Plan Review Details - Project Z16020017
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16020017
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-09-2016 Time 12:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By squinone Date 03-09-2016 Time 12:54 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 12:56:04DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. SHEET A-1.-00 STATES THAT T3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. HOWEVER, THE ONLY ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE TWO ON SHEET
 A-2.00, GROUND FLOOR PLAN. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 3. WHEN THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE
 SHOWN, PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
 SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
 TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN
 OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. WHEN THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE
 SHOWN, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE
 LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR
 WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL
 LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE
 OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 10. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION
 OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT,
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-13-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By squinone Date 02-13-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By squinone Date 02-08-2018 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-13 14:07:14CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 DATE: 02/13/2018
 PROJECT: ALOFT HOTEL
 ADDRESS: 3RD STREET & ROSEMARY AVE
 STATUS: FAILED
  
 THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE
 ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH
 AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT
 ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN
 SHEET;
  
 2. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN;
  
 3. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAYS;
  
 4. SHOW PROPERTY LINE IN THE PLANS;
  
 5. PLANNING AND GRADING PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTED DURING
 THIS REVIEW PROCESS;
  
 6. WATER SUPPLY FROM THE METER TO THE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER MUST BE ENCASED;
  
 7. SHOW ROADWAY WIDTH FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY TO RIGHT-OF-WAY
 ON THE PLANS;
  
 8. ON THE SW CORNER THERE IS A POLE THAT FALLS WITHIN
 THE CURB RAMP LANDING. IS THE POLE BEING RELOCATED?
  
 AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE
 FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: HTTP
 ://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-
 PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE ?AUTO-CALC
 CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM? FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL
 WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE
 FOLLOWING LINK: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-
 PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND
 PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO
 VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS
 ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL;
  
 4. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS WHERE ARE THE PROPOSED WATER
 AND SANITARY SEWER LINES ARE CONNECTED TO EXISTING
 WATER AND SEWER MAINS;
  
 5. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE
 FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN
 SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE
 PLANS;
  
 6. FIRE HYDRANT TEST CAN BE REQUESTED AT (561)804-4700;
  
 7. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
 WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN
 AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY;
  
 8. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY?S
 STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST
 INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
 ACCESSIBLE;
  
 9. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT
 TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE
 CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER
 PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL
 ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY
 CROSSING INFORMATION;
  
 10. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE
 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION
 POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE
 LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE;
  
 11. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OPEN CUT/TRENCH FOR
 UTILITY CONNECTION WORKS WILL NEED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH 2016 CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. THE ROAD SHALL BE
 MILLED/RESURFACED FOR FULL LANE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL
 LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH AREA, INCLUDING A
 TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
 PLEASE SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS THE EXTENT OF THE
 MILLING AND RESURFACING;
  
 12. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL
 EXISTING UTILITIES ON 3RD STREET, 4TH STREET AND
 ROSEMARY AVE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER,
 GAS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY
 THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE
 POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN;
  
 13. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE
 THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD
 FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI
 PROJECT ENGINEER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
 (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366)
 P: 561.494.1108
 C: 561.459.6518
 F: 561.494.1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-25-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By squinone Date 08-25-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By squinone Date 08-15-2017 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-25 16:08:03PROJECT: ALOFT HOTEL (Z16020017)
 ADDRESS: W. ROSEMARY AVENUE AND 3RD STREET
 STATUS: FAILED
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS WITH THE ?AUTO CALC CONSTRUCTION
 ESTIMATE?. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED
 PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE. SHOW PROJECTED WATER/SEWER FLOW RATES FOR
 METER SIZING IN THE PLANS.
  
 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON?STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT?OF?WAY.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74?35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWING THE
 DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SHOWING
 LOADING AREAS.
  
 5. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 6. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/CWGIS/MYGE
 ONAV.HTML?APP=FLOODZONES. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 7. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94?305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 8. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
 SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE
 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE
 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS.
 ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
 PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC
 ENGINEER (UYEN DANG) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE
 REQUIRED STUDY.
  
 9. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN?OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES.
  
 10. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG?TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN.
  
 11. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES
 ENGINEER (LAURA LE) FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN
 LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES
 MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS.
  
 12. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 13. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND
 TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. INCLUDE LEGEND WITH
 DESCRIPTION FOR THE MILLING AND RESURFACING SHAPE.
  
 14. DIFFICULT TO READ PLANS MUST SUBMIT 24X36 PLAN SET.
  
 15. PLEASE, REVIEW THE MARKED UP PLANS PROVIDED BY
 MANUEL GONZALEZ AND SUBMITTED TO CONSULTANT AT AUGUST
 22, 2017 MEETING.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART
 OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES
 APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 SINCERELY,
 SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI
 PROJECT ENGINEER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
 (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366)
 P: 561.494.1108
 C: 561.459.6518
 F: 561.494.1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 10:25:41CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A
 ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN
 PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 5. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 7. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
 SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE
 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE
 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS.
 ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
 PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC
 ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE
 REQUIRED STUDY.
  
 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES.
  
 9. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN.
  
 10. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES
 ENGINEER (LAURA LE) FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN
 LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES
 MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. THE
 SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS
 DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY STAFF.
  
 11. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 12. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND
 TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS.
  
 13. EACH BUILDING SHOULD HAVE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE
 OF STORM WATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWING THE
 DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SHOWING
 LOADING AREAS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART
 OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES
 APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 REPLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT
 [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION.
 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE
 PLAN.
  
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-18-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-18-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-18-2017 Time 13:34 Sent To  
Notes
2017-08-18 13:40:503RD REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 THERE WERE NO NOTES, NARRATIVES OR CLOUD REVISION
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE
 PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS.
  
 HOWEVER, THIS PROJECT APPEARS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF
 A HIGH RISE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 5
 EDITION AND THE BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED.
  
 THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN INDICATES A SINGLE
 WATER SUPPLY FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM, TWO ARE
 REQUIRED. A DOUBLE CHECK FOR THE FIRE LINE IS NOT
 INDICATED. IT SHALL INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA
 24 AND BE A MINIMUM 40' FROM THE BUILDING OR CONTAINED
 WITHIN A 2 HOOUR ENCLOSURE. PLEASE COORDINATE THESE
 ITEMS THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE LIFE SAFETY CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-03-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-03-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-03-2017 Time 10:44 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-03 11:02:192ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 THERE WERE NO NOTES, NARRATIVES OR CLOUD REVISION
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE
 PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS.
  
 HOWEVER, THIS PROJECT APPEARS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF
 A HIGH RISE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 5
 EDITION AND THE BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE LIFE SAFETY CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-25-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 02-25-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 02-25-2016 Time 13:14 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-25 13:15:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 13. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED
 FEBRUARY 3, 2015, FROM URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS, TO
 ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY
 SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-08-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-08-2018 Time 16:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-08-2018 Time 16:46 Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-08 16:47:02FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: ALOFT HOTELS Z16020017
 MARCH 8, 2018
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
 STAFF HAS REVIEWED PLANS AND OFFERED COMMENTS, AND
 SEVERAL COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. STAFF IS
 AVAILABLE TO MEET WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO
 CLARIFY ANY COMMENTS AND HELP RESOLVE ANY ISSUES.
 1. COMMENTS 1 THROUGH 5 PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED.
 2.
 3.
 4.
 5.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN INCLUDING THE CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER
 THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED,
 RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK
 THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL
 HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO
 MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5
 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS
 LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET
 TREES ALONG 3RD STREET AND ROSEMARY AND SHOW TREE
 GRATES AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND LOCATION.
 STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY. DETAIL
 PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET CURRENT REQUIREMENTS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/5/17:
  
 10. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED.
  
 11. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE CONSISTENT
 WITH SECTION 94-113 FOR SPACING EVERY 30 FEET, AND
 CONSISTENT IN SPECIES WITH OAKS ALONG ROSEMARY AVE.,
 3RD ST, AND RAILROAD AVE. THE PURPLE TABEBUIA TREES
 ADJACENT TO THE PLAZA AT RAILROAD AND 3RD ST MAY REMAIN
 AS THEY RELATE TO THE PLAZA. 4TH ST. PLEASE CHECK
 SPACING, STAFF RECOMMENDS STREET TREE IN TREE GRATE
 RATHER THAN ALEXANDER PALMS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/31/17:
 13. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 14. NOT SATISFIED. THE ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS
 GREASE TRAPS AND WATER LINE CONNECTIONS IN CONFLICT
 WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. PLEASE SHOW THE UTILITIES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ADDRESS CONFLICTS.
  
 15. NOT SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT TREE GRATES ONLY
 BE PROPOSED WHERE NECESSARY FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH,
 OTHERWISE EXPANDED PLANTING AREAS ARE PREFERRED.
 A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF SIDEWALK WIDTH IS REQUIRED, AND
 THE REST OF THE SPACE CAN BE PLANTING AREA OR 4X4 TREE
 GRATES ONLY. IF STREET PARKING IS ADJACENT TO THE AREA,
 PASS THROUGH AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-01-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-01-2017 Time 10:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-01-2017 Time 10:47 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-01 10:48:17FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: ALOFT AND SOJOURN HOTELS Z16020017
 AUGUST 31, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED
 BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PER SECTION 94-442 (A).
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM FOR
 THE REQUIRED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON SHEET A-1.02 TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR POOL AREA AS
 ROOFTOP GARDEN AND MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN SECTION
 94-109. ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED
 AREA, AND 20% TREE CANOPY.
  
 PLEASE SHADE THE VEGETATED AREAS TO DISCERN THEM FROM
 THE OVERALL OPEN SPACE AREA.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CATEGORY FOR INTERIOR
 COURTYARD MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN OF 20%
 VEGETATED AREA, AND 30% TREE CANOPY.
  
 PLEASE SHADE THE VEGETATED AREAS TO DISCERN THEM FROM
 THE OVERALL OPEN SPACE AREA.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8 FOR ALL
 APPLICABLE REQUIRED AREAS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLANT AND TREE LIST FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE AREAS AND LABEL EACH TREE FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CREDIT TO DEMONSTRATE IT MEETS THE PERCENTAGE
 CLAIMED ON THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR
 EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
 GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN INCLUDING THE CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER
 THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED,
 RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK
 THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL
 HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO
 MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5
 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS
 LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET
 TREES ALONG 3RD STREET AND ROSEMARY AND SHOW TREE
 GRATES AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND LOCATION.
 STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN. NO DETAIL
 PROVIDED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/5/17:
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE LABEL ALL STREETS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE
 PROPERTIES TOGETHER SHOWING HOW THE ADJOINING BUFFERS
 AND STREET TREES RELATE TO EACH OTHER.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE CONSISTENT
 WITH SECTION 94-113 FOR SPACING EVERY 30 FEET, AND
 CONSISTENT IN SPECIES WITH OAKS ALONG ROSEMARY AVE.,
 3RD ST, AND RAILROAD AVE. THE PURPLE TABEBUIA TREES
 ADJACENT TO THE PLAZA AT RAILROAD AND 3RD ST MAY REMAIN
 AS THEY RELATE TO THE PLAZA.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/31/17:
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 14. THE ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS GREASE TRAPS
 AND WATER LINE CONNECTIONS IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPING. PLEASE SHOW THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND ADDRESS CONFLICTS.
  
 15. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT TREE GRATES ONLY BE PROPOSED
 WHERE NECESSARY FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH, OTHERWISE
 EXPANDED PLANTING AREAS ARE PREFERRED.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-07-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-07-2017 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-07-2017 Time 15:35 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-07 15:36:05FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: ALOFT AND SOJOURN HOTELS Z16020017
 APRIL 4, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED
 BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PER SECTION 94-442 (A).
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE
 DIAGRAM FOR THE REQUIRED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON
 SHEET A-1.02 TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR
 POOL AREA AS ROOFTOP GARDEN AND MEET THE DEFINITION
 FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY
 REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED AREA, AND 20% TREE CANOPY.
  
 PLEASE SHADE THE VEGETATED AREAS TO DISCERN THEM FROM
 THE OVERALL OPEN SPACE AREA.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CATEGORY FOR
 INTERIOR COURTYARD MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ON ITS
 OWN OF 20% VEGETATED AREA, AND 40% TREE CANOPY.
  
 PLEASE SHADE THE VEGETATED AREAS TO DISCERN THEM FROM
 THE OVERALL OPEN SPACE AREA.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8 FOR ALL
 APPLICABLE REQUIRED AREAS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLANT AND TREE LIST FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE AREAS AND LABEL EACH TREE FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CREDIT TO DEMONSTRATE IT MEETS THE PERCENTAGE
 CLAIMED ON THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR
 EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
 GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN INCLUDING THE CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER
 THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED,
 RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK
 THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL
 HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO
 MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5
 FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS
 LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT
 VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE
 ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT
 TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET
 TREES ALONG 3RD STREET AND ROSEMARY AND SHOW TREE
 GRATES AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND LOCATION.
 STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN. NO DETAIL
 PROVIDED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/5/17:
  
 10. PLEASE LABEL ALL STREETS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PROPERTIES
 TOGETHER SHOWING HOW THE ADJOINING BUFFERS AND STREET
 TREES RELATE TO EACH OTHER.
  
 12. STREET TREES NEED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION
 94-113 FOR SPACING EVERY 30 FEET, AND CONSISTENT IN
 SPECIES WITH OAKS ALONG ROSEMARY AVE., 3RD ST, AND
 RAILROAD AVE. THE PURPLE TABEBUIA TREES ADJACENT TO THE
 PLAZA AT RAILROAD AND 3RD ST MAY REMAIN AS THEY RELATE
 TO THE PLAZA.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-07-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-07-2016 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-07-2016 Time 14:37 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-07 14:37:36FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: ALOFT AND SOJOURN HOTELS Z16020017
 MARCH 7, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY A
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PER SECTION 94-442 (A).
  
 2. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM FOR THE
 REQUIRED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON SHEET A-1.02 TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR POOL AREA AS ROOFTOP
 GARDEN AND MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN SECTION 94-109.
 ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED AREA,
 AND 20% TREE CANOPY.
  
 3. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CATEGORY FOR INTERIOR COURTYARD
 MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN OF 20% VEGETATED
 AREA, AND 40% TREE CANOPY.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE CANOPY BY
 SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8 FOR ALL
 APPLICABLE REQUIRED AREAS.
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES
 ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN INCLUDING THE
 CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER THE EXISTING TREES
 AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED, RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 6. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT
 TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4
 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 7. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT VEHICLE ENTRANCES
 AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE ENGINEERED TO ALLOW
 ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN
 ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL
 ALLOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR.
  
 8. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET TREES ALONG 3RD
 STREET AND ROSEMARY AND SHOW TREE GRATES AND STRUCTURAL
 SOIL DETAIL AND LOCATION.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-21-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-02-21 13:55:54THE PLANS SHOW A TURN RADIUS THAT IS ACCEPTABLE BUT THE
 PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE ELEVATIONS THAT WILL ALLOW OUR
 TRUCKS TO OPERATE AND EMPTY THE DUMPSTERS.. THE MINIMUM
 FLOOR TO CEILING ELEVATION FOR OUR TRUCKS TO OPERATE IS
 22' WITH NO OBSTRUCTIONS. PLEASE VERIFY THIS CLEARANCE.
 IF THIS CLERANCE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN ANOTHER SOLUTION
 WILL HAVE TO BE ARRANGED.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 10:27:18SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-18-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-18-2019 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-18-2019 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
2019-07-18 16:15:34THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS CAN BE MADE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
 OF THE SITE PLAN:
  
 1.STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED PER SFWMD
 CRITERIA FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW
 ATTENUATION. ONLY ONE CONNECTION WILL BE ALLOWED TO THE
 CITY?S MS4. EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE CONSIDERED
 UNDEVELOPED LAND.
  
 2.SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS ARE TO USE THE SAME
 VERTICAL DATUM. THE SURVEY USED NAVD 1988. THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS LIST NGVD1929.
  
 3.THE CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). ALL
 SHEETS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION SHALL LIST THE
 VERTICAL DATUM USED AND THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO
 NGVD1929.
  
 4.THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINES TO THE PROJECT SITE
 ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN IF NOT UTILIZED
 FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 5.THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERALS ARE TO BE
 REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE MAIN IF NOT USED FOR THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 6.SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 PROVIDE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE TO UTILITIES AND ROOT
 BARRIERS PER PUBLIC UTILITIES GUIDELINES.
  
 7.PROVIDE CCTV OF THE CITY?S MS4 PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 12:33:111. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
  
 2. VERTICAL DATUM ON SURVEY IS NAVD 1988. A CONVERSION
 FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD1929 WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 3. NO ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED.
  
 4. A SIDEWALK EASEMENT ALONG 3RD STREET MAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 5. WILL 4TH STREET BE A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET?
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
2016-03-09 10:27:03SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 10:26:50SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-06-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-06 16:09:43PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 4TH STREET BETWEEN
 ROSEMARY AVENUE AND RAILROAD AVENUE PRIOR TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
 2. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVERT ONE OF THE TWO WESTBOUND
 RECEIVING LANES INTO AN EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE IN THE
 WEST LEG OF THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET
 INTERSECTION, AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY PERMIT FOR SUCH
 CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST
 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. DESIGN PLANS FOR THE
 IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE DEVELOPER AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW DURING PERMITTING.
 3. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING
 PERMITTING:
 A. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY CODE SECTIONS
 94-485 AND 94-113.
 B. ALIGN THE CURB RAMPS CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR
 ROSEMARY AVENUE WITH THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER PROVIDING
 DECORATIVE CROSSWALK TO MATCH THE CROSSWALK ON 4TH
 STREET.
 C. ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE PARALLEL PARKING. THE
 PARALLEL PARKING SHOWN IS TOO CLOSE TO THE CROSSWALK
 PER MUTCD AND FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIREMENTS (MINIMUM OF
 20 FEET FROM THE NEAR SIDE OF CROSSWALK TO THE FIRST
 PARKING SPACE).
 D. PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AT THE LOCATIONS WHERE IT SAYS
 ?PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY? (ON SHEET A-1.00). ALIGN THE CURB
 RAMPS AND PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK.
 E. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF
 THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND
 FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT
 SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE
 SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE.
 F. SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
 STREETS.
 G. PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG
 THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS
 WITH DRAINAGE WORK.
 H. RECONSTRUCT ROSEMARY AVENUE ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE
 TO MATCH THE CITY?S IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON ROSEMARY
 AVENUE. DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-03-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-07-03 15:22:39TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. VERIFY TRIP GENERATION (IN/OUT TRIPS) FOR
 RESIDENTIAL USE DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR.
 2. EXPAND TRIP DISTRIBUTION TO INCLUDE MAJOR ROADWAYS
 WITH THE 2-MILE RADIUS OF INFLUENCE. CLARIFY IF TRIP
 PERCENTAGES ALONG 4TH STREET AND 3RD STREET WEST OF
 ROSEMARY AVENUE ARE REASONABLE AS THESE ARE LOCAL
 STREETS AND NOT FOR LONG DISTANCE TRIPS. ALSO, CLEARLY
 LABEL THE PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS ON RAILROAD AVENUE
 BETWEEN SITE DRIVEWAY AND 3RD STREET.
 3. NORTHBOUND RIGHT-TURN OVERLAP DOES NOT CURRENTLY
 EXIST AT BANYAN BLVD/QUADRILLE BLVD BUT IS ASSUMED IN
 THE ANALYSIS. CLARIFY IF THIS IS A PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENT.
 4. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS EXPECTED TO ADD
 APPROXIMATELY 95 TRIPS AND 120 TRIPS TO THE QUADRILLE
 BLVD/3RD STREET INTERSECTION, AND VEHICLE QUEUES AT
 THIS INTERSECTION MAY IMPACT VEHICULAR CIRCULATION TO
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS ADJACENT ROADWAY
 NETWORK. PLEASE PROPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES SUCH AS
 CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET BY
 CONVERTING ONE OF THE WESTBOUND RECEIVING LANES INTO AN
 EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE IN THE WEST LEG OF THE
 INTERSECTION (AND OTHER ASSOCIATED MODIFICATIONS), AND
 IMPLEMENT A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) PROGRAM TO MINIMIZE VEHICULAR TRIPS.
 TDM MEASURES TO CONSIDER INCLUDE:
 A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTIAL LEASE
 B. PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYEES
 C. BIKE CORRALS AND BICYCLE AND SCOOTER RENTAL FOR
 HOTEL GUESTS
 D. SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITIES FOR EMPLOYEES
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING
 PERMITTING:
  
 5. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY CODE SECTIONS
 94-485 AND 94-113.
 6. ALIGN THE CURB RAMPS CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR
 ROSEMARY AVENUE WITH THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER PROVIDING
 DECORATIVE CROSSWALK TO MATCH THE CROSSWALK ON 4TH
 STREET.
 7. ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE PARALLEL PARKING. THE
 PARALLEL PARKING SHOWN IS TOO CLOSE TO THE CROSSWALK
 PER MUTCD AND FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIREMENTS (MINIMUM OF
 20 FEET FROM THE NEAR SIDE OF CROSSWALK TO THE FIRST
 PARKING SPACE).
 8. PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AT THE LOCATIONS WHERE IT SAYS
 ?PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY? (ON SHEET A-1.00). ALIGN THE CURB
 RAMPS AND PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK.
 9. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF
 THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND
 FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT
 SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE
 SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE.
 10. SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
 STREETS.
 11. PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG
 THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS
 WITH DRAINAGE WORK.
 12. RECONSTRUCT ROSEMARY AVENUE ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE
 TO MATCH THE CITY?S IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON ROSEMARY
 AVENUE. DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-07-2018 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2018-03-07 16:29:49 
 ALOFT HOTEL/INDIGO HOTEL/ROSEMARY RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC
 STUDY (DATED APRIL 12, 2017) COMMENTS:
 - DETERMINE THE RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE PER
 CITY CODE SECTION 94-311(D)(4)F.
 - PROVIDE ACCIDENT DATA PER CITY CODE SECTION
 94-311(D)(3)I TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS INTERSECTIONS.
 - USE PEAK SEASON CONVERSION FACTOR (PSCF) INSTEAD OF
 SEASONAL FACTOR (SF) TO ADJUST TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PEAK
 SEASONS.
 - INCLUDE ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUT INCOMPLETE
 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE BACKGROUND
 TRAFFIC.
 - IN THE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS, INCLUDE EXISTING AND
 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AT THE DRIVEWAYS ON WEST
 RAILROAD AVENUE.
 - PROVIDE DAILY TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES.
 - CLARIFY AND PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE
 TRIPS ARE ASSIGNED TO THE ROADWAY NETWORK. SOME OF THE
 TRIP ASSIGNMENT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
 THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION. FOR EXAMPLE, 30% OF THE TRIPS
 ARE DISTRIBUTED TO THE NORTH, BUT LESS THAN 10% OF THE
 TRIPS ARE USING ROSEMARY AVENUE NORTH, AND NO TRIPS ARE
 USING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH.
 - REVISE THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT TO REFLECT THE LATEST SITE
 PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE ALOFT HOTEL
 DRIVEWAY ON 3RD STREET IS FOR SERVICE VEHICLE ONLY, BUT
 QUITE A FEW TRIPS ARE SHOWN TO ACCESS THE SITE THROUGH
 THIS DRIVEWAY.
 - WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE 95TH PERCENTILE
 QUEUE IN THE EB APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET
 IS FORECAST TO INCREASE FROM APPROXIMATELY 370 FEET TO
 APPROXIMATELY 580 FEET DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR.
 THIS IS EXPECTED TO SPILL BACK TO THE ROSEMARY
 AVENUE/3RD STREET INTERSECTION. PLEASE PROPOSE
 MITIGATION MEASURES AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET. IT
 APPEARS TO BE SUFFICIENT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE
 AN EB LEFT-TURN LANE AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET WITH
 RESTRIPING AND SIGNAL HEAD MODIFICATIONS.
 - THE CITY HAS NOT COMPLETED A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE
 ANALYSES DUE TO INCOMPLETE INFORMATION AND PEAK SEASON
 TRAFFIC VOLUMES. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED
 WHEN WE RECEIVE THE REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY.
 - INCLUDE IN THE APPENDIX SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS AT THE
 STUDY INTERSECTIONS.
 SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON JANUARY 29, 2018) COMMENTS:
 ALOFT HOTEL (Z16020017)
 - THE GROUND FLOOR HAS 26 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BUT
 IS LABELED AS 25 SPACES. PLEASE REVISE.
 - CLARIFY HOW MANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED
 WITH THE 3 BIKE RACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PER CITY
 CODE SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), A MINIMUM OF 4 BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 63 REQUIRED AUTOMOBILE
 PARKING SPACES.
 - ALIGN THE CURB RAMPS CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR
 ROSEMARY AVENUE WITH THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER PROVIDING
 DECORATIVE CROSSWALK TO MATCH THE CROSSWALK ON 4TH
 STREET.
 - ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE PARALLEL PARKING. THE
 PARALLEL PARKING SHOWN IS TOO CLOSE TO THE CROSSWALK
 PER MUTCD REQUIREMENTS.
 - PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AT THE LOCATIONS WHERE IT SAYS
 ?PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY? (ON SHEET A-1.00). ALIGN THE CURB
 RAMPS AND PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK.
 - MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF
 THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND
 FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT
 SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE
 SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE.
 - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
 STREETS.
 - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO
 CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING
 LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN,
 PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED
 IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN.
 - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG
 THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS
 WITH DRAINAGE WORK.
 - PROVIDE FLUSH SECTION ON ROSEMARY AVENUE TO ALIGN
 WITH CITY?S FUTURE PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN.
 INDIGO HOTEL (Z16020016)
 - PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), A MINIMUM OF 4
 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 65 REQUIRED
 AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES. HOWEVER, NO BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE SHOWN. PLEASE REVISE.
 - CLARIFY HOW MANY HOTEL ROOMS ARE PROPOSED. SHEET
 A-0.00 INDICATES THERE ARE 148 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES, BUT
 SHEET A-1.00 AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATE THERE ARE
 146 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES.
 - REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE 2 DRIVEWAYS (WHICH IS
 CURRENTLY SHOWN AS 22 FEET WIDE) FOR THE PORTE COCHERE
 ON WEST RAILROAD AVENUE.
 - MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF
 THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND
 FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT
 SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE
 SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE.
 - SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE CORNERS ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR AND MEZZANINE LEVELS ARE STRIPED OUT BUT
 WITH PARKING CURB STOPS. CLARIFY IF THOSE ARE INTENDED
 AS TURNAROUND AREA OR PARKING SPACES.
 - ALIGN THE CURB RAMP CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR WEST
 RAILROAD AVENUE WITH THE RAMP ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE.
 - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
 STREETS.
 - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO
 CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING
 LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN,
 PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED
 IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN.
 - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG
 THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS
 WITH DRAINAGE WORK.
 ROSEMARY RESIDENTIAL (Z16020014)
 - CLARIFY HOW MANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED
 WITH THE 2 BIKE RACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PER CITY
 CODE SECTION 94-111(I)(2), A MINIMUM OF 10 BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 144 REQUIRED PARKING
 SPACES, AND THESE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN A SECURED AREA.
 - A CURB RAMP IS PROPOSED FACING ROSEMARY AVENUE NEAR
 4TH STREET. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSSWALK AND A CURB RAMP
 ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE.
 - A CURB RAMP IS PROPOSED FACING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE
 NEAR 4TH STREET. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THIS CURB
 RAMP TO THE INDIGO HOTEL PROPERTY TO ALIGN WITH THE
 CURB RAMP ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE.
 - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
 STREETS.
 - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO
 CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING
 LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN,
 PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED
 IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN.
 - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG
 THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS
 WITH DRAINAGE WORK.
 - PROVIDE FLUSH SECTION ON ROSEMARY AVENUE TO ALIGN
 WITH CITY?S FUTURE PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN.
  
 ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E.
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 10:26:33SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 04-17-2018 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 04-17-2018 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 02-22-2018 Time 13:08 Sent To  
Notes
2018-04-17 14:49:061. PLEASE REVISE ALL THE DRAWINGS TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY
 BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS.
 RENDERINGS NEED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE PROJECT,
 INCLUDING PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MATERIALS.
 2. GREASE TRAP INDICATED IN SHEET C-01 IS IN DIRECT
 CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ALONG ROSEMARY AVE
 NEXT TO BUILDING FACADE. PLEASE RELOCATE GREASE TRAP TO
 A LESS PROMINENT SITE LOCATION.
 3. PLEASE RELOCATE THE PROPOSED VAULT FOR DOMESTIC
 METER ON 3RD STREET DUE TO ITS CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED
 TREES.
 4. PLEASE INCLUDE A LIST OF SPECIFIC MATERIALS AND
 FINISHES PROPOSED FOR THE ELEVATIONS.
 5. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED
 PUBLIC BIKE PARKING ALONG BUILDING FRONTAGE 1/100 FEET
 OF FRONTAGE).
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE STREET LEVEL.
 STREET FIXTURE SHALL FOLLOW DOWNTOWN STANDARD.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-27-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-27-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By kmartin Date 09-27-2017 Time 13:19 Sent To  
Notes
2017-09-22 13:20:401. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN WITH ALL THREE PROJECTS
 SHOWN.
 2. THE ROSEMARY AVENUE STREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
 CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT. THE CITY IS CURRENTLY
 CONSIDERING MULTIPLE CHANGES TO THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN.
 THE PROJECT WILL INCORPORATE SUCH CHANGES AS THEY
 BECOME AVAILABLE.
 3. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS NEXT TO THE BUILDING, ALONG
 ROSEMARY AVENUE, SHALL BE REDESIGNED TO CREATE A
 STRONGER CONNECTION BETWEEN THE STREETSCAPE AND THE
 BUILDING INTERIOR, ESPECIALLY FOR RETAIL SPACES.
 4. ADDITIONAL SEATING SHOULD BE INCORPORATED TO SUPPORT
 THE TRANSIT STOP.
 5. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE PRIMARY
 ENTRANCE AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 6. THE CORNER OF ROSEMARY AND THIRD SHALL INCORPORATE
 HIGHLY ACTIVE CONNECTION TO THE INSIDE OF THE BUILDING.
 THE FLOORPLAN SHALL BE RESTUDIED FOR POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
 INCLUDING THE RELOCATION OF THE STAIRS.
 7. THE OPENING FOR THE DROP OFF AREA SHOULD BE REDUCED
 AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, PROVIDE AUTO-TURN STUDY FOR THE
 AREA.
 8. PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 9. PROVIDE GROUND FLOOR DETAIL ELEVATIONS IN COLOR.
 10. MONUMENT SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN THE DMP
 AREA.
 11. PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO DOWNTOWN ACTION
 COMMITTEE SPECIAL REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEVIN MARTIN -
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER ([email protected]).
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-17-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-17-2017 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By kmartin Date 03-17-2017 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-17 15:54:351. THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF 4TH STREET CONNECTS 2
 RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND THEREFORE SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE
 CITY.
 2. APPLICANT SHALL MEET WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,
 UYEN DANG ([email protected]) BEFORE RESUBMITTAL TO
 DISCUSS TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE.
 3. A FULL ENGINEERING SET OF DRAWINGS SHALL BE INCLUDED
 WITH RESUBMITTAL.
 4. APPLICANT SHALL MEET WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
 PETER BIENIEK ([email protected]) BEFORE RESUBMITTAL TO
 ADDRESS SANITATION OPERATION.
 5. APPLICANT SHALL MEET WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT, POONAM KALKAT ([email protected]) BEFORE
 RESUBMITTAL TO ADDRESS CAPACITY FOR THE PROJECT.
 6. THE OPENING FOR THE DROP OFF AREA SHOULD BE REDUCED
 AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, PROVIDE AUTO-TURN STUDY FOR THE
 AREA.
 7. PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 8. THE ROSEMARY AVENUE STREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
 CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT.
 9. PROVIDE GROUND FLOOR DETAIL ELEVATIONS IN COLOR.
 10. THE STREETSCAPE ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL
 ACCOMMODATE A TRANSIT STOP.
 11. MONUMENT SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN THE DMP
 AREA.
  
  
 FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEVIN MARTIN -
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER ([email protected]).
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:34 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 15:34:411. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CURRENT
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZLRDRS. A CODE AMENDMENT WILL BE
 NECESSARY TO ALLOW A 7-STORY BUILDING ON THE SITE.
 - ICD-5 HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5-STORIES. PROPOSED
 BUILDING EXCEED HEIGHT PERMITTED.
 2. A PORTE COCHERE IS NOT PERMITTED ALONG A PRIMARY
 STREET SUCH AS ROSEMARY AVENUE WITHIN ICD .
 3. SIDEWALK AROUND THE ENTIRE PROJECT IS RECOMMENDED TO
 BE AT LEAST 12 FEET.
 4. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE
 DESIRABLE SECTION FOR THE PROPOSED 4TH STREET. STAFF
 RECOMMENDS 11? TRAVEL LANES, AND 8? ON-STREET PARKING
 (COUNTING THE GUTTER).
 5. PLEASE INDICATE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PROPOSED 4TH
 STREET IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING 4TH STREET WEST OF
 ROSEMARY AVENUE.
 6. IF THE FIRST FLOOR SPACES ALONG ROSEMARY AVE ARE
 INTENDED FOR RETAIL USES (STORES OR RESTAURANTS) THE
 WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA IS NOT APPROPRIATE.
 7. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG 3RD STREET ON
 TREE GRATES ADJACENT TO THE CURB (30? SEPARATION).
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE BLANK WALL REGULATION.
 9. TREE GRATES SHALL BE 4? BY 4?.
 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE
 (SEC 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN
 14% REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION).
 11. ALL DRIVEWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ADJACENT
 SIDEWALK LEVEL.
 12. PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE PICK-UP
 OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC).
 PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH TRANSPARENCY REGULATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
 15. SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING
 SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET
 UP TO THE FACE OF BUILDINGS.
 16. PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO REFLECT
 THE SURVEY INFORMATION (1.13 AC= 49,223 SF)
 17. THE SITE PLAN DRAWING SHALL INCLUDE THE ADJACENT
 BUILDINGS AND STREET, INCLUDING THE BUILDINGS ACROSS
 THE STREET , AND SHOW THE PROJECT INSERTED IN THE
 CONTEXT.
 18. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO
 ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN
 SHEET A0.06.
 19. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN
 ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 20. COLORED ELEVATIONS (ALL FACADES) SHALL INCLUDE CALL
 OUT MATERIALS AND REFERENCE PICTURES OF PROPOSED
 MATERIALS (INDICATE SCALE). FACADES SHALL INCLUDE
 ADJACENT BUILDINGS (INCLUDING ACROSS THE STREET) TO
 SHOW THE PROJECT IN ITS CONTEXT.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved