Plan Review Details - Project Z15110014
Plan Review Stops For Project Z15110014
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-17-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-17-2015 Time 21:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 12-17-2015 Time 21:37 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-17 22:03:24DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. THE EXIT ROUTE FROM THE NORTH STAIR TO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL HAVE SEPARATION FROM THE SOUTH STAIR
 EXIT ROUTE, SHEET A2.01 DOES NOT SHOW THE PROPOSED EXIT
 ROUTE, AND IT APPEARS THAT THE EXIT ROUTE FROM THE
 NORTH STAIR WOULD TAKE THOSE EVACUATING THE BUILDING
 THROUGH THE LOBBY AND PAST THE SOUTH STAIR ONTO THE
 SIDEWALK ON 2ND STREET. PER SECTION 1021.3 OF FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, EXITS SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A DISTANCE
 NO LESS THAN ONE-THIRD OF THE BUILDING DIAGONAL
 DIMENSION IN SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS.
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
 LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY ENTRANCES. THE VEHICULAR DRIVEWAY SHALL NOT BE
 THE ONLY PEDESTRIAN AND WHEELCHAIR ACCESS TO THE
 BUILDING.
  
 4. WHEN THE WHEELCHAIR ACCESS ROUTE IS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS, ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE
 GREATER THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE). THE ONE
 PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE VAN
 ACCESSIBLE.
  
 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 7. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
2015-12-08 10:28:02SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-17-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-17-2016 Time 16:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 06-17-2016 Time 16:43 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-17 16:45:13PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENT(S):
  
 1.) THE PRIVE SUITES PROJECT IS PROPOSING TO CHANGE 2ND
 STREET FROM SAPODILLA AVE. TO ROSEMARY AVE. FROM
 ONE-WAY TO TWO-WAY. CITY ENGINEERING WOULD RECOMMEND
 AGAINST THIS CHANGE DUE TO THE CHOKE POINT AT THE
 INTERSECTION OF SAPODILLA AVE. AND 2ND ST. THERE WILL
 BE SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS INTERSECTION THAT
 COULD BE OPEN TO DISCUSSION. IN ADDITION, THE CITY
 WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS CIRCULATION OF THE ENTIRE
 NEIGHBORHOOD AS A WHOLE AND NOT ONE BLOCK. THE PROPOSED
 CHANGE WOULD TRIGGER AN ORDINANCE CHANGE.
  
 CONTACT:
  
 KHANH UYEN DANG, PE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 OFFICE: (561) 494-1087
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-11-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 03-11-2016 Time 08:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 03-11-2016 Time 08:33 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-11 08:35:34CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
  
 A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOWING
 HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE TRAFFIC
 VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. RESULTS SHOULD
 JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON 2ND STREET,
 WHICH IS CURRENTLY ONE-WAY WEST BOUND. INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS AND A
 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS. DATA COLLECTION WILL
 INCLUDE COMPLETE 4 HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
 COUNTS FOR AM AND PM PEAK HOURS FOR THE FOLLOWING
 INTERSECTIONS: 2ND STREET/ROSEMARY AVENUE, 2ND STREET /
 SAPODILLA AVENUE, AND BANYAN BLVD / ROSEMARY AVENUE.
 INTERSECTION AND OPERATIONAL CONDUCT AN ANALYSIS AND
 REVIEW BASED ON TRAFFIC DIVERSION TO 2ND STREET BASED
 ON THE CONVERSION TO TWO-WAY CIRCULATION. SAFETY
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
  
 CONDITIONS OF RECOMMENDATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 2. UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS WILL
 REQUIRE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S PUBLIC UTILITIES
 ENGINEER.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MILL AND RESURFACE 2ND
 STREET AND THE ALLEY.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 10:26:30CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT ONE FULL SIZED, SIGNED AND SEALED
 SURVEY.
  
 3. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
 SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE
 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. RESULTS
 SHOULD JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON 2ND
 STREET, WHICH IS CURRENTLY ONE-WAY WEST BOUND. INCLUDE
 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS.
 ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
 EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON THE TRINITY/DIXIE INTERSECTION
 DURING PEAK HOURS DURING SEASON. (STAFF HAS FREQUENTLY
 OBSERVED TRAFFIC BACKING UP ON DIXIE PASS THE
 INTERSECTION OF TRINITY.) PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING
 WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO
 DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE REQUIRED STUDY.
  
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A PROPOSED STRIPING PLAN FOR 2ND
 STREET SHOWING LANES WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 10 FEET.
 WE SUGGEST MEETING WITH THE CITY?S TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 PRIOR TO FINALIZING THE DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
 THE 2ND STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5. PLEASE VERIFY THE 50 FT RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH SHOWN ON
 SHEET A0.01A. THE DEMOLITION PLAN, SHEET A1.01 SHOWS A
 30 FT RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 6. WILL ON-STREET PARKING BE PROVIDED? IF NOT, WHAT
 MITIGATION IS PROPOSED FOR THE LOSS OF PARKING SPACES?
  
 7. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERIN
 G/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 8. THE PROPOSED TWO 96-GALLON TRASH BINS DO NOT APPEAR
 TO BE LARGE ENOUGH TO SERVICE THE PROPOSED 20 HOTEL
 ROOMS AND RESTAURANT. FOOD WASTE MUST BE COLLECTED ON A
 DAILY BASIS. PLEASE RE-EXAMINE THE TRASH GENERATION
 VOLUME FOR THIS PROJECT AND CONSIDER USING A DUMPSTER.
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 10. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS TO INCLUDE THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH GARBAGE RECEPTACLE DETAIL. MINIMUM
 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED IN SECTION
 94-444(B) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. CITY STANDARD
 DETAIL GC-8 MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEE
 RING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 11. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 12. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE
 ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. COMPLIANCE
 WITH CHAPTER 40E-4 WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THIS PROVISION [SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11), AND
 94-307].
  
 13. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES.
  
 14. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 15. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 16. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN.
  
 17. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 18. THE GRAVITY SEWER WITHIN THE ALLEY IS NOT IN GOOD
 CONDITION AND WILL EVENTUALLY BE REMOVED. PLEASE MEET
 WITH CITY ENGINEERING STAFF TO DISCUSS ALTERNATIVE
 SEWER CONNECTION LOCATION(S).
  
 19. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. A UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FROM
 THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS
 DEPARTMENT. THE APPLICATION FOR UNITY OF TITLE CAN BE
 DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 FERDINAND RIVERA
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-822-2076
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-04-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 12-04-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 12-04-2015 Time 14:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-04 14:54:34THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES,
 INCLUDING NFPA 101, CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENT
 BUILDINGS.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND APARTMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
 AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST STRINGENT
 PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER OF THE FIRE
 CODE.
  
 8. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. A CLASS A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE
 FIGHTER?S EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 12. PROVIDE FIRE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED AND
 PROVIDED SUFFICIENT FIRE HYDRANTS AND WATER SUPPLY TO
 MEET THE FIRE LOAD DEMANDS.
  
 13. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 15. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 16. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-27-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-27-2016 Time 08:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-27-2016 Time 08:44 Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-27 08:45:09ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/3/16:
 15. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE
 FA?ADE TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE NEW ENTRANCE
 FACING ROSEMARY WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE CONTINUING
 THE DIETES CONTINUOUSLY ALONG THE ENTIRE FA?ADE.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES OR
 PALMS ON THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-12-2016 Time 17:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-12-2016 Time 17:00 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-12 17:01:14FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PRIVE SUITES Z15110014
 MAY 3, 2016
 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN SIGNED
 AND SEALED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PER SECTION 94-448
 (D)(2)R.
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR:
 ? 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY AS INTERIOR
 COURTYARD, ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR ANY
 REQUIRED TREE CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109
 TABLE IV-8.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THERE APPEARS TO BE ONE SABAL PALM ON THE
 PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER AND A TREE WITHIN THE
 WEST PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. SOME SHEETS
 ON THE PLANS CONTAIN NOTES ABOUT REMOVING EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. ANY REMOVAL
 PROPOSED WILL REQUIRE A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 AUTHORIZED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 MITIGATION CHART TO REFLECT A TREE INVENTORY, AND
 PROVIDE PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE PER SECTION
 94-448 (E) INCLUDING SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND
 REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CHANGE THE STREET TREE SPECIES TO
 PIGEON PLUM TO MATCH THE EXISTING STREET TREES ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF ROSEMARY, AND REMOVE THE NOTE REFERRING TO
 RESERVING PALMS ON SHEET LP-1.
  
 1. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL
 HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS
 UP TO THE CURB. IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND AN ADJACENT PERVIOUS
 LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 FEET, THE STRUCTURAL SOIL
 SHALL BE EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA. PLEASE SHOW ALL STRUCTURAL SOIL
 LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL
 DETAIL.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR
 EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
 GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-442 (G).
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE LOCATIONS
 STARTING FROM THE BACK OF CURB PER SECTION 94-113(C).
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LANDSCAPE AREA WILL
 BE PROTECTED ADJACENT TO THE FRONT OF THE PARKING
 SPACES ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE PER SECTION
 94-113(E)(3). PROVIDE WHEEL STOPS, OR MOVE THE CURB
 BACK TO PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS ARE FOR THE OVERHANG.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN
 WALL AS TO THE TYPE OF SYSTEM PROPOSED.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND
 ENGINEERING PLANS TO SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY LIGHTING OR
 FPL EQUIPMENT AND LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS. ADJUST CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE CHANGE THE PLANT SPECIES ALONG
 THE ROSEMARY LOBBY FACE TO MEET THE 50 PERCENT
 TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT FOR THE REQUIRED ACTIVE USE.
  
 SPACING DOES NOT ALLOW FOR FUTURE GROWTH NEEDED FOR
 PLANTS TO SURVIVE. PLEASE CHANGE TO A PLANT SPECIES
 THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED AT 4 FEET OR LESS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/11/16:
 14. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE PIGEON PLUM STREET
 TREE SIZE TO MEET THE REQUIRED 14 FEET HEIGHT.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/3/16:
 15. PLEASE ADD A LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE FA?ADE TO THE
 NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE NEW ENTRANCE FACING ROSEMARY
 WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE CONTINUING THE DIETES
 CONTINUOUSLY ALONG THE ENTIRE FA?ADE.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES OR
 PALMS ON THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-15-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-15-2016 Time 16:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-15-2016 Time 16:11 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-15 16:12:04FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PRIVE SUITES Z15110014
 MARCH 11, 2016
 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN SIGNED
 AND SEALED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PER SECTION 94-448
 (D)(2)R.
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR:
 ? 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY AS INTERIOR
 COURTYARD, ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR ANY
 REQUIRED TREE CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109
 TABLE IV-8.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THERE APPEARS TO BE ONE SABAL PALM ON THE
 PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER AND A TREE WITHIN THE
 WEST PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. SOME SHEETS
 ON THE PLANS CONTAIN NOTES ABOUT REMOVING EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. ANY REMOVAL
 PROPOSED WILL REQUIRE A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 AUTHORIZED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 MITIGATION CHART TO REFLECT A TREE INVENTORY, AND
 PROVIDE PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE PER SECTION
 94-448 (E) INCLUDING SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND
 REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE CHANGE THE STREET TREE SPECIES TO
 PIGEON PLUM TO MATCH THE EXISTING STREET TREES ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF ROSEMARY, AND REMOVE THE NOTE REFERRING TO
 RESERVING PALMS ON SHEET LP-1.
  
 1. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL
 HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS
 UP TO THE CURB. IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND AN ADJACENT PERVIOUS
 LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 FEET, THE STRUCTURAL SOIL
 SHALL BE EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA. PLEASE SHOW ALL STRUCTURAL SOIL
 LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL
 DETAIL.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR
 EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE
 GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-442 (G).
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE LOCATIONS
 STARTING FROM THE BACK OF CURB PER SECTION 94-113(C).
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LANDSCAPE AREA WILL
 BE PROTECTED ADJACENT TO THE FRONT OF THE PARKING
 SPACES ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE PER SECTION
 94-113(E)(3). PROVIDE WHEEL STOPS, OR MOVE THE CURB
 BACK TO PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS ARE FOR THE OVERHANG.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN
 WALL AS TO THE TYPE OF SYSTEM PROPOSED.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND
 ENGINEERING PLANS TO SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY LIGHTING OR
 FPL EQUIPMENT AND LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS. ADJUST CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CHANGE THE PLANT SPECIES
 ALONG THE ROSEMARY LOBBY FACE TO MEET THE 50 PERCENT
 TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT FOR THE REQUIRED ACTIVE USE.
  
 SPACING DOES NOT ALLOW FOR FUTURE GROWTH NEEDED FOR
 PLANTS TO SURVIVE. PLEASE CHANGE TO A PLANT SPECIES
 THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED AT 4 FEET OR LESS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/11/16:
 14. PLEASE ADJUST THE PIGEON PLUM STREET TREE SIZE TO
 MEET THE REQUIRED 14 FEET HEIGHT.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES OR
 PALMS ON THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-07-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-07-2015 Time 17:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-07-2015 Time 17:02 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-07 17:02:32FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PRIVE SUITES Z15110014
 DECEMBER 7, 2015
 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN SIGNED AND SEALED BY
 A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PER SECTION 94-448 (D)(2)R.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO SHOW
 QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR:
 ? 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY AS INTERIOR
 COURTYARD, ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE
 AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND
 TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109
 TABLE IV-7.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR ANY REQUIRED TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 5. THERE APPEARS TO BE ONE SABAL PALM ON THE PROPERTY
 AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER AND A TREE WITHIN THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. SOME SHEETS ON
 THE PLANS CONTAIN NOTES ABOUT REMOVING EXISTING TREES
 AND PALMS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. ANY REMOVAL
 PROPOSED WILL REQUIRE A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 AUTHORIZED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 MITIGATION CHART TO REFLECT A TREE INVENTORY, AND
 PROVIDE PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE PER SECTION
 94-448 (E) INCLUDING SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND
 REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED.
  
 6. PLEASE CHANGE THE STREET TREE SPECIES TO PIGEON PLUM
 TO MATCH THE EXISTING STREET TREES ON THE WEST SIDE OF
 ROSEMARY, AND REMOVE THE NOTE REFERRING TO RESERVING
 PALMS ON SHEET LP-1.
  
 1. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS UP
 TO THE CURB. IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND AN ADJACENT PERVIOUS
 LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 FEET, THE STRUCTURAL SOIL
 SHALL BE EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA. PLEASE SHOW ALL STRUCTURAL SOIL
 LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL
 DETAIL.
  
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH SPECIES
 ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE GUIDE TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART SECTION 94-442 (G).
  
 8. PLEASE SHOW SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE LOCATIONS STARTING
 FROM THE BACK OF CURB PER SECTION 94-113(C).
  
 9. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE LANDSCAPE AREA WILL BE PROTECTED
 ADJACENT TO THE FRONT OF THE PARKING SPACES ON THE WEST
 SIDE OF THE GARAGE PER SECTION 94-113(E)(3). PROVIDE
 WHEEL STOPS, OR MOVE THE CURB BACK TO PROVIDE MORE
 PERVIOUS ARE FOR THE OVERHANG.
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN WALL AS TO
 THE TYPE OF SYSTEM PROPOSED.
  
 11. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS
 TO SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY LIGHTING OR FPL EQUIPMENT AND
 LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A/C
 COMPRESSORS. ADJUST CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND
 PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES.
  
 12. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 13. PLEASE CHANGE THE PLANT SPECIES ALONG THE ROSEMARY
 LOBBY FACE TO MEET THE 50 PERCENT TRANSPARENCY
 REQUIREMENT FOR THE REQUIRED ACTIVE USE.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES OR
 PALMS ON THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 10:28:14SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 10:27:48SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 10:27:20SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2015 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 10:27:01SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 06-28-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-28-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 06-28-2016 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-06-28 16:56:01GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE FOLLOWING
 PUBLIC UTILITIES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL
 AND COMCAST. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SITE PLAN WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED UNTIL ALL UTILITY LETTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED
 BY STAFF. [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15, 3/23/16 AND
 5/12/16]
  
 ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT. PLEASE CONTACT KHANH UYEN DANG @ (561)
 494-1087.
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 SIXTEEN (16) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN
 8.5 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
 PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($300.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-12-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-12-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-12-2016 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-12 17:18:55GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE FOLLOWING
 PUBLIC UTILITIES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL
 AND COMCAST. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SITE PLAN WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED UNTIL ALL UTILITY LETTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED
 BY STAFF. [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15 AND 3/23/16]
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED 7 FT. HIGH WALL ALONG 2ND STREET SHALL
 NOT EXCEED 6 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE 12 FT. FRONT
 SETBACK. ADDITIONALLY, THE PERIMETER 7 FT. HIGH WALL
 SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 FT. IN HEIGHT ALONG THE SIDE AND
 REAR PROPERTY LINES. [ZLDR S.94- 109]
  
 2.) THE ARCHITECTURAL EYEBROW CANNOT ENCROACH INTO THE
 12 FT. BUILDING SETBACK BY MORE THAN 2 FT. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE PLAN TO ENSURE THAT THE
 EYEBROW DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THE BUILDING SETBACK.
 [ZLDR S.94-109, TABLE IV-5, PROJECTION STANDARDS]
  
 3.) THE BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE MOVED FROM THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY ONTO THE PROPERTY. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO
 ILLUSTRATE THAT THE PLACEMENT OF THE RACK IS CONSISTENT
 WITH THE CITY?S BICYCLE STANDARDS. ALSO, INCLUDE
 BICYCLE PARKING INFORMATION IN THE DATA TABULAR IN
 SHEET A0.03.
  
 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS:
  
 1.) PURSUANT TO S. 94-109, TABLE IV-4 OF THE ZLDR,
 FA?ADES ENCLOSING ACTIVE USES SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM
 OF 15 PERCENT FENESTRATION. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS TO
 ENSURE THAT THIS MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IS MET.
  
 2.) CLARIFY THE "ARCHITECTURE FEATURE/TREATMENT
 PROJECTION 4.5 INCHES" IN SHEET A3.00. IS THE
 PROJECTION REFERRING TO THE FENESTRATION?
  
 3.) ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE TRANSPARENT, NOT TINTED OR
 MIRRORED. PLEASE SPECIFY MATERIAL AND NOTATE IN THE
 PLANS.
  
 ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ADDITIONAL UTILITY AND CIVIL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 IDENTIFIED ON THE REVISED PLANS BY THE ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT. PLEASE CONTACT KELLY CRANFORD, THE CITY?S
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER @ (561) 494-1098 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 NOTES:
  
 * A UNITY OF TITLE COMBINING THE THREE PARCELS IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONTACT THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 PROCESS (561) 494-1040.
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 SIXTEEN (16) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN
 8.5 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
 PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($300.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-23-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 03-23-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 03-23-2016 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-23 09:14:29GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE FOLLOWING
 PUBLIC UTILITIES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL
 AND COMCAST. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SITE PLAN WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED UNTIL ALL UTILITY LETTERS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED
 BY STAFF. [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15]
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 WILL NOT CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION UNTIL THE
 TSP LETTER FROM THE COUNTY IS RECEIVED. [REPEAT COMMENT
 FROM 12/8/15]
  
 2.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-109, "ACTIVE USE" IS DEFINED
 AS A USE THAT IS VISIBLE TO ADJACENT STREETS AND
 ATTRACTS PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE
 GENERAL PUBLIC. THE CURRENT PLANS SEEM TO MASK THE
 GROUND FLOOR USE. A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINT
 FROM THE SIDE WALK TO THE CORNER OF THE BUILDING OR
 DIRECTLY TO A FRONT ENTRANCE ROSEMARY AVENUE SHOULD BE
 ADDED TO ENGAGE THE BUILDING WITH THE STREET AND TO
 PROVIDE ACCESS FOR PEDESTRIANS. [REPEAT COMMENT FROM
 12/8/15]
  
 3.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-128, TABLE IV-6, THE MINIMUM
 PERCENTAGE OF GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE ALONG 2ND STREET
 IS 30 PERCENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. ACTIVE USE IS REGULATED AS A
 PERCENTAGE OF THE ENTIRE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE. ACCESS
 INTO THE COVERED PARKING AREA IS NOT CONSIDERED AN
 ACTIVE USE. [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15]
  
 4.) THE MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY FOR ACTIVE USES ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE IS 50 PERCENT. THE
 CURRENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS
 REQUIREMENT. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SEEMS TO MASK THE
 TRANSPARENCY OF THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE. [ZLDR
 S.94-128, TABLE IV-36] [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15]
  
 5.) HOW WIDE IS THE TERMINUS AT THE END OF THE DRIVE
 AISLE? A MINIMUM 3 FT. WIDE BACK UP AREA SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE TO
 ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END
 PARKING SPACES. PLEASE NOTATE THE DIMENSION IN THE SITE
 PLAN. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE (1) PARKING
 SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF THE DEAD END AISLE SHALL BE
 STRIPED AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR TURNING AROUND.
 [ZLDR S.94-111(C)(2)] [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15]
  
 6.) THE PROPOSED VEHICULAR DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA ALONG
 2ND STREET IS NOT PERMITTED. THE INTENT OF THE DOWNTOWN
 MASTER PLAN (DMP) IS TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN
 USES/ACTIVITY ALONG STREET FRONTAGES. THE APPLICANT
 SHOULD CONSIDER REDESIGNING THE DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA
 INTO A PEDESTRIAN COURTYARD IN ORDER TO MEET THE INTENT
 OF THE DMP. THE BOLLARDS SHOULD ALSO BE REMOVED AND
 REPLACED WITH PLANTER(S) TO CREATE A MORE
 PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT.
  
 7.) THE PROPOSED 7 FT. HIGH WALL ALONG 2ND STREET
 CANNOT EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE SETBACK OF THE
 STREET FRONTAGE. ALSO MOVE THE WALL BACK TO THE 12 FT.
 BUILDING SETBACK TO CREATE ADDITIONAL OPEN GREEN SPACE
 ALONG 2ND STREET. THIS WILL ALSO CREATE A SPACE THAT IS
 MORE OPEN AND PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY.[ZLDR S.94- 109]
  
 8.) THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL HAVE A
 MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 6 FT. AND THE STREET PLANTERS
 ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE 4 FT. BY 4 FT. (SIDEWALK
 WIDTH TOTAL, INCLUDING PLANTER AND SIDEWALK CLEARANCE
 SHALL BE 10 FT. WIDE)
  
 9.) THE SIDEWALK ALONG 2ND STREET, AS MEASURED FROM THE
 BACK OF THE CURB SHALL BE EXPANDED TO 6 FT. WIDE.
  
 10.) REMOVE THE TRIANGULAR SEGMENT OF GREEN SPACE ALONG
 ROSEMARY AVENUE IN ORDER TO REDESIGN THE PEDESTRIAN
 ENTRANCE/COURTYARD AREA.
  
 11.) THE PREP AREA/JUICE BAR THAT WAS PROVIDED IN THE
 PREVIOUS PLANS RECEIVED BY STAFF ON 11/17/15 SEEMS TO
 BE REPLACED BY A MASSAGE AREA, WHICH DOES NOT SEEM TO
 BE AN APPROPRIATE ACTIVE USE ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE WITH
 THE TRANSPARENCY/ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS PER THE DMP. A
 SECONDARY ENTRANCE INTO THE JUICE BAR/PREP AREA FOR
 EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED TO INCREASE
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE.
  
 12.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK. THE
 RACK SHOULD COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S
 BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES.
  
 13.) #22 IS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE "NOTES".
  
 14.) MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON THE LOGISTICS FOR
 TRASH PICKUP (I.E. WILL THE BINS BE PLACED IN THE ALLEY
 FOR TRASH REMOVAL OR ARE THE TRUCKS SUPPOSED TO PULL
 INTO THE DELIVERY SERVICE AREA?). PLEASE NOTE THAT
 FERDINAND RIVERA, PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER, HAS
 BEEN CONTACTED FOR ADDITIONAL INPUT TO WHETHER OR NOT
 THE PROPOSED SIX (6) TRASH BINS ARE SUFFICIENT FOR THE
 USE/ACCESS TO TRASH REMOVAL.
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) BLANK WALLS VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT STREETS AND
 PUBLIC AREAS ARE PROHIBITED. A MINIMUM FACADE
 ARTICULATION OF 20 PERCENT IS REQUIRED FOR BOTH THE
 NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE BLANK WALL
 CALCULATIONS FOR BOTH THE NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES TO
 ENSURE THAT THE MINIMUM 20 PERCENT IS BEING MET. [ZLDR
 S.94-109] [REPEAT COMMENT FROM 12/8/15]
  
  
 LANDSCAPING:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED HEDGE ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL NOT
 EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT. PLEASE WORK WITH THE CITY'S
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI (561-822-1462), TO
 IDENTIFY A PLANT MATERIAL THAT WOULD BE SUITABLE ALONG
 ROSEMARY AVENUE.
  
 SIGNAGE:
  
 1.) CONSIDER MOVING THE WALL SIGN TO FACE THE PRIMARY
 PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. THE SIGN SHALL NOT
 BE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED AND SHALL NOT EXCEED A TOTAL
 SIGN FACE OF 40 SQ. FT. EXTERIOR ILLUMINATION IS
 PERMITTED. PROVIDE DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS ON THE
 PROPOSED SIGNAGE TO ENSURE THAT THE REQUIREMENTS ARE
 BEING MET. [ZLDR S.94-110(D)(3)]
  
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN:
  
 1.) STAND-ALONE LIGHT FIXTURE SHOULD ALIGN WITH THE
 STREET TREES ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE.
  
 2.) STAFF HAS A PREFERENCE FOR LIGHT POLES AS OPPOSED
 TO BOLLARDS ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE AND 2ND STREET. IS
 THERE A REASON TO WHY BOLLARDS ARE BEING USED?
  
 ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ADDITIONAL UTILITY AND CIVIL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 IDENTIFIED ON THE REVISED PLANS BY THE ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT. PLEASE CONTACT KELLY CRANFORD, THE CITY'S
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER @ (561) 494-1098 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 NOTES:
  
 1.) A UNITY OF TITLE COMBINING THE THREE PARCELS IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONTACT THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 PROCESS (561) 494-1040.
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 SIXTEEN (16) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN
 8.5 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
 PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($300.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * ANY REVISION TO THE PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 12-08-2015 Time 13:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 12-08-2015 Time 12:57 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 13:09:15GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A UNITY OF TITLE COMBINING THE THREE PARCELS IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONTACT THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 PROCESS (561) 494-1040.
  
 2.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE FOLLOWING
 PUBLIC UTILITIES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL
 AND COMCAST.
  
 3.) THE DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE AND CANNOT BE
 MEASURED.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 37.3 FT. ON
 ROSEMARY AVENUE EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SETBACK
 OF 30 FT. PERMITTED ON ROSEMARY AVENUE PER ZLDR
 S.94-128, TABLE IV-36. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 2.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY.
  
 3.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-109, "ACTIVE USE" IS DEFINED
 AS A USE THAT IS VISIBLE TO THE ADJACENT STREETS,
 ATTRACTS PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE
 GENERAL PUBLIC. THE CURRENT PLANS SEEM TO MASK THE
 GROUND FLOOR USE. A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINT
 FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE CORNER OF THE BUILDING OR
 DIRECTLY TO A FRONT ENTRANCE ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHOULD
 BE ADDED TO ENGAGE THE BUILDING WITH THE STREET AND TO
 PROVIDE BETTER ACCESS FOR PEDESTRIANS.
  
 4.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-128, TABLE IV-6, THE MINIMUM
 PERCENTAGE OF GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE ALONG 2ND STREET
 IS 30 PERCENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT; ACCESS INTO THE COVERED
 PARKING/PASSENGER PICKUP AND DROP OFF AREA IS NOT
 CONSIDERED AN ACTIVE USE. EXPANDING THE LOBBY AREA
 FURTHER INTO THE CORNER OF ROSEMARY AND 2ND AVENUE WILL
 HELP THE PROJECT MEET THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE
 REQUIREMENT ALONG 2ND STREET AND SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON
 ROSEMARY AVENUE.
  
 5.) THE MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY FOR ACTIVE USES ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR LEVEL ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE IS 50 PERCENT.
 THE CURRENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT SEEM TO MEET
 THIS REQUIREMENT. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND
 ARCHITECTURAL PANELING SEEMS TO MASK THE TRANSPARENCY
 OF THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE, WHICH DOES NOT SATISFY
 THE INTENT OF THE ZLDR. [ZLDR S.94-128, TABLE IV-36]
  
 6.) THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THERE IS ONLY GROUND LEVEL
 PARKING. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF HAVING A CAR LIFT AS
 DEPICTED IN SHEET A4.01?
  
 7.) THE COVERED PARKING SHOWS A TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE
 WIDTH OF 23 FT. THE ZLDR REQUIRES A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 24
 FT. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 8.) HOW WIDE IS THE TERMINUS AT THE END OF THE DRIVE
 AISLE? A MINIMUM 3 FT. WIDE BACK UP AREA SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE TO
 ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END
 PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE (1)
 PARKING SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF THE DEAD END AISLE
 SHALL BE STRIPED AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR
 TURNING AROUND. [ZLDR S.94-111(C)(2)]
  
 9.) IT IS UNCLEAR TO HOW TRASH WILL BE STORED AND
 COLLECTED FOR THE PROJECT; THE PROPOSED TRASH ROOM AND
 BINS SEEMS RATHER SMALL FOR A 20 ROOM HOTEL.
  
 10.) INCREASE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH TO 5 FT. ON 2ND STREET
 AND 8 FT. ON ROSEMARY AVENUE. THE WIDER SIDEWALK WIDTH
 WILL IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF PEDESTRIANS WALKING ALONG
 THESE STREETS.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE PLANS. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 2.) BLANK WALLS VISIBLE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC FROM
 ADJACENT STREETS AND PUBLIC AREAS ARE PROHIBITED.
 ADDITIONAL FACADE ARTICULATION ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH
 FACADES ARE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO BREAK UP THE BLANK
 WALLS ON THESE FACADES. [ZLDR S.94-109]
  
  
 LANDSCAPING AND STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL
 PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN
 TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS AND PATHS,
 AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOT CANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE
 BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK.
 THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES
 SHALL BE PROHIBITED. [ZLDR S.94-113(B)]
  
 2.) SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM
 THE BACK OF THE CURB. [ZLDR S.94-113(C)]
  
  
 SIGNAGE:
 1.) THE MONUMENT SIGN IS PROHIBITED. PLEASE REMOVE FROM
 THE PLANS. [ZLDR S.94-110(B)(3)]
  
 2.) ONE (1) BUILDING IDENTITY SIGN SHALL BE ALLOWED ON
 THE BUILDING (NOT TWO (2) AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS).
 SUCH SIGN SHALL NOT BE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED AND SHALL
 NOT EXCEED A TOTAL SIGN FACE OF 40 SQ. FT. EXTERIOR
 ILLUMINATION IS PERMITTED. [ZLDR S.94-110(D)(3)]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 SIXTEEN (16) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN
 8.5 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
 PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($300.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved