City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z17110025

Plan Review Stops For Project Z17110025

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	07-20-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	12-11-2017	Time	18:46	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-11-2017	Time	18:46	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-11 19:21:53	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	2. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	POTENTIAL SPREAD OF FIRE TO OTHER (FUTURE) STRUCTURES.
	DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE NORTH-WEST WALL OF THE
	EXISTING BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN
	PARCEL NO. 1 AND PARCEL NO. 5A, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL
	BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND OPENING
	PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE MUST BE VERIFIED. COMPLIANCE WITH
	TABLE 705.8 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE MUST BE
	DEMONSTRATED. THEREFORE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO SHOW
	THE FIRE RESISTACE RATING OF THE NORTH-WEST WALL AND
	THE PERCENTAGE OF THAT WALL THAT IS TAKEN UP BY DOOR
	AND WINDOW OPENINGS WHICH ARE NOT FIRE-RESISTANCE
	RATED. THE SAME APPLIES TO THE CENTER PORTION OF THE
	NORTH-EAST WALL WHICH FACES PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 3.

	3. EXITS ON THE NORTH-WEST ELEVATION. A FLOOR PLAN,
	LIFE SAFETY PLAN OR OTHER FORM OF PLAN SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED TO SHOW THAT THERE IS NO REQUIRED EXIT
	REQUIREMENT ON THE NORTH-WEST ELEVATION. ANY EXIT MAY
	NOT DISCHARGE ONTO A DIFFERENT PROPERTY, SO IT MUST
	DISCHARGE EITHER ONTO THE SAME PROPERTY AS THE BUILDING
	WHICH IT SERVES OR IT MUST DISCHARGE ONTO THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PARCEL
	NO. 1 AND PARCEL NO. 5A APPEARS TO BE ON THE NORTH-WEST
	WALL OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, SO ANY EXIT THROUGH THAT
	WALL WOULD BE DISCHARGING ONTO A DIFFERENT PROPERTY.
	THE SAME APPLIES TO THE CENTER PORTION OF THE
	NORTH-EAST WALL WHICH FACES PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 3.

	4. THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PARCEL NO. 1 AND
	PARCEL NO. 5A APPEARS TO BE ON THE NORTH-WEST WALL OF
	THE EXISTING BUILDING. THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT DETAIL
	TO CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING WILL NOT
	CROSS THAT PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE. FOR ANY BUILDING
	CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF
	TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL
	BE SUBMITTED, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
	ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE. THE
	SAME APPLIES TO THE CENTER PORTION OF THE NORTH-EAST
	WALL WHICH FACES PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 3.

	5. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING WILL NEED A SEPARATE ADDRESS.
	FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
	SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]


	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG			ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-07-2018		Cont ID
Sent By	Mgonzale			Date	06-07-2018	Time	Rev Time	0.50
Received By	mgonzale			Date	06-07-2018	Time	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-12-2017		Cont ID
Sent By	squinone			Date	12-12-2017	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	squinone			Date	12-12-2017	Time	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-12 16:03:44	1. PLEASE PROVIDE AND SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS, ALL EXISTING
	UTILITIES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE AS WELL AS
	ANY PROPOSED UTILITIES TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT (LABEL
	SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL PIPES AND CONDUITS ETC.)

	SOFIA QUINONES?BENEJAM, EI
	PROJECT ENGINEER
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
	(MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366)
	P: 561.494.1108
	C: 561.459.6518
	F: 561.494.1116
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-09-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	04-09-2018	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	04-09-2018	Time	13:04	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-09 13:07:15	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM ERIC
	SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPLE PLANNER, AND THE ATTACHMENT DATED
	MARCH 23, 2018, FROM KIMBERLY HORN, THE PREVIOUSLY
	SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO
	HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
	561-804-4709

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	12-05-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	12-05-2017	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	12-05-2017	Time	12:43	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-05 12:48:04	THE FOLLOWING COMMENT(S) WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.


	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.


	THIS REVIEW DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FUTURE WATER
	SUPPLY REQUIRERMENTS AND/OR FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE
	ACCESS POINTS OF EACH SEPARATED PARCEL. ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN THOSE PARCEL PROJECTS ARE
	SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.


	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	07-20-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	07-20-2018	Time	16:08	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	07-20-2018	Time	16:08	Sent To

Notes

2018-07-20 16:13:20	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: BRANDSMART CPD Z17110025
	JULY 20, 2018
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD NOT
	IMMEDIATELY AFFECT EXISTING APPROVED PARKING LOT LAYOUT
	AND LANDSCAPING. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON INDIVIDUAL
	LOTS WOULD HAVE TO MEET LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS
	UNLESS DESIGN GUIDELINES WERE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, OR
	WAIVERS WERE REQUESTED AS EACH LOT WAS DEVELOPED. STAFF
	WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE DESIGN GUIDELINES IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE NUMBER THE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR
	EASIER REFERENCE.

	3. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST TO SECTION 94-443 SHOULD
	BE FOR 94-443(B), AS THESE WILL ALL BE NON-RESIDENTIAL
	USE LOTS. IF THE REQUEST WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL LOTS
	WITHIN THE CPD WHERE THEY ABUT, HE REQUEST SHOULD BE
	FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.

	4. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243, TABLE
	VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING OPEN
	SPACE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. 40% OPEN
	SPACE IS THE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AS THEY WOULD
	BE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS 60%.
	OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS THAT
	ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%, AND
	EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

	5. SATISFIED. WAIVER FOR PARKING LOT DIVIDERS NEEDS TO
	BE CLARIFIED. SECTION 94-113 IS NOT APPLICABLE, AS THIS
	SECTION IS IN ARTICLE IV -DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. A
	WAIVER IS NOT NEEDED FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, AS THEY ARE
	NOT REQUIRED, BUT ARE OPTIONAL. THE CURRENTLY APPROVED
	PLANS FOR THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE MEET CODE
	REQUIREMENTS, AND ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALSO
	HAVE TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/18/18:

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING
	EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE PROPOSED PARK
	AREA. THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE UPGRADES FOR
	THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY REDUCTIONS IN
	LANDSCAPE IN OTHER AREAS, SO THE PLAN MUST BE APPROVED
	WITH THE MAJOR AMENDMENT.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES TO
	CLARIFY EXACTLY WHAT AREAS WILL BE EXEMPT FROM
	PROVIDING THE 5 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. ALSO
	OVERLAP OF EASEMENTS MAY AFFECT THE PLACEMENT OF
	REQUIRED TREES.
	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES TO
	CLARIFY EXACTLY WHAT BUFFER AREAS WILL BE EXEMPT FROM
	PROVIDING THE REQUIRED TREES, AS IT APPEARS ONLY THE
	HEDGE WILL BE PROVIDED.

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PERIMETER PARCEL BUFFER ITEM
	TO READ ?FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED BUFFER?
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
	10. ALL MISSING LANDSCAPING AND TREES MUST BE REPLACED
	ON THE SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS,
	AND ANY CHANGES TO SPECIES MUST BE SUBMITTED AS A MINOR
	AMENDMENT.


	SUBDIVISION Z17110024.
	1. SATISFIED. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CPD NEED TO BE
	SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BEFORE SIGN OFF FOR LANDSCAPE
	CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THE SUBDIVISION TO ASSURE THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

	1. ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LANDSCAPING MUST BE
	IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-18-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-18-2018	Time	15:56	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-18-2018	Time	15:56	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-18 15:57:32	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: BRANDSMART CPD Z17110025
	JUNE 18, 2018
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD NOT
	IMMEDIATELY AFFECT EXISTING APPROVED PARKING LOT LAYOUT
	AND LANDSCAPING. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON INDIVIDUAL
	LOTS WOULD HAVE TO MEET LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS
	UNLESS DESIGN GUIDELINES WERE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, OR
	WAIVERS WERE REQUESTED AS EACH LOT WAS DEVELOPED. STAFF
	WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE DESIGN GUIDELINES IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE NUMBER THE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR
	EASIER REFERENCE.

	3. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST TO SECTION 94-443 SHOULD
	BE FOR 94-443(B), AS THESE WILL ALL BE NON-RESIDENTIAL
	USE LOTS. IF THE REQUEST WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL LOTS
	WITHIN THE CPD WHERE THEY ABUT, HE REQUEST SHOULD BE
	FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.

	4. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243, TABLE
	VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING OPEN
	SPACE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. 40% OPEN
	SPACE IS THE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AS THEY WOULD
	BE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS 60%.
	OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS THAT
	ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%, AND
	EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

	5. SATISFIED. WAIVER FOR PARKING LOT DIVIDERS NEEDS TO
	BE CLARIFIED. SECTION 94-113 IS NOT APPLICABLE, AS THIS
	SECTION IS IN ARTICLE IV -DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. A
	WAIVER IS NOT NEEDED FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, AS THEY ARE
	NOT REQUIRED, BUT ARE OPTIONAL. THE CURRENTLY APPROVED
	PLANS FOR THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE MEET CODE
	REQUIREMENTS, AND ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALSO
	HAVE TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/18/18:

	6. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE PROPOSED PARK AREA. THE
	LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE UPGRADES FOR THE
	EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY REDUCTIONS IN LANDSCAPE
	IN OTHER AREAS, SO THE PLAN MUST BE APPROVED WITH THE
	MAJOR AMENDMENT.

	7. PLEASE REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES TO CLARIFY
	EXACTLY WHAT AREAS WILL BE EXEMPT FROM PROVIDING THE 5
	FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. ALSO OVERLAP OF EASEMENTS
	MAY AFFECT THE PLACEMENT OF REQUIRED TREES.
	8. PLEASE REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES TO CLARIFY
	EXACTLY WHAT BUFFER AREAS WILL BE EXEMPT FROM PROVIDING
	THE REQUIRED TREES, AS IT APPEARS ONLY THE HEDGE WILL
	BE PROVIDED.

	9. CORRECT THE PERIMETER PARCEL BUFFER ITEM TO READ
	?FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED BUFFER?

	SUBDIVISION Z17110024.
	1. SATISFIED. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CPD NEED TO BE
	SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BEFORE SIGN OFF FOR LANDSCAPE
	CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THE SUBDIVISION TO ASSURE THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/18/18:

	2. ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LANDSCAPING MUST BE
	IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-18-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-18-2018	Time	13:57	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-18-2018	Time	13:57	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-18 13:58:23	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: BRANDSMART CPD Z17110025
	APRIL 18, 2018
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. NOT SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD NOT
	IMMEDIATELY AFFECT EXISTING APPROVED PARKING LOT LAYOUT
	AND LANDSCAPING. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON INDIVIDUAL
	LOTS WOULD HAVE TO MEET LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS
	UNLESS DESIGN GUIDELINES WERE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, OR
	WAIVERS WERE REQUESTED AS EACH LOT WAS DEVELOPED. STAFF
	WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE DESIGN GUIDELINES IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.

	2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE NUMBER THE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR
	EASIER REFERENCE.

	3. NOT SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST TO SECTION 94-443
	SHOULD BE FOR 94-443(B), AS THESE WILL ALL BE
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USE LOTS. IF THE REQUEST WILL BE
	APPLICABLE TO ALL LOTS WITHIN THE CPD WHERE THEY ABUT,
	HE REQUEST SHOULD BE FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.

	4. NOT SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243, TABLE
	VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING OPEN
	SPACE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. 40% OPEN
	SPACE IS THE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AS THEY WOULD
	BE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS 60%.
	OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS THAT
	ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%, AND
	EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

	5. NOT SATISFIED. WAIVER FOR PARKING LOT DIVIDERS NEEDS
	TO BE CLARIFIED. SECTION 94-113 IS NOT APPLICABLE, AS
	THIS SECTION IS IN ARTICLE IV -DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. A
	WAIVER IS NOT NEEDED FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, AS THEY ARE
	NOT REQUIRED, BUT ARE OPTIONAL. THE CURRENTLY APPROVED
	PLANS FOR THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE MEET CODE
	REQUIREMENTS, AND ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALSO
	HAVE TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-11-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-11-2017	Time	14:56	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-11-2017	Time	14:56	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-11 14:58:00	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: BRANDSMART CPD Z17110025
	DECEMBER 11, 2017
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD NOT IMMEDIATELY
	AFFECT EXISTING APPROVED PARKING LOT LAYOUT AND
	LANDSCAPING. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS
	WOULD HAVE TO MEET LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS UNLESS
	DESIGN GUIDELINES WERE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, OR
	WAIVERS WERE REQUESTED AS EACH LOT WAS DEVELOPED. STAFF
	WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE DESIGN GUIDELINES IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.

	2. PLEASE NUMBER THE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR EASIER
	REFERENCE.

	3. WAIVER REQUEST TO SECTION 94-443 SHOULD BE FOR
	94-443(B), AS THESE WILL ALL BE NON-RESIDENTIAL USE
	LOTS. IF THE REQUEST WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL LOTS
	WITHIN THE CPD WHERE THEY ABUT, HE REQUEST SHOULD BE
	FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.

	4. THE WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243, TABLE VII-3
	COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. 40% OPEN SPACE IS
	THE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AS THEY WOULD BE
	DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS 60%.
	OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS THAT
	ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%, AND
	EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

	5. WAIVER FOR PARKING LOT DIVIDERS NEEDS TO BE
	CLARIFIED. SECTION 94-113 IS NOT APPLICABLE, AS THIS
	SECTION IS IN ARTICLE IV -DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. A
	WAIVER IS NOT NEEDED FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, AS THEY ARE
	NOT REQUIRED, BUT ARE OPTIONAL. THE CURRENTLY APPROVED
	PLANS FOR THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE MEET CODE
	REQUIREMENTS, AND ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALSO
	HAVE TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	12-12-2017		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-12-2017	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	12-12-2017	Time	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-12 10:11:50	DURING THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS.
	WHEN THEY DEVELOPE THE PROPERTY THEY WILL NEED TO KEEP
	IN MIND HOW THE SOLID WASTE WILL BE HANDLE FOR EACH
	SUBDIVIDED PARCEL.

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	06-04-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	06-04-2018	Time	08:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	06-04-2018	Time	08:23	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-04 08:23:08	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE JUNE
	1, 2018 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE:

	1. ON SHEET E-1, LABEL THE RETENTION AREAS AS DETENTION
	AREAS UNLESS IT IS DETERMINED THERE IS NOT AN OUTFALL
	FOR THE AREA(S).

	2. SINCE THE PROPERTY IS BEING RE-PLATTED AND
	RE-DEVELOPED AND THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM
	(DETENTION PONDS) WILL CONTINUE TO SERVE THE OVERALL
	DEVELOPMENT, THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOULD BE
	CHECKED TO SEE IF IT IS SUFFICIENTLY SIZED FOR THE
	CHANGE IN DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA (IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS
	AREAS, BUILDING FOOT PRINT AREAS, ETC.). THE EXISTING
	DETENTION PONDS MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED WHICH MAY
	AFFECT THEIR PLATTED PARCEL BOUNDARIES.

	TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-18-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	04-18-2018	Time	18:44	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	04-18-2018	Time	18:48	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-18 18:47:47	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF HTE APRIL
	3, 2018 REVIEW SET:

	1. PLAT NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT
	ACROSS PARCELS 3 AND 4.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-13-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	12-13-2017	Time	12:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	12-13-2017	Time	12:39	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-13 12:39:21	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
	WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
	MITS-APPLICATIONS

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:

	1. DETENTION POND STORMWATER TRACT 1 EXTENDS INTO
	PARCEL NO. 4 AND PARCEL NO. 5. IT'S BELIEVED THAT THIS
	PORTION OF THE DETENTION POND CONVEYS WATER TO THE
	CONTROL STRUCTURE FOR THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
	WILL A DRAINAGE EASEMENT BE CREATED OVER THIS PORTION
	OF THE DETENTION POND?

	2. WILL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS BE CREATED OVER THE
	STORMWATER SYSTEM? SEVERAL STORM PIPES CROSS PARCEL
	LINES.

	3. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	07-24-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	07-24-2018	Time	08:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2018-07-24 08:41:16	PASSED BUT EXTEND PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS UE
	TO INTERSECT THE WEST R/W OF EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-21-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	06-21-2018	Time	10:10	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2018-06-21 10:10:49

2ND PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS MAILED 6/21/2018.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-18-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	04-18-2018	Time	11:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2018-04-18 11:11:29

PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS EMAILED TO APPLICANT ON 4/18/18.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-11-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	12-11-2017	Time	12:29	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2017-12-11 12:54:34	1. SEPARATE SUBMITTALS TO ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
	TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT WILL
	BE REQUIRED.
	2. ROADWAY AND STORMWATER TRACTS WILL REQUIRE
	DEDICATION TO A MASTER ASSOCIATION.
	3. CROSS ACCESS, PARKING, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE
	AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
	4. NEED OVERLAY OF EXISTING UTILITIES ON PROPOSED PLAT.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-22-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-22-2018	Time	14:17	Rev Time	4.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	06-22-2018	Time	14:17	Sent To

Notes

2018-06-22 14:22:25	CASE NO. 1060JJ - 2ND REVIEW
	BRANDSMART SUBDIVISION MAJOR PD AMENDMENT
	751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
	(11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON
	WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
	SCHEDULED FOR THE AUGUST 21, 2018 PLANNING BOARD
	MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 22, 2018), THE
	CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
	SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	1) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT A 90 FOOT SIGN HEIGHT. THE
	BUILDING WAS BUILT WITH A TOWER ELEMENT TO ACT SOLELY
	AS A LOCATION FOR THE WALL SIGN. THAT SIGN HEIGHT IS 60
	FEET.

	2) CLARIFICATION NEEDED: THE JUSTIFICATION MATERIAL
	CONTINUES TO STATE THAT TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
	CONFIRMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY.
	STAFF WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THERE IS NO NEW
	SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS
	APPLICATION.

	3) WAIVERS:

	A. WAIVER #2 - IS THIS INTENDED FOR BUILDINGS THAT
	CURRENTLY HAVE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED SETBACK ONLY?
	STAFF WILL SUPPORT THIS ONLY IF NEW CONSTRUCTION
	CONFORMS TO REQUIRED GC SETBACKS.
	B. WAIVER #3 IS NOT REQUIRED - THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN
	THE CPD IS 10,000 SF, NOT 2 ACRES.
	C. WAIVER #6 - STAFF WILL ONLY SUPPORT FOR TRACT 1A.
	D. WAIVER #4 - THE PARCEL BREAKDOWN TABLE SHOWS NO
	PARCEL WITH LESS THAN 72% OPEN SPACE. WHERE DID 8% COME
	FROM? STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS. (SEE THE DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS STAFF IS PROPOSING).

	4) CLARIFICATION NEEDED: CROSS PARKING.

	A. SECTION 7.1 OF THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS STATES
	THAT ALL PARKING AREAS WITHIN THE PROPERTY ARE INCLUDED
	AS PART OF THE COMMONS FACILITIES. HOWEVER, IT FURTHER
	STATES THAT A SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION CAN BE ISSUED
	THAT REMOVES THE PARKING FOR SPECIFIC PARCELS FROM THE
	DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. THIS IS CONCERNING SINCE IT
	MAY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PROVIDED PARKING FOR A
	SPECIFIC BUSINESS.
	B. THE PLAT ONLY PERMITS CROSS ACCESS ON THE PARKING
	AISLES AND DOES NOT MENTION CROSS-PARKING.

	5) THERE ARE ERRORS AND ADDITIONAL DETAIL NEEDED ON THE
	PARKING TABLE.

	A. THE BUILDING PERMITS FOR STEAK AND SHAKE (3,880 SF)
	AND GOLFSMITH (19,593 SF) CONTAIN GREATER NUMBERS THAN
	ARE SHOWN ON THE PARKING TABLE. THE HIGHER BUILDING
	PERMIT VALUES REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PARKING IN THE
	"REQUIRED COLUMN".
	B. WHEN FRACTIONAL REQUIREMENTS EXIST, IT ROUNDS DOWN
	AT 0.5, SO THERE IS ONE LESS SPACE REQUIRED FOR PARCEL
	1 & 1A.
	C. STAFF ONLY COUNTS 224 PARKING SPACES ON PARCEL 4 &
	4A. PLEASE RECHECK THE NUMBERS.
	D. PLEASE ADD A TOTAL COLUMN FOR THE PARKING TABLE SO
	THAT IT IS EASY TO SEE IF THE OVERALL SITE REQUIREMENTS
	ARE MET BY WHAT IS PROVIDED (ADA TABLE AS WELL).

	6) THE SITE, AS IT WAS DEVELOPED (BRANDSMART, STEAK AND
	SHAKE, GOLFSMITH) COMPLIES WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS.
	HOWEVER, THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS CHANGE BASED ON THE
	SEPARATION OF PARCEL 4A FROM PARCEL 1.

	A. THE ADA PARKING TABLE IN THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS HAS AN ERROR. PARKING LOTS
	HAVING 400-500 PARKING SPACES ONLY REQUIRE 9 OF THEM TO
	BE ADA COMPLIANT. ONE LESS SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR
	PARCELS 1 AND 1A.
	B. PARCEL 3 ONLY REQUIRES 2 ADA SPACES SINCE THERE ARE
	LESS THAN 50 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES.
	C. A TOTAL OF 18 ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, YET
	THE SIGHT ONLY PROVIDES 17 ADA PARKING SPACES. (PARCEL
	4 & 4A ACTUALLY HAVE 8 ADA SPACES)
	D. IF PARCEL 4A WAS JOINED WITH PARCEL 1, AS THE SITE
	WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED, THEN ONLY 17 ADA PARKING
	SPACES ARE REQUIRED.

	7) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE THREE BUILDINGS.
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE AMOUNT AND LOCATIONS OF BICYCLE
	PARKING. ANY DEFICIENCY WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR
	TO THE CITY SIGNING THE PLAT.

	8) DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

	A. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LABELS ON THE MASTER
	PLAN FOR WHICH PARCEL FRONTAGE IS THE FRONT, SIDE AND
	REAR. THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS REVIEWED THE FRONTAGE
	LOCATIONS AND RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING (ADJUST ALL THE
	FRONTAGES ACCORDINGLY):

	PARCEL 1 - EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE = FRONT
	PARCEL 3 - EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE = FRONT
	BRANDSMART WAY = SIDE

	B. SETBACKS - ALL PARCELS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH
	THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT SETBACKS BASED
	ON THE FRONTAGE LISTED ON THE MASTER PLAN.

	C. LANDSCAPE

	LANDSCAPE AREA: THE OVERALL SITE IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
	A MINIMUM OF 15% LANDSCAPE AREA. UPON REDEVELOPMENT,
	PARCELS 2, 3 & 4/4A MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10%
	LANDSCAPE AREA.

	A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS
	REQUIRED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BRANDSMART CPD.
	AT SUCH TIME THAT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4/4A ARE
	REDEVELOPED, A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE
	BUFFER IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROADWAY TRACT 3.
	ANY EXISTING LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO ROADWAY TRACT
	3 MAY NOT BE REDUCED.
	A LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE PORTIONS OF
	PARCELS 1A, 2 AND 4 THAT ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO A
	STORMWATER TRACT. HOWEVER, ANY PARKING OR VEHICULAR USE
	AREA LOCATED ON TRACTS 2 AND 4 ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
	A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE
	ADJACENT TO A STORMWATER TRACT.
	A LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT REQUIRED BETWEEN PARCELS 1
	AND 4A AND BETWEEN PARCELS 3 AND 4.
	AN EASEMENT MAY NOT BE USED TO MEET THE REQUIRED
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT.
	FOUNDATION PLANTING IS REQUIRED.

	D. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: PARCELS 2, 3 & 4/4A SHALL BE
	PERMITTED A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF 75%. THE MAXIMUM
	OVERALL LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED IN THE BRANDSMART CPD IS
	60%. [ALLOW 75% ON PARCEL 1?]

	E. BUILDING HEIGHT: EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL (2, 3 &
	4/4A) SHALL BE PERMITTED A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF
	FIFTY (50) FEET. [IS IT INTENDED THAT PARCEL 1 MEET GC
	HEIGHT?]

	F. FLOOR AREA RATIO- THE MAXIMUM OVERALL FLOOR AREA
	RATIO FOR THE BRANDSMART CPD IS 1.0. AN INDIVIDUAL
	PARCEL MAY NOT EXCEED AN FAR OF 2.0.

	G. ANY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS NOT SPECIFICALLY STATED
	IN THE BRANDSMART CPD, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE GENERAL
	COMMERCIAL ZONING REGULATIONS.

	9) PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE EXECUTIVE CENTER
	DRIVE PARK. THIS AREA WILL NEED TO BE RESERVED WITH A
	CONSERVATION EASEMENT PRIOR TO THE CITY ACCEPTING THE
	PLAT.

	10) ITEM TO DISCUSS: THE COVENANTS HAVE A LIST OF
	RESTRICTED/PROHIBITED USES. THIS CAN BE PUT INTO THE
	ADOPTING LEGISLATION AND THE CITY WILL ENFORCE IT.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT SOME USES ARE ALREADY PROHIBITED BY
	THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION WITHIN THE
	CPD'S BASE GC ZONING.

	11) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE EXECUTIVE CENTER PARK IS
	PROPOSED AS A MITIGATING FACTOR TO GRANT THE WAIVERS
	REQUIRED TO SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY. AS SUCH, THE SITE
	NEEDS TO HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THE
	APPROVAL AND THE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE
	INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE CITY SIGNING THE PLAT.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-24-2018			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	04-24-2018	Time	12:57	Rev Time	0.50
Received By	eschneid			Date	04-24-2018	Time	12:57	Sent To

Notes

2018-04-24 12:58:25	CASE NO. 1060JJ - 2ND REVIEW
	BRANDSMART SUBDIVISION MAJOR PD AMENDMENT
	751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
	(11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	MAY 25, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
	JUNE 17, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 24, 2018), THE CASE
	SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	1) OUTSTANDING ITEM: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE AREA
	BREAKDOWN TABLE ON THE MASTER PLAN AND THE WAIVER TABLE
	IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. FURTHER DISCUSSION
	NEEDS TO TAKE PLACE ON HOW:
	A. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE MEMORIALIZED IN THE
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
	B. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIMPROVED PARCELS
	WILL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS OR
	ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL
	PARCEL - EX. SETBACKS, NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES,
	IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS, LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE, FLOOR AREA
	RATIO, ETC.
	C. THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT (ULTIMATE BUILD-OUT) WILL
	COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
	ENTIRE SITE - EX. IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS, LANDSCAPE
	PERCENTAGE, FLOOR AREA RATIO, ETC.

	2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LANDSCAPE CURRENTLY
	PROVIDED ON EACH PROPOSED PARCEL. STAFF WILL BE
	REQUIRING, NOT ONLY THAT THE OVERALL SITE MEETS THE
	MINIMUM 15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT (SUBJECT INCREASE FOR
	POTENTIAL WAIVER MITIGATION) BUT ALSO THAT THE DESIGN
	REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT THERE BE A MINIMUM PERCENTAGE
	OF LANDSCAPE ON EACH PARCEL (POSSIBLY 10%).

	3) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE INCORRECTLY LISTS THE
	AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE ON THE OVERALL SITE AND FOR
	INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS THE
	UNENCLOSED AREA OF A SITE. PARCEL NO. 2 IS VACANT, SO
	IT HAS 100% OPEN SPACE IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION.

	4) OUTSTANDING ITEM: STAFF IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SIGN
	WAIVER IS ASKING FOR.

	5) OUTSTANDING ITEM: INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION WAS
	PROVIDED AS TO WHY STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE WAIVERS
	THAT ARE REQUESTED. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS ARE TO
	ENCOURAGE THE USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND
	DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND
	ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. THE SUBDIVISION OF
	AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER, REQUIRING WAIVERS, WITH NO
	MITIGATING LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FACTORS DOES
	NOT MEET THESE CRITERIA.

	6) OUTSTANDING ITEM: STAFF HAS NOTED THE CROSS ACCESS
	EASEMENT ON THE NORTH END OF THE SITE (ADJACENT TO THE
	STEAK AND SHAKE PARCEL) AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS
	FORMALLY INCORPORATED INTO A POTENTIAL CONNECTION TO
	FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH.

	7) OUTSTANDING ITEM: CROSS PARKING AND CROSS UTILITY
	AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-13-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	12-13-2017	Time	11:23	Rev Time	2.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	12-13-2017	Time	11:22	Sent To

Notes

2017-12-13 11:22:48	CASE NO. 1060JJ
	BRANDSMART SUBDIVISION MAJOR PD AMENDMENT
	751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
	(11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	DECEMBER 29, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
	THE FEBRUARY 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 13,
	2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
	FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE ON
	THE MASTER PLAN AND THE WAIVER TABLE IN THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDS TO
	TAKE PLACE ON HOW:
	A. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE MEMORIALIZED IN THE
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
	B. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIMPROVED PARCELS
	WILL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS OR
	ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL
	PARCEL - EX. SETBACKS, NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES,
	IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS, LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE, FLOOR AREA
	RATIO, ETC.
	C. THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT (ULTIMATE BUILD-OUT) WILL
	COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
	ENTIRE SITE - EX. IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS, LANDSCAPE
	PERCENTAGE, FLOOR AREA RATIO, ETC.

	2) STAFF WILL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PALM BEACH OUTLETS
	DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE AUSTRALIAN/BELVEDERE CPD AS
	DISCUSSION POINTS FOR POTENTIAL MODELS. STAFF
	RECOMMENDS A FOLLOW-UP MEETING TO DISCUSS.

	3) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE
	INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE ON THE OVERALL
	SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DRY
	DETENTION AREAS DO NOT COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE 15%
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.

	4) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE
	INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE ON THE OVERALL
	SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS.

	5) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE
	INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF FLOOR AREA RATIO ON THE
	OVERALL SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS.

	6) STAFF IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SIGN WAIVER IS ASKING FOR.

	7) INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION WAS PROVIDED AS TO WHY
	STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE WAIVERS THAT ARE REQUESTED.
	PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS ARE TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF
	INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO
	CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
	CITY. THE SUBDIVISION OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER,
	REQUIRING WAIVERS, WITH NO MITIGATING LAND PLANNING AND
	DEVELOPMENT FACTORS DOES NOT MEET THESE CRITERIA.

	8) STAFF HAS NOTED THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE
	NORTH END OF THE SITE (ADJACENT TO THE STEAK AND SHAKE
	PARCEL) AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS FORMALLY
	INCORPORATED INTO A POTENTIAL CONNECTION TO FUTURE
	DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH.

	9) THE SETBACK FOR THE EXISTING BRANDSMART BUILDING WAS
	NOT SHOWN TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 1 AT THE CLOSEST
	POINT.

	10) CROSS PARKING AND CROSS UTILITY
	AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED.