 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16020016
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16020016 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
12:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 12:47:45 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. SHEET A-1.-00 STATES THAT T3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. HOWEVER, THE ONLY ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS ONE ON SHEET | | | A-2.00, GROUND FLOOR PLAN. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE. | | | | | | 3. WHEN THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE | | | SHOWN, PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE | | | SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING | | | TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN | | | OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION | | | 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 4. WHEN THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE | | | SHOWN, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE | | | LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR | | | WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL | | | LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE | | | OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 9. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 10. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION | | | OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2016-03-08 15:53:43 | 1. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CURRENT | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZLRDRS. A CODE AMENDMENT WILL BE | | | NECESSARY TO ALLOW A 7-STORY BUILDING ON THE SITE. | | | - ICD-5 HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5-STORIES. PROPOSED | | | BUILDING EXCEED HEIGHT PERMITTED. | | | 2. A PORTE COCHERE IS NOT PERMITTED ALONG A SECONDARY | | | STREET SUCH AS RAILROAD AVENUE WITHIN ICD . | | | 3. SIDEWALK AROUND THE ENTIRE PROJECT IS RECOMMENDED TO | | | BE AT LEAST 12 FEET. | | | 4. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE | | | DESIRABLE SECTION FOR THE PROPOSED 4TH STREET. STAFF | | | RECOMMENDS 11? TRAVEL LANES, AND 8? ON-STREET PARKING | | | (COUNTING THE GUTTER). | | | 5. PLEASE INDICATE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PROPOSED 4TH | | | STREET IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING 4TH STREET WEST OF | | | ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | 6. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT PROVIDE MINIMUM AMOUNT | | | REQUIRED BY CURRENT CODE. | | | 7. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG 3RD STREET ON | | | TREE GRATES ADJACENT TO THE CURB (30? SEPARATION). | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE BLANK WALL REGULATION. | | | 9. TREE GRATES SHALL BE 4? BY 4?. | | | 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE | | | (SEC 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN | | | 14% REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION). | | | 11. ALL DRIVEWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ADJACENT | | | SIDEWALK LEVEL. | | | 12. PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE PICK-UP | | | OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC). | | | PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS. | | | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH TRANSPARENCY REGULATIONS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | 15. SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING | | | SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET | | | UP TO THE FACE OF BUILDINGS. | | | 16. PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO REFLECT | | | THE SURVEY INFORMATION (1.18 AC= 51,401 SF= MAX DEV | | | CAPACITY OF 141,352 SF) | | | 17. THE SITE PLAN DRAWING SHALL INCLUDE THE ADJACENT | | | BUILDINGS AND STREET, INCLUDING THE BUILDINGS ACROSS | | | THE STREET , AND SHOW THE PROJECT INSERTED IN THE | | | CONTEXT. | | | 18. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO | | | ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN | | | SHEET A0.06. | | | 19. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN | | | ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. | | | 20. COLORED ELEVATIONS (ALL FACADES) SHALL INCLUDE CALL | | | OUT MATERIALS AND REFERENCE PICTURES OF PROPOSED | | | MATERIALS (INDICATE SCALE). FACADES SHALL INCLUDE | | | ADJACENT BUILDINGS (INCLUDING ACROSS THE STREET) TO | | | SHOW THE PROJECT IN ITS CONTEXT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
02-13-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
02-08-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-13 11:50:34 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DATE: 02/13/2018 | | | PROJECT: INDIGO HOTEL | | | ADDRESS: 3RD ST & W RAILROAD AVE | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH | | | AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT | | | ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. SHOW PROJECTED DEMANDS ON THE UTILITY PLAN | | | SHEET; | | | | | | 2. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE | | | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN | | | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY | | | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY | | | DESIGN; | | | | | | 3. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAYS; | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTERS TO BE | | | LOCATED AS CLOSED TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AS POSSIBLE. | | | ANOTHER OPTION IS TO ENCASE THE PIPE UP TO THE BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS WHICH WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE; | | | | | | 5. ADVISORY: GENERALLY VAULTS FOR DOMESTIC METERS | | | RANGES UP TO 20 LF. ROTATE THE VAULT 90 DEGREES TO | | | OBTAIN THE NECESSARY SPACE FOR THE VAULT WHICH WILL | | | CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREE GRATE; | | | | | | 6. ON THE SE CORNER OF THE PROPERTY THERE IS A CURB | | | RAMP PERPENDICULAR TO 3RD STREET WITH NO PROPOSED CURB | | | RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 3RD STREET. PLEASE COORDINATE | | | WITH CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER, ERIK FERGUSON ON THE | | | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED CURB RAMP/CROSSWALK; | | | | | | 7. ON THE NE CORNER OF THE PROPERTY THE CURB RAMP DOES | | | NOT ALIGN WITH THE NORTH CURB RAMP ON 4TH STREET. THE | | | CURB RAMP ALSO CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED STORM INLET. | | | PLEASE REDESIGN TO AVOID CONFLICT; | | | | | | 8. SHOW PROPERTY LINE ON THE PLANS; | | | | | | 9. ADD A NORTH ARROW ON THE LOCATION MAP; | | | | | | 10. PLANNING AND GRADING PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTED | | | DURING THIS PLAN REVIEW; | | | | | | 11. A ROAD WIDTHS TO THE PLANS FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY TO | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY; | | | | | | AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE | | | FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: HTTP | | | ://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,- | | | PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING- | | | PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND | | | PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO | | | VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS | | | ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL; | | | | | | 4. SHOW THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO THIS SITE ON THE | | | FINAL UTILITY PLAN. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN | | | SUBMITTAL. SHOW HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA RESULT ON THE | | | PLANS; | | | | | | 5. FIRE HYDRANT TEST CAN BE REQUESTED AT (561)804-4700; | | | | | | 6. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY; | | | | | | 7. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST | | | INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | ACCESSIBLE; | | | | | | 8. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT | | | TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE | | | CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER | | | PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL | | | ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY | | | CROSSING INFORMATION; | | | | | | 9. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 10. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OPEN CUT/TRENCH FOR | | | UTILITY CONNECTION WORKS WILL NEED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH 2016 CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. THE ROAD SHALL BE | | | MILLED/RESURFACED FOR FULL LANE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL | | | LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH AREA, INCLUDING A | | | TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH. | | | PLEASE SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS THE EXTENT OF THE | | | MILLING AND RESURFACING; | | | | | | 11. SHOW ON THE FINAL PLANS SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES ON 3RD STREET, 4TH STREET AND WEST | | | RAILROAD AVE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER, | | | GAS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS ETC. PLEASE IDENTIFY | | | THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE | | | POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN; | | | | | | 12. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE | | | THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: HT | | | TP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLICA | | | TIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-28-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
squinone |
Date |
08-28-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
squinone |
Date |
08-15-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-28 14:50:11 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | PROJECT: Z16020016 - HOTEL INDIGO | | | STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS, IN THE NEXT REVIEW LEVEL, | | | HOW WILL THE SITE/BUILDING BE SERVED FOR WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE PROTECTION. SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN | | | THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED SITE AS WELL AS PROPOSED | | | UTILITIES TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT (LABEL SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL OF ALL PIPES AND CONDUITS ETC.); | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR WATER AND FIRE DEMAND, BOTH | | | AVERAGE AND PEAK FLOW WITH PEAKING FACTOR. ALSO SUBMIT | | | ESTIMATES OF SANITARY SEWER FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 3. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY'S RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A | | | ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER | | | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN | | | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 5. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT HTT | | | P://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS, | | | -PERMITS-APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | 6. FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTP://MA | | | PS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/CWGIS/MYGEONAV.HTML?APP=FLOODZON | | | ES. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS | | | WHICH WILL BE ADOPTED IN OCTOBER 2017 WILL NOT IMPACT | | | THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 8. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, WHEN SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW PHASE, SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, | | | VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY | | | BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES. ALSO | | | CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | | | | 9. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT | | | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE | | | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. | | | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE CONTACT UYEN DANG, CITY'S TRANSPORTATION | | | ENGINEER AT (561) 494-1087. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE | | | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER | | | LINES. | | | | | | 11. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE | | | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN | | | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY | | | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY | | | DESIGN. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | ENGINEER (LAURA LE) FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN | | | LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES | | | MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. THE | | | SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS | | | DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY STAFF. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 14. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND | | | TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR | | | OPEN CUT/TRENCH FOR UTILITY CONNECTION WORKS WILL NEED | | | TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2016 CITY STANDARD DETAIL | | | GC-9. THE ROAD SHALL BE MILLED/RESURFACED FOR FULL LANE | | | WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH | | | AREA, INCLUDING A TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH | | | SIDE OF THE TRENCH. | | | | | | 15. EACH BUILDING SHOULD HAVE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE | | | OF STORM WATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION. | | | PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWING THE | | | DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SHOWING | | | LOADING AREAS. | | | | | | 17. DIFFICULT TO READ PLANS MUST SUBMIT 24X36 PLAN SET. | | | | | | 18. PLEASE, REVIEW THE MARKED UP PLANS PROVIDED BY | | | MANUEL GONZALEZ AND SUBMITTED TO CONSULTANT AT AUGUST | | | 22, 2017 MEETING. | | | | | | AFTER THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED, IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE | | | FOLLOWING GENERAL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE 'AUTO-CALC | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM' FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | WORK PROPOSED. THIS FORM CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING- | | | PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT WITH THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION (IN DETAIL I.E. AVERAGE AND | | | PEAK WITH PEAKING FACTOR). SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO | | | VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS | | | ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS WELL. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LATEST VERSION OF THE APPLICABLE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD UTILITY DETAILS TO THE | | | DETAIL SHEET/S DURING SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT FOR THE LATEST REVISED DETAILS IN CAD | | | FORMAT. CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS (IN PDF FILE FORMAT) | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING SITE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 5. PLACEMENT OF THE ANY PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER, DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST | | | INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | ACCESSIBLE. | | | | | | 6. IN THE FINAL PLANS, MUST PROVIDE UTILITY CONFLICT | | | TABLE (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE | | | CONFLICT POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER | | | PIPES AS WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL | | | ARE TO BE VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS, PROVIDE ALL UTILITY | | | CROSSING INFORMATION | | | | | | 7. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 8. FOR THE FINAL WATER AND SEWER PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE | | | THAT: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | 9. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, | | | LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE | | | PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR | | | POTABLE WATER LINES. | | | | | | 10. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS | | | PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN | | | INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | | | | SOFIA QUINONES-BENEJAM, EI | | | PROJECT ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 3366) | | | P: 561.494.1108 | | | C: 561.459.6518 | | | F: 561.494.1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 10:16:22 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A | | | ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER | | | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN | | | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 5. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 | | | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND | | | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 7. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT | | | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE | | | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. | | | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE | | | REQUIRED STUDY. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE | | | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER | | | LINES. | | | | | | 9. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE | | | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN | | | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY | | | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY | | | DESIGN. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | ENGINEER (LAURA LE) FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN | | | LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES | | | MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. THE | | | SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS | | | DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY STAFF. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 12. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND | | | TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. | | | | | | 13. EACH BUILDING SHOULD HAVE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE | | | OF STORM WATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION. | | | PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWING THE | | | DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SHOWING | | | LOADING AREAS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART | | | OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES | | | APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | | | | 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | REPLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT | | | [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. | | | FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-18-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-18-2017 |
Time |
14:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-18-2017 |
Time |
13:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-08-18 14:35:15 | 3RD REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | THERE WERE NO NOTES, NARRATIVES, OR CLOUD REVISIONS | | | INDICATING COMPLIANCE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS. HOWEVER, THE | | | BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROJECTAND. | | | | | | A DOUBLE CHECK VALVE BACK FLOW PREVENTER FOR THE FIRE | | | LINE IS NOT INDICATED ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGEERING PLAN. | | | PER NFPA 24 THIS BACK FLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE LOCATED | | | 40' FROM THE BUILDING OR WITHIN A 2 HOUR ENCLOSURE. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE THE LOCATION THROUGH THE OFFICE OF | | | THE FIRE MARSHAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE LIFE SAFETY CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-03 10:44:14 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | THERE WERE NO NOTES, NARRATIVES, OR CLOUD REVISIONS | | | INDICATING COMPLIANCE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS. HOWEVER, THE | | | BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROJECTAND. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE LIFE SAFETY CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-25-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-25-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-25-2016 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-25 13:12:46 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 12. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 13.THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-08-2018 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-08-2018 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-08 16:45:00 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: INDIGO HOTELS Z16020016 | | | MARCH 8, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED PLANS AND OFFERED COMMENTS, AND | | | SEVERAL COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. STAFF IS | | | AVAILABLE TO MEET WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO | | | CLARIFY ANY COMMENTS AND HELP RESOLVE ANY ISSUES. | | | 1. SATISFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. | | | 3. SATISFIED. | | | 4. SATISFIED. | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN INCLUDING THE CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER | | | THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED, | | | RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK | | | THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL | | | HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO | | | MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 | | | FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS | | | LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. | | | | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET | | | TREES ALONG 3RD STREET AND WEST RAILROAD AVENUE AND | | | SHOW TREE GRATES AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES AS REQUIRED ON 30 FOOT | | | SPACING. CHANGE MEDJOOL DATE PALMS AT DROP OFF TO OAKS, | | | AND ADD THE REQUIRED OAK IN THE CENTER OF THE DROP OFF. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/31/17: | | | | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. THE ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS | | | GREASE TRAPS AND WATER LINE CONNECTIONS IN CONFLICT | | | WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. PLEASE SHOW THE UTILITIES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ADDRESS CONFLICTS. | | | | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT TREE GRATES ONLY | | | BE PROPOSED WHERE NECESSARY FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH, | | | OTHERWISE EXPANDED PLANTING AREAS ARE PREFERRED ALONG | | | 3RD ST. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF SIDEWALK WIDTH IS | | | REQUIRED, AND THE REST OF THE SPACE CAN BE PLANTING | | | AREA OR 4X4 TREE GRATES ONLY. IF STREET PARKING IS | | | ADJACENT TO THE AREA, PASS THROUGH AREAS MUST BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-01-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-01-2017 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-01-2017 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-01 11:31:09 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: INDIGO AND SOJOURN HOTELS Z16020016 | | | AUGUST 31, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED | | | BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PER SECTION 94-442 (A). | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM FOR | | | THE REQUIRED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON SHEET A-1.02 TO | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR ROOFTOP GARDEN | | | AND MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. | | | ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED AREA, | | | AND 20% TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | PLEASE SHADE THE VEGETATED AREAS TO DISCERN THEM FROM | | | THE OVERALL OPEN SPACE AREA. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE | | | CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8 FOR ALL | | | APPLICABLE REQUIRED AREAS. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLANT AND TREE LIST FOR THE OPEN | | | SPACE AREAS AND LABEL EACH TREE FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE CREDIT TO DEMONSTRATE IT MEETS THE PERCENTAGE | | | CLAIMED ON THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR | | | EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G). | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN INCLUDING THE CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER | | | THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED, | | | RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK | | | THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL | | | HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO | | | MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 | | | FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS | | | LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT | | | VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE | | | ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND | | | GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT | | | TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR. | | | | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET | | | TREES ALONG 3RD STREET AND WEST RAILROAD AVENUE AND | | | SHOW TREE GRATES AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES AS REQUIRED ON 30 FOOT | | | SPACING. CHANGE MEDJOOL DATE PALMS AT DROP OFF TO OAKS, | | | AND ADD THE REQUIRED OAK IN THE CENTER OF THE DROP OFF. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/31/17: | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 10. THE ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS GREASE TRAPS | | | AND WATER LINE CONNECTIONS IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPING. PLEASE SHOW THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND ADDRESS CONFLICTS. | | | | | | 11. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT TREE GRATES ONLY BE PROPOSED | | | WHERE NECESSARY FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH, OTHERWISE | | | EXPANDED PLANTING AREAS ARE PREFERRED ALONG 3RD ST. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-16-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-07-2017 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-07-2017 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-16 15:36:44 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: INDIGO AND SOJOURN HOTELS Z16020016 | | | APRIL 7, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED | | | BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PER SECTION 94-442 (A). | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE | | | DIAGRAM FOR THE REQUIRED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON | | | SHEET A-1.02 TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR | | | ROOFTOP GARDEN AND MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN SECTION | | | 94-109. ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED | | | AREA, AND 20% TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | PLEASE SHADE THE VEGETATED AREAS TO DISCERN THEM FROM | | | THE OVERALL OPEN SPACE AREA. | | | | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE | | | CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8 FOR ALL | | | APPLICABLE REQUIRED AREAS. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLANT AND TREE LIST FOR THE OPEN | | | SPACE AREAS AND LABEL EACH TREE FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE CREDIT TO DEMONSTRATE IT MEETS THE PERCENTAGE | | | CLAIMED ON THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR | | | EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G). | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN INCLUDING THE CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER | | | THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED, | | | RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK | | | THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL | | | HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO | | | MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 | | | FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS | | | LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT | | | VEHICLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE | | | ENGINEERED TO ALLOW ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND | | | GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL ALLOW SAFE SIGHT | | | TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR. | | | | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET | | | TREES ALONG 3RD STREET AND WEST RAILROAD AVENUE AND | | | SHOW TREE GRATES AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES AS REQUIRED ON 30 FOOT | | | SPACING. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-07-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-07-2016 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-07-2016 |
Time |
14:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-07 14:20:46 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: INDIGO AND SOJOURN HOTELS Z16020016 | | | MARCH 7, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY A | | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PER SECTION 94-442 (A). | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM FOR THE | | | REQUIRED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON SHEET A-1.02 TO MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2ND FLOOR ROOFTOP GARDEN AND | | | MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN CATEGORY REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED AREA, AND 20% | | | TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE CANOPY BY | | | SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8 FOR ALL | | | APPLICABLE REQUIRED AREAS. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES | | | ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | CHART SECTION 94-446 (G). | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN INCLUDING THE | | | CANOPY SIZES AND INDICATING WHETHER THE EXISTING TREES | | | AND PALMS WILL BE PRESERVED, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 5. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT | | | TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 | | | FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE AT VEHICLE ENTRANCES | | | AND EXITS. THE ENTRANCES NEED TO BE ENGINEERED TO ALLOW | | | ANY TREES AND SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER TO BE PLANTED IN | | | ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEM, AND STILL | | | ALLOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES TO BE CLEAR. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF STREET TREES ALONG 3RD | | | STREET AND WEST RAILROAD AVENUE AND SHOW TREE GRATES | | | AND STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL AND LOCATION. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pbieniek |
Date |
02-21-2018 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-02-21 14:09:41 | BASED ON THE PRINTS THE AUTO TURN SHOULD WORK. THE | | | PRINTS DO NOT INDICATE THE FLOOR TO CEILING ELEVATION. | | | THE SANITATION TRUCKS IN ORDER TO OPERATE NEED A | | | MINIMUM 22' CLEARANCE. IF THE BUILDING DOES NOT PROVIDE | | | THAT CLEARANCE TO OPERATE AND ALTERNATIVE SANITATION | | | PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 10:17:44 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-18-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-18-2019 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-18-2019 |
Time |
16:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-07-18 16:12:50 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS CAN BE MADE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL | | | OF THE SITE PLAN: | | | | | | 1.STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED PER SFWMD | | | CRITERIA FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW | | | ATTENUATION. ONLY ONE CONNECTION WILL BE ALLOWED TO THE | | | CITY?S MS4. EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE CONSIDERED | | | UNDEVELOPED LAND. | | | | | | 2.SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS ARE TO USE THE SAME | | | VERTICAL DATUM. THE SURVEY USED NAVD 1988. THE | | | ENGINEERING PLANS LIST NGVD1929. | | | | | | 3.THE CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). ALL | | | SHEETS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION SHALL LIST THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM USED AND THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO | | | NGVD1929. | | | | | | 4.THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINES TO THE PROJECT SITE | | | ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN IF NOT UTILIZED | | | FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 5.THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERALS ARE TO BE | | | REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE MAIN IF NOT USED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 6.SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | PROVIDE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE TO UTILITIES AND ROOT | | | BARRIERS PER PUBLIC UTILITIES GUIDELINES. | | | | | | 7.PROVIDE CCTV OF THE CITY?S MS4 PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-05-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-05-2017 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-05-2017 |
Time |
14:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-05 14:17:09 | COMMENTS BELOW ARE BASED ON THE AUGUST 15, 2017 REVIEW | | | PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. NEW FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREAS WILL BE EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2017 IF | | | RESOLUTION PASSES AT SECOND READING BEFORE CITY | | | COMMISSION. | | | | | | 2. LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE PRIVATE | | | STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND THE CITY'S MS4 SYSTEM TO NO | | | MORE THAN ONE (1). | | | | | | 3. PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SHOULD BE BASED ON CURRENT | | | STATE OF THE PROPERTY (E.G. NEARLY PERVIOUS / | | | UNDEVELOPED). | | | | | | 4. LABEL 4TH STREET AS PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 12:30:36 | 1. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | | | | 2. VERTICAL DATUM ON SURVEY IS NAVD 1988. A CONVERSION | | | FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD1929 WILL NEED TO BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 3. NO ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. A SIDEWALK EASEMENT ALONG 3RD STREET MAY NEED TO BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 5. WILL 4TH STREET BE A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET? | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | 2016-03-09 10:17:26 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 10:17:09 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-06 16:06:43 | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 4TH STREET BETWEEN | | | ROSEMARY AVENUE AND RAILROAD AVENUE PRIOR TO THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. | | | 2. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVERT ONE OF THE TWO WESTBOUND | | | RECEIVING LANES INTO AN EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE IN THE | | | WEST LEG OF THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/3RD STREET | | | INTERSECTION, AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY PERMIT FOR SUCH | | | CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. DESIGN PLANS FOR THE | | | IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE DEVELOPER AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW DURING PERMITTING. | | | 3. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING | | | PERMITTING: | | | A. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY CODE SECTIONS | | | 94-485 AND 94-113. | | | B. CLARIFY HOW MANY HOTEL ROOMS ARE PROPOSED. SHEET | | | A-0.00 INDICATES THERE ARE 148 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES, BUT | | | SHEET A-1.00 AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATE THERE ARE | | | 146 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES. | | | C. REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE 2 DRIVEWAYS (WHICH IS | | | CURRENTLY SHOWN AS 22 FEET WIDE) FOR THE PORTE COCHERE | | | ON WEST RAILROAD AVENUE. | | | D. SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE | | | STREETS. | | | E. PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG | | | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS | | | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-03-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-07-03 15:18:58 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. VERIFY TRIP GENERATION (IN/OUT TRIPS) FOR | | | RESIDENTIAL USE DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR. | | | 2. EXPAND TRIP DISTRIBUTION TO INCLUDE MAJOR ROADWAYS | | | WITH THE 2-MILE RADIUS OF INFLUENCE. CLARIFY IF TRIP | | | PERCENTAGES ALONG 4TH STREET AND 3RD STREET WEST OF | | | ROSEMARY AVENUE ARE REASONABLE AS THESE ARE LOCAL | | | STREETS AND NOT FOR LONG DISTANCE TRIPS. ALSO, CLEARLY | | | LABEL THE PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS ON RAILROAD AVENUE | | | BETWEEN SITE DRIVEWAY AND 3RD STREET. | | | 3. NORTHBOUND RIGHT-TURN OVERLAP DOES NOT CURRENTLY | | | EXIST AT BANYAN BLVD/QUADRILLE BLVD BUT IS ASSUMED IN | | | THE ANALYSIS. CLARIFY IF THIS IS A PROPOSED | | | IMPROVEMENT. | | | 4. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS EXPECTED TO ADD | | | APPROXIMATELY 95 TRIPS AND 120 TRIPS TO THE QUADRILLE | | | BLVD/3RD STREET INTERSECTION, AND VEHICLE QUEUES AT | | | THIS INTERSECTION MAY IMPACT VEHICULAR CIRCULATION TO | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS ADJACENT ROADWAY | | | NETWORK. PLEASE PROPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES SUCH AS | | | CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET BY | | | CONVERTING ONE OF THE WESTBOUND RECEIVING LANES INTO AN | | | EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE IN THE WEST LEG OF THE | | | INTERSECTION (AND OTHER ASSOCIATED MODIFICATIONS), AND | | | IMPLEMENT A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND | | | MANAGEMENT (TDM) PROGRAM TO MINIMIZE VEHICULAR TRIPS. | | | TDM MEASURES TO CONSIDER INCLUDE: | | | A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTIAL LEASE | | | B. PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYEES | | | C. BIKE CORRALS AND BICYCLE AND SCOOTER RENTAL FOR | | | HOTEL GUESTS | | | D. SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITIES FOR EMPLOYEES | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING | | | PERMITTING: | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY CODE SECTIONS | | | 94-485 AND 94-113. | | | 6. CLARIFY HOW MANY HOTEL ROOMS ARE PROPOSED. SHEET | | | A-0.00 INDICATES THERE ARE 148 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES, BUT | | | SHEET A-1.00 AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATE THERE ARE | | | 146 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES. | | | 7. REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE 2 DRIVEWAYS (WHICH IS | | | CURRENTLY SHOWN AS 22 FEET WIDE) FOR THE PORTE COCHERE | | | ON WEST RAILROAD AVENUE. | | | 8. SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE | | | STREETS. | | | 9. PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG | | | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS | | | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-07-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-07 16:32:04 | ALOFT HOTEL/INDIGO HOTEL/ROSEMARY RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC | | | STUDY (DATED APRIL 12, 2017) COMMENTS: | | | - DETERMINE THE RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE PER | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311(D)(4)F. | | | - PROVIDE ACCIDENT DATA PER CITY CODE SECTION | | | 94-311(D)(3)I TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS INTERSECTIONS. | | | - USE PEAK SEASON CONVERSION FACTOR (PSCF) INSTEAD OF | | | SEASONAL FACTOR (SF) TO ADJUST TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PEAK | | | SEASONS. | | | - INCLUDE ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUT INCOMPLETE | | | DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE BACKGROUND | | | TRAFFIC. | | | - IN THE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS, INCLUDE EXISTING AND | | | FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AT THE DRIVEWAYS ON WEST | | | RAILROAD AVENUE. | | | - PROVIDE DAILY TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES. | | | - CLARIFY AND PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE | | | TRIPS ARE ASSIGNED TO THE ROADWAY NETWORK. SOME OF THE | | | TRIP ASSIGNMENT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH | | | THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION. FOR EXAMPLE, 30% OF THE TRIPS | | | ARE DISTRIBUTED TO THE NORTH, BUT LESS THAN 10% OF THE | | | TRIPS ARE USING ROSEMARY AVENUE NORTH, AND NO TRIPS ARE | | | USING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH. | | | - REVISE THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT TO REFLECT THE LATEST SITE | | | PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE ALOFT HOTEL | | | DRIVEWAY ON 3RD STREET IS FOR SERVICE VEHICLE ONLY, BUT | | | QUITE A FEW TRIPS ARE SHOWN TO ACCESS THE SITE THROUGH | | | THIS DRIVEWAY. | | | - WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE 95TH PERCENTILE | | | QUEUE IN THE EB APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET | | | IS FORECAST TO INCREASE FROM APPROXIMATELY 370 FEET TO | | | APPROXIMATELY 580 FEET DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR. | | | THIS IS EXPECTED TO SPILL BACK TO THE ROSEMARY | | | AVENUE/3RD STREET INTERSECTION. PLEASE PROPOSE | | | MITIGATION MEASURES AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET. IT | | | APPEARS TO BE SUFFICIENT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE | | | AN EB LEFT-TURN LANE AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET WITH | | | RESTRIPING AND SIGNAL HEAD MODIFICATIONS. | | | - THE CITY HAS NOT COMPLETED A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE | | | ANALYSES DUE TO INCOMPLETE INFORMATION AND PEAK SEASON | | | TRAFFIC VOLUMES. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED | | | WHEN WE RECEIVE THE REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY. | | | - INCLUDE IN THE APPENDIX SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS AT THE | | | STUDY INTERSECTIONS. | | | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON JANUARY 29, 2018) COMMENTS: | | | ALOFT HOTEL (Z16020017) | | | - THE GROUND FLOOR HAS 26 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BUT | | | IS LABELED AS 25 SPACES. PLEASE REVISE. | | | - CLARIFY HOW MANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED | | | WITH THE 3 BIKE RACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PER CITY | | | CODE SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), A MINIMUM OF 4 BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 63 REQUIRED AUTOMOBILE | | | PARKING SPACES. | | | - ALIGN THE CURB RAMPS CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR | | | ROSEMARY AVENUE WITH THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER PROVIDING | | | DECORATIVE CROSSWALK TO MATCH THE CROSSWALK ON 4TH | | | STREET. | | | - ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE PARALLEL PARKING. THE | | | PARALLEL PARKING SHOWN IS TOO CLOSE TO THE CROSSWALK | | | PER MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. | | | - PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AT THE LOCATIONS WHERE IT SAYS | | | ?PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY? (ON SHEET A-1.00). ALIGN THE CURB | | | RAMPS AND PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK. | | | - MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF | | | THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND | | | FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT | | | SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE | | | SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE. | | | - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE | | | STREETS. | | | - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO | | | CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING | | | LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, | | | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED | | | IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. | | | - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG | | | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS | | | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. | | | - PROVIDE FLUSH SECTION ON ROSEMARY AVENUE TO ALIGN | | | WITH CITY?S FUTURE PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH | | | ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN. | | | INDIGO HOTEL (Z16020016) | | | - PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), A MINIMUM OF 4 | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 65 REQUIRED | | | AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES. HOWEVER, NO BICYCLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE SHOWN. PLEASE REVISE. | | | - CLARIFY HOW MANY HOTEL ROOMS ARE PROPOSED. SHEET | | | A-0.00 INDICATES THERE ARE 148 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES, BUT | | | SHEET A-1.00 AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATE THERE ARE | | | 146 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES. | | | - REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE 2 DRIVEWAYS (WHICH IS | | | CURRENTLY SHOWN AS 22 FEET WIDE) FOR THE PORTE COCHERE | | | ON WEST RAILROAD AVENUE. | | | - MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF | | | THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND | | | FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT | | | SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE | | | SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE. | | | - SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE CORNERS ON THE | | | GROUND FLOOR AND MEZZANINE LEVELS ARE STRIPED OUT BUT | | | WITH PARKING CURB STOPS. CLARIFY IF THOSE ARE INTENDED | | | AS TURNAROUND AREA OR PARKING SPACES. | | | - ALIGN THE CURB RAMP CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR WEST | | | RAILROAD AVENUE WITH THE RAMP ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. | | | - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE | | | STREETS. | | | - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO | | | CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING | | | LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, | | | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED | | | IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. | | | - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG | | | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS | | | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. | | | ROSEMARY RESIDENTIAL (Z16020014) | | | - CLARIFY HOW MANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED | | | WITH THE 2 BIKE RACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PER CITY | | | CODE SECTION 94-111(I)(2), A MINIMUM OF 10 BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 144 REQUIRED PARKING | | | SPACES, AND THESE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED IN A SECURED AREA. | | | - A CURB RAMP IS PROPOSED FACING ROSEMARY AVENUE NEAR | | | 4TH STREET. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSSWALK AND A CURB RAMP | | | ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. | | | - A CURB RAMP IS PROPOSED FACING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE | | | NEAR 4TH STREET. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THIS CURB | | | RAMP TO THE INDIGO HOTEL PROPERTY TO ALIGN WITH THE | | | CURB RAMP ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. | | | - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE | | | STREETS. | | | - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO | | | CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING | | | LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, | | | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED | | | IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. | | | - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG | | | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS | | | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. | | | - PROVIDE FLUSH SECTION ON ROSEMARY AVENUE TO ALIGN | | | WITH CITY?S FUTURE PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH | | | ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN. | | | | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 10:16:51 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
03-09-2018 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
01-29-2018 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-03-09 16:29:15 | 1.PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE RACKS. | | | USE CITY GUIDELINES FOR DIMENSIONS AND RECOMMENDED BIKE | | | RACK TYPES. | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING MID-BLOCK CROSSING ON EAST SIDE | | | OF RAILROAD AVENUE TO ENSURE IT ALIGNS WITH PROPOSED | | | MID-BLOCK CROSSING. | | | 3. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT EAST CORNER OF 4TH STREET | | | SHALL ALIGN ON PATH OF TRAVEL FROM SOUTH TO NORTH. | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS INCLUDING | | | PHOTOMETRICS FOR ALL EXTERIOR AREAS AT GROUND LEVEL. | | | LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH DECORATIVE FIXTURE | | | STANDARD FOR DOWNTOWN. MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE IS 0.6 AT 1 | | | FOOT ABOVE GROUND AT THE BACK OF CURB. | | | 5. ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPEMENT LOCATED OUTSDIE THE | | | BUILDING (FPL TRANSFORMER) SHALL BE SCREENED ACCORDING | | | TO SECTION 94-113(H) AND 94-315(A). | | | 6. PLEASE CONFIRM COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS (FROM | | | ALL DISCIPLINES) HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. A RESPONSE "BY | | | OTHERS" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. IT IS THE APPLICANT'S | | | RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE RESPONSES FOR ALL COMMENTS. | | | 7. THE INDIGO HOTEL IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN DAC APPROVAL. | | | ONCE ALL THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESS, A DAC | | | APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED INCLUDING ALL | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE DRAWING, | | | AND SURVEY. CIVIL DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR DAC | | | SUBMITTAL BUT ENGINEERING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSES | | | TO ENSURE NO CONFLICTS WILL ARISE AFTER DAC APPROVAL. | | | DAC APPLICATION CAN BE FOUND IN THE CITY'S WEBSITE. | | | PLEASE CHECK SUBMITTAL DEADLINES INCLUDED IN THE | | | APPLICATION. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-22-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-27-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kmartin |
Date |
09-27-2017 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-22 13:35:30 | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN WITH ALL THREE PROJECTS | | | SHOWN. | | | 2. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE PRIMARY | | | ENTRANCE AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | 3. THE 4TH STREET STREETSCAPE SHALL EXPAND EAST CORNER | | | LANDSCAPE AREA TO INCLUDE ALL SPACE NOT REQUIRED FOR | | | PARKING. | | | 4. THE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK ON RAILROAD AVENUE SHALL BE | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE EAST SIDE OF THE STREET. | | | 5. THE OPENING FOR THE DROP OFF AREA SHOULD BE REDUCED | | | AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. | | | 6. PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 7. ALL DRIVEWAYS SHALL MAINTAIN SIDEWALK LEVEL. | | | 8. PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE | | | SPECIAL REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEVIN MARTIN - | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER ([email protected]). | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-17-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-17-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kmartin |
Date |
03-17-2017 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-17 15:50:01 | 1. THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF 4TH STREET CONNECTS 2 | | | RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND THEREFORE SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE | | | CITY. | | | 2. APPLICANT SHALL MEET WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, | | | UYEN DANG ([email protected]) BEFORE RESUBMITTAL TO | | | DISCUSS TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE. | | | 3. A FULL ENGINEERING SET OF DRAWINGS SHALL BE INCLUDED | | | WITH RESUBMITTAL. | | | 4. APPLICANT SHALL MEET WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, | | | PETER BIENIEK ([email protected]) BEFORE RESUBMITTAL TO | | | ADDRESS SANITATION OPERATION. | | | 5. APPLICANT SHALL MEET WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT, POONAM KALKAT ([email protected]) BEFORE | | | RESUBMITTAL TO ADDRESS CAPACITY FOR THE PROJECT. | | | 6. THE OPENING FOR THE DROP OFF AREA SHOULD BE REDUCED | | | AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, PROVIDE AUTO-TURN STUDY FOR THE | | | AREA. | | | 7. PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 8. PROVIDE GROUND FLOOR DETAIL ELEVATIONS IN COLOR. | | | 9. THE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK ON RAILROAD AVENUE SHALL BE | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE EAST SIDE OF THE STREET. | | | | | | FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT KEVIN MARTIN - | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER ([email protected]). | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 15:54:13 | 1. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CURRENT | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZLRDRS. A CODE AMENDMENT WILL BE | | | NECESSARY TO ALLOW A 7-STORY BUILDING ON THE SITE. | | | - ICD-5 HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5-STORIES. PROPOSED | | | BUILDING EXCEED HEIGHT PERMITTED. | | | 2. A PORTE COCHERE IS NOT PERMITTED ALONG A SECONDARY | | | STREET SUCH AS RAILROAD AVENUE WITHIN ICD . | | | 3. SIDEWALK AROUND THE ENTIRE PROJECT IS RECOMMENDED TO | | | BE AT LEAST 12 FEET. | | | 4. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE | | | DESIRABLE SECTION FOR THE PROPOSED 4TH STREET. STAFF | | | RECOMMENDS 11? TRAVEL LANES, AND 8? ON-STREET PARKING | | | (COUNTING THE GUTTER). | | | 5. PLEASE INDICATE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PROPOSED 4TH | | | STREET IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING 4TH STREET WEST OF | | | ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | | 6. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT PROVIDE MINIMUM AMOUNT | | | REQUIRED BY CURRENT CODE. | | | 7. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG 3RD STREET ON | | | TREE GRATES ADJACENT TO THE CURB (30? SEPARATION). | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE BLANK WALL REGULATION. | | | 9. TREE GRATES SHALL BE 4? BY 4?. | | | 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE | | | (SEC 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN | | | 14% REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION). | | | 11. ALL DRIVEWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ADJACENT | | | SIDEWALK LEVEL. | | | 12. PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE PICK-UP | | | OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC). | | | PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS. | | | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH TRANSPARENCY REGULATIONS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | 15. SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING | | | SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET | | | UP TO THE FACE OF BUILDINGS. | | | 16. PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO REFLECT | | | THE SURVEY INFORMATION (1.18 AC= 51,401 SF= MAX DEV | | | CAPACITY OF 141,352 SF) | | | 17. THE SITE PLAN DRAWING SHALL INCLUDE THE ADJACENT | | | BUILDINGS AND STREET, INCLUDING THE BUILDINGS ACROSS | | | THE STREET , AND SHOW THE PROJECT INSERTED IN THE | | | CONTEXT. | | | 18. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO | | | ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN | | | SHEET A0.06. | | | 19. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN | | | ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. | | | 20. COLORED ELEVATIONS (ALL FACADES) SHALL INCLUDE CALL | | | OUT MATERIALS AND REFERENCE PICTURES OF PROPOSED | | | MATERIALS (INDICATE SCALE). FACADES SHALL INCLUDE | | | ADJACENT BUILDINGS (INCLUDING ACROSS THE STREET) TO | | | SHOW THE PROJECT IN ITS CONTEXT. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |