Plan Review Details - Project Z16020009
Plan Review Stops For Project Z16020009
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 03-09-2016 Time 10:17 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-09 10:32:02DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A
 RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL
 INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
 ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE.
  
 3. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. THE PLANS FOR LEVELS 2 THROUGH 5 SHALL SHOW THE
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES TO
 THE ELEVATORS. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES
 SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO
 WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE
 TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH
 THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 10. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION
 OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT,
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-31-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-31-2016 Time 13:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-10-31 14:18:36IN ADDITION TO PREVIOUS ACKNOWLEDGED COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS WAS NOT SHOWN FOR WHERE THE
 TRASH COLLECTORS ARE BEING LOCATED. ROOM DOES NOT
 APPEAR LARGE ENOUGH. PLEASE CONTACT FERDINAND RIVERA
 FOR SANITATION APPROVAL.
  
 2. AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED, A NEW WATER MAIN AND SEWER
 LINE WILL NEED TO BE RUN FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LIMITS
 TO CONNECT WITH THE NEW FRONTAGE ROAD ALONG THE FEC.
 THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED OVERHEAD AND
 SUBSURFACE ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS.
  
 3. THE CITY WILL WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON THE TYPE OF
 SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ALLEY WHEN RESTORED.
  
 4. A PREVIOUS GAS LINE IS NO LONGER SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.. IS THERE A GAS LINE IN THE ALLEY?
  
 ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS CONCERNING ADDITIONAL SUBMITTALS
 AND AGREEMENTS STILL PERTAIN.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 15:51:54CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A
 ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN
 PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 5. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 7. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
 SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE
 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE
 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS.
 ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
 PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC
 ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE
 REQUIRED STUDY.
  
 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES.
  
 9. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN.
  
 10. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING STAFF
 FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND
 CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR
 THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY
 STAFF.
  
 11. PLEASE CLARIFY THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING WATER MAIN.
 IT IS SHOWN AS A 10? EXISTING MAIN, BUT A 12? X 8?
 TAPPING SLEEVE. THE MAIN NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY IS SHOWN
 AS A 12?, BUT AS A 10? MAIN AT THE PROPOSED CONNECTION
 LOCATION.
  
 12. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 13. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND
 TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. PAVERS WITHIN THE ROSEMARY
 RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL NEED TO BE RESTORED.
  
 14. A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY ALONG DATURA WILL BE
 DEDICATED TO THE CITY.
  
 15. PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN THE ALLEY APPEARS TO BE IN
 CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING GAS MAIN.
  
 16. THE SFWMD EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION IS NOT
 APPLICABLE FOR THE DESIGN CONDITIONS OF THE TRENCH
 LAYOUT.
  
 17. EACH BUILDING SHOULD HAVE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE
 OF STORM WATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 18. DRAINAGE PLANS SHOW 18? HDPE AND RCP PIPES. BAFFLE
 DETAIL ON SHEET 03 SHOWS 15? HDPE. PLEASE REVISE SO
 THEY ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 19. THE EXISTING DRAINAGE CATCH BASIN MAY NEED TO BE
 REHABILITATED OR REPLACED RATHER THAN CORED AS SHOWN ON
 SHEET 02 OF 5.
  
 20. VERIFY DRIVE AISLE IS MINIMUM 24 FEET WIDE FOR THE
 SOUTH BUILDING GROUND FLOOR PARKING LOT OFF OF THE
 ALLEY
  
 21. TURN AROUND SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE DEAD
 ENDS. REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION
 94-485 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 22. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWING THE
 DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SHOWING
 LOADING AREAS.
  
 23. THERE IS NOT AN EXISTING BUILDING EAST OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALONG DATURA. ONLY THE FPL
 SUBSTATION.
  
 24. AN AGREEMENT FOR AERIAL AND SUBSURFACE
 ENCROACHMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 25. NEW WATER MAIN MAY NEED TO BE EXTENDED EASTWARD.
 PROVIDE RESULTS OF MEETING WITH CITY
 OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE STAFF REGARDING CONDITION OF
 EXISTING POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY FACILITIES.
 PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING LINES MAY NEED TO BE SLEEVED
 OR ENCASED.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART
 OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES
 APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 REPLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT
 [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION.
 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE
 PLAN.
  
  
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-06-2017 Time 13:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-06-2017 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-06 13:54:573RD REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DATED DECEMBER13,
 2016, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES, TO ANA MARIA
 APONTE, URBAN PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-21-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-21-2016 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-21-2016 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-21 11:01:382ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DATED AUGUST 10,
 2016, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES, TO ANA MARIA
 APONTE, URBAN PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-24-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 02-24-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 02-24-2016 Time 15:05 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-24 16:30:38THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 HIGH RISES SHALL HAVE TWO SEPARATE SOURCES OF WATER
 SUPPLY.
  
 PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT
 CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 1. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 2. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 3. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 4. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 5. A WORK TABLE.
 6. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 7. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 8. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 9. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 10. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 11. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 12. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 13. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 14. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 15. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 16. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 17. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 18. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
 13. RADIO
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH OF 102.0 DBM
 FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE
 RESCUE. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-20-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-20-2017 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-20-2017 Time 11:43 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-20 11:43:46FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: CLEMATIS PLACE Z16020009
 JANUARY 20, 2017
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM AND
 CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 20% TERRACE PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE ON SHEET LP-2 TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE CWD-CD. IT MUST MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN
 SECTION 94-109, AND HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED.
 THE TERRACE PROVIDED WITHOUT MEETING THE VEGETATIVE
 COVER REQUIREMENT REQUIRES DAC BOARD APPROVAL FOR A
 VARIANCE. STAFF MAY SUPPORT THE VARIANCE DUE TO THE
 HISTORIC VALUE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 2. SATISFIED. THE CWD-10 SITE IS LESS THAN 50,000 SQ
 FT, SO NO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CORRECT
 THE OPEN SPACE CHART TO REFLECT THIS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREA COUNTED AS
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE 25% REQUIREMENT ON THE
 CWD-10 SITE, AND SHOW THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIRED
 VEGETATED AND CANOPY AREAS.
  
 THE ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 CONTAINS AMENITIES BY DEFINITION, AND REQUIRES 30%
 VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. THE AREA IS
 COMBINED FOR BOTH BUILDINGS AND SHOULD MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOTAL ROOFTOP GARDEN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE USE THE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR
 EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
 GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN INDICATING WHETHER THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS ON
 SITE WILL BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 THERE ARE EIGHT EXISTING OAK TREES IN THE PARKING AREA
 OF 531 DATURA, PLEASE PROVIDE A DISPOSITION PLAN.
 THE 8 OAK TREES ARE CLEARLY MARKED ON THE SURVEY
 SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT. THEY ARE ALSO CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIABLE ON SITE.
  
 6. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST BE 14 FEET MINIMUM.
 PLEASE REVISE AND CONSIDER A DIFFERENT SPECIES IF THE
 OVERHEAD LINES ARE OF CONCERN ON DATURA.
 THE HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES REQUIRE A 30 FOOT
 SETBACK FOR OAK TREES BY FPL STANDARDS. PLEASE
 RECOMMEND A DIFFERENT STREET TREE SPECIES THAT MEETS
 FPL STANDARDS ALONG DATURA.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-20-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-20-2016 Time 09:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-20-2016 Time 09:54 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-20 09:55:22FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: CLEMATIS PLACE Z16020009
 SEPTEMBER 20, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
 AND CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 20% TERRACE
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON SHEET LP-2 TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CWD-CD. IT MUST MEET THE
 DEFINITION FOUND IN SECTION 94-109, AND HAVE A
 LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED.
 THE TERRACE PROVIDED WITHOUT MEETING THE VEGETATIVE
 COVER REQUIREMENT REQUIRES DAC BOARD APPROVAL FOR A
 VARIANCE. STAFF MAY SUPPORT THE VARIANCE DUE TO THE
 HISTORIC VALUE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 2. SATISFIED. THE CWD-10 SITE IS LESS THAN 50,000 SQ
 FT, SO NO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CORRECT
 THE OPEN SPACE CHART TO REFLECT THIS.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREA COUNTED AS
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE 25% REQUIREMENT ON THE
 CWD-10 SITE, AND SHOW THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIRED
 VEGETATED AND CANOPY AREAS.
  
 THE ROOFTOP GARDEN CATEGORY OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 CONTAINS AMENITIES BY DEFINITION, AND REQUIRES 30%
 VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. THE AREA IS
 COMBINED FOR BOTH BUILDINGS AND SHOULD MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOTAL ROOFTOP GARDEN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE USE THE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR
 EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
 GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN INDICATING WHETHER THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS ON
 SITE WILL BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 THERE ARE EIGHT EXISTING OAK TREES IN THE PARKING AREA
 OF 531 DATURA, PLEASE PROVIDE A DISPOSITION PLAN.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST BE 14 FEET
 MINIMUM. PLEASE REVISE AND CONSIDER A DIFFERENT SPECIES
 IF THE OVERHEAD LINES ARE OF CONCERN ON DATURA.
 THE HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES REQUIRE A 30 FOOT
 SETBACK FOR OAK TREES BY FPL STANDARDS. PLEASE
 RECOMMEND A DIFFERENT STREET TREE SPECIES THAT MEETS
 FPL STANDARDS ALONG DATURA.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-07-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-07-2016 Time 17:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-07-2016 Time 17:02 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-07 17:09:13FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: CLEMATIS PLACE Z16020009
 MARCH 7, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM AND
 CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 20% TERRACE PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE ON SHEET LP-2 TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE CWD-CD. IT MUST MEET THE DEFINITION FOUND IN
 SECTION 94-109, AND HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED.
  
 2. THE CWD-10 SITE IS LESS THAN 50,000 SQ FT, SO NO
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN
 SPACE CHART TO REFLECT THIS.
  
 3. PLEASE CLARIFY THE AREA COUNTED AS PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE TO MEET THE 25% REQUIREMENT ON THE CWD-10 SITE,
 AND SHOW THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AND
 CANOPY AREAS.
  
 4. PLEASE USE THE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES
 ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART SECTION 94-446 (G).
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN INDICATING
 WHETHER THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS ON SITE WILL BE
 RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 6. STREET TREES MUST BE 14 FEET MINIMUM. PLEASE REVISE
 AND CONSIDER A DIFFERENT SPECIES IF THE OVERHEAD LINES
 ARE OF CONCERN ON DATURA.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 15:53:06SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 15:52:47SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 15:52:32SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-08-2016 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-08 15:52:16SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-19-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 01-19-2017 Time 11:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 01-19-2017 Time 11:06 Sent To  
Notes
2017-02-01 12:01:19ADDITONAL COMMENTS FOR DAC SPECIAL REVIEW:
 1. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BUILDING ENTRANCE TO THE
 RESIDENTIAL USE SHALL HAVE SOME ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
 THAT DIFFERENCIATES THE CORNER FROM THE RETAIL PORTION
 OF THE BUILDING.
 2. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE ALLEY OPENING TO BE
 REDUCED FROM THE PROPOSED 26'-6" TO 22'. THE DOWNTOWN
 ALLEYS ARE ENVISIONED AS SHARED ROADS AND DO NOT NEED A
 SEPARATE SIDEWALK.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE WINDOWS ON THE TWO RETAIL WALLS
 FACING THE ALLEY.
 4. PLEASE LOOK AT THE OPTION TO TAKE THE GLASS BREAK
 PROPOSED ALL THE WAY DOWN AND RECESS IT THE NECESSARY
 AMOUNT TO COMPLY WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS ON
 THE DATURA ELEVATION. PLEASE JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE
 REQUEST IF NEEDED.
 5. PLEASE PROPOSE SOME OPTIONS TO MAKE THE ALLEY
 CIRCULATION MORE ATTRACTIVE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND
 MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE GARAGE OVER THE
 ALLEY. SUGGEST HOW THE PAVERS ON ROSEMARY ARE GOING TO
 TRANSITION INTO THE ALLEY MATERIAL. STAFF SUFFEST THE
 ALLEY MATERIAL SHALL BE ENHANCED BEYOND SIMPLE ASPHALT
 COAT.
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH BLANK WALL REGULATION ON THE EAST FACADE.
 TREATMENT OF THE GARAGE WALL FACING EAST.
 7. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE STAGGERED SETBACK ON THE UPPER
 LEVELS OF THE CLEMATIS ELEVATION (ABOVE PODIUM) TO BE
 LARGER, MINIMIZING THE IMPACT OF THE 12 STORY BUILDING
 ON THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
 8. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BRICK FACADE TO PROJECT BELOW
 THE MINIMUM CELARANCE REQUIRED FOR THE ALLEY TO
 ACCOMPLISH A BETTER PEDESTRIAN SCALE FOR THE 1ST FLOOR
 OF THE BUILDING. EXACT DIMENSION TO BE DETERMINED WITH
 ENGINEERING TOENSURE CLEARANCE FOR TRUCKS ENTERING THE
 ALLEY IS PROVIDED.
 9. AWNINGS ON DATURA SHALL REFLECT THE SMALLER SIZE
 ALREDY INCLUDED IN THE ROSEMARY ELEVATIONS.
 10. ARE THE ROUND COLUMNS ON THE FIRST FLOOR FREE
 STANDING SEPARATED FROM THE GLASS STOREFRONT?
 RENDERINGS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT, BUT FLOOR PLANS ARE
 NOT.
  
  
 1. TDR APPROVAL STILL NEEDED. HPB APPROVAL DONE-SITE IS
 WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT AND AS SUCH APPROVAL FROM
 THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD IS REQUIRED. IN
 ADDITION, AND DUE TO PROPOSED UTILIZATION OF THE TDR
 INCENTIVE PROGRAM, THE SITE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE
 DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE (SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS).
 2. DONE- SETBACK ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE MEASURED
 FROM THE BACK OF THE PLANTER CURB.
 3. DONE- PAVERS ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL MATCH EXISTING
 PAVERS IN COLOR, PATTERN, TEXTURE ETC.
 4. DONE- FIRST FLOOR ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE COMPLIES
 WITH THE MINIMUM 228.8 RETAIL REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER,
 STAFF RECOMMENDS THE RELOCATION OF THE FITNESS CENTER
 AND THE USE OF THE PROMINENT CORNER SPACE FOR THE LOBBY
 ENTRANCE OR COMMERCIAL SPACE (OFFICES ALLOWED- RETAIL
 ALLOWED BUT NOT REQUIRED).
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CONFIRM FINAL DECISION ON
 ALLOWING THE DUMPSTER TO BE ROLLED OUT TO THE ALLEY FOR
 PICK UP- PLEASE EXPLAIN THE GARBAGE COLLECTION
 OPERATION. WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINER/PICK UP IS PROPOSED?
 - 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE
 PICK-UP OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR
 PUBLIC).
 6. DONE-PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE THE RAMP
 SLOPE IN PERCENTAGE AND IN ALL RAMPS PROPOSED WITHIN
 THE GARAGE - 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING
 RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE (SEC 94-111 (Q)(2) - NON-PARKING
 RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN 14% REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER
 TRANSITION).
 7. DONE- DEAD-END PARKING REQUIRES A TURN-AROUND SPACE.
 8. DONE -NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE ALL THE FLOOR
 LEVELS ABOVE THE 7TH STORY AS IT SEEMS FOR THE
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE FACADES THE UPPER LEVEL ARE
 ALL DIFFERENT AND STEP BACK FROM CLEMATIS AS THEY GO
 HIGHER. - 1ST REVIEW: FACADES AND RENDERING FACING
 NORTH ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH FLOOR PLANS (CANTILEVER
 CONDITION AND STEP BACK CONDITIONS)
 9. DONE- DATURA ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW THE GARAGE
 ENTRANCE.
 10. DONE-PARTIALLY SATISFIED- SHEET A2.01 STILL SHOWS
 SETBACK ON CLEMATIS AT 52'.- 1ST REVIEW: ALONG CLEMATIS
 STREET A 56' CONDITIONAL SETBACK IS REQUIRED ABOVE THE
 2ND FLOOR. PROPOSAL SEEMS TO BE AT 52' ONLY. PLEASE
 INCLUDE DIMENSION FROM THE BACK OF THE EXISTING CURB.
 11. DONE- PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING
 AREAS.
 12. - DONE- SITE PLAN SHOWS THE ALLEY OPENING (WALL TO
 WALL) TO BE AROUND 26' WHILE ELEVATION SHOWS THE ALLEY
 OPENING AT 34' IN WIDTH.
 13. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE LOOK AT DEFINITION OF PLANAR
 BREAK, TABLE IV-4 AND FIGURE IV-21 TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE. FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSPARENCY PLEASE
 SHOW DIAGRAMS ON ELEVATIONS WITH TRANSPARENCY AREAS.-
 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS, AND
 TRANSPARENCY.
 14. DONE-NOT SATISFIED- DUE TO THE HISTORIC NATURE OF
 THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON CLEMATIS STREET THE TERRACE
 WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON THE ROOF OF HISTORIC
 BUILDINGS. THE REQUIRED AREA SHALL BE RELOCATED TO THE
 ROOF TOP GARDEN. - 1ST REVIEW:THE SETBACK REQUIRED
 ABOVE THE 2ND STORY, AND PROVIDED IN THIS PROJECT ABOVE
 THE 1ST STORY SHALL BE DESIGNED AS A TERRACE (20% OF
 THE CWD-CD SITE).
 15. DONE- PLEASE DOCUMENT ALL THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
 FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 SUBJECT PARCEL, AND IDENTIFY ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS AND
 IMPACTS.
 16. DONE - AN AERIAL AND UDNERGROUND EASEMENT WILL BE
 PROVIDED. PROJECT LEGAL TEAM TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 DRAFT AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF EASEMENT.- 1ST REVIEW:
 PROPOSAL TO EXPAND THE BUILDING OVER THE ALLEY SHALL BE
 DISCUSSED FURTHER. INITIAL OPTIONS ARE 1. ABANDONING
 THE ALLEY BUT REQUIRE AN ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT;
 OR 2. AIR RIGHT EASEMENT AND UNDERGROUND EASEMENT.
 17. DONE- PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDITIONS OF THE
 SIDEWALK ON DATURA STREET EAST OF THE PROJECT AND HOW
 IT WILL TRANSITION TO THE NEW HARDSCAPE.
 18. DONE- PLEASE INDICATE INFORMATION ON SITE PLAN
 REFLECTING EXISTING CONDITIONS- 1ST REVIEW:PLEASE
 INDICATE IF ANY ON-STREET PARKING IS GOING TO BE
 REMOVED.
 19. DONE - PLEASE SPECIFY THE PLANTING DETAIL FOR THE
 PROPOSED OAKS ALONG DATURA STREET CONSIDERING THE
 UNDERGROUND PARKING IS BEING PROPOSED UNDER THE
 EXISTING SIDEWALK. ARE THE PROPOSED TREES VIABLE?
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
 19. NOT SATISFIED - SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE THE SQURE
 FOOTAGE OF NORTH AND SOUTH PARCELS SEPARATELY. IT SHALL
 ALSO INCLUDE SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS AND DISTANCE FROM BACK
 OF CURB TO PROPERTY LINE. - 1ST REVIEW: DATA ON SURVEY
 SHOWS TOTAL PARCEL AREA AS 43,584 OR 1.23 ACRE. PLEASE
 CORRECT NUMBER AND PROVIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE GROUP
 OF PROPERTIES DESIGNATED CWD-CD AND CWD-10 SEPARATELY.
 SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING
 SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE
 STREET.
 20. DONE- PLEASE ADJUST THE LOT SIZE AREAS TO BE
 CONSISTENT IN ALL THE DRAWINGS BASED ON THE SURVEY
 INFORMATION.
 21. DONE - PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE TWO
 PROPERTY LINES ON DATURA IN SHEET A2.01.- 1ST REVIEW:
 PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN ALL
 FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 22. DONE- SHEET A1.02 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE ACCURATE
 (ACCESS RAMP NOT SHOWN).
 23. DONE- PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE
 RENDERINGS WITHIN THE REAL CONTEXT, HOW IS THE PROJECT
 INSERTED ON THE SITE AND HOW IT WILL IMPACT THE
 PERCEPTION FROM THE STREET. THE SUBMITTED RENDERINGS
 ARE GOOD TO PROVIDE A VISUAL OF THE ENTIRE BUILDING,
 BUT ARE NOT ACCURATELY REFLECTING THE SCALE OF THE
 BUILDING IN RELATION TO THE STREET AND THE ADJACENT
 BUILDING (ROSEMAY SECTION). TAHT TYPE OF RENDERINGS ARE
 IMPORTANT FOR THE SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL- 1ST REVIEW:
 THE INTENTIONRENDERING IN SHEET R0-02 IS NOT ACCURATE
 IN THE PLACEMENT OF THE SURROUNDING BUILDINGS. ALL
 RENDERINGS SHALL ACCURATELY REFLECT THE EXISTING
 CONDITIONS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
 24. DONE- NOT SATISFIED- SUBMITTED ELEVATIONS ARE BLACK
 AND WHITE. - 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE INCLUDE NORTH AND EAST
 COLORED ELEVATIONS. PLEASE INDICATE SCALE ON ALL
 ELEVATIONS.
 25. NOT SATISFIED.- 1ST REVIEW: FOR THE DAC SPECIAL
 REVIEW FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE MORE
 DETAILED INDICATING LOCATION OF WINDOWS, BUILDING
 ENTRANCES AND BALCONIES. FACADE SHALL INCLUDE A CALL
 OUT FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS AND IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED
 MATERIALS. A MATERIAL BOARD WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 HEARING.
 26. NOT SATISFIED - 1ST REVIEW: FOR DAC, COMPLIANCE
 WITH SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED.
 27. DONE- PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR
 CADD) TO ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA
 INDICATED IN SHEET A0.06.
 28. DONE - PLEASE ENSURE ALL THE DRAWINGS ARE PRINTED
 AT SCALE (SHEET A1.01 IS NOT AT SCALE). STAFF WAS NOT
 ABLE TO VERIFY ANY DIMENSION ON SUBMITTED DRAWINGS.
 29. DONE- PLEASE CORRECT FAR CALCULATION IN SHEET
 A1.01AND A0.01. ADDITIONAL FAR PERMITTED ON CWD-10/12
 IS ONLY 14,780SF. ADJUST TOTAL ALLOWED.
  
 SPECIAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- THE TREATMENT AND SCALE OF THE
 1ST FLOOR ALONG ROSEMAY AVE DOES NOT RELATE TO THE
 SCALE OF ROSEMARY AVE, OR THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS. THE
 PROPOSED LARGE AWNINGS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE
 HISTORIC DISTRICT.
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- THE SCALE OF THE 1ST FLOOR
 SHALL BE LOWERED.
  
 HPB APPROVAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE INCORPORATED -
 COMMENTS FROM CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER:
 AFTER PRELIMINARILY REVIEWING THE PROPOSED PROJECT I
 OFFER THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. ADDITION/NEW CONSTRUCTION IN HISTORIC DISTRICT
 REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.
 2. PLANS ARE NOT DETAILED ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND
 REHABILITATION EFFORTS ON EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES,
 PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION.
 3. PROPOSED ADDITION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION
 94-49, SPECIFICALLY;
 SETTING, ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS IS NOT COMPATIBLE
 WITH DISTRICT UTILIZING INVERSE STEPPING OF BUILDING AS
 PROPOSED
 PROPORTION OF OPENINGS ARE NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE WITH
 SURROUNDING BUILDINGS
 RHYTHM OF SOLIDS TO VOIDS IS NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE
 AND
 THE SIZE, SCALE, MASS AND VOLUME OVERWHELMS THE
 EXISTING STRUCTURES.
 2. DETAILED PLANS OF SHORING/SUPPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 PRIOR TO PERMITTING TO ENSURE NO DAMAGE OCCURS
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-06-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 10-14-2016 Time 13:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 10-14-2016 Time 13:36 Sent To  
Notes
2016-10-14 16:21:211. SITE IS WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT AND AS SUCH
 APPROVAL FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD IS
 REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, AND DUE TO PROPOSED UTILIZATION
 OF THE TDR INCENTIVE PROGRAM, THE SITE REQUIRES
 APPROVAL FROM THE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE (SPECIAL
 REVIEW STANDARDS).
 2. DONE- SETBACK ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE MEASURED
 FROM THE BACK OF THE PLANTER CURB.
 3. DONE- PAVERS ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL MATCH EXISTING
 PAVERS IN COLOR, PATTERN, TEXTURE ETC.
 4. DONE- FIRST FLOOR ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE COMPLIES
 WITH THE MINIMUM 228.8 RETAIL REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER,
 STAFF RECOMMENDS THE RELOCATION OF THE FITNESS CENTER
 AND THE USE OF THE PROMINENT CORNER SPACE FOR THE LOBBY
 ENTRANCE OR COMMERCIAL SPACE (OFFICES ALLOWED- RETAIL
 ALLOWED BUT NOT REQUIRED).
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE GARBAGE COLLECTION
 OPERATION. WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINER/PICK UP IS PROPOSED?
 - 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE
 PICK-UP OPERATION (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR
 PUBLIC).
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE THE RAMP SLOPE
 IN PERCENTAGE AND IN ALL RAMPS PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 GARAGE - 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP
 PROPOSED SLOPE (SEC 94-111 (Q)(2) - NON-PARKING RAMP
 SLOPE HIGHER THAN 14% REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER
 TRANSITION).
 7. DONE- DEAD-END PARKING REQUIRES A TURN-AROUND SPACE.
 8. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE ALL THE FLOOR LEVELS
 ABOVE THE 7TH STORY AS IT SEEMS FOR THE INFORMATION
 PROVIDED IN THE FACADES THE UPPER LEVEL ARE ALL
 DIFFERENT AND STEP BACK FROM CLEMATIS AS THEY GO
 HIGHER. - 1ST REVIEW: FACADES AND RENDERING FACING
 NORTH ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH FLOOR PLANS (CANTILEVER
 CONDITION AND STEP BACK CONDITIONS)
 9. DONE- DATURA ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW THE GARAGE
 ENTRANCE.
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- SHEET A2.01 STILL SHOWS
 SETBACK ON CLEMATIS AT 52'.- 1ST REVIEW: ALONG CLEMATIS
 STREET A 56' CONDITIONAL SETBACK IS REQUIRED ABOVE THE
 2ND FLOOR. PROPOSAL SEEMS TO BE AT 52' ONLY. PLEASE
 INCLUDE DIMENSION FROM THE BACK OF THE EXISTING CURB.
 11. DONE- PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING
 AREAS.
 12. - DONE- SITE PLAN SHOWS THE ALLEY OPENING (WALL TO
 WALL) TO BE AROUND 26' WHILE ELEVATION SHOWS THE ALLEY
 OPENING AT 34' IN WIDTH.
 13. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE LOOK AT DEFINITION OF PLANAR
 BREAK, TABLE IV-4 AND FIGURE IV-21 TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE. FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSPARENCY PLEASE
 SHOW DIAGRAMS ON ELEVATIONS WITH TRANSPARENCY AREAS.-
 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS, AND
 TRANSPARENCY.
 14. NOT SATISFIED- DUE TO THE HISTORIC NATURE OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDINGS ON CLEMATIS STREET THE TERRACE WILL
 NOT BE PERMITTED ON THE ROOF OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS. THE
 REQUIRED AREA SHALL BE RELOCATED TO THE ROOF TOP
 GARDEN. - 1ST REVIEW:THE SETBACK REQUIRED ABOVE THE 2ND
 STORY, AND PROVIDED IN THIS PROJECT ABOVE THE 1ST STORY
 SHALL BE DESIGNED AS A TERRACE (20% OF THE CWD-CD
 SITE).
 15. DONE- PLEASE DOCUMENT ALL THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
 FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 SUBJECT PARCEL, AND IDENTIFY ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS AND
 IMPACTS.
 16. DONE - AN AERIAL AND UDNERGROUND EASEMENT WILL BE
 PROVIDED. PROJECT LEGAL TEAM TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 DRAFT AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF EASEMENT.- 1ST REVIEW:
 PROPOSAL TO EXPAND THE BUILDING OVER THE ALLEY SHALL BE
 DISCUSSED FURTHER. INITIAL OPTIONS ARE 1. ABANDONING
 THE ALLEY BUT REQUIRE AN ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT;
 OR 2. AIR RIGHT EASEMENT AND UNDERGROUND EASEMENT.
 17. DONE- PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDITIONS OF THE
 SIDEWALK ON DATURA STREET EAST OF THE PROJECT AND HOW
 IT WILL TRANSITION TO THE NEW HARDSCAPE.
 18. DONE- PLEASE INDICATE INFORMATION ON SITE PLAN
 REFLECTING EXISTING CONDITIONS- 1ST REVIEW:PLEASE
 INDICATE IF ANY ON-STREET PARKING IS GOING TO BE
 REMOVED.
 19. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PLANTING DETAIL FOR THE PROPOSED
 OAKS ALONG DATURA STREET CONSIDERING THE UNDERGROUND
 PARKING IS BEING PROPOSED UNDER THE EXISTING SIDEWALK.
 ARE THE PROPOSED TREES VIABLE?
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
 19. NOT SATISFIED - SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE THE SQURE
 FOOTAGE OF NORTH AND SOUTH PARCELS SEPARATELY. IT SHALL
 ALSO INCLUDE SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS AND DISTANCE FROM BACK
 OF CURB TO PROPERTY LINE. - 1ST REVIEW: DATA ON SURVEY
 SHOWS TOTAL PARCEL AREA AS 43,584 OR 1.23 ACRE. PLEASE
 CORRECT NUMBER AND PROVIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE GROUP
 OF PROPERTIES DESIGNATED CWD-CD AND CWD-10 SEPARATELY.
 SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING
 SIDEWALKS, AND ROW INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE
 STREET.
 20. DONE- PLEASE ADJUST THE LOT SIZE AREAS TO BE
 CONSISTENT IN ALL THE DRAWINGS BASED ON THE SURVEY
 INFORMATION.
 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE TWO
 PROPERTY LINES ON DATURA IN SHEET A2.01.- 1ST REVIEW:
 PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN ALL
 FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 22. DONE- SHEET A1.02 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE ACCURATE
 (ACCESS RAMP NOT SHOWN).
 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE RENDERINGS
 WITHIN THE REAL CONTEXT, HOW IS THE PROJECT INSERTED ON
 THE SITE AND HOW IT WILL IMPACT THE PERCEPTION FROM THE
 STREET. THE SUBMITTED RENDERINGS ARE GOOD TO PROVIDE A
 VISUAL OF THE ENTIRE BUILDING, BUT ARE NOT ACCURATELY
 REFLECTING THE SCALE OF THE BUILDING IN RELATION TO THE
 STREET AND THE ADJACENT BUILDING (ROSEMAY SECTION).
 TAHT TYPE OF RENDERINGS ARE IMPORTANT FOR THE SPECIAL
 REVIEW APPROVAL- 1ST REVIEW: THE INTENTIONRENDERING IN
 SHEET R0-02 IS NOT ACCURATE IN THE PLACEMENT OF THE
 SURROUNDING BUILDINGS. ALL RENDERINGS SHALL ACCURATELY
 REFLECT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SURROUNDING
 AREA.
 24. NOT SATISFIED- SUBMITTED ELEVATIONS ARE BLACK AND
 WHITE. - 1ST REVIEW: PLEASE INCLUDE NORTH AND EAST
 COLORED ELEVATIONS. PLEASE INDICATE SCALE ON ALL
 ELEVATIONS.
 25. NOT SATISFIED.- 1ST REVIEW: FOR THE DAC SPECIAL
 REVIEW FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE MORE
 DETAILED INDICATING LOCATION OF WINDOWS, BUILDING
 ENTRANCES AND BALCONIES. FACADE SHALL INCLUDE A CALL
 OUT FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS AND IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED
 MATERIALS. A MATERIAL BOARD WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 HEARING.
 26. NOT SATISFIED - 1ST REVIEW: FOR DAC, COMPLIANCE
 WITH SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED.
 27. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO
 ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN
 SHEET A0.06.
 28. PLEASE ENSURE ALL THE DRAWINGS ARE PRINTED AT SCALE
 (SHEET A1.01 IS NOT AT SCALE). STAFF WAS NOT ABLE TO
 VERIFY ANY DIMENSION ON SUBMITTED DRAWINGS.
 29. PLEASE CORRECT FAR CALCULATION IN SHEET A1.01AND
 A0.01. ADDITIONAL FAR PERMITTED ON CWD-10/12 IS ONLY
 14,780SF. ADJUST TOTAL ALLOWED.
  
 SPECIAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 1. THE TREATMENT AND SCALE OF THE 1ST FLOOR ALONG
 ROSEMAY AVE DOES NOT RELATE TO THE SCALE OF ROSEMARY
 AVE, OR THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS. THE PROPOSED LARGE
 AWNINGS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
 2. THE SCALE OF THE 1ST FLOOR SHALL BE LOWERED.
  
 COMMENTS FROM CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER:
 AFTER PRELIMINARILY REVIEWING THE PROPOSED PROJECT I
 OFFER THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. ADDITION/NEW CONSTRUCTION IN HISTORIC DISTRICT
 REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.
 2. PLANS ARE NOT DETAILED ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND
 REHABILITATION EFFORTS ON EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES,
 PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION.
 3. PROPOSED ADDITION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION
 94-49, SPECIFICALLY;
 SETTING, ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS IS NOT COMPATIBLE
 WITH DISTRICT UTILIZING INVERSE STEPPING OF BUILDING AS
 PROPOSED
 PROPORTION OF OPENINGS ARE NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE WITH
 SURROUNDING BUILDINGS
 RHYTHM OF SOLIDS TO VOIDS IS NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE
 AND
 THE SIZE, SCALE, MASS AND VOLUME OVERWHELMS THE
 EXISTING STRUCTURES.
 2. DETAILED PLANS OF SHORING/SUPPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 PRIOR TO PERMITTING TO ENSURE NO DAMAGE OCCURS
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-07-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 03-07-2016 Time 13:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 03-07-2016 Time 13:59 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-07 15:30:531. SITE IS WIHTIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT AND AS SUCH
 APPROVAL FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD IS
 REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, AND DUE TO PROPOSED UTILIZATION
 OF THE TDR INCENTIVE PROGRAM, THE SITE REQUIRED
 APPROVAL FROM THE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE (SPECIAL
 REVIEW STANDARDS).
 2. SETBACK ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM
 THE BACK OF THE PLANTER CURB.
 3. PAVERS ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL MATCH EXISTING
 PAVERS IN COLOR, PATTERN, TEXTURE ETC.
 4. FIRST FLOOR ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE COMPLIES WITH THE
 MINIMUM 228.8? RETAIL REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER, STAFF
 RECOMMENDS THE RELOCATION OF THE FITNESS CENTER AND THE
 USE OF THE PROMINENT CORNER SPACE FOR THE LOBBY
 ENTRANCE OR COMMERCIAL SPACE (OFFICES ALLOWED- RETAIL
 ALLOWED BUT NOT REQUIRED).
 5. PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE PICK-UP OPERATION
 (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC).
 6. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE (SEC
 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN 14%
 REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION).
 7. DEAD-END PARKING REQUIRES A TURN-AROUND SPACE.
 8. FACADES AND RENDERING FACING NORTH ARE NOT
 CONSISTENT WITH FLOOR PLANS (CANTILEVER CONDITION AND
 STEP BACK CONDITIONS)
 9. DATURA ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW THE GARAGE ENTRANCE.
 10. ALONG CLEMATIS STREET A 56? CONDITIONAL SETBACK IS
 REQUIRED ABOVE THE 2ND FLOOR. PROPOSAL SEEMS TO BE AT
 52? ONLY. PLEASE INCLUDE DIMENSION FROM THE BACK OF THE
 EXISTING CURB.
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS.
 12. SITE PLAN SHOWS THE ALLEY OPENING (WALL TO WALL) TO
 BE AROUND 26? WHILE ELEVATION SHOWS THE ALLEY OPENING
 AT 34? IN WIDTH.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS, AND TRANSPARENCY.
 14. THE SETBACK REQUIRED ABOVE THE 2ND STORY, AND
 PROVIDED IN THIS PROJECT ABOVE THE 1ST STORY SHALL BE
 DESIGNED AS A TERRACE (20% OF THE CWD-CD SITE).
 15. PLEASE DOCUMENT ALL THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SUBJECT
 PARCEL, AND IDENTIFY ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS AND
 IMPACTS.
 16. PROPOSAL TO EXPAND THE BUILDING OVER THE ALLEY
 SHALL BE DISCUSSED FURTHER. INITIAL OPTIONS ARE 1.
 ABANDONING THE ALLEY BUT REQUIRE AN ACCESS AND UTILITY
 EASEMENT; OR 2. AIR RIGHT EASEMENT AND UNDERGROUND
 EASEMENT.
 17. PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDITIONS OF THE SIDEWALK ON
 DATURA STREET EAST OF THE PROJECT AND HOW IT WILL
 TRANSITION TO THE NEW HARDSCAPE.
 18. PLEASE INDICATE IF ANY ON-STREET PARKING IS GOING
 TO BE REMOVED.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
 19. DATA ON SURVEY SHOWS TOTAL PARCEL AREA AS 43,584 OR
 1.23 ACRE. PLEASE CORRECT NUMBER AND PROVIDE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR THE GROUP OF PROPERTIES DESIGNATED CWD-CD
 AND CWD-10 SEPARATELY. SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE
 MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, AND ROW
 INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET.
  
 20. PLEASE ADJUST THE LOT SIZE AREAS TO BE CONSISTENT
 IN ALL THE DRAWINGS BASED ON THE SURVEY INFORMATION.
 21. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN
 ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 22. SHEET A1.02 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE ACCURATE (ACCESS
 RAMP NOT SHOWN).
 23. RENDERING IN SHEET R0-02 IS NOT ACCURATE IN THE
 PLACEMENT OF THE SURROUNDING BUILDINGS. ALL RENDERINGS
 SHALL ACCURATELY REFLECT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE
 SURROUNDING AREA.
 24. PLEASE INCLUDE NORTH AND EAST COLORED ELEVATIONS.
 PLEASE INDICATE SCALE ON ALL ELEVATIONS.
 25. FOR THE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW FLOOR PLANS AND
 ELEVATIONS SHALL BE MORE DETAILED INDICATING LOCATION
 OF WINDOWS, BUILDING ENTRANCES AND BALCONIES. FACADE
 SHALL INCLUDE A CALL OUT FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS AND
 IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED MATERIALS. A MATERIAL BOARD WILL
 BE REQUIRED FOR THE HEARING.
 26. FOR DAC, COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS
 SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED.
 27. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO
 ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN
 SHEET A0.06.
  
 COMMENTS FROM CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER:
 AFTER PRELIMINARILY REVIEWING THE PROPOSED PROJECT I
 OFFER THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. ADDITION/NEW CONSTRUCTION IN HISTORIC DISTRICT
 REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.
 2. PLANS ARE NOT DETAILED ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND
 REHABILITATION EFFORTS ON EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES,
 PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION.
 3. PROPOSED ADDITION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION
 94-49, SPECIFICALLY;
 SETTING, ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS IS NOT COMPATIBLE
 WITH DISTRICT UTILIZING INVERSE STEPPING OF BUILDING AS
 PROPOSED
 PROPORTION OF OPENINGS ARE NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE WITH
 SURROUNDING BUILDINGS
 RHYTHM OF SOLIDS TO VOIDS IS NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE
 AND
 THE SIZE, SCALE, MASS AND VOLUME OVERWHELMS THE
 EXISTING STRUCTURES.
 2. DETAILED PLANS OF SHORING/SUPPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 PRIOR TO PERMITTING TO ENSURE NO DAMAGE OCCURS
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved