  
 8. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE
 DETAIL SHEET/S DURING SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL
 ENGINEERING PLANS. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD
 FORMAT. CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT)
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE: HTTP://WPB.O
 RG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-
 APPLICATIONS
  
 9. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S
 STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST
 INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
 ACCESSIBLE;
  
 10. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT
 TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE
 CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER
 PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL
 ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY
 CROSSING INFORMATION;
  
 11. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE
 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION
 POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE
 LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE;
  
 12. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OPEN CUT/TRENCH FOR
 UTILITY CONNECTION WORKS WILL NEED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH 2016 CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. THE ROAD SHALL BE
 MILLED/RESURFACED FOR FULL LANE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL
 LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH AREA, INCLUDING A
 TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
 PLEASE SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS THE EXTENT OF THE
 MILLING AND RESURFACING;
  
 13. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL
 EXISTING UTILITIES ON HAMPTON ROAD AND S DIXIE HWY
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER, GAS,
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE
 SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE
 POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN;
  
 14. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE
 THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
 FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI
 PROJECT ENGINEER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
 (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366)
 P: 561.494.1108
 C: 561.459.6518
 F: 561.494.1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-09-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-09-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-09-2018 Time 13:20 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-09 13:21:12AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE INFORMATION PACKET
 FROM JOHN P. ROACH, PRINCIPLE PLANNER, DATED APRIL 6,
 2018, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-31-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-31-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-31-2018 Time 14:36 Sent To  
Notes
2018-01-31 15:07:17THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESSES SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 FOR INFORMATIONAL AND PLAN SUBMITTAL PURPOSES, THE
 PARKING GARAGES, STAND ALONE AND UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL
 APARTMENTS, QUALIFIES AS ENCLOSED PARKING STRUCTURE AND
 WOULD FALL UNDER NFPA 88A FOR LIFE SAFETY CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE OR EACH STRUCTURE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE
 PREVENTION CODE, AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED
 OCCUPANCY, WHERE APPLICABLE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 THE LOCATIONS PROPOSED DO NOT TO PROVIDE FOR THE
 OPTIMAL FIRE OPERATIONS USE AND CONTROL.
  
 THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION WOULD LIKE THE
 OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND COORDINATE THE LOCATIONS OF
 THE FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 IT IS OFTEN BEST FOR THE FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S TO BE
 LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET OR ACCESS
 ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER ARRIVING
 EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 THE BUREAU LOOKS FORWARD TO MEETING AND DISCUSSING
 VARIOUS LOCATION OPTIONS IN THE FUTURE.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ANY ACCESS GATES THAT
 THEY BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS
 AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-29-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-29-2018 Time 17:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-29-2018 Time 17:29 Sent To  
Notes
2018-05-29 17:29:38FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 MAY 29, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TS-2
 FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY ALL TREES CORRECTLY FOR SPECIES.
 REFERENCE THE PREVIOUS PLAN.
 ? SATISFIED. AS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF EXISTING TREES
 ON SITE WERE PREVIOUSLY GOOD CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION,
 PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION ON CONDITION OF EXISTING TREES.
 ? SATISFIED. TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE TAGGED
 WITH THEIR IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION SHOWN BY
 NUMBER ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SEE NEW COMMENT.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH
 TREE ON THE DISPOSITION CHART.
 ? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE MITIGATION CHART AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS ABOVE ARE MADE.
 MITIGATION CHART IS NOT CORRECT, APPLICABLE CODE IS
 FROM LANDSCAPE CODE AMENDED 4/11/17. CANOPY LESS THAN
 20 FEET IN DIAMETER ARE 1:1 REPLACEMENT IN THE SAME
 CATEGORY. 20 FEET OR MORE IS ACTUAL CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS PROPOSED AND WHAT IS
 REQUIRED BY CODE IN ORDER TO CLEARLY DEFINE THE BUFFER
 REQUESTS.
 AREAS FOR WAIVER REQUESTS MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN, A
 SEPARATE EXHIBIT IS REQUESTED.
 INCLUDE THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED BUFFER TREES TO
 ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECT OF THE WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS ARE 10
 FEET FOR THE EAST AND SOUTH BUFFER, AND 5 FEET FOR THE
 WEST AND NORTH BUFFER. PLEASE CORRECT WAIVER #1 ON THE
 SITE PLAN AND NARRATIVE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE ACCOUNT FOR THE REQUIRED TREES ON
 ALL 4 BUFFER LENGTHS, AND INDICATE IF ANY WILL BE
 ELIMINATED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
 CALCULATION FOR WEST BUFFER IS 33 TREES REQUIRED, NOT
 32 PROVIDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. CPD ZONING REQUIRES 20% LANDSCAPE AREA.
 PERVIOUS PAVERS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE AREA.
 CURBS MAY BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING SPACE TO A
 LOCATION TO PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED PERVIOUS OVERHANG
 AREA, AND ELIMINATE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER TO 14
 REQUIRED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. THE DATA PROVIDED IN THE LANDSCAPE
 CALCULATIONS CHART ON SHEET LP-6 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED
 TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REQUIRED
 TREES FOR OPEN SPACE AND THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
 TREES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED IS 437. FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS OF 40 POINTS ARE NOT FOUND ON THE PLANS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE AREA USED
 FOR CALCULATING TREE AND SHRUB REQUIREMENTS TO 40% OF
 THE TOTAL SITE AREA. THIS IS 163223 SQ. FT. NOT 81021
 AS LISTED.
 CALCULATION FOR FLOWERING TREES IS 28, NOTE IN CHART
 FOR REQUIRED OPEN SPACE STILL NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 AREA REQUIRED FOR SECTIONS 94-443(C)3 AND (C)4 AND
 INCLUDE A PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PROVIDED AREA.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 40 PERCENT
 BUILDING LANDSCAPING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B FOR EACH
 OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, AND 30 PERCENT PER
 SECTION 94-443(E)(1) FOR EACH OF THE COMMERCIAL
 BUILDINGS.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR EACH BUILDING
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS HEDGE AROUND
 THE THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF ALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROWS OF PARKING TO THE NORTH
 OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
 THE SITE, SHEET LP-2.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE
 ADA SPACE, SHEET LP-3.
  
 14. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN TREE GRATES IN A
 SIDEWALK OR PAVED AREA SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL
 EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AND UP TO THE CURB.
 INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON
 THE LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
 COMPLETE THE DETAIL SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN IS VERY CROWDED, SO EITHER SHOW
 STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON A SEPARATE EXHIBIT OR ON
 THE SITE PLAN.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE REQUIRED SIZE OF THE
 LIGUSTRUM, CORDIA, CALYPTRANTHES, LAGERSTROEMIA
 MUSKOGEE AND STEMMADENIA TO 12 FEET OR PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS SIZE IS NOT AVAILABLE.
  
 16. SATISFIED. DURANTA ERECTA IS NOT DOCUMENTED AS A
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. PLEASE REVISE ON PLANT LIST.
  
 17. SATISFIED. PHILODENDRON ROJO CONGO AND STENOTAPHRUM
 DO NOT HAVE THE NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT COLUMNS
 COMPLETE ON THE PLANT LIST. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 18. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS VERY CROWDED, SO EITHER SHOW ROOT
 BARRIER LOCATIONS ON A SEPARATE EXHIBIT OR ON THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 19. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
 UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 SOME VALVES AND TRANSFORMERS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS
 ARE OBSCURED OR NOT SCREENED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PLEASE REVISE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/16/18:
 20. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT, NOR DOES THE
 CODE ALLOW DESTRUCTION OF EXISTING TREES AND PALMS THAT
 ARE GOOD CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION ON SITE. THE CURRENT
 LIMITED MARKET AVAILABILITY OF NEW TREES IS A MAJOR
 FACTOR IN PRESERVING EXISTING RESOURCES WHENEVER
 POSSIBLE. THE SITE IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW STORAGE OF
 THE TREES AND PALMS DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SOME TREES
 MAY BE RELOCATED INTO PERMANENT LOCATIONS IN THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/29/18:
 21. IN REVIEWING THE REVISED TREE DISPOSITION CHART,
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
 ? CANOPY MEASUREMENT ON DISPOSITION LIST IN FEET
 APPEARS TO BE RADIUS, NOT DIAMETER. PLEASE CORRECT.
 ? AREA OF CANOPY COVERAGE IS CALCULATED AS PI TIMES
 RADIUS SQUARED. PLEASE CORRECT.
 ? CHART SHOWS 75 TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED, THE
 ACTUAL LIST ONLY HAS 68 INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. PLEASE
 CORRECT.
 ? TOTAL ALL CANOPY CALCULATIONS FOR TREES AND PALMS
 REMOVED BY CATEGORY FOR 1:1 AND SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ALL
 20 FEET AND ABOVE DIAMETER.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL BY CATEGORY FOR ALL NEW TREES
 PROPOSED. CATEGORY 1 =300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 =150 SQ FT,
 CATEGORY 3= 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 = 50 SQ FT.
  
 22. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PALM
 SUBSTITUTION FOR THE 437 REQUIRED TREES. IT APPEARS
 THERE ARE 316 TREES PROVIDED, AND THE REMAINING 121 ARE
 PROVIDED AS PALMS EITHER LARGE PALMS CREDIT OR SMALL
 PALMS AT 2:1 RATIO.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-18-2018 Time 12:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-16-2018 Time 12:27 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-18 12:30:33FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 3111 S DIXIE Z18010012
 APRIL 16, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TS-2
 FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY ALL TREES CORRECTLY FOR SPECIES.
 REFERENCE THE PREVIOUS PLAN.
 ? SATISFIED. AS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF EXISTING TREES
 ON SITE WERE PREVIOUSLY GOOD CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION,
 PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION ON CONDITION OF EXISTING TREES.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE
 TAGGED WITH THEIR IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION
 SHOWN BY NUMBER ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SEE NEW COMMENT.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH
 TREE ON THE DISPOSITION CHART.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. CORRECT THE MITIGATION CHART AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS ABOVE ARE MADE.
 MITIGATION CHART IS NOT CORRECT, APPLICABLE CODE IS
 FROM LANDSCAPE CODE AMENDED 4/11/17. CANOPY LESS THAN
 20 FEET IN DIAMETER ARE 1:1 REPLACEMENT IN THE SAME
 CATEGORY. 20 FEET OR MORE IS ACTUAL CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN
 SHOWING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS PROPOSED AND WHAT
 IS REQUIRED BY CODE IN ORDER TO CLEARLY DEFINE THE
 BUFFER REQUESTS.
 AREAS FOR WAIVER REQUESTS MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN, A
 SEPARATE EXHIBIT IS REQUESTED.
 INCLUDE THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED BUFFER TREES TO
 ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECT OF THE WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS ARE 10
 FEET FOR THE EAST AND SOUTH BUFFER, AND 5 FEET FOR THE
 WEST AND NORTH BUFFER. PLEASE CORRECT WAIVER #1 ON THE
 SITE PLAN AND NARRATIVE.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ACCOUNT FOR THE REQUIRED
 TREES ON ALL 4 BUFFER LENGTHS, AND INDICATE IF ANY WILL
 BE ELIMINATED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
 CALCULATION FOR WEST BUFFER IS 33 TREES REQUIRED, NOT
 32 PROVIDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. CPD ZONING REQUIRES 20% LANDSCAPE AREA.
 PERVIOUS PAVERS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE AREA.
 CURBS MAY BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING SPACE TO A
 LOCATION TO PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED PERVIOUS OVERHANG
 AREA, AND ELIMINATE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER TO 14
 REQUIRED.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. THE DATA PROVIDED IN THE LANDSCAPE
 CALCULATIONS CHART ON SHEET LP-6 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED
 TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REQUIRED
 TREES FOR OPEN SPACE AND THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
 TREES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED IS 437. FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS OF 40 POINTS ARE NOT FOUND ON THE PLANS.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE
 AREA USED FOR CALCULATING TREE AND SHRUB REQUIREMENTS
 TO 40% OF THE TOTAL SITE AREA. THIS IS 163223 SQ. FT.
 NOT 81021 AS LISTED.
 CALCULATION FOR FLOWERING TREES IS 28, NOTE IN CHART
 FOR REQUIRED OPEN SPACE STILL NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED FOR SECTIONS 94-443(C)3 AND
 (C)4 AND INCLUDE A PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PROVIDED
 AREA.
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 40
 PERCENT BUILDING LANDSCAPING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B
 FOR EACH OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, AND 30 PERCENT
 PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1) FOR EACH OF THE COMMERCIAL
 BUILDINGS.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR EACH BUILDING
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS HEDGE AROUND
 THE THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF ALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROWS OF PARKING TO THE NORTH
 OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
 THE SITE, SHEET LP-2.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE
 ADA SPACE, SHEET LP-3.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN TREE
 GRATES IN A SIDEWALK OR PAVED AREA SHALL HAVE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AND
 UP TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL
 SOIL DETAIL ON THE LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
 COMPLETE THE DETAIL SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN IS VERY CROWDED, SO EITHER SHOW
 STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON A SEPARATE EXHIBIT OR ON
 THE SITE PLAN.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE REQUIRED SIZE OF THE
 LIGUSTRUM, CORDIA, CALYPTRANTHES, LAGERSTROEMIA
 MUSKOGEE AND STEMMADENIA TO 12 FEET OR PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS SIZE IS NOT AVAILABLE.
  
 16. SATISFIED. DURANTA ERECTA IS NOT DOCUMENTED AS A
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. PLEASE REVISE ON PLANT LIST.
  
 17. SATISFIED. PHILODENDRON ROJO CONGO AND STENOTAPHRUM
 DO NOT HAVE THE NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT COLUMNS
 COMPLETE ON THE PLANT LIST. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 18. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT
 BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM
 CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE,
 SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT
 COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS VERY CROWDED, SO EITHER SHOW ROOT
 BARRIER LOCATIONS ON A SEPARATE EXHIBIT OR ON THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL
 GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS,
 A/C UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 SOME VALVES AND TRANSFORMERS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS
 ARE OBSCURED OR NOT SCREENED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PLEASE REVISE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/16/18:
 20. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT, NOR DOES THE CODE ALLOW
 DESTRUCTION OF EXISTING TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE GOOD
 CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION ON SITE. THE CURRENT LIMITED
 MARKET AVAILABILITY OF NEW TREES IS A MAJOR FACTOR IN
 PRESERVING EXISTING RESOURCES WHENEVER POSSIBLE. THE
 SITE IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW STORAGE OF THE TREES AND
 PALMS DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SOME TREES MAY BE
 RELOCATED INTO PERMANENT LOCATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-13-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-13-2018 Time 17:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-13-2018 Time 17:18 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-13 17:19:04FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 3111 S DIXIE Z18010012
 FEBRUARY 13, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TS-2
 FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 ? IDENTIFY ALL TREES CORRECTLY FOR SPECIES. REFERENCE
 THE PREVIOUS PLAN.
 ? AS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF EXISTING TREES ON SITE
 WERE PREVIOUSLY GOOD CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION, PROVIDE
 ALL INFORMATION ON CONDITION OF EXISTING TREES.
 ? TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE TAGGED WITH THEIR
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION SHOWN BY NUMBER ON THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 ? PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE ON THE
 DISPOSITION CHART.
 ? CORRECT THE MITIGATION CHART AFTER ALL CORRECTIONS
 ABOVE ARE MADE.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER WIDTHS PROPOSED AND WHAT IS REQUIRED BY CODE IN
 ORDER TO CLEARLY DEFINE THE BUFFER REQUESTS.
  
 3. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS ARE 10 FEET FOR THE
 EAST AND SOUTH BUFFER, AND 5 FEET FOR THE WEST AND
 NORTH BUFFER. PLEASE CORRECT WAIVER #1 ON THE SITE PLAN
 AND NARRATIVE.
  
 4. PLEASE ACCOUNT FOR THE REQUIRED TREES ON ALL 4
 BUFFER LENGTHS, AND INDICATE IF ANY WILL BE ELIMINATED
 THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 5. CPD ZONING REQUIRES 20% LANDSCAPE AREA. PERVIOUS
 PAVERS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE AREA. CURBS MAY
 BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING SPACE TO A LOCATION TO
 PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED PERVIOUS OVERHANG AREA, AND
 ELIMINATE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 6. PLEASE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES
 REQUIRED FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER TO 14 REQUIRED.
  
 7. THE DATA PROVIDED IN THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
 CHART ON SHEET LP-6 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT
 CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REQUIRED TREES FOR
 OPEN SPACE AND THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
 TREES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE AREA USED FOR
 CALCULATING TREE AND SHRUB REQUIREMENTS TO 40% OF THE
 TOTAL SITE AREA. THIS IS 163223 SQ. FT. NOT 81021 AS
 LISTED.
  
 9. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA
 REQUIRED FOR SECTIONS 94-443(C)3 AND (C)4 AND INCLUDE A
 PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PROVIDED AREA.
  
 10. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 40 PERCENT BUILDING
 LANDSCAPING PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2)B FOR EACH OF THE
 RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, AND 30 PERCENT PER SECTION
 94-443(E)(1) FOR EACH OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS HEDGE AROUND THE THREE
 NON-ACCESS SIDES OF ALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND FOR THE ROWS OF PARKING TO THE NORTH OF THE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE,
 SHEET LP-2.
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE ADA
 SPACE, SHEET LP-3.
  
 14. STREET TREES LOCATED IN TREE GRATES IN A SIDEWALK
 OR PAVED AREA SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5
 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AND UP TO THE CURB. INDICATE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
  
 15. PLEASE ADJUST THE REQUIRED SIZE OF THE LIGUSTRUM,
 CORDIA, CALYPTRANTHES, LAGERSTROEMIA MUSKOGEE AND
 STEMMADENIA TO 12 FEET OR PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT
 THIS SIZE IS NOT AVAILABLE.
  
 16. DURANTA ERECTA IS NOT DOCUMENTED AS A FLORIDA
 NATIVE PLANT. PLEASE REVISE ON PLANT LIST.
  
 17. PHILODENDRON ROJO CONGO AND STENOTAPHRUM DO NOT
 HAVE THE NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT COLUMNS COMPLETE ON
 THE PLANT LIST. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 18. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 19. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
 AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 AND UTILITIES.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-12-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-12-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 02-12-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-12 12:06:00BASED ON THE DRAWINGS IT APPEARS THE INTENT IS TO USE
 SELF CONTAINED COMPACTORS. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ONE
 OF THE FIVE APPROVED FRANCHISE HAULERS MUST BE USED.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-14-2018 Time 12:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-14-2018 Time 12:58 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-14 12:57:54THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN EPH-1.1 MISLABELED.
  
 2. REVISE FIRE HYDRANT CLEAR ZONE DETAIL THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS. SEE CITY DETAIL P-8 (AVAILABLE ONLINE).
  
 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS LABEL WATER AND STORM UTILITIES AS
 EASEMENTS.
  
 4. UPDATE LIST OF PROFESSIONAL FIRMS ON ARCHITECTURAL
 INDEX OF DRAWINGS PAGE.
  
 5. THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED.
  
 6. VERTICAL DATUM INCONSISTENT ON THE CIVIL PLANS. NOTE
 ON SHEET C1.01 LISTS VERTICAL DATUM AS NGVD 1929. OTHER
 CIVIL SHEETS AND THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LIST THE
 VERTICAL DATUM AS NAVD 1988.
  
 7. WILL A SIDEWALK EASEMENT ON HAMPTON ROAD BE
 PROVIDED?
  
 8. DRIVEWAY FLARES DO NOT MATCH CITY STANDARD DETAILS
 GC-6 OR GC-7.
  
 9. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS FOR THE SOUTH PARKING LOT DO
 NOT AGREE WITH THE PROPOSED GRADES.
  
 10. PARKING AND DRIVE AISLE CROSS SLOPES APPEAR TO BE
 CLOSE TO 8% WEST OF BUILDING 4 AND CLOSE TO 5% EAST OF
 BUILDING 4.
  
 11. ADD SPOT GRADES IN THE DRIVE AISLE IN THE NORTH
 PARKING LOT TO INDICATE INVERTED CROWN SECTION.
  
 12. CONSIDER ADDING CROSS SECTIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE
 TO PROPERTY LINE TO INDICATE MAX./MIN.
 PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK SLOPES AND TIES TO THE FFE.
  
 13. FOUNTAIN DRAIN MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE CONNECTED TO
 THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM.
  
 14. PAVEMENT STRIPING PLAN WILL BE NEEDED FOR HAMPTON
 ROAD.
  
 15. ROOF DRAINS SHOULD CONNECT TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 INSTEAD OF SURFACE DISCHARGE.
  
 16. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY
 DEDICATION FOR HAMPTON ROAD. SHOW THE LIMITS ON THE
 PLANS.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 02-14-2018 Time 07:21 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-14 07:52:251. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE RE-PLATTED. SEPARATE
 SUBMITTAL TO ENG
 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 SIDEWALK/LANDSCAPING ALONG DIXIE AND HAMPTON.
 3. COPY OF SURVEY NOT IN PACKAGE,
 4. METER ASSEMBLY MAY NOT REQUIRE EASEMENT PER NEW
 ORDINANCE.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-15-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-06-15 15:44:233111 S. DIXIE (PROSPECT PLACE) CPD
 PROJECT NO.: Z18010012
 5/10/18 RESUBMITTAL
 - HAMPTON ROAD TYPICAL SECTION SHEET C2.01
 O HAMPTON ROAD IS PROPOSED AS A BIKE BOULEVARD IN THE
 BIKE MASTER PLAN.
 O 14' WIDE LANES ARE PROPOSED WITH A 5' WIDE SIDEWALK.
 SUGGEST NARROWING TRAVEL LANE TO 10' TO 11' AND
 UTILIZING THE ENTIRE GUTTER PAN AS PART OF THE PARALLEL
 PARKING WIDTH.
 O UTILIZE REDUCED LANE WIDTH TO PROVIDE FOR A WIDER
 SIDEWALK.
 O INSTALL SHARROWS FOR BIKE BOULEVARD. APPLICANT IS
 REQUESTING A PARKING VARIANCE. IMPROVED BIKE FACILITIES
 WILL ENCOURAGE A MODAL SHIFT FROM VEHICULAR MODE WHICH
 WILL REDUCE PARKING DEMAND.
 - ENTRANCE ON HAMPTON ROAD. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE PULLED
 BACK FURTHER FROM THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. SUGGEST 18' TO
 20'. CODE REFERENCES:
 O CITY CODE SEC. 78-1. - OBSTRUCTING PASSAGE ON
 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND BICYCLE PATHS PROHIBITED. - IT
 SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO OBSTRUCT OR HINDER
 THE FREE FLOW OF PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON ANY
 STREET, SIDEWALK OR BICYCLE PATH IN THE CITY.
 O FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 316.1945 STOPPING, STANDING,
 OR PARKING PROHIBITED.
 O TRAVEL LANE REDUCTION ON HAMPTON WOULD ALLOW SIDEWALK
 TO MOVE CLOSER TO THE STREET AND AWAY FROM THE GATE.
 - CROSS ACCESS TO NORTH PARCEL.
 O IN ADDITION TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, CITY ORDINANCE SECTION 94-312
 ACCESS TO STREETS (2) (C) STATES - SHARED DRIVEWAYS AND
 INTERNAL CROSS ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHENEVER
 FEASIBLE, PROVIDED THAT APPROPRIATE ACCESS EASEMENTS
 ARE GRANTED BETWEEN OR AMONG THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
 O ADD CALLOUT ON SITE PLAN FOR FUTURE CROSS ACCESS TO
 NORTH PARCEL, REMOVE TWO PARKING SPACES, ADD END OF
 ROAD OBJECT MARKERS IN THE PARKING SPACES, AND ADD A
 DETAIL TO THE PLAN SET TO SHOW GATE REMOVAL WHEN FUTURE
 CROSS ACCESS IS CONSTRUCTED.
 - CONSIDER ELIMINATING CURB STOPS, REDUCE PAVED PORTION
 OF PARKING SPACE TO 16? AND LET CAR OVERHANG 2? OVER A
 GRASSED AREA. THIS WILL REDUCE IMPERVIOUS AREA OF SITE
 AND REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARD FROM CURB STOPS.
 - NORTH ENTRY / GATE. CONSIDER DESIGNATING A PARKING
 SPACE AS TEMPORARY LOADING OR AS TURN AROUND ONLY FOR
 VEHICLES THAT CAN'T ENTER THROUGH THE GATE.
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-11-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-11 17:28:56PROSPECT PLACE (3111 SOUTH DIXIE) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 (DATED MARCH 27, 2018) COMMENTS:
 - THE EASTBOUND MOVEMENT AT DRIVEWAY 1/SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY INTERSECTION IS FORECAST TO OPERATE WITH LOS F
 (WITH EXISTING GEOMETRY SCENARIO) AND LOS E (WITH
 POTENTIAL LANE ELIMINATION) DURING PM PEAK HOUR IN THE
 FUTURE TOTAL CONDITIONS. MORE TRAFFIC MAY CHOOSE TO
 MAKE THE LEFT-TURN AT DRIVEWAY 2 INSTEAD DURING PM PEAK
 HOUR. CLARIFY IF 40% OF TRIPS MAKING LEFT-TURN AT
 DRIVEWAY 1 ARE REASONABLE.
 - THE PROPOSED LANE ELIMINATION DOES NOT PROPOSE
 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AT
 DRIVEWAY 1 NOR DRIVEWAY 2. REMOVE THE EXCLUSIVE
 RIGHT-TURN LANE IN THE ANALYSIS.
 - 20% OF RETAIL TRIPS USING ON-STREET PARKING WOULD
 STILL GO THROUGH THE STUDY INTERSECTIONS BUT ARE NOT
 TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN THE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT OR
 INTERSECTION ANALYSES. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS (DATED ON MARCH 22, 2018):
 - IN THE HAMPTON ROAD CROSS-SECTION SHOWN ON C2.01,
 SHOW THE PROPOSED TRAVEL LANES, PARKING LANES,
 SIDEWALKS, AND LANDSCAPE, ETC. AND INCLUDE THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HAMPTON ROAD.
 - THE RESPONSE INDICATES THAT THE GORE OUT CENTER TURN
 LANE TAPER IN FRONT OF DRIVEWAY 1 WOULD BE MODIFIED TO
 CONTAIN SKIP STRIPING TO INDICATE THAT LEFT TURNS ARE
 OCCURRING, BUT THE PLAN SHEETS ARE STILL SHOWING THE
 GORE OUT CENTER TURN LANE TAPER.
 - THE PARKING WAIVER REQUEST NEEDS TO TAKE INTO
 CONSIDERATION THE 3 PARKING SPACES WHICH WILL BE
 REMOVED WHEN CROSS-ACCESS IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE.
 - PROVIDE DEAD-END STUB INSTEAD OF THE 3 PARKING SPACES
 FOR FUTURE CROSS-ACCESS.
 - PROVIDE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE FUTURE CONNECTION TO
 THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.
 - DIMENSION ALL DRIVEWAY WIDTHS.
 - PROVIDE BIKE RACKS FOR RETAIL USES.
 - INCLUDE BICYCLE PARKING DATA IN THE DATA TABLE ON
 SP-1.
 - ALL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS NEED TO BE ADA COMPLIANCE.
 NO CURB RAMPS ARE SHOWN AND IT IS UNKNOWN IF CURB RAMPS
 ARE PROVIDED FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS.
 - PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN GATED ENTRY FROM HAMPTON ROAD, AND
 PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE BUILDINGS.
 - PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FOR A MORE
 DIRECT PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ROUTE BETWEEN THE
 BUILDING 5 NORTH ENTRANCE AND THE BUS STOP.
 - RELOCATE THE BUS STOP CLOSE TO THE SIGNAL AT
 ALBEMARLE ROAD WHICH IS MORE CENTRAL TO THE PROPOSED
 LAND USES, AND THE SIGNAL PROVIDES PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON
 THE BUS STOP RELOCATION.
 - A VEHICLE WAITING AT THE ENTRY GATE ON HAMPTON ROAD
 WOULD BLOCK THE SIDEWALK.
 - PROVIDE AN OPENING ON HAMPTON ROAD TO CONNECT TO THE
 INTERNAL ROAD, REMOVE THE PROPOSED ENTRY GATE ON
 HAMPTON ROAD, AND RELOCATE THE MAIN ENTRY GATE. THIS
 WOULD CREATE A MORE INTER-CONNECTED STREET SYSTEM
 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
 - A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, PREPARED, SIGNED
 AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER FOR US
 TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
 CONNECTIVITY AS WELL AS VEHICULAR ACCESS.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-13-2018 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-13 17:56:051 - FDOT HAS A FOUR TO THREE LANE ROADWAY LANE
 REPURPOSING PROJECT PROGRAMMED FOR S. DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 ENGINEERING STAFF WILL PROVIDE PROPOSED FDOT TYPICAL
 SECTION TO ALLOW PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE
 CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT LANE ELIMINATION
 DESIGN.
 2 - S. DIXIE IS A FDOT ROADWAY AND WILL REQUIRE FDOT
 PERMITS FOR THE DRIVEWAYS AND WORK IN THE FDOT RIGHT OF
 WAY.
 3 - CONCEPTUAL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS. ADD TYPICAL
 SECTION WITH WIDTHS FOR HAMPTON ROAD. IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH FLORIDA GREENBOOK, A 6' WIDE SIDEWALK MUST BE
 PROVIDED WHEN THE SIDEWALK IS BEHIND A CURB.
 4 - THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS FOR S. DIXIE HIGHWAY
 DO NOT SHOW OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES. WILL THE
 ELECTRIC BE UNDERGROUNDED?
 5 - AN EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK ALONG S.
 DIXIE THAT IS OUTSIDE OF RIGHT OF WAY.
 6 - SITE PLAN - LABEL OVERALL S. DIXIE RIGHT OF WAY
 WIDTH AND DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY.
 7 - PARALLEL PARKING ON S. DIXIE NEAR RETAIL PARKING
 DOES NOT MEET FDOT PARKING RESTRICTIONS. SOME PARALLEL
 PARKING WILL HAVE TO BE ELIMINATED.
 7B - S. DIXIE RETAIL PARKING LOT. IT IS ILLEGAL FOR A
 VEHICLE TO CROSS THE GORE OUT CENTER TURN LANE TAPER. A
 PLANTED RAISED MEDIAN WOULD ELIMINATE ILLEGAL TURNS
 INTO THE RETAIL PARKING LOT.
 8 - PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT OF PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ROUTE
 FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BUS STOP AND SKY BIKE
 STATION.
 9 - WILL ELECTRIC BE UNDERGROUNDED ON HAMPTON? WILL
 EXISTING POLES INTERFERE WITH SIDEWALK, TREES, AND
 ON-STREET PARKING?
 10 - THE ENTRANCE PROPOSED ON HAMPTON IS TOO CLOSE TO
 THE RAILROAD GATE AND IS NOT SAFE. THE ENTRANCE NEEDS
 TO BE MOVED OUTSIDE OF THE FUNCTIONAL AREA OF THE RAIL
 CROSSING AND TO ALLOW OPERATION OF THE DRIVEWAY WHEN
 CARS ARE QUEUED DURING RAIL CLOSINGS.
 11 - THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE ON HAMPTON IS SHOWN AS
 GATED. A TURNAROUND MUST BE PROVIDED AND QUEUING
 ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED.
 12 - THE PROPOSED SHARED PARKING WITH THE RETAIL LOT
 WILL NOT BE EFFECTIVE AS THE LOT DOESN'T CONNECT TO THE
 RESIDENTIAL.
 13 - SITE DESIGN REQUIRES RESIDENTIAL USERS THAT ARE
 UTILIZING RETAIL LOT TO REENTER S. DIXIE TO ACCESS
 THEIR RESIDENTIAL PARKING. FORCING INTERNAL TRIPS TO
 REENTER S. DIXIE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.
 14 - TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF WEST PALM ORDINANCES ARTICLE
 94-311. TRAFFIC STUDY HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED AND WILL BE
 REVIEWED AGAIN WITH RESUBMITTAL.
 15 - THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IS NOT CONSISTENT
 WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. AN
 INTERNAL ROAD PARALLEL TO S. DIXIE AND OPEN TO THE
 PUBLIC SHOULD BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE. IN ADDITION THE
 INTERNAL ROAD SHOULD ALLOW FOR A FUTURE CONNECTION TO
 THE PARCEL TO THE NORTH. THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT REGARDING
 INTERCONNECTIVITY OF STREETS ARE:
  
 POLICY 2.3.2(A): THE CITY SHALL REDUCE THE NEED FOR
 WIDENING MAJOR AND MINOR THOROUGHFARES BY ENCOURAGING
 THE PLACEMENT OF A WELL INTER-CONNECTED SYSTEM OF
 STREETS. WHERE AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM BECOMES
 POSSIBLE, CARE SHOULD BE GIVEN TO A COMMUNITY'S QUALITY
 OF LIFE, THE AMOUNT OF THROUGH-TRAFFIC, THE IMPACTS ON
 SAFETY, AND OVERALL SECURITY.
  
 POLICY 2.3.2(B): THE CITY SHALL DISCOURAGE THE USE OF
 DEAD-END STREETS, LOOP STREETS, AND OVERSIZED BLOCKS IN
 FAVOR OF THROUGH-STREETS AND SHORTER BLOCKS; PROVIDE
 CUT-THROUGHS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT; AND
 PROMOTE LANDSCAPING OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
 POLICY 2.3.2(C): THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE NEW
 DEVELOPMENTS TO INCLUDE: 1) AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM OF
 STREETS IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLANS WHICH CONSIDER
 APPROPRIATE ADJACENT PARCELS WITH POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE
 COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENTS; 2) STUB STREETS THAT CONNECT
 TO ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED PARCELS WITH A POTENTIAL FOR
 FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS; AND 3) STUB STREETS THAT TIE INTO
 EXISTING ADJACENT STUB STREETS.
  
 16 - SUGGEST HAVING BUILDINGS FRONT HAMPTON ROAD
 INSTEAD OF PARKING LOT
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-18-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-18-2018 Time 14:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 04-18-2018 Time 14:10 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-18 14:31:09PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.18.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18010012
 CASE NO.: PB 1693C
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. BUILDING #1 IS SHOWN ENCROACHING INTO THE SOUTH
 DIXIE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. - PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR
 RESPONSE OF "SEEKING A TRANSFER OF THE PARCEL FROM THE
 CITY..." THERE HAVE BEEN NO DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF
 REGARDING THIS AND WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY AGREES WITH
 THE APPLICANT'S POSITION REGARDING THE PROPERTIES
 STATUS/DISPOSITION. DISCUSSIONS NEED TO OCCUR BETWEEN
 THE APPLICANT AND VARIOUS CITY STAFF REGARDING THIS
 MATTER TO ENSURE THAT ALL PARTIES ARE ON THE SAME PAGE.
 THIS DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT (AS
 CURRENTLY DESIGNED) COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS:
  
  C. THE PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS POINT ON HAMPTON ROAD,
 ADJACENT TO RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT TO
 THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST. - WE WOULD
 LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THE FEEDBACK FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD
 WILL BE ON THIS ISSUE.
  
  D. PARKING CALCULATION UTILIZING RETAIL USES ONLY. HOW
 WILL RESTAURANT USES BE ACCOUNTED FOR? WILL THERE BE A
 PROHIBITION ON RESTAURANT USES? WILL A MONITORING TABLE
 BE REQUIRED? - THE SITE PLAN STILL REFERENCES THE
 "SHARED PARKING TABLE" UNDER THE "PARKING PROVIDED"
 PORTION OF THE SITE DATA TABLE.
  
 3. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 6. WILL A LIST OF PERMITTED/PROHIBITED USES BE
 DEVELOPED FOR THE CPD? - THE PROPOSED LIST OF USES
 INCLUDE RESTAURANTS; PLEASEE REFER TO COMMENT #2D ABOVE
 REGARDING THE IMPACT ON THE PARKING IF RESTAURANT USES
 ARE ALLOWED.
  
 8. THE PRE-APPLICATION LETTER FROM FDOT INDICATES 4,500
 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT USE, BUT THIS IS NOT
 INDICATED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE SITE PLAN, ETC. PLEASE
 CLARIFY AND ENSURE THAT ALL PROPOSALS ARE CONSISTENT. -
 WHAT IS THE STATUS OF GETTING THE REVISED LETTER FROM
 FDOT?
  
 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE FAR WAS CALCULATED. FAR
 INCLUDES AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE
 SPACES, ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS
 AND LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FAR CALCULATION SHALL
 NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES,
 PORCHES AND BALCONIES; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
 SPACES; TRASH ROOMS; AND STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS
 AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL
 VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR CIRCULATION. THE FLOOR AREA
 SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR
 WALLS. - THE FAR ON THE SITE PLAN (DATED 3/22/18)
 INDICATES THAT THE FAR IS 0.57. PURSUANT TO THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE FAR NEEDS TO
 INCLUDE THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. IT IS MY
 UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED, BUT
 WAS NOT DONE UNTIL AFTER THE 3/22/18 SUBMITTAL.
  
 15. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE MIXED-USE
 BUILDINGS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. - STAFF RECOGNIZES
 THAT BIKE STORAGE HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR
 RESIDENTS/TENANTS, BUT BIKE RACKS NEED TO BE PROVIDED
 THROUGHOUT THE NON-RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE SO
 THAT THEY CAN BE UTILIZED BY PATRONS OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES.
  
 18. HOW WILL SIGNAGE BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT? - NO SIGN PROGRAM IS BEING DEVELOPED? IF
 NOT, THEN ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE REGULATED BY THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S SIGN CODE.
  
 20. THE TRASH COMPACTOR AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 PROPERTY SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO
 LOAD/UNLOAD. THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN ON SHEET C6.00
 DON?T SEEM CONDUCIVE TO ACTUALLY PICKING IT UP. THE
 GATE CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE
 MOVEMENTS AS WELL. - THE REVISED LOCATION OF THE
 DUMPSTER REQUIRES THE OPENING OF BOTH (IN-BOUND AND
 OUT-BOUND) GATES; PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS WILL
 FUNCTION.
  
 29. HAS ANY COORDINATION BEEN MADE WITH THE SCHOOL
 DISTRICT WITH REGARD TO THE PROVISION OF SCHOOL BUS
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AND HOW THAT WOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? - PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  
 31. TURN-AROUND SPACES NEED TO BE PROVIDED BEFORE THE
 GATES.
  
 32. NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH NEEDS TO OCCUR BEFORE
 SCHEDULING OR NOTIFICATION OF ANY PUBLIC HEARING (I.E.
 PLANNING BOARD). RESIDENT COMMENTS FROM THE OUTREACH
 MEETINGS NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED AND POTENTIALLY
 INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 19, 2018,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MAY 12, 2018.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 19, 2018, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JUNE 4, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-14-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 02-14-2018 Time 12:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 02-14-2018 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-14 12:15:19PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 02.14.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18010012
 CASE NO.: PB 1693C
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. BUILDING #1 IS SHOWN ENCROACHING INTO THE SOUTH
 DIXIE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS:
  
  A. THE PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING LOT ON DIXIE HIGHWAY
 AND THE ABSENCE OF A MIXED-USE BUILDING IN THIS
 LOCATION.
  
  B. THE GATING OFF OF THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING AND ITS
 IMPACT ON CIRCULATION PATTERNS.
  
  C. THE PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS POINT ON HAMPTON ROAD,
 ADJACENT TO RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT TO
 THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST.
  
  D. PARKING CALCULATION UTILIZING RETAIL USES ONLY. HOW
 WILL RESTAURANT USES BE ACCOUNTED FOR? WILL THERE BE A
 PROHIBITION ON RESTAURANT USES? WILL A MONITORING TABLE
 BE REQUIRED?
  
  E. THE PROVISION AND DESIGN OF THE GROUND-FLOOR
 RESIDENTIAL USES IN BUILDING #3.
  
  F. THE PROPOSED WAIVER REQUESTS, ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT
 CONSIST OF REDUCED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS BETWEEN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SURFACE PARKING LOTS. SOME OF THE
 BUFFERS ARE EVEN ENCROACHED ON BY THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK,
 RESULTING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ON-STREET
 PARKING.
  
  G. THE FUNCTIONALITY AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING AND ITS PROXIMITY (OR LACK
 THEREOF) TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES.
  
  H. THE CONFIGURATION OF THE VISITOR LANE AND ITS
 ACCESSIBILITY.
  
  I. THE WIDTH OF THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ALONG THE
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY FRONTAGE. GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE
 PROPOSED USES, THE WALKWAY SHOULD PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
 CLEARANCE. IN SOME INSTANCES THE PROPOSED WALKWAY IS
 ONLY 5 FEET IN WIDTH (OR LESS), ESPECIALLY UNDER THE
 ARCADE.
  
  J. HOW IS THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED TO COMPLY WITH THE
 LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NON-RESIDENTIAL
 USES, ALONG WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY OF SOLID WASTE
 DISPOSAL.
  
  K. ARE THE RETAILS SPACES AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS
 OF BUILDINGS # AND #2, AND THE SOUTH END OF BUILDING
 #3, PROPOSED TO BE A SINGLE TENANT, OR SPLIT INTO
 MULTIPLE TENANT BAYS? IF MULTIPLE TENANTS ARE PROPOSED,
 THEN THERE IS NO ACCESS TO THE WESTERN HALF OF THESE
 SPACES.
  
 3. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 4. SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION SHALL BE
 OBTAINED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
  
 5. PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN WOULD
 WORK IN COORDINATION WITH THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT
 AND HOW IT WOULD SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF THE
 PRE-APPLICATION LETTER. STAFF DOES HAVE CONCERNS
 REGARDING FDOT?S REQUIREMENT OF INSTALLING A RIGHT TURN
 LANE
  
 6. WILL A LIST OF PERMITTED/PROHIBITED USES BE
 DEVELOPED FOR THE CPD?
  
 7. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THE PROVISION
 OF DEDICATED PARKING FOR RIDE SHARE; PLEASE PROVIDE
 MORE INFORMATION. WHERE ARE THE SPACES PROPOSED TO BE
 LOCATED? THESE SPACES SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE
 OVERALL PARKING REQUIREMENT. COORDINATION SHOULD BE
 MADE WITH THE CITY?S REPRESENTATIVE FOR SOUTH FLORIDA
 COMMUTER SERVICES.
  
 8. THE PRE-APPLICATION LETTER FROM FDOT INDICATES 4,500
 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT USE, BUT THIS IS NOT
 INDICATED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE SITE PLAN, ETC. PLEASE
 CLARIFY AND ENSURE THAT ALL PROPOSALS ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 9. THE LIST OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF
 THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED, AS OBTAINED FROM THE
 PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER
  
 10. A SIGNED/NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED
 REGARDING OBTAINING THE MAILING LIST (SEE PAGE 20 OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION)
  
 11. THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE ULTIMATE OUTLINE
 OF THE MIXED-USE BUILDINGS, ESPECIALLY WITH REGARD TO
 BUILDING #3 (DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE AN ARCADE LIKE
 THAT WHICH IS SHOWN FOR BUILDINGS #1 AND #2)
  
 12. PERVIOUS PAVERS SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE
 AREA. CONSIDERATION COULD BE MADE IN THEIR CALCULATION
 TOWARD IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, BUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE
 LANDSCAPE AREA. IF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT
 MEET THE 20% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA (WITHOUT PAVERS),
 THEN A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUESTED.
  
 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE FAR WAS CALCULATED. FAR
 INCLUDES AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE
 SPACES, ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS
 AND LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FAR CALCULATION SHALL
 NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES,
 PORCHES AND BALCONIES; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
 SPACES; TRASH ROOMS; AND STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS
 AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL
 VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR CIRCULATION. THE FLOOR AREA
 SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR
 WALLS.
  
 14. ALL SETBACK MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AT THE
 CLOSEST POINT BETWEEN THE FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING AND
 THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE.
  
 15. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE MIXED-USE
 BUILDINGS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY.
  
 16. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHERE FENCING IS PROPOSED
 THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AS THERE IS NO DISTINGUISHING
 LINE TYPE INDICATING ITS LOCATION.
  
 17. IF THE PARKING LOT ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS TO BE
 UTILIZED BY THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THEN SAFE PEDESTRIAN
 WALKWAYS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE AREAS.
  
 18. HOW WILL SIGNAGE BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT?
  
 19. THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AT THE
 INTERSECTION OF HAMPTON ROAD AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 WITHIN ALL VISIBILITY TRIANGLES, NO MATERIALS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE REQUIRED VISIBILITY TRIANGLES ON
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH FDOT
 REQUIREMENTS AS IT IS A STATE HIGHWAY. PLEASE CONFIRM
 THAT THE BUS SHELTER, ON-STREET PARKING, MONUMENT SIGN,
 LANDSCAPING, ETC. DO NOT POSE ANY CONFLICTS.
  
 20. THE TRASH COMPACTOR AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 PROPERTY SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO
 LOAD/UNLOAD. THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN ON SHEET C6.00
 DON?T SEEM CONDUCIVE TO ACTUALLY PICKING IT UP. THE
 GATE CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE
 MOVEMENTS AS WELL.
  
 21. THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUILDING #4 NEEDS
 TO BE EXTENDED TO INCORPORATE THE ACCESSIBLE AISLE.
  
 22. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE THE HEAD OF THE PARKING STALL
 IS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING, THE WHEEL STOP CAN BE
 REMOVED, THE CURB RELOCATED TO EXPAND THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA, AND ALLOW THE OVERHANG TO OCCUR OVER THE SOD,
 ETC. THIS REDUCES MAINTENANCE, MINIMIZES TRIPPING
 HAZARDS, ETC.
  
 23. A TURNAROUND SPACE WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED IN THE
 PARKING LOT BETWEEN BUILDINGS #5 AND #6.
  
 24. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE ENCLOSURES AROUND THE
 TRASH COMPACTORS AND RECYCLING, AND INCLUDE THE HEIGHT
 OF THE ENCLOSURE.
  
 25. THE ENCLOSURE IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
 PROPERTY WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH BUILDING SETBACKS (5
 FEET MINIMUM).
  
 26. ALL PROJECTIONS EXTENDING OUT FROM THE FA?ADE SHALL
 BE DIMENSIONED. STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS SHALL NOT EXTEND
 MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A SETBACK. AWNINGS SHALL NOT
 EXTEND MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO THE SETBACK.
  
 27. WHERE IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. A/C CONDENSERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED?
  
 28. THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHERE THE
 LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS ARE NOT AT LEAST 5 FEET IN
 WIDTH, OR DON?T EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING
 STALL.
  
 29. HAS ANY COORDINATION BEEN MADE WITH THE SCHOOL
 DISTRICT WITH REGARD TO THE PROVISION OF SCHOOL BUS
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AND HOW THAT WOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT?
  
 30. ONE OF THE PARKING ROWS (SOUTH OF THE POOL) IS
 MIS-NUMBERED WITH THE INCORRECT NUMBER OF SPACES. THE
 ROW IS LABELED WITH THE NUMBER 4, BUT ONLY 3 SPACES ARE
 PROVIDED IN THAT ROW.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE APRIL 17, 2018,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MARCH 2, 2018.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE APRIL 17, 2018, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN APRIL 2, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved