Plan Review Details - Project Z16070022
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16070022
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-11-2017 Time 19:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 07-11-2017 Time 19:11 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-11 19:32:12DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2.THE PLANS PROPOSE AN EXPANSION OF DREYFOOS HALL. THE
 ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY CHAPTER
 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL
 NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA
 BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF
 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF
 CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 3. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, CONSTRUCTION TYPE.
 WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 4. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, HORIZONTAL
 SEPARATION. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 5. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, VENTILATION.
 ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, BUILDING ADDRESS.
 EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS.
 FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-10-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-10-2016 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-10-2016 Time 11:30 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-10 11:46:16DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE VALET PARKING
 STRUCTURE WILL INCREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING
 SPACES PROVIDED AN MAY TRIGGER A REQUIREMENT FOR
 ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE SITE DATA
 TABLE ON SITE PLAN, SHEET SP.1, STATES THAT 20
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED. HOWEVER, THEY
 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUDING THE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
 SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. DISTRIBUTION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING. THE VALET
 PARKING STRUCTURE WILL INCREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING
 THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUDING THE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER
 SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST
 POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN
 ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 5. ACCESS AISLE FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS
 AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT
 COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED
 VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL
 ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF
 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. THE PLANS PROPOSE AN EXPANSION OF DREYFOOS HALL. THE
 ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY CHAPTER
 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL
 NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA
 BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF
 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF
 CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 7. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, CONSTRUCTION TYPE.
 WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 8. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, HORIZONTAL
 SEPARATION. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 9. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, VENTILATION.
 ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 10. PROPOSED VALET PARKING STRUCTURE, BUILDING ADDRESS.
 EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS.
 FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 11. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-12-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 07-12-2017 Time 10:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 07-12-2017 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-12 10:23:34CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
  
 PROJECT NAME: KRAVIS CENTER - 701 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. -
 Z16070022
  
 RESPONSE: PASSED WITH CONDITION
  
 DATE: JULY 12, 2017
  
 AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS AND THE RESPONSES
 TO THE PREVIOUS PPRC COMMENTS ON THE LETTER DATED JUNE
 13, 2017, IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS HAVE
 BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED. ALSO PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED PER THE
 COMMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS ALONG
 WITH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ADDRESSED
 DURING 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION' PHASE
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION
 INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL:
  
 THE FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR
 TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE "AUTO-CALC
 CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM" FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL
 WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE
 FOLLOWING LINK:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 3. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS, FIRE PROTECTION FOR THE
 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE. SHOW PROPOSED FIRE LINE,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTER, METER ASSEMBLY ETC. IN THE UTILITY
 PLAN DURING FINAL PLANS SUBMITTALS;
  
 4. EXISTING WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS/WATER METERS AND
 SANITARY SEWER SERVING THE PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, ARE
 TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN.
  
 5. SHOW APPROPRIATE ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT THE
 PROPOSED DRIVE/ACCESS AND ADD A DETAIL IN THE FINAL
 PLANS;
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-06-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-06-2017 Time 16:48 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-06 16:50:322ND REVIEW
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
  
 1) FIRE PREVENTION'S PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
  
  
 2) THERE IS A CONCERN REGARDING THE FIRE PROTECTION IN
 THE PARKING GARAGE BASEMENT AREA. FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION IS REQUIRED IN THE BASEMENT AREA PER FLORIDA
 FIRE PREVENTION CODE, NFPA 1
  
 13.3.2.2 BASEMENTS EXCEEDING 2500 FT2 (232 M2) IN NEW
 BUILDINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED
 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
  
 PLEASE REIVEW AND ADDRESS FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
 PURPOSES.
  
  
 3) THERE IS AN INDICATION THAT THE NEW PARKING GARAGE
 WILL BE OPEN; HOWEVER, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, NFPA 1
  
 13.3.2.4 NEW BUILDINGS THREE OR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT
 ABOVE GRADE SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN
 APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 13.3 UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY 13.3.2.5.
  
 13.3.2.5 STAND-ALONE OPEN PARKING STRUCTURES THAT ARE
 DETACHED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED
 TO BE PROTECTED BY AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
  
 THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DETAIL INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE IS DETACHED.
  
 PLEASE REIVEW AND ADDRESS FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
 PURPOSES.
  
  
  
 4) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF VALET DROPS
 OFFS/PORTE-COCHERES THAT DO NOT SHOW FIRE PROTECTION.
 PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, NFPA 1
  
  
 13.3.2.6* EXTERIOR ROOFS, CANOPIES, PORTE-COCHERES,
 BALCONIES, DECKS, OR SIMILAR PROJECTIONS. IN BUILDINGS
 PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE EXTERIOR SPACES IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH 13.3.2.6.
  
 PLEASE REIVEW AND ADDRESS FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
 PURPOSES.
  
  
 5) THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
  
 6) THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS
 AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-08-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-08-2016 Time 09:58 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-08 11:41:02THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE AND
 CONTAINED FEW DETAILS. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE
 EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE EXISITNG PARKING GARAGE
 RELATING TO OPEN/CLOSED AND THE ENGINEERED LIFE SAFETY
 FEATURES THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR
 FACADE.
  
 7. THE PROPOSED REDUCTION OF IRIS ST TO A 12' ( AND
 APPEARS TO BE11' IN ONE AREA) WIDTH DOES NOT PROVIDE
 FIRE APPARATUS WITH SUFFICIENT TRAVEL WIDTH.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 18
  
 18.2.3.4.1.1 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN
 UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 20 FT (6.1 M).
 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 VERTICAL CLEARANCES OR WIDTHS SHALL BE
 INCREASED WHEN VERTICAL CLEARANCES OR WIDTHS ARE NOT
 ADEQUATE TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS.
  
 8. IT APPEARS THAT AN EXITING FIRE HYDRANT IS LOCATED
 ON THE OPPISITE SIDE OF IRIS ST TOWARDS THE EAST END OF
 THE PARKING GARAGE. DUE TO THE PROPOSED NARROWING OF
 THE ROADWAY AND IN THE EVENT OF FIRE OPERATIONS WITH
 THE USE OF THAT HYDRANT, ACCESS ALONG IRIS ST WILL BE
 CUT OFF AND HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON APPARATUS
 MANEUVERING.
  
 9. ANY PROPOSED COVERED ENTRANCES AND/OR DROP OFFS THAT
 COULD/WOULD BE USED BY FIRE APPARATUS, I.E.
 RESCUE/PATIENT TRANSPORT APPARATUS SHALL MEET THE
 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE REQUIRERMENT.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 18
  
 18.2.3.4.1.2 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN
 UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FT
 6 IN. (4.1 M).
 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO
 BE REDUCED, PROVIDED SUCH REDUCTION DOES NOT IMPAIR
 ACCESS BY FIRE APPARATUS, AND APPROVED SIGNS ARE
 INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED INDICATING THE ESTABLISHED
 VERTICAL CLEARANCE WHEN APPROVED.
 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 VERTICAL CLEARANCES OR WIDTHS SHALL BE
 INCREASED WHEN VERTICAL CLEARANCES OR WIDTHS ARE NOT
 ADEQUATE TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS.
  
 10. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 11. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 02-15-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-15-2018 Time 16:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-15-2018 Time 16:07 Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-15 16:07:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER Z16070022
 FEBRUARY 15, 2018
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION BASED ON
 THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION, AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS:
  
 COMMENTS 1 THROUGH 15 PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED.
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND LIGHTING PLAN NEED
 TO BE REVISED TO ELIMINATE CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND
 LIGHT FIXTURES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT
 TO THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-13-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-13-2017 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-13-2017 Time 11:56 Sent To  
Notes
2017-12-13 12:01:59FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER Z16070022
 DECEMBER 13, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION BASED ON
 THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION, AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE SURVEY
 IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE MAKE
 CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO INDICATE THE
 CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
 RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE PHOENIX
 CANARIENSIS.
 THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
 DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
 ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE THE DRI AND SECTION 94-448
 REQUIRE HEALTHY TREES TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE MANY
 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT
 TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. DRI REQUIRES:
 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
  
 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY AND THE
 DEVELOPER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS
 FOR A PARTICULAR SITE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE, IN
 CONFORMANCE TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IN A FORM
 ACCEPTABLE TO THE PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING
 DIRECTOR MANAGER, A LANDSCAPE AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
 FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. SUCH PLAN SHALL SPECIFICALLY
 ADDRESS PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND RELOCATION OF
 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE.
  
  STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT DESTRUCTION OF THE LARGE LIVE
 OAK TREES ON SITE. THE INTENT OF THE DRI, THE DOWNTOWN
 MASTER PLAN AND THE TREE PROTECTION CODE IS TO RELOCATE
 THE HEALTHY LIVE OAKS ON SITE TO LOCATIONS WHERE THE
 BENEFITS OF THE MATURE CANOPY WILL BE MAXIMIZED FOR
 THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT
 MOBILITY STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
  STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
 OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
 ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
  OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
 SAME CATEGORY.
  THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
 OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
 OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
 LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG
 THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE COMPLYING WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DRI,
 SPECIFICALLY (3) SCREENING AND BUFFERING OF RESIDENTS
 AND USERS OF OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT FROM ON-SITE ADVERSE
 EFFECTS, AND (4) ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY
 THROUGH FENCES, WALLS, BARRIERS AND VEGETATION ARRANGED
 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE PROPERTY AND TO ENHANCE THE
 PRIVACY OF ITS OCCUPANTS.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-117 CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT
 (CAD) AS UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIRES STRONG PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL FACILITIES AND
 CITYPLACE BY IMPROVING SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THE MAIN
 PEDESTRIAN WALKING STREET WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF
 TREE CANOPY TO PROVIDE SHADE. THE CURRENT PLACEMENT OF
 LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDES A COOLING CANOPY FOR
 PEDESTRIANS, AND THE PROPOSED PLAN WOULD REMOVE ALL
 TREE CANOPY ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE REVISE TO MEET THIS
 STANDARD.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE VERIFY THE SITE WILL COMPLY WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CAD FOUND IN SECTION 94-117 AND
 TABLE IV-13 FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
 OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR TREE CANOPY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING ALL COMPONENTS OF
 THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01
 REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
 PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS INCLUDING 94-442 AND 94-443 FOR
 ALL SURFACE PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
 THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
 PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.
  
 8. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF
 LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
 BUFFER LENGTHS IN ANY AFFECTED AREAS PER SECTION 94-443
 B. IN THE DATA CHART. THIS INCLUDES IRIS AND SAPODILLA
 BUFFERS.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:
 12. SATISFIED. PHOENIX CANARIENSIS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED
 FOR SOUTH FLORIDA, AS THEY ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE IN THIS
 ENVIRONMENT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/14/17:
 13. SATISFIED. THE PARKING AREA TO THE SOUTH OF THE
 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE NEEDS TO MEET THE SETBACK AND
 LANDSCAPE SCREENING REQUIREMENT ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE
 REVISE TO INCLUDE THE SCREENING HEDGE.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF
 THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE.
  
 15. SATISFIED. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE,
 AND CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED TREES.
  
 16. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 LIGHTING PLAN NEED TO BE REVISED TO ELIMINATE CONFLICTS
 BETWEEN TREES AND LIGHT FIXTURES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLANS
 AND PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT
 TO THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-17-2017 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-17-2017 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
2017-11-17 10:36:58FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER Z16070022
 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION BASED ON
 THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION, AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE SURVEY
 IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE MAKE
 CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO INDICATE THE
 CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
 RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE PHOENIX
 CANARIENSIS.
 THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
 DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
 ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE THE DRI AND SECTION 94-448
 REQUIRE HEALTHY TREES TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE MANY
 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT
 TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. DRI REQUIRES:
 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
  
 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY AND THE
 DEVELOPER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS
 FOR A PARTICULAR SITE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE, IN
 CONFORMANCE TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IN A FORM
 ACCEPTABLE TO THE PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING
 DIRECTOR MANAGER, A LANDSCAPE AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
 FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. SUCH PLAN SHALL SPECIFICALLY
 ADDRESS PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND RELOCATION OF
 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE.
  
  STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT DESTRUCTION OF THE LARGE LIVE
 OAK TREES ON SITE. THE INTENT OF THE DRI, THE DOWNTOWN
 MASTER PLAN AND THE TREE PROTECTION CODE IS TO RELOCATE
 THE HEALTHY LIVE OAKS ON SITE TO LOCATIONS WHERE THE
 BENEFITS OF THE MATURE CANOPY WILL BE MAXIMIZED FOR
 THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT
 MOBILITY STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
  STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
 OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
 ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
  OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
 SAME CATEGORY.
  THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
 OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
 OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
 LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG
 THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE COMPLYING WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DRI,
 SPECIFICALLY (3) SCREENING AND BUFFERING OF RESIDENTS
 AND USERS OF OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT FROM ON-SITE ADVERSE
 EFFECTS, AND (4) ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY
 THROUGH FENCES, WALLS, BARRIERS AND VEGETATION ARRANGED
 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE PROPERTY AND TO ENHANCE THE
 PRIVACY OF ITS OCCUPANTS.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-117 CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT
 (CAD) AS UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIRES STRONG PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL FACILITIES AND
 CITYPLACE BY IMPROVING SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THE MAIN
 PEDESTRIAN WALKING STREET WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF
 TREE CANOPY TO PROVIDE SHADE. THE CURRENT PLACEMENT OF
 LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDES A COOLING CANOPY FOR
 PEDESTRIANS, AND THE PROPOSED PLAN WOULD REMOVE ALL
 TREE CANOPY ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE REVISE TO MEET THIS
 STANDARD.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE VERIFY THE SITE WILL COMPLY WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CAD FOUND IN SECTION 94-117 AND
 TABLE IV-13 FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
 OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR TREE CANOPY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING ALL COMPONENTS OF
 THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01
 REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
 PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS INCLUDING 94-442 AND 94-443 FOR
 ALL SURFACE PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
 THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
 PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.
  
 8. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF
 LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
 BUFFER LENGTHS IN ANY AFFECTED AREAS PER SECTION 94-443
 B. IN THE DATA CHART. THIS INCLUDES IRIS AND SAPODILLA
 BUFFERS.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:
 12. SATISFIED. PHOENIX CANARIENSIS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED
 FOR SOUTH FLORIDA, AS THEY ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE IN THIS
 ENVIRONMENT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/14/17:
 13. THE PARKING AREA TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED
 PARKING GARAGE NEEDS TO MEET THE SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE
 SCREENING REQUIREMENT ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE REVISE TO
 INCLUDE THE SCREENING HEDGE.
  
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF THE
 PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE.
  
 15. JATROPHA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE, AND CANNOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED TREES.
  
 16. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND LIGHTING PLAN NEED TO BE
 REVISED TO ELIMINATE CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND LIGHT
 FIXTURES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT
 TO THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-06-2017 Time 16:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-06-2017 Time 16:37 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-06 16:37:55FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER Z16070022
 OCTOBER 6, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION BASED ON
 THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION, AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE
 SURVEY IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
 PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO
 INDICATE THE CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE
 REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE
 PHOENIX CANARIENSIS.
 THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
 DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
 ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
 THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 AND LIST. STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE
 DISCREPANCIES.
  
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE THE DRI AND SECTION
 94-448 REQUIRE HEALTHY TREES TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE
 MANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT
 TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. DRI REQUIRES:
 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
  
 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY AND THE
 DEVELOPER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS
 FOR A PARTICULAR SITE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE, IN
 CONFORMANCE TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IN A FORM
 ACCEPTABLE TO THE PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING
 DIRECTOR MANAGER, A LANDSCAPE AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
 FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. SUCH PLAN SHALL SPECIFICALLY
 ADDRESS PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND RELOCATION OF
 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE.
  
  STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT DESTRUCTION OF THE LARGE LIVE
 OAK TREES ON SITE. THE INTENT OF THE DRI, THE DOWNTOWN
 MASTER PLAN AND THE TREE PROTECTION CODE IS TO RELOCATE
 THE HEALTHY LIVE OAKS ON SITE TO LOCATIONS WHERE THE
 BENEFITS OF THE MATURE CANOPY WILL BE MAXIMIZED FOR
 THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT
 MOBILITY STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
  STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
 OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
 ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
  OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
 SAME CATEGORY.
  THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
 OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
 OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
 LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
 ? THE ADDITION OF THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE
 EXISTING PARKING GARAGE ALSO CAUSES A CONFLICT WITH
 EXISTING OAKS AND MAHOGANY THAT CAN BE DESIGNED TO
 AVOID REMOVAL OF EXISTING SHADE TREES.
 STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVING TREES 11269, 11270,
 11274, 11295, OR RELOCATION OF TREES 11275 AND 11276.
 THIS APPEARS TO BE A LOADING AREA OFF THE RAMP. THESE
 TREES PROVIDE SCREENING FOR THE PARKING GARAGE AND NEED
 TO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG
 THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE COMPLYING WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DRI,
 SPECIFICALLY (3) SCREENING AND BUFFERING OF RESIDENTS
 AND USERS OF OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT FROM ON-SITE ADVERSE
 EFFECTS, AND (4) ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY
 THROUGH FENCES, WALLS, BARRIERS AND VEGETATION ARRANGED
 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE PROPERTY AND TO ENHANCE THE
 PRIVACY OF ITS OCCUPANTS.
  
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-117 CULTURAL ARTS
 DISTRICT (CAD) AS UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIRES STRONG
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL FACILITIES
 AND CITYPLACE BY IMPROVING SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THE MAIN
 PEDESTRIAN WALKING STREET WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF
 TREE CANOPY TO PROVIDE SHADE. THE CURRENT PLACEMENT OF
 LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDES A COOLING CANOPY FOR
 PEDESTRIANS, AND THE PROPOSED PLAN WOULD REMOVE ALL
 TREE CANOPY ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE REVISE TO MEET THIS
 STANDARD.
  
 THE DESIGN OF THE SIDEWALK AND DISCUSSION OF ADDING
 PLANTING AREAS BETWEEN THE CURB AND SIDEWALK IS NOT
 REFLECTED ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. WEST OF THE
 OKEECHOBEE ENTRANCE SHOULD HAVE A PLANTING STRIP
 BETWEEN CURB AND SIDEWALK, AND EAST OF THE ENTRANCE AND
 ALONG SAPODILLA STREET CAN BE A CONTINUOUS PLANTING
 AREA INCLUDING THE TREES, AND COULD BE DESIGNED WITH
 THE ABILITY TO ABSORB STORMWATER RUNOFF. THE USE OF
 TREE GRATES SHOULD BE LIMITED ONLY TO AREAS WHERE THE
 ADDITIONAL TRAVEL SURFACE IS NEEDED FOR PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE VERIFY THE SITE WILL
 COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CAD FOUND IN SECTION
 94-117 AND TABLE IV-13 FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE.
 OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR TREE CANOPY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING ALL COMPONENTS OF
 THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET
 LP3.01 REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
 AND PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS INCLUDING 94-442 AND 94-443 FOR
 ALL SURFACE PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
 THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
 PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
 BUFFER LENGTHS IN ANY AFFECTED AREAS PER SECTION 94-443
 B. IN THE DATA CHART. THIS INCLUDES IRIS AND SAPODILLA
 BUFFERS.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:
 12. SATISFIED. PHOENIX CANARIENSIS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED
 FOR SOUTH FLORIDA, AS THEY ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE IN THIS
 ENVIRONMENT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/6/17:
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG THE
 PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE COMPLYING WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DRI,
 SPECIFICALLY (3) SCREENING AND BUFFERING OF RESIDENTS
 AND USERS OF OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT FROM ON-SITE ADVERSE
 EFFECTS, AND (4) ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY
 THROUGH FENCES, WALLS, BARRIERS AND VEGETATION ARRANGED
 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE PROPERTY AND TO ENHANCE THE
 PRIVACY OF ITS OCCUPANTS.
 THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY EXISTING
 TREES, PALMS AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN AROUND THE WATER
 DETENTION AREA AND ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE. PLEASE
 CLARIFY ALL THAT WILL REMAIN TO SATISFY SCREENING
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-11-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-11-2017 Time 16:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-11-2017 Time 16:44 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-11 16:44:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER Z16070022
 JULY 11, 2017
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION BASED ON
 THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION, AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE
 SURVEY IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
 PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO
 INDICATE THE CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE
 REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE
 PHOENIX CANARIENSIS.
 THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
 DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
 ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE THE DRI AND SECTION
 94-448 REQUIRE HEALTHY TREES TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE
 MANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT
 TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. DRI REQUIRES:
 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
  
 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY AND THE
 DEVELOPER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS
 FOR A PARTICULAR SITE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE, IN
 CONFORMANCE TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IN A FORM
 ACCEPTABLE TO THE PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING
 DIRECTOR MANAGER, A LANDSCAPE AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
 FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. SUCH PLAN SHALL SPECIFICALLY
 ADDRESS PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND RELOCATION OF
 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE.
  
  STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT DESTRUCTION OF THE LARGE LIVE
 OAK TREES ON SITE. THE INTENT OF THE DRI, THE DOWNTOWN
 MASTER PLAN AND THE TREE PROTECTION CODE IS TO RELOCATE
 THE HEALTHY LIVE OAKS ON SITE TO LOCATIONS WHERE THE
 BENEFITS OF THE MATURE CANOPY WILL BE MAXIMIZED FOR
 THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT
 MOBILITY STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
  STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
 OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
 ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
  OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
 SAME CATEGORY.
  THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
 OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
 OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
 LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG
 THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE COMPLYING WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DRI,
 SPECIFICALLY (3) SCREENING AND BUFFERING OF RESIDENTS
 AND USERS OF OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT FROM ON-SITE ADVERSE
 EFFECTS, AND (4) ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY
 THROUGH FENCES, WALLS, BARRIERS AND VEGETATION ARRANGED
 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE PROPERTY AND TO ENHANCE THE
 PRIVACY OF ITS OCCUPANTS.
  
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-117 CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT
 (CAD) AS UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIRES STRONG PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL FACILITIES AND
 CITYPLACE BY IMPROVING SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THE MAIN
 PEDESTRIAN WALKING STREET WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF
 TREE CANOPY TO PROVIDE SHADE. THE CURRENT PLACEMENT OF
 LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDES A COOLING CANOPY FOR
 PEDESTRIANS, AND THE PROPOSED PLAN WOULD REMOVE ALL
 TREE CANOPY ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE REVISE TO MEET THIS
 STANDARD.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE VERIFY THE SITE WILL
 COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CAD FOUND IN SECTION
 94-117 AND TABLE IV-13 FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE.
 OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR TREE CANOPY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING ALL COMPONENTS OF
 THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET
 LP3.01 REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
 AND PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS INCLUDING 94-442 AND 94-443 FOR
 ALL SURFACE PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
 LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
 THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
 PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
 BUFFER LENGTHS IN ANY AFFECTED AREAS PER SECTION 94-443
 B. IN THE DATA CHART. THIS INCLUDES IRIS AND SAPODILLA
 BUFFERS.
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT
 BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM
 CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE,
 SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT
 COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR
 ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:
 12. PHOENIX CANARIENSIS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED FOR SOUTH
 FLORIDA, AS THEY ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE IN THIS
 ENVIRONMENT.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-08-2016 Time 15:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-08-2016 Time 15:13 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-08 15:15:34FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER Z16070022
 AUGUST 9, 2016
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION BASED ON
 THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION, AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE SURVEY IDENTIFYING
 EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS
 TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO INDICATE THE CORRECT
 SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED,
 OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE PHOENIX CANARIENSIS.
  
 2. PLEASE NOTE THE DRI AND SECTION 94-448 REQUIRE
 HEALTHY TREES TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE MANY
 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT
 TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. DRI REQUIRES:
  
 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
  
 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY AND THE
 DEVELOPER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS
 FOR A PARTICULAR SITE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE, IN
 CONFORMANCE TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IN A FORM
 ACCEPTABLE TO THE PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING
 DIRECTOR MANAGER, A LANDSCAPE AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN
 FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. SUCH PLAN SHALL SPECIFICALLY
 ADDRESS PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND RELOCATION OF
 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ALONG THE
 PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE COMPLYING WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DRI,
 SPECIFICALLY (3) SCREENING AND BUFFERING OF RESIDENTS
 AND USERS OF OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT FROM ON-SITE ADVERSE
 EFFECTS, AND (4) ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY
 THROUGH FENCES, WALLS, BARRIERS AND VEGETATION ARRANGED
 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE PROPERTY AND TO ENHANCE THE
 PRIVACY OF ITS OCCUPANTS.
  
  
 4. SECTION 94-117 CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT (CAD) AS
 UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIRES STRONG PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL FACILITIES AND
 CITYPLACE BY IMPROVING SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THE MAIN
 PEDESTRIAN WALKING STREET WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF
 TREE CANOPY TO PROVIDE SHADE. THE CURRENT PLACEMENT OF
 LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDES A COOLING CANOPY FOR
 PEDESTRIANS, AND THE PROPOSED PLAN WOULD REMOVE ALL
 TREE CANOPY ALONG SAPODILLA. PLEASE REVISE TO MEET THIS
 STANDARD.
  
 5. PLEASE VERIFY THE SITE WILL COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR CAD FOUND IN SECTION 94-117 AND TABLE
 IV-13 FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
  
 6. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01 REGARDING
 ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND PROVIDE A DATA
 CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED CODE
 SECTIONS INCLUDING 94-442 AND 94-443 FOR ALL SURFACE
 PARKING AND DRIVE AISLE
  
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH
 PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN THE CHART AS
 SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE PLANTS IS ALSO
 SUGGESTED.
  
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS IN ANY
 AFFECTED AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 B. IN THE DATA CHART.
 THIS INCLUDES IRIS AND SAPODILLA BUFFERS.
  
 10. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
  
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-20-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-20-2017 Time 17:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-20-2017 Time 17:39 Sent To  
Notes
2017-11-20 17:31:07COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE NOVEMBER 7,
 2017 PACKAGE FROM E. SCHNEIDER INCLUDING ENGINEERING
 PLANS SIGNED AND SEALED ON 11/3/2017 AND COMMENT
 RESPONSE LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 3, 2017.
  
 1. REVISE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS A-A AND B-B ON SHEET
 PDD-3 TO ILLUSTRATE SAPODILLA AVE IS A CROWNED ROADWAY
 AND NOT A SHED SECTION. REVISE PAVEMENT DESIGN OF LANE
 ADDITION TO MATCH CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-5.
  
 2. ADD DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE (UPSTREAM OF) THE
 CROSS WALKS AT THE INTERSECTION OF IRIS AND SAPODILLA
 TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS
 THE CROSSWALKS (REPEAT COMMENT). THE RESPONSE DISCUSSED
 PLACEMENT OF A TRENCH DRAIN BEFORE THE CROSS WALKAT THE
 INTERSECTION OF SAPODILLA. THE COMMENT IS REFERRING TO
 THE CROSSWALKS ACROSS IRIS (SW CORNER TO NW CORNER) AND
 ACROSS SAPODILLA (SW CORNER TO EAST SIDE OF STREET) AT
 THE INTERSECTION OF IRIS ST. AND SAPODILLA AVE.
  
 3. IDENTIFY WHERE THE ONSITE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURES WLL BE. ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHOULD BE
 LOCATED UPSTREAM OF THE CONTOL STRUCTURES (REPEAT
 COMMENT). STRUCTURES EX-MH4 ON SHEET PD-1 AND EX-CS ON
 SHEET PD-2 WERE THE ONLY STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED WITH
 WEIRS TO HOLD BACK AND CONTROL THE DISCHARGE OF
 STORMWATER FROM THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. PLEASE
 EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF THE WEIR IN STRUCTURE EX-MH4 IF
 IT CONTROLS THE FLOW FROM THE KRAVIS SITE. IT MAY NEED
 TO BE MOVED TO A STRUCTURE THAT IS WITHIN THE KRAVIS
 PROPERTY. EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION SYSTEM BETWEEN
 STRUCTURES EX-S5S AND S-1 WILL BE SURCHARGED.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED PIPE BETWEEN S-4 AND EX-CS NEEDS TO
 ENTER STRUCTURE EX-CS UPSTREAM OF THE WEIR.
  
 5. SHEET DEM-1 NEEDS TO CALLOUT THE REMOVAL OF THE
 EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
 SAPODILLA AND IRIS.
  
 6. ON SHEET PD-2, THE PROPOSED GRADES FOR THE CROSSWALK
 ACROSS THE RAMP UP TO THE PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE
 INDICATE FLOW COMING DOWN THE RAMP WILL FLOW DOWN THE
 SIDEWALK LANDING AT THE WEST END OF THE CROSSWALK. IF
 THIS IS THE DESIGN INTENT, EROSION PROTECTION MAY BE
 NEEDED ALONG THE SIDE SLOPE.
  
 7. IS A HANDRAIL PROPOSED FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE
 WEST SIDE OF THE EXITING DRIVEWAY TO OKEECHOBEE BLVD
 FROM THE PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE. THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE
 APPEARS STEEPER THAN 5%.
  
 8. ON SHEET SMP-1, THE YIELD HERE TO PEDESTRIAN SIGN AT
 THE DRIVEWAY TO IRIS ST. FROM THE PROPOSED VALET
 PARKING GARAGE IS POSTED AFTER THE SIDEWALK.
  
 TRACY L WARD, P.E.
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-17-2017 Time 10:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-17-2017 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-17 10:31:45THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS OF THE SAPODILLA AVE
 LANE ADDITIONS FROM THE EAST BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF
 SIDEWALK ALONG THE PROPOSED WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 2. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF SAPODILLA AVE AT VALET
 DRIVEWAY FROM EAST BACK OF CURB CURB OF SAPODILLA AVE
 TO BEYOND THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 3. CHECK PROPOSED GRADES OF SAPODILLA AVE. THERE IS A
 FLAT SPOT ALONG THE CURB LINE AND STEEP CROSS SLOPE
 SOUTH OF THE VALET PARKING DRIVEWAY.
  
 4. CROSS SLOPES FOR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR CROSSWALKS
 SHOULD NOT EXCEED 2%. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES ON THE
 GRADING PLANS THAT MEET THIS ADA DESIGN CRITERIA.
  
 5. ADD DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE (UPSTREAM OF) THE
 CROSS WALKS AT THE INTERSECTION OF IRIS AND SAPODILLA
 TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS
 THE CROSSWALKS.
  
 6. IDENTIFY WHERE THE ONSITE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURES WILL BE. ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHOULD BE
 LOCATED UPSTREAM OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
  
 7. THE ADDITIONAL PARKING AREA FOR THE LOADING ZONE
 APPEARS TO HAVE A 10% CROSS SLOPE.
  
 8. DEMOLITION PLAN CALLS OUT THE CONVERSION OF AN
 EXISTING CATCH BASIN (APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET WEST OF
 THE CROSS WALK AT S. SAPODILLA) TO A STORM MANHOLE AND
 THE REMOVAL OF THE STORM PIPE TO THE WEST OF THE CATCH
 BASIN. THE PGD PLANS SHOW CONSTRUCTION OF 18? RCP FROM
 THIS CATCH BASIN TO STRUCTURE S-10. SHOULD THE EXISTING
 CATCH BASIN REMAIN A CATCH BASIN TO LIMIT THE SPREAD OF
 WATER AT STRUCTURE S-10?
  
 9. THE PROPOSED BULBOUT AT IRIS AND SAPODILLA APPEARS
 TO INTERRUPT THE DRAINAGE FLOW PATTERN.
  
 10. DESIGN GRADING OF VALET DRIVEWAY AND STRUCTURE S-3
 TO PREVENT BY-PASS OF THE STRUCTURE DUE TO THE STEEP
 SLOPE OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 11. LIST VERTICAL DATUM ON THE PGD PLANS. ALTHOUGH THE
 VERTICAL DATUM IS LISTED ON THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET,
 THIS SHEET IS NOT ALWAYS WITH THE PGD PLANS.
  
 12. WIDTH OF HANDICAP PARKING SPACE (11 FEET) (SHEET
 SMP-1) DOES NOT MATCH THE H.C. PARKING DETAIL (SHEET
 PDD-2).
  
 13. CONSIDER PLACING STOP SIGNS (R1-1) INSTEAD OF YIELD
 HERE TO PEDESTRIAN SIGNS (R1-5) ON THE VALET PARKING
 DRIVEWAY (SHEET SMP-1)
  
 14. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE SFWMD PERMIT MODIFICATION FOR
 THE KRAVIS CENTER SITE WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION.
  
 15. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE SFWMD PERMIT MODIFICATION
 (CITY PLACE PERMIT?) FOR THE SAPODILLA AVE ROAD
 WIDENING WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION.
  
 16. OKEECHOBEE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. PERMITS WILL BE NEEDED
 FROM FDOT FOR WORK WITHIN OKEECHOBEE BLVD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 PROVIDE A COPY OF FDOT PERMIT FOR IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED
 WITHIN THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD. RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION.
  
 17. MINIMUM 2 FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION IS NOW REQUIIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITHIN
 SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS AS INDICATED ON THE NEW FEMA
 FIRMS.
  
 18. REVIEW SPREAD ON WEST SIDE OF SAPODILLA AVE. TO
 DETERMINE NEED FOR CATCH BASIN.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-09-2016 Time 15:07 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-09 15:08:25THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND
 TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS.
  
 3. OKEECHOBEE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. PERMITS WILL BE NEEDED
 FROM FDOT FOR WORK WITHIN OKEECHOBEE BLVD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 4. INLET AT NW CORNER OF SAPODILLA AND OKEECHOBEE MAY
 NEED TO BE MODIFIED.
  
 5. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 6. VERTICAL DATUM ON PLANS AND SURVEYS SHOULD BE
 CONSISTENT. VERTICAL DATUM ON TITLE SURVEY LISTED AS
 NGVD 1929. VERTICAL DATUM ON CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS
 LISTED AS NAVD 1988. PROVIDE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
 NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929 FOR THE SITE.
  
 7. REVIEW SPREAD ON WEST SIDE OF SAPODILLA AVE. TO
 DETERMINE NEED FOR CATCH BASIN.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED
 BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
 INDICATING THE CHANGES TO THE ONSITE PEAK FLOOD STAGES
 WILL NOT EXCEED THE SFWMD PERMITTED FLOOD STAGES AND
 STORMWATER PRE-TREATMENT VOLUMES ARE BEING PROVIDED PER
 SFWMD CRITERIA.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION FOR
 THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FO
 RMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-17-2017 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-17 13:30:54PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. PLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. DEDICATION OF TURN LANE BY PLAT.
 3. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ELEMENTS IN EASEMENTS.
 4. SUBMITTAL OF SITE/CIVIL PERMIT THROUGH ENGINEERING.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-12-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-12-2017 Time 07:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-12 07:17:021. PLATTING IS STILL A REQUIREMENT.
 2. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SAPODILLA CAN BE
 DEDICATED BY PLAT IF APPROVED BY TRANSPORTATION.
 3. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT THE SW CORNER MAY NEED TO
 BE MODIFIED FOR PLACEMENT OF ANY PAVERS.
 4. NO SURVEY WAS PROVIDED WITH RESUBMITTAL.
 5. A SITE/CIVIL PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED
 THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-08-2016 Time 07:59 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-08 08:10:511. ENTIRE PROPERTY SHOULD BE REPLATTED.
 2. UTILITY RELOCATION IS BEING REVIEWED BY THE
 UTILITIES DEPT.
 3. IT APPEARS THAT A PORTION OF THE PLATTED IRIS ST. TO
 BE ABANDONED WILL RESULT IN THE SCHOOL BOARD ACQUIRING
 A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE WESTERLY PORTION OF
 IRIS WILL NEED TO BE SURPLUSSED AND APPRAISED.
 4. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SAPODILLA WILL NEED TO
 BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. THIS MAY AFFECT SETBACKS.
 FDOT APPROVAL WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-18-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-12 11:23:23REVIEW COMMENTS 12-18-2017
 PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000F
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL II SITE PLAN
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 CITY ENGINEERING DOES NOT SUPPORT THE GARAGE OPERATIONS
 AS IT IS CURRENTLY PRESENTED DUE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REASONS:
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS REQUESTED MCMAHON
 ASSOCIATES, INC. (MCMAHON) TO REVIEW THE KRAVIS
 CENTER QUEUING ANALYSIS, DATED DECEMBER 11, 2017,
 PREPARED BY JFO GROUP, INC. MCMAHON OFFERS THE
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 COMMENTS:
 1. MCMAHON GENERALLY AGREES WITH THE METHODOLOGY AND
 ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE ANALYSIS.
 2. THE ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT 12 VALET ATTENDANTS ARE
 REQUIRED AT THE PROPOSED VALET DROP-OFF/PICKUP LOCATION
 IN ORDER TO PREVENT SPILLBACK OF QUEUED VEHICLES ONTO
 SAPODILLA AVENUE. THEREFORE, APPROVAL OF THE
 APPLICATION AND THE KRAVIS CENTER OCCUPANCY PERMIT
 SHOULD BE CONDITIONED UPON HAVING 12 ATTENDANTS FOR THE
 PROPOSED VALET LOCATION IN ADDITION TO THOSE ALREADY
 STATIONED AT THE EXISTING VALET LOCATION.
 3. THE PROPOSED VALET OPERATIONS ASSUME ONE-WAY INBOUND
 TRAFFIC FLOW FROM SAPODILLA AVENUE USING BOTH LANES FOR
 DROP-OFF FOR THREE (3) HOURS LEADING UP TO AN EVENT.
 DURING THIS TIME, ANY PERSON CHOOSING TO LEAVE THE
 FACILITY WILL REQUIRE AN ATTENDANT TO RETURN THE CAR BY
 WAY OF EXITING THE GARAGE ONTO IRIS STREET, TURNING
 RIGHT ONTO SAPODILLA AVENUE, TURNING RIGHT AGAIN INTO
 THE INBOUND ONLY SAPODILLA AVENUE DRIVEWAY AND COMBINE
 WITH THE DROP-OFF OPERATION. THIS WILL HAVE MULTIPLE
 NEGATIVE IMPACTS. FIRST, THE USE OF THE PUBLIC STREET
 NETWORK WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE VALET OPERATION.
 SECOND, THE DROP-OFF OPERATIONS WILL BE IMPEDED. THIRD,
 THE AREA WILL NOT BE ACCESSIBLE BY EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
 TWO-WAY OPERATIONS WITH ONE (1) LANE DROP-OFF FROM
 SAPODILLA AVENUE WILL PROVIDE INSUFFICIENT STACKING FOR
 QUEUED VEHICLES. THEREFORE, MCMAHON CONTINUES
 TO PROVIDE THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE VALET OPERATIONS
 USE THE IRIS STREET DRIVEWAY FOR INBOUND/DROP-OFF
 ACTIVITIES AND THAT THE SAPODILLA AVENUE DRIVEWAY BE
 OUTBOUND ONLY.
  
 IF THIS PROJECT WERE TO PASS, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE
 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LETTER.
  
 1. NO POLICE ENFORCEMENT ARE ALLOWED AT THE PROXIMITY
 OF KRAVIS' ENTRANCE, THIS INCLUDES SAPODILLA AND
 OKEECHOBEE AND IRIS AND TAMARIND.
 2. ALL SHOWS AT DREYFOOS HALL ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3
 HOURS APART TO SUPPORT JFO GROUP QUEUING ANALYSIS DATED
 DECEMBER 11TH, 2017
 3. KRAVIS COMMITMENT TO ENTER INTO A SHARE PARKING
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BY JANUARY
 2020 IF DAILY PARKING UTILIZATION OF THE MAIN GARAGE IS
 LESS THAN 85%.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 12-19-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 12-19-2017 Time 13:44 Rev Time 6.00
Received By eschneid Date 12-18-2017 Time 10:46 Sent To  
Notes
2017-12-19 13:45:03PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E - NOVEMBER 27, 2017
 RESUBMITTAL
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN - DREYFOOS HALL AND
 VALET GARAGE
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS VALET GARAGE
 PORTION OF THIS APPLICATION IN ITS CURRENT DESIGN AS
 THE PRESENTED PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE ALL OF THE
 SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
  
 2) SAPODILLA AVENUE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL
 STREET FRONTED BY ACTIVE USES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THE CITYPLACE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THE METROPOLITAN AND
 THE EVERNIA PLACE DEVELOPMENTS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
 VALET GARAGE WITH NO ACTIVE USE LINER, THE CONSTRUCTION
 OF A SURFACE VALET PARKING LOT AND THE WIDENING OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE TO ACCOMMODATE THE VALET ENTRANCE AND
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT EXIST ON
 SAPODILLA IS EXPECTED TO HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE
 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
  
 CONDITIONS TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY
 COMMISSION
  
 1) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN MUST BE CORRECTED TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE 0.6 FOOTCANDLE MINIMUM AT THE CURB
 ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK LEVEL ALONG ALL FRONTAGES.
  
 2) SUBMIT A PLAN SHOWING THE EXISTING DIRECTIONAL
 SIGNAGE (INCLUDING SIZES, LOCATION AND TEXT) FOR THE
 SITE SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY HOW THE PROPOSED SIGNS
 RELATED TO THE EXISTING SIGNS. THE PROPOSED PLAN ONLY
 SHOWS THE SIGN FACES AND NOT HOW THEY ARE PROPOSED TO
 BE MOUNTED. THE FULL EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED SIGN IS
 REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE SIGN PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN
 MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING
 THEIR SPECIFIC APPROVAL OF A SIGN PLAN.
  
 3) REVISE THE PLANS TO REDUCE THE CURB FACE TO CURB
 FACE OPENING WIDTH AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG
 SAPODILLA AVENUE TO 25 FEET. THE DOWNTOWN REGULATIONS
 LIMIT THE WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES FOR PORTE COCHERES TO
 25 FEET IN WIDTH AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (FIGURE
 IV-22). THE CURRENTLY SUBMITTED PLANS SHOW THE DRIVE
 AISLE 25 FEET WIDE WHEN MEASURED TEN (10) FEET FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. THE DRIVE AISLE THEN WIDENS PRIOR
 TO WHERE IT JOINS THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK TO A WIDTH
 GREATER THAN 25 FEET.
  
 4) IN ORDER TO PREVENT THERE BEING A WALL IN EXCESS OF
 SIX FEET ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK ALONG SAPODILLA
 AVENUE, THE RETAINING WALL ALONG THE VALET SURFACE LOT
 MAY BE NO TALLER THAN SIX INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE
 CONCRETE CURB AT THE LOT LEVEL. IF A CRASH BARRIER IS
 REQUIRED, THEN IT MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE BACK OF THE
 CURB AND SCREENED WITH A HEDGE. THIS CRASH BARRIER
 COULD BE A CABLE SYSTEM OR A WALL.
  
 ZONING STAFF WILL BE RECOMMENDING THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS IF REQUEST IS APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD AND
 CITY COMMISSION (NOTE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN
 GENERATED BY THE OTHER REVIEWERS AND ARE NOT INCLUDED
 IN THIS LIST).
  
 1) CONDITION: GIVEN THAT THE PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
 CONCLUSION AND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATE
 THAT NEW VALET PARKING GARAGE AND ASSOCIATED SITE
 IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE VEHICLE FLOW
 IN AND AROUND THE SITE, THE TWO VALET AREAS MAY NOT BE
 UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THE SAME TIME TO MINIMIZE THE
 DISRUPTION TO THE USERS OF THE SURROUNDING ROADWAY
 NETWORK.
  
 2) CONDITION: THE KRAVIS CENTER MUST PAY THE CITY FOR
 THE REMOVAL OF ANY STANDARD PARKING SPACES ALONG IRIS
 STREET. THE TWO ADA SPACES ARE BEING REPLACED BY THE
 RELOCATED TROLLEY STOP AND THUS NO COMPENSATION IS
 REQUIRED FOR THESE SPACES.
  
 3) CONDITION: THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES
 BUILDINGS ON SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30
 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE (REQ. 132.3
 FEET). THE ACTIVE USE ALONG SAPODILLA AVENUE (PROVIDED
 134 FEET) IS PREDICATED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER ABUTTING
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE
 ZLDR. THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE (PROPOSED DREYFOOS HALL
 PLAZA) IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL ADA
 REQUIREMENTS AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT IN ORDER TO
 MEET THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS. IF THE DREYFOOS HALL
 PLAZA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AT THAT
 TIME, THEN THE GARAGE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
 ACTIVE USES.
  
 4) CONDITION: THE SITE PLAN CALLS OUT THE SIGNAL POLE
 AT THE CORNER OF SAPODILLA AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD AS BEING RELOCATED. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM
 FDOT OR PALM BEACH COUNTY THAT THIS SIGNAL POLE MAY BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 5) NOTE: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE WAIVER FOR THE
 ADDITIONAL CURB CUT FOR INGRESS/EGRESS ON IRIS STREET.
 THIS ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE TO THE
 SITE DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
 SINCE MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE VEHICLE
 PEDESTRIAN CONFLICTS.
  
 CONDITION: THE VALET GARAGE ACCESS POINT ON IRIS STREET
 MAY NOT BE USED FOR VALET OPERATIONS AND SHALL REMAIN
 BLOCKED WHEN THE GARAGE IS OPEN.
  
 CONDITION: IN THE EVENT THAT A PATRON WHO HAS UTILIZED
 THE VALET IS REQUIRED TO LEAVE THE SITE PRIOR TO THE
 LANE REVERSAL, THE PATRON MUST PICK UP THE VEHICLE
 INSIDE THE GARAGE ON THE FIRST LEVEL ADJACENT TO THE
 ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY ADJACENT TO STAIRWAY #3.
  
 6) CONDITION: IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE REVERSAL OF THE
 VALET OPERATIONS FOR THE SAPODILLA AVENUE GARAGE, THERE
 MUST BE AT LEAST THREE HOURS BETWEEN THE END OF A
 PERFORMANCE AT THE DREYFOOS HALL AND THE START OF THE
 NEXT PERFORMANCE.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-17-2017 Time 13:07 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-16-2017 Time 09:31 Sent To  
Notes
2017-11-17 13:06:37PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E - NOVEMBER 3, 2017
 RESUBMITTAL
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN - DREYFOOS HALL AND
 VALET GARAGE
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY,
 NOVEMBER 27, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE JANUARY 16, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING OR FRIDAY,
 DECEMBER 29, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE FEBRUARY 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 17, 2018),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS VALET GARAGE
 PORTION OF THIS APPLICATION IN ITS CURRENT DESIGN AS
 THE PRESENTED PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE ALL OF THE
 SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
  
 2) SAPODILLA AVENUE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL
 STREET FRONTED BY ACTIVE USES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THE CITYPLACE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THE METROPOLITAN AND
 THE EVERNIA PLACE DEVELOPMENTS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
 VALET GARAGE WITH NO ACTIVE USE LINER, THE CONSTRUCTION
 OF A SURFACE VALET PARKING LOT AND THE WIDENING OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE TO ACCOMMODATE THE VALET ENTRANCE AND
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT EXIST ON
 SAPODILLA IS EXPECTED TO HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE
 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
  
 OUTSTANDING ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING
 FOR PLANNING BOARD
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER
 DOES NOT ADDRESS THE MODIFICATION (WIDENING) OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD.
  
 NOTE: THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER APPROVES THE TWO
 DRIVEWAYS ON OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, WITH THE CONDITION
 THAT THE DRIVEWAYS HAVE A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 16 FEET. THE
 SITE AND CIVIL PLANS SHOW DRIVEWAY NO. 1 WITH A WIDTH
 OF 20 FEET. SINCE DRIVEWAY NO. 1 IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
 DMP PORTION OF THE SITE, IT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE
 CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE PLANNING BOARD REVIEW OF THE
 APPLICATION; HOWEVER, SINCE OTHER SITE PLAN CORRECTIONS
 ARE REQUIRED, IT NEEDS TO BE DONE WITH THE NEXT
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 4) SAPODILLA AVENUE VALET DROP-OFF
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE DOWNTOWN REGULATIONS LIMIT THE
 WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES FOR PORTE COCHERES TO 25 FEET IN
 WIDTH AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (FIGURE IV-22).
 SECTION 94-111(O)(3) ALSO LIMITS CURB CUTS, PARKING
 ENTRANCES, EXITS AND DRIVEWAYS TO NO WIDER THAN 25
 FEET. REDUCE THE OPENING WIDTH TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY
 REQUIREMENT. - THE RESUBMITTED PLANS SHOW THE DRIVE
 AISLE AT TEN (10) FEET INTO THE PROPERTY WITH A MEASURE
 OF 25 FEET WIDTH. THE APRON FLAIR IS CLEARLY VISIBLE ON
 THE PLANS AS WIDER THAN 25 FEET AND SCALES AT
 APPROXIMATELY 27 FEET IN WIDTH. THE MEASURE POINT NEEDS
 TO BE THE CURB FACE TO CURB FACE.
  
 B. NEW COMMENT: THE RESUBMITTED PLANS HAVE REMOVED THE
 REQUIRED FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT
 TO THE BACKUP ASSIST AREA IN THE SURFACE VALET LOT AND
 REPLACED WITH A RETAINING WALL. IF A RETAINING WALL IS
 REQUIRED, IT NEEDS TO BE PLACED ON THE INSIDE OF THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER (IE. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER,
 WITH A HEDGE, IS REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED ADJOINING THE
 SIDEWALK). NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED REGARDING
 THE RETAINING WALL, TO INCLUDE HEIGHT, MATERIAL OR
 DESIGN. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL IS
 NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ALL PLANS MUST
 SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS.
  
 5) THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE
 ADDITIONAL CURB CUT FOR THE VALET INGRESS/EGRESS ON
 IRIS STREET (STAFF NOTES THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING A
 WAIVER). THIS ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE
 TO THE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN
 SAFETY SINCE MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE
 VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN CONFLICTS. THE WAIVER JUSTIFICATION
 STATE THAT THIS ACCESS POINT IS FOR INGRESS ON
 SAPODILLA AVENUE AND EGRESS ON IRIS STREET, AS WELL AS
 EMERGENCY INGRESS/EGRESS TO THE VALET ENTRANCE SHOULD
 THE PRIMARY ACCESS BE BLOCKED. THIS PRESENTS THREE
 ISSUES:
 1. DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-485(M) - ALL
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENT AND MANEUVERING THAT MAY BE REQUIRED
 TO UTILIZE OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE
 RETAINED ON-SITE. PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL NOT BE
 UTILIZED TO ALLOW OR ENHANCE MOVEMENT OR MANEUVERING.
 IF A VALET IS DRIVING IN OFF OF IRIS STREET, THEN THE
 GARAGE IS USING CITY STREETS FOR MANEUVERING. GIVEN THE
 TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE ARRIVING/DEPARTING SHOWS, ADDING
 VALETS TO THE CITY STREET NETWORK IS NOT A SAFE,
 DESIRABLE SITUATION. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES
 THE NEED FOR THE ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT TO "MAINTAIN
 EFFICIENT VALET FUNCTIONS". CITY STREETS ARE NOT
 INTENDED TO MAKE VALET FUNCTIONS EFFICIENT, THIS
 OPERATION IS TO BE KEPT ON-SITE.
 2. REPEAT COMMENT: THIS THEN WOULD REQUIRE THAT THE
 PATRON PICKING UP THE VEHICLE TO DRIVE THROUGH THE
 GARAGE AND EXIT ONTO IRIS STREET. THIS IS LEFT OUT OF
 ALL THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS. MIXING VALET AND PATRON,
 ESPECIALLY ELDERLY (62 YEAR OLD AVERAGE AGE), VEHICLE
 OPERATION IN A PARKING GARAGE IS NOT A SAFE SITUATION.
 A CIRCULATION PLAN IS REQUIRED. NO CIRCULATION PLAN TO
 SHOW HOW VALET AND PATRON CAN SAFELY SHARE THE VALET
 GARAGE HAS BEEN PROVIDED, EITHER IN THE RESPONSE OR IN
 THE WAIVER JUSTIFICATION.
 3. NEW COMMENT: THE CITY EMS WILL NOT DRIVE INTO A
 GARAGE TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY SERVICES. THEY WILL PARK
 THE VEHICLE(S) OUTSIDE OF THE GARAGE AND PROVIDE
 EMERGENCY SERVICES.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: SHOW THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON
 THE SITE PLAN, NOT JUST THE DETAIL.
  
 7) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DIMENSIONS AND FENESTRATION
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRYFOOS HALL WERE
 NOT PROVIDED IN TABULAR FORM OR ON THE SITE OR
 ELEVATION PLANS, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE
 INFORMATION PRESENTED SUCH AS THE FACADES MEETING THE
 FENESTRATION PERCENTAGES.
  
 8) REVISED COMMENT: THE RESPONSE COMMENTS STATE THAT
 THE PROPOSED VALET AND OTHER DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WILL
 MATCH THE EXISTING SIGNS; HOWEVER, THE PLANS STATE THAT
 THE PROPOSED SIGNS WILL BE CUSTOM SIZED. THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS LIMIT PARKING AREA
 IDENTIFICATION SIGNS TO FOUR (4) SQUARE FEET PER SIGN
 FACE WHILE PARKING AREA INSTRUCTIONAL SIGNS MAY BE
 LARGER, PROVIDED THAT THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY
 THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AUTHORITY. THE SIZES LISTED FOR
 THE EXISTING SIGNS ARE LARGER THAN FOUR (4) SQUARE
 FEET. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE EXISTING SIGNS
 (SIZE, LOCATION AND TEXT) SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE
 EXISTING CONDITIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPOSED SIGNS
 MUST SHOW SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN
 DETERMINE IF THEY REPLACE EXISTING SIGNS, OR REQUIRE
 THE APPLICANT TO REQUEST A WAIVER FOR THE SIGNS FROM
 THE CITY COMMISSION. PLEASE NOTE THAT SPECIFIC SIGNS
 SIZES ARE REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED AS PART OF THE
 AMENDMENT SO THAT NO ISSUES ARISE AT THE TIME OF SIGN
 PERMITTING.
  
 9) IN THE LAST MEETING THAT STAFF HAD WITH THE
 CONSULTANT, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE LIGHTING NEEDED TO
 BE CARRIED AROUND THE NORTH SIDE OF THE GARAGE BY THE
 TROLLEY STOP AND REWORED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. THIS
 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 10) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE 0.6 FOOTCANDLE MINIMUM AT THE CURB ONE FOOT ABOVE
 THE SIDEWALK LEVEL ALONG ALL FRONTAGES.
  
 CONDITIONS IF REQUEST IS APPROVED
  
 11) CONDITION, IF APPROVED: GIVEN THAT THE PARKING
 DEMAND ANALYSIS CONCLUSION AND THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATE THAT NEW VALET PARKING GARAGE AND
 ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE
 THE VEHICLE FLOW IN AND AROUND THE SITE, THE TWO VALET
 AREAS MAY NOT BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THE SAME TIME TO
 MINIMIZE THE DISRUPTION TO THE USERS OF THE SURROUNDING
 ROADWAY NETWORK.
  
 12) CONDITION: THE KRAVIS CENTER MUST PAY THE CITY FOR
 THE REMOVAL OF ANY STANDARD PARKING SPACES ALONG IRIS
 STREET. THE TWO ADA SPACES ARE BEING REPLACED BY THE
 RELOCATED TROLLEY STOP AND THUS NO COMPENSATION IS
 REQUIRED FOR THESE SPACES.
  
 13) CONDITION: THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES
 BUILDINGS ON SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30
 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE (REQ. 132.3
 FEET). THE ACTIVE USE ALONG SAPODILLA AVENUE (PROVIDED
 134 FEET) IS PREDICATED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER ABUTTING
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE
 ZLDR. THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE (PROPOSED DREYFOOS HALL
 PLAZA) IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL ADA
 REQUIREMENTS AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT IN ORDER TO
 MEET THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS. IF THE DREYFOOS HALL
 PLAZA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AT THAT
 TIME, THEN THE GARAGE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
 ACTIVE USES.
  
 14) CONDITION: THE SITE PLAN CALLS OUT THE SIGNAL POLE
 AT THE CORNER OF SAPODILLA AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD AS BEING RELOCATED. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM
 FDOT OR PALM BEACH COUNTY THAT THIS SIGNAL POLE MAY BE
 RELOCATED.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-17-2017 Time 15:02 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-13-2017 Time 13:40 Sent To  
Notes
2017-10-17 15:03:10PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E - SEPTEMBER 22, 2017
 RESUBMITTAL
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN - DREYFOOS HALL AND
 VALET GARAGE
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 NOVEMBER 3, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE DECEMBER 19, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 17, 2017),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS VALET GARAGE
 PORTION OF THIS APPLICATION IN ITS CURRENT DESIGN AS
 THE PRESENTED PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE ALL OF THE
 SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
  
 2) SAPODILLA AVENUE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL
 STREET FRONTED BY ACTIVE USES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THE CITYPLACE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THE METROPOLITAN AND
 THE EVERNIA PLACE DEVELOPMENTS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
 VALET GARAGE WITH NO ACTIVE USE LINER, THE CONSTRUCTION
 OF A SURFACE VALET PARKING LOT AND THE WIDENING OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE TO ACCOMMODATE THE VALET ENTRANCE AND
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT EXIST ON
 SAPODILLA IS EXPECTED TO HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE
 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION
 LETTER FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SAPODILLA AVENUE
 INTERSECTION MODIFICATION AND ADDITIONAL WESTBOUND
 RIGHT TURN LANE. CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY FDOT MAY RESULT
 IN MODIFIED OR NEW COMMENTS. PLEASE REVIEW THE COMMENTS
 PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
 REGARDING THE ON AND OFF SITE CIRCULATION BOTH FOR
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THESE MAY
 AFFECT THE FDOT APPLICATION.
  
 4) REVISED COMMENT: WHAT IS THE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION
 PHASING OF THE ITEMS COVERED BY THE LEVEL II AND LEVEL
 III APPLICATIONS? GIVEN THAT THE PARKING DEMAND
 ANALYSIS CONCLUSION AND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 INDICATE THAT NEW VALET PARKING GARAGE AND ASSOCIATED
 SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE VEHICLE
 FLOW IN AND AROUND THE SITE, IT DOES NOT SEEM WISE TO
 CONSTRUCT ALL OF THE PROPOSED ELEMENTS (IF APPROVED BY
 THE CITY COMMISSION) AS ONE PHASE AS THIS WOULD CREATE
 INCREASED DISRUPTION TO THE USERS OF THE SURROUNDING
 ROADWAY NETWORK. IF APPROVED, STAFF WILL RECOMMEND A
 CONDITION THAT TWO VALET AREAS ARE NOT UNDER
 CONSTRUCTION AT THE SAME TIME.
  
 5) PLAZA AREA
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE NEW BASEMENT
 AREA IS THAT IS SHOWN ON THE CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET
 AE121. THE RESPONSE COMMENTS STATE THAT THERE IS NO
 BASEMENT, YET SHEET AE121 AND SHEET AE220 CLEARLY STATE
 "NEW BASEMENT AREA". THE PLANS AND THE RESPONSE
 COMMENTS NEED TO AGREE.
  
 6) DRYFOOS HALL ENTRY DRIVE
  
 A. REVISED COMMENT: THE NEWLY DESIGNED "BOX OFFICE"
 PARKING SPACES SHOW THE ADA SPACE AT 11 FEET IN WIDTH
 (SHEET SMP-1). ADA SPACES REQUIRE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 12
 FEET. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 DRIVE AISLE BEHIND THESE PARKING SPACES ON THE PLAN.
 B. PROVIDE THE WIDTH DIMENSION OF THE NEW 4TH FLOOR
 RAMP ON THE PLANS.
  
 7) SAPODILLA AVENUE VALET DROP-OFF
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE DOWNTOWN REGULATIONS LIMIT THE
 WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES FOR PORTE COCHERES TO 25 FEET IN
 WIDTH AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (FIGURE IV-22) NOT 30
 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. SECTION 94-111(O)(3)
 ALSO LIMITS CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS AND
 DRIVEWAYS TO NO WIDER THAN 25 FEET. REDUCE THE OPENING
 WIDTH TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENT.
  
 8) THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE
  
 A. REVISED COMMENT: THE PRICE TO REMOVE A METERED
 PARKING SPACE IS CURRENTLY $16,800. THE CITY TRAFFIC
 ENGINEER HAS AUTHORITY OVER THE REMOVAL OF PARKING
 SPACES ALONG CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE SITE PLAN PROPOSES
 TO RECONFIGURE IRIS STREET DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE
 PROPOSED VALET GARAGE BY ADDING BULBOUTS, THE RELOCATED
 TROLLEY DROP-OFF AND SOME PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. THE
 START OF THE TROLLEY STOP IS REQUIRED TO BE 30 FEET
 FROM THE STOP BAR, WHICH IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE PLANS.
 BASED ON THIS STARTING POINT, THE TROLLEY PARKING SPACE
 DEPTH (40 FEET ALONG THE CURB) AND AN AREA TO SEPARATE
 THE PARKED CARS FROM THE TROLLEY PARKING, IT APPEARS
 THAT ONLY TWO PARKING SPACES WILL BE ABLE TO BE
 INSTALLED. THE IRIS STREET CONFIGURATION, TO INCLUDE
 THE NUMBER OF SPACES THAT REQUIRE PAYMENT, REQUIRES
 ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION WITH PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
 STAFF AND THE APPLICANT AND A SET OF PLANS.
 B. CONDITION: THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES
 BUILDINGS ON SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30
 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE (REQ. 132.3
 FEET). THE ACTIVE USE ALONG SAPODILLA AVENUE (PROVIDED
 134 FEET) IS PREDICATED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER ABUTTING
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE
 ZLDR. THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE (PROPOSED DREYFOOS HALL
 PLAZA) IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL ADA
 REQUIREMENTS AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT IN ORDER TO
 MEET THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS. IF THE DREYFOOS HALL
 PLAZA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AT THAT
 TIME, THEN THE GARAGE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
 ACTIVE USES.
 C. REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE
 ADDITIONAL CURB CUT FOR THE VALET INGRESS/EGRESS ON
 IRIS STREET (STAFF NOTES THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING A
 WAIVER). THIS ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE
 TO THE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN
 SAFETY SINCE MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE
 VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN CONFLICTS. THE RESPONSE STATES THAT
 THIS ACCESS POINT IS FOR VALETS TO EXIT THE SITE AND
 BRING VEHICLES BACK FOR PICK-UP VIA THE SAPODILLA
 AVENUE ENTRANCE. THIS PRESENTS TWO ISSUES:
 1. DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-485(M) - ALL
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENT AND MANEUVERING THAT MAY BE REQUIRED
 TO UTILIZE OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE
 RETAINED ON-SITE. PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL NOT BE
 UTILIZED TO ALLOW OR ENHANCE MOVEMENT OR MANEUVERING.
 2. THIS THEN WOULD REQUIRE THAT THE PATRON PICKING UP
 THE VEHICLE TO DRIVE THROUGH THE GARAGE AND EXIT ONTO
 IRIS STREET. THIS IS LEFT OUT OF ALL THE PROJECT
 DESCRIPTIONS. MIXING VALET AND PATRON, ESPECIALLY
 ELDERLY (62 YEAR OLD AVERAGE AGE), VEHICLE OPERATION IN
 A PARKING GARAGE IS NOT A SAFE SITUATION. A CIRCULATION
 PLAN IS REQUIRED.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE PLANS CALL OUT VALET INGRESS/EGRESS.
 IF A VALET IS DRIVING IN OFF OF IRIS STREET, THEN THE
 GARAGE IS USING CITY STREETS FOR MANEUVERING (WHERE IS
 THE VALET COMING FROM?). GIVEN THE TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE
 ARRIVING/DEPARTING SHOWS, ADDING VALETS TO THE CITY
 STREET NETWORK IS NOT A SAFE, DESIRABLE SITUATION. THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THE NEED FOR THE
 ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT TO "MAINTAIN EFFICIENT VALET
 FUNCTIONS". CITY STREETS ARE NOT INTENDED TO MAKE VALET
 FUNCTIONS EFFICIENT, THIS OPERATION IS TO BE KEPT
 ON-SITE.
 D. THE TERMINAL ISLAND STRIPING NEEDS TO EXTEND THE
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE.
  
 9) REVISED COMMENT: SHOW ALL OF THE LIGHT POLES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THEY DO NOT INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROPOSED OR EXISTING TREES.
  
 10) BICYCLE PARKING
  
 A. REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR DISTRIBUTING THE
 BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES; HOWEVER, SOME OF THE
 LOCATIONS DO NOT WORK DUE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS (DOORS
 AND PEDESTRIAN AREAS) AND NON-CODE COMPLIANT SITING.
 STAFF WILL E-MAIL REVISED LOCATIONS TO WGI.
 B. REVISED COMMENT: THE BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE CENTERED IN THE SIX FOOT DEEP BICYCLE PAD, NOT
 PUSHED TO THE FRONT OF THE PAD. THE BICYCLE PAD NEEDS
 TO SHOW THE CORRECT NUMBER OF RACK ELEMENTS AND THEIR
 DIMENSIONS ON THE PAD. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A
 MINIMUM REQUIRED 24 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE RACK
 ELEMENT AND THE EDGE OF THE PAD.
 C. SHOW THE EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING IN THE GARAGE AND
 INCLUDE THOSE ON THE DATA TABLE.
  
 11) REVISED COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE IS INADEQUATE.
 PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN FOR EACH LEVEL OF THE COHEN
 PAVILION SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE SEPARATION OF
 USES IN THE DRI AND THE DMP PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING.
 THE TABLE WILL NEED TO BE UPDATED AFTER STAFF REVIEW OF
 THE FLOOR PLAN. THE DIMENSIONS AND FENESTRATION
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRYFOOS HALL WERE
 NOT PROVIDED IN TABULAR FORM OR ON THE SITE OR
 ELEVATION PLANS, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE
 INFORMATION PRESENTED SUCH AS THE FACADES MEETING THE
 FENESTRATION PERCENTAGES (ONLY ROUGH CALCULATION DONE
 IN COMMENT #8B).
  
 12) REVISED COMMENT: CITY STAFF HAS GARNERED INPUT FROM
 THE TROLLEY OPERATOR AND HAS SOME MODIFICATIONS TO THE
 TROLLEY AREA THAT NEED TO BE DISCUSSED. SEE PREVIOUS
 COMMENT #8A REGARDING MEETING WITH STAFF REGARDING THE
 TROLLEY PARKING ALONG IRIS STREET.
  
 13) REVISED COMMENT: ACCESS EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR
 SIDEWALKS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ON THE KRAVIS
 CENTER PROPERTY UNLESS THE ROADWAY AUTHORITY REQUIRES
 THAT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED TO THE AUTHORITY.
 THE RESPONSE WAS THAT FDOT REQUIRES DEDICATIONS. AREAS
 TO BE DEDICATED MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 14) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN CALLS OUT THE SIGNAL
 POLE AT THE CORNER OF SAPODILLA AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD AS BEING RELOCATED. WHERE WILL THIS BE
 RELOCATED TOO? PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM FDOT OR PALM BEACH
 COUNTY THAT THIS SIGNAL POLE MAY BE RELOCATED.
  
 15) REVISED COMMENT: NO OVERALL DETAILED OVERALL
 SIGNAGE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE AREA WITHIN THE DRI.
 PLEASE INCLUDE THE LOCATION OF ALL THE FACADE SIGNAGE,
 WITH SIZES, ON THE SITE PLAN DRAWING.
  
 A. REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION ON THE DREYFOOS HALL PLAZA SIGN; HOWEVER,
 THERE WAS NO FRONT ELEVATION DRAWING THAT SHOWS HOW THE
 SIGN WILL LOOK ON THE RETAINING WALL. NOTE: THERE IS A
 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TEXT
 AND THE PLANS AS TO THE DIMENSION OF THE SIGN. THE
 DIMENSION PROVIDED ON THE PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE DMP
 ALLOWANCE, SUBJECT TO THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVING THE
 WAIVER TO RELOCATE THE SIGN OFF THE BUILDING. THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INCORRECTLY CITES THE SIGN TYPE
 AND CODE SECTION. STAFF IS REVIEWING THIS AS A FACADE
 SIGN BAND (PERMITTED 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT X 60% OF THE
 BUILDING FACADE). THE PLANS LIST A 36 INCH HIGH SIGN X
 50 FEET LONG, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 30% OF THE
 BUILDING FRONTAGE. THE WAIVER SHOULD BE TO RELOCATE THE
 SIGN TO THE PLAZA SINCE THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE
 BUILDING DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO MOUNTING A FACADE
 SIGN. PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 ACCORDINGLY. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER
 REQUEST (SUBJECT TO A REVIEW OF THE ELEVATION DRAWING).
 B. REVISED COMMENT: THE ARTIST ENTRANCE SIGN COMPLIES
 WITH THE DMP HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. THE SIGN BAND MAY
 OCCUPY A MAXIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF THE NORTH DRYFOOS
 HALL BUILDING FACADE (DIMENSION STILL NOT PROVIDED).
 THE PROPOSED SIGN LENGTH IS SHOWN AS 40 FEET.
 C. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAILS OF THE VALET
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. NO DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED FOR
 THESE SIGNS. THE SIGNS ARE SHOWN BLOCKING THE SIDEWALK,
 WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 D. NO NEW SIGNS ARE PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN
 THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY (EX. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD).
  
 16) CONDITION: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRI ADOPTING
 ORDINANCE, THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY SHALL BE PLATTED.
 THE PREVIOUS OVERSIGHT OF THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
 RESOLVE THE PLATTING REQUIREMENT.
  
 17) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLAN MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE
 CITYPLACE COURTYARDS AND CONDO ASSOCIATIONS PRIOR TO
 STAFF SCHEDULING THE CASE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. STAFF
 MUST BE MADE AWARE OF THE MEETING SO THAT A
 REPRESENTATIVE CAN ATTEND.
  
 18) CONDITION: PROVIDE CHARGING STATIONS FOR ELECTRIC
 CARS ON SITE.
  
 19) THE SCALE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SHOWN AT 1":50',
 WHEN IT SHOULD ACTUALLY BE 1":20'.
  
 20) THE "REQUIRED" LINE OF THE PARKING TABLE MUST USE
 THE CITY'S PARKING STANDARDS AS LISTED IN THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. YOU MAY NOT USE OTHER
 NUMBERS UNLESS THE PARKING TABLE IS AMENDED.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-12-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-12-2017 Time 09:28 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-10-2017 Time 13:23 Sent To  
Notes
2017-07-12 09:28:46PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E - 2ND PPRC REVIEW
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN - DREYFOOS HALL AND
 VALET GARAGE
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 JULY 28, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 12,
 2017), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION IN
 ITS CURRENT DESIGN AS THE PRESENTED PLANS DO NOT COMPLY
 WITH THE ALL OF THE SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT
 STANDARDS.
  
 2) SAPODILLA AVENUE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL
 STREET FRONTED BY ACTIVE USES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THE CITYPLACE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THE METROPOLITAN AND
 THE EVERNIA PLACE DEVELOPMENTS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
 VALET GARAGE WITH NO ACTIVE USE LINED, THE CONSTRUCTION
 OF A SURFACE VALET PARKING LOT AND THE WIDENING OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE TO ACCOMMODATE THE VALET ENTRANCE AND
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT EXIST ON
 SAPODILLA IS EXPECTED TO HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE
 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION
 LETTER FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SAPODILLA AVENUE
 INTERSECTION MODIFICATION AND ADDITIONAL WESTBOUND
 RIGHT TURN LANE. CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY FDOT MAY RESULT
 IN MODIFIED OR NEW COMMENTS. PLEASE REVIEW THE COMMENTS
 PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
 REGARDING THE ON AND OFF SITE CIRCULATION BOTH FOR
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THESE MAY
 AFFECT THE FDOT APPLICATION.
  
 4) PROVIDE A STUDY OR ANALYSIS DESIGNED BY A CERTIFIED
 PARKING EXPERT TO SHOW THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE NEED
 OF 278 ADDITIONAL VALET PARKING SPACES.
 A. HOW MANY TOTAL VALET SPACES ARE THERE GOING TO BE
 AFTER THE NEW SPACES ARE ADDED WHEN COMBINED WITH THE
 SPACES WHICH ALREADY EXIST?
 B. HOW OFTEN IS A SHOW AT THE COHEN PAVILION AND AT THE
 DREYFOOS HALL WHICH REQUIRE UTILIZATION OF TWO VALET
 FIELDS?
 5) WHAT IS THE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PHASING OF THE
 ITEMS COVERED BY THE LEVEL II AND LEVEL III
 APPLICATIONS?
  
 6) THE PORTION OF THE ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP OFF THAT
 IS LOCATED SOUTH WEST OF THE DRYFOOS HALL, THE DRYFOOS
 HALL EXTENSION, THE ARTIST ENTRANCE PORTE CORCHERE AND
 THE NEW VALET PARKING STRUCTURE ARE CURRENTLY COMBINED
 AS PART OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION.
 WHILE THESE MAY BE PROCESSED AS A LEVEL III, IF THESE
 VARIOUS ELEMENTS ARE PLANNED TO BE PART OF PHASED
 CONSTRUCTION, IT MAY BE BETTER TO REMOVE SOME OF THE
 ITEMS AND PROCESS THEM AS A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT SO THAT THE REVIEW PROCESS DOES NOT DELAY THE
 START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ENTRY DRIVE
 AND BUS DROP OFF RECONFIGURATION IS DIRECTLY TIED TO
 THE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE PROPOSED SOUTH OF THE COHEN
 PAVILION AS PART OF THE LEVEL II REVIEW. UNDER THE
 CURRENT APPLICATION PROCESS, THE LEVEL II IMPROVEMENTS
 MAY NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN REVIEW
 IS APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION AFTER A PUBLIC
 HEARING.
  
 7) PLAZA AREA
  
 A. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE NEW BASEMENT AREA IS THAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET AE121.
 B. THE CROSS SECTION DETAIL PAGE IS MISLABELED ON SHEET
 AE120 AS SHEET AE120 NOT AE121.
 C. THE LOWER PLAZA LEVEL FAILS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
 STREET TREES ADJACENT TO THE CURB AT 30 FOOT ON CENTER
 FOR ALL STREETS.
  
 8) LOBBY EXPANSION
  
 A. THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW
 DIFFERING NUMBERS FOR THE LOBBY EXPANSION. ALL PLANS
 MUST SHOW THE SAME VALUES.
  
 9) DRYFOOS HALL ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP OFF PORTE
 COCHERE - PLEASE REVIEW THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
 COMMENTS FOR CITY CONCERNS REGARDING THE LAYOUT AND
 CIRCULATION CONFLICTS FOR THE ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP
 OFF. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE SPECIFIC TO ITEMS NOTED
 BY THE PLANNING STAFF WHICH MUST BE ADDRESSED IF THEY
 REMAIN ON THE PLANS AFTER SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSING THE
 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMENTS.
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS TO
 SHOW THAT FULL SIZED BUSSES AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN
 ENTER AND EXIT THIS AREA. --- THE ONLY AUTOTURN DRAWING
 THAT WAS PROVIDED WAS FOR A 45 FOOT BUS. THE PROVIDED
 AUTOTURN EXHIBIT DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE THAT BUSSES CAN
 NEGOTIATE THE SITE. IT REQUIRES UNNATURAL DRIVING AND
 NOT A SMOOTH TRANSITION AROUND CURVES AS WELL AS
 CLIPPING THE BOX OFFICE PARKING SPACES SOUTH OF THE
 PORTE COCHERE.
 B. WILL THE BOX OFFICE PARKING BE SIGNED AS "BOX OFFICE
 ONLY" OR DOES THIS PARKING BECOME OPEN PARKING DURING
 PERFORMANCES?
 C. 60 DEGREE STANDARD PARKING SPACES (8.5 FEET WIDE)
 REQUIRE A STALL DEPTH OF 19 FEET 10 INCHES NOT THE 18
 FOOT DEPTH PROVIDED. YOU ARE PROPOSING 9 FOOT WIDE
 PARKING SPACES AND THE ADA PARKING SPACE IS 12 FEET
 WIDE. THESE WIDER SPACES REQUIRE AN EVEN DEEPER STALL
 DEPTH TO KEEP A PORTION OF THE CAR FROM EXTENDING INTO
 THE DRIVE AISLE. CORRECT THE DIMENSIONS AND PROVIDE
 PARKING DETAILS FOR THE 60 DEGREE BOX OFFICE PARKING
 SPACES AT THE WIDTHS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 D. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF NEW CANOPIES BEING PROPOSED AS
 PART OF THIS APPLICATION. THERE ARE EXISTING CANOPIES
 THAT WILL REMAIN BETWEEN THE COHEN PAVILION AND THE
 DRYFOOS HALL. THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO MIRROR THE
 EXISTING CANOPIES IN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, BOTH THE ROOF
 AND THE COLUMNS. PLEASE ADDRESS AND INDICATE ON THE
 PLANS THAT THE NEW CANOPIES WILL MATCH THE EXISTING
 CANOPIES AND THE CLADDING OF THE BUILDING.
 E. THE DRYFOOS HALL ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP OFF PORTE
 COCHERE FAILS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED STREET TREES
 ADJACENT TO THE CURB AT 30 FOOT ON CENTER ALONG
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD.
  
 10) SECTION 94-113(D)(1) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRES THAT SIDEWALKS BE A
 MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. THE NEW SIDEWALKS
 ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, IRIS STREET AND SAPODILLA
 AVENUE ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS STANDARD.
  
 11) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES DIVISION THAT AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS ONLY
 REQUIRED FROM SAPODILLA AVENUE TO THE DRYFOOS HALL AND
 NOT FROM OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS WELL.
  
 12) SAPODILLA AVENUE VALET DROP-OFF
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE DOWNTOWN REGULATIONS LIMIT THE
 WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES FOR PORTE COCHERES TO 25 FEET IN
 WIDTH AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (FIGURE IV-22) NOT 40
 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. REDUCE THE OPENING
 WIDTH TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENT.
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION THAT THIS PARKING
 AREA DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ADA PARKING SPACE.
 C. THE REVISED PLANS SHOW AN EXIT TO THE SURFACE VALET
 LOT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE. NO EXIT IS PERMITTED. THE
 ALLOWANCE FOR A DROP OFF PORTE COCHERE FROM SAPODILLA
 AVENUE REQUIRES THAT THE NEXT DRIVEWAY BE LOCATED A
 MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM THE DROP OFF DRIVE (FIGURE
 IV-22).
  
 13) THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE
  
 A. THE SITE PLAN PROPOSES TO RECONFIGURE IRIS STREET
 DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE PROPOSED VALET GARAGE BY ADDING
 BULBOUTS TO FRAME SOME OF THE EXISTING PARALLEL PARKING
 SPACES. THE BULBOUTS REMOVE TWO METERED PARALLEL
 PARKING SPACES AND ONE PARALLEL ADA PARKING SPACE.
 PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE CITY'S PARKING
 DIVISION APPROVING THAT THE SPACES MAY BE REMOVED,
 INCLUDING WHAT THE COST FOR THE PERMANENT REMOVAL IS.
 IF THE PARKING DIVISION WILL PERMIT THE SPACES TO BE
 REMOVED, THEN YOU MUST PROVIDE A NOTORIZED AGREEMENT TO
 PAY ANY FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PERMANENT REMOVAL OF
 THE SPACES.
 B. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON
 SECONDARY STREETS TO BE SETBACK 16 FEET FROM THE BACK
 OF THE CURB. THE PROPOSED BULBOUTS DO NOT SET THE CURB
 LINE. THE CURB LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY THE PREDOMINANT
 CURB ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF IRIS STREET. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSION (MINIMUM 16 FEET) FROM
 THIS CURB LINE TO THE FACE OF THE PANELS MOUNTED TO THE
 PROPOSED GARAGE ON IRIS STREET. THE SAPODILLA AVENUE
 SETBACK
 C. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON
 SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 PERCENT OF
 THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE (REQ. 132.3 FEET). THE
 ACTIVE USE ALONG SAPODILLA AVENUE (PROVIDED 134 FEET)
 IS PREDICATED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER ABUTTING PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDR. PROVIDE
 WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DIVISION THAT THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE (PROPOSED
 DREYFOOS HALL PLAZA) COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL ADA
 REQUIREMENTS. IF IT MEETS THE ADA REQUIREMENTS, THEN
 THE SAPODILLA AVENUE FRONTAGE HAS MET THE ACTIVE USE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 D. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS WITH THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS OF THE
 GARAGE. THE GARAGE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CALCULATED FROM
 THE FINISHED GRADE AT THE EXTERIOR OR EACH FA?ADE.
 E. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY THAT THE ROOFTOP
 CANOPY PROVIDES AT LEAST 30 PERCENT COVERAGE OF THE
 ROOFTOP DECK.
 F. PROVIDE THE OVERHANG DIMENSION OF THE ROOFTOP
 CANOPY. THIS MAY NOT EXCEED THE HORIZONTAL ENCROACHMENT
 ALLOWANCES.
 G. THE MAXIMUM PARKING RAMP SLOPE IS PERMITTED AT SIX
 PERCENT. SHEET AE301 SHOWS A 6.2 PERCENT SLOPE, WHICH
 IS NOT PERMITTED.
 H. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL CURB CUT FOR
 THE VALET INGRESS/EGRESS ON IRIS STREET. THIS
 ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE TO THE SITE
 DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SINCE
 MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN
 CONFLICTS. THE KRAVIS CENTER NEEDS TO MANAGE THEIR
 SHOWS AND NOT USE IRIS STREET, A PUBLIC ROAD FOR THEIR
 VALET OPERATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT
 THE USE OF IRIS STREET WAS PERMITTED FOR USE BY THE
 VALET TO EXIT THE GARAGE TO RETURN IT INBOUND FROM
 SAPODILLA AVENUE (AS STATED IN THE RESPONSE) THERE IS
 NO SCENARIO WHERE THE VALET SHOULD BE ACCESSING THE
 GARAGE FROM IRIS STREET, SO A 24 FOOT OPENING IS NOT
 SUPPORTABLE.
 I. THE PROPOSED GARAGE NEEDS TO MIRROR THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS OF THE KRAVIS CENTER, FOR EXAMPLE
 THE STONE CLADDING AT THE BASE OF THE BUILDING (THIS
 CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE BUILDING PROPOSED FOR
 DEMOLITION).
 J. PROVIDE A TABLE ON THE ELEVATION PLANS TO VERIFY HOW
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE IV-4, FACADE ARTICULATION
 REQUIREMENTS, OF THE ZLDR ARE MET FOR THE PROPOSED
 GARAGE.
  
 14) ARTIST DROP-OFF
  
 A. PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE CURB TO THE ARTIST
 DROP-OFF PORTE COCHERE. REMEMBER THAT IT IS REQUIRED TO
 MEET THE 16 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE BUILDING ENVELOPE.
  
 15) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE HOW THE PROPOSED NEW
 DEVELOPMENT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ENERGY CONSERVATION
 MEASURES REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12, EXHIBIT D.
 THERE IS A SPECIFIC LIST OF REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED IN
 THE ORDINANCE WHICH MUST BE ADDRESSED.
  
 16) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC
 PLANS FOR THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. ANY PROPOSED LIGHT POLES
 MAY NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PLACEMENT OF TREES.
  
 17) BICYCLE PARKING
  
 A. THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT THE WAVE TYPE BICYCLE RACK.
 PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED
 CITY MODELS. NOTE: THE CITY WILL ACCEPT ALTERNATIVE
 BICYCLE PARKING RACKS THAT ARE COMPLIMENTARY TO THE
 BUILDING USE IF THEY ARE DESIGNED TO ALLOW BICYCLES TO
 BE CORRECTLY SECURED TO THEM. ALTERNATIVE RACKS COULD
 BE IN THE SHAPE OF A MUSIC INSTRUMENT, THE
 THALIA/MELPOMENE MASKS, OR A MUSIC NOTE. STAFF IS
 WILLING TO DISCUSS CREATIVE BICYCLE RACK OPTIONS.
 B. BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE
 SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485(Q)(2), NOT
 HIDDEN AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.
 C. THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE BICYCLE PAD
 DIMENSIONS AND RACKS IN CONFORMANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS
 AS WELL AS PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET SHOWING THE ACTUAL
 PAD AND RACK DIMENSIONS.
  
 18) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE IS INADEQUATE.
 IT FAILS TO PROVIDE SUCH AS TOTAL BUILDING AREA, LOT
 COVERAGE, OPEN SPACE, ETC. FOR THE DRI PORTION OF THE
 SITE INDEPENDENT OF THE DMP PORTION OF THE SITE. THE
 ADDITIONAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS TABLE FAILS TO PROVIDE
 THE INFORMATION FOR ALL FRONTAGES. ADDITIONALLY, THE
 TABLE MUST INCLUDE THE CALCULATIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRESENTED SUCH AS THE FACADES
 MEETING THE FENESTRATION PERCENTAGES.
  
 19) CITY STAFF HAS CONTACTED THE TROLLEY OPERATOR TO
 DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY OF USING THE ARTIST DROP-OFF
 AS A TURNAROUND LOCATION. STAFF WILL NOT BE MOVING THE
 APPLICATION FORWARD WITHOUT A SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION
 TO THE TROLLEY TURNAROUND.
  
 20) ACCESS EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALKS AND
 RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY
 UNLESS THE ROADWAY AUTHORITY REQUIRES THAT THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED TO THE AUTHORITY.
  
 21) THE SITE PLAN CALLS OUT THE SIGNAL POLE AT THE
 CORNER OF SAPODILLA AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS
 BEING RELOCATED. WHERE WILL THIS BE RELOCATED TOO?
 PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM FDOT OR PALM BEACH COUNTY THAT
 THIS SIGNAL POLE MAY BE RELOCATED.
  
 22) REPEAT COMMENT: NO OVERALL DETAILED OVERALL SIGNAGE
 PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE AREA WITHIN THE DRI.
  
 A. PROVIDE GRAPHICS, WITH DIMENSIONS, ON THE PLANS TO
 SHOW THE DREYFOOS HALL PLAZA SIGN.
 B. THE SIGN CALCULATIONS FOR THE ARTIST ENTRANCE SIGN
 WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE SIGN BAND MAY OCCUPY A MAXIMUM
 OF 60 PERCENT OF THE NORTH DRYFOOS HALL BUILDING FACADE
 (DIMENSION NOT PROVIDED).
 C. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAILS OF THE SAPODILLA VALET
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. THESE SIGNS MUST BE SITED TO AVOID
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
  
 23) THE DRI PERMITS WAIVERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 94-207 OF THE ZLDR. STAFF DOES NOT FIND THAT THE
 REQUESTED WAIVERS PROVIDE FOR INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING
 AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES THAT CREATE MORE DESIRABLE
 AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY.
  
 24) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRI ADOPTING
 ORDINANCE, THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY SHALL BE PLATTED.
 THE PREVIOUS OVERSIGHT OF THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
 RESOLVE THE PLATTING REQUIREMENT.
  
 25) THE PLAN MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE CITYPLACE
 COURTYARDS AND CONDO ASSOCIATIONS PRIOR TO STAFF
 SCHEDULING THE CASE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. STAFF MUST BE
 MADE AWARE OF THE MEETING SO THAT A REPRESENTATIVE CAN
 ATTEND.
  
 26) HAS CONSIDERATION BEEN MADE TO PROVIDING CHARGING
 STATIONS FOR ELECTRIC CARS ON SITE?
  
 27) YOU MAY NOT RESERVE DRI CAPACITY FOR THE OUTDOOR
 THEATER THAT IS BEING DEMOLISHED.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-10-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-10-2016 Time 13:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-10-2016 Time 13:00 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-10 13:00:56PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN ? DREYFOOS HALL AND
 VALET GARAGE
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 AUGUST 26, 2016, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 OCTOBER 18, 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 10,
 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION AS
 SUBMITTED. NOT ONLY DOES IT NOT COMPLY WITH THE SITE
 DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BUT IT ALSO
 FAILS TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO PROVIDE A
 FULL ANALYSIS OF THE REQUEST. STAFF HAS DONE ITS BEST
 TO PROVIDE AS COMPREHENSIVE AS POSSIBLE COMMENTS BASED
 ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED.
  
 2) STAFF STRONGLY ENCOURAGES THE ENTIRE SITE BEING
 BROUGHT UNDER ONE SET OF REGULATIONS, EITHER WITHIN THE
 CITYPLACE DRI OR THE DMP.
  
 3) STAFF IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE DESIGN OF THE NEW PLAZA
 AREA AT THE CORNER OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND
 SAPODILLA AVENUE.
 A. SHEET AE201 AND THE RENDERINGS PROVIDE INSUFFICIENT
 DETAIL FOR STAFF TO REVIEW. CROSS SECTIONS AND
 ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE, WITH DIMENSIONS, ARE
 REQUIRED.
 B. THE CIVIL PLANS FAIL TO SHOW THE ELEVATION POINTS
 FOR THE NEW PLAZA LAYOUT.
 C. THE HARDSCAPE PLANS, WHICH ARE ACTUALLY THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, FAIL TO DEFINE THE MATERIALS PROPOSED
 FOR THE PLAZA.
  
 4) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE NEW LOBBY EXPANSION
 AT A BIGGER SCALE, WITH DIMENSIONS.
  
 5) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE AND THE
 CROSS SECTIONS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, FOR THE DRYFOOS
 HALL PORTE COCHERE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THIS SHALL
 PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEIGHT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
 A. PROVIDE THE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS TO SHOW THAT FULL
 SIZED BUSSES AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN ENTER AND EXIT
 THIS AREA.
 B. WILL THIS AREA BE USED FOR VALET?
 C. PLEASE DESCRIBE HOW THE BOX OFFICE PARKING IS
 ACCESSED BY SOMEONE WISHING TO PURCHASE A TICKET. THE
 ARROWS INDICATE THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO DRIVE UNDER THE
 BUS DROP-OFF AREA PRIOR TO ACCESSING THE PARKING.
 D. THE SITE PLAN AND THE PAVING PLAN (SHEET PD-1) DO
 NOT SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ADA PARKING
 SPACE TO THE BUILDING.
 E. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND PARKING DETAILS FOR THE
 BOX OFFICE PARKING SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT 90 DEGREE
 PARKING SPACES REQUIRE A 24 FOOT DRIVE AISLE.
  
 6) THE SIDEWALK ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD THAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE KRAVIS CENTER SITE ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE IS SHOWN AT FIVE (5) FEET IN
 WIDTH. THIS SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET
 IN WIDTH AS IT IS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 7) PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD AND SAPODILLA AVENUE TO THE DREYFOOS HALL.
  
 8) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE AND THE
 CROSS SECTIONS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, FOR THE SAPODILLA
 AVENUE VALET DROP-OFF. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THIS SHALL
 PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEIGHT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
 A. SHOW STACKING DIMENSIONS FOR THE ENTRY CONDITION.
 THERE SHALL BE NO BACK-UP INTO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
 INTO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD FROM THE LEFT TURN LANE.
 B. THE LANES SHALL NOT BE 12 FEET WIDE AT THE ENTRANCE
 TO THE SITE. THIS IS EXCESSIVE AND DOES NOT PROMOTE
 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AS REQUIRED BY THE SITE DESIGN
 CRITERIA. ADDITIONALLY, THE DOWNTOWN REGULATION LIMITS
 THE WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES TO 25 FEET IN WIDTH;
 THEREFORE, THERE MAY ONLY BE TWO DRIVEWAY OPENINGS. THE
 LANES MAY BE INCREASED TO THREE AND WIDENED ONCE
 FURTHER ON THE SITE.
 C. THE THREE EXIT LANES FROM THE VALET AREA DO NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE SITE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ACCESS TO
 PUBLIC WAYS AND THE DESIGN OF ACCESS AND EGRESS DRIVES.
 THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL ONLY PERMIT TWO EXIT
 LANES SINCE THREE EXIT LANES WILL CREATE CONFUSION AND
 BE UNSAFE FOR PEOPLE EXITING THE SITE DEPENDING ON
 WHICH LANE THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN THEIR VEHICLE AND THEIR
 ULTIMATE DESTINATION AND THE NON-KRAVIS CENTER USERS OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE.
 D. THE SURFACE (VALET?) LOT SHALL BE SETBACK 16 FEET
 PLUS A 5 (FIVE) FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER (21 FEET TOTAL)
 FROM THE CURB IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE
 ADJOINING CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REGULATIONS. WILL THIS
 LOT EVER BE USED FOR SELF-PARK OPERATIONS? PROVIDE
 VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION
 THAT THIS PARKING AREA DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ADA PARKING
 SPACE.
 E. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE VALET INGRESS/EGRESS ON
 IRIS STREET? WHAT IS THE WIDTH? WHY DOES IT NEED TO BE
 TWO-WAY IF IT IS ONLY FOR VALETS? THE PROPOSED VALET
 DRIVE ONTO IRIS STREET EXCEEDS THE TWO (2) CURB CUTS
 PERMITTED BY SECTION 94-313(1) AND THE SEPARATE OF
 ACCESS POINTS CRITERIA IN SECTION 94-313(2). THIS
 ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE TO THE SITE
 DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SINCE
 MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN
 CONFLICTS.
 F. IF THE VALET DRIVE ONTO IRIS STREET IS ABSOLUTELY
 NECESSARY, THEN EITHER REMOVE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS
 IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST TO ELIMINATE EXISTING CURB CUTS
 OR REDESIGN THE VALET EGRESS ROUTE TO COMBINE IT WITH
 THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY.
  
 9) THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE IS NOT DESIGNED IN
 CONFORMANCE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE ADJOINING
 CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REGULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE
 SITE DESIGN CRITERIA.
 A. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON
 SECONDARY STREETS TO BE SETBACK 16 FEET FROM THE BACK
 OF THE CURB.
 B. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON
 SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 PERCENT OF
 THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE.
  
 10) NO DETAILS ON THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE WERE
 PROVIDED.
 A. PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR EACH LEVEL
 OF THE GARAGE.
 B. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS WITH THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS OF THE
 GARAGE.
 C. PROVIDE DETAILS, INCLUDING SECTION DRAWINGS, FOR THE
 PROPOSED GARAGE CLADDING.
 D. IF PROVIDED, PROVIDE HOW ROOFTOP PARKING COMPLIES
 WITH SECTION 94-111(Q)
  
 13) HOW WILL PEOPLE KNOW TO USE THE SAPODILLA VALET?
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS MAY NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD MEDIAN OR IN OTHER RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
 14) PROVIDE HOW THE PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL
 COMPLY WITH THE ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES REQUIRED
 BY ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12, EXHIBIT D.
  
 15) PROVIDE LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE NEW
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 16) BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE
 SITE BASED ON THE NUMBER OF NEW PARKING SPACES. PROVIDE
 DETAILS.
  
 17) PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR EACH
 LEVEL OF THE GARAGE, BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED.
 A. THE 3RD FLOOR PLAN SHALL SHOW HOW THE RAMP WILL
 ATTACH TO THE GARAGE WALL GIVEN THE EXISTING SUPPORT
 COLUMNS.
 B. THE PARKING LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEET SP.1, INCLUDING
 DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW AND PARKING SPACE ANGLE, IS
 OPPOSITE THE WAY IT CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR THE OUTER
 PARKING SPACES. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE RESTRIPE OF EACH
 FLOOR.
 C. THE PLANS SHALL NOT MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THE RAMP IS
 COMING OFF OF THE 5TH FLOOR OF THE GARAGE.
  
 18) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND SECTION DRAWINGS, INCLUDING
 DIMENSIONS, FOR THE NEW GARAGE RAMP AND SCREENING,
 PARTICULARLY WHERE IT CONNECTS TO THE 3RD FLOOR WITHIN
 THE DRI. INSUFFICIENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 19) THE SITE DATA TABLE IS INADEQUATE. IT FAILS TO
 PROVIDE SUCH AS TOTAL BUILDING AREA, LOT COVERAGE, OPEN
 SPACE, ETC.
  
 18) THERE ARE 24 ADA PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR 1,411
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 20) PLEASE ADDRESS THE REMOVAL OF THE TROLLEY STOP FROM
 THE SITE. THE TROLLEY SERVICE SERVES TO REINFORCE THE
 EFFICIENT MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE DOWNTOWN IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA FOR
 DOWNTOWN WEST PALM BEACH. THE DRI REQUIRES THAT
 DEVELOPERS COOPERATE WITH THE CITY TO LOCATE BUS, AND
 BY EXTENSION TROLLEY STOPS IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS.
 THE KRAVIS CENTER STOP HAS BEEN A KEY STOP AND
 TURN-AROUND LOCATION FOR THE 10 PLUS YEARS THE TROLLEY
 HAS BEEN IN OPERATION. HOW WILL THE KRAVIS CENTER
 ASSIST IN PROVIDING AN ALTERNATE STOP AND TURN-AROUND
 LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INCREASE TROLLEY HEADWAY TIMES?
  
 21) ACCESS EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALKS AND
 RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY.
  
 22) PLEASE NOTE THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION IS NOT EXEMPT
 FROM MEETING THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV.
 THE SECTION CITED (94-441) EXEMPTS AREAS OUTSIDE THE
 LIMITS OF WORK THAT CURRENTLY DO NOT MEET CODE FROM
 BEING REQUIRED TO MEET CODE. MANY AREAS SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK DO NOT COMPLY
 WITH CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 23) CONTRARY TO THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER, THERE IS NO
 OVERALL DETAILED OVERALL SIGNAGE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH
 THIS APPLICATION.
  
 24) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRI ADOPTING ORDINANCE, THE
 KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY SHALL BE PLATTED.
  
 25) HAS THIS PLAN BEEN PRESENTED TO THE CITYPLACE
 COURTYARDS AND CONDO ASSOCIATIONS?
  
 25) SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN.
  
 26) PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER FOR THE
 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SAPODILLA AVENUE INTERSECTION
 MODIFICATION.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved