 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z17100015
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z17100015 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-08-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
11-08-2017 |
Time |
12:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
11-08-2017 |
Time |
12:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-08 12:36:59 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. PARKING GARAGE. AN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE IS | | | REQUIRED. PER SECTION 208.2 EACH TYPE OF PARKING | | | FACILITY SHALL INCORPORATE ACCESSIBLE PARKING. PER | | | SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN | | | EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 3. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 4. EXIT STAIRS FROM BASEMENT. BASEMENT PLAN, SHEET | | | A0.0.1, SHOWS THE INTRODUCTION OF RECREATION SPACE IN | | | THE BASEMENT, SO THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL OCCUPANCY | | | BEYOND THE EXISTING BASEMENT OCCUPANCY. PER SECTION | | | 1027.1 THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST ON EXIT STAIR THAT DOES | | | NOT REQUIRE PASSAGE THROUGH OTHER AREAS OF THE | | | BUILDING. FIRST FLOOR PLAN, SHEET A1.1.1, SHOWS BOTH | | | BASEMENT STAIRS DISCHARGING INTO THE FIRST FLOOR | | | OCCUPIED SPACE. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-27-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
12-27-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
12-20-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-27 11:45:36 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 12/27/2017 | | | PROJECT: 302 DATURA STREET REMODELING | | | ADDRESS: 302 DATURA STREET | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION | | | PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION | | | PROCESSES. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED | | | PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS, HOW WILL THE SITE/BUILDING | | | BE SERVED FOR WATER, SEWER AND FIRE PROTECTION. SHOW | | | ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE | | | PROPOSED SITE AS WELL AS PROPOSED UTILITIES TO SERVE | | | THE DEVELOPMENT (LABEL SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL PIPES | | | AND CONDUITS ETC.); | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH | | | AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT | | | ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN | | | SHEET; | | | | | | 3. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, WHEN SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW PHASE, SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, | | | VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY | | | BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES. ALSO | | | CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-02-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
11-02-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
11-02-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-02 14:35:21 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 11/02/2017 | | | PROJECT: 302 DATURA STREET REMODELING | | | ADDRESS: 302 DATURA STREET | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | NO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS WERE SUBMITTED IN THE | | | INITIAL SITE PLAN PACKAGE INDICATING STORMWATER CONTROL | | | AND PLANS FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICES/CONNECTIONS FOR | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS, IN THE NEXT REVIEW LEVEL, | | | HOW WILL THE SITE/BUILDING BE SERVED FOR WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE PROTECTION. SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN | | | THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED SITE AS WELL AS PROPOSED | | | UTILITIES TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT (LABEL SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL OF ALL PIPES AND CONDUITS ETC.); | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH | | | AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT | | | ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN | | | SHEET; | | | | | | 3. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, WHEN SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW PHASE, SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, | | | VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY | | | BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES. ALSO | | | CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | | | | 4. PLEASE ALSO SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHEN | | | SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT REVIEW PHASE, SHOW THE SIGHT | | | TRIANGLES FOR THE ALL VEHICULAR EXITS FROM THE SITE. | | | (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES); | | | | | | 5. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE SOLID WASTE | | | COLLECTION YARDAGE AT THE CONCEPTUAL STAGE. AS PART OF | | | THE FINAL DESIGN, THIS SOLID WASTE ESTIMATE WILL NEED | | | TO BE VERIFIED TO VALIDATE APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE | | | OF DUMPSTERS/GARBAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SHOW ON THE | | | PLAN IF A COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE | | | OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED TO BE COLLECTED; | | | | | | 6. THE TRASH DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS | | | EASILY SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND | | | MANPOWER PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES. A 'TRASH ROOM' IS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED | | | SITE PLAN WHICH IS INSIDE THE BUILDING ENCLOSURE; | | | | | | 7. IF ROLL OUT TYPE DUMPSTER IS PROPOSED, PLEASE NOTE | | | ON THE PLANS THAT: ?OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE TO ROLL OUT | | | THE DUMPSTER OUTSIDE THE ENCLOSURE TO THE OPEN SPACE | | | PRIOR TO CITY'S SANITATION CREW PICK UP GARBAGE?. | | | CITY'S FRONT LOADING SANITATION/GARBAGE TRUCKS NEED AT | | | LEAST 25-FEET VERTICAL CLEARANCE FOR TIPPING THE | | | GARBAGE RECEPTACLES/BINS OVER IT; | | | | | | 8. FOR SANITATION/GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS NEED | | | TO SHOW PROPOSED SANITATION COLLECTION PLANS AND | | | DETAILS; AND WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM PETER BIENIEK, | | | PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. IF A SEPARATE ON-SITE LOCATION | | | IS CHOSEN FOR STANDARD DUMPSTER, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL | | | (E.G. THE GATE WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FEET) | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES. CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-8 MAY BE DOWNLOADED | | | AT: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEE | | | RING-STANDARDS/ | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS AND | | | MANEUVER WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE | | | FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE | | | FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN | | | SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE | | | PLANS; | | | | | | 4. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 5. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES ON DATURA STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE | | | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER, GAS, | | | UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE | | | SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE | | | POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN; | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-05 16:54:47 | 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO DATED DECEMBER | | | 20, 2017, FROM ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN PLANNER, | | | AND ATTACHMENTS, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-06-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-06-2017 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-06 11:45:07 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | THERE IS A BASEMENT PROPOSED. PER NFPA 1, 3.3.23 | | | BASEMENT. ANY STORY OF A BUILDING WHOLLY OR PARTLY | | | BELOW GRADE PLANE THAT IS NOT CONSIDERED THE FIRST | | | STORY ABOVE GRADE PLANE. | | | 13.3.2.2 BASEMENTS EXCEEDING 2500 FT2 (232 M2) IN NEW | | | BUILDINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED | | | AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. | | | | | | PER NFPA THE PROPOSED WORK APPEARS TO FALL UNDER | | | 43.2.2.1.4* RECONSTRUCTION. THE RECONFIGURATION OF A | | | SPACE THAT AFFECTS AN EXIT OR A CORRIDOR SHARED BY MORE | | | THAN ONE OCCUPANT SPACE; OR THE RECONFIGURATION OF A | | | SPACE SUCH THAT THE REHABILITATION WORK AREA IS NOT | | | PERMITTED TO BE OCCUPIED BECAUSE EXISTING MEANS OF | | | EGRESS AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, OR THEIR | | | EQUIVALENT, ARE NOT IN PLACE OR CONTINUOUSLY | | | MAINTAINED. | | | | | | FOR OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL PLEASE PROVIDE ALL | | | PERTINENT ENGINEERED LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM INFORMATION. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ANY ACCESS GATES THAT | | | THEY BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS | | | AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-01-2018 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-06-01 15:53:35 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 302 DATURA Z17100015 | | | JUNE 1, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN THAT INCLUDES | | | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES (OAK TREES ARE LAUREL OAK, | | | NOT LIVE OAK) THE TWO TREES LOCATED ON OLIVE ARE | | | HOLLIES, NOT BLACK OLIVES. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE | | | ? SATISFIED. COLUMN FOR REMOVED OR PRESERVED IN PLACE. | | | ? SATISFIED. REASON FOR REMOVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION. NEED MORE INFORMATION. | | | ? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. MITIGATION CHART SHOWING | | | TOTAL TREE CANOPY REMOVED AND TREE CANOPY ADDED. ALL | | | TREES TO BE REMOVED NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE CHART. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREES FOR THE FOUNDATION | | | PLANTING AS REQUIRED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. STAFF SUGGESTS EXCHANGING THE GUMBO LIMBO | | | TREES AND THE DAHOON HOLLIES TO PROVIDE A SMALL SCALE | | | TREE NEXT TO THE BUILDING AND CANOPY TREES IN THE | | | PARKING AREA. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS EXPLORING OPTIONS TO | | | EXPAND THE PLANTING AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE LARGER SCALE | | | SHADE TREES AND PROVIDE SHADE FOR PARKING SPACES. STAFF | | | DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE TREES AND | | | REPLACING THEM WITH PALMS OR SMALLER SCALE TREES. | | | RELOCATING THE CURBS BACK TO THE WHEEL STOP POSITION TO | | | PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA IS ALSO SUGGESTED | | | IF THE PAVEMENT IS BEING REPLACED. STAFF DOES NOT | | | SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE LARGE BLACK OLIVE TREE AT THE | | | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND WOULD LIKE TO | | | DISCUSS OPTIONS TO MODIFY THE PARKING SPACE ROW DESIGN | | | AND ROLLING GATE PLACEMENT IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE | | | TREE. ALSO SEE ABOVE COMMENT REGARDING SHADE TREES IN | | | PARKING AREA. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR PAD LOCATIONS PROPOSED | | | RESTRICT THE CHOICE OF REQUIRED TREES, PLEASE RELOCATE | | | TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM SPACE FOR ROOTS AND PROVIDE A SHADE | | | TREE AS REQUIRED FOR THE TERMINAL ISLAND. STAFF | | | SUGGESTS ADDING MORE PALMS AROUND THE DUMPSTER AND | | | GENERATOR TO PROVIDE MORE SCREENING AND COME CLOSER TO | | | ELIMINATING THE NONCONFORMING AREAS. | | | | | | 5. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE STREET TREES | | | TO MEET THE 30 FOOT ON CENTER REQUIREMENT ALONG DATURA | | | STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY PER | | | SECTION 94-113 (D) (2). THE TREES NEED TO MEET THE | | | MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20 FEET. CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS ARE TO | | | BE SPECIFIED ON DATURA, NOT LAUREL OAKS. STAFF WOULD | | | LIKE TO DISCUSS THE SPECIES PROPOSED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TWO BLACK OLIVE STREET TREES | | | SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH NEW TREES TO PROVIDE | | | CONSISTENCY ALONG THE BLOCK. THE COMMENT RESPONSE | | | INDICATES REMOVAL, BUT TREE #9 IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO | | | REMAIN. PLEASE CORRECT. THE BLACK OLIVE TREE IS | | | INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AS A LAUREL OAK. | | | | | | 7. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TYPICAL | | | SHOWING THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND TREE GRATE | | | INSTALLATION, AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | ON THE PLAN EXTENDING 5 FEET FROM THE REAR AND SIDES OF | | | THE TREE GRATE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL, AND | | | SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT | | | IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS | | | THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN, APPLICABLE TO THE STREET TREE ADJACENT TO THE | | | CENTER ISLAND FOR THE PARKING AREA. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/22/18: | | | 9. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES OR PALMS | | | IN THE WESTERN BUFFER TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THE 4 FOOT FENCE PROPOSED ALONG THE | | | ALLEY CANNOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER, PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW AT OR NEAR THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. | | | | | | 11. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. AFTER MAKING THE ABOVE | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION AND | | | MITIGATION CHARTS. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW ANY LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION SHALL BE REVISED | | | TO MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | DETAIL, ADD PALMS TO THE WESTERN BUFFER TO MEET CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS, ADD TWO PALMS TO THE PALM BOSQUE AREA, | | | AND ADJUST THE STREET TREES ALONG DATURA BETWEEN OLIVE | | | AND THE FIRST PARKING LOT ENTRANCE TO BE EVENLY SPACED | | | WITH THE WESTERN MOST TREE CLOSER TO THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-23 10:22:33 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 302 DATURA Z17100015 | | | JANUARY 22, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN THAT INCLUDES | | | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES (OAK TREES ARE LAUREL OAK, | | | NOT LIVE OAK) THE TWO TREES LOCATED ON OLIVE ARE | | | HOLLIES, NOT BLACK OLIVES. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE | | | ? SATISFIED. COLUMN FOR REMOVED OR PRESERVED IN PLACE. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REASON FOR REMOVAL. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION. NEED MORE INFORMATION. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MITIGATION CHART SHOWING TOTAL | | | TREE CANOPY REMOVED AND TREE CANOPY ADDED. ALL TREES TO | | | BE REMOVED NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE CHART. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED PLEASE PROVIDE TREES FOR THE | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING AS REQUIRED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF | | | THE BUILDING. STAFF SUGGESTS EXCHANGING THE GUMBO LIMBO | | | TREES AND THE DAHOON HOLLIES TO PROVIDE A SMALL SCALE | | | TREE NEXT TO THE BUILDING AND CANOPY TREES IN THE | | | PARKING AREA. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS EXPLORING | | | OPTIONS TO EXPAND THE PLANTING AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE | | | LARGER SCALE SHADE TREES AND PROVIDE SHADE FOR PARKING | | | SPACES. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE | | | TREES AND REPLACING THEM WITH PALMS OR SMALLER SCALE | | | TREES. RELOCATING THE CURBS BACK TO THE WHEEL STOP | | | POSITION TO PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA IS | | | ALSO SUGGESTED IF THE PAVEMENT IS BEING REPLACED. STAFF | | | DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE LARGE BLACK OLIVE TREE | | | AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND WOULD LIKE | | | TO DISCUSS OPTIONS TO MODIFY THE PARKING SPACE ROW | | | DESIGN AND ROLLING GATE PLACEMENT IN ORDER TO PRESERVE | | | THE TREE. ALSO SEE ABOVE COMMENT REGARDING SHADE TREES | | | IN PARKING AREA. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED THE GENERATOR PAD LOCATIONS | | | PROPOSED RESTRICT THE CHOICE OF REQUIRED TREES, PLEASE | | | RELOCATE TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM SPACE FOR ROOTS AND PROVIDE | | | A SHADE TREE AS REQUIRED FOR THE TERMINAL ISLAND. STAFF | | | SUGGESTS ADDING MORE PALMS AROUND THE DUMPSTER AND | | | GENERATOR TO PROVIDE MORE SCREENING AND COME CLOSER TO | | | ELIMINATING THE NONCONFORMING AREAS. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED PLEASE PROVIDE STREET TREES TO | | | MEET THE 30 FOOT ON CENTER REQUIREMENT ALONG DATURA | | | STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY PER | | | SECTION 94-113 (D) (2). THE TREES NEED TO MEET THE | | | MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20 FEET. CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS ARE TO | | | BE SPECIFIED ON DATURA, NOT LAUREL OAKS. STAFF WOULD | | | LIKE TO DISCUSS THE SPECIES PROPOSED. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TWO BLACK OLIVE | | | STREET TREES SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH NEW TREES TO | | | PROVIDE CONSISTENCY ALONG THE BLOCK. THE COMMENT | | | RESPONSE INDICATES REMOVAL, BUT TREE #9 IS SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS TO REMAIN. PLEASE CORRECT. THE BLACK OLIVE TREE | | | IS INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AS A LAUREL OAK. | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TYPICAL | | | SHOWING THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND TREE GRATE | | | INSTALLATION, AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | ON THE PLAN EXTENDING 5 FEET FROM THE REAR AND SIDES OF | | | THE TREE GRATE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL, AND | | | SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A | | | SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA | | | SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE | | | SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE | | | BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE | | | AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, APPLICABLE TO THE STREET | | | TREE ADJACENT TO THE CENTER ISLAND FOR THE PARKING | | | AREA. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/22/18: | | | 9. PLEASE ADD TREES OR PALMS IN THE WESTERN BUFFER TO | | | MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 10. THE 4 FOOT FENCE PROPOSED ALONG THE ALLEY CANNOT BE | | | INSTALLED WITHIN THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, PLEASE | | | REVISE TO SHOW AT OR NEAR THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 11. AFTER MAKING THE ABOVE CORRECTIONS, PLEASE UPDATE | | | THE TREE DISPOSITION AND MITIGATION CHARTS. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE SHOW ANY LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-07-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-07-2017 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-07-2017 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-07 15:23:58 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 302 DATURA Z17100015 | | | NOVEMBER 6, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN THAT INCLUDES | | | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: | | | ? TREE SPECIES (OAK TREES ARE LAUREL OAK, NOT LIVE OAK) | | | ? TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE | | | ? COLUMN FOR REMOVED OR PRESERVED IN PLACE. | | | ? REASON FOR REMOVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION. | | | ? MITIGATION CHART SHOWING TOTAL TREE CANOPY REMOVED | | | AND TREE CANOPY ADDED. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE TREES FOR THE FOUNDATION PLANTING AS | | | REQUIRED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 3. STAFF SUGGESTS EXPLORING OPTIONS TO EXPAND THE | | | PLANTING AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE LARGER SCALE SHADE TREES | | | AND PROVIDE SHADE FOR PARKING SPACES. STAFF DOES NOT | | | SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE TREES AND REPLACING | | | THEM WITH PALMS OR SMALLER SCALE TREES. RELOCATING THE | | | CURBS BACK TO THE WHEEL STOP POSITION TO PROVIDE MORE | | | PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA IS ALSO SUGGESTED IF THE | | | PAVEMENT IS BEING REPLACED. | | | | | | 4. THE GENERATOR PAD LOCATIONS PROPOSED RESTRICT THE | | | CHOICE OF REQUIRED TREES, PLEASE RELOCATE TO PROVIDE | | | MAXIMUM SPACE FOR ROOTS AND PROVIDE A SHADE TREE AS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE TERMINAL ISLAND. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE STREET TREES TO MEET THE 30 FOOT ON | | | CENTER REQUIREMENT ALONG DATURA STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE | | | ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY PER SECTION 94-113 (D) (2). | | | THE TREES NEED TO MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20 FEET. | | | | | | 6. THE EXISTING TWO BLACK OLIVE STREET TREES SHOULD BE | | | REPLACED WITH NEW TREES TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY ALONG | | | THE BLOCK. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A TYPICAL SHOWING THE STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | AND TREE GRATE INSTALLATION, AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE PLAN EXTENDING 5 FEET FROM THE | | | REAR AND SIDES OF THE TREE GRATE. | | | | | | 8. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT | | | TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 | | | FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-03-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-03 10:00:20 | PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF HOW YOUR SOLID | | | WASTE IS TO BE HANDLED. PLEASE ADD ALL NECESSARY | | | ESTIMATES OF QUANTITY TO BE GENERATED SO THAT IF | | | SERVICE IS REQUIRED PUBLIC WORKS CAN PROVIDE THE | | | APPROPRIATE GUIDANCE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-22-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-22-2018 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-22-2018 |
Time |
16:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-22 16:43:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 12/20/2017 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 2. THE SITE DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY STORMWATER TREATMENT | | | BEFORE DISCHARGING INTO THE CITY'S MS4. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-03-2017 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-03-2017 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-03 16:02:22 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. NEW FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREA ARE NOW IN EFFECT. THE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE | | | AT HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX? | | | | | | 2. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 4. BE ADVISED THE ALLEY BEHIND THE PROPOSED GARAGE IS | | | ONLY 14 FEET WIDE. IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO MANEUVER INTO | | | AND OUT OF THE GARAGE SPACE. NORMALLY 24 FEET OF BACKUP | | | SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR BACKING OUT OF A 90-DEGREE | | | PARKING AREA. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
08:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-09 08:19:25 | PASSED WITH CONDITION OF UNITY OF TITLE PRIOR TO C.O. | | | AND APPROVAL OF DUMPSTER LOCATION BY PUBLIC WORKS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-06-2017 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-06 12:02:29 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS | | | AVAILABLE ON-LINE THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 2. EXPLAIN HOW GARBAGE COLLECTION IS BEING HANDLED | | | 3. COVERED PARKING ALONG ALLEY MAY NOT HAVE ADEQUATE | | | ROOM. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-22-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-05-22 13:40:43 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1) AN INADEQUATE QUEING DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 15' | | | IS PROVIDED BETWEEN THE BACK OF SIDEWALK AND THE | | | ROLLING GATE. SEC. 94-111. - PARKING AND LOADING | | | REQUIREMENTS (P) QUEUING. NOT LESS THAT 20 LINEAR FEET | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CAR QUEING, SHALL OCCUR INTERNAL | | | TO THE LOT, AND SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN | | | CIRCULATION ON A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. PROVIDE 20' OF | | | STACKING DISTANCE OR LIMIT GATE OPERATION TO | | | NON-BUSINESS EVENING HOURS. (REPEAT COMMENT) | | | | | | 2) RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APRON TO ONE LANE WIDTH. | | | | | | 3) PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APRON TO HAVE LEVEL SIDEWALK AREA | | | ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-08 11:28:55 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN: | | | 1 - A 4' HIGH ROLLING GATE IS SHOWN AT BOTH DRIVEWAYS | | | ON DATURA STREET. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE GATE | | | WILL CAUSE CARS TO BLOCK THE SIDEWALK WHILE UTILIZING | | | THE GATE. QUEUING CAN'T OCCUR IN RIGHT OF WAY. | | | SEC. 78-1. - OBSTRUCTING PASSAGE ON STREETS, SIDEWALKS | | | AND BICYCLE PATHS PROHIBITED. | | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO OBSTRUCT OR | | | HINDER THE FREE FLOW OF PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC | | | ON ANY STREET, SIDEWALK OR BICYCLE PATH IN THE CITY. | | | SEC. 94-111. - PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS (P) | | | QUEUING. NOT LESS THAT 20 LINEAR FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | FOR CAR QUEING, SHALL OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE LOT, AND | | | SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A | | | PUBLIC SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 2 - THERE ARE TWO DRIVEWAYS SHOWN ON DATURA STREET. THE | | | MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS (DRIVEWAYS) IS ONE. | | | REFERENCE SEC. 94-312. - ACCESS TO STREETS. APPLICANT'S | | | RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS STATES THAT EXISTING | | | DRIVEWAYS ARE GRANDFATHERED. PROVIDE CODE OF ORDINANCES | | | REFERENCE THAT ALLOWS DRIVEWAY TO BE GRANDFATHERED. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-08-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-08 10:54:48 | 1) ELIMINATE ONE OF THE DRIVEWAYS ON DATURA. ONLY ONE | | | DRIVEWAY IS ALLOWED. | | | 2) A GATE IS SHOWN FOR THE ENTRANCE ON DATURA. PROVIDE | | | AUTOMOTIVE STACKING DISTANCE ONSITE FOR GATE OPERATION. | | | 3) PROVIDE TURNING MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FOR PARKING SPACES | | | PROPOSED ALONG THE ALLEY. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-30-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
08-30-2018 |
Time |
15:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
08-30-2018 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-08-30 15:13:51 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE 8 REQUIRED BICYCLE RACKS | | | AT THE ENTRANCE WILL FIT IN THE PROPOSED AREA. THE | | | DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE BIKE RACK DETAIL WILL HAVE | | | TO BE ANALYZED AND A PROPERLY SIZED AREA FOR THE 8 | | | RACKS WILL HAVE TO BE LOCATED ON SITE. | | | | | | 2. THE PROJECT SHALL RECONSTRUCT THE DRIVEWAY APRON TO | | | ACCOMMODATE THE ONE-WAY ACCESS POINT. | | | | | | 3. SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE 20' OF STACKING DISTANCE | | | OR GATES SHALL REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURS TO | | | AVOID CARS BLOCKING THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 5. PROPOSED FENCES ALONG DATURA STREET SHALL BE LOCATED | | | OUTSIDE THE 16? SETBACK LINE, SHALL BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT | | | OF 4', AND SHALL BE LOCATED BEHIND 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | | | | 6. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION SHALL BE REVISED | | | TO MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 8. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 9. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | DETAIL, ADD PALMS TO THE WESTERN BUFFER TO MEET CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS, ADD TWO PALMS TO THE PALM BOSQUE AREA, | | | AND ADJUST THE STREET TREES ALONG DATURA BETWEEN OLIVE | | | AND THE FIRST PARKING LOT ENTRANCE TO BE EVENLY SPACED | | | WITH THE WESTERN MOST TREE CLOSER TO THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURES ALONG | | | STREET FRONTAGES AND REMOVE ANY EXISTING COBRA HEAD | | | LIGHTS ON SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE LIGHT FIXTURE DETAIL | | | WITH PERMIT PLANS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-23 16:20:52 | 1. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A FULL FAR TABLE | | | INCLUDING THE DATA FOR THE ADDITONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.THE | | | TABLE SHALL INCLUDE THE EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE | | | NEW. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE CONSIDERED | | | MECHANICAL SPACE. USE THE GROSS BUILDING AREA | | | DEFINITION IN THE DMP CODE. -11/8/17 -PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DETAILED CALCULATIONS ON THE ADDED SQUARE FEET, THE | | | ROOF AMENITIES HAVE NOT BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR AND WILL | | | ALTER THE REQUIREMENT LISTED BELOW. | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED- BIKE RACK NEXT TO WEST BUILDING | | | ENTRANCE DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE ENOUGH SPACE FOR | | | OPERATION. - 11/8/17 - BIKE RACKS FOR BUILDING | | | OCCUPANTS SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE PRIMARY | | | ENTRANCE AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, A TOTAL OF 8 | | | SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE RELOCATE THE PROPOSED | | | BIKE RACK ALONG OLIVE TO THE PUBLIC ROW TO THE SPACE | | | BETWEEN THE STREET TREES.PLEASE USE THE POST AND LOOP | | | FOR THE PUBLIC BIKE RACKS - 11/8/17-PUBLIC BIKE RACKS | | | SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE STREETSCAPE, ATOTAL OF 4 | | | SPACES SHALL BE REQUIRED. PUBLIC BIKE PARKING SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARD. | | | 4. SATISFIED- THE FOUR SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE | | | ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CAN BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE | | | EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT. STAFF'S RESEARCH OF | | | ORIGINAL RECORDS INDICATE THE ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS | | | BUILT WITHOUT PARKING, EXISTING SURFACE PARKIGN LOT IS | | | NOT CONSIDERED REQUIRED PARKING FOR EXISTING BUILDING. | | | - | | | 5. SATISFIED - BASED ON ORIGINAL BUILDING RECORDS, THE | | | ADJACENT SURFACE PARKING WAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE | | | ORIGINAL BUILDING BUT IT WAS ADDED LATER.11/8/17- | | | PLEASE INCLUDE THE ORIGINAL BUILDING APPROVAL AND | | | ARCHITECTURAL SET TO VERIFY THAT PARKING SPACES | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WERE NOT REQUIRED. | | | 6. SATISFIED - LIGHTING PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN | | | BUILDING PERMIT. 11/8/17- STREET LIGHTING SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARD, PHOTOMETRIC STUDY | | | FOR THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 7. SATISFIED - PLEASE FOLLOW LANDSCAPE COMMENTS FOR | | | TREE SPECIES ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE 11/8/17- | | | ADDITIONAL TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG BOTH STREET | | | FRONTAGES AT 30' INTERVALS. | | | 8. ACKNOWLEDGED - 11/8/17-IF MODIFIED, SIDEWALK | | | ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH ALL CURB CUTS. | | | 9. ACCEPTED - PLEASE REDUCE OPENING AT THE PROPERTY | | | LINE TO 20' AND EXPAND THE LANDSCAPE AREA. COORDINATE | | | REDUCTION WITH APRON LOCATION. 11/8/17- PARKING DESIGN | | | SHOULD BE RECONFIGURED TO REDUCE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIAN | | | AREAS, A SINGLE BUT IS PREFERRED. | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED - SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON DATURA | | | STREET ENCROACHES INTO SURFACE PARKING LOT. PLEASE | | | LOCATE PROPOSED GATES OUTSIDE THE MINIMUM SETBACK LINE. | | | PARKING SPACES CAN BE REDUCED TO 8'-6" TO PROVIDE FOR | | | THE ADDITONAL ROOM NEEDED TO COMPLY WITHOUT AFFECTING | | | THE NUMBER OF SPACES. THE SPACE BETWEEN THE PROPERTY | | | LINE AND THE SETBACK LINE CAN BE USED AS LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. 11/8/17- PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE SHOWN ON | | | PROPOSED SITE PLAN. BUILDING MODIFICATIONS SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SETBACK AND ENCROACHMENT REGULATIONS, REQUIRED | | | SETBACK ALONG DATURA ST IS 16', AND ALONG OLIVE AVE IS | | | 12'. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT SHALL NOT ENCROACH THE | | | SETBACK BEYOND TWO FEET. | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED - FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE | | | SETBACK LINE.11/8/17- PROPOSED FENCE SHALL MEET CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS, MAX HEIGHT 4', SHOULD BE LOCATED BEHIND | | | 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | 12. SATISFIED 11/8/17- PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE REDESIGNED TO EXPAND THE | | | BUFFER, MOVIGN THE CURB TO THE PROPOSED WHEEL STOP | | | LOCATION. THE ADDITIONAL SPACE SHALL BE DESIGNED AS | | | PART OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | 13. ACCEPTED - STAFF WOULD HAVE PREFERRED THE PROPOSED | | | OPEN SPACE NOT TO BE FENCED OFF, BUT NO REQUIREMENT IN | | | PLACE FOR IT.11/8/17 - PROPOSED OPEN SAPCE WEST OF THE | | | STRUCTURE SHOULD BE REDIGNED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC | | | REALM, CONNECTED TOT HE ADJACENT SIDEWALK AND NOT | | | FENCED OFF. | | | 14. SATISFIED- PLEASE FOLLOW LANDSCAPE COMMENTS FOR | | | TREE SPECIES ALONG BUILDING.11/8/17 - LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ADJACENT TO THE STRUCTURE (WEST) SHALL INCLUDE SMALL | | | SHADE TREES. | | | 15. SATISFIED. 11/8/17- PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL DETAILS | | | FOR ALL FACADES. | | | 16-21- SATISFIED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-08-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-08-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kmartin |
Date |
11-08-2017 |
Time |
11:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-08 11:27:08 | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED CALCULATIONS ON THE ADDED | | | SQUARE FEET, THE ROOF AMENITIES HAVE NOT BEEN ACCOUNTED | | | FOR AND WILL ALTER THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW. | | | 2. BIKE RACKS, FOR BUILDING OCCUPANTS, SHALL BE LOCATED | | | CLOSE TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE AND SHOWN ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, A TOTAL OF EIGHT SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 3. PUBLIC BIKE RACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE | | | STREETSCAPE, A TOTAL OF FOUR SPACES SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | PUBLIC BIKE PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARD. | | | 4. THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRES AN ADDITIONAL | | | EIGHT PARKING SPACES, ONLY FOUR ARE PROVIDED, PLEASE | | | IDENTIFY HOW THE REMAINING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE ORIGINAL BUILDING APPROVAL AND | | | ARCHITECTURAL SET TO VERIFY THAT PARKING SPACES | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WERE NOT REQUIRED. | | | 6. STREET LIGHTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY | | | STANDARD, PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR THE SITE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | 7. ADDITIONAL TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG BOTH STREET | | | FRONTAGES AT 30-FEET INTERVALS, REFERENCE SECTION | | | 94-113 (D)(1). | | | 8. IF MODIFIED, SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGH ALL CURB CUTS. | | | 9. PARKING DESIGN SHOULD BE RECONFIGURED TO REDUCE | | | IMPACT ON PEDESTRIAN AREAS; A SINGLE CURB CUT IS | | | PREFERRED. | | | 10. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE SHOWN ON PROPOSED SITE PLAN | | | (SP 1.0.1). BUILDING MODIFICATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | SETBACK AND ENCROACHMENT REGULATIONS, THE REQUIRED | | | SETBACK ALONG DATURA STREET IS 16 FEET AND ALONG OLIVE | | | AVENUE 12 FEET; ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS SHALL NOT | | | ENCROACH THE SETBACK BEYOND TWO FEET. | | | 11. PROPOSED FENCE SHALL MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS, | | | MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FOUR-FEET, SHOULD BE LOCATED BEHIND | | | FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | 12. PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE BUFFERS SHOULD | | | BE REDESIGNED TO EXPAND THE BUFFER, MOVING THE CURB TO | | | THE PROPOSED WHEEL STOP LOCATION. THE ADDITIONAL SPACE | | | SHALL BE DESIGNED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHILE | | | ALLOWING VEHICLE OVERHANG (SOUTH AND WEST EDGES) | | | 13. PROPOSED OPEN SPACE WEST OF THE STRUCTURE SHOULD BE | | | DESIGNED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC REALM, CONNECTED TO THE | | | ADJACENT SIDEWALK AND NOT FENCED OFF. | | | 14. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE STRUCTURE (WEST) | | | SHALL INCLUDE SMALL SHADE TREES. | | | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL DETAILS ON ALL FACED | | | ELEMENTS. | | | 16. PLEASE INCLUDE HISTORIC IMAGES WITH MATERIAL | | | DETAILS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ADDRESS THE HISTORIC NATURE OF | | | THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. IMAGES WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE | | | PLANNING DIVISION FOR APPLICANT.S REFERENCE. | | | 17. MULLION PATTERN SHOULD BE REDESIGNED TO RESEMBLE | | | HISTORIC FACADE. | | | 18. PLANTER, ALONG DATURA STREET, MATERIAL SHOULD MATCH | | | HISTORIC MATERIAL; ROMAN BRICK STYLE. | | | 19. FENESTRATION FRAME FINISH SHOULD RESEMBLE HISTORIC | | | FINISH; GALVANIZED ALUMINUM (SILVER). | | | 20. FENESTRATION PATTERN, ALONG OLIVE AVENUE, SHOULD | | | MATCH HISTORIC PATTERN; TWO ROWS OF FENESTRATION AT THE | | | SAME DIMENSION. | | | 21. PROPOSED FENESTRATION OPENING ON THE UPPER LEVELS | | | OF THE EAST CORNER SIDE, SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED TO | | | MAINTAIN THE HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. | | | | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEVIN MARTIN | | | -URBAN DESIGN PLANNER AT [email protected]. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |