Plan Review Details - Project Z16030014
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16030014
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-14-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 04-14-2016 Time 00:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 04-14-2016 Time 00:00 Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-14 00:12:09NO COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE INCREASE.

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-26 17:47:23THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE GENERATED FROM THE REVIEW
 OF THE REVISED PLANS LABELED LEVEL III SITE PLAN CITY
 COMMENTS 5/16/2016:
 1. SHEET C3.00 SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN - CONSIDER
 ADDING NO RIGHT TURN AND NO LEFT TURN SIGNS TO RESTRICT
 TURNS FROM THE NORTH-SOUTH THROUGH DRIVE ONTO THE SOUTH
 PARKING AREA.
  
 2. IS THERE A LANDING FOR THE CROSSWALKS AT THE END OF
 THE WEST HANDICAP PARKING SPACE IN THE NORTH PARKING
 AREA?
  
 3. L1.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN - OAK TREES AND OTHER TREES
 PROPOSED OVER THE PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE PIPES.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-11-2016 Time 08:08 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-11 07:42:53THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 2. REVISE THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR THE SOLID WASTE
 COLLECTION VEHICLE SO THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE TO CROSS
 THE LANE LINE ON WESTBOUND OKEECHOBEE BLVD TO ENTER THE
 SITE.
  
 3. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 4. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN.
  
 5. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING STAFF
 (LAURA LE) FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN LOCATIONS.
 THE AGE AND CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES MAY NOT BE
 ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS.
  
 6. SHOW HOW NEW WATER MAIN WILL BE FILLED AND FLUSHED.
 REFER TO CITY?S STANDARD DETAIL P-6 PRESSURE PIPE ?
 PIGGING PROCEDURE.
  
 7. EXISTING WATER SERVICE IS TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT
 THE MAIN WHEN NEW WATER SERVICE BECOMES ACTIVE. THIS
 SHALL BE SHOWN IN THE RECORD DRAWINGS.
  
 8. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE SAMPLE POINT FOR THE
 POTABLE WATER SOURCE.
  
 9. ON SHEET C3.00, CHANGE NOTE UNDER THE SIGN LEGEND TO
 READ A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 7? (AS OPPOSED TO MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 7?).
  
 10. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 11. ON SHEET C4.02, SECTION A-A SHOWS AN ELEVATION OF
 24.75 ABOVE ELEVATION 25.56 AND SECTION B-B SHOWS
 ELEVATIONS 25.00 AND 25.06 ABOVE ELEVATION 25.57. IT IS
 NOT CLEAR HOW THESE ELEVATIONS RELATE TO ONE ANOTHER.
  
 12. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH
 BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED
 TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A
 COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED
 TO BE COLLECTED. IF A COMPACTOR LARGER THAN 8 CUBIC
 YARDS IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE
 APPROPRIATE PRIVATE SERVICE PROVIDER STATING THEY HAVE
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND WILL BE ABLE TO
 SERVICE THE COMPACTOR IN THE PROPOSED LOCATION.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART
 OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES
 APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 LAURA LE, P.E.
 PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1093
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-07-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-07-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-07-2016 Time 14:56 Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-07 14:58:56THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 2. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS,
 TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END
 CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS
 LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS,
 AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 3. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 4. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS
 AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-26-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-26-2016 Time 16:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-26-2016 Time 16:08 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-26 16:09:11FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: RESTORATION HARDWARE Z16030014
 MAY 26, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE PLACEMENT OF TREES AND PALMS HAS
 CHANGED, AND THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES HAVE ALSO
 CHANGED. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLACEMENT OF ROOT BARRIERS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENT DATA
 CHART ON SHEET L1.00 TO MATCH THE PLANT LIST, THERE ARE
 SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES
 AND FLOWERING TREES TO MATCH THE NUMBER ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AS APPROVED.
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE JAPANESE FERN TREES ARE PLACED IN A
 VERY NARROW AREA BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE CURB AND
 TRAVEL LANES OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. THE NATURE OF
 THESE TREES IS TO SPREAD HORIZONTALLY WITH VERY WIDE
 CROWNS, AND THIS WILL CONFLICT WITH THE TRAVEL LANES
 AND COVER THE SIDES OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW
 THIS WILL BE MAINTAINED OR CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE SPECIES.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-11-2016 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-11-2016 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-11 11:25:29FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: RESTORATION HARDWARE Z16030014
 APRIL 11, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE PLACEMENT OF TREES AND PALMS HAS CHANGED, AND
 THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES HAVE ALSO CHANGED. PLEASE
 UPDATE THE PLACEMENT OF ROOT BARRIERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 2. PLEASE CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENT DATA CHART ON
 SHEET L1.00 TO MATCH THE PLANT LIST, THERE ARE SEVERAL
 DISCREPANCIES.
  
 3. PLEASE ADJUST THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES AND
 FLOWERING TREES TO MATCH THE NUMBER ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AS APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
  
 4. THE JAPANESE FERN TREES ARE PLACED IN A VERY NARROW
 AREA BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE CURB AND TRAVEL LANES
 OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. THE NATURE OF THESE TREES IS
 TO SPREAD HORIZONTALLY WITH VERY WIDE CROWNS, AND THIS
 WILL CONFLICT WITH THE TRAVEL LANES AND COVER THE SIDES
 OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS WILL BE
 MAINTAINED OR CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE SPECIES.
  

Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-27-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By lle Date 06-27-2016 Time 11:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lle Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-27 07:43:34THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE THOSE FROM
 CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW, MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEERING/MEP
 CALCULATIONS FOR WATER AND SEWER DEMAND (AVERAGE AND
 PEAK), INCLUDE IRRIGATION DEMAND AND FIRE FLOW DEMAND;
  
 2. SHOW HOW NEW WATER MAIN WILL BE FILLED AND FLUSHED.
 REFER TO CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL P-6 PRESSURE PIPE AND
 PIGGING PROCEDURE.
  
 3. EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE LINES, INCLUDING THOSE
 INSTALLED AND USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES, ARE TO BE
 CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN WHEN NEW SYSTEM BECOMES
 ACTIVE. ADD A NOTE TO CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING SERVICES
 (2-INCH IRRIGATION SERVICE AND POTABLE SERVICE) TOWARD
 ROSEMARY AVENUE. INCLUDE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EXIST
 PIPES ON ASBUILTS DRAWING.
  
 4. ADD AN BFP TO THE PROPOSED 1-1/2 INCH PRIVATE WATER
 SERVICE TO THE WESTERN FOUNTAIN AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO
 THE POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE 8-INCH WATER MAIN. CALL
 OUT THE POINT OF SERVICE. HOW IS THIS SERVICE METERED?
 THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION STANDARD FOR WATER SERVICE IS
 1-INCH OR 2-INCH.
  
 5. INDICATE THE LOCATION FOR SAMPLE POINT OF THE
 POTABLE WATER SOURCE AND CALL OUT AS "SOURCE".
  
 6. THE CAP TO THE NORTH TERMINATION POINT OF THE
 PROPOSED 8-INCH SERVICE IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. TO AVOID
 FUTURE BLOW OUT OF THE DEAD END, ADD A VALVE IN
 ADDITION TO THE CAP/PLUG WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS. CALL
 OUT ITS PROXIMITY (DISTANCE AND DEPTH) TO THE PROPOSED
 PRIVATE 8-INCH SANITARY SEWER.
  
 7. PROVIDE UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION.
  
 LAURA LE, P.E.
 PUBLCI UTILITIES ENGINEER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 PHONE: 561-494-1093
 CELL: 561-289-8414
 [email protected]

Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-11-2016 Time 08:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-13 00:07:52GENERAL COMMENTS FROM PU CUSTOMER SERVICE (S. HUNTER):
 1) SHOW FULL DETAILS OF BACKFLOW DEVICES. FOUNTAIN AND
 IRRIGATION MAY NEED TO BE SPLIT;
 2) CHEMICAL IN FOUNTAIN? AUTO FILL?
 3) ALL WATER METER IN EASEMENT
2016-04-11 08:10:27SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC.

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-11-2016 Time 08:09 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-11 08:09:24SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC.

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-11-2016 Time 08:07 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-11 08:06:53SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-27-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-27-2016 Time 12:30 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 06-27-2016 Time 08:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-31-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 05-31-2016 Time 10:19 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 05-31-2016 Time 10:19 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-31 10:20:19CASE NO. PB 950WWWW
 RESTORATION HARDWARE CAFE MAJOR DSI
 560 OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 JUNE 17, 2016, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 19, 2016
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JULY 31, 2016), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) NEW ITEM: STAFF HAS NOTICED THAT THE WALL AROUND THE
 WESTERN COURTYARD NO LONGER CONSISTS OF ANGLED SECTIONS
 THAT FOLLOW THE CONTOUR OF THE COURTYARD, BUT IS RATHER
 A FLAT PLANE OF 95 FEET. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS
 CHANGE. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLANAR BREAK(S) IN THE WALL TO
 PROVIDE ARTICULATION TO CREATE SHADOW AND VISUAL
 INTEREST AS STIPULATED IN THE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN
 GUIDELINES. REGARDLESS OF THE WALL LAYOUT YOU PROCEED
 WITH, PROVIDE A BETTER GRAPHIC TO VERIFY THAT THE NEW
 NORTHERN WALL OF THE WESTERN COURTYARD DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. THE LINE WEIGHT ON
 THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN MAKES IT LOOK LIKE A
 PORTION OF THE WALL IS IN THE SETBACK.
  
 2) OPEN ITEM: PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED OPEN AREA
 CALCULATION EXHIBIT BASED ON THE RECONFIGURED COURTYARD
 TO VERIFY THAT THE MINIMUM PARK/OPEN SPACE IS STILL
 MET.
  
 - THE REVISED OPEN AREA CALCULATION INCLUDES 2,212
 SQUARE FEET ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS. WHILE
 STAFF HAD SUGGESTED THIS MIGHT BE AN AREA WHERE
 ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE COULD BE ACHIEVED, IT WAS TO BE
 FUNCTIONAL OPEN SPACE SUCH AS A PLAZA OR A PATHWAY THAT
 TERMINATES AT A BENCH. A BENCH IN THE MIDDLE OF A
 LANDSCAPE STRIP, 120 FEET FROM THE PEDESTRIAN WAY DOES
 NOT PERMIT THIS AREA TO BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION. FOR THE AREA TO THE
 BENCH TO COUNT, IT WOULD NEED TO BE DESIGNED IN SUCH A
 MANNER THAT ALLOWS FUNCTIONAL USE. STAFF WOULD
 RECOMMEND LOOKING AT LANDSCAPE TO BUFFER THE BENCH FROM
 THE RAILROAD TRACK AS PART OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGN.
  
 3) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE ADD SOME ARCHITECTURAL
 ENHANCEMENTS ON THE NEW LARGE, EAST WALL THAT IS BEING
 PROPOSED ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE FOURTH FLOOR.
 PREVIOUSLY THIS HAD GLAZING THAT BROKE UP THE MASS OF
 THE SMALLER WESTERN WALL.
  
 - STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT ONE OF THE PARAPET WALLS WAS
 LOWERED SO THAT THE SKYLIGHT ABOVE THE STAIR IS NOW
 EXPOSED. CONTRARY TO THE RESPONSE, STAFF DID NOT
 SUGGEST INSTALLING WINDOWS ON THE KITCHEN BACK OF
 HOUSE. THE ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS REFERENCED IN THE
 ORIGINAL COMMENT CAN TAKE THE FORM OF SCORING LINES,
 MEDALLIONS, REPLICATING THE WINDOW GRILL WORK, ETC.
 ONTO THE BLANK AREAS. THE RESPONSE STATES THAT THERE
 WILL BE LANDSCAPE TO SOFTEN THE WALL. THE EAST
 ELEVATION IS MISLEADING THAT IT SHOWS NINE FOOT TALL
 PALM TREES INSTEAD OF THE SIX FOOT TALL JAMAICA CAPER
 TREE THAT IS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. GIVEN THE
 CONSTRAINTS WHERE THE TREES ARE PLANTED, THESE TREES
 ARE NOT EXPECTED TO GROW TO THEIR FULL POTENTIAL, SO
 ADDING TWO ADDITIONAL TREES WOULD HELP TO SOFTEN THE
 FACADE.
  
 4) NO RESPONSE PROVIDED TO THIS COMMENT: IS IT POSSIBLE
 TO SYMMETRICALLY LINE UP THE 4TH FLOOR DOOR ON THE
 NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES WITH THE SPANDREL GLASS
 "DOORWAYS" ON THE FIRST THREE FLOORS?
  
 5) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE MORE THAN 50 PARKING SPACES
 ON SITE, SO THREE ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED.
  
 6) NEW COMMENT: SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A REQUIRES THAT
 TERMINAL PARKING ISLANDS BE NO LESS THAN FIVE (5) FEET
 IN WIDTH FOR THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE.
 THE NEW CENTER PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET THIS
 STANDARD.
  
 7) NEW COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT ACCEPT OAK TREES IN FIVE
 (5) FOOT WIDE PARKING LOT ISLANDS. THE NEW CENTER
 PARKING TERMINAL ISLAND TREES SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR
 THE PLANTING WIDTH OF THE ISLAND. NOTE: A TREE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE AUTOTURN PLAN IN SHOWS THE
 GARBAGE TRUCK DRIVING UP ON CURBS AND SCRAPING THE
 PARKING LOT ENTRY COLUMN AND WALL. THE AUTOTURN PLAN
 OUT SHOWS THE GARBAGE TRUCK DRIVING OVER CURBS. NEITHER
 SITUATION IS PERMITTED. THE PLAN WILL BE AFFECTED BY
 ADDRESSING THE PREVIOUS COMMENT.
  
 9) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE OAK TREES SHOWN IN DIRECT
 CONFLICT WITH THE STORMWATER PIPES. THE TREES OR PIPES
 NEED TO BE RELOCATED AND HAVE ROOT BARRIERS INSTALLED
 TO ELIMINATE THE CONFLICT.
  
 10) REMINDER: PLEASE PROVIDE THE ITEMS SO STAFF MAY
 CLOSE THE OPEN MINOR PD AMENDMENT. OUTSTANDING COMMENTS
 RELATED TO THE WALL CORNERS WHERE THE WAIVER WAS
 GRANTED, THE NUMBER OF PARKING LOT LIGHT POLES, AND THE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SCREENING. THERE HAD BEEN DISCUSSION
 IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING OF INCLUDING SOME
 ROOFTOP FRAMING CHANGES TO FACILITATE BUILDING PERMIT
 REVISIONS PENDING THIS APPLICATION BEING APPROVED BY
 CITY COMMISSION.
  
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 04-08-2016 Time 16:49 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 04-08-2016 Time 16:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-08 16:51:00CASE NO. PB 950WWWW
 RESTORATION HARDWARE CAF? MAJOR DSI
 560 OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 APRIL 29, 2016, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JUNE 21, 2016
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JUNE 13, 2016),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE THE ITEMS SO STAFF MAY CLOSE THE OPEN
 MINOR PD AMENDMENT. OUTSTANDING COMMENTS RELATED TO THE
 WALL CORNERS WHERE THE WAIVER WAS GRANTED, THE NUMBER
 OF PARKING LOT LIGHT POLES, AND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 SCREENING. THERE HAD BEEN DISCUSSION IN THE
 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING OF INCLUDING SOME ROOFTOP
 FRAMING CHANGES TO FACILITATE BUILDING PERMIT REVISIONS
 PENDING THIS APPLICATION BEING APPROVED BY CITY
 COMMISSION.
  
 2) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEFINITION OF "NET INTERIOR
 AREA" WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN, PLEASE REVISE THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE SO THAT THE TOILET ROOMS ARE NOT EXCLUDED FROM
 THE NET INTERIOR AREA TOTAL. PLEASE REVISE THE PARKING
 DATA TABLE AS REQUIRED.
  
 3) PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE RELOCATED TREE TO THE
 FIRE HYDRANT (SOUTHEAST OF THE GREASE TRAPS) ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. WHY DOES THE HYDRANT ONLY
 SHOW ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN?
  
 4) WHY IS A WALL BEING ADDED AROUND THE PARKING AREA?
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED WALL. IS THERE
 AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THIS BE A DECORATIVE PICKET
 FENCE INSTEAD, PERHAPS MIRRORING THE STYLE THAT IS ON
 TOP OF THE WEST COURTYARD WALL OR THE FRONT GATE? NOTE:
 IT APPEARS THAT THE GARBAGE TRUCK WILL HIT THE WALL
 NORTHEAST OF THE FOUNTAIN.
  
 5) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON THE EASTERN COURTYARD
 AND FOUNTAIN WALL HEIGHTS. STAFF IS CONFUSED AS TO WHAT
 IS 8 FEET IN HEIGHT AND WHAT IS 16 FEET IN HEIGHT ON
 THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN WHEN COMPARED TO THE
 ELEVATION PLANS.
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED OPEN AREA CALCULATION
 EXHIBIT BASED ON THE RECONFIGURED COURTYARD TO VERIFY
 THAT THE MINIMUM PARK/OPEN SPACE IS STILL MET.
  
 7) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE
 SKYLIGHT STRUCTURE.
  
 8) THE NOTES ON THE BUILDING ELEVATION SHEET CALL OUT
 THE NEW CAF? AREA AS PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
 AND SKYLIGHT. IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING THESE WERE
 EXPLAINED TO STAFF AS BEING GLASS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT
 MATERIAL IS BEING USED FOR THE CAF?.
  
 9) PLEASE ADD SOME ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS ON THE
 NEW LARGE, EAST WALL THAT IS BEING PROPOSED ALONG THE
 LENGTH OF THE FOURTH FLOOR. PREVIOUSLY THIS HAD GLAZING
 THAT BROKE UP THE MASS OF THE SMALLER WESTERN WALL.
  
 10) IS IT POSSIBLE TO SYMMETRICALLY LINE UP THE 4TH
 FLOOR DOOR ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES WITH THE
 SPANDREL GLASS "DOORWAYS" ON THE FIRST THREE FLOORS?
  
  
  
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved