Plan Review Details - Project Z16080012
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16080012
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 04-20-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 04-20-2017 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 04-20-2017 Time 10:39 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-20 10:41:17DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-11-2017 Time 11:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-11-2017 Time 11:46 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-11 11:46:12DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE IN FLOOD ZONE.
 CORRECTION OF THE FOLLOWING TYPOGRAPICAL ERROR WILL BE
 CHECKED WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. SHEET A114 STATES
 THE ELEVATION OF THE MECHANICAL ROOMS AS 6'-9" NGVD.
 THAT APPEARS TO BE A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR BECAUSE,
 ACCORDING TO THE COMMENT RESPONSE NARRATIVE, THIS
 SHOULD BE 9'-6" NGVD. THE ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR
 OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL BE 12 INCHES
 (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 3. SHEET A114, GROUND FLOOR PLAN, DOES NOT SHOW A SAFE
 PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM THE NORTH-WEST OR THE SOUTH-WEST
 STAIR TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
 4. SHEET A115, LEVEL 2 PLAN, THE EXIT DOOR FROM THE
 SOUTH-WEST SHOULD SWING OUTWARD.
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY
 SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE
 BUILDING EMTRANCE. IF THAT IS TO BE BY MEANS OF THE
 MEANDERING WALKWAY, SHOWN ON SHEET A115, LEVEL 2 PLAN,
 LEADING FROM ARKONA COURT UP THE LANDSCAPE BERM TO THE
 ARRIVAL COURT AT THE NORTH-WEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING,
 IT SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN TO HAVE A SLOPE OF 1 IN 20 OR
 BETTER. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE
 GREATER THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. SHEET A122, LEVEL 25. THERE APPEARS TO BE A DRAFTING
 ERROR. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT THE CORRIDOR LEADING
 TO THE EAST STAIR SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN WITHOUT A WALL
 ACROSS THE CORRIDOR. AS CURRENTLY SHOWN, THE PENTHOUSE
 APPEARS TO HAVE ACCESS TO ONLY THE WEST STAIR. THERE IS
 CURRENTLY NO EXIT PATH SHOWN TO ACCESS THE EAST STAIR
 BECAUSE A WALL IS SHOWN OPPOSITE THE ELEVATOR 1 LANDING
 DOOR. A MINIMUM OF TWO SEPARATE EXITS IS REQUIRED.
  
 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 09-14-2016 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-14-2016 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-14 11:01:08DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE IN FLOOD ZONE. THE
 ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL
 ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS
 ETC.) SHALL BE 12 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE
 FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 3. SIX ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN ON SHEET
 A113, GROUND FLOOR PLAN, BUT FOUR OF THEM DO NOT HAVE
 ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLE. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT
 COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED
 VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL
 ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF
 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 4. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 5. SHEET A114, LEVEL 2 ? AMENITIES PLAN. NO EXIT DOOR
 IS SHOWN TO ACCESS THE WEST STAIR.
  
 6. SHEET A115, LEVEL 3. INDOOR AMENITIES SPACE IS
 LIKELY TO BE AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, BUT ONLY ONE EXIT
 IS SHOWN. THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE WEST STAIR TAKES
 OCCUPANTS PAST THE EAST STAIR, SO ONE FIRE EVENT COULD
 ENDER BOTH STAIRS UNAVAILABLE. A MINIMUM OF TWO
 SEPARATE EXITS IS REQUIRED.
  
 7. SHEET A116, LEVEL 4. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE
 GREAT LOUNGE? IS THAT SPACE AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY? ONLY
 ONE EXIT IS SHOWN, BECAUSE THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE WEST
 STAIR TAKES OCCUPANTS PAST THE EAST STAIR, SO ONE FIRE
 EVENT COULD ENDER BOTH STAIRS UNAVAILABLE. A MINIMUM OF
 TWO SEPARATE EXITS IS REQUIRED IF IT IS AN ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANCY.
  
 8. SHEET A121, LEVEL 26. THE PENTHOUSE APPEARS TO HAVE
 ACCESS TO ONLY THE WEST STAIR. THERE IS NO EXIT PATH
 SHOWN TO ACCESS THE EAST STAIR. A MINIMUM OF TWO
 SEPARATE EXITS IS REQUIRED.
  
 9. SHEET A122, LEVEL 27. THE PENTHOUSE APPEARS TO HAVE
 ACCESS TO ONLY THE WEST STAIR. THERE IS NO EXIT PATH
 SHOWN TO ACCESS THE EAST STAIR. A MINIMUM OF TWO
 SEPARATE EXITS IS REQUIRED.
  
 10. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 11. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 12. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
 DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
 OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
 GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
 GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
 USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 13. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 14. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION
 OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT,
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-28-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 03-28-2017 Time 15:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 03-28-2017 Time 15:53 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-28 15:54:27CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 PROJECT NAME: GREAT GULF - 1515 S. FLAGLER DR. -
 Z16080012 (CASE #: PB 1559J)
  
 RESUBMITTAL REVIEW RESPONSE/STATUS: PASSED WITH
 CONDITION
  
 DATE: MARCH 28, 2017
  
 AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS AND THE RESPONSE TO
 THE PREVIOUS PPRC COMMENTS (RECEIVED ON 3/22/2017), IT
 APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED
 AND SOME ARE ACKNOWLEDGED THE ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS AND
 A NEW COMMENT SHOWN BELOW ARE EXPECTED TO BE ADDRESSED
 DURING 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION' PHASE
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION
 INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL:
  
 1. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW CONFLICT INFORMATION
 (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE CONFLICT
 POINTS OF THE PROPOSED WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES
 WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM DRAINS JUST TO THE
 NORTH OF THE BUILDING AND INSIDE THE PROPERTY;
  
 2. IN THE REVISED PLANS PROPOSED MANHOLE THAT IS CALLED
 OUT AS CITY'S 'POINT-OF-SERVICE' IS SHOWN TO BE INSIDE
 THE PRIVATE PROPERTY. CITY'S 'POINT-OF-SERVICE' MANHOLE
 SHALL BE WITHIN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE CORRECT
 IT IN THE FINAL PLANS;
  
 3. 'FIRE POINT-OF-SERVICE' SHALL BE, PER 2016 NFPA 24,
 FROM THE CONNECTION POINT OF THE PROPOSED FIRE LINE TO
 THE EXISTING WATER MAIN LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S
 RIGHT-OF-WAY I.E. WHERE TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVES IS
 SHOWN TO BE FOR BOTH SOUTH FLAGLER DR. AND ARKONA CT.
 PLEASE REVISE AND SHOW ACCORDINGLY ON THE FINAL PLANS;
  
 4. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED MAKING
 KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD FREE." IN
 THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE STATING
 THAT. FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 5. RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT AND SUBMITTAL OF MAINTENANCE OF
 TRAFFIC (MOT) FOR WORK WITHIN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BEGINS FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 01-10-2017 Time 09:27 Rev Time 2.00
Received By mkhan Date 01-10-2017 Time 09:26 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-10 09:33:05CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 PROJECT NAME: 1515 S. FLAGLER DR. - THE MODERN -
 Z16080012
 DATE: JANUARY 10, 2017
  
 STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISO (STATED BELOW):
  
 AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS AND THE RESPONSES
 TO THE PPRC COMMENTS (RECEIVED ON 12/21/2016), IT
 APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ACKNOWLEDGED. HOWEVER, THESE ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS
 ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE
 ADDRESSED DURING 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION'
 PHASE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION
 INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL:
  
 5. REVISED 'UTILITY PLAN - C6.00' SHOWS A WATER
 CONNECTION COMING INSIDE THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE (NEAR THE THREE EXISTING WATER VALVES AND
 JUST NORTH OF THE PROPOSED 'POINT OF WATER SERVICE').
 IT NEEDS TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AND CALLED OUT SO IN THE
 PLAN, IF NOT USED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT;
 6. SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND SEWER DEMAND
 CALCULATIONS (AVERAGE AND PEAK) FOR METER SIZING
 SELECTION AND SERVICE SIZING NEED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR
 TO 'BUILDING PERMIT'. ALSO NEEDED IS CALCULATION FOR
 FIRE FLOW DEMAND;
 7. REVISED 'UTILITY PLAN' DOES NOT CONTAIN FIRE HYDRANT
 FLOW TEST DATA FROM EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT USED FOR
 DESIGN. WAS IT SUBMITTED IN A SEPARATE DOCUMENT? PLEASE
 SUBMIT THE INFORMATION WITH THE DETAIL ENGINEEING PLANS
 DURING SUBMISSION OF 'ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION'
 PHASE.
 10. PREVIOUS COMMENT OF: 'CITY'S RECORD INFORMATION
 SHOWS THAT FROM AN EXISTING SAN MH AT THE OLIVE AVENUE
 AND CRANENEST WAY INTERSECTION, THERE IS AN 8-INCH
 SANITARY SEWER THAT RUNS EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 320 LF
 AND TERMINATE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS NEED TO
 TELEVISE THIS MAIN AND CALL OUT THE PIPE SECTION WITHIN
 THE R/W TO BE REMOVED IF NOT IN USE'. SUBMITTED SURVEY
 AND REVISED 'UTILITY PLAN' DOES NOT SHOW THIS LINE. IT
 HAS BEEN 'ACKNOWLEDGED' IN THE RESPONSE BUT NO PROPOSED
 PLAN IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS COMMENT
 AS ADVISED;
  
 THE FOLLOWING NEW COMMENT MUST BE ALSO ADDRESSED PRIOR
 TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 12. EXISTING MANHOLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE AND ARKONA CT. WHERE THE PROPOSED
 SANITARY SEWER IS CONNECTED SHALL BE REHABILITATED PER
 CITY STANDARD;
 13. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANS;
 14. PAVEMENT RESTORATION SHOWN ON THE REVISED 'UTILITY
 PLAN - C6.00' SHALL BE PER THE DETAIL P-4 I.E. 'FULL
 LANE WIDTH OF TRAVEL LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH
 AREA, INCLUDING A TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH
 SIDE OF THE TRENCH'. PLEASE REVISE THE PAVEMENT
 RESTORATION HATCH AREA ACCORDINGLY FOR ALL WATER AND
 SEWER CONNECTION WORK;
 15. INCLUDE THE CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL FOR PARKING
 STALL STRIPING DETAIL;
  
 MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1124 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 09-14-2016 Time 09:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 09-14-2016 Time 09:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-10 09:25:15SEE COMMENTS IN UTILITIES, STORMWATER AND TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-29-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-29-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-29-2017 Time 13:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-29 13:26:323RD REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DATED MARCH 20,
 2017, FROM STANTEC, TO ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL
 PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-06-2017 Time 16:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-06-2017 Time 15:16 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-06 16:52:01THE PREVIOUS COMMNETS FROM THE BUREAU OF FIRE
 PREVENTION WERE ADDRESSED UNDER COMMNET REVIEW.
  
 THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY
 PETER LEDUC, FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION,
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
  
  
 1) THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ON ARKONA
 CT WOULD BE BETTER LOCATED CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE RAMP
 AND ACCESS TO THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM AREA.
  
  
  
 2) THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE PUMP ROOM WOULD BE BETTER
 LOCATED ON A OUTSIDE WALL WITH EXTERIOR ACCESS AND NEXT
 TO THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT
 ACCESS.
  
  
  
 3) PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THERE IS ACCESS TO THE BUILDING
 FROM FLAGER DR AT THE LOCATION OF THE FDC AND FIRE
 HYDRANT.
  
  
  
 4) PLEASE ENSURE THERE IS CODE COMPLIANT WALL
 SEPARATION/RATING SURROUNDING THE BOLIER ROOM MEETING
 NFPA 85 WERE APPLICABLE.
  
  
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-06-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-06-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-06-2016 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-06 16:46:55THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER
 SUPPLY.THIS APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED, PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION.
 THE APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT
 CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE. THIS APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED,
 PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
  
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC'S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE. ANY CHANGES
 SHALL BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE BUREAU OF FIRE
 PREVENTION.
  
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 E. A WORK TABLE.
 F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
 K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
  
 13. RADIO
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH OF 102.0 DBM
 FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE
 RESCUE. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9 AND AS WELL AS
 A CITY FIRE INSPECTOR(S).
  
  
 16. FLOORS 26TH $ 27TH INDICATE A SINGLE EXIT FROM THE
 PH UNIT(S). PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 30,NEW APARTMENT
 BUILDINGS, TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 30.2.4 NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS.
 30.2.4.1 THE NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 7.4.
 30.2.4.2 THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS SHALL COMPLY WITH
 30.2.4.3, 30.2.4.4, OR 30.2.4.6.
 30.2.4.3 EVERY DWELLING UNIT SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO AT
 LEAST TWO SEPARATE EXITS REMOTELY LOCATED FROM EACH
 OTHER AS REQUIRED BY 7.5.1.
 30.2.4.4 DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE
 ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT, PROVIDED THAT ONE OF THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS MET:
 (1) THE DWELLING UNIT HAS AN EXIT DOOR OPENING DIRECTLY
 TO THE STREET OR YARD AT THE FINISHED GROUND LEVEL.
 (2) THE DWELLING UNIT HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO AN OUTSIDE
 STAIR THAT COMPLIES WITH 7.2.2 AND SERVES A MAXIMUM OF
 TWO UNITS, BOTH OF WHICH ARE LOCATED ON THE SAME STORY.
 (3) THE DWELLING UNIT HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO AN INTERIOR
 STAIR THAT SERVES ONLY THAT UNIT AND IS SEPARATED FROM
 ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING BY FIRE BARRIERS
 HAVING A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, WITH NO
 OPENING THEREIN.
  
 THE PROPOSED 26TH & 27TH FLOOR LAYOUT EXIT STRATEGY
 DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT
 OR JUSTIFY CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 04-13-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-13-2017 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-13-2017 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-13 16:16:47FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: THE MODERN Z16080012
 APRIL 13, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE DATA CHART ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED, APPROVED, AND
 PROVIDED OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 LANDSCAPING AROUND THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE 40%
 REQUIREMENT FOR TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION
 94-443 (E)(1).
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES WITHIN
 THE WEST BUFFER, SPACED AS REQUIRED MEETING THE INTENT
 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL, ALSO AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
 OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE DATA CHART ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED, APPROVED, AND
 PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS
 BASED ON THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED AND PROPOSED CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER
 INTERRUPTIONS THAT REQUIRED A WAIVER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER
 LINES THAT SERVICE THE BUILDING, LOCATIONS OF ABOVE
 GROUND VALVES, AND LOCATION OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CAN BE ENLARGED TO INCORPORATE THE
 UTILITY LOCATIONS AND TREE LOCATIONS ADJUSTED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE 10
 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ARKONA COURT AND SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(D).
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
 THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
 PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE FOR WATER VALVES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND
 SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
 MORE DETAIL IS NEEDED ESPECIALLY FOR DRAINAGE LINES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART PER SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TYPE OF LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION
 MOISTURE SENSOR OTHER THAN A RAIN SWITCH TO BE
 PROVIDED, AND AN IRRIGATION PLAN INDICTING THE
 LOCATIONS OF LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH WATER USE ZONES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE TO SHOW HOW
 THE PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-442 (E) SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY AS CLAIMED ON SHEET
 L000.1.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/10/17:
 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS OF
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS FOR EACH OF THE FOUR SIDES
 OF THE BUILDING TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THE LANDSCAPING AND
 TREES WILL BE PLACED WITHIN THE ENGINEERING OF SLOPES
 AND ELEVATIONS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCE TO STONE MULCH
 OVER WEED FABRIC FOR THE WATER VALVE AREA AT THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. ALL AREAS MUST BE
 LANDSCAPED WITH GRASS OR GROUNDCOVER AND HAVE A
 SCREENING HEDGE.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-10-2017 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-10-2017 Time 11:09 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-10 11:16:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: THE MODERN Z16080012
 JANUARY 10, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE DATA CHART ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED, APPROVED, AND
 PROVIDED OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 LANDSCAPING AROUND THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE 40%
 REQUIREMENT FOR TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION
 94-443 (E)(1).
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES WITHIN
 THE WEST BUFFER, SPACED AS REQUIRED MEETING THE INTENT
 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL, ALSO AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
 OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE DATA CHART ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED, APPROVED, AND
 PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS
 BASED ON THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED AND PROPOSED CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER
 INTERRUPTIONS THAT REQUIRED A WAIVER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND
 SEWER LINES THAT SERVICE THE BUILDING, LOCATIONS OF
 ABOVE GROUND VALVES, AND LOCATION OF DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CAN BE ENLARGED TO INCORPORATE THE
 UTILITY LOCATIONS AND TREE LOCATIONS ADJUSTED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE 10
 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ARKONA COURT AND SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(D).
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
 THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
 PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
 GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE FOR WATER VALVES.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL
 AND SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
 MORE DETAIL IS NEEDED ESPECIALLY FOR DRAINAGE LINES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART PER SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TYPE OF LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION
 MOISTURE SENSOR OTHER THAN A RAIN SWITCH TO BE
 PROVIDED, AND AN IRRIGATION PLAN INDICTING THE
 LOCATIONS OF LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH WATER USE ZONES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE TO SHOW HOW
 THE PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-442 (E) SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY AS CLAIMED ON SHEET
 L000.1.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/10/17:
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS OF THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS FOR EACH OF THE FOUR SIDES OF
 THE BUILDING TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THE LANDSCAPING AND
 TREES WILL BE PLACED WITHIN THE ENGINEERING OF SLOPES
 AND ELEVATIONS.
  
 15. PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCE TO STONE MULCH OVER WEED
 FABRIC FOR THE WATER VALVE AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
 OF THE SITE. ALL AREAS MUST BE LANDSCAPED WITH GRASS OR
 GROUNDCOVER AND HAVE A SCREENING HEDGE.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-09-2016 Time 10:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-09-2016 Time 10:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-09 10:50:14FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: THE MODERN Z16080012
 SEPTEMBER 9, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE DATA CHART ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED, APPROVED, AND PROVIDED
 OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE LANDSCAPING
 AROUND THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE 40% REQUIREMENT FOR
 TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (E)(1).
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES WITHIN THE WEST
 BUFFER, SPACED AS REQUIRED MEETING THE INTENT OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPROVAL, ALSO AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 PROPERTY.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE DATA CHART ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED, APPROVED, AND PROVIDED
 NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS BASED ON
 THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
 AND PROPOSED CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER INTERRUPTIONS
 THAT REQUIRED A WAIVER.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 7. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES THAT
 SERVICE THE BUILDING, LOCATIONS OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES,
 AND LOCATION OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 8. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE 10 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ARKONA COURT AND SOUTH FLAGLER
 DRIVE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(D).
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH
 PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, TO SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN THE CHART AS
 SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE PLANTS IS ALSO
 SUGGESTED.
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE
 AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER,
 DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES
 THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 12. PLEASE REVISE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART
 PER SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR
 THE TYPE OF LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION MOISTURE SENSOR OTHER
 THAN A RAIN SWITCH TO BE PROVIDED, AND AN IRRIGATION
 PLAN INDICTING THE LOCATIONS OF LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH
 WATER USE ZONES.
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE TO SHOW HOW THE PLAN
 COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (E)
 SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY AS CLAIMED ON SHEET L000.1.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By lle Date 09-14-2016 Time 12:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 09-14-2016 Time 09:23 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-14 12:12:351515 S. FLAGLER DRIVE - THE MODERN
  
 PUBLIC UTILITIES - LAURA LE 561-494-1093
  
 BELOW ARE THE WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS FROM A CURSORY
 REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET C1.00:
  
 1. THE CITY IS EVALUATING IMPACTS TO THE WATER AND
 SEWER SYSTEMS DUE TO INCREASED DEMAND;
 2. INCLUDE APPLICABLE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 WATER AND SEWER DETAILS UPDATED VERSION 2016;
 3. REFER TO THE CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS FOR ACCEPTABLE
 PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY,
 METER BOX/VAULT, AND DOUBLE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY;
 4. SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ON OLIVE AVENUE, ARKONA
 COURT, AND FLAGLER DRIVE. PROVIDE UTILITY CROSSING INFO
 @ PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 5. EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE LINES, IF NOT USED BY THE
 SITE REDEVELOPMENT, ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE
 MAIN AND REMOVED IF LARGER THAN 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER;
 6. SUBMIT SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND SEWER
 DEMAND CALCULATIONS (AVERAGE AND PEAK) FOR METER SIZING
 SELECTION AND SERVICE SIZING. ALSO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS
 FOR FIRE FLOW DEMAND;
 7. PROVIDE THE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT USED FOR DESIGN;
 8. CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE FOR WATER AND SEWER;
 9. CITY'S RECORD INFORMATION INDICATES THAT THE
 EXISTING WM ON OLIVE AVENUE IS 8-INCH DIP WM. PLEASE
 REVISE THE PLAN ACCORDINGLY;
 10. CITY'S RECORD INFORMATION SHOWS THAT FROM AN
 EXISTING SAN MH AT THE OLIVE AVENUE AND CRANENEST WAY
 INTERSECTION, THERE IS AN 8-INCH SAN SEWER THAT RUNS
 EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 320 LF AND TERMINATE ON THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS NEED TO TELEVISE THIS MAIN
 AND CALL OUT THE PIPE SECTION WITHIN THE R/W TO BE
 REMOVED IF NOT IN USE;
 11. THE PROPOSED 10-INCH SAN SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION
 ON FLAGLER DRIVE NEEDS TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
 EXISTING SAN SEWER MAIN. ADD A SAN MH AT THE JUNCTION.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 04-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-17-2017 Time 09:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-17-2017 Time 09:06 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-17 09:05:42THE FOLLOWING TWO STORMWATER COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN
 FULLY ANSWERED. THESE SHOULD BE A CONDITION OF SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 4. THE METHOD FOR CONTROLLING GROUNDWATER FROM ENTERING
 THE SUBTERRANEAN PARKING GARAGE AND HOW GROUNDWATER
 WILL BE DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE ARE TO BE APPROVED BY
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 5. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS THAT ACCOUNT FOR SEA LEVEL
 RISE IMPACTS ON THE ONSITE STORMWATER SYSTEM SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-11-2017 Time 11:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-11 11:05:40THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. THE CITY COMMISSION RECENTLY PASSED A RESOLUTION
 INCREASING THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT TO ONE FOOT ABOVE
 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN A SPECIAL FLOOD
 HAZARD AREA.
  
 3. INDICATE ON THE PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS
 THAT THE PIPE CONNECTIONS FOR BUILDING PLUMBING ARE FOR
 RAIN WATER LEADERS ONLY. INDICATE IF THESE BUILDING
 PLUMBING PIPES WILL BE USED FOR FLOW OTHER THAN STORM
 WATER RUNOFF.
  
 4. THE BUILDING INCLUDES A BASEMENT WITH A FINISHED
 FLOOR ELEVATION AT (-)1.0 FT NGVD. INDICATE HOW
 GROUNDWATER WILL BE CONTROLLED AND WHERE THE
 GROUNDWATER WILL BE DISCHARGED TO.
  
 5. THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT
 SEA LEVEL RISE.
  
 6. INCLUDE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH THE
 OTHER UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 7. TRY TO AVOID PLACING MANHOLES WITHIN THE SIDEWALK.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED
 BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER FOR THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED STORM RUNOFF WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 AND PEAK FLOOD STAGES FOR 5-YEAR 1-DAY, 25-YEAR 3-DAY
 AND 100-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORMS PER SFWMD CRITERIA.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-14-2016 Time 08:19 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-14 08:22:33THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. THE CITY COMMISSION RECENTLY PASSED A RESOLUTION
 INCREASING THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT TO ONE FOOT ABOVE
 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN A SPECIAL FLOOD
 HAZARD AREA.
  
 3. SHOW ALL UTILITIES WITHIN ARKONA COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY
 BETWEEN OLIVE AVE AND FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 4. INDICATE IF THE MID-BLOCK STORM CONNECTION ON ARKONA
 COURT IS AT AN EXISTING OR A PROPOSED MANHOLE. IF AT AN
 EXISTING MANHOLE, VERIFY THERE IS SUFFICIENT WALL AREA
 TO MAKE THE CONNECTION.
  
 5. VERIFY THERE IS SUFFICIENT WALL AREA FOR THE STORM
 CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING MANHOLE AT FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 6. STORM PIPE SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN. MINIMUM PIPE SIZE
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 15? RCP.
  
 7. VALLEY GUTTER (DROP CURB) MAY BE REQUIRED ACROSS THE
 ONSTREET PARKING SPACES.
  
 8. SHOW UTILITIES, SWALES AND STORMWATER DETENTION
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 9. CONTACT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ABOUT THE
 NEED FOR AN EASEMENT FOR THE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT AT
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SITE.
  
 10. ENGINEERING PLANS WERE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED
 BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
 INDICATING THE CHANGES TO THE ONSITE PEAK FLOOD STAGES
 WILL NOT EXCEED THE SFWMD PERMITTED FLOOD STAGES.
  
 3. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT HTT
 P://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,
 -PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-10-2017 Time 10:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-10 10:29:25PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
 1. PREVIOUS COMMENTS OF EASEMENTS AND AGREEMENTS BEING
 PROVIDED.
 2. UTILITY DEPT. APPROVAL OF CONNECTIONS AND ANY
 REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-09-2016 Time 13:07 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-09 13:19:171. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY
 IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 2. NEED TO SEE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS ALONG NORTH R/W
 OF ARKONA. ADD ELEVATIONS ALONG WEST EDGE OF PAVEMENT
 OF FLAGLER DRIVE.
 3. SIDEWALK/ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG WITH
 ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 4. SITE/CIVIL PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED THROUGH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES.
 5. GARBAGE CONTAINERS WILL NEED TO BE PULLED OUT FOR
 PICK-UP.
 6. SURVEY INCLUDES PARCEL B WHICH IS NOT PART OF SITE
 PLAN.
 7. UTILITY CONNECTIONS WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE
 UTILITIES DEPT.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-17 11:34:30RESUBMITTAL 1/6/17
 PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1559J
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT UYEN DANG @ (561) 494-1087
  
 1. IF PARKING ON ARKONA CT. IS PUBLIC PARKING, REQUEST
 TO HAVE A 2 HOUR PARKING LIMIT AT THESE LOCATIONS.
 2. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS.
 3. PROVIDE SIDEWALK ACCESS EAST AT THE WALKWAY OF
 SERVICE ENTRANCE. CONSIDER HATCHING OR PROVIDE A
 DECORATIVE TREATMENT TO DISCOURAGE CARS QUEUING OR
 PARKED IN THIS PEDESTRIAN CONFLICT ZONE. PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS TO BE KEPT CLEAR OF VEHICLES AT THIS TRIANGULAR
 AREA.
 4. THE ENTIRE WIDTH AND LENGTH OF ARKONA CT ARE TO BE
 MILL AND PAVED 1? OF SP 9.5
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By KUDANG Date 09-12-2016 Time   Rev Time 2.00
Received By   Date 09-12-2016 Time   Sent To Z
Notes
2016-09-12 12:31:37PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1559J
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT UYEN DANG @ (561) 494-1087
  
 1. EXISTING WIDTH OF ARKONA COURT IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH
 FOR ANGLED PARKING. REVISE DESIGN FOR PARALLEL PARKING.
 DEPTH OF STALL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 8?.
 2. ARE THE WEST PARKING SPACES ON ARKONA COURT PUBLIC
 PARKING SPACES? IF SO, IT SHOULD BE CONTAINED WITHIN
 THE RIGHTS OF WAY.
 3. WHAT TYPE OF APPROACH CONTROL (STOP OR YIELD) IS
 PROPOSED FOR THE CROSSWALK EAST WEST ON FLAGLER DRIVE?
 THIS CROSSWALK SHOULD BE UNMARKED. CONSIDER
 GUIDANCE FROM A STUDY PERFORMED FOR FHWA IN 2002 BY
 ZEGEER, STEWART, AND HUANG ENTITLED "SAFETY EFFECTS OF
 MARKED VS UNMARKED CROSSWALKS AT UNCONTROLLED
 LOCATIONS".
 4. CROSSWALK SHALL BE STAMPED ASPHALT AND NOT PAVERS. A
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT IS NEEDED AND SKID TESTS SHALL BE
 PERFORMED EVERY 3 YEARS BASED ON THE PERFORMANCE
 SPECIFICATIONS.
 5. AUTOTURN DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE DRIVE AISLE NEEDED
 TO BE TWO-WAY INSTEAD OF ONE-WAY.
 6. PROVIDE RESTORATION LIMITS FOR THE WATER AND SEWER
 TAP.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-27-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 04-27-2017 Time 15:46 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 04-27-2017 Time 15:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-18-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 04-18-2017 Time 13:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 04-14-2017 Time 14:48 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-18 13:28:47PB 1559J - 2ND PPRC RESUBMITTAL 1
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER CONDO (A.K.A. THE MODERN PD)
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) [IF MAJOR AMENDMENT] OR FIVE (5) [IF REMAINS MINOR
 AMENDMENT] PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF
 FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 18, 2017), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60 FOR
 MINOR AMENDMENT).
  
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON CONDITION 2.M. OF
 SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 4245-09, WHICH REQUIRES
 MEETING WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS ON THE DESIGN OF
 THE PASSIVE PARK. PLEASE NOTE THAT FINAL PARK LAYOUT,
 IF IT DIFFERS THAN WHAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, WILL
 REQUIRE A MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. THE SPECIFIC TYPES
 OF BENCHES, LIGHTS, ETC. WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME
 OF BUILDING PERMIT SO LONG AS THE LOCATIONS ARE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN.
  
 2) THE NEWLY SHOWN THREE PARALLEL COMPACT SPACES ON
 SHEET A115 DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENT OF 8 FEET BY 20 FEET PER SPACE. PLEASE
 INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN.
  
 3) PLEASE PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON SHEET
 A115. THE PAD FOR THREE RACKS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 FEET (DEPTH) BY NINE FEET (WIDTH).
  
 4) PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SHEET FOR THE BICYCLE STORAGE
 ROOM THAT SHOWS THE SIDE WITH THE THREE RACKS HAVING A
 MINIMUM OF SIX FEET BY NINE FEET (PLEASE BE AWARE OF
 THE DOOR SWING) AND THE TWO RACK SIDE HAVING A MINIMUM
 OF SIX FEET BY 6.5 FEET.
  
 5) CONDITION: AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT, PHOTOMETRIC
 PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT VERIFY THAT THERE WILL BE
 NO OFF-SITE GLARE AND THAT PROVIDES THE FOOT CANDLE
 LEVELS AT THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE ON THE SOUTH
 SIDE OF THE SITE.
  
 6) CONDITION: THE INSTALLATION OF A FREESTANDING SIGN
 WILL REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR SITE PLAN
 AMENDMENT.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-10-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-10-2017 Time 09:59 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-10-2017 Time 09:58 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-10 09:59:37PB 1559J ? 2ND PPRC REVIEW
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER CONDO (A.K.A. THE MODERN PD)
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) [IF MAJOR AMENDMENT] OR FIVE (5) [IF REMAINS MINOR
 AMENDMENT] PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF
 FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - IF THE PLAN ELEMENTS REQUIRING A MAJOR AMENDMENT
 REMAIN THEN THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5
 PM ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 27, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 21, 2017 PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY MARCH 11, 2017),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60 FOR
 MINOR AMENDMENT).
  
 - IF THE CASE IS A MAJOR AMENDMENT THEN PUBLIC HEARING
 NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AN ADDITIONAL
 $2,916 IN APPLICATION AND ADVERTISING FEES ARE
 REQUIRED. YOU WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAILERS.
  
 - IF THIS CONTINUES AS A MINOR AMENDMENT, IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SECTION 94-35(D)(6)A, SINCE THIS IS A NEW SITE
 PLAN WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, YOU NEED TO GET
 APPROVAL OF A LEVEL II SITE PLAN CONCURRENT WITH THE
 MINOR AMENDMENT. WHILE NO ADDITIONAL APPLICATION
 DOCUMENTS OR PLANS ARE REQUIRED AS THEY WOULD BE A
 DUPLICATION OF THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT APPLICATION, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PAY THE
 APPLICATION FEE OF $1,500.
  
 1) SHEET A125 SHOWS THE NORTH DIMENSION TO THE FACE OF
 THE BALCONIES AT 30 FEET 10 INCHES, WHILE SHEET A127
 SHOWS THIS DIMENSION AS 30 FEET 9 3/4 INCHES. WHILE
 BOTH MEET THE BALCONY INTRUSION WAIVER, PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL DRAWINGS SHOW THE SAME DIMENTIONS.
  
 2) THE REAR PEDESTAL SETBACK FOR THE APPROVED MODERN
 RPD IS 24 FEET 4 INCHES. WHILE THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS
 AND THE SITE PLAN SHOW THIS DIMENSION LINE, IT APPEARS
 THAT IT IS MARKING THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL NOT THE
 EXTERIOR FACE OF THE WALL. PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT
 THE DRAWINGS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED
 PEDESTAL SETBACK. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE REAR
 SETBACK DIMENSION FOR THE PORTION OF THE PEDESTAL NORTH
 OF THE PORTION OF THE LOT WHICH EXTENDS TO SOUTH OLIVE
 AVENUE (ADJACENT TO SMITH AND MOORE ARCHITECTS) SO THAT
 STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED SETBACK
 WAIVER.
  
 3) PROVIDE THE BUILDING SETBACKS FOR THE PEDESTAL ON AT
 LEAST ONE OF THE CIVIL PLAN SHEETS.
  
 4) PLEASE CLARIFY, THE FPL VAULT, THE MAIN ELECTRIC,
 THE SWITCH GEAR AND EMERGENCY GENERATOR ROOMS HAVE THE
 FLOOR A BIT BELOW GRADE WITH THE ROOF ELEVATION AT 24
 FEET 4 INCH NGVD? HOW WILL THIS ROOF BE TREATED?
  
 5) THE APPROVED MODERN RPD INCLUDED A PUBLICLY
 ACCESSIBLE PASSIVE PARK WITH AN AREA OF 11,455 ALONG
 FLAGLER DRIVE. THE 12,442 SQUARE FOOT AREA SHOWN ON
 SHEET L000.5 INCLUDES THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, WHICH MAY
 NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE PASSIVE PARK AREA. THIS DIAGRAM
 NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE REQUIRED
 AMOUNT OF PASSIVE PARK WHOLLY ON-SITE. THE PROVIDED
 PLANS SHOW A LESSER AREA GIVEN UP AS THE PASSIVE PARK.
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON CONDITION 2.M. OF
 SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 4245-09, WHICH REQUIRES
 MEETING WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS ON THE DESIGN OF
 THE PASSIVE PARK. ZONING STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY ISSUES
 WITH THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF THE PLAZA. DETAILS, SUCH
 AS THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL, SEAT WALL AND BENCHES WAS
 NOT BEEN PROVIDED. ENSURE THERE IS ADEQUATE LIGHTING
 FOR THE EVENING HOURS WHEN THE PARK MAY BE IN USE AND
 TO DISCOURAGE USE OF THE PARK FOR OVERNIGHT
 ACCOMMODATIONS. THE WALLS AND THE BENCH WALLS SHOULD BE
 DESIGNED WITH ANTI-SKATE BOARD GRINDING FEATURES ?
 AFTERMARKET ADD-ONS RARELY LOOK AS GOOD AS IF THE
 FEATURES WERE DESIGNED IN THE ORIGINAL PLAN. THE
 BENCHES ARE ALL UNIQUE SHAPES WHICH WOULD REQUIRE
 CUSTOM WORK. IT MAY BE MORE PRACTICAL HAVE A UNIFORM
 DESIGN SHOWN ON THE PLANS AT THIS STAGE, RATHER THAN AT
 THE PERMITTING PHASE, THOUGH THIS IS UP TO YOU.
 WHICHEVER BENCH ROUTE IS CHOSEN, PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE
 BENCHES ARE DESIGNED IN SUCH A WAY TO MAKE SLEEPING ON
 THEM UNCOMFORTABLE.
  
 7) THE PARKING TABLE PROVIDED WITH THE PLAN DOES NOT
 INCLUDE THE PARKING TABLE SHALL INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, ADA PARKING
 SPACES, GUEST SPACES AND BICYCLE SPACES. EXAMPLE:
  
 84 UNITS WITH 2+ BEDROOMS X 2 SPACES PER UNIT = 168
 PARKING SPACES
 GUEST PARKING IS 1 SPACE PER 10 UNITS = 9 PARKING
 SPACES
 STAFF PARKING PER THE APPROVED MODERN = 6 SPACES
 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING REQUIRED = 183 SPACES
 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = *** SPACES
  
 THE PROVIDED SPACES ON THE TABLE SHALL BE BROKEN DOWN
 BY NUMBER OF EACH TYPE OF SPACE (REGULAR, ADA,
 COMPACT). PLEASE SEE THE MODERN APPROVAL FOR AN
 EXAMPLE.
  
 8) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 11 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 WERE APPROVED BY THE MODERN ORDINANCE AS PUBLIC PARKING
 SPACES (CONDITION 2.D. OF THE ORDINANCE) SEPARATE FROM
 THE PARKING SPACES THAT WERE PROVIDED TO MEET THE
 REQUIRED PARKING. AS SUCH, THE 11 ON-STREET PARKING
 SPACES MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE REQUIRED
 183 PARKING SPACES. STAFF COUNTS ONLY 173 PARKING
 SPACES ON-SITE, WHICH DOES NOT MATCH THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED BY THE MODERN ORDINANCE.
 9) THE PARKING DETAILS PROVIDED ON SHEET A114.1 DO NOT
 MEET CITY STANDARDS AND MUST BE REPLACED WITH THE
 STANDARD CITY DETAIL. ADDITIONALLY, THEY MUST INCLUDE A
 COMPACT SPACE DETAIL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CORRECT CITY
 DETAIL WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET C-1 AS PART OF THE
 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL.
  
 10) PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE BICYCLE STORAGE
 ROOM AND DETAILS, MEETING CITY STANDARDS, FOR THE
 BICYCLE RACKS AND PARKING PAD. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 RACKS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS.
 THE PARKING TABLE SHALL INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED
 AND PROVIDED SPACES.
  
 11) HOW WILL RESIDENTS BRING THEIR BICYCLES TO THE
 STORAGE ROOM? RIDING THE BICYCLES THROUGH THE PARKING
 GARAGE IS NOT A SAFE ROUTE. IS THE INTENTION FOR ACCESS
 TO BE THROUGH THE HALLWAY WHICH LEADS OUT TO ARKONA
 COURT? HOW WILL ACCESS CONTROL BE PROVIDED?
  
 12) IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE RESIDENTS OF THE
 BUILDING MAY HAVE GUESTS ARRIVE VIA BICYCLE, THERE
 SHALL BE AT LEAST ONE, PREFERABLY TWO BICYCLE RACKS
 (TWO OR FOUR BICYCLE PARKING SPACES) PROVIDED NEAR THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING IN THE ARRIVAL COURT IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485(Q). THIS BICYCLE PARKING
 MAY BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE REQUIRED 10 SPACES,
 WITH THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM NUMBER REDUCED
 ACCORDINGLY (ALTHOUGH STAFF RECOMMENDS PROVIDING MORE
 THAN 10 TOTAL SPACES).
  
 13) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW 22 FOOT ARKONA
 COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 14) NO PHOTOMETRIC PLANS WERE PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE
 SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY NOW THAT THERE WILL BE NO
 ISSUES AT TIME OF PERMITTING.
  
 15) PROVIDE BETTER DETAILS ON WHAT THE EXTERIOR FACADE
 OF THE PEDESTAL WILL LOOK LIKE FROM THE EXTERIOR
 PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE ELEVATIONS ARE NOT
 CLEAR WHERE IT WILL BE A WALL WITH LANDSCAPE IN FRONT
 OR A SLOPE OF DIRT WITH SOD/LANDSCAPE COVERING THE
 WALL. STAFF EXPECTED MORE OF WHAT MATERIALS WOULD BE
 EXPOSED IF THERE WAS NO SLOPE. THE TOWER DOES LABEL
 MATERIALS.
  
 14) THERE NEEDS TO BE A DATA TABLE WHICH STATES THE
 TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS IN THE BUILDING. THE TABLE NEEDS
 TO INCLUDE THAT THERE ARE THREE GUEST SUITES WITH A
 NOTE REPLICATING THE ORDINANCE PROHIBITION ON THEM
 CONTAINING KITCHEN FACILITIES (CONDITION 10 OF THE
 ORDINANCE).
  
 15) IS A MONUMENT SIGN PROPOSED FOR THE BUILDING? IF
 SO, PLEASE SHOW ITS LOCATION ON THE PLANS SO STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT IT IS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH SITE LINES OR
 LANDSCAPE.
  
 16) THE ZONING STAFF IDENTIFIES ITEMS 2 AND 6 AS ITEMS
 THAT FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MODERN
 APPROVAL, ORDINANCE NO. 4195-09, AND WOULD NEED
 APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS REVISED WAIVERS AS
 PART OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-13-2016 Time 10:26 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 09-13-2016 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-13 10:26:58PB 1559J
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER CONDO (A.K.A. THE MODERN PD)
 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) [IF MAJOR AMENDMENT] OR FIVE (5) [IF REMAINS MINOR
 AMENDMENT] PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF
 FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - IF THE PLAN ELEMENTS REQUIRING A MAJOR AMENDMENT
 REMAIN THEN THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5
 PM ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE NOVEMBER 15, 2016 PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY NOVEMBER 14,
 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 - IF THE CASE IS A MAJOR AMENDMENT THEN PUBLIC HEARING
 NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AN ADDITIONAL
 $2,916 IN APPLICATION AND ADVERTISING FEES ARE
 REQUIRED. YOU WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAILERS.
  
 - IF THIS CONTINUES AS A MINOR AMENDMENT, IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SECTION 94-35(D)(6)A, SINCE THIS IS A NEW SITE
 PLAN WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, YOU NEED TO GET
 APPROVAL OF A LEVEL II SITE PLAN CONCURRENT WITH THE
 MINOR AMENDMENT. WHILE NO ADDITIONAL APPLICATION
 DOCUMENTS OR PLANS ARE REQUIRED AS THEY WOULD BE A
 DUPLICATION OF THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT APPLICATION, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PAY THE
 APPLICATION FEE OF $1,500.
  
 1) THE SOUTH SIDE PEDESTAL SETBACK FOR THE APPROVED
 MODERN RPD IS 24 FEET. THE SOUTHERN SETBACK SHOWN ON
 SHEET A111 IS ONLY 23 FEET 10 INCHES AND SHEET A125 IS
 ONLY 23 FEET. THIS NEW REDUCED SETBACK REQUIRES A MAJOR
 AMENDMENT APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
  
 2) THE ENTRY CANOPY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING
 IS SHOWN AT FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
 THE NORTH SIDE SETBACK FOR THE MODERN RPD IS
 ESTABLISHED AT 34 FEET 10 INCHES, WITH A STRUCTURAL
 INTRUSION INTO THE SETBACK FOR THE NORTH SIDE TO BE A
 MAXIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET, WHICH REQUIRES ALL ELEMENTS ON
 THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 28
 FEET 10 INCHES FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. THE
 CANOPY, AS SHOWN, DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE REQUIRED
 SETBACK AND THUS REQUIRES A NEW WAIVER APPROVAL BY THE
 CITY COMMISSION AS PART OF A MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 3) THE BUILDING COMPARISON DRAWINGS ON SHEET A125 AND
 A127 SHOW DIFFERING LOCATIONS FOR THE OUTLINE OF THE
 EXISTING MODERN. THE A127 ELEVATION SHOWS THE TOWER
 BALCONIES ENCROACHING INTO THE PERMITTED SETBACKS,
 WHICH REQUIRES A NEW WAIVER APPROVAL BY THE CITY
 COMMISSION AS PART OF A MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 4) THE REAR PEDESTAL SETBACK FOR THE APPROVED MODERN
 RPD IS 24 FEET 4 INCHES. SHEET A129 SHOWS THE NORTHWEST
 PORTION OF THE PEDESTAL WITH A SETBACK OF ONLY 13 FEET
 6 5/8 INCHES. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SETBACK IS MEASURED
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE POINT ADJACENT TO THE
 SPECIFIC PORTION OF THE PEDESTAL. SINCE THE PROPERTY
 LINE JOGS EASTWARD NORTH OF THE STRIP OF LAND LEADING
 TO SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE, THE BUILDING PEDESTAL NEEDS TO
 SHIFT ACCORDINGLY TO MAINTAIN THE APPROVED SETBACK. THE
 BUILDING AS SHOWN REQUIRES A NEW WAIVER APPROVAL BY THE
 CITY COMMISSION AS PART OF A MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 5) THE HEIGHT OF THE PEDESTAL, INCLUDING THE PARKING
 LIFT AND THE RAISED PLANTER (SHEET A129) IS THREE FEET
 HIGHER THAN THE APPROVED MODERN RPD HEIGHT OF THE
 PEDESTAL, WHICH IS AN INCREASE OF MORE THAN 5 PERCENT
 OF THE PEDESTAL HEIGHT ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY. THIS EXCEEDS WHAT STAFF CAN APPROVE AS PART
 OF A MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 6) PROVIDE DETAILS, TO INCLUDE ELEVATIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED COOLING TOWER AND ENCLOSURE AND THE
 TRANSFORMERS. PLEASE NOTE THAT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY
 ONLY ENCROACH FOUR (4) FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
 BOTH OF THESE ENCROACH MORE THAN THE PERMITTED FOUR (4)
 FEET AND THUS, AS SHOWN, REQUIRE A NEW WAIVER APPROVAL
 BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS PART OF A MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 7) THE APPROVED MODERN RPD INCLUDED A PUBLICLY
 ACCESSIBLE PASSIVE PARK WITH AN AREA OF 11,455 ALONG
 FLAGLER DRIVE. PLEASE SHOW THIS AREA AND ITS CONCEPTUAL
 DESIGN, WITH DETAILS, ON THE PROPOSED PLAN. THE
 PROVIDED PLANS SHOW A LESSER AREA GIVEN UP AS THE
 PASSIVE PARK.
  
 8) THE SURVEY LISTS A PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT OVER A
 PORTION OF THE STRIP OF LAND THAT LEADS TO SOUTH OLIVE
 AVENUE. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE EASEMENT SO THAT STAFF
 CAN VERIFY HOW THE STRIP OF LAND IS ENCUMBERED AND IF
 THE PROPOSED WATER METER AND BY-PASS PIPING IS
 PERMITTED.
  
 9) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED WATER METER
 AND BY-PASS PIPING, TO INCLUDE HOW IT LOOKS ABOVE
 GROUND. THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS AN ENCROACHMENT OF THE
 PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE APPROVED
 MODERN RPD REQUIRES THAT THE ENTIRE 12 FOOT WIDE STRIP
 IS GRANTED AN ACCESS EASEMENT.
  
 10) ARE RESIDENTS GOING TO HAVE ASSIGNED PARKING
 SPACES?
  
 11) THE PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE A PARKING TABLE. THE
 PARKING TABLE SHALL INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES, ADA PARKING SPACES, GUEST
 SPACES AND BICYCLE SPACES. IT SHALL ALSO CLEARLY LIST
 THE NUMBER OF TANDEM AND LIFT SPACES.
  
 12) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE GENERAL CITY PARKING CODE DOES
 NOT COUNT TANDEM (OR TRIDEM) OR LIFT PARKING SPACES AS
 COUNTING TOWARD MEETING REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, BUT
 THEY MAY BE PROVIDED AS EXTRA SPACES. THEREFORE 105 OF
 THE PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLAN MAY NOT BE COUNTED
 AS MEETING THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT THE CITY
 COMMISSION SPECIFICALLY ADDING A CONDITION THAT THESE
 SPACES COUNT TOWARD MEETING PARKING REQUIREMENTS
 (ADOPTING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING ALLOWANCE) AS PART OF A
 MAJOR AMENDMENT. THE EXISTING MODERN RPD APPROVAL
 PROVIDED 196 PARKING SPACES THAT WERE NOT TANDEM SPACES
 AND CLEARLY EXCLUDED THE TANDEM SPACES FROM MEETING THE
 PARING REQUIREMENTS. THE TABLE SHALL CLEARLY STATE THAT
 THE TANDEM (AND TRIDEM) AND LIFT PARKING WILL ONLY BE
 UTILIZED BY VALET.
  
 13) THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING SPACES/PARKING ROWS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS. THE DIMENSIONS SHALL
 INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE COLUMNS.
  
 14) THE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL THE DRIVE AISLES SHALL BE
 SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 15) THE PLANS SHOW THE GARBAGE AND MOVING TRUCKS
 EXITING THE SITE VIA THE SAME ONE-WAY DRIVE AISLE WHICH
 THEY ENTER, JUST IN A REVERSE FLOW. FOR SAFETY REASONS
 THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. THE TRUCKS SHALL USE TWO CLEARLY
 MARKED, SEPARATE LANES.
  
 16) THE AUTOTURN PLAN SHOWS THE TRUCKS SWINGING INTO
 THE OPPOSITE LANE OF TRAFFIC BEFORE ENTERING THE SITE
 (AND EXITING THE SITE FOR THE GARBAGE TRUCK) WHICH IS
 NOT PERMITTED.
  
 17) THE AUTOTURN PLAN SHOWS THE SU-40 TRUCKS RUNNING
 OVER THE CURB IN A FEW LOCATIONS. THIS IS NOT
 PERMITTED. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 18) THE EASTERN MOST DRIVE WAY IS SHOWN WITH AN EGRESS
 ARROW; HOWEVER, ITS WIDTH AND PROXIMITY TO THE VALET
 ENTRANCE TO THE PARKING AREA ENCOURAGE ITS USE AS AN
 ENTRY POINT TO THE GARAGE. THIS EGRESS POINT SHALL BE
 REDESIGNED TO DISCOURAGE ENTRY TO THE GARAGE. IF IT IS
 LEFT IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION, STAFF WILL HAVE TO
 COUNT IT AS AN ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT. THIS WOULD
 EXCEED THE PERMITTED TWO ACCESS POINTS TO A PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH REQUIRES A CITY COMMISSION WAIVER
 AS A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.
  
 19) THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST TWO BICYCLE RACKS (FOUR
 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES) PROVIDED NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO
 THE BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485(Q).
  
 20) PLEASE DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REMAINDER OF THE
 REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES (MINIMUM SIX BICYCLES)
 WILL MEET CITY BICYCLE PARKING SIZE REQUIREMENTS AND
 FIT IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE AREA. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 RECOMMENDS PROVIDING ENOUGH SPACE TO HOUSE MORE THAN
 SIX BICYCLES.
  
 21) PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN
 WIDENS THE ARKONA COURT TRAVEL LANE TO 22 FEET ADJACENT
 TO THE PROPERTY AS REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED MODERN RPD
 PLAN.
  
 22) SECTION 94-485(J)(1) PROHIBITS PARKING
 CONFIGURATIONS WHICH REQUIRE BACKING DIRECTLY ONTO A
 STREET, SO THE EIGHT ANGLED PARKING SPACES ARE NOT
 PERMITTED. THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED 11 PARALLEL
 PARKING SPACES ALONG ARKONA COURT. ALTERNATIVE
 CONFIGURATIONS OR NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRE APPROVAL AS
 A MAJOR AMENDMENT BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
  
 23) PLEASE VERIFY WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DIVISION THAT ON-STREET PARKING SPACE NO. 11 IS A
 SUFFICIENT DISTANCE FROM FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 24) ALL REQUIRED FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN
 AND LABELED ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO COMPLY WITH
 HYDRANT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
  
 25) PLEASE PROVIDE LIGHTING LOCATIONS, INCLUDING POLE
 DETAILS, AND PHOTOMETRIC PLANS AT THIS TIME SO THAT
 ZONING STAFF CAN REVIEW.
  
 26) PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS OF THE BUFFERS SHOWING THE
 SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE THAT IS PROPOSED AND ANY GRADE
 VARIATIONS. THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS WITH ELEVATIONS DO
 NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH DETAIL OR ACCURATE CONDITIONS - EX.
 THE SOUTHERN PERIMETER SWALE.
  
 27) PROVIDE BETTER DETAILS ON WHAT THE EXTERIOR FACADE
 OF THE PEDESTAL WILL LOOK LIKE FROM THE EXTERIOR
 PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved