 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16060058
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16060058 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 11:41:27 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SHEET SP-1, SITE PLAN, DOES NOT | | | SHOW A WALKWAY FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE BUILDING | | | ENTRANCE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH | | | SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING | | | OR FACILITY ENTRANCES. | | | | | | 3. ACCESSIBLE PARKING. SHEET SP-1, SITE PLAN, DOES NOT | | | SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING CLOSE TO THE ENTRANCE OF | | | THIS BUILDING. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 4. CONSTRUCTION TYPE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING | | | PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF | | | CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN | | | CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 5. HORIZONTAL SEPARATION. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING | | | PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, | | | PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE | | | A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mkhan |
Date |
01-13-2017 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mkhan |
Date |
01-13-2017 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-13 15:45:26 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | | | | PROJECT NAME: 2101 N. AUSTRALIAN AVE. ? JOSEPH?S | | | VILLAGE - Z16060058 | | | DATE: JANUARY 13, 2017 | | | | | | STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISO (STATED BELOW): | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS IT APPEARS THAT | | | SOME OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS FOR CIVIL PLAN HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, COMMENTS MADE BY CITY?S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES ENGINEER (MADE ON 07/12/2016, FOR JULY PPRC), | | | ARE STILL APPLICABLE AND ARE ADDED TO THE NEW COMMENTS. | | | ALL THESE COMMENTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ADDRESSED DURING | | | ?ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION? PHASE PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | A) GENERAL COMMENT: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE ?AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM? FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THIS FORM CAN | | | BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING LINK: | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE CALCULATION WILL NEED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT | | | THE DESIGN INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF | | | DUMPSTERS/GARBAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLAN | | | IF A COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF | | | WASTE THAT WILL NEED TO BE COLLECTED; | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A | | | ROLL?OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER | | | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN | | | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS; | | | | | | B) UTILITY COMMENTS: | | | | | | 5. THE CITY IS REVIEWING THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER | | | MAINS AND CONNECTIONS (LOCATION, ALIGNMENT, PIPE SIZE, | | | VALVES, FIRE HYDRANT, ETC.) AS CURRENTLY DEPICTED ON | | | SHEET C?3; | | | | | | 6. PLEASE ADD THE EXISTING WATER METER AND METER | | | BOX/VAULT AND CALL OUT THE METER SIZE | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE INCREASED WATER | | | DEMAND (AVERAGE AND PEAK) AND DEMONSTRATE THAT THE | | | EXISTING METER SIZE IS ADEQUATE FOR THE ADDITIONAL | | | DEMAND. | | | | | | MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1124 (OFFICE) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-06-2017 |
Time |
17:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-06-2017 |
Time |
17:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-06 17:19:23 | 3RD REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM HEATHER | | | TRIBOU, PLANNER, AND ATTACHMENT DATED DECEMBER 22, | | | 2016, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES, THE | | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS | | | APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-07-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-07-2016 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-07-2016 |
Time |
16:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-07 16:36:48 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE MEMO FROM HEATHER | | | TRIBOU AND THE ATTACHMENT DATED OCTOBER 21, 2016, FROM | | | JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | 69A-60.0081 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-12 14:06:57 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE APPLICABLE SECTION S OF FLORIDA STATUE, 5TH EDITION | | | OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, NFPA 1 & 101, ALL | | | ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES, INCLUDING CHAPTER 32 NEW | | | RESIDENTIAL BOARD AND CARE OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | 6. IT MUST BE NOTED THAT THE EXISTING NORTH BLDG | | | INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN IS AN EXISTING APARTMENT | | | BUILDING THAT APPEARS TO BE CONVERTING TO AN ALF. THE | | | FIRE INSPECTOR HAS BEEN PROVIDING ADVICE TO SUBMITT A | | | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT; HOWEVER, TO THIS DATE A | | | SUBMITTAL HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 10. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 11. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 12. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-31-2017 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-31-2017 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-31 10:53:41 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: JOSEPHS VILLAGE Z16060058 | | | MAY 25, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THIS SITE WAS REQUIRED BY CONDITION OF | | | APPROVAL THROUGH THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO | | | BRING THE LANDSCAPING ON SITE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH | | | A LANDSCAPE PERMIT 15040126 THAT ALLOWED UPDATING OF | | | SPECIES TO PROVIDE A BETTER, SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE | | | WHERE POSSIBLE. INVASIVE EXOTICS WERE REMOVED FROM THE | | | SITE AND THE WATER RETENTION AREA CLEANED. FINAL | | | INSPECTION WAS NEVER REQUESTED, AND THE PERMIT REMAINS | | | OPEN. FINAL INSPECTION AND CLOSING OF THE PERMIT ARE | | | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART | | | INDICATING WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH EXISTING TREES WHERE | | | THE NEW BUILDING IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. PER SECTION 94-443 (D). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES, OR REQUEST A WAIVER | | | WHERE NOT POSSIBLE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR | | | EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING | | | SPACES PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN DATA CHART AND USE | | | THIS NUMBER FOR THE CALCULATION OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-443 (C)(4) FOR THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | REQUIRED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROVIDING 4 SQUARE | | | FEET FOR EACH 100 SQUARE FEET OF OTHER PAVED AREAS | | | ADDITIONAL TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. ONE SHADE TREE PER LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST | | | BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA TO SHOW ALL BUILDINGS | | | MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 PERCENT LINEAR FEET | | | AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF ALL STRUCTURES BE PLANTED WITH | | | TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)B. | | | | | | 10. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SITE COMPLIES WITH SECTION | | | 94-443 (D)(2)A. FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED FOR | | | THE NUMBER OF UNITS PROVIDED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE FOR | | | REQUIRED TREES PER REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND REQUIRED | | | ADDITIONAL TREES FOR TOTAL UNITS THEN SHOW THE ACTUAL | | | NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED ON SITE. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANT LIST AND FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS TO REFLECT THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND | | | EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | PROVIDE SCREENING FOR DDCV AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/9/16: | | | 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE TREE #1 AS REMAINING, AS | | | IT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE, AND NOT AFFECTED | | | BY CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON DUMPSTER | | | ACCESS AND PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGE ON 3 SIDES AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | THE DUMPSTER IS NOW PROPOSED IN A LOCATION IN DIRECT | | | CONFLICT WITH THE LARGE OAK TREE THAT WAS TO BE | | | PROTECTED. PLEASE CONSIDER MOVING THE DUMPSTER TO A | | | LOCATION THAT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TREE ABOVE OR | | | BELOW GROUND. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE CURBING OR WHEEL STOPS | | | TO PROTECT LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | PLEASE ADD CURBING TO THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO | | | THE ENTRANCE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR THE PLANNING BOARD, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO: | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND SHOW THE QUANTITY OF TREES ADDED | | | WITH THIS PETITION. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE SABAL PALMS | | | PROPOSED TO ALLOW SPACE FOR MAINTENANCE NEXT TO THE | | | BUILDING AND AVOID OVER PRUNING ISSUES, AND SHOW THEM | | | ACCURATELY ON THE PLAN OUTSIDE OF THE SIDEWALK. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH | | | HEDGE AND 2 PALMS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NEW DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE. | | | ? INCLUDE A COPY OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE REST OF | | | THE PD THAT WAS APPROVED BY PERMIT 15040126 AS AN | | | EXHIBIT, SO THAT THE ENTIRE PLAN BECOMES THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE REZONING. | | | | | | STAFF SUPPORTS THE ADDITION OF A WAIVER TO ELIMINATE | | | THE LOADING ZONE FOR THE NEW BUILDING, AS IT WILL AVOID | | | DAMAGE OR REMOVAL OF THE LARGE LIVE OAK TREE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-03-2017 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-03-2017 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-03 11:09:58 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR THE PLANNING BOARD, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO: | | | ? SHOW THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN, AND SHOW THE QUANTITY OF TREES ADDED WITH THIS | | | PETITION. | | | ? ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE SABAL PALMS PROPOSED TO | | | ALLOW SPACE FOR MAINTENANCE NEXT TO THE BUILDING AND | | | AVOID OVER PRUNING ISSUES, AND SHOW THEM ACCURATELY ON | | | THE PLAN OUTSIDE OF THE SIDEWALK. | | | ? ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH HEDGE AND 2 | | | PALMS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | STAFF SUPPORTS THE ADDITION OF A WAIVER TO ELIMINATE | | | THE LOADING ZONE FOR THE NEW BUILDING, AS IT WILL AVOID | | | DAMAGE OR REMOVAL OF THE LARGE LIVE OAK TREE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-13-2017 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-13-2017 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-13 16:01:42 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: JOSEPHS VILLAGE Z16060058 | | | JANUARY 13, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THIS SITE WAS REQUIRED BY CONDITION OF | | | APPROVAL THROUGH THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO | | | BRING THE LANDSCAPING ON SITE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH | | | A LANDSCAPE PERMIT 15040126 THAT ALLOWED UPDATING OF | | | SPECIES TO PROVIDE A BETTER, SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE | | | WHERE POSSIBLE. INVASIVE EXOTICS WERE REMOVED FROM THE | | | SITE AND THE WATER RETENTION AREA CLEANED. FINAL | | | INSPECTION WAS NEVER REQUESTED, AND THE PERMIT REMAINS | | | OPEN. FINAL INSPECTION AND CLOSING OF THE PERMIT ARE | | | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART | | | INDICATING WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH EXISTING TREES WHERE | | | THE NEW BUILDING IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. PER SECTION 94-443 (D). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES, OR REQUEST A WAIVER | | | WHERE NOT POSSIBLE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR | | | EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING | | | SPACES PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN DATA CHART AND USE | | | THIS NUMBER FOR THE CALCULATION OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-443 (C)(4) FOR THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | REQUIRED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROVIDING 4 SQUARE | | | FEET FOR EACH 100 SQUARE FEET OF OTHER PAVED AREAS | | | ADDITIONAL TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. ONE SHADE TREE PER LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST | | | BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA TO SHOW ALL BUILDINGS | | | MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 PERCENT LINEAR FEET | | | AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF ALL STRUCTURES BE PLANTED WITH | | | TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)B. | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW | | | THE SITE COMPLIES WITH SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A. FOR THE | | | NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED FOR THE NUMBER OF UNITS | | | PROVIDED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE FOR | | | REQUIRED TREES PER REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND REQUIRED | | | ADDITIONAL TREES FOR TOTAL UNITS THEN SHOW THE ACTUAL | | | NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED ON SITE. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | ADDITIONAL TREES REQUIRED FOR THE 252 UNITS. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANT LIST AND FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS TO REFLECT THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND | | | EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | PROVIDE SCREENING FOR DDCV AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/9/16: | | | 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE TREE #1 AS REMAINING, AS | | | IT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE, AND NOT AFFECTED | | | BY CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 16. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON | | | DUMPSTER ACCESS AND PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGE ON 3 SIDES | | | AS REQUIRED. | | | THE DUMPSTER IS NOW PROPOSED IN A LOCATION IN DIRECT | | | CONFLICT WITH THE LARGE OAK TREE THAT WAS TO BE | | | PROTECTED. PLEASE CONSIDER MOVING THE DUMPSTER TO A | | | LOCATION THAT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TREE ABOVE OR | | | BELOW GROUND. | | | | | | 17. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE CURBING OR WHEEL | | | STOPS TO PROTECT LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | PLEASE ADD CURBING TO THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO | | | THE ENTRANCE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-09-2016 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-09-2016 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-09 15:43:47 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: JOSEPHS VILLAGE Z16060058 | | | NOVEMBER 9, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THIS SITE WAS REQUIRED BY CONDITION OF | | | APPROVAL THROUGH THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO | | | BRING THE LANDSCAPING ON SITE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH | | | A LANDSCAPE PERMIT 15040126 THAT ALLOWED UPDATING OF | | | SPECIES TO PROVIDE A BETTER, SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE | | | WHERE POSSIBLE. INVASIVE EXOTICS WERE REMOVED FROM THE | | | SITE AND THE WATER RETENTION AREA CLEANED. FINAL | | | INSPECTION WAS NEVER REQUESTED, AND THE PERMIT REMAINS | | | OPEN. FINAL INSPECTION AND CLOSING OF THE PERMIT ARE | | | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART | | | INDICATING WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH EXISTING TREES WHERE | | | THE NEW BUILDING IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. PER SECTION 94-443 (D). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES, OR REQUEST A WAIVER | | | WHERE NOT POSSIBLE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR | | | EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING | | | SPACES PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN DATA CHART AND USE | | | THIS NUMBER FOR THE CALCULATION OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-443 (C)(4) FOR THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | REQUIRED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROVIDING 4 SQUARE | | | FEET FOR EACH 100 SQUARE FEET OF OTHER PAVED AREAS | | | ADDITIONAL TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. ONE SHADE TREE PER LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST | | | BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA TO SHOW ALL BUILDINGS | | | MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 PERCENT LINEAR FEET | | | AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF ALL STRUCTURES BE PLANTED WITH | | | TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)B. | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW | | | THE SITE COMPLIES WITH SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A. FOR THE | | | NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED FOR THE NUMBER OF UNITS | | | PROVIDED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE FOR | | | REQUIRED TREES PER REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND REQUIRED | | | ADDITIONAL TREES FOR TOTAL UNITS THEN SHOW THE ACTUAL | | | NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED ON SITE. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANT LIST AND FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS TO REFLECT THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND | | | EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 14. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL | | | GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | PROVIDE SCREENING FOR DDCV AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/9/16: | | | 15. PLEASE INDICATE TREE #1 AS REMAINING, AS IT IS ON | | | THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE, AND NOT AFFECTED BY | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON DUMPSTER ACCESS AND | | | PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGE ON 3 SIDES AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 17. PLEASE INDICATE CURBING OR WHEEL STOPS TO PROTECT | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-11 16:54:03 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: JOSEPHS VILLAGE Z16060058 | | | JULY 11, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS SITE WAS REQUIRED BY CONDITION OF APPROVAL | | | THROUGH THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO BRING THE | | | LANDSCAPING ON SITE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT 15040126 THAT ALLOWED UPDATING OF | | | SPECIES TO PROVIDE A BETTER, SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE | | | WHERE POSSIBLE. INVASIVE EXOTICS WERE REMOVED FROM THE | | | SITE AND THE WATER RETENTION AREA CLEANED. FINAL | | | INSPECTION WAS NEVER REQUESTED, AND THE PERMIT REMAINS | | | OPEN. FINAL INSPECTION AND CLOSING OF THE PERMIT ARE | | | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART INDICATING | | | WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH EXISTING TREES WHERE THE NEW | | | BUILDING IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG | | | AUSTRALIAN AVE. PER SECTION 94-443 (D). | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INDICATE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ALL | | | OTHER PROPERTY LINES, OR REQUEST A WAIVER WHERE NOT | | | POSSIBLE. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR EVERY 10 | | | PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN DATA CHART AND USE THIS | | | NUMBER FOR THE CALCULATION OF LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED | | | PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | 7. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443 | | | (C)(4) FOR THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROVIDING 4 SQUARE FEET FOR EACH 100 | | | SQUARE FEET OF OTHER PAVED AREAS ADDITIONAL TO PARKING | | | SPACES. | | | | | | 8. ONE SHADE TREE PER LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED | | | PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3). | | | | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA TO SHOW ALL BUILDINGS MEETING | | | THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 PERCENT LINEAR FEET AROUND THE | | | EXTERIOR OF ALL STRUCTURES BE PLANTED WITH TREES, | | | SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)B. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SITE | | | COMPLIES WITH SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)A. FOR THE NUMBER OF | | | TREES REQUIRED FOR THE NUMBER OF UNITS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANT LIST AND FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | REQUIREMENTS TO REFLECT THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | | | | 12. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ssamuels |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
12:30 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
ssamuels |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 12:35:11 | PARKING DEPT | | | 561-822-1507 | | | SEAN SAMUELS CPP | | | PARKING FACILITY SUPERVISOR | | | | | | ADA SPACES IS RECOMMENDED CLOSES TO THE BUILDING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lle |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lle |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
17:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-12 17:14:24 | THIS IS A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE CONCEPTUAL CIVIL | | | PLAN. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ARE EXPECTED WHEN DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION. | | | 1. THE CITY IS REVIEWING THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER | | | MAINS AND CONNECTIONS (LOCATION, ALIGNMENT, PIPE SIZE, | | | VALVES, FIRE HYDRANT, ETC) AS CURRENTLY DEPICTED ON | | | SHEET C-3 | | | 2. PLEASE CHANGE WATER MAIN PIPE DIAMETER FROM 16 FT | | | TO16 INCHES, SANITARY SEWER FROM 8 FT TO 8 INCHES, AND | | | FORCE MAIN FROM 24 FT TO 24 INCHES | | | 3. PLEASE ADD THE EXISTING WATER METER AND METER | | | BOX/VAULT AND CALL OUT THE METER SIZE | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE INCREASED WATER | | | DEMAND (AVERAGE AND PEAK) AND DEMONSTRATE THAT THE | | | EXISTING METER SIZE IS ADEQUATE FOR THE ADDITIONAL | | | DEMAND | | | | | | LAURA LE, PE | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1093 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-18-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-18-2017 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-18 16:25:10 | COMMENTS ON THE 12-29-16 PLAN SUBMITTAL: | | | 1. ON THE SWPPP PLAN, ADD FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER IN | | | THE LAKE AROUND THE OUTFALL PIPE OF THE DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | 2. SHOW AND LABEL THE PERIMETER BERM ON THE CIVIL PLAN. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-18 10:57:09 | 1. SHEET C-3 SHOWS "CONST. INLET NO. 11" AND "CONST. | | | INLET NO. 12" WHEREAS ALL OF THE OTHER INLETS ARE | | | LABELED AS EXISTING. ARE INLETS NO. 11 AND 12 BEING | | | REPLACED UNDER THIS PROJECT? | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
12:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 12:48:18 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT | | | HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?. | | | PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS | | | WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING BUT | | | NOT LIMITED TO WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT | | | POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE | | | PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR | | | POTABLE WATER LINES. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 4. SHOW EXISTING EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN. THE | | | BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWS A FPL EASEMENT THAT MAY CUT | | | ACROSS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | 5. NORTH ARROW ON SHEETS C-2 AND C-3 APPEARS TO BE | | | POINTING IN THE WEST DIRECTION. | | | | | | 6. THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ON SHEET C-2 CALLS OUT | | | SILT FENCE OR HAY BALES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY SITE. IS THERE CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA THAT | | | WOULD REQUIRE PLACEMENT OF SILT FENCE HERE? | | | | | | 7. SHEETS C-2 AND C-3 LABEL PROPOSED BUILDING AS 13,600 | | | S.F. SITE PLAN LABELS THE PROPOSED BUILDING AS 81,600 | | | S.F. | | | | | | 8. SITE GRADING AROUND THE BUILDING SHOULD PREVENT | | | RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 9. INDICATE ON THE CONCEPTUAL CIVIL PLAN (SHEET C-3) | | | WHERE THE SIDEWALK WILL BE FLUSH WITH THE EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT AND WHERE RAISED CURBING WILL BE LOCATED | | | ADJACENT TO PERVIOUS/LANDSCAPED AREAS. | | | | | | 10. SHOW ON THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN THE | | | LOCATION OF THE CATCH BASIN INLET ON AUSTRALIAN AVE AND | | | THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN THE INLET AND THE CANAL. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER | | | INDICATING THE CHANGES TO THE ONSITE PEAK FLOOD STAGES | | | WILL NOT EXCEED THE SFWMD PERMITTED FLOOD STAGES. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION FOR | | | THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT HTT | | | P://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS, | | | -PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-12 14:52:25 | 1. THERE IS AN EXISTING FORCE MAIN THAT RUNS E-W THRU | | | THE PARKING LOT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CANAL THEN | | | TURNS NORTH BETWEEN THE FENCE AND THE CANAL. IT HAS | | | BEEN FIELD LOCATED. PLEASE HAVE SURVEYED AND ADDED TO | | | SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS. A SEPARATE EASEMENT WILL | | | NEED TO BE GRANTED. SEE ATTACHMENT FOR GIS. | | | | | | 2. SITE/CIVIL SUBMITTAL STILL REQUIRED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-11 13:16:31 | 1. BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGES DO NOT MATCH ON CIVIL VS. SITE | | | PLAN. | | | 2. NORTH ARROW IS INCORRECT ON CIVIL PLAN. | | | 3. PLAN SHOWS A PROPOSED METER FOR NEW BUILDING. ANY | | | SUB-METERING WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL THROUGH CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE. | | | 4. THERE APPEARS TO BE EXISTING UTILITIES ALONG NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE WHICH MAY REQUIRE AN EASEMENT. | | | 5. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE AN ALTA SURVEY. | | | 6. ARE ANY NEW DUMPSTERS NEEDED FOR THE NEW FACILITY? | | | 7. SITE CIVIL PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED THROUGH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
08:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 09:00:25 | SHOW HANDICAP PARKING NEAR THE ENTRANCE OF PROPOSED | | | BUILDING | | | IF THERE IS AN EXCESS OF 58 PARKING SPACES, SHOW | | | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING COMING FROM | | | THE EAST PARKING LOT. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM UYEN DANG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-02-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-02-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-02-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-03 10:09:47 | CASE PB 1709 | | | PROJECT NAME: JOSEPHS VILLAGE | | | ADDRESS: 2210 N. AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | | | | - CONTACT HEATHER M. TRIBOU @ (561) 822-1562/ | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PEASE PROVIDE REVISE PLANS AND UPDATE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11)/FIVE (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN | | | .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES | | | ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF | | | INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON THURSDAY, | | | MAY 4, 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY PLANNING BOARD | | | MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JULY 2, 2017), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE LETTER FROM COMCAST THE CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS | | | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: LETTER FROM COMCAST | | | MUST BE PROVIDED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2- ASIDE FROM EXISTING WALKWAYS, THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT COULD BENEFIT WITH THE ADDITION OF STREET | | | FURNITURE. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES | | | (I.E. BENCHES, ETC.) THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. | | | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: NO NEW BENCHES ARE LOCATED NEAR | | | THE PROPOSED 6 STORY BUILDING AND NO DETAIL WAS | | | PROVIDED. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: PLANS MUST BE REVISED | | | TO INCLUDE BENCH DETAIL AS DESCRIBED IN THE RESPONSE TO | | | COMMENTS BEFORE THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED | | | FOR THE MAY PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | 3- SITE PLAN-LOCATE ALL EASEMENTS AND REFERENCE BOOK | | | AND PAGE. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: STILL MISSING FORCE | | | MAIN LOCATION, AS FIELD LOCATED BY CITY, AND REQUIRED | | | EASEMENT. THIS MAY CONFLICT WITH DUMPSTER LOCATION AND | | | LOADING LOCATION. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: FORCE MAIN | | | EASEMENT NOT INCLUDED ON SITE PLAN. A CONDITION OF | | | APPROVAL WILL BE TO RECORD ALL EASEMENTS BEFORE CO. | | | | | | 4- SITE PLAN-LABEL FENCES AND ANY GATES AND MEASURE | | | DISTANCE FROM FENCE TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. AMENDMENT | | | TO COMMENT: STILL MISSING ALL LABELING OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED FENCING AND GATES. A GATE IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | SIDEWALK AND WILL NEED A DETAIL. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: | | | PLANS MUST BE REVISED TO INCLUDE LABEL GATE BEFORE | | | THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY | | | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | | | | 5- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE REQUIRED BIKE RACK. AMENDMENT TO | | | COMMENT: BIKE RACK REQUIREMENT IS 1 BIKE RACK SPACE FOR | | | 20 AUTOMOBILE SPACES. UPDATE PLANS PER 94-486. IT IS | | | PREFERRED TO HAVE A BIKE RACK AT FRONT ENTRY NEAR | | | CLUBHOUSE. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: DETAIL ON PLANS MUST | | | BE REVISED TO PROPERLY CROSS REFERENCE NUMBER OF BIKE | | | RACKS REQUIRED ON THE SITE PLAN BEFORE THURSDAY, MAY 4, | | | 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY PLANNING BOARD | | | MEETING. | | | | | | 6- SITE PLAN- ALL PARKING SPACES MUST BE PAVED. REMOVE | | | RESERVE PARKING. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: RESERVE PARKING | | | IS NOT PERMITTED IN RETENTION AREAS AND IN AREAS THAT | | | DO NOT MEET MINIMUM PARKING DIMENSION STANDARDS. IN | | | ADDITION, RESERVE PARKING CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING | | | LANDSCAPING. RECALCULATE RESERVE PARKING IN AREAS THAT | | | MEET MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS. AMENDMENT TO | | | COMMENT: PLANS MUST BE REVISED TO REFERENCE THE | | | NUMERICAL AMOUNT OF SPACES THAT ACTUALLY FIT INTO THE | | | RESERVED SPACES BEFORE THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017, TO BE | | | SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | 7- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS AND TOTAL | | | NUMBER OF BEDS. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: NUMBER STILL | | | INCORRECT COMPARED TO PERMIT SET ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR | | | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CHANGE OF USE AND ARCHITECTURAL | | | FLOOR PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THIS REZONING IN OCTOBER. IN | | | ADDITION, PLEASE PROVIDE IN CHART AS DISCUSSED IN | | | PROJECT MEETING. NOTE THAT SECTION 94-273 (D)(28)7. | | | READS LICENSED NURSING HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | | | MAY HAVE 2.5 TIMES AS MANY BEDS AS DWELLING UNITS | | | PERMITTED IN THAT DISTRICT. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: PLANS | | | MUST BE REVISED TO BOTH AMEND THE CHART TO NOT DOUBLE | | | COUNT BEDS AND UNITS AND TO HAVE THE NUMBER ON THE | | | CHART MATCH THE NUMBERS ON THE BUILDING OF THE SITE | | | BEFORE THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | MAY PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | 8- SITE PLAN-PROVIDE REQUIRED LOADING SPACE. AMENDMENT | | | TO COMMENT: CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO TRASH. AMENDMENT TO | | | COMMENT: STAFF WILL SUPPORT A WAIVER OF THE REQUIRED | | | LOADING SPACE TO NOT IMPACT LARGE OAK TREE AND NOT TO | | | HAVE A LOADING SPACE LOCATED 2 FEET FROM A WINDOW. | | | PLANS AND JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST BE REVISED TO | | | INCLUDE DETAIL BEFORE THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017, TO BE | | | SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-06-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-06-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmtribou |
Date |
01-06-2017 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-06 16:07:39 | CASE PB 1709 | | | PROJECT NAME: JOSEPHS VILLAGE | | | ADDRESS: 2210 N. AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | | | | - CONTACT HEATHER M. TRIBOU @ (561) 822-1562/ | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11)/FIVE (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN | | | .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES | | | ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF | | | INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY, | | | JANUARY 27, 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH | | | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MARCH 14, 2017), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. SINCE | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($769.00). | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS | | | 1- PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | 2- PROVIDE LETTER FROM COMCAST THE CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS | | | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES | | | 3- ASIDE FROM EXISTING WALKWAYS, THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT COULD BENEFIT WITH THE ADDITION OF STREET | | | FURNITURE. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES | | | (I.E. BENCHES, ETC.) THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. | | | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: NO NEW BENCHES ARE LOCATED NEAR | | | THE PROPOSED 6 STORY BUILDING AND NO DETAIL WAS | | | PROVIDED. | | | 4- SITE PLAN-LOCATE ALL EASEMENTS AND REFERENCE BOOK | | | AND PAGE. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: STILL MISSING FORCE | | | MAIN LOCATION, AS FIELD LOCATED BY CITY, AND REQUIRED | | | EASEMENT. THIS MAY CONFLICT WITH DUMPSTER LOCATION AND | | | LOADING LOCATION. | | | 5- SITE PLAN-LABEL FENCES AND ANY GATES AND MEASURE | | | DISTANCE FROM FENCE TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. AMENDMENT | | | TO COMMENT: STILL MISSING ALL LABELING OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED FENCING AND GATES. A GATE IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | SIDEWALK AND WILL NEED A DETAIL. | | | 6- SITE PLAN- ADD ANY HYDRANTS AND WATER VALVES. | | | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS AN | | | EXISTING BACKFLOW PREVENTER THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH | | | THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LEADING TO THE ROW. | | | 7- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE REQUIRED BIKE RACK. AMENDMENT TO | | | COMMENT: BIKE RACK REQUIREMENT IS 1 BIKE RACK SPACE FOR | | | 20 AUTOMOBILE SPACES. UPDATE PLANS PER 94-486. IT IS | | | PREFERRED TO HAVE A BIKE RACK AT FRONT ENTRY NEAR | | | CLUBHOUSE. | | | 8- SITE PLAN- ALL PARKING SPACES MUST BE PAVED. REMOVE | | | RESERVE PARKING. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: RESERVE PARKING | | | IS NOT PERMITTED IN RETENTION AREAS AND IN AREAS THAT | | | DO NOT MEET MINIMUM PARKING DIMENSION STANDARDS. IN | | | ADDITION, RESERVE PARKING CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING | | | LANDSCAPING. RECALCULATE RESERVE PARKING IN AREAS THAT | | | MEET MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS. | | | 9- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS AND TOTAL | | | NUMBER OF BEDS. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: NUMBER STILL | | | INCORRECT COMPARED TO PERMIT SET ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR | | | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CHANGE OF USE AND ARCHITECTURAL | | | FLOOR PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THIS REZONING IN OCTOBER. IN | | | ADDITION, PLEASE PROVIDE IN CHART AS DISCUSSED IN | | | PROJECT MEETING. NOTE THAT SECTION 94-273 (D)(28)7. | | | READS LICENSED NURSING HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | | | MAY HAVE 2.5 TIMES AS MANY BEDS AS DWELLING UNITS | | | PERMITTED IN THAT DISTRICT. | | | 10- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE A BUS PARKING SPACE. AMENDMENT | | | TO COMMENT: THIS IS FOR THE EXISTING BUS CURRENTLY | | | LOCATED ON SITE. A BUS CANNOT BE PARKED IN FRONT OF THE | | | TRASH. | | | 11- SITE PLAN-PROVIDE REQUIRED LOADING SPACE. AMENDMENT | | | TO COMMENT: CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO TRASH. | | | 12- CIVIL PLANS- DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOT WORK. | | | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE ANY | | | REMOVAL OF PARKING SPACES TO ADD REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | 13- A LIGHTING PLAN IS REQUIRED TO MEET ALL FOOT CANDLE | | | REQUIREMENTS. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: THE LIGHTING PLAN | | | IS TO SHOW THAT THE LIGHT DOES NOT PROVIDE OF SITE | | | GLARE. REVISE TO SHOW THAT PROPOSED ILLUMINATION DOES | | | NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE BEYOND PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. | | | 14- LANDSCAPE PLAN- PROVIDE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | LIGHT POLES, HYDRANTS AND WATER VALVES. AMENDMENT TO | | | COMMENT: MISSING FORCE MAIN. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS | | | 15- SHOW EXISTING TREES ON LANDSCAPE PLANS INCLUDING | | | TREES ALONG FENCE AT ROW. THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK MAY | | | CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING TREE. | | | 16- THE DUMPSTER LOCATED 2 FEET FROM THE RESIDENTAIL | | | WINDOWS OF THE BUILDING IS NOT PREFERED. PROVIDE | | | DUMPSTER DETAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 94-444(B) | | | 17-PARKING IN SITE DATA DIFFER FROM ACTUAL COUNTS OF | | | PARKING ON SITE PLAN | | | 18-BUILDING C MISLABELED FOR NUMBER OF BEDS | | | 19- JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SAYS EXISTING 257 UNITS AND | | | PLANS AND PAST APPROVAL SAY 252 UNITS | | | 20-PLEASE PROVIDE THAT PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE MEETS | | | APPLICABLE LICENSING CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY DEPARTMENT | | | OF STATE. | | | 21-PROVIDE IN THE JUSTIFICATION ON HOW THE ADDITIONAL | | | BEDS WILL NOT RESULT IN A CONCENTRATION OF GROUP HOMES | | | IN THE AREA. | | | 22- BUILDING AND/OR LANDSCAPE ISLAND MAY BE NEED TO BE | | | REDUCED TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT DROP-OFF SPACE AND PASS | | | THROUGH AT PORT COCHERE. | | | 23- PROVIDE IN JUSTIFICATION HOW PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE | | | IN INNOVATIVE DESIGN AS REQUIRED IN A PB BEYOND | | | MATCHING EXISTING 1986 ARCHITECTURE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
10-28-2016 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-10 13:41:54 | CASE PB 1709 | | | PROJECT NAME: JOSEPHS VILLAGE | | | ADDRESS: 2210 N. AUSTRALIAN AVE. | | | | | | | | | - CONTACT HEATHER M. TRIBOU @ (561) 822-1562/ | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11)/FIVE (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN | | | .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES | | | ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF | | | INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON | | | WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2016, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | JANUARY PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY | | | JANUARY 9, 2017), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED | | | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. SINCE | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($769.00). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS | | | 1- UPDATED SURVEY MUST BE SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | 2- PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | 3- PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPL AND COMCAST. | | | 4- MODIFY THE EXISTING DRIVE AISLE IN ORDER TO PUSH | | | THE PROPOSED BUILDING FURTHER INTO THE PROPERTY | | | (SOUTH). THIS WOULD REDUCE THE WAIVER REQUEST TO THE | | | HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | 5- ASIDE FROM EXISTING WALKWAYS, THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT COULD BENEFIT WITH THE ADDITION OF STREET | | | FURNITURE. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES | | | (I.E. BENCHES, ETC.) THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS | | | 1- PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INTENT OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | DISTRICT IS TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND | | | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE | | | DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION. | | | 2- SURVEY- NOT SEALED | | | 3- SURVEY- NOT TO SCALE | | | 4- SURVEY- NOTES INDICATE NO UTILITIES OR ABSTRACT OR | | | TITLE SEARCH | | | 5- SURVEY- NEEDS TO SHOW EXISTING BUS STOP AND | | | RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 6- SITE PLAN- SHOW ALL LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS ON SURVEY | | | AND ALL PROPOSED LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS | | | 7- SITE PLAN-LOCATE ALL EASEMENTS AND REFERENCE BOOK | | | AND PAGE | | | 8- SITE PLAN- BUILDING A AND BUILDING C LOCATIONS | | | DIFFER ON SURVEY | | | 9- SITE PLAN- DUMPSTER LOCATION SHALL BE LOCATED AT | | | REAR OF SITE | | | 10- SITE PLAN-LABEL FENCES AND ANY GATES AND MEASURE | | | DISTANCE FROM FENCE TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. | | | 11- SITE PLAN- ADD ANY HYDRANTS AND WATER VALVES | | | 12- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE REQUIRED BIKE RACK | | | 13- SITE PLAN- ALL PARKING SPACES MUST BE PAVED. REMOVE | | | RESERVE PARKING. | | | 14- SITE PLAN -BENCHES ARE LOCATED IN THE WATER OF THE | | | RETENTION POND | | | 15- SITE PLAN- BENCHES LOCATED NEAR THE SHUFFLE BOARD | | | COURTS WERE ON PLAN PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH ON OCTOBER 19, 1995. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | SITE FURNISHINGS FOR THE ADDITIONAL 138 BEDS. | | | 16- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS AND TOTAL | | | NUMBER OF BEDS. | | | 17- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE A BUS PARKING SPACE | | | 18- SITE PLAN-PROVIDE REQUIRED LOADING SPACE | | | 19- CIVIL PLANS- DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOT WORK | | | 20- A LIGHTING PLAN IS REQUIRED TO MEET ALL FOOT CANDLE | | | REQUIREMENTS | | | 21- ARCHITECTURE PLANS- GROUP HOMES ARE REQUIRED TO | | | HAVE A MINIMUM LIVING AREA OF 450 SQ. FT. PER DWELLING | | | UNIT, PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS. | | | 22- LANDSCAPE PLAN- PROVIDE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | LIGHT POLES, HYDRANTS AND WATER VALVES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
17:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
17:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-12 17:43:56 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE A SIGNED LETTER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, | | | ERIC NATHANSON, AUTHORIZING SCOTT DAIAGI TO SIGN ON | | | BEHALF OF 2210 N AUSTRALIAN AVE, LLC FOR THE PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2.) AN UPDATED SURVEY, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA | | | REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION STATING | | | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TPS OF THE COUNTY | | | IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING OF THIS | | | APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | | | | 5.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND | | | COMCAST. | | | | | | | | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: | | | | | | 1.) THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION TO | | | JUSTIFY THE NEED FOR EACH WAIVER (I.E. ARE THERE | | | SITE/DESIGN CONSTRAINTS? WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS FOR | | | WAIVING EACH REQUIREMENT AND HOW WILL IT BENEFIT THE | | | COMMUNITY/CITY? WHAT ARE THE IMPACTS AND HOW ARE THE | | | IMPACTS BEING MITIGATED IN THE SITE DESIGN? HAVE OTHER | | | ALTERNATIVES BEEN EXPLORED? ). THE ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION FOR EACH WAIVER IS NEEDED IN ORDER TO | | | ASSESS WHETHER OR NOT STAFF CAN SUPPORT EACH WAIVER | | | REQUEST. [ZLDR S.94-207(C)(2)] | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (RPD) | | | CANNOT BE REVIEWED FOR THE AFFECTED AREA ONLY; THE | | | APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE ENTIRE SITE AS AN | | | RPD. THEREFORE, THE ENTIRE SITE WILL BE REVIEWED AS | | | PART OF THE RPD APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2.) MODIFY THE EXISTING DRIVE AISLE IN ORDER TO PUSH | | | THE PROPOSED BUILDING FURTHER INTO THE PROPERTY | | | (SOUTH). THIS WOULD REDUCE THE WAIVER REQUEST TO THE | | | HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | 3.) ASIDE FROM EXISTING WALKWAYS, THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT COULD BENEFIT WITH THE ADDITION OF STREET | | | FURNITURE. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES | | | (I.E. BENCHES, ETC.) THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. | | | | | | 4.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, INCLUDING ROOF OVERHANG | | | PROJECTIONS SHALL NOT EXTEND FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO | | | ANY SETBACK. THE ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS SEEM TO | | | ENCROACH BEYOND THE 3 FT. ALONG THE FRONT AND SIDE | | | (NORTH) PROPERTY LINES. {ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)] | | | | | | 5.) WHERE ARE THE A/C UNITS LOCATED? PURSUANT TO ZLDR | | | S.94-305(A)(4), MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT PROJECT | | | MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO A SETBACK. IF APPLICABLE, ANY | | | ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE | | | BUILDING PARAPET. | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FOR THE PROPOSED NEW | | | BUILDING. INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 7.) THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS 73.7 FT., | | | WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN | | | THE SITE DATA TABULAR AND WAIVER REQUEST. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. | | | | | | 8.) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE | | | ENTRANCE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN | | | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8.5 BY 11), AND AN | | | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% ($200) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |