 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16070016
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16070016 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-22 10:59:32 | PROVISO - ALL ADA CROSS WALKS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-10-2016 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-10-2016 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-10 11:13:49 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. ACCESSIBILITY. PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN, SHEET 5, AND | | | PROPOSED LAYOUT, SHEET 6, SHOW ACCESS TO THE WOOD DECKS | | | VIA STEPS ONLY. THOSE PLAN SHEETS TO NOT ALIGN WITH | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1, WHICH DOES NOT SHOW STEPS ON THE | | | SIDE OF THE DECK THAT IS CLOSEST TO THE RESTAURANT | | | BUILDING. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH | | | SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES | | | WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE | | | BUILDING OR FACILITY | | | | | | 3. WHEN ADDRESSING THE COMMENT ABOVE, PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
Time |
09:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-08 09:57:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | THIS APPEARS TO BE AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY SPACE AND | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. A REVIEW | | | OF THE PROPOSED EXIT STAIRS WIDTH MAY BE NECESSARY TO | | | ENSURE IT MEETS THE OCCUPANCY EXIT REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 6. BASED ON SOME OF THE DESIGN PICTURES AND VARYING | | | OVERHEAD ROOFING/CANOPIES AND A POTENTIAL OCCUPANCY | | | OVER 300 A FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM MAY BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ANY EXISITNG ENGINEERED FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM(S) | | | IN THE MAIN STRUCTURE(S) SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT TO PROVIDE THE SAME OR EQUAL LEVEL OF | | | FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY. | | | | | | 7. ANY PROPOSED CANOPY CONFIGURATION SHALL BE OF A | | | LISTED FIRE RETARDANT/PROOF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL. | | | | | | 8. OPEN FLAME(S) EFFECTS/DEVICES ARE PROHIBITED UNLESS | | | SPECIFACCALY APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE | | | MARSHAL. | | | | | | 9. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 10. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-22 16:35:42 | PROJECT: VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING Z16070016 | | | SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND | | | FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES | | | AND EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC., AND PROVIDE | | | SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND | | | UTILITIES. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION AND | | | MITIGATION CHART TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-448 | | | FOR THE FOUR EXISTING ROYAL PALMS THAT WILL BE | | | AFFECTED. | | | | | | THE ROYAL PALMS SHOULD STAY IN THE SAME AREA IF | | | POSSIBLE, MOVING THEM TO OTHER AREAS IN THE PARKING LOT | | | IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW OF THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS TO | | | ASSURE TREES ARE NOT MISSING IN THOSE LOCATIONS, AND | | | NEED TO BE REPLACED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE EXISTING LANDSCAPING THAT | | | WILL STAY IN PLACE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-08 16:01:38 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING Z16070016 | | | AUGUST 8, 2016 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUCH | | | AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL | | | GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION AND MITIGATION | | | CHART TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-448 FOR THE | | | FOUR EXISTING ROYAL PALMS THAT WILL BE AFFECTED. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE INDICATE EXISTING LANDSCAPING THAT WILL STAY | | | IN PLACE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lle |
Date |
08-09-2016 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lle |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-09 15:30:01 | NO UTILITY IMPACTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-09-2016 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-09 15:14:35 | 1. INDICATE IF THERE ARE ANY UTILITIES IN THE PROJECT | | | AREA. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-08-2016 |
Time |
07:57 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-08 07:57:39 | NO COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-22-2016 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-22 15:01:19 | CASE NO. PB812N - RESUBMITAL 8/26/16 | | | VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING MAJOR AMENDMENT | | | 831 VILLAGE BOULEVARD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE NOVEMBER 15, | | | 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS BEING ISSUED (BY NOVEMBER | | | 22, 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE COPIES OF THE FPL, COMCAST, | | | AND CITY SERVICE LETTERS. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN HAS REMOVED | | | SOME OF THE ADA CROSS WALKS ACROSS THE DRIVE AISLES | | | THAT ARE ON THE CURRENT APPROVED PLAN AND EXIST ON THE | | | SITE. SHOW ALL CROSS-WALKS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE (STAFF | | | COUNTS SIX MISSING WHEN COMPARED TO THE EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS). PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THIS WILL BE THE SITE | | | PLAN OF RECORD ONCE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. | | | STAFF HAS SENT THE SITE PLANNER A LINK TO THE PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY PICTOMETRY WHICH SHOWS THE SITE WITH ALL | | | THE CROSSWALKS. | | | | | | 4) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE REVIEW THE BICYCLE PARKING | | | PROVIDED. THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN ONLY SHOWS 42 PARKING | | | SPACES PROVIDED, NOT 44 AS STATED ON THE DATA CHART. | | | STAFF REVIEWED APPROVAL WITH THE PUBLIX EXPANSION AND | | | THERE ARE 48 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. STAFF HAS | | | SENT THE SITE PLANNER A COPY OF THE APPROVED BUILDING | | | PERMIT (16010722) SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE 24 | | | BICYCLE RACKS (48 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES). THE MAJOR | | | AMENDMENT SITE PLAN AND DATA TABLE SHALL BE AMENDED TO | | | REFLECT THE ACCURATE NUMBER AND LOCATIONS OF THE | | | BICYCLE PARKING. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-05-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-05-2016 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-05-2016 |
Time |
17:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-08-05 17:17:29 | CASE NO. PB812N | | | VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING MAJOR AMENDMENT | | | 831 VILLAGE BOULEVARD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | AUGUST 26, 2016, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE OCTOBER 18, | | | 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 10, | | | 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC | | | APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY AND CITY | | | SERVICE LETTERS. | | | | | | 3) HOW IS ADA ACCESS BEING PROVIDED TO THE NEW RAISED | | | OUTDOOR SEATING DECKS? | | | | | | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE HEIGHT OF THE SEATING | | | AREA WALLS AND THE MATERIALS OF WHICH THEY WILL BE | | | CONSTRUCTED. SOME OF THE DRAWINGS INCLUDE SOLID ROOFS, | | | SOME ARE OF TRELLIS COVERINGS AND SOME HAVE NO COVER. | | | WHAT IS THE ULTIMATE PLAN FOR COVER? THIS SHALL BE LAID | | | OUT IN THE CPD DESIGN GUIDELINES, EVEN IF IT HAS | | | MULTIPLE OPTIONS. | | | | | | 5) THE PICTURES PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION SHOW TWO | | | LARGE ROYAL PALMS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF WORK. PLEASE | | | REVIEW THE POSSIBILITY TO RELOCATE THESE PALMS | | | ELSEWHERE ON SITE. THERE ARE SOME TERMINAL ISLANDS IN | | | THE NORTH PORTION OF THE PLAZA THAT DO NOT HAVE TREES. | | | | | | 6) THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN HAS REMOVED SOME OF THE ADA | | | CROSS WALKS ACROSS THE DRIVE AISLES THAT ARE ON THE | | | CURRENT APPROVED PLAN AND EXIST ON THE SITE. | | | | | | 7) SITE DATA TABLE ITEMS | | | A. THE NEW OUTDOOR RESTAURANT SEATING SHALL BE ADDED | | | ADJACENT TO THE LINE ITEM FOR BUILDING 6 UNDER TOTAL | | | GROSS FLOOR AREA. | | | B. WHY DOES BUILDING 2 SHOW ONLY 762 SF OF OUTDOOR | | | SEATING WHEN THERE IS 1,076 SF SHOWN ON THE PLAN? | | | C. PLEASE REVIEW THE BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED. ALEX | | | HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER, BELIEVES THAT | | | VILLAGE COMMONS HAS INSTALLED ADDITIONAL BICYCLE | | | PARKING. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR | | | SEATING SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRES AN ADDITIONAL TWO | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES UNLESS THE ENTIRE PLAZA HAS AT | | | LEAST 51 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES (OVERALL REQUIRED | | | 1,029/20). | | | D. HOW DID THE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE (AND USES) REDUCE | | | WITH THE ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR SEATING AREA? NOTE: THE | | | GROSS FLOOR AREA VALUE DOESN?T MATCH THE BUILDING LOT | | | COVERAGE VALUE. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
