Plan Review Details - Project Z17040019
Plan Review Stops For Project Z17040019
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 10-26-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-26-2017 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-26-2017 Time 13:30 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-26 13:31:25PER SAMANTHA HILL, SEE ZONING COMMENTS.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-26-2017 Time 09:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-10 09:32:44SEE ZONING COMMENTS
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-25-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-25-2017 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-25-2017 Time 12:33 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-25 12:33:51SEE ZONING COMMENTS FOR ADA PARKING AND SIDEWALK FOLLOW
 UP COMMENTS.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 05-10-2017 Time 11:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-10-2017 Time 11:48 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-10 11:57:50DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. NEW FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRMS) WILL BE
 ADOPTED BEFORE OCTOBER 2017. THE PROPOSED BUILDING MAY
 BE IN FLOOD ZONE. THE CURRENT REQUIREMENT IS FOR THE
 ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL
 ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS
 ETC.) SHALL BE 12 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THAT BASE
 FLOOD ELEVATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A PROPOSAL
 TO INCREASE THE FREEBOARD TO 24 INCHES SOMETIME AFTER
 THE MIDDLE OF MAY 2017.
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
 LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY ENTRANCES.
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
 LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES
 WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE
 BUILDING OR FACILITY
  
 5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING. THE PARKING COMPUTATIONS ON
 SHEETS MP.1 AND PSP.1 SHOW 139 ADDITIONAL PARKING
 SPACES PROPOSED BUT DO NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING.
 WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 6. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
 SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
 TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN
 OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 10. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION
 OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT,
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-18-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 07-18-2017 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 07-18-2017 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-18 15:33:58CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 PROJECT NAME: KEISER UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC FIELD ADDITION
 - 2331 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR.
  
 PB CASE NO. 1069U - Z17040019
  
 2ND REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH CONDITION
  
 DATE: JULY 18, 2017
  
 AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS AND THE RESPONSES
 ON THE LETTER OF JUNE 29, 2017, IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF
 THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WITH INFORMATION
 PROVIDED AS REQUESTED AND OTHERS ARE ACKNOWLEDGED.
 HOWEVER, THESE ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS (E.G. #7, #8, AND
 #10) ARE EXPECTED TO BE ADDRESSED DURING 'ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION' PHASE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
 CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS
 AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-05-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 05-05-2017 Time 17:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 05-05-2017 Time 17:08 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-05 17:10:53CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 DATE: 05/05/2017
  
 Z17040019: 2331 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. - KEISER
 UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC FIELD ADDITION (PB CASE NO. 1069U)
  
 THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL:
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ENGINEERING PLANS SHOWING HOW THE
 ATHLETIC BUILDING WILL BE SERVED FOR WATER, SEWER AND
 FIRE PROTECTION. ON THE REVISED PLANS SHOW ALL EXISTING
 UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE AND LABEL THEIR
 SIZE AND MATERIALS.
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 AND FIRE DEMAND; AND SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE
 PROPOSED ATHLETIC BUILDING.
  
 3. SHOW ON THE PLANS ANY EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT CLOSEST
 TO THE BUILDING AND ITS DISTANCE. ALL PROPOSED FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 150 FEET OF A
 FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE
 PROPERTY.
  
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE SOLID WASTE
 COLLECTION YARDAGE AT THIS STAGE. AS PART OF THE FINAL
 DESIGN, THIS SOLID WASTE ESTIMATE WILL NEED TO BE
 VERIFIED TO VALIDATE APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF
 DUMPSTERS/GARBAGE RECEPTACLES.
  
 5. FOR SANITATION/GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTACT THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. SUBMIT A LETTER OF APPROVAL
 FOR SANITATION PLANS, SIZE OF GARBAGE BINS AND LOCATION
 OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FROM PETER BIENIEK,
 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 PLEASE INCLUDE THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM
 DIMENSIONAL (E.G. THE GATE WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF
 12.5 FEET) REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN
 CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE CODE OF
 ORDINANCES. CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-8 MAY BE DOWNLOADED
 AT:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEE
 RING-STANDARDS/
  
 6. PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING THE SOLID
 WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS AND MANEUVER WITHIN
 THE SITE/PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE
 FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 7. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 8. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC
 CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL
 WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE
 FOLLOWING LINK:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 9. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM THE CLOSEST
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN
 SUBMITTAL;
  
 10. IN THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE
 THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
 FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-31-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-31-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-31-2017 Time 13:16 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-31 13:17:303RD REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM ERIC
 SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AND ATTACHMENT DATED
 AUGUST 25, 2017, FROM DUNAY MISKEL BACKMAN LLP, THE
 PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS
 APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PARKING LOT ACCESS
 TRAFFIC CIRCLES. HOWEVER, ONE AREA THAT I WOULD LIKE TO
 SEE ADJUSTED IS THE FIRE LANE ACCESS LANE LEADING TO
 THE FILED. THE AREA HATCHED NOTED AS "STABILIZED SOD"
 SHOWS 2 SHARP ANGLES, OR A BACKWWARDS S, AT THE FIELD
 AREA. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO REDUCE OR SOFTEN
 THOSE ANGLES FOR GREATER EASE OF TURNING FOR EMEGENCY
 APPRATUS AND TO STAY "ON" THE STABLIZED SOD. CLOSE
 COORDINATION WITH THE BUREAU IS ENCOURAGE TO REVIEW
 THAT AREA AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-07-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-07-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-07-2017 Time 12:39 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-07 12:41:03 
 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED JUNE
 29, 2017, FROM DUNAY MISKEL BACKMAN, LLP, TO ERIC
 SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED
 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-08-2017 Time 12:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-08-2017 Time 12:02 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-08 12:35:52THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 THERE IS AN OPEN FLEX SPACE THAT MAY BE CLASSIFIED AS
 AN ASSEMBLY SPACE, AND THERE IS FUTURE EXSPANSION. FIRE
 SPRINKLERS MAY BE REQUIRED EITHER NOW OR IN THE FUTURE
 DEPENDING ON THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE. IS THIS A MIXED OR
 SEPARATED OCCUPANCY?
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 WHERE IS THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING?
  
 9. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT
 ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON
 PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS,
 EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ANY ACCESS GATES THAT
 THEY BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS
 AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 THERE SHOULD BE AT LEAST ONE GATE ACCESS POINT WITH A
 SUITABLE TRAVEL PATH FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES?
  
 DOES KEISER HAVE AN EMERGENCY SERVICE PLAN FOR THE
 SPORTING EVENTS AT THIS LOCATION?
  
 IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY
 ACCESS ROADS/PATHWAYS ARE PROVIDED FOR ACCESS TO THE
 END OF THE FIELD AND/OR THE GRANDSTAND. IN THE EVENT OF
 INJURY OR ILLNESS IT IS BENEFICIAL FOR EXPEDIENT
 PATIENT CARE TO PROVIDE A MEANS OF ACCESS FOR A FIRE
 DEPARTMENT VEHICLE.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-14-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-14-2017 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-14-2017 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
2017-12-14 15:42:51FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019
 DECEMBER 14, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 COMMENTS 1 THROUGH 17 PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/2017:
 1. SATISFIED. THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE CHANGED
 TO SATISFY THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS, BUT HAVE NOW REVERTED
 TO THE SAME CONDITION WITH THIS SUBMITTAL. THE
 DETENTION AREA ADJACENT TO THE REDUCED SOUTH BUFFER HAS
 REAPPEARED. PLEASE RELOCATE THE DETENTION AREA TO AVOID
 CONFLICT WITH EXISTING TREES AND IN ITS PLACE ADD TREES
 TO INCREASE THE BUFFER. THERE ARE SEVERAL LARGE LIVE
 OAK TREES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE DESTROYED. STAFF
 RECOMMENDS RELOCATING THEM TO THIS AREA TO PROVIDE AN
 ADEQUATE BUFFER TO COMPENSATE FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER
 WIDTH. THIS WILL REDUCE THE MITIGATION PAYMENT AS A
 BENEFIT.
 THIS IS ALSO REPEATED IN THE ZONING COMMENTS.
  
 2. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. ANY CHANGES PROPOSED FOR
 THE EXPANSION OR MODIFICATION OF THE NORTHERN PARKING
 AREAS WILL NEED TO HAVE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR
 REVIEW THAT MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE LAUREL OAKS LISTED AS BEING REMOVED
 ARE A CATEGORY ONE TREE, NOT A CATEGORY TWO. PLEASE
 REVISE. THIS WILL ALSO AFFECT MITIGATION DUE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-8 TO
 ADD TERMINAL ISLAND TREES FOR THE PARKING AREA IN ANY
 NONCONFORMING LOCATIONS, AND ADDRESS THE REMOVAL OF
 INVASIVE EXOTICS AND REDUCTION OF NON-CONFORMING
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PARKING.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 10-20-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-20-2017 Time 16:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-20-2017 Time 16:45 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-20 16:46:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019
 OCTOBER 20, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION CHART.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREE SURVEY AND TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE CECIL RD. ACCESS ROAD.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CURBS OR WHEEL STOPS IN
 PARKING AREAS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE
 GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR THE BUFFER REDUCTION HAS
 SEVERAL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
 ? THE DETENTION AREA PROPOSED WILL RESULT IN THE
 REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES PROVIDING BUFFERING. IT
 SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION.
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID THE
 NARROW AREA IN THE BUFFER, AND SHOULD AVOID REMOVING
 ANY EXISTING TREES. DETENTION AREA ADDED ALONG CECIL
 ROAD WILL ALSO RESULT IN REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES.
 ? ADDITIONAL TREES SHOULD BE ADDED TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
 BUFFERING IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL TREES PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH BUFFER ARE NOT
 SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER, RELOCATE
 DRAINAGE AREA AND ADD TREES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE
 STATEMENT REGARDING INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION
 (SUBSECTION 18?).
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER REFERRED TO IN THE NARRATIVE
 BETWEEN THE PARKING TO THE NORTH AND THE SPORTS ARE
 DOES NOT HAVE A HEDGE EXISTING. PLEASE INDICATE IF IT
 WILL BE REPLACED ON THE PARKING LOT SIDE OR THE SPORTS
 FIELD SIDE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CECIL
 RD. ACCESS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE GRASS PARKING AREAS INDICATED MAY NOT
 BE ALLOWED BY CODE. PLEASE PROVIDE PARKING LANDSCAPE TO
 MEET REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE
 GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE
 SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT ITEM C IN THE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO REFER TO TREES, NOT
 GRASS.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD THE WATER USE LEVEL TO THE
 PLANT LIST FOR EACH SPECIES, AND INDICATE NATIVE
 SPECIES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SPORTS FIELD
 ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-451.
  
 14. SATISFIED. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL IS PROVIDED,
 BUT LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/17:
  
 15. SATISFIED. THE ADA SPACES AND SIDEWALK THAT EXIST
 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PRACTICE FIELD CONNECTING THE
 FACILITY TO THE MAIN WALKWAY NEAR THE STUDENT HOUSING
 WAS CONSTRUCTED LAST YEAR TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS AND
 AVOID DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING TREES. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE
 NEED TO RELOCATE THE ACCESS, POTENTIALLY NEGATIVELY
 AFFECTING EXISTING TREES AND UNDOING THE PREVIOUS
 ACCOMPLISHED SOLUTION.
  
 16. SATISFIED. THE TREE MITIGATION CHART NEEDS TO BE
 CORRECTED TO REMOVE ANY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR
 CARROTWOOD OR ALBIZIA, DUE TO THEM BEING CLASSIFIED AS
 INVASIVE EXOTICS.
  
 17. SATISFIED. THE TREE PAYMENT IN LIEU CALCULATIONS
 NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF THE
 INSTALLATION COST FOR EACH TREE EQUAL TO THE TREE COST.
 (COST TIMES TWO). THE ADDITION OF MORE TREES ON SITE TO
 MITIGATE AND PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REDUCED
 BUFFER WIDTH WAIVER FOR THE USE AND PARKING IS
 PREFERRED BY STAFF.
 THE CALCULATED PRICE OF $180.00 FOR THE 12 FOOT SLASH
 PINE IS ACTUALLY AVERAGING $130.00 X 2=$260.00 FOR THE
 AUGUST PLANTFINDER. PLEASE RECALCULATE MITIGATION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/2017:
 18. THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE CHANGED TO
 SATISFY THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS, BUT HAVE NOW REVERTED TO
 THE SAME CONDITION WITH THIS SUBMITTAL. THE DETENTION
 AREA ADJACENT TO THE REDUCED SOUTH BUFFER HAS
 REAPPEARED. PLEASE RELOCATE THE DETENTION AREA TO AVOID
 CONFLICT WITH EXISTING TREES AND IN ITS PLACE ADD TREES
 TO INCREASE THE BUFFER. THERE ARE SEVERAL LARGE LIVE
 OAK TREES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE DESTROYED. STAFF
 RECOMMENDS RELOCATING THEM TO THIS AREA TO PROVIDE AN
 ADEQUATE BUFFER TO COMPENSATE FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER
 WIDTH. THIS WILL REDUCE THE MITIGATION PAYMENT AS A
 BENEFIT.
 THIS IS ALSO REPEATED IN THE ZONING COMMENTS.
  
 19. ANY CHANGES PROPOSED FOR THE EXPANSION OR
 MODIFICATION OF THE NORTHERN PARKING AREAS WILL NEED TO
 HAVE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW THAT MEET
 CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 20. THE LAUREL OAKS LISTED AS BEING REMOVED ARE A
 CATEGORY ONE TREE, NOT A CATEGORY TWO. PLEASE REVISE.
 THIS WILL ALSO AFFECT MITIGATION DUE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-13-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-13-2017 Time 17:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-13-2017 Time 17:17 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-13 17:18:36FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019
 JULY 21, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION CHART.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREE SURVEY AND TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE CECIL RD. ACCESS ROAD.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CURBS OR WHEEL STOPS IN
 PARKING AREAS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE
 GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR THE BUFFER REDUCTION HAS
 SEVERAL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
 ? THE DETENTION AREA PROPOSED WILL RESULT IN THE
 REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES PROVIDING BUFFERING. IT
 SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION.
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID THE
 NARROW AREA IN THE BUFFER, AND SHOULD AVOID REMOVING
 ANY EXISTING TREES. DETENTION AREA ADDED ALONG CECIL
 ROAD WILL ALSO RESULT IN REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES.
 ? ADDITIONAL TREES SHOULD BE ADDED TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
 BUFFERING IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL TREES PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH BUFFER ARE NOT
 SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER, RELOCATE
 DRAINAGE AREA AND ADD TREES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE
 STATEMENT REGARDING INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION
 (SUBSECTION 18?).
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER REFERRED TO IN THE NARRATIVE
 BETWEEN THE PARKING TO THE NORTH AND THE SPORTS ARE
 DOES NOT HAVE A HEDGE EXISTING. PLEASE INDICATE IF IT
 WILL BE REPLACED ON THE PARKING LOT SIDE OR THE SPORTS
 FIELD SIDE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CECIL
 RD. ACCESS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE GRASS PARKING AREAS INDICATED MAY NOT
 BE ALLOWED BY CODE. PLEASE PROVIDE PARKING LANDSCAPE TO
 MEET REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE
 GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE
 SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT ITEM C IN THE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO REFER TO TREES, NOT
 GRASS.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD THE WATER USE LEVEL TO THE
 PLANT LIST FOR EACH SPECIES, AND INDICATE NATIVE
 SPECIES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SPORTS FIELD
 ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-451.
  
 14. SATISFIED. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL IS PROVIDED,
 BUT LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/17:
  
 15. SATISFIED. THE ADA SPACES AND SIDEWALK THAT EXIST
 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PRACTICE FIELD CONNECTING THE
 FACILITY TO THE MAIN WALKWAY NEAR THE STUDENT HOUSING
 WAS CONSTRUCTED LAST YEAR TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS AND
 AVOID DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING TREES. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE
 NEED TO RELOCATE THE ACCESS, POTENTIALLY NEGATIVELY
 AFFECTING EXISTING TREES AND UNDOING THE PREVIOUS
 ACCOMPLISHED SOLUTION.
  
 16. SATISFIED. THE TREE MITIGATION CHART NEEDS TO BE
 CORRECTED TO REMOVE ANY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR
 CARROTWOOD OR ALBIZIA, DUE TO THEM BEING CLASSIFIED AS
 INVASIVE EXOTICS.
  
 17. NOT SATISFIED. THE TREE PAYMENT IN LIEU
 CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE
 ADDITION OF THE INSTALLATION COST FOR EACH TREE EQUAL
 TO THE TREE COST. (COST TIMES TWO). THE ADDITION OF
 MORE TREES ON SITE TO MITIGATE AND PROVIDE
 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER WIDTH WAIVER FOR
 THE USE AND PARKING IS PREFERRED BY STAFF.
 THE CALCULATED PRICE OF $180.00 FOR THE 12 FOOT SLASH
 PINE IS ACTUALLY AVERAGING $130.00 X 2=$260.00 FOR THE
 AUGUST PLANTFINDER. PLEASE RECALCULATE MITIGATION.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-24-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-24-2017 Time 11:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-24-2017 Time 11:14 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-24 11:15:21FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019
 JULY 21, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION CHART.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREE SURVEY AND TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE CECIL RD. ACCESS ROAD.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CURBS OR WHEEL
 STOPS IN PARKING AREAS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE
 GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR THE BUFFER REDUCTION
 HAS SEVERAL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
 ? THE DETENTION AREA PROPOSED WILL RESULT IN THE
 REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES PROVIDING BUFFERING. IT
 SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION.
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID THE
 NARROW AREA IN THE BUFFER, AND SHOULD AVOID REMOVING
 ANY EXISTING TREES. DETENTION AREA ADDED ALONG CECIL
 ROAD WILL ALSO RESULT IN REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES.
 ? ADDITIONAL TREES SHOULD BE ADDED TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
 BUFFERING IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL TREES PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH BUFFER ARE NOT
 SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER, RELOCATE
 DRAINAGE AREA AND ADD TREES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE
 STATEMENT REGARDING INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION
 (SUBSECTION 18?).
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER REFERRED TO IN THE NARRATIVE
 BETWEEN THE PARKING TO THE NORTH AND THE SPORTS ARE
 DOES NOT HAVE A HEDGE EXISTING. PLEASE INDICATE IF IT
 WILL BE REPLACED ON THE PARKING LOT SIDE OR THE SPORTS
 FIELD SIDE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CECIL
 RD. ACCESS.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE GRASS PARKING AREAS
 INDICATED MAY NOT BE ALLOWED BY CODE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 PARKING LANDSCAPE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE
 GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE
 SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT ITEM C IN THE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO REFER TO TREES, NOT
 GRASS.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD THE WATER USE LEVEL TO THE
 PLANT LIST FOR EACH SPECIES, AND INDICATE NATIVE
 SPECIES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SPORTS FIELD
 ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-451.
  
 14. SATISFIED. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL IS PROVIDED,
 BUT LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/17:
  
 15. THE ADA SPACES AND SIDEWALK THAT EXIST ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE PRACTICE FIELD CONNECTING THE FACILITY TO
 THE MAIN WALKWAY NEAR THE STUDENT HOUSING WAS
 CONSTRUCTED LAST YEAR TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS AND
 AVOID DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING TREES. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE
 NEED TO RELOCATE THE ACCESS, POTENTIALLY NEGATIVELY
 AFFECTING EXISTING TREES AND UNDOING THE PREVIOUS
 ACCOMPLISHED SOLUTION.
  
 16. THE TREE MITIGATION CHART NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO
 REMOVE ANY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR CARROTWOOD OR
 ALBIZIA, DUE TO THEM BEING CLASSIFIED AS INVASIVE
 EXOTICS.
  
 17. THE TREE PAYMENT IN LIEU CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE
 CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF THE INSTALLATION
 COST FOR EACH TREE EQUAL TO THE TREE COST. (COST TIMES
 TWO). THE ADDITION OF MORE TREES ON SITE TO MITIGATE
 AND PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER WIDTH
 WAIVER FOR THE USE AND PARKING IS PREFERRED BY STAFF
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-09-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-09-2017 Time 13:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-09-2017 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-09 13:58:48FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019
 MAY 9, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION CHART.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 FOR THE CECIL RD. ACCESS ROAD.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE CURBS OR WHEEL STOPS IN PARKING AREAS
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 4. THE WAIVER FOR THE BUFFER REDUCTION HAS SEVERAL
 ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
 ? THE DETENTION AREA PROPOSED WILL RESULT IN THE
 REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES PROVIDING BUFFERING. IT
 SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION.
 ? ADDITIONAL TREES SHOULD BE ADDED TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
 BUFFERING IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE STATEMENT
 REGARDING INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION (SUBSECTION 18?).
  
 6. THE BUFFER REFERRED TO IN THE NARRATIVE BETWEEN THE
 PARKING TO THE NORTH AND THE SPORTS ARE DOES NOT HAVE A
 HEDGE EXISTING. PLEASE INDICATE IF IT WILL BE REPLACED
 ON THE PARKING LOT SIDE OR THE SPORTS FIELD SIDE.
  
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG
 THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CECIL RD. ACCESS.
  
 8. THE GRASS PARKING AREAS INDICATED MAY NOT BE ALLOWED
 BY CODE. PLEASE PROVIDE PARKING LANDSCAPE TO MEET
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 10. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
 GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL.
  
 11. PLEASE CORRECT ITEM C IN THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO REFER TO TREES, NOT GRASS.
  
 12. PLEASE ADD THE WATER USE LEVEL TO THE PLANT LIST
 FOR EACH SPECIES, AND INDICATE NATIVE SPECIES.
  
 13. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SPORTS FIELD ARTIFICIAL TURF
 WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451.
  
 14. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL IS PROVIDED, BUT LOCATION
 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 10-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-17-2017 Time 11:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-17-2017 Time 11:05 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-17 11:03:04BASED UPON REVIEW OF RESPONSES SUBMITTED IN THE
 SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 APPLICANT LETTER AND THE OCTOBER 10,
 2017 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, THE APPLICANT HAS
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED OR ACKNOWLEDGED ALL PREVIOUS
 STORMWATER COMMENTS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. MODIFICATIONS TO THE SFWMD AND NPBCID PERMITS WILL
 NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 2. PALM BEACH COUNTY WILL NEED TO APPROVE ANY
 IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
 MILITARY TRAIL.
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-25-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-25-2017 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-25-2017 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-25 15:31:11THE FOLLOWING NOTES ARE BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE
 RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE FROM ES, DATED AUGUST 31, 2017.
  
 1. APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 AREA WILL NOT BE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS
 SHOWN ON THE NOW ADOPTED FEMA FIRMS.
  
 2. VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND
 NGVD1929 ARE NOW CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE TOPOGRAPHIC
 SURVEY AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 3. WILL THE SIDEWALK ALONG CECIL AVE. BE AT GRADE? HOW
 RUNOFF FROM SOUTH SIDE OF CECIL AVE. MAKE IT INTO THE
 SWALE, SOUTH OF THE ROADWAY?
  
 4. DRY DETENTION BASINS ARE CALLED OUT ON THE
 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS. HOWEVER THEY ARE LABELED
 AS DRY RETENTION ON THE OTHER PLANS (SITE PLAN, MASTER
 PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLANS).
  
 5. EXPLAIN HOW THE DRY DETENTION AREA WILL BE USED FOR
 DRAINAGE. THE DRY DETENTION BASIN AT THE SOUTH END OF
 THE FOOTBALL FIELD IS LOCATED AT THE UPSTREAM END OF
 THE STORM WATER SYSTEM. A CONTROL STRUCTURE IS NOT
 IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BACKUP THE WATER INTO THE
 DRY DETENTION BASIN. EXPLAIN HOW STORMWATER QUALITY
 TREATMENT WILL BE OBTAINED.
  
 6. IN ADDITION TO MODIFYING THE SFWMD PERMIT, A PERMIT
 MODIFICATION WILL BE NEEDED FROM THE NORTHERN PALM
 BEACH COUNTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-03-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-03-2017 Time 17:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-03-2017 Time 17:06 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-03 17:05:57THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE JUNE
 29, 2017 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
 1. THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EXHIBIT SHOWS PROPOSED
 DRY DETENTION BASINS ALONG CECIL AVE AND AT THE SOUTH
 END OF THE ATHLETIC FIELD.
 A. WILL THESE BE DETENTION BASINS OR RETENTION BASINS?
  
 B. IF DETENTION BASINS, WHERE IS THE OFFSITE OUTFALL?
  
 C. HOW WILL THE WEST AND EAST BASINS ALONG CECIL AVE BE
 CONNECTED?
  
 2. HOW IS THE RUNOFF FROM CECIL AVE BEING COLLECTED?
  
 3. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED ELIMINATING THE NORTH-SOUTH
 STORM PIPES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ATHLETIC FIELD AND,
 INSTEAD, CONNECT THE YARD DRAINS AT THE SE AND SW
 CORNERS OF THE ATHLETIC FIELD TO THE INLET IN THE DRY
 DETENTION BASIN?
  
 4. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DRAWING LISTS 1.529 FEET AS
 THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929.
 THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LISTS 1.54 FEET AS THE
 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929.
 THESE CONVERSION FACTORS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-05-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-05-2017 Time 11:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-05-2017 Time 11:13 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-05 11:13:02THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT FOR STRUCTURES IN A
 SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA IS ONE FOOT ABOVE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION. THE CITY COMMISSION WILL BE CONSIDERING
 RAISING THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT TO TWO FEET IN THE
 NEAR FUTURE.
  
 3. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED.
  
 4. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY REFERENCES THE NORTH AMERICAN
 VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM. THE CITY
 USES THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 AS
 THE VERTICAL DATUM. A CONVERSION FACTOR BETWEEN THE TWO
 DATUMS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY.
  
 5. WHAT WILL BE DONE WITH THE MONITORING WELL THAT IS
 LOCATED IN THE PROPOSED PLAY FIELD?
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION FOR
 THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-24-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-24-2017 Time 08:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-09-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-09-2017 Time 07:32 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-09 07:37:351. AS THE CITY DATUM IS STILL NGVD-29, SHOW THE
 CONVERSION FACTOR FROM NAVD 88 TO NGVD 29.
 2. DUMPSTER WILL NEED TO MEET CITY'S STANDARD.
 3. NO ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL
 WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SITE/CIVIL REVIEW.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-17-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-17 08:19:44PASSED WITH CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT CONSIDER OTHER
 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIANS OPTIONS FOR CECIL AVENUE. THESE
 OPTIONS WOULD PROVIDE BIKE AND PEDESTRIANS FACILITIES
 AT A LOWER COST TO THE APPLICANT WITH LESS IMPERVIOUS
 AREA.
  
 OPTION 1 - INSTEAD OF TWO FOUR BIKE LANES AND A 5'
 SIDEWALK, THE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION BELIEVES A
 SINGLE10' TO 12' WIDE SHARED USE PATH WOULD BE
 SUFFICIENT FOR BOTH BIKES AND PEDESTRIANS. THE PATH
 SHOULD PREFERABLY BE SEPARATED (E.G. TREE LINED GRASS
 STRIP, TRAFFIC SEPARATOR) OR COULD USE TUBULAR
 DELINATORS WITH A GORED OUT AREA WITH PAVEMENT MARKINGS
 IF THE INTENT IS TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF THE EXISTING
 ASPHALT PAVEMENT. THE SHARED USE PATH CONCEPT SHOULD
 REDUCE CONSTRUCTION COST OVER THE CURRENT PROPOSAL.
  
 OPTION 2 - ONE OF THE BIKE LANES COULD BE PLACED ON THE
 NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD AND THE TRAVEL LANE COULD THEN
 BE REDUCED FROM ITS CURRENT 16' WIDTH. THIS OPTION
 WOULD ALSO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF ASPHALT, BUT WOULD
 REQUIRE A SECOND PEDESTRIAN GATE AT MILITARY TRAIL.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-19-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-19 13:13:52THIS REVIEW IS CONCEPTUAL AS CONSTRUCTION LEVEL DETAILS
 WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
  
 1) CECIL AVENUE - A 5' WIDE SIDEWALK IS SHOWN ADJACENT
 TO THE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE. THE PROPOSED 5' WID
 SIDEWALK DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED
 IN THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM STANDARD FOR DESIGN,
 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS.
 (A.K.A. FLORIDA GREENBOOK). THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR A
 SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO A CURB IS 6' WIDE, (SECTION 8B.1
 FLORIDA GREENBOOK).
  
 2) THE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TRANSPORTATION
 ELEMENT VISION FOR "INCREASED USE OF BICYCLE AND
 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AS A VIABLE ALTERNATE MEANS OF
 TRANSPORATION TO THE AUTOMOBILE." THERE DOESN'T APPEAR
 TO BE ANY BICYCLE FACILITIES PROVIDED FROM THE CAMPUS
 TO MILITARY TRAIL. IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO CONSTRUCT
 A WIDER MULTIMODAL TRAIL ALONG CECIL AVENUE OR AT
 ANOTHER LOCATION TO CONNECT TO MILITARY TRAIL. THE
 TRIPS LENGTH LEAVING CAMPUS IS MORE CONDUCIVE TO BIKING
 THAN WALKING AND ONLY CONSTRUCTING A SIDEWALK WILL NOT
 ADDRESS THE NEED TO PROVIDE BICYCLE FACILITIES.
  
 3) THE 25' PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR CECIL AVENUE APPEARS
 EXCESSIVE. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PAVEMENT WIDTH.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-02-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-02 09:05:05THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO
 ACKNOWLEDGE THE WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION FROM THE
 PROPOSED ATHLETIC BUILDING. PREVIOUSLY, UNADDRESSED
 COMMENT. THE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC GENERATED FROM THE
 ATHLETIC BUIDING MAY BE MINIMAL AND INSIGNIFICANT, BUT
 IT NEEDS TO DOCUMENTATED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-10 08:36:011) THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR WEEKDAY
 TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED ATHLETIC
 BUILDING. REVISE TRAFFIC STATEMENT.
 2) PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR DRIVEWAYS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 10-26-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-26-2017 Time 15:24 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-19-2017 Time 11:46 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-26 15:28:12CASE NO. PB 1069U ? 3RD RESUBMITTAL
 KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM
 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE
 NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR
 THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE
 COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE RESUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5
 PM ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE JANUARY 16, 2017 PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 26, 2017), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED WITH THE APPROVING
 LEGISLATION
  
 1) PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT
 SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE "COVENANT TO MAINTAIN
 DRAINAGE" RECORDED IN ORB 2474 PG 687 HAS BEEN
 TERMINATED.
  
 2) THE PEDESTRIAN GATE WILL REQUIRE ACCESS FOR STUDENTS
 AND EMPLOYEES ALL THE TIME. ON GAME DAYS, A STAFF
 MEMBER IS REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE GATE TO PROVIDE ACCESS
 TO FANS.
  
 3) THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF CONCESSION AND
 MERCHANDISE STANDS OR BUILDINGS WILL REQUIRE THE PRIOR
 APPROVAL BY THE ZONING DIVISION AS A MINOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND/OR FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW,
 DEPENDING ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 4) ALL PARKING SPACES WITHIN ANY PARKING ROW WHICH HAS
 ANY RESTRIPING OR OTHER MODIFICATION MUST BE RESTRIPED
 TO COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF RESTRIPING
 OR MODIFICATION. IN ANY EVENT, ALL PARKING SPACES NEED
 TO BE STRIPED TO MEET CITY STANDARDS BY DECEMBER 31,
 2020.
  
 5) STAFF RECOMMENDS REDESIGNING SOME OF THE SPEED HUMPS
 TO SPEED TABLES THAT CAN DOUBLE AS ADA COMPLIANT
 CROSSINGS OF THE MAIN ENTRY ROAD.
  
 CHANGES TO THE RES. NO. 2-12 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
  
 1) PARKING PROVISION REQUIREMENT TO BE BASED ON
 ENROLLMENT NUMBERS, NOT MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT. ANNUAL
 VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED FROM KEISER UNIVERSITY.
 SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IS STILL TO BE DRAFTED. THE PROPOSAL
 FROM APPLICANT WILL BE USED AS A STARTING POINT.
  
 2) STAFF HAS DONE SOME RESEARCH ON ADJUNCT FACULTY AND
 WILL AGREE TO SPECIFICALLY PERMIT ADJUNCT FACULTY TO BE
 COUNTED AT A 1:2 RATIO. THIS NUMBER WILL NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ON THE ANNUAL VERIFICATIONS.
  
 OUTSTANDING PLAN COMMENTS
  
 1) REVISED SHEET MP.1 INCORRECTLY LISTS THE NUMBER OF
 ADA PARKING SPACES LOCATED IN THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING
 FIELD. THREE ADA PARKING SPACES WERE ADDED BUT IT STILL
 LISTS ONLY TWO ADA PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING FIELD.
  
 2) THE THREE NEW ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED TO
 HAVE AN ADA COMPLIANT WALKWAY INSTALLED AT THE HEAD OF
 THE SPACES FROM THE ACCESS AISLE TO THE EXISTING
 WALKWAY NETWORK (COMMENT VERIFIED BY SAMANTHA HILL,
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER).
  
 3) STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT YOU DO NOT WISH TO FULLY
 DESIGN THE PLANS FOR THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD
 UNTIL THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THE CODE TEXT TO
 PERMIT THE PARKING WAIVER. STAFF HAS SCHEDULED THE CODE
 AMENDMENT FOR FIRST READING ON NOVEMBER 20, 2017, WITH
 THE SECOND READING ON DECEMBER 4, 2017. BOTH STAFF AND
 THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS
 REQUEST.
 PLEASE REMEMBER THAT CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE
 CODE AMENDMENT DOES NOT APPROVE YOUR PARKING REDUCTION,
 IT ALLOWS YOU TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO REQUEST THE
 REDUCTION AS PART OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT. THE CITY COMMISSION WILL APPROVE OR NOT
 APPROVE YOUR SPECIFIC PARKING WAIVER REQUEST, AFTER A
 RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, WHEN THEY HEAR
 THE MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR THE STADIUM.
  
 4) IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO BRING THE PLANS, INCLUDING THE
 PARKING WAIVER, BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD AND THEN THE
 CITY COMMISSION, THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS
 RELATING TO PARKING ARE STILL DEFICIENT:
  
 A. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW A CODE COMPLIANT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD
 AND THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE.
 B. NO TREE SURVEY WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY MITIGATION FOR
 THE TREES REMOVED FOR THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD,
 THE NEW TURN AROUND AREAS AND OTHER NEW PAVING AND
 WALKWAYS TO BRING THE SITE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEW STADIUM AND EXISTING
 CAMPUS ENROLLMENT/SQUARE FOOTAGE/FACULTY. STAFF VISITED
 THE SITE AND IT CLEARLY LOOKS LIKE TREES WILL NEED TO
 BE REMOVED FOR THE BUS PARKING AND TURN AROUND. THE
 TREE SURVEY WOULD VERIFY THE STATEMENT THAT FEATURES
 HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO AVOID THE TREES.
 C. NO SURVEY OR CIVIL PLANS WERE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD, AS SHOWN ON
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, DOES NOT HAVE CONFLICTS
 WITH SITE CONDITIONS.
 D. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT VERIFY THAT THE EXISTING
 PARKING AREAS COMPLY WITH PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENTS
 EITHER UNDER CURRENT CODE OR EARLIER APPROVED PLANS.
 STAFF HAS LOCATED A 1991 VERSION OF THE MASTER PLAN
 WHICH SHOWS TREE LOCATIONS, BUT NOT THE SPECIFIC
 SPECIES FOR THE LOWER PORTION OF THE CAMPUS PARKING AND
 A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE EXISTING NORTHERN PARKING
 FIELD FROM 2002. THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO BE
 UPDATED TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND THE
 LANDSCAPE WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE
 FOOTBALL STADIUM PROJECT.
 E. EVEN THOUGH THE RESTRIPED ADA PARKING SPACES BY
 BUILDING NOS. 8 AND 9 NOW HAVE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
 THEY ARE NOT THE CLOSEST TO ONES TO THE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE. STAFF VISITED THE SITE AND NOTED A SEVERE
 GRADE CHANGE IN THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED WALKWAY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE CIVIL PLANS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED
 LAYOUT MEETS ADA REQUIREMENTS. IF IT DOES NOT, THEN AN
 ALTERNATIVE DESIGN WILL NEED TO BE PRESENTED. (COMMENT
 VERIFIED BY SAMANTHA HILL).
 F. THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FOR THE TWO ADA
 PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SOFTBALL FIELD DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE ADA REQUIREMENTS SINCE THE ADA ACCESS
 AISLE DOES NOT CONNECT TO THE NEW WALKWAY. STAFF
 VISITED THE SITE AND CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE LARGE
 PINE TREES LOCATED WHERE THE PATH WOULD NEED TO BE
 INSTALLED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF THE
 TREES FOR THE WALKWAY. THE PROPOSED ADA ACCESS NEEDS TO
 BE DESIGNED TO AVOID THE TREES, SIMILAR TO THE
 ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY THAT WAS INSTALLED AS PART OF THE
 GOLF RANGE PROJECT.
 G. THE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE IN THE NORTHERN ROW OF
 PARKING WAS NOT REFLECTED ON THE PARKING FILED TOTAL
 NUMBER ON SHEET MP.1, NOR WAS THE PARKING TABLE
 UPDATED.
 H. ON OCTOBER 25, 2017, STAFF DROVE THROUGH THE SITE TO
 VERIFY THE BICYCLE PARKING AND ADA PARKING ITEMS AND
 NOTED THAT THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 15-20 PARKING SPACES
 THAT ARE NOT USABLE DUE TO PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS
 (PODS), DUMPSTERS, NO PARKING STRIPING AND KEISER
 UNIVERSITY BUSSES LOCATED WHERE PARKING SPACES ARE TO
 BE. THE ALREADY DEFICIENT PARKING FOR THE CAMPUS IS
 REDUCED EVEN MORE BY THE FEATURES. THE PODS AND
 DUMPSTERS NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM PARKING SPACES. THE
 SCHOOL VEHICLES NEED TO BE STORED IN THEIR OWN AREA
 THAT IS NOT PART OF THE PROVIDED PARKING COUNT. THE
 PLANS NEED TO BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 5) THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED
 PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH NEEDS ONE MORE OAK TREE TO FILL
 IN THE 63 FOOT GAP BETWEEN EXISTING OAK #95 AND THE NEW
 OAK. THIS WILL SATISFY THE ZONING COMMENT REGARDING THE
 BUFFER REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER TO THE REQUIRED
 100 FOOT SETBACK.
  
 6) SHOW THE POWERLINE POLES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NOT CONFLICTS WITH THE REQUIRED
 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE.
  
 7) THE EASTERNMOST PARKING BAY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
 CECIL AVENUE DOES NOT SHOW THE RELOCATION OF THE TREES
 AWAY FROM THE LIGHT POLES.
  
 BICYCLE PARKING
  
 8) STAFF PERFORMED A SITE VISIT TO CONFIRM THE BICYCLE
 PARKING AND DISCOVERED A NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES.
  
 A. NONE OF THE EXISTING BICYCLE RACKS ARE LOCATED WHERE
 THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PLANS MUST SHOW
 ACCURATE CONDITIONS.
 B. THE TYPE OF BICYCLE RACK THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED
 IN SIX LOCATIONS ON THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO CITY
 STANDARDS. STAFF WILL PERMIT THESE TO CONTINUE TO BE
 USED PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING:
 I) ALL RACKS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE GROUND ON
 A PAVED SURFACE (ONLY ONE RACK WAS BOLTED TO THE GROUND
 AND ONE WAS LOCATED IN A LANDSCAPE AREA).
 II) THE EXISTING RACKS ARE ONLY APPROVED TO SECURE
 EIGHT (8) NOT TEN (10) BICYCLES. THERE ARE ONLY 48, NOT
 60, BICYCLE PARKING SPACES CURRENTLY ON THE SITE. THERE
 ARE 12 ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.
 STAFF RECOMMENDS PLACING THEM BY THE FITNESS CENTER AND
 THE DEVOS-COOK ACADEMIC CENTER SO THAT MORE AREAS OF
 THE CAMPUS HAVE FACILITIES.
  
 9) THE NEW BICYCLE RACKS NEED TO CONFORM TO THE CITY
 STANDARDS. THE PROVIDED BIKE RACK DETAIL CORRECTLY
 SHOWS A BICYCLE RACK THAT SERVES EIGHT (8) BICYCLES
 (NOT FIVE AS STATED IN THE TITLE). YOU WILL NEED TO
 PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE ADDITIONAL RACKS THAT DO NOT
 HAVE EIGHT SPACES.
  
 10) THE BICYCLE RACK PAD PLAN SHOWS THE CORRECT
 DIMENSIONS FOR A RACK SERVING EIGHT BICYCLES THAT MEETS
 CITY STANDARDS; HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT SHOW THE ACCURATE
 LOCATION FOR A CITY COMPLIANT RACK. COMPLIANT RACKS ARE
 REQUIRED TO HAVE 24 INCHES FROM THE OUTSIDE ELEMENT TO
 THE EDGE OF THE PAD TO PROVIDE ROOM TO PARK THE OUTER
 BICYCLE. COMPLIANT RACKS ARE REQUIRED TO BE CENTERED IN
 THE MIDDLE OF THE PAD FROM FRONT TO BACK SO THAT THE
 FRAME IS LOCKED TO THE RACK.
  
 11) A SPECIFIC PAD DETAIL WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE EXISTING RACKS USING THEIR SPECIFIC WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS. DUE TO ALL THE BICYCLES BEING LOCKED WITHIN
 THE RACK, THEY DO NOT NEED AN OUTSIDE SEPARATION FROM
 THE PAD. THE DEPTH OF THESE PADS IS REQUIRED TO BE SIX
 (6) FEET FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE ELEMENT SINCE
 BICYCLES ARE PARKED WITH THE WHEEL LOCKED TO THE RACK,
 NOT THE FRAME.
  
 12) THE PLANS NEED TO CLEARLY SHOW THE PADS AND THEIR
 DIMENSIONS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 OBSTRUCTIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW PAD BY THE
 STADIUM DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSION FOR EIGHT
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 GENERAL
  
 13) THERE ARE STRAY ARROW LABELS POINTING TO LIGHT
 POLES ALONG CECIL AVENUE WHICH NO LONGER EXIST.
  
 14) PLEASE REVIEW THE LAST FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENT
 REGARDING THE ACCESS PATH TO THE STADIUM SEATING.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-26-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-26-2017 Time 16:28 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 09-26-2017 Time 16:28 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-26 16:29:14CASE NO. PB 1069U - 2ND RESUBMITTAL
 KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM
 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE
 NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR
 THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE
 COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE RESUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5
 PM ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE NOVEMBER 21, 2017 PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 26, 2017), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) CONDITION: PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE "COVENANT TO
 MAINTAIN DRAINAGE" RECORDED IN ORB 2474 PG 687 HAS BEEN
 TERMINATED.
  
 SITE/MASTER PLANS
  
 2) ALL THE PLANS INCORRECTLY CALL OUT CECEILE AVENUE AS
 CECIL AVENUE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE NEW PARKING AREA ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE SITE IS REQUIRED PARKING. NO SURVEY, CIVIL
 PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS PROVIDED FOR THE NEW PARKING
 AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THE 117 PARKING
 SPACES WITHIN THIS PARKING FIELD ARE REQUIRED TO MEET
 THE MINIMUM 803 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES AFTER THE 30%
 DISCOUNT IS FACTORED IN FROM THE PROPOSED TEXT
 AMENDMENT. THE MEETING HELD PRIOR TO THE RESUBMITTAL
 DISCUSSED THAT THIS SUBMITTAL WOULD BE DONE AS IF THE
 PARKING TEXT AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED, SO SINCE THIS IS
 REQUIRED PARKING, IT NEEDS TO HAVE INFORMATION
 PRESENTED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
  
 4) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW PARKING
 AREA, BUS PARKING AND TURN-AROUND FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINES. PROVIDE THE WIDTH OF THE TURN-AROUND SPACE ON
 THE PLAN.
  
 5) SHOW THE POWERLINE POLES AND THE SPEED HUMPS ON THE
 MASTER PLAN.
  
 6) CONNECT THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE VILLAGE COMMONS
 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE INTERNAL SIDEWALK NETWORK
 INSTEAD OF HAVING IT DEAD-END INTO A PARKING LOT. ONE
 OF THE AERIALS SHOWS A WEAR PATTERN IN THE GRASS TO
 SUPPORT THE SIDEWALK CONTINUATION.
  
 7) STAFF RECOMMENDS REDESIGNING SOME OF THE SPEED HUMPS
 TO SPEED TABLES THAT CAN DOUBLE AS ADA COMPLIANT
 WALKWAYS.
  
 8) THE LIGHT POLES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 15 FOOT
 SETBACK FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES UNLESS THE CITY
 COMMISSION GRANTS A WAIVER TO PERMIT THEM TO BE CLOSER.
 NO SETBACK DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS;
 HOWEVER, THE TWO POLES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CECEILE
 AVENUE SCALE AT 9 AND 13 FEET. THE CITY COMMISSION
 WOULD NEED TO GRANT A WAIVER FOR THESE POLE LOCATIONS.
  
 9) CONDITION: THE PEDESTRIAN GATE WILL REQUIRE ACCESS
 FOR STUDENTS AND EMPLOYEES ALL THE TIME. ON GAME DAYS,
 A STAFF MEMBER IS REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE GATE TO
 PROVIDE ACCESS TO FANS.
  
 10) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR REVISING THE
 DETENTION WITHIN THE AREA THAT IS PART OF THE REQUESTED
 100 FOOT WAIVER. IN THE LAST MEETING BETWEEN THE
 APPLICANT AND STAFF, THIS AREA WAS NOT ONLY TO HAVE THE
 ONE ADDITIONAL OAK TREE PRESERVED, BUT ALSO SOME
 ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE INSTALLED TO CREATE A SOLID
 VEGETATIVE BARRIER TO THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY
 TO THE SOUTH. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THERE ARE
 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE SURVEY AND WHAT IS
 LABELED AS EXISTING TREES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MUST BE ACCURATELY
 SHOWN. A MORE SUBSTANTIAL BUFFER PLANTING IS REQUIRED
 FOR STAFF TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 11) CONDITION: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FUTURE INSTALLATION
 OF CONCESSION AND MERCHANDISE STANDS OR BUILDINGS WILL
 REQUIRE THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE ZONING DIVISION IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN
  
 12) A D-CURB IS REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE LANDSCAPE TO
 THE WEST OF THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 13) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE
 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN SHOW DIFFERING CONDITIONS
 FOR THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE
 GRASS PARKING SPACES. THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN
 DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS ARE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY A
 D-CURB. WHEEL STOPS ARE PERMITTED TO BE USED AT THE
 HEAD OF THE SPACES AS DISCUSSED.
  
 14) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TREE SURVEY, TO INCLUDE THE
 TREE MITIGATION PLAN, NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE AREAS
 SUBJECT TO THE NEW PARKING FIELD ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE CAMPUS.
  
 15) THE NEW BUS PARKING AND BUS TURN AROUND APPEARS TO
 REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF TREES. PLEASE SHOW THE TREE
 SURVEY FOR THIS AREA.
  
 16) THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED LIGHT
 POLES AND TREES IN THE NEW PARKING ISLANDS NORTH OF THE
 ATHLETIC BUILDING. THE POLES MUST BE LOCATED AWAY FROM
 THE TREES. THEY MAY BE ABLE TO MOVE TO THE GAPS IN THE
 EXISTING BUFFER.
  
 PARKING
  
 17) CONDITION AMENDMENT FROM RES. NO. 2-12: PARKING
 PROVISION REQUIREMENT TO BE BASED ON ENROLLMENT
 NUMBERS, NOT MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT. ANNUAL VERIFICATION IS
 REQUIRED FROM KEISER UNIVERSITY. SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IS
 STILL TO BE DRAFTED.
  
 18) CONDITION AMENDMENT FROM RES. NO. 2-12: STAFF HAS
 DONE SOME RESEARCH ON ADJUNCT FACULTY AND WILL AGREE TO
 SPECIFICALLY PERMIT ADJUNCT FACULTY TO BE COUNTED AT A
 1:2 RATIO. THIS NUMBER WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE
 ANNUAL VERIFICATIONS.
  
 19) REPEAT COMMENT: THE REQUIRED INTERIOR AND TERMINAL
 ISLAND LANDSCAPE (TREES) NEEDS TO BE SHOWN FOR EXISTING
 PARKING AREAS AND INSTALLED IF MISSING. NO LANDSCAPE
 PLAN WAS PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING INTERIOR OR TERMINAL
 ISLANDS.
  
 20) THANK YOU FOR RESTRIPING THE ADA SPACES TO INCLUDE
 ACCESS AISLES ADJACENT TO EACH PARKING SPACE. AFTER
 DISCUSSION WITH THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DIVISION, THERE ARE STILL SOME ITEMS THAT NEED BE
 CORRECTED TO BRING THE EXISTING ADA SPACES INTO
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 A. THE EXISTING NORTHERN PARKING FIELD NEEDS TO HAVE AN
 ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE SIDEWALK
 IN FRONT OF THE ADA PARKING SPACES, ACROSS THE DRIVE
 AISLE, DIRECTLY TO BUILDING NO. 2.
 B. THE RESTRIPED ADA PARKING SPACES BY BUILDING NOS. 8
 AND 9 ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE
 BUILDINGS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE CURRENTLY EXISTS A
 SIDEWALK THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN THAT
 ALLOWS TIE IN.
 C. THE TWO ADA PARKING SPACES TO THE EAST OF THE DORMS
 NEED AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING.
 D. THE TWO ADA PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SOFTBALL
 FIELD NEED TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE
 SOFTBALL AND BASEBALL SEATING AS WELL AS THE SIDEWALK
 ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DORMS.
  
 21) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHO PARKS IN THE 3 PARKING SPACES
 NEXT TO BUILDING NO. 1. THESE ARE THE CLOSEST SPACES TO
 THE BUILDING, SO IF THEY ARE USED FOR OPEN PARKING,
 THEY NEED TO INCLUDE AN ADA PARKING SPACE.
  
 22) THE NORTHERN ROW OF PARKING SPACES AT THE EXISTING
 MAIN PARKING AREA CURRENTLY CONTAINS 20 PARKING SPACES
 AS SHOWN ON THE AERIAL. THE PLANS SHOW THIS AS 19
 PARKING SPACES AT 9 FEET IN WIDTH. STAFF SUGGESTS
 KEEPING IT AT 20 PARKING SPACES (8.5 FEET IN WIDTH).
 THERE IS ONE FOOT LEFT OVER THAT CAN BE ABSORBED IN THE
 20 SPACES.
  
 23) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING AREA IS
 BEING PROPOSED WITH 26 FOOT WIDE DRIVE AISLES. THE CITY
 ONLY REQUIRES 24 FEET WIDTH. REDUCING PAVEMENT IS
 BENEFICIAL TO THE SITE.
  
 24) THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD IS CONSIDERED A
 SEPARATE PARKING AREA AND NEEDS TO MEET THE ADA PARKING
 REQUIREMENT FOR 117 SPACES, WHICH REQUIRES 5 ADA
 PARKING SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE THREE ADDITIONAL
 SPACES CAN BE NEW OR RELOCATED FROM THE EXISTING
 NORTHERN LOT (ONE EXTRA SPACE SHOWN) AND THE SPACES
 WEST OF BUILDING NOS. 8 AND 9 (TWO EXTRA SPACES SHOWN)
  
 25) THE PARKING BAY IMMEDIATELY NORTHEAST OF THE NEW
 ATHLETIC BUILDING IS MISLABELED AS ONLY HAVING 8 AND
 NOT 10 PARKING SPACES ON SHEET MP.5.
  
 26) THE LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE NEW NORTHERN
 PARKING AREA, THE BUS PARKING AND THE BUS TURN AROUND
 AREAS MUST BE SEPARATED FROM TYPE D CURBS. THIS IS NOT
 CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND IN SOME INSTANCES LOOKS
 AS IF THERE IS NO CURBING PROVIDED.
  
 27) CONDITION: ALL PARKING SPACES WITHIN ANY PARKING
 ROW WHICH HAS ANY RESTRIPING OR OTHER MODIFICATION MUST
 BE RESTRIPED TO COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARDS AT THE TIME
 OF RESTRIPING OR MODIFICATION. IN ANY EVENT, ALL
 PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE STRIPED TO MEET CITY
 STANDARDS BY DECEMBER 31, 2020.
  
 BICYCLE PARKING
  
 28) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE
 BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS AND RACKS IN CONFORMANCE WITH
 CITY STANDARDS AS WELL AS PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET
 SHOWING THE ACTUAL PAD AND RACK DIMENSIONS.
  
 A. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE EXISTING
 BICYCLE RACKS NOR ARE DETAILS PROVIDED OF THE SPECIFIC
 RACKS TO ALLOW STAFF TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE 60
 EXISTING SPACES.
 B. THE NEW BICYCLE DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET RP.1 ONLY
 SHOWS THE RACK AND DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PAD THAT THE
 RACK WILL BE INSTALLED ON. THE DETAIL MUST SHOW THE
 PAD, WITH THE CORRECT DIMENSIONS FOR AN 8 BICYCLE RACK
 (WIDTH 11.5 FEET X DEPTH 6 FEET). THE PLANS MUST ALSO
 INCLUDE THE PAD TO SCALE WITH THE ACCURATE DIMENSIONS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-25-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-25-2017 Time 12:08 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-25-2017 Time 12:08 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-25 12:09:15CASE NO. PB 1069U - 1ST RESUBMITTAL
 KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM
 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE
 NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR
 THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE
 COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 JULY 28, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING OR AUGUST 25,
 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE OCTOBER
 17, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY SEPTEMBER 25, 2017), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS
 WERE NOT ADDRESSED, YOU ARE BEING ASSESSED A
 RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY THAT THEY APPROVE OF THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
 AREA RECORDED IN ORB 4723 PG 1643.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) THAT
 THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE FDOT TRANSFER OF
 RESERVATION PARCEL NO. 801 DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 FUTURE NEED OF THE PARCEL.
  
 3) STAFF REVIEWED THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR THE GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND PUTTING AREA.
 THAT SURVEY SHOWS A "COVENANT TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE"
 RECORDED IN ORB 2474 PG 687 WHICH IS NOT REFLECTED ON
 THE CURRENTLY PROVIDED SURVEY. DOES THIS COVENANT STILL
 EXIST ON THE SITE? IF SO, PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONFORMS TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
 COVENANT.
  
 4) THE RELOCATED PARKING ADJACENT TO THE SOFTBALL FIELD
 IS PROPOSED TO ENCROACH INTO DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
 RECORDED IN ORB 6230 PG 1357 AND ORB 5876 PG 1296
  
 SITE PLAN
  
 5) SHEET MP -1 SHOWS THE OVERLAP OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED CONDITIONS. THIS MAY BE USED AS A COMPARATIVE
 PLAN, BUT A FINAL "CLEAN" MASTER PLAN IS REQUIRED WHICH
 SHOWS ONLY THE CONDITIONS APPROVED AS PART OF THE
 AMENDMENT.
  
 6) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THAT THERE
 ARE 62 DORM ROOMS ON CAMPUS. HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE
 HOUSED PER DORM ROOM?
  
 7) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SIDEWALK FROM MILITARY
 TRAIL TO THE STADIUM AND THEN TO THE INTERNAL SIDEWALK
 NETWORK. SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER, WHO
 HAS REVIEWED THE MOST RECENT PERMITS FOR KEISER
 UNIVERSITY, PERFORMED A CURSORY REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED
 SIDEWALK AND NOTED THAT THE SIDEWALK IS NOT PERMITTED
 TO BE GATED AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. THE CURRENT
 CONFIGURATION WITH THE VEHICULAR GATE ALSO BLOCKING THE
 SIDEWALK PROHIBITS THE SIDEWALK FROM FUNCTIONING AS
 INTENDED.
  
 8) REVISED COMMENT: THE PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE A NOTE
 REFERRING TO THE LIGHTS ALONG CECEILE AVENUE AS
 OPTIONAL AS STATED IN THE COMMENT RESPONSE.
  
 9) REVISED COMMENT: THE VALUES FOR THE PHOTOMETRIC
 PLANS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT TO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
 FOR THE WESTERN PARKING LOT LIGHTS AND ALONG THE SOUTH
 SIDE OF CECEILE AVENUE TO THE MILITARY TRAIL ROW TO
 VERIFY THAT THE LIGHT FIXTURES DO NOT CREATE GLARE (NO
 MORE THAN 0.5 FOOTCANDLES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS)
 ONTO THOSE PROPERTIES. PROVIDE THE VALUES ALONG CECEILE
 AVENUE AT A LARGER FONT. THEY ARE UNREADABLE ON THE
 SUBMITTED PLANS DUE TO THEIR TINY SIZE.
  
 10) THE LIGHTING LEVELS ARE SHOWN IN EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT
 CANDLES AT THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE
 STADIUM (ADJACENT TO THE RETENTION AREA). THESE
 LIGHTING LEVELS NEED TO BE REDUCED.
  
 11) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DOES NOT MEET CITY MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS. WHILE THE
 DUMPSTER DETAIL ON SHEET RP 1 IS THE CITY'S STANDARD
 DETAIL, THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHOWN ON SHEET SP 1 DOES
 NOT MATCH THE DETAIL (OR CITY MINIMUM SIZE).
  
 12) REVISED COMMENT: THE APPLICATION IS REQUESTING A
 WAIVER FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT, "ALL SITES SHALL
 CONTAIN AT LEAST A 100-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED, OPEN SPACE
 BUFFER ADJACENT TO ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS."
 WHILE THERE HAS BEEN ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE INSTALLED
 WITHIN THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE WAIVER, STAFF DOES NOT
 FEEL THAT THE MATERIAL PROVIDES ENOUGH OF A BUFFER TO
 MITIGATE THE WAIVER REQUEST. SINCE THE PROPERTY HAS A
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND AN INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE,
 STAFF HAS TO REVIEW THE PARCEL AS HAVING A POTENTIAL
 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WHICH REQUIRES A HIGHER
 STANDARD OF BUFFERING. IN ADDITION TO THE ADDITIONAL
 LANDSCAPE, PLEASE CONSIDER A SOLID FENCE IN THIS
 LOCATION INSTEAD OF THE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE. THE
 LACK OF ADEQUATE BUFFERING IS VERIFIED BY THE LIGHT
 LEVELS IN THIS AREA COVERED IN COMMENT NO. 10.
  
 13) REVISED COMMENT: NO JUSTIFICATION WAS SHOWN FOR THE
 FOLLOWING STANDARD THAT REQUIRES A WAIVER, "ALL OUTDOOR
 ACTIVITY AREAS: 100 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE." STAFF
 FEELS THAT ADDITIONAL BUFFERING IS REQUIRED TO MITIGATE
 THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 14) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF
 CONCESSION AND MERCHANDISE STANDS OR BUILDINGS WILL
 REQUIRE THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE ZONING DIVISION IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN
  
 15) REVISED COMMENT: STAFF IS CONFUSED BY THE
 INCONSISTENT LINE WORK AND THE LACK OF LABELS TO
 DIFFERENTIAL THE LANDSCAPED AREAS FROM PAVEMENT ON THE
 VARIOUS PLANS. THE PROVIDED PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW
 THAT THE LANDSCAPE AREAS PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR
 ENCROACHMENT BY A D-CURB.
  
 16) REPEAT COMMENT: NO TREES ARE SHOWN IN THE TERMINAL
 ISLANDS AT EITHER SIDE OF THE REVISED DRIVEWAY BETWEEN
 THE DORM PARKING LOT AND THE STADIUM DRIVEWAY.
  
 17) THE SOUTHERNMOST PARKING ROW OF THE EXISTING DORM
 PARKING HAS BEEN CHANGED AND HAS BECOME MORE
 NON-CONFORMING WITH THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE INTERIOR
 ISLANDS (INCREASE IN PARKING SPACES NOT INTERRUPTED BY
 AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND). PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS
 ISLAND, AND THE PARKING ADJACENT TO IT, WAS JUST REDONE
 AS PART OF THE GOLF FACILITIES PROJECT. ADDITIONALLY,
 THERE ARE CURRENTLY FOUR ADA SPACES AND THE PROPOSED
 PLAN DROPS THIS TO THREE ADA SPACES, WHICH NO LONGER
 APPEAR TO BE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE DORMS.
  
 18) THE TREE SURVEY, TO INCLUDE THE TREE MITIGATION
 PLAN, NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE AREAS SUBJECT TO THE NEW
 PARKING FIELD ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CAMPUS.
  
 PARKING
  
 19) REVISED COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO.
 2-12, THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE CAMPUS NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE RESUBMITTED
 INFORMATION AND AGREES WITH THE RE-CALCULATION OF THE
 PLACES OF ASSEMBLY TO EXCLUDE THE STUDENT AND FACULTY
 AREAS THAT ARE ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE STUDENT
 STATION AND FACULTY PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 A. WHILE STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE UNIVERSITY WISHES
 TO INCLUDE PARKING ONLY FOR THE STUDENTS THAT ARE
 CURRENTLY ENROLLED, STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT AN INCREASE
 IN ENROLLMENT FROM 580 (ESPECIALLY TO THE POTENTIAL
 1,800 VESTED STUDENTS) WOULD CREATE A DEFICIENCY IN THE
 AMOUNT OF ON-SITE PARKING. STAFF IS NOT SATISFIED THAT
 THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL.
 B. THE RESUBMITTAL MAKES A DISTINCTION BETWEEN FACULTY
 AND ADJUNCT FACULTY. THIS NEEDS TO BE FURTHER DEFINED
 AS THE REQUEST IS TO COUNT ADJUNCT FACULTY AT HALF THE
 PARKING RATE. THE PARKING TABLE IN THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DOES NOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN
 FULL TIME AND PART TIME FACULTY OR STAFF SO THIS CHANGE
 MAY REQUIRE YOU TO APPLY FOR A CHANGE TO THE SCHOOLS,
 COLLEGES, AND UNIVERSITIES: PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARKING
 CALCULATION IN THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 20) REVISED COMMENT: THE NEW STADIUM REQUIRES 133
 PARKING SPACES (534 SEATS), YET ONLY 87 NEW PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE STADIUM. WHERE ARE THE
 REMAINING 46 PARKING SPACES THAT ARE REFERENCED IN THE
 RESPONSE?
  
 21) STAFF CONFUSED WITH WHERE THE GRASS PARKING
 MENTIONED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS LOCATED.
 NONE OF THE PLANS ARE LABELED AS SUCH.
  
 22) WAIVER REQUIRED: "ALL PARKING, LOADING, AND
 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AREAS: 100 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY
 LINE." NOTE: WHILE STAFF RECOGNIZES THE NEED TO PROVIDE
 PARKING TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW ATHLETIC BUILDING,
 STAFF FEELS THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A MORE SUBSTANTIAL
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO MITIGATE THE WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 23) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET RP 1
 DOES NOT MEET THE CITY STANDARD. IT SHALL CLEARLY SHOW
 THE DIMENSION BETWEEN THE DOUBLE STRIPES. STAFF
 RECOMMENDS USING THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL AS THE BASE.
  
 24) THE PARKING PLAN SHOWS NEW PARKING AREAS AS WELL AS
 THE EXISTING PARKING LOTS.
  
 A. PROVIDE THIS PLAN AT A LARGER SCALE WHICH INCLUDES
 DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING AISLES AND SPACES SO THAT
 STAFF CAN VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE OF BOTH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED PARKING.
 B. A QUICK VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE SUBMITTAL INDICATES
 THAT MANY OF THE EXISTING ADA PARKING SPACES ARE
 NON-COMPLIANT. THESE WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE
 REVISED PARKING PLAN.
 C. THE NEW PARKING FIELDS REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF AN
 EXISTING SURVEY AND THE PROPOSED CIVIL, LANDSCAPE AND
 SITE PLAN.
 D. THE REQUIRED INTERIOR AND TERMINAL ISLAND LANDSCAPE
 NEEDS TO BE SHOWN FOR EXISTING PARKING AREAS AND
 INSTALLED IF MISSING.
 E. THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD REQUIRES ADA PARKING
 SPACES THAT ARE LOCATED ON THE CLOSEST ROUTE TO
 BUILDING NO. 4.
 F. ADDING UP THE VALUES FOR THE VARIOUS PARKING FIELDS
 RESULTS IN A LARGER NUMBER THAN IS LISTED AS "TOTAL
 PARKING PROVIDED" ON THE PARKING TABLE.
 G. SHEET PP.1 SHOWS 13 PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE
 SOFTBALL FIELD; HOWEVER, THESE SPACES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 ANY OTHER PLANS (CIVIL, LANDSCAPE, MASTER PLAN).
 COMPARING GOOGLE STREET VIEW AND THE SURVEY TO SHEET
 PP.1 INDICATES THAT THESE EXISTING PARKING SPACES ARE
 BEING RELOCATED (AND TREES BEING REMOVED THAT ARE NOT
 SHOWN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN), THEREFORE, THE
 SPACES MUST FULLY COMPLY WITH CURRENT CODE AS TO
 MAXIMUM NUMBER IN A ROW (10) BEFORE AN INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND IS REQUIRED AND THE PROVISION OF
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 H. THE PARKING PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW THE
 FOOTPRINT OF THE EXISTING MAINTENANCE BUILDING ADJACENT
 TO THE NEW PARKING SPACES THAT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE SITE.
  
 25) THE AERIALS OF THE SITE SHOW THAT THE PARKING
 STRIPING FOR THE ENTIRE CAMPUS DOES NOT CONFORM TO CITY
 STANDARDS. AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, THE
 PARKING MUST BE BROUGHT INTO CODE CONFORMANCE.
  
 26) BICYCLE PARKING
  
 A. THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT THE WAVE TYPE BICYCLE RACK.
 PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED
 CITY MODELS. NOTE: THE CITY WILL ACCEPT ALTERNATIVE
 BICYCLE PARKING RACKS THAT ARE COMPLIMENTARY TO THE
 BUILDING USE IF THEY ARE DESIGNED TO ALLOW BICYCLES TO
 BE CORRECTLY SECURED TO THEM. IN THIS CASE, YOU COULD
 EXPLORE INSTALLING FOOTBALL SHAPED RACKS.
 B. THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE BICYCLE PAD
 DIMENSIONS AND RACKS IN CONFORMANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS
 AS WELL AS PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET SHOWING THE ACTUAL
 PAD AND RACK DIMENSIONS.
  
 27) REVISED COMMENT: THE NEW ATHLETIC BUILDING REQUIRES
 ONE 10 FOOT BY 25 FOOT LOADING SPACE. THE DIMENSIONS
 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, THE TEXT ON
 THE PLAN CALLS OUT A MINIMUM 10 FOOT BY 20 FOOT LOADING
 SPACE WHICH IS NOT THE CORRECT SIZE.
  
 28) REVISED COMMENT: PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS DRAWINGS TO
 VERIFY THE BUSSES CAN ACCESS THE DROP OFF AREA AND THE
 TURN AROUND BY THE BUSS PARKING SPACES. SHOW THE ROUTE
 THE BUSSES WILL USE AND PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS DRAWINGS
 TO VERIFY THEY CAN MAKE ANY TIGHT RADIUS TURNS.
  
 TRAFFIC
  
 29) REPEAT COMMENT: WHILE THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT
 INDICATES THAT THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR
 VEHICLE TRIPS BASED ON THE NEW STADIUM, YOU ARE
 REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL
 LETTER WITH THE APPLICATION. PALM BEACH COUNTY MAKES
 THE DETERMINATION IF THE STADIUM IS INCLUDED IN THE
 APPROVAL OF THE 1,800 STUDENT CAMPUS.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 05-10-2017 Time 12:29 Rev Time 6.00
Received By eschneid Date 05-10-2017 Time 12:29 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-10 12:29:36CASE NO. PB 1069U
 KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM
 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE
 NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR
 THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE
 COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 MAY 26, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 JULY 18, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JULY 10, 2017),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) THE SURVEY NEEDS TO SHOW THE PROTRUDING FINGER OF
 PROPERTY ALL THE WAY TO MILITARY TRAIL, INCLUDING ANY
 EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS.
  
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE ROAD
 EASEMENT TO DALE ALEXANDER. CAN THIS BE ABANDONED?
  
 3) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 THAT THEY APPROVE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
 THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA RECORDED IN ORB
 4723 PG 1643.
  
 4) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) THAT THE
 IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE FDOT TRANSFER OF
 RESERVATION PARCEL NO. 801 DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 FUTURE NEED OF THE PARCEL.
  
 5) PROVIDE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, TO INCLUDE
 PAVING AND DRAINAGE AND WATER AND SEWER PLANS.
  
 SITE PLAN
  
 6) THE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET PSP.1 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A
 LARGER SCALE THAN 1 INCH = 80 FEET.
  
 7) IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 2-12, THE REQUIRED
 PARKING FOR THE CAMPUS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. THE
 SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. WHILE THE
 PARKING TABLE LISTS THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING
 SPACES, IT FAILS TO LIST THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING
 SPACES, TO INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 ADA PARKING SPACES. ADDITIONALLY, THE MASTER PLAN DOES
 NOT SHOW THE EXISTING PARKING OR THE ADDITIONAL PARKING
 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITION OF RESOLUTION
 NO. 2-12.
  
 8) THE DATA TABLES MUST BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE NUMBER
 OF DORMS ON CAMPUS AND HOW MANY SEATS ARE IN THE
 STADIUM.
  
 9) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE RECONFIGURED DRIVEWAY
 BETWEEN THE DORM PARKING LOT AND THE STADIUM DRIVEWAY.
  
 10) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS THAT THERE IS
 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION WHICH IS SEPARATED FROM THE
 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM. THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON
 THE SITE PLAN. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK
 NETWORK THAT DOES NOT FORCE THE USER TO CUT DIAGONALLY
 ACROSS THE DRIVE AISLE (AS IT CURRENTLY DOES TO ACCESS
 THE GOLF AREA. ADDITIONALLY A SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED TO
 CONNECT TO THE MILITARY TRAIL BUS ROUTE(S).
  
 11) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED FIELD LIGHTS AND
 SCOREBOARD, TO INCLUDE THE HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 CSPD DISTRICT PERMITS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 80 FEET.
 NOTE: THE LIGHT POLES MAY BE ATTRACTIVE TO CELLULAR
 COMPANIES AS ANTENNA SITES.
  
 12) THE PLANS CALL OUT FIELD LIGHTS. THIS IMPLIES THAT
 THERE WILL BE EVENING AND NIGHT GAMES. SHOW HOW THERE
 WILL BE ILLUMINATION OF THE PARKING AREAS AND CECEILE
 AVENUE FOR THE SAFETY OF FANS LEAVING THE GAME.
  
 13) PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF
 THE SITE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND THE
 MILITARY TRAIL ROW TO VERIFY THAT THE LIGHT FIXTURES DO
 NOT CREATE GLARE (NO MORE THAN 0.5 FOOTCANDLES IN
 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) ONTO THOSE PROPERTIES.
  
 14) THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT MEET CITY
 MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 15) THE APPLICATION IS REQUESTING A WAIVER FROM THE
 REQUIREMENT THAT, "ALL SITES SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST A
 100-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED, OPEN SPACE BUFFER ADJACENT TO
 ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS." THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT CLAIMS THAT THE REDUCED AREA INCLUDES
 LANDSCAPING AND AN EXISTING FENCE TO SCREEN, BUFFER AND
 ABSORB SOUNDS AND LIGHT FROM THE STADIUM. THE EXISTING
 SIX FOOT HIGH FENCE IS CHAIN LINK, WHICH WILL PROVIDE
 NO SOUND OR LIGHT BUFFERING. THE LANDSCAPE INCLUDES A
 35 FOOT WIDE DRY DETENTION AREA WITH THE PHYSICAL
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONSISTING OF A FEW RECENTLY PLANTED
 OAK TREES AND SABLE PALM GROUPINGS. THIS IS
 INSUFFICIENT LANDSCAPE TO MITIGATE THE BUFFER
 REDUCTION.
  
 16) NO JUSTIFICATION WAS SHOWN FOR THE FOLLOWING
 STANDARD THAT REQUIRES A WAIVER, "ALL OUTDOOR ACTIVITY
 AREAS: 100 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE."
  
 17) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE BLEACHERS, TO INCLUDE
 HEIGHT AND ELEVATIONS.
  
 18) WHERE ARE THE CONCESSION AND MERCHANDISE STANDS?
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN
  
 19) THE TREE SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED IN PAPER FORM. THE
 REVIEW OF THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE TREE SURVEY
 DOES NOT SHOW THE ENTIRE LIMITS OF WORK.
  
 20) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE
 THAT, "ALL SITES SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST A 100-FOOT WIDE
 LANDSCAPED, OPEN SPACE BUFFER ADJACENT TO ALL
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS." THE ONE ROW OF 49 BUFFER
 TREES, SPACED 30 FEET APART, DO NOT MEET THE STANDARD
 OF A 100 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO SERVE AS
 SCREENING.
  
 21) THE PROPERTY LINES ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST
 SIDES OF THE FINGER PROTRUDING TO MILITARY TRAIL (AREA
 CONTAINING CECEILE AVENUE) ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH
 THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE
 REGULATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS NO LANDSCAPE IN
 THESE AREAS. THE DRY RETENTION AREA AND SOD DO NOT MEET
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS.
  
 22) THE PROVIDED PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT
 BY A D-CURB.
  
 23) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FAILS TO SHOW THE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE AROUND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 24) NO TREES ARE SHOWN IN THE TERMINAL ISLANDS AT
 EITHER SIDE OF THE REVISED DRIVEWAY BETWEEN THE DORM
 PARKING LOT AND THE STADIUM DRIVEWAY.
  
 25) THE GRASS PARKING IS REQUIRED TO HAVE INTERIOR AND
 TERMINAL TREES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S PARKING
 STANDARDS.
  
 PARKING
  
 26) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THE REQUEST
 IS TO RECALCULATE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THE PARKING
 TABLE LOCATED IN ARTICLE XV OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DICTATES THE PARKING REQUIRED
 FOR A USE. BASED ON THE MAXIMUM 1,800 STUDENT COUNT,
 THE FACULTY COUNT AND THE NUMBER OF ASSEMBLY SEATS
 PROVIDED TO THE CITY AS PART OF THE LAST MAJOR
 AMENDMENT, THE REQUIRED PARKING IS 2,615 PARKING
 SPACES. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AS
 PART OF THE PARKING STUDY; HOWEVER, PARKING
 REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT BASED ON OBSERVATION OF CURRENT
 CONDITIONS OR THE ITE PARKING MANUAL, BUT THE CITY'S
 PARKING REQUIREMENTS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THE
 PARKING REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, YOU ARE WELCOME TO APPLY FOR A
 CODE TEXT AMENDMENT, WHICH IF APPROVED, WOULD APPLY TO
 ALL SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, AND UNIVERSITIES: PUBLIC/PRIVATE
 WITHIN THE CITY. THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS DO NOT PERMIT THE REDUCTION OF PARKING AT
 THIS LOCATION; THEREFORE, THE CITY CANNOT ADOPT A
 PARKING STUDY THAT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ARGUMENTS YOU MAKE IN
 FAVOR OF THE PARKING RECALCULATION ARE ONES THAT YOU
 MAY INCLUDE WITH A CODE TEXT AMENDMENT.
  
 27) THE STADIUM REQUIRES 305 PARKING SPACES, YET ONLY
 220 NEW PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE STADIUM.
  
 28) THE PROPOSED GRASS PARKING REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION
 APPROVAL AS A WAIVER TO THE CSPD. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE WAIVER STANDARDS.
  
 29) THE NEWLY PROPOSED PARKING ALONG CECEILE AVENUE
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING STADIUM ADDITIONAL
 STANDARD, "ALL PARKING, LOADING, AND VEHICULAR
 CIRCULATION AREAS: 100 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE."
  
 30) THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET PSP.1 DOES NOT MEET THE
 CITY STANDARD.
  
 31) NO PARKING DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE PARALLEL
 PARKING SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE END OF EACH ROW WITH
 A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FOR EASE IN PARKING.
  
 32) THE EASTERN TEN PARALLEL SPACES DO NOT FUNCTION AS
 THERE IS NO TURN AROUND AT THE DEAD END FOR ANYONE
 WISHING TO USE THE PARKING SPACES.
  
 33) NO ADA PARKING SPACES WERE PROVIDED FOR THE
 STADIUM.
  
 34) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED.
  
 35) THE NEW ATHLETIC BUILDING REQUIRES ONE 10 FOOT BY
 25 FOOT LOADING SPACE.
  
 36) WHERE WILL THE TEAM BUSSES UNLOAD AND PARK? PROVIDE
 TURNING RADIUS DRAWINGS TO SHOW HOW THE BUSSES WILL
 NEGOTIATE ENTERING AND THEN LEAVING THE SITE.
  
 TRAFFIC
  
 37) WHILE THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THERE
 WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS BASED ON
 THE NEW STADIUM, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PALM
 BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER WITH THE
 APPLICATION. PALM BEACH COUNTY MAKES THE DETERMINATION
 IF THE STADIUM IS INCLUDED IN THE APPROVAL OF THE 1,800
 STUDENT CAMPUS.
  
 38) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROVIDES THAT THE SITE
 WILL BE DIRECTLY ACCESSED FROM MILITARY TRAIL VIA
 CECEILE AVENUE. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE
 ACCESS POINT AND DEMONSTRATE HOW THIS IS A SAFE ACCESS
 POINT FOR GAME DAY TRAFFIC, VERIFIED BY PALM BEACH
 COUNTY/FDOT, TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARD THAT,
 "ADEQUATE TRAFFIC FACILITIES, SUCH AS INTERSECTION
 IMPROVEMENTS, TURN LANES, ACCELERATION LANES,
 SIGNALIZATION, ETC., SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MINIMIZE THE
 IMPACTS OF THE FACILITY ON ADJACENT PUBLIC
 THOROUGHFARES." STAFF NOTES THAT THE PROPOSED
 WESTERNMOST GRASS PARKING SPACES WILL CREATE A BACKUP
 FOR ANYONE ENTERING THE SITE FROM MILITARY TRAIL.
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved