Plan Review Details - Project Z17030030
Plan Review Stops For Project Z17030030
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 04-11-2017 Time 19:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 04-11-2017 Time 19:11 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-11 19:50:39DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEET SP-2,
 SITE PLAN, SHOWS 216 PARKING SPACES IN PARKING
 STRUCTURE 1, BUT SHOWS ONLY 6 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES. 7 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
 SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FLOOR PLAN SHOWS NO INTERIOR
 CONNECTION BETWEEN THE LOUNGE AREA AND THE
 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES. AS A RESULT THE ADMINISTRATIVE
 OFFICES HAVE ONLY ONE EXIT DOOR. THERE ARE NO
 DIMENSIONS OR SCALE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT THIS STAGE
 BUT, DEPENDING ON THE TRAVEL DISTANCES AND THE NUMBER
 OF OCCUPANTS, ANOTHER EXIT DOOR MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. THE
 EQUIVALENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY
 DWELLINGS, AND TOWNHOUSES ARE IN SECTION R302 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (RESIDENTIAL).
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING STRUCTURES
 ARE ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES AND DO NOT HAVE WALL
 OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE
 DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, THEY WILL BE
 CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 9. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-01-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 06-01-2017 Time 13:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 06-01-2017 Time 13:25 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-01 13:26:49CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 DATE: 06/01/2017
  
 Z17030030: 2300 PRESIDENTIAL WAY - BANYAN CAY PD MAJOR
 (PB CASE NO. 1624P)
  
 2ND/RE-SUBMITTAL REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 STATUS: PASSED WITH CONDITION (AT THE SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL LEVEL)
  
 AFTER REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS AND RESPONSE (LETTER
 DATED MAY 26, 2017) TO THE PPRC COMMENTS, WE FIND SOME
 COMMENTS ARE SATISFIED AT THIS LEVEL AS THEY CAN BE
 ADDRESSED AT THE 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION'
 PHASE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION
 INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL. BUT THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE STILL EXPECTED
 TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 2. FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS NEED TO SHOW CORRECT
 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND CITY
 APPROVED DETAILS. PLEASE CONTACT PETER BIENIEK, PUBLIC
 WORKS DIRECTOR, TO OBTAIN A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM HIM
 FOR PROPOSED SANITATION PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT
 WHICH IS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL.
  
 5. EXHIBIT OF THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS WILL NEED TO BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR,
 PETER BIENIEK PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 04-11-2017 Time 14:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 04-11-2017 Time 14:07 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-11 14:16:13CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 DATE: 04/11/2017;
  
 STATUS: PASSED FOR THIS REVIEW LEVEL;
  
 Z17030030: 2300 PRESIDENTIAL WAY - BANYAN CAY PD MAJOR
 (PB CASE NO. 1624P)
  
 THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESS UPON SUBMISSION OF DETAILED
 ENGINEERING PLANS. THE FOLLOWING ARE GENERAL COMMENTS
 AT THIS LEVEL:
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. FOR SANITATION/GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTACT THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS NEED
 TO SHOW PROPOSED SANITATION COLLECTION PLANS AND
 DETAILS; AND WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM PETER BIENIEK,
 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL (E.G. THE GATE WIDTH
 MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FEET) REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
 ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION
 94-444(B) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. CITY STANDARD
 DETAIL GC-8 MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEE
 RING-STANDARDS/
  
 3. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH
 AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR FOR 150-ROOM
 HOTEL, GOLF CLUBHOUSE AND OTHER FACILITIES. ALSO SUBMIT
 ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENTS;
  
 4. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN;
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS AND
 MANEUVER WITHIN THE PROPOSED HOTEL AND OTHER MULTI-USE
 FACILITIES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 6. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
 WITHIN 150 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN
 AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL
 SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS,
 LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE
 PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR
 POTABLE WATER LINES.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-06-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-06-2017 Time 09:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-06 09:27:13THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED CHANGES.
  
  
 1) FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS APPEARS TO BE ADDRESSED AS
 DISCUSSED WITH THE DESIGN TEAM AND ACCEPTABLE AT THIS
 TIME; HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
  
 2) THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS
 AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-30-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-30-2017 Time 16:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-30-2017 Time 16:12 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-30 16:12:44FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: BANYAN CAY PD AMENDMENT Z17030030
 AUGUST 30, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THERE ARE OVERLAPS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 SHEET LP-2 AND L-5 THAT DO NOT DEPICT THE SAME
 MATERIAL. PLEASE CORRECT TO PROPOSE ONLY ONE LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN FOR EACH AREA.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE RECHECK AND CORRECT THE DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE LEVELS FOR THE PLANT SPECIES LISTED ON SHEET
 L-8 OF 10 WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA EDITION OF WATERWISE.
 EXAMPLE- CARYOTA MITIS IS MODERATE NOT HIGH DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE.
 THERE ARE SEVERAL PLANTS WITH INCORRECT DROUGHT LEVELS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE SITE DESIGN TABULAR
 DATA CHART FROM SHEET L-8 OF 10 AS IT IS NOT
 APPLICABLE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AT 1:20
 SCALE FOR THE TENNIS AND CLUBHOUSE SHOWN ON SHEET LP-2
 OF 4.
 PLANS SUBMITTED AT 1:10 SCALE ARE TOO LARGE. PLEASE
 SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AT 1:20 SCALE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT THE TURNAROUND
 CIRCLE IN POD C-2 DOES NOT MEET THE APPROVED PLAN OR
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES (PAGE 31). PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW
 A CONTINUOUS LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED TREES IN THE TWO
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PARKING AREA ADJACENT TO THE
 TENNIS COURTS (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE ADDED
 PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE ROAD LEADING TO THE OLD
 CLUBHOUSE LOCATION (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR THE CART PARKING SPACES
 ADJACENT TO THE CLUBHOUSE (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET
 L-1 OF 2 FOR THE PRACTICE TEE TO BE COMPLETE WITH
 DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS FOR ALL PLANTS.
 PLAN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN SUBMITTAL.
  
 10. ONGOING. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT MUST BE AMENDED
 TO INCLUDE THE AREAS ADDED TO THE PD, AND PROVIDE TREE
 DISPOSITION AND MITIGATION AS NECESSARY.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/9/17:
 11. SATISFIED. OVERALL, THE SITE PLANS AND LANDSCAPE
 PLANS NEED TO BE DIVIDED INTO SECTIONS SO THAT EACH POD
 AND ALL COMMON AREAS (ROADS) ARE CONSOLIDATED AND CODE
 REQUIREMENT CHARTS ARE ACCURATE. LANDSCAPE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE EVALUATED WHEN PLANS MIX
 INFORMATION BETWEEN PODS AND COMMON AREAS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/30/17:
  
 12. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL IS RECOMMENDED TO REQUIRE
 DESIGN OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS DURING SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL AND INSTALLATION OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ALONG THE ENTRANCE ROAD AND PRESIDENTIAL WAY AS
 PART OF THE TOWER PHASE.
  
 13. BUFFER TREES AT MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING ARE
 REQUIRED FOR ALL PERIMETER BUFFERS BY THE CODE AND
 DESIGN GUIDELINES. THE BUFFER ADJACENT TO CONGRESS
 AVENUE SOUTH OF THE MAIN ENTRY ROAD DOES NOT MEET THE
 SPACING REQUIREMENTS, AND THE SPECIES DO NOT MEET THE
 TREE REQUIREMENTS TO ACHIEVE BUFFERING AS INTENDED.
 PLEASE REVISE TO ACHIEVE THE SAME TREE CANOPY AS THE
 NORTHERN PORTION OF THE BUFFER ALREADY COMPLETED.
  
 14. PLEASE CORRECT THE NOTE ON VILLA SHEETS TO
 REFERENCE-27 RATHER THAN L-20 FOR THE PLANT LIST.
  
 15. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW PALMS DO NOT
 EXCEED THE 35 PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED TREES FOR THE
 HOTEL, PARKING STRUCTURE AND POOL LANDSCAPE SHEETS.
  
 16. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CHART
 FOR THE HOTEL, PARKING STRUCTURE AND POOL LANDSCAPE
 SHEETS.
  
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AREA
 ADJACENT TO THE ENVOY WHERE THE LARGE FICUS TREE IS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED, AND INCLUDE ANY ADDITIONAL
 LANDSCAPING PROPOSED TO ENHANCE THE AREA.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-09-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-09-2017 Time 10:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-30-2017 Time 10:55 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-09 10:56:53FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: BANYAN CAY PD AMENDMENT Z17030030
 JUNE 9, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THERE ARE OVERLAPS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 SHEET LP-2 AND L-5 THAT DO NOT DEPICT THE SAME
 MATERIAL. PLEASE CORRECT TO PROPOSE ONLY ONE LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN FOR EACH AREA.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE RECHECK AND CORRECT THE
 DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS FOR THE PLANT SPECIES LISTED
 ON SHEET L-8 OF 10 WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA EDITION OF
 WATERWISE. EXAMPLE- CARYOTA MITIS IS MODERATE NOT HIGH
 DROUGHT TOLERANCE.
 THERE ARE SEVERAL PLANTS WITH INCORRECT DROUGHT LEVELS.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE SITE DESIGN TABULAR
 DATA CHART FROM SHEET L-8 OF 10 AS IT IS NOT
 APPLICABLE.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AT 1:20
 SCALE FOR THE TENNIS AND CLUBHOUSE SHOWN ON SHEET LP-2
 OF 4.
 PLANS SUBMITTED AT 1:10 SCALE ARE TOO LARGE. PLEASE
 SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AT 1:20 SCALE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT THE TURNAROUND
 CIRCLE IN POD C-2 DOES NOT MEET THE APPROVED PLAN OR
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES (PAGE 31). PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW
 A CONTINUOUS LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED TREES IN THE TWO
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PARKING AREA ADJACENT TO THE
 TENNIS COURTS (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE ADDED
 PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE ROAD LEADING TO THE OLD
 CLUBHOUSE LOCATION (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR THE CART PARKING SPACES
 ADJACENT TO THE CLUBHOUSE (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANT SCHEDULE ON
 SHEET L-1 OF 2 FOR THE PRACTICE TEE TO BE COMPLETE WITH
 DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS FOR ALL PLANTS.
 PLAN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN SUBMITTAL.
  
 10. ONGOING. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT MUST BE AMENDED
 TO INCLUDE THE AREAS ADDED TO THE PD, AND PROVIDE TREE
 DISPOSITION AND MITIGATION AS NECESSARY.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/9/17:
 11. OVERALL, THE SITE PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO
 BE DIVIDED INTO SECTIONS SO THAT EACH POD AND ALL
 COMMON AREAS (ROADS) ARE CONSOLIDATED AND CODE
 REQUIREMENT CHARTS ARE ACCURATE. LANDSCAPE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE EVALUATED WHEN PLANS MIX
 INFORMATION BETWEEN PODS AND COMMON AREAS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-11-2017 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-11-2017 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-11 14:33:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: BANYAN CAY PD AMENDMENT Z17030030
 APRIL 11, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THERE ARE OVERLAPS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHEET LP-2
 AND L-5 THAT DO NOT DEPICT THE SAME MATERIAL. PLEASE
 CORRECT TO PROPOSE ONLY ONE LANDSCAPE DESIGN FOR EACH
 AREA.
  
 2. PLEASE RECHECK AND CORRECT THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVELS FOR THE PLANT SPECIES LISTED ON SHEET L-8 OF 10
 WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA EDITION OF WATERWISE. EXAMPLE-
 CARYOTA MITIS IS MODERATE NOT HIGH DROUGHT TOLERANCE.
  
 3. PLEASE REMOVE THE SITE DESIGN TABULAR DATA CHART
 FROM SHEET L-8 OF 10 AS IT IS NOT APPLICABLE.
  
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLANS AT 1:20 SCALE FOR THE
 TENNIS AND CLUBHOUSE SHOWN ON SHEET LP-2 OF 4.
  
 5. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT THE TURNAROUND CIRCLE IN POD
 C-2 DOES NOT MEET THE APPROVED PLAN OR THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES (PAGE 31). PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW A
 CONTINUOUS LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED TREES IN THE TWO LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS IN THE PARKING AREA ADJACENT TO THE TENNIS
 COURTS (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 7. PLEASE SHOW THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE ADDED PARCEL
 ADJACENT TO THE ROAD LEADING TO THE OLD CLUBHOUSE
 LOCATION (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR THE CART PARKING SPACES ADJACENT
 TO THE CLUBHOUSE (SHEET LP-2 OF 4).
  
 9. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET L-1 OF 2
 FOR THE PRACTICE TEE TO BE COMPLETE WITH DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE LEVELS FOR ALL PLANTS.
 10. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT MUST BE AMENDED TO
 INCLUDE THE AREAS ADDED TO THE PD, AND PROVIDE TREE
 DISPOSITION AND MITIGATION AS NECESSARY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-12-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-12-2017 Time 10:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-12-2017 Time 10:59 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-12 10:57:11THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT FOR STRUCTURES IN A
 SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA IS ONE FOOT ABOVE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. PLACEMENT OF PAVERS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR
 WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS USED BY CWPB PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT WILL REQUIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE
 CITY. THE TYPICAL SECTIONS SHOWN ON ENGINEERING PLAN 02
 OF 9 SHOWS PAVERBRICK SIDEWALK ABOVE THE WATER MAIN.
  
 4. DRAINAGE FROM SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE TO BE
 ACCOUNTED FOR WHEN THE EXISTING ONSITE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM(S) ARE MODIFIED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION FOR
 THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-11-2017 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 04-11-2017 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-30 15:43:231. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PLAT AND
 ENGINEERING SITE/CIVIL REVIEW.
 2. PLEASE CONTACT PETER BIENIEK, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
 @ 494-1099 FOR REVIEW OF GARBAGE COLLECTION.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-14-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-14-2017 Time 14:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-14-2017 Time 14:10 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-14 14:14:51PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 06.14.2017
 PROJECT NO.: Z17030017, Z17030018, Z17030030 AND
 Z17030031
 CASE NO.: PB CASE NOS. 1624N, O, P AND Q
 ADDRESS: 3100-3200 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: JONI BRINKMAN
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. EXTRA LINE WORK IS SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN THAT
 ISN?T NECESSARY AND CONFUSING (EASEMENTS, UTILITY
 LINES, ETC.).
  
 2. THROUGHOUT THE SITE PLAN THERE IS LINE WORK THAT IS
 INCONSISTENT?PODS ARE DRAWN USING DIFFERENT LINE
 STYLES, THICKNESSES, ETC.
  
 3. WOULD LIKE TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE
 PARKING/MANEUVERING OF VEHICLES AT VILLAS #6 AND #9.
  
 4. RESPONSE TO ZONING COMMENT #6 IS INCOMPLETE AND
 CONFUSING.
  
 5. RESPONSE TO ZONING COMMENT #15 IS INCORRECT. THE
 CUL-DE-SAC REFERENCED IN THE COMMENT WAS THAT WHICH
 SERVES AS ACCESS TO PARKING FOR 2400 PRESIDENTIAL WAY
  
 6. LETTER FROM ADJACENT CONDOMINIUM REGARDING DRIVING
 RANGE BUFFER DOES NOT REFERENCE ANY SPECIFIC SET OF
 PLANS, SO IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT BUFFER THEY HAVE
 AGREED TO OR ACCEPTED.
  
 7. ON MASTER PLAN, THE SIZE OF THE SPA DIFFERS BETWEEN
 WHAT IS LABELED UNDER PBA #4 AND POD B.
  
 8. WHO IS THE ADMIN SPACE BEING CONSIDERED FOR AND WHY
 IS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOCATED FOR THE ADMIN SPACE NOT
 BEING FACTORED INTO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS?
  
 9. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS SHOULD ACCOUNT FOR PHASE II
 OF THE HOTEL. A SEPARATE CALCULATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
 FOR EACH PHASE TO CORRESPOND WITH EACH PHASE OF THE
 PARKING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 10. STAFF HAS SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS WITH REGARD TO THE
 FOLLOWING AND WOULD LIKE TO MEET TO DISCUSS IN MORE
 DETAIL:
  
  A. PROPOSED LOCATION AND SCREENING FOR THE HOTEL
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.
  
  B. DESIGN OF THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
  C. INCREASE IN HEIGHT OF THE HOTEL.
  
  D. OPENING INTO THE HOTEL SERVICE AREA FROM THE
 CLUBHOUSE ENTRANCE DRIVE.
  
  E. DESIGN OF THE VILLAS.
  
 11. ALL ELEVATIONS SHALL PROVIDE THE HEIGHTS OF THE
 BUILDINGS AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 12. ENLARGED DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR
 THAT AREA AT THE PRESIDENTIAL WAY ENTRANCE DRIVE.
  
 13. ON THE PLAT, DOESN?T THE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR 2400
 PRESIDENTIAL WAY NEED TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE THE
 NEW DESIGN / CUL-DE-SAC?
  
 14. LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE A NOTE INDICATING THAT THE
 HEDGE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE TENNIS COURTS IS TO BE A
 COCOPLUM HEDGE MAINTAINED AT 6 FEET, BUT PODOCARPUS IS
 SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST.
  
 15. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE
 PRESIDENTIAL WAY ACCESS DRIVE WAS MOVED TO THE INSIDE
 OF THE HEDGE.
  
 16. LAWN AREA LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE PROVIDED. AS
 PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR
 CONSTRUCTION TO OCCUR IN EVERY PHASE OF THE PROJECT,
 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE MULTIFAMILY POD, LANDSCAPE
 PLANS, ETC. SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY ELEMENT OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 17. WHAT IS THE CROSS HATCHING SHOWN ACROSS ALL OF
 SHEET L1 OF THE HOTEL LANDSCAPE PLAN?
  
 18. WHY IS THE POOL AREA LANDSCAPING NOT INCLUDED IN
 THIS SUBMITTAL? AND IF THAT?S THE CASE, WHY IS
 LANDSCAPING STILL SHOWN ON THE PLANS?
  
 19. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION THAT NEED TO OCCUR?
  
  A. PIECEMEAL LANDSCAPE PLANS (SEE COMMENT ABOVE)
  
  B. EXCEPTION TO LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT PROPOSED
 TO BE ADDED TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ? NEED
 CLARIFICATION.
  
  C. TIMING OF AERATORS
  
  D. ADDITION OF PHASING PLAN INTO THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
  
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JULY 18, 2017,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN JUNE 23, 2017.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JULY 18, 2017, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JULY 3, 2017. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-12-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-12-2017 Time   Rev Time  
Received By jroach Date 04-12-2017 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-30 15:38:48PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.12.2017
 PROJECT NO.: Z17030017, Z17030018, Z17030030 AND
 Z17030031
 CASE NO.: PB CASE NOS. 1624N, O, P AND Q
 ADDRESS: 3100-3200 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: JONI BRINKMAN
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. REVISIONS TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES SHOULD BE MADE TO
 ACCOUNT FOR THE REVISED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. A
 STRIKETHROUGH / UNDERLINE VERSION OF THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILTY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE REZONING, FLU AMENDMENT, AND
 MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
  
 3. UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 4. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PROPOSED TRACT BOUNDARY BETWEEN
 TRACT ?MF? AND TRACT ?D??THIS DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH
 THE MASTER PLAN, ETC. THIS BOUNDARY IS ALSO SHOW ON THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN AS BEING DIFFERENT FROM THE MASTER
 PLAN.
  
 5. THE GARAGES, DRIVEWAYS, ETC. FOR THE VILLAS DO NOT
 FUNCTION. THE DRIVEWAYS WILL NEED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
 TURNING RADII AND BACK-OUT / TURN-AROUND AREAS.
  
 6. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDS TO OCCUR REGARDING THE
 PARKING CALCULATIONS AND TRIP GENERATION THAT IS
 PROPOSED, EVEN UPON EXPANSION OF THE RESORT HOTEL
 (PHASE II).
  
 7. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT 616 PARKING SPACES ARE
 REQUIRED FOR PHASE I, BUT ONLY 503 ARE PROVIDED.
 ADDITIONALLY, PHASE II IS DEFICIENT. THE SHARED PARKING
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE UPDATED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE CURRENT
 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
  
 8. PLEASE RE-NUMBER THE LOTS IN PBA #3 TO 1 THROUGH 31.
  
 9. THE ELEVATIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATION/CAR ROOM SHOULD
 BE ENHANCED, ESPECIALLY ON THE NORTH SIDE.
 ADDITIONALLY, WAS CONSIDERATION MADE WITH THE FACT THAT
 A PARKING DECK WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT
 TO THIS STRUCTURE AS PART OF THE PHASE 2 OF THE
 PARKING?
  
 10. WHAT IS THE BUILDING DIVISION?S POSITION REGARDING
 RELOCATING THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES FOR THE
 CLUBHOUSE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROADWAY (BANYAN CAY
 ROAD)?
  
 11. LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE DRIVING RANGE SHOULD INCLUDE
 ALL LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN POD D, NOT JUST THE
 BUFFER.
  
 12. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE DRIVING RANGE BUFFER
 BEING REVIEWED / APPROVED BY THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 TOWER?
  
 13. WERE ANY CONCERNS DISCUSSED REGARDING THE PLACEMENT
 OF THE LIFT STATION IN THE ?FRONT YARD? OF LOT 21?
  
 14. THERE SHOULD BE CLEAR DELINEATION IN THE PLANS. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE CLUBHOUSE / TENNIS /ADMIN AREA
 STATE ?SEE POD R FOR LANDSCAPE PLANS? FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE, BUT THERE IS STILL LANDSCAPING SHOWN IN
 THE ROADWAY TRACT BY THE CLUBHOUSE.
  
 15. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT WAS
 PROPOSED AROUND THE EAST END OF THE CUL-DE-SAC? THERE
 IS A REQUIRED BUFFER AS THIS IS THE ?PERIMETER? OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 16. LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AT
 2400 PRESIDENTIAL WAY REQUIRES AN EASEMENT / AGREEMENT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE STATUS.
  
 17. THE BUFFERS ALONG THE PRESIDENTIAL WAY ACCESS ROAD,
 AND BETWEEN THE TENNIS COURTS AND PRESIDENTIAL WAY DO
 NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES.
  
 18. THE PROPOSED VILLAS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 PERMITTED BY THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 19. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION
 REGARDING THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE
 VILLAS AS IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE
 DESIGN GUIDELINES NOR IS IT COMPATIBLE WITH THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL
 COMMUNITIES.
  
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 VILLAS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 21. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PHASE I OF
 THE HOTEL? WHAT WILL THE LANDSCAPING CONSIST OF IN THE
 AREA THAT IS PLANNED FOR PHASE II?
  
 22. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE HOTEL
 PARKING STRUCTURE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES.
  
 23. WHERE IS ALL OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PROPOSED
 TO BE INSTALLED? SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES.
  
 24. LANDSCAPE PLANS STILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR THAT
 AREA BETWEEN LAKE LK2 AND THE ADJACENT MULTIFAMILY
 DEVELOPMENTS.
  
 25. HAVE THE PROPOSED STREET NAMES BEEN
 REVIEWED/APPROVED BY THE CITY?S ADDRESSING PERSONNEL?
  
 26. ANY CONSIDERATION OF PATHWAY CONNECTIONS BETWEEN
 THE VARIOUS PODS? FOR EXAMPLE, CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE
 VILLAS AND THE RESORT HOTEL, CONNECTION BETWEEN THE
 BANEBERRY LANE CUL-DE-SAC AND THE ADJACENT VILLAS,
 ETC.? THE ENTIRE SITE SHOULD BE INTERCONNECTED FOR
 PEDESTRIAN / CART CIRCULATION.
  
 27. THE CONNECTION OF THE SIDEWALK FROM BANYAN CAY ROAD
 TO THE HOTEL PARKING STRUCTURE DOESN?T SEEM TO MAKE
 SENSE AS IT HAS NO LOGICAL CONNECTION INTO THE GARAGE
 PLAN.
  
 28. THE LANDSCAPING AROUND THE PARKING STRUCTURE IS TO
 CONSIST OF SHADE/FLOWERING TREES OF AT LEAST TEN (10)
 FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 29. WHAT IS PROPOSED IN THE LARGE ?LAWN? AREA? ANY
 LANDSCAPING? IF SO, PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 20, 2017,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN APRIL 28, 2017.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 20, 2017, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JUNE 5, 2017. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved