 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z17070013
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z17070013 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-19-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-19-2017 |
Time |
19:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-19 19:04:45 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 3. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 7. THIS PROJECT MAY BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF | | | PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
01-09-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
01-02-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-09 11:26:33 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 01/09/2018 | | | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE EXPANSION | | | ADDRESS: 3215 S. DIXIE HWY | | | STATUS: PASSED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, | | | IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST | | | BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION | | | AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS AND | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE | | | FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN | | | SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE | | | PLANS; | | | | | | 4. FIRE HYDRANT TEST CAN BE REQUESTED AT (561)804-4700; | | | | | | 5. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY; | | | | | | 6. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES ON S. DIXIE HWY INCLUDING BUT NOT | | | LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER, GAS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC | | | CONDUITS, VALVES, ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF | | | THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE | | | WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN; | | | | | | 7. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE | | | THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: HT | | | TP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLICA | | | TIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-29-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
11-29-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
11-28-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-11-29 08:52:21 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 11/29/2017 | | | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE | | | ADDRESS: 3215 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS, HOW WILL THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING BE SERVICED FOR WATER AND SEWER. | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES?BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-13 15:00:40 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 09/20/2017 | | | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE | | | ADDRESS: 3215 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | NO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS WERE SUBMITTED IN THE | | | INITIAL SITE PLAN PACKAGE INDICATING PLANS FOR WATER | | | AND SEWER SERVICES/CONNECTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED | | | PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS, IN THE NEXT REVIEW LEVEL, | | | HOW WILL THE SITE/BUILDING BE SERVED FOR WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE PROTECTION. SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN | | | THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED SITE AS WELL AS PROPOSED | | | UTILITIES TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT (LABEL SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL OF ALL PIPES AND CONDUITS ETC.); | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH | | | AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT | | | ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN | | | SHEET; | | | | | | 3. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, WHEN SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW PHASE, SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, | | | VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY | | | BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES; | | | | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE SOLID WASTE | | | COLLECTION YARDAGE AT THE CONCEPTUAL STAGE. AS PART OF | | | THE FINAL DESIGN, THIS SOLID WASTE ESTIMATE WILL NEED | | | TO BE VERIFIED TO VALIDATE APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE | | | OF DUMPSTERS/GARBAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SHOW ON THE | | | PLAN IF A COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE | | | OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED TO BE COLLECTED; | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS AND | | | MANEUVER WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE | | | FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND | | | PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO | | | VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS | | | ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL; | | | | | | 4. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE | | | FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN | | | SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE | | | PLANS; | | | | | | 5. FIRE HYDRANT TEST CAN BE REQUESTED AT (561)804-4700 | | | | | | 6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE | | | DETAIL SHEET(S) DURING SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD | | | FORMAT. CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT) | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE: HTTP://WPB.O | | | RG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS- | | | APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 7. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST | | | INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | ACCESSIBLE; | | | | | | 8. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT | | | TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE | | | CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER | | | PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL | | | ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY | | | CROSSING INFORMATION; | | | | | | 9. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 10. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY INCLUDING BUT | | | NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER, GAS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC | | | CONDUITS ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE | | | AS-BUILT INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, | | | SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN; | | | | | | 11. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE | | | THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: HT | | | TP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLICA | | | TIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | 12. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scaldero |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scaldero |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-13 14:04:08 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY SUE ELLEN | | | CALDERON, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE | | | PREVENTION, WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | 6. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | 7. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS | | | AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | SUE ELLEN CALDERON | | | ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-23-2018 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-23 11:23:38 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE Z17070013 | | | MARCH 23, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS THE | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TREES AND PALMS ON SITE. PLEASE | | | ACCOUNT FOR ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS THAT MATCH THE | | | APPROVED PLAN, AND LABEL THEM ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN BY SPECIES. | | | | | | IDENTIFY ALL EXISTING TREES WITH SPECIES TAGS AND | | | INCLUDE IN THE PLANT LIST AS PART OF THE PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST | | | SHOWING TREES AND PALMS TO REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENT CHART TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | SHADE TREES AND FLOWERING TREES FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT | | | CALCULATIONS ARE NOT MET ON THE PLAN FOR THE EAST | | | BUFFER. PALMS MAY ONLY BE SUBSTITUTED AT A 3 TO 1 RATIO | | | FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | DRIVEWAY WIDTHS ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH AND REQUIRED BUFFER TREE COUNT CALCULATION AS | | | MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE BUFFER. PLEASE | | | REVISE. SEE SECTION 94-443(B)(5). | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED CHART SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING PER | | | SECTION 94-442 (G). THIS INCLUDES SHOWING DROUGHT | | | TOLERANCE LEVEL AND NATIVE SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST | | | AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED 40 POINTS. | | | | | | TREE AND SHRUB CATEGORIES MAY NOT BE COUNTED TWICE FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE OPTIONS AND CANNOT ADD UP | | | TO MORE THAN 100%. 51% AND 25-50% ARE MAXIMUM. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. TREE HEIGHTS NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED 12 | | | FEET HEIGHT SPECIFIED IN SECTION 94-445(4). | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4). PLEASE | | | SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS AND PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE | | | AREAS COUNTED TOWARD THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SECTION 94-443(C)(4). | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | REQUIRED BUILDING PERIMETER PLANTING OF 30 PERCENT FOR | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING AND PROPOSED BUILDING PER SECTION | | | 94-444(E)(1). | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PALM IN THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT | | | THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE | | | SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT OR THE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/7/17: | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE CHANGE TO LARGER TREE SPECIES IN | | | THE BUFFER TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO | | | PROVIDE MORE SUBSTANTIAL BUFFERING RATHER THAN THE | | | SMALL TREE SPECIES PROPOSED. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE WEST BUFFER IN THE | | | BUFFER CALCULATION CHART, AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED | | | TREES OR PALMS FOR BUFFERING OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE PLANT LIST FOR | | | THE ENTIRE SITE. PLAN MAY HAVE ENLARGED DETAIL OF THE | | | EAST LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT PLANT LIST MUST BE | | | CONSOLIDATED. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF | | | THE PROPOSED BUILDING NEXT TO THE ADA PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-23-2018 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-23 09:33:41 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | MEMO TO FILE | | | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE Z17070013 | | | JANUARY 2, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS THE | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TREES AND PALMS ON SITE. PLEASE | | | ACCOUNT FOR ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS THAT MATCH THE | | | APPROVED PLAN, AND LABEL THEM ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN BY SPECIES. | | | | | | IDENTIFY ALL EXISTING TREES WITH SPECIES TAGS AND | | | INCLUDE IN THE PLANT LIST AS PART OF THE PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST | | | SHOWING TREES AND PALMS TO REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENT CHART TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | SHADE TREES AND FLOWERING TREES FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 4. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREE | | | REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS ARE NOT MET ON THE PLAN FOR | | | THE EAST BUFFER. PALMS MAY ONLY BE SUBSTITUTED AT A 3 | | | TO 1 RATIO FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | DRIVEWAY WIDTHS ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH AND REQUIRED BUFFER TREE COUNT CALCULATION AS | | | MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE BUFFER. PLEASE | | | REVISE. SEE SECTION 94-443(B)(5). | | | | | | 5. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED | | | CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPING PER SECTION 94-442 (G). THIS INCLUDES | | | SHOWING DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL AND NATIVE SPECIES ON | | | THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED 40 POINTS. | | | | | | TREE AND SHRUB CATEGORIES MAY NOT BE COUNTED TWICE FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE OPTIONS AND CANNOT ADD UP | | | TO MORE THAN 100%. 51% AND 25-50% ARE MAXIMUM. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. TREE HEIGHTS NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED 12 | | | FEET HEIGHT SPECIFIED IN SECTION 94-445(4). | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4). PLEASE | | | SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS AND PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE | | | AREAS COUNTED TOWARD THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SECTION 94-443(C)(4). | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | REQUIRED BUILDING PERIMETER PLANTING OF 30 PERCENT FOR | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING AND PROPOSED BUILDING PER SECTION | | | 94-444(E)(1). | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PALM IN THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT | | | THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE | | | SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT OR THE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/7/17: | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE CHANGE TO LARGER TREE SPECIES IN | | | THE BUFFER TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO | | | PROVIDE MORE SUBSTANTIAL BUFFERING RATHER THAN THE | | | SMALL TREE SPECIES PROPOSED. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE WEST BUFFER IN THE | | | BUFFER CALCULATION CHART, AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED | | | TREES OR PALMS FOR BUFFERING OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE PLANT LIST FOR | | | THE ENTIRE SITE. PLAN MAY HAVE ENLARGED DETAIL OF THE | | | EAST LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT PLANT LIST MUST BE | | | CONSOLIDATED. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF | | | THE PROPOSED BUILDING NEXT TO THE ADA PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PERMIT MUST BE REVISED TO SHOW | | | THE 15 BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER AS | | | THE TREE IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS | | | COUNTED TOWARD THE 6 EAST BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PERMIT MUST BE REVISED TO SHOW | | | THAT FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS FOR POINTS IN TREE | | | AND SHRUB CATEGORIES ARE NOT COUNTED TWICE FOR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT AND NATIVE OPTIONS AND CANNOT ADD UP TO MORE | | | THAN 100%. 51% AND 25-50% ARE MAXIMUM IN EACH CATEGORY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-11-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-11-2017 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-11-2017 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-11 11:19:11 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | MEMO TO FILE | | | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE Z17070013 | | | DECEMBER 7, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS THE | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TREES AND PALMS ON SITE. PLEASE | | | ACCOUNT FOR ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS THAT MATCH THE | | | APPROVED PLAN, AND LABEL THEM ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN BY SPECIES. | | | | | | IDENTIFY ALL EXISTING TREES WITH SPECIES TAGS AND | | | INCLUDE IN THE PLANT LIST AS PART OF THE PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST | | | SHOWING TREES AND PALMS TO REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENT CHART TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | SHADE TREES AND FLOWERING TREES FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT | | | CALCULATIONS ARE NOT MET ON THE PLAN FOR THE EAST | | | BUFFER. PALMS MAY ONLY BE SUBSTITUTED AT A 3 TO 1 RATIO | | | FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | DRIVEWAY WIDTHS ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH AND REQUIRED BUFFER TREE COUNT CALCULATION AS | | | MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE BUFFER. PLEASE | | | REVISE. SEE SECTION 94-443(B)(5). | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED CHART | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING | | | PER SECTION 94-442 (G). THIS INCLUDES SHOWING DROUGHT | | | TOLERANCE LEVEL AND NATIVE SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST | | | AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED 40 POINTS. | | | | | | TREE AND SHRUB CATEGORIES MAY NOT BE COUNTED TWICE FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE OPTIONS AND CANNOT ADD UP | | | TO MORE THAN 100%. 51% AND 25-50% ARE MAXIMUM. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. TREE HEIGHTS NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED 12 | | | FEET HEIGHT SPECIFIED IN SECTION 94-445(4). | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND | | | (4). PLEASE SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS AND PROVIDE A DIAGRAM | | | SHOWING THE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SECTION 94-443(C)(4). | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | REQUIRED BUILDING PERIMETER PLANTING OF 30 PERCENT FOR | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING AND PROPOSED BUILDING PER SECTION | | | 94-444(E)(1). | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PALM IN THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT | | | THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE | | | SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT OR THE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/7/17: | | | 13. PLEASE CHANGE TO LARGER TREE SPECIES IN THE BUFFER | | | TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO PROVIDE MORE | | | SUBSTANTIAL BUFFERING RATHER THAN THE SMALL TREE | | | SPECIES PROPOSED. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE WEST BUFFER IN THE BUFFER | | | CALCULATION CHART, AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES OR | | | PALMS FOR BUFFERING OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE PLANT LIST FOR THE ENTIRE | | | SITE. PLAN MAY HAVE ENLARGED DETAIL OF THE EAST | | | LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT PLANT LIST MUST BE CONSOLIDATED. | | | | | | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING NEXT TO THE ADA PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-06-2017 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-06-2017 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-06 16:10:10 | PROJECT: PALM BEACH GARAGE Z17070013 | | | SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS THE PREVIOUSLY | | | APPROVED TREES AND PALMS ON SITE. PLEASE ACCOUNT FOR | | | ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS THAT MATCH THE APPROVED | | | PLAN, AND LABEL THEM ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN BY | | | SPECIES. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST SHOWING TREES | | | AND PALMS TO REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE UPDATE THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT | | | CHART TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SHADE TREES AND | | | FLOWERING TREES FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 4. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS | | | ARE NOT MET ON THE PLAN FOR THE EAST BUFFER. PALMS MAY | | | ONLY BE SUBSTITUTED AT A 3 TO 1 RATIO FOR REQUIRED | | | TREES. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | | WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING PER SECTION 94-442 | | | (G). THIS INCLUDES SHOWING DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDING THE | | | REQUIRED 40 POINTS. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW VALVES AND FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS MUST HAVE SCREENING HEDGES. | | | | | | 8. TREE HEIGHTS NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED 12 FEET | | | HEIGHT SPECIFIED IN SECTION 94-445(4). | | | | | | 9. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4). PLEASE | | | SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS AND PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE | | | AREAS COUNTED TOWARD THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | BUILDING PERIMETER PLANTING OF 30 PERCENT FOR THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING AND PROPOSED BUILDING PER SECTION | | | 94-444(E)(1). | | | | | | 12. PALM IN THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE | | | NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE | | | SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT OR THE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
|
Date |
01-05-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-05-2018 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-05 16:35:22 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE BASED ON THE PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER'S 1/2/2018 REVIEW PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. THE TRENCH DRAIN AT THE SOUTH DRIVEWWAY SHOULD BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 AND THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 2. NOT ALL CATCH BASINS ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN | | | SHEET SP-1. THE ONES THAT ARE SHOWN CAN BE REMOVED FROM | | | THE SHEET. | | | | | | 3. AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WILL BE | | | REQUIRED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 4. THE CITY'S MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ARE 50 FEET | | | ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH CUT. FDOT MAINTAINS DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY SO ITS REQUIREMENTS FOR MILL AND RESURFACING | | | SHOULD BE FOLLOWED AND SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-06-2017 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
12-06-2017 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-06 15:21:59 | THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE NOVEMBER | | | 28, 2017 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. SHOW SIDEWALK REPAIR AND PAVEMENT MILLING AND | | | OVERLAY FOR THE WATER SERVICE TAP. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES AT THE BACK OF DIXIE HWY | | | SIDEWALKS FOR THE DRIVEWAYS. THE BACK OF WALK ELEVATION | | | SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN THE GRATE ELEVATION OF THE | | | NEAREST CATCH BASIN BEHIND THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 3. CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO THE DRAINAGE INLETS. | | | | | | 4. IT APPEARS THERE IS A TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS THE SOUTH | | | DRIVEWAY AT THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADVISE IF THIS | | | WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | 5. THE FRONT DISPLAY AREA IS TO DRAIN INTERNALLY AND | | | NOT TO THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 6. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEEERING PLANS | | | AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION FACTOR TO NGVD 1929 IF THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM IS DIFFERENT FROM NGVD 1929. (REPEAT | | | COMMENT). | | | | | | 7. CONFIRM AN 8" DCDA IS APPROPRIATE FOR A 4" FIRE | | | LINE. | | | | | | 8. ON THE SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1, THE DIMENSION LINE | | | ACROSS THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET FROM | | | THE EAST PROPERTY LINE IS DRAWN FROM THE FACE OF THE | | | NORTH CURB TO THE BACK OF THE SOUTH CURB AND SHOWS A | | | DIMENSION OF 19.8 FEET. THE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS | | | SIMILAR COMMENT WAS THE DIMENSION WAS FROM BACK OF CURB | | | TO BACK OF CURB. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-07-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-07-2017 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-07-2017 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-07 13:13:56 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. NEW FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREAS WILL BE EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2017 IF | | | RESOLUTION PASSES AT SECOND READING BEFORE CITY | | | COMMISSION. THE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE AT | | | HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX? | | | | | | 2. CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL | | | DATUM OF 1929 (NGVD29). THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE | | | BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IS NORTH AMERICAN | | | VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). PROVIDE A CONVERSION | | | FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD88 AND NGVD29 ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 3. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE CONCEPTUAL PAVING, | | | GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND DETAIL SHEET. PROVIDE | | | EQUATION TO CONVERT TO NGVD1929 IF DIFFERENT VERTICAL | | | DATUM IS USED. | | | | | | 4. THE DIMENSION OF THE ONE-WAY DRIVE LANE SOUTH OF THE | | | BUILDING APPEARS TO MEASURE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK | | | OF CURB ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 5. THE DIMENSION OF THE ONE-WAY DRIVE LANE EAST OF THE | | | BUILDING APPEARS TO MEASURE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK | | | OF CURB ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 6. ARE THE TRENCH DRAINS ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS | | | NECESSARY? THE GRADING PLAN SHOWS THE DRIVEWAYS SLOPING | | | DOWN FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 7. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8. CONNECT ROOF DRAINS DIRECTLY TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR | | | DRAIN THE DOWN SPOUTS TO PERVIOUS AREAS. | | | | | | 9. SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY IS MAINTAINED BY | | | THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT AND SIGNED | | | AND SEALED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-04-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-04-2017 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-14-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-14-2017 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-14 11:05:22 | 1. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | 2. ADDITIONAL DIXIE HWY. RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS TAKEN BY | | | MAINTENANCE MAP RECORDED IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE | | | 23-29. | | | 3. SHOW CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 DATUM. | | | 4. NO ENGINEERING PLANS SUBMITTED. IS NEW BUILDING TO | | | HAVE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE? | | | 5. NEED DUMPSTER DETAIL AND AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS. | | | APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED BY PETER BIENIEK, PUBLIC | | | WORKS DIRECTOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-09 10:26:35 | APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. GIVEN THE EXISTING SITE | | | DESIGN'S CIRCULATION PATTERN, APPROVAL IS GIVEN TO | | | RETAIN THE TWO DRIVEWAYS WITH A CONDITION OF APPROVAL | | | THAT THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY ON S. DIXIE HIGHWAY IS MODIFIED | | | TO A ONE WAY OUT CONFIGURATION. THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY | | | SHALL BE THE MINIMUM ONE WAY WIDTH ALLOWED BY THE | | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-08 17:04:33 | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) PREVIOUS REVIEW IDENTIFIED THAT THE SOUTHERN | | | DRIVEWAY ON SOUTH DIXE IS NON-CONFORMING. WHY CAN'T THE | | | DRIVEWAY BE REMOVED? | | | | | | 2) PREVIOUS UNADDRESSED COMMENT - CONFIRM THAT EXISTING | | | DRIVEWAY APRON IS A.D.A. COMPLIANT. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-15 17:01:54 | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION | | | PROCESS. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED | | | PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1) PROPOSED PARKING LOT AISLE WIDTH IS 25'. CITY | | | STANDARD IS 24'. REDUCING TO STANDARD AISLE WIDTH WOULD | | | ALLOW FOR MORE LANDSCAPING AND LESS IMPERVIOUS AREA. | | | 2) PROPOSED PARKING LOT STALL DEPTH IS 18.5'. CITY | | | STANDARD DEPTH IS 18'. REDUCING TO STANDARD AISLE WIDTH | | | WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE LANDSCAPING AND LESS IMPERVIOUS | | | AREA. | | | 3) SOUTH DRIVEWAY DOES NOT MEET FDOT SEPARATION OF | | | ACCESS POINT CRITERIA AND CITY SEPARATION CRITIERA | | | (SECTION 94-312) WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT RESTARAUNT | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | 4) PROPOSED SITE PLAN EXCEEDS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCSS | | | POINTS TO STREET. MAXIMUM ALLOWED ACCESS POINTS IS ONE. | | | (SECTION 94-312). | | | 5) ELIMINATE ONE ACCESS ON S. DIXIE. PREFERABLY THE | | | SOUTH ACCESS POINT. | | | 5) S. DIXIE IS A FDOT ROAD. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THE | | | ACCESS POINTS WILL REQUIRE FDOT PERMIT AND APPROVAL. | | | PROVIDE STATUS OF FDOT COORDINATION AT PPRC. | | | 6) PROVIDE COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER. | | | 7) THE SIGHT TRIANGLE SHOWN ON THE SITE FOR THE S. DIXE | | | ENTRANCE NEEDS TO MEET FDOT CRITERIA. | | | 8) REVIEW EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRON FOR A.D.A. | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
01-12-2018 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
01-11-2018 |
Time |
09:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-01-12 14:37:50 | PLAN HAS SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS ITEMS TO PROCEED TO ZBA. | | | | | | STAFF REQUIRING ONE CONDITION:CONDITION - THE BICYCLE | | | PARKING LOCATION DOES NOT MEET THE CITY STANDARDS. AT | | | LEAST ONE RACK ELEMENT NEEDS TO BE AT THE FRONT OF | | | BUILDING A. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-12-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-12-2017 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-12-2017 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-12 09:25:59 | CASE NO. ZBA 3358 2ND RESUB | | | PALM BEACH GARAGE ADDITIONAL BUILDING | | | 3215 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | DECEMBER 29, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR | | | THE FEBRUARY 1, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 8, 2018), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($378). | | | | | | 1) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THIS IS | | | APPLICATION FOR AN EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING MOTOR | | | VEHICLE SALES AND LIGHT REPAIR BUSINESS. THE SITE ONLY | | | HAS A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE FOR MOTOR | | | VEHICLE REPAIR, NOT FOR MOTOR VEHICLE SALES. SALES | | | OCCURRING ON THE SITE ARE A VIOLATION OF THE EXISTING | | | BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE. A CLASS B | | | SPECIAL USE PERMIT HAS BEEN APPROVED TO PERMIT MOTOR | | | VEHICLE SALES; HOWEVER, THE SPECIAL USE GRANTED HAS NOT | | | YET BEEN INITIATED. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS | | | TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CORRECT CONDITIONS. ?THE | | | AUTO SALES BUSINESS TAX RECIEPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE WAS | | | ERRONEOUSLY ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. STAFF | | | RECOGNIZES THAT THE APPLICANT HAS ATTEMPTED TO INITIATE | | | THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE FOR AUTO SALES. | | | | | | 2) IT SEEMS THAT THE APPLICATION IS TO COMBINE BOTH | | | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMITS UNDER ONE CLASS B SPECIAL | | | USE PERMIT. WHAT IS THE PRIMARY USE FOR THE SITE UNDER | | | THE NEW OWNERSHIP? THIS WILL DICTATE WHAT APPROVAL(S) | | | IS APPROPRIATE. THE RESPONSE WAS UNCLEAR AS TO WHETHER | | | THIS WILL BE ONE OR TWO SPECIAL USE PERMITS BUT THE JS | | | SEEMS TO INDICATED CONSOLIDATION. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN FOR | | | BUILDING A (EXISTING IF IT WILL NOT CHANGE), SO THAT | | | STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE LOCATION | | | OF THE BUILDING FIFTEEN FEET FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY | | | LINE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND | | | EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE A 100 FOOT SETBACK | | | BETWEEN A BUILDING AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING. | | | THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVER. | | | | | | 5) REVISED COMMENT: THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT | | | INCLUDES A REDUCTION OF THE EXISTING WAIVER FOR | | | BUILDING A ALONG THE SOUTH RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE | | | WITH THE REQUESTED WAIVER FOR BUILDING B. STAFF DOES | | | NOT SUPPORT A REDUCTION OF THE CURRENT WAIVER FOR THE | | | BUILDING A. THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE | | | REDUCTION. | | | | | | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE WEB SITE AND THE PROPOSED SIGN | | | BOTH STATE THE PALM BEACH GARAGE OFFERS LONG AND SHORT | | | TERM STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, BOATS/TRAILERS, MOTORCYCLES, | | | AND RVS. THE STORAGE USE, INDOOR OR OUTDOOR, IS NOT | | | PERMITTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICT. A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE | | | WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THIS TYPE OF USE AND THE | | | ACTIVITIES MUST CEASE. ADDITIONALLY, YOU MAY NOT | | | ADVERTISE ANY STORAGE. | | | | | | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE GUY WIRE IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL | | | PLAN. IT MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND LABELED ON THE SITE | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THE | | | BICYCLE PARKING LOCATION DOES NOT MEET THE CITY | | | STANDARDS. AT LEAST ONE RACK ELEMENT NEEDS TO BE AT THE | | | FRONT OF BUILDING A. ADDITIONALLY, THE PAD LAYOUT DOES | | | NOT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS OR MATCH THE TYPE OF RACK | | | ELEMENT PROPOSED. | | | | | | 9) THE LOADING SPACE IS NOT PERMITTED TO EXTEND INTO | | | THE DRIVE AISLE OR REDUCE THE BACKUP FOR 90 DEGREE | | | PARKING SPACES TO LESS THAN 24 FEET. | | | | | | 10) THE PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET | | | THE CITY?S MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS OF 22 FEET | | | LONG AND 8.5 FEET IN WIDTH. PROVIDE THE DETAIL FOR THIS | | | TYPE OF PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-20-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-20-2017 |
Time |
09:49 |
Rev Time |
5.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-20-2017 |
Time |
09:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-20 09:50:08 | CASE NO. ZBA 3358 | | | PALM BEACH GARAGE ADDITIONAL BUILDING | | | 3215 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY, | | | OCTOBER 2, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | NOVEMBER 2, 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY NOVEMBER 20, | | | 2017), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($378). | | | | | | 1) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THIS IS | | | APPLICATION FOR AN EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING MOTOR | | | VEHICLE SALES AND LIGHT REPAIR BUSINESS. THE SITE ONLY | | | HAS A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE FOR MOTOR | | | VEHICLE REPAIR, NOT FOR MOTOR VEHICLE SALES. SALES | | | OCCURRING ON THE SITE ARE A VIOLATION OF THE EXISTING | | | BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE. A CLASS B | | | SPECIAL USE PERMIT HAS BEEN APPROVED TO PERMIT MOTOR | | | VEHICLE SALES; HOWEVER, THE SPECIAL USE GRANTED HAS NOT | | | YET BEEN INITIATED. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS | | | TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CORRECT CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 2) THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST BE CORRECTED TO | | | SHOW THAT THERE IS NO EXISTING AUTO SALES OCCURRING IN | | | THE FRONT BUILDING. IT MAY BE DESIGNATED PROPOSED AUTO | | | SALES. | | | | | | 3) THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT AND THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TRAFFIC LETTER MUST BE CORRECTED TO REMOVE THE | | | REFERENCES TO EXISTING USE AS MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND | | | SHOW THE FUTURE USE AS THE CORRECT RATIO OF REPAIR TO | | | SALES, NOT JUST THE SITE AS FULLY AUTO SALES. | | | | | | 4) IT SEEMS THAT THE APPLICATION IS TO COMBINE BOTH | | | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMITS UNDER ONE CLASS B SPECIAL | | | USE PERMIT. WHAT IS THE PRIMARY USE FOR THE SITE UNDER | | | THE NEW OWNERSHIP? THIS WILL DICTATE WHAT APPROVAL(S) | | | IS APPROPRIATE AND WILL CLARIFY ISSUES RAISED IN NO. 3, | | | ABOVE. | | | | | | 5) THE OUTDOOR VEHICLE SALES DISPLAY AREA(S) NEEDS TO | | | BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE | | | PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE. THIS IS A CONDITION | | | OF THE CURRENT CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT PRIOR TO THE | | | COMMENCEMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE SALES. | | | | | | 6) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REDUCTION IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE AND BUFFER ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE | | | INCREASED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | WAS PART OF FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CLASS B | | | GENERAL STANDARDS THAT LEAD TO THE APPROVAL FOR THE | | | MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND LATER THE MOTOR VEHICLE SALES. | | | | | | 7) PROVIDE AN ACCURATE FLOOR PLAN FOR THE NEW BUILDING | | | (NOT JUST A BIG BOX) TO SHOW WHAT IS OCCURRING WITHIN | | | IT SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PARKING CALCULATIONS | | | FOR THE SITE. SERVICE BAYS ARE CALCULATED DIFFERENTLY | | | FROM ENCLOSED AREA. | | | | | | 8) PROVIDE A PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING IF IT WILL | | | NOT CHANGE), SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PARKING | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 9) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTERS | | | ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE | | | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND EXISTING RESIDENTIAL | | | PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 10) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING | | | FIFTEEN FEET FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO | | | THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND EXISTING | | | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS REQUIRE A 100 FOOT SETBACK BETWEEN A | | | BUILDING AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING. THERE IS NO | | | JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVER. | | | | | | 11) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THE | | | EXISTING WAIVER FOR THE BUILDING ALONG THE SOUTH | | | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE WILL BE REDUCED. STAFF DOES | | | NOT SUPPORT A REDUCTION OF THE CURRENT WAIVER FOR THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING. THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE | | | REDUCTION. | | | | | | 12) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THERE IS | | | CURRENTLY A MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AREA ON THE EAST SIDE | | | OF THE BUILDING. THIS IS INCORRECT. AS STATED EARLIER, | | | THE PROPERTY HAS NOT LEGITIMATELY ESTABLISHED THE MOTOR | | | VEHICLE SALES USE. THIS AREA IS NOT APPROVED FOR MOTOR | | | VEHICLE DISPLAY AS IT IS A DRIVEWAY. THE MOTOR VEHICLE | | | SALES CLASS B SPECIAL USE APPROVAL WAS BASED ON VEHICLE | | | SALES DISPLAY OCCURRING WITHIN THE BUILDING. THE | | | CONDITION THAT THE PARKING SPACES EAST OF THE FENCE | | | COULD NOT BE USED FOR DISPLAY REINFORCED THAT VEHICLE | | | DISPLAY NOT OCCUR ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. STAFF DOES | | | NOT SUPPORT MOTOR VEHICLES FOR SALE DISPLAYED EAST OF | | | THE EXISTING FENCE. | | | | | | 13) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS OUTDOOR STORAGE SPACES. OUTDOOR | | | STORAGE IS NOT A USE PERMITTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD | | | COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. | | | | | | 14) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (ALSO ON THE WEB SITE) | | | STATES THE PALM BEACH GARAGE OFFERS LONG AND SHORT TERM | | | STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, BOATS/TRAILERS, MOTORCYCLES, AND | | | RVS. THE STORAGE USE, INDOOR OR OUTDOOR, IS NOT | | | PERMITTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICT. A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT/CERTIFICATE OF USE | | | WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THIS TYPE OF USE AND THE | | | ACTIVITIES, IF OCCURRING, MUST CEASE. | | | | | | 15) A CONDITION OF THE EXISTING APPROVAL REQUIRES A TEN | | | FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO 428 AND 430 HAMPTON | | | ROAD. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SHOWS THIS REDUCED TO FIVE | | | FEET. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT A CHANGE TO THIS CONDITION | | | THAT WAS PUT INTO PLACE TO BUFFER THE TWO PROPERTIES | | | BEING USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES FROM THE IMPACTS OF | | | THE SITE BEING USED FOR MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR. | | | | | | 16) THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE NC ZONING | | | DISTRICT IS 30 FEET, NOT 35 FEET AS LISTED ON THE DATA | | | TABLE AND IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | 17) STAFF IS UNABLE TO EASILY DECIPHER THE PARKING | | | TABLE. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS NEED TO CLEARLY SHOW | | | THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES IN SEPARATE | | | COLUMNS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE. NOTE: NO | | | OUTDOOR VEHICLE DISPLAY PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN. | | | | | | 18) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A GUY WIRE IS SHOWN ATTACHED TO | | | THE ROOF OF BUILDING B. PROVIDE A LETTER FROM FPL THAT | | | PERMITS THIS CONDITION. | | | | | | 19) THE DUMPSTERS ARE SUBSTANDARD IN DIMENSION. | | | | | | 20) NO BICYCLE FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 21) SHOW THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE IS | | | AT LEAST ONE INSTANCE WHERE THE DRAINAGE LINE CONFLICTS | | | WITH A TREE. | | | | | | 22) NO DETAIL SHEETS FOR PARKING SPACES, DUMPSTERS OR | | | BICYCLE PARKING WERE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 23) THE SITE PLAN REFERENCES LIGHTING LOCATIONS. NONE | | | ARE SHOWN. IS THIS AN OVERSIGHT? PLEASE SHOW THE | | | LIGHTING ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN AS WELL AS | | | PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THE | | | LIGHTING CONDITION OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVED | | | AS PART OF ZBA CASE NO. 3314. | | | | | | 24) THE LOADING SPACE IS NOT PERMITTED TO EXTEND INTO | | | THE DRIVE AISLE OR REDUCE THE BACKUP FOR 90 DEGREE | | | PARKING SPACES TO LESS THAN 24 FEET. | | | | | | 25) THE CONDITIONS TO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE MOTOR | | | VEHICLE SALES AND THE MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICE USES | | | ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WERE | | | APPROVED WITH THE SERVICE HOURS BETWEEN 8 AM AND 6 PM | | | AND THE SALES HOURS BETWEEN 8 AM AND 8 PM. STAFF DOES | | | NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THESE APPROVED | | | HOURS OF OPERATION. | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |