City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z16070021

Plan Review Stops For Project Z16070021

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-10-2016		Cont ID
Sent By	KUDANG			Date	08-10-2016	Time	Rev Time	2.00
Received By				Date	08-10-2016	Time	Sent To	I

Notes

2016-08-10 11:58:44	PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000F
	KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL II SITE PLAN
	701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

	- CONTACT UYEN DANG @ (561) 494-1087

	1) ENGINEERING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE RAMP TO IRIS
	STREET PORTION OF THE APPLICATION.
	A. VEHICLES WILL BE TRAPPED AT THE RAMP AND CANNOT
	MANEUVER BACK TO TAMARIND AVE.
	B. THE PROPOSED RAMP IS TOO CLOSE TO THE EXISTING
	ENTRANCE.
	C. IF THERE IS A NEED TO ALLEVIATE TRAFFIC EXITING FROM
	THE 3RD FLOOR, WHY IS THERE A NEED FOR AN ON RAMP?
	D. PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS WITH DIMENSIONS FOR EACH LEVEL
	OF THE GARAGE.

	2) THE FOLLOWING ARE RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE
	CIRCULATION IN THE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE:
	A. PROVIDE PROPER ILLUMINATION, MANY LIGHT BULBS NEEDED
	TO BE SERVICED.
	B. UPDATE AND ADD MORE PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO SHOW THE
	DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW.
	C. BASED ON THE EXISTING DESIGN, THE VERY SLIGHT ANGLE
	PARKING AND LARGE AISLE WIDTH, IT IS DIFFICULT TO
	DETERMINE IF IT IS TWO-WAY OR ONE-WAY.
	D. USE LIGHTED ?SPACE AVAILABLE? SIGNS AT THE ENTRANCE
	AND ON EACH FLOOR.
	E. CONSIDER A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN TO REVERSE THE
	DIRECTION OF FLOW AT THE END OF AN EVENT.
	F. PROVIDE GARAGE AND DESTINATION SIGNING IN THE GARAGE
	TO DIRECT TRAFFIC TO I-95 OR PALM BEACH.
	G. CONSULT WITH A PARKING CONSULTANT THAT SPECIALIZES
	IN PARKING STRUCTURES.

	3) VALET OPERATIONS:
	A. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE THREE ENTER AND EXIT
	LANES AT THE VALET PARKING STRUCTURE WITH ONLY TWO
	SOUTH BOUND LANES ON SAPODILLA AVE. THE ENTRANCE AND
	EXIT SHALL BE
	LIMITED TO TWO EXIT ONLY LANES AT SAPODILLA AVE. IN
	ADDITION, THIS WILL ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR WIDENING ON
	SAPODILLA.
	B. PROVIDE A VALET CIRCULATION PLAN. IT IS NOT CLEAR
	WHERE THE VALET DROP OFF AND PICK UP ARE LOCATED.
	C. DIRECT VALET TRAFFIC FROM THE WEST TO TAMARIND AVE.
	AND IRIS ST. THIS WILL REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF U-TURN
	MOVEMENTS AT SAPODILLA AND OKEECHOBEE.

	4) PROVIDE BETTER CIRCULATION AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE TO
	ALLOW VALET DROP OFF IN ONE CIRCULAR MOTION.

	5) TRAFFIC:
	A. THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS OUTDATED AND SHOULD INCLUDE
	EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA
	AND THE CLOSURE AT EVERNIA AND DATURA.
	B. PROVIDE UPDATED COUNTS AND DISTRIBUTION AT ALL
	ENTRANCE AND EXITS TO INCLUDE VALET SERVICE.

Review Stop	ENG-P			ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	07-12-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	mkhan			Date	07-12-2017	Time	10:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mkhan			Date	07-12-2017	Time	10:27	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	11-17-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	11-17-2017	Time	10:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	11-17-2017	Time	10:32	Sent To

Notes

2017-11-17 10:35:17	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER PARKING RAMP Z16070021
	JULY 11, 2017

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION FOR
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE DMP CODE AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
	COMMENTS BASED ON THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION:

	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE SURVEY
	IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE MAKE
	CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO INDICATE THE
	CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
	RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE PHOENIX
	CANARIENSIS.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
	DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
	PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
	ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.

	2. SATISFIED THERE ARE MANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE
	TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE
	MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING
	RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
	DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
	PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
	ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.


	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
	LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
	SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
	THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
	PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.

	4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01
	REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
	PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS FOR THE DMP- 94-117 CULTURAL
	ARTS DISTRICT, INCLUDING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN TABLE IV-13.

	5. NO LONGER APPLIES TO REDESIGNED PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE
	LANDSCAPING ALONG THE RAMP IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	STREETSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION
	94-113 (D), (E), AND (F).

	6. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF
	LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
	PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
	INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
	AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
	ROOTS.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:

	9. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT DESTRUCTION OF THE
	LARGE LIVE OAK TREES ON SITE. THE INTENT OF THE DRI,
	THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AND THE TREE PROTECTION CODE
	IS TO RELOCATE THE HEALTHY LIVE OAKS ON SITE TO
	LOCATIONS WHERE THE BENEFITS OF THE MATURE CANOPY WILL
	BE MAXIMIZED FOR THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT MOBILITY STUDIES AND
	RECOMMENDATIONS.
	STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
	OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
	SAME CATEGORY.
	THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
	OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
	OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
	LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
	THE ADDITION OF THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE EXISTING
	PARKING GARAGE ALSO CAUSES A CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
	OAKS AND MAHOGANY THAT CAN BE DESIGNED TO AVOID REMOVAL
	OF EXISTING SHADE TREES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN AND LIGHTING PLAN SHALL BE REVISED TO
	ELIMINATE CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND LIGHT FIXTURES.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT
	TO THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
	MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-06-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	10-06-2017	Time	16:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	10-06-2017	Time	16:38	Sent To

Notes

2017-10-06 16:39:06	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER PARKING RAMP Z16070021
	OCTOBER 6, 2017

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION FOR
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE DMP CODE AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
	COMMENTS BASED ON THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION:

	1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE
	SURVEY IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
	PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO
	INDICATE THE CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE
	REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE
	PHOENIX CANARIENSIS.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
	DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
	PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
	ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
	THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	AND LIST. STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO REVIEW THE
	DISCREPANCIES.

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE ARE MANY DISCREPANCIES
	BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
	THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT TREES AND PALMS ARE
	BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
	DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
	PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
	ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
	THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	AND LIST.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
	LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
	SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
	THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
	PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.

	4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01
	REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
	PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS FOR THE DMP- 94-117 CULTURAL
	ARTS DISTRICT, INCLUDING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN TABLE IV-13.

	5. NO LONGER APPLIES TO REDESIGNED PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE
	LANDSCAPING ALONG THE RAMP IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	STREETSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION
	94-113 (D), (E), AND (F).

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
	PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
	INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
	AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
	ROOTS.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:

	9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT
	DESTRUCTION OF THE LARGE LIVE OAK TREES ON SITE. THE
	INTENT OF THE DRI, THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AND THE
	TREE PROTECTION CODE IS TO RELOCATE THE HEALTHY LIVE
	OAKS ON SITE TO LOCATIONS WHERE THE BENEFITS OF THE
	MATURE CANOPY WILL BE MAXIMIZED FOR THE PEDESTRIAN
	ENVIRONMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT MOBILITY STUDIES
	AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
	STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
	OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
	SAME CATEGORY.
	THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
	OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
	OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
	LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
	? THE ADDITION OF THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE
	EXISTING PARKING GARAGE ALSO CAUSES A CONFLICT WITH
	EXISTING OAKS AND MAHOGANY THAT CAN BE DESIGNED TO
	AVOID REMOVAL OF EXISTING SHADE TREES.
	STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVING TREES 11269, 11270,
	11274, 11295, OR RELOCATION OF TREES 11275 AND 11276.
	THIS APPEARS TO BE A LOADING AREA OFF THE RAMP. THESE
	TREES PROVIDE SCREENING FOR THE PARKING GARAGE AND NEED
	TO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
	? THE DESIGN OF THE SIDEWALK AND DISCUSSION OF ADDING
	PLANTING AREAS BETWEEN THE CURB AND SIDEWALK IS NOT
	REFLECTED ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. WEST OF THE
	OKEECHOBEE ENTRANCE SHOULD HAVE A PLANTING STRIP
	BETWEEN CURB AND SIDEWALK, AND EAST OF THE ENTRANCE AND
	ALONG SAPODILLA STREET CAN BE A CONTINUOUS PLANTING
	AREA INCLUDING THE TREES, AND COULD BE DESIGNED WITH
	THE ABILITY TO ABSORB STORMWATER RUNOFF. THE USE OF
	TREE GRATES SHOULD BE LIMITED ONLY TO AREAS WHERE THE
	ADDITIONAL TRAVEL SURFACE IS NEEDED FOR PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	07-11-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	07-11-2017	Time	16:41	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	07-11-2017	Time	16:41	Sent To

Notes

2017-07-11 16:42:00	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER PARKING RAMP Z16070021
	JULY 11, 2017

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION FOR
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE DMP CODE AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
	COMMENTS BASED ON THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION:

	1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE
	SURVEY IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
	PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO
	INDICATE THE CORRECT SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE
	REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE
	PHOENIX CANARIENSIS.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
	DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
	PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
	ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED THERE ARE MANY DISCREPANCIES
	BETWEEN THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
	THE MITIGATION CHART AS TO WHAT TREES AND PALMS ARE
	BEING RELOCATED, AND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE
	DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET TD1.02 THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE
	PLAN SHEET TD1.01. PLEASE CORRECT THE LIST TO INCLUDE
	ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.


	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE
	LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND
	SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN
	THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE
	PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED.

	4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01
	REGARDING ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND
	PROVIDE A DATA CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	REQUIRED CODE SECTIONS FOR THE DMP- 94-117 CULTURAL
	ARTS DISTRICT, INCLUDING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN TABLE IV-13.

	5. NO LONGER APPLIES TO REDESIGNED PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE
	LANDSCAPING ALONG THE RAMP IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	STREETSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION
	94-113 (D), (E), AND (F).

	6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING
	ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING.

	7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
	PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
	INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
	AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
	ROOTS.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/11/17:

	9. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT DESTRUCTION OF THE LARGE LIVE
	OAK TREES ON SITE. THE INTENT OF THE DRI, THE DOWNTOWN
	MASTER PLAN AND THE TREE PROTECTION CODE IS TO RELOCATE
	THE HEALTHY LIVE OAKS ON SITE TO LOCATIONS WHERE THE
	BENEFITS OF THE MATURE CANOPY WILL BE MAXIMIZED FOR THE
	PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECENT
	MOBILITY STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
	STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT RELOCATE THE LIVE
	OAK TREES TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALKS ON 30 FOOT CENTERS
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RATHER THAN ADD NEW TREES IN THE
	SAME CATEGORY.
	THE SIGN DESIGN FOR THE CORNER OF TAMARIND AND
	OKEECHOBEE WILL CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF ONE OF THE LIVE
	OAK TREES ALONG TAMARIND. PLEASE ADJUST THE DESIGN OR
	LOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF THE OAK.
	THE ADDITION OF THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE EXISTING
	PARKING GARAGE ALSO CAUSES A CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
	OAKS AND MAHOGANY THAT CAN BE DESIGNED TO AVOID REMOVAL
	OF EXISTING SHADE TREES.

	PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
	REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
	THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	08-08-2016	Time	15:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	08-08-2016	Time	15:42	Sent To

Notes

2016-08-08 15:43:14	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	PROJECT: KRAVIS CENTER PARKING RAMP Z16070021
	AUGUST 9, 2016

	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION FOR
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE DMP CODE AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
	COMMENTS BASED ON THE SUBMITTED INFORMATION:

	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT TREE SURVEY IDENTIFYING
	EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS
	TO THE TREE INVENTORY PLAN TO INDICATE THE CORRECT
	SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED,
	OR REMAIN. PALMS 147-151 ARE PHOENIX CANARIENSIS.

	2. THERE ARE MANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE
	INVENTORY PLAN, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE MITIGATION
	CHART AS TO WHAT TREES AND PALMS ARE BEING RELOCATED,
	AND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.

	3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH
	PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, AND SHOW COMPLIANCE
	WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING
	REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN THE CHART AS
	SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE PLANTS IS ALSO
	SUGGESTED.

	4. PLEASE REMOVE THE NOTE ON SHEET LP3.01 REGARDING
	ARTICLE XIV LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND PROVIDE A DATA
	CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED CODE
	SECTIONS FOR THE DMP- 94-117 CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT,
	INCLUDING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
	FOUND IN TABLE IV-13.

	5. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE RAMP IN
	COMPLIANCE WITH STREETSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
	IN SECTION 94-113 (D), (E), AND (F).

	6. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.

	7. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
	INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
	WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
	FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.

	8. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
	EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
	REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
	THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-09-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	lle			Date	08-09-2016	Time	17:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lle			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2016-08-09 17:49:32	FROM: LAURA LE, PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER
	AUGUST 9, 2016

	THIS IS A CURSORY REVIEW OF THE 60% DESIGN - WATER &
	SEWER PLAN SHEET WS-1:

	1. CALL OUT EXISTING UTILITY PIPELINES AND SERVICES,
	SIZE AND MATERIAL INCLUDE PIPE CONNECTIVITY
	2. SHOW THE EXISTING 20-INCH WM THAT IS TO BE REMOVED
	ON IRIS STREET
	3. ADD THE PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN
	REPLACEMENT/OFFSET ON IRIS STREET. INCLUDE APPLICABLE
	CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS - PIPE RESTRAINTS, VALVE, ETC.
	4. ADD ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ON IRIS STREET

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	11-17-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	11-17-2017	Time	14:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	11-03-2017	Time	14:40	Sent To

Notes

2017-11-17 14:47:37	1. SATISFIED. DAC VARIANCE FOR SCREEN SUBMITTED BY
	APPLICANT. DAC APPROVAL OF REQUEST NEEDED BEFORE FINAL
	SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
	2. SATISFIED.
	3. SATISFIED. - SECURITY GATE PROVIDED AT GROUND LEVEL.
	PLEASE REVISE SHEET AE 405 TO REFLECT THE PROPOSED
	SECURITY GATES.
	4. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS.
	5. SATISFIED.
	6. AND 7. SATISFIED. DAC APPROVAL OF REQUEST NEEDED
	BEFORE FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
	8. FURTHER DISCUSSION ON SIGNS NECESSARY.
	9. SATISFIED - INFOR ON ELECTRONIC SIGN MAINTAIN WITH
	NOT INDICATING THE UNGOING CRC.
	10. STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:
	A. SATISFIED- 12' WIDE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK PROVIDED
	WITH BUFFER ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
	B. SATISFIED - PLANTING STRIP PROVIDED.
	11. NOT SATISFIED . PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIGHTING LEVEL
	ALONG ALL STREET. CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 0.6
	FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK OF CURB 1 FOOT
	ABOVE THE SIDEWALK LEVEL. SOME AREAS INDICATE A LOWER
	LEVEL THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED. UTILIZING THE FIXTURES
	UTILIZED ELSEWHERE ON THE KRAVIS PROPERTY IS
	ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SPECS FOR SUCH
	FIXTURE.THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED LIGHTING POLES
	SHALL BE ADJUSTED. PLEASE RELOCATE THE POLES TO THE
	PLANTING STRIP ADJACENT TO THE STREET, BUT ENSURE THE
	POLES ARE NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE TREES ROOT BALLS.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
	12. SATISFIED - FINAL APPROVAL FROM ENG NEEDED FOR
	SAPODILLA CROSSING.
	13. NOT SATISFIED - FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH ENG NEEDED.
	COMMENT FROM 10/7/17:PLEASE PROVIDE BULB OUTS AT
	TAMARIAND AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE TO REDUCE THE
	PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE.
	14. SATISFIED . APPLICANT CONCERN WITH TRUCK TURNING,
	BULB OUT NOT INCORPORATED. COMMENT FROM 10/7/17: PLEASE
	PROVIDE A BULB OUT AT IRIS STREET AND TAMARIND
	CAPTURING THE ON-STREET PARKING AT IRIS ST.
	NEW COMMENTS 11/17/17
	15. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FACADES OF THE EXISTIGN GARAGE
	INCLUDIGN THE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED SCREEN.
	16. PLEASE INCLUDE DRAWINGS WITH THE PROPOSED SIGN ON
	THE EXISTING GARAGE.
	FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTAC ANA MARIA
	APONTE AT 561-822-1439.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-13-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	10-13-2017	Time	13:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	09-22-2017	Time	13:56	Sent To

Notes

2017-10-13 15:07:05	1. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR DAC VARIANCE
	REQUEST REGARDING ENCROACHMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT
	INTO MINIMUM REQUIERED SETBACK. SCREEN IS JUS 1"-2"
	INTO THE SETBACK, IS THERE A WAY TO COMPLY AND AVOID
	THE VARIANCE?
	2. SATISFIED.
	3. WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH THE GROUND LEVEL SPACE
	BENEATH THE SCREEEN? THERE IS NO LANDSCAPE OR GROUND
	COVERING INDICATED. THERE IS A LARGE LEFT OVER SPACE
	ALONG THE WEST ELEVATION THAT MAY TURN INTO A HIDING
	AREA IF NOT ADDRESSED.
	4. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS.
	5. PLEASE SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENT REGARDING THE REMOVAL
	OF SOME TREES FOR THE SERVCE ENTRANCE. EXISTING TREES
	CURRENTLY SCREEN THE GARAGE AND THEY SHALL BE MAINTAIN
	AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
	6. AND 7. PLEASE SUBMIT APPLICATION FOR A DAC VARIANCE
	REQUEST FOR SIGN.
	8. FURTHER DISCUSSION ON SIGNS NECESSARY.
	9. DUE TO THE RELATION BETWEEN THE PLAZA AT TAMARIND
	AND OKEECHOBEE AND THE SIGN CODE CHANGE, THE SPECIFIC
	DETAILS ON THIS PLAZA SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THIS
	DESIGN.
	10. STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:
	A. SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT SATISFIED. BASED ON
	DISCUSSION AT THE JULY 27, 17 MEETING, A LANDSCAPE
	BUFFER WAS SUGGESTED ALONG THE OKEECHOBEE CURB BETWEEN
	TAMARIND AND THE WESTERN CURB CUT. SUBMITTED DRAWINGS
	ONLY INCLUDE THE 12' WIDE MULTIPURPOSE PATH BUT NOT THE
	BUFFER. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE BUFFER TO BE ADDED TO
	PROTECT THE PEDESTRIANS. IF NEEDED THE MULTIPURPOSE
	PATH CAN BE REDUCED TO 10' AND THE BUFFER COULD BE 2'
	IN WITH.
	B. TREES PROPOSED BETWEEN THE WESTERN CURB CUT AND
	SAPODILLA AVENUE ALONG OKEECHOBEE SHALL BE ON A
	PLANTING STRIP, NOT TREE GRATES. LEAVE TREE ON TREE
	GRATES THE ONES CLOSER TO THE SAPODILLA INTERSECTION IF
	NEEDED.
	11. APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE
	LIGHTING ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
	12. PLEASE ADJUST THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT SAPODILLA
	AND OKEECHOBEE TO PROVIDE A BETTER CROSSING FOR
	PEDESTRIANS (SEPARATED ADA RAMPS MAY BE NEEDED)PLEASE
	DISCUSS WITH ENGINEERING DEPT.
	13. PLEASE PROVIDE BULB OUTS AT TAMARIAND AVENUE AND
	OKEECHOBEE TO REDUCE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DISTANCE.
	14. PLEASE PROVIDE A BULB OUT AT IRIS STREET AND
	TAMARIND CAPTURING THE ON-STREET PARKING AT IRIS ST.
	FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTAC ANA MARIA
	APONTE AT 561-822-1439.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	07-12-2017			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	07-12-2017	Time	12:34	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2017-07-12 12:37:13	1. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED SCREENS AND
	SUPPORT COLUMNS IN RELATION TO PROPERTY LINE AND THE
	BACK OF CURB TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SETBACK
	REQUIREMENTS.
	2. PROPOSED CORRUGATED METAL CLADDING IS NEGATIVELY
	IMPACTING THE ALREADY NON-CONFORMING ACTIVE USE
	REQUIREMENT ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE AND IRIS STREET.
	STAFF SUGGESTS A TRANSPARENT ELEMENT BE MAINTAINED AT
	THE GROUND LEVEL TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING INTERACTION
	BETWEEN THE ACTIVITY INSIDE THE GARAGE AND THE OUTSIDE.
	3. PLEASE INDICATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED SCREEN ON
	THE EXISTING GARAGE PLANTERS. EXISTING GARAGE PLANS DO
	NOT SHOW ANY PLANTERS.
	4. PLEASE COORDINATE A MEETING WITH PLANNING AND
	ENGINEERING TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE CIRCULATION PATTERN
	PROPOSED ON THE VEHICULAR USE AREA ADJACENT TO
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. STAFF HAS CONCERNS REGARDING
	CIRCULATION PATTERN, CONFLICT POINTS, MARKINGS,
	ADDITIONAL DECELERATION LANE PROPOSED AND OTHERS.
	5. THE PROPOSED RAMP FROMT HE GARAGE IS REMOVIGN
	EXISTING VEGETATION. WILL THE RAMP BE VISIBLE FROMT THE
	STREET? ANY VEGETATION PROPOSED TO SCREEN THE SIDE OF
	THE RAMP?
	SIGNS:
	6. PLEASE CLARIFY THE REQUESTED VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN
	CODE SECTION 94-407.
	7. PROPOSED SIGN ON THE PARKING GARAGE MAY BE
	CONSIDERED AN IDENTITY SIGN BUT IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 100
	SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.
	8. PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL THE SIGNS IN THE COMPLEX.
	9. PROPOSED LARGE MONUMENT SIGN AT TAMARIND AVENUE IS
	CREATING A LARGE ?PLAZA? BUT NO PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES.
	IT IS ALSO REMOVING ONE LARGE OAK JUST TO INSTALL A
	SIGN. SIGN SHALL BE RELOCATED TO PRESERVE THE LARGE
	TREE.
	STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:
	10. THE CITY IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON MAKING OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY. THE SCALE OF THIS
	PROJECT JUSTIFIES SOME MODIFICATION TO THE CURRENT
	CONFIGURATION OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD AS FOLLOWS:
	A.MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH SHALL BE 8 FEET CLEAR AND
	PEDESTRIANS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CARS ON ADJACENT
	TRAVEL LANES.
	B.PEDESTRIAN SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE TRAVEL LINE BY
	A PLANTING AREA OR STREET TREES PLANTED IN GRATES OR
	PLANTING AREAS DEPENDING ON THE CONDITIONS.
	C. THE FOLLOWING DESIGN SUGGESTED: A) BETWEEN TAMARIND
	AND WESTERN CURB CUT INSTALL A CONTINUOUS PLANTING AREA
	WITH LOW PLANTS NEXT TO THE CURB, MINIMUM 8? SIDEWALK
	AND RELOCATED LARGE SHADE TREES ON EDGE OF RETENTION
	AREA. B) BETWEEN WESTERN CURB CUT AND SAPODILLA INSTALL
	SHADE TREES NEXT TO THE CURB IN TREE GRATES AND A MIN.
	8? SIDEWALK (1 FOOT OF THE TREE GRATE CAN BE COUNTED IN
	THE MIN. SIDEWALK WIDTH).
	11. PEDESTRIAN STREET LIGHTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD TO ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL
	COMFORT AND SAFETY. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY ON
	SPECIFIC FIXTURE AND POLE.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-10-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	08-10-2016	Time	10:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	08-10-2016	Time	10:52	Sent To

Notes

2016-08-10 12:56:43	PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000F
	KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL II SITE PLAN ? PARKING GARAGE RAMP
	TO IRIS STREET
	701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
	(5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 10,
	2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
	FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE RAMP TO IRIS
	STREET PORTION OF THE APPLICATION. NOT ONLY DOES IT NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE DOWNTOWN MASTER
	PLAN (DMP), BUT STAFF FEELS THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS
	THAT WOULD NOT REQUIRE THE ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF
	A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SO PEOPLE COULD EXIT A GARAGE
	FASTER.

	2) PROVIDE A REPORT FROM A CONSULTANT, WHO SPECIALIZES
	IN PARKING CONSULTING SERVICES WITH EXPERTISE IN
	PARKING GARAGE DESIGN, WHO HAS STUDIED THE GARAGE
	OPERATIONS AND EVALUATED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE GARAGE
	FUNCTIONALITY.

	3) STAFF STRONGLY ENCOURAGES THE ENTIRE SITE BEING
	BROUGHT UNDER ONE SET OF REGULATIONS, EITHER WITHIN THE
	CITYPLACE DRI OR THE DMP.

	4) PLEASE NOTE THAT PB1000F IS A LEVEL II SITE PLAN
	REVIEW FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE RAMP WHICH IS LOCATED
	OUTSIDE OF THE CITYPLACE DRI AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF
	THE ENTRY DRIVE SOUTH OF THE COHEN PAVILION. THE SMALL
	PORTION OF THE RAMP WHICH IS PHYSICALLY CONNECTED TO
	THE GARAGE IS WITHIN THE CITYPLACE DRI BOUNDARY AND
	REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION ACTION AS A LEVEL III SITE
	PLAN.

	5) A RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT APPLICATION IS REQUIRED
	TO REVIEW THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE IRIS STREET
	ABANDONMENT AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF TAMARIND AVENUE.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS ARE
	DISCOURAGED WITHIN THE DMP AND ARE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL
	REVIEW BY THE DAC. THE ABANDONMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH
	CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE VII. THIS APPLICATION CANNOT BE
	FINALIZED UNLESS THE ROADWAY IS ABANDONED.

	6) THE RAMP DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRED CULTURAL
	ARTS DISTRICT SECONDARY STREET SETBACK OF 16 FEET FROM
	THE BACK OF THE CURB FOR IRIS STREET OR THE NUMBER OF
	CURB CUTS PERMITTED BY SECTION 94-313(1). THESE REQUIRE
	A VARIANCE APPROVAL FROM DAC ? NO APPLICATION
	SUBMITTED. THIS APPLICATION CANNOT BE FINALIZED UNLESS
	THE DAC APPROVES THE VARIANCE REQUEST.

	7) PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR EACH LEVEL
	OF THE GARAGE, BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED.
	A. THE 3RD FLOOR PLAN SHALL SHOW HOW THE RAMP WILL
	ATTACH TO THE GARAGE WALL GIVEN THE EXISTING SUPPORT
	COLUMNS.
	B. THE PARKING LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEET SP.1, INCLUDING
	DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW AND PARKING SPACE ANGLE, IS
	OPPOSITE THE WAY IT CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR THE OUTER
	PARKING SPACES. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE RESTRIPE OF EACH
	FLOOR.
	C. THE PLANS SHALL NOT MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THE RAMP IS
	COMING OFF OF THE 5TH FLOOR OF THE GARAGE.

	8) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND SECTION DRAWINGS, INCLUDING
	DIMENSIONS, FOR THE NEW GARAGE RAMP AND SCREENING.
	INSUFFICIENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
	COMMENT.

	9) PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STAFF VISITED THE SITE AND
	BASED ON OUR OBSERVATIONS, NOTED THAT THERE ARE SOME
	INTERNAL ITEMS THAT COULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN AN
	IMMEDIATE TIME FRAME THAT MAY IMPROVE OPERATIONS.
	A. INSTALL ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE IN THE
	GARAGE. THE "PARK" LIGHTING SHOULD ILLUMINATE WHEN THE
	GARAGE IS FILLING TO DIRECT FOLKS TO PARKING SPACES.
	THE "EXIT" LIGHTING SHOULD ILLUMINATE WHEN IT IS TIME
	TO EMPTY THE GARAGE TO DIRECT PATRONS TOWARD THE EXIT.
	B. RESTRIPE ALL PARKING SPACES TO BE 90 DEGREES AND THE
	CENTER RAMP COULD BECOME ALL DOWN AT TIME OF EXIT, WITH
	BOTH SIDE AISLES FEEDING INTO IT (THIS IS REVERSE FLOW
	ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF GARAGE). ILLUMINATED SIGNS
	WOULD DIRECT PEOPLE THE CORRECT WAY AS WELL AS IN
	GARAGE PERSONNEL.
	C. IMPROVE THE OVERALL LIGHTING WITHIN THE GARAGE.

	10) IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS, THE INDICATED PROBLEM WAS THE
	POST SHOW FLUSH FROM THE GARAGE. WHY DOES THE RAMP NEED
	TO HAVE AN INGRESS DRIVE?

	11) IF A RAMP IS TO BE USED, IT SHOULD COME OFF THE
	SOUTH SIDE OF THE GARAGE. THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT
	SHALL OCCUR ON-SITE AND NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE
	OFF-SITE ROADWAY NETWORK. SECTION 94-111(G)(3) STATES
	THAT WHERE POSSIBLE, CIRCULATION RAMPS SHALL BE
	INTERNALIZED TO AVOID VISIBILITY OF THE RAMPS FROM THE
	STREET OR PUBLIC AREAS. THE PROPOSED RAMP LOCATION IS
	SUBSTANTIALLY IMPACTING THE PUBLIC REALM. VIEWS FROM
	BOTH EAST AND WEST DOWN IRIS STREET WILL BE OF A
	PARKING RAMP.

	12) THE CHANNELIZED NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE OFF OF
	TAMARIND AVENUE IS A DANGEROUS SITUATION. IF GIVES NO
	ABILITY FOR DRIVERS WHO ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE AREA TO
	BE ABLE TO SAFELY TRANSITION BACK INTO THE NORTHBOUND
	TRAFFIC FLOW IF THEY MISTAKENLY GET INTO THE RAMP LANE.
	THIS IS A DE FACTO ABANDONMENT OF A LANE OF TAMARIND
	AVENUE FOR KRAVIS CENTER USE ONLY.

	13) SAPODILLA AVENUE WAS DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL
	STREET AS PART OF THE CITYPLACE DEVELOPMENT. THE
	CLOSING OF EASTBOUND IRIS STREET FORCES ALL TRUCKS THAT
	ACCESS THE IRIS STREET LOADING DOCKS ONTO SAPODILLA
	AVENUE, WHICH DOES NOT REINFORCE THIS AS A RESIDENTIAL
	STREET.

	14) SINCE THERE ARE NO ACTIVE USES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
	THE GARAGE, A LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE
	GARAGE FRONTAGE, TO INCLUDE FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND
	TREES.

	15) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLANTERS ON THE SIDE
	OF THE GARAGE SHALL HAVE LANDSCAPE REPLANTED.

	16) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON THE "PARKING" SIGNS
	ON THE SCREEN WALL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SIGNS DO NOT
	APPEAR TO CONFORM TO DMP REQUIREMENTS.

	17) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE AND THE
	CROSS SECTIONS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, FOR THE COHEN
	PAVILION PORTE COCHERE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THIS SHALL
	PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEIGHT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
	A. WHO IS ANTICIPATED TO USE THE LOADING SPACES
	ADJACENT TO THE PORTE COCHERE?
	B. PLEASE SHOW THE STACKING DIMENSION FOR THE DROP-OFF
	TO THE SITE ENTRANCE.
	C. WHY ARE THE ENTRY AND EXIT DRIVES 25 FEET WIDE FOR A
	SINGLE LANE OF TRAFFIC? 20 FOOT WIDE IS MORE THAN
	ADEQUATE. THE NARROWER DRIVE AISLE PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN
	SAFETY AS REQUIRED BY THE SITE DESIGN CRITERIA.
	D. PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE EXIT TURNING RADIUS
	WORKS FOR THE CARS LEAVING THE PORTE COCHERE.
	E. HOW IS CONFLICT BETWEEN VALETS RETURNING CARS AND
	CARS LEAVING THE PORTE COCHERE HANDLED?
	F. WHY IS THE VALET RETURN LANE 15 FEET WIDE?
	G. PROVIDE THE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS TO SHOW THAT FULL
	SIZED BUSSES AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN MAKE THE TURN
	TO BOTH ENTER THE SITE AND TO TRAVERSE THE SITE AND
	MAKE THE TURN TO REACH THE EXIT ONTO OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD.

	18) PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD TO THE COHEN PAVILION

	19) PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER FOR THE
	MODIFICATIONS TO THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD TURN LANE AND
	ENTRANCES.

	20) A CROSSWALK SHALL BE SHOWN AT TO CONNECT THE
	SOUTHERN SIDEWALK TO THE NORTHERN SIDEWALK AT THE
	EASTERN SIDE OF THE PROPOSED GARAGE RAMP.

	21) HAS THIS PLAN BEEN PRESENTED TO THE CITYPLACE
	COURTYARDS AND CONDO ASSOCIATIONS?

	22) THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN ARE NOT
	PERMITTED AND SHALL NOT BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
	STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED
	FOR THE MONUMENT SIGNS; HOWEVER, UNTIL AN ORDINANCE IS
	ADOPTED TO PERMIT MONUMENT SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY THEY
	MAY NOT BE SHOWN.

	23) THE FUTURE EXPANSION AREA BOX AND NOTE SHALL BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE PLAN AS THESE ARE NOT UNDER
	REVIEW AND THIS PROCESS DOES NOT VEST ANY FUTURE
	DEVELOPMENT.