| 2017-01-10 09:27:31 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) HAS THE APPLICANT PROVIDED THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN |
| | TO THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT (LWDD) FOR REVIEW? |
| | WRITTEN APPROVAL AND A LEASE AGREEMENT FROM THE LWDD |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED AS ONE OF THE PREREQUISITES FOR SITE |
| | PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 2.) A CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE OFF-SITE PARKING LOCATED IN THE LWDD ROW. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(B)] |
| | |
| | 3.) THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO EXECUTE A LEASE |
| | WITH THE LWDD FOR THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PARKING WITH |
| | THE CITY AS A THIRD PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT. CONTRACTUAL |
| | AGREEMENTS OF THIS NATURE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY |
| | COMMISSION FOLLOWING ACTION BY THE ZONING BOARD OF |
| | APPEALS FOR THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND PRIOR TO |
| | THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE |
| | PARTIES SHALL ONLY EXPIRE AFTER 25 YEARS OR UPON |
| | TERMINATION OF THE USE REQUIRING THE PROVISION OF |
| | PARKING. [ZLDR S.94-485(C)] |
| | |
| | 4.) THE APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE ALL REQUIRED PARKING, BUILDING SETBACKS AND |
| | LANDSCAPING ON THE DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY SHOULD THE |
| | LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE LWDD |
| | EXPIRE (OR IS TERMINATED). |
| | |
| | 5.) A TPS LETTER STATING THAT THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL |
| | PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) |
| | OF THE COUNTY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6.) A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT IS REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE ACCESS POINT ON OKEECHOBEE ROAD. |
| | |
| | 7.) A SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION |
| | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY |
| | (<1 YEAR OLD) OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 8.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 9.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FP&L AND |
| | COMCAST. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PER ZLDR S.94-273(D)(66)B., A RESTAURANT WITH A |
| | DRIVE-THRU FACILITY SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 100 |
| | FT. FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. STAFF'S |
| | MEASUREMENT OF THE PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT FROM |
| | THE ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS ONLY 90 |
| | FT., WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DISTANCE |
| | SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO EITHER REDESIGN THE SITE |
| | IN ORDER TO MEET THE MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIREMENT OR |
| | SEEK A WAIVER BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THROUGH |
| | THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL PARCEL AT THE SOUTH END |
| | OF THE PROPERTY IS ILLUSTRATED IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | BUT NOT IN THE SITE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, THERE SEEMS TO |
| | BE A CONFLICT THE WITH THE 6 FT. HIGH WALL ON THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL PARCEL AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINT TO THE |
| | COMMERCIAL PARCEL (I.E. WALL; NO GATE). PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 3.) WILL CUSTOMERS HAVE ACCESS FROM BOTH THE FRONT AND |
| | REAR OF THE BUILDING? SHOW INTERIOR SIDEWALKS WITH |
| | DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE THE PEDESTRIAN PATH TO THE |
| | PROPOSED USES. |
| | |
| | 4.) CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE 5 FT. WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG |
| | SKEES ROAD. |
| | |
| | 5.) CONSIDER INCORPORATING A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM |
| | THE SIDEWALK TO THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING FROM |
| | SKEES ROAD. |
| | |
| | 6.) THE PLAN SHOWS A 5 FT. WIDE STRIP (QUIT CLAIM) ON |
| | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING THE LWDD |
| | LATERAL CANAL ROW. PLEASE PROVIDE STAFF WITH |
| | INFORMATION/DOCUMENTATION ON THIS PROPOSED STRIP. |
| | |
| | 7.) IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT |
| | (INCLUDING A/C UNITS). PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT MAY NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO A |
| | SETBACK (IF LOCATED ON THE GROUND). ANY ROOFTOP |
| | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE BUILDING'S |
| | PARAPET. [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(4)] |
| | |
| | 8.) HOW FAR DO THE CANOPIES PROJECT FROM THE BUILDING? |
| | BUILDING CANOPIES CANNOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO |
| | ANY SETBACK. [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(5)] |
| | |
| | 9.) STEPS, UNCOVERED PORCHES SHALL NOT ENCROACH MORE |
| | THAN 2 FT. INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-305(A)(7)] |
| | |
| | 10.) ONE (1) 10 FT. BY 25 FT. LOADING SPACE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE LOADING SPACE |
| | CALCULATIONS IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR AND PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11.) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE |
| | PARKING AND A DETAIL THAT MATCHES THE PLAN. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(Q)] |
| | |
| | 12.)A BACK OUT SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR PARKING AT THE |
| | NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 13.) PLEASE CHECK THE PARKING COUNT. THERE ARE SOME |
| | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 14.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR: INCLUDE BUILDING, OPEN SPACE, PERVIOUS AND |
| | IMPERVIOUS SITE CALCULATIONS FOR JUST THE CMSJR |
| | DEVELOPMENT GROUP PARCEL. THE APPLICANT MUST |
| | DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPERTY (MINUS THE LWDD ROW) |
| | MEETS THE MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS); CHECK |
| | BUILDING CALCULATIONS. INCONSISTENCIES HAVE BEEN |
| | DETECTED WITH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT, SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS; REFERENCE ZLDR |
| | SEC. 94-145(6) FOR THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING |
| | HEIGHT; PARKING DATA: PLEASE ENSURE THE PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU |
| | INCLUDES OUTDOOR SEATING (STAFF CALCULATIONS INDICATE |
| | THAT 195 SEATS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE RESTAURANT |
| | W/DRIVE-THROUGH USE); REQUIRED PARKING FOR A RESTAURANT |
| | (NO DRIVE THRU) IS 1 PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY 100 SQ. |
| | FT. (NOT 1 PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY 300 SQ. FT.); |
| | SETBACK MEASUREMENTS FROM THE BUILDING TO THE CMSJR |
| | PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE THAT THE |
| | BUILDING MEETS THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 15.) CHECK DIMENSIONS IN THE PLAN (I.E. BUILDING |
| | SETBACKS). SOME DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE PLAN ARE |
| | INACCURATE WHEN MEASURED WITH A SCALE. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 16.) DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE(S) SHALL MATCH |
| | THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE(S) ILLUSTRATED IN THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 17.) LABEL THE FPL TRANSFORMER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 18.) IDENTIFY THE APPROVED 6 FT. HIGH WALL ON THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL PARCEL THAT ABUTS THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR THE |
| | DIFFERENT USES IN THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THERE SEEMS TO |
| | BE A DISCREPANCY WITH THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2.) ONE (1) INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | FOR EVERY TEN (10) PARKING SPACES. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-443(C)(3)B.] |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AT ALL ROAD |
| | INTERSECTIONS PER ZLDR S.94-305(E). VISIBILITY SHALL |
| | NOT BE OBSCURED BY PLANT MATERIAL BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND |
| | 8 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN EACH VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE LIGHTING: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING |
| | SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED |
| | TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM THE ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. |
| | ANY GLARE SHALL BE CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR INDIRECT |
| | LIGHT FROM THE SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE ILLUMINATION IN |
| | EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES WHEN MEASURED IN A |
| | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. [ZLDR S.94-309(A) AND |
| | S.94-310(D)] |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE: |
| | |
| | 1.) OFF PREMISE SIGNAGE IS NOT PERMITTED. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-402(B)] |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ENTRY |
| | SIGNS AND MENU BOARD (I.E. SIGN HEIGHT, CONTENT, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 3.) CONSIDER THE SUBMISSION OF A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 4.) WILL THERE BE ANY DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE TO THE |
| | DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY? |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($200). |