 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z16010019
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z16010019 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-26-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-26-2016 |
Time |
17:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-26-2016 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-10-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-10-2016 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-10 10:21:59 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1, SHOWS FIVE PARKING SPACES | | | BEING REMOVED, INCLUDING THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACE THAT IS REQUIRE TO SERVE BUILDING 3. WHEN | | | SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THE | | | CLOSEST PARKING SPACE TO THE ENTRANCE OF BUILDING 3 AS | | | AN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF | | | FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF | | | TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE | | | FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 3. WHEN PROVIDING THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACE, PLEASE NOTE THAT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS | | | AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT | | | COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED | | | VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL | | | ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF | | | 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-01-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
06-01-2016 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-08 13:30:42 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. WHAT IS THE DIMENSION FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO | | | THE BACK OF CURB? | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | PLAY AREA. HOW WILL THE PLAY AREA BE SEPARATED FROM THE | | | TRAVEL LANES? | | | | | | 3. THERE APPEAR TO BE UTILITY LINES RUNNING BENEATH THE | | | PROPOSED OUTDOOR PLAY AREA AND A 8" WATER LINE UNDER | | | THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR SEATING AREA. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-08-2016 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-08 15:40:47 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED | | | FEBRUARY 26, 2016, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES, | | | TO DANIELLE KITTREDGE, SENIOR PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-04-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-04-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-04-2016 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-04 13:17:30 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | 1. THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL INFOMATION IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | FOR THE PROPOSED COVERED TERRACE AREA: | | | | | | 2. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 5TH | | | EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, INCLUDING | | | NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | ANY FIRE ALARM OR FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION OF THE MAIN | | | BUILDING SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE PROPOSED TERRACE. | | | | | | 4. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT | | | LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, | | | DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, | | | EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER | | | LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | WHAT TYPE OF DOORS OR OPENINGS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE | | | TERRACE AREA? | | | | | | 5. THE FIRE PIT SHALL BE PERMITTED SEPARATLY, LISTED | | | FOR THE INSTALLATION, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN | | | APPROVED MEANS OR BARRIER TO PROTECT AGAINST OR | | | RESTRICT PEDESTRIAN CONTACT OR MISUSE. | | | | | | FOR THE PROPOSE OUTDORR PLAY AREA: | | | | | | 6. NO DETAIL WAS PROVIDED TO REVIEW THE INDICATED | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 7. AREA ACCESS DOORS AND EXIT DETAILS, INCLUDING DOOR | | | HARDWARE IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | DOES THE PROPOSED RETRICT ANY EXISTING EXIT DOORS ? | | | WILL GATES BE PROVIDED FOR EXIT FROM THE PROPOSED | | | SPACE? | | | | | | 8. PROTECTION FROM VEHICLE TRAFFIC IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 9. ALL CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 5TH | | | EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, INCLUDING | | | NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT | | | LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, | | | DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, | | | EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER | | | LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-06-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-06-2016 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-06-2016 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-06 09:04:59 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING Z16010019 | | | MAY 6, 2016 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | OUTDOOR SEATING AREA: | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR | | | EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND | | | FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES | | | AND EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC., AND PROVIDE | | | SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND | | | UTILITIES. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION AND | | | MITIGATION CHART TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-448. THE SABAL PALMS COULD READILY BE RELOCATED TO | | | THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DRIVE AISLE OR ELSEWHERE ON THE | | | PROPERTY. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A TREE IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA | | | AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING PER SECTION 94-443 | | | (C). USING A FLOWERING TREE WOULD MITIGATE FOR THE LOSS | | | OF THE BOTTLEBRUSH. | | | PLAYGROUND AREA: | | | 7. WITHDRAWN. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE LAYOUT | | | AND LANDSCAPING PROPOSED FOR THE PLAYGROUND AREA TO | | | BUFFER IT FROM VEHICLE TRAFFIC. DUPLICATING THE | | | EXISTING BUFFER PLANTINGS WOULD PROVIDE CONTINUITY TO | | | THE ADDITIONAL AREA. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-11-2016 |
Time |
12:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-11-2016 |
Time |
12:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-11 12:06:33 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING Z16010019 | | | MARCH 11, 2016 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDE WITH THE RESUBMITTAL, | | | SO ALL COMMENTS WILL REMAIN UNSATISFIED UNTIL THE | | | REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. | | | OUTDOOR SEATING AREA: | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY | | | FOR EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD | | | WATERWISE GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND | | | FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES | | | AND EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL | | | AND SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC., AND PROVIDE | | | SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND | | | UTILITIES. | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION AND | | | MITIGATION CHART TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-448. THE SABAL PALMS COULD READILY BE RELOCATED TO | | | THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DRIVE AISLE OR ELSEWHERE ON THE | | | PROPERTY. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A TREE IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING PER SECTION | | | 94-443 (C). USING A FLOWERING TREE WOULD MITIGATE FOR | | | THE LOSS OF THE BOTTLEBRUSH. | | | PLAYGROUND AREA: | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE | | | LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPING PROPOSED FOR THE PLAYGROUND AREA | | | TO BUFFER IT FROM VEHICLE TRAFFIC. DUPLICATING THE | | | EXISTING BUFFER PLANTINGS WOULD PROVIDE CONTINUITY TO | | | THE ADDITIONAL AREA. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-08 13:42:42 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: VILLAGE COMMONS OUTDOOR SEATING Z16010019 | | | FEBRUARY 8, 2016 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES | | | ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUCH | | | AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL | | | GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION AND MITIGATION | | | CHART TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-448. THE SABAL | | | PALMS COULD READILY BE RELOCATED TO THE OTHER SIDE OF | | | THE DRIVE AISLE OR ELSEWHERE ON THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE ADD A TREE IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE END | | | OF THE ROW OF PARKING PER SECTION 94-443 (C). USING A | | | FLOWERING TREE WOULD MITIGATE FOR THE LOSS OF THE | | | BOTTLEBRUSH. | | | | | | PLAYGROUND AREA: | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE LAYOUT AND | | | LANDSCAPING PROPOSED FOR THE PLAYGROUND AREA TO BUFFER | | | IT FROM VEHICLE TRAFFIC. DUPLICATING THE EXISTING | | | BUFFER PLANTINGS WOULD PROVIDE CONTINUITY TO THE | | | ADDITIONAL AREA. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
02-08-2016 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-21-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
awooten |
Date |
06-21-2016 |
Time |
15:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
awooten |
Date |
06-21-2016 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-18-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
03-18-2016 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
03-04-2016 |
Time |
08:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-18 16:14:13 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 3/17/2016 | | | | | | 1. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #2] STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE | | | APPLICANT IS WORKING TO OBTAIN A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | APPROVAL LETTER. A TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY LETTER | | | FROM PBC WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #3] STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE | | | APPLICANT IS WORKING TO OBTAIN A UTILITY LETTERS. A | | | UTILITY LETTERS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #10] BICYCLE PARKING DEPICTED ON | | | THE PLAN IS NOT IN THE LAST APPROVED LOCATION. PLEASE | | | CONTACT ME FOR PLAN SHOWING MOST CURRENT LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 4. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #12] THE NOTATED 500 SQUARE FOOT | | | OUTDOOR SEATING AREA FOR A RESTAURANT NEEDS TO BE | | | DELINEATED ON THE PLAN. IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE 500 SQUARE | | | FOOT IS THE TRIANGULATED AREA ON THE PLAN OR A NOT. | | | | | | 5. [PREVIOUS COMMENT #13] DETAIL ON PLAY AREA WAS | | | EXPLAINED BUT THERE WAS NO SITE PLAN INCLUDED. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE SITE PLAN FOR THE PLAY AREA CONVERSION. PLEASE | | | BE SURE TO INCLUDE ON THE PLAN ANY CHANGES TO THE | | | PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION RAMP FROM REAR PARKING TO TRAVEL | | | THROUGH THE WALKWAY TO THE COURTYARD. | | | | | | 6. WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY | | | DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | B. PROVIDE 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS | | | ALONG WITH ONE ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
02-10-2016 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
02-05-2016 |
Time |
09:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-10 09:53:28 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 2/10/16 | | | | | | 1. ERIC HINES SIGNED THE APPLICATION AS THE PROPERTY | | | OWNER. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION AS TO ERIC HINES? | | | RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN | | | THE APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF JAMESTOWN VILLAGE COMMONS, | | | LP. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE UTILITY LETTERS. | | | | | | 4. SURVEY PROVIDED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | | | | 5. SITE DATA CHART CALCULATION SHOWS REQUIRED PARKING | | | AS 973, BUT APPEARS TO BE 975. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | 6. SHARED PARKING CHART SHOWS ?RETAIL? PARKING AS 161 | | | SPACES, BUT SITE DATA CHART SHOWS ?RETAIL? AS 164. | | | PLEASE CORRECT AND UPDATE. | | | | | | 7. SHARED PARKING CHART SHOWS ?SUPERMARKET? PARKING AS | | | 164 SPACES, BUT SITE DATA CHART SHOWS ?SUPERMARKET? AS | | | 184. PLEASE CORRECT AND UPDATE. | | | | | | 8. PROPOSED PARKING IS 860 SPACES, HOWEVER, THERE ARE | | | ONLY ABOUT 830 SPACES SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE | | | REVIEW AND UPDATE. | | | | | | 9. UPDATE CALCULATION SHOWING MINIMUM REQUIRED ADA | | | SPACES AS 20 RATHER THAN 19. ALSO, ADA PARKING SPACES | | | CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE PARKING COUNT TO MEET MINIMUM | | | PARKING REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 10. INDICATE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING | | | ON THE MASTER SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 11. INDICATE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED LOADING AREAS ON | | | THE MASTER SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE NOTE THAT A RECENT SITE VISIT INCLUDES | | | EXPANSION OF A DINING AREA WITH TRELLIS LIKE FEATURES | | | IN FRONT OF BUILDING 3. IF THIS IS TO REMAIN A | | | PERMANENT DINNING SPACE, THE SITE PLAN WILL NEED TO BE | | | ADJUSTED TO INCLUDE THIS OUTDOOR DINING AREA. | | | | | | DAY CARE EXPANSION: | | | | | | 13. PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE PLAY AREA. WILL THE AREA BE | | | GRASS, WILL NEW CURBING BE INSTALLED, WILL THERE BE A | | | FENCE AROUND THE PLAY AREA, WILL THE PASSAGEWAY | | | CONNECTION BETWEEN THE REAR PARKING AND FOUNTAIN PLAZA | | | AREA REMAIN OPEN, AND, IF SO, SHOW ACCESS FROM THE REAR | | | PARKING AREA TO THE FOUNTAIN AREA. | | | | | | BUILDING 2 EXPANSION/ADDITION: | | | | | | 14. INTERIOR BUILDING LAYOUT SHOWS A BAR, A BAR | | | FACILITY WILL NOT BE PERMITTED AS THE PROPOSED FACILITY | | | IS TO INCLUDE ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE | | | AS ACCESSORY TO THE PRIMARY USE. THEREFORE, A BAR IS | | | NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 15. ALTHOUGH THE UNCOVERED OUTDOOR SEATING DOES NOT GET | | | INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION FOR THE INCREASE IN | | | BUILDING FOOTPRINT, THE INCREASE IN COMMERCIAL SPACE | | | (SQ. FOOTAGE) CREATED BY THE OUTDOOR SEATING | | | SPECIFICALLY SERVING THE BUSINESS MUST BE INCLUDED IN | | | THE PARKING CALCULATION. | | | | | | 16. ELEVATIONS INDICATE THAT SIGNAGE MAY BE LOCATED IN | | | MORE THAN ONE LOCATION ON THE BUILDING 2 ADDITION. | | | BUILDING SIGNAGE WILL NEED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ZLDR SEC. 94-408(D). EACH BUSINESS IS PERMITTED ONE | | | WALL SIGN WITH TWO ADDITIONAL ALLOTTED TO THE PLAZA AS | | | A WHOLE. IF YOU UTILIZE ANY OF THE TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS | | | ALLOTTED TO THE PLAZA EVIDENCE THAT THESE ADDITIONAL | | | SIGNS HAVE NOT BEEN USED ELSEWHERE WILL NEED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT WITH THE MINOR PD | | | AMENDMENT THAT ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM COPY AREA BE | | | DETERMINED AND GENERAL SIGN PLACEMENT BE PROPOSED FOR | | | CONSIDERATION. | | | | | | 17. WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY | | | DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | B. PROVIDE 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS | | | ALONG WITH ONE ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |