Plan Review Details - Project Z16110015
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16110015
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-14-2016 Time 10:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-27-2017 Time 10:42 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-14 11:06:04DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A
 RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL
 INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
 ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE.
  
 3. ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A1.1A, IT APPEARS THAT THE
 EGRESS FROM THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS IS
 THROUGH THE SPACE LABELED AS "CONNECTION TO THE OLD
 SCHOOL" AND THOUGH DOUBLE DOORS INTO THE COURTYARD. THE
 DOOUBLE DOORS MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED BECAUSE THEY ARE
 SHOWN RIGHT UP AGAINST THE LIBRARY AND WILL BE AT RISK
 FROM FIRE OR SMOKE COMING FROM ANY WINDOWS THAT ARE IN
 THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE LIBRARY.
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
 LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY ENTRANCES.
  
 4. SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH
 SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES
 WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE
 BUILDING OR FACILITY
  
 5. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. ACCESSIBLE PARKING LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN. THE SITE
 DATA TABLE ON SHEET SP-1 STATES THAT 2 ACCIESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED. THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE
 LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM
 ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH
 BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 7. WHEN SELECTING LOCATIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES, PLEASE NOTE THAT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT
 COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED
 VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL
 ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF
 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 8. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 9. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 11. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION
 OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT,
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-24-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 03-24-2017 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 03-24-2017 Time 16:22 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-24 16:23:21CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 PROJECT NAME: GREEN SCHOOL EXPANSION RESUBMITTAL - ISPR
 16-01B - Z16110015
  
 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE: PASSED WITH CONDITION
  
 DATE: MARCH 24, 2017
  
 AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLAN (RECEIVED ON
 03/14/2017) AND THE RESPONSES TO THE PREVIOUS PPRC
 COMMENTS, IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS HAVE
 BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED AND OTHER REQUESTED INFORMATION ARE
 NOT YET SHOWN ON THE ?PHASE II CONCEPTUAL PLAN?. THESE
 ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AND ?MORE
 DETAILS? NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLANS AS AGREED
 UPON ON THE RESPONSE DURING DETAIL DESIGN AT
 ?ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION? PHASE PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 12-12-2016 Time 12:14 Rev Time 4.00
Received By mkhan Date 12-12-2016 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-12 12:16:47CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 ENGINEERING DIVISION
  
 DATE: 12/12/2016
  
 Z16110015: 2001 S. DIXIE HWY. - GREEN SCHOOL
  
 THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR
 TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 1. PLAN REVIEW FOR ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENT WILL REQUIRE
 A SEPARATE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION
 FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS
 DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC
 CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL
 WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE
 FOLLOWING LINK:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 THE FOLLOWING WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS:
  
 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (AVERAGE AND PEAK WITH
 PEAKING FACTOR) FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING/GYMNASIUM.
 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION.
 SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS
 WELL;
  
 4. PLAN DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW WHAT ARE THE UTILITY
 SERVICES TO THE PROPOSED GYMNASIUM BUILDING;
  
 5. HOW DO YOU PROPOSE TO ISOLATE THE EXISTING WATER
 MAIN IN THE ALLEY WAY BETWEEN BISCAYNE DRIVE AND
 FLAMINGO DRIVE? REVIEW WATERLINE CONFIGURATION ON
 BISCAYNE DRIVE;
  
 6. A FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM EXISTING FIRE
 HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN SUBMITTAL;
  
 7. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE
 DETAILS SHEET. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD
 FORMAT. CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT)
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 8. PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER,
 DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S STANDARD
 DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE INSIDE AN 'UTILITY
 EASEMENT' JUST INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ACCESSIBLE;
  
 9. PROVIDE ALL UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION. SHOW
 CONFLICT INFORMATION (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES)
 AT THE CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY
 SEWER PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES;
  
 10. PAVEMENT RESTORATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING
 MANHOLE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. REFER TO THE CITY
 STANDARD DETAILS FOR RESTORATION GUIDELINES AND SHOW
 THE EXTENT OF PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON THE PLANS;
  
 11. EXISTING WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS/WATER METERS
 SERVING THE PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, ARE TO BE CUT AND
 CAPPED AT THE MAIN. DE-ACTIVATED/INACTIVE PIPELINES
 LARGER THAN 2" DIAMETER WILL BE REMOVED. PLEASE LABEL
 PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL AND ADD NOTES TO THE UTILITY
 PLANS ACCORDINGLY;
  
 12. EXISTING SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SERVING THE
 PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE
 MAIN;
  
 13. PLEASE NOTE THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS
 BEEN REVISED, MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES
 MUST BE LEAD FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE
 LINK BELOW:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 14. THE PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE
 WITHIN 150 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN
 AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL
 SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS,
 LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE
 PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR
 POTABLE WATER LINES.
  
 15. SUBMITTAL MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) WILL BE
 REQUIRED AT THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1024 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 12-09-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 12-09-2016 Time 09:12 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-09 09:18:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES,
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CHAPTER 14, NEW
 EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCIES.
  
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 AND WHETHER IT WILL BE MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES.
  
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.
  
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ANY SITE AND/OR
 BUILDING ACCESS POINTS THAT THEY BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX
 KEY BOXES, ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR
 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
  
 12. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED
 FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY
 MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE
 WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES
 HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED
 REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED
 WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
  
  
 13. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
  
 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-27-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-27-2017 Time 16:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-27-2017 Time 16:56 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-27 16:57:28FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z16110015
 JUNE 27, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE
 INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND
 PERMITTED LANDSCAPING FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING
 BUILDING, AND HOW THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THIS ADDITION WOULD BE COORDINATED.
  
 THE CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE
 LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND
 CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE
 ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED AND THE
 LANDSCAPE PERMIT CLOSED OUT.
  
 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED ON 5/30/17, A PUNCH
 LIST OF ITEMS WAS EMAILED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG
 THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, AND
 LABEL ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION TO REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF THE ENTIRE
 BUILDING FOR REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT, BUT THE
 EXISTING BUILDING SHOWS ONLY 60 LINEAR FEET PROVIDED,
 NOT THE 100 INDICATED ON THE PLAN, AND SHORT OF THE 75
 FEET REQUIRED.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS UPDATE ON
 CONDITION #2 OF THE CURRENT APPROVAL REGARDING STREET
 TREES ON DIXIE.
  
 PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLEASE
 PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION FROM FDOT TO SHOW THIS CANNOT
 BE ACCOMPLISHED.
  
 COMMENT WAS NOT SATISFIED FROM THE LAST REVIEW. (ALSO
 SEE COMMENT #9)
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED IF REQUIRED TREES FOR PARKING
 ARE ADDED IN THE NORTH DROP OFF AREA PARKING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
 INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
 AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
 ROOTS.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE OAK
 TREE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE
 DRIVE, AS IT HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 TREE IS STILL SHOWN ON SHEETS LP-1 AND LI-1. PLEASE
 REVISE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/3/17:
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE AND
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO EACH END OF THE
 ROW OF PARKING IN THE NORTH DROP OFF AREA.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE CURBED BULB OUTS ADJACENT
 TO THE PARKING SPACES PROPOSED IN THE FLAMINGO DRIVE
 RIGHT OF WAY AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES.
  
 THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES CANNOT BE INSTALLED
 WHERE EFFECTIVE DUE TO THE NONCONFORMING SETBACK OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDING, THEREFORE THE LOGICAL WAY TO MEET
 THE INTENT OF THE CODE AND PROVIDE FOR SCREENING AND
 SUPPLY NECESSARY SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALKS AND PARKING
 SPACES IS TO PROVIDE TREES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
 RECENTLY AMENDED LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIRES THIS IN FUTURE
 PROJECTS, AND THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT THIS PROJECT
 PROVIDE THE TREES WHERE POSSIBLE TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE FPL
 TRANSFORMER IS PROPOSED IF IT IS NOT GOING TO REMAIN IN
 THE CURRENT LOCATION.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/31/17:
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 TO SHOW WHAT IS PROPOSED FOR THE EXISTING TREES ON SITE
 THAT WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. TREES MAY BE
 RELOCATED TO ANY LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY. A SEPARATE
 PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IF
 ADDING TREES TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS CHART TO SHOW THE NUMBER OF FLOWERING
 TREES PROVIDED TO MATCH THE PLANT LIST (SHOWS 9),
 LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHOWS 8) AND CURRENT CONDITIONS (7,
 LOCATION IN SOUTH PARKING LOT HAS A SILVER BUTTONWOOD
 EXISTING INSTEAD OF TABEBUIA).
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR
 ANY RELOCATION OF TREES OR PALMS ONTO OTHER PROPERTIES
 TO ALLOW REVIEW OF LOCATIONS, RECORD FINAL LOCATIONS,
 AND ALLOW FOR INSPECTIONS.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-31-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-31-2017 Time 14:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-24-2017 Time 14:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-31 14:26:13FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z16110015
 MAY 31, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE
 INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND
 PERMITTED LANDSCAPING FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING
 BUILDING, AND HOW THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THIS ADDITION WOULD BE COORDINATED.
  
 THE CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE
 LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND
 CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE
 ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED AND THE
 LANDSCAPE PERMIT CLOSED OUT.
  
 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED ON 5/30/17, A PUNCH
 LIST OF ITEMS WAS EMAILED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG
 THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, AND
 LABEL ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION TO REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF THE ENTIRE
 BUILDING FOR REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT, BUT THE
 EXISTING BUILDING SHOWS ONLY 60 LINEAR FEET PROVIDED,
 NOT THE 100 INDICATED ON THE PLAN, AND SHORT OF THE 75
 FEET REQUIRED.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS UPDATE ON
 CONDITION #2 OF THE CURRENT APPROVAL REGARDING STREET
 TREES ON DIXIE.
  
 PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLEASE
 PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION FROM FDOT TO SHOW THIS CANNOT
 BE ACCOMPLISHED.
  
 COMMENT WAS NOT SATISFIED FROM THE LAST REVIEW. (ALSO
 SEE COMMENT #9)
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED IF REQUIRED TREES FOR PARKING
 ARE ADDED IN THE NORTH DROP OFF AREA PARKING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
 INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
 AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
 ROOTS.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE
 OAK TREE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF
 BISCAYNE DRIVE, AS IT HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 TREE IS STILL SHOWN ON SHEETS LP-1 AND LI-1. PLEASE
 REVISE.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/3/17:
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE AND
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO EACH END OF THE
 ROW OF PARKING IN THE NORTH DROP OFF AREA.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE CURBED BULB OUTS
 ADJACENT TO THE PARKING SPACES PROPOSED IN THE FLAMINGO
 DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND STREET
 TREES.
  
 THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES CANNOT BE INSTALLED
 WHERE EFFECTIVE DUE TO THE NONCONFORMING SETBACK OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDING, THEREFORE THE LOGICAL WAY TO MEET
 THE INTENT OF THE CODE AND PROVIDE FOR SCREENING AND
 SUPPLY NECESSARY SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALKS AND PARKING
 SPACES IS TO PROVIDE TREES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
 RECENTLY AMENDED LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIRES THIS IN FUTURE
 PROJECTS, AND THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT THIS PROJECT
 PROVIDE THE TREES WHERE POSSIBLE TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE FPL
 TRANSFORMER IS PROPOSED IF IT IS NOT GOING TO REMAIN IN
 THE CURRENT LOCATION.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/31/17:
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO SHOW WHAT
 IS PROPOSED FOR THE EXISTING TREES ON SITE THAT WILL
 NEED TO BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. TREES MAY BE RELOCATED
 TO ANY LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY. A SEPARATE PLAN WILL
 BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IF ADDING
 TREES TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS.
  
 12. PLEASE CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART TO
 SHOW THE NUMBER OF FLOWERING TREES PROVIDED TO MATCH
 THE PLANT LIST (SHOWS 9), LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHOWS 8) AND
 CURRENT CONDITIONS (7, LOCATION IN SOUTH PARKING LOT
 HAS A SILVER BUTTONWOOD EXISTING INSTEAD OF TABEBUIA).
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-03-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-03-2017 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-03-2017 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-03 16:35:11FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z16110015
 APRIL 3, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE
 INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND
 PERMITTED LANDSCAPING FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING
 BUILDING, AND HOW THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THIS ADDITION WOULD BE COORDINATED.
  
 THE CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE
 LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND
 CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE
 ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED AND THE
 LANDSCAPE PERMIT CLOSED OUT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG
 THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, AND
 LABEL ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION TO REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF THE
 ENTIRE BUILDING FOR REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR
 FOOTAGE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-443(E)(1).
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT, BUT THE
 EXISTING BUILDING SHOWS ONLY 60 LINEAR FEET PROVIDED,
 NOT THE 100 INDICATED ON THE PLAN, AND SHORT OF THE 75
 FEET REQUIRED.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS UPDATE ON
 CONDITION #2 OF THE CURRENT APPROVAL REGARDING STREET
 TREES ON DIXIE.
  
 PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLEASE
 PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION FROM FDOT TO SHOW THIS CANNOT
 BE ACCOMPLISHED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED IF REQUIRED TREES FOR PARKING
 ARE ADDED IN THE NORTH DROP OFF AREA PARKING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
 INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
 AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
 ROOTS.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE OAK
 TREE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE
 DRIVE, AS IT HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/3/17:
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE AND TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO EACH END OF THE ROW OF
 PARKING IN THE NORTH DROP OFF AREA.
  
 9. PLEASE INDICATE CURBED BULB OUTS ADJACENT TO THE
 PARKING SPACES PROPOSED IN THE FLAMINGO DRIVE RIGHT OF
 WAY AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES.
  
 10. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE FPL TRANSFORMER IS
 PROPOSED IF IT IS NOT GOING TO REMAIN IN THE CURRENT
 LOCATION.
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-13-2016 Time 12:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-13-2016 Time 12:29 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-13 12:44:25FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z16110015
 DECEMBER 13, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE INSTALLATION AND
 COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND PERMITTED LANDSCAPING
 FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, AND HOW THE TIMING
 OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS ADDITION WOULD BE
 COORDINATED.
  
 2. PLEASE SHOW THE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, AND LABEL ALL
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. PLEASE CORRECT THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION
 TO REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF THE ENTIRE BUILDING FOR
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS UPDATE ON CONDITION #2 OF
 THE CURRENT APPROVAL REGARDING STREET TREES ON DIXIE.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 7. PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE OAK TREE IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, AS IT
 HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-27-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-27-2017 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-27-2017 Time 14:07 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-27 14:04:57COMMENT(S) BELOW BASED CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW OF
 6/27/2017 EMAILED SET OF PLANS FROM R. REIKENIS:
 1. CONSTRUCTION PLANS NEED TO INCLUDE CITY'S STANDARD
 DETAILS FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE S-102.
  
 2. S&S DRAINAGE CALCS SUBMITTED 6/27/17 DEMONSTRATE
 PROJECT DRAINAGE SYSTEM MEETS WATER QUALITY AND
 DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-25-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-25-2017 Time 13:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-25-2017 Time 16:53 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-25 16:53:02COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW OF
 THE MAY 23, 2017 REVIEW PACKAGE.
  
 1. WEIR BOX DETAIL ON SHEET 5 OF 8 CALLS OUT PLACING
 THE WEIR IN STRUCTURE S-102. THE WEIR NEEDS TO BE
 INSTALLED ON THE PRIVATE SYSTEM, OUTSIDE OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 2. CONSIDER MOVING THE STORM PIPE ALONG THE WEST SIDE
 OF THE BUILDING FURTHER TO THE WEST AWAY FROM THE
 BUILDING SO THAT IF THE PIPE NEEDS TO BE REPLACED IN
 THE FUTURE, IT CAN BE EXCAVATED WITHOUT UNDERMINING THE
 BUILDING FOUNDATION.
  
 3. CONSIDER ADDING MORE EXFILTRATION TRENCH AT THE
 SOUTH END OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM (WEST OF THE BUILDING
 AND/OR ACROSS THE WEST END OF THE SOCCER FIELD. THE
 EXISTING EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS AT THE UP STREAM END OF
 THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND ONLY THE PARKING LOT RUNOFF
 WILL BE FLOW TO THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. THE PIPE
 SYSTEM SLOPES FROM NORTH TO SOUTH.
  
 4. CONFIRM DIAMETER OF THE EXISTING STORM PIPE ON
 BISCAYNE DRIVE WHERE STRUCTURE S-102 WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED.
  
 5. LANDSCAPING ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF NEW BUILDING
 WILL BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED STORM PIPES.
  
 6. CONSIDER USING 45-DEGREE BEND INSTEAD OF 90-DEGREE
 BEND AFTER THE 4" X 8" REDUCER FOR THE WATER MAIN
 CONNECTION ON BISCAYNE DRIVE.
  
 7. PROVIDE UPDATED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR PHASE 2
 IMPROVEMENTS.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-27-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-27-2017 Time 10:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-27-2017 Time 11:07 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-27 11:06:56COMMENTS ON MARCH 23, 2017 REVIEW PACKAGE:
  
 1. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS TREES PROPOSED OVER OR NEAR THE
 ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS INCLUDING ALONG THE SOUTH AND
 WEST PROPERTY LINES AND ALONG THE ONSITE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH SOUTH OF FLAMINGO DRIVE. HOW WILL THE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM BE PROTECTED FROM ROOT INTRUSION AND FUTURE
 MAINTENANCE NEEDS OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS?
  
 2. PHASE II CONCEPTUAL PLAN SHOWS EXISTING DRAINAGE
 (EXDN) UNDER THE PROPOSED BUILDING. IS THIS DRAINAGE TO
 REMAIN?
  
 3. LABEL THE CIRCULAR SYMBOL SHOWN TO THE WEST OF THE
 RELOCATED CONTROL STRUCTURE ON THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN. IS
 THIS A STORM MANHOLE?
  
 4. WHAT ARE THE LONG NARROW HATCHING AREAS ON SOUTH AND
 EAST SIDES OF PROPOSED BUILDING SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL
 PLAN SHEET?
  
 5. THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING WATER MAIN ADJACENT
 TO THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN THE RELOCATED CONTROL
 STRUCTURE AND MANHOLE IN BISCAYNE DRIVE. THERE NEEDS TO
 BE A MINIMUM FIVE FEET HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE
 WATER AND STORM PIPE.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMNWATER ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-14-2016 Time 01:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-14-2016 Time 01:48 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-14 01:48:44THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. THE CITY COMMISSION RECENTLY PASSED A RESOLUTION
 INCREASING THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT TO ONE FOOT ABOVE
 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN A SPECIAL FLOOD
 HAZARD AREA.
  
 3. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED
 BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER FOR THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED STORM RUNOFF WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 AND PEAK FLOOD STAGES FOR 5-YEAR 1-DAY, 25-YEAR 3-DAY
 AND 100-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORMS PER SFWMD CRITERIA.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP OR ERP MODIFICATION
 FOR THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-11-2017 Time 09:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-11 09:01:27PASSED WITH CONDITION OF REPLAT AND UTILITY EASEMENT
 ABANDONMENT PRIOR TO C.O.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 12-13-2016 Time 11:20 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-13 11:29:121. ENTIRE PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED.
 2. EXISTING 2 FOOT UE NEEDS TO BE ABANDONED.
 3. ENTIRE ALLEY SHOULD BE SHOWN AS CITY-OWNED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-30-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-30-2017 Time 10:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 06-30-2017 Time 10:08 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-30 10:11:07CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1.) A REPLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) FOR
 THE EXPANSION.
  
 2.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 3.) A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT HALL BE REQUIRED FOR
 ANY RELOCATION OF TREES OR PALMS ONTO OTHER PROPERTIES
 TO ALLOW REVIEW OF LOCATIONS, RECORD FINAL LOCATIONS,
 AND ALLOW FOR INSPECTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-23-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-23-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-23-2017 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-23 15:32:16GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT WITH
 ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE PLANS.
  
 2.) A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE ISSUANCE OF THE C.O. FOR THE EXPANSION.
  
 3.) CROSSWALK STRIPING ON BISCAYNE DRIVE WILL REQUIRE A
 PERMIT FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION FOR THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE SHOULD IT BE REMOVED FROM THE 20 FT. UTILITY
 EASEMENT?
  
 2.) DUMPSTER DETAIL IS MISSING FROM THE REGULATING PLAN
 (SHEET SP-2).
  
 3.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
 THE APPLICANT MAY ALSO WANT TO ORIENTATE THE RACK SO
 THAT IT IS PARALLEL WITH THE STREET FOR EASE OF USE.
  
 4.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IN THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET
 SP-2) DOES NOT HAVE ALL THE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE
 THAT THE PAD AND RACK IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S
 BICYCLE DESIGN STANDARDS.
  
 5.) THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET SP-2) SHOWS A DETAIL FOR
 A 6 FT. HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE; HOWEVER, THIS FENCE
 CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW WHERE
 THE FENCE IS LOCATED OR REMOVE THE DETAIL FROM THE
 REGULATING PLAN.
  
 6.) THE PROPOSED FAR IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR IS
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED FAR IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABLE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (THE
 CORRECT PROPOSED FAR IS 0.61)
  
 7.) BASED ON STAFF'S CALCULATION, THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 COVERAGE IS 46 PERCENT (WITHOUT THE 1,600 SQ. FT.
 CANOPY). PLEASE CORRECT IN THE SITE DATA AND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLES FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO,
 PLEASE SHOW WHERE THE 1,600 SQ. FT. CANOPY IS LOCATED
 IN THE SITE PLAN.
  
 8.) PHOTOMETRIC PLAN STILL DOES NOT SHOW LIGHT
 SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 9.) CLARIFY AND CORRECT IN THE REGULATING PLAN IF THE
 DETAIL FOR THE LIGHT POLE LOCATION DETAIL (EAST PARKING
 LOT) IS FOR THE TWO SOUTH END PARKING LOTS.
  
 10.) WILL THE EXISTING GREASE TRAPS, LOCATED IN THE
 STUDENT DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA BE REMOVED? PLEASE
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND/OR NOTATE IF THE
 INTENT IS TO LEAVE THE GREASE TRAPS.
  
 11.) NORTH ARROW IS MISSING FROM THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
  
 12.) REVISE THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO THE
 TOP OF THE PARAPET WALL (LOCATED ON THE ROOFTOP OF THE
 BUILDING). PLEASE ENSURE THE CHANGE TO THE HEIGHT IS
 REFLECTED IN ALL PLANS.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X
 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND
 AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($200.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-13-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 04-13-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 04-13-2017 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-13 16:40:43GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ANY REFERENCE TO THE "ALLEY" SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM
 THE PLANS UPON THE APPROVAL OF ORD. 4702-17 AND RESO.
 106-17.
  
 2.) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT WITH
 ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE PLANS.
  
 3.) A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE ISSUANCE OF THE C.O. FOR THE EXPANSION.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) REVISED COMMENT #2: RELOCATE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 FROM THE 20 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE OR PROVIDE WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE
 UTILITY PROVIDER(S) THAT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE CAN BE
 LOCATED WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
  
 2.) REVISED COMMENT #4: THE CANOPIED PRE-K PLAY AREA
 HAS BEEN RELOCATED FROM THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. IS
 THERE STILL A 4 FT. HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE AROUND THE
 PLAY AREA? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE. THE PLANS INDICATE
 THAT THERE IS NO FENCE AROUND THE PLAY AREA.
  
 3.) REVISED COMMENT #6: BICYCLE RACK DETAIL STILL DOES
 NOT MATCH THE PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) REVISED COMMENT #8: PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING
 IS STILL MISSING FROM THE SITE DATA TABULAR.
  
 5.) CHECK CALCULATIONS FOR THE TOTAL SITE AREA AND
 TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA. CALCULATIONS DO NOT SEEM TO ADD
 UP.
  
 6.) TEN (10) VISITOR PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED (ONLY
 4 VISITOR PARKING SPACES PROVIDED). [ZLDR S.94-486]
  
 7.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-486 TABLE XV-6, THE MINIMUM
 NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE USE IS 34
 PARKING SPACES (1 SPACE/STAFF MEMBER + 10 GUEST PARKING
 SPACES). THE PROJECT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING
 REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 8.) PROVIDE DETAIL (I.E. HEIGHT) ON THE PROPOSED
 TRELLIS.
  
 9.) THERE SEEMS TO BE AN OUTDOOR KITCHEN INCLUDED IN
 THE LATEST SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION AND DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR
 KITCHEN.
  
 10.) SHOW LIGHT SPILLOVER JUST BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE
 IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS)
  
 1.) CHECK THE BUILDING HEIGHT PROVIDED IN THE
 ELEVATIONS. INCLUDE THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOFTOP WALL. THE
 ELEVATIONS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING IS
 APPROXIMATELY 133 FT. TALL? PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 2.) FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED, DATED
 AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X
 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND
 AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($200.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 12-09-2016 Time 09:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 12-09-2016 Time 09:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-09 09:56:44GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED EXPANSION IS CONTINGENT ON THE
 APPROVAL OF THE ALLEYWAY ABANDONMENT BETWEEN FLAMINGO
 DRIVE AND BISCAYNE DRIVE. THE APPLICATION FOR THE
 ABANDONMENT IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH THE PLANNING
 DIVISION (REFERENCE CASE NO. PB 1720).
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED PLAN NOW SHOWS TANDEM PARKING IN THE
 SOUTHWEST PARKING LOT. TANDEM PARKING IS NOT PERMITTED
 OUTSIDE THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN (DMP) AREA. PLEASE
 ADDRESS.
  
 2.) SHOW THE 10 FT. WIDE FPL UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE
 PLAN.
  
 3.) WHERE ARE THE A/C UNITS LOCATED? IF LOCATED ON THE
 GROUND LEVEL, THE A/C UNITS WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH
 THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). COMPLETE SCREENING OF
 THE EQUIPMENT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED IF THE UNITS ARE
 LOCATED ON THE ROOFTOP OF THE BUILDING (I.E. USE OF
 PARAPETS TO SCREEN THE A/C UNITS FROM VIEW).
  
 4.) CLEARLY SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED 4 FT.
 HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE AROUND THE PRE-K CANOPIED PLAY
 AREA. IT IS NOT CLEAR TO HOW FAR THE FENCE EXTENDS.
  
 5.) RELOCATE THE BICYCLE PARKING TO A MORE VISIBLE,
 EASILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION ON THE SCHOOL SITE (I.E.
 NEAR THE ENTRANCE ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IN THE DROP-OFF AND
 PICK-UP AREA).
  
 6.) THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON SHEET SP-2 SHOWS A HEDGE
 AROUND THE PAD; HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT ILLUSTRATED IN THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE DETAIL MUST MATCH ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 ADDRESS.
  
 7.) THE TWO (2) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES LOCATED NEXT
 TO THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE RELOCATED CLOSER TO
 THE ENTRANCE OF THE SCHOOL BUILDING. [ZLDR S.94-485(O)]
  
 8.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE SITE
 DATA TABULAR: PROJECT NO.: ISPR 16-01B/Z16110015;
 BUILDING HEIGHT (MAX. 50'): PLEASE PROVIDE THE OVERALL
 HEIGHT OF THE SCHOOL STRUCTURE; BICYCLE PARKING
 PROPOSED: 2 (NOT 6 ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN)
  
 9.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABULAR: MINIMUM OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENT IS 40% (NOT 32%)
  
 10.) REVIEW THE PARKING COUNT FOR THE PROJECT. THE
 PARKING PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR DOES NOT
 MATCH THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS):
  
 1.) CONSIDER ADDING ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ON THE
 BUILDING FACADES TO BREAK UP THE BLANK WALLS.
  
 2.) PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS.
  
 3.) FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED
 AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED ARCHITECT.
  
  
 LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRICS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE AN UPDATED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR THE
 PROJECT.
  
 2.) HOW TALL ARE THE PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURES?
 PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8.5 BY 11), AND AN
 ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% ($200) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved