Plan Review Details - Project Z15120017
Plan Review Stops For Project Z15120017
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-10-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 05-10-2016 Time 21:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-10-2016 Time 21:25 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-10 21:37:49DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT
 RELATES TO THE SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL
 COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS ARE TO BE ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE REGARDING THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING AND ACCESS TO THE AMENITIES BUILDING IS NOTED,
 BUT FAILS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENT FULLY. THE PARKING
 COMPUTATION TABLE ON SHEET FSP-1 STATES THAT 13
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE 1ST LEVEL AND
 7 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE 2ND
 LEVEL, BUT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SPACES ARE NOT SHOWN
 ON SHEETS FSP-1, FSP-2, SP-1, LVL-2, LVL-3, THAT IS
 SHOWN ON SHEET LVL-3 APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AT LVL-2. THOSE SHEETS ONLY SHOW 9
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES ON THE 1ST LEVEL AND NO ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ON THE 2ND LEVEL. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 3. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES
 (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN
 ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF
 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE
 NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS
 ROUTE)
  
 4. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
  
 5. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 6. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: THE PARKING GARAGE APPEARS TO BE AN
 OPEN "VENTED" GARAGE. THE REMAINDER OF THIS COMMENT
 ONLY APPLIES IF IT IS IN FACT AN ENCLOSED PARKING
 GARAGE. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE WALL
 OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE
 DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE
 CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 5. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL
 APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED
 BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND
 FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS,
 GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
 INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
 IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A
 SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING
 ORIGIANL COMMENT: THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART
 IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE
 PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-12-2016 Time 20:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-12-2016 Time 20:53 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-12 21:02:26DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE AMENITIES BUILDING
 THAT IS SHOWN ON SHEET LVL-3 APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN
 THE PARKING GARAGE AT LVL-2. THE CLOSEST SPACES TO THE
 AMENITIES BUILDING SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
 PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
 SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
 TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN
 OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 3. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 6. THE PARKING GARAGE APPEARS TO BE AN OPEN "VENTED"
 GARAGE. THE REMAINDER OF THIS COMMENT ONLY APPLIES IF
 IT IS IN FACT AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE. IF THE
 PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR
 SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN
 OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED
 PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE
 LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED
 METHODS.
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 7. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-03-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 06-03-2016 Time 09:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 06-03-2016 Time 08:41 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-03 08:49:19NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 05-11-2016 Time 08:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 05-11-2016 Time 08:19 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-11 08:19:12CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE SOLID WASTE
 COLLECTION YARDAGE.
  
 2. AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED, PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN
 ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER / COMPACTOR
 LOCATIONS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND
 WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A
 ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN
 PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 3. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 5. EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE LINES, IF NOT UTILIZED BY
 THE SITE REDEVELOPMENT, ARE TO BE REMOVED BACK TO THE
 MAIN. (SECTION 2.23 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY
 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL) PLEASE ADD THE
 APPROPRIATE NOTES TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN.
  
 6. AS MENTIONED IN OUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS, PLEASE
 RELOCATE THE PROPOSED MASTER METER ADJACENT TO PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. ON-SITE SUB-METERS WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL
 FROM CITY UTILITIES CUSTOMER SERVICE DIVISION.
  
 7. AS MENTIONED IN OUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS, PER SECTION
 2.21.2 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY STANDARDS MANUAL,
 PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB 40% OR MORE OF A ROADWAY (LINEAR
 FOOTAGE) PER BLOCK WILL BE REQUIRED TO MILL AND
 RESURFACE THE ENTIRE BLOCK. PLEASE INCLUDE MILLING AND
 RESURFACING OF THE HAMPTON ROAD ON THE CONSTRUCTION
 PLANS.
  
 8. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS ON THE ALLEY TO
 MEET THE CITY?S ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. AN
 EXCEPTION TO THE STANDARD MAY BE REQUESTED. HTTP://WPB.
 ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDA
 RDS/
  
 9. PLEASE ELIMINATE THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY ON HAMPTON.
 THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE IS DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 DISTANCES LISTED IN SECTION 94-313(2) OF THE CITY?S
 CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 10. PLEASE RE-EVALUATE THE PARKING CIRCULATION PLAN.
 THE SOUTHEASTERN RETAIL PARKING APPEARS TO UTILIZE
 HAMPTON AVENUE AS PART OF THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION
 PLAN.
  
 11. PLEASE CHECK THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING TOTALS. IN THE
 PARKING GARAGE, THE PLANS SHOW 269 PARKING SPOTS ON
 LEVEL 1 AND 288 SPOTS ON LEVEL 2 (557 SPOTS). SOME OF
 THESE SPOTS WILL NEED TO BE ELIMINATED TO COMPLY WITH
 CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION 94-111, WHICH REQUIRED A
 MINIMUM 3 FT BACK UP AREA AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY
 DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE PLUS THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE PARKING
 SPACE AS A DEDICATE PULL-IN AREA FOR TURNING AROUND.
 THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT 625 SPACES WILL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE GARAGE.
  
 12. THE PLAN ALSO SHOWS 24 SURFACE PARKING SPOTS ON
 SOUTH DIXIE. HAVE THESE SPOTS BEEN APPROVED BY FDOT?
  
 13. PLEASE ADD STREET NAMES TO ALL PLANS.
  
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION.
  
 15. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA FROM
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON S DIXIE HWY.
  
 16. PLEASE LABEL UTILITY PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL.
  
 17. PLEASE MOVE THE PROPOSED DDCV, REDUCER ASSEMBLY,
 AND METER VAULT CLOSER TO THE POINT OF
 CONNECTION/ROADWAY R/W.
  
 18. PLEASE PROVIDE ENGINEERING/MEP CALCULATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED 8? WM SIZING ON HAMPTON ROAD.
  
 19. PLEASE PROVIDE PROFILE OF THE PROPOSED 8" WM FROM
 THE TAP/POINT OF CONNECTION ON S DIXIE @ HAMPTON ROAD
 TO THE METER VAULT. PLEASE CALL OUT THE POINT OF
 SERVICE (WATER).
  
 20. PLEASE SHOW THE EXISTING 6" WM ON HAMPTON ROAD. IT
 IS THE CITY'S PREFERENCE NOT TO HAVE PARALLEL WATER
 MAINS AND WILL BE REVIEWING THE NEED FOR MAINTAINING
 (2) ACTIVE MAINS ON HAMPTON ROAD.
  
 21. PLEASE LABEL THE SIZE AND MATERIAL OF EXISTING
 WATER MAIN AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS ON S DIXIE
 HWY. RECORD INFORMATION INDICATES THAT THE EXISTING
 WATER MAIN ON S DIXIE IS 8" CIP.
  
 22. PLEASE PROVIDE ENGINEERING/MEP CALCULATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED 8? GRAVITY MAIN SIZING ON HAMPTON ROAD.
  
 23. PLEASE CALL OUT THE POINT OF SERVICE (SEWER). CCTV
 RECORD (VIDEO AND TV LOG) OF THE PROPOSED SAN SEWER
 MAIN WITHIN THE ROADWAY R/W WILL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF
 THE PROJECT CLOSE-OUT SUBMITTAL.
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS
  
 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 2. FDOT APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE DRAINAGE AND
 DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS OFF OF DIXIE.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART
 OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES
 APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
 LAURA LE, PE
 PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER
 561-494-1093
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:31 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:33:52CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. A DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THIS PROJECT SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL
 AFFECT THE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL
 ROADWAYS. INCLUDE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED
 STREET CORRIDORS. ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED
 POTENTIAL. SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED
 WHERE NECESSARY.
  
 2. REGARDING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS:
  
 A. THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION OF 47% NORTH AND 53% SOUTH
 SEEMS TO BE COUNTER INTUITIVE. PLEASE JUSTIFY WHY MORE
 OF THE TRIPS ARE ASSUMED TO BE GOING SOUTH. BOTH
 DOWNTOWN AND I-95 (THROUGH BELVEDERE) ARE ACCESSIBLE TO
 THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT.
  
 B. THE ANALYSIS SHOWS OVER 1,070 DAILY TRIPS USE
 HAMPTON ROAD TO ENTER / EXIT THE PROJECT. HAMPTON IS A
 SMALL ROAD WITH AN UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AT DIXIE.
 WE ARE CONCERNED THAT THIS INTERSECTION (AND HAMPTON IN
 GENERAL) MAY BE OVERBURDENED AS A RESULT OF THIS
 PROJECT.
  
 C. THE ANALYSIS INDICATES THE PERCENTAGE OF PEAK HOUR
 TRIPS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE LESS THAN 7.5% OF THE
 TOTAL DAILY TRIPS. THIS APPEARS TO BE VERY LOW FOR A
 PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 ASSUMPTIONS USED TO ARRIVE AT THE NUMBER OF DAILY
 TRIPS.
  
 3. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 4. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN GARDENIA RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A
 ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN
 PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 6. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, APPROVAL IS
 REQUIRED FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
 (FDOT) FOR THE DRAINAGE CONNECTION TO THE DIXIE SYSTEM.
  
 7. THE CITY WILL EVALUATE THE CONDITION OF THE EXISTING
 OFF-SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS. IT IS
 RECOMMENDED THAT THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION BE
 INCORPORATED INTO FINAL POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY
 DESIGN.
  
 8. WHERE ARE THE GREASE TRAPS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED
 FOR THE RESTAURANTS? THE DESIGN MUST COMPLY WITH CITY
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARD GS-7 OR GS-7.1. SAMPLING
 PORTS MUST BE LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEE
 RING-STANDARDS/
  
 9. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE MASTER METER WILL BE
 LOCATED FOR THE PROJECT. THE METER WILL NEED TO BE
 LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN AN
 EASEMENT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 10. THE CITY WILL NOT BE TAKING OWNERSHIP OF UTILITIES
 LOCATED WITHIN THE PARCEL WHICH SERVE ONLY THIS
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 11. ARE THE OUTPARCEL PROPOSED TO BE LEASED OR FEE
 SIMPLE?
  
 12. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE
 WITHIN THE CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS
 HIGHER THAN THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND THAT A
 LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY BE PERFORMED ON THE POTABLE
 WATER LINES PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE DESIGN.
  
 13. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH
 BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED
 TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A
 COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED
 TO BE COLLECTED. IF A COMPACTOR LARGER THAN 8 CUBIC
 YARDS IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE
 APPROPRIATE PRIVATE SERVICE PROVIDER STATING THEY HAVE
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND WILL BE ABLE TO
 SERVICE THE COMPACTOR IN THE PROPOSED LOCATION.
  
 14. PER SECTION 2.21.2 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY
 STANDARDS MANUAL, PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB 40% OR MORE OF
 A ROADWAY (LINEAR FOOTAGE) PER BLOCK WILL BE REQUIRED
 TO MILL AND RESURFACE THE ENTIRE BLOCK. PLEASE INCLUDE
 MILLING AND RESURFACING OF THE HAMPTON ROAD ON THE
 CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
  
 15. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS ON THE ALLEY TO
 MEET THE CITY?S ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WP
 B.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STAN
 DARDS/
  
 16. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE PRIOR
 TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. THE ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE
 DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT
 [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION.
  
 3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS
 PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN
 INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED NEW CONNECTIONS TO THE CITY?S EXISTING
 STORMWATER STRUCTURES MAY NECESSITATE REHABILITATION OF
 THE MANHOLES.
  
 5. INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH PORTIONS OF THE POTABLE
 WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL
 REMAIN PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE
 MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT. TYPICALLY, THE CITY'S
 OWNERSHIP STOPS AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNLESS
 EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRED THE OWNERSHIP
 DIVISION TO TAKE PLACE AT ANOTHER LOCATION.
  
 6. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 CIP MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 FERDINAND RIVERA
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-822-2076
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-06-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-06-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-06-2016 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-06 14:19:463RD REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED MAY
 27, 2016, FROM CHRIS BARRY, SENIOR PLANNER, URBAN
 DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS, TO JOHN ROACH SENIOR PLANNER,
 THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-05-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-05-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-05-2016 Time 15:22 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-05 15:24:34ON REVIEW OF THE RE-SUBMITTAL, THE PREVIUOS COMMENTS BY
 FIRE REMAIN APPLICABLE.
  
 2ND REVIEW:
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION,
 ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2
 TEMPORARY OFFICES AND SHEDS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 TABLE 4.2.1. PER TABLE 4.2.1:
 1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET
 2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET
 3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET
 4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET
 5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET
 6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE
 SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET
 **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL
 BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC
 SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST
 STRINGENT PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER OF
 THE FIRE CODE.
  
 THESE BUILDINGS IS FUNCTIONING AS A MULTIUSE OCCUPANCY.
 INDICATE IF THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED FOR MIXED USE
 (NON-SEPARATED) OR SEPARATED USE PER SECTION 6.1.14.2.1
 OF NFPA 101 FLORIDA EDITION 2009. FOR NON-SEPARATED
 MIXED USE OCCUPANCIES, THE MOST STRINGENT FIRE AND LIFE
 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL APPLY TO
 THE BUILDING.
  
 8. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED FOR EACH BUILDING HAVE IT'S
 OWN FIRE ALARM PANEL AND SYSTEM.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 9. A CLASS A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 10. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 11. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 IF AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS
 (ARE) THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 12. TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL EXIT
 DOORS.
  
 13. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 A REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED LIFE SAFETY PLAN ON SHEET A
 1.0- 3.0 SHOWS THE EXIT SEPARATION OF THE EXIT
 STAIRWELLS THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE LIFE SAFETY
 CODE. THE SEPARATION OF THE EXITS, 50' SHALL BE
 MEASURED EXIT DOOR TO EXIT DOOR.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, 7.5.1.3.2, WHERE TWO EXITS,
 EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES ARE REQUIRED, THEY
 SHALL BE LOCATED AT A DISTANCE FROM ONE ANOTHER NOT
 LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL
 DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE
 SERVED, MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST
 EDGE OF THE EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES.
  
 14. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION. ADDITIONAL HYDRANTS APPEAR TO REQUIRED
 AT THE FRONT ACCESS WAY. COORDINATION WITH THE
 PREVENTION BUREUA IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGE.
  
 15. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
 ADDITIONAL FDC'S APPEAR TO REQUIRED AT THE FRONT OF
 EACH BUILDING. COORDINATION WITH THE PREVENTION BUREUA
 IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGE.
  
 16. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN. TWO SEPARATE, SEPARATED WATER SUPPLIES
 SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 ALL SITE FIRE LINES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 24 AND BE
 INSPECTED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU.
  
 17. A FIRE LOAD CALCULATION IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT
 THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY IS AVAILABLE FOR
 FIRE PROTECTION OF THE PROJECT.
  
 18. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 19. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 20. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 1. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 2. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 3. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 4. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 5. A WORK TABLE.
 6. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 7. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 8. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 9. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 10. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 11. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 12. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 13. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 14. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 15. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 16. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 17. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 18. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
 21. RADIO
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH OF 102.0 DBM
 FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE
 RESCUE. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 22. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 23. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-08-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-08-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-07-2016 Time 16:14 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-07 17:06:15THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 PER NFPA 241- STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING CONSTRUCTION,
 ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS, SECTION 4.2
 TEMPORARY OFFICES AND SHEDS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT TRAILERS OR STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 TABLE 4.2.1. PER TABLE 4.2.1:
 1) 20 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 30 FEET
 2) 30 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 35 FEET
 3) 40 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 40 FEET
 4) 50 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 45 FEET
 5) 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 50 FEET
 6) GREATER THAN 60 FEET EXPOSED LENGTH SHALL BE
 SEPARATED FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES BY AT LEAST 60 FEET
 **A 75 PERCENT REDUCTION IN SEPARATION DISTANCES SHALL
 BE PERMITTED TO BE APPLIED, PROVIDED AUTOMATIC
 SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS USED IN THE EXPOSING STRUCTURE.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST
 STRINGENT PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER OF
 THE FIRE CODE.
  
 THESE BUILDINGS IS FUNCTIONING AS A MULTIUSE OCCUPANCY.
 INDICATE IF THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED FOR MIXED USE
 (NON-SEPARATED) OR SEPARATED USE PER SECTION 6.1.14.2.1
 OF NFPA 101 FLORIDA EDITION 2009. FOR NON-SEPARATED
 MIXED USE OCCUPANCIES, THE MOST STRINGENT FIRE AND LIFE
 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL APPLY TO
 THE BUILDING.
  
 8. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED FOR EACH BUILDING HAVE IT'S
 OWN FIRE ALARM PANEL AND SYSTEM.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 9. A CLASS A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 10. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 11. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 IF AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS
 (ARE) THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 12. TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL EXIT
 DOORS.
  
 13. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 A REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED LIFE SAFETY PLAN ON SHEET A
 1.0- 3.0 SHOWS THE EXIT SEPARATION OF THE EXIT
 STAIRWELLS THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE LIFE SAFETY
 CODE. THE SEPARATION OF THE EXITS, 50' SHALL BE
 MEASURED EXIT DOOR TO EXIT DOOR.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, 7.5.1.3.2, WHERE TWO EXITS,
 EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES ARE REQUIRED, THEY
 SHALL BE LOCATED AT A DISTANCE FROM ONE ANOTHER NOT
 LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL
 DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE
 SERVED, MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST
 EDGE OF THE EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES.
  
 14. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION. ADDITIONAL HYDRANTS APPEAR TO REQUIRED
 AT THE FRONT ACCESS WAY. COORDINATION WITH THE
 PREVENTION BUREUA IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGE.
  
 15. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
 ADDITIONAL FDC'S APPEAR TO REQUIRED AT THE FRONT OF
 EACH BUILDING. COORDINATION WITH THE PREVENTION BUREUA
 IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGE.
  
 16. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN. TWO SEPARATE, SEPARATED WATER SUPPLIES
 SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 ALL SITE FIRE LINES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 24 AND BE
 INSPECTED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU.
  
 17. A FIRE LOAD CALCULATION IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT
 THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY IS AVAILABLE FOR
 FIRE PROTECTION OF THE PROJECT.
  
 18. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 19. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 20. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 1. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 2. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 3. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 4. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 5. A WORK TABLE.
 6. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 7. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 8. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 9. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 10. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 11. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 12. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 13. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 14. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 15. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 16. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 17. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 18. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
 21. RADIO
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH OF 102.0 DBM
 FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE
 RESCUE. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 22. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 23. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 08-31-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-31-2016 Time 14:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-31-2016 Time 14:10 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-31 14:11:49CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING
 AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR THE
 SITE, A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE
 AMENITY DECK MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF 27 TREES OR
 EQUIVALENT PALMS MEETING THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OR AS
 APPROVED. THE PLANT LIST SHALL BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE
 THE ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL AND IDENTIFY THE WATER
 USE CATEGORY FOR ALL PER THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE. AN
 AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 RECORD THE AMENITY DECK LANDSCAPING AS PART OF THE
 PLANNING AND ZONING RECORD.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-25-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-25-2016 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-25-2016 Time 14:06 Sent To  
Notes
2016-07-25 14:07:28FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 3111 S DIXIE Z15120017
 JULY 25, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE PERVIOUS AREA ONLY EXCEEDS THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED BY 433 SQUARE FEET. THE STABILIZED
 EMERGENCY ACCESS AREA IS COUNTED AS 100% PERVIOUS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE STABILIZED SYSTEM AND
 DEDUCT THE AREA THAT IS NOT PERVIOUS. PLEASE BE AWARE
 THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE DESIGN IN THE FUTURE MUST
 ACCOUNT FOR ANY PERVIOUS AREA ALTERATIONS, AND ASSURE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE DIXIE BUFFER
 SHOULD INDICATE A 10 FOOT BUFFER IS REQUIRED. PLEASE
 CORRECT THE CHART ON FSP-1.
  
 SECTION 94-443 (D) (1) REQUIRES A 10 FOOT BUFFER ALONG
 PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES FOR MULTIFAMILY USES, AND A 5 FOOT
 BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL USES. STAFF CAN
 SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUEST TO MODIFY THE BUFFER, AS
 LONG AS THE DESIGN INCLUDES THE NUMBER OF TREES AS
 REQUIRED. THE CODE ALLOWS LIMITED CLUSTERING OF BUFFER
 TREES TO ALLOW FOR INTEGRATION OF SIGNAGE AND FUNCTION.
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE SHADE TREE
 REDUCTION SHOULD INDICATE THE CORRECT NUMBER OF TREES.
 LANDSCAPE DATA CHART SHEET LP-1, WAIVER CHART ON FSP-1,
 AND JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 QUANTITY.
  
 SEE RESPONSE TO COMMENT 2.
  
 4. SATISFIED. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET IN WIDTH IS
 SHOWN ON THE PLAN ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, YET
 WAIVER REQUEST #6 STILL INDICATES A REQUEST FOR A ZERO
 BUFFER WIDTH. WAIVER MAY NO LONGER BE NEEDED. THE PALMS
 MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE REQUIRED TREES IF THE TOTAL
 NUMBER OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR SHADE TREES ON SITE
 DOES NOT EXCEED 35%.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING
 LOT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT REPRESENT AREAS
 PROVIDED IN THE PARKING AREAS AS REQUIRED. PLEASE
 REVISE TO SHOW HOW THE LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE
 PARKING LOT COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-443(C) 3 AND 4.
  
 SOME AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY AS BEING WITHIN THE PARKING
 AREA, AND OTHER AREAS IN LANDSCAPED MEDIANS ARE NOT
 COUNTED.
  
 6. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE
 PLAN FOR THE ROOFTOP AMENITY DECK. THIS IS MATERIAL IN
 CONSIDERING THE TRUE QUANTITY OF WAIVER REQUEST #8, AND
 FOR TREE MITIGATION.
  
 A PRELIMINARY PLAN CAN BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME FOR
 APPROVAL, AND AMENDED AT A LATER DATE, OR A CONDITION
 OF APPROVAL CAN BE ADDED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #7 CREATES A NARROW BUFFER
 AREA AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE
 LIVE OAK PROPOSED DOES NOT FIT THE RESTRICTED SPACE
 BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND BUILDING. PLEASE CHANGE TO A
 MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES PROPOSED ALONG THE
 NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL NOT PROVIDE BUFFERING FROM THE
 ADJACENT USE FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE YEAR DUE TO
 LEAF DROP. PLEASE CONSIDER A MIX OF SPECIES TO PROVIDE
 MORE DIVERSITY AND YEAR ROUND BUFFERING.
  
 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE TAGGED
 WITH THEIR IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION SHOWN BY
 NUMBER ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CATEGORY AND QUANTITY FOR EACH
 TREE TO BE REPLACED 1:1 AND PROVIDE THE MITIGATION FOR
 THE TREE CANOPY REPLACEMENT AS A SEPARATE QUANTITY.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL COLUMN TO RECORD
 TREE CANOPY WIDTH 35 FEET OR MORE.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR THE RELOCATION
 SHOWING HOW TREES TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED OR
 PLACED PERMANENTLY DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AT A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL PRIOR
 TO APPROVAL TO ASSURE THAT IT IS POSSIBLE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL
 HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS
 FROM THE TREE GRATE AND PLANTING PIT UP TO THE CURB.
 INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND CORRECT THE TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON
 THE LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
  
 12. SATISFIED. THE TREE GRATES WILL BE U S FOUNDRY 9531
 IF NO LIGHTING IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE VERIFY
 IF 9530 IS TO BE USED THAT LIGHTING WILL BE INSTALLED.
  
 A RESPONSE WAS NOT PROVIDED.
  
 13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH
 LANDSCAPING. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE FIXTURES
 IN THESE AREAS.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
 UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. THERE ARE STILL SOME
 AREAS THAT NEED SCREENING.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING
 AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 4. 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR
 THE SITE, A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE
 AMENITY DECK MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF 27 TREES OR
 EQUIVALENT PALMS MEETING THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OR AS
 APPROVED. AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED PLAN WILL BE
 REQUIRED TO RECORD THE AMENITY DECK LANDSCAPING AS PART
 OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING RECORD.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-13-2016 Time 16:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-13-2016 Time 16:59 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-13 17:00:47FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 3111 S DIXIE Z15120017
 JUNE 9, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE PERVIOUS AREA ONLY EXCEEDS THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED BY 433 SQUARE FEET. THE STABILIZED
 EMERGENCY ACCESS AREA IS COUNTED AS 100% PERVIOUS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE STABILIZED SYSTEM AND
 DEDUCT THE AREA THAT IS NOT PERVIOUS. PLEASE BE AWARE
 THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE DESIGN IN THE FUTURE MUST
 ACCOUNT FOR ANY PERVIOUS AREA ALTERATIONS, AND ASSURE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE DIXIE
 BUFFER SHOULD INDICATE A 10 FOOT BUFFER IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE CHART ON FSP-1.
  
 SECTION 94-443 (D) (1) REQUIRES A 10 FOOT BUFFER ALONG
 PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES FOR MULTIFAMILY USES, AND A 5 FOOT
 BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL USES. STAFF CAN
 SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUEST TO MODIFY THE BUFFER, AS
 LONG AS THE DESIGN INCLUDES THE NUMBER OF TREES AS
 REQUIRED. THE CODE ALLOWS LIMITED CLUSTERING OF BUFFER
 TREES TO ALLOW FOR INTEGRATION OF SIGNAGE AND FUNCTION.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE SHADE TREE
 REDUCTION SHOULD INDICATE THE CORRECT NUMBER OF TREES.
 LANDSCAPE DATA CHART SHEET LP-1, WAIVER CHART ON FSP-1,
 AND JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 QUANTITY.
  
 SEE RESPONSE TO COMMENT 2.
  
 4. SATISFIED. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET IN WIDTH IS
 SHOWN ON THE PLAN ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, YET
 WAIVER REQUEST #6 STILL INDICATES A REQUEST FOR A ZERO
 BUFFER WIDTH. WAIVER MAY NO LONGER BE NEEDED. THE PALMS
 MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE REQUIRED TREES IF THE TOTAL
 NUMBER OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR SHADE TREES ON SITE
 DOES NOT EXCEED 35%.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED FOR
 THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT REPRESENT
 AREAS PROVIDED IN THE PARKING AREAS AS REQUIRED. PLEASE
 REVISE TO SHOW HOW THE LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE
 PARKING LOT COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-443(C) 3 AND 4.
  
 SOME AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY AS BEING WITHIN THE PARKING
 AREA, AND OTHER AREAS IN LANDSCAPED MEDIANS ARE NOT
 COUNTED.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
 THE ROOFTOP AMENITY DECK. THIS IS MATERIAL IN
 CONSIDERING THE TRUE QUANTITY OF WAIVER REQUEST #8, AND
 FOR TREE MITIGATION.
  
 A PRELIMINARY PLAN CAN BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME FOR
 APPROVAL, AND AMENDED AT A LATER DATE, OR A CONDITION
 OF APPROVAL CAN BE ADDED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #7 CREATES A NARROW BUFFER
 AREA AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE
 LIVE OAK PROPOSED DOES NOT FIT THE RESTRICTED SPACE
 BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND BUILDING. PLEASE CHANGE TO A
 MORE APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES PROPOSED ALONG THE
 NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL NOT PROVIDE BUFFERING FROM THE
 ADJACENT USE FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE YEAR DUE TO
 LEAF DROP. PLEASE CONSIDER A MIX OF SPECIES TO PROVIDE
 MORE DIVERSITY AND YEAR ROUND BUFFERING.
  
 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE TAGGED
 WITH THEIR IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION SHOWN BY
 NUMBER ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CATEGORY AND QUANTITY FOR
 EACH TREE TO BE REPLACED 1:1 AND PROVIDE THE MITIGATION
 FOR THE TREE CANOPY REPLACEMENT AS A SEPARATE QUANTITY.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL COLUMN TO RECORD
 TREE CANOPY WIDTH 35 FEET OR MORE.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR THE RELOCATION
 SHOWING HOW TREES TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED OR
 PLACED PERMANENTLY DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AT A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL PRIOR
 TO APPROVAL TO ASSURE THAT IT IS POSSIBLE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL
 HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS
 FROM THE TREE GRATE AND PLANTING PIT UP TO THE CURB.
 INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND CORRECT THE TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON
 THE LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. THE TREE GRATES WILL BE U S FOUNDRY
 9531 IF NO LIGHTING IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE
 VERIFY IF 9530 IS TO BE USED THAT LIGHTING WILL BE
 INSTALLED.
  
 A RESPONSE WAS NOT PROVIDED.
  
 13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH
 LANDSCAPING. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE FIXTURES
 IN THESE AREAS.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
 UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. THERE ARE STILL SOME
 AREAS THAT NEED SCREENING.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING
 AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-10-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-10-2016 Time 12:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-10-2016 Time 12:15 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-10 12:16:24FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: 3111 S DIXIE Z15120017
 MAY 9, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE PERVIOUS AREA ONLY EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 BY 433 SQUARE FEET. THE STABILIZED EMERGENCY ACCESS
 AREA IS COUNTED AS 100% PERVIOUS. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL OF THE STABILIZED SYSTEM AND DEDUCT THE AREA
 THAT IS NOT PERVIOUS. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ANY CHANGES
 TO THE DESIGN IN THE FUTURE MUST ACCOUNT FOR ANY
 PERVIOUS AREA ALTERATIONS, AND ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
  
 2. THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE DIXIE BUFFER SHOULD
 INDICATE A 10 FOOT BUFFER IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CORRECT
 THE CHART ON FSP-1.
  
 3. THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE SHADE TREE REDUCTION
 SHOULD INDICATE THE CORRECT NUMBER OF TREES. LANDSCAPE
 DATA CHART SHEET LP-1, WAIVER CHART ON FSP-1, AND
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 QUANTITY.
  
 4. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET IN WIDTH IS SHOWN ON
 THE PLAN ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, YET WAIVER
 REQUEST #6 STILL INDICATES A REQUEST FOR A ZERO BUFFER
 WIDTH. WAIVER MAY NO LONGER BE NEEDED. THE PALMS MAY BE
 SUBSTITUTED FOR THE REQUIRED TREES IF THE TOTAL NUMBER
 OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR SHADE TREES ON SITE DOES NOT
 EXCEED 35%.
  
 5. THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING LOT
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT REPRESENT AREAS PROVIDED
 IN THE PARKING AREAS AS REQUIRED. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW
 HOW THE LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING LOT COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 94-443(C) 3 AND 4.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ROOFTOP
 AMENITY DECK. THIS IS MATERIAL IN CONSIDERING THE TRUE
 QUANTITY OF WAIVER REQUEST #8, AND FOR TREE MITIGATION.
  
 7. WAIVER REQUEST #7 CREATES A NARROW BUFFER AREA AT
 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE LIVE OAK
 PROPOSED DOES NOT FIT THE RESTRICTED SPACE BETWEEN THE
 SIDEWALK AND BUILDING. PLEASE CHANGE TO A MORE
 APPROPRIATE SPECIES.
  
 8. THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES PROPOSED ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE WILL NOT PROVIDE BUFFERING FROM THE
 ADJACENT USE FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE YEAR DUE TO
 LEAF DROP. PLEASE CONSIDER A MIX OF SPECIES TO PROVIDE
 MORE DIVERSITY AND YEAR ROUND BUFFERING.
  
 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 FOLLOWING:
 ? TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE TAGGED WITH THEIR
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION SHOWN BY NUMBER ON THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 ? PROVIDE THE CATEGORY AND QUANTITY FOR EACH TREE TO BE
 REPLACED 1:1 AND PROVIDE THE MITIGATION FOR THE TREE
 CANOPY REPLACEMENT AS A SEPARATE QUANTITY.
 ? PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL COLUMN TO RECORD TREE CANOPY
 WIDTH 35 FEET OR MORE.
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR THE RELOCATION SHOWING
 HOW TREES TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED OR PLACED
 PERMANENTLY DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. THIS
 NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AT A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL PRIOR TO
 APPROVAL TO ASSURE THAT IT IS POSSIBLE.
  
 11. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS FROM
 THE TREE GRATE AND PLANTING PIT UP TO THE CURB.
 INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND CORRECT THE TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON
 THE LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
  
 12. THE TREE GRATES WILL BE U S FOUNDRY 9531 IF NO
 LIGHTING IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE VERIFY IF
 9530 IS TO BE USED THAT LIGHTING WILL BE INSTALLED.
  
 13. THERE ARE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN THAT APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE FIXTURES IN THESE AREAS.
  
 14. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 15. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
 AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 AND UTILITIES. THERE ARE STILL SOME AREAS THAT NEED
 SCREENING.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-12-2016 Time 17:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-12-2016 Time 17:07 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-12 17:10:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 3111 S DIXIE Z15120017
 JANUARY 12, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM ON SHEET OSP1
 TO REFLECT THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA AS 80%.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ROOFTOP
 AMENITY DECK.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES
 REQUIRED FOR ALL 4 BUFFER LENGTHS, AND INDICATE HOW
 MANY WILL BE ELIMINATED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PLANTING SYSTEM ALONG
 THE WEST FA?ADE, AND INCLUDE A CROSS SECTION SHOWING
 THE INSTALLATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF
 HAS CONCERNS REGARDING LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THIS
 FEATURE, AND HOW ACCESS WILL BE OBTAINED FROM FEC RIGHT
 OF WAY. THIS WILL BE USED TO EVALUATE IF THIS AREA
 QUALIFIES AS FOUNDATION PLANTING AREA.
  
 5. THE DATA PROVIDED ON SHEET LP-1 NEEDS TO BE
 CLARIFIED TO REFLECT THE NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED IN
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE MITIGATION CHART WILL INCLUDE
 THE DETAILS OF HOW MANY TREES ARE BEING RELOCATED.
  
 6. PLEASE CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 FOLLOWING:
 ? IDENTIFY TREES 200 THROUGH 204
 ? IDENTIFY THE YELLOW TABS AND PINK TABS INDIVIDUALLY.
 ? TREES TO BE RELOCATED NEED TO BE TAGGED WITH THEIR
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER, AND LOCATION SHOWN BY NUMBER ON THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 ? PROVIDE THE CATEGORY FOR EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED AND
 REPLACED 1:1
  
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR THE RELOCATION SHOWING HOW
 TREES TO BE RELOCATED WILL BE STORED OR PLACED
 PERMANENTLY DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION.
  
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH
 PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST CHARTS TO VERIFY
 PERCENTAGES CLAIMED WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (G).
  
 9. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS UP
 TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS AND
 PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON THE
 LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE.
  
 10. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE TREE GRATES. THE TREE
 GRATES MUST BE U S FOUNDRY 9531.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF SHADE TREE PER CODE. MUST REACH
 A MATURE SIZE OF AT LEAST15 FEET TALL AND PROVIDE A
 CANOPY OF 15 FEET WIDE.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE THE VARIETY FOR THE LAGERSTROEMIA TO
 VERIFY THEY WILL MEET THE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENTS.
 SINGLE TRUNK MAY ALSO BE MORE APPROPRIATE IN SOME
 INSTANCES.
  
 13. THE JAPANESE BLUEBERRY SIZE SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT
 ADEQUATE FOR PLACEMENT AS STREET TREES. THE SIZE MUST
 BE AT LEAST 14 FEET, AND 6 TO 7 FOOT CLEAR TRUNK TO
 ALLOW CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.
 OAKS MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR STREET TREES.
  
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 16. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
 AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 AND UTILITIES.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO
 THE PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-10 17:12:26THIS IS A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE CONCEPTUAL PLANS
 RESUBMITTAL DATED MAY 2016. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL:
  
 1. RECORD INFORMATION INDICATES THAT THE EXISTING WATER
 MAIN ON HAMPTON ROAD IS A DEAD END MAIN. THE EXISTING
 6-INCH WATER MAIN REDUCES TO A 3-INCH WATER MAIN
 APPROXIMATELY 340 FEET FROM S. DIXIE HIGHWAY AND
 TERMINATES AT THE LAST WATER SERVICE JUST EAST OF THE
 RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. BOTH WERE INSTALLED IN 1940'S.
 THE INITIAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN SUBMITTAL DATED APRIL 2016
 SHOWED APPROX. 180 LF OF NEW 8-INCH WATER MAIN FROM S.
 DIXIE HIGHWAY TO SERVE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE
 EXTEND THE NEW 8-INCH WATER MAIN APPROX. 240 LF BEYOND
 THE PROPOSED 8-INCH FIRE LINE SERVICE CONNECTION.
 ABANDON THE EXISTING WATER MAINS AND TRANSFER ALL
 EXISTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO THE NEW WATER MAIN.
 2. PLEASE ADD A BACKFLOW DEVICE FOR EACH OF THE
 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE THAT WILL SERVE A WATER FEATURE;
 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY IS EVALUATING IMPACTS TO
 THE WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS DUE TO INCREASED DEMANDS.
  
 LAURA LE, P.E.
 PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:36 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:36:26SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:35 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:35:43SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:35:16SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 01-13-2016 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:34:53SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-11-2016 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-11-2016 Time 10:39 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-11 10:39:45PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.11.2016
 PROJECT NO.: Z15120015, Z15120016 & Z15120017
 CASE NO.: PB 1693, 1693A & 1693B
 ADDRESS: 3111 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER BARRY, AICP CUD
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF
 300 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS; 13,600 SQUARE FEET OF
 RETAIL; AND 5,600 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT (INCLUDES
 OUTDOOR SEATING).
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ALL OF THE
 FOLLOWING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT:
  
  A. A LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATION LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
 SCHOOL DISTRICT INDICATES THAT THE MIDDLE AND HIGH
 SCHOOL UTILIZATIONS ARE PROJECTED TO EXCEED 100% AND
 THAT MITIGATION OR SOME OTHER SOLUTIONS MAY BE
 NECESSARY IN ORDER TO KEEP THE SCHOOL FROM BEING
 OVERCROWDED. HAS THERE BEEN ANY FOLLOW UP WITH THE
 SCHOOL DISTRICT ON THIS MATTER? A RESOLUTION WILL NEED
 TO BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING.
  
  B. A LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 PUBLIC PARKS.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THIS ANALYSIS STILL NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
  C. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE
 VARIOUS SERVICE AGENCIES INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT
 CAPACITY EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE IN DEMAND
 RESULTING FROM INCREASE IN DEMAND GENERATED BY THE
 BUILD-OUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATION.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THIS DOCUMENTATION STILL NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED.
  
 4. THE LETTER FROM COMCAST INDICATES AN AERIAL VIEW
 THAT WAS ATTACHED; PLEASE PROVIDE SUCH.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: I DID NOT SEE A COPY OF THIS
 LETTER/AERIAL IN THE RESUBMITTAL.
  
 6. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ACREAGE DISCREPANCY CHART
 PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT C OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: NO EXPLANATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 7. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: CONCURRENCY APPROVAL STILL HAS
 NOT BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 10. VERIFY THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY WITH THE
 VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE FDOT. IT SEEMS THAT SOME
 OF THE ON-STREET PARKING AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 PROJECT WOULD CREATE SIGNIFICANT VISIBILITY CONCERNS.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: HAS ANY PRELIMINARY APPROVAL BEEN
 ISSUED BY FDOT? APPROVAL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE SOUTH DIXIE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THERE IS SOME CONCERN THAT SOME
 IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE WITHIN THE REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE
 AT THE INTERSECTIONS/DRIVEWAYS (I.E. BUS SHELTER,
 ON-STREET PARKING, SIGNAGE, ETC.).
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE FDOT
 INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION, SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS,
 ON-STREET PARKING, ETC.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SEE COMMENT #10.
  
 15. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS FOR ALL PARTS
 OF THE PROPERTY AT THE PROPERTY LINE. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-207(D)(8), ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0
 FOOTCANDLES AT THE OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARY OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED AT THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 16. IT IS ENCOURAGED THAT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES BE
 DEVELOPED SO AS TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE TENANTS COMPLY
 WITH THE VISION AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE TYPE OF
 PROJECT THAT IS BEING PROPOSED. IF NO LIST OF PERMITTED
 USES IS PROVIDED, THE CPD WILL REVERT TO THE PERMITTED
 USE TABLE FOR THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING
 DISTRICT.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SOME MODIFICATIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PERMITTED USE LIST MAY BE NECESSARY ? ADDITION
 OF RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY; REMOVAL OF PARKING LOTS AS
 PRINCIPAL, ACCESSORY OR OFF-SITE USES; REMOVAL OF
 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND DETACHED.
  
 17. ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ADJACENT TO EACH RESIDENTIAL TOWER TO ACCOUNT FOR
 VISITORS.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE PLACED IN
 CLOSE PROXIMITY / VISIBLE TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
 ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND AT THE ENTRANCES TO THE
 RESIDENTIAL TOWERS, UNLESS THERE IS A WAY TO DIRECT
 GUESTS AND MAKE THEM AWARE OF THE RACKS IN THE GARAGE.
  
 20. THERE IS INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SETBACK
 MEASUREMENTS OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. FOR EXAMPLE,
 SOME ARE MEASURED FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE EDGE OF THE
 BALCONY LINE, OTHERS ARE MEASURED TO THE CORER OF THE
 TOWER. PLEASE BE CONSISTENT.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NORTHERNMOST
 RESIDENTIAL TOWER DOES NOT MEET THE 81 FOOT SETBACK. AS
 DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, PART OF YOUR JUSTIFICATION WAS
 THAT WHILE A WAIVER WAS BEING REQUESTED FOR SETBACKS,
 THE NEED FOR THE WAIVER WAS BECAUSE OF THE
 PODIUM/PARKING GARAGE AND THAT ALL OF THE RESIDENTIAL
 TOWERS COMPLIED WITH SETBACKS (IF MEASURED
 INDEPENDENTLY OF THE PARKING GARAGE). AS CURRENTLY
 PROPOSED, THE PLANS DO NOT SUPPORT THIS JUSTIFICATION.
 EITHER AMEND THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER, OR
 MODIFY THE SETBACKS FOR THE NORTH TOWER.
  
 25. MORE DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF THE FACADES OF THE BUILDING,
 ESPECIALLY THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS THAT
 PORTION OF THE GARAGE THAT FACES HAMPTON ROAD.
  
 26. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR ALL OF
 THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES FROM THE DIXIE HIGHWAY
 PROPERTY LINE. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT 5
 FEET IS BEING PROVIDED, BUT THE ONLY DIMENSION PROVIDED
 INDICATES THAT THERE IS A 10 FOOT SETBACK.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ARE ALL OF THE COMMERCIAL
 BUILDINGS 8.5 FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY? A DIMENSION
 LINE WAS ONLY PROVIDE FOR THE NORTHERNMOST BUILDING;
 PLEASE PROVIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 27. IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL MONUMENT
 SIGN WILL IMPEDE WITH THE VISIBILITY ONTO SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PLEASE SEE COMMENT #10. NOTE THAT
 AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE OUTBOUND
 LANES; IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. PLANTINGS, SIGNAGE, ETC.) IN
 THE MEDIAN BETWEEN THE INBOUND AND OUTBOUND LANES
 SHOULD NOT ENCROACH INTO THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE.
  
 28. HAS ANY DOCUMENTATION BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE FAA
 INDICATING THAT THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING HEIGHT?
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: DOCUMENTATION STILL NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 32. MORE AESTHETIC DESIGN CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE
 MADE FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES, ETC.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PLEASE NOTE THAT IT APPEARS THAT
 THE PROPOSED 10 FOOT WIDE GATE OPENING DOES NOT MEET
 THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARD. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY
 OR OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY?S PUBLIC WORKS
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 36. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS AS TO HOW THE GATE SYSTEM IS
 PROPOSED TO WORK WITH THE PARKING GARAGE. ARE GUESTS
 PERMITTED IN THE GARAGE? HOW TO THEY GAIN ACCESS? IS
 THERE A CALL BOX? WHAT HAPPENS IF SOMEONE IS DENIED
 ACCESS AT THE GATE?
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SOME FURTHER EXPLANATION NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED ON HOW THE GATES WILL OPERATE WITHOUT
 IMPEDING THE PARKING SPACES, DRIVE AISLES, ETC.
  
 42. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE
 PROJECT TO PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY TO VISITORS,
 RESIDENTS, EMPLOYEES, ETC. AT EACH OF THE BUILDINGS.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SEE COMMENT #17.
  
 45. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS-SECTION OF THE SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE, SPECIFICALLY THAT AREA
 BETWEEN THE CURB LINE AND THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
 STAFF WANTS TO ENSURE THAT SUFFICIENT SIDEWALK WIDTH IS
 PROVIDED FOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON THE COMMERCIAL
 CORRIDOR.
  
 46. THE PARKING SPOT AT THE FAR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED AS VEHICLES
 BACKING OUT OF THIS SPACE WILL ENCROACH INTO THE
 SIDEWALK, TRAFFIC WILL BE FORCED TO STACK IN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, ETC.
  
 GENERAL CONCERNS OR AREAS IN NEED OF FURTHER
 DISCUSSION:
  
 4. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS.
  
  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, THIS
 ITEM WILL LIKELY BE AN ON-GOING TOPIC OF DISCUSSION.
  
 9. GLAZING OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ON SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY. STAFF WANTS TO DISCUSS WAYS TO ENSURE THAT THE
 SOUTH DIXIE FRONTAGE CONSISTS OF THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
 CLEAR GLAZING AND THAT IT DOES NOT BECOME A BLANK
 FRONTAGE WITH TINTED OR SPANDREL GLASS, BACK-OF-HOUSE
 OF THE INTERIOR USES, OR OTHERWISE BLOCKED FROM THE
 INSIDE.
  
 10. ON-GOING DISCUSSION NEEDS TO OCCUR REGARDING
 POTENTIAL PHASING OF THE PROJECT AND HOW ELEMENTS OF
 THE SITE AND BUILDINGS WILL BE TREATED BETWEEN PHASES,
 WHAT WILL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF EACH PHASE, ETC.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JULY 19, 2016
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MAY 27, 2016.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JULY 19, 2016 PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JULY 4, 2016. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2016 Time 11:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-13-2016 Time 11:51 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:30:23PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2016
 PROJECT NO.: Z15120015, Z15120016 & Z15120017
 CASE NO.: PB 1693, 1693A & 1693B
 ADDRESS: 3111 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER BARRY, AICP CUD
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF
 300 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS; 14,400 SQUARE FEET OF
 RETAIL; AND 4,400 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ALL OF THE
 FOLLOWING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT:
  
  A. A LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATION LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
  
  B. A LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 PUBLIC PARKS.
  
  C. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE
 VARIOUS SERVICE AGENCIES INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT
 CAPACITY EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE IN DEMAND
 RESULTING FROM INCREASE IN DEMAND GENERATED BY THE
 BUILD-OUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATION.
  
 2. SURVEYS AND SEPARATE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS WILL NEED TO
 BE PROVIDED FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
  
  A. THE 6.02 ACRES BEING CHANGED FROM COMMERCIAL (C) TO
 COMMERCIAL EAST (CE);
  
  B. THE 0.99 ACRES BEING CHANGED FROM NEIGHBORHOOD
 COMMERCIAL (NC) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC); AND
  
  C. THE 8.33 ACRES BEING CHANGED FROM OFFICE COMMERCIAL
 (OC) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC).
  
 3. TABLE 3 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BOTH SCENARIOS AS ?PROPOSED
 FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT?. THE FIRST SCENARIO SHOULD
 BE ?EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT?.
  
 4. THE LETTER FROM COMCAST INDICATES AN AERIAL VIEW
 THAT WAS ATTACHED; PLEASE PROVIDE SUCH.
  
 5. PAGES 26 AND 31 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 INDICATES THAT 18,500 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE IS
 BEING PROVIDED; THE PLANS INDICATES 18,800 SQUARE FEET
 OF RETAIL/RESTAURANT. PLEASE ENSURE ALL DOCUMENTS
 MATCH.
  
 6. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ACREAGE DISCREPANCY CHART
 PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT C OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT.
  
 7. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION INDICATING
 THAT TWO (2) OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONALS
 WERE UTILIZED:
  
  A. URBAN PLANNER (AICP)
  
  B. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT (ASLA)
  
  C. CIVIL ENGINEER (LICENSED BY STATE OF FLORIDA)
  
  D. ARCHITECT (LICENSED BY STATE OF FLORIDA)
  
 9. WAS A MARKET STUDY DONE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT?
  
 10. VERIFY THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY WITH THE
 VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE FDOT. IT SEEM THAT SOME
 OF THE ON-STREET PARKING AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 PROJECT WOULD CREATE SIGNIFICANT VISIBILITY CONCERNS.
  
 11. SHOULD THE END SPOTS OF THE ON-STREET PARKING JUST
 NORTH OF HAMPTON ROAD HAVE ANGLED CURBING?
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM PALM TRAN
 INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION WITH THE
 PROPOSED LOCATION/DESIGN OF THE BUS STOP (FUTURE
 SHELTER).
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE FDOT
 INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION, SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS,
 ON-STREET PARKING, ETC.
  
 14. TO PROVIDE BETTER CLARITY WITH REGARD TO THE
 ARCHITECTURE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COLOR ELEVATIONS AND
 RENDERINGS.
  
 15. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS FOR ALL PARTS
 OF THE PROPERTY AT THE PROPERTY LINE. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-207(D)(8), ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0
 FOOTCANDLES AT THE OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARY OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 16. IT IS ENCOURAGED THAT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES BE
 DEVELOPED SO AS TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE TENANTS COMPLY
 WITH THE VISION AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE TYPE OF
 PROJECT THAT IS BEING PROPOSED. IF NO LIST OF PERMITTED
 USES IS PROVIDED, THE CPD WILL REVERT TO THE PERMITTED
 USE TABLE FOR THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING
 DISTRICT.
  
 17. ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ADJACENT TO EACH RESIDENTIAL TOWER TO ACCOUNT FOR
 VISITORS.
  
 18. LANDSCAPE SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 UTILITY CONNECTION, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, METERS, ETC.
 IT APPEARS THAT MANY OF THESE COMPONENTS ARE PLACED IN
 THE MIDDLE OF (CONCRETE?) OPEN PLAZAS.
  
 19. PLANS NEED TO PROVIDE BETTER DEFINITION BETWEEN THE
 VARIOUS HARDSCAPE MATERIALS. IS THE ENTIRE ?COURTYARD
 PLAZA AREA? CONCRETE?
  
 20. THERE IS INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SETBACK
 MEASUREMENTS OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. FOR EXAMPLE,
 SOME ARE MEASURED FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE EDGE OF THE
 BALCONY LINE, OTHERS ARE MEASURED TO THE CORER OF THE
 TOWER. PLEASE BE CONSISTENT.
  
 21. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT THE RESIDENTIAL
 SETBACK FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY IS 135.8 FEET; NEITHER OF
 THE DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN SHOW THAT DISTANCE.
  
 22. AS THE PARKING GARAGE AND THE RESIDENTIAL TOWERS
 ARE ALL CONSIDERED ONE (1) STRUCTURE (AS THEY ARE
 CONNECTED AND FULLY INTEGRATED), THE REQUIRED SETBACKS
 FOR EVERYTHING IS BASED UPON THE 170 FOOT HEIGHT OF THE
 TOWERS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR THE NORTH
 PROPERTY IS 81 FEET FOR BOTH THE TOWER AND THE PARKING
 GARAGE.
  
 23. IN THE SITE DATA TABLE, LIST THE REQUIRED REAR
 SETBACK AS FIVE (5) FEET, AND MOVE THE ** TO THE
 DIMENSION LISTED UNDER ?PROPOSED?.
  
 24. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS AS TO HOW FENCING, ETC. WILL
 BE INCORPORATED INTO THE AMENITY DECK TO ADDRESS THE
 TENNIS COURTS, ENCLOSURE OF THE POOLS, ETC. ARE THE
 PLANS CORRECT IN THAT THEY SHOW AN 11 FOOT HIGH GLASS
 PANEL AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE AMENITY DECK?
  
 25. MORE DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF THE FACADES OF THE BUILDING,
 ESPECIALLY THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
 26. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR ALL OF
 THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES FROM THE DIXIE HIGHWAY
 PROPERTY LINE. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT 5
 FEET IS BEING PROVIDED, BUT THE ONLY DIMENSION PROVIDED
 INDICATES THAT THERE IS A 10 FOOT SETBACK.
  
 27. IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL MONUMENT
 SIGN WILL IMPEDE WITH THE VISIBILITY ONTO SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY.
  
 28. HAS ANY DOCUMENTATION BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE FAA
 INDICATING THAT THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING HEIGHT?
  
 29. NEED TO ADDRESS THE SERVICE AREA AT THE SOUTHWEST
 CORNER OF THE PARKING GARAGE. WOULD LIKE TO MINIMIZE
 THIS AREA TO ALLOW FOR THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
 LANDSCAPING ALONG THE FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING, MINIMIZE
 THE IMPACT ON THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT ALONG HAMPTON
 ROAD, ETC.
  
 30. PLEASE NOTE THE ANGLE OF THE PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED WEST OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
  
 31. THE ROW OF PARKING IN THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF
 THE COMMERCIAL PARKING AREA IS MISLABELED AS HAVING 10
 SPACES, WHEN ONLY 9 ARE PROVIDED.
  
 32. MORE AESTHETIC DESIGN CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE
 MADE FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES, ETC.
  
 33. THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA SHOWN NEAR THE NORTH END
 OF THE PROPERTY (ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY) NEEDS TO BE
 FACTORED INTO THE PARKING CALCULATION.
  
 34. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW COMMERCIAL
 DELIVERIES ARE ANTICIPATED TO OCCUR TO EACH OF THE
 RETAIL/RESTAURANT BUILDINGS. ONLY ONE LOADING SPACE IS
 PROVIDED AT THE FAR NORTH END OF THE PROPERTY, AND ANY
 DELIVERY TRUCK THAT PARKS IN THE DRIVE AISLE OF THE
 PARKING LOT WILL COMPLETELY BLOCK TRAFFIC FLOW.
  
 35. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT 5 ACCESSIBLE
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED FOR THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, BUT
 THE PLANS INDICATE 6.
  
 36. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS AS TO HOW THE GATE SYSTEM IS
 PROPOSED TO WORK WITH THE PARKING GARAGE. ARE GUESTS
 PERMITTED IN THE GARAGE? HOW TO THEY GAIN ACCESS? IS
 THERE A CALL BOX? WHAT HAPPENS IF SOMEONE IS DENIED
 ACCESS AT THE GATE?
  
 37. TURNAROUND SPACES WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE
 EASTERN END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING THAT OCCURS WITHIN
 THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER.
  
 38. PLEASE DIMENSION THE PARKING, DRIVE AISLES, ETC.
 FOR THE PARKING GARAGE (ALL LEVELS).
  
 39. THE PARKING COUNT FOR THE GARAGE DOES NOT SEEM TO
 MATCH THE NUMBER OF SPACES DRAWN; PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 40. THERE ARE NUMEROUS DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SHEETS FSP-1
 AND SP-1. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
 SP-1 SHOWS A LOT MORE OUTDOOR DINING AREA, DIFFERENT
 CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE PLANTERS, ETC.
  
 41. THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHOULD BE
 DETERMINED BY THE OVERALL PARKING COUNT PROVIDED
 (COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL). THE SITE DATA TABLE ONLY
 ACCOUNTS FOR THE COMMERCIAL PARKING.
  
 42. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE
 PROJECT TO PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY TO VISITORS,
 RESIDENTS, EMPLOYEES, ETC. AT EACH OF THE BUILDINGS.
  
 43. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE GREENSCREEN
 THAT IS PROPOSED ALONG THE WEST FACADE OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE.
  
 44. HOW DOES A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS THE RESIDENTIAL
 PORTION OF THE PROJECT FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY IF THE
 PEDESTRIAN GATES ARE CLOSED? PLEASE MAKE NOTE OF THE
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE ROUTES THAT ARE NECESSARY
 THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT, INCLUDING FROM THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUS STOP, ETC.
  
 BELOW ARE COMMENTS PROVIDED BY ALEX HANSEN, SENIOR
 TRANSPORTATION PLANNER:
  
 1. THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION OF 47% NORTH AND 53% SOUTH
 SEEMS TO BE COUNTER INTUITIVE. I DON'T SEE WHY MOST OF
 THE TRIPS WOULD BE GOING SOUTH CONSIDERING THAT BOTH
 DOWNTOWN AND I-95 (THROUGH BELVEDERE) ARE ACCESSIBLE TO
 THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT.
  
 2. THE ANALYSIS IS SHOWING THAT OVER 1,070 DAILY TRIPS
 ARE USING HAMPTON ROAD TO ENTER OR EXIT THE PROJECT.
 HAMPTON IS A SMALL ROAD WITH AN UNSIGNALIZED
 INTERSECTION WITH DIXIE WHICH ALSO HAS SOME VISIBILITY
 ISSUES DUE TO THE PLACEMENT OF A DENTAL OFFICE ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION. I AM CONCERNED THAT
 THIS INTERSECTION (AND HAMPTON IN GENERAL) MAY BE
 OVERBURDENED AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT. INSTALLING A
 TRAFFIC LIGHT AT DIXIE AND HAMPTON IS NOT AN OPTION
 GIVEN THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING LIGHT AT ALBEMARLE AND
 DIXIE ABOUT 300 FEET TO THE NORTH OF HAMPTON.
  
 3. THE STUDY CLAIMS THAT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEAK HOUR
 TRIPS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE LESS THAN 7.5% OF THE
 TOTAL DAILY TRIPS. THIS PERCENT OF PEAK HOUR TRIPS IS
 QUITE LOW FOR A PROJECT WHICH IS PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL
 IN NATURE.
  
 GENERAL CONCERNS OR AREAS IN NEED OF FURTHER
 DISCUSSION:
  
 1. INTERCONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE VARIOUS PARKING AREAS
 (NORTH AND SOUTH). PLEASE MAKE NOTE OF SEC.
 94-313(2)(C).
  
 2. LINING OF THE TOWERS ON THE GROUND FLOOR WITH AN
 ACTIVE USE THAT FRONTS ONTO THE PARK SPACE.
  
 3. DESIGN OF THE PARK SPACE SO THAT IT IS INTEGRATED
 WITH BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL
 COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT.
  
 4. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS.
  
 5. DESIGN OF THE PARK SPACE DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO
 INTEGRATION WITH THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE
 PROJECT (TALL FENCE AND HEDGE, ETC.). THERE ARE
 MULTIPLE SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT THAT CAN BE DISCUSSED
 REGARDING THIS INTERCONNECTIVITY AND HOW IT ALSO
 AFFECTS THE SAFETY AND POLICING OF THE SPACE.
  
 6. PLACEMENT OF FENCING.
  
 7. DESIGN OF THE PLAZA AREA BETWEEN AND AROUDN THE
 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
  
 8. HAS THERE BEEN ANY CONVERSATION REGARDING FUTURE
 INSTALLATION OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
 ON THE TOP OF THE RESIDENTIAL TOWERS? IF SO, I WOULD
 LIKE TO ADDRESS THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF THESE
 ELEMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 17, 2016
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 2016.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 17, 2016 PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN FEBRUARY 2, 2016. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved