| Plan Review Stops For Project Z17090003 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-12-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-12-2019 |
Time |
20:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-12-2019 |
Time |
20:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-12 20:26:12 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | PROPOSED MAJOR SUBDIVISION ONLY. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR | | | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 2. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINES. THE SUBMITTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, | | | DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SECTION STATES THAT THE PROPOSAL | | | IS TO COMBINE THE 7 LOTS INTO 2 LARGER LOTS. HOWEVER, | | | THE SUBMITTED SURVEY APPEARS TO SHOW THE 7 LOTS | | | COMBINED INTO 1 LOT. IF THAT IS CORRECT, THE FOLLOWING | | | COMMENT WILL IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 3. THIS COMMENT DOES IS NOT APPLICABLE IF THE PROPOSAL | | | IS TO COMBINE THE 7 LOTS INTO 1 LOT. IF THE PROPSAL IS | | | TO COMBINE THE 7 LOTS INTO 2 LOTS, THE SURVEY SHOULD | | | SHOW THE 2 LOTS. WHEREVER THE LOT LINE IS PLACED TO | | | SEPARATE THE 2 LOTS, THE FIRE RATING AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | UNPROTECTED OPENINGS IN THE BUILDING WALLS CLOSE TO | | | THAT LOT LINE SHALL BE COMPLY WITH TABLE 602, SECTION | | | 705, AND TABLE 705.8, OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. TO | | | DEMONSTRATE THAT COMPLIANCE, A DRAWING WOULD HAVE TO BE | | | SUBMITTED SHOWING THE WALL FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, | | | PERCENTAGE OF UNPROTECTED OPENINGS, AND WHETHER THE | | | BUILDINGS ARE FULLY FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED. NO | | | INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ASSERTAIN WHAT | | | PERCENTAGE OF THE AFFECTED WALLS WOULD BE CONSIDERED | | | "UNPROTECTED OPENING" AND WHETHER THE BUILDINGS ARE | | | FULLY SPRINKLER PROTECTED AS DEFINED BY NFPA 13. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-11-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-11-2017 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-11-2017 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-11 12:38:56 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | PROPOSED MAJOR SUBDIVISION ONLY. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR | | | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 2. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINES. TO COMPLY WITH TABLE 602, SECTION 705, AND TABLE | | | 705.8, OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE WALL SHOWN TO BE | | | JUST 5 FEET FROM PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN | | | PROPOSED LOT 5 AND PROPOSED LOT 2, SHALL HAVE NO MORE | | | THAN 10% UNPROTECTED OPENINGS (WINDOWS AND DOORS) IF | | | THE BUILDINGS ARE NOT FULLY FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED | | | OR, NOT MORE THAN 25% UNPROTECTED OPENINGS (WINDOWS AND | | | DOORS) IF THE BUILDINGS ARE FULLY FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTED. NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO | | | ASSERTAIN WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE WALL WOULD BE | | | CONSIDERED "UNPROTECTED OPENING" AND WHETHER THE | | | BUILDINGS ARE FULLY SPRINKLER PROTECTED AS DEFINED BY | | | NFPA 13. | | | | | | 3. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 4. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. WHERE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE PROVIDED AT EACH OF THE BUILDINGS, AT LEAST | | | ONE OF THE SPACES MUST BE AN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. | | | THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF | | | FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 5. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED, PER SECTION | | | 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, SUCH THAT IT IS ON | | | THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM THE ADJACENT | | | PARKING AREA TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR THE | | | BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 6. THE ACCESS AISLE THAT SERVES THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT | | | COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED | | | VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLE SHALL | | | ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF | | | 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-05-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
10-05-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
10-05-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-05 16:57:33 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 10/11/2017 | | | PROJECT: Z17090003 ? REPLAT OF NORTHWOOD ADDITION, PLAT | | | NO. 7 | | | ADDRESS: EAST OF SOUTH ST BETWEEN 26 ST. AND 25TH CT. | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. NO CIVIL ENGINEERING | | | PLANS WERE SUBMITTED IN THE INITIAL SITE PLAN PACKAGE | | | INDICATING LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER | | | SERVICES/CONNECTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. FOLLOWING | | | COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE AND SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS, ALL EXISTING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE AS WELL AS | | | ANY PROPOSED UTILITIES TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT (LABEL | | | SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL PIPES AND CONDUITS ETC.); | | | | | | 2. FOR AS-BUILT CONTACT JANICE TARBILL AT | | | [email protected]. | | | | | | 3. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, WHEN SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW PHASE, SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, | | | VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY | | | BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES. ALSO | | | CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | | | | 4. PLEASE ALSO SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHEN | | | SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT REVIEW PHASE, SHOW THE SIGHT | | | TRIANGLES FOR THE ALL VEHICULAR EXITS FROM THE SITE. | | | (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES); | | | | | | 5. FOR SANITATION/GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS NEED | | | TO SHOW PROPOSED SANITATION COLLECTION PLANS AND | | | DETAILS; AND WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM PETER BIENIEK, | | | PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. IF A SEPARATE ON-SITE LOCATION | | | IS CHOSEN FOR STANDARD DUMPSTER, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL | | | (E.G. THE GATE WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FEET) | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES. CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-8 MAY BE DOWNLOADED | | | AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENG | | | INEERING-STANDARDS/ | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-28-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-28-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-28-2019 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-28 15:56:28 | ON REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED AND THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS | | | SUBMITTED BY FIRE, THE PROPOSED DOES NOT INDICATE NEW | | | BUILDINGS OR ENTAIL THE SAME CONCERNS. | | | | | | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-06-2017 |
Time |
17:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-05-2017 |
Time |
15:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-06 17:20:13 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | 1) THE PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION BLOCKS THE EXISTING | | | ENTRANCE INTO THE STORAGE YARD. THERE APEARS TO BE | | | INSUFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO ACCESS THE INDUSTRILA | | | STORAGE YARD IN THE EVENT OF THE NEED FOR EMERGENCY | | | VEHICLE ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2) . SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | | | | | | | 3) ANY CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-18-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-18-2019 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-18-2019 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-03-18 14:05:38 | NO CHANGES |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-05-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-05-2019 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-05-2019 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-03-05 14:16:21 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RE-PLAT OF NORTHWOOD ADDITION PLAT NO. 7- | | | Z17090003 | | | MARCH 5, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD CREATE | | | NONCONFORMITIES TO THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR LOT 2 ALONG ALL THE REAR AND SIDE | | | LOT LINES. IF THE REAR AND SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR | | | RECONFIGURED LOTS 1, 3, AND 4 WERE INSTALLED AS | | | REQUIRED, THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS WOULD TAKE UP | | | ALL BUT 1 FOOT OF THE REAR OF LOT 2. | | | THE PROPOSED LOT LINES HAVE BEEN REDRAWN WITH THIS | | | RESUBMITTAL. SUBMIT A PLAN THAT SHOWS THE LOCATIONS OF | | | BUILDINGS AND INDICATE WHERE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS WOULD BE LOCATED RELATIVE TO THE NEW LOT LINE | | | AND ADJACENT TO THE STREET. THIS WILL SHOW THAT THERE | | | WOULD BE NO CONFLICTS IN MEETING THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-11-2019 |
Time |
12:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-11-2019 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-11 12:37:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: RE-PLAT OF NORTHWOOD ADDITION PLAT NO. 7- | | | Z17090003 | | | FEBRUARY 11, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD | | | CREATE NONCONFORMITIES TO THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR LOT 2 ALONG ALL THE REAR | | | AND SIDE LOT LINES. IF THE REAR AND SIDE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS FOR RECONFIGURED LOTS 1, 3, AND 4 WERE | | | INSTALLED AS REQUIRED, THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS | | | WOULD TAKE UP ALL BUT 1 FOOT OF THE REAR OF LOT 2. | | | THE PROPOSED LOT LINES HAVE BEEN REDRAWN WITH THIS | | | RESUBMITTAL. SUBMIT A PLAN THAT SHOWS THE LOCATIONS OF | | | BUILDINGS AND INDICATE WHERE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS WOULD BE LOCATED RELATIVE TO THE NEW LOT LINE | | | AND ADJACENT TO THE STREET. THIS WILL SHOW THAT THERE | | | WOULD BE NO CONFLICTS IN MEETING THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-10-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-10-2017 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-10-2017 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-10 11:56:06 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | MEMO TO FILE | | | PROJECT: RE-PLAT OF NORTHWOOD ADDITION PLAT NO. 7- | | | Z17090003 | | | OCTOBER 10, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WOULD CREATE | | | NONCONFORMITIES TO THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR LOT 2 ALONG ALL THE REAR AND SIDE | | | LOT LINES. IF THE REAR AND SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR | | | RECONFIGURED LOTS 1, 3, AND 4 WERE INSTALLED AS | | | REQUIRED, THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS WOULD TAKE UP | | | ALL BUT 1 FOOT OF THE REAR OF LOT 2. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-16-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-16-2017 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-16-2017 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-16 11:15:30 | 1. CROSS-PARCEL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER STORMWATER | | | INFRA-STRUCTURE CROSSING PARCEL LINES MAY NEED TO BE | | | EXECUTED. | | | | | | 2. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUAL | | | PARCEL(S) WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ONSITE STORMWATER | | | TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENTUATION STORAGE FOR THE | | | PARCEL(S). | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-07-2019 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-03-07 09:10:40 | PLAT REVIEW LETTER HAS BEEN EMAILED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-01-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-01-2019 |
Time |
07:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-01 07:50:27 | 1. EXISTING UNITY OF TITLES WILL NEED TO BE TERMINATED. | | | USE APPLICATION FOR UNITY OF TITLE. | | | 2. SHOW UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED IN ORB 29746/1683. | | | THIS MAY WANT TO BE TERMINATED AS WELL. | | | 3. A SEPARATE TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW LETTER WILL BE | | | ISSUED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-11-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
10-11-2017 |
Time |
07:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-11 07:48:19 | 1. SEPARATE PLAT SUBMITTAL TO ENGINEERING FOR TECHNICAL | | | REVIEW IS REQUIRED. | | | 2. EASTERLY TRIANGULAR PORTION OF PROPERTY SHOULD BE | | | INCLUDED IN PLAT. | | | 3. NEED LOCATION OF ALL WATER AND SEWER SERVICES SHOWN | | | AS WELL AS DRAINAGE. | | | 4. CHECK COVER SHEET OF PLAT FOR NUMEROUS SPELLING | | | ERRORS. | | | 5. WHY DOES LOT 3 HAVE A HANDICAP SPACE? | | | 6. THE CREATION OF A POA(PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION) | | | MAY BE REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-05-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-05 15:19:06 | THE PARALLEL PARKING SHOWN ON 26TH STREET IS LOCATED | | | TOO CLOSE TO THE DRIVEWAY AND DOES NOT MEET SIGHT LINE | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1092 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-13-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
03-13-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
03-13-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-03-13 14:19:14 | 1.) UPDATE NAME OF THE MAYOR IN THE SIGNATURE BLOCK. | | | | | | 2.) PROVIDE ALL BUILDING SETBACKS IN THE SITE PLAN | | | (SHEET SP-1). NOT ALL SETBACKS ARE SHOWN IN THE SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE NOTATE IN THE SITE PLAN THAT ALL BUILDINGS | | | ARE EXISTING. | | | | | | 4.) ALL COMMENTS FROM THE CITY?S SURVEYOR SHALL BE | | | ADDRESSED AND SATISFIED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT | | | FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) | | | PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X 11 | | | INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN | | | ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-05-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
02-05-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
02-05-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-05 15:06:16 | 1.) PROVIDE A SITE PLAN, SHOWING THE EXISTING | | | STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE | | | PROPOSED PARCEL LINES. ALL RELEVANT DIMENSIONS (I.E. | | | SETBACKS AND BUFFERS, ETC.) WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE | | | SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2.) THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION, | | | WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE THE APPLICATION TO BE HEARD BY | | | THE PLANNING BOARD. THEREFORE, THE SIGNATURE BLOCK FOR | | | THE PLANNING BOARD CHAIR IS NOT NEEDED. PLEASE REMOVE | | | FROM THE PLAT DOCUMENT. | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-10-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
10-10-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
10-10-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-10-10 13:35:46 | 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S. 94-513(A)(1), WHEN CONTIGUOUS | | | LOTS OF RECORD, OR PORTIONS OF LOTS OF RECORD, EXIST | | | UNDER SINGLE OWNERSHIP AND SUCH LOTS OR PORTIONS | | | THEREOF DO NOT CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM | | | DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS, SUCH LOTS SHALL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN UNDIVIDED PARCEL FOR THE PURPOSES OF | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE REGULATIONS. THE | | | APPLICANT IS ADVISED TO WORK WITH STAFF TO RESOLVE THE | | | ISSUE OF THE LAND LOCKED PARCELS EAST OF THE PROPOSED | | | RE-PLAT AREA, AS THESE PARCELS ARE UNDER THE SAME | | | OWNERSHIP. THIS MUST BE RESOLVED AS PART OF THE MAJOR | | | SUBDIVISION APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2.) THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SEEMS TO INCREASE THE | | | EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES THAN DECREASE THE EXISTING | | | NON-CONFORMITIES. PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-513(A)(1), THE | | | PARCEL SHALL NOT BE SUBDIVIDED IF IT INCREASES THE | | | EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES. | | | | | | 3.) THE USES/SPACES (I.E. OFFICE, MEZZANINE, ETC.) | | | WITHIN EACH EXISTING BUILDING MUST BE CLARIFIED. THIS | | | IS IMPORTANT AS THE EXISTING USES WILL IMPACT THE | | | PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AND THE ABILITY OF EACH | | | STAND-ALONE PARCEL TO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIRED | | | PARKING. PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-513(A)(1), LOTS SHALL | | | NOT BE SUBDIVIDED AS TO CREATE A NON-CONFORMITY OR TO | | | INCREASE AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY. | | | | | | 4.) THE PROPOSED NEW T-SHAPED LOT WILL BE REQUIRED TO | | | FULLY COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), | | | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PARKING, LANDSCAPING, | | | ETC. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE | | | CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, THE PROPOSED NEW LOT DOES NOT | | | DEMONSTRATE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. THE LOT | | | SHALL NOT BE SUBDIVIDED IN THIS MANNER IF THE PROPOSED | | | NEW LOT DOES NOT FULLY COMPLY WITH THE ZLDRS. (STAFF | | | UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL DRAWING, BUT THE | | | CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN MUST ALSO DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY | | | TO FULLY COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | ZLDRS IF IT IS TO BE SUBDIVIDED IN THIS MANNER). | | | | | | 5.) THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY ARE NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE | | | CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN. DIMENSIONS MUST MATCH FOR | | | ACCURACY. | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS | | | DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES AT (561) 494-1040. | | | | | | 7.) AS DISCUSSED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS WITH | | | THE AGENT, STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE PROPOSED | | | SUBDIVISION DESIGN. STAFF ENCOURAGES THE APPLICANT TO | | | CONSIDER OTHER ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION | | | DESIGN. | | | | | | 8.) STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THE PROPOSED | | | SUBDIVISION HAS FULLY COMPLIED WITH ARTICLE XI, | | | SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS, THEREFORE, STAFF CANNOT | | | SUPPORT THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REQUEST. | | | | | | 9.) THE APPLICANT MAY WANT TO CONSIDER THE | | | ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL CONDOMINIUM AS OPPOSED A | | | MAJOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE THE | | | COMPLICATION WITH DIVIDING THE PARCEL INTO SMALLER | | | LOTS. | | | | | | 10.) ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ADA COMPLIANCE SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($600) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION | | | FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |