 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16020010
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16020010 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-09-2016 |
Time |
12:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-28-2017 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 12:34:26 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. SHEET A1.01 DOES NOT SHOW HOW PEOPLE EVACUATING THE | | | BUILDING VIA THE EAST STAIR WILL GET FROM THE STAIR TO | | | THE STREET WITHOUT TRAVERSING THE PARKING GARAGE. EXIT | | | DISCHARGE SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1027 OF FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, | | | | | | 3. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAIR HOUSING ACT | | | AND SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. SHEET | | | A0.01 STATES THAT 8 ACCESSIBLE SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED, | | | BUT ONLY LEVELS 2 AND 3 ARE SHOWN TO HAVE TWO | | | ACCESSIBLE SPACES EACH ON SHEET A1.02. | | | | | | 4. THERE IS NO ACCESSBLE ROUTE SHOWN FROM THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES TO THE BUILDING | | | ENTRANCE/ELEVATORS. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 5. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A | | | PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND | | | DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 | | | INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 6. WHEN ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE SHOWN, PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED | | | SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL | | | BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. | | | THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER | | | PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE. | | | | | | 7. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 8. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 9. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 11. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 11. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION | | | OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-16-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mkhan |
Date |
03-16-2017 |
Time |
08:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mkhan |
Date |
03-16-2017 |
Time |
08:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-16 09:28:24 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | | | | PROJECT NAME: BANYAN RESIDENTIAL - 550 BANYAN BLVD. - | | | Z16020010 | | | | | | DATE: MARCH 16, 2017 | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS AND THE RESPONSE TO | | | THE PREVIOUS PPRC COMMENTS (RECEIVED ON 2/14/2017), IT | | | APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED | | | AND SOME ARE ACKNOWLEDGED OR NOTED AS: 'TO BE ADDRESSED | | | DURING THE FINAL DESIGN AND /OR ENGINEERING APPROVAL | | | PHASE'. HOWEVER, THESE ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS ALONG WITH | | | THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ADDRESSED DURING | | | 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION' PHASE PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR DEMAND FOR WATER AND SEWER ARE | | | GIVEN WITH THE RESPONSE LETTER OF 11/2/2016. DURING THE | | | 'ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION' PHASE, | | | SUBMISSION OF SIGNED & SEALED ENGINEER/MEP WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWER DETAIL CALCULATIONS (AVERAGE AND PEAK | | | WITH PEAKING FACTOR) WILL BE REQUIRED AS WELL AS FIRE | | | DEMAND FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. ALSO WILL BE | | | REQUIRED DETAIL CALCULATIONS TO VALIDATE METER SIZE | | | SELECTION; DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE AND FIRE LINE | | | SIZING. SHOW THESE CALCULATIONS ON THE UTILITY PLAN | | | SHEET AS WELL; | | | | | | 7. IT IS STATED THAT SIMMONS & WHITE TO ADDRESS TRAFFIC | | | RELATED CONCERNS FOR WHICH APPROVAL NEED TO BE OBTAINED | | | FROM CITY'S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER. CONTACT UYEN DANG, | | | P.E., AT EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] AND PHONE: (561) | | | 494-1087; | | | | | | 8. CONFIGURATION OF PROPOSED 6-INCH WATER SERVICE LINE | | | TO THE BUILDING AND RPZ SHOWN ON THE 'LANDSCAPE PLAN - | | | SHEET LP-1' DOES NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE 'WATER & | | | SEWER PLAN - SHEET 4 OF 5'. PLEASE REVISE; | | | | | | 12. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS IS REVIEWED BY CITY'S | | | STORMWATER ENGINEER TRACY WARD AND COMMENTS ARE | | | PROVIDED SEPARATELY UNDER STORMWATER REVIEWS; | | | | | | 13. PROPOSED EGRESS OPTION TO BANYAN BLVD NEED TO BE | | | APPROVED BY CITY'S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER; | | | | | | 17. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS IS REVIEWED BY CITY'S | | | STORMWATER ENGINEER TRACY WARD AND COMMENTS ARE | | | PROVIDED SEPARATELY UNDER STORMWATER REVIEWS; | | | | | | FOLLOWING NEW COMMENTS APPLIES TO THE REVISED TO WATER | | | AND SANITARY SEWER PLANS AS WELL AS SANITATION/GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION: | | | | | | 1. FOR SANITATION/GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS NEED | | | TO SHOW PROPOSED SANITATION COLLECTION PLANS AND | | | DETAILS; AND WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM PETER BIENIEK, | | | PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR; | | | | | | 2. SHOW EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEAREST TO THE SITE. A | | | FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT | | | WILL BE REQUIRED PART OF THE PLAN SUBMITTAL; | | | | | | 3. ALL PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | WITHIN 150 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND SHALL BE WITHIN | | | AN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, | | | LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE | | | PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR | | | POTABLE WATER LINES. | | | | | | 4. PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER, | | | DCDA ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY'S STANDARD | | | DETAILS. THEY SHALL NOT BE INSIDE THE BUILDING | | | ENCLOSURE. WATER METER SHOULD BE WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INSIDE AN 'UTILITY EASEMENT' JUST | | | INSIDE THE PROPERTY NEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND | | | ACCESSIBLE; | | | | | | 5. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW CONFLICT INFORMATION | | | (BOTTOM AND TOP OF CROSSING PIPES) AT THE CONFLICT | | | POINTS OF ALL WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES AS | | | WELL AS OTHER FRANCHISE UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITIES | | | WITHIN THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERAL ARE TO BE | | | VERIFIED VIA SOFTDIGS AND PROVIDE ALL UTILITY CROSSING | | | INFORMATION; | | | | | | 6. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR THE | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. SHOW INVERT AT CONNECTION | | | POINTS AND INCLUDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | | LATERAL WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 7. IN THE REVISED PLANS PROPOSED MANHOLE MH#2 IS SHOWN | | | TO BE PRIVATE AND CITY'S 'POINT-OF-SERVICE' AT THE SAME | | | TIME. CITY'S 'POINT-OF-SERVICE' SHALL BE MH#1 I.E. | | | WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NOT INSIDE PRIVATE | | | PROPERTY; | | | | | | 8. IN THE FINAL PLANS, SHOW PROFILE FOR PROPOSED | | | SANITARY SEWER WITH GROUND ELEVATIONS ABOVE THE PIPE; | | | | | | 9. THERE ARE EXISTING WATER METER AND CONNECTIONS FOR | | | THE SITE ON BANYAN BLVD. EXISTING WATER SERVICE | | | CONNECTIONS/WATER METERS SERVING THE PROPERTY, IF NOT | | | USED, ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN. | | | DE-ACTIVATED/INACTIVE PIPELINES LARGER THAN 2-INCH | | | DIAMETER WILL BE REMOVED. PLEASE LABEL PIPE SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL AND ADD NOTES TO THE UTILITY PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY; | | | | | | 10. EXISTING SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SERVING THE | | | PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, ARE TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE | | | MAIN; | | | | | | 11. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH TO BE REHABBED PER | | | CITY'S REQUIREMENTS; | | | | | | 12. FOR THE FINAL UTILITY PLANS, INCLUDE A NOTE THAT: | | | AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | | FREE." FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | 13. SUBMITTAL OF MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) FOR WORK | | | WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE | | | PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. | | | | | | MOSTAQUE KHAN, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1124 (OFFICE) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 16:05:53 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A | | | ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER | | | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN | | | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 5. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 | | | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND | | | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 7. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT | | | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE | | | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. | | | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE | | | REQUIRED STUDY. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE | | | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER | | | LINES. | | | | | | 9. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE | | | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN | | | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY | | | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY | | | DESIGN. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING STAFF | | | FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND | | | CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR | | | THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. | | | | | | 11. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND | | | TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. | | | | | | 12. EACH BUILDING SHOULD HAVE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE | | | OF STORM WATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION. | | | PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND | | | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF | | | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURN-AROUND AT THE EASTERN END OF | | | THE ALLEY. THE ALLEY IS UTILIZED BY DELIVERY AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES (INCLUDING CITY SANITATION TRUCKS) AND | | | THEY ARE UNABLE TO BACK DOWN THE LENGTH OF THE ALLEY. | | | | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE VEHICULAR LIGHTING ALONG BANYAN | | | PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FT-CANDLES. | | | | | | 15. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BANYAN WILL NEED TO | | | BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. | | | | | | 16. CALL OUT CITY UTILITIES INSTEAD OF PBCWUD ON THE | | | ROOT BARRIER DETAIL. | | | | | | 17. NO DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED. NOTE THE | | | SFWMD EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION IS NOT APPLICABLE | | | FOR THE DESIGN CONDITIONS OF THE TRENCH LAYOUT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART | | | OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES | | | APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | REPLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT | | | [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. | | | FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-03-2017 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-03 15:18:34 | 3RD REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DATED FEBRUARY 14, | | | 2017, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES, TO ANA MARIA | | | APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED | | | FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-08-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-08-2016 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-08 16:58:29 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DATED NOVEMBER 2, | | | 2016, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES, TO ANA MARIA | | | APONTE, URBAN PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-25-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-25-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-25-2016 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-25 11:01:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER | | | SUPPLY. | | | | | | PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL | | | HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD | | | OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM | | | TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP | | | DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED | | | INFORMATION SUCH AS PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 12. COMMAND ROOM | | | | | | THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, | | | CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN | | | THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: | | | | | | A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM | | | DIMENSION OF 10 FT. | | | B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. | | | C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL | | | FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION | | | OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE | | | BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS | | | E. A WORK TABLE. | | | F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF | | | THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL | | | I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS. | | | J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY | | | K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY | | | PANELS | | | L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS | | | M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND | | | TRANSFER FEATURES. | | | O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED | | | BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE | | | P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL | | | Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1. | | | R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR | | | SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS | | | PROVIDED | | | | | | 13. RADIO | | | | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | | | | MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH OF 102.0 DBM | | | FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE | | | RESCUE. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION | | | EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-21-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-21-2017 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-21-2017 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-21 10:41:34 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: BANYAN RESIDENTIAL MICRO UNITS Z16020010 | | | MARCH 21, 2016 | | | | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS 1. THROUGH 5 PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-16-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-16-2016 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-16-2016 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-16 16:49:56 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: BANYAN RESIDENTIAL MICRO UNITS Z16020010 | | | DECEMBER 16, 2016 | | | | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM AND | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON | | | SHEET A-1.02 TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ONE OF THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE | | | IV-7. SELECTED CATEGORY MUST MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND | | | IN SECTION 94-109, AND HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS | | | FOR TREE CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE | | | IV-8: TYPE 2 MEDIUM TREE MUST BE 10 FEET IN HEIGHT; | | | TIBOUCHINA LISTED AS 100 SQ FT, SHOULD BE TYPE 3 AT 150 | | | SQ FT. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE USE THE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR | | | EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN INDICATING WHETHER THE EXISTING SABAL | | | PALMS ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE WILL BE RELOCATED | | | OR REMOVED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST BE 14 FEET MINIMUM. | | | PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.THE | | | APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY | | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-07-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-07-2016 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-07-2016 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-07 16:07:41 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: BANYAN RESIDENTIAL MICRO UNITS Z16020010 | | | | | | | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM AND | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON | | | SHEET A-1.02 TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ONE OF THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE | | | IV-7. SELECTED CATEGORY MUST MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND | | | IN SECTION 94-109, AND HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE CORRECT THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS FOR TREE | | | CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8: TYPE 2 | | | MEDIUM TREE MUST BE 10 FEET IN HEIGHT; TIBOUCHINA | | | LISTED AS 100 SQ FT, SHOULD BE TYPE 3 AT 150 SQ FT. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE USE THE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES | | | ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | CHART SECTION 94-446 (G). | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION | | | PLAN INDICATING WHETHER THE EXISTING SABAL PALMS | | | ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE WILL BE RELOCATED OR | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | 5. STREET TREES MUST BE 14 FEET MINIMUM. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-28-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-28-2017 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-28-2017 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-03-28 12:15:32 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT | | | HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?. | | | PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS | | | WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 2. THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT FOR STRUCTURES IN A | | | SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA IS ONE FOOT ABOVE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. THE CITY IS CONSIDERING INCREASING THE | | | FREEBOARD TO TWO FEET IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD | | | AREAS. | | | | | | 3. SHOW PIPE INVERTS ON THE FINAL PLANS. | | | | | | 4. PREFERRED CONNECTION OF THE PROPOSED STORM DRAINS IS | | | TO THE EXISTING STORM DRAINS IN BANYAN BLVD. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF HOW THE WEIR WILL ATTACH TO THE | | | WALLS FOR THE OUTLET PIPE IN THE CORNER OF THE | | | STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 6. INDICATE HOW ROOF RUNOFF AND GROUND SURFACE RUNOFF | | | WILL BE ROUTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | 7. SHOW THE PROPOSED BANYAN BLVD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE | | | (BACK OF EXISTING SIDEWALK?) ON THE SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 8. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW BOLLARDS AT EACH END OF THE | | | CROSS-BLOCK PASSAGE. HOW WILL THESE AFFECT THE TRUCK | | | TRAFFIC EXPECTED IIN THE ALLEY? | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-30-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
05-30-2017 |
Time |
12:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-05-30 12:06:11 | SITE AREA= 54,842SF | | | 2.75 FAR = 150,815.6SF | | | TDRS .5 FAR = 27,421SF | | | | | | TOTAL ALLOWED = 178,237SF ( SHEET A0.01 HAS THE TDRS AT | | | 27,429SF- MINOR CORRECTION NEEDED) | | | | | | - PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE IN ALL THE | | | FLOOR PLANS, SITE PLAN. | | | - PLEASE LABEL THE SPACES ARE NOT COUNTED AS FAR | | | (TRASH, FLP VAULT ETC) | | | - IN SHEET A1.01 THERE IS A NOTE ON BANYAN INDICATING A | | | CANOPY OVERHANG, BUT I DO NOT SEE THAT IN ANY OF THE | | | ELEVATIONS THOUGH IT IS SHOWN IN THE SECTIONS. IS THAT | | | A CONTINUOUS CANOPY ALONG THE ENTIRE BUILDING FRONTAGE? | | | THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL CANOPY AT THE BUILDING ENTRANCE | | | INDICATED IN THE FACADE. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | - THERE IS ALSO A COLUMN ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF THE | | | EAST LOBBY THAT IS ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM | | | SETBACK. IT DOES NOT SEEM TO MATCH WITH THE UPPER | | | LEVELS. | | | - VEHICULAR CURB CUT CAN BE REDUCED TO 10 FEET EACH | | | TRAVEL LANE. | | | - PLEASE INDICATE THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL CONTINUE AT | | | THE SAME LEVEL ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON THE 1ST FLOOR | | | FACADE. IS THERE ANY KICK PLATE PROPOSED? WHAT MATERIAL | | | ARE THE ROUND COLUMNS? PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES OF THE | | | PROPOSED NATURAL WOOD PANELING AND BRING SAMPLE TO THE | | | MEETING. | | | - IS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION TO PROVIDE A MORE | | | PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY SCALE ALONG THE FRONTAGE? THE GLASS | | | STOREFRONT IS 18 FEET IN HEIGHT, AND THE CANOPY IS AT | | | THE SAME HEIGHT. CAN THE FIRST FLOOR BE SMALLER OR THE | | | CANOPY LOWERED? CONSIDERING THERE ARE NOT EVEN | | | COMMERCIAL USES IN THE FIRST FLOOR THE 18 FEET | | | STOREFRONT SEEMS A LOT. | | | - DO YOU HAVE ANY RENDERING OF THE NEW PASSAGE WAY? I | | | THINK THAT CAN BE NICE TO SHOW, THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE | | | PUBLIC REALM WITH THE NEW CONNECTION WITH CLEMATIS AND | | | THE PROPOSED SHARED OFFICE SPACE. | | | - IS THERE REALLY A NEED TO HAVE THE MECHANICAL | | | SCREENING AS ONE ADDITIONAL FLOOR? OR CAN IT BE | | | MODIFIED SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS DONE FOR CLEMATIS PLACE? | | | - PLEASE ADJUST THE PARKING TABLE TO REFLECT PROPOSED | | | CODE CHANGE, AND INDICATE BIKE PARKING AND SHARED | | | PARKING SPACES. | | | - PLEASE LIST ALL THE UNITS IN THE UNIT TABLE SO WE CAN | | | HAVE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH UNIT IN ADDITION TO THE | | | AVERAGE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-09-2016 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
11-07-2016 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-12-09 14:25:11 | 1. NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH | | | THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A DWELLING UNIT OR THE CUMULATIVE | | | AVERAGE SIZE OF A DWELLING UNIT AS PRESCRIBED BY SEC | | | 94-109. | | | 2. SATISFIED- PLEASE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR ACTIVE | | | USES ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD. PARKING ENTRANCES, | | | MECHANICAL SPACES AND STORAGE ARE NOT CONSIDERED ACTIVE | | | USES (SHEET A0.01). | | | 3. SATISFIED - PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT | | | COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A POS (ONE SIDE | | | NO MORE THAN 5 TIMES THE OTHER SIDE). | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED, PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 6% | | | SLOPE- PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE | | | (SEC 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN | | | 14% REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION). | | | 5. SATISFIED -A 20' SIDE SETBACK IS REQUIRED ABOVE THE | | | 5TH STORY. | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED, PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM | | | THAT NO PORTION OF ANY FACADE GREATER THAN 20% OF THE | | | ENTIRE FACADE ELEVATION IS ABSENT OFF FENESTRATION AND | | | ABSENT OF A PLANAR BREAK OF AT LEAST TWO FEET IN DEPTH. | | | PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PROVIDED FOR | | | THE PARKING GARAGE ELEVATION TO DETERMINE IF THAT | | | COMPLIES WITH BLANK WALL REGULATIONS- BLANK WALLS ARE | | | NOT PERMITTED. | | | 7. SATISFIED- PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE WILL NOT BE | | | ALLOWED TO SALE ALCOHOL (BEER, WINE OR HARD LIQUOR). | | | 8. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE TREATMENT OF THE | | | GARAGE ROOFTOP THAT WILL NOT BE UTILIZED FOR ROOF | | | GARDEN. | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED, PLEASE PROVIDE A DESIGNED DETAIL TO | | | SHOW THE SIDEWALK LEVEL MAINTAINED AT THE DRIVEWAY. DO | | | NOT USE WPB DETAIL GD-7- DRIVEWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | AT THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK LEVEL. | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED, AUTO TURN NOT INCLUDED IN SET | | | SUBMITTED. FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH SANITATION | | | DEPARTMENT NEEDED- PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE | | | PICK-UP OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR | | | PUBLIC). PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING | | | AREAS. | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED, VARIANCE REQUEST MENTIONED ON | | | RESPONSE LETTER. PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANAR BREAK SHALL | | | OCCUR FOR THE ENTIRE HEIGHT OF THE PODIUM- PLEASE | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR | | | BREAK REGULATIONS. | | | 12. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM | | | COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSPARENCY REGULATIONS. | | | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON 11/7/16 SUBMITTAL: | | | 13. DRIVE AISLE SHALL BE MINIMUM 24' IN WIDTH WHEN 90 | | | DEGREE PARKING IS PROVIDED. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE | | | TREATMENT OF THE FIRST FLOOR, INCLUDE MATERIALS. SOME | | | CONCERN ABOUT THE EXCESIVE GLASS AS SOME OF THE USES | | | ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO SUCH AMOUNT OF TRANSPARENCY (YOGA | | | ROOM OR SCREENING ROOM). | | | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON FACADE, CROSS | | | SECTION OF FACADE TO DEMONSTRATE THE DEPTH OF THE | | | WINDOWS INDICATED ON THE RENDERINGS, THE MATERIALS | | | PROPOSED ETC. ARE THE STAIRS AT THE SW CORNER OF | | | BUILDING PROPOSED TO HAVE THE SAME TREATMENT OF A | | | RESIDENTIAL UNIT? | | | 16. BUILDING EXCEEDS MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT ON 4TH | | | FLOOR (MAX ALLOWED=60%; PROPOSED 79%) | | | 17. MINIMUM SETBACK AREA (16') CANNOT BE ENCLOSED AS A | | | PRIVATE PATIO. | | | 18. BACK FLOW PREVENTORS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM STREET. | | | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS WITH DETAIL ON | | | PROPOSED MATERIALS, LIGHTING PLAN AND ANY OTHER STREET | | | FURNITURE PROPOSED. | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE WITH THE SIZE OF EACH UNIT | | | AND THE AVERAGE FOR BUILDING. | | | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH BICYCLE PARKING REGULATION (1/15 REQUIRED SPACES). | | | 22. FLOOR PLANS FOR LEVEL 10 AND 12 ARE MISSING FROM | | | SUBMITTED SET. | | | 23. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BUIDLING TO RESPOND TO THE | | | SMALLER SCALE OF CLEMATIS STREET WITH SOME STEP DOWN AT | | | THE SW CORNER OF THE BUILDING. | | | 24. THE PROPOSED USES ON THE FIRST FLOOR RESULT IN A | | | SINGLE ENTRANCE TO THE BUIDLING. STAFF SUGGESTS THE | | | INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL ACTIVE USES AT GROUND LEVEL | | | TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND | | | ACTIVITY (MORE ENTRANCES). | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED -PROJECT IS UTILIZING THE TDR PROGRAM, | | | THEREFORE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED - SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF | | | THE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK | | | ACROSS THE STREET AND FACE OF BUILDINGS. | | | 3. SATISFIED - THE SITE PLAN DRAWING SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | ADJACENT BUILDINGS AND STREET, INCLUDING THE BUILDINGS | | | ACROSS THE STREET , AND SHOW THE PROJECT INSERTED IN | | | THE CONTEXT. | | | 4. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF | | | OR CADD) TO ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA | | | INDICATED IN SHEET A0.06. | | | 5. SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK | | | LINES IN ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. | | | 6. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS (ALL | | | FACADES) WITH CALL OUT MATERIALS AND REFERENCE PICTURES | | | OF PROPOSED MATERIALS (INDICATE SCALE). FACADES SHALL | | | INCLUDE ADJACENT BUILDINGS TO SHOW THE PROJECT IN ITS | | | CONTEXT. | | | 7. SATISFIED- RENDERINGS SHALL BE AN ACCURATE | | | REFLECTION OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, ACCOUNTING FOR | | | EXISTING STREET DIMENSIONS AND SURROUNDING BUILDINGS. | | | 8. SATISFIED - FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHALL INDICATE THE | | | LOCATION OF PROPOSED DOORS AND WINDOWS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 12:00:06 | 1. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM | | | SIZE OF A DWELLING UNIT OR THE CUMULATIVE AVERAGE SIZE | | | OF A DWELLING UNIT AS PRESCRIBED BY SEC 94-109. | | | 2. PLEASE CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR ACTIVE USES ALONG | | | BANYAN BOULEVARD. PARKING ENTRANCES, MECHANICAL SPACES | | | AND STORAGE ARE NOT CONSIDERED ACTIVE USES (SHEET | | | A0.01). | | | 3. PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE | | | MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A POS (ONE SIDE NO MORE THAN 5 | | | TIMES THE OTHER SIDE). | | | 4. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE (SEC | | | 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN 14% | | | REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION). | | | 5. A 20? SIDE SETBACK IS REQUIRED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY. | | | 6. BLANK WALLS ARE NOT PERMITTED. | | | 7. PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO | | | SALE ALCOHOL (BEER, WINE OR HARD LIQUOR). | | | 8. PLEASE INDICATE THE TREATMENT OF THE GARAGE ROOFTOP | | | THAT WILL NOT BE UTILIZED FOR ROOF GARDEN. | | | 9. DRIVEWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ADJACENT | | | SIDEWALK LEVEL. | | | 10. PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE PICK-UP | | | OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC). | | | PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH TRANSPARENCY REGULATIONS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROJECT IS UTILIZING THE TDR PROGRAM, THEREFORE DAC | | | SPECIAL REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING | | | SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET | | | AND FACE OF BUILDINGS. | | | 3. THE SITE PLAN DRAWING SHALL INCLUDE THE ADJACENT | | | BUILDINGS AND STREET, INCLUDING THE BUILDINGS ACROSS | | | THE STREET , AND SHOW THE PROJECT INSERTED IN THE | | | CONTEXT. | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO | | | ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN | | | SHEET A0.06. | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN | | | ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS (ALL FACADES) WITH | | | CALL OUT MATERIALS AND REFERENCE PICTURES OF PROPOSED | | | MATERIALS (INDICATE SCALE). FACADES SHALL INCLUDE | | | ADJACENT BUILDINGS TO SHOW THE PROJECT IN ITS CONTEXT. | | | 7. RENDERINGS SHALL BE AN ACCURATE REFLECTION OF THE | | | SURROUNDING AREA, ACCOUNTING FOR EXISTING STREET | | | DIMENSIONS AND SURROUNDING BUILDINGS. | | | 8. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHALL INDICATE THE LOCATION OF | | | PROPOSED DOORS AND WINDOWS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |