 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16020011
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16020011 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-12 10:58:31 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE IN A FLOOD ZONE. THE | | | ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL | | | ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS | | | ETC.) SHALL BE 12 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE | | | FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. THERE APPEARS TO BE THREE | | | COVERED PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON SHEET SP-1, SITE PLAN. | | | THE ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE THAT IS SHOWN IS NOT A | | | COVERED PARKING SPACE. THIS DOES NOT OFFER EQUIVALENT | | | FACILITATION BECAUSE SOMEONE WHO CAN ONLY USE AN | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE DOES NOT HAVE THE THE SAME | | | OPPORTUNITY TO PARK, LOAD AND UNLOAD, WITHOUT BEING | | | EXPOSED TO RAIN AND DIRECT SUNLIGHT. | | | | | | 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF | | | PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 10:13:32 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE IN A FLOOD ZONE FOR | | | WHICH THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION IS EL 7 NGVD. THE | | | ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL | | | ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS | | | ETC.) SHALL BE 6 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THAT BASE | | | FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. THE FIRST FLOOR UNIT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE. WHEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH FAIR HOUSING ACT, FROM | | | THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR | | | FACILITY ENTRANCES. | | | | | | 4. ONLY ON EXIT STAIR IS SHOWN. PER SECTION 1021.2 AND | | | TABLE 1021.2(1) OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, A MINIMUM OF | | | TWO EXIS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL UNITS ON THE FOURTH FLOOR | | | AND ABOVE. | | | | | | 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 8. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF | | | PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-20-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-20-2017 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-20 11:32:40 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT | | | 2. SITE/CIVIL PLAN SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mkhan |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
Time |
8:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
Time |
8:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-12 08:48:22 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION | | | | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS WATER AND SANITARY | | | SEWER DEMANDS (AVERAGE AND PEAK); AND FIRE DEMAND. | | | SUBMIT CALCULATIONS TO VALIDATE METER SIZE SELECTION. | | | | | | 2. ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS ACKNOWLEDGED STILL PERTAIN. | | | | | | 3. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR SHOWN ON PLANS DOES NOT MEET | | | DIMENSION CRITERIA PER CITY?S STANDARD DETAIL. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | | | | 4. MILLING AND RESURFACING REQUIREMENT FOR SANITARY | | | SEWER IS FOR A TOTAL WIDTH OF 100-FEET (50-FEET ON BOTH | | | SIDE OF THE CONNECTION POINT). | | | | | | | | | FOLLOWING ARE COMMENTS ON WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER, | | | DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY?S STANDARD | | | DETAILS. REVISE THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT. | | | | | | 2. THE NEW LANDSCAPING ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINES IS BEING PROPOSED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF | | | THE EXISTING WATER MAIN. THE CITY IS EVALUATING THE | | | POTENTIAL ABANDONMENT OF THE 4-INCH AND 8-INCH WATER | | | LINES (ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES | | | RESPECTIVELY). | | | | | | 3. EXTEND THE EXISTING 8-INCH WATER MAIN ON SOUTH | | | FLAGLER TO THE NORTH (ABOUT 100-FEET) AND MOVE THE | | | PROPOSED CONNECTION FOR POTABLE WATER LINE AND FIRE | | | LINE FOR ?THE CRYSTAL? PROPERTY FURTHER NORTH. | | | | | | MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1024 (OFFICE) | | | | | 2016-03-08 15:19:32 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 3. WHERE IS THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATION? | | | PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING THE | | | SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE PROPOSED | | | DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A | | | ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER | | | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN | | | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B), ALSO SEE FIGURE XIV-3 OF | | | THE SAME SECTION. | | | | | | 5. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 | | | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND | | | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 7. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT | | | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE | | | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. | | | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE | | | REQUIRED STUDY. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE | | | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER | | | LINES. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 10. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE | | | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN | | | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY | | | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY | | | DESIGN. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 12. CONSIDER OTHER METHODS OF STORM WATER TREATMENT | | | OTHER THAN EXFILTRATION TRENCH. EXFILTRATION TRENCHES | | | ARE NOT EFFECTIVE IN THE LOW AREAS ALONG LAKE WORTH | | | LAGOON. | | | | | | 13. PER THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY STANDARDS MANUAL, MINIMUM | | | PIPE SIZE FOR USE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 15? RCP. | | | | | | 14. IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATIONS, EXPLAIN | | | HOW THE DEPTH TO WATER VALUE OF 3 FEET WAS CALCULATED | | | WHEN THE WEIR ELEVATION IS SHOWN AS 4.5 FEET AND THE | | | WATER LEVEL IS SHOWN AS 2.0 FEET. | | | | | | 15. PROVIDE FIELD DATA SUPPORTING THE EXFILTRATION RATE | | | ASSUMED IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 16. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. NOTE THERE | | | IS A WATER MAIN SOUTH OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 17. CALL OUT CITY UTILITIES INSTEAD OF PBCWUD ON THE | | | ROOT BARRIER DETAIL. | | | | | | 18. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND | | | TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. | | | | | | 19 REPLACE THE CURB CUT ALONG THE SOUTH END OF THE EAST | | | FRONTAGE ON FLAGLER BLVD. WITH TYPE ?D? CONCRETE CURB. | | | DROP CURB AND CURB TRANSITIONS CAN REMAIN AROUND THE | | | EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET. | | | | | | 20. TURN AROUND SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE DEAD | | | ENDS. REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION | | | 94-485 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | | | | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS LISTED IN THE TITLE | | | SEARCH (DB 1024/180). | | | | | | 22. RELOCATE THE PROPOSED METER OUTSIDE OF THE SIDEWALK | | | ALONG FLAGLER. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART | | | OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES | | | APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | | | | 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT | | | [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. | | | FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-05-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-05-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-05-2016 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-05 16:01:37 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, SPECIFICALLY CHAPTER CHAPTER | | | 30, NEW APARTMENT BUILDINGS, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE | | | CODES. | | | | | | 6. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. | | | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING | | | REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING | | | CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 7. THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT IS ACCEPTABLE; | | | HOWEVER, THE LOCATION OF THE FDC IS SUCH THAT WHEN THE | | | GATE OPENS IT WILL BECOME BLOCKED. RELOCATION OF THE | | | FDC CLOSER TO THE ROAD, 3 FT AWAY FROM THE OPENED GATE | | | IS RECOMMENDED. | | | | | | 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. IS AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR PROPOSED, WHAT WOULD | | | THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 10. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | FD ACCESS TO EACH STAIRWELL AT GROUND LEVEL WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 11. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER'S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 12. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU'S REVIEW OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-24-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-24-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-24-2016 |
Time |
13:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-24 14:13:25 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. THE PROPOSED EXIT DESIGN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED | | | TWO MEANS OF EGRESS OR THE ARRANGEMENT OF MEANS OF | | | EGRESS PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENT | | | BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | IS A FIRE PUMP PROPOSED, WHAT WOULD BE THE PRIMARY AND | | | SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. IS AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR PROPOSED, WHAT WOULD | | | THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 10. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 11. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 12. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 13. THE PARKING ACCESS DESIGN IS TOO NARROW FOR THE 20? | | | MINIMUM FIRE LANE WIDTH. A FDC AND FIRE HYDRANT WATER | | | SUPPLY SHALL BE LOCATED FOR ACCESS ALONG FLAGLER DR. | | | AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE | | | PREVENTION. | | | | | | 14. THE BUREAU'S REVIEW OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-19-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-19-2017 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-19-2017 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-19 15:33:33 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: THE CRYSTAL RESIDENTIAL Z16020011 | | | JANUARY 19, 2016 | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE PROTECTION DETAIL | | | AND PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION TO BE | | | MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD | | | THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT OF 40%. | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS JUST UNDER THE OVERHANG OF THE | | | BUILDING THAT CAN BE ENHANCED WITH SHRUBS AND | | | GROUNDCOVER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG FLAGLER PER | | | SECTION 94-443(D), AND INDICATE THE WIDTH OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE DECK AREA FROM THE | | | FLAGLER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PER 94-443(D). THE RETAINING | | | WALL CAN THEN BE MOVED BACK IN LINE WITH THE SOUTHERN | | | PORTION. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LINEAR FEET OF BUFFER | | | ON SHEET LP-1 TO SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF | | | BUFFERS AND RECALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN ORDER TO CLARIFY PORTIONS | | | WHERE CODE CANNOT BE MET. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL WATER, | | | SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/3/16: | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREE, | | | FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB REQUIREMENTS BASED ON 40% | | | MINIMUM OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR | | | THE ACTUAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IN THE CHART ON SHEET | | | LP-1 | | | | | | | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES FOR RESUBMITTALS | | | ADDRESSING OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-16-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-16-2016 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-16-2016 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-16 10:03:10 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: THE CRYSTAL RESIDENTIAL Z16020011 | | | DECEMBER 15, 2016 | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE PROTECTION DETAIL | | | AND PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION TO BE | | | MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD | | | THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT OF 40%. | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS JUST UNDER THE OVERHANG OF THE | | | BUILDING THAT CAN BE ENHANCED WITH SHRUBS AND | | | GROUNDCOVER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG FLAGLER PER | | | SECTION 94-443(D), AND INDICATE THE WIDTH OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE DECK AREA FROM THE | | | FLAGLER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PER 94-443(D). THE RETAINING | | | WALL CAN THEN BE MOVED BACK IN LINE WITH THE SOUTHERN | | | PORTION. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LINEAR FEET OF BUFFER | | | ON SHEET LP-1 TO SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF | | | BUFFERS AND RECALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN ORDER TO CLARIFY PORTIONS | | | WHERE CODE CANNOT BE MET. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL WATER, | | | SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/3/16: | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREE, | | | FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB REQUIREMENTS BASED ON 40% | | | MINIMUM OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR | | | THE ACTUAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IN THE CHART ON SHEET | | | LP-1 | | | | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAYHAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE | | | REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES FOR RESUBMITTALS ADDRESSING | | | OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-03-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-03-2016 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-03-2016 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-03 16:15:55 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: THE CRYSTAL RESIDENTIAL Z16020011 | | | OCTOBER 3, 2016 | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE PROTECTION DETAIL | | | AND PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION TO BE | | | MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD | | | THE BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT OF 40%. | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS JUST UNDER THE OVERHANG OF THE | | | BUILDING THAT CAN BE ENHANCED WITH SHRUBS AND | | | GROUNDCOVER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | INDICATE A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG FLAGLER PER | | | SECTION 94-443(D), AND INDICATE THE WIDTH OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE DECK AREA FROM THE | | | FLAGLER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PER 94-443(D). THE RETAINING | | | WALL CAN THEN BE MOVED BACK IN LINE WITH THE SOUTHERN | | | PORTION. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LINEAR FEET OF BUFFER | | | ON SHEET LP-1 TO SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF | | | BUFFERS AND RECALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN ORDER TO CLARIFY PORTIONS | | | WHERE CODE CANNOT BE MET. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL WATER, | | | SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/3/16: | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREE, FLOWERING | | | TREE AND SHRUB REQUIREMENTS BASED ON 40% MINIMUM OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE ACTUAL | | | OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IN THE CHART ON SHEET LP-1 | | | | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 11:41:51 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: THE CRYSTAL RESIDENTIAL Z16020011 | | | MARCH 8, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE PROTECTION DETAIL AND PLAN | | | SHOWING LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION TO BE MAINTAINED | | | DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT OF 40%. THERE ARE | | | SEVERAL AREAS JUST UNDER THE OVERHANG OF THE BUILDING | | | THAT CAN BE ENHANCED WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INDICATE A 10 | | | FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG FLAGLER PER SECTION | | | 94-443(D), AND INDICATE THE WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE REMOVE THE DECK AREA FROM THE FLAGLER | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER PER 94-443(D). THE RETAINING WALL CAN | | | THEN BE MOVED BACK IN LINE WITH THE SOUTHERN PORTION. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE REVISE THE LINEAR FEET OF BUFFER ON SHEET | | | LP-1 TO SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF BUFFERS AND | | | RECALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER | | | TREES IN ORDER TO CLARIFY PORTIONS WHERE CODE CANNOT BE | | | MET. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 15:21:12 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-12-2016 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-12 15:07:47 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT | | | HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?. | | | PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS | | | WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 2. THE CITY COMMISSION RECENTLY PASSED A RESOLUTION | | | INCREASING THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT TO ONE FOOT ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN A SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREA. | | | | | | 3. MOVE HIGH POINT FOR WEST DRIVEWAY FURTHER WEST TO | | | REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF FLOWING TO THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 4. THE ?CORE EX. CATCH BASIN? NOTE ON PLAN REFERENCES | | | HDPE PIPE. IT SHOULD REFERENCE RCP PIPE. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE INVERT ELEVATION FOR 15? RCP PIPE AT | | | EXISTING STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 6. IS NOTE 3 ON SHEET C-1 (?? ASSUMED HYDRAULIC | | | CONDUCTIVITY ??) STILL VALID? | | | | | | 7. MODIFY/REPLACE EXISTING INLET TO VALLEY GUTTER TOP. | | | | | | 8. UPDATE CITY DETAILS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER | | | INDICATING THE CHANGES TO THE ONSITE PEAK FLOOD STAGES | | | WILL NOT EXCEED THE SFWMD PERMITTED FLOOD STAGES AND | | | STORMWATER PRE-TREATMENT VOLUMES ARE BEING PROVIDED PER | | | SFWMD CRITERIA. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP FOR THIS PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 15:20:54 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-20-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-20-2017 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-11 09:21:34 | 1. DUMPSTER LOCATION AND SIZE WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM | | | FERDINAND RIVERA, PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS, 822-2076 | | | 2. UTILITIES IS REVIEWING WATER MAIN ALONG WEST | | | PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED CONNECTION ON FLAGLER. | | | 3. PREVIOUS COMMENTS ACKNOWLEDGED STILL PERTAIN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 15:20:35 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 15:19:58 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-19-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
01-19-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
01-19-2017 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-01-19 16:28:17 | SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING | | | CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1.) A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE | | | DEVELOPER FOR THE PAVED DRIVE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. THE HOLD | | | HARMLESS AGREEMENT SHALL BE PROCESSED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT . A COPY OF THE HOLD | | | HARMLESS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION | | | UPON EXECUTION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-12-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
12-12-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
12-12-2016 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-12 15:39:32 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) REVISED COMMENT: PROVIDE A LETTER FROM FPL | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENT OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES. | | | | | | 2.) EXECUTION OF A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT FOR THE | | | PAVED DRIVE WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) REVISED COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM | | | THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT STATING THAT THE LOCATION OF | | | THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS ADEQUATE FOR SERVICE. | | | | | | 2.) REVISED COMMENT: THE DEPTH OF THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE (6'-6") DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS | | | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). | | | THE ZLDRS REQUIRE A MINIMUM ENCLOSURE DEPTH OF 13'-8". | | | PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 3.) THE 90 DEGREE PARKING DETAIL IS DIFFICULT TO READ. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A CLEAR DETAIL. | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE A DETAIL WITH DIMENSIONS OF THE RETAINING | | | WALL WITH THE 4 FT. HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE AROUND THE | | | PRIVATE POOL FACING FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | | | | 5.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE SITE | | | DATA TABULAR: EXISTING USE: MULTI FAMILY, 9 UNITS (NOT | | | 6 UNITS); PARKING REQUIRED IS 13 (NOT 14) | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE: REQUIRED REAR SETBACK IS | | | 15 FT. (NOT 35 FT.); REFERENCE ZLDR S. 94-77(A)(3) FOR | | | THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT; REFERENCE ZLDR S. | | | 94-304(D)(2)1.E. FOR THE MINIMUM POOL SETBACKS FOR A | | | DOUBLE FRONTAGE LOT; MAKE REFERENCE THAT THE VARIANCES | | | TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WAS APPROVED BY ZBA FINAL ORDER | | | 3337 IN THE VARIANCE CHART. | | | | | | | | | FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT DIMENSION OF THE | | | PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE ANY | | | ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL) IN THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. | | | REVISE THE HEIGHT INFORMATION IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR | | | AS NECESSARY. | | | | | | 2.) ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE FLOOR PLANS IN THE | | | PLANS SET. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) THE COLORED ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE ELEVATIONS | | | PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 4.) THE A/C UNITS LOCATED ON THE ROOFTOP OF THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH A | | | PARAPET WALL. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE. | | | | | | 5.) REFERENCE TO THE "VARIANCE REQUEST" SHOULD BE | | | ELIMINATED FROM THE TITLE BOX. | | | | | | | | | SUGGESTED SITE IMPROVEMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) APPLICANT MAY WANT TO CONSIDER MOVING THE PROPOSED | | | PRIVACY WALL THAT LIES PARALLEL TO FLAGLER DRIVE IN | | | ORDER TO PROVIDE DECORATIVE LANDSCAPING ON THE EXTERIOR | | | SIDE OF THE WALL AND ENHANCE THE AESTHETICS OF THE | | | SITE. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN | | | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8.5 BY 11), AND AN | | | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% ($200) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-11-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
awooten |
Date |
10-11-2016 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2016-10-11 11:54:17 | **ZONING** | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | 1.) UTILITY LETTERS ARE REQUIRED FROM AT&T AND FPL. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 1.) THE DUMPSTER LOCATION WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVAL FROM | | | PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | 2.) THE DEPTH OF THE ENCLOSURE (13'8") AND THE DEPTH OF | | | THE SPACE/STALL FOR THE ENCLOSURE (8.5') ARE NOT | | | CONSISTENT. PROVIDE THE CLEAR DIMENSIONS FOR THE | | | ENCLOSURE SPACE. | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE THE CLEAR DIMENSIONS FOR THE ANGULAR | | | PARKING ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AS WELL | | | AS THE TANDEM PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING | | | AND THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. (SEE ANGULAR | | | PARKING STANDARD DIMENSIONS IN SEC 94-485, FIGURE | | | XV-2). | | | | | | 4.) SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 OF 1 HAS FRONT SETBACKS ON | | | FLAGLER AS 32', BUT ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN | | | SHEET A-101 HAS A FRONT SETBACK OF 25'. PLEASE MAKE | | | CONSISTENT. | | | | | | 5.) ACCESS TO STREETS SEC 94-313(1) (A) - RESIDENTIAL | | | DEVELOPMENTS WITH 3-75 UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE | | | (1) ACCESS POINT ONTO EACH RIGHT-OF-WAY. ONE-WAY | | | CURBCUT CAN BE 10'?. | | | | | | 6.) HOW WILL GUEST GAIN ACCESS TO GATES? HOW WILL THEY | | | MANEUVER OUT OF DEVELOPMENT IF THEY ARE NOT LET IN? | | | | | | 7.) FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL REQUIRE 20' ACCESS LANE. | | | | | | 8.) WHO WILL USE THE OBSERVATION DECK? HOW WILL IT BE | | | ACCESSED? | | | | | | 9.) PLEASE SHOW OBSERVATION DECK ON THE ELEVATION | | | DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 10.) PLEASE SHOW THE OVERHANG FOR STAIRS ON SITE PLAN | | | AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 11.) PLEASE SHOW THE CROSS-SECTION OF GRADE AND | | | RETAINER WALL. | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN | | | FORMAT. | | | | | | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN | | | (10) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | CHANGES ON RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | *PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLTY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE | | | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300.00). | | | | | | *CONTACT ALANA WOOTEN @ 561-822-1449 OR AT | | | [email protected] IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 13:28:08 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | | | | 2.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, COMCAST, FPL AND | | | FPU. | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC | | | DIVISION, CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL | | | HAVE NO TRAFFIC IMPACTS TO THE AREA. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-77(A)(3) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE MAXIMUM | | | BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL BE THE GREATER OF 40 FT., OR 2 | | | FT. IN HEIGHT FOR EACH 1 FT. IN SETBACK FROM THE SIDE | | | AND REAR LOT LINES. SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE | | | SHORTEST DIMENSION, RUNNING FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO | | | THE BUILDING LINE. THE CURRENT BUILDING SETBACKS FOR | | | THE PROJECT DOES NOT SUPPORT ANY ADDITIONAL HEIGHT | | | BEYOND 40 FT. (PROPOSED 64 FT.) IN THE MF32 ZONING | | | DISTRICT; ADDITIONAL HEIGHT CANNOT BE ADDED TO THE | | | BUILDING BEYOND THE 40 FT. BY SCALING THE BUILDING BACK | | | WITH THE "TIERED CAKE EFFECT" BASED ON THE ZLDR | | | DEFINITION FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF SETBACKS. [ZLDR | | | S.94-305(A)] | | | | | | 2.) THE PROPOSED FENCE AROUND THE POOL AREA (POOL | | | BARRIER) SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 FT. THE PLANS INDICATE | | | THAT THE FENCE IS ONLY 3.5 FT. IN HEIGHT, WHICH IS | | | INSUFFICIENT FOR A POOL BARRIER. [ZLDR | | | S.94-304(D)(2)(1)(B.)] | | | | | | 3.) RELOCATE THE SWIMMING POOL AWAY FROM THE FRONTAGE | | | OF FLAGLER DRIVE. ALTHOUGH THE PROPERTY IS CONSIDERED A | | | DOUBLE FRONTAGE LOT, FLAGLER DRIVE IS NOT THE | | | PREDOMINANT LOCATION FOR EXISTING SWIMMING POOLS ON A | | | DOUBLE FRONTAGE LOT IN THE AREA. PLEASE RELOCATE THE | | | SWIMMING POOL TO EITHER THE SIDE OR CLOSER TO | | | WASHINGTON ROAD. [ZLDR S.94-304(D)(2)(1)(E.)] | | | | | | 4.) THE PROPOSED ROLL OUT DUMPSTERS MUST BE APPROVED BY | | | THE PUBLIC WORKS/SANITATION DEPARTMENT. MORE | | | INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO WHERE THE DUMPSTERS WILL BE | | | PLACED FOR TRASH PICK-UP. ALSO, THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | THE PUBLIC WORKS/SANITATION DEPARTMENT FOR THE ROLL-OUT | | | DUMPSTERS. | | | | | | 5.) HOW HIGH IS THE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY? | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE A/C UNITS | | | AND/OR ANY OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE PROJECT. | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CANNOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. | | | INTO A SETBACK/CANNOT BE VISIBLE FROM THE ROOFTOP OF | | | THE PROPOSED BUILDING. ALL GROUND FLOOR MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH VEGETATION. | | | [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(4)] | | | | | | 7.) WILL THERE BE ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO THE | | | PROPERTY? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN | | | SHOWING THE PLACEMENT OF LIGHT FIXTURES AND LIGHT | | | SPILLOVER TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ALSO ENSURE THAT | | | THERE IS NO CONFLICT WITH THE PLACEMENT OF THE FIXTURES | | | WITH EXISTING UTILITIES AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. [ZLDR | | | S.94-309(A)] | | | | | | 8.) PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE VEHICULAR TURN-AROUND FOR THE | | | PARKING AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 9.) THE PROJECT PROPOSES SIX (6) TANDEM PARKING SPACES. | | | MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON HOW THE PARKING WILL | | | FUNCTION FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS (I.E. ARE | | | THE PARKING SPACES DESIGNATED? HOW WILL THE TANDEM | | | PARKING SPACES FUNCTION EFFICIENTLY? ETC.) | | | | | | 10.) SITE DATA TABULAR: APPLICATION NUMBER: FSPR 16-03 | | | | | | | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ENTIRE | | | NORTH PROPERTY LINE IS REQUIRED. A VARIANCE WILL BE | | | NECESSARY IF THIS REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET. [ZLDR | | | S.94-443(C)(2)] | | | | | | 2.) A 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ENTIRE | | | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE IS REQUIRED. A VARIANCE WILL BE | | | NECESSARY IF THIS REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET. [ZLDR | | | S.94-443(C)(2)] | | | | | | | | | SUGGESTED SITE IMPROVEMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) CONSIDER RECONFIGURING THE SITE AND DESIGN OF THE | | | PROJECT TO ACCOMMODATE THE NINE (9) UNITS AT THE | | | MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT OF 40 FT. | | | | | | 2.) CONSIDER A ROOF TOP SWIMMING POOL FOR THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. THIS MAY PROVIDE GREATER FLEXIBILITY WITH THE | | | SITE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 3.) CONSIDER PROVIDING LESS GLAZING/TRANSPARENCY TO THE | | | ELEVATION FACING THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES TO THE | | | NORTH. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN | | | (10) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($300.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 OR AT | | | [email protected] IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |