 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z17120025
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z17120025 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-22 11:10:09 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD | | | INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS | | | IN A FLOOD ZONE. THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND | | | ALL ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, | | | GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE | | | THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE COMMENT REGARDING ACCESSIBLE PARKING. | | | | | | 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT THE PLANS SHALL BE MARKED | | | TO SHOW WHICH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE DESIGNATED | | | AS VAN ACCESSIBLE. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS | | | NOTED AND PARTIALLY ADDRESSES THE COMMENT REGARDING VAN | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING. | | | | | | 5. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED | | | FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE | | | OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN | | | CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO | | | THE PROPERTY LINE AND OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED | | | FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING | | | SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND OPENING | | | PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE COMMENT REGARDING SOUND ATTENUATION FOR THE | | | MECHANICAL VENTILATION OF THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | | | | 8. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE COMMENT REGARDING MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE | | | RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | | | | 9. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY | | | ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) | | | 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 10. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL | | | APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED | | | BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND | | | FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, | | | GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE | | | SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE | | | INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE | | | IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 11. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 12. RESPONSE LETTER DATED 3/1/18 IS NOTED AND ADDRESSES | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT - THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON | | | THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
01-10-2018 |
Time |
00:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-10-2018 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-10 01:11:34 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS | | | (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN A FLOOD ZONE. THE | | | FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. THE SOUTH-WEST ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES DO NOT | | | APPEAR TO BE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE | | | SOUTH-WEST ELEVATOR. SHEET A2.01, FIRST FLOOR PLAN, | | | DOES NOT CLEARLY LABEL THE ELEVATORS, BUT THERE SEEMS | | | TO BE REGULAR PARKING SPACES CLOSER TO THE ELEVATOR | | | THAN THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER | | | SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST | | | POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN | | | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 4. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A | | | PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND | | | DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 | | | INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE). | | | | | | 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. IS THIS AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE OR AN ENCLOSED | | | PARKING GARAGE? IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE | | | WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE | | | DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 8. MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE | | | SUBMITTED PLANS A2.01 THROUGH A2.06 DO NOT SHOW THE | | | ENTRANCES OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THERE IS | | | INSUFFICIENT INFOMATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ALL OF THE | | | FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS HAVE AT LEAST ONE | | | ENTRACNCE DIRECT TO THE OUTSIDE, SUCH THAT OCCUPANTS | | | ARE NOT COMPELLED TO EGRESS THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE, | | | AND WHETHER THE OCCUPANTS OF SOME OF THE THIRD AND | | | FOURTH FLOOR UNITS HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE VIA THE "EXTERIOR | | | ROOF DECK AND CIRCULATION PATH" AND THEN RE-ENTER THE | | | BUILDING TO GET TO THE THEIR SECOND INDEPENDENT EXIT | | | STAIR. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT, PER SECTION 1014.3 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE ALLOWABLE COMMON PATH OF | | | TRAVEL IS 125 FEET FOR AN R-2 OCCUPANCY IN A FULLY | | | SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDING. | | | | | | 9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 11. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 12. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION | | | OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-02-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
04-02-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
04-02-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-02 13:43:42 | RE: CASE PB 1773- 1701 CLARE- RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS | | | | | | OUR COMMENT TO THIS PROJECT FALLS BACK TO ITEM #4 CCTV | | | (VIDEO OF EXISTING CONDITIONS OF ADJACENT LINES) | | | | | | AT THIS TIME THE CITY'S PUBLIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT | | | POSITION ARE THAT IT CANNOT COMMIT TO ANY SEWER | | | CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO DETERMINATION OF WHAT EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS ARE. ALL ADJACENT SEWER SYSTEMS SHALL BE | | | RESEARCHED THRU CCTV. WE KNOW THAT LINES AND | | | CONNECTIONS SHOWN ON THIS SUBMITTAL WHERE PREPARED FROM | | | THE MOST RELIABLE DATA TO ACCOMODATE A PRELIMINARY | | | DESIGN TO SATISFY THE PLANNING SUBMITTAL. HOWEVER THE | | | CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENT HAS GENUINE AND JUSTIFIABLE | | | FEAR THAT BY NOT HAVING THIS RESEARCH DONE THRU CCTV | | | NOW AND REACH A SOLID DETERMINATION OF WHAT THE | | | UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS, THE PROJECT COULD INCUR | | | AVOIDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS IF PROPERLY IDENTIFIED, | | | GAGED AND BUDGETED. BY PERFORMING THIS RESEARCH THE | | | PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH COMMENT #10 WHICH WILL BE TO | | | IDENTIFY ANY SEWER SERVICE LATERAL TO BE CUT AND CAPPED | | | AND IDENTIFY THE CORRESPONDING ROAD ROW RESTORATION OF | | | SUCH LOCATION(S). | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
01-02-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-09 10:39:11 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 01/09/2018 | | | PROJECT: CLARE AVENUE CPD | | | ADDRESS: 1710 CLARE AVENUE | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE CONTACT ME TO SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. MEETING WILL BE | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL; | | | | | | AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE | | | FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND | | | PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO | | | VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS | | | ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL; | | | | | | 4. CCTV MUST BE PROVIDED FROM MANHOLE TO MANHOLE WHERE | | | THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER WILL BE LOCATED. CONTACT ME | | | FOR THE MANHOLE NUMBER AND SUBMIT CD WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION. | | | COORDINATE WITH UTILITIES O&M SANITARY SEWER | | | SUPERINTENDENT CHARLES PHOENIX PROVIDE 48-HOUR NOTICE | | | AND OBTAIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT; | | | | | | 5. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY; | | | | | | 6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE | | | DETAIL SHEET/S DURING SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD | | | FORMAT. CITY?S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT) | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE: HTTP://WPB.O | | | RG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS- | | | APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 7. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY?S | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST | | | INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | ACCESSIBLE; | | | | | | 8. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT | | | TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE | | | CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER | | | PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL | | | ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY | | | CROSSING INFORMATION; | | | | | | 9. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 10. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OPEN CUT/TRENCH FOR | | | UTILITY CONNECTION WORKS WILL NEED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH 2016 CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. THE ROAD SHALL BE | | | MILLED/RESURFACED FOR FULL LANE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL | | | LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH AREA, INCLUDING A | | | TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH. | | | PLEASE SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS THE EXTENT OF THE | | | MILLING AND RESURFACING; | | | | | | 11. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES ON CLARE AVE, BLANCHE ST, ELIZABETH | | | ST, AND WILKINS AVE. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO | | | WATER, SEWER, GAS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS, | | | VALVES, ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT | | | INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, SANITARY | | | SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN; | | | | | | 12. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE | | | THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: HT | | | TP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLICA | | | TIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-08-2018 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-08 16:48:33 | 3RD REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM HEATHER | | | TRIBOUR, SENIOR PLANNER, THE ATTACHMENT LETTER DATED | | | APRIL 23, 2018, FROM URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS, AND | | | INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-20-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-20-2018 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-20 10:29:38 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM HEATHER | | | TRIBOU, SENIOR PLANNER, AND THE ATTACHMENT DATED MARCH | | | 1, 2018, FROM MICHELLE CUETARA, URBAN DESIGN KILDAY | | | STUDIOS, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
13:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-05 14:03:09 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | THIS BUILDING DOES NOT APPEAR BE A HIGHRISE; HOWEVER, | | | THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DETAIL PROVIDE TO DETEMINE ACTUAL | | | MEASURMENT THAT MEETS THE NFPA DEFINITION OF HIGH RISE: | | | | | | HIGH-RISE BUILDING. A BUILDING WHERE THE FLOOR OF AN | | | OCCUPIABLE STORY IS GREATER THAN 75 FT (23 M) ABOVE THE | | | LOWEST LEVEL OF FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ACCESS. | | | | | | A MEASUREMENT FROM THE LOWEST LEVEL NEEDS TO BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPES, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER THEY WILL BE MIXED OR SEPARATED | | | OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL PURPOSES, PLEASE REVIEW THE | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCULATIONS OF THE AMENITY DECK AND | | | ENSURE SUFFICIENT EXTING NUMBERS, WIDTH AND TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIRMENTS. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR | | | THIS DEVELOPMENT APPEAR ACCEPTABLE. THE FDC?S LOCATIONS | | | NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE | | | MARSHAL. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | A FIRE PUMP ROOM DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE INDICATED. IT IS | | | PREFERRED THAT THIS ROOM HAS ACCESS FROM AN EXTERIOR | | | WALL AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS POINT. | | | | | | WITH LOBBIES BEING SPLIT AND POSSIBLE SEPARATE BUILDING | | | ADDRESSES THE FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL MAY NEED TO BE | | | PROVIDE WITH DUAL PANELS. EACH SEPARATE OCCUPANCY WILL | | | NEED TO ADDRESSABLE TO THE FACP. SEPARATE FA OR FACP IN | | | THESE SPACES WILL NOT BE APPROVED. COORRDINATION WITH | | | THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL IS NEEDED. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ANY ACCESS GATES THAT | | | THEY BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS | | | AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-22-2018 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-22-2018 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-22 14:59:23 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1710 CLARE PD Z17120025 | | | JUNE 22, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR POD A. ANY CHANGES TO POD B WILL | | | NEED TO ACCOUNT FOR EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY SHOWING REQUIRED ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION | | | PER SECTION 94-452. SHRUB AND TREE PLANTINGS CAN BE | | | ADDED TO CONNECT THE ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TO SITE | | | LANDSCAPING RESULTING IN AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN | | | ENVIRONMENT. | | | THE PLAN SUBMITTED LACKS ANY SHRUB OR GROUNDCOVER | | | PLANTINGS TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TO | | | THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE MANY PLANTING | | | OPPORTUNITIES ALONG CLARE AVE AND BLANCHE ST. THAT CAN | | | BE ENHANCED. THE PLANTING AREAS CAN ALSO HAVE | | | APPROPRIATE SPECIES OF TREES OR PALMS ADDED WITH ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE BUFFERS AND PLAZA | | | AREA TO PROVIDE SHADE TO THE PEDESTRIANS ON THE | | | SIDEWALKS OR PLAZAS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | FLOWERING TREES TO SHOW 10 REQUIRED, AND PROVIDE 10 | | | FLOWERING TREES. ONE FOR EVERY 1500 SQ. FT. OF REQUIRED | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LIMITED DIVERSITY OF | | | THE PLANT SPECIES PROPOSED. THERE ARE DIVERSE | | | CONDITIONS WITHIN THE SITE THAT CAN BE CREATIVELY AND | | | SUSTAINABLY DESIGNED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS | | | SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLAN INDICATING LOW, | | | MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER USE AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN | | | ON THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON GROUNDCOVER | | | OR GRASS AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN ON THE FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLANT LIST INCLUDING ALL | | | PERTINENT INFORMATION INCLUDING QUANTITIES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR BACKFLOW | | | VALVES AND SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ANY | | | A/C UNITS OR GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | LIGHTING ALONG THE STREETS ARE PLACED IN EVERY AREA | | | WHERE LANDSCAPING COULD BE PLACED. LIGHTS NEED TO BE | | | LOCATED AWAY FROM LANDSCAPED AREAS WHERE THEY WOULD | | | CREATE CONFLICTS WITH ADDING TREES OR PALMS TO ENHANCE | | | THE LANDSCAPE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING | | | PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE TERRACES AND BALCONIES | | | AS SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS. | | | | | | A LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS PROVIDED FOR ONE OF THE THIRD | | | FLOOR TERRACES THAT DOES NOT HAVE ANY VERTICAL | | | LANDSCAPE COMPONENT SUCH AS PALMS TO HAVE A VISUAL | | | IMPACT FROM THE STREET. | | | THERE ARE OTHER AREAS ON THE THIRD FLOOR THAT ALSO NEED | | | TO HAVE A SIMILAR LANDSCAPE PLAN, INCLUDING THE | | | RECREATION AMENITY AREA AND THE TERRACE ON THE | | | NORTHWEST CORNER. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/23/18: | | | 14. SATISFIED. THE TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SUBMITTED INDICATES RELOCATING EXISTING SABAL PALMS. | | | NONE OF THE PALMS ARE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO BE GOOD | | | CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION. PLEASE INDICATE REMOVAL AND | | | MITIGATE. THE LIVE OAK TREES ARE ALSO VERY POOR | | | QUALITY, AND NEED FURTHER EVALUATION AS TO WHETHER THEY | | | IT IS POSSIBLE TO MOVE THEM TO ANOTHER SITE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/21/18: | | | 15. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN | | | POINTS SO THAT NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ARE | | | NOT COUNTED TWICE. IF 51% ARE NATIVE, THEN 25-50% CAN | | | ONLY BE TAKEN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE NORTH BUFFER TREE COUNT NOTE | | | ON SHEET LP-3, AND LP-1 TO 8 REQUIRED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION AS PERMITTED AND | | | INSTALLED. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. ANY CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ANY PROPERTIES | | | WITHIN POD B WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO BRING THE NEW | | | PLANS INTO THE PD RECORD. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
11:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-22 11:13:05 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1710 CLARE PD Z17120025 | | | MAY 21, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR POD A. ANY CHANGES TO POD B WILL | | | NEED TO ACCOUNT FOR EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY SHOWING REQUIRED ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION | | | PER SECTION 94-452. SHRUB AND TREE PLANTINGS CAN BE | | | ADDED TO CONNECT THE ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TO SITE | | | LANDSCAPING RESULTING IN AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN | | | ENVIRONMENT. | | | THE PLAN SUBMITTED LACKS ANY SHRUB OR GROUNDCOVER | | | PLANTINGS TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TO | | | THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE MANY PLANTING | | | OPPORTUNITIES ALONG CLARE AVE AND BLANCHE ST. THAT CAN | | | BE ENHANCED. THE PLANTING AREAS CAN ALSO HAVE | | | APPROPRIATE SPECIES OF TREES OR PALMS ADDED WITH ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE BUFFERS AND PLAZA | | | AREA TO PROVIDE SHADE TO THE PEDESTRIANS ON THE | | | SIDEWALKS OR PLAZAS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | FLOWERING TREES TO SHOW 10 REQUIRED, AND PROVIDE 10 | | | FLOWERING TREES. ONE FOR EVERY 1500 SQ. FT. OF REQUIRED | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LIMITED DIVERSITY OF | | | THE PLANT SPECIES PROPOSED. THERE ARE DIVERSE | | | CONDITIONS WITHIN THE SITE THAT CAN BE CREATIVELY AND | | | SUSTAINABLY DESIGNED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS | | | SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLAN INDICATING LOW, | | | MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER USE AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN | | | ON THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON GROUNDCOVER | | | OR GRASS AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN ON THE FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLANT LIST INCLUDING ALL | | | PERTINENT INFORMATION INCLUDING QUANTITIES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR BACKFLOW | | | VALVES AND SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ANY | | | A/C UNITS OR GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | LIGHTING ALONG THE STREETS ARE PLACED IN EVERY AREA | | | WHERE LANDSCAPING COULD BE PLACED. LIGHTS NEED TO BE | | | LOCATED AWAY FROM LANDSCAPED AREAS WHERE THEY WOULD | | | CREATE CONFLICTS WITH ADDING TREES OR PALMS TO ENHANCE | | | THE LANDSCAPE. | | | | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS | | | SHOWING PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE TERRACES AND | | | BALCONIES AS SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS. | | | | | | A LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS PROVIDED FOR ONE OF THE THIRD | | | FLOOR TERRACES THAT DOES NOT HAVE ANY VERTICAL | | | LANDSCAPE COMPONENT SUCH AS PALMS TO HAVE A VISUAL | | | IMPACT FROM THE STREET. | | | THERE ARE OTHER AREAS ON THE THIRD FLOOR THAT ALSO NEED | | | TO HAVE A SIMILAR LANDSCAPE PLAN, INCLUDING THE | | | RECREATION AMENITY AREA AND THE TERRACE ON THE | | | NORTHWEST CORNER. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/23/18: | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. THE TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SUBMITTED INDICATES RELOCATING EXISTING SABAL PALMS. | | | NONE OF THE PALMS ARE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO BE GOOD | | | CANDIDATES FOR RELOCATION. PLEASE INDICATE REMOVAL AND | | | MITIGATE. THE LIVE OAK TREES ARE ALSO VERY POOR | | | QUALITY, AND NEED FURTHER EVALUATION AS TO WHETHER THEY | | | IT IS POSSIBLE TO MOVE THEM TO ANOTHER SITE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/21/18: | | | | | | 15. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN POINTS SO THAT | | | NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ARE NOT COUNTED | | | TWICE. IF 51% ARE NATIVE, THEN 25-50% CAN ONLY BE TAKEN | | | FOR DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | | | | 16. CORRECT THE NORTH BUFFER TREE COUNT NOTE ON SHEET | | | LP-3, AND LP-1 TO 8 REQUIRED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION AS PERMITTED AND | | | INSTALLED. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. ANY CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ANY PROPERTIES | | | WITHIN POD B WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO BRING THE NEW | | | PLANS INTO THE PD RECORD. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
Time |
16:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-23 16:25:01 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1710 CLARE PD Z17120025 | | | MARCH 23, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR POD A. ANY CHANGES TO POD B WILL | | | NEED TO ACCOUNT FOR EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY SHOWING REQUIRED ROADWAY | | | BEAUTIFICATION PER SECTION 94-452. SHRUB AND TREE | | | PLANTINGS CAN BE ADDED TO CONNECT THE ROADWAY LANDSCAPE | | | TO SITE LANDSCAPING RESULTING IN AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN | | | ENVIRONMENT. | | | THE PLAN SUBMITTED LACKS ANY SHRUB OR GROUNDCOVER | | | PLANTINGS TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TO | | | THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE MANY PLANTING | | | OPPORTUNITIES ALONG CLARE AVE AND BLANCHE ST. THAT CAN | | | BE ENHANCED. THE PLANTING AREAS CAN ALSO HAVE | | | APPROPRIATE SPECIES OF TREES OR PALMS ADDED WITH ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE BUFFERS AND PLAZA | | | AREA TO PROVIDE SHADE TO THE PEDESTRIANS ON THE | | | SIDEWALKS OR PLAZAS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | FLOWERING TREES TO SHOW 10 REQUIRED, AND PROVIDE 10 | | | FLOWERING TREES. ONE FOR EVERY 1500 SQ. FT. OF REQUIRED | | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LIMITED DIVERSITY OF | | | THE PLANT SPECIES PROPOSED. THERE ARE DIVERSE | | | CONDITIONS WITHIN THE SITE THAT CAN BE CREATIVELY AND | | | SUSTAINABLY DESIGNED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS | | | SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLAN INDICATING LOW, | | | MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER USE AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN | | | ON THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON GROUNDCOVER | | | OR GRASS AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN ON THE FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLANT LIST INCLUDING ALL | | | PERTINENT INFORMATION INCLUDING QUANTITIES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR BACKFLOW | | | VALVES AND SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ANY | | | A/C UNITS OR GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF | | | LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | LIGHTING ALONG THE STREETS ARE PLACED IN EVERY AREA | | | WHERE LANDSCAPING COULD BE PLACED. LIGHTS NEED TO BE | | | LOCATED AWAY FROM LANDSCAPED AREAS WHERE THEY WOULD | | | CREATE CONFLICTS WITH ADDING TREES OR PALMS TO ENHANCE | | | THE LANDSCAPE. | | | | | | 12. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS | | | SHOWING PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE TERRACES AND | | | BALCONIES AS SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/23/18: | | | 14. THE TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION PLAN SUBMITTED | | | INDICATES RELOCATING EXISTING SABAL PALMS. NONE OF THE | | | PALMS ARE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO BE GOOD CANDIDATES FOR | | | RELOCATION. PLEASE INDICATE REMOVAL AND MITIGATE. THE | | | LIVE OAK TREES ARE ALSO VERY POOR QUALITY, AND NEED | | | FURTHER EVALUATION AS TO WHETHER THEY IT IS POSSIBLE TO | | | MOVE THEM TO ANOTHER SITE. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION AS PERMITTED AND | | | INSTALLED. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. ANY CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ANY PROPERTIES | | | WITHIN POD B WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO BRING THE NEW | | | PLANS INTO THE PD RECORD. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-09 14:57:50 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1710 CLARE PD Z17120025 | | | JANUARY 9, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN FOR POD A. ANY CHANGES TO POD B WILL NEED TO | | | ACCOUNT FOR EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY | | | SHOWING REQUIRED ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION PER SECTION | | | 94-452. SHRUB AND TREE PLANTINGS CAN BE ADDED TO | | | CONNECT THE ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TO SITE LANDSCAPING | | | RESULTING IN AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE BUFFERS AND PLAZA AREA TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE TO THE PEDESTRIANS ON THE SIDEWALKS OR | | | PLAZAS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR FLOWERING TREES | | | TO SHOW 10 REQUIRED, AND PROVIDE 10 FLOWERING TREES. | | | ONE FOR EVERY 1500 SQ. FT. OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LIMITED DIVERSITY OF THE PLANT | | | SPECIES PROPOSED. THERE ARE DIVERSE CONDITIONS WITHIN | | | THE SITE THAT CAN BE CREATIVELY AND SUSTAINABLY | | | DESIGNED. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED | | | FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLAN INDICATING LOW, MEDIUM AND | | | HIGH WATER USE AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN ON THE | | | FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS | | | AREAS TO JUSTIFY POINTS TAKEN ON THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLANT LIST INCLUDING ALL PERTINENT | | | INFORMATION INCLUDING QUANTITIES. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR BACKFLOW VALVES AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ANY A/C UNITS | | | OR GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING PROPOSED | | | PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE TERRACES AND BALCONIES AS SHOWN | | | ON THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION AS PERMITTED AND | | | INSTALLED. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-20-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-20-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
04-16-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-20 12:46:23 | BASED ON IMFORMATION PROVIDED TO PUBLIC WORKS, THE | | | TRASH SERVICE WILL BE HAULED TO THE CURBSIDE FOR PICK | | | UP AT AN AGREED DESIGNATED TIME AND QUANTITY OF | | | DUMPSTERS. BASED ON TH PLAN PROVIDED WE ARE ALRIGHT | | | WITH SERVICING THIS FACILITY. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND IF AT | | | ANY POINT YOUR SERVICE IS LARGER THEN WHAT YOU PLANNED | | | FOR WE WILL HAVE TO REVIST THE NUMBER OF CONTAINERS AND | | | THE PICK UP SCHEDULE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-23-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-23-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-23 11:34:39 | BASED ON RESUBMITTAL. THE AREA DESIGNED TO SET ONE | | | DUMPSTER FOR OUR STAFF TO PICK UP WILL NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENT AND COULD CREATE GREATER ISSUES. TO | | | ACCOMPLISHE THIS GOAL A REDESIGN WILL BE NECESSARY. | | 2018-02-06 08:44:47 | BASED ON CONVERSATIONS WITH THE APPLICANT IT IS | | | NECESSARY FOR THEM TO DESIGN OR FIND A WAY TO IMPLEMENT | | | APPROPRIATE TRASH REMOVAL. BASED ON THE CURRENT PLAN | | | ANY TRASH REMOVAL WOULD BE DIFFICULT OR CUMBERSOME. THE | | | APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE AN APPROVED METHOD TO HANDLE ALL | | | SOLID WASTE IN THEIR DESIGN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-22 16:07:36 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 5/2/2018 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT IS DEVELOPING | | | MINIMUM CLEARANCES BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES AND | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | MAY NEED TO SHIFT AWAY FROM THE UTILITIES AND/OR ROOT | | | BARRIERS WILL BE NEEDED. | | | | | | 2. THE CITY WILL BE EVALUATING IF THE DRAINAGE PIPE ON | | | BLANCHE ST. NEEDS TO BE UPSIZED. | | | | | | 3. REVISE PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS ON SHEET C3.1 | | | TO MATCH CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-5. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-29-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-29-2018 |
Time |
17:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-29-2018 |
Time |
17:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-29 09:02:48 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE PLANS | | | IN THE 3/12/2018 ROUTED REVIEW PACKAGE. THEY CAN BE | | | MADE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD | | | 1929 NEED TO BE CONSISTENT ON THE SURVEY AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. THE SURVEY USES 1.53' AND THE | | | ENGINEERING PLANS USE 1.52'. | | | | | | 2. REDUCE THE SIDEWALK APPROACH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF | | | THE CURB RAMP AT THE INTERSECTION OF ELIZABETH ST AND | | | WILKINS AVE. TRY TO KEEP THE APPROACH WITHIN THE CROSS | | | WALK STRIPING. | | | | | | 3. STRUCTURE S-301 APPEARS TO BE A CONTROL STRUCTURE | | | FOR THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THE CONTROL STRUCTURE | | | NEEDS TO BE ONSITE. | | | | | | 4. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT #1 AT CLARE AVE AND WILKINS | | | AVE NEEDS TO BE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR IN A UTILITY | | | EASEMENT. | | | | | | 5. THE WATER MAIN TO PROPOSED FH #2 APPEARS TO ME IN | | | CONFLICT WITH STRUCTURE S-304. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE ENGINEERING PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED | | | FOR OFFSITE WORK. | | | | | | 7. THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION GROUP TO REVIEW/APPROVE | | | THE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK ON BLANCHE ST. | | | | | | 8. THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO MEET SFWMD CRITERIA | | | FOR WATER QUALITY AND PRE- VS. POST-DEVELOPMENT OFFSITE | | | DISCHARGE RATE. | | | | | | 9. THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE IN THE INTERSECTION OF | | | CLARE AVE AND BLANCH ST MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED/UPSIZED | | | TO RECEIVE NEW 36" RCP FROM WEST AND 24" RCP FROM | | | SOUTHWEST. | | | | | | 10. ADD NEW PIPE LINE SYMBOL FOR 24" RCP FROM STRUCTURE | | | S-304 TO EXISTING MANHOLE IN INTERSECTION OF CLARE AVE | | | AND BLANCHE ST. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-09 14:59:24 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PER SECTION 78-9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE CITY IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | BEEN ALLOWING THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE | | | CONVERSION BETWEEN NGVD AND NAVD IS PROVIDED ON THE | | | SURVEY/PLANS. | | | | | | 2. IS FH#2 NECESSARY? THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING | | | FH ACROSS THE STREET. | | | | | | 3. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE S-211 APPEARS TO BE UNNECESSARY. | | | CAN STRUCTURE S-210 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE | | | IN THE INTERSECTION OF CLARE AVE AND BLANCHE ST.? | | | | | | 4. CAN THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG ELIZABETH ST | | | AND WILKINS AVE DRAIN TOWARD THE CURB AND THEN WARP THE | | | PAVEMENT TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF CATCH BASINS? ARE | | | BULBOUTS NEEDED EVERY THREE PARKING SPACES? CONSIDER | | | PROVIDING A VALLEY GUTTER BETWEEN THE BULBOUT AND | | | SIDEWALK IF THEY ARE NEEDED. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PUT THE OFFSITE WORK (WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY) ON A | | | SEPARATE SET OF ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 3. INCLUDE SITE-SPECIFIC EXFILTRATION TEST RESULTS WITH | | | THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-22 10:01:36 | PASSED WITH CONDITION OF REPLAT AND REVIEW OF | | | CROSS-ACCESS/UTILITY, ETC. AGREEMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-17-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-17-2018 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-17 13:11:44 | 1. SURVEY COMMENT RESPONSES MISSING IN RESPONSE LETTER. | | | 2. NO SURVEY PROVIDED. | | | 3. CCTV HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED BY ENGINEERING. | | | 4. DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT THE CROSS-ACCESS/UTILITY, | | | ETC. AGREEMENT. | | | 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT OF REPLAT WILL BE A CONDITION OF | | | EITHER PERMIT OR C.O. ACCORDING TO PLANNING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-05 08:54:38 | 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | 3. UTILITY DEPT. WILL REQUIRE EXISTING SANITARY TO BE | | | TELEVISED. | | | 4. CROSSWALK ON BLANCHE ST. NOT SHOWN ON PRELIMINARY | | | ENG. PLANS. | | | 5. ADD VERTICAL DATUM TO ENG. PLANS. ADD CONVERSION | | | FACTOR TO NGVD-29 ON BOTH SURVEY AND ENG. PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-22 17:52:00 | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE CONTRIBUTION FOR ACCESSIBLE PATHWAY TO | | | PARKER AVENUE VIA CAROLINE STREET AND PEDESTRIAN | | | IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTION OF PARKER AVENUE AND | | | CAROLINE STREET. | | | 2) PROVIDE INFORMATION (MAPS, SCHEDULES/ TIMETABLES, | | | BROCHURES) FOR TRANSIT SERVICES, INCLUDING TRIRAIL, | | | PALM TRAN BRIGHTLINE, IN A CENTRALIZED AREA IN THE | | | LEASING OFFICE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL RESIDENTS. | | | 3) INFORMATION REGARDING TRANSIT SERVICES AND SOUTH | | | FLORIDA COMMUTER SERVICES (SFCS) INFORMATION WILL BE | | | PROVIDED IN INFORMATION PACKETS FOR NEW RESIDENTS. | | | 4) UNBUNDLE SECOND PARKING SPACE FROM TWO BEDROOM | | | DWELLING UNITS LEASE. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-03-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
12.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
04-03-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-04-03 14:58:11 | 1701 CLARE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (DATED | | | MARCH 2, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - TABLES 1A AND 1B INCORRECTLY LABELED SQUARE-FOOTAGE | | | AS DWELLING UNIT FOR THE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | - PROVIDE APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ON | | | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS | | | 1701 CLARE SITE-SPECIFIC TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (DATED MARCH | | | 2, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - REPORT CRITICAL MOVEMENT (NOT APPROACH) DELAY AND LOS | | | FOR THE TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS. | | | - PROVIDE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR INTERSECTIONS WHICH | | | FAIL TO MEET THE LOS REQUIREMENTS (LOS E ON CITY | | | THOROUGHFARE STREETS AND LOS D FOR OTHER STREETS). PER | | | CITY?S COMP PLAN, PLEASE IDENTIFY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM | | | MANAGEMENT (TSM) AND TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT | | | (TDM) MEASURES AS MITIGATION, OR PROVIDE PROPORTIONATE | | | SHARE CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS CITY?S TSM, TDM OR | | | MULTI-MODEL IMPROVEMENTS. | | | - THE INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET IS NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT. PLEASE REVISE. IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT WAS UPDATED IN FIGURE | | | 2 BUT NOT THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT IN THE INTERSECTION | | | VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET. | | | - THE INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET DOES | | | NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE PASS-BY TRIPS. PASS-BY TRIPS | | | SHOULD BE SHOWN AS DIVERTING FROM THE MAJOR STREETS | | | INTO THE SITE. | | | - THE ATTACHMENT FOR PEAK SEASON FACTOR REPORT IS FOR | | | I-95. PLEASE ATTACH THE CORRECT PEAK SEASON FACTOR | | | REPORT FOR THE STUDY AREA. | | | - THE LANE CONFIGURATION FOR THE PARKER AVENUE/CAROLINE | | | STREET ANALYSIS IS INCORRECT. PARKER AVENUE HAS ONLY | | | ONE THROUGH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION AT THAT LOCATION. | | | - INFORMATION ON COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY WILL | | | BE PROVIDED. | | | - PROVIDE THE APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ON | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | PARKING REQUIREMENT EVALUATION (DATED MARCH 2, 2018) | | | COMMENTS: | | | - THE CITED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING | | | STUDY IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | - WITH THE REDUCED PARKING SPACES, AND 65% OF THE TRIPS | | | ASSIGNED TO CLARE AVENUE AND 35% TO CAROLINE STREET, | | | ACCESS TO TRANSIT AND REGIONAL PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE | | | NETWORK BECOMES CRITICAL IN ENCOURAGING ALTERNATE MODES | | | OF TRANSPORTATION, AND DECREASING VEHICULAR DEMAND AND | | | PARKING NEEDS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING | | | TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES AND | | | PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY TO PARKER | | | AVENUE: | | | O PROVIDE SIDEWALK AND ACCESSIBLE PATHWAY TO PARKER | | | AVENUE VIA CAROLINE STREET, COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN | | | TO RELOCATE THE BUS STOP ON PARKER AVENUE SOUTH OF | | | CAROLINE STREET TO NEAR HOWARD PARK | | | O PROVIDE SHUTTLE SERVICES TO RESIDENTS AND EMPLOYEES | | | TO/FROM NEARBY TRANSIT STATIONS | | | O PROVIDE EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS FOR | | | ALTERNATE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION | | | O PROVIDE OPTION FOR NEW RESIDENTS TO PURCHASE | | | DISCOUNTED TRI-RAIL AND PALM TRAN TRANSIT PASSES FOR AT | | | LEAST 1 YEAR | | | O PROVIDE CAR SHARING AND BIKE SHARING FACILITIES AND | | | SERVICES | | | O DEDICATE PARKING SPACES FOR CARPOOLS | | | O IMPLEMENT PARKING MANAGEMENT AND PRICING STRATEGIES | | | FOR RESIDENT PARKING | | | O OTHER TDM MEASURES AS APPROPRIATE. | | | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON MARCH 5, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | - THE SUBMITTAL DOES NOT INCLUDE RESPONSES TO THE SITE | | | PLAN AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION COMMENTS FROM TRAFFIC. | | | - A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, PREPARED, SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER FOR US | | | TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE | | | CONNECTIVITY. | | | - THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS ON PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION | | | 94-207-B-13 WERE NOT ADDRESSED. - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | (PD) DISTRICT - THE APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE THAT | | | THE PROJECT REQUIRING SUCH A WAIVER (PARKING) SHALL | | | CONFORM TO THE CONCEPTS OF NEW URBANISM. THE PEDESTRIAN | | | CIRCULATION NETWORK IS LACKING THE CONCEPTS OF NEW | | | URBANISM. THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS WILL ASSIST IN THE | | | PROJECT CONFORMING TO THE CONCEPTS OF NEW URBANISM: | | | - REDUCE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE AT ALL | | | INTERSECTIONS. THERE MAY BE OPPORTUNITIES TO SQUARE UP | | | OR ADD CHANNELIZING ISLANDS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF | | | ELIZABETH / WILKINS AND WILKINS / CLARE AND TO ALSO ADD | | | LANDSCAPE BULB OUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET | | | FROM THE SITE. CONSIDER MOVE THE CROSSWALK CLOSER TO | | | THE BULB-OUT. ALSO, CONSIDER REALIGNING CLARE AVENUE | | | (WITH CURB) TO COME IN PERPENDICULAR TO WILKINS AVENUE | | | TO REDUCE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE AND EXPOSURE OF | | | BICYCLES TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. THESE ARE ALL IMPORTANT | | | ELEMENTS IN PROVIDING FAVORABLE MULTI-MODAL FACILITIES | | | TO ENCOURAGE ALTERNATE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION. | | | - ADD MIDBLOCK CROSSING ON CLARE AVENUE. | | | - ADD CROSSWALKS AND CURB RAMPS ON OTHER SIDE OF STREET | | | FROM SITE TO ALLOW PEDESTRIANS TO WALK TO THE SITE. | | | - PROVIDE SHADE TREES ALONG THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER THE | | | ADDITION OF SHADE TREES IN THE SIDEWALK AT THE END OF | | | EACH PARKING SPACE AND IN THE LANDSCAPE STREET | | | BULBOUTS. SIDEWALK COULD BE WIDENED INTO BUFFER TO | | | ALLOW PASSING DISTANCE AT EACH TREE. | | | - CONSIDER UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF STORMWATER ON THE | | | WEST END OF THE SITE INSTEAD OF THE PROPOSED DRY | | | RETENTION. THIS WOULD ALLOW THE AREA TO USED AS A | | | PLAZA. IF DRY DETENTION IS RETAINED THEN CONSIDER | | | PROVIDING A WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG WILKINS AND | | | INTEGRATING IT INTO THE DRY DETENTION AREA. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-03-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kudang |
Date |
01-29-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
10.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
04-03-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-10 09:37:04 | THE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION REQUESTS ADDITIONAL TIME TO | | | REVIEW THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT. OUR PRELIMINARY | | | COMMENTS FOLLOW: | | | | | | TPS ANALYSIS | | | THE ANALYSIS IS FOR PCN 74-43-43-28-10-011-0010, WHICH | | | IS 3.1901 ACRES PER THE PROPERTY APPRAISER INFORMATION | | | PROVIDED IN THE STUDY. 3.0191 * 32.27 DU/ACRE (WHICH IS | | | REQUESTED) = 103 UNITS NOT 173 UNITS. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | JUSTIFICATION FOR THE USE OF 173 DWELLING UNITS. | | | | | | SITE SPECIFIC TIS | | | IT APPEARS THAT THE COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRIPS USED | | | FOR THE ANALYSIS WHERE ONLY OBTAINED FROM THE PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY DATABASE. COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT STUDIES | | | SHOULD BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY AND INCLUDED IN THE | | | ANALYSIS. | | | | | | THE DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC ASSUMES THAT NO TRAFFIC | | | WILL USE OKEECHOBEE ROAD TO ENTER OR EXIT THE SITE. | | | GIVEN EXISTING PATTERNS AND THE CONNECTION OF | | | OKEECHOBEE ROAD TO PARKER AVENUE FURTHER NORTH THAN | | | CAROLINE STREET, A PORTION OF THE TRAFFIC WILL MOST | | | LIKELY USE OKEECHOBEE ROAD TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE | | | IF DESTINED TO/FROM THE NORTH. THEREFORE, THE ANALYSIS | | | SHOULD BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS | | | INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR | | | THE INTERSECTIONS OF PARKER AVENUE AT CAROLINE STREET | | | AND AT THE INTERSECTION OF PARKER AVENUE AT OKEECHOBEE | | | ROAD ASSUMING THE FULL BUILDOUT OF THE PARCELS WITH THE | | | ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. THIS WILL | | | HELP IDENTIFY THE IMPACTS OF THE FULL DEVELOPMENT ON | | | THOSE NEARBY INTERSECTIONS. | | | | | | | | | WE ANTICIPATE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL COMMENTS NEXT WEEK. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1-29-2018 | | | 1) PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION | | | 94-207-B-13. - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT - THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROJECT REQUIRING | | | SUCH A WAIVER (PARKING) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONCEPTS | | | OF NEW URBANISM. | | | THE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION NETWORK IS LACKING THE | | | CONCEPTS OF NEW URBANISM. THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS | | | WILL ASSIST IN THE PROJECT CONFORMING TO THE CONCEPTS | | | OF NEW URBANISM: | | | - REDUCE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE AT ALL | | | INTERSECTIONS. THERE MAY BE OPPORTUNITIES TO SQUARE UP | | | OR ADD CHANNELIZING ISLANDS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF | | | ELIZABETH / WILKINS AND WILKINS / CLARE AND TO ALSO ADD | | | LANDSCAPE BULB OUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET | | | FROM THE SITE. | | | - CLARE AVENUE ? BLOCK IS EXTREMELY LONG. ADD MIDBLOCK | | | CROSSING. | | | - ADD CROSSWALKS AND CURB RAMPS ON OTHER SIDE OF STREET | | | FROM SITE TO ALLOW PEDESTRIANS TO WALK TO THE SITE. | | | - THERE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES | | | WITHOUT A LANDSCAPING BREAK. HOW WILL SHADE BE PROVIDED | | | FOR PEDESTRIANS TO HAVE A COMFORTABLE WALK? THERE ARE | | | NO SHADE TREES PROPOSED ALONG THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER | | | THE ADDITION OF SHADE TREES IN THE SIDEWALK AT THE END | | | OF EACH PARKING SPACE AND IN THE LANDSCAPE STREET | | | BULBOUTS. SIDEWALK COULD BE WIDENED INTO BUFFER TO | | | ALLOW PASSING DISTANCE AT EACH TREE. | | | - CONSIDER UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF STORMWATER ON THE | | | WEST END OF THE SITE INSTEAD OF THE PROPOSED DRY | | | RETENTION. THIS WOULD ALLOW THE AREA TO USED AS A | | | PLAZA. IF DRY DETENTION IS RETAINED THEN CONSIDER | | | PROVIDING A WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG WILKINS AND | | | INTEGRATING IT INTO THE DRY DETENTION AREA. | | | 2) SITE PLAN | | | - SHEET FSP-2 THE SIDEWALK IS SHOWN FLARING OUT AT THE | | | GARAGE ENTRANCE ON CLARE AVENUE. THE SIDEWALK SHALL | | | REMAIN INLINE AND AT THE SAME LEVEL AS THE REST OF THE | | | SIDEWALK AT THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. | | | - PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON BLANCHE STREET DO NOT MEET | | | THE MINIMUM MUTCD PARKING RESTRICTIONS FROM A CROSSWALK | | | LINE. | | | - A LANDSCAPE BULBOUT IS MISSING FROM THE CORNER OF | | | CLARE AND BLANCHE. | | | - REDUCE PROPOSED ON STREET TRAVEL LANES TO 10?. USE | | | LANE REDUCTION TO WIDEN SIDEWALK. | | | - SOME OF THE ON STREET PARKING EXCEEDS AN 8?WIDTH. USE | | | 8? WIDE PARALLEL PARKING ON STREET. | | | - FSP-2. A 12? THROAT IS INSUFFICIENT AT GARAGE GATE AS | | | IT WILL CAUSE CARS TO BLOCK A PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK | | | WHEN THE SIDEWALK IS IN LINE WITH THE REST OF THE | | | SIDEWALK. | | | 3) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (T.I.A.) | | | - INTERSECTION ANALYSES DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE DELAY | | | AND OPERATION ISSUES THAT OCCUR TO DUE SFRT TRAIN | | | CROSSING. REVISE ANALYSIS TO ACCOUNT FOR SFRT | | | CROSSINGS. | | | - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS STATES THAT THE ANALYSIS WAS | | | PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | STANDARDS. IN ADDITION TO PALM BEACH COUNTY STANDARDS, | | | THE ANALYSIS MUST BE REVISED TO BE ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE | | | 94-311 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. | | | - TRIP ASSIGNMENT IS NOT CONSISTENT BETWEEN | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SITE ANALYSIS. | | | - SITE PLAN TRIP ASSIGNMENT DID NOT ASSIGN ANY TRIPS TO | | | AUSTRALIAN SOUTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS NOT LOGICAL. | | | - INTERSECTION OF AUSTRALIAN AND MERCER WAS NOT | | | ANALYZED. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. | | | - SITE T.I.A. TABLE 1 PASS BY. CHECK TABLE AS THERE | | | APPEARS TO BE AN ARITHMETIC ERROR. | | | - SITE T.I.A. PAGE 10, PROVIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION | | | ON HOW THE 2.31 % GROWTH RATE WAS CALCULATED. | | | - PASS BY HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY CALCULATED. PASS BY HAS | | | INCORRECTLY BEEN REMOVED FROM THE INTERSECTION TURNING | | | MOVEMENTS INTO THE SITE. PASS BY CAN ONLY BE REMOVED | | | FROM THE THROUGH MOVEMENTS THAT ARE DIVERTING FROM | | | THEIR THROUGH TRIP TO ACCESS THE SITE. | | | - PARKING STUDY ? PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND ON THE | | | TEXAS SITES USED IN THE STUDY AND HOW THEY ARE | | | CORRELATED TO THE SITE. | | | | | | UPDATE 2/14/2018 - MET WITH CHRIS HEGGEN AND MICHELLE | | | CUETARA. INFORMED THEM THAT ELIZABETH AVENUE IS ON THE | | | BICYCLE MASTER PLAN.STAFF REQUESTED THAT A BIKE LANE BE | | | CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE APPLICANT'S FRONTAGE. ADDITIONAL | | | ON-STREET PARKING WOULD HAVE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OUTSIDE | | | OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1092 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmtribou |
Date |
05-23-2018 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmtribou |
Date |
05-23-2018 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-23 15:07:01 | CASE NUMBER: PB 1773, 1773A, 1773B | | | PROJECT NAME: 1701 CLARE AVE | | | | | | ZONING CONTACT: HEATHER M. TRIBOU | | | (561) 822-1562 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PROCESS COMMENTS | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC | | | COPIES IN PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. ELEVEN PAPER COPIES | | | TO BE RESUBMITTED. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | JUNE 8, 2018, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 17, 2018 | | | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JULY 22, 2018), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, | | | THEREFORE THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL | | | FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION | | | FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS | | | | | | -- THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY? SCHOOL | | | CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION RECOMMENDS THE | | | FOLLOWING CONDITION. | | | | | | "IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SCHOOL CAPACITY DEFICIENCY | | | CREATED BY THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE DISTRICT | | | MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS | | | REQUIRED TO CONTRIBUTE A TOTAL OF $27,740 TO THE SCHOOL | | | DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF | | | FIRST BUILDING PERMIT. THIS SCHOOL CAPACITY | | | CONTRIBUTION IS INTENDED TO SUPPLEMENT THE REQUIRED | | | SCHOOL IMPACT FEE (IMPACT FEE CREDIT HAS ALREADY BEEN | | | APPLIED)." | | | | | | -- BASED ON REC'S OF THE PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT, | | | A PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | | STUDY IS REQUIRED BEFORE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. | | | IF FINDINGS REQUIRE A REMEDIATION PLAN, A RECORDED | | | REMEDIATION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ISSUANCE OF | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | --COMMITMENT FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING SHALL BE RECORDED AS | | | DEED RESTRICTION OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE AGREEMENT BEFORE | | | ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. RECORDED | | | RESTRICTION FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING FOR WOULD BE 20% AT | | | 140% AMI BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THE FLORIDA | | | HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION FOR MINIMUM PERIOD OF 15 | | | YEARS AS INDICATED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT DATED | | | DECEMBER 12, 2017 AND REVISED APRIL 30, 2018 BY URBAN | | | DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS. | | | | | | --REPLAT REQUIRED WITH REVIEW OF CROSS-ACCESS, UTILITY | | | AND OTHER AGREEMENTS. | | | | | | | | | SPECIFIC COMMENTS | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- PLANS FOR AMENITIES ON 3RD LEVEL | | | ARE STILL UNCLEAR. PLANTER BOXES ARE NOW LABELED IN THE | | | COURTYARD LAWN AREA AND AT ONE CORNER CALLED OUT AS THE | | | LEVEL 3 AMENITY DECK. HOWEVER THERE ARE LARGE AMOUNTS | | | OF LEVEL 3 CIRCULATION PATH AREAS AND COVERED ROOF DECK | | | AREAS THAT ACT AS CIRCULATION TO ENTER INTO UNITS. | | | THESE AREAS STILL CONTAIN LARGE UNLABELED RECTANGLES. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS CONVEY | | | MESSAGE OF GREATER BALANCE OF GREEN AREA IN COMMON | | | AREAS THEN DEPICTED ON PLANS AND NO GREEN AREA IS | | | PROPOSED ON OPPOSITE CORNER WHICH IS ACROSS FROM | | | RESIDENTIAL ZONING. UPDATE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS TO ADD | | | MORE PLANTERS FOR TO CONVEY MESSAGE OF RENDERINGS AND | | | ADD ON BOTH SIDES OF LEVEL THREE. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- PREVIOUS SUBMITTALS HAVE ALL | | | INDICATED 6 STORIES AND A MEZZANINE. THE MOST RECENT | | | SUBMITTAL INDICATES 7 STORIES. PLEASE EXPLAIN OR | | | ADJUST. | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN- MONUMENT SIGNS ARE INCOMPATIBLE | | | WITH THE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND THE | | | DISTRICT. | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN ? PARKING AREA AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS | | | SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO ADDRESS CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH | | | ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED). | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN- PLEASE REVIEW WALL SIGNAGE TO MAKE | | | CONSISTENT WITH HISTORICAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND | | | COMPATIBLE SURROUNDING PROPERTY SIGNAGE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmtribou |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmtribou |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-23 12:21:30 | CASE NUMBER: PB 1773, 1773A, 1773B | | | PROJECT NAME: 1701 CLARE AVE | | | | | | ZONING CONTACT: HEATHER M. TRIBOU | | | (561) 822-1562 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PROCESS COMMENTS | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC | | | COPIES IN PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. NUMBER OF PAPER | | | COPIES TO BE RESUBMITTED WILL DEPEND ON REVIEWER | | | COMMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED | | | PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS | | | THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | APRIL 27, 2018, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JUNE 19, 2018 | | | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 22, 2018), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, | | | THEREFORE THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL | | | FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION | | | FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS | | | | | | -- THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY? SCHOOL | | | CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION RECOMMENDS THE | | | FOLLOWING CONDITION. | | | | | | ?IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SCHOOL CAPACITY DEFICIENCY | | | CREATED BY THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE DISTRICT | | | MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS | | | REQUIRED TO CONTRIBUTE A TOTAL OF $27,740 TO THE SCHOOL | | | DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF | | | FIRST BUILDING PERMIT. THIS SCHOOL CAPACITY | | | CONTRIBUTION IS INTENDED TO SUPPLEMENT THE REQUIRED | | | SCHOOL IMPACT FEE (IMPACT FEE CREDIT HAS ALREADY BEEN | | | APPLIED).? | | | | | | --COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLES ARE | | | INCORRECTLY LABELED AS DWELLING UNITS FOR SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE TOTALS. (PG. 2) | | | | | | --PARKING STUDY RECOMMENDS 290 PARKING SPACES, WHICH IS | | | LESS THEN CODE. PLANS ONLY PROVIDE 253 SPACES WHICH IS | | | LESS THEN PARKING STUDY. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | -- PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT- REC?S STATED MUST BE | | | ADDRESSED BEFORE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | --WORKFORCE HOUSING- THE VOLUNTARY WORKFORCE HOUSING | | | COMMITMENT IS COMMENDABLE IN THE BURGEONING NEW AREA, | | | BUT NEEDS FURTHER DEVELOPMENT/ DISCUSSION. TOPICS | | | INCLUDE HOW LONG THE WORKFORCE HOUSING WILL BE | | | MAINTAINED. HOW THE COMMITMENT RELATES TO CURRENT | | | MARKET RATES AND THE NUMBER OF UNITS. A TRUE COMMITMENT | | | WOULD BE 20% AT 140% AMI FOR 15 YEARS OR 10% AT 120% | | | AMI FOR 15 YEARS. THIS WILL BE A RECORDED RESTRICTION. | | | | | | SPECIFIC COMMENTS | | | | | | --FSP-1- PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON TRASH SERVICE. | | | CURRENTLY THE PLANS INDICATE ROLLING THE TRASH OUT OF | | | THE FRONT ENTRY OF MULTIPLE UNITS. PLEASE CHECK SIZING | | | OF DUMPSTERS AND VERIFY LOCATION SIZE IS ADEQUATE AND | | | IF EXTRA SCREENING WILL BE NEEDED TO BLOCK THE VIEW | | | FROM THE FRONT DOOR OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | | | | --FSP-1- PROVIDE SIDEWALK WIDTH DIMENSIONS FOR | | | PEDESTRIAN EXIT LOCATIONS. | | | | | | --FSP-1- SIDEWALK AT WILKINS AVE AND CLARE PINCHES DOWN | | | IN SIZE. PLEASE UPDATE RADIUS AT CORNER. | | | | | | --FSP-1 & ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- THE ACCESS DRIVE TO THE | | | PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS WHICH IS | | | 24 FEET. (SEC. 94-846) | | | | | | --FSP-1 & ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- PARKING COMPUTATIONS ON | | | SITE PLAN DIFFER THEN ACTUAL SPACES. STAFF COUNTED 35 | | | ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND 219 IN THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | | | | --FSP-1-LOCATE SIGNAGE ON SITE PLAN. | | | | | | --FSP-1- PLEASE PROVIDE SITE AMENITIES IN RESIDENTIAL | | | SIDE PARK. | | | | | | --FSP-2- PROVIDE DETAILS FOR FENCES. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- PLANS FOR AMENITIES ON 3RD LEVEL | | | ARE JUST A SET OF UNLABELED BOXES. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- LABEL PLANTERS TO INDICATE | | | RELATIONSHIP WITH CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- TWO GROUND FLOOR UNITS DO NOT | | | HAVE ACCESS FROM THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | | | | --ROADWAY BEATIFICATION PLAN- PROVIDE LANDSCAPE IN BULB | | | OUTS ON CLARE. IF UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS PROVIDE | | | TYPICAL INDUSTRY STANDARD ROOT BARRIER DETAIL WITH | | | PLANT SELECTIONS WITH SHALLOW ROOT SYSTEMS. | | | | | | --ROADWAY BEATIFICATION PLAN-PROVIDE DOOR ZONES ON | | | SIDEWALK FOR CLARE AVE. FOR SAFETY. | | | | | | --PHOTOMETRIC PLAN-TWENTY-FIVE FEET TALL STREET LIGHTS | | | PROPOSED ON CLARE AVE AND ELIZABETH WILL GLARE INTO | | | RESIDENTIAL UNITS, PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING IS | | | RECOMMENDED. | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN- PLAN REQUESTS ALLOWANCE OF ONE 10 | | | FOOT TALL, THREE 6 FOOT TALL AND ONE 4 FOOT TALL | | | SIGNAGE PER FRONTAGE. THIS NEEDS SOME REFINEMENT FOR | | | HIERARCHY AND CONTEXTUAL INTEGRATION. | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN - UNDER SIGNAGE INTENT PLEASE ADD | | | WORD ?INTERNAL? IN FRONT OF PLAZA FOR CLARITY. | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN- CONSISTENT WITH THE DOWNTOWN | | | MASTERPLAN CODE PLEASE PROHIBIT INTERNALLY LIT BOX | | | SIGNS. | | | | | | --MASTER SIGN PLAN- WALL AND BLADE SIGNS ARE NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURE OF STORE FRONTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmtribou |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmtribou |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-05 15:56:45 | CASE NUMBER: PB 1773, 1773A, 1773B | | | PROJECT NAME: 1701 CLARE AVE | | | | | | ZONING CONTACT: HEATHER M. TRIBOU | | | (561) 822-1562 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PROCESS COMMENTS | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) AND AN ELECTRONIC COPIES IN PDF FORMAT OF ALL | | | PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED | | | PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS | | | THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | JANUARY 26, 2018, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 20, | | | 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY | | | MARCH 12, 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED | | | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS | | | | | | --THE APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY? SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY | | | DETERMINATION. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | --A LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE (PAGE 38 OF THE | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION) SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | ENTIRE CPD (POD A AND POD B) AND IMPACTS SHOULD BE | | | DISCUSSED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | --RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX DIFFERS IN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | | FROM MASTER PLAN, FSP, JUSTIFICATION PLAN AND TRAFFIC | | | STUDIES, PLEASE UPDATE TO MATCH UP. | | | | | | --RESTAURANT SQUARE FOOTAGE INCONSISTENT ON MASTER | | | PLAN, FSP, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND TRAFFIC STUDIES, | | | PLEASE UPDATE TO MATCH UP. | | | | | | --COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLES ARE | | | INCORRECTLY LABELED AS DWELLING UNITING FOR SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE TOTALS. | | | | | | --VOLUNTARY LIMITS ON COMMERCIAL MUST BE CLEARLY STATED | | | ON ALL PLANS AND IN JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | --FLOOR AREA RATIOS MUST CLEARLY RELATE TO VOLUNTARY | | | LIMITS ON COMMERCIAL ON ALL PLANS AND IN JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT. | | | | | | --JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT REFERENCES POPULATION DATA | | | AND PROJECTIONS WHICH DIFFER FROM CITY?S; PLEASE | | | PROVIDE REFERENCES. | | | | | | --JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT REFERENCES THE COMPREHENSIVE | | | PLAN PROJECTIONS BEING FROM 2008, WHEN THE CITY?S | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS UPDATED IN 2015. | | | | | | --JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT DISREGARDS ANY PROSPECT FOR | | | MASS TRANSIT IN THE AREA WHILE INDICATING A RESURGENCE | | | OF BUSINESS IN THE AREA AND APPLICATION PROPOSES | | | RESIDENTIAL, THIS IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | --THE APPLICATION PROPOSES TO TAKE A PROPERTY | | | HISTORICALLY USED AS INDUSTRIAL AND REPURPOSE IT AS | | | RESIDENTIAL, TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, A PHASE | | | I ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AND IF | | | MITIGATION EFFORTS ARE NEEDED SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IN | | | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | --THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHOULD ADDRESS MEASURES | | | TAKEN TO INCREASE BIKING ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SITE. | | | | | | --THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHOULD ADDRESS POLICY | | | 1.15 OF THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADVISED ON | | | PAGE 32 OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | --THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (STANDARDS OF CODE | | | COMPLIANCE) SHOULD INCLUDE MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON | | | CHANGED CONDITIONS. | | | | | | --WAIVER #1- SUBJECT SITE IS NOT ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL, | | | IT IS SEPARATED BY PUBLIC ROW AND THEREFORE IS NOT | | | REQUIRED TO PROVIDE INCREASED SETBACK. | | | | | | --WAIVER #1- PLEASE VERIFY BUILDING HEIGHTS ON WAIVER | | | WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | | | | --WAIVER #2- JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES GARAGE | | | WAS CALCULATED. PLEASE CALCULATE % RESIDENTIAL AND % | | | COMMERCIAL FIRST FLOOR AREA ONLY. | | | | | | --WAIVER #2- JUSTIFICATION STATES THE INCREASED | | | RESIDENTIAL IS TO COMPLIMENT SURROUNDINGS. THREE SIDES | | | OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE ACROSS OF INDUSTRIAL AND ONE IS | | | ACROSS FROM RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED APPLICATION | | | PROPOSES RESIDENTIAL ACROSS FROM INDUSTRIAL ON TWO | | | SIDE, PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | --MASTERPLAN- LABELS ON PLAN AND IN KEY ARE | | | INCONSISTENT FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. | | | | | | --MASTERPLAN- PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINTS DO NOT MATCH | | | WITH FSP. | | | | | | --MASTERPLAN (GENERAL NOTE #2)- PLEASE INDICATE THAT | | | SEC. 94-312: SEPERATION OF ACCESS POINTS WILL BE MEET. | | | | | | -MASTERPLAN- CLEARLY INDICATE ALL OVERALL DATA WITH POD | | | A AND POD B DATA. | | | | | | --MASTERPLAN (NOTE ON POD B)- SEC. 94-207(D)(9) | | | PROHIBITS OUTDOOR STORAGE IN THE PROPOSED ZONING, THIS | | | MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED. | | | | | | -- MASTERPLAN (NOTE ON POD B) - STAFF RESEARCHED ALL | | | CURRENT LICENSED BUSINESS AS OF 1/5/17. USES OF | | | LICENSED BUSINESS ARE PERMITTED IN THE GC ZONING | | | DISTRICT. THIS NOTE IS VAGUE AND SHOULD BE REMOVED. | | | | | | --MASTERPLAN- STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT A 0?SETBACK | | | WAIVER. IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE | | | APPLICATION, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT AND THE | | | GC DISTRICT SETBACK REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | --LANDSCAPE PLANS- THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS INDICATES | | | LARGE AMOUNTS OF LANDSCAPE ON THE BUILDING TO SOFTEN | | | THE LOOK OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE UPDATE THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS TO SPECIFY THE INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE SHOWN ON | | | THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS. | | | | | | --LANDSCAPE PLANS- PROVIDE PLANS FOR AMENITIES ON 3RD | | | LEVEL. | | | | | | --FSP AND LANDSCAPE PLAN- SEC.94-145(6) (B) MINIMUM | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15% | | | | | | --MASTERPLAN AND FSP- 94-305(E) INDICATE VISIBILITY | | | TRIANGLE ON PLANS. | | | | | | --MASTER PLAN AND FSP- 94-145(3) MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE | | | IS 60% | | | | | | --MASTER PLAN AND FSP- 94-145(4) MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS | | | SURFACE IS 85% | | | | | | --FSP-PROVIDE SIGNAGE PLAN OR NOTE WILL MEET SEC. | | | 94-408. | | | | | | --FSP-2- PROVIDE DETAILS FOR FENCES. | | | | | | --FSP-2- PROVIDE DETAILS FOR SITE AMENITIES, INCLUDING | | | BENCHES. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX ON PLANS | | | AND CHARTS TO NOT MATCH. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- PLEASE PROVIDE SAMPLES AND | | | DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS BEING USED. | | | | | | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS- PROVIDE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR | | | PARKING SPACES IN GARAGE. NOTE COLUMNS MAY NOT ENCROACH | | | ON MINIMUM SIZE PARKING SPACES. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |