 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z17020016
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z17020016 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-08 08:52:37 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. SITE PLAN SHEET 1 OF 2 SHOWS THE WALL AT THE EDGE OF | | | THE RAMP LOCATED SUCH THAT THERE IS WHEELCHAIR ACCESS | | | FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES BUT NO WHEELCHAIR | | | ACCESS FOR PERSONS APPROACHING ON THE CONCRETE WALKWAY | | | THAT COMES FROM COLUMBIA DRIVE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR | | | PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE | | | ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF | | | FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY | | | ENTRANCES. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE | | | IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-07-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mkhan |
Date |
03-07-2017 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mkhan |
Date |
03-07-2017 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
Time |
12:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-02 12:40:57 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED APRIL | | | 24, 2017, FROM JOHNSTON GROUP, DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN, TO | | | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED | | | FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
11:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-03 11:29:44 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | | | | 3.DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | | | | 4. THE PROPSED CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 5TH | | | EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, INCLUDING | | | NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | | | | 5. THE INSTALLATION OF PAVERS ALONG THE VEHICLE TRAVEL | | | LANE SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL DOT STANDARDS FOR VEHILCE | | | TRAVEL. | | | | | | | | | 6. THE PROPOSED GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY | | | ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR | | | EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 7. ENSURE A FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IS PROVIDED FOR THE | | | ATTENDANT BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | 8. ENSURE THE SMALL PATIO WITH ARBOR AREA IS NOT AN | | | AREA LEADING FROM A REQUIRED EXIT. IF SO, THE GATE | | | ALONG THE FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE EXIT WIDTH | | | AND HAVE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | | | | | | | 9. THE PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING SHALL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 5TH | | | EDITION. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO HAVE A KNOX BOX INSTALLED | | | AT THIS BUILDING FOR EMERGECNY FIRE DEPARTMENT 24 HR | | | EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | ENSURE THE PROPOSED CANOPY IS FIRE RETARDENT CERTIFIED. | | | | | | | | | 10. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | 11. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-10-2017 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-10-2017 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-10 09:24:45 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: JEWISH FEDERATION Z17020016 | | | MAY 9, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS | | | TO THE TREE MITIGATION CHART IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES | | | ON THE PROPERTY THAT WILL BE REMOVED AND MITIGATION | | | PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-448: | | | ? CASSIA SHOULD BE CATEGORY 2 AT 150 | | | ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF ALL CANOPY REMOVAL | | | ? CORRECT THE REPLACEMENT CHART TO SHOW 600 CREDIT FOR | | | 2 NEW OAK TREES | | | ? SHOW ALL NEW TREES ADDED AND TOTAL CANOPY CREDITS | | | PROVIDED | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A COLUMN ON THE PLANT LIST | | | SHOWING DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS INDICATED IN | | | WATERWISE, THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT | | | PLANT AND LANDSCAPE PRACTICES GUIDE AS SPECIFIED IN | | | SECTION 94-446(G). PLEASE REVISE AND RECALCULATE TO | | | CONFIRM PERCENTAGES FOR POINTS CLAIMED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS TO | | | SUBSTANTIATE THE TYPE OF MOISTURE SENSING CONTROLLER | | | PROVIDED TO MEET THE POINTS TAKEN ON FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART. ALSO PLEASE RENAME THE | | | CHART TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED NAME AND CODE SECTION. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A REQUIRED SHADE TREE FOR | | | EACH ROW OF PARKING IN ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS IN PARKING | | | AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A, OR EXPLAIN WHY PALMS | | | ARE SUBSTITUTED. SPECIFICALLY AT THE SOUTH ENTRANCE, | | | ALSO EXPLAIN THE NEED TO REMOVE THE EXISTING OAK TREES. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE | | | GUARDRAIL SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT DAMAGING THE | | | EXISTING MATURE TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE | | | LANDSCAPING MEETS THE 30% REQUIRED AROUND THE NEW | | | STORAGE BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1). | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING | | | WATER, SEWER, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. ADJUST UTILITY LOCATIONS TO AVOID TREES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE HEDGE AROUND | | | THE THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-06-2017 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-06-2017 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-06 11:02:36 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: JEWISH FEDERATION Z17020016 | | | MARCH 7, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | MITIGATION CHART IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE | | | PROPERTY THAT WILL BE REMOVED AND MITIGATION PROVIDED | | | PER SECTION 94-448: | | | ? CASSIA SHOULD BE CATEGORY 2 AT 150 | | | ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF ALL CANOPY REMOVAL | | | ? CORRECT THE REPLACEMENT CHART TO SHOW 600 CREDIT FOR | | | 2 NEW OAK TREES | | | ? SHOW ALL NEW TREES ADDED AND TOTAL CANOPY CREDITS | | | PROVIDED | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A COLUMN ON THE PLANT LIST SHOWING | | | DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS INDICATED IN WATERWISE, THE | | | SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLANT AND | | | LANDSCAPE PRACTICES GUIDE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION | | | 94-446(G). PLEASE REVISE AND RECALCULATE TO CONFIRM | | | PERCENTAGES FOR POINTS CLAIMED. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS TO SUBSTANTIATE | | | THE TYPE OF MOISTURE SENSING CONTROLLER PROVIDED TO | | | MEET THE POINTS TAKEN ON FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS CHART. ALSO PLEASE RENAME THE CHART TO | | | REFLECT THE REQUIRED NAME AND CODE SECTION. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A REQUIRED SHADE TREE FOR EACH ROW OF | | | PARKING IN ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS IN PARKING AREAS PER | | | SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A, OR EXPLAIN WHY PALMS ARE | | | SUBSTITUTED. SPECIFICALLY AT THE SOUTH ENTRANCE, ALSO | | | EXPLAIN THE NEED TO REMOVE THE EXISTING OAK TREES. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE GUARDRAIL SYSTEM | | | WILL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT DAMAGING THE EXISTING MATURE | | | TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE LANDSCAPING | | | MEETS THE 30% REQUIRED AROUND THE NEW STORAGE BUILDING | | | PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1). | | | | | | 7. PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER, | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST | | | UTILITY LOCATIONS TO AVOID TREES. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE HEDGE AROUND THE THREE | | | NON-ACCESS SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
Time |
04:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
Time |
05:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-03 09:21:18 | 1. APPROVAL OF FENCE IN 25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL | | | REQUIRE NPBCOID APPROVAL. | | | 2. APPROVAL OF FENCE IN 12' UTILITY EASEMENT WILL | | | REQUIRE ALL UTILITY COMPANIES APPROVAL. | | | 3. QUEUE LENGTH FOR NEW ENTRY GATE MY NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENT. DETAIL OF ATTENDANT BUILDING IS UNREADABLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-12-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-12-2017 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-12-2017 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-02 11:34:38 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.02.2017 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z17020016 | | | CASE NO.: PB 813J | | | ADDRESS: 1 HARVARD CIRCLE | | | APPLICANT/CONTACT: RYAN JOHNSTON | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.691.4552 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: ADDITION OF STORAGE BUILDING AND SITE | | | IMPROVEMENTS. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. IN YOUR RESPONSE TO ZONING COMMENT #8 YOU STATE | | | THAT... "THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO MAINTAIN TWO-WAY | | | INGRESS AND EGRESS AT THE MAIN DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE FROM | | | HARVARD CIRCLE DURING DAYTIME OPERATING HOURS WITH THE | | | GATE IN A PERMANENT OPEN POSITION. AFTER HOURS THE GATE | | | WILL BE IN USE WITH KEY CARD ENTRY AND THE DRIVEWAY ON | | | COLUMBIA WILL BE AN ENTRANCE ONLY. THE GATE ON HARVARD | | | CIRCLE WILL ALWAYS BE IN USE AND IS AN EXIT ONLY." I | | | BELIEVE THIS RESPONSE IS INCORRECT. BASED UPON YOUR | | | SITE PLAN, IT APPEARS THAT COLUMBIA DRIVE WILL MAINTAIN | | | TWO-WAY INGRESS AND EGRESS, AND HARVARD CIRCLE WILL BE | | | AN EXIT ONLY. IF THE RESPONSE YOU PROVIDED IS | | | INCORRECT, PLEASE UPDATE ACCORDINGLY. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
03-08-2017 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-08 08:59:02 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.08.2017 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z17020016 | | | CASE NO.: PB 813J | | | ADDRESS: 1 HARVARD CIRCLE | | | APPLICANT/CONTACT: RYAN JOHNSTON | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.691.4552 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: ADDITION OF STORAGE BUILDING AND SITE | | | IMPROVEMENTS. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL | | | UTILITY COMPANIES INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE NO | | | OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | 2. HAS THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSION AS TO WHETHER TRAFFIC | | | CONCURRENCY IS REQUIRED FOR THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE? | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STATUS OF REVIEW BY THE VILLAGE | | | COMMERCE CENTER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD. | | | | | | 4. IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN IN THE EXISTING UTILITY | | | EASEMENT?EASEMENT CONSENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL | | | UTILITY COMPANIES. | | | | | | 5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE DISCUSSION REGARDING | | | THE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. IF THE BARRIER IS TO BE | | | VISIBLE, A MORE AESTHETIC ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE | | | ENCOURAGED. IF THE BARRIER IS GOING TO BE HIDDEN | | | COMPLETELY AMONGST THE LANDSCAPING, THEN WHAT IS | | | PROPOSED MAY BE ACCEPTABLE. REGARDLESS, ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING HOW THE | | | GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED AS IT COULD HAVE IMPACT ON | | | EXISTING MATURE TREES, ETC. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE DIMENSION THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE FRONT OF | | | THE PARKING STALL AND THE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. THERE | | | NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) FEET OF CLEAR OVERHANG | | | FOR THE PARKING. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED GATES. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE CLARIFY THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC PATTERN WITHIN | | | THE SITE, SPECIFICALLY RELATING TO THE GATE OPERATIONS, | | | DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW (ENTRANCES AND EXISTS). IS | | | THE ACCESS POINT ON COLUMBIA DRIVE AN ENTRANCE ONLY? IF | | | NOT, THE EXIT GATE IS SWINGING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. | | | IF THE ACCESS POINTS ARE GOING TO BE DESIGNATED AS | | | SEPARATE ENTRANCE AND EXIT, THEN SIGNAGE MAY BE | | | REQUIRED WITHIN THE PARKING LOT TO DIRECT TRAFFIC FLOW. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
