City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z16020008

Plan Review Stops For Project Z16020008

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-13-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	04-13-2016	Time	20:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	04-13-2016	Time	20:54	Sent To

Notes

2016-04-13 20:59:55	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
	LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
	206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
	PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
	FACILITY ENTRANCES.

	3. THE PARKING REQUIREMEMNTS TABLE ON SITE PLAN SHEET
	SP-1 NOW SHOWS THAT 150 PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED,
	AND STATES THAT 7 ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE PROPOSED.
	HOWEVER, THE PLAN ONLY SHOWS WHERE 4 OF THE ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES ARE LOCATED. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT,
	AT LEAST 5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE SHOWN ON
	THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE.

	4. WHE SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
	OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE

	5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	7. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
	ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
	GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	8. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
	(AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
	PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
	SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	03-08-2016	Time	00:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	03-08-2016	Time	00:52	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-08 01:03:28	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
	LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
	206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
	PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
	FACILITY ENTRANCES.

	3. SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 SHOWS THAT 148 PARKING SPACES
	ARE PROPOSED, AND JUST 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE
	PROPOSED. 5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRES
	BECAUSE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
	PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF
	FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	4. WHE SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
	OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE

	5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	7. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
	ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
	GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	8. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
	(AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
	PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
	SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-06-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	05-06-2016	Time	10:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2016-05-06 10:55:55	5/5/16 D. KITTREDGE SPOKE WITH K. CRANFORD AND PROJECT
	IS OKAY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH 'PASS' STATUS.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:18	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-08 14:19:15	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL.

	1. REQUIREMENTS LISTED UNDER ORIGINAL APPROVAL STILL
	APPLY.

	2. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM MAY REQUIRE A MASTER METER.

	3. CAN PHASE 2 BE SOLD TO A SEPARATE OWNER?

	4. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
	THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
	PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
	DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
	SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
	PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.

	KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
	CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

	VINCE NOEL, PSM
	CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
	[email protected]
	561-494-1096

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	02-24-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	02-24-2016	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	02-24-2016	Time	11:47	Sent To

Notes

2016-02-24 11:53:53	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. PROVIDE FOR THE APPROPRIATE FIRE LANE DIMENSIONS
	AND/OR TURN-AROUND CONFIGURATIONS, INCLUDING AUTO-TURN,
	FOR SITE EMERGENCY VEHICLES ACCESS AND EGRESS.

	7. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
	NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	8. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS
	AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.


	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	05-06-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-06-2016	Time	10:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-06-2016	Time	10:47	Sent To

Notes

2016-05-06 10:49:26	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NOVUS MEDICAL Z16020008
	MAY 6, 2016
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY FOR THE
	SITE. THERE IS ONE BLACK OLIVE ON SITE THAT IS NOT
	SHOWN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
	PLEASE SUBMIT A TREE SURVEY.

	2. SATISFIED. THE PINES EXISTING ON THE SITE ARE PINUS
	CLAUSA. PLEASE VERIFY AND CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION
	PLAN.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION CHART
	SHOWING THE TREE CATEGORIES REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH
	THE PROPOSED PLAN.

	THERE ARE MANY CORRECTIONS NECESSARY ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN. A MEETING TO REVIEW THE CORRECTIONS
	WOULD BE THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO COMMUNICATE THE
	CORRECTIONS NEEDED.

	4. SATISFIED. THERE ARE MANY HEALTHY MATURE SABAL PALMS
	ON SITE THAT CAN BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN DESTROYED.
	PLEASE INDICATE PRESERVATION OF THE SABAL PALMS ON THE
	TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN REGARDING TREE MITIGATION. ALL TREES
	LESS THAN 35 FEET OF CANOPY SPREAD MUST BE MITIGATED
	ONE FOR ONE. THE LISTED INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES ARE THE
	ONLY ONES EXEMPT FROM MITIGATION.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE
	ON SHEET SP-1TO REFLECT THE CORRECT OPEN SPACE AS
	DEFINED BY CODE.

	7. SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND
	SHRUBS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442 MUST BE CALCULATED
	ON 50 PERCENT OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-203.
	PLEASE REVISE THE DATA TABLE TO REFLECT THE CORRECT
	QUANTITIES.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE REQUIRED TREE COUNTS
	FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH BUFFERS TO 23 EACH, AND ADD THE
	TREES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	9. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW TREES AT THE
	REQUIRED SPACING ALONG THE NORTH BUFFER. THE ADJACENT
	PROPERTY OWNER CAN BE CONTACTED TO REMOVE THE
	AUSTRALIAN PINES WITHIN THEIR BUFFER.

	10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEDGE IN ALL
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED, AND PER
	SECTION 94-443.

	11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TREE CATEGORIES FOR
	TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED AND MITIGATION TREES
	PROVIDED ON THE TREE ALTERATION PLAN SHEET TAP-1.

	THERE ARE MANY CORRECTIONS NECESSARY ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN. A MEETING TO REVIEW THE CORRECTIONS
	WOULD BE THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO COMMUNICATE THE
	CORRECTIONS NEEDED.

	12. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL
	INDIVIDUAL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
	CORRESPOND TO THE WIDTHS AS LISTED ON SHEET SP-1.

	13. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
	TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
	THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
	CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
	BY TREE ROOTS.

	14. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
	UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. PLEASE SHOW ALL
	EASEMENTS.

	LIFT STATION NEEDS SCREENING.
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. A SEPARATE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED
	FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT. ALL TREES EXISTING
	WITHIN THE PHASE AREA SHALL BE ACCOUNTED FOR AND
	MITIGATED AT TIME OF PERMITTING.

	3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF
	OCCUPANCY FOR EACH PHASE, ALL INVASIVE EXOTIC PLANTS
	SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN THE PHASE AREA.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-19-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-19-2016	Time	14:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-11-2016	Time	14:40	Sent To

Notes

2016-04-19 14:42:25	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NOVUS MEDICAL Z16020008
	APRIL 18, 2016
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY FOR THE
	SITE. THERE IS ONE BLACK OLIVE ON SITE THAT IS NOT
	SHOWN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
	PLEASE SUBMIT A TREE SURVEY.

	2. SATISFIED. THE PINES EXISTING ON THE SITE ARE PINUS
	CLAUSA. PLEASE VERIFY AND CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION
	PLAN.

	3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION
	CHART SHOWING THE TREE CATEGORIES REMOVED AND REPLACED
	WITH THE PROPOSED PLAN.

	THERE ARE MANY CORRECTIONS NECESSARY ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN. A MEETING TO REVIEW THE CORRECTIONS
	WOULD BE THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO COMMUNICATE THE
	CORRECTIONS NEEDED.

	4. SATISFIED. THERE ARE MANY HEALTHY MATURE SABAL PALMS
	ON SITE THAT CAN BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN DESTROYED.
	PLEASE INDICATE PRESERVATION OF THE SABAL PALMS ON THE
	TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN REGARDING TREE MITIGATION. ALL TREES
	LESS THAN 35 FEET OF CANOPY SPREAD MUST BE MITIGATED
	ONE FOR ONE. THE LISTED INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES ARE THE
	ONLY ONES EXEMPT FROM MITIGATION.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE
	ON SHEET SP-1TO REFLECT THE CORRECT OPEN SPACE AS
	DEFINED BY CODE.

	7. SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND
	SHRUBS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442 MUST BE CALCULATED
	ON 50 PERCENT OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-203.
	PLEASE REVISE THE DATA TABLE TO REFLECT THE CORRECT
	QUANTITIES.

	8. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE REQUIRED TREE COUNTS
	FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH BUFFERS TO 23 EACH, AND ADD THE
	TREES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	9. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW TREES AT THE
	REQUIRED SPACING ALONG THE NORTH BUFFER. THE ADJACENT
	PROPERTY OWNER CAN BE CONTACTED TO REMOVE THE
	AUSTRALIAN PINES WITHIN THEIR BUFFER.

	10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEDGE IN ALL
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED, AND PER
	SECTION 94-443.

	11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TREE CATEGORIES
	FOR TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED AND MITIGATION TREES
	PROVIDED ON THE TREE ALTERATION PLAN SHEET TAP-1.

	THERE ARE MANY CORRECTIONS NECESSARY ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN. A MEETING TO REVIEW THE CORRECTIONS
	WOULD BE THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO COMMUNICATE THE
	CORRECTIONS NEEDED.

	12. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL
	INDIVIDUAL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
	CORRESPOND TO THE WIDTHS AS LISTED ON SHEET SP-1.

	13. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
	TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
	THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
	CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
	BY TREE ROOTS.

	14. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
	UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. PLEASE SHOW ALL
	EASEMENTS.

	LIFT STATION NEEDS SCREENING.
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. A SEPARATE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE PERMITTED
	SEPARATELY FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT.

	3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF
	OCCUPANCY, ALL INVASIVE EXOTIC PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED
	FROM THE ENTIRE SITE.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-03-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	03-03-2016	Time	16:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	03-03-2016	Time	16:54	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-03 16:54:39	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NOVUS MEDICAL Z16020008
	MARCH 3, 2016
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY FOR THE SITE. THERE IS
	ONE BLACK OLIVE ON SITE THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN.

	2. THE PINES EXISTING ON THE SITE ARE PINUS CLAUSA.
	PLEASE VERIFY AND CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.

	3. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION CHART SHOWING THE
	TREE CATEGORIES REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE PROPOSED
	PLAN.

	4. THERE ARE MANY HEALTHY MATURE SABAL PALMS ON SITE
	THAT CAN BE RELOCATED RATHER THAN DESTROYED. PLEASE
	INDICATE PRESERVATION OF THE SABAL PALMS ON THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN.

	5. PLEASE CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	REGARDING TREE MITIGATION. ALL TREES LESS THAN 35 FEET
	OF CANOPY SPREAD MUST BE MITIGATED ONE FOR ONE. THE
	LISTED INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES ARE THE ONLY ONES EXEMPT
	FROM MITIGATION.

	6. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE ON SHEET
	SP-1TO REFLECT THE CORRECT OPEN SPACE AS DEFINED BY
	CODE.

	7. THE NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS
	REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442 MUST BE CALCULATED ON 50
	PERCENT OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-203. PLEASE
	REVISE THE DATA TABLE TO REFLECT THE CORRECT
	QUANTITIES.

	8. PLEASE REVISE THE REQUIRED TREE COUNTS FOR THE NORTH
	AND SOUTH BUFFERS TO 23 EACH, AND ADD THE TREES TO THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	9. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW TREES AT THE REQUIRED SPACING
	ALONG THE NORTH BUFFER. THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER CAN
	BE CONTACTED TO REMOVE THE AUSTRALIAN PINES WITHIN
	THEIR BUFFER.

	10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEDGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
	AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED, AND PER SECTION 94-443.

	11. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TREE CATEGORIES FOR TREES AND
	PALMS TO BE REMOVED AND MITIGATION TREES PROVIDED ON
	THE TREE ALTERATION PLAN SHEET TAP-1.

	12. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL INDIVIDUAL
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO CORRESPOND
	TO THE WIDTHS AS LISTED ON SHEET SP-1.

	13. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
	INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
	WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
	FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.

	14. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
	EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
	AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
	AND UTILITIES. PLEASE SHOW ALL EASEMENTS.
	PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
	REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
	THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	04-28-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	04-28-2016	Time	16:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2016-04-28 16:48:21	THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
	CONDITIONS:

	1.THE ONSITE WATER MAIN WILL BE A PRIVATE MAIN AND
	WATER USAGE WILL BE MEASURED WITH A MASTER METER FOR
	THE DEVELOPMENT.

	2. THE WATER MAIN IS NOT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	STORMWATER RETENTION AREA.

	3. THE GRADING PLAN FOR THE PARKING LOTS ON THE NORTH
	SIDE OF THE SITE ARE TO BE DESIGNED TO DRAIN TOWARD THE
	DRAINAGE SYSTEM OF CATCH BASINS.

	4. GRADING OF PHASE 2 ROADWAY ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
	NOT INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN.

	5. GRADING PLAN FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT WILL NEED
	ADDITIONAL PROPOSED GRADES FOR THE CORNERS OF THE
	PARKING LOTS.

	6. REQUIREMENTS LISTED UNDER THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL
	STILL APPLY.

	TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	[email protected]
	(561) 494-1120

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-25-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	04-25-2016	Time	12:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2016-04-25 12:19:30	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE
	APRIL 8, 2016 PLAN SUBMITTAL TO PPRC:
	1. SHEET C-1 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE AN EASEMENT OVER
	THE WATER MAIN. THIS IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE
	ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE ENGINEER THAT THE WATER SYSTEM
	WILL BE MASTER METERED.

	2. REVISE THE PROPOSED RETENTION AREA OR WATER MAIN
	ROUTE SO THAT THE WATER MAIN DOES NOT CROSS THE STORM
	RETENTION AREA. PERHAPS THE STORM RETENTION AREA CAN
	INCLUDE INLET D-13 INSTEAD OF D-14, THEREBY ELIMINATING
	THE 90 LF OF 36" RCP THAT WOULD BE REMOVED IN PHASE 2.

	3. ENGINEER HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE NORTH PARKING LOTS
	NEED TO BE RE-GRADED TO DRAIN TO THE STORM INLETS
	INSTEAD OF THE BACK OF THE PARKING SPACES.

	4. GRADING OF PHASE 2 ROADWAY ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
	NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL.

	5. GRADING PLAN FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT WILL NEED
	ADDITIONAL PROPOSED GRADES FOR THE CORNERS OF THE
	PARKING LOTS.

	6. ENGINEER EMAILED AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
	THE DUMPSTER LOCATION CAN BE READILY SERVICED.

	7. REQUIREMENTS LISTED UNDER THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL
	STILL APPLY.

	TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	[email protected]
	(561) 494-1120

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:19	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-08 14:20:03

SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-25-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	04-25-2016	Time	12:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2016-04-25 12:21:37	SEE COMMENTS UNDER PUBLIC WORKS #2.

	TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	[email protected]
	561-494-1120

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	Ward			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:19	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-09 12:10:59	1. STEEP BACK OF CURB SLOPE ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.

	2. PROPOSED PERIMETER SPOT GRADE OF 20.25 BELOW MINIMUM
	PERIMETER GRADE OF 20.56.

	3. PARKING SPACES ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE SLOPE
	TOWARD PROPERTY LINE INSTEAD OF TO CENTERLINE OF DRIVE
	WHERE THE DRAINAGE INLETS ARE LOCATED.

	4. ?14? CONTOUR MISLABELED FOR RETENTION AREA AROUND
	STRUCTURE D-2.

	5. SHOW ALL UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPE PLANS (STORM NOT
	SHOWN; WATER AND SEWER DO NOT MATCH CIVIL PLANS).

	TRACY WARD, P.E.
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:20	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-08-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-08-2016	Time	14:20	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	05-06-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	05-06-2016	Time	20:31	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2016-05-06 20:33:18	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:

	5/6/16

	1. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER REQUIRED PRIOR
	TO ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:

	A. A PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
	PRIOR TO C.O., AS LISTED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	OF THE LAST SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-19-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	04-19-2016	Time	16:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred			Date	04-11-2016	Time	14:08	Sent To

Notes

2016-04-19 16:15:21	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: *FAILED*

	4/19/2016

	1. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #1] PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION
	AS TO ANDREW ROTNERMEL'S (OR BRYN WESCH'S) RELATIONSHIP
	TO THE PROPERTY OWNER - ORIGINS BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE
	OF FLORIDA, LLC, AND AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN THE
	APPLICATION.

	2. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #3] TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER WAS
	NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE. THE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
	TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FOR THIS SITE HAS EXPIRED.

	3. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #4] GRAPHIC DEPICTING CHANGE IN
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT NEEDS TO INCLUDE A CALCULATION
	DEMONSTRATING THAT THERE IS NOT GREATER THAN A 5%
	CHANGE IN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TO STAY WITHIN THE
	MINOR PD AMENDMENT CATEGORY.

	4. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #5] REVISE THE DETAIL ON THE
	BICYCLE PAD SHOWING DIMENSIONS. THE WIDTH IS BASED ON
	THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACING SHOWN BETWEEN THE RACK AND
	DEPTH IS A MINIMUM OF 6 FEET. IF TWO ROWS OF PARKING
	ARE PROVIDED, THEN 4 FEET OF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS
	REQUIRED BETWEEN THE ROWS OF BICYCLE PARKING. IT IS
	RECOMMENDED THE DETAIL IS REVISED TO PROVIDE 4 BICYCLE
	PARKING SPACES (TWO 'U'-SHAPED RACKS) REQUIRED FOR THIS
	PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AND ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING
	PROVIDED PROPORTIONAL TO PHASE II THAT WILL BE ADDED TO
	THE SITE WHEN PHASE II IS CONSTRUCTED. ADJUST BICYCLE
	PARKING CALCULATION TO SHOW HOW THE MINIMUM BICYCLE
	PARKING WAS CALCULATED AND WHAT IS REQUIRED AND BEING
	INSTALLED FOR PHASE I AND PHASE II - FINAL BUILD-OUT.

	5. STALL DEPTH FOR 60 DEGREE ANGLE PARKING NEEDS TO BE
	A MINIMUM OF 19'-10". PLEASE DIMENSION ON PLAN. GRAPHIC
	IN ZLDR SEC. 94-485(J) SHOWS HOW THE STALL DEPTH
	DIMENSION IS CALCULATED.

	6. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #14] INFORMATION ON HEIGHT OF
	PROPOSED FENCE WAS REQUESTED. RESPONSE LETTER DID NOT
	INDICATE A HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT
	OF FENCE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SEC.
	94-302.

	7. PARKING WAS BROKEN DOWN INTO PHASES, BUT ADA SPACES
	ALSO NEED TO BE BROKEN DOWN INTO PHASES TO DEMONSTRATE
	THAT ADA PARKING SPACES MEETS MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR
	PHASE I AND PHASE II - FINAL BUILD-OUT.

	8. IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE PROPOSED SITE DATA IS
	REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PHASE I CONSTRUCTION OR FINAL
	BUILD-OUT. PLEASE CLARIFY.

	9. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #17(F)] MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY
	IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 75 PERCENT [ZLDR SEC.
	94-203(B)(2(B)], PLEASE INCLUDE THE CALCULATED
	PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
	REQUIREMENT.

	10. SHEET SP-1 SITE DATA SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE AREA
	PERCENTAGE AS 43%, HOWEVER, BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	OF LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED, THE PERCENTAGE WOULD BE
	36%. PLEASE REVIEW AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY.

	11. INDICATE THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLES.
	LIGHT POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
	HEIGHT FOR THE DISTRICT - 80 FEET [ZLDR SEC.
	94-203(B)(6)].

	CONDITION(S):

	A. A PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
	PRIOR TO C.O., AS LISTED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	OF THE LAST SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-02-2016			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	03-02-2016	Time	17:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred			Date	02-12-2016	Time	09:57	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-02 17:36:22	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: *FAILED*

	3/2/16

	1. ANDREW ROTNERMEL HAS SIGNED THE OWNER'S CONSENT
	FORM. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION AS TO ANDREW
	ROTNERMEL?S RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER -
	ORIGINS BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE OF FLORIDA, LLC, AND
	AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN THE APPLICATION.

	2. OWNER'S CONSENT AUTHORIZES MARK RICKARDS TO SUBMIT
	THE APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF NOVUS PROPERTIES, LLC,
	HOWEVER, THE APPLICATION LISTS KYLE CARR AS THE
	AGENT/APPLICANT. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO THE
	VARIOUS PARTIES/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED WITH THE
	APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.

	3. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE
	PROVIDE. THE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
	LETTER FOR THIS SITE HAS EXPIRED.

	4. SUBMITTAL APPEARS TO BE A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT RATHER
	THAN A MINOR PD AMENDMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC AND
	CALCULATION DEPICTING CHANGE IN ORIGINAL APPROVED
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT. RELOCATION OF MORE THAN FIVE
	PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE INDICATED AS BEING
	COVERED BY STRUCTURES REQUIRES A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT
	[ZLDR SEC. 94-207(E)(1)(E)] AND ADDITIONAL FEES
	ASSOCIATED WITH PROCESSING A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT
	APPLICATION.

	5. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC.
	94-485(Q). INCLUDE A CALCULATION, RACK STYLE (NOTE:
	WAVE AND COMB STYLES NOT PERMITTED), AND PAD DETAIL
	INCLUDING PAD DIMENSIONS AND BICYCLE RACK SPACING.

	6. PROVIDE SIDEWALK FROM PARKING LOT TO ENTRANCE(S).

	7. PROVIDE A SIDEWALK FROM THE LOADING AREA TO THE
	LOADING AREA ENTRANCE.

	8. THERE IS A PHASE 2 ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
	PROPERTY WHICH CUTS THROUGH A ONE-WAY DRIVE. IT IS
	UNCLEAR HOW MUCH OF THE ONE WAY DRIVE WILL BE
	CONSTRUCTED DURING PHASE 1 AND IF IT WILL DEAD-END AT
	THE PHASE 2. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ENTIRE ONE-WAY
	DRIVE BE PUT IN AT A FUTURE DATE (UNLESS REQUIRED FOR
	EMERGENCY ACCESS) SINCE NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO USE IT
	UNTIL THE REAR PARKING IS CONSTRUCTED.

	9. IT APPEARS ON THE SITE PLAN THAT THE NORTHERN
	STORMWATER RETENTION AREA WILL BE UTILIZED IN PHASE 1
	CONSTRUCTION, BUT NOT INCLUDED WITHIN PHASE 1 LIMITS.
	IT IS ALSO NOT CLEAR WHAT UTILITY WORK WILL BE
	CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE 1 VERSUS PHASE 2 AS THE LINES
	CROSS THE PHASING. PLEASE CLARIFY AND EXPAND PHASE 1
	BOUNDARY AS NECESSARY.

	10. DIMENSION LENGTH OF LOADING SPACE TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS [ZLDR SEC.
	94-485(P)].

	11. DIMENSION DRIVE AISLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MAIN
	PARKING AREA AND INCLUDE A DIMENSION OF THE DRIVE AISLE
	ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA.

	12. WHAT IS THE ANGLE OF THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES?
	PLEASE INDICATE ON PLAN AND CORRECT ANGLED STRIPING
	DETAIL TO SHOW ANGLE AND DOUBLE LINES CONNECTED AT THE
	BOTTOM [ZLDR SEC. 94-485(J)].

	13. THERE IS A PROPOSED FENCE THAT GOES AROUND THE
	SOUTH AND WEST SIDE OF THE PARKING AREA. WHAT IS THE
	HEIGHT OF THIS FENCE AND DOES IT INTERFERE WITH THE
	PROPOSED STORMWATER RETENTION AREA TO THE EAST OF THE
	PARKING AREA?

	14. THERE IS A FENCE PROPOSED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
	THE ADA PARKING SPACES. HOW HIGH WILL THIS FENCE BE AND
	WILL THERE BE GATE ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK THAT GOES
	AROUND THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING?

	15. THERE ARE SEVERAL STOP BARS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
	PLEASE INCLUDE STOP SIGNS WITH THE STOP BARS.

	16. DIMENSION SETBACKS OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND
	DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING DISTRICT
	SETBACKS [ZLDR SEC. 94-203(B)(2)].

	17. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET SP-1, SITE
	DATA CHART:

	A. 'PROPOSED USE' OF THE PROPERTY IS INDICATED AS
	'MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING'. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING A
	GROUP HOME, TYPE V IS PROPOSED FOR THIS LOCATION FOR
	PHASE I AND PHASE 2 WILL BE A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING.
	PLEASE UPDATE THE USE ACCORDINGLY.

	B. UPDATE THE SITE DATA CALCULATIONS TO CLARIFY WHAT IS
	HAPPENING IN PHASE 1 VERSUS SITE CALCULATIONS FOR
	BUILDING-OUT. FOR EXAMPLE, THE CHART SAYS 148 SPACES
	ARE BEING PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THIS REPRESENTS TOTAL
	BUILD-OUT AND ONLY 54 SPACES ARE REALLY BEING PROVIDED
	AS PART OF PHASE 1. CHART SHOULD DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN
	PHASE 1 AND COMPLETE BUILD-OUT.

	C. THE SITE DATA CHART INDICATES THE EXISTING FAR AS
	0.16, BUILDING COVERAGE AS 16%, AND BUILDING HEIGHT AS
	19 FEET, HOWEVER, THE SITE IS VACANT. PLEASE REVISE.

	D. THE LAND USE FOR THE PROPERTY IS COMMUNITY SERVICES
	(CS) NOT COMMUNITY. PLEASE CORRECT.

	E. THE SIDE (SOUTH) SETBACK IS REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM
	OF 15 FEET, NOT 25 FEET [ZLDR SEC. 94-203(B)(2)(B)].
	PLEASE CORRECT.

	F. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 75
	PERCENT [ZLDR SEC. 94-203(B)(5)]. PLEASE INCLUDE
	PERCENT ON PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE.

	G. PLEASE REVIEW THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATION, IT APPEARS
	TOO LOW. OPEN SPACE MEANS "AN OPEN, UNENCLOSED AREA
	CONSISTING OF SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING, BUFFERS, VEHICULAR
	AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FEATURES, AND SURFACE
	PARKING." [ZLDR SEC. 94-611].

	H. THE PARKING CALCULATION PROVIDED FOR THE TYPE V
	GROUP HOME ONLY INCLUDES PARKING SPACES BASED ON 1
	PARKING SPACE PER 6 BEDS AND DOES NOT PROVIDE GUEST
	PARKING OR PARKING FOR OFFICE SPACE. THE USE REQUIRES
	THE FOLLOWING PARKING REQUIREMENT '1 PER 6 BEDS
	(RESIDENTS), 1 PER 10 BEDS (GUESTS), 1 PER 300 SQ. FT.
	OF OFFICE, 50 PERCENT RESERVE PARKING ALLOWED.' [ZLDR
	SEC. 94-486, TABLEXV-6]. PLEASE REVISE CALCULATION TO
	DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.

	I. PROVIDE A CALCULATION THAT SHOWS THE MINIMUM NUMBER
	OF REQUIRED ADA SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT [ZLDR
	SEC. 94-485(O)].

	18. LOCATION OF UTILITIES BETWEEN THE PRELIMINARY
	ENGINEERING SHEET AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
	SHEET ARE NOT THE SAME. PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT.

	19. LANDSCAPE BUFFER WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG THE SOUTH
	SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

	20. WILL THERE BE ANY SITE LIGHTING? IF SO INDICATE
	LOCATIONS OF POLES (MUST COMPLY WITH SETBACKS) AND
	PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE
	WITH ZLDR SEC. 94-207(D)(8), 94-309(A), AND 94-310(D).

	GENERAL COMMENTS:
	21. IF THERE WILL BE ANY FREESTANDING SIGNS PROPOSED
	FOR THIS PROJECT, PLEASE INCLUDE LOCATION ON SITE PLAN.
	ADDITIONALLY, IF THERE WILL BE ANY WALL SIGNAGE PLEASE
	ALSO INCLUDE ON THE PLAN TO AVOID HAVING TO COME BACK
	FOR A MINOR PD AMENDMENT WHEN SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED.

	22. A PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
	PRIOR TO C.O., AS LISTED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	OF THE LAST SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

	23. NOTE THAT ALL NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, NEW
	CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR REMODELING, WHERE TOTAL
	VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF ALL BUILDINGS ON A
	PROJECT SITE ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $500,000.00,
	IS SUBJECT TO THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS
	OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE V OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
	ORDINANCES.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING:
	1. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY
	DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING.

	2. PROVIDE 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
	ALONG WITH ONE REDUCED COPY AND ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
	PLANS.

	3. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	4. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.


	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]

2016-02-12 10:03:03	SUFFICIENCY REVIEW

	2/12/16

	1. ANDREW ROTNERMEL HAS SIGNED THE OWNER'S CONSENT
	FORM. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION AS TO ANDREW
	ROTNERMEL'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER -
	ORIGINS BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE OF FLORIDA, LLC, AND
	AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN THE APPLICATION.

	2. OWNER'S CONSENT AUTHORIZES MARK RICKARDS TO SUBMIT
	THE APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF NOVUS PROPERTIES, LLC,
	HOWEVER, THE APPLICATION LISTS KYLE CARR AS THE
	AGENT/APPLICANT. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO THE
	VARIOUS PARTIES/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED WITH THE
	APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.

	3. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE
	PROVIDE. THE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
	LETTER FOR THIS SITE HAS EXPIRED.

	4. ONLY 6 SETS OF PLANS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE SUBMIT 9
	ADDITIONAL SETS FOR A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF PLAN AS THIS
	PROJECT REQUIRES PPRC REVIEW. ADDITIONAL PLANS MUST BE
	RECEIVED BY THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 18 OR ELSE THE PROJECT
	WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH PPRC
	MEETING.

	5. SUBMITTAL APPEARS TO BE A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT RATHER
	THAN A MINOR PD AMENDMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC AND
	CALCULATION DEPICTING CHANGE IN ORIGINAL APPROVED
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT. RELOCATION OF MORE THAN FIVE
	PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE INDICATED AS BEING
	COVERED BY STRUCTURES REQUIRES A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT
	[ZLDR SEC. 94-207(E)(1)(E)].

	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]