 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16040005
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16040005 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
10:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
12:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 10:48:34 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 3. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-05-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-05-2016 |
Time |
12:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-05-2016 |
Time |
12:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-05 12:41:41 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DATED OCTOBER 4, | | | 2016, FROM ROBLING ARCHITURE CONSTRUCTION, TO ERIC | | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED | | | FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTSWERE NOTED SPECIFICALLY | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROJECT AND WILL SUPPORT IT THROUGH THE NORMAL BUILDING | | | PLAN PROCESS. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-12-2016 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-12 13:05:48 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE; | | | NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES, INCLUDING | | | CHAPTER40 INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD AND | | | PROPOSED PROCESSES FOR THE EXISTING PORTION AND | | | PROPOSED PORTION. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL LIFE SAFETY FEATURES/EQUIPMENT | | | FOR THE EXISTING PORTION. | | | | | | 8. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 9. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED | | | FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE | | | CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY | | | MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE | | | WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES | | | HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED | | | REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED | | | WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR. | | | A. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE | | | MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R". | | | B. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS | | | SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F". | | | C. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F". | | | | | | 10. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 11. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-19-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-19-2016 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-19-2016 |
Time |
16:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-11 13:54:39 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 4701 GEORGIA AVE Z16040005 | | | JULY 11, 2016 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND SPECIES OF EXISTING TREES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE | | | COUNTED TOWARD THE 15 PERCENT REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES AND | | | SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 BASED ON THE 40 PERCENT OPEN | | | SPACE REQUIRED, AND WHAT IS BEING PROVIDED. ALSO NOTE | | | THE LIMIT OF 35 PERCENT MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS | | | FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ADJACENT TO OTHER PROPERTIES WHERE POSSIBLE, AND THE 10 | | | FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY WHERE POSSIBLE. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPING PROVIDED | | | TOWARD COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT 20 PERCENT | | | OF THE LINEAR FEET AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF ALL | | | INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH TREES, | | | SHRUBS OR HEDGES. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-442 (G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES | | | ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | CHART. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUCH | | | AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL | | | GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-18 11:51:30 | 1. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WITH THE 10-4-2016 SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. | | | | | | 2. VERTICAL DATUM NOT FOUND ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPING | | | PLAN. RESPONSE TO LAST SET OF COMMENTS INDICATED THIS | | | DATUM NOTE WAS ADDED TO THE PLAN. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
12:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 12:40:49 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT | | | HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?. | | | PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS | | | WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 2. NO ENGINEERING PLANS INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW PACKAGE. | | | | | | 3. INDICATE LOCATION OF ROOF LEADERS AND DIRECT THE | | | DISCHARGE ONTO PERVIOUS AREAS AND AWAY FROM ADJACENT | | | PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 4. PROJECT IS LOCATED ALONG THE CITY?S LAKEWOOD ROAD / | | | EDMOR ROAD PHASE 2 PROJECT. CITY?S PROJECT INCLUDES | | | MILLING AND RESURFACING GEORGIA AVENUE ROADWAY PAVEMENT | | | ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE. | | | | | | 5. INDICATE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
12:35 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-11 12:38:07 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE | | | THROUGH THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. | | | 2. HOW WILL CARPORT BE ACCESSED? |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
12:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
12:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-18 13:10:41 | ENTERED ON BEHALF OF UYEN DANG | | | | | | SEE THE ZONING COMMETNS REGARDING THE ON-STREET | | | PARKING. | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENT: SHOW SIGHT TRIANGLE. PLESAE NOTE THAT | | | ANY HEDGS OR SHRUBS WITHIN THE SITE TRIANGLE SHALL BE | | | TRIMMED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES. | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENT: SHOW DIMENSIONS IN THE DRIVE THROUGH | | | AREA. IF THE AREA IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A DRIVE THRU, | | | CLOSE CURB CUT ON BRADLEY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-13-2016 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-13 08:55:39 | SHOW PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES | | | ACCOUNTED FOR ON CITY STREETS. | | | SHOW SIGHT TRIANGLE. | | | SHOW DIMENSIONS IN THE DRIVE THROUGH AREA. IF THE AREA | | | IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A DRIVE THRU, CLOSE CURB CUT ON | | | BRADLEY | | | . | | | COMMENTS FROM UYEN DANG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-18-2016 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-10-2016 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-11-18 13:23:35 | CASE NO. ISPR 16-03 | | | WILHELM'S RATAN, INC. | | | 4701 GEORGIA AVENUE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 18, 2017), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) REVISED COMMENT: THE 2,630 ADDITION IS REQUIRED TO | | | HAVE THREE PARKING SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA | | | COMPLIANT. THE RESUBMITTED PLANS SHOW THREE ON-SITE | | | PARKING SPACES THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION | | | 94-485(J)(1) WHICH STATES, "INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM | | | PARKING AND LOADING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED BY MEANS | | | OF CLEARLY DEFINED DRIVES WHICH LEAD FROM PUBLIC | | | RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO CLEARLY DEFINED MANEUVERING LANES | | | WHICH IN TURN PROVIDE ACCESS TO INDIVIDUAL PARKING OR | | | LOADING SPACES. CONFIGURATIONS WHICH REQUIRE BACKING | | | DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET, EXCLUDING ALLEYS, FROM A | | | PARKING OR LOADING SPACE FOR MORE THAN TWO RESIDENTIAL | | | UNITS AND ALL NONRESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED | | | IN ALL RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICTS." THESE THREE PROPOSED SPACES MAY NOT BE USED | | | TO PROVIDE THE PARKING FOR THE ADDITION. ADDITIONALLY, | | | THE PARKING SPACE THAT IS SHOWN BACKING INTO BRADLEY | | | STREET IS LOCATED WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. | | | OBSTRUCTIONS OVER 18 INCHES IN HEIGHT ARE NOT PERMITTED | | | WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, SO THE PARKING SPACE | | | MAY NOT BE LOCATED AS SHOWN. | | | | | | THE THREE PARKING SPACES DO NOT APPEAR AS EXISTING (THE | | | ONE SHOWN OFF OF BRADLEY STREET IS PART OF THE DRIVE | | | ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE | | | BUILDING). HOWEVER, IF THESE WERE EXISTING PARKING | | | SPACES, THEY WOULD COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING'S PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MAY NOT BE USED TO | | | PROVIDE PARKING FOR THE ADDITION. | | | | | | THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE NOT | | | RECOGNIZED BY THE CITY AS "EXISTING" AS THEY DO NOT | | | COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS. SPACES 1, 2, 3, 4 | | | AND 6 DIRECTLY CONFLICT OR DO NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT | | | DISTANCE FROM EXISTING ON-SITE CURB CUTS. SPACES 4 AND | | | 5 ARE TOO CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION OF BRADLEY STREET | | | AND GEORGIA AVENUE. THESE MAY NOT BE USED TO PROVIDE | | | PARKING TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ADDITION. | | | | | | 2) NEW COMMENT: THE SITE DATE TABLE DOES NOT REFLECT | | | THE ACCURATE PARKING NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | COMMENT ABOVE. | | | | | | 3) NEW COMMENT: THE PARKING SPACES SHOWN IN FRONT OF | | | THE ROLL-UP DOOR FOR THE ADDITION HAVE WHEEL STOPS. HOW | | | WILL THE ROLL-UP DOOR BE ACCESSED WITH THESE | | | OBSTRUCTIONS SINCE THERE IS ONLY TWO FEET BETWEEN THE | | | WHEEL STOP AND THE WALL? | | | | | | 4) NEW COMMENT: THE ADDITION INCLUDES A ROLL-UP DOOR ON | | | THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS | | | THE WEST SIDE OF THE ADDITION AS GRASS AREA. THE ROLL | | | UP DOOR SHALL ACCESS A PAVED AREA. | | | | | | 5) REVISED COMMENT: THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST ONE BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACE PROVIDED ON THE SITE MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-485(Q) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. PROVIDE THE BICYCLE RACK | | | AND PAD DETAILS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | REQUIRES THE PROVISION OF ONE 10 FOOT BY 25 FOOT | | | LOADING SPACE ON-SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-485(P) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. NO LOADING SPACE WAS PROVIDED ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE DUMPSTER SHALL BE IN AN | | | ENCLOSURE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-444(B) | | | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | A. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATE MAY NOT OPEN INTO THE | | | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | B. THE REQUIRED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE | | | HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. SEE SECTION 94-444(B). | | | C. HOW WILL THE DUMPSTER BE ACCESSED FOR COLLECTION? | | | | | | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE CHECK YOUR WINDOW LABELS - | | | THEY SHOULD BE "SINGLE" HUNG. THIS WAS NOT UPDATED ON | | | THE ELEVATION PLANS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-11-2016 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-07-11 16:10:47 | CASE NO. ISPR 16-03 | | | WILHELM?S RATAN, INC. | | | 4701 GEORGIA AVENUE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 13, | | | 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER PROVIDED BY THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION THAT VERIFIES THE ADDITIONAL | | | 2,630 SQUARE FEET MEETS THE COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE THE FPL LETTER CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR | | | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES. | | | | | | 3) THE SCALE ON THE SITE PLAN IS INCORRECT. IT SHOULD | | | BE 1 INCH = 10 FEET. | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS/SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE | | | EXISTING CANOPY AREA AND THE CONCRETE CARPORT AREA. | | | THESE ARE CONSIDERED BUILDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF LOT | | | COVERAGE AND OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5) STAFF CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED ADDITION | | | WILL RESULT IN LOT COVERAGE OF 66.2% (EXITING BUILDING, | | | EXISTING CARPORT PLUS PROPOSED ADDITION OF 6,590 SF) | | | WITH THE OPEN SPACE ONLY AT 33.8%. THE SITE SHALL HAVE | | | A MAXIMUM OF 60% COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS AND A MINIMUM OF | | | 40% OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | 6) THE AMOUNT OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS | | | AREA/LANDSCAPE IS NOT PROVIDED ON THE DATE TABLE. | | | | | | 7) THE EXPANSION OF THE BUILDING REQUIRES THAT THE | | | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE MEETS THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 8) THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT TEMPORARY BUILDINGS, SO THE | | | STORAGE CONTAINER WHICH IS BEING USED AS A BUILDING | | | SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. | | | | | | 9) PROVIDE THE FLOOR PLAN FOR THE SECOND STORY. | | | | | | 10) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THE USE FOR | | | THE NEW ADDITIONS WILL BE STORAGE. THREE PARKING | | | SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA COMPLIANT, ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | THE BUILDING EXPANSION OF 2,630 SQUARE FEET. CODE | | | COMPLIANT PARKING IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION | | | DETERMINES IF THERE ARE ADEQUATE DIMENSIONS FOR | | | ON-STREET PARKING. THE VACANT LOT TO THE WEST IS | | | RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AND MAY NOT BE USED FOR PARKING | | | UNLESS A CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED BY THE | | | ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. | | | | | | 11) THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE | | | PROVIDED ON THE SITE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-485(Q) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 12) THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRES THE | | | PROVISION OF ONE 10 FOOT BY 25 FOOT LOADING SPACE | | | ON-SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485(P) OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 13) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT ALL VEHICULAR MOVEMENT AND | | | MANEUVERING THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE OFF-STREET | | | PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE RETAINED ON-SITE. PUBLIC | | | RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED TO ALLOW OR ENHANCE | | | MOVEMENT OR MANEUVERING. | | | | | | 14) THE SITE DATE TABLE SHALL BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE | | | PARKING AND BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 15) THE DUMPSTER SHALL BE IN AN ENCLOSURE MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 16) STAFF NOTED ON THE SITE VISIT THAT NOT ALL THE | | | OUTDOOR STORAGE OF GOODS, MERCHANDISE AND MATERIALS IS | | | ENCLOSED ON ALL SIDES BY A WALL OF ADEQUATE HEIGHT | | | CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OTHER | | | DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD OR STEEL | | | AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-444(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 17) THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL THE CURB CUTS. | | | | | | 18) THE SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE DOOR LOCATIONS FOR THE | | | NEW BUILDING. | | | | | | 19) THE SITE PLAN FAILS TO SHOW THE EXHAUST FAN ON THE | | | WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING OR THE BOLLARD WITHIN THE | | | EAST DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 20) PLEASE CHECK YOUR WINDOW LABELS - THEY SHOULD BE | | | "SINGLE" HUNG. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |