Plan Review Details - Project Z17020040
Plan Review Stops For Project Z17020040
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-08-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-08-2017 Time 11:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-01-2017 Time 16:26 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-08 11:56:11DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. SITE DATA, SHEET A0.01, AND BUILDING AREAS, SHEET
 A0.06, BOTH STATE THAT 716 PARKING SPACES WILL BE
 PROVIDED. 2% OF THOSE ARE REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE,
 SO14.32 ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE REQUIRED, WHICH MUST BE
 ROUNDED UP TO 15 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, BUT ONLY 14
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE PROPOSED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 3. NO VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOW AT THIS
 STAGE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THREE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION
 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE).
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 6. LEVEL 1 PLAN, SHEET A1.01, SHOWS STAIR 8 DISCHARGING
 THROUGH THE CAFE WHILE LEVEL 7 PLAN, SHEET A1.07, SHOWS
 THE HOTEL BALLROOM, PRE-FUNCTION ROOMS, BOARDROOM, AND
 OTHER MEETING ROOMS, USING STAIR 8 AS AN EXIT. AT LEAST
 50% OF THE REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH FROM THE ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANCY SHALL DISCHARGE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE
 BUILDING. THE EXIT SHALL NOT DISCHARGE THROUGH THE
 CAFE.
  
 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IT IS NOTED THAT A GREEN
 SCREEN WALL IS PROPOSED FOR THE PARKING GARAGE. IF THE
 PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS
 TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT
 WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST
 HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE
 DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN
 SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 10.THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date   Time 08:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date   Time 11:20 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-08 08:22:19REVIEW STOP OPENED IN ERROR, PLEASE SEE 2ND REVIEW STOP
 FOR BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) REVIEW.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 02-14-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 04-09-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 02-14-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-04-09 15:14:59PASSED WITH PROVISO: IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT FINAL PLANS
 SHALL INCLUDE TOTAL REPLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN ON 5TH
 STREET TO SERVE THE PROJECT.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO
 PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH):
 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-31-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By RRossano Date 01-31-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-31-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-01-31 12:38:17SOME PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM 4/13/17 HAVE NOT BEEN
 ADDRESSED; PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS WITH WRITTEN
 RESPONSES TO BE PROVIDED WITH RESUBMITTAL.
  
 FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, UPDATE ALL CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST CURRENT VERSIONS, WHICH
 CAN BE FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERI
 NG-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED FOR YOUR GENERAL
 INFORMATION AND USE FOR THE ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF REGULATIONS
 AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT THE
 DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE DEVELOPMENT
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WPB_W
 EBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FULL-P
 ACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97B19
 60045731D3658206F27451722716EF
  
 THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA,
 CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED SEPT. 22,
 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
  
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
  
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
  
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS
 FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE
 FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR
 SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG
 ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT
 OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR
 PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER
 OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 PROVIDE PROFILE VIEW OF ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS WITHIN
 CITY OF WPB RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 CUT AND CAP ANY UTILITIES NOT BEING USED.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 04-17-2017 Time 14:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 04-17-2017 Time 14:27 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-17 14:28:59CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 ENGINEERING DIVISION
  
 DATE: 04/17/2017
  
 PROJECT NAME: ONE WEST PALM - 550 N. QUADRILLE BLVD. -
 Z17020040
  
 2ND/RE-SUBMITTAL REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 STATUS: FAILED
  
 AFTER REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS RECEIVED AT MY DESK
 ON APRIL 13, 2017, IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS
 HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND OTHERS ARE ACKNOWLEDGED AS:
 'COMMENT NOTED' AND DEEM SATISFIED. THE ACKNOWLEDGED
 COMMENTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ADDRESSED DURING
 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION' PHASE PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE STILL NOT SATISFIED AND NEED TO
 BE ADDRESSED AT THIS LEVEL PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. IN THE REGARDS TO SANITATION PLAN I.E. TRASH/GARBAGE
 COLLECTION BY A PRIVATE PROVIDER FOR THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT, PLEASE SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER OF APPROVAL
 FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, PETER BIENIEK;
  
 4. LOCATION OF WATER METER SHALL NOT BE INSIDE BUILDING
 ENCLOSURE AND NEED TO BE ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE SHOW IN THE
 PLANS ACCORDINGLY;
  
 7. ?SHEET 2 ? SITE DEMOLITION PLAN? SHOWING EXISTING
 WATER METER, WATER SERVICE AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES
 ON 4TH ST. ARE TO BE REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES,
 IF NOT SERVING THE PROPERTY, HAVE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED
 AT THE MAIN. DE-ACTIVATED/INACTIVE PIPELINES LARGER
 THAN 2" DIAMETER WILL BE REMOVED. PLEASE CORRECT LABELS
 ON THIS SHEET ACCORDINGLY;
  
 ** ALL TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION RELATED COMMENTS
 PREVIOUSLY OFFERED NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO 'SITE
 PLAN' APPROVAL ALSO. PLEASE CONTACT ERIK FERGUSON AT:
 (561) 494-1092 TO DISCUSS TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
 RELATED MATTERS.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 03-06-2017 Time 17:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 03-06-2017 Time 17:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-07 17:22:35CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 ENGINEERING DIVISION
  
 DATE: 03/07/2017
  
 Z17020040: 550 N. QUADRILLE BLVD - ONE WEST PALM
 DEVELOPMENT
  
 THIS IS A RESUBMITTAL HENCE ALL PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF
 APPROVAL STILL APPLY. ANY AND ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 THOSE HAVE NOT BEEN SATISFIED WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED
 DURING THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION
 PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING NEW COMMENTS ARE MADE ON THE RECENTLY
 SUBMITTED PLANS AND MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
 OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING BUILDING
 PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 FOLLOWING IS GENERAL SITE COMMENT:
  
 1. FOR SANITATION/GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTACT THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS NEED
 TO SHOW PROPOSED SANITATION COLLECTION PLANS AND
 DETAILS; AND WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM PETER BIENIEK,
 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL (E.G. THE GATE WIDTH
 MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FEET) REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
 ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION
 94-444(B) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. CITY STANDARD
 DETAIL GC-8 MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEE
 RING-STANDARDS/
  
 FOLLOWING ARE WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS AND NEED TO BE
 ADDRESSED PRIOR TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
  
 2. A FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM EXISTING FIRE
 HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN SUBMITTAL;
  
 3. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE
 DETAILS SHEET DURING SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL
 ENGINEERING PLANS. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD
 FORMAT. CITY?S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT)
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 4. PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER,
 DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S STANDARD
 DETAILS. THEY SHALL NOT BE INSIDE THE BUILDING
 ENCLOSURE. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST
 INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
 ACCESSIBLE;
  
 5. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW CONFLICT INFORMATION
 (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE CONFLICT
 POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES AS
 WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITIES
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL ARE TO BE
 VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS AND PROVIDE ALL UTILITY CROSSING
 INFORMATION;
  
 6. CCTV RECORD (VIDEO AND TV LOG) OF THE EXISTING
 SANITARY SEWER (FULL LENGTH FROM MH TO MH) ON NORTH
 DIXIE HWY. AND NEW SANITARY SEWER LATERAL WILL BE
 REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT CLOSE-OUT SUBMITTALS;
  
 7. EXISTING WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS/WATER METERS
 SERVING THE PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, ARE TO BE CUT AND
 CAPPED AT THE MAIN. DE-ACTIVATED/INACTIVE PIPELINES
 LARGER THAN 2" DIAMETER WILL BE REMOVED. PLEASE LABEL
 PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL AND ADD NOTES TO THE UTILITY
 PLANS ACCORDINGLY;
  
 8. EXISTING SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SERVING THE
 PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE
 MAIN;
  
 9. SHOW SIZE AND MATERIAL OF THE PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER SERVICE. INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED
 SERVICE LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE;
  
 10. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH TO BE REHABBED PER
 CITY'S REQUIREMENTS WHILE CONNECTING NEW SERVICE LINES;
  
 11. FOR THE FINAL UTILITY PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE THAT:
 AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
 FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 12. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
 WITHIN 150 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN
 AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL
 SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS,
 LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE
 PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR
 POTABLE WATER LINES.
  
 13. SUBMITTAL OF MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) FOR WORK
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE
 PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 03-07-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 03-07-2017 Time 16:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 03-07-2017 Time 15:50 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-07 16:04:51CIVIL:
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS PER NFPA 14.
  
 PER NFPA 24 SECTION 6.2.1, ALL CONNECTIONS TO PRIVATE
 FIRE SERVICE MAINS FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE
 ARRANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING SO
 THAT THEY CAN BE ISOLATED:
 (1)A POST INDICATOR VALVE INSTALLED NOT LESS THAN 40
 FEET FROM THE BUILDING.
 (A) FOR BUILDINGS LESS THAN 40 FEET IN HEIGHT, A POST
 INDICATOR VALVE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED
 CLOSER THAN 40 FEET BUT AT LEAST AS FAR FROM THE
 BUILDING AS THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL FACING THE POST
 INDICATOR VALVE.
 (2) A WALL POST INDICATOR VALVE
 (3) AN INDICATING VALVE IN A PIT, INSTALLED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.4
 (4) A BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH AT LEAST ONE INDICATING
 VALVE NOT LESS THAN 40 FEET FROM THE BUILDING.
 (A) FOR BUILDINGS LESS THAN 40 FEET IN HEIGHT, A
 BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH AT LEAST ONE INDICATING VALVE
 SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED CLOSER THAN 40 FEET
 BUT AT LEAST AS FAR FROM THE BUILDING AS THE HEIGHT OF
 THE WALL FACING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER.
 (5) CONTROL VALVES INSTALLED IN A FIRE-RATED ROOM
 ACCESSIBLE FROM THE EXTERIOR
 (6) CONTROL VALVES IN A FIRE-RATED STAIR ENCLOSURE
 ACCESSIBLE FROM THE EXTERIOR AS PERMITTED BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION
  
 SITE:
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES CONSTRUCTION
 TRAILERS LARGER THAN A SINGLE "DOUBLE WIDE" (OR TWO
 "SINGLE WIDE") TO EITHER BE PROTECTED BY AN AUTOMATIC
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR COMPLY WITH THE SEPARATION
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 241. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
 TRAILERS OR MODULAR BUILDINGS WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT AND
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
 PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION,
 ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2:
 TEMPORARY OFFICES, TRAILERS, AND OTHER FACILITIES OF
 COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR HOUSING COMBUSTIBLE
 CONTENTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS,
 TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 4.2.1.
 PER TABLE 4.2.1:
 1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET
 2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET
 3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET
 4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET
 5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET
 6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE
 SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET
 **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL
 BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC
 SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE.
  
 PER NFPA 241 SECTION 4.2.2: DETACHMENT BETWEEN
 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, ADEQUATE TEMPORARY FIXED FIRE
 PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND PORTABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING
 JURISDICTION.
  
 BUILDING:
 THE BUILDING IS FUNCTIONING AS A MULTIUSE OCCUPANCY.
 INDICATE IF THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED FOR MIXED USE
 (NON-SEPARATED) OR SEPARATED USE PER SECTION 6.1.14.2.1
 OF NFPA 101 FLORIDA EDITION 2009. FOR NON-SEPARATED
 MIXED USE OCCUPANCIES, THE MOST STRINGENT FIRE AND LIFE
 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL APPLY TO
 THE BUILDING.
  
 NO LIFE SAFETY PLANS SUBMITTED. A THOROUGH AND COMPLETE
 PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED AT THIS TIME DUE TO
 LACK OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL
 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED DURING PLAN
 RESUBMISSION.
  
 PER FFPC SECTION 11.9.4 AND FBC SECTION 911.1.5 - THE
 FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 72 AND SHALL
 CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 1. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 2. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 3. FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR.
 4. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL.
 5. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 6. THE FIRE-FIGHTER?S CONTROL PANEL REQUIRED BY SECTION
 909.16 FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS INSTALLED IN THE
 BUILDING.
 7. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY.
 8. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS.
 9. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS.
 10. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM.
 11. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS.
 12. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS.
 13. WORK TABLE.
 14. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES, MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 15. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE.
 16. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 17. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 LARGE FLOOR OPENING CREATED BETWEEN LEVELS 7 AND 8.
 INDICATE IF THIS IS INTENDED TO BE A CONVENIENCE
 OPENING, ATRIUM, OR COMMUNICATING SPACE PER NFPA 101.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 9 Status P Date 11-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-10-2020 Time 11:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-10-2020 Time 11:37 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-10 11:38:57RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED ON GREEN
 WALL. INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES WILL BE
 INCLUDED IN APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 8 Status P Date 10-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-07-2020 Time 15:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-07-2020 Time 15:26 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-07 15:27:12SEE ZONING COMMENTS FOR CONDITION REGARDING FDOT MEDIAN
 LANDSCAPING.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 7 Status P Date 03-04-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-04-2020 Time 14:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-04-2020 Time 14:48 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-04 14:49:32ALL COMMENTS PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED, NO CHANGES
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 08-26-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-26-2019 Time 15:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-26-2019 Time 15:29 Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-26 15:30:07FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z17020040
 AUGUST 26, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
 PLAN FOR REFERENCE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION, MITIGATION
 AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE QUALITY OF THE PLANTINGS USING THE SABAL PALMS
 APPEARS TO BE A DOWNGRADE FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
 SABAL PALMS DO NOT HAVE TO BE USED ON SITE, THEY CAN BE
 RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY,
 INCLUDING PUBLIC SPACES.
 THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF THE LANDSCAPING IS REDUCED
 FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. STAFF REQUESTS THAT
 QUANTITIES OF STREET TREES BE MAINTAINED AS APPROVED,
 AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS PROVIDE COMPARABLE TREE
 CANOPY AREA AS THE APPROVED PLAN.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM AND CALCULATIONS
 TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND
 PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
 EACH OPEN SPACE AREA NEEDS TO BE DEFINED. TREE CANOPY
 FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA
 CANNOT BE COUNTED. ALL TREE CANOPY CREDITS FOR OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.
  
 THE LIMITS OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA ARE SHOWN
 BEYOND THE FUNCTIONAL QUALIFYING SPACE. (SEE APPROVED
 PLANS).
 THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS AND CALCULATIONS NEED TO
 BE SEPARATED BY EACH AREA AND IDENTIFIED BY TYPE, AND
 EACH HAVE INDIVIDUAL QUALIFYING PERCENTAGES SHOWN.
 EACH AREA MUST MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN,
 NOT COMBINED OR INCLUDING TREE CANOPY FROM OUTSIDE THE
 AREA.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE AREA BY TYPE ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITIONS
 FOUND IN SECTION 94-109.
 THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS FROM TABLE IV-6 FOR QGD10 FOR
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. GARDEN PLAZA, GARDEN COURTYARD OR
 PASSAGEWAY. IDENTIFY WHAT THE TYPE IS FOR EACH PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AREA. PLAZA IS NOT AN OPTION.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES PER
 SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
 TREES AND CANOPY CREDITS MUST BE LISTED AND LABELED FOR
 EACH INDIVIDUAL SPACE.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION ON SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. QUALITY OF THE
 EXISTING TREES AND PALMS IS NOT GOOD, AND THE
 SURVIVABILITY MAY BE LOW WITH POTENTIALLY MOVING THEM
 TWICE. SEE COMMENT 1.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL
 AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 LOCATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALKS ADJACENT
 TO STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. AREAS ARE INCOMPLETE ON S DIXIE SIDE, AND THERE
 ARE NONE SHOWN ON THE 4TH STREET SIDE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT
 IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS
 THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #6.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PISCIDIA PISCIPULA IS NOT COLD HARDY TO
 THIS ZONE. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. STRANGLER FIG IS NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO
 WHITEFLY ISSUES IN THIS AREA. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE
 APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL? OAKS ARE
 TO BE USED AS STREET TREES. PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO READ QUERCUS
 VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL?.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/16/18:
 12. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART TO CURRENT CODE.
 PLANTS IN EACH CATEGORY CANNOT BE COUNTED TWICE PER THE
 CODE. IF TAKING 51% OR MORE NATIVE CREDIT, THERE IS
 ONLY THE DIFFERENCE FROM 100% LEFT TO CLAIM ANOTHER
 CATEGORY. REVISE.
  
 13. SATISFIED. WATER, SEWER AND FIRE LINE LOCATIONS ARE
 IN CONFLICT WITH STREET TREES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
 ADJUST LINE LOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT AND SHOW ROOT
 BARRIER LOCATIONS.
 SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE UTILITIES AS SHOWN
 ON THE CIVIL PLANS, AND CONFLICTS STILL EXIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST OF SHRUB SPECIES
 AND SIZES. MUST IDENTIFY DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS AND
 IF NATIVE PLANTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO
 REFLECT THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT.
  
 16. SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON 5TH
 STREET AND N DIXIE AS APPROVED ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE.
 STREET TREES (OAKS) ON 5TH ST NEED TO BE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE CURB. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MAY BE
 EXPANDED TO THE BACK OF CURB
  
 17. SATISFIED. STREET TREES PROPOSED ALONG QUADRILLE
 APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN EASEMENTS THAT WILL NOT ALLOW
 THEM. THE APPROVED PLAN SHOWS THE TREES OUTSIDE OF THE
 EASEMENTS AND SHOULD BE FOLLOWED.
 PROVIDE FPL RELEASE ACCEPTING THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
 IN THEIR EASEMENT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/21/19:
  
 18. SATISFIED. THE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS CONFLICT
 WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. THESE ARE INCOMPATIBLE, AS
 ONE IS INTENDED TO PROMOTE TREE ROOT GROWTH, AND THE
 OTHER IS NOT INTENDED FOR ROOT INTRUSION. EXFILTRATION
 IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.
  
 19. SATISFIED. A NEW FPL POLE WAS RECENTLY INSTALLED
 AT THE CORNER OF 4TH ST AND QUADRILLE THAT WILL NOT
 ALLOW THE LIVE OAKS TO BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 FEET OF THE
 LINES. INDICATE IF THIS POLE WILL BE REMOVED AND LINES
 RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE PLANTING OF THE STREET TREES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
  
 1. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES
 AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED
 WITH THIS PETITION. THE APPLICANT SHALL ASSURE THAT ALL
 EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY REMAINS
 INTACT AND FUNCTIONAL FOR ALL OTHER LOCATIONS, WHILE
 ALL IRRIGATION TO STREET TREES ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY
 WILL BE SERVED BY THE PROJECT IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 04-30-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-19-2019 Time 15:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-09-2019 Time 15:43 Sent To  
Notes
2019-04-30 15:50:55FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z17020040
 APRIL 16, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO THE
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN FOR REFERENCE ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION, MITIGATION AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE QUALITY OF THE PLANTINGS USING THE SABAL PALMS
 APPEARS TO BE A DOWNGRADE FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
 SABAL PALMS DO NOT HAVE TO BE USED ON SITE, THEY CAN BE
 RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY,
 INCLUDING PUBLIC SPACES.
 THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF THE LANDSCAPING IS REDUCED
 FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. STAFF REQUESTS THAT
 QUANTITIES OF STREET TREES BE MAINTAINED AS APPROVED,
 AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS PROVIDE COMPARABLE TREE
 CANOPY AREA AS THE APPROVED PLAN.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM AND CALCULATIONS
 TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND
 PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
 EACH OPEN SPACE AREA NEEDS TO BE DEFINED. TREE CANOPY
 FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA
 CANNOT BE COUNTED. ALL TREE CANOPY CREDITS FOR OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.
  
 THE LIMITS OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA ARE SHOWN
 BEYOND THE FUNCTIONAL QUALIFYING SPACE. (SEE APPROVED
 PLANS).
 THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS AND CALCULATIONS NEED TO
 BE SEPARATED BY EACH AREA AND IDENTIFIED BY TYPE, AND
 EACH HAVE INDIVIDUAL QUALIFYING PERCENTAGES SHOWN.
 EACH AREA MUST MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN,
 NOT COMBINED OR INCLUDING TREE CANOPY FROM OUTSIDE THE
 AREA.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE AREA BY TYPE ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITIONS
 FOUND IN SECTION 94-109.
 THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS FROM TABLE IV-6 FOR QGD10 FOR
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. GARDEN PLAZA, GARDEN COURTYARD OR
 PASSAGEWAY. IDENTIFY WHAT THE TYPE IS FOR EACH PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AREA. PLAZA IS NOT AN OPTION.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES PER
 SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
 TREES AND CANOPY CREDITS MUST BE LISTED AND LABELED FOR
 EACH INDIVIDUAL SPACE.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION ON SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. QUALITY OF THE
 EXISTING TREES AND PALMS IS NOT GOOD, AND THE
 SURVIVABILITY MAY BE LOW WITH POTENTIALLY MOVING THEM
 TWICE. SEE COMMENT 1.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL
 AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 LOCATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALKS ADJACENT
 TO STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. AREAS ARE INCOMPLETE ON S DIXIE SIDE, AND THERE
 ARE NONE SHOWN ON THE 4TH STREET SIDE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT
 IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS
 THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #6.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PISCIDIA PISCIPULA IS NOT COLD HARDY TO
 THIS ZONE. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. STRANGLER FIG IS NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO
 WHITEFLY ISSUES IN THIS AREA. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE
 APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL? OAKS ARE
 TO BE USED AS STREET TREES. PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO READ QUERCUS
 VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL?.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/16/18:
 12. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART TO CURRENT CODE.
 PLANTS IN EACH CATEGORY CANNOT BE COUNTED TWICE PER THE
 CODE. IF TAKING 51% OR MORE NATIVE CREDIT, THERE IS
 ONLY THE DIFFERENCE FROM 100% LEFT TO CLAIM ANOTHER
 CATEGORY. REVISE.
  
 13. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. WATER, SEWER AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH STREET TREES IN SEVERAL
 LOCATIONS. ADJUST LINE LOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT AND
 SHOW ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS.
 SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE UTILITIES AS SHOWN
 ON THE CIVIL PLANS, AND CONFLICTS STILL EXIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST OF SHRUB SPECIES
 AND SIZES. MUST IDENTIFY DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS AND
 IF NATIVE PLANTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO
 REFLECT THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT.
  
 16. SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON 5TH
 STREET AND N DIXIE AS APPROVED ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE.
 STREET TREES (OAKS) ON 5TH ST NEED TO BE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE CURB. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MAY BE
 EXPANDED TO THE BACK OF CURB
  
 17. SATISFIED. STREET TREES PROPOSED ALONG QUADRILLE
 APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN EASEMENTS THAT WILL NOT ALLOW
 THEM. THE APPROVED PLAN SHOWS THE TREES OUTSIDE OF THE
 EASEMENTS AND SHOULD BE FOLLOWED.
 PROVIDE FPL RELEASE ACCEPTING THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
 IN THEIR EASEMENT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/21/19:
  
 18. SATISFIED. THE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS CONFLICT
 WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. THESE ARE INCOMPATIBLE, AS
 ONE IS INTENDED TO PROMOTE TREE ROOT GROWTH, AND THE
 OTHER IS NOT INTENDED FOR ROOT INTRUSION. EXFILTRATION
 IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.
  
 19. SATISFIED. A NEW FPL POLE WAS RECENTLY INSTALLED
 AT THE CORNER OF 4TH ST AND QUADRILLE THAT WILL NOT
 ALLOW THE LIVE OAKS TO BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 FEET OF THE
 LINES. INDICATE IF THIS POLE WILL BE REMOVED AND LINES
 RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE PLANTING OF THE STREET TREES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
  
 1. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES
 AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED
 WITH THIS PETITION. THE APPLICANT SHALL ASSURE THAT ALL
 EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY REMAINS
 INTACT AND FUNCTIONAL FOR ALL OTHER LOCATIONS, WHILE
 ALL IRRIGATION TO STREET TREES ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY
 WILL BE SERVED BY THE PROJECTS IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE PLANS AT PERMITTING
 TO RETAIN AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF THE PALMS AS SHOWN ON
 THE APPROVED PLAN BY SPECIES OR RETURN FOR DAC REVIEW.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY, ALL APPROVED AND PERMITTED LANDSCAPING SHALL
 BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED, AND ALL TREE MITIGATION DUE
 SHALL BE SATISFIED BY REPLACEMENT ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN
 LIEU.
  
 5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SHOW
 ADJUSTMENTS TO UTILITY LOCATIONS SO THAT CONFLICTS ARE
 ELIMINATED.
  
 NOTE CONDITIONS 3, 4 AND 5. THESE ARE TO SATISFY
 COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 02-25-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-25-2019 Time 16:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-25-2019 Time 16:19 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-25 16:20:03FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z17020040
 FEBRUARY 21, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO THE PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED PLAN FOR REFERENCE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION,
 MITIGATION AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE QUALITY OF THE PLANTINGS USING THE SABAL PALMS
 APPEARS TO BE A DOWNGRADE FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
 SABAL PALMS DO NOT HAVE TO BE USED ON SITE, THEY CAN BE
 RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY,
 INCLUDING PUBLIC SPACES.
 THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF THE LANDSCAPING IS REDUCED
 FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. STAFF REQUESTS THAT
 QUANTITIES OF STREET TREES BE MAINTAINED AS APPROVED,
 AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS PROVIDE COMPARABLE TREE
 CANOPY AREA AS THE APPROVED PLAN.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
  
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM AND
 CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY,
 AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
 EACH OPEN SPACE AREA NEEDS TO BE DEFINED. TREE CANOPY
 FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA
 CANNOT BE COUNTED. ALL TREE CANOPY CREDITS FOR OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.
  
 THE LIMITS OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA ARE SHOWN
 BEYOND THE FUNCTIONAL QUALIFYING SPACE. (SEE APPROVED
 PLANS).
 THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS AND CALCULATIONS NEED TO
 BE SEPARATED BY EACH AREA AND IDENTIFIED BY TYPE, AND
 EACH HAVE INDIVIDUAL QUALIFYING PERCENTAGES SHOWN.
 EACH AREA MUST MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN,
 NOT COMBINED OR INCLUDING TREE CANOPY FROM OUTSIDE THE
 AREA.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA BY TYPE ACCORDING TO THE
 DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109.
 THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS FROM TABLE IV-6 FOR QGD10 FOR
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. GARDEN PLAZA, GARDEN COURTYARD OR
 PASSAGEWAY. IDENTIFY WHAT THE TYPE IS FOR EACH PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AREA. PLAZA IS NOT AN OPTION.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS
 FOR TREE CANOPY BY SPECIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE
 CATEGORIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
 TREES AND CANOPY CREDITS MUST BE LISTED AND LABELED FOR
 EACH INDIVIDUAL SPACE.
 STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE PLANS WITH THE
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THESE COMMENTS AND
 CLARIFY WHAT IS REQUESTED.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION ON SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. QUALITY OF THE
 EXISTING TREES AND PALMS IS NOT GOOD, AND THE
 SURVIVABILITY MAY BE LOW WITH POTENTIALLY MOVING THEM
 TWICE. SEE COMMENT 1.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL
 AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 LOCATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALKS ADJACENT
 TO STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. AREAS ARE INCOMPLETE ON S DIXIE SIDE, AND THERE
 ARE NONE SHOWN ON THE 4TH STREET SIDE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT
 IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS
 THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #6.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PISCIDIA PISCIPULA IS NOT COLD HARDY TO
 THIS ZONE. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. STRANGLER FIG IS NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO
 WHITEFLY ISSUES IN THIS AREA. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE
 APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL? OAKS ARE
 TO BE USED AS STREET TREES. PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO READ QUERCUS
 VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL?.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/16/18:
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART TO CURRENT CODE.
 PLANTS IN EACH CATEGORY CANNOT BE COUNTED TWICE PER THE
 CODE. IF TAKING 51% OR MORE NATIVE CREDIT, THERE IS
 ONLY THE DIFFERENCE FROM 100% LEFT TO CLAIM ANOTHER
 CATEGORY. REVISE.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. WATER, SEWER AND FIRE LINE LOCATIONS
 ARE IN CONFLICT WITH STREET TREES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
 ADJUST LINE LOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT AND SHOW ROOT
 BARRIER LOCATIONS.
 SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE UTILITIES AS SHOWN
 ON THE CIVIL PLANS, AND CONFLICTS STILL EXIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST OF SHRUB SPECIES
 AND SIZES. MUST IDENTIFY DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS AND
 IF NATIVE PLANTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO
 REFLECT THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT.
  
 16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SHOWN
 ON 5TH STREET AND N DIXIE AS APPROVED ADJACENT TO THE
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
 STREET TREES (OAKS) ON 5TH ST NEED TO BE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE CURB. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MAY BE
 EXPANDED TO THE BACK OF CURB
  
 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES PROPOSED ALONG
 QUADRILLE APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN EASEMENTS THAT WILL
 NOT ALLOW THEM. THE APPROVED PLAN SHOWS THE TREES
 OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENTS AND SHOULD BE FOLLOWED.
 PROVIDE FPL RELEASE ACCEPTING THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
 IN THEIR EASEMENT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/21/19:
  
 18. THE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS CONFLICT WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. THESE ARE INCOMPATIBLE, AS ONE
 IS INTENDED TO PROMOTE TREE ROOT GROWTH, AND THE OTHER
 IS NOT INTENDED FOR ROOT INTRUSION. EXFILTRATION IS NOT
 SUSTAINABLE.
  
 19. A NEW FPL POLE WAS RECENTLY INSTALLED AT THE
 CORNER OF 4TH ST AND QUADRILLE THAT WILL NOT ALLOW THE
 LIVE OAKS TO BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 FEET OF THE LINES.
 INDICATE IF THIS POLE WILL BE REMOVED AND LINES
 RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE PLANTING OF THE STREET TREES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-16-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-16-2018 Time 16:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-16-2018 Time 16:45 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-16 16:45:32FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z17020040
 NOVEMBER 16, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO THE PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED PLAN FOR REFERENCE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION,
 MITIGATION AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE QUALITY OF THE PLANTINGS USING THE SABAL PALMS
 APPEARS TO BE A DOWNGRADE FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
 SABAL PALMS DO NOT HAVE TO BE USED ON SITE, THEY CAN BE
 RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY,
 INCLUDING PUBLIC SPACES.
 THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF THE LANDSCAPING IS REDUCED
 FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. STAFF REQUESTS THAT
 QUANTITIES OF STREET TREES BE MAINTAINED AS APPROVED,
 AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS PROVIDE COMPARABLE TREE
 CANOPY AREA AS THE APPROVED PLAN.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM AND
 CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY,
 AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
 EACH OPEN SPACE AREA NEEDS TO BE DEFINED. TREE CANOPY
 FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA
 CANNOT BE COUNTED. ALL TREE CANOPY CREDITS FOR OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA BY TYPE ACCORDING TO THE
 DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109.
 THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS FROM TABLE IV-6 FOR QGD10 FOR
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. GARDEN PLAZA, GARDEN COURTYARD OR
 PASSAGEWAY. IDENTIFY WHAT THE TYPE IS FOR EACH PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AREA. PLAZA IS NOT AN OPTION.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES PER
 SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
 TREES AND CANOPY CREDITS MUST BE LISTED AND LABELED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION ON SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. QUALITY OF THE
 EXISTING TREES AND PALMS IS NOT GOOD, AND THE
 SURVIVABILITY MAY BE LOW WITH POTENTIALLY MOVING THEM
 TWICE. SEE COMMENT 1.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL
 DETAIL AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 LOCATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALKS ADJACENT
 TO STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. AREAS ARE INCOMPLETE ON S DIXIE SIDE, AND THERE
 ARE NONE SHOWN ON THE 4TH STREET SIDE.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK
 THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL
 HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO
 MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5
 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS
 LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #6.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PISCIDIA PISCIPULA IS NOT COLD HARDY TO
 THIS ZONE. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. STRANGLER FIG IS NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO
 WHITEFLY ISSUES IN THIS AREA. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE
 APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL? OAKS ARE
 TO BE USED AS STREET TREES. PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO READ QUERCUS
 VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL?.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/16/18:
 12. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART TO
 CURRENT CODE.
  
 13. WATER, SEWER AND FIRE LINE LOCATIONS ARE IN
 CONFLICT WITH STREET TREES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. ADJUST
 LINE LOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT AND SHOW ROOT BARRIER
 LOCATIONS.
  
 14. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST OF SHRUB SPECIES AND SIZES.
 MUST IDENTIFY DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS AND IF NATIVE
 PLANTS.
  
 15. UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO REFLECT THE
 SUBMITTAL FOR THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT.
  
 16. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON 5TH STREET AND N
 DIXIE AS APPROVED ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
 17. STREET TREES PROPOSED ALONG QUADRILLE APPEAR TO BE
 LOCATED IN EASEMENTS THAT WILL NOT ALLOW THEM. THE
 APPROVED PLAN SHOWS THE TREES OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENTS,
 AND SHOULD BE FOLLOWED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-24-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-12-2017 Time 11:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-12-2017 Time 11:08 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-24 11:16:13FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z17020040
 MAY 12, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
 THESE COMMENTS WERE REVIEWED WITH THE APPLICANT IN A
 CONFERENCE CALL MEETING ON 5/12/17.
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REFER TO THE PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED PLAN FOR REFERENCE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION,
 MITIGATION AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE QUALITY OF THE PLANTINGS USING THE SABAL PALMS
 APPEARS TO BE A DOWNGRADE FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
 SABAL PALMS DO NOT HAVE TO BE USED ON SITE, THEY CAN BE
 RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY,
 INCLUDING PUBLIC SPACES.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM AND
 CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY,
 AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA BY TYPE ACCORDING TO THE
 DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES PER
 SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION ON SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. QUALITY OF THE
 EXISTING TREES AND PALMS IS NOT GOOD, AND THE
 SURVIVABILITY MAY BE LOW WITH POTENTIALLY MOVING THEM
 TWICE. SEE COMMENT 1.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL
 DETAIL AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK
 THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL
 HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO
 MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5
 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS
 LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PISCIDIA PISCIPULA IS NOT COLD HARDY TO
 THIS ZONE. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. STRANGLER FIG IS NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO
 WHITEFLY ISSUES IN THIS AREA. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE
 APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL? OAKS
 ARE TO BE USED AS STREET TREES. PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANT LIST TO READ QUERCUS
 VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL?.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-07-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-07-2017 Time 17:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-07-2017 Time 17:01 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-07 17:01:53FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z17020040
 MARCH 7, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PLEASE REFER TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN FOR
 REFERENCE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION, MITIGATION AND OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM AND CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
  
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 AREA BY TYPE ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITIONS FOUND IN
 SECTION 94-109.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE CANOPY BY
 SPECIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES PER SECTION
 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE TREES PROPOSED
 TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE
 LOCATION ON SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF
 THE BUILDING. QUALITY OF THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS
 IS NOT GOOD, AND THE SURVIVABILITY MAY BE LOW WITH
 POTENTIALLY MOVING THEM TWICE. SEE COMMENT 1.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND SHOW THE
 LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 7. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT
 TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4
 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT VEHICLE ENTRANCES
 AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE ENGINEERED TO ALLOW
 ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN
 ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL
 ALLOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. PISCIDIA PISCIPULA IS NOT COLD HARDY TO THIS ZONE.
 PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 10. STRANGLER FIG IS NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO WHITEFLY
 ISSUES IN THIS AREA. PLEASE PROPOSE A MORE APPROPRIATE
 SPECIES.
  
 11. QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?CATHEDRAL? OAKS ARE TO BE USED
 AS STREET TREES. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-14-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-14-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 02-14-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-14 13:28:37THE PROPERTY BASED ON THE PRINT IS TO HAVE ITS
 SANITATION SERVICE PROVIDED BY A ROLL OFF COMPACTOR
 SYSTEM. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE VENDOR MUST BE ONE OF
 THE FRANCHISED VENDORS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 7 Status P Date 03-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-23-2020 Time 13:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-23-2020 Time 13:27 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-23 13:26:44THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF
 ENGINEERING PLANS AND ARCHITRECTURAL PLANS RECEIVED BY
 THE CITY ON FEBRUARY 6, 2020, THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED
 DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AND/OR MADE
 CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL, WHERE APPROPRIATE:
  
 1. PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR THE SANITARY SEWER
 PIPE BETWEEN MH#2 AND MH #2B DO NOT SUPPORT THE LISTED
 PROPOSED SLOPE OF 0.58%.
  
 2. ENGINEERING SHEET #9:
 A. SECTION 'D-D' - SHOW A SHALLOW "SWALE" BETWEEN
 BUIDLING AND BACK OF SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF STRRAIGHT
 SLOPE. THIS AREA IS TO DRAIN TO THE 12" DECORATIVE
 FLOOR DRAIN IN THE EAST PART OF THE PLAZA.
  
 B. SECTION 'C-C' - THE 21' DRIVE WILL SLOPE AT ~4%
 INSTEAD OF 1.0% SHOWN ON THE SECTION WITH THE SPOT
 GRADE OF 13.00 SHOWN AT THE TRAFFIC/CURB SEPARATOR ON
 THE GRADING PLAN.
  
 C. SECTION 'G-G' - CURBING IS SHOWN ALONG THE PROPERTY
 LINE BUT THE CURBING IS NOT CALLED OUT ON SHEET 4. THE
 BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR OF 13.20 FT NGVD IS LESS THAN 3
 INCHES HIGHER THAN THE BACK OF (12' WIDE) SIDEWALK
 ELEVATION OF 12.96.
  
 3. DIFFERENT DISTANCES SHOWN BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE
 AND THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT ON SECTIONS 'G - G' (14.0
 FEET) AND 'H - H' (13.0 FEET).
  
 4. DIFFERENT LANE WIDTHS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET A0.04 AND
 SECTIONS 'C - C', 'F - F' AND 'I - I' ON ENGINEERING
 SHEET 9.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 6 Status F Date 08-28-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-28-2019 Time 17:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-28-2019 Time 17:51 Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-28 17:15:47THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 AUGUST 22, 2019 ROUTED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 1. CONFIRM THERE WILL NOT BE A RAISED CURB BETWEEN THE
 PLANTERS ALONG N. DIXIE HWY AND THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK
 AND THAT RUNOFF FROM THE SIDEWALK WEST OF THE PLANTERS
 WILL BE ABLE TO FLOW INTO THE PLANTERS.
  
 2. PROVIDE VIDEO OF EXISTING STORM PIPES ON 4TH STREET.
 SOME PIPES MAY BE VCP. (REPEAT COMMENT)
  
 3. ADD THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 TO GENERAL
 NOTE #7 ON THE COVER SHEET. (REPEAT COMMENT)
  
 4. CALL OUT THE TYPE OF CURB RAMPS AND ADA MATS FOR
 DRIVEWAYS CROSSING THE SIDEWALK ON 4TH STREET.(REPEAT
 COMMENT)
  
 5. CIVIL PLAN 5 SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN:
 A. PARKING DIMENSIONS DO NOT LINE UP WITH THE STRIPING
 ON 4TH STREET.(REPEAT COMMENT)
  
 6. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS (TOP AND BOTTOM OF
 TRENCH) OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES
  
 7. DIFFERENT VERTICAL DATUMS REFERENCED ON THE CIVIL
 AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE FFE'S VARY:
 CIVIL PLANS LIST FFE'S AS:
 A. 15.70 FEET NAVD88 FOR PROPOSED OFFICE TOWER
 B. 13.95 FEET NAVD88 FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL TOWER
 C. 13.20 FEET NAVD88 FOR PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING.
  
 THE ELEVATION VIEWS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS LIST
 FFE'S AS:
 A. 15 FEET 6 INCHES NGVD29 FOR THE PROPOSED OFFICE
 TOWER
 B. 13 FEET 9 INCHES NGVD29 FOR THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
 TOWER
 C. 13 FEET 0 INCHES NGVD29 FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL
 BUILDING.
  
 8. EAST ELEVATION ON SHEET A2.01 SHOWS 18 FEET 0 INCHES
 FROM THE LEVEL 2 PODIUM TO THE GROUND LEVEL BUT
 DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATIONS IS 10.5 FEET (33 FEET 6 INCHES
 MINUS 13 FEET 0 INCHES).
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 5 Status F Date 04-17-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-17-2019 Time 18:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-17-2019 Time 18:59 Sent To  
Notes
2019-04-17 18:59:26THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE APRIL 9,
 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
  
 1. REMOVE / ABANDON THE STORM PIPE CROSSING THE WEST
 END OF 4TH STREET IF THE STORM PIPE IS NOT NEEDED.
  
 2. COORDINATE THE RIM/GRATE ELEVATIONS OF DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES WITH THE GRADING PLAN. THERE ARE MANY PLACES
 WHERE THE RIM ELEVATION IS TOO LOW COMPARED TO A
 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 5 FEET AWAY.
  
 3. SPECIFY WHAT THE SPOT GRADES REPRESENT - TOP OF
 CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, ETC.
  
 4. GRADE THE PLAZAS TO DRAIN TO ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 INSTEAD OF FLOWING INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY. (REPEAT COMMENT)
  
 5. SECTIONS C-C AND F-F SHOW VALLEY GUTTER BUT THESE
 GUTTERS DO NOT APPEAR ON THE GRADING PLAN. (REPEAT
 COMMENT)
  
 6. CONFIRM CURBING AND PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR SECTION D-D.
 (REPEAT COMMENT)
  
 7. LABEL THE DRAINAGE PIPE SIZE CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE
 S-401.
  
 8. CONFIRM SE INVERT OF 0.00 SHOWN FOR STRUCTURE S-104.
 ALSO SHOW THE PIPE.
  
 9. WHY TWO OUTFALL PIPES (EAST AND SOUTH) AT STRUCTURE
 S-201? CONFIRM THERE IS A DRAINAGE MANHOLE TO THE EAST
 OF STRUCTURE S-201.
  
 10. SHOW CORRECT PIPE CONNECTIVITY FOR DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES ON DIXIE HWY AND 4TH STREET.
  
 11. PROVIDE VIDEO OF EXISTING STORM PIPES ON 4TH
 STREET. SOME PIPES MAY BE VCP.
  
 12. ADD VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION
 DATA.
  
 13. ADD THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 TO GENERAL
 NOTE #7 ON THE COVER SHEET.
  
 14. CALL OUT THE TYPE OF CURB RAMPS AND ADA MATS FOR
 DRIVEWAYS CROSSING SIDEWALK ON 4TH STREET.
  
 15. PROVIDE MINIMUM 5 FEET OF HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN SANITARY LATERALS AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 16. RELOCATE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES FROM UNDER PLANTER
 AREAS.
  
 17. INTERCEPT STORMWATER RUNOFF AT ALL DRIVEWAYS AND
 CONVEY TO INTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 18. BETWEEN TYPICAL SECTIONS C AND B, THE INTERNAL
 DRIVE GOES FROM INVERTED CROWN TO NORMAL CROWN. HOW IS
 THE STORMWATER RUNOFF COLLECTED?
  
 19. WAS CONSIDERATION MADE TO CONNECT STRUCTURE S-302
 AND S-108 AND ELIMINATE THE PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURES
 S-301 AND S-201?
  
 20. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE SHOWING
 STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS, WHERE THE PIPES ARE COMING INTO
 THE STRUCTURE, WHERE THE WEIR WILL BE LOCATED AND
 ELEVATIONS OF THE INVERTS AND WEIR OVERFLOW.
  
 21. HOW WILL THE LOADING DOCK DRAIN?
  
 22. SHOW UTILITIES (INCLUDING EXFILTRATION TRENCHES) ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 23. CIVIL PLAN 5 SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN:
 A. PARKING DIMENSIONS DO NOT LINE UP WITH THE STRIPING
 ON 4TH STREET.
 B. NEED TO CALLOUT STRIPING ON N. DIXIE HWY.
 C. CALLOUT CROSSWALK STRIPING.
 D. RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN FOR DRIVEWAY TO QUADRILLE BLVD.
 E. RIGHT TURN ARROW STRIPING FOR DRIVEWAY TO N. DIXIE
 HWY.
  
 24. ANY OFFSITE ENGINEERING PLANS?
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-01-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-01-2017 Time 16:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-01-2017 Time 16:27 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-01 08:10:48COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. THE
 COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW OF
 THE APRIL 13, 2017 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 1. CIVIL PLAN 2 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN:
 A. STORM PIPE ENTERING NORTH SIDE OF EXISTING DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURE AT NE CORNER OF QUADRILLE BLVD AND 4TH ST
 WILL BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURE S-106.
 B. EXISTING WATE SERVICES TO BE ABANDONED ARE TO BE
 REMOVED BACK TO THE MAIN.
 C. EXISTING SEWER LATERALS TO BE ABANDONED ARE TO BE
 REMOVED BACK TO THE MAIN AND THE WYE PLUGGED AT THE
 MAIN.
  
 2. CONFIRM IF THE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE AT NE CORNER
 OF QUADRILLE BLVD AND 4TH ST WILL STILL BE NEEDED. IF
 NOT, THIS STRUCTURE AND THE STORM PIPE CROSSING UNDER
 4TH ST WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. CHECK GRADING FLOW ARROWS FOR DRIVEWAY TO 4TH
 STREET. STRUCTURE S-108 HAS A RIM ELEVATION OF 14.00
 FEET NGVD. SPOT GRADE ON DRIVEWAY TO THE NORTH IS 13.50
 FEET NGVD.
  
 4. CHECK GRADING OF DRIVEWAY TO DIXIE HWY. TRENCH DRAIN
 AT PROPERTY LINE IS AT ELEVATION 12.25 FEET NGVD. SPOT
 GRADE AT INTERIOR DRIVE TO THE WEST IS ALSO AT
 ELEVATION 12.25 FEET NGVD.
  
 5. GRADE THE PLAZAS TO DRAIN TO ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 INSTEAD OF FLOWING INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 6. SECTIONS C-C AND F-F SHOW VALLEY GUTTER BUT THESE
 GUTTERS DO NOT APPEAR ON THE GRADING PLAN.
  
 7. CONFIRM CURBING AND PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR SECTION D-D.
  
 8. CIVIL PLAN 5 SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN:
 A. MISSING STOP SIGN AT WEST END OF 4TH STREET.
 B. MISSING RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN FOR DRIVEWAY ONTO
 QUADRILLE BLVD.
 C. DIMENSION THE LENGTHS OF DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPES
 WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-08-2017 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-08-2017 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-08 12:34:40THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT FOR STRUCTURES IN A
 SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA IS ONE FOOT ABOVE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR WORK WITH IN THE 4TH
 STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 4. CONSIDER MOVING WEIRS TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE S-201.
  
 5. MOVE ONSITE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG N. DIXIE
 HIGHWAY FURTHER INTO THE SITE SO WHEN THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH IS REHABILITATED IN A FEW YEARS, THE
 CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO DIXIE HIGHWAY
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 6. STORM MANHOLE S-106 APPEARS TO BE LOCATED IN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OF QUADRILLE BLVD.
  
 7. QUADRILLE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. APPROVAL FROM
 FDOT WILL BE NEEDED FOR WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 8. WHAT IS THE PHASING OF THE 4TH STREET UTILITY
 CONSTRUCTION AND ROAD DEMOLITION. THE WATER AND SEWER
 PLAN SHOWS A PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL RUNNING THROUGH AN
 EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET AT THE EAST END OF 4TH STREET.
  
 9. THE PROPOSED WEIR ELEVATION IS 11.00 FT NGVD. THE
 GRATE ELEVATION IS 12.25 FOR THE PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN
 ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY ON N. DIXIE HIGHWAY. SUBMIT THE
 HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE FOR THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR THE
 25-YEAR 3-DAY STORM DEMONSTRATING THE HGL IS BELOW THE
 TRENCH GRATE ELEVATION.
  
 10. DO NOT SHOW TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER ON THE
 DRIVEWAY APRON TO DIXIE HIGHWAY.
  
 11. WOOD POWER POLE ENCROACHING ON DIXIE HWY DRIVEWAY
 APRON.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED
 BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER FOR THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED STORM RUNOFF WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 AND PEAK FLOOD STAGES FOR 5-YEAR 1-DAY, 25-YEAR 3-DAY
 AND 100-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORMS PER SFWMD CRITERIA.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP FOR THIS PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-25-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-25-2017 Time 13:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-25 13:40:40PASSED WITH CONDITIONS OF:
  
 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ADJACENT RIGHTS OF WAY.
 3. APPROVED ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-03-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-03-2017 Time 11:01 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-03 11:05:211. PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PERTAINING TO
 ENGINEERING, UTILITIES, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND
 RE-PLAT STILL APPLY.
 2. SANITATION COLLECTION WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM PETER
 BIENIEK, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 9 Status P Date 11-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-12-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-12 16:38:10PASSED, UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1. CONDUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET EVERY YEAR FOR 2 YEARS WHEN THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 85% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 2. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSES SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, WARRANT 1 EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT
 2 FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT 4 PEDESTRIAN
 VOLUME, AND WARRANT 7 CRASH EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTED IN
 THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
 THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DATA SHOULD BE
 COLLECTED FOR THE ANALYSES.
 3. SHOULD THE REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE DENIED, THE
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO
 MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ADDITIONAL TDM
 MEASURES, WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIVERT TRIPS TO THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTIONS, ETC. IN
 ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD, ON CITY?S REQUEST,
 CONDUCT AN ENGINEERING STUDY FOR A POTENTIAL ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AT
 4TH STREET, AND PURSUE SUCH A CROSSWALK APPROVAL WITH
 FDOT, AND IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCT SUCH ENHANCED
 CROSSWALK AT THE DEVELOPER?S OWN EXPENSES.
 4. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC
 SIGNAL AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET UNTIL THE
 OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES
 OR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION (#1, #2 AND #3 ABOVE) ARE FULLY
 MET.
 5. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 6. PROVIDE THE CITY A COPY OF THE UPDATED PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN ANNUALLY, STARTING AT ONE (1) YEAR
 AFTER CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, UNTIL
 TWO (2) YEARS AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED. THE PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOULD DOCUMENT THE USAGE AND
 SPILLBACK, IF ANY, AT THE 4TH STREET VALET STATION, AND
 ANY MEASURE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS THE SPILLBACK, IF
 ANY.
 7. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TDM MEASURES:
 O AT LEAST 2 PARKING SPACES FOR CAR-SHARING SERVICES
 O MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 8 Status P Date 09-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-29-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-21-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-29 15:50:19PASSED, UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1. CONDUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET EVERY YEAR FOR 2 YEARS WHEN THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 85% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 2. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSES SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, WARRANT 1 EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT
 2 FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT 4 PEDESTRIAN
 VOLUME, AND WARRANT 7 CRASH EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTED IN
 THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
 THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DATA SHOULD BE
 COLLECTED FOR THE ANALYSES.
 3. SHOULD THE REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE DENIED, THE
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO
 MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ADDITIONAL TDM
 MEASURES, WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIVERT TRIPS TO THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTIONS, ETC. IN
 ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD, ON CITY?S REQUEST,
 CONDUCT AN ENGINEERING STUDY FOR A POTENTIAL ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AT
 4TH STREET, AND PURSUE SUCH A CROSSWALK APPROVAL WITH
 FDOT, AND IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCT SUCH ENHANCED
 CROSSWALK AT THE DEVELOPER?S OWN EXPENSES.
 4. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC
 SIGNAL AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET UNTIL THE
 OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES
 OR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION (#1, #2 AND #3 ABOVE) ARE FULLY
 MET.
 5. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 6. RESERVED PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL TENANTS, IF
 IMPLEMENTED, SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 156 PARKING SPACES
 (IF 1 SPACE PER UNIT) OR 89 PARKING SPACES (IF 2 SPACES
 PER UNIT) OR EQUIVALENT OR AS AMENDED IN PARKING
 CALCULATIONS SUCH THAT THE UNRESERVED PARKING SPACES
 EXCEED THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR THE REMAINING USES PER
 SHARED PARKING CALCULATIONS. RESERVED PARKING SHALL BE
 IMPLEMENTED ONLY AFTER UNBUNDLED PARKING POLICY IS USED
 FOR RESIDENTIAL LEASE AND IF THE RESIDENTIAL TENANTS
 ELECT TO PAY FOR THE PARKING SPACES.
 7. PROVIDE THE CITY A COPY OF THE UPDATED PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN ANNUALLY, STARTING AT ONE (1) YEAR
 AFTER CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, UNTIL
 TWO (2) YEARS AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED. THE PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOULD DOCUMENT THE USAGE AND
 SPILLBACK, IF ANY, AT THE 4TH STREET VALET STATION, AND
 ANY MEASURE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS THE SPILLBACK, IF
 ANY.
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TDM MEASURES:
 O AT LEAST 2 PARKING SPACES FOR CAR-SHARING SERVICES
 O MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE
 O A TROLLEY SHELTER ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE EXACT
 LOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
 O CONTRIBUTION TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND. AMOUNT TO BE
 DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
 O UNBUNDLED PARKING FOR RESIDENTS AND PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYEES
 O TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY
 9. PROVIDE ANNUAL SUMMARY TO THE CITY ON THE USAGE OF
 THE CAR-SHARING, UNBUNDLED PARKING AND PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM, AND TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY BY DECEMBER 31ST OF
 EACH YEAR.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 7 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-13-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-13 12:10:54PASSED, BUT PLEASE REVISE THE SITE DATA TABLE PER
 COMMENT BELOW. ALSO SEE CONDITION #7 ON RESERVED
 PARKING SPACES.
 1. PLEASE REVIEW AND REVISE THE SITE DATA (SHEET A0.01)
 AND PARKING DATA (A0.06) SHEETS AS THEY CONTAIN
 INCONSISTENT INFORMATION IN TERMS OF NUMBER OF UNITS
 AND PARKING CALCULATIONS. ALSO, IT APPEARS THAT 230
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE PROVIDED BUT THE PARKING
 CALCULATION ONLY INCLUDED 225 UNITS.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1. CONDUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET EVERY YEAR FOR 2 YEARS WHEN THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 85% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 2. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSES SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, WARRANT 1 EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT
 2 FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT 4 PEDESTRIAN
 VOLUME, AND WARRANT 7 CRASH EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTED IN
 THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
 THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DATA SHOULD BE
 COLLECTED FOR THE ANALYSES.
 3. SHOULD THE REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE DENIED, THE
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO
 MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ADDITIONAL TDM
 MEASURES, WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIVERT TRIPS TO THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTIONS, ETC. IN
 ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD, ON CITY'S REQUEST,
 CONDUCT AN ENGINEERING STUDY FOR A POTENTIAL ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AT
 4TH STREET, AND PURSUE SUCH A CROSSWALK APPROVAL WITH
 FDOT, AND IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCT SUCH ENHANCED
 CROSSWALK AT THE DEVELOPER'S OWN EXPENSES.
 4. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC
 SIGNAL AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET UNTIL THE
 OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES
 OR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION (#1, #2 AND #3 ABOVE) ARE FULLY
 MET.
 5. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 6. RESERVED PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL TENANTS, IF
 IMPLEMENTED, SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 156 PARKING SPACES
 (IF 1 SPACE PER UNIT) OR 89 PARKING SPACES (IF 2 SPACES
 PER UNIT) OR EQUIVALENT OR AS AMENDED IN PARKING
 CALCULATIONS SUCH THAT THE UNRESERVED PARKING SPACES
 EXCEED THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR THE REMAINING USES PER
 SHARED PARKING CALCULATIONS. RESERVED PARKING SHALL BE
 IMPLEMENTED ONLY AFTER UNBUNDLED PARKING POLICY IS USED
 FOR RESIDENTIAL LEASE AND IF THE RESIDENTIAL TENANTS
 ELECT TO PAY FOR THE PARKING SPACES.
 7. PROVIDE THE CITY A COPY OF THE UPDATED PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN ANNUALLY, STARTING AT ONE (1) YEAR
 AFTER CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, UNTIL
 TWO (2) YEARS AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED. THE PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOULD DOCUMENT THE USAGE AND
 SPILLBACK, IF ANY, AT THE 4TH STREET VALET STATION, AND
 ANY MEASURE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS THE SPILLBACK, IF
 ANY.
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TDM MEASURES:
 O AT LEAST 2 PARKING SPACES FOR CAR-SHARING SERVICES
 O MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE
 O A TROLLEY SHELTER ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE EXACT
 LOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
 O CONTRIBUTION TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND. AMOUNT TO BE
 DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
 O UNBUNDLED PARKING FOR RESIDENTS AND PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYEES
 O TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY
 9. PROVIDE ANNUAL SUMMARY TO THE CITY ON THE USAGE OF
 THE CAR-SHARING, UNBUNDLED PARKING AND PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM, AND TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY BY DECEMBER 31ST OF
 EACH YEAR.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 6 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-17-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-09-17 12:12:36PASSED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN BETWEEN 4TH STREET
 AND DIXIE HIGHWAY ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. THE MEDIAN
 DESIGN SHOULD PREVENT WESTBOUND VEHICLES FROM MAKING
 LEFT-TURNS FROM THE DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON
 THE TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, THE SITE DRIVEWAY, AND EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN AT
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 2. CONDUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET EVERY YEAR FOR 2 YEARS WHEN THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 85% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 3. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSES SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, WARRANT 1 EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT
 2 FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT 4 PEDESTRIAN
 VOLUME, AND WARRANT 7 CRASH EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTED IN
 THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
 THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DATA SHOULD BE
 COLLECTED FOR THE ANALYSES.
 4. SHOULD THE REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE DENIED, THE
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO
 MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ADDITIONAL TDM
 MEASURES, WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIVERT TRIPS TO THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTIONS, ETC. IN
 ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD, ON CITY'S REQUEST,
 CONDUCT AN ENGINEERING STUDY FOR A POTENTIAL ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AT
 4TH STREET, AND PURSUE SUCH A CROSSWALK APPROVAL WITH
 FDOT, AND IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCT SUCH ENHANCED
 CROSSWALK AT THE DEVELOPER'S OWN EXPENSES.
 5. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC
 SIGNAL AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET UNTIL THE
 OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES
 OR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION (#3, #4 AND #5 ABOVE) ARE FULLY
 MET.
 6. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 7. PLEASE REPLACE OR RESET THE PAVERS AT THE DIXIE
 HIGHWAY/4TH STREET INTERSECTION AS THE PAVERS WILL BE
 IMPACTED DURING MILLING AND RESURFACING.
 8. NO RESERVED PARKING IS ALLOWED FOR ANY TENANT SINCE
 THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING SPACES IS AT THE MINIMUM
 ALLOWED WITH SHARED PARKING.
 9. PROVIDE THE CITY A COPY OF THE UPDATED PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN ANNUALLY, STARTING AT ONE (1) YEAR
 AFTER CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, UNTIL
 TWO (2) YEARS AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED. THE PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOULD DOCUMENT THE USAGE AND
 SPILLBACK, IF ANY, AT THE 4TH STREET VALET STATION, AND
 ANY MEASURE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS THE SPILLBACK, IF
 ANY.
 10. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TDM MEASURES:
 O AT LEAST 2 PARKING SPACES FOR CAR-SHARING SERVICES
 O BIKE SHARING STATIONS, MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES OR
 SCOOTER RACKS
 O A TROLLEY SHELTER ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE EXACT
 LOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
 O CONTRIBUTION TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND. AMOUNT TO BE
 DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
 O UNBUNDLED PARKING FOR RESIDENTS AND PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYEES
 O TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY
 11. PROVIDE ANNUAL SUMMARY TO THE CITY ON THE USAGE OF
 THE CAR-SHARING, UNBUNDLED PARKING AND PARKING CASH-OUT
 PROGRAM, AND TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY BY DECEMBER 31ST OF
 EACH YEAR.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-23-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-04-23 10:25:201. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. IN ADDITION TO BEING A TAXI/RIDESHARING
 PICKUP/DROPOFF, PLEASE CLARIFY WHEN THE VALET STATION
 IN THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE WILL BE USED AND BY WHICH
 TYPES OF USERS.
 3. WOULD TAXI/RIDESHARING PICKUP/DROPOFF FOR HOTEL
 GUESTS BE LOCATED AT THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE VALET
 STATION, AND THE 4TH STREET VALET STATION WOULD NOT
 ALLOW TAXI/RIDESHARING PICKUP/DROPOFF? IF SO,
 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE WOULD BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE CLEAR
 DIRECTIONS TO HOTEL GUESTS.
 4. THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THAT 5 VALET ATTENDANTS
 ARE NEEDED AT THE 4TH STREET VALET STATION, BUT THE
 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN INDICATES THAT A MAXIMUM OF 6
 VALET ATTENDANTS ARE NEEDED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. THIS
 LEAVES 1 VALET ATTENDANT FOR THE OTHER 3 VALET
 STATIONS. PLEASE CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF VALET ATTENDANTS
 NEEDED.
 5. IN THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE PARKING
 ACCUMULATION CALCULATION REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF
 OCCUPIED PARKING SPACES AT ANY GIVEN TIME, WHICH DOES
 NOT REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF VEHICLE ARRIVALS AND
 DEPARTURES. THE NUMBER OF VEHICLE ARRIVALS AND
 DEPARTURES ARE DOCUMENTED IN THE VEHICULAR TRIP
 GENERATION IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, WHICH SHOWS AN AM PEAK
 HOUR TRIPS OF 395 (258 IN / 137 OUT) AND PM PEAK HOUR
 TRIPS OF 437 (163 IN / 275 OUT).
 6. THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN INDICATES THAT RESIDENTS
 AND OFFICE TENANTS COULD CHOOSE TO PICK UP THEIR
 VEHICLES EITHER INSIDE THE GARAGE OR AT THE 4TH STREET
 VALET STATION. COULD RESIDENTS AND OFFICE TENANTS BE
 RESTRICTED (THROUGH THE PROPOSED EMAIL/TEXT MESSAGE
 SYSTEM) TO PICK UP THEIR VEHICLES AT VALET STATIONS
 INSIDE THE GARAGE DURING PEAK HOUR OR DYNAMICALLY BASED
 ON THE DEMAND AND CONGESTION LEVEL AT THE 4TH STREET
 VALET STATION?
 7. CLARIFY IF THE ASSUMED 2.5-MINUTE VALET RUNNING TIME
 IS REASONABLE, GIVEN 33% OF PARKING SPACES ARE TANDEM
 PARKING SPACES, 31% OF PARKING SPACES ARE PARKING LIFTS
 WITH SOME BEING TANDEM PARKING LIFTS, AND THE POTENTIAL
 FOR VALET ATTENDANTS TO DRIVE 5 FLOORS DOWN THE GARAGE.
 8. WHAT BACKUP PLANS ARE IN PLACE SHOULD THE PARKING
 LIFT MALFUNCTION AND THE VALET ATTENDANTS ARE UNABLE TO
 RETRIEVE VEHICLES ON THE PARKING LIFTS?
 9. WHAT MEASURES ARE IN PLACE TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN
 COMMERCIAL PATRONS, HOTEL GUESTS, OFFICE TENANTS AND
 RESIDENTS TO MAKE SURE THEY DROP OFF VEHICLES AT THE
 APPROPRIATE VALET STATIONS?
 10. ARE COMMERCIAL PATRONS AND HOTEL GUESTS ALLOWED TO
 SELF PARK?
 11. PROVIDE VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF CIRCULATION ROUTES
 FOR EACH VALET STATION, AS WELL AS THE UBER/LYFT
 CIRCULATION ROUTES. ALSO, PROVIDE AUTOTURN EXHIBITS AT
 LOCATIONS WITH LIMITED CURB RADII SUCH AS AROUND THE
 4TH STREET VALET STATION AND THE EASTERN GARAGE
 ENTRANCE.
 12. THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS IN THE PARKING MANAGEMENT
 PLAN INDICATED THAT A SMALL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL
 TENANTS WILL BE OFFERED TWO-TANDEM SPACES AS PART OF
 THEIR RENTAL AGREEMENT. SINCE THE CURRENT PARKING
 SUPPLY IS AT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY CITY CODE WITH
 SHARED PARKING, ANY RESERVED PARKING SPACES WOULD
 RESULT IN CODE VIOLATION AS THOSE RESERVED PARKING
 SPACES WOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM THE SHARED PARKING
 CALCULATION.
 13. CONSIDERING MOVING ALL OR PART OF THE OUTDOOR BIKE
 RACKS AND BIKE SHARING STATIONS TO BE UNDER THE CANOPY
 OR COVER.
 14. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TDM MEASURES INCLUDING THE TDM
 MEASURES LISTED BELOW, IN ADDITION TO DESIGNATED
 CAR-SHARING PARKING SPACES, BIKE SHARING STATION,
 TROLLEY STOP ON DIXIE HIGHWAY AND CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
 TROLLEY FUND. DETAILS OF THE TDM MEASURES WILL BE
 DETERMINED BY THE CITY. MONITORING OF THESE TDM
 MEASURES WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED.
 O UNBUNDLED PARKING/PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM
 O TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY
  
 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS RELATED TO COMMENTS PROVIDED
 PREVIOUSLY WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF
 APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN BETWEEN 4TH STREET
 AND DIXIE HIGHWAY ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. THE MEDIAN
 DESIGN SHOULD PREVENT WESTBOUND VEHICLES FROM MAKING
 LEFT-TURNS FROM THE DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON
 THE TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, THE SITE DRIVEWAY, AND EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN AT
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 2. PURSUE WITH FDOT ON ELIMINATING THE EXCLUSIVE
 RIGHT-TURN LANE REQUIREMENT ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. THE
 CITY WILL PROVIDE A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO THE APPLICANT.
 3. CONDUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET EVERY YEAR FOR 2 YEARS WHEN THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 85% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 4. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSES SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, WARRANT 1 EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT
 2 FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT 4 PEDESTRIAN
 VOLUME, AND WARRANT 7 CRASH EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTED IN
 THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
 THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DATA SHOULD BE
 COLLECTED FOR THE ANALYSES.
 5. SHOULD THE REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE DENIED, THE
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO
 MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ADDITIONAL TDM
 MEASURES, WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIVERT TRIPS TO THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTIONS, ETC. IN
 ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD, ON CITY?S REQUEST,
 CONDUCT AN ENGINEERING STUDY FOR A POTENTIAL ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AT
 4TH STREET, AND PURSUE SUCH A CROSSWALK APPROVAL WITH
 FDOT, AND IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCT SUCH ENHANCED
 CROSSWALK AT THE DEVELOPER?S OWN EXPENSES.
 6. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC
 SIGNAL AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET UNTIL THE
 OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES
 OR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION (#3, #4 AND #5 ABOVE) ARE FULLY
 MET.
 7. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 8. PLEASE REPLACE OR RESET THE PAVERS AT THE DIXIE
 HIGHWAY/4TH STREET INTERSECTION AS THE PAVERS WILL BE
 IMPACTED DURING MILLING AND RESURFACING.
 9. A TROLLEY STOP ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BE REQUIRED
 AS PART OF THE TDM MEASURES. THE EXACT LOCATION WILL BE
 DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-13-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-13 15:11:311. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. APPROXIMATELY TWO-THIRD OF THE PARKING SPACES ARE
 EITHER TANDEM OR PARKING LIFTS. CLARIFY IF THESE
 PARKING SPACES ARE USED BY VALET ONLY. THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY ASSUMED ONLY 20% OF TRIPS ARE USING VALET.
 3. THE VALET LANES ON 4TH STREET MAY NOT PROVIDE
 SUFFICIENT STORAGE FOR VEHICLES. VALET QUEUE LENGTH OF
 6 VEHICLES REQUIRES THE SECOND VALET LANE BE OCCUPIED,
 WHICH MAY BLOCK OTHER EGRESS VEHICLES. ALLOWING
 UBER/LYFT IN THE VALET LANES MAY WORSEN THE ISSUES AS
 UBER/LYFT VEHICLES MAY OCCUPY THE VALET LANES FOR A
 LONGER TIME DURING PICK-UP. VEHICLES BACKUP ON THE
 WESTBOUND APPROACH OF QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET
 MAY BLOCK EGRESS VEHICLES AND FURTHER EXACERBATE THE
 ISSUES. PLEASE ALSO VERIFY THE PERCENTAGE OF VALET
 TRIPS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TYPE OF PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED.
 4. PROVIDE A VALET OPERATION MANAGEMENT PLAN TO DISCUSS
 THE DETAILED OPERATIONS OF THE VALET, AND HOW THE QUEUE
 ISSUES COULD BE ADDRESSED SHOULD THEY ARISE. THE PLAN
 SHOULD DISCUSS THE RUNNING TIME, ROUTE, AND NUMBER OF
 VALET STAFF, AS WELL AS THE PLAN OF ACTION SHOULD THE
 VALET LANE EGRESS IS BLOCKED BY QUEUED VEHICLES AT
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET.
 5. IDENTIFY AN AREA INSIDE THE GARAGE WHICH COULD BE
 CONVERTED TO AN ADDITIONAL VALET DROP-OFF/PICK-UP AREA
 SHOULD THE NEED ARISES.
 6. SHEET A0.06 - CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 PERMITS UP TO
 FOUR STANDARD PARKING SPACES TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE
 PARKING REQUIREMENT WHEN UP TO EIGHT MOTORCYCLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. THEREFORE, THE TOTAL PARKING COUNT
 TOWARDS THE REQUIRED PARKING WOULD BE 700.
 7. SHEET A1.05 - PROVIDE THE EQUIVALENCE OF ONE PARKING
 SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF THE DEAD-END AISLE IN WEST
 SIDE OF THE GARAGE AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR
 TURNING AROUND PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111.
 8. ON CIVIL PLAN SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6, DARKEN THE LINEWORK
 FOR THE PROPOSED CURB. ALSO, THE VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF
 LANES ON 4TH STREET DOES NOT SHOW PROPOSED PAVEMENT.
 PLEASE REVISE.
 9. SHOW SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE INTERNAL
 ROADWAYS AND ALONG 4TH STREET INCLUDING PARKING SPACES.
 10. SHEET 9 SECTION H ? THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE AT THE
 RIGHT LOCATION. THERE SHOULD BE 9 FEET BETWEEN THE
 PARKING LANE AND THE PROPERTY LINE ACCORDING TO THE
 CROSS-SECTION.
 11. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 12. PROVIDE 12-FOOT SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE DRIVEWAY AND
 NORTH OF THE PROPERTY ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD.
 13. PROVIDE ADA-COMPLIANCE CONCRETE LANDING PAD FOR THE
 RELOCATED BUS STOP WITH SHELTER ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD.
 14. IN THE AUTOTURN EXHIBIT, THE PASSENGER CAR RUNS
 OVER THE STRIPPED MEDIAN ISLAND AREA JUST OUTSIDE THE
 GARAGE ENTRANCE FROM QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. PLEASE MODIFY
 THE STRIPING TO DESIGN FOR PASSENGER CARS. PLEASE ALSO
 SHOW TWO CONCURRENT PASSENGER CARS MAKING THAT TURN IN
 THE OPPOSING DIRECTIONS, AND SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 VEHICLES USED IN THE AUTOTURN PATHS.
 15. PLEASE REPLACE OR RESET THE PAVERS AT THE DIXIE
 HIGHWAY/4TH STREET INTERSECTION AS THE PAVERS WILL BE
 IMPACTED DURING MILLING AND RESURFACING.
 16. PROVIDE TDM MEASURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
 THE TDM MEASURES LISTED BELOW. DETAILS OF THE TDM
 MEASURES WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY. MONITORING OF
 THESE TDM MEASURES WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED.
 O UNBUNDLED PARKING/PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM
 O TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY
 O CONTRIBUTE FUNDING TO TROLLEY OPERATIONS
 O LIVE NEAR YOUR WORK PROGRAM
 17. A TROLLEY STOP ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BE REQUIRED
 AS PART OF THE TDM MEASURES. THE EXACT LOCATION WILL BE
 DETERMINED BY THE CITY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS RELATED TO COMMENTS PROVIDED
 PREVIOUSLY WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF
 APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN BETWEEN 4TH STREET
 AND DIXIE HIGHWAY ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. THE MEDIAN
 DESIGN SHOULD PREVENT WESTBOUND VEHICLES FROM MAKING
 LEFT-TURNS FROM THE DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON
 THE TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, THE SITE DRIVEWAY, AND EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN AT
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 2. PURSUE WITH FDOT ON ELIMINATING THE EXCLUSIVE
 RIGHT-TURN LANE REQUIREMENT ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. THE
 CITY WILL PROVIDE A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO THE APPLICANT.
 3. CONDUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET EVERY YEAR FOR 2 YEARS WHEN THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 85% OF THE PROPOSED
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, HOTEL OR GENERAL OFFICE USES, AND
 THE WESTBOUND APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS OPERATING AT LOS F DURING WEEKDAY AM OR PM
 PEAK HOUR WHEN ANALYZED USING THE LATEST HIGHWAY
 CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 4. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSES SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, WARRANT 1 EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT
 2 FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME, WARRANT 4 PEDESTRIAN
 VOLUME, AND WARRANT 7 CRASH EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTED IN
 THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
 THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DATA SHOULD BE
 COLLECTED FOR THE ANALYSES.
 5. SHOULD THE REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE DENIED, THE
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO
 MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ADDITIONAL TDM
 MEASURES, WAYFINDING SIGNS TO DIVERT TRIPS TO THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTIONS, ETC. IN
 ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD, ON CITY?S REQUEST,
 CONDUCT AN ENGINEERING STUDY FOR A POTENTIAL ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AT
 4TH STREET, AND PURSUE SUCH A CROSSWALK APPROVAL WITH
 FDOT, AND IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCT SUCH ENHANCED
 CROSSWALK AT THE DEVELOPER?S OWN EXPENSES.
 6. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC
 SIGNAL AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET UNTIL THE
 OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES
 OR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION (#3, #4 AND #5 ABOVE) ARE FULLY
 MET.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-14-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-14 18:03:51TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. THE TRAFFIC COUNTS AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/DIXIE
 HIGHWAY WERE FROM YEAR 2012, WHICH IS MORE THAN 6 YEARS
 AGO. PLEASE COLLECT NEW COUNTS.
 3. PLEASE GROW HISTORICAL TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS TO
 YEAR 2018 BASED ON HISTORICAL GROWTH RATES.
 4. CLARIFY IF THESE APPROVED PROJECTS ARE INCLUDED IN
 THE COMMITTED TRIP CALCULATION: 360 ROSEMARY TOWER,
 BANYAN PLACE, AND FLAGLER BANYAN SQUARE (OLD CITY HALL
 SITE). IF NOT, PLEASE INCLUDE THEM.
 5. THE LAND USE INTENSITIES ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 6. USE ITE METHODOLOGY FOR INTERNAL TRIP CALCULATION.
 SOME OF THE INTERNAL TRIP REDUCTION ARE HIGHER THAN THE
 PERCENTAGE INDICATED. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 7. PROVIDE SOURCE OF THE 20% MULTIMODAL REDUCTION. THE
 NON-VEHICLE MODE SHARE FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY IS
 CURRENTLY AT APPROXIMATELY 10%. MULTIMODAL REDUCTION,
 IF PROPOSED, SHOULD BE APPLIED AFTER INTERNAL TRIPS ARE
 ACCOUNTED FOR.
 8. PROPOSE TDM MEASURES TO SUPPORT MULTIMODAL
 REDUCTION.
 9. THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT IN FIGURE 4 ASSUMES SOME OF THE
 TRIPS ARE TAKING LONGER ROUTES TO ACCESS THE GARAGE,
 WHILE THERE ARE MORE DIRECT ROUTES ACCESSING THE GARAGE
 VIA DIXIE HIGHWAY AND 4TH STREET. PLEASE REVIEW AND
 REVISE.
 10. PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED VALET CIRCULATION ROUTE.
 IT APPEARS THAT THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT IN FIGURE 4 ASSUMES
 VALET VEHICLES WOULD ACCESS THE GARAGE VIA QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD. PLEASE HAVE THE VALET VEHICLES USE THE
 DRIVEWAY ON 4TH STREET INSTEAD.
 11. IN FIGURE 2 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION, A TRIP
 DISTRIBUTION OF 5% IS ASSUMED ON DIXIE HIGHWAY BETWEEN
 4TH STREET AND BANYAN BOULEVARD, BUT 10% IS ASSUMED
 SOUTH OF BANYAN BOULEVARD, WHICH SEEMS UNREASONABLE.
 PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 12. PLEASE REPORT HCM 2010 RESULTS BUT NOT HCM 2000
 RESULTS.
 13. DIXIE HIGHWAY/QUADRILLE BOULEVARD SHOULD BE
 ANALYZED WITH ACTUATED-COORDINATED CONTROL TYPE BUT NOT
 ACTUATED-UNCOORDINATED CONTROL TYPE. PLEASE REVISE.
 14. THE TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS AT QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/4TH STREET ASSUMES STORAGE SPACE OF 2
 VEHICLES AT THE MEDIAN ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD, BUT IT
 APPEARS THAT STORAGE SPACE FOR AT MOST 1 VEHICLE IS
 PROVIDED. PLEASE REVISE.
 15. THE WESTBOUND MOVEMENT AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET IS EXPECTED TO OPERATE AT LOS F DURING PM PEAK
 HOUR UNDER YEAR 2022 TOTAL CONDITIONS, AND THE QUEUE IS
 EXPECTED TO BLOCK VEHICLE ACCESS TO THE HOTEL/OFFICE
 DROP OFF. CONSIDER PROVIDING WAYFINDING SIGNS TO
 REROUTE LEFT-TURNING VEHICLES TO THE QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD/3RD STREET INTERSECTION VIA DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 VERIFY SUFFICIENT CAPACITIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL
 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS.
 16. INSTALL SPEED TABLES ALONG 3RD STREET WEST OF
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD TO PREVENT VEHICLES FROM CUTTING
 THROUGH 3RD STREET TO GET TO BANYAN BOULEVARD WEST.
 COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ON THE LOCATIONS
 OF THE SPEED TABLES.
 17. MONITOR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS AS WELL AS
 SAFETY DATA AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET AND
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY, AND CONDUCT SIGNAL
 WARRANT ANALYSIS AT THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY
 EVERY YEAR FOR 24 MONTHS AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED.
 THE SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WILL ASSUME OUTBOUND
 VEHICLES AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET WOULD USE
 THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY. IF A SIGNAL IS
 WARRANTED, CONSTRUCT A SIGNAL AT THE QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY.
 18. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SIGNAL
 AT THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY, UNTIL 24 MONTHS
 AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED.
 19. SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN AT QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH
 STREET HAS ONLY 10 AND 3 VEHICLES PER HOUR DURING AM
 AND PM PEAK HOUR PER THE TRAFFIC STUDY. CLARIFY IF AN
 EXCLUSIVE LEFT-TURN LANE IS WARRANTED. CONSIDER
 EXTENDING THE RAISED MEDIAN TO 4TH STREET AND PROVIDE A
 PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING ACROSS QUADRILLE BOULEVARD TO ACCESS THE BUS
 STOP. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP ON THE WEST SIDE OF
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/4TH STREET.
 20. PROVIDE QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR VALET VEHICLES AT THE
 DROP-OFF, AND VERIFY THAT THE VEHICLE QUEUES WOULD NOT
 SPILL BACK ONTO 4TH STREET.
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 21. PROVIDE FDOT DRIVEWAY LETTER OR PERMIT.
 22. INCLUDE DESIGN FOR THE PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN ALONG
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN THE CIVIL PLAN. THE MEDIAN
 DESIGN SHOULD PREVENT WESTBOUND VEHICLES FROM MAKING
 LEFT-TURNS FROM THE DRIVEWAY. THE MEDIAN DESIGN AS
 CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT RESTRICT
 WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN MOVEMENT. PROVIDE 10-FOOT
 LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN.
 23. SHEET A0.06 - UP TO EIGHT MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACES
 MAY BE PERMITTED IN LIEU OF FOUR STANDARD PARKING
 SPACES PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111. PLEASE REVISE THE
 PARKING COUNT. ALSO, WHAT ARE THE ?LIFTS? PARKING
 SPACE? THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE ?LIFTS? PARKING
 SPACES.
 24. SOME OF THE TANDEM PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO HAVE
 A PARKING CURB STOP IN THE OUTSIDE PARKING SPACE.
 PLEASE REVISE.
 25. SHEET A1.04 - A BUILDING COLUMN ENCROACHES ONE OF
 THE TANDEM PARKING SPACES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 GARAGE. PLEASE REVISE.
 26. PROVIDE THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE PARKING SPACE AT THE
 TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END AISLE AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN
 AREA FOR TURNING AROUND PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111.
 27. SHEETS A1.04 AND A1.05 - CLARIFY HOW VEHICLES WILL
 SAFELY PULL OUT FROM THE TWO DEAD-END PARKING SPACES ON
 THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR
 VEHICLE PULL OUT FOR PASSENGER CARS.
 28. THE TWO DRIVEWAYS ON DIXIE HIGHWAY DOES NOT MEET
 THE MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SEPARATION OF 125 FEET PER CITY
 CODE 94-312. PLEASE REVISE.
 29. THE DOOR OF THE FENCED BICYCLE PARKING AREA NEAR
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD OPENS ONTO THE INTERNAL ROADWAY
 WITHOUT ANY BUFFER AREA. CONSIDER PROVIDING A RAISED
 AREA AT THE CORNER OF THE ROADWAY CURVE, AND PROVIDE A
 RECESSED ENTRANCE TO PROVIDE BIGGER PROTECTED AREA
 OUTSIDE THE BICYCLE PARKING AREA FOR CYCLISTS TO GO IN
 AND OUT WITH THEIR BICYCLES.
 30. INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE LOCATION OF SHOWER
 FACILITY FOR EMPLOYEES. DOES THE CHANGING FACILITY
 SHOWN ON SHEET A1.02 INCLUDES SHOWER?
 31. SHEET A0.05 - THE AERIAL DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE
 SITE RENDERING. PLEASE REVISE.
 32. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON THE EXISTING BUS STOP
 ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD, WHICH MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 THE PROPOSED RIGHT-TURN LANE AND SIDEWALK.
 33. A DROP OFF LANE IS SHOWN NEAR THE DRIVEWAY ON
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN THE CIVIL PLAN (E.G. SHEET 4)
 BUT NOT ON THE SITE PLAN (E.G. A1.01). PLEASE REVISE TO
 REMOVE THE INCONSISTENCY.
 34. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR DELIVERY AND GARBAGE
 TRUCKS.
 35. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION
 ROADWAYS AND THE GARAGE ENTRANCE/EXIT NEAR THE
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DRIVEWAY, AS WELL AS THE DROP OFF
 AREA ON 4TH STREET. SOME OF THE TURNING RADII APPEAR TO
 BE VERY SMALL. MODIFY THE EXIT OF THE PORTE COCHERE TO
 FACILITY VALET VEHICLES TO USE THE DRIVEWAY ON 4TH
 STREET.
 36. PROVIDE STOP CONTROL ON ALL THREE RAMP APPROACHES
 AT THE SECOND STORY RAMPED T-INTERSECTION.
 37. CLARIFY IF TWO LANES ARE NEEDED FOR THE
 SOUTHWEST-BOUND INTERNAL ROADWAY NEAR THE DIXIE HIGHWAY
 DRIVEWAY. THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION STUDY SHOWS
 ONLY 9 AND 6 VEHICLES PER HOUR WOULD USE THIS ROADWAY
 DURING AM AND PM PEAK HOUR RESPECTIVELY.
 38. PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH LANE ELIMINATION ON
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IS IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY?S
 DOWNTOWN MOBILITY PLAN. INSTALL 6-FOOT ELEVATED BIKE
 LANE WITH ASPHALT PAVEMENT, AS WELL AS LANDSCAPED
 BUFFER WITH TREES BETWEEN THE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK
 ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE.
 39. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD HAS EXCESS CAPACITY, AND THE
 PROPOSED RIGHT-TURN LANE DOES NOT FIT IN THE CONTEXT OF
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN A DOWNTOWN ENVIRONMENT. THE CITY
 DOES NOT SUPPORT THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE. AS A
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL, PURSUE WITH FDOT ON ELIMINATING
 THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE REQUIREMENT.
 40. SHOW THE CURB CUTS AND DRIVEWAYS ON THE OPPOSITE
 SIDE OF 4TH STREET. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING FOR
 PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET AS THESE
 SPACES WILL BE METERED.
 41. SHEET 5 - SPECIAL EMPHASIS PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE
 SHOWN ACROSS THE CROSSWALK AT DIXIE HIGHWAY/4TH STREET,
 BUT THE EXISTING CROSSWALK HAS PAVERS. PLEASE REVISE TO
 MATCH EXISTING INTERSECTION HARDSCAPE.
 42. USE STAMPED ASPHALT CROSSWALKS FOR THE CROSSWALKS
 ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD, MATCHING OTHER STAMPED
 CROSSWALKS ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD.
 43. SHEET 9 SECTIONS G AND H ? SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE
 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET.
 44. L0-002 ? QUADRILLE IS A STATE HIGHWAY. THE 20-FOOT
 SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES SHOWN DOES NOT MEET FDOT
 REQUIREMENTS. REFERENCE FDOT DESIGN MANUAL SECTION
 212.11.
 45. SIDEWALK ON DIXIE HIGHWAY IS SHOWN AS 8 FEET ON
 SHEET A1.01 AND L1-110, BUT IS SHOWN AS 7 FEET ON THE
 CROSS SECTION ON SHEET 9 AND L3-100. CLARIFY THE
 SIDEWALK WIDTH. THE CITY PREFERS 8-FOOT SIDEWALK BE
 PROVIDED.
 46. DISCUSS THE PARKING ARRANGEMENT AMONG HOTEL,
 RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USES. WOULD EACH RESIDENTIAL
 UNIT HAVE RESERVED PARKING SPACE? WOULD RESIDENTS BE
 ABLE TO VALET THEIR VEHICLES?
 47. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE AND FULL
 CENTERLINE.
 48. PROVIDE TDM MEASURES, INCLUDING PARKING PRICING,
 PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM/UNBUNDLED PARKING, TRANSIT
 PASS SUBSIDY, CONTRIBUTION TO TROLLEY OPERATIONS,
 RESERVED LOCATIONS FOR SHARED MOBILITY, LIVE NEAR YOUR
 WORK PROGRAM, RIDESHARING AND CAR SHARING SERVICES AND
 FACILITIES.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-25 10:33:12 
 CONTACT ERIK FERGUSON [email protected]
  
  
 1. THERE ARE MULTIPLE PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
 PATTERNS SHOWN IN THE SUBMITTAL. FOR EXAMPLE SHEET
 A0.07 ? DAC SUBMITTAL, PLAN VIEW FOR LEVEL ONE SHOWS
 TWO WAY TRAFFIC BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND NORTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY. SHEET 5 SIGNING AND MARKING SHOWS N. DIXIE
 HIGHWAY ENTRANCE AS TWO- ONE WAY LANES. TRAFFIC
 CIRCULATION AT PARKING GARAGE RAMP INTERSECTION IS
 INCONSISTENT BETWEEN SHEET A0.07 AND SHEET 5. CLARIFY
 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION.
 2. SHEET A0.07, SHEET 5, AND SHEET A0.10 ? INTERNAL
 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AT THE THREE WAY INTERSECTION IS
 INCONSISTENT. WE ARE UNABLE TO REVIEW THE TRAFFIC
 CIRCULATION. PLEASE CONTACT CITY TRANSPORTATION
 DIVISION TO SCHEDULE TO DISCUSS INTERNAL TRAFFIC
 CIRCULATION.
 3. SHEET A0.07 ? LEVEL #1. THE WALL AT THE PARKING
 GARAGE INTERSECTION WILL NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE SIGHT
 DISTANCE TO OTHER INTERSECTIONS.
 4. CHANGES TO THE INTERNAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION WILL
 REQUIRE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AS THIS WILL
 CHANGE THE VOLUMES AT INTERSECTIONS AND TRIP
 DISTRIBUTION.
 5. SHEET 5 - SPECIFY SIZE OF SIGNS.
 6. SHEET 5 - ADD STREET NAME BLADES TO STOP SIGNS.
 7. SHEET 5 - ADD CROSSWALK MARKINGS AT ALL STOP
 CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS.
 8. SHEET 5 - PROVIDE PROTECTED BIKE LANES ON N.
 QUADRILLE BOULEVARD
 9. SHEET 5 - NORTHERN N QUADRILLE BLVD. DRIVEWAY, A
 TRAFFIC SEPARATOR IS SHOWN ON SHEET 5, BUT IT IS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN (SHEET 4). WHAT IS THE WIDTH
 OF THE LANES AND THE TRAFFIC SEPARATOR?
 10. SHEET 5 - NORTHERN N QUADRILLE BLVD ? DRIVEWAY, THE
 EXIT IS SHOWN AS ONLY RIGHT OUT. HOW WILL THIS BE
 ENFORCED? SUGGEST RESTRICTIVE MEDIAN ON QUADRILLE
 BOULEVARD. EXIT DOES NOT APPEAR TO ADEQUATE HORIZONTAL
 SIGHT DISTANCE FOR LEFT TURN MOVEMENT, SO IT IS
 IMPORTANT TO RESTRICT THE LEFT OUT MOVEMENT.
 11. SHEET 5 - NORTHERN N QUADRILLE BLVD DRIVEWAY. THE
 STOP BAR IS SHOWN ACROSS A HATCHED OUT AREA. THE STOP
 BAR NEEDS TO STOP AT THE END OF THE LANE. WHAT IS THE
 HATCHED OUT AREA NEXT TO THE EXIT LANE? HOW WILL
 TRAFFIC
 12. SHEET 4 - WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT
 TURN LANES ON QUADRILLE? PROVIDE SECTION FOR PROPOSED
 RIGHT TURN LANE.
 13. SHEET 4 - SECTION D (4TH STREET). ARE 12? WIDE
 LANES REQUIRED? CAN THEY BE NARROWED?
 14. SHEET 4 - 4TH STREET. IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE CURB
 WILL BE NEW OR EXISTING. SECTION G AND H APPEAR TO
 INDICATE NEW CURB CURB, BUT NEW CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON
 SHEET 4.
 15. QUADRILLE - 4TH STREET INTERSECTION ? PROVIDE BULB
 OUT TO REDUCE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE.
 16. SHEET 4 - SPECIFY THE RADIUS OF ANY PROPOSED
 CURBING IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. DRAW THE PROPOSED CURB
 RAMP AND ADD THE FDOT CURB RAMP DESIGNATION.
 17. SHEET 4 - PROPOSED SIDEWALKS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON
 CIVIL PLANS.
  
 18. SHEET 9 - SECTION G AND H (4TH STREET) ? REDUCE
 TRAVEL LANES FROM 11' TO 10'. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE ON
 SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET.
 19. SHEET 9 - SECTION H (4TH STREET) SPECIFY WIDTH OF
 SOUTH SIDEWALK.
 20. SHEET 9 - SECTION H (4TH STREET) UTILIZE GUTTER PAN
 AS PART OF THE 8' PARALLEL PARKING WIDTH. INCREASE
 SOUTH SIDEWALK WIDTH.
 21. SHEET 4, 9 - THE REVIEW OF THE STREETS IS
 CONCEPTUAL. DETAILED ROADWAY PLANS INCLUDING A PROFILE
 FOR 4TH STREET AND PAVEMENT DESIGN WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
 22. SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET MAY NOT MEET
 ADA MINIMUM WIDTH. IS IT POSSIBLE TO MOVE CURB LINE
 NORTH WITH RECONSTRUCTION OF 4TH STREET?
 23. L0-002 - QUADRILLE IS A STATE HIGHWAY. THE 20? SAFE
 SIGHT TRIANGLES SHOWN DOES NOT MEET FDOT REQUIREMENTS.
 REFERENCE FDOT DESIGN STANDARDS, INDEX NO. 546.
 24. L3-100 - SECTION -02 AND 05- 4TH AND 5TH STREET
 .THE 5'-3" AND 5'-0" WIDE SIDEWALK DO NOT MEET FDOT
 GREENBOOK REQUIREMENTS. A MINIMUM 6' WIDTH SIDEWALK
 MUST BE PROVIDED FOR SIDEWALKS LOCATED BEHIND THE BACK
 OF CURB. SUGGEST A WIDER SIDEWALK THAN MINIMUM. ALSO,
 1'-6" WIDTH SHOWN IS NOT CORRECT FOR F CURB.
 25. HOTEL DROP OFF- L3-100 SECTION 2 - CAN THE WIDTH OF
 THE DROP OF BE REDUCED? CURB FOR DROP OFF SHOULDN'T BE
 LOCATED IN RIGHT OF WAY.
 26. DUE TO THE NUMBER OF INCONSISTENCIES IN THE PLANS,
 WE CANNOT APPROVE THE PLANS.
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 8 Status F Date 10-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 10-23-2020 Time 16:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 10-08-2020 Time 11:46 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-23 16:44:581. SATISFIED- / SHEET A0.102 LIST BUILDING FOOTPRINT
 REQUIREMENT AS MINIMUM PERCENTAGE, IT IS A MAXIMUM
 PERCENTAGE. PLEASE CORRECT DATA TO ACCURATELY REFLECT
 REQUIREMENT.
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE LIST THE REQUIRED GUEST
 PARKING FOR THE MICROUNITS.- / SHEET A0.102 STILL LIST
 328 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
 AND THE REQUIRED PARKING DATA. PLEASE ADJUST TO THE
 CURRENT PROPOSAL OF 230 UNITS. TABLE IN THE SAME SHEET
 LIST 202 REGULAR RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 23 MICRO UNITS
 FOR A TOTAL OF 205 NOT THE NEW 230 LISTED. PLEASE
 CORRECT AND ADJUST ALL RELATED CALCULATIONS. SHEET
 A0.06 OF SITE PLAN PACKET ALSO HAS DISCREPANCIES.
 AVERAGE UNIT SIZE IS LISTED BUT NOT LEGIBLE.
 3. SATISFIED/ IN SHEET A1.500, THE HOTEL UNITS
 DESCRIPTION AND AREAS SUITE 1.3C AND 1.3W UNIT AREA IS
 NOT LISTED. PLEASE UPDATE TABLE AND INCLUDE INFORMATION
 TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM 350SF UNITS SIZE.
 4. SATISFIED/ PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 THAT REGULAR RESIDENTIAL UNITS COMPLY WITH THE AVERAGE
 800SF UNIT SIZE.
 5. SATISFIED/ PLEASE SUBMIT COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH
 CALL OUT MATERIALS.
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE CHECK THE FAR TABLE
 LISTED IN A0.06 AS THE FAR BY USE IN EVENT +RESTAURANT
 IS LESS THAN HOTEL RESTAURANT AND PUBLIC MEETING.-/
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE FAR DETAIL INFORMATION PER FLOOR AS
 SUBMITTED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SHEET A0.08 IN SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL HAS A TYPO IN THE LEVEL NUMBERS.
 7. NOT SATISFIED- MORE DETAIL IS NEEDED FOR THE GREEN
 SCREEN. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL FOR
 GREEN SCREEN AND INCLUDE A MAINTENANCE PLAN-/.PLEASE
 EXPLAIN HOW THE PLANTS PROPOSED FOR THE GARAGE
 SCREENING WILL GROW AND STILL MAINTAIN THE AIR FLOW
 REQUIRED FOR GARAGE VENTILATION.
 8. SATISFIED.-PLEASE CONFIRM THE GLASS UTILIZED FOR
 THIS PROJECT AT THE GROUND FLOOR IS NOT DARK TINTED OR
 REFLECTIVE TO THE POINT THAT THE INTERIOR IS NOT
 VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE.
 9. SATISFIED.-FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY FOR THE
 SELECTION OF THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL TO BE LOCATED ON
 THE QUADRILLE BLVD MEDIAN.
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED-PLEASE INDICATE THE NEW
 LOCATION OF THE TROLLEY SHELTER -PLEASE CONFIRM PALM
 TRAM APPROVED THE RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING SHELTER TO
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION.
 11. SATISFIED- DUE TO THE PROPOSED MICROUNITS PROJECT
 IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 1 CAR SHARING STATION PER EVERY
 13 MICROUNITS. IF PARKING IS PROVIDED FOR THE
 MICROUNITS THERE MUST BE AT LEAST ONE CAR SHARING
 STATION ON SITE. PLEASE IDENTIFY LOCATION OF CAR
 SHARING STATION INSIDE PARKING GARAGE.
 12. SATISFIED- DUE TO THE PROPOSED MICROUNITS, PROJECT
 IS REQUIRED TO CONTRIBUTE A FEE INTO THE TROLLEY
 OPERATION FUND. FEE IS EQUAL TO $10 PER UNIT/MONTH. AN
 AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER
 BEFORE FINAL CO.
 13. SATISFIED- PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION FOR
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION WITHIN THE PROJECT PUBLIC REALM
 AREA.
 14. SATISFIED - MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG
 DIXIE HWAY IS 80% NOT 79%. PLEASE ADJUST TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SHOWS 80% NOT THE
 79%. IN ADDITION, USES BEHIND THE CURB CUT (OUTLINED IN
 RED) CANNOT BE COUNTED AS ACTIVE USES FOR THE PURPOSE
 OF CALCULATING MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIRED AS THEY ARE
 BEHIND THE MINIMUM SETBACK AND NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE. YOU MAY NEED TO EXTEND THE RETAIL A LITTLE
 BIT TO THE NORTH TO REDUCE THE GAP.
 15. SATISFIED- THE VARIANCE APPROVED BY THE DAC TO
 REDUCE ACTIVE USES ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR ALONG
 QUADRILLE BLVD ALLOWED A REDUCTION FROM 60% TO 47%.
 PROPOSED PROJECT LISTS ACTIVE USES ONLY ALONG 31.9%.
 PLEASE INCREASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVE USES TO COMPLY WITH
 VARIANCE APPROVED. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SHOWS 47%
 ACTIVE USES BUT BUILDING PERMIT PACKET SHOWS 31.9%.
 PLEASE IDENTIFY WHERE THE DISCREPANCY EXISTS.
 16. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 ACROSS DIXIE HWAY FROM THE SE CORNER OF THE PROJECT.
 17. SATISFIED- PLEASE RELOCATE AT LEAST 3 BIKE RACKS
 CLOSER TO THE OFFICE TOWER OPEN SPACE, AND RELOCATE AT
 LEAST 2 BIKE RACKS TO THE AREA CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED
 RETAIL.
 18. SATISFIED- GRADING PLAN SHEET 4 HAS LABELS BLACKED
 OUT.
 19. SATISFIED- A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THIS PERMIT.
 20. NOT SATISFIED-/PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT ALONG
 ALL FRONTAGES.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMAITON PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 7 Status F Date 03-20-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 03-20-2020 Time 09:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 03-20-2020 Time 09:04 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-20 09:05:581. SHEET A0.102 LIST BUILDING FOOTPRINT REQUIREMENT AS
 MINIMUM PERCENTAGE, IT IS A MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE. PLEASE
 CORRECT DATA TO ACCURATELY REFLECT REQUIREMENT.
 2. SHEET A0.102 STILL LIST 328 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN
 THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND THE REQUIRED PARKING DATA.
 PLEASE ADJUST TO THE CURRENT PROPOSAL OF 230 UNITS.
 TABLE IN THE SAME SHEET LIST 202 REGULAR RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS AND 23 MICRO UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 205 NOT THE NEW
 230 LISTED. PLEASE CORRECT AND ADJUST ALL RELATED
 CALCULATIONS. SHEET A0.06 OF SITE PLAN PACKET ALSO HAS
 DISCREPANCIES. AVERAGE UNIT SIZE IS LISTED BUT NOT
 LEGIBLE.
 3. IN SHEET A1.500, THE HOTEL UNITS DESCRIPTION AND
 AREAS SUITE 1.3C AND 1.3W UNIT AREA IS NOT LISTED.
 PLEASE UPDATE TABLE AND INCLUDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM 350SF UNITS SIZE.
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM THAT REGULAR
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS COMPLY WITH THE AVERAGE 800SF UNIT
 SIZE.
 5. PLEASE SUBMIT COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT
 MATERIALS.
 6. PLEASE SUBMIT THE FAR DETAIL INFORMATION PER FLOOR
 AS SUBMITTED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SHEET A0.08 IN
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL HAS A TYPO IN THE LEVEL NUMBERS.
 7. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PLANTS PROPOSED FOR THE
 GARAGE SCREENING WILL GROW AND STILL MAINTAIN THE AIR
 FLOW REQUIRED FOR GARAGE VENTILATION.
 8. PLEASE CONFIRM THE GLASS UTILIZED FOR THIS PROJECT
 AT THE GROUND FLOOR IS NOT DARK TINTED OR REFLECTIVE TO
 THE POINT THAT THE INTERIOR IS NOT VISIBLE FROM
 OUTSIDE.
 9. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY FOR THE SELECTION OF
 THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL TO BE LOCATED ON THE QUADRILLE
 BLVD MEDIAN.
 10. PLEASE CONFIRM PALM TRAM APPROVED THE RELOCATION OF
 THE EXISTING SHELTER TO THE PROPOSED LOCATION.
 11. DUE TO THE PROPOSED MICROUNITS PROJECT IS REQUIRED
 TO PROVIDE 1 CAR SHARING STATION PER EVERY 13
 MICROUNITS. IF PARKING IS PROVIDED FOR THE MICROUNITS
 THERE MUST BE AT LEAST ONE CAR SHARING STATION ON SITE.
 PLEASE IDENTIFY LOCATION OF CAR SHARING STATION INSIDE
 PARKING GARAGE.
 12. DUE TO THE PROPOSED MICROUNITS, PROJECT IS REQUIRED
 TO CONTRIBUTE A FEE INTO THE TROLLEY OPERATION FUND.
 FEE IS EQUAL TO $10 PER UNIT/MONTH. AN AGREEMENT WILL
 BE REQUIRED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER BEFORE FINAL CO.
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION FOR MICRO-MOBILITY
 STATION WITHIN THE PROJECT PUBLIC REALM AREA.
 14. MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG DIXIE HWAY IS
 80% NOT 79%. PLEASE ADJUST TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. SITE
 PLAN INFORMATION SHOWS 80% NOT THE 79%. IN ADDITION,
 USES BEHIND THE CURB CUT (OUTLINED IN RED) CANNOT BE
 COUNTED AS ACTIVE USES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING
 MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIRED AS THEY ARE BEHIND THE
 MINIMUM SETBACK AND NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE. YOU MAY NEED TO EXTEND THE RETAIL A LITTLE BIT
 TO THE NORTH TO REDUCE THE GAP.
 15. THE VARIANCE APPROVED BY THE DAC TO REDUCE ACTIVE
 USES ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD ALLOWED
 A REDUCTION FROM 60% TO 47%. PROPOSED PROJECT LISTS
 ACTIVE USES ONLY ALONG 31.9%. PLEASE INCREASE AMOUNT OF
 ACTIVE USES TO COMPLY WITH VARIANCE APPROVED. SITE PLAN
 INFORMATION SHOWS 47% ACTIVE USES BUT BUILDING PERMIT
 PACKET SHOWS 31.9%. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHERE THE
 DISCREPANCY EXISTS.
 16. PLEASE PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ACROSS DIXIE
 HWAY FROM THE SE CORNER OF THE PROJECT.
 17. PLEASE RELOCATE AT LEAST 3 BIKE RACKS CLOSER TO THE
 OFFICE TOWER OPEN SPACE, AND RELOCATE AT LEAST 2 BIKE
 RACKS TO THE AREA CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED RETAIL.
 18. GRADING PLAN SHEET 4 HAS LABELS BLACKED OUT.
 19. A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THIS PERMIT.
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT ALONG ALL FRONTAGES.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMAITON PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 09-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 09-10-2019 Time 08:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 07-26-2019 Time 08:04 Sent To  
Notes
2019-09-10 08:31:03ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES FROM LAST
 SUBMITTAL:
 1. THE MINIMUM HOTEL ROOM SIZE FOR A FULL SERVICE HOTEL
 IS 350SF. THERE ARE 5 ROOMS THAT DO NOT MEET THE
 DEFINITION REQUIRED FOR THE INCENTIVE PROGRAM. PLEASE
 ADJUST ROOM SIZE TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIRED.
 2. SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE OFFICE PLAZA AND THE HOTEL
 DROP-OFF AREA (NEXT TO PLANTER) SHALL BE WIDENED TO A
 MINIMUM OF 6 FEET.
 3. MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT INFORMATION SHALL SAY
 ?MAXIMUM? ALLOWED, NOT MINIMUM.
 4. WITHIN THE PARKING CALCULATION (SHEET A0.06) PLEASE
 INCLUDE A SEPARATE LINE FOR MICROUNITS AND STATE THE
 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES ALLOWED (0.5 PER
 UNIT), AND THE BIKE SPACES REQUIRED SEPARATE FOR
 MICROUNITS (0.5 PARKING SPACES PER UNIT= 14.5) AND FOR
 REGULAR UNITS (1/15=19.9).TOTAL NUMBER OF BIKE SPACE
 FOR RESIDENTIAL = 34 SPACES. YOU WILL NEED FEW MORE.
 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CAR SHARING STATION SPACE
 REQUIRED IN THE CALCULATIONS.
 6. LAST SET OF DRAWINGS DID NOT INCLUDE THE DETAILS FOR
 THE GARAGE SCREEN. PLEASE INSERT BACK IN THE DRAWINGS.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 04-19-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 04-19-2019 Time 09:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 04-01-2019 Time 09:07 Sent To  
Notes
2019-04-19 14:41:19OUTSTANDING COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
 1. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ON 4TH STREET (BY OFFICE
 PLAZA) SEEMS TO BE LOCTED ON THE PEDESTRIAN PATH.
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND IT THE FDC WILL
 BE A WALL MOUNTED CONNECTION OR A STAND PIPE.
 2. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CAR SHARING
 SPACES IN THE FLOOR PLAN AND ADD THEM TO THE PARKING
 TABLE.
 3. LIGHT FIXTURES AND POLES WITHIN THE ROW SHALL MEET
 CITY STANDARDS.SUBMITTED LIGHTING DRAWINGS INDICATE A
 DIFFERENT FIXTURE.
 4. EXFILTRATION TRENCH RELOCATED IN DRAINAGE SHEET NO.
 3 BUT IT IS STILL SHOWN IN WATER ADN SEWER SHEET NO. 6.
 PLEASE ADJUST.
 5. THERE ARE SOME UTILITY LINES UNDER THE PLANTING AREA
 ON 4TH STREET AND THE OFFICE ENTRANCE. PLEASE RELOCATE
 THE UTILITIES SO THEY DO NOT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE.
 6. THE TYPE OF PAVERS PROPOSED ON THE SIDEWALK ARE
 DIFFERENT THAN THE TYPE OF PAVERS PROPOSED ON THE
 PLAZAS AND PEDESTRIAN AREAS INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE.
 STAFF RECOMMENDS BOTH TO BE THE SAME, OR HAVE A
 DIFFERENCIATION ONLY WHEN THE DESIGN JUSTIFY THE
 CHANGE, NOT BASED ON PROPERTY LINE.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 02-27-2019 Time 14:19 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-28 10:44:38OUTSTANTING COMMENTS FROM 5/11/17 REVIEW:
 4.NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED CURB CUT ON 4TH STREET
 EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 25 FEEET IN WIDTH ALLOWED. THE 6
 FOOT WIDE MEDIAN IS STILL CONSIDERED PART OF THE CURB
 CUT.
 7 AND 8. SATISFIED
 9. NOT SATISFIED- CIVIL DRAWINGS (SHEET 9) SHOW RETAIL
 AREA AT ELEVATION 15.50 WHILE SIDEWALK IS AT ELEVATION
 APPROX. 12-13. SHEET 4 SHOWS RETAIL AT ELEVATION 13.
  
 OUTSTANDING COMMENTS FROM 11/27/19 REVIEW
 1. SATISFIED
 2. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITHOUT
 SHADES TO CLEARLY CONVEY THE DIFFERENT MATERIALS OF THE
 ELEVATION. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE
 BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS FACADE DETAIL AND THE PROPOSED.
 3. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CONSIDE LOCATING THE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ON THE STAIR WALL OR LOCATE THEM
 CLOSER TO THE STAIR WALL. TEH FDC CONNECTION ON 4TH
 STREET IS ALSO LOCATED ON THE PEDESTRIAN PATH AREA.
 4. SATISFIED- PRINTING FOR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WAS NOT
 DONE TO PRESERVE THE SCALE. STAFF WAS NOT ABLE TO
 MEASURE INDICATED DIMENSIONS.
 5. NOT SATISFIED - LANDSCAPE MATERIALS HAVE
 SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL APPROVAL IN
 DETRIMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE PUBLIC REALM. SEE
 LANDSCAPE COMMENTS.
 6. SATISFIED- PLEASE DIMENSION PARKING SPACES TO
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. SPACE
 ADJACENT TO A WALL OR COLUMN SHALL BE WIDER (SEC
 94-111(C))
 7. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS TO CONFIRM
 THE LEVELS ARE MAINTAINED . CURB CUT SHALL BE DESIGNED
 IN A WAY THAT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL IS MAINTAINED ACROSS
 CURB CUT AND NOT LOWERED TO THE ROAD LEVEL. PEDESTRIANS
 GET PRIORITY, NOT THE CARS.
 8. NOT SATISFIED- TABLE PROVIED INDICATES THAT 25 UNITS
 ARE BELOW THE MINIMUM 550 SF UNIT SIZE PERMITTED BY THE
 CODE FOR REGUALR UNITS. THOSE UNITS SHALL BE CLASSIFIED
 AS MICRO UNITS AND MUST COMPLY WITH SPECIFIC MICROUNIT
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94 106 (8A) AND
 RESPOND HOW THE PROJECT IS GOING TO ADDRESS THE
 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
 9. NOT SATISFIED - TABLE PROVIDED INDICATES 8 HOTEL
 ROOMS ARE LESS THAN THE 350 SF REQUIRED FOR FULL
 SERVICE HOTELS.
 10. SATISFIED-PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CAR
 LIFTS.
 11. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE TENANT ACCESS TO THE
 BIKE STORAGE ROOM.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM 1/28/19 SUBMITTAL:
 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE FAR NUMBER IN SHEET A0.0A AND
 A0.07, THE TWO NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH.
 2.PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT THE CORNER OF 4RD AND DIXIE
 HWAY SHALL BE SPLIT INTO TWO DIRECTIONAL RAMPS.
 3. THERE ARE TWO BIKE RACKS INDICATED ON THE OFFICE
 PLAZA THAT CONFLICT WITH THE WATER FEATURE PROPOSE AND
 THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR PEDESTRIANS. PLEASE RELOCATE.
 4.LIGHT POLES INDICATED IN SHEETL1-150 SHALL MEET THE
 DOWNTOWN CITY STANDARD FOR POLE AND FIXTURE.
 5. A LIGHTING PROTOMETRIC SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE
 EXTERIOR GROUND FLOOR AREA TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE MINIMUM REQUIRED 0.6 FOOTCANDLES AT THE CURB SIDE
 ONE FOOT ABOVE GROUND.
 6. PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE BIKE RACKS TO CONFIRM
 SPACE PROVIDED IS ADEQUATE.
 7. PLEASE CONFIRM THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL NOT
 CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES ALONG DIXIE HWAY.
 8. PLEASE RECONSIDER PROPOSED GREESE TRAP UNDER HOTEL
 OUTDOOR DINING AREA.
  
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-27-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 11-27-2018 Time 14:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 10-26-2018 Time 15:53 Sent To  
Notes
2018-11-26 16:40:48OUTSANTING COMMENTS FROM 5/11/17 REVIEW.
 4.PROPOSED CURB CUT ON 4TH STREET EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
 25 FEEET IN WIDTH ALLOWED.
 7 AND 8. MONUMENT SIGN STILL SHOWN IN SHEET A2.02.
 PLEASE UPDATE THE RENDERINGS, AS THEY STILL SHOW THE
 TALL FOUNTAIN AT THE CORNER OF 4TH AND QUADRILLE. SHEET
 A0.01 STILL INCLUDES A DIAGRAM WITH PREVIOUS FOUNTAIN.
 9. CIVIL DRAWINGS STILL SHOW RETAIL AREA AT THE SAME
 ELEVATION THAN THE RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE/HOTEL
 BUILDING. ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF 3 FEET BETWEEN THE
 SIDEWALK LEVEL AND THE RETAIL LEVEL WILL NEGATIVELY
 IMPACT THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT ALONG DIXIE HWAY.
 LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS SHOW RETAIL AT THE DIXIE ELEVATION.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
 1. PLEASE INDICATE THE MATERIAL FOR SIDEWALKS. SHEET
 L1-110 IS MISSING KEY.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITHOUT SHADES TO
 CLEARLY CONVEY THE DIFFERENT MATERIALS OF THE
 ELEVATION. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE
 BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS FACADE DETAIL AND THE PROPOSED.
 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION PROPOSED ON 5TH STREET
 SHALL NOT BE PLACED ON THE SIDEWAL.K
 4. PRINTING FOR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WAS NOT DONE TO
 PRESERVE THE SCALE. STAFF WAS NOT ABLE TO MEASURE
 INDICATED DIMENSIONS.
 5. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED FROM
 ORIGINAL APPROVAL IN DETRIMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE
 PUBLIC REALM. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS.
 6. PLEASE DIMENSION PARKING SPACES TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. SPACE ADJACENT TO
 A WALL OR COLUMN SHALL BE WIDER (SEC 94-111(C))
 7. CURB CUT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN A WAY THAT THE SIDEWLK
 LEVEL IS MAINTAINED ACROSS CURB CUT AND NOT LOWERED TO
 THE ROAD LEVEL. PEDESTRIANS GET PRIORITY, NOT THE CARS.
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE INDICATING THE SIZE OF THE
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM
 AVERAGE OF 800SF.
 9. PLEASE INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE HOTEL ROOMS TO
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FULL SERVICE HOTEL DEFINITION.
 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CAR LIFTS.
 11. PLEASE INDICATE THE TENANT ACCESS TO THE BIKE
 STORAGE ROOM.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 05-11-2017 Time 17:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 05-11-2017 Time 17:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-11 13:04:131. SATISFIED- VARIANCE FOR THE MAXIMUM SETBACK ALONG
 QUADRILLE BLVD GRANTED FOR 76?. PROJECT PROPOSES A
 SETBACK OF 78?-5?. DAC APPROVAL NEEDED.
 2.SATISFIED- VARIANCE FOR ACTIVE USES ABOVE 1ST STORY
 ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD GRANTED TO REDUCE FROM 60% TO 47%.
 REVISED PROJECT PROPOSED 41%. DAC APPROVAL NEEDED.
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CALCULATE THE SHARED PARKING
 FOLLOWING TABLE IV-10 IN SECTION 94-110. IT IS OK TO
 COUNT THE FITNESS AND TENNIS CENTER AS HOTEL AMENITIES.
 A SPECIAL EVENT PARKING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 EACH EVENT AT SUCH FACILITY.- IS THE ENTIRE PROJECT
 FUNCTIONING WITH SHARED PARKING? IS YES, NO SPACES CAN
 BE ASSIGNED TO A PARTICULAR USE/TENANT.-REVISE PARKING
 CALCULATION TO INCLUDE DAY CARE, FITNESS CENTER,
 TENNIS/EVENT AREA, HOTEL RESTAURANTS, AND ANY OTHER
 ADDITIONAL USE.
 4.NOT SATISFIED. A VARIANCE FROM DAC WILL BE REQUIRED
 IF THE CURB CUT IS TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 25' ALLOWED.-
 CURB CUT ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD IS ALLOWED MAXIMUM WIDTH
 OF 25?. CURRENT CURB CUT IS 40?.
 5. SATISFIED. BUILDING + MECHANINCAL IS BELOW MAXIMUM
 ALLLOWABLE HEIGHT.-MECHANICAL ENCROACHMENT EXCEEDS
 MAXIMUM 20' ALLOWED.
 6. SEE NO. 3.- PLEASE INCLUDE A TABLE LISTING THE SEC
 94-110(D) PROCEDURE FOR THE SHARE PARKING CALCULATION.
 MINIMUM PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THE SHARED PARKING
 CALCULATION SHALL NOT BE MARKED AS DESIGNATED SPACE FOR
 A PARTICULAR USE.
 7. NOT SATISFIED. LA DRAWINGS STILL SHOW MONUMENT
 SIGN.-MONUMENT SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN DMP AREA.
 8. NOT SATISFIED. WALL DO NOT MEET CPTED PRINCIPLES.
 PROPOSED DESIGN LIMITS THE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION.
 LOWER FOUNTAIN WALL-PLEASE EXPLAIN WALLS DEPICTED IN
 RENDERINGS OF ON OPEN SPACES. OPEN SPACES SHALL HAVE
 DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE STREET AND IT SHALL NOT BLOCK
 VIEW OF THE INTERIOR SPACES FROM THE STREET.
 9. SATISFIED, BUT PLEASE CLARIFY IF SECTIN 4 ON SHEET
 L3-100 IS CORRECT. IT SHOWS A 2 FEET DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
 THE DIXIE HWAY SIDEWALK LEVEL AND THE RETAIL
 AREA.-CONSIDERING THE UNDERGROUND PARKING IS REMOVED,
 STAFF RECOMMENDS THE ACTIVE USES ALONG DIXIE HWAY TO BE
 LOCATED AT GRADE AND CLOSER TO THE STREET.
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE LIST THE NUMBER OF BIKE SPACES
 PROVIDED IN EACH AREA ON THE FLOOR PLAN.- STAFF
 RECOMMENDS BIKE STORAGE TO BE LOCATED AT THE GROUND
 LEVEL DUE TO SAFETY CONCERNS.
 11. SATISFIED.-PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF CHANGING
 FACILITIES AND SHOWERS ASSOCIATED WITH OFFICE BUILDING.
 12.SATISFIED.- PLEASE INDICATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF
 SPACES PROVIDE AT GROUND LEVEL.- STAFF RECOMMENDS SOME
 BIKE PARKING SPACES BE PROVIDED FOR HOTEL EMPLOYEES.
 13. SATISFIED.-STAFF RECOMMENDS THE LOCATION OF A BIKE
 SHARING STATION ON SITE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED DRAWINGS:
 14. THE AREA WITHIN THE MINIMUM SETBACK SHALL BE
 TREATED AS AN EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC REALM. SEATING
 AREA ALONG 4TH STREET IS SURROUNDED BY A PLANTING AREA
 THAT LEAVES ONLY A 6 FEET WIDE SIDEWLK NEXT TO THE
 CURB. THE SEATING AREA SHALL BE OPEN/CONNECTED WITH THE
 SIDEWALK, IT SHALL FEET LIKE PART OF THE PUBLIC REALM,
 NOT A PRIVATE TERRACE. MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH IS 8
 FEET.
 15. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE SIDEWALK,
 NEXT TO THE CURB, WITH BASE PLANITNG OR IN TREE GRATES.
 ALONG 4TH STREET, THE TREES BETWEEN THE CURB CUTS SHALL
 BE NEXT TO THE CURB ON TREE GRATES.
 16. SW OPEN SPACE WILL QUALIFY FOR THE 5% PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENT, BUT PLEASE LOOK AT TABLE IV-7 AND
 DEMONSTRATE THE SPACE MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE PLAZA TYPE. MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK CANNOT BE
 COUNTED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. NUMBERS ON
 SHEET L0-002 DO NOT MATCH NUMBERS ON SHEET A0.09.
 17. MINIMUM WIDTH OF SIDEWALK SHALL BE 8 FEET. MINIMUM
 SIDEWALK WIDTH FOR DROP-OFF AREA IS 10 FEET.
 18. PLEASE INDICATE TEH PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AT ALL
 INTERSECTIONS.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 03-08-2017 Time 13:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 03-08-2017 Time 13:06 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-08 13:11:561. VARIANCE FOR THE MAXIMUM SETBACK ALONG QUADRILLE
 BLVD GRANTED FOR 76?. PROJECT PROPOSES A SETBACK OF
 78?-5?. DAC APPROVAL NEEDED.
 2. VARIANCE FOR ACTIVE USES ABOVE 1ST STORY ALONG
 QUADRILLE BLVD GRANTED TO REDUCE FROM 60% TO 47%.
 REVISED PROJECT PROPOSED 41%. DAC APPROVAL NEEDED.
 3. REVISE PARKING CALCULATION TO INCLUDE DAY CARE,
 FITNESS CENTER, TENNIS/EVENT AREA, HOTEL RESTAURANTS,
 AND ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL USE.
 4. CURB CUT ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD IS ALLOWED MAXIMUM
 WIDTH OF 25?. CURRENT CURB CUT IS 40?.
 5. MECHANICAL ENCROACHMENT EXCEEDS MAXIMUM 20? ALLOWED.
 6. PLEASE INCLUDE A TABLE LISTING THE SEC 94-110(D)
 PROCEDURE FOR THE SHARE PARKING CALCULATION. MINIMUM
 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THE SHARED PARKING
 CALCULATION SHALL NOT BE MARKED AS DESIGNATED SPACE FOR
 A PARTICULAR USE.
 7. MONUMENT SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN DMP AREA.
 8. PLEASE EXPLAIN WALLS DEPICTED IN RENDERINGS OF ON
 OPEN SPACES. OPEN SPACES SHALL HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH
 THE STREET AND IT SHALL NOT BLOCK VIEW OF THE INTERIOR
 SPACES FROM THE STREET.
 9. CONSIDERING THE UNDERGROUND PARKING IS REMOVED,
 STAFF RECOMMENDS THE ACTIVE USES ALONG DIXIE HWAY TO BE
 LOCATED AT GRADE AND CLOSER TO THE STREET.
 10. STAFF RECOMMENDS BIKE STORAGE TO BE LOCATED AT THE
 GROUND LEVEL DUE TO SAFETY CONCERNS.
 11. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF CHANGING FACILITIES
 AND SHOWERS ASSOCIATED WITH OFFICE BUILDING.
 12. STAFF RECOMMENDS SOME BIKE PARKING SPACES BE
 PROVIDED FOR HOTEL EMPLOYEES.
 13. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE LOCATION OF A BIKE SHARING
 STATION ON SITE.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved