| 2016-01-12 18:59:32 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1/12/16 |
| | |
| | 1. IT IS DIFFICULT TO DISCERN IF ALL OF THE NORTHERN |
| | DOCK IS LOCATED WITHIN THE MIDDLE 1/3. PLEASE EXTEND |
| | LINES ON SITE PLAN AND ALSO INCLUDE MIDDLE 1/3 |
| | DIMENSION ON THE SURVEY TO VERIFY FULL COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2. MIDDLE DRIVEWAY CURB CUT AND ASSOCIATED DRIVEWAY DO |
| | NOT MEET SETBACKS AND NUMBER/SIZE OF DRIVEWAY WIDTHS |
| | FOR A SINGLE PROPERTY. MIDDLE CURB CUT AND DRIVEWAY |
| | WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED SO NO NON-CONFORMITIES ARE |
| | CREATED WITH THE REPLAT. |
| | |
| | 3. SITE PLAN SHOWS THAT THE 'EXISTING GARAGE' AND |
| | 'EXISTING RESIDENCE' ARE SEPARATE STRUCTURES. |
| | STRUCTURES ARE ATTACHED AND PLAN WILL NEED TO BE |
| | REVISED. |
| | |
| | 4. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES A NORTHERN LOT HAS ONLY AN |
| | EXISTING NON-CONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. THE |
| | EXISTING NON-CONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE CANNOT |
| | REMAIN WITHOUT A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE. IT IS UNDERSTOOD |
| | THAT A NEW RESIDENCE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE |
| | NORTHERN LOT, HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO CONCURRENT NEW |
| | HOUSE CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTED WITH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT |
| | (15081049) OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. THE EXISTING |
| | NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE WILL EITHER NEED TO BE |
| | DEMOLISHED OR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE |
| | OCCUR WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIMEFRAME (ZLDR ARTICLE XVI). |
| | FURTHER DISCUSSION TO OCCUR AT THE PPRC MEETING ON THIS |
| | ISSUE. [1/13/16 - COMMENT CLARIFICATION: CONSTRUCTION |
| | OF THE NEW RESIDENCE ON THE NORTHERN PARCEL MUST |
| | COMMENCE WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT OR |
| | EXISTING NON-CONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SHALL BE |
| | DEMOLISHED.] |
| | |
| | 5. THE CREATION OF THE NEW LOTS ARE BEING PROCESSED AS |
| | A REPLAT. PLEASE REVISE REPLAT SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS TO |
| | REFLECT COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 177. |
| | |
| | 6. WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY |
| | DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | B. PROVIDE 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS |
| | ALONG WITH ONE REDUCED COPY AND ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONCE THE REPLAT HAS BEEN FOUND TO |
| | MEET TECHNICAL REVIEW, IT WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR A CITY |
| | COMMISSION MEETING TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE |
| | REPLAT DOCUMENT. [NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATION FEE DID |
| | NOT INCLUDE AN ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE WHICH WILL BE |
| | BILLED SEPARATELY FROM ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE |
| | TECHNICAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION(S).] |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
