Plan Review Details - Project Z16060044
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16060044
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-13-2016 Time 10:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-13-2016 Time 12:45 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-13 11:04:27DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. SITE LAYOUT PLAN SHEET C-5 DOES NOT SHOW A WALKWAY
 FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE BUIDING ENTRANCE. WHEN
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND
 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY
 ENTRANCES.
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 7. THIS PROJECT MAY BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-30-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-30-2016 Time 13:19 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-11-30 13:18:49SITE IS SERVICED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY WATER & SEWER SO
 NO ENGINEERING REVIEW NEEDED AT THIS TIME. AFTER SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TO
 ENGINEERING FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-03-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-03-2016 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-28-2016 Time 15:55 Sent To  
Notes
2016-10-03 16:00:222ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET DATED
 SEPTEMBER 29, 2016, FROM ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL
 PLANNER, THERE WERE NO DIRECT SPECIFIC RESPONSES TO MY
 PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED COMMENTS. HOWEVER, I DO NOT HAVE
 ANY OBJECTIONS OR CONCERNS WITH THE PROJECT.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-12-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-12-2016 Time 13:07 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-12 13:33:42THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE;
 NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES, INCLUDING
 CHAPTER 41 STORAGE OCCUPANCIES.
  
 6. ON THE PROPOSED FLOORS PALNSM IN EACH STAIRWELL ON
 FLOORS 2-5, AN EXIT DOOR IS INDICATED AS LEADING OUT
 INTO THE OPEN AIR. THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW THESE
 DOORS. PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT OR CLARIFY.
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM IS BEING PROPOSED FOR
 THIS STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN
 THE BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 10. ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE
 FIGHTER?S EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 11. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 12. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 13. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED
 FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY
 MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE
 WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES
 HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED
 REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED
 WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
 A. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
 B. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
 C. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".
  
 14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 01-23-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-23-2017 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-23-2017 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-23 15:42:49FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: AUSTRALIAN AND BELVEDERE CPD, SELF-STORAGE
 Z16060044
 JANUARY 19, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS, AND PROVIDE
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 INDICATE THE 5 FOOT BUFFER LOCATED AT THE EDGE OF THE
 PROPERTY AS SUBDIVIDED ON THE WEST SIDE, AND SHOW
 HEDGES AND TREES IN THE BUFFER AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SEPARATION AND
 BUFFERING IS ACHIEVED BETWEEN THE DRIVE AISLE TO THE
 NORTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE ADJACENT
 UNDEVELOPED SITE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DATA TABLE TO INCLUDE THE
 LENGTH OF THE BUFFERS AND REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
 FOR THE LIFT STATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 PARCEL, THE FPL TRANSFORMER ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, AND THE WATER VALVE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE BUILDING.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE
 EAST, SOUTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS
 REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-444 (B).
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE REDESIGN OR CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE
 SHADE TREE FOR THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE TRUCK
 EMPTYING THE DUMPSTER. IT IS NOTED HIGHRISE OAKS ARE
 SPECIFIED, BUT THIS MAY STILL BE AN ISSUE.
 PLEASE ADD A SECOND SABAL PALM TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 DUMPSTER, AS 2 PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE
 REQUIRED SHADE TREE AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT NOTE 6 ON SHEET LP1.01 TO
 READ 30 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE SINGLE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING APPEARS TO OPEN INTO LANDSCAPING WITH NO
 ACCESS. PLEASE REVISE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/15:
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPING PLAN AND
 PLANT LIST FOR THE OFF-SITE LIFT STATION AS A SEPARATE
 SHEET FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE SELF-STORAGE
 PARCEL. THIS WILL BE APPROVED AND PERMITTED SEPARATELY.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS THE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER INCLUDED IN ZONING COMMENTS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-16-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-16-2016 Time 09:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-16-2016 Time 09:17 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-16 09:31:46FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: AUSTRALIAN AND BELVEDERE CPD, SELF-STORAGE
 Z16060044
 DECEMBER 15, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS, AND PROVIDE
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 INDICATE THE 5 FOOT BUFFER LOCATED AT THE EDGE OF THE
 PROPERTY AS SUBDIVIDED ON THE WEST SIDE, AND SHOW
 HEDGES AND TREES IN THE BUFFER AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SEPARATION AND
 BUFFERING IS ACHIEVED BETWEEN THE DRIVE AISLE TO THE
 NORTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE ADJACENT
 UNDEVELOPED SITE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DATA TABLE TO INCLUDE THE
 LENGTH OF THE BUFFERS AND REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
 FOR THE LIFT STATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 PARCEL, THE FPL TRANSFORMER ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, AND THE WATER VALVE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE BUILDING.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE
 EAST, SOUTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS
 REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-444 (B).
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE REDESIGN OR CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE
 SHADE TREE FOR THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE TRUCK
 EMPTYING THE DUMPSTER. IT IS NOTED HIGHRISE OAKS ARE
 SPECIFIED, BUT THIS MAY STILL BE AN ISSUE.
 PLEASE ADD A SECOND SABAL PALM TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 DUMPSTER, AS 2 PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE
 REQUIRED SHADE TREE AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT NOTE 6 ON SHEET LP1.01 TO
 READ 30 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE SINGLE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING APPEARS TO OPEN INTO LANDSCAPING WITH NO
 ACCESS. PLEASE REVISE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/15:
  
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPING PLAN AND PLANT LIST
 FOR THE OFF-SITE LIFT STATION AS A SEPARATE SHEET FROM
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE SELF-STORAGE PARCEL. THIS
 WILL BE APPROVED AND PERMITTED SEPARATELY.
  
 10. PLEASE ADDRESS THE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER INCLUDED IN ZONING COMMENTS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-14-2016 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-14-2016 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
2016-10-14 15:59:10FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: AUSTRALIAN AND BELVEDERE CPD, SELF-STORAGE
 Z16060044
 OCTOBER 14, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS, AND PROVIDE
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 INDICATE THE 5 FOOT BUFFER LOCATED AT THE EDGE OF THE
 PROPERTY AS SUBDIVIDED ON THE WEST SIDE, AND SHOW
 HEDGES AND TREES IN THE BUFFER AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SEPARATION AND
 BUFFERING IS ACHIEVED BETWEEN THE DRIVE AISLE TO THE
 NORTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE ADJACENT
 UNDEVELOPED SITE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DATA TABLE TO INCLUDE THE
 LENGTH OF THE BUFFERS AND REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
 FOR THE LIFT STATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 PARCEL, THE FPL TRANSFORMER ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, AND THE WATER VALVE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE BUILDING.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE
 EAST, SOUTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS
 REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-444 (B).
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REDESIGN OR CHOOSE AN
 ALTERNATE SHADE TREE FOR THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE
 TRUCK EMPTYING THE DUMPSTER. IT IS NOTED HIGHRISE OAKS
 ARE SPECIFIED, BUT THIS MAY STILL BE AN ISSUE.
 PLEASE ADD A SECOND SABAL PALM TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 DUMPSTER, AS 2 PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE
 REQUIRED SHADE TREE AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT NOTE 6 ON SHEET LP1.01 TO
 READ 30 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE SINGLE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING APPEARS TO OPEN INTO LANDSCAPING WITH NO
 ACCESS. PLEASE REVISE.
  
  
 RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-12-2016 Time 14:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-12-2016 Time 14:21 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-12 14:22:04FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: AUSTRALIAN AND BELVEDERE CPD, SELF STORAGE
 Z16060007
 JULY 11, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLANS, AND PROVIDE
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INDICATE THE 5
 FOOT BUFFER LOCATED AT THE EDGE OF THE PROPERTY AS
 SUBDIVIDED ON THE WEST SIDE, AND SHOW HEDGES AND TREES
 IN THE BUFFER AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443.
  
 2. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SEPARATION AND BUFFERING IS
 ACHIEVED BETWEEN THE DRIVE AISLE TO THE NORTH OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED SITE.
  
 3. PROVIDE A DATA TABLE TO INCLUDE THE LENGTH OF THE
 BUFFERS AND REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE PROPOSED
 SUBDIVIDED LOT.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING FOR THE
 LIFT STATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL, THE
 FPL TRANSFORMER ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, AND
 THE WATER VALVE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
 BUILDING.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE EAST, SOUTH
 AND WEST SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS REQUIRED
 PER SECTION 94-444 (B).
  
 6. PLEASE REDESIGN OR CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE SHADE TREE
 FOR THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE TRUCK EMPTYING THE
 DUMPSTER. IT IS NOTED HIGHRISE OAKS ARE SPECIFIED, BUT
 THIS MAY STILL BE AN ISSUE.
  
 7. PLEASE CORRECT NOTE 6 ON SHEET LP1.01 TO READ 30
 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
  
 8. THE SINGLE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING
 APPEARS TO OPEN INTO LANDSCAPING WITH NO ACCESS. PLEASE
 REVISE.
  
  
 RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-29-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-29-2016 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-29-2016 Time 15:40 Sent To  
Notes
2016-11-29 15:39:58COMMENTS ON THE 9/22/2016 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
 1. CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - PROVIDE COPY OF
 JOINT REA ADDRESSING STOMRWATER, UTILITY AND ACCESS
 RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-13-2016 Time 12:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-13-2016 Time 12:46 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-13 12:44:36THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT
 HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?.
 PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS
 WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 2. PROVIDE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ADJACENT LAND
 OWNERS FOR THE SWALE RELOCATION ON THE PROPERTY TO THE
 EAST OF THE DETENTION POND AND FOR THE SURFACE GRADING
 DIRECTING STORMWATER RUNOFF ONTO THE PROPERTY TO THE
 NORTH OF THE SITE.
  
 3. EXPLAIN THE PHASING OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ERP MODIFICATION FOR THIS
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-02-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-02-2016 Time 12:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-11-02 12:50:45PASSED WITH CONDITION OF REPLAT OF PROPERTY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-11-2016 Time 12:38 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-11 12:40:311. PLAN SHOWS PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES. ARE THESE FEE
 SIMPLE OR LEASE LINES? A REPLAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
 2. IS THERE AN OVERALL CROSS-ACCESS/UTILITY/DRAINAGE
 AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE OF PARCEL LINES?
 3. PROVIDE AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK TO
 ACCESS DUMPSTER. IT APPEARS THAT IT MAY NEED TO BE
 ANGLED.
 4. SITE CIVIL PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS
 MADE THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-24-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 04-24-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 04-24-2017 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-03 16:27:34CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1.) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS:
  
 - NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE USES SPECIFIED IN THE
 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER FROM
 THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION (DATED DECEMBER
 14, 2016), SHALL BE ISSUED AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2018.
  
 - ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THE PROPRETY OWNER HAD ALREADY
 PAID THE PROPORTIONATE SHARE AMOUNT OF $374,392 AND
 OBTAINED BUILDING PERMITS FOR PHASE I DEVELOPMENT, NO
 ADDITIONAL BUILDING PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL THE
 PROPERTY OWNER PAYS ADDITIONAL $151,011 OF THE
 PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR PHASE II.
  
 - EXTEND THE SOUTH APPROACH LEFT TURN LANE STORAGE TO
 500 FEET PLUS 100 FEET TAPER OR AS DETERMINED BY THE
 COUNTY ENGINEER AT AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND BELVEDERE ROAD
 INTERSECTION PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY FOR THE LAST REMAINING DEVELOPABLE TRACT.
  
 2.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW
 CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN
 EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
 ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $750,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO
 THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78,
 ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 12-14-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 12-14-2016 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-15 14:47:52GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) REPEAT COMMENT: THE APPLICANT STILL HAS NOT
 PROVIDED SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH WAIVER
 REQUEST. AS NOTED IN STAFF?S PREVIOUS COMMENTS, EACH
 WAIVER REQUEST MUST INCLUDE WHAT LAND PLANNING AND
 DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES ARE BEING USED TO MITIGATE THE
 WAIVER REQUESTS (I.E. WHAT WILL BE DONE TO MITIGATE THE
 IMPACTS OF THE LOSS OF LANDSCAPING (INCREASE IN
 ASPHALT) FROM THE WAIVER TO THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, ETC.). THIS INFORMATION HAS NOT
 BEEN PROVIDED FOR ANY OF THE WAIVERS IN THE REVISED
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A PD
 AMENDMENT WHICH "ENCOURAGES THE USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE MORE
 EFFICIENT, DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
 THE CITY"; HOWEVER, STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THIS HAS
 BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESS IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 OR DEMONSTRATED IN THE REVISED PLANS.DUE TO THIS
 MISSING INFORMATION, STAFF CANNOT ASSESS IF THE WAIVERS
 CAN BE SUPPORTED.
  
 2.) THE LIST OF WAIVERS MAY BE INCOMPLETE. STAFF HAS
 DETECTED A POSSIBLE WAIVER FOR THE LOCATION OF THE
 LIGHT FIXTURES APPROVED ON THE WAWA SITE WITH THE
 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROPERTY LINES FOR THE PROPOSED
 SUBDIVISION. IT SEEMS THE LIGHT FIXTURES DOES NOT MEET
 THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR THE WAWA SITE (NO
 DIMENSIONS PROVIDED; SCALE MEASUREMENT INDICATES LESS
 THAN 5 FT.). EITHER THE LIGHT FIXTURES MUST BE PUSHED
 BACK FROM THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE OR A WAIVER MUST
 BE SOUGHT FOR THE SETBACK, AS LAND CANNOT BE SUBDIVIDED
 IF THERE ARE NON-CONFORMITIES WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN: (SHEET MP-1)
  
 1.) THE ZONING OF THE PARCELS ADJACENT TO THE NORTH AND
 EAST ARE NOW ZONED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC). PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 2.) THE FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE
 EDGE OF THE ENTIRE CPD OVERLAP AT ACCESS POINTS "A" AND
 "B". PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 3.) THERE ARE TWO INTERNAL CROSS ACCESS POINTS THAT
 CONNECT TRACTS #3 AND #4; HOWEVER, THESE ACCESS POINTS
 SEEM TO LEAD INTO AN EXISTING DETENTION POND ON TRACT
 #3. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 4.) A WAIVER IS REQUIRED FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT ALONG THE PROPOSED WEST PROPERTY LINE FOR
 TRACT #2.
  
 5.) FOR THE DATA PROVIDED FOR TRACT #2, PLEASE CLARIFY
 THE FOOTNOTE "THE PROPOSED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT W/DRIVE
 THRU WILL RUN THROUGH THE SITE PLAN AND PERMITTING
 PROCESS SEPARATELY."
  
 6.) FOR THE DATA PROVIDED FOR TRACT #3, PLEASE CLARIFY
 THE FOOTNOTE, "THE PROPOSED HOTEL WILL RUN THROUGH THE
 SITE PLAN AND PERMITTING PROCESS SEPARATELY."
  
 7.) THE PROPOSED USE ON TRACT #4 IS A SELF-STORAGE
 FACILITY (NOT A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE
 THRU). PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 8.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE MEANING OF THE TWO ASTERIKS FOR
 TRACT #1 IN THE FOOTNOTE.
  
  
 SITE PLAN:
  
 1.) REVISED COMMENT: REVISE PLANS TO SHOW BETTER
 VEHICULAR CROSS ACCESS BETWEEN THE WAWA SITE AND THE
 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE WAWA SITE.
 THE PLAN WAS NOT CHANGED TO REFLECT THE STAFF MARK-UP.
 IN THE APPLICANT'S 11/30/16 RESPONSE LETTER, IT WAS
 NOTED THAT THE POSSIBILITY OF ADDING AN ACCESS POINT
 FOR BETTER VEHICULAR CROSS ACCESS BETWEEN THE TWO SITES
 WAS NOT FEASIBLE. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION.
  
 2.) REVISED COMMENT: THE DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE ON SHEET A1.6 MUST MATCH THE DETAILS
 SPECIFIED IN THE SITE PLAN. THE STOP BAR SPECIFICATIONS
 MUST ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE DETAIL.
  
 3.) REVISED COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD DETAIL ON SHEET
 C-10 SHALL MATCH THE SINGLE RACK PAD ILLUSTRATED IN THE
 SITE PLAN. INCLUDE ANY APPLICABLE DIMENSIONS IN THE
 DETAIL. ALSO, THE DETAIL ON SHEET C-10 SHOWS A WALL ON
 THE RACK PAD; THE WALL MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE DETAIL
 IF IT IS NOT APPLICABLE, AS IT DOES NOT MATCH THE PAD
 ILLUSTRATED IN THE SITE PLAN.
  
 4.) THERE IS NO ANGLED PARKING PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN. PLEASE REMOVE THE ANGLED PARKING DETAIL IN SHEET
 C-10.
  
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN:
  
 1.) REVISED/REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE AROUND THE
 LIFT STATION AND ON TRACT 1 SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN
 THE LANDSCAPE CHART FOR THE STORAGE TRACT.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURE (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS):
  
 1.) ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH UP. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
  
 LIGHTING:
  
 1.) REVISED COMMENT: ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED LIGHT
 POLES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE PARCEL TRACT. PLEASE
 SHOW AND INCLUDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE
 PLAN FOR THE EXISTING LIGHT POLES ON THE WAWA SITE
 BASED ON THE PROPOSED TRACT LINES FOR THE CPD. THE
 APPLICANT MAY NEED TO ADJUST THE LOT LINES OR SEEK A
 WAIVER FROM THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR THE LIGHT POLES
 IF THE 5 FT. SETBACK CANNOT BE MET.
  
  
 SIGNAGE:
  
 FREESTANDING
  
 1.) REVISED COMMENT: AUSTRALIAN FRONTAGE 646.81 X 0.5 =
 323.4 SF SIGNAGE PERMITTED
  
 SIGN A1 = 19 FT. X 15 FT. = 285 X 2 = 570 SQ. FT. TOTAL
  
 EXCEEDS ALLOWED BY AT LEAST 246.6 SQ. FT.
  
 ALSO PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
 SIGNAGE ON THE WAWA SITE ALONG THE AUSTRALIAN FRONTAGE.
 THE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE WAWA PARCEL WILL BE
 APPLIED TO THE SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS FOR ALL SIGNS
 FRONTING ON AUSTRALIAN.
  
 PLEASE NOTATE IN THE PLANS THAT NO SIGNAGE IS PERMITTED
 ON THE POSTS OF THE MONUMENT SIGN FOR BOTH A1 AND A2.
  
  
 2.) REVISED COMMENT: BELVEDERE FRONTAGE: 557.8 X 1 =
 557.8 SF SIGNAGE PERMITTED
  
 SIGN A2 = 16.67 FT. X 12 = 200.04 SQ. FT. X 2 = 400.08
 SQ. FT. TOTAL
  
 ALSO PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
 SIGNAGE ON THE WAWA SITE ALONG THE BELVEDERE FRONTAGE.
 THE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE WAWA PARCEL WILL BE
 APPLIED TO THE CUMULATIVE SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS FOR
 BELVEDERE.
  
 PLEASE NOTATE IN THE PLANS THAT NO SIGNAGE IS PERMITTED
 ON THE POSTS OF THE MONUMENT SIGN FOR BOTH A1 AND A2.
  
  
 NOTES/INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN
 FORMAT.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE
 TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-39(I)(5)
 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561)822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-21-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-21-2016 Time 17:05 Rev Time 6.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-21-2016 Time 17:05 Sent To  
Notes
2016-10-21 17:07:31CASE NO. PB1670D
 EXTRA SPACE STORAGE
 1520 BELVEDERE RD.
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 21, 2016),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS
 WERE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT
 WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1) REVISED COMMENT: THE PLANS SHOW THE COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE PARCELS
 BY PROPERTY LINE AND A PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN
 SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN
 EACH SUBDIVIDED PARCEL WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE
 MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND
 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS PER THE ZLDR FOR EACH
 INDIVIDUAL PARCEL. THIS REQUIRES THAT DATA TABLES BE
 GENERATED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL, INCLUDING
 LANDSCAPE DATA, TO SHOW THAT EACH PARCEL CAN STAND ON
 ITS OWN. THESE TABLES HAVE NOT BEEN FULLY PROVIDED. THE
 RESPONSE LETTER INCLUDES THREE WAIVERS FOR PBA #4 ?
 SETBACK FROM WESTERN PROPERTY LINE, LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 AND LOADING DOCK DEPTH. WHILE STAFF REQUIRES THE FULL
 DATA TABLES TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL
 WAIVERS REQUIRED, STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE SIGNAGE
 PACKAGE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR (SEE FULL
 ANALYSIS UNDER THE SIGNAGE SECTION OF COMMENTS). THE
 SUBMITTED WAIVER JUSTIFICATION DID NOT INCLUDE WHAT
 LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES ARE BEING USED
 TO MITIGATE THE WAIVER REQUESTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS NOT FULLY EVALUATED THE PROPOSED WAIVER REQUESTS,
 AND MAY FIND SPECIFIC ONES ARE NOT SUPPORTABLE.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WILL
 NEED TO BE REVISED IF WAIVERS TO THE PROJECT ARE BEING
 REQUESTED. THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A LIST OF
 WAIVER(S) AND JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH WAIVER. THE
 RESPONSE LETTER (NOT THE REQUIRED REVISED JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT) INCLUDES THREE WAIVERS FOR PBA #4 - SETBACK
 FROM WESTERN PROPERTY LINE, LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND
 LOADING DOCK DEPTH. WHILE STAFF REQUIRES THE FULL DATA
 TABLES TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL WAIVERS
 REQUIRED, STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE SIGNAGE PACKAGE DOES
 NOT COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR (SEE FULL ANALYSIS UNDER THE
 SIGNAGE SECTION OF COMMENTS). THE REVISED JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT SHALL INCLUDE WHAT LAND PLANNING AND
 DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES ARE BEING USED TO MITIGATE THE
 WAIVER REQUESTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF HAS NOT FULLY
 EVALUATED THE PROPOSED WAIVER REQUESTS, AND MAY FIND
 SPECIFIC ONES ARE NOT SUPPORTABLE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS STILL MISSING
 FROM THE APPLICATION PACKET. PLEASE SUBMIT A TRAFFIC
 STUDY FOR THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO REVIEW.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
 (TPS) REVIEW LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC
 DIVISION STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TPS
 APPROVAL LETTER MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE
 SCHEDULING OF THIS APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN: (SHEET MP-1)
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: CLARIFY NOTE: "USES PERMITTED IN
 THIS CPD SHALL INCLUDE ALL USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT
 WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT AND
 ADDITIONAL USES AS APPROVED PER ORDINANCE NO. 4572-15."
 THE PHRASE "BY RIGHT" WAS EXCLUDED FROM SHEET MP-1.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE FAR TABLE SHALL BE CLEAR THAT
 IT IS FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. FOR EXAMPLE, THE FAR
 FOR THE STORAGE FACILITY IS 0.29 FOR THE ENTIRE
 DEVELOPMENT YET 1.31 FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PBA #4 TRACT.
 THE VARIOUS PLANS SHALL CLEARLY STATE THE DEVELOPMENT
 DATA. ADDITIONALLY, THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHALL
 CLEARLY DESCRIBE THE WAIVER TO THE PARCEL'S FAR.
  
 3) THE PARCEL LINES ON THE MASTER PLAN DO NOT MATCH
 OTHER SHEETS IN THE SUBMITTAL OR THE PLAT. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT SINCE THE SITE IS BEING SUBDIVIDED, THE PBA
 STRUCTURE SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN SHALL BE REVISED TO
 BE A TRACT BASED STRUCTURE.
  
 SITE PLAN:
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: REVISE PLANS TO SHOW BETTER
 VEHICULAR CROSS ACCESS BETWEEN THE WAWA SITE AND THE
 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE WAWA SITE.
 THE PLAN WAS NOT CHANGED TO REFLECT THE STAFF MARK-UP.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE DATA TABLE SHALL BE FOR THE
 STORAGE PARCEL TRACT. ALL WAIVER REQUESTS SHALL BE
 REFLECTED. EX. THE 1.31 FAR
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE. THE DIMENSIONS ON SHEET C-5 DO NOT MATCH THE
 DIMENSIONS ON THE DUMPSTER DETAIL. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW
 SAME CONDITION.
  
 4) REVISED COMMENT: THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 SHOWN ON SHEET A1.6 SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING PARAPET AND SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE
 ELEVATION SHEETS.
  
 5) REVISED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 BICYCLE RACK ON SHEET C-5. THE BICYCLE PAD DETAIL ON
 SHEET C-10 SHALL MATCH THE SINGLE RACK PAD BEING USED,
 NOT A TWO RACK PAD.
  
 6) THE PARCEL LINES ON SHEET C-5 DO NOT MATCH OTHER
 SHEETS IN THE SUBMITTAL OR THE PLAT. ALL SHEETS SHALL
 SHOW CONSISTENT AND CORRECT LOCATION OF PARCEL LINES.
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN:
  
 1) THE DOOR AND LANDING TO THE RISER ROOM ARE SHOWN
 WITH A HEDGE OVERLAPPING THEM.
  
 2) SINCE THIS IS GOING TO BE ITS OWN PARCEL, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARCEL
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE BUFFER
 TREES AND HEDGE. NOTE: ANY AREAS THAT ARE NOT CODE
 COMPLIANT SHALL BE CLEARLY ANNOTATED AND A WAIVER
 REQUESTED, WITH JUSTIFICATION.
  
 3) THE LANDSCAPE AROUND THE LIFT STATION SHALL NOT BE
 INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE CHART FOR THE STORAGE TRACT,
 BUT RATHER ON A SEPARATE SHEET FOR THE HOTEL TRACT.
  
 4) THE SABAL PALM TREE SHOWN AS A TERMINAL ISLAND TREE
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR.
  
 5) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A PARCEL LINE THAT DOES NOT
 MATCH OTHER PLANS OR THE PROPOSED PLAT.
  
 FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS:
  
 1) THE DOORS ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING DO
 NOT HAVE A LANDING IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT/FENESTRATION, PARTICULARLY TO THE SOUTH
 ELEVATION TO BREAK UP THE BLANK FACADE. NO RESPONSE WAS
 PROVIDED.
  
 LIGHTING:
  
 1) REVISED COMMENT: THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLES SHALL BE
 SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THE POSTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE (PROVIDE DIMENSION VERIFICATION).
 PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF
 ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE
 (1) FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH
 DEVELOPMENT. PHOTOMETRIC VERIFICATION OF THIS
 REQUIREMENT WAS NOT EXTENDED TO THE FULL SOUTH PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 SIGNAGE:
  
 WALL
  
 1) THE FACADE AREA IS CALCULATED INCORRECTLY. IT SHALL
 NOT INCLUDE THE VOID AREA OF THE LOWER PARAPET BETWEEN
 THE UPPER PARAPETS.
  
 2) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE "BOX" FOR THE SIGN ON THE NORTH
 FACADE IS DRAWN INCORRECTLY AS IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE
 FULL SIGN AREA TO THE BOTTOM OF THE "P" OR THE
 "REGISTERED TRADEMARK 'LOGO.
  
 3) THE EAST AND WEST SIGNS APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH SQUARE
 FOOTAGE ALLOWANCES AS SHOWN.
  
  
 FREESTANDING
  
 4) ONLY ONE PRICE SIGN IS PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 94-408(G) OF THE ZLDR.
  
 5) SINCE THE SITE IS BEING SUBDIVIDED, THE SIGNS ARE
 BECOMING OFF-PREMISE SIGNS FOR THE VARIOUS PARCELS THEY
 ADVERTISE. A WAIVER FOR OFF PREMISE SIGNS IS REQUIRED.
 PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION.
  
 6) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM SIGN A1 TO THE NEW LOT
 LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 3. THIS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF
 24 FEET OR A WAIVER IS REQUIRED.
  
 7) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF SIGNS TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 8) AUSTRALIAN FRONTAGE 646.81 X 0.5 = 323.4 SF SIGNAGE
 PERMITTED
  
 A1 TOP = 23.25 X 10 = 232.5 SF X 2 = 465 SF
 A1 BASE = 4 X 12 = 48 SF X 2 = 96 SF
 A1 TOTAL = 561 SF
  
 EXCEEDS ALLOWED BY 237.4 SF
  
 9) BELVEDERE FRONTAGE: 557.8 X 1 = 557.8 SF SIGNAGE
 PERMITTED
  
 A2 TOP = 18 X 10 = 180 SF X 2 = 360 SF
 A2 BASE = 4 X 12 = 48 SF X 2 = 96 SF
 A2 TOTAL = 456 SF
  
 A3 TOP = 20.25 X 10 = 202.5 SF X 2 = 405 SF
 A3 BASE = 4 X 12 = 48 SF X 2 = 96 SF
 A3 TOTAL = 501 SF
  
 TOTAL PROPOSED AUSTRALIAN SIGNAGE = 957 SF
  
 EXCEEDS ALLOWED BY 399.2 SF
  
 10) THE SIDES OF THE SIGN ARE DEEP ENOUGH TO PERMIT THE
 INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL COPY. EITHER THIS DIMENSION
 SHALL BE REDUCED OR IT WILL BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE SIGN
 AREA, WHICH ALREADY EXCEEDS AMOUNT OF PERMITTED SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 07-12-2016 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 07-12-2016 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-12 14:06:15GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PLANS SHOW THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 (CPD) DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE PARCELS BY PROPERTY LINE.
 IF THE DEVELOPER INTENDS TO SUBDIVIDE THE CPD, ALL
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EACH SUBDIVIDED PARCEL WILL BE
 REQUIRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS,
 BUILDING SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS PER THE
 ZLDR FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL. IF THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS CANNOT BE MET, THE DEVELOPER
 WILL BE REQUIRED TO SEEK WAIVERS FROM THE CPD. THE
 WAIVERS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE APPLICATION (IF
 APPLICABLE).
  
 2.) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WILL NEED TO BE REVISED
 IF WAIVERS TO THE PROJECT ARE BEING REQUESTED. THE
 APPLICANT WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A LIST OF WAIVER(S) AND
 JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH WAIVER.
  
 3.) THE TRAFFIC STUDY SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE
 APPLICATION PACKET. PLEASE SUBMIT A TRAFFIC STUDY FOR
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO REVIEW.
  
 4.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER
 FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION STATING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TPS OF THE COUNTY
 IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER
 MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING OF THIS
 APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.
  
 5.) PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY.
  
 6.) REVISE THE STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE (ZLDR
 S.94-32(A), AMENDMENT AND REZONING STANDARDS) TO
 SPECIFY HOW EACH STANDARD IS ADDRESSED FOR THE PROJECT.
  
 7.) SHEET A4.1 SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE PLANS
 PACKET.
  
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN: (SHEET MP-1)
  
 1.) CLARIFY NOTE: "USES PERMITTED IN THIS CPD SHALL
 INCLUDE ALL USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT WITHIN THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL USES AS
 APPROVED PER ORDINANCE NO. 4572-15."
  
 2.) THE FAR FOR THE WAWA PROJECT IS 0.02 (NOT 0.04).
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
  
 SITE PLAN:
  
 1.) PEDESTRIAN CROSS ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARCELS (I.E.
 WAWA SITE) SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE
 PROJECT.
  
 2.) REVISE PLANS TO SHOW BETTER VEHICULAR CROSS ACCESS
 BETWEEN THE WAWA SITE AND THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
 IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE WAWA SITE. [SEE MARK-UP PLANS
 BY STAFF]
  
 3.) THE PROPOSED ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 SEEMS TO BE INEFFECTIVE FOR DUMP TRUCKS TO EASILY
 ACCESS. RELOCATE AND/OR ANGLE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 FOR BETTER DUMP TRUCK ACCESSIBILITY.
  
 4.) A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) 10 FT. BY 50 FT. LOADING AND
 UNLOADING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE USE. [ZLDR
 S.94-485, TABLE XV-4]
  
 5.) INCREASE THE SIZE OF A FEW PARKING STALLS (BOTH
 LENGTH AND WIDTH OF STALLS) TO ACCOMMODATE LARGER
 VEHICLES FOR THE PROPOSED USE.
  
 6.) FOUNDATION PLANTING IS PROPOSED AROUND THE
 BUILDING. HOW WIDE IS THE FOUNDATION PLANTING AND
 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AROUND THE BUILDING? PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS. A MINIMUM UNINTERRUPTED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY
 OF 5 FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE BUILDING.
  
 7.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES IN THE
 DATA TABULAR: A.) CLARIFY THAT THE MAXIMUM FAR FOR THE
 OVERALL CPD IS ONE (1.00); B.) CALCULATIONS FOR
 BUILDING SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS
 ARE INCORRECT IF THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO
 SUBDIVIDE THE CPD INTO SMALLER PARCELS BASED ON THE
 "PROPERTY LINES" ILLUSTRATED IN THE PLANS; C.) CORRECT
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE PARKING REQUIREMENT; D.) ADD
 CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ZONE REQUIREMENT; E.) ADD
 CALCULATIONS FOR BICYCLE PARKING.
  
 8.) THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN (SHEET C-5) NEEDS TO BE
 UPDATED TO REFLECT THE LATEST CHANGES TO THE WAWA SITE
 (PENDING APPLICATION PB 1670C).
  
 9.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 10.) WILL THERE BE ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE
 ROOFTOP? IF SO, ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL
 BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE PROPOSED BUILDING PARAPET.
  
 11.) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED PER ZLDR S.94-485(Q).
  
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN:
 1.) COMMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE PROVIDED BY
 THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE PLANNER.
  
  
 FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE A SECONDARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE POINT INTO
 THE BUILDING FROM THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 2.) PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT/FENESTRATION, PARTICULARLY TO THE SOUTH
 ELEVATION TO BREAK UP THE BLANK FACADE.
  
  
 LIGHTING:
  
 1.) WILL THERE BE ANY SITE LIGHTING PROVIDED FOR THE
 PROJECT? IF SO, A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED.
 PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF
 ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE
 (1) FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
  
 SIGNAGE:
  
 1.) PROVIDE SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
 WALL SIGNAGE. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THE ZLDRS.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8 .5 BY 11), AND AN
 ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% ($600) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved